US20160191352A1 - Network asset information management - Google Patents

Network asset information management Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160191352A1
US20160191352A1 US14/846,502 US201514846502A US2016191352A1 US 20160191352 A1 US20160191352 A1 US 20160191352A1 US 201514846502 A US201514846502 A US 201514846502A US 2016191352 A1 US2016191352 A1 US 2016191352A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
asset
information
rules
network
network activity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/846,502
Inventor
Anurag Singla
Robert Block
Dhiraj Sharan
Dilraba Ibrahim
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
Original Assignee
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP filed Critical Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
Priority to US14/846,502 priority Critical patent/US20160191352A1/en
Assigned to HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP reassignment HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Assigned to HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. reassignment HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SINGLA, ANURAG, BLOCK, ROBERT, IBRAHIM, Dilraba, SHARAN, DHIRAJ
Publication of US20160191352A1 publication Critical patent/US20160191352A1/en
Assigned to HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP reassignment HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1433Vulnerability analysis
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/06Generation of reports
    • H04L43/065Generation of reports related to network devices
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0894Policy-based network configuration management
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/50Testing arrangements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/02Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
    • H04L63/0227Filtering policies
    • H04L63/0263Rule management
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/20Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for managing network security; network security policies in general
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0893Assignment of logical groups to network elements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0896Bandwidth or capacity management, i.e. automatically increasing or decreasing capacities
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/16Threshold monitoring

Definitions

  • the network assets can grow to be so numerous, dispersed and managed by dispersed IT staff that it can become difficult to track and categorize these assets using traditional manual or automated approaches.
  • real time updates to the network infrastructure information using automated rules is not present.
  • asset information may not always be fully up-to-date, Further, the information usually corresponds to static attributes of the asset (e.g. business classification of asset, IP address, vulnerabilities etc.) but not to the dynamic attributes, such as current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks happening on the asset, current risk based on network traffic and static attributes of the asset etc., in real time.
  • static attributes of the asset e.g. business classification of asset, IP address, vulnerabilities etc.
  • dynamic attributes such as current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks happening on the asset, current risk based on network traffic and static attributes of the asset etc., in real time.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an environment including a network asset information management system, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system interaction diagram for the network asset information management system, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method for network asset information management, according to an embodiment
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system that may be used for the system and related method, according to an embodiment.
  • a network asset information management system provides for management of information about network assets automatically through rule based analysis of any event data.
  • the data may be collected, for example, by connectors, and may include, for example, system logs, application logs, network data etc., in correlation with additional information observed about network assets internally by the system or provided externally to the system.
  • These assets may include, for example, managed hosts, servers and network devices, which may be any machine (physical or virtual) having an IP address and connected to a customer's network.
  • the servers may be shared or dedicated in a cloud offering that may appear and disappear in the network based on service demand.
  • the network asset information management system may provide for discovery and maintenance of rich information regarding assets. This information may be updated in real-time by analysis of the network activity involving these assets, provided to the network asset information management system through connectors collecting data from various network devices in a customer environment. Real-time data may be considered data that is evaluated and processed upon capture, as opposed to static data, which may be stored for processing at a subsequent time.
  • richer set of data regarding assets may be calculated and maintained, including, for example, identifying list of services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, vulnerabilities, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromise, rogue processes, rogue servers, operating system (OS) versions, patch levels, web clients, and risk associated with the asset.
  • This rich information regarding assets may be further used by the network asset information management system in issuing security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks.
  • the information may also facilitate providing a high level overview of the statistics and risks associated with a single asset or several assets grouped by any characteristic of the assets (e.g., services, business unit, network zone etc.).
  • the network asset information management system may include an asset determination and event prioritization module to generate real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset.
  • the modules and other components of the system may include machine readable instructions, hardware or a combination of machine readable instructions and hardware.
  • the real-time asset information may include, for example, dynamic attributes such as current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks happening on the asset, and current risk based on network traffic etc.
  • a rules module may include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset.
  • An information analysis module may evaluate the real-time asset information and the rules to generate a notification related to the asset. The notification may be in the form of a report.
  • the rules may include rules for determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold. Vulnerability may be defined, for example, as a weakness based on exposure to attack, whereas risk may be defined, for example, as the possibility of an undesirable event occurring.
  • the notification may include, for example, a level of risk associated with the asset.
  • the system may further include an asset model module to generate an asset model based on static information about the asset.
  • the asset model may include static information about an asset.
  • the static information may include, for example, business classification of asset, IP address etc.
  • the information analysis module may thus evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notification related to the asset.
  • the static information about the asset may be obtained from a scanner and/or an external asset database.
  • the network activity involving the asset may include, for example, event data involving the asset.
  • the event data may include, for example, asset logs, application logs and/or network data.
  • the event data may be received directly from the asset or from other devices interfacing with the asset (e.g., routers, other machines connected to the asset etc.), in addition, risk associated with an asset may be derived from risks, such as, for example, virus, malware etc., discovered on other assets in the same network zone as a particular asset.
  • the network activity involving the asset may be obtained, for example, by a connector.
  • the asset may include, for example, a managed host, a server or a network device.
  • the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may include rules for creation of an asset if traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, and the notification may include an indication for creation of the asset.
  • the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may also include rules for deletion of an asset if traffic has not been observed from the asset for a predetermined time-period, and the notification may include an indication for deletion of the asset.
  • the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may further include rules for updating of an asset if an event identifying an OS patch or application patch has been applied to the asset, and the notification may include an indication for updating of the asset.
  • the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset.
  • the information analysis module may maintain an age of an asset based on last scan time and use the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset. The information analysis module may use the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset.
  • the notification related to the asset may include, for example, services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromises, rogue processes, rogue servers, OS versions, patch levels, web clients, and/or risk associated with the asset.
  • the notification related to the asset may be used to issue security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks.
  • the notification related to the asset may also be used to generate statistics associated with the asset.
  • a method for network asset information management may include generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset.
  • the method may further include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset.
  • the method may also include evaluating the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset.
  • Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold, and the notification may include a level of risk associated with the asset.
  • the method may further include generating an asset model based on static information about the asset.
  • the evaluation may further include evaluating the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the monitored network activity to generate the notification related to the asset.
  • the method may include obtaining the network activity involving the asset by a connector.
  • the method may also include maintaining an age of an asset based on last scan time and using the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset.
  • the method may include using the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset.
  • a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine readable instructions.
  • the machine readable instructions when executed by a computer system may perform a method for network asset information management including generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset.
  • the method may further include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset.
  • the method may also include evaluating the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset.
  • Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold, and the notification may include a level of risk associated with the asset,
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an environment 100 for the network asset information management system 101 , according to an embodiment.
  • the environment 100 may include data sources 102 (i.e., assets) generating event data for events, which may be collected by the network asset information management system 101 and stored in the data storage 103 .
  • Connectors 104 may include code comprised of machine readable instructions that provide event data from the data sources 102 to the network asset information management system 101 .
  • the connectors 104 may provide efficient, real-time local event data capture and filtering from the data sources 102 .
  • An asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may determine assets based on the event data captured by the connectors 104 , and provide for prioritization of events as described below.
  • the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may also generate real-time information about the data sources 102 based on network activity involving the data sources.
  • An asset model module 106 may obtain static asset information from scanners 107 and/or external asset databases 108 , and generate an asset model based on the static information about the data sources 102 .
  • a rules module 109 may obtain information from the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 and/or the asset model module 106 , and may include a set of rules for monitoring network activity involving the data sources 102 .
  • An information analysis module 110 may evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate, for example, notifications at 111 . Thus the module 110 may perform event processing based on the information provided by the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 , the asset model module 106 , and the rules module 109 .
  • an event may be any activity that can be monitored and analyzed.
  • Data captured for an event may be referred to as event data.
  • the analysis of captured event data may be performed to determine if the event is associated with a threat or some other condition. Examples of activities associated with events may include logins, logouts, sending data over a network, sending emails, accessing applications, reading or writing data, performing transactions, etc.
  • An example of a common threat may include a network security threat whereby a user is attempting to gain unauthorized access to confidential information, such as social security numbers, credit card numbers, etc., over a network.
  • the data sources 102 may include network devices, applications or other types of data sources described below operable to provide event data that may be analyzed.
  • Event data may be captured in logs or messages generated by the data sources 102 .
  • intrusion detection systems IDSs
  • IPSs intrusion prevention systems
  • vulnerability assessment tools For example, firewalls, anti-virus tools, anti-spam tools, encryption tools, and business applications may generate logs describing activities performed by the source.
  • Event data may be provided, for example, by entries in a log file or a syslog server, alerts, alarms, network packets, emails, or notification pages.
  • Event data may include information about the device or application that generated the event and when the event was received from the event source (“receipt time”).
  • the receipt time may be a date/time stamp
  • the event source may be a network endpoint identifier (e.g., an IP address or Media Access Control (MAC) address) and/or a description of the source, possibly including information about the product's vendor and version.
  • the data/time stamp, source information and other information may be used to correlate events with a user and analyze events for threats.
  • Examples of the data sources 102 are shown in FIG. 1 as Database (DB), UNIX, App 1 and App 2 , DB and UNIX are systems that include network devices, such as servers, and may generate event data.
  • App 1 and App 2 are applications that are hosted for example by the DB systems respectively, and also generate event data.
  • App 1 and App 2 may be business applications, such as financial applications for credit card and stock transactions, IT applications, human resource applications, or any other type of applications.
  • data sources 102 may include security detection and proxy systems, access and policy controls, core service logs and log consolidators, network hardware, encryption devices, and physical security.
  • security detection and proxy systems include IDSs, IPSs, multipurpose security appliances, vulnerability assessment and management, anti-virus, honeypots, threat response technology, and network monitoring.
  • access and policy control systems include access and identity management, virtual private networks (VPNs), caching engines, firewalls, and security policy management.
  • core service logs and log consolidators include operating system logs, database audit logs, application logs, log consolidators, web server logs, and management consoles.
  • network devices includes routers and switches.
  • encryption devices include data security and integrity.
  • Examples of physical security systems include card-key readers, biometrics, burglar alarms, and fire alarms.
  • the data storage 103 may include a database or other type of data storage system.
  • the data storage 103 may include memory for performing in-memory processing and/or non-volatile storage for database storage and operations.
  • the data storage 103 may store any data used by the network asset information management system 101 to correlate and analyze event data.
  • the connectors 104 may include code comprised of machine readable instructions that provide event data from the data sources 102 to the network asset information management system 101 . Alternatively, the event data may be collected from other devices directly or indirectly connected to the data sources 102 .
  • the connectors 104 may provide efficient, real-time (or near real-time) local event data capture and filtering from the data sources 102 .
  • the connectors 104 for example, collect event data from event logs or messages. The collection of event data by the connectors 104 is shown as “EVENTS” describing some data sent from the data sources 10 $ to the connectors 104 in FIG. 1 .
  • the connectors 104 may reside at the data sources 102 or at intermediate points between the data sources 102 and the network asset information management system 101 .
  • the connectors 104 may reside at network devices, at consolidation points within the network, and/or operate through simple network management protocol (SNMP) traps.
  • the connectors 104 may send the event data to the network asset information management system 101 .
  • the connectors 104 may be configurable through both manual and automated processes and via associated configuration files.
  • Each connector may include one or more software modules including a normalizing component, a time correction component, an aggregation component, a batching component, a resolver component, a transport component, and/or additional components. These components may be activated and/or deactivated through appropriate commands in the configuration file.
  • the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may collect and analyze the event data in conjunction with the information analysis module 110 .
  • Events may be cross-correlated with rules by the rules module 109 to create meta-events. Correlation includes, for example, discovering the relationships between events, inferring the significance of those relationships (e.g., by generating metaevents), prioritizing the events and meta-events, and providing a framework for taking action.
  • the network asset information management system 101 (one embodiment of which is manifest as machine readable instructions executed by computer hardware such as a processor) provided for aggregation, correlation, detection, and investigative tracking of activities. The system 101 also supports response management, ad-hoc query resolution, reporting and replay for forensic analysis, and graphical visualization of network threats and activity.
  • the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may thus determine which data sources 102 (i.e., assets) are enrolled. For example, a router may indicate that an event is arriving from IP address 192.168.10.1 and going to IP address 192.168.2.1 and port 60 . Based on this information, the module 105 may determine which data source 102 has the particular 192.168.10.1 IP address in a particular network from which the information is being obtained. Based on this type of information, the information analysis module 110 may determine the vulnerability involved based in conjunction with the information provided by the asset model module 106 and the rules module 109 .
  • the network asset information management system 101 provides real-time management of the information about network assets through rule based analysis of network traffic.
  • the system 101 also provides for enhancement of the set of asset information maintained based on automatic rule-based analysis and maintenance of data.
  • additional information may include, for example, traffic utilization, patch level for OS and applications, risk associated with the asset, compromised vulnerabilities etc., and any user defined attribute. These attributes may be maintained in real-time using rule based analysis of traffic in correlation with already available or deduced information about these assets. Thus traffic related data may be analyzed to discover an asset, and/or to determine additional information about assets.
  • the network asset information management system 101 may determine, for example, the type of service being provided by the asset. For example, the system 101 may determine the type of software being executed by the asset. The type of traffic from an asset may also be used to determine a particular type of service being provided by the asset. For example, an activity log from the asset may be used to determine what type of patches have been applied and the vulnerability of the asset in real-time, This information may be used to determine the vulnerability of the asset for other types of traffic in real-time.
  • the network asset information management system 101 described herein may be implemented with or without information related to static attributes of assets.
  • the network asset information management system may utilize real-time traffic related information provided by the connectors 104 to determine information about assets.
  • a new timestamp may be added to the asset attributes to track the last time the rules updated the asset information. This may be used in conjunction with the last asset scan time to calculate the asset model information confidence, which may be used to calculate priority of events or activity involving these assets.
  • Other attributes may be added to assets, including, for example, timestamps that can be updated by rules.
  • the timestamp may facilitate an understanding of an activity level of an asset. For example, if an asset has no activity for a time period, a timestamp may facilitate an understanding of when the activity stopped. Such timestamp information may also be used to determine the existence of an asset.
  • the timestamp may also be used in conjunction with rules to assign a model confidence to the notifications 111 generated by the system 101 .
  • asset model information may be utilized by a prioritization component for prioritizing events based on, among other attributes, the identified vulnerabilities and open ports of the asset.
  • the prioritization may be analyzed by the information analysis module 110 .
  • the confidence regarding truthfulness of this information may be influenced by the last scan time.
  • certain components of the asset information may be updated in real-time by rules. Thus, knowledge of the last time rules refreshed the asset information may facilitate calculation of the asset information model confidence to be utilized by event prioritization.
  • timestamp information may be used to raise or lower priori of risk of a particular asset activity.
  • the traffic may contain a packet that points to exploitation of a certain vulnerability.
  • the information from the packet may be compared to previously obtained information at a particular timestamp to determine the level of vulnerability.
  • the asset model module 106 may obtain static asset information from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108 . Information collected from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108 may form the basis of an asset model used by the rules module 109 . Thus for any asset under analysis, even prior to collection of any real-time information from the connectors 104 , the asset model module 106 may determine an asset model based on the initial information collected from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108 , Based partially on the asset model determined by the asset model module 106 , the information analysis module 110 may determine the type of services being performed by an asset or whether the assed is vulnerable to attack.
  • the rules module 109 may include, for example, rule conditions for asset creation, deletion and update.
  • the rule conditions may be applicable to any of a number of the data sources 102 (i.e., assets) managed by the network asset information management system 101 .
  • Asset creation may be based on the rule condition that traffic identified to or from an IP address exceeds more than a threshold amount of data or duration.
  • Asset deletion may be based on the rule condition that traffic has not been seen from an asset for a period of time, which may be user defined.
  • Asset update may be based on the rule condition that an event identifying an OS patch or application patch applied to the asset. Additional components may maintain mappings between OS patch and vulnerabilities addressed.
  • the rule module 109 may update the asset vulnerability list.
  • another rule condition may include the event identifying connection accepted to a port on an asset which was not known to be open. Asset open ports may be updated.
  • another rule condition may include an asset compromise is identified by a rule based on complex rule conditions. The rules may thus raise asset risk.
  • Asset information may be deduced from various events directly or indirectly, and the confidence level of the asset information may be affected as follows.
  • Events retrieved may directly report device vendor and device product information (e.g., name, patch level, version level etc.). This provides a high level of confidence that the asset/system information is accurate. For example, since the event is describing parts of an asset and the information is arriving directly from the asset, the events retrieved may thus provide a high level of confidence that the asset/system information is accurate.
  • Events may also contain information about the connections made from an asset/device to another asset. This gives a second degree of confidence regarding the services running on an asset/system.
  • Events may also report the user agents used for web browsing, the OS versions, patch levels and even the applications installed on a system. Based on this information, richer data about assets, such as list of applications, web browser clients and operation system versions may be deduced.
  • the network asset information management system 101 also provides for enrichment of asset information (e.g. current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks going on the asset, current risk based on network traffic, risk associated with other assets in the network zone, and static attributes of the asset etc.).
  • asset information e.g. current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks going on the asset, current risk based on network traffic, risk associated with other assets in the network zone, and static attributes of the asset etc.
  • the network information may be enriched with security information from an asset to thus update the risk associated with an asset in real-time.
  • the risk may be compared to predetermined risk thresholds to determine actual risk, for example, for a particular network, department or organization.
  • the system 101 may determine that a particular risk or attack actually compromises an asset, thus raising the level of risk.
  • the rules module 109 may also include rules that identify which vulnerabilities may be exploited or not exploited.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system interaction diagram for the network asset information management system 101 , according to an embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 shows various network switches 120 (i.e., PC 1 , PC 2 . . . PCn), and collectors 121 , which may function similar to connectors 104 of FIG. 1 .
  • Additional components may include a domain name system (DNS) collector 122 for obtaining information from DNS server 123 , firewall collector 124 for obtaining information from firewall server 125 , and a virtual private network (VPN) collector 126 for obtaining information from VPN server 127 .
  • DNS domain name system
  • firewall collector 124 for obtaining information from firewall server 125
  • VPN virtual private network
  • the DNS server 123 , firewall server 125 and VPN server 127 may be connected to the internet 128 for providing information to the network asset information management system 101 .
  • VPN virtual private network
  • management of the information about network assets automatically through rule based analysis of network traffic, in correlation with additional information observed about network assets internally by the system or provided externally to the system, thus provides real-time and accurate maintenance of information.
  • the system also provides for enrichment of asset information (e.g. current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks going on the asset, current risk based on network traffic and static attributes of the asset etc.). Further, the system provides the ability to maintain the last update timestamp of asset information through rules which can be further used to identify possible staleness of information. This can be further used, for example, by the information analysis module 110 to calculate asset model confidence.
  • the system also provides a flexible framework (using flexible user customizable rules) to manage and use the asset information.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 300 for network asset information Management, according to an embodiments.
  • the method 300 may be implemented on the network asset information management system 101 described above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 by way of example and not limitation.
  • the method 300 may be practiced in other systems.
  • the method may include generating an asset model based on static information about an asset.
  • the asset model module 106 may generate the asset model based on static information about the data sources 102 (i.e., assets).
  • the static information about the assets may be obtained from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108 .
  • the assets may include, for example, a managed host, a server or a network device.
  • the method may include generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving the asset.
  • the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may generate the real-time asset information based on network activity involving the asset.
  • the network activity involving the asset may include, for example, event data involving the asset.
  • the event data may include, for example, asset logs, application logs and/or network data.
  • the network activity involving the asset may be obtained, for example, by the connectors 104 .
  • the method may include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset.
  • the rules module 109 may include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset.
  • Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold.
  • the notification at block 304 below may include a level of risk associated with the asset.
  • the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may include rules for creation of an asset if traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration.
  • the rules may also include rules for deletion of an asset if traffic has not been observed from an asset for a predetermined time-period.
  • the rules may further include rules for updating of an asset if an event identifying an OS patch or application patch has been applied to the asset.
  • the method may include evaluating the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset.
  • the information analysis module 110 may evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notifications 111 related to the asset.
  • the information analysis module 110 may maintain an age of an asset based on last scan time and use the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset.
  • the information analysis module 110 may use the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset.
  • the notifications 111 related to the asset may include, for example, services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromises, rogue processes, rogue servers, OS versions, patch levels, web clients, and/or risk associated with the asset
  • the notifications 111 may be used to issue security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks.
  • the notifications 111 may also be used to generate statistics and risks associated with the asset.
  • FIG. 4 shows a computer system 400 that may be used with the embodiments described herein.
  • the computer system 400 represents a generic platform that includes components that may be in a server or another computer system.
  • the computer system 400 may be used as a platform for the system 101 .
  • the computer system 400 may execute, by a processor or other hardware processing circuit, the methods, functions and other processes described herein. These methods, functions and other processes may be embodied as machine readable instructions stored on computer readable medium, which may be non-transitory, such as hardware storage devices (e.g., RAM (random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable, programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable, programmable ROM), hard drives, and flash memory).
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read only memory
  • EPROM erasable, programmable ROM
  • EEPROM electrically erasable, programmable ROM
  • hard drives and flash memory
  • the computer system 400 includes a processor 402 that may implement or execute machine readable instructions performing some or all of the methods, functions and other processes described herein. Commands and data from the processor 402 are communicated over a communication bus 404 .
  • the computer system 400 also includes a main memory 406 , such as a random access memory (RAM), where the machine readable instructions and data for the processor 402 may reside during runtime, and a secondary data storage 408 , which may be non-volatile and stores machine readable instructions and data.
  • the memory and data storage are examples of computer readable mediums.
  • the memory 406 may include modules 420 including machine readable instructions residing in the memory 406 during runtime and executed by the processor 402 .
  • the modules 420 may include the modules 105 , 106 , 109 and 110 of the system 101 shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the computer system 400 may include an I/O device 410 , such as a keyboard, a mouse, a display, touchscreen, etc.
  • the computer system 400 may include a network interface 412 for connecting to a network.
  • Other known electronic components may be added or substituted in the computer system 400 .

Abstract

A network asset information management system (101) may include an asset determination and event prioritization module (105) to generate real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset (102). A rules module (109) may include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset. An information analysis module (110) may evaluate the real-time asset information and the rules to generate a notification (111) related to the asset. The rules may include rules for determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold. The notification may include a level of risk associated with the asset.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)
  • This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application U.S. Ser. No. 61/492,309, filed Jun. 1, 2011, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • For many large information technology (IT) organizations, the network assets (Le, computers, laptops, routers, switches, web servers, database machines, and other components connected on the network) can grow to be so numerous, dispersed and managed by dispersed IT staff that it can become difficult to track and categorize these assets using traditional manual or automated approaches. In traditional systems, real time updates to the network infrastructure information using automated rules is not present.
  • There are various systems that maintain network asset and topology information. These systems usually use various network discovery techniques to discover the network nodes and topology at any given point of time. The discovery can be reissued to update the information regarding the network. These network assets may then be scanned using commercially available scanners or proprietary techniques to determine the vulnerabilities present on these assets. Scanners may also detect the open ports on a given asset that can be used to reach the asset and exploit its vulnerabilities.
  • For the foregoing approaches, asset information may not always be fully up-to-date, Further, the information usually corresponds to static attributes of the asset (e.g. business classification of asset, IP address, vulnerabilities etc.) but not to the dynamic attributes, such as current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks happening on the asset, current risk based on network traffic and static attributes of the asset etc., in real time.
  • Other systems also allow importation of static asset data collected by network scanners and periodic update of this data (usually in weeks or months, but possibly days at customer installations). Thus, the network asset information is not always up-to-date. Such systems also allow asset auto creation based on IP Address, Hostname and Media Access Control address (MAC address) of the machine, but not a rule based approach. Categories may also be added or removed from the assets through rules, but not any other aspect of the asset information (e.g., current patch level, vulnerabilities, risk etc, and any other user defined attributes.). The age of an asset may be maintained based upon last scan time, and using this information, asset model confidence may be calculated for activity occurring on the asset. For such systems, the asset model information confidence is based on the duration since last scan time. Since the last scan, the asset may have been patched for certain vulnerabilities, re-purposed for different business use, services may have been added or removed, and other changes may have been made.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • The embodiments are described in detail the following description with reference to the following figures.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an environment including a network asset information management system, according to an embodiment;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system interaction diagram for the network asset information management system, according to an embodiment;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method for network asset information management, according to an embodiment; and
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a computer system that may be used for the system and related method, according to an embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • For simplicity and illustrative purposes, the principles of the embodiments are described by referring mainly to examples thereof. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. It is apparent that the embodiments may be practiced without limitation to all the specific details, Also, the embodiments may be used together in various combinations.
  • 1. Overview
  • A network asset information management system is described herein and provides for management of information about network assets automatically through rule based analysis of any event data. The data may be collected, for example, by connectors, and may include, for example, system logs, application logs, network data etc., in correlation with additional information observed about network assets internally by the system or provided externally to the system. These assets may include, for example, managed hosts, servers and network devices, which may be any machine (physical or virtual) having an IP address and connected to a customer's network. The servers may be shared or dedicated in a cloud offering that may appear and disappear in the network based on service demand.
  • The network asset information management system may provide for discovery and maintenance of rich information regarding assets. This information may be updated in real-time by analysis of the network activity involving these assets, provided to the network asset information management system through connectors collecting data from various network devices in a customer environment. Real-time data may be considered data that is evaluated and processed upon capture, as opposed to static data, which may be stored for processing at a subsequent time.
  • Furthermore, using rules that monitor network activity involving assets, richer set of data regarding assets may be calculated and maintained, including, for example, identifying list of services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, vulnerabilities, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromise, rogue processes, rogue servers, operating system (OS) versions, patch levels, web clients, and risk associated with the asset. This rich information regarding assets may be further used by the network asset information management system in issuing security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks. The information may also facilitate providing a high level overview of the statistics and risks associated with a single asset or several assets grouped by any characteristic of the assets (e.g., services, business unit, network zone etc.).
  • The approach described herein of using event feeds of network and application activity occurring on the assets from the assets directly, as well as from other devices sending traffic to the assets, and further using a rule based approach to identify current activities on the assets provides richness of information, as well as updating of the statically or periodically calculated information with real-time analysis of the network activity.
  • The network asset information management system is described in further detail below and may include an asset determination and event prioritization module to generate real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset. The modules and other components of the system may include machine readable instructions, hardware or a combination of machine readable instructions and hardware. The real-time asset information may include, for example, dynamic attributes such as current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks happening on the asset, and current risk based on network traffic etc. A rules module may include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset. An information analysis module may evaluate the real-time asset information and the rules to generate a notification related to the asset. The notification may be in the form of a report. The rules may include rules for determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold. Vulnerability may be defined, for example, as a weakness based on exposure to attack, whereas risk may be defined, for example, as the possibility of an undesirable event occurring. The notification may include, for example, a level of risk associated with the asset.
  • For the network asset information management system described herein, the system may further include an asset model module to generate an asset model based on static information about the asset. The asset model may include static information about an asset. The static information may include, for example, business classification of asset, IP address etc. The information analysis module may thus evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notification related to the asset. The static information about the asset may be obtained from a scanner and/or an external asset database. The network activity involving the asset may include, for example, event data involving the asset. The event data may include, for example, asset logs, application logs and/or network data. The event data may be received directly from the asset or from other devices interfacing with the asset (e.g., routers, other machines connected to the asset etc.), in addition, risk associated with an asset may be derived from risks, such as, for example, virus, malware etc., discovered on other assets in the same network zone as a particular asset. The network activity involving the asset may be obtained, for example, by a connector. The asset may include, for example, a managed host, a server or a network device. The rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may include rules for creation of an asset if traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, and the notification may include an indication for creation of the asset. The rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may also include rules for deletion of an asset if traffic has not been observed from the asset for a predetermined time-period, and the notification may include an indication for deletion of the asset. The rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may further include rules for updating of an asset if an event identifying an OS patch or application patch has been applied to the asset, and the notification may include an indication for updating of the asset. The rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset. The information analysis module may maintain an age of an asset based on last scan time and use the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset. The information analysis module may use the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset. The notification related to the asset may include, for example, services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromises, rogue processes, rogue servers, OS versions, patch levels, web clients, and/or risk associated with the asset. The notification related to the asset may be used to issue security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks. The notification related to the asset may also be used to generate statistics associated with the asset.
  • As described in further detail below, a method for network asset information management is provided and may include generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset. The method may further include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset. The method may also include evaluating the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset. Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold, and the notification may include a level of risk associated with the asset.
  • For the method described herein, the method may further include generating an asset model based on static information about the asset. The evaluation may further include evaluating the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the monitored network activity to generate the notification related to the asset. The method may include obtaining the network activity involving the asset by a connector. The method may also include maintaining an age of an asset based on last scan time and using the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset. The method may include using the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset.
  • As also described in further detail below, a non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine readable instructions is provided. The machine readable instructions when executed by a computer system may perform a method for network asset information management including generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset. The method may further include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset. The method may also include evaluating the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset. Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold, and the notification may include a level of risk associated with the asset,
  • 2. System
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an environment 100 for the network asset information management system 101, according to an embodiment. The environment 100 may include data sources 102 (i.e., assets) generating event data for events, which may be collected by the network asset information management system 101 and stored in the data storage 103. Connectors 104 may include code comprised of machine readable instructions that provide event data from the data sources 102 to the network asset information management system 101. The connectors 104 may provide efficient, real-time local event data capture and filtering from the data sources 102. An asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may determine assets based on the event data captured by the connectors 104, and provide for prioritization of events as described below. The asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may also generate real-time information about the data sources 102 based on network activity involving the data sources. An asset model module 106 may obtain static asset information from scanners 107 and/or external asset databases 108, and generate an asset model based on the static information about the data sources 102. A rules module 109 may obtain information from the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 and/or the asset model module 106, and may include a set of rules for monitoring network activity involving the data sources 102. An information analysis module 110 may evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate, for example, notifications at 111. Thus the module 110 may perform event processing based on the information provided by the asset determination and event prioritization module 105, the asset model module 106, and the rules module 109.
  • As discussed herein, for the network asset information management system 101 an event may be any activity that can be monitored and analyzed. Data captured for an event may be referred to as event data. The analysis of captured event data may be performed to determine if the event is associated with a threat or some other condition. Examples of activities associated with events may include logins, logouts, sending data over a network, sending emails, accessing applications, reading or writing data, performing transactions, etc. An example of a common threat may include a network security threat whereby a user is attempting to gain unauthorized access to confidential information, such as social security numbers, credit card numbers, etc., over a network.
  • The data sources 102 may include network devices, applications or other types of data sources described below operable to provide event data that may be analyzed. Event data may be captured in logs or messages generated by the data sources 102. For example, intrusion detection systems (IDSs), intrusion prevention systems (IPSs), vulnerability assessment tools, firewalls, anti-virus tools, anti-spam tools, encryption tools, and business applications may generate logs describing activities performed by the source. Event data may be provided, for example, by entries in a log file or a syslog server, alerts, alarms, network packets, emails, or notification pages.
  • Event data may include information about the device or application that generated the event and when the event was received from the event source (“receipt time”). The receipt time may be a date/time stamp, and the event source may be a network endpoint identifier (e.g., an IP address or Media Access Control (MAC) address) and/or a description of the source, possibly including information about the product's vendor and version. The data/time stamp, source information and other information may be used to correlate events with a user and analyze events for threats.
  • Examples of the data sources 102 are shown in FIG. 1 as Database (DB), UNIX, App1 and App2, DB and UNIX are systems that include network devices, such as servers, and may generate event data. App1 and App2 are applications that are hosted for example by the DB systems respectively, and also generate event data. App1 and App2 may be business applications, such as financial applications for credit card and stock transactions, IT applications, human resource applications, or any other type of applications.
  • Other examples of data sources 102 may include security detection and proxy systems, access and policy controls, core service logs and log consolidators, network hardware, encryption devices, and physical security. Examples of security detection and proxy systems include IDSs, IPSs, multipurpose security appliances, vulnerability assessment and management, anti-virus, honeypots, threat response technology, and network monitoring. Examples of access and policy control systems include access and identity management, virtual private networks (VPNs), caching engines, firewalls, and security policy management. Examples of core service logs and log consolidators include operating system logs, database audit logs, application logs, log consolidators, web server logs, and management consoles. Examples of network devices includes routers and switches. Examples of encryption devices include data security and integrity. Examples of physical security systems include card-key readers, biometrics, burglar alarms, and fire alarms.
  • The data storage 103 may include a database or other type of data storage system. The data storage 103 may include memory for performing in-memory processing and/or non-volatile storage for database storage and operations. The data storage 103 may store any data used by the network asset information management system 101 to correlate and analyze event data.
  • The connectors 104 may include code comprised of machine readable instructions that provide event data from the data sources 102 to the network asset information management system 101. Alternatively, the event data may be collected from other devices directly or indirectly connected to the data sources 102. The connectors 104 may provide efficient, real-time (or near real-time) local event data capture and filtering from the data sources 102. The connectors 104, for example, collect event data from event logs or messages. The collection of event data by the connectors 104 is shown as “EVENTS” describing some data sent from the data sources 10$ to the connectors 104 in FIG. 1. The connectors 104 may reside at the data sources 102 or at intermediate points between the data sources 102 and the network asset information management system 101. For example, the connectors 104 may reside at network devices, at consolidation points within the network, and/or operate through simple network management protocol (SNMP) traps. The connectors 104 may send the event data to the network asset information management system 101. The connectors 104 may be configurable through both manual and automated processes and via associated configuration files. Each connector may include one or more software modules including a normalizing component, a time correction component, an aggregation component, a batching component, a resolver component, a transport component, and/or additional components. These components may be activated and/or deactivated through appropriate commands in the configuration file.
  • The asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may collect and analyze the event data in conjunction with the information analysis module 110. Events may be cross-correlated with rules by the rules module 109 to create meta-events. Correlation includes, for example, discovering the relationships between events, inferring the significance of those relationships (e.g., by generating metaevents), prioritizing the events and meta-events, and providing a framework for taking action. The network asset information management system 101 (one embodiment of which is manifest as machine readable instructions executed by computer hardware such as a processor) provided for aggregation, correlation, detection, and investigative tracking of activities. The system 101 also supports response management, ad-hoc query resolution, reporting and replay for forensic analysis, and graphical visualization of network threats and activity.
  • The asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may thus determine which data sources 102 (i.e., assets) are enrolled. For example, a router may indicate that an event is arriving from IP address 192.168.10.1 and going to IP address 192.168.2.1 and port 60. Based on this information, the module 105 may determine which data source 102 has the particular 192.168.10.1 IP address in a particular network from which the information is being obtained. Based on this type of information, the information analysis module 110 may determine the vulnerability involved based in conjunction with the information provided by the asset model module 106 and the rules module 109.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, the network asset information management system 101 provides real-time management of the information about network assets through rule based analysis of network traffic. The system 101 also provides for enhancement of the set of asset information maintained based on automatic rule-based analysis and maintenance of data. Such additional information may include, for example, traffic utilization, patch level for OS and applications, risk associated with the asset, compromised vulnerabilities etc., and any user defined attribute. These attributes may be maintained in real-time using rule based analysis of traffic in correlation with already available or deduced information about these assets. Thus traffic related data may be analyzed to discover an asset, and/or to determine additional information about assets. For example, assuming an asset is accepting traffic at a port, based on the traffic, the network asset information management system 101 may determine, for example, the type of service being provided by the asset. For example, the system 101 may determine the type of software being executed by the asset. The type of traffic from an asset may also be used to determine a particular type of service being provided by the asset. For example, an activity log from the asset may be used to determine what type of patches have been applied and the vulnerability of the asset in real-time, This information may be used to determine the vulnerability of the asset for other types of traffic in real-time.
  • The foregoing and other aspects of the network asset information management system 101 described herein may be implemented with or without information related to static attributes of assets. Thus, without information related to static attributes of assets provided by the scanners 107 and the external asset databases 108, the network asset information management system may utilize real-time traffic related information provided by the connectors 104 to determine information about assets.
  • A new timestamp may be added to the asset attributes to track the last time the rules updated the asset information. This may be used in conjunction with the last asset scan time to calculate the asset model information confidence, which may be used to calculate priority of events or activity involving these assets. Other attributes may be added to assets, including, for example, timestamps that can be updated by rules. The timestamp may facilitate an understanding of an activity level of an asset. For example, if an asset has no activity for a time period, a timestamp may facilitate an understanding of when the activity stopped. Such timestamp information may also be used to determine the existence of an asset. The timestamp may also be used in conjunction with rules to assign a model confidence to the notifications 111 generated by the system 101.
  • Using the asset determination and event prioritization module 105, asset model information may be utilized by a prioritization component for prioritizing events based on, among other attributes, the identified vulnerabilities and open ports of the asset. The prioritization may be analyzed by the information analysis module 110. In the absence of a rule based approach, the confidence regarding truthfulness of this information may be influenced by the last scan time. However, with the rules provided by the rules module 109 being able to monitor the patch installations, vulnerability compromises, traffic to various ports, and other events targeted at an asset, certain components of the asset information may be updated in real-time by rules. Thus, knowledge of the last time rules refreshed the asset information may facilitate calculation of the asset information model confidence to be utilized by event prioritization.
  • With regard to event prioritization, as discussed above, timestamp information may be used to raise or lower priori of risk of a particular asset activity. For example, for traffic from one source going to a specific port of an asset, the traffic may contain a packet that points to exploitation of a certain vulnerability. The information from the packet may be compared to previously obtained information at a particular timestamp to determine the level of vulnerability.
  • The asset model module 106 may obtain static asset information from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108. Information collected from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108 may form the basis of an asset model used by the rules module 109. Thus for any asset under analysis, even prior to collection of any real-time information from the connectors 104, the asset model module 106 may determine an asset model based on the initial information collected from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108, Based partially on the asset model determined by the asset model module 106, the information analysis module 110 may determine the type of services being performed by an asset or whether the assed is vulnerable to attack.
  • The rules module 109 may include, for example, rule conditions for asset creation, deletion and update. The rule conditions may be applicable to any of a number of the data sources 102 (i.e., assets) managed by the network asset information management system 101. Asset creation may be based on the rule condition that traffic identified to or from an IP address exceeds more than a threshold amount of data or duration. Asset deletion may be based on the rule condition that traffic has not been seen from an asset for a period of time, which may be user defined. Asset update may be based on the rule condition that an event identifying an OS patch or application patch applied to the asset. Additional components may maintain mappings between OS patch and vulnerabilities addressed. The rule module 109 may update the asset vulnerability list. For asset update, another rule condition may include the event identifying connection accepted to a port on an asset which was not known to be open. Asset open ports may be updated. For asset update, another rule condition may include an asset compromise is identified by a rule based on complex rule conditions. The rules may thus raise asset risk.
  • Asset information may be deduced from various events directly or indirectly, and the confidence level of the asset information may be affected as follows. Events retrieved may directly report device vendor and device product information (e.g., name, patch level, version level etc.). This provides a high level of confidence that the asset/system information is accurate. For example, since the event is describing parts of an asset and the information is arriving directly from the asset, the events retrieved may thus provide a high level of confidence that the asset/system information is accurate. Events may also contain information about the connections made from an asset/device to another asset. This gives a second degree of confidence regarding the services running on an asset/system. Events may also report the user agents used for web browsing, the OS versions, patch levels and even the applications installed on a system. Based on this information, richer data about assets, such as list of applications, web browser clients and operation system versions may be deduced.
  • The network asset information management system 101 also provides for enrichment of asset information (e.g. current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks going on the asset, current risk based on network traffic, risk associated with other assets in the network zone, and static attributes of the asset etc.). For example, the network information may be enriched with security information from an asset to thus update the risk associated with an asset in real-time. The risk may be compared to predetermined risk thresholds to determine actual risk, for example, for a particular network, department or organization. Based on the security information for an asset, the system 101 may determine that a particular risk or attack actually compromises an asset, thus raising the level of risk. For example, if traffic identified to or from an IP address related to an asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, such an increase in traffic may render an asset vulnerable to attack and therefore a level of risk related to an asset may be raised. The system 101 may also maintain a list of all vulnerabilities that have been exploited for a predetermined time period for a particular asset or vulnerabilities that have been tried out but were not exploited. Such security information may be added to the asset model in real-time. With regard to enrichment of asset information as discussed herein, the rules module 109 may also include rules that identify which vulnerabilities may be exploited or not exploited.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system interaction diagram for the network asset information management system 101, according to an embodiment. For example, FIG. 2 shows various network switches 120 (i.e., PC1, PC2 . . . PCn), and collectors 121, which may function similar to connectors 104 of FIG. 1. Additional components may include a domain name system (DNS) collector 122 for obtaining information from DNS server 123, firewall collector 124 for obtaining information from firewall server 125, and a virtual private network (VPN) collector 126 for obtaining information from VPN server 127. The DNS server 123, firewall server 125 and VPN server 127 may be connected to the internet 128 for providing information to the network asset information management system 101.
  • For the network asset information management system 101, management of the information about network assets automatically through rule based analysis of network traffic, in correlation with additional information observed about network assets internally by the system or provided externally to the system, thus provides real-time and accurate maintenance of information. The system also provides for enrichment of asset information (e.g. current and historic bandwidth utilization, current set of attacks going on the asset, current risk based on network traffic and static attributes of the asset etc.). Further, the system provides the ability to maintain the last update timestamp of asset information through rules which can be further used to identify possible staleness of information. This can be further used, for example, by the information analysis module 110 to calculate asset model confidence. The system also provides a flexible framework (using flexible user customizable rules) to manage and use the asset information.
  • 3. Method
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 300 for network asset information Management, according to an embodiments. The method 300 may be implemented on the network asset information management system 101 described above with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2 by way of example and not limitation. The method 300 may be practiced in other systems.
  • For the method 300, referring to FIGS. 1-3, at block 301, the method may include generating an asset model based on static information about an asset. As shown in FIG. 1, the asset model module 106 may generate the asset model based on static information about the data sources 102 (i.e., assets). The static information about the assets may be obtained from the scanners 107 and/or the external asset databases 108. The assets may include, for example, a managed host, a server or a network device.
  • At block 302, the method may include generating real-time asset information based on network activity involving the asset. As shown in FIG. 1, the asset determination and event prioritization module 105 may generate the real-time asset information based on network activity involving the asset The network activity involving the asset may include, for example, event data involving the asset. The event data may include, for example, asset logs, application logs and/or network data. The network activity involving the asset may be obtained, for example, by the connectors 104.
  • At block 303, the method may include performing rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset. As shown in FIG. 1, the rules module 109 may include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset. Performing the rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset may include determining vulnerabilities and risks associated with the asset based on comparison of a level of traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset to a predetermined threshold. In this regard, the notification at block 304 below may include a level of risk associated with the asset. The rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset may include rules for creation of an asset if traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration. The rules may also include rules for deletion of an asset if traffic has not been observed from an asset for a predetermined time-period. The rules may further include rules for updating of an asset if an event identifying an OS patch or application patch has been applied to the asset.
  • At block 304, the method may include evaluating the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the monitored network activity to generate a notification related to the asset. As shown in FIG. 1, the information analysis module 110 may evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notifications 111 related to the asset. The information analysis module 110 may maintain an age of an asset based on last scan time and use the age to calculate asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset. The information analysis module 110 may use the asset model information confidence to calculate priority of the activity occurring on the asset. The notifications 111 related to the asset may include, for example, services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromises, rogue processes, rogue servers, OS versions, patch levels, web clients, and/or risk associated with the asset The notifications 111 may be used to issue security alerts related to asset compromises and attacks. The notifications 111 may also be used to generate statistics and risks associated with the asset.
  • 4. Computer Readable Medium
  • FIG. 4 shows a computer system 400 that may be used with the embodiments described herein. The computer system 400 represents a generic platform that includes components that may be in a server or another computer system. The computer system 400 may be used as a platform for the system 101. The computer system 400 may execute, by a processor or other hardware processing circuit, the methods, functions and other processes described herein. These methods, functions and other processes may be embodied as machine readable instructions stored on computer readable medium, which may be non-transitory, such as hardware storage devices (e.g., RAM (random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable, programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable, programmable ROM), hard drives, and flash memory).
  • The computer system 400 includes a processor 402 that may implement or execute machine readable instructions performing some or all of the methods, functions and other processes described herein. Commands and data from the processor 402 are communicated over a communication bus 404. The computer system 400 also includes a main memory 406, such as a random access memory (RAM), where the machine readable instructions and data for the processor 402 may reside during runtime, and a secondary data storage 408, which may be non-volatile and stores machine readable instructions and data. The memory and data storage are examples of computer readable mediums. The memory 406 may include modules 420 including machine readable instructions residing in the memory 406 during runtime and executed by the processor 402. The modules 420 may include the modules 105, 106, 109 and 110 of the system 101 shown in FIG. 1.
  • The computer system 400 may include an I/O device 410, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a display, touchscreen, etc. The computer system 400 may include a network interface 412 for connecting to a network. Other known electronic components may be added or substituted in the computer system 400.
  • While the embodiments have been described with reference to examples, various modifications to the described embodiments may be made without departing from the scope of the claimed embodiments.

Claims (21)

1. A network asset information management system (101) comprising:
an asset determination and event prioritization module (105) to generate real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset (102);
a rules module (109) to include a set of rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset; and
an information analysis module (110), executed by a processor, to i) maintain an age of the asset based on last scan time and use the age to calculate a) asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset, and b) priority of the activity occurring on the asset, and ii) evaluate the real-time asset information and the rules to generate a notification (111) related to the asset.
2. The system of claim 1, further comprising an asset model module (106) to generate an asset model based on static information about the asset, wherein the information analysis module is to evaluate the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notification related to the asset.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the static information about the asset is obtained from a scanner (107).
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the static information about the asset is obtained from an external asset database (108).
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the network activity involving the asset includes event data involving the asset, and wherein the event data includes asset logs, application logs or network data.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the network activity involving the asset is obtained by a connector (104).
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for creation of an asset if the traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, and wherein the notification includes an indication for creation of the asset.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for deletion of an asset if the traffic has not been observed from the asset for a predetermined time-period, and wherein the notification includes an indication for deletion of the asset.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for updating of an asset if an event identifying an OS patch or application patch has been applied to the asset, and wherein the notification includes an indication for updating of the asset.
10. (canceled)
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the notification related to the asset includes services, applications, resource utilization, traffic assessment, attacks, viruses, worms, security compromises, rogue processes, rogue servers, operating system (OS) versions, patch levels, web clients, or risk associated with the asset.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the notification related to the asset is used to generate statistics associated with the asset.
13. A method for network asset information management (300), the method comprising:
generating (302) real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset (102);
performing (303) rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset;
maintaining, by a processor, an age of the asset based on last scan time;
calculating, by the processor, a) asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset, and b) priority of the activity occurring on the asset; and
evaluating (304), by the processor, the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification (111) related to the asset.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising generating (301) an asset model based on static information about the asset, wherein evaluating further comprising evaluating the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the monitored network activity to generate the notification related to the asset.
15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing machine readable instructions, that when executed by a computer system (400), perform a method for network asset information management (300), the method comprising:
generating (302) real-time asset information based on network activity involving an asset (102);
performing (303) rule-based monitoring of the network activity involving the asset;
maintaining, by a processor, an age of the asset based on last scan time
calculating, by the processor, a) asset model information confidence for activity occurring on the asset, and b) priority of the activity occurring on the asset; and
evaluating (304), by the processor, the real-time asset information and the monitored network activity to generate a notification (111) related to the asset.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the notification includes a level of risk associated with the asset.
17. The method of claim 13, wherein rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for creation of an asset if the traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, and wherein the notification includes an indication for creation of the asset.
18. The method of claim 13, wherein rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for deletion of an asset if the traffic has not been observed from the asset for a predetermined time-period, and wherein the notification includes an indication for deletion of the asset.
19. The computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the method further comprises generating an asset model based on static information about the asset, wherein the processor evaluates the asset model, the real-time asset information, and the rules to generate the notification related to the asset.
20. The computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for creation of an asset if the traffic identified to or from an IP address related to the asset exceeds a predetermined threshold amount of data or duration, and wherein the notification includes an indication for creation of the asset.
21. The computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein rules for monitoring the network activity involving the asset include rules for deletion of an asset if the traffic has not been observed from the asset for a predetermined time-period, and wherein the notification includes an indication for deletion of the asset.
US14/846,502 2011-06-01 2015-09-04 Network asset information management Abandoned US20160191352A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/846,502 US20160191352A1 (en) 2011-06-01 2015-09-04 Network asset information management

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161492309P 2011-06-01 2011-06-01
US201314116128A 2013-11-06 2013-11-06
US14/846,502 US20160191352A1 (en) 2011-06-01 2015-09-04 Network asset information management

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US201314116128A Continuation 2011-06-01 2013-11-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160191352A1 true US20160191352A1 (en) 2016-06-30

Family

ID=47259703

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/116,128 Active US9438616B2 (en) 2011-06-01 2011-10-31 Network asset information management
US14/846,502 Abandoned US20160191352A1 (en) 2011-06-01 2015-09-04 Network asset information management

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/116,128 Active US9438616B2 (en) 2011-06-01 2011-10-31 Network asset information management

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US9438616B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2715975B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103563302B (en)
WO (1) WO2012166194A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3793166A1 (en) * 2016-10-31 2021-03-17 Acentium Inc. Methods and systems for ranking, filtering and patching detected vulnerabilities in a networked system
US11218504B2 (en) 2016-10-31 2022-01-04 Acentium Inc. Systems and methods for multi-tier cache visual system and visual modes
US11411970B2 (en) 2016-10-31 2022-08-09 Acentium Inc. Systems and methods for computer environment situational awareness

Families Citing this family (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9954883B2 (en) 2012-12-18 2018-04-24 Mcafee, Inc. Automated asset criticality assessment
CN105009137B (en) 2013-01-31 2017-10-20 慧与发展有限责任合伙企业 Orient safety warning
US20140288996A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-09-25 Digital River, Inc. Technology asset tracking system and method
US10171318B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2019-01-01 RiskIQ, Inc. System and method of identifying internet-facing assets
US10075474B2 (en) * 2015-02-06 2018-09-11 Honeywell International Inc. Notification subsystem for generating consolidated, filtered, and relevant security risk-based notifications
US10021125B2 (en) * 2015-02-06 2018-07-10 Honeywell International Inc. Infrastructure monitoring tool for collecting industrial process control and automation system risk data
US10594714B2 (en) * 2015-10-28 2020-03-17 Qomplx, Inc. User and entity behavioral analysis using an advanced cyber decision platform
CN108496196A (en) * 2015-12-23 2018-09-04 苏伊士水资源私营有限公司 To assets putting maintenance into practice activity
US10860715B2 (en) * 2016-05-26 2020-12-08 Barracuda Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for proactively identifying and mitigating malware attacks via hosted web assets
US10237240B2 (en) 2016-07-21 2019-03-19 AT&T Global Network Services (U.K.) B.V. Assessing risk associated with firewall rules
US10764311B2 (en) * 2016-09-21 2020-09-01 Cequence Security, Inc. Unsupervised classification of web traffic users
FR3058015A1 (en) * 2016-10-26 2018-04-27 Orange METHOD FOR DYNAMIC AND INTERACTIVE CONTROL OF A RESIDENTIAL GATEWAY CONNECTED TO A COMMUNICATION NETWORK, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER DEVICE AND PROGRAM
US10904282B2 (en) * 2017-08-08 2021-01-26 American International Group, Inc. System and method for assessing cybersecurity risk of computer network
CN108055246B (en) * 2017-11-29 2020-11-24 国家计算机网络与信息安全管理中心 Control system for automatically adding abnormal network space assets into blacklist
CN108494787B (en) * 2018-03-29 2019-12-06 北京理工大学 Network risk assessment method based on asset association graph
EP4333374A3 (en) * 2018-10-17 2024-03-27 Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America Threat analysis apparatus, threat analysis method, and program
US11132446B2 (en) 2018-10-25 2021-09-28 Bank Of America Corporation Blockchain system for assessment and management of assets
CN110336684B (en) * 2019-03-21 2022-03-18 北京天防安全科技有限公司 Intelligent network asset identification method and system
CN110311927B (en) * 2019-07-30 2022-05-27 中国工商银行股份有限公司 Data processing method and device, electronic device and medium
US11321213B2 (en) 2020-01-16 2022-05-03 Vmware, Inc. Correlation key used to correlate flow and con text data
CN111400720A (en) * 2020-03-16 2020-07-10 深信服科技股份有限公司 Terminal information processing method, system and device and readable storage medium
CN111431753A (en) * 2020-04-02 2020-07-17 深信服科技股份有限公司 Asset information updating method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN111724261B (en) * 2020-06-22 2024-03-15 安全能力生态聚合(北京)运营科技有限公司 Multi-user asset virtualization management method and system
CN112202629B (en) * 2020-09-11 2023-08-25 智网安云(武汉)信息技术有限公司 Network asset monitoring method and network asset monitoring device
CN112258054A (en) * 2020-10-26 2021-01-22 福建奇点时空数字科技有限公司 Network asset compliance analysis method based on flow perception
KR102408489B1 (en) * 2020-11-19 2022-06-13 주식회사 에이아이스페라 The method for controling security based on internet protocol and system thereof
CN113411378A (en) * 2021-05-26 2021-09-17 深圳万物安全科技有限公司 Asset management method, system and computer readable medium based on event triggering
US20230011957A1 (en) * 2021-07-09 2023-01-12 Vmware, Inc. Detecting threats to datacenter based on analysis of anomalous events
CN114124913B (en) * 2021-09-24 2023-11-28 绿盟科技集团股份有限公司 Method and device for monitoring network asset change and electronic equipment
US20230094208A1 (en) * 2021-09-29 2023-03-30 Bit Discovery Inc. Asset Inventorying System with In-Context Asset Valuation Prioritization
CN114500024B (en) * 2022-01-19 2024-03-22 恒安嘉新(北京)科技股份公司 Network asset management method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN114430347A (en) * 2022-01-31 2022-05-03 上海纽盾科技股份有限公司 Security situation awareness defense method, device and system for network assets
CN114978614A (en) * 2022-04-29 2022-08-30 广州市昊恒信息科技有限公司 IP asset rapid scanning processing system
CN114866315A (en) * 2022-04-29 2022-08-05 广州市昊恒信息科技有限公司 Digital safety management method for IT assets
CN115242463B (en) * 2022-06-30 2023-06-09 北京华顺信安科技有限公司 Method, system and computer equipment for monitoring dynamic change of network asset
CN115225533B (en) * 2022-07-26 2023-09-19 深圳证券通信有限公司 Security analysis method and related device
CN115801454A (en) * 2023-01-30 2023-03-14 网思科技股份有限公司 Network data leakage prevention method, system and readable storage medium
CN116366316B (en) * 2023-03-16 2024-02-27 中国华能集团有限公司北京招标分公司 Network space mapping method
CN116975007B (en) * 2023-07-29 2024-03-22 上海螣龙科技有限公司 Method, system, equipment and medium for storing and displaying network assets

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050160480A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2005-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method, apparatus and program storage device for providing automated tracking of security vulnerabilities
US20050193430A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2005-09-01 Gideon Cohen System and method for risk detection and analysis in a computer network
US20070067848A1 (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-03-22 Alcatel Security vulnerability information aggregation
US7665119B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2010-02-16 Secure Elements, Inc. Policy-based selection of remediation
US7761920B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2010-07-20 Fortinet, Inc. Data structure for policy-based remediation selection
US7840663B1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2010-11-23 Mcafee, Inc. Desktop security in peer-to-peer networks
US8171555B2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2012-05-01 Fortinet, Inc. Determining technology-appropriate remediation for vulnerability
US8438643B2 (en) * 2005-09-22 2013-05-07 Alcatel Lucent Information system service-level security risk analysis
US8479297B1 (en) * 2010-11-23 2013-07-02 Mcafee, Inc. Prioritizing network assets
US8561197B2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2013-10-15 Fortinet, Inc. Vulnerability-based remediation selection
US8590047B2 (en) * 2011-01-04 2013-11-19 Bank Of America Corporation System and method for management of vulnerability assessment
US8677496B2 (en) * 2004-07-15 2014-03-18 AlgoSec Systems Ltd. Method and apparatus for automatic risk assessment of a firewall configuration
US8782796B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2014-07-15 Stratum Security, Inc. Data exfiltration attack simulation technology

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7096502B1 (en) * 2000-02-08 2006-08-22 Harris Corporation System and method for assessing the security posture of a network
US8201256B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2012-06-12 Trustwave Holdings, Inc. Methods and systems for assessing and advising on electronic compliance
US20100312718A1 (en) * 2004-06-08 2010-12-09 Rosenthal Collins Group, L.L.C. Method and system for providing electronic information for risk assesement and management via net worth for multi-market electronic trading
US20060230450A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-10-12 Tian Bu Methods and devices for defending a 3G wireless network against a signaling attack
CN101174973A (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-05-07 华为技术有限公司 Network safety control construction
US8069471B2 (en) 2008-10-21 2011-11-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation Internet security dynamics assessment system, program product, and related methods
CN101610174B (en) * 2009-07-24 2011-08-24 深圳市永达电子股份有限公司 Log correlation analysis system and method

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7840663B1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2010-11-23 Mcafee, Inc. Desktop security in peer-to-peer networks
US20050193430A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2005-09-01 Gideon Cohen System and method for risk detection and analysis in a computer network
US20050160480A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2005-07-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method, apparatus and program storage device for providing automated tracking of security vulnerabilities
US8677496B2 (en) * 2004-07-15 2014-03-18 AlgoSec Systems Ltd. Method and apparatus for automatic risk assessment of a firewall configuration
US8561197B2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2013-10-15 Fortinet, Inc. Vulnerability-based remediation selection
US8171555B2 (en) * 2004-07-23 2012-05-01 Fortinet, Inc. Determining technology-appropriate remediation for vulnerability
US7761920B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2010-07-20 Fortinet, Inc. Data structure for policy-based remediation selection
US7665119B2 (en) * 2004-09-03 2010-02-16 Secure Elements, Inc. Policy-based selection of remediation
US8438643B2 (en) * 2005-09-22 2013-05-07 Alcatel Lucent Information system service-level security risk analysis
US20070067848A1 (en) * 2005-09-22 2007-03-22 Alcatel Security vulnerability information aggregation
US8479297B1 (en) * 2010-11-23 2013-07-02 Mcafee, Inc. Prioritizing network assets
US8590047B2 (en) * 2011-01-04 2013-11-19 Bank Of America Corporation System and method for management of vulnerability assessment
US8782796B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2014-07-15 Stratum Security, Inc. Data exfiltration attack simulation technology

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Mummidi, Sailaja, et al.; "Information Management System Vulnerability Analysis Study", New Mexico Tech., Nov. 8, 2001, pp. 1-16. *
Swiler, LP et al.; "Computer-Attack Graph Generation Tool", Darpa Information Survivability Conference & Exposition II, 2001, Disc Ex '01, Proceedings Jun. 12-14, 2001, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA pp. 307-321. *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3793166A1 (en) * 2016-10-31 2021-03-17 Acentium Inc. Methods and systems for ranking, filtering and patching detected vulnerabilities in a networked system
US11075939B2 (en) 2016-10-31 2021-07-27 Acentium Inc. Methods and systems for ranking, filtering and patching detected vulnerabilities in a networked system
US11218504B2 (en) 2016-10-31 2022-01-04 Acentium Inc. Systems and methods for multi-tier cache visual system and visual modes
US11411970B2 (en) 2016-10-31 2022-08-09 Acentium Inc. Systems and methods for computer environment situational awareness

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103563302A (en) 2014-02-05
EP2715975A4 (en) 2015-01-21
US20140075564A1 (en) 2014-03-13
US9438616B2 (en) 2016-09-06
EP2715975B1 (en) 2016-03-23
EP2715975A1 (en) 2014-04-09
WO2012166194A1 (en) 2012-12-06
CN103563302B (en) 2016-09-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9438616B2 (en) Network asset information management
US10721243B2 (en) Apparatus, system and method for identifying and mitigating malicious network threats
JP6894003B2 (en) Defense against APT attacks
US9516039B1 (en) Behavioral detection of suspicious host activities in an enterprise
US9069954B2 (en) Security threat detection associated with security events and an actor category model
US9860265B2 (en) System and method for identifying exploitable weak points in a network
US10601844B2 (en) Non-rule based security risk detection
US9942270B2 (en) Database deception in directory services
Yen et al. Beehive: Large-scale log analysis for detecting suspicious activity in enterprise networks
US11388186B2 (en) Method and system to stitch cybersecurity, measure network cyber health, generate business and network risks, enable realtime zero trust verifications, and recommend ordered, predictive risk mitigations
US9565204B2 (en) Cyber-security system and methods thereof
US9338187B1 (en) Modeling user working time using authentication events within an enterprise network
US20150128267A1 (en) Context-aware network forensics
US20140165207A1 (en) Method for detecting anomaly action within a computer network
EP2577552A2 (en) Dynamic multidimensional schemas for event monitoring priority
US11855869B2 (en) Secure configuration of a network sensor on a network sensor host
WO2011149773A2 (en) Security threat detection associated with security events and an actor category model
US20200106791A1 (en) Intelligent system for mitigating cybersecurity risk by analyzing domain name system traffic metrics
CN110581850A (en) Gene detection method based on network flow
RU2769075C1 (en) System and method for active detection of malicious network resources
US20230336591A1 (en) Centralized management of policies for network-accessible devices
US20230370479A1 (en) Automatic generation of attack patterns for threat detection
JP2023511095A (en) Systems and methods for network monitoring, reporting and risk mitigation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:037079/0001

Effective date: 20151027

AS Assignment

Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SINGLA, ANURAG;BLOCK, ROBERT;SHARAN, DHIRAJ;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20111026 TO 20111027;REEL/FRAME:039209/0991

AS Assignment

Owner name: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:039211/0001

Effective date: 20151027

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION