|Número de publicación||US3589859 A|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Fecha de publicación||29 Jun 1971|
|Fecha de presentación||9 Oct 1967|
|Fecha de prioridad||9 Oct 1967|
|También publicado como||DE1936990A1|
|Número de publicación||US 3589859 A, US 3589859A, US-A-3589859, US3589859 A, US3589859A|
|Inventores||Foroulis Zisis Andrew|
|Cesionario original||Exxon Research Engineering Co|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citada por (49), Clasificaciones (14)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
United States Patent O Int. Cl. C23f 11/04 US. Cl. 21--2.7 9 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE The addition of small amounts of gluconate salts to cooling water systems effectively inhibits oxidative corrosion in such systems. Further, combinations of gluconate salts with other corrosion inhibitors such as benzoate salts and salicylate salts result in synergistic improvement of such inhibition.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Water is utilized as the heat exchange medium of choice in the chemical and petroleum process industries. It is also used for the same purpose in air cooling systems in homes, factories, public buildings (such as theaters, halls, etc.). Thus, each day huge volumes of water are being circulated through tremendous numbers of such systems. This obviously represents a large dollar value in capital investment and operating expense.
Heat picked up by the water in most systems is passed on to the atmosphere by passing air through the heated water in cooling towers or equivalent types of equipment. However, during the course of such contact with the air, a substantial amount of air dissolves in the cooling water and is circulated throughout the cooling system. The oxygen dissolved in the water-diffuses to the water-metal interface and will produce corrosion in the heat exchangers and on the metal pipes and vessels in the cooling system. Steel, Admiralty metal, copper and in particular carbon steels, are the most commonly used materials in such systems and unfortunately such materials are particularly prone to oxidative attack.
The prior art has recognized this problem and has attempted to inhibit this oxidative corrosion in water cooling systems by introducing various inorganic substances which produce thin metal oxide films on the metal surfaces of the cooling systems so as to retard or hopefully prevent the diffusion of oxygen to the metal surfaces. Substances which have achieved wide acceptance in the art for this purpose include the chromate and phosphate salts and mixtures thereof.
Unfortunately, these substances do have two very serious drawbacks when used as corrosion inhibitors. In the first place under certain conditions chromate, as well as phosphate corrosion inhibitors, can give rise to accelerated corrosion. For example, chromates can promote pitting when introduced in low concentrations. This pitting attack may be quite serious and may result in perforation particularly in areas of breaks or discontinuities in the film produced by the chromate inhibitor. Since setting up virtually perfect thin film in large scale equipment with high flow conditions is tricky to say the least, it is safe to say that efiective inhibition will be most unpredictable from unit to unit and even from day to day in the same unit. In the case of polyphosphates it is well known that these substances are very corrosive when present in concentrated solutions, and that they suffer from reversion to orthophosphates with the resulting formation of sludge or scale which can promote serious corrosion.
A further and most serious drawback in the use of metal oxide inhibitors arises from the fact that such "ice substances are pollutants. Chromates, for example, have toxic properties and their presence in streams and rivers is coming under ever stricter control in new anti-pollution laws. Thus, in order to be able to circulate used cooling water with an environmental sewage system, it would be necessary for the cooling system operator employing such inorganic metal oxide salts to install adequate purification equipment to remove such substances prior to water disposal. This procedure adds substantially to plant investment and operating costs.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION It is the object of the present invention to provide a substance which will effectively inhibit oxidative corrosion in cooling water systems at low concentrations. It is a further object of this invention to provide a corrosion inhibitor which is non-toxic and will not pose a pollution problem if it were purged to environmental water systems with used cooling water.
It has now been found that very small amounts of an inorganic gluconate salt will be effective as an oxidative corrosion inhibitor in cooling water systems. These gluconate salts are non-toxic in the concentrations utilized and pose no pollution problems if vented to the environmental waste water systems.
It has further been found that such gluconate salts surprisingly exhibit a higher degree of inhibition efliciency at temperatures above ambient temperature. For example, increasing the temperature from about 77 F. to about 120 F. can result in an increase of about 5% in inhibitor efiiciency which will more than compensate for any increase in the rate of corrosion due to the temperature rise. Thus, one Will observe a lower absolute corrosion rate at the higher temperature than for the lower temperature when using a gluconate salt inhibitor, although the corrosion rate on an uninhibited sample blank will nearly double for the same rise in temperature. Obviously, this temperature eifect will be most useful in Water cooling systems where temperatures of about 120 F. are not uncommon.
As still another embodiment of the present invention, it has been discovered that gluconate salts will interact synergistically with other corrosion inhibitors such as for example the salts of organic acids, particularly the salts of an aromatic acid to yield a mixture which is more effective than either of its components alone. Specifically, a mixture of a gluconate salt and a benzoate salt or a mixture of a gluconate salt and a salicylate salt will yield an extremely effective composition for inhibiting oxidative corrosion in water cooling systems.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The gluconate salts of preference for use in inhibiting corrosion in the practice of the present invention include the alkali metal and the ammonium salts. In particular, lithium gluconate, sodium gluconate, potassium gluconate and ammonium gluconate are eminently suitable for use herein. The most preferred salt is sodium gluconate. This material is an article of commerce and is readily available at relatively low cost.
Generally, the gluconate salts will be used in a concentration in the range between about 1 to 4000 p.p.m., more preferably in the range between about to 2000 ppm. The inhibitor may be added as a solid to the cooling water system in an amount sufficient to yield the desired concentration. It is also possible to add the gluconate salt as a concentrated aqueous solution also in the desired amount to yield the requisite concentration. The
choice of mode of treatment is completely within the discretion of the user and the selection is made purely on the relative convenience of the respective modes.
It is believed that the contact of the cooling water containing dissolved gluconate salt inhibitor in the desired concentration range with the metal surfaces of the cooling water system results in the formation of a thin prtective gluconate film on those metal surfaces. This film serves to inhibit the diffusion of dissolved oxygen from the water phase to the metal surfaces thereby substantially lowering the corrosion rate of the metal.
In some applications, a single treatment with the gluconate salt inhibitor by the method disclosed above will be suflicient to adequately protect a cooling water system for up to 2 to 3 Weeks. However, in cases where there is unusually turbulent water flow or singular vessel configuration which makes it difficult to preserve film integrity on the metal surfaces or in instances where inhibitor and water losses are excessive, it may be necessary to repeat the treatment on occasion or alternatively to maintain a continuous low concentration of the gluconate inhibitor in the cooling water by constant addition in order to preserve the protective film.
When synergistic mixtures of gluconate salts are used in conjunction with other inhibiting materials such as benzoate or salicylate salts, the desired proportions of the inhibitors in the mixture are in the range of from 0.001 to 0.4 Wt. percent gluconate, preferably from 0.010 to 0.10 wt. percent and from 0.001 to 0.40 wt. percent benzoate or salicylate, preferably from 0.010 to 0.10 Wt. percent. A 0
most preferable synergistic mixture contains equal quantities by weight of each component. The desired range of concentrations for the synergistic mixture in Water is from 10 to 4000 p.p.m., preferably from 100 to 2000 p.p.m.
The present invention will be more fully understood by referring to the following examples.
Example 1 This example demonstrates the eflicacy of sodium gluconate as an inhibitor of oxidative corrosion in carbon steel exposed to water containing a substantial quantity of dissolved oxygen. The test procedure involves placing a small specimen of known weight of 1020 carbon steel (1" x 4 x A2") in water through which air is constantly being bubbled. The concentration of dissolved oxygen will thus be kept at a very high level and will duplicate a long period of exposure of the metal in a cooling water system environment. A second piece of 1020 carbon steel of known weight is placed in water which is also saturated with air by means of a bubbler. A desired quantity of the corrosion inhibitor is dissolved in this water. The temperature of both the blank and test solutions are maintained at a fixed desired level by means of a water bath or other form of temperature regulator known to the art.
The specimens before their introduction in the test solution are abraded through 40 emery paper, degreased in benzene, pickled in dilute sulfuric acid and washed in distilled water. Immediately after drying the specimens are weighed and placed in the test solution.
After the desired test period of about four days the samples are removed, cleaned with a soft brush, washed with water, then acetone and are weighed after drying. The amount of the corroded metal is determined by weight loss by weighing before and after the test. The eifectiveness of an inhibitor to reduce corrosion is expressed as percent inhibitor efficiency where I is the corrosion rate without and I the corrosion rate with inhibi or.
The results of representative experiments utilizing the above procedure are summarized in Table I for tests conducted with sodium gluconate.
TABLE I lOxidative corrosion inhibition by 200 p.p.m. of sodium glucouate for 1020 carbon steel in aerated (but not air saturated) tap water] Examination of Table I clearly demonstrates that sodium gluconate is an extremely effective oxidation corrosion inhibitor even when employed at a concentration of about 200 p.p.m. This example also demonstrates the effect of temperature on the efiiciency of sodium gluconate as an oxidation corrosion inhibitor.
Reference to Table I shows rather unexpectedly that while the corrosion rate for the blank sample at 120 F. nearly doubled as a result of increasing the temperature about 43 F., the corrosion rate for the sample exposed to oxygen in the presence of small amounts of sodium gluconate at 120 F. decreased when compared to the test results at 77 F. The results for the sodium gluconate sample at the higher temperature reveal a higher percent corrosion inhibition efiiciency than for the lower temperature run.
Example 2 This example also demonstrates the effectiveness of sodium gluconate as corrosion inhibitor for cooling water corrosion systems. In addition, this example illustrates the variation of the corrosion inhibitor efiiciency with the inhibitor concentration and defines the threshold inhibitor concentration of about 50 to p.p.m. for effective corrosion control.
TABLE II oxidative corrosion inhibition by sodium glueonate for 1020 carbon steel in air saturated tap water at. F. (4 days runs)] Example 3 This example demonstrates the surprising synergism resulting from combining sodium gluconate with sodium benzoate as oxidative corrosion inhibitors. The test procedure utilized for this demonstration was that of Exampie 1, with the exception that the temperature used in this case was 120 F. The results of the synergism experiments are compiled below in Table III.
TABLE III synergism of mixtures of sodium gluconate and sodium benzoate in corro ion inhibition of 1020 carbon steel in aerated tap we tor at 120 E] Corrosion Percent rate, inhibitor Inhibitor mgJdmfi/day efficiency Blank 03. 7 Sodium gluconato (500 p.p.m.) 12 87. 2 Sodium honzoute 500 p.p.m.) 7t. 1 20. 0 Mixture:
Sodium glucouatc (250 p.p.m.) 5 0 Q3 7 Sodium bcnzontc (250 p.p.m Sodium glucouate (1,000 p.p.m.) 13.8 85. 3 Sodium bonzoate (1,000 p.p.m.) 44. 0 53.0 Mixture:
Sodium ulucouate (500 p.p.m.) 9 7 97 1 Sodium benzoatc (500 p.p.m.)
Examination of Table III shows that although sodium benzoate is a far less effective corrosion inhibitor than sodium gluconate, equal concentrations of both compounds is the same solution will result in a substantially improved inhibitor efiiciency than was obtainable from the use of either inhibitor alone at equivalent total inhibitor concentrations.
Example 4 TABLE IV [oxidative corrosion inhibition by potassium gluconate for 1020 carbon steel in air saturated tap water at 120" F. (4 days runs)] Corrosion Percent rate, inhibitor Inhibitor concentration mgJdmfi/day efiiciency Blank 93. 7 1 p.p.m. potassium gluconate 30.6 p.p.m. potassium gluconate 85. 3 9. 0 100 p.p.m. potassium gluconate"-.. 87 7. 2 1,000 p.p.m. potassium gluconat 5. 2 04. 4
Example 5 This example demonstrates the synergism resulting from combining sodium gluconate with sodium salicylate as corrosion inhibitor for cooling water systems. The same test procedure was utilized as in Example 1 cited earlier. The temperature of testing was 120 The results of these experiments are compiled in Table V.
TABLE V [Synergism of mixtures of sodium gluconate and sodium salicylate in oorrolsitlm inhibition of 1020 carbon steel in air saturated tap water at 120 Corrosion Percent r e, inhibitor Inhibitor mg./dm. /day eflicienoy Blank 93. 7 Sodium gluconate (500 p.p.m.) 12 87. 2 Sodium salicylate (500 p.p.1n.) 69. 2 26. 1 Mixture:
Sodium gluconate (250 p.p.m.) 5 o M 7 Sodium salicylate (250 p.p.m.) Sodium gluconate (1,000 p.p.m.) 13. 8 85. 3 Mixture:
Sodium gluconate (500 p.p.m.) 2 5 97 3 Sodium salicylate (500 p.p.m.)
The data in Table V shows that although sodium salicylate is a far less effective inhibitor than sodium gluconate, a mixture of equal concentrations of both compounds in solution results in substantial improvement in inhibition efficiency than was obtainable from the use of either inhibitor alone at equivalent total concentrations.
Example 6 This example demonstrates the corrosion inhibition properties of another salt form of the gluconate series. In this example ammonium gluconate was tested by the procedure of Example 1 and the results are summarized in Table VI.
TABLE VI [Protective properties of ammonium gluconate to control corrosion of 1020 carbon steel in alr saturated tap water at 120 F. (4 days runs)] Corrosion Percent rate, inhibitor Inhibitor mgJdmJ/day efficiency Blank 03. 7 Ammonium gluconate (5 p.p.m.) 49. 0 47. 6 Ammonium gluconate (20 p.p.m.) 51. 2 45.4 Ammonium gluconate (80 p.p.m.) 22. 4 70. 1 Ammonium gluconate (100 p.p.m.) 57. l 39. 1 Ammonium gluconate (500 p.p.m.) 6. 4 93. 2 Ammonium gluconate (1,000 p.p.m.) 5. 6 94 Examination of Table VI clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of ammonium gluconate especially in concentrations greater than 100 p.p.m. The reason for the discontinuity in the -100 p.p.m. region is not fully understood. It is possible that the data reflect the influence of concentration on the orientation of the inhibitor molecules on the metal surface and that at the p.p.m. level the inhibitor molecules are not packing in the most efiicient manner needed for high levels of inhibition. In any case, this tendency is completely reversed at levels above 100 p.p.m. and very excellent results are observed at the 500+ p.p.m. levels.
What is claimed is:
1. An improved method for inhibiting metal oxidative corrosion in circulating cooling water systems in which the cooling water contains substantial amounts of dissolved air, said method consisting essentially of adding corrosion inhibiting amounts of a water soluble gluconate salt and a water soluble benzoate or salicylate salt to said water.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein a gluconate salt concentration in the range between 1 to 4000 p.p.m. is added to said cooling water system, said gluconate salt being selected from the group consisting of the alkali metal and. ammonium salts of gluconate.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said gluconate salt comprises sodium gluconate.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein said gluconate salt comprises potassium gluconate.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein said gluconate salt comprises ammonium gluconate.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said organic aromatic acid water soluble salt comprises sodium benzoate.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said organic aromatic acid water soluble salt comprises sodium salicylate.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said gluconate salt and said benzoate or salicylate salt are each added to said cooling water system in concentrations of about 100 to about 2000 p.p.m., said gluconate salt being selected from the group consisting of the alkali metal and ammonium gluconate.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein said gluconate salt and said benzoate or salicylate salt are added in approximately equal amounts.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,110,684 11/1963 Miller 212.7X 3,240,708 3/1966 Dulat et a1. 2S2389X OTHER REFERENCES Kurita Industrial Ltd., Chem. Abstracts, 54:1'5784 (1960).
King et al., Chem. Abstracts, 49:2981 (1955).
Imperial Chem. Ind. Ltd., Chem. Abstracts, 55:18548 (1961).
Shibasaki et al., Chem. Abstracts, 63:5227 (1965).
RICHARD D. LOVERING, Primary Examiner I. GLUCK, Assistant Examiner U.S. Cl. X.R.
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US4093557 *||16 Sep 1976||6 Jun 1978||Hercules Incorporated||Process for inhibiting corrosion of metals in aqueous systems|
|US5000916 *||17 Jul 1989||19 Mar 1991||Amax Inc.||Molybdate-gluconate corrosion inhibitor|
|US5244600 *||2 Mar 1992||14 Sep 1993||W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.||Method of scavenging oxygen in aqueous systems|
|US5330683 *||17 Jun 1993||19 Jul 1994||Nalco Chemical Company||Method of inhibiting corrosion in brine solutions|
|US5589106 *||14 Feb 1995||31 Dic 1996||Nalco Chemical Company||Carbon steel corrosion inhibitors|
|US5597514 *||24 Ene 1995||28 Ene 1997||Cortec Corporation||Corrosion inhibitor for reducing corrosion in metallic concrete reinforcements|
|US5750053 *||31 Ene 1996||12 May 1998||Cortec Corporation||Corrosion inhibitor for reducing corrosion in metallic concrete reinforcements|
|US6299909||18 Sep 2000||9 Oct 2001||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US6306441||17 Nov 1999||23 Oct 2001||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US6322822||24 Sep 1999||27 Nov 2001||Albemarle Corporation||Biocidal applications of concentrated aqueous bromine chloride solutions|
|US6348219||18 Sep 2000||19 Feb 2002||Albemarle Corporation||Processes for preparing concentrated aqueous liquid biocidal compositions|
|US6352725||30 Nov 1999||5 Mar 2002||Albemarle Corporation||Continuous processes for preparing concentrated aqueous liquid biocidal composition|
|US6375991||8 Sep 2000||23 Abr 2002||Albemarle Corporation||Production of concentrated biocidal solutions|
|US6495169||8 Dic 1999||17 Dic 2002||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US6506418||7 Dic 2000||14 Ene 2003||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US6511682||18 Feb 2000||28 Ene 2003||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US6551624||10 Abr 2002||22 Abr 2003||Albemarle Corporation||Production of concentrated biocidal solutions|
|US6652889||9 Oct 2001||25 Nov 2003||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation and use|
|US6869620||18 Feb 2003||22 Mar 2005||Albemarle Corporation||Production of concentrated biocidal solutions|
|US6908636||21 Dic 2001||21 Jun 2005||Albermarle Corporation||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US6919364||21 Dic 2001||19 Jul 2005||Solution Biosciences, Inc.||Microbiological control in animal processing|
|US6986910||6 Dic 2002||17 Ene 2006||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US7087251||28 Oct 2002||8 Ago 2006||Albemarle Corporation||Control of biofilm|
|US7172782||12 Jul 2005||6 Feb 2007||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US7182966||11 Abr 2005||27 Feb 2007||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US7195782||10 Oct 2002||27 Mar 2007||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US7767240||19 Ene 2007||3 Ago 2010||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US7828908||31 Mar 2010||9 Nov 2010||Ecolab USA, Inc.||Acid cleaning and corrosion inhibiting compositions comprising gluconic acid|
|US7901276||23 Dic 2004||8 Mar 2011||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiocidal control in the processing of meat-producing four-legged animals|
|US7914365||29 Nov 2006||29 Mar 2011||Albemarle Corporation||Microbiocidal control in the processing of meat-producing four-legged animals|
|US8021607||31 Oct 2008||20 Sep 2011||General Electric Company||Methods for inhibiting corrosion in aqueous media|
|US8025840||31 Oct 2008||27 Sep 2011||General Electric Company||Compositions and methods for inhibiting corrosion in aqueous media|
|US8048435||8 Jun 2009||1 Nov 2011||Albemarle Corporation||Preparation of concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and biocidal applications thereof|
|US8293795||30 Nov 1999||23 Oct 2012||Albemarle Corporation||Preparation of concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and biocidal applications thereof|
|US8409630||16 Feb 2001||2 Abr 2013||Albermarle Corporation||Continuous processes for preparing concentrated aqueous liquid biocidal compositions|
|US8414932||28 Oct 2002||9 Abr 2013||Albemarie Corporation||Active bromine containing biocidal compositions and their preparation|
|US8536106||14 Abr 2010||17 Sep 2013||Ecolab Usa Inc.||Ferric hydroxycarboxylate as a builder|
|US8623943||17 Nov 2008||7 Ene 2014||The University Of Montana||Hydroxypolyamide gel forming agents|
|US8679548||11 Mar 2013||25 Mar 2014||Albemarle Corporation||Active bromine containing biocidal compositions and their preparation|
|US8961813||16 Ago 2012||24 Feb 2015||The University Of Montana||Hydroxycarboxylic acids and salts|
|US9005671||7 Sep 2005||14 Abr 2015||Albemarle Corporation||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation|
|US9023780||27 Ago 2013||5 May 2015||Ecolab Usa Inc.||Ferric hydroxycarboxylate as a builder|
|US9096787||25 Nov 2013||4 Ago 2015||Rivertop Renewables||Corrosion inhibiting, freezing point lowering compositions|
|US20010004461 *||16 Feb 2001||21 Jun 2001||Moore Robert M.||Continuous processes for preparing concentrated aqueous liquid biocidal compositions|
|US20040219231 *||4 Jun 2004||4 Nov 2004||Moore Robert M||Production of concentrated biocidal solutions|
|US20050100643 *||21 Dic 2001||12 May 2005||Howarth Jonathan N.||Microbiological control in poultry processing|
|US20050147696 *||7 Nov 2003||7 Jul 2005||Moore Robert M.Jr.||Concentrated aqueous bromine solutions and their preparation and use|
|US20060004072 *||28 Jun 2005||5 Ene 2006||Howarth Jonathan N||Microbiological control in animal processing|
|US20060278586 *||23 May 2006||14 Dic 2006||Nalepa Christopher J||Highly concentrated, biocidally active compositions and aqueous mixtures and methods of making the same|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||422/17, 252/407, 252/396, 252/181|
|Clasificación internacional||C23F11/10, A44B19/54, C23F11/12, A44B19/42|
|Clasificación cooperativa||C23F11/124, C23F11/126, A44B19/54|
|Clasificación europea||A44B19/54, C23F11/12C2, C23F11/12C|