US3193012A

US3193012A - Method of cutting a notch in an underground formation penetrated by a well

Info

Publication number: US3193012A
Application number: US113432A
Authority: US
Inventors: Jimmie L Huitt; Joseph L Pekarek
Original assignee: Gulf Research and Development Co
Current assignee: Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority date: 1961-05-29
Filing date: 1961-05-29
Publication date: 1965-07-06
Anticipated expiration: 1982-07-06

Description

'QIOSS REFERENCE Jllly, 1965 J. L. Hum' `E'rAl. 3,193,012 v METHOD 0F CUTTING A NOTCH IN AN UNDERGROUND FORMATION PENETRATED `BY A WELL 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 Filed May 29. 1961 July, 1965 J. L. Hum Em. 3,193,012

METHOD OF CUTTING A NOTCH IN AN UNDERGROUND FORMATION PENETRATED BY A WELL 2. Sheets-Sheet z Filed May 29. 1961 lll United States Patent O 3 193.012 METHOD OF CUTTING NOTCH IN AN UNDER- (,VIEND FORMATION PENETRATED BY A Jimmie L. Huitt, Glenshaw, and Joseph L. Pekarek, Penn This invention relates to the fracturing of subsurface `formations penetrated by a well, and more particularly to a method of cutting a notch in such formations for the initiation of a fracture.

It has become common practice to create fractures extending from the borehole of a well into a subsurface formation to increase the productive capacity of the well regardless of whether the well is used in the primary production of fluids from the subsurface formation or is an injection or production well used in a secondary recovery process. The fractures are created by pumping a liquid down the well and. applying a pressure, usually called the breakdown pressure, adequate to overcome the tensile strength of the subsurface .formation and the weight of the overburden.

It is important,.if the maximum improvement in the capacity of the well is to be obtained by fracturing. that the fracture be properly located and oriented. In the DismukesPatent No. 2,699,212 a process is described for the accurate location and orientation of the fracture. In that process, a notch is cut in the borehole wall to create a plane of weakness and increase the surface subjected to the pressure applied to the fracturing fluid to cause the fracture to form as an extension of the notch. The notch also lowers the breakdown pressure required to fracture the formation.

It is advantageous to fracture wells that have been 3,193,012 vPatented July 6, 1965 ICC This invention relates to a method of hydraulically cutting'a notch in a formation penetrated by a cased well for the initiation of a fracture in which an opening of substantial width is cut through the casing, and thereafter a hydraulic cutting fluid is discharged from a nozzle through the openingy in the casing to cut the desired notch in the subsurface formation. The Width of the opening cut in the casing is at least four times the diameter of the nozzle.

cased through the zone tobe fractured. The pressure of the fracturing duid is then applied to the formation only at an opening that has been cut in the casing at the desired location; hence, accurate control of the location of the point of initiation of the fracture is assured. Notches cut in the subsurface formationto be fractured are advantageous in fracturing a formation from a well in which casing has been set because of the reduced pressure that is necessary to create the desired fracture. Frequently,

the breakdown pressure exceeds the pressure that may be applied to the casing if a notch has not lbeen cut in the borehole Wall. It is then necessary to set a packer in the casing isolating the opening through which the fracture is to be made from the remainder of the casing and run tubing through the packer for delivery of the fracturing uid into the isolated portion of the casing.`

One of the methods that has been widely used for cutting a notch in a subsurface formation for initiation of a fracture employs a fluid which is directed at a high velocity rfrom a nozzle against the borehole wall. The uid may be a liquid, which may be a corrosive liquid such as an acid, or a suspension of abrasive particles in a liquid or gas. This method, usually referred to as hydra-ulic cutting, is faster 'than the cutting of a notch with a mechanically operated tool. Moreover, the hydraulic cutting of the desired notch does not require a rotary rig, as do mechanical tools adapted to cut a horizontal notch, thereby allowing a substantial saving in the cost of the undercutting operation. However, in some instances the marked reduction in breakdown pressure land accurate location of the fracture that is obtained when a notch is cut by hydraulic means in an open hole have not been realized when an abrasive slurry is used to cut the desired notch in a cased well.

In the drawings:

FIGURE l is a diagrammatic illustration, partially in vertical section, of apparatus for use in the process of this invention in which a mechanical tool is used to cut an opening in the casing;

FIGURE 2 is a vertical sectional view of the cutting tool and nozzle used in the embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIGURE l; l

FIGURE 3 is a vertical sectional view along the `section line 3-3 in FIGURE 2 of the apparatus for cutting the opening in the casing;

FIGURE 4 is a sectional view of a preferred embodiment of this invention in which the opening of substantial Width in the casing is cut hydraulically; and

FIGURE 5 shows a comparison of the configuration 0f a notch cut in the subsurface formation by the process of this invention with notches cut when the same nozzles used to cut the notch in the formation are used to cut the opening in the casing. l

We have discovered that the removal of a section of the casing substantially larger than the diameter of the stream discharged from the nozzle used to cut the notch in the formation prior to cutting the notch in the formation allows the creation of a notch extending a greater distance radially from the casing into the formation. The nozzles ordinarily used for the cutting of casing or the cutting of notches in subsurface formations by hydraulic means have a diameter not exceeding 1/4 inch. A preferred nozzle has an opening with a diameter of f/w'inch. In the process of this invention` the opening cut in the casing has a width at least four times the-diameter of the opening in the nozzle used to cut the notch in the formation. The maximum width of the opening in the casing is governed by considerations other than those important to this invention. Ordinarily, there is no improvement in the depth or shape of the notch cut in the formation if the opening in the casing is more than about ten times the diameter of the nozzle used to cut the notch in the formation. The removal of a section of the casing greater than approximately ten times the diameter of the nozzle used to cut the notch in the formation may be objectionable because of the exposure of a larger areavof the formation with a resultant diminishing accuracy of location of the fracture.

Although the reason for the increased depth of cut into the formation made possible by the process of this invention is not known with certainty, it is believed that when the opening in the casing is the result only of discharging a stream of cutting uid from the nozzle used to cut the notch in the formation, the opening in the casing does not have sufficient area to allow cutting fluid to ow back into the borehole of the well after striking the outer portion of the cut without interfering with the ow of cutting uid outwardly from. the nozzle.. Apparently, the backflow of hydraulic fluid from the outer portion of the notch cut into the borehole of the well is not at a high enough velocity to cut the casing and increase the opening in the casing to a width which will eliminate the interference with the outwardly owing stream discharged from the nozzle.

A series of tests was run to determine the effect of increasing the width of the opening in the casing through which a high velocity stream of water and sand is directed lb./ft. casing which. was etxended down into theftarget to a depth about 4 inches from the bottom of the target and welded in place at the opening. The lowerl end of the l/z-inch O.D. casing was closed with a 5-inch extra strong seamless steel welding cap. Two openings were cut in the end of the target near the opening for the 51/2-inch O.D. casing to receive l inch couplings. The annular space between the 51A-inch casing and the 20- inch casing was filled with a lb./gal. neat Portland cement. The cement was set under 700 p.s.i. pressure for a period of at least 14 days. An opening outside of the target in the 5l/2-inch casing was fitted with a 2-inch coupling to which suitable valves were connected for control of the back pressure during the cutting of the notch inthe casing in the cement surrounding the casing.

A Z-inch pipe having a hydraulic nozzle head mounted at its lower end to direct `an abrasive slurry laterally against the 51/2-inch O.D. casing was extended down through the 51/z-inch O.D. casing. Suitable connections were provided for supplying the hydraulic slurry under pressure into the 2-inch pipe, to allow rotation of the 2f inch pipe within the 5l/z-inch O.D. casing, and to control the ow from the 5*/2 inch O.D. casing whereby the desired pressure could be maintained in the annulus between the 2inch pipe and the 51/2-inch O D. casing. An abrasive slurry of water containing sand in a concentration of 11/2 lb./ gal. was pumped down through the A2- inch pipe and discharged from the nozzle against the 5/z'inch O.D. casing while a back pressure of 700 p.s.i. was maintained inside the 51/2 inch O.D. casing. The 2 -inch pipe was rotated at a rate of 6 r.p.m. The cutting action was discontinued periodically and the depth of the notch eut in the formation measured.

Several differentA nozzle headswere used to. cut the opening in the casing and the notch in the cement surrounding the 51/2-inch O.D. casing. In Tests No. I, 2, and 3 all of the nozzles were in the same horizontal plane and the same nozzles were used for cutting the opening in the casing and the notch. In Test No. 4 the nozzle head used for cutting the opening in the casing had three nozzles arranged in a spiral around the nozzle head. In Test No. 5 the nozzle head had four nozzles arranged in a spiral similar to the lower nozzle body illustrated in FIGURE 4. Nozzle heads with the individual nozzles arranged in the same horizontal plane were used in every test to cut the notch in the cement. The results of the tests are set forth in Table I.

Table I Width of No. of Depth of Notch Beyond Casing After Test Casing Nozzles Cutting for No. Opening, r

in. Cutting Notch 'i min. 12 min. 15min. 17min. 20 min.

l/ 5; 4 .1/5 3 1*/ 3 t lig 4 (i, 1 t

It will be noted from Test No. 1 in which a section 1/2 linch wide was removed from the easing by means of the nozzles used to cut the notch in the target that the maximum diameter of the notch was 14 inches after a -minute cutting period. Because there was no increase in the notch diameter after a ZO-minute cutting period over the' notch diameter after a l5-minute cutting period, the maximum notch diameter apparently had been obtained. By increasing the width of the section removed from the 51A-inch casing to 11/s inch, the maximum diameter of the notch was increased to 17 inches in a 17- minute cutting period. Moreover, the diameter of the notch was increased 2 inches by increasing the cutting period from l2 to 17 minutes. Hence, a further increase in the notch diameter muy have been obtained if a longer cutting period had been used.

An even greater increase in the diameter of the notch was obtained with a cutting tool having four nozzles, as is shown by comparison of -Tests Nos. 2 and 5. In Run No. 5 in which the width of the section removed from the casing was 11/2 inches, a maximum notch diameter of 19 inches was obtained. That notch diameter was equal to the inside diameter ofthe 20-inch casing used in construction of the target. Moreover, there was an approximately 3inch increase in diameter during the last 5 minutes of the cutting period. The areaof the formation exposed by the notch in Test No. 5 was approximately twice the area of the formation exposed by the 14-inch notch of Test No. 2.

Referring to FIGURE 5 in which the configuration of the notch 1 cut during Test No. 2 is compared with that ot the notch 2 cut in Test No. 5, it will be noticed that the increased length of the notch is obtained with substantially no change in width. The longer, narrower shape of the notch obtained in Test No. 5 provides a greater concentration of forces at the apex of the notch and more accurately fixes the plane of the fracture. Moreover, notches formed through narrower openings in the casing tend to approach the wall of the casing at an acute angle, as a result of which upon application of pressure during the fracturing operation, substantial forces tending to separate the formation from the casing are created. The notches Aformed through wide openings in the casing approach the outer surface of the casing at an obtuse angle which minimizes forcestending to separate the casing from the formation during the subsequent fracturing.A The'notches formed actually are more irregular than indicated in FIGURE 5 which indicates an average of the shape of cross sections taken along different radii, and permits a more accurate comparison of the two notches. n

One embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIGURES 1 to 4 for the mechanical removal of a section of the casing to form the desired wide opening. Referring to FIGURE 1, a well indicated generally by reference numeral 10 is illustrated with a borehole extending through the pay zone 12. Casing 14 is set completely through the pay zone. The well is illustrated with its lupper end closed at the surface by a' casing head 16 on whicha blowout preventer 18 is mounted. A T 20 on the upper end 'of the blowout preventer 18 has a lateral outlet for connection to a line 22 for discharge of a circulating uid.

Within the casing near the lower portion of the pay zone 12 is the tool, indicated generally by reference numeral 24, for cutting the opening in the casing and the notch in the pay zone 12. The tool 24 is connected at its upper end to'drill pipe 26 connected to the lower end of a kelly 28 which is illustrated extending upwardly from the T 20 through a rotary table 30 mounted on a rotary rig 32.

Referring to FIGURE 2, tool 24, which is illustrated in vertical section, is made up of a tubular housing 34 connected at its upper end to a hydraulic nozzle head 36 which is suitably threaded at its upper end for connection to the lower end of the drill pipe 26. Housing 34 has a central passage 38 extending through it in which a piston 40 is adapted to slide. Piston 40 is urged upwardly by a helical spring 42 which engages the lower surface of the piston 40 and a shoulder 44 extending from the inner surface of passage 38. Extending downwardly from piston 40 are spaced connecting rods 46 between which an arbor 48 extends. A pair of pivot arms 50 adapted to rotate on the arbor 48 are connected by means of pivot pins 54 to a pair of cutters 56 which are rotatably mounted on an axle 58 extending between opposite faces of the housing 34. One of the pivot arms 50 is connected to the cutter 56 on one side and the other pivot arm 50 to the cutter 56 on the opposite side of the center line betweenarbor 48 and axle 58 to cause the cutting elements to move in opposite directions as the piston 40 is forced downwardly. A tubular neck 60 in the piston 40 has an orifice insert 62 which permits a limited liow through the piston 40.

Hydraulic nozzle head 36 has a central passage 64 extending lengthwise through it in which a sleeve `66 is slidably mounted. During the period when a section is cut from the casing, Sleeve 66 is held in the upper position illustrated in FIGURE 2 by a shear pin 68. A plurality of nozzle ports 7,0 adapted to receive nozzle inserts 72 are provided in the wall of the hydraulic nozzle head 36 for the discharge of a cutting uid during the cutting'of a notch in the formation. Openings 74 in the wall of sleeve 66 are located for alignment with the nozzle port 70 upon shearing of shear pin 68 and movement of the sleeve 66 to its lower position. y

In the operation of theapparatus illustrated in FIG- URES 1 through 3, the tool 24 is suspended with the cutters 56 at the desired elevation by means of drill pipe 26. A circulating liquid is pumped down through the kelly 28 and the drill pipe Z6 and through the hydraulic nozzle head 36 into the housing 34 while the tool is rotated by means of the kelly 28 on rotary table 30. The pressure drop through orifice 62 causes downward movement of the piston 40 which in turn causes the cutters 56 to rotate to an extended position at which they engage the casing. The cutters 56 are shaped to cut an opening of the desired width in the casing. Rotation of the tool 24 and circulation of the circulating liquid is continued until the piston 40 descends to a level below relief ports 76 at which position the cutters 56 are fully extended and the desired opening has been cut completely through the casing 14. The pressure on the circulating liquid drops to indicate when the casing cutting operation is completed. Thereafter, the flow of the circulating liquid is stopped and the spring 42 returns the piston 40 to the position illustrated in FIGURE 2 of the drawings.

The tool is then lowered on the drill pipe 26 a distance adapted to bring the orifice ports 70 in alignment with the opening cut in the casing by the cutters S6. A ball 78 is dropped down the drill pipe to come to rest on a valve seat 80 at the bottom of sleeve 66. Liquid is then pumped into the upper end of the drill pipe under pressure sufficient to shear shear pin 68 and cause sleeve 66 to move downwardly and bring openings 74 into alignment with the nozzle ports 70. A hydraulic cutting fluid such as an abrasive slurry of sand suspended in water is pumped down the drill pipe 26 and through the nozzle 72 for a period adequate to cut the desired notch.

A preferred tool for use in this invention in which both the opening in the casing and the notch are cut hydraulically is illustrated in FIGURE 4. Referring to that figure, the tool, indicated generally by reference numeral 82, illustrated suspended on the lower end of a string of tubing 84, consists in an upper nozzle body 86 having a plurality of nozzle ports 88 positioned in a single horizontal plane. Nozzle inserts 90 of a suitable hard metal such as tungsten carbide are mounted in the ports 88 by any suitable means such as the screw threads illustrated in FIGURE 4.v Fitting slidably within the upper body 86 is a sleeve 92 having an upper section of large diameter connected to a lower section of smaller diameter by a sloping surface 96 which serves as a valve seat. Above the level of surface 96 are openings 98 extending through the wall of sleeve 92 in position for alignment with the nozzle ports 88. `The sleeve 92 is held in the upperl position illustrated in FIG- URE 4 with the openings 98 out of alignment with the nozzle ports 88 by a shear pin l100 during the period the opening is cut in the casing.

tion without intervening strips of metal.

Connected to the lower end of sleeve 92 is a lower nozzle body 102 having nozzle ports 104 extending through it. The number and location of the nozzle `ports 104 is designed to cause the stream discharged from the nozzle to overlap and thereby remove a continuous sec- The number of nozzle ports 104 will be determined Aby the width of opening that is desired in the casing. In the apparatus illustrated in FIGURE 4, the lower nozzle body 102 is provided with four nozzle ports 104 pointing in directions separated by from one another. A nozzle insert 106 of suitable hard material is mounted in each of the nozzle ports 104. The size of the central opening 108 in the lower body 102 is decreased at the lower end of the lower body to provide a valve seat 110.

In the operation of the apparatus illustrated in FIG- URE 4, the hydraulic tool 82 is run into'the well on tubing 84 to the desired depth. A ball 112 of proper size to engage the va-lve seat 110 and close the lower end of the tool 82 is dropped down the tubing. Thereafter, an abrasive slurry is pumped down the tubing and discharged from the nozzles 104 while the tubing is rotated. Rotation of the lower nozzle body 102 with the tubing 84 is accomplished by means of a spline 114 in the lower end of upper nozzle body 86 which is engaged by a key 116 extending from the outer surface of the sleeve 92. The rotation 'of the tool and the pumping of the cutting fluids through the nozzles of the lower nozzle body is continuedfor a period adequate to cut an opening in the casing. The tool 82 is then lowered a distance adequate to bring the nozzle ports 88 into alignment with the center of the opening cut in the casing wall. A -ball 118 is then dropped down the tubing to engage surface 96 to close the lower end of sleeve 92. Liquid pressure is applied to break the shear pin 100 and move the sleeve 92 to a lower position at which passages 98 are 'in alignment with the nozzle ports 88. Downward movement of the sleeve 92 is limited by a retaining ring 120 at the lower end of the upper nozzle body. The tool is then rotated as before while a cutting uid is pumped down the tubing and through the nozzles 90 to cut the desired notch in the subsurface formation.

This invention has been described for processes and apparatus adapted to cut a continuous ring from the casing and a continuous horizontal notch in the surrounding formation. The invention can also be used for cutting other types of holes in the formation for facilitating fracturing. For example, it may be desirable to make a series of holes, instead of a slot, in the formation hydraulically by not rotating the nozzle during the cutting operation. The advantages of this invention can then be realized by cutting a hole in the casing having a substantially larger diameter than the diameter of the nozzle used to cut the hole in the formation.

We claim: l

1. A method of hydraulically cutting a notch in a subsurface formation penetrated by a well having casing set therein by means of a high velocity stream of a cutting iiuid discharged from a nozzle for initiation of a fracture in the subsurface formation, comprising cutting a circumferential opening in the casing wall having a width at least four times the diameter of the nozzle at the desired depth to expose the subsurface formation, thereafter centering a nozzle opposite the circumferential opening and directing a high velocity stream of a cutting fluid from the nozzle through the circumferential opening in the casing wall to cut a notch in the lformation, and `rotating the nozzle about a vertical axis and in a horizontal plane adapted to direct the high velocity stream through the circumferential opening while discharging the high velocity stream of a cutting fluid from the nozzle.

2. A method of hydraulically cutting a notch by means of a high velocity stream of a cutting uid discharged from a nozzle in a subsurface formation for the initiation of a fracture in the formation, said formation being penetrated by a well casing set therein, comprising running a mechanical milling tool into the casing to the desired depth, rotating said milling tool about a vertical axis to cut a circumferential opening in the casing with said mechanical tool, said opening having a width at least yfour times -the diameter of the nozzle, thereafter centering the nozzle having a diameter less than one-fourth the width of the opening opposite the opening in the casing, pumping a hydraulic cutting Huid down the well and discharging said hydraulic cutting fluid through the nozzle at high velocity through the opening in the casing, and rotating the nozzle about a vertical axis and in a horizontal plane to cut the notch in the formation.

3. A method of hydraulically cutting a notch for the initiation of a fracture in a subsurface formation penetrated by a well having casing set therein comprising directing a high velocity stream of cutting fluid against the inner surface of the casing wall, rotating said high velocitystream about a vertical axis to cut a circumferential opening th-rough the casing wall, directing a second high velocity stream of cutting fluid against the casing wall at a location overlapping but vertically displaced from the circumferential opening and rotating said stream about a vertical axis to enlarge the circumferential opening in the casing wall, thereafter centering a nozzle having a diameter less than one-fourth the width of the circumferential opening opposite said circumferential opening, directing a high velocity stream of cutting fluid from the nozzle radially outward through the circumferential opening in the casing to cut a notch in the formation, and rotating the nozzle about a vertical axis and in a horizontal plane whereby the notch cut in the formation extends continuously around the casing.

4. Ak method of hydraulically cutting a notch in a subsurface formation for the initiation of a fracture in the formation, said formation being penetrated by a well having casing set into the formation comprising simultaneously directing a plurality of high velocity streams of cutting fluid against the casing wall at positions overlapping but vertically displaced from one another, rotating said high velocity streams around a vertical axis to cut a circumferential opening through the casing, thereafter centering a nozzle having a diameter less than one-fourth the widthv of the circumferential opening opposite said opening, discharging a high velocity stream of cutting uid from said nozzle, and rotating said nozzle about a vertical axis and in a horizontal plane while discharging the high velocity stream from the nozzle to cut a notch in the formation.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,315,496 4/43 Boynton 166-222 2,624,409 1/53 ONeill 166-55 2,690,218 9/54 Robishaw 166-35 2,884,066 4/59 Teplitz et al 166-55 2,891,620 6/59 Bielstein -166-35 BENJAMIN HERSH, Primary Examiner.

BENJAMIN BENDETT, Examiner.

Attest:

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE 0F CORRECTION Patent Nm 3,193,012 July 6, 1965 Jimmie Lc Huitt et :ilo

ears in the above numbered pat- It is hereby certified that error app atent should read as ent requiring correction and that Jche said Letters P corrected below.

Column 6, line 75, after "well" insert M having M Signed and sealed this 4th day of January 1966,

(SEAL) EDWARD I BRENNER ERNEST W. SWIDER Commissionerv of Patents Attesting Officer

Claims

1. A METHOD OF HYDRAULICALLY CUTTING A NOTCH IN A SUBSURFACE FORMATION PENETRATED BY A WELL HAVING CASING SET THEREIN BY MEANS OF A HIGH VELOCITY STREAM OF A CUTTING FLUID DISCHARGED FROM A NOZZLE FOR INTIATION OF A FRACTURE IN THE SUBSURFACE FORMATION, COMPRISING CUTTING A CIRCUMFERENTIAL OPENING IN THE CASING WALL HAVING A WIDTH AT LEAST FOUR TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE NOZZLE AT THE DESIRED DEPTH TO EXPOSE THE SUBSURFACE FORMATION, THEREAFTER CENTERING A NOZZLE OPPOSITE THE CIRCUMFERENTIAL OPENING AND DIRECTING A HIGH VELOCITY STREAM OF A CUTTING FLUID FROM THE NOZZLE THROUGH THE CIRCUMFERENTIAL OPENING IN THE CASING WALL TO CUT A NOTCH IN THE FORMATION, AND ROTATING THE NOZZLE ABOUT A VERTICAL AXIS AND IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE ADAPTED TO DIRECT THE HIGH VELOCITY STREAM THROUGH THE CIRCUMFERENTIAL OPENING WHILE DISCHARGING THE HIGH VELOCITY STREAM OF A CUTTING FLUID FROM THE NOZZLE.