US3617530A - Metals removal from heavy hydrocarbon fractions - Google Patents
Metals removal from heavy hydrocarbon fractions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3617530A US3617530A US876052A US3617530DA US3617530A US 3617530 A US3617530 A US 3617530A US 876052 A US876052 A US 876052A US 3617530D A US3617530D A US 3617530DA US 3617530 A US3617530 A US 3617530A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- solvent
- metal
- sodium
- added
- ethylenediamine
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G21/00—Refining of hydrocarbon oils, in the absence of hydrogen, by extraction with selective solvents
- C10G21/003—Solvent de-asphalting
Definitions
- Cochran and Charles R. Wetter ABSTRACT The use of alkali or alkaline earth metals with amines or ammonia to reduce the level of metal contamination of heavy hydrocarbon fractions boiling above about 900 F. such as, tars, residue, and asphaltenes.
- wash oils comprising deasphalting solvents which are described as metal-free synthetic asphalts
- metal-free synthetic asphalts have also been used for treating metal-contaminated heavy hydrocarbon fractions. While all of the above-listed methods have had some limited success in removal of the metal contaminants from asphalts, residua and tars, they have been found impractical for economical large-scale commercial operation, mainly because of large yield losses owing to recovery of treated products and reagents.
- Another objective is to upgrade the value of heavy hydrocarbon fractions for use as a fuel.
- the heavy fraction of petroleum oils and other carbonaceous materials can be upgraded by removal of the metal contaminants naturally found therein by mixing said fraction with sufficient amine or ammonia to form a solution or stirrable slurry and then adding an alkali .or alkaline earth metal to the solution or slurry. This tends to release the contaminant metals in the heavy fraction so that water washing will remove substantial amounts of these contaminants with little or no loss of the hydrocarbon fraction.
- alkali or alkaline earth metals are suitable for the practice of this invention. They may be used alone or in combination with each other.
- the metals preferred for use in our invention include lithium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium, while sodium is the most preferred.
- the amines suitable for use in our invention include all of the primary and secondary aliphatic monoand di-amines including ethylamine, isoamylamine, n-hexylamine, cetylamine,
- tertiary amines are not suitable for invention as they do not have an available hydrogen on the amine nitrogen to react with the active alkali or alkaline earth metals. Ammonia with its readily available hydrogen is quite satisfactory when used in suitable equipment such that is'can be maintained in a liquid state up to its critical temperature and pressure.
- the diamines having two amine nitrogens with their available hydrogen are preferred. Additionally the higher boiling point of the diamines with respect to their corresponding monoamines allows operation in liquid phase at higher temperatures. We prefer using ethylenediamine as its availability and boiling point are advantageous in practicing the invention.
- Theheavy hydrocarbon fraction and amine can be mixed in any proportion that will produce a stirrable slurry or a solution at reaction temperature. Stirrability is necessary to ensure contacting between the mixture and the active metal to be added later. Larger amounts of the amine are not harmful as it can be easily recovered from the reaction zone and recycled as will be explained later. It is only necessary that there be a molar excess of the amine group with respect to the alkali or alkaline earth metal to be added to the solution or slurry.
- the active alkaline or alkali earth metal Into the heavy hydrocarbon fraction-amine solution or slurry can be added the active alkaline or alkali earth metal. Contacting can be insured by any suitable means such as constant stirring within the reaction vessel.
- the alkali or alkaline earth metal can be added to the solution in such amounts that 0.05 to 75 parts by weight of the metal are present per I00 parts by weight of the heavy fraction in the solution. It is preferred that the active metal to solution weight ratio be between 0.! and 25 parts metal per 100 parts heavy fraction.
- the active metal reacts with the amine in such a way as to release hydrogen and electrons.
- the additional amine in the solution serves as the solvent and provides an im proved contacting medium in which the active ingredients may contact the heavy hydrocarbon fraction.
- the freed hydrogen and electrons attack the metal-organic bonds of the heavy hydrocarbon fraction releasing the metal contaminants from suspension therein and the metals tend to become suspended or dissolved in the amine-hydrocarbon mixture in a water-soluble form. Additionally, some of the hydrogen released in the reaction between the metal and amine tend to combine with the heavy fraction and upgrade it by decreasing the carbon percentage therein as a result of hydrogen addition.
- Treatment of the heavy fraction can take place over a wide range of temperatures, however, the temperature should preferably be at or below the boiling point of the amine. Solvent vapors may be contained by refluxing or superatmospheric pressures. When ethylenediamine is used we have found that satisfactory results can be obtained when the temperature is maintained between and l00 C. Using this amine we prefer to maintain the temperature between and C. Although treatment may take place at any pressure, we prefer to practice the invention at below 10 atmosphere pressure in order to simplify the equipment needed. Very good results have been obtained when practicing this invention at atmospheric pressure.
- Separation of the modified contaminants from the treated oil can be carried out by quenching the reaction with water and then filtering, centrifuging, or settling or by any combination of these methods.
- a combination of settling and water washing has been found to be particularly effective and is therefore preferred.
- a 2-gram portion of a 7-percent bottoms fraction of asphaltene was placed in a reaction chamber.
- the asphaltene was obtained by washing the tar residue of petroleum refining with isopentane until only 7 percent of the residue remained. This entire residue had an initial boiling point of over 1,000 F. and the asphaltene had a boiling range above 1,050 F. Analysis of the asphaltene indicated that it contained 796 p.p.m. iron, 73 p.p.m. nickel and 40 p.p.m. vanadium. Ten cubic centimeters of ethylenediamine were added and the mixture was heated to 100 C. and stirred to obtain a solution.
- sodiurn ribbon was added to the reaction chamber and stirring was continued for 2 hours while maintaining the temperature at 100 C.
- the product was water washed with five volumes of water with respect to the solution volume to remove the metal contaminants and the heavy petroleum fraction was dried using moderate heat and vacuum removal of moisture and then analyzed. It was found that 77 percent of the iron, 49 percent of the nickel'and 85 percent of the vanadium had been removed 'using this process- Essentially no loss of the hydrocarbon was incurred.
- Table 1 gives some results obtained using the above described procedure on asphaltenes. It can be seen that when using sodium and allowing the reaction to continue for 66 hours, 100 percent of the vanadium and about 96 percent of the iron can be removed from a heavy fraction thereby upgrading the fraction for further processing. it may also be seen that considerable amounts of the metals can be removed by allowing the reaction to continue for as little as 2 hours.
- Table 2 depicts results obtained when sodium was added to a solution of vacuum flashed tars in ethylenediamine.
- the tar had an initial boiling point of 1,000 F.
- the procedures were the same as described above.
- Preliminary analysis of the tar indicated the presence of 356 p.p.m. Fe, 50 p.p.m. Ni, and 56 p.p.m. V. it can be seen from the percent of the contaminants removed that the tars can be considerably upgraded by practicing this invention.
- a Z-gram sample of tar was used in each run. Reaction temperature was maintained at 100C.
- a solvent selected from the group consisting of liquified ammonia, primary and secondary aliphatic mono amines, and primary and secondary aliphatic diamines, said amines having up to 16 carbon atoms therein, in an amount to produce a stirrable slurry or solution;
- a metal selected from the group consisting of alkali or alkaline earth metals in an amount ranging from 0.05 -75 parts metal per 100 parts per hydrocarbon on a weight basis;
- metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
- metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
Abstract
The use of alkali or alkaline earth metals with amines or ammonia to reduce the level of metal contamination of heavy hydrocarbon fractions boiling above about 900* F. such as, tars, residua, and asphaltenes.
Description
United States Patent Inventors Robert W. Rleve Springfield; Harold Shalit, Drexel Hill; John J. Rothrock, Ambler, all oi Pa. Appl. No. 876,052 Filed Nov. 12, 1969 Patented Nov. 2, 1971 Assignee Atlantic Richfleld Company New York, N.Y.
METALS REMOVAL FROM HEAVY [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,470,887 5/1949 Chenicek 208/251 2,453,138 11/1948 Kharasch 208/251 2,281,356 4/1942 Johnstone et al. 196/30 2,474,411 6/1949 Bersworth 196/16 2,729,592 1/1956 Niehaus..... 196/29 1,882,002 10/1932 Dietrich 208/289 3,153,623 10/1964 Eldib et a1 204/184 FOREIGN PATENTS 588,448 12/1959 Canada 208/206 Primary Examiner-Delbert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-J. M. Nelson Atlorneys- Robert R. Cochran and Charles R. Wetter ABSTRACT: The use of alkali or alkaline earth metals with amines or ammonia to reduce the level of metal contamination of heavy hydrocarbon fractions boiling above about 900 F. such as, tars, residue, and asphaltenes.
METALS REMOVAL FROM I-IEAVY I-IYDROCARBON FRACTIONS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates broadly to the removal of metal-comprising contaminants from hydrocarbons. The invention is applicable to the treatment of heavy hydrocarbon fractions derived from crude petroleum oil, oil shale, coal tar, and tar sands so as to improve substantially the characteristics of the hydrocarbon fraction. The invention is particularly directed to the addition of alkali or alkaline earth metals to a solution or stirrable mixture of heavy hydrocarbon fractions, i.e. those boiling above about 900 F. and amines or ammonia to facilitate removal of nickel, vanadium, iron, an other metal contaminants which are naturally occurring in the hydrocarbons.
2. Description of the Prior Art Metallic contaminants naturally occur in hydrocarbons and it is known that these contaminants are concentrated in the heavy fractions of the oils in the form of metal complexes including nickel, iron and vanadium porphyrins. These contaminants are difficult to remove by ordinary distillation procedures as they tend to vaporize at temperatures of the order of l,050 F. Various methods of removing these metal contaminants have been tried including, (1) the contacting of the heavy fractions with a quantity of pulverized contact clay: (2) washing the contaminated hydrocarbons in either hydantoin or alkyl substituted hydantoin: (3) the use of butyrolactone as a washing agent: and (4) subjecting of the hydrocarbons to a direct current electrical field of high voltage. Additionally various wash oils, comprising deasphalting solvents which are described as metal-free synthetic asphalts, have also been used for treating metal-contaminated heavy hydrocarbon fractions. While all of the above-listed methods have had some limited success in removal of the metal contaminants from asphalts, residua and tars, they have been found impractical for economical large-scale commercial operation, mainly because of large yield losses owing to recovery of treated products and reagents.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above discussion, it is an object of this invention to provide an economical method of removing metallic contaminants from heavy hydrocarbon fractions, such as those found in petroleum oils, oil shale, coal tar and tar sands, suitable for large-scale operations wherein a high yield of treated product can be obtained.
It is a further object to remove metals from heavy hydrocarbon fractions that tend to react with and deactivate catalytic cracking catalysts.
Another objective is to upgrade the value of heavy hydrocarbon fractions for use as a fuel.
These and other objectives may be achieved through practice of the present invention.
We have discovered that the heavy fraction of petroleum oils and other carbonaceous materials (those having a boiling point of above 900 F.) can be upgraded by removal of the metal contaminants naturally found therein by mixing said fraction with sufficient amine or ammonia to form a solution or stirrable slurry and then adding an alkali .or alkaline earth metal to the solution or slurry. This tends to release the contaminant metals in the heavy fraction so that water washing will remove substantial amounts of these contaminants with little or no loss of the hydrocarbon fraction.
All of the alkali or alkaline earth metals are suitable for the practice of this invention. They may be used alone or in combination with each other. The metals preferred for use in our invention include lithium, sodium, calcium, and magnesium, while sodium is the most preferred.
The amines suitable for use in our invention include all of the primary and secondary aliphatic monoand di-amines including ethylamine, isoamylamine, n-hexylamine, cetylamine,
dimethylamine, diisobutylamine, methylethylamine, ethylenediamine, putrescine, and hexamethylenediamine. Those monoand di-amines having more than 16 carbon atoms are not readily available in the pure form, therefore, their use is not considered practical at this time. The tertiary amines are not suitable for invention as they do not have an available hydrogen on the amine nitrogen to react with the active alkali or alkaline earth metals. Ammonia with its readily available hydrogen is quite satisfactory when used in suitable equipment such that is'can be maintained in a liquid state up to its critical temperature and pressure.
The diamines having two amine nitrogens with their available hydrogen are preferred. Additionally the higher boiling point of the diamines with respect to their corresponding monoamines allows operation in liquid phase at higher temperatures. We prefer using ethylenediamine as its availability and boiling point are advantageous in practicing the invention.
Theheavy hydrocarbon fraction and amine can be mixed in any proportion that will produce a stirrable slurry or a solution at reaction temperature. Stirrability is necessary to ensure contacting between the mixture and the active metal to be added later. Larger amounts of the amine are not harmful as it can be easily recovered from the reaction zone and recycled as will be explained later. It is only necessary that there be a molar excess of the amine group with respect to the alkali or alkaline earth metal to be added to the solution or slurry.
Into the heavy hydrocarbon fraction-amine solution or slurry can be added the active alkaline or alkali earth metal. Contacting can be insured by any suitable means such as constant stirring within the reaction vessel. The alkali or alkaline earth metal can be added to the solution in such amounts that 0.05 to 75 parts by weight of the metal are present per I00 parts by weight of the heavy fraction in the solution. It is preferred that the active metal to solution weight ratio be between 0.! and 25 parts metal per 100 parts heavy fraction.
While not wishing to be bound by any theories of operation. it is believed the active metal reacts with the amine in such a way as to release hydrogen and electrons. The additional amine in the solution serves as the solvent and provides an im proved contacting medium in which the active ingredients may contact the heavy hydrocarbon fraction. The freed hydrogen and electrons attack the metal-organic bonds of the heavy hydrocarbon fraction releasing the metal contaminants from suspension therein and the metals tend to become suspended or dissolved in the amine-hydrocarbon mixture in a water-soluble form. Additionally, some of the hydrogen released in the reaction between the metal and amine tend to combine with the heavy fraction and upgrade it by decreasing the carbon percentage therein as a result of hydrogen addition.
Treatment of the heavy fraction can take place over a wide range of temperatures, however, the temperature should preferably be at or below the boiling point of the amine. Solvent vapors may be contained by refluxing or superatmospheric pressures. When ethylenediamine is used we have found that satisfactory results can be obtained when the temperature is maintained between and l00 C. Using this amine we prefer to maintain the temperature between and C. Although treatment may take place at any pressure, we prefer to practice the invention at below 10 atmosphere pressure in order to simplify the equipment needed. Very good results have been obtained when practicing this invention at atmospheric pressure.
Separation of the modified contaminants from the treated oil can be carried out by quenching the reaction with water and then filtering, centrifuging, or settling or by any combination of these methods. A combination of settling and water washing has been found to be particularly effective and is therefore preferred.
ln order to better understand the teachings of this invention, the following specific example is offered as one embodiment. It is not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure in any way.
A 2-gram portion of a 7-percent bottoms fraction of asphaltene was placed in a reaction chamber. The asphaltene was obtained by washing the tar residue of petroleum refining with isopentane until only 7 percent of the residue remained. This entire residue had an initial boiling point of over 1,000 F. and the asphaltene had a boiling range above 1,050 F. Analysis of the asphaltene indicated that it contained 796 p.p.m. iron, 73 p.p.m. nickel and 40 p.p.m. vanadium. Ten cubic centimeters of ethylenediamine were added and the mixture was heated to 100 C. and stirred to obtain a solution. Then 0.2 gram of sodiurn ribbon was added to the reaction chamber and stirring was continued for 2 hours while maintaining the temperature at 100 C. The product was water washed with five volumes of water with respect to the solution volume to remove the metal contaminants and the heavy petroleum fraction was dried using moderate heat and vacuum removal of moisture and then analyzed. It was found that 77 percent of the iron, 49 percent of the nickel'and 85 percent of the vanadium had been removed 'using this process- Essentially no loss of the hydrocarbon was incurred.
Other active metals including calcium, magnesium, and lithium were used in the above process and considerable amounts of metal contaminants were removed. By varying the weight ratio of the active metal to the heavy hydrocarbon frac-v tion to be upgraded it was found that some selectivity in the metals removed could be obtained. Essentially all of the hydrocarbon was recovered under all conditions. One could select the active metal and the metal to solution ratio depending upon the further use intended for the upgraded heavy hydrocarbon fraction.
Table 1 gives some results obtained using the above described procedure on asphaltenes. It can be seen that when using sodium and allowing the reaction to continue for 66 hours, 100 percent of the vanadium and about 96 percent of the iron can be removed from a heavy fraction thereby upgrading the fraction for further processing. it may also be seen that considerable amounts of the metals can be removed by allowing the reaction to continue for as little as 2 hours.
A Z-gram sample of 7-percent bottoms fraction of asphaltene was used in each run at atmospheric pressure. Sufficient ethylenediamine to form a solution at reaction temperature was added. Preliminary analysis of the asphaltene indicated the presence of 796 p.p.m. Fe, 73 p.p.m. Ni, and 40 p.p.m. V. All runs were maintained at 100 C. except No. 6 which was maintained at 80 C.
Table 2 depicts results obtained when sodium was added to a solution of vacuum flashed tars in ethylenediamine. The tar had an initial boiling point of 1,000 F. The procedures were the same as described above. Preliminary analysis of the tar indicated the presence of 356 p.p.m. Fe, 50 p.p.m. Ni, and 56 p.p.m. V. it can be seen from the percent of the contaminants removed that the tars can be considerably upgraded by practicing this invention. A Z-gram sample of tar was used in each run. Reaction temperature was maintained at 100C.
TABLE 2 METAL CONTAMINANTS REMOVAL FROM TARS Run Grams Reaction MetalsRemoved Na Time, hrs. %Ni%Fe av 21 0.041 61 so 14 41 22 0.233 40 as or 53 23 0.461 as as 100 It We claim: 1. A process for removing nickel, vanadium and iron contaminants from a hydrocarbon fraction having a boiling point above 900 F., which consists essentially of the steps of:
placing said fraction into a reaction zone;
adding a solvent selected from the group consisting of liquified ammonia, primary and secondary aliphatic mono amines, and primary and secondary aliphatic diamines, said amines having up to 16 carbon atoms therein, in an amount to produce a stirrable slurry or solution;
adding a metal selected from the group consisting of alkali or alkaline earth metals in an amount ranging from 0.05 -75 parts metal per 100 parts per hydrocarbon on a weight basis; and
removing the metal contaminants by water washing.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the amount of alkali or alkaline earth metal added ranges between 0.1 to 25 parts metal per 100 parts hydrocarbon on a weight basis.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is added in an amount to produce a solution.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is liquified ammonia.
5. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is a primary or secondary aliphatic diamine.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the diamine added to the petroleum fraction is ethylenediamine and the reaction zone is maintained at to 1 10 C.
7. The process of claim 3 wherein the metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the metal additive is sodium.
9. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is ethylenediamine and the metal is sodium and the reaction is allowed to take place at atmospheric pressure at C.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is added in an amount to produce a stirrable slurry.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is liquefied ammonia.
12. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is a primary or secondary aliphatic diamine.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the diamine added to the petroleum oil fraction is ethylenediamine and the reaction zone is maintained at 80 to 1 10 C.
14. The process of claim 10 wherein the metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein the. metal additive is sodium.
16. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is ethylenediamine and the metal is sodium and the reaction is allowed to take place at atmospheric pressure at 100 C.
17. The process of claim 1 including the step of drying the product to remove all water used in the water washing.
18. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is removed by fractional distillation.
19. The process of claim 1 using ethylenediamine as the solvent, sodium as the metal, and wherein the reaction zone is maintained at atmospheric pressure and between 95 to C. including the steps of:
removing the solvent by fractional distillation, and drying the product to remove all water used in the water washing.
# I i i
Claims (18)
- 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the amount of alkali or alkaline earth metal added ranges between 0.1 to 25 parts metal per 100 parts hydrocarbon on a weight basis.
- 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is added in an amount to produce a solution.
- 4. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is liquified ammonia.
- 5. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is a primary or secondary aliphatic diamine.
- 6. The process of claim 5 wherein the diamine added to the petroleum fraction is ethylenediamine and the reaction zone is maintained at 80* to 110* C.
- 7. The process of claim 3 wherein the metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
- 8. The process of claim 7 wherein the metal additive is sodium.
- 9. The process of claim 3 wherein the solvent is ethylene-diamine and the metal is sodium and the reaction is allowed to take place at atmospheric pressure at 100* C.
- 10. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is added in an amount to produce a stirrable slurry.
- 11. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is liquefied ammonia.
- 12. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is a primary or secondary aliphatic diamine.
- 13. The process of claim 12 wherein the diamine added to the petroleum oil fraction is ethylenediamine and the reactIon zone is maintained at 80* to 110* C.
- 14. The process of claim 10 wherein the metal additive is selected from the group consisting of lithium, calcium, sodium and magnesium.
- 15. The process of claim 14 wherein the metal additive is sodium.
- 16. The process of claim 10 wherein the solvent is ethylenediamine and the metal is sodium and the reaction is allowed to take place at atmospheric pressure at 100* C.
- 17. The process of claim 1 including the step of drying the product to remove all water used in the water washing.
- 18. The process of claim 1 wherein the solvent is removed by fractional distillation.
- 19. The process of claim 1 using ethylenediamine as the solvent, sodium as the metal, and wherein the reaction zone is maintained at atmospheric pressure and between 95* to 105* C. including the steps of: removing the solvent by fractional distillation, and drying the product to remove all water used in the water washing.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US87605269A | 1969-11-12 | 1969-11-12 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US3617530A true US3617530A (en) | 1971-11-02 |
Family
ID=25366892
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US876052A Expired - Lifetime US3617530A (en) | 1969-11-12 | 1969-11-12 | Metals removal from heavy hydrocarbon fractions |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US3617530A (en) |
Cited By (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4203830A (en) * | 1978-08-28 | 1980-05-20 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Visbreaking process for demetalation and desulfurization of heavy oil |
| US4306959A (en) * | 1978-04-24 | 1981-12-22 | Conoco Inc. | Use of chelating agents in the conversion of coal to low mineral content fuel |
| US4405825A (en) * | 1981-10-30 | 1983-09-20 | Union Oil Company Of California | Pour point reduction of syncrude |
| US4613726A (en) * | 1984-06-27 | 1986-09-23 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for removing nickel, aluminum and chlorine from olefin oligomers |
| US4773988A (en) * | 1986-09-23 | 1988-09-27 | Union Oil Company Of California | Arsenic removal from shale oil by addition of basic materials |
| US7556715B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2009-07-07 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | Bituminous froth inline steam injection processing |
| DE102011013470A1 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2012-01-26 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Process and means for removing metals from high boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
| WO2014180759A1 (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2014-11-13 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Process for removing metals from high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
| US9410042B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-08-09 | Aditya Birla Science And Technology Company Ltd. | Process for obtaining carbon black powder with reduced sulfur content |
| US9873797B2 (en) | 2011-10-24 | 2018-01-23 | Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited | Process for the production of carbon black |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1882002A (en) * | 1930-08-08 | 1932-10-11 | Laval Separator Co De | Process for refining mineral oil |
| US2281356A (en) * | 1939-09-22 | 1942-04-28 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Treatment of hydrocarbons |
| US2453138A (en) * | 1946-05-02 | 1948-11-09 | Morris S Kharasch | Process of deleading gasoline |
| US2470887A (en) * | 1947-04-16 | 1949-05-24 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Method of treating cracked gasoline to remove metals |
| US2474411A (en) * | 1948-03-17 | 1949-06-28 | Frederick C Bersworth | Method of reclaiming the hydrocarbon content of used hydrocarbon lubricants |
| US2729592A (en) * | 1953-02-03 | 1956-01-03 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Air sweetening process |
| CA588448A (en) * | 1959-12-08 | G. Bowers Rolland | Treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons | |
| US3153623A (en) * | 1961-04-07 | 1964-10-20 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Deashing of residua |
-
1969
- 1969-11-12 US US876052A patent/US3617530A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA588448A (en) * | 1959-12-08 | G. Bowers Rolland | Treatment of petroleum hydrocarbons | |
| US1882002A (en) * | 1930-08-08 | 1932-10-11 | Laval Separator Co De | Process for refining mineral oil |
| US2281356A (en) * | 1939-09-22 | 1942-04-28 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Treatment of hydrocarbons |
| US2453138A (en) * | 1946-05-02 | 1948-11-09 | Morris S Kharasch | Process of deleading gasoline |
| US2470887A (en) * | 1947-04-16 | 1949-05-24 | Universal Oil Prod Co | Method of treating cracked gasoline to remove metals |
| US2474411A (en) * | 1948-03-17 | 1949-06-28 | Frederick C Bersworth | Method of reclaiming the hydrocarbon content of used hydrocarbon lubricants |
| US2729592A (en) * | 1953-02-03 | 1956-01-03 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Air sweetening process |
| US3153623A (en) * | 1961-04-07 | 1964-10-20 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Deashing of residua |
Cited By (14)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4306959A (en) * | 1978-04-24 | 1981-12-22 | Conoco Inc. | Use of chelating agents in the conversion of coal to low mineral content fuel |
| US4203830A (en) * | 1978-08-28 | 1980-05-20 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Visbreaking process for demetalation and desulfurization of heavy oil |
| US4405825A (en) * | 1981-10-30 | 1983-09-20 | Union Oil Company Of California | Pour point reduction of syncrude |
| US4613726A (en) * | 1984-06-27 | 1986-09-23 | Institut Francais Du Petrole | Process for removing nickel, aluminum and chlorine from olefin oligomers |
| US4773988A (en) * | 1986-09-23 | 1988-09-27 | Union Oil Company Of California | Arsenic removal from shale oil by addition of basic materials |
| US7914670B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2011-03-29 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Bituminous froth inline steam injection processing |
| US7556715B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2009-07-07 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | Bituminous froth inline steam injection processing |
| US8685210B2 (en) | 2004-01-09 | 2014-04-01 | Suncor Energy Inc. | Bituminous froth inline steam injection processing |
| DE102011013470A1 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2012-01-26 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Process and means for removing metals from high boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
| WO2012013581A2 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2012-02-02 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Process and agents to remove metals from high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
| US9873797B2 (en) | 2011-10-24 | 2018-01-23 | Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited | Process for the production of carbon black |
| US9410042B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2016-08-09 | Aditya Birla Science And Technology Company Ltd. | Process for obtaining carbon black powder with reduced sulfur content |
| WO2014180759A1 (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2014-11-13 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Process for removing metals from high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
| DE102013104696A1 (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2014-11-13 | L'Air Liquide, Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude | Process for removing metals from high boiling hydrocarbon fractions |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US3502564A (en) | Hydroprocessing of coal | |
| US2778777A (en) | Removal of metal components from petroleum oils | |
| US3617530A (en) | Metals removal from heavy hydrocarbon fractions | |
| US3839187A (en) | Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil | |
| US3813329A (en) | Solvent extraction of coal utilizing a heteropoly acid catalyst | |
| US4303634A (en) | Method of catalyst preparation | |
| US4317711A (en) | Coprocessing of residual oil and coal | |
| US3825488A (en) | Process for hydrorefining a hydrocarbon charge stock | |
| US2686152A (en) | Production of high quality lump coke from lignitic coals | |
| US3622502A (en) | Cracking hydrocarbon residua | |
| US3725250A (en) | Process for improving a hydrocarbon charge stock by contacting the charge with water at elevated temperature and pressure | |
| US3617505A (en) | Hydroconversion of asphaltenes with a coke promoter | |
| US3483118A (en) | Hydrorefining a hydrocarbonaceous charge stock with a molten lewis acid and molybdenum sulfide | |
| US3167500A (en) | Removal of metal comprising contaminants from petroleum oils | |
| US4051014A (en) | Process for treating sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feedstocks to produce high yield coke | |
| US2996442A (en) | Process for electrically treating a metallic contaminated residual petroleum fraction | |
| US2729593A (en) | Demetalation of hydrocarbon oils | |
| US2203470A (en) | Cracking hydrocarbon mixtures | |
| WO1985003647A1 (en) | Surfactant | |
| US4336129A (en) | Method for treating a water-containing waste oil | |
| US4464245A (en) | Method of increasing the oil yield from hydrogenation of coal | |
| US2331244A (en) | Refining mineral oils | |
| US3645912A (en) | Regeneration of unsupported vanadium sulfide catalyst | |
| US3970545A (en) | Hydrocarbon desulfurization utilizing a non-catalytic hydrogen donor step and an oxidation step | |
| US2745792A (en) | Hydrocarbon treating process |