US2773623A - Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making - Google Patents

Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2773623A
US2773623A US433698A US43369854A US2773623A US 2773623 A US2773623 A US 2773623A US 433698 A US433698 A US 433698A US 43369854 A US43369854 A US 43369854A US 2773623 A US2773623 A US 2773623A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
coating
chromium
steel
weight
oxide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US433698A
Inventor
Ludwig K Schuster
Jr Alfonso L Baldi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Heintz Manufacturing Co
Original Assignee
Heintz Manufacturing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to CA581081A priority Critical patent/CA581081A/en
Application filed by Heintz Manufacturing Co filed Critical Heintz Manufacturing Co
Priority to US433698A priority patent/US2773623A/en
Priority to FR1145660D priority patent/FR1145660A/en
Priority to DEH21000A priority patent/DE1176958B/en
Priority to LU33622D priority patent/LU33622A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2773623A publication Critical patent/US2773623A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/24Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing hexavalent chromium compounds
    • C23C22/30Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing hexavalent chromium compounds containing also trivalent chromium
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S220/00Receptacles
    • Y10S220/917Corrosion resistant container

Description

7 1356 LK. SCHUSTER ETAL 2,773,623
CORROSIOMRESISTANT COATED STEEL MEMBERS AND METHOD OF MAKING Filed :June 1, 1954 4 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 LUDWJG K; SCHUSTER a ALFONSO 1.. BALDl JR.
ATTORNEYS Dec. 11, 1956 sc us ETAL 2,773,623
CORROSION RESISTANT COAT-ED STEEL MEMBERS AND METHOD OF MAKING I Filed June 1, 1954 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 FIGS FIG.3
INVENTORS LUDWIG KLscHUsTER a ALFONSO L. BALDI, JR.
ATTORNEY;
United States Patent CORROSION RESISTANT COATED STEEL MEMBERS AND METHOD or MAKING Ludwig Karl Schuster, Philadelphia, and Alfonso L. Baldi, Jr., Drexel Hill, Pa., assignors to Heintz Manufacturing Company, Philadelphia, Pa., a corporation of Pennsylvania Application June 1, 1954, Serial No. 433,698
12 Claims. (Cl. 220-64) This invention relates to coated steel members, more particularly to such members which are protected from corrosion.
Among the objects of the present invention is the provision of novel coated steel members which are simple and inexpensive to make and yet are extremely resistant to corrosion.
Additional objects of the present invention include the provision of a novel method for making such members.
The above as Well as still further objects of the present invention will be more clearly understood from the following description of several of its exemplifications, reference being made to the accompanying drawings wherein:
Fig. 1 is a partially broken away perspective view of a storage container of the type used to can food articles and the like in accordance with the present invention;
Figs. 2, 3 and 4 are views of further types of articles that illustrate the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a view similar to Fig. 1 of a modified form of storage container embodying the present invention; and
Fig. 6 is a graphical representation of compositions that are suitable for use in the manufacture of cans such as that shown in Fig. 5.
Plain carbon steels such as ordinary SAE 1010 steel, or the conventional Blackplate sheets that are used in the canning industry, are relatively inexpensive and simple to fabricate and use in practically any desired configuration. Unfortunately, these steels are extremely vulnerable to corrosion. In fact, unless the steel is protected as by a film of oil, it will usually corrode even before it can be delivered by the manufacturer to the consumer.
However, by reason of the low cost and extreme versatility of these steels, many different types of treatment have been developed to reduce their corrosion so that their use can be extended to such fields as canning and the like. Perhaps the most Widely spread corrosionresistant treatment is the application of a tin plating. Although the plating of tin has proven to be very satisfactory in most respects, it is fairly expensive and requires in this country that the tin be imported from abroad.
According to the present invention, very effective corrosion resistance can be imparted to members made of the above steels, particularly where these members are to come into body-engaging contact, by applying a coating of an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight, about 40 to 95% of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent, and the coating weighting about 10 to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers. The steel is preferably oxidized so that its surface is covered with a film of uniformly adherent iron oxide before the coating is applied.
A can of lubricating oil or roasted coffee beans can have its inner surface covered with the above coating to prevent rusting prior to filling as well as when filled with oil or cotfee beans; the outer surfaces of the can can also have the same type of combined chromium oxide coating which provides an excellent substrate for subse quent lithographic coatings, varnishes, lacquers, enamels and other organic coatings.
Instead of applying the coating of the present invention to the can after it is manufactured or after it is filled and sealed, it is simpler to make the can from steel sheets that have the coating applied while they are being produced. This permits the coated sheets to be stored, if desired, and even shipped over substantial distances without requiring any supplemental treatment to prevent them from becoming unmarketable or unsightly as a result of corrosion.
The sheets are readily coated by first making sure they are very clean and then passing them through an aqueous solution of chromic acid and a reducing agent which is compatible with the chromic acid. This compatibility means that the chromic acid and the reducing agent, even though both are present in the solution, will not in the appropriate dilution react rapidly with each other and will not form a visible precipitate while the solution is being contacted with the steel.
The steel sheet wet with the solution is then dried at a temperature above 212 F. During this drying, the chromic acid reacts with the reducing agent and becomes partially reduced. As a result, the final coating is a combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight.
An inordinately high degree of corrosion resistance is obtained when 40 to by weight of the chromium in the final coating is in what corresponds to the trivalent condition, the remainder being hexavalent, and the coating itself weighs about 10 to 200 milligrams for every square foot of surface that is covers. Coatings of less weight give less protection, although coating weights need not be more thanabout 30 milligrams per square foot to give all the protection that is needed.
If the reducing agent is omitted from the coating bath, dried coatings of the above weight range will not show the desired trivalent chromium content. They also tend to be somewhat deliquescent and therefore inferior.
Typical reducing agents suitable for use in connection with the present invention are organicvpolyalcohols such as sugars, including invert sugar, sucrose, dextrose, glycol and polyethylene glycols, glycerine, mannitol, sorbitol, triethanolamine, hydroxylamine as well as its salts such as its sulfate and hydrochloride, phosphorous acid, and potassium iodide.
Care should be taken to limit the amount of watersoluble material that is included in the coating. Although as much as 5 or 6% of such materials can generally be tolerated, it is preferred to use reducing agents that do not leave such materials in the final product. Potassium iodide is not a preferred type of reducing agent inasmuch as it is carried through as water-soluble potas-- sium compounds after reducing the chromic acid. Phosphorous acid is a better reducing agent even though it is oxidized to phosphoric acid because the drying operation converts such phosphoric acid to Water-insoluble phosphates. The most eifective reducing agents appear to be the organic polyalcohols since their oxidation products are essentially completely volatilized and driven off during the drying operation.
As indicated above, the coatings of the present inven* tion are preferably applied to a steel that has had its surface covered with an oxide film. The oxidation need not be extensive and can be accompanied by etching which may vary from an insignificant amount to a heavy etch that removes to 1000 milligrams of metal per square foot of steel surface. The oxidation can be efiected by merely attacking the surface with a reagent that converts it to oxide with substantially no removal :of metal. The etch type of treatment can be effected bytcontacting the steel surface-with aqueous nitric acid having a concentration of from 1 to 20% HNOa by weight for a period of from 2 to 70 seconds at atempcrature of. from 60 to-150 F. This treatment appears to leave only an exceedingly minute oxide Aqueous solutions of ammoniumpersulfate,'-picric acid or ferric nitrate are also effectiveand react similarly to nitric acid solutions. For example an aqueous solution containing 4% of ammonium persulfate will, when applied at 75 for .15 secondspremove approximately 380 milligrams of metal persquare footand provide a very satisfactory surface for the chromium oxide coating. A 1 /2% picric acid solution in water at 155 F. for .12 seconds removesabout-370'rnilligrams of metal per square foot and is also very satisfactory. Aqueous ferric nitrate in a concentrate of about 5% based on anhydrous material, used at 80 F. for I'Sseconds removes about 400 milligrams per square foot and also leaves anexcellent pretreatment surface. The non-etching type of oxidation can be accomplished with hot'concentrated aqueous solutions of sodium hydroxide containingsodium nitrate as used instandard bluing operations. A concentration of 39% NaOH and 2% NaNOs used at 280 F. is very etfective although any bluing treatment appears to be suitable.
It is not desirable to have oxide pretreatment films that are loose or non-adherennthe oxide produced should be continuous and adherent to the metal surface. However, such films as ordinary corrosion do not interfere with the application of the coating since loose portions are readily removed as by a conventional pre-cleaning operation.
The proportion of reducing agent to chromic acid should be insuflicient for the complete reduction of all the chromic acid to trivalent condition. The minimum amount of reducing agent is somewhat below that which will stoichiometrically reduce the lowest proportion of the chromium, inasmuch as some of the chromium is reduced during the drying operation even if the reducing agent is not present in the bath. Chromic acidsolutions of any concentration can be used and the coating weight adjusted by controlling the amount of solution that is left on the metal surface when it isbeing dried.
The final heat treatment is somewhat more effective if carried out at temperatures substantially above 212 F. Temperatures between 250 F. and 350 F. are preferable and provide the most corrosion-resistant and adherent forms of coating. At about 450 F. and higher, however, the coating appears to be adversely affected.
Referring now to Fig. 1, there is shown a can representing one embodiment of the;present invention. The can has a tubular body 12 made in the conventional manner from a single strip of a full bright finishedsteel 10 mils thick with the ends joined together as indicated at 13. These ends are folded back on each other to provide interlocking flanges 16and 18 between which a yielding gasketing layer 17 such as rubber is applied. The flange and gasket combination is then crimped together to make a suitably sturdy and leak-proof joint.
The opening at the top and bottom of the tubular'body are sealed with covers 20, 22 that 'have beaded iperipheries 24 with interlocking flanges 26, 28. The'interlocking beaded periphery can merely be crimped, preferably with a layer 30 of gasketing to'assure hermetical-sealing.
As shown by the broken-away edge 32, the metal of the body has a coating 34 applied in accordance with the present invention. This coating was provided on the unfabricated sheet by subjecting it to the following operations:
A. Clean the Blackplate cathodically in an aqueous solution containing 16 grams KOH per liter using a current density of amperes per square foot of cathode at 140-160 F..for 10 seconds.
B. -Cold'water rinse.
-C. Clean anodically inan aqueous solution containing 4 16 I grams KOH per liter using acurrentdensityof '15 amperes per square foot ofanode at l40-l60 F. for 10 seconds.
D. Cold water rinse.
E. Flood with a passivity-preventing /2% aqueous H2804 solution by a weight 1-2 seconds at F.
F. Cold water rinse.
G. Spray with an aqueous solution containing 2% nitric acid, 80 F., 8 seconds using a spray pressure of about 6 pounds per square inch.
H. Cold water rinse.
I. Desmut by brushing in water to remove looseor non-adherent reaction products including any developed in G.
I. Flood with an aqueous solution containing 4% chromic acid and 1.3% cane sugar at 75 F. for 2 seconds.
K. Roll through rubber rolls wetted with the flooded solution.
L. Cure by passing the resulting filmed metalthrough a drying unit having a set of ceramic gas burners heated red hotby burning gas, a five second exposure to the incandescent units being used, and the metal reaching a temperature of 300 to 350 F.
If the metal is in the form of an elongated strip, it may be coiled up directly after step L.
The same coated sheet can be used for making both the'top and bottom covers 20, '22 as well as the body 12 of Fig. 1, although in some cases different thicknesses of metal can be used in the different portions, so that separate coated sheets are required.
After the can body is secured together in the above manner, or by soldering, the cover on one end'can be applied in any convenient manner such as the one generally used in the industry and shown in Fig. '1. The can can then be filled and the remaining cover applied with the usual precautions in the case where-the contents have to be sterilized or heated, or kept in a special atmosphere such as under evacuation or superatmospheric pressures. The cans having the coatingsof the present invention are particularly useful in storingsuch materials as dried foods, nuts, spices, dough mixtures, etc., as well as the above-mentioned coffee and lubricating oil. Wet-packed foods or other materials can also be stored in the cans of the present invention, but here it is desirable to have an organic covering layer (enamel, lacquer, varnish) applied over the coatingof theprescnt invention on the inside surface of the can.
The coatings of the present invention contributed a substantial amount of increased adhesion and wear resistance for such organic coatings as well as resistance to corrosion. Suitable organic layers are those usually loosely referred to in the art as enamels, sanitary enamels or lacquers such as the oleo-resinous phenolic or vinyl resin varnishes. Particularly effective forms of such organictype coating are describedin U.-S. Patents numbered 2,231,407, 2,299,433, 2,479,409 and 2,675,334. Such top coatings will even further reduce corrosion as well as increase the wear resistance and lowerthecontamination of the can contents by the oxides.
According to another phase of the present invention, the advantageous characteristics contributed by the inorganic coating of the present invention can also be used for machine elements, particularly those that come in contact with the body and have a tendency to be corroded by perspiration that they therebypick up. Such metal members as the external portions of firearms, pistols, rifles and metal camera bodies, for instance, are very advantageously given. the above type of coating. This not only increases the life of the part upon handling butin addition improves the ease with which the parts slideon each other upon the addition of a slight amount of "oil for example. In fact, the improvement -in sliding action makes the oiled coating desirable for use even greases on the internal portions of mechanisms where they are not subjected to be handled.
Fig. 4 shows an embodiment of this phase of the invention. Here a rifle 80 has its exposed bodyengaging parts, including trigger 81, trigger guard 82 and barrel 83 covered with the hydrated mixture of chromium oxides as described above. This coating is particularly effective if applied directly over a. surface that 'has been blued in the conventional manner.
The advantages of the present invention are contributed to any plain carbon steel, that is steel that contains no more than about 2% of alloying metals. They can have a carbon content varying from extremely low values, 0.05% or even less, to as much as 1.4% or higher. The phosphorus and sulphur contents can range from substantially zero up to several tenths of a percent. Generally phosphorus maxima are about 0.15% and sulphur maxima about 0.3%. These materials include the steels ordinarily considered as carbon steels (SAE 1010 to 1095), free cutting steels, plain carbon tool steels, including those that have up to several percent of silicon, and casting metals.
The inorganic mixed chromium oxide coating of the present invention is even further impoved if after the final high temperature drying it is subjected to a quench that rapidly reduces its temperature at least about 25 F. Any liquid appears to be suitable for this purpose, and plain or tap water is very eifective. The addition of 0.03 to 1.0% CrOa in the quenching water even further improves its effectiveness.
The mixed chromium oxide is also improved by including with these oxides a small amout of an oxide of a metal such as molybdenum that is in the same periodic group as chromium. Such supplemental oxide can be added to the chromic acid bath as water-soluble oxides, acids, or as water-soluble salts. It is preferred to add molybdenum as M003. The advantages of the supplemental oxides are felt when they make up as much as /3 the weight of the final coating, although it is preferred to use from 5 to 20%. The combined oxide coatings show particularly good adhesion to the steel with or Without a previous oxidation, as well as better adhesion to an organic top layer. Similarly reducible compounds of other metals such as titanium and vanadium can also be used. In general, it is desirable to diminish the proportion of reduced chromium oxide in the final coating, when a supplemental oxide is used, to not over approximately 75%.
The inclusion of 1 to 5% of insoluble or slightly soluble chromate of such divalent metals as zinc, calcium and strontium also improves the quality of the coating in a similar manner. This effect is obtained with or without the supplemental oxide.
The improvements contributed by the quenching as described above are also. produced with the coatings that have the supplemental oxides, or the slightly soluble chromates, or both.
The above coating techniques can be readily carried out either in a batch process or continuously. They may, for example, be added at the end of a standard sheet steel production line. In fact, the coating treatment of the present invention can be carried out with the steel moving at a relatively high speed through the necessary treating stations. Under some condition, particularly where the steel is moving very rapidly through a chromic acid bath, it is desirable to have a wetting agent present in the bath. This enables the bath liquid to more rapidly and uniformly wet the surface of the metal. Wetting agents of any type can be used so long as their wetting action is not completely destroyed by the oxidizing action of the bath. Anionic, cationic or non-ionic types of wetting agent used in amounts of about 0.001 to 0.1% by weight of the bath is efiective to keep from developing coating irregularities apparently due to air bubbles trapped on the metal while moving 6 through the .chromic acid bath. A highly effective example of wetting agent is the polyoxyethylene ether of alkylated phenols such as those produced by condensing dodecyl phenol with twelve molecules of ethylene oxide. Reference is also made to U. S. Patents 1,970,578 and 2,085,706 for more specifically disclosed wetting agents that are suitable..-
The oxide-coated steel of the present invention is further protected against corrosion by applying to the coating a film of an oil such as a parafiin or a glyceride oil. Thus mineral oil or palm oil can be applied in very minute quantities (0.5 milligram or more per square foot) as by conventional electrostatic coating techniques and enhances the corrosion resistance of the oxide coatings as well as reduces friction to simplify fabrication operations such as stamping, bending etc.
Under some conditions the nitric acid treatment of the steel does not produce the desired effect unless the steel is subjected to .a preliminary activation. Under these conditions the steel appears to be passive, and any chemical attack as by very dilute sulphuric acid or even mechanical working of the steel will suffice to activate it. The addition of /2 to 2% urea to the nitric acid bath tends to supress NO formation thereby reducing the tendency for iron to be oxidized to terri c form. The urea is consumed in the process and can therefore be replenished either on a continuous basis or by infrequent additions.
In commercial operations large quantities of dissolved iron will build up in the nitric bath with a consequent increase in specific gravity .of the bath. If the iron content becomes too high excessive drag-out results and in addition there is an increased tendency tor oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric iron. It is preferred to permit the iron content to build up to no more than about to grams per liter, although very effective coatings are obtained if these limits are exceeded. It is desirable to either continuously or intermittently remove and replace a portion of the bath. The removed portions of the bath are advisedly treated to recover the nitric acid and nitrite content. -One desirable procedure for doing this is by adding an excess of lime to the exh austed bath to precipitate out the iron as insoluble hydroxide, which is filtered off. The filtrate can then be acidified with sulphuric acid and boiled to'drive off the nitric acid which i distilled over and collected. If desired, the sulphuric acid acidification can be effected merely to the neutralization point and the precipitated calcium sulfate filtered off to leave a nitric acid solution that can be reused directly without distillation. The small amount of calcium sulfate that remains in the solution in the filtrate can be further minimized by conducting the filtration at high temperatures where the solubility of calcium sulfate is diminished.
As stated previously etching and oxidizing with HNOa can be effected with concentrations of HNO3 from 1 to 20% and temperatures from 60 to F. Not only is it desirable from a handling and economic standpoint to work with low concentrations of HNOa (less than 5% by weight) and low temperatures (less than 110 -F.) but extremely advantageous from an operational standpoint. The lower concentration and temperature provide somewhat more uniform results and greatly minimize the tendency for {oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric iron. It should be noted that this oxidation consumes excessive amounts of nitric acid and is accompanied by the generation of large quantities of noxious nitrogen oxide fumes.
Figs. 2 and 3 show other articles with which the in vention is very effective. The article of Fig. 2 is a stamped metal t-oy as manufactured in large quantities for childrens pl'aythings, from ordinary SAE 1010 steel. Articles made in this way are conventionally covered by a protective layer of paint to keep them from corroding when they are handled. Many articles of this type have the protective layer applied in various colors arranged to stimulate articles such as automobiles, airplanes, etc.
Since these articles are expendible and made as inexpensive as possible, the protective layer is generally applied to the steel before the blanking operation and as Well as any assembling where this is necessary. Any blanked out or cut edges of the stamping are therefore not coated and likely to orrode. In addition the protective layer sometimes comes off particularly where it is subjected to a severe mechanical deformation during the stamping or other manufacturing stage.
In accordance with the present invention, a chromium oxide coating as described above is applied to the steel as a base for the protective paint or other layer. As with the previous illustration, the material can be first filmed with adherent oxide if desired, and the chromium oxide coating can also be improved by the inclusion of supplemental oxide or any of the other described techniques. The use of the invention in this type of article reduces the tendency for corrosion to take place and therefore increases the inhesion of the external film of paint or the like.
Fig. 3 shows a Venetian blind slat made of steel and covered with the chromium oxide coating of the present invention, in 'any of its forms. Since these slatsare generally required to be of relatively springy nature, the steel from which they are made can be given an extra severe rolling operation or can have a higher carbon content. High carbon steels are usually more susceptible to corrosion than the low carbon steels, and coatings of the present invention are highly effective to prevent this corrosion. These coatings can be applied either-before or after the slat is blanked out inasmuch as the protection of any cut edges is not too significant. Paint or other protective layers are preferably applied over the coating and the final product, will not show corrosion for several years in normal use. Any cut edges not covered by the chromium oxide coating should be covered by paint.
Inasmuch as the chromium'oxide coatingsof the present invention show unusually high resistance to chemical attack, soldering to such coated metal is made somewhat difficult. Not only is it necessary to use special flux, but even then the removal of the coating to permit access of the solder is a relatively slow process. It is, therefore, preferable and certainly more rapid to make can seams by using a gasket, as indicated above. This gasket can be either pre-formed or can be applied as a coating of resin or the like in cured or uncured form,'for example. Where an uncured layer is used, aging or heating can be used to effect a partial or complete cure.
Fig. 5 shows a can similar to that of 'Fig. 1 but joined with a soldering operation as referred to above. The can is shown with its components identified by the same reference characters used in Fig. l where applicable. However, in the construction of Fig. -5 the strip of metal joining the body has its flanged ends joined by soldering as indicated at 14'. Soldered joints 'can also be used to seal the can ends if desired.
The can body of Fig. Scan be soldered together after being blanked to shape, by dipping the edges to be joined first in a flux and then in a bath of molten solder. This causes the flux to attackthe coating and permits the solder to wet the immersed metal over the area of the joint. The solder-carrying edges are then washed as with water to remove residual flux, and the resulting sheet fed to a canforming machine where the solder-carrying edges are joined to form interlocking flanges 16, 18, and these edges are crimped together and subjected to a heat treatment to liquefy the solder and hermetically seal the joint.
Suitable fluxes for the above purposes are 'mixturesof hydrochloric acid and ammonium chloride. Neither of these ingredient by themselves is suitable, but when mixed in certain proportionsthey will together provide the necessary fiuxing action. The more concentrated the hydrochloric acid the less ammonium chloride is needed. At extreme dilution-s the acid will, however, not be suitable regardless of the proportions of the ammonium chloride that is added.
Fig. 6 indicates the efiective range of flux formulations with tin-lead type solder. In this figure, curve 50 represents the range of hydrochloric acid concentrations with the minimum proportions of ammonium chloride that will be suitable. Thus, point 51 on this curve represents a hydrochloric acid concentration of 35%, that is a solution of 35 grams of dry hydrogen chloride in grams of water. At this concentration the acid requires the addition of 0.15% of ammonium chloride by weight. In other words, for each grams of the concentrated acid, 0.15 gram of ammonium chloride is added. The ammonium chloride dissolves in the hydrochloric acid so that the final mixture is a clear solution.
As indicated at point 52, when the hydrochloric acid concentration drops to 17.5% by weight the minimum ammonium chloride addition is 0.26%. Point 53 represents 7% hydrochloric acid, at which concentration 0.42% ammonium chloride is needed. As the acid concentration drops toward 3%, which appears to be the minimum that is effective, the ammonium chloride proportion increases sharply. At 4% hydrochloric acid (point 54) for example, 1.5% ammonium chloride is needed.
The above mixtures can also have their chloride content increased without aflecting the fluxing action to any appreciable degree. In Fig. 6 there is accordingly indicated a shaded area 60 which represents the above formulations with the excess ammonium chloride that can be added. For convenience, the excess ammonium chloride is desirable since it reduces the criticality of the flux formulation. Suflicient excess ammonium chloride can be added to make a solution saturated with respect to this ingredient. If desired, even more ammonium chloride can be present, in which case it should not be present in such amount as to keep the flux from losing itsfluid character. In view of the above, the upper limit of ammonium chloride formation has not been sharply defined in Fig. 6. For practical purposes it can be considered as that amount which will dissolve in the acid.
Although a 35% hydrochloric acid makes a suitable flux ingredient, as indicated above, it is usually desirable for commercial operations to use an acid that is no higher than about 25 to 30%. This reduces the amount of hydrogen chloride fumes that are evolved by the flux and makes it simpler to handle with less precautions needed to keep hydrogen chloride fumes from being spread around and attacking metal or other materials or personnel that might be near by. This is particularly important when the flux-containing metal isdipped into the fused solderbath, inasmuch as the temperature of this treatment is more likely to cause the liberation of hydrogen chloride fumes.
The soldering of the body can also be efiected after the joint is prepared by folding and interlocking the flanges 16, 18. The flux and hot solder is in this case applied to the joint area after the interlocking, and the washing off of excess flux can be accomplished immediately afterward or subsequent to the can sealing.
The coatings of the present invention can be applied to articles afterthey are formed as by shaping, stamping, or even casting. When treating such formed articles with ammonium the liquid coating solutions, however, care should be taken to see that the layer of solution on the article does not concentrate as by running or dripping to any portion of the article that should be protected. A localized thick layer of solution tends to form on the lower edges of the article under the influence of gravity, but a blast of air canbe used to redistribute the thick layer. Alternatively, the articles can be rotated or kept moving so as to keep a thickened film from forming at any location.
Although it is indicated above that coating weights of at least ten milligrams per square foot are required to As many apparently widely different embodiments of this invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope hereof, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments hereof except as defined in the appended claims.
What is claimed is:
1. A storage container having walls of plain carbon steel covered with an in situ formed adherent iron oxide surface film, the film being coated with an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight, about 40 to 95 of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent and the coating weighing about 10 to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers.
2. A plain carbon steel container having a corrosioninhibiting coating of an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight, about 40 to 95% of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent, and the coating weighing about 10 to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers.
3. The container of claim 2 in which the coating is covered with an organic protective layer.
4. The invention of claim 2 in which the coating also includes uniformly distributed through it about 5% of combined metal of the class consisting of zinc, calcium and strontium.
5. The invention of claim 2 in which the coating also includes uniformly distributed through it up to about onethird its weight of molybdenum oxide.
6. A plain carbon steel container having a corrosioninhibiting coating of an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight, about 40 to 95 of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent, the coating weighs about to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers and the surface of the steel under the coating being nitric acid etched.
7. Plain carbon steel having its surface coated with an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to chromium by weight, about 40 to of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent and the coating weighing about 10 to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers.
8. The invention of claim 7 in which the steel surface underneath the coating is nitric acid etched.
9. The invention of claim 8 in which the coating also includes uniformly distributed through it about 5% of combined metal of the class consisting of zinc, calcium and strontium.
10. The invention of claim 8 in which the coating also includes uniformly distributed through it up to about onethird its weight of molybdenum oxide.
11. The invention of claim 8 in which the coating is covered with a film of water-repellent material of the class consisting of hydrocarbon and glyceride oils.
12. Plain carbon steel having its surface covered with an in situ formed adherent protective iron oxide surface film, the film being coated with an in situ formed combination of hydrated chromium oxides containing about 20 to 60% chromium by weight, about 40 to 95% of the chromium by weight being trivalent, the remainder being hexavalent, and the coating weighing about 10 to 200 milligrams per square foot of surface that it covers References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,067,214 Tanner et al Jan. 12, 1937 2,160,195 Beno May 30, 1939 2,288,182 Curtin June 30, 1942 2,301,983 Tanner Nov. 17, 1942 2,303,242 Tanner et al. Nov. 24, 1942 2,314,565 Thompson Mar. 23, 1943 2,393,663 Thomas et a1 Jan. 29, 1946 2,393,665 Taylor Jan. 29, 1946 2,535,794 Hempel Dec. 23, 1950 FOREIGN PATENTS 597,754 Great Britain Feb. 23, 1948 OTHER REFERENCES Steel, page 87, issue of February 26, 1945. Abstract No. 37,498, vol. 652, O. G., page 891.

Claims (1)

12. PLAIN CARBON STEEL HAVING ITS SURFACE COVERED WITH AN IN SITU FORMED ADHERENT PROTECTIVE IRON OXIDE SURFACE FILM, THE FILM BEING COATED WITH AN IN SITU FORMED COMBINATION OF HYDRATED CHROMIUM OXIDES CONTAINING ABOUT 20 TO 60% CHROMIUM BY WEIGHT, ABOUT 40 TO 95% OF THE CHROMIUM BY WEIGHT BEING TRIVALENT, THE REMAINDER BEING HEXAVALENT, AND THE COATING WEIGHING ABOUT 10 TO 200 MILLIGRAMS PER SQUARE FOOT OF SURFACE THAT IT COVERS.
US433698A 1953-07-30 1954-06-01 Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making Expired - Lifetime US2773623A (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA581081A CA581081A (en) 1953-07-30 Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making
US433698A US2773623A (en) 1954-06-01 1954-06-01 Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making
FR1145660D FR1145660A (en) 1953-07-30 1954-07-19 Improvements to metal parts with a corrosion-resistant coating and to their manufacturing process
DEH21000A DE1176958B (en) 1953-07-30 1954-07-29 Process for applying protective coatings to metal objects
LU33622D LU33622A1 (en) 1953-07-30 1955-05-28 Steel objects, such as tanks and containers, protected by a coating.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US433698A US2773623A (en) 1954-06-01 1954-06-01 Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2773623A true US2773623A (en) 1956-12-11

Family

ID=23721208

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US433698A Expired - Lifetime US2773623A (en) 1953-07-30 1954-06-01 Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US2773623A (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2915420A (en) * 1956-06-27 1959-12-01 American Can Co Nitric acid treatment of steel
US2950839A (en) * 1958-11-17 1960-08-30 Lyon Inc Chromium plated baking pans
US3031333A (en) * 1956-06-20 1962-04-24 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making same
US3053702A (en) * 1959-05-19 1962-09-11 Gennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating
US3053693A (en) * 1958-05-29 1962-09-11 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating with hexavalent chromium compound
US3063877A (en) * 1960-10-10 1962-11-13 Amchem Prod Method and solutions for treating metal surfaces
US3097978A (en) * 1961-08-17 1963-07-16 Isaac L Newell Method of coating zinc surfaces
US3112231A (en) * 1957-06-20 1963-11-26 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Protective coating
US3132975A (en) * 1959-06-04 1964-05-12 Framalite Soc Process for pickling and passivating enclosed structures
US3210220A (en) * 1962-07-30 1965-10-05 Norman E Clegg Process for coating stainless steel
US3282744A (en) * 1963-05-08 1966-11-01 Lubrizol Corp Chromate conversion coating
US3318716A (en) * 1962-09-11 1967-05-09 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Foam reduction and coating
US3404044A (en) * 1965-03-09 1968-10-01 Hooker Chemical Corp Method for forming improved coating on metal
US3765955A (en) * 1970-07-30 1973-10-16 Nippon Steel Corp Surface treated steel sheet for use in a forming operation
US3849206A (en) * 1973-01-02 1974-11-19 Combustion Eng Densification of hard chrome plated surfaces
US20160109140A1 (en) * 2013-05-29 2016-04-21 Linda BRANNIGAN Central heating system

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2067214A (en) * 1933-06-24 1937-01-12 Patents Corp Method of coating metal
US2160195A (en) * 1935-02-18 1939-05-30 Continental Can Co Process and flux for solder bonding on coated metal surfaces
US2288182A (en) * 1939-04-06 1942-06-30 Curtin Howe Corp Container manufacture
US2301983A (en) * 1940-07-16 1942-11-17 Parker Rust Proof Co Coated ferrous article and method of making
US2303242A (en) * 1938-11-19 1942-11-24 Parker Rust Proof Co Metal coating
US2314565A (en) * 1940-05-29 1943-03-23 Parker Rust Proof Co Coated ferrous article and method of making the same
US2393665A (en) * 1944-03-27 1946-01-29 Rheem Res Products Inc Corrosion resistant metal
US2393663A (en) * 1943-03-22 1946-01-29 Rheem Res Products Inc Coating for cadmium and zinc
GB597754A (en) * 1945-08-24 1948-02-03 Alfred Edward Pugh Process for treating ferrous sheets and other ferrous articles
US2535794A (en) * 1947-01-24 1950-12-26 Heresite & Chemical Company Method of preparing ferrous metal objects for the application of synthetic resins

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2067214A (en) * 1933-06-24 1937-01-12 Patents Corp Method of coating metal
US2160195A (en) * 1935-02-18 1939-05-30 Continental Can Co Process and flux for solder bonding on coated metal surfaces
US2303242A (en) * 1938-11-19 1942-11-24 Parker Rust Proof Co Metal coating
US2288182A (en) * 1939-04-06 1942-06-30 Curtin Howe Corp Container manufacture
US2314565A (en) * 1940-05-29 1943-03-23 Parker Rust Proof Co Coated ferrous article and method of making the same
US2301983A (en) * 1940-07-16 1942-11-17 Parker Rust Proof Co Coated ferrous article and method of making
US2393663A (en) * 1943-03-22 1946-01-29 Rheem Res Products Inc Coating for cadmium and zinc
US2393665A (en) * 1944-03-27 1946-01-29 Rheem Res Products Inc Corrosion resistant metal
GB597754A (en) * 1945-08-24 1948-02-03 Alfred Edward Pugh Process for treating ferrous sheets and other ferrous articles
US2535794A (en) * 1947-01-24 1950-12-26 Heresite & Chemical Company Method of preparing ferrous metal objects for the application of synthetic resins

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3031333A (en) * 1956-06-20 1962-04-24 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making same
US2915420A (en) * 1956-06-27 1959-12-01 American Can Co Nitric acid treatment of steel
US3112231A (en) * 1957-06-20 1963-11-26 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Protective coating
US3053693A (en) * 1958-05-29 1962-09-11 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating with hexavalent chromium compound
US2950839A (en) * 1958-11-17 1960-08-30 Lyon Inc Chromium plated baking pans
US3053702A (en) * 1959-05-19 1962-09-11 Gennsalt Chemicals Corp Metal coating
US3132975A (en) * 1959-06-04 1964-05-12 Framalite Soc Process for pickling and passivating enclosed structures
US3063877A (en) * 1960-10-10 1962-11-13 Amchem Prod Method and solutions for treating metal surfaces
US3097978A (en) * 1961-08-17 1963-07-16 Isaac L Newell Method of coating zinc surfaces
US3210220A (en) * 1962-07-30 1965-10-05 Norman E Clegg Process for coating stainless steel
US3318716A (en) * 1962-09-11 1967-05-09 Pennsalt Chemicals Corp Foam reduction and coating
US3282744A (en) * 1963-05-08 1966-11-01 Lubrizol Corp Chromate conversion coating
US3404044A (en) * 1965-03-09 1968-10-01 Hooker Chemical Corp Method for forming improved coating on metal
US3765955A (en) * 1970-07-30 1973-10-16 Nippon Steel Corp Surface treated steel sheet for use in a forming operation
US3849206A (en) * 1973-01-02 1974-11-19 Combustion Eng Densification of hard chrome plated surfaces
US20160109140A1 (en) * 2013-05-29 2016-04-21 Linda BRANNIGAN Central heating system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2773623A (en) Corrosion resistant coated steel members and method of making
US3964936A (en) Coating solution for metal surfaces
AU684929B2 (en) Composition and process for treating the surface of aluminiferous metals
US5407749A (en) Iridescent chromium coatings and method
US4278477A (en) Metal treatment
US2418608A (en) Corrosion-resistant metallic article and method of making the same
US2777785A (en) Composition for and method of treating metals as well as the treated product
US3066055A (en) Process and composition for producing aluminum surface conversion coatings
US3810792A (en) Process for the application of phosphate coatings on steel,iron and zinc surfaces
US4496404A (en) Composition and process for treatment of ferrous substrates
US2301983A (en) Coated ferrous article and method of making
GB2072225A (en) Process and composition for coating metal surfaces
US2318656A (en) Coated metal article and method of making same
US5358623A (en) Corrosion resistant anodized aluminum
US3081238A (en) Electrolytic treatment of metal surfaces
US4617068A (en) Composition and process for treatment of ferrous substrates
US3338755A (en) Production of phosphate coatings on metals
US6200693B1 (en) Water-based liquid treatment for aluminum and its alloys
US3333988A (en) Phosphate coating process
US3404044A (en) Method for forming improved coating on metal
US2431728A (en) Treatment of ferrous metals to improve resistance to rusting
KR100311062B1 (en) Manufacturing method of zinc-containing metal plated steel sheet with excellent black resistance and whiteness
US3450577A (en) Composition and process for cleaning and coating metal surfaces
US4708744A (en) Process for phosphating metal surfaces and especially iron surfaces
US3052575A (en) Method of inhibiting corrosion