US3664422A - Well fracturing method employing a liquified gas and propping agents entrained in a fluid - Google Patents
Well fracturing method employing a liquified gas and propping agents entrained in a fluid Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3664422A US3664422A US3664422DA US3664422A US 3664422 A US3664422 A US 3664422A US 3664422D A US3664422D A US 3664422DA US 3664422 A US3664422 A US 3664422A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- propping agents
- liquified gas
- fluid
- gelled
- alcohol
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 36
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 title abstract description 53
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 66
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 48
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 46
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 28
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 14
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 8
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003129 oil well Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 3
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000009834 vaporization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008016 vaporization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010019233 Headaches Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920002367 Polyisobutene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 208000036366 Sensation of pressure Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003926 acrylamides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- CEGOLXSVJUTHNZ-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminium tristearate Chemical compound [Al+3].CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC([O-])=O.CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC([O-])=O.CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC([O-])=O CEGOLXSVJUTHNZ-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 229940063655 aluminum stearate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000003118 aryl group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010779 crude oil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002274 desiccant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003349 gelling agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035876 healing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009991 scouring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009491 slugging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/2605—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures using gas or liquefied gas
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17C—VESSELS FOR CONTAINING OR STORING COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED OR SOLIDIFIED GASES; FIXED-CAPACITY GAS-HOLDERS; FILLING VESSELS WITH, OR DISCHARGING FROM VESSELS, COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED, OR SOLIDIFIED GASES
- F17C9/00—Methods or apparatus for discharging liquefied or solidified gases from vessels not under pressure
- F17C9/02—Methods or apparatus for discharging liquefied or solidified gases from vessels not under pressure with change of state, e.g. vaporisation
- F17C9/04—Recovery of thermal energy
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17C—VESSELS FOR CONTAINING OR STORING COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED OR SOLIDIFIED GASES; FIXED-CAPACITY GAS-HOLDERS; FILLING VESSELS WITH, OR DISCHARGING FROM VESSELS, COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED, OR SOLIDIFIED GASES
- F17C2221/00—Handled fluid, in particular type of fluid
- F17C2221/01—Pure fluids
- F17C2221/013—Carbone dioxide
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17C—VESSELS FOR CONTAINING OR STORING COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED OR SOLIDIFIED GASES; FIXED-CAPACITY GAS-HOLDERS; FILLING VESSELS WITH, OR DISCHARGING FROM VESSELS, COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED, OR SOLIDIFIED GASES
- F17C2221/00—Handled fluid, in particular type of fluid
- F17C2221/01—Pure fluids
- F17C2221/014—Nitrogen
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17C—VESSELS FOR CONTAINING OR STORING COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED OR SOLIDIFIED GASES; FIXED-CAPACITY GAS-HOLDERS; FILLING VESSELS WITH, OR DISCHARGING FROM VESSELS, COMPRESSED, LIQUEFIED, OR SOLIDIFIED GASES
- F17C2223/00—Handled fluid before transfer, i.e. state of fluid when stored in the vessel or before transfer from the vessel
- F17C2223/01—Handled fluid before transfer, i.e. state of fluid when stored in the vessel or before transfer from the vessel characterised by the phase
- F17C2223/0146—Two-phase
- F17C2223/0153—Liquefied gas, e.g. LPG, GPL
Definitions
- This invention relates to the art of hydraulically fracturing subterranean earth formations surrounding oil wells, gas wells, and similar bore holes.
- this invention relates to hydraulic fracturing utilizing a liquified gas and a fluid containing entrained propping agents.
- Hydraulic fracturing has been widely used for stimulating the production of crude oil and natural gas from wells completed in reservoirs of low permeability.
- Methods employed normally require the injection of a fracturing fluid containing suspended propping agents into a well at a rate sufficient to open a fracture in the exposed formation.
- a fracturing fluid containing suspended propping agents into a well at a rate sufficient to open a fracture in the exposed formation.
- Continued pumping of fluid into the well at a high rate extends the fracture and leads to the build-up of a bed of propping agent particles between the fracture walls. These particles prevent complete closure of the fracture as the fluid subsequently leaks off into the adjacent formations and results in a permeable channel extending from the well bore into the formations.
- the conductivity of this channel depends upon the fracture dimensions, the size of the propping agent particles, the particle spacing, and the confining pressures.
- the fluids used in hydraulic fracturing operations must have filter loss values sufficiently low to permit build-up and maintenance of the required pressures at reasonable injection rates. This normally requires that such fluids either have adequate viscosities or contain filter-loss control agents which will plug the pores in the formation.
- the use of fracturing fluids having relatively low viscosities in conjunction with additives which provide the low filter-loss values needed avoids excessively high friction losses in the tubing and casing. The well head pressures and hydraulic horsepower required to overcome such friction losses may otherwise be prohibitive.
- Fracturing of low permeability reservoirs has always presented the problem of fluid compatibility with the formation core and formation fluids, particularly in gas wells.
- many formations contain clays which swell when contacted by aqueous fluids causing restricted permeability,
- Another problem encountered in fracturing operations is the difficulty of total recovery of the fracturing fluid. Fluids left in the reservoir rock as immobile residual fluid impede the flow of reservoir gas or fluids, to an extent that the benefit of fracturing is decreased or eliminated. The removal of the fracturing fluid may require the expenditure of a large amount of energy and time, consequently the reduction or elimination of the problem is highly desirable.
- gelled fluids prepared with water, diesel and similar low viscosity liquids have been useful. Such fluids have apparent viscosities high enough to support the propping agent particles without settling and yet low enough to give acceptable friction losses.
- the gelling agents also promote laminar flow under conditions where turbulent flow would otherwise take place and hence in some cases, the losses may be lower than those obtained with low viscosity-base fluids containing no additives.
- Certain water-soluble poly-acrylamides, oil soluble poly-isobutylene and other polymers which have little effect on viscosity when used in low concentration can be added to the ungelled fluid to achieve similar benefits.
- Low density gases such as CO, or N; have been used in attempting to overcome the problem of removing the fracturing liquid.
- the low density gasses are added at a calculated ratio which promotes fluid flow subsequent to the fracturing.
- This .back flow of load fluids is usually due to reservoir pressure alone, without mechanical aid from surface, because of the reduction of hydrostatic head caused by gasifying the fluid.
- the present invention provides a method of well stimulation with little or no reservoir contamination and a high percentage of load fluid recovery.
- a liquified gas and a fluid containing entrained propping agents are injected into the formations. Since the two aforementioned fluid phases are completely miscible they may be either blended prior to well entry, or injected separately and blended in the well.
- the fluids are injected until a fracture of suflicient width to produce a highly conductive .channel has been formed. Particles of the propping agent, suspended in the mixture, are carried into the fracture.
- the injected fluid is then permitted to leak off into the formation until the fracture has closed sufficiently to hold the particles in place.
- liquid carbon dioxide (CO and a high concentration of propping agents in a stream of gelled alcohol are simultaneously injected into the well bore.
- the liquid carbon dioxide reaches the formations, it gasifies, leaving only a low fluid residual of alcohol to recover.
- This alcohol in turn, is soluble in reservoir gas (methane) and is essentially returned as a vapor.
- the propping agents are added to a separate side stream of alcohol at atmospheric pressure and subsequently blended with the liquid carbon dioxide for injection into the well.
- a suitable alternate to alcohol is a light oil, condensate, or reformate (aromatic refinery by-product) gelled with additives such as aluminum stearate and time-dependant breakers.
- FIG. 1 depicts a pressure enthalpy chart for CO in the re- I gion of interest of oil well servicing.
- FIG. 2 shows the viscosity of CO
- FIG. 3 shows the thermodynamic properties of saturated carbon dioxide.
- FIG. 4 shows the rate of reaction of gel breaker on the gelled alcohol.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a system used in this invention.
- FIG. 6 shows a fracturing manifold that may be used to inject the fluids into the well bore.
- liquid carbon dioxide is the primary fracturing fluid in a well fracturing method.
- Simultaneous injection of gelled alcohol (methanol) is used to carry the propping agent.
- FIG. 1 a pressure enthalpy chart for carbon dioxide in the region of interest in oil well servicing is shown. The probable path followed during a fracturing job is depicted by a dash line.
- Liquid carbon dioxide is pumped from a delivery transport at approximately 300 psi and F. It is pumped to an elevated pressure where it is comingled with gelled alcohol and propping agents. The temperature of the combined fluids rises due to mixing with warm fluid and as the mixed stream goes down the well, it picks up additional heat from the borehole and additional pressure due to hydrostatic head. At the perforation, pressure is at its peak and it declines after formation fracturing as fluid enters the reservoir.
- the viscosity of carbon dioxide determined by the method of Uyehara and Watson was calculated over the range of 0 to 300 F. for pressures from 100 to 30,000 psi. This information may be used in calculating the friction pressure drop which may be encountered when pumping pure liquid carbon dioxide into a well.
- the density of carbon dioxide is calculated from the equation PV 0.243ZTM where P equals pressure in psia; V equals volume in cubic feet; Z equals compressibility factor; T equals temperature in degrees Rankin; M equals weight in pounds. This equation was solved for temperatures from 0 to 200 F. and pressures from 100 psi to 10,000 psi.
- thermodynamic properties of saturated carbon dioxide are shown in the Table of FIG. 3.
- the latent heat of vaporization is a function of temperature, ranging from 120.1 BTU/lb. at 0 F. (transport conditions) to 0.0 BTU/lb. at 87.8 F., when the CO is entirely gaseous.
- the volume of gaseous carbon dioxide in the well reservoir at any temperature may also be calculated according to the formula:
- V is the initial volume at standard conditions
- f is the compressibility factor at final conditions
- p is the final pressures in atmospheres.
- the gelled alcohol used to carry the propping agent may be methanol or another alcohol with similar properties.
- Methanol is used as a proppant carrying agent in view of its compatibility with most gas and oil reservoirs, its low freezing point, and potential chemical benefits to the stimulation.
- the rate of reaction of gel breaker on the gelled alcohol is rapid, but allows adequate time for the displacement of the proppant into the formation at a high viscosity blend. From initial viscosity of 50 to 60 cp the gel breaks back to 2 cp as a final viscosity. By comparison, straight methanol has a viscosity of 0.6 cp. It is preferred that the alcohol be gelled to a viscosity of 20 cp or higher in order to be sufficient to carry the high concentration of propping agent through the pumping equipment and into the formation. In a low fluid residual treatment, the alcohol occupies as little as 16 percent of the total fluid volume. This alcohol is distributed over a total fracture area of many thousands of square feet, and in actual field use it is seldom recovered as a liquid.
- Total recovery of the methanol without residual fluid saturation is realized by vaporization during subsequent production of the well.
- the saturation of alcohol in methane varies with temperature and pressure, but is generally over 250 lbs. per million cubic feet of gas under reservoir conditions.
- FIG. 5 one embodiment of a system of the present invention is shown in schematic form.
- An alcohol storage tank 11 is connected to a blender 12.
- the blender 12 may be of the type conventionally used in oil field fracturing operations and would normally include paddles, a ribbon mixer or jets for mixing and suspending propping agents in the gelled alcohol.
- the alcohol is gelled in this blender just prior to the addition of the propping agents. It is generally preferred to operate the blender 12 at a high speed to prevent buildup and slugging of the propping agent particles.
- a return line 13 from the blender to the alcohol storage tank 1] permits circulation to promote initial mixing of the fluid before the propping agent is added.
- a suitable propping agent from container 14 is added to blender 12.
- Discharge line 15 extends from blender 12 to high pressure fracturing pump or pumps 16. These pumps are normally positive displacement, Triplex pumps, truck mounted and specially equipped for pumping abrasive slurries at high rates and pressures.
- Liquid carbon dioxide from tank or tanks 17 is injected into the well 18 by means of a pump or pumps 19.
- Unit 19 may be a pumping unit similar to that described in connection with pumping unit 16.
- the pumps 16 and 19, blender 12, tanks 11 and 17 and other equipment are normally located some distance from the well 18 to minimize the danger in case of fire or blowout. Valves are provided throughout the system to permit control of the fluids and the disconnection of individual units of equipment as necessary.
- a fracturing manifold particularly suited for the present invention is indicated generally at 20.
- Thegelled alcohol with proppant enters the manifold 20 at the inlet 21. It receives the gel breaking mixture which enters at 22 and the mixture then passes down the tubing 23.
- the liquid carbon dioxide enters at 24 and passes down the annulus between tubing 23 and tubing 25. As the gelled alcohol including the additives exits from tubing 23 it is completely mixed with the carbon dioxide prior to entry into the formation 26.
- alcohol with between 5 to 8 lbs. of proppant per gallon, depending on the well conditions, is pumped into a manifold at the rate of 7 barrels per minute.
- the carbon dioxide is pumped at 14 barrels per minute into the manifold and a diluted sand/liquid ratio of approximately 2 lb./gal. is injected into the well.
- Additional additives such as surfactants and fluid loss additives may be added to the alcohol at the blender during the treatment.
- a controlled screen-out may be effected at the conclusion of the fracture treatment. Simultaneous with the flush, the annulus carbon dioxide rate is reduced to increase the bottom hole sand concentration. After the sand is displaced into the formation, the well is shut in for any length of time desired prior to the flowing back to evaluate treatment.
- a method of treating a subsurface earth formation penetrated by a well bore comprising: injecting a liquified gas into the formation and injecting gelled alcohol containing entrained propping agents into said formation.
- a method of treating subsurface earth formations penetrated b a borehole comprising: mixing ropping agents with gelled cohol, mixing said gelled alcoho containing the propping agents with a liquified gas and injecting the mixture into the formation surrounding said borehole.
- the method of claim 10 including the step of adding a gel breaker to the gelled alcohol.
- a system for treating subsurface earth formations comprising:
Abstract
The formations surrounding a well bore are subjected to hydraulic fracturing. A liquified gas and a fluid containing entrained propping agents are injected into the formations. The liquified gas returns to its gaseous state and is therefore easily removed from the formation.
Description
05*Z372 XR 366646422 U llllefl mates ratent [1 1 3,664,422
Bullen 1 51 May 23, 1972 4 WELL FRACTURING METliOl) 3,396,107 8/1968 11111 ..l66/308 x A G s AND 2,896,717 7/ 1959 Howard ..166/28l 3,368,627 2/1968 11 1 1 a1. ..166/3o8 x PROPPING AGENTS ENTRAINED IN A 3,108,636 10/1963 P328311 166/308 FLUID 3,170,517 2/1965 Graham et a]. 166/308 x [721 lnvenm" Bulk", Calgary Albem' 2,596,844 5/1952 Clark 166/308 ux Canada v [73] Assignee: Dresser Industries, Inc., Dallas, Tex. Primary Examiner'"stephen Novosad Attorney-Robert W. Mayer, Thomas P. Hubbard, Jr., Danlel [22] Filed: Aug. 17, 1970 Rubin, Raymond T. Majesko, Roy L. Van Winkle, William E.
[ 1 pp 64,271 Johnson, Jr. and Eddie E. Scott ABS (ACT [52] US. Cl. 166/283, [66/308, 166/75 The formations Surrounding a we bore are subjected to [51 1 Int. 6 hydraulic fracturing A gas and a containing en- Field of Search 281, trained propping agents are injected into the formations, The 166/283 liquified gas returns to its gaseous state and is therefore easily removed from the formation.
[56] References Cited 14 Claims, 6 Drawing figures UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,136,361 6/1964 Marx ..l66/308 ALCOHOL l3 PROPPING BLENDER 2 AGENT l6 PUMP PUMP WELL PATENTEUMM 23 m2 8,664, 12 2 SHEET 3 [IF 3 METHANOL GEL BREAK 5o 1 I I GEL VISCOSITY 480p C zo 2 METHANOL VISCOSITY 0.6cp L l l -l JLL .L 4 .E-. L E- E 0 IO so so e0 :oo no I20 I30 I40 :50 TIME IN MINUTES & J
FIG. 4
ALCOHOL l3 l4 2 8 ZQ w BLENDER 00 PUMP f PUMP L IS f 25 PIC 15 T wELL 6 INVENTOR 26 RONALD S. BULLEN ATTORNEY WELL FRACTURING METHOD EMPLOYING A LIQUIFIED GAS AND PROPPING AGENTS ENTRAINED IN A FLUID BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to the art of hydraulically fracturing subterranean earth formations surrounding oil wells, gas wells, and similar bore holes. In particular, this invention relates to hydraulic fracturing utilizing a liquified gas and a fluid containing entrained propping agents.
Hydraulic fracturing has been widely used for stimulating the production of crude oil and natural gas from wells completed in reservoirs of low permeability. Methods employed normally require the injection of a fracturing fluid containing suspended propping agents into a well at a rate sufficient to open a fracture in the exposed formation. Continued pumping of fluid into the well at a high rate extends the fracture and leads to the build-up of a bed of propping agent particles between the fracture walls. These particles prevent complete closure of the fracture as the fluid subsequently leaks off into the adjacent formations and results in a permeable channel extending from the well bore into the formations. The conductivity of this channel depends upon the fracture dimensions, the size of the propping agent particles, the particle spacing, and the confining pressures.
The fluids used in hydraulic fracturing operations must have filter loss values sufficiently low to permit build-up and maintenance of the required pressures at reasonable injection rates. This normally requires that such fluids either have adequate viscosities or contain filter-loss control agents which will plug the pores in the formation. The use of fracturing fluids having relatively low viscosities in conjunction with additives which provide the low filter-loss values needed avoids excessively high friction losses in the tubing and casing. The well head pressures and hydraulic horsepower required to overcome such friction losses may otherwise be prohibitive.
Fracturing of low permeability reservoirs has always presented the problem of fluid compatibility with the formation core and formation fluids, particularly in gas wells. For example, many formations contain clays which swell when contacted by aqueous fluids causing restricted permeability,
and it is not uncommon to see reduced flow through gas well cores tested with various oils. 1
Another problem encountered in fracturing operations is the difficulty of total recovery of the fracturing fluid. Fluids left in the reservoir rock as immobile residual fluid impede the flow of reservoir gas or fluids, to an extent that the benefit of fracturing is decreased or eliminated. The removal of the fracturing fluid may require the expenditure of a large amount of energy and time, consequently the reduction or elimination of the problem is highly desirable.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART In attempting to overcome the filter-loss problem, gelled fluids prepared with water, diesel and similar low viscosity liquids have been useful. Such fluids have apparent viscosities high enough to support the propping agent particles without settling and yet low enough to give acceptable friction losses. The gelling agents also promote laminar flow under conditions where turbulent flow would otherwise take place and hence in some cases, the losses may be lower than those obtained with low viscosity-base fluids containing no additives. Certain water-soluble poly-acrylamides, oil soluble poly-isobutylene and other polymers which have little effect on viscosity when used in low concentration can be added to the ungelled fluid to achieve similar benefits.
In attempting to overcome the problem of fluid compatibility when aqueous fracturing fluids are used, chemical additives have been used such as salt or chemicals for pH control. Salts such as NaCl, KCl, or CaCl, have been widely used for fracturing water sensitive formations. Where hydrocarbons are used, light products such as gelled condensate have seen a wide degree of success, but are restricted in use due to the inherent hazards of pumping volative fluids.
Low density gases such as CO, or N; have been used in attempting to overcome the problem of removing the fracturing liquid. The low density gasses are added at a calculated ratio which promotes fluid flow subsequent to the fracturing. This .back flow of load fluids is usually due to reservoir pressure alone, without mechanical aid from surface, because of the reduction of hydrostatic head caused by gasifying the fluid.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method of well stimulation with little or no reservoir contamination and a high percentage of load fluid recovery. A liquified gas and a fluid containing entrained propping agents are injected into the formations. Since the two aforementioned fluid phases are completely miscible they may be either blended prior to well entry, or injected separately and blended in the well. The fluids are injected until a fracture of suflicient width to produce a highly conductive .channel has been formed. Particles of the propping agent, suspended in the mixture, are carried into the fracture. The injected fluid is then permitted to leak off into the formation until the fracture has closed sufficiently to hold the particles in place.
Inone embodiment of the invention, liquid carbon dioxide (CO and a high concentration of propping agents in a stream of gelled alcohol are simultaneously injected into the well bore. When the liquid carbon dioxide reaches the formations, it gasifies, leaving only a low fluid residual of alcohol to recover. This alcohol, in turn, is soluble in reservoir gas (methane) and is essentially returned as a vapor. The propping agents are added to a separate side stream of alcohol at atmospheric pressure and subsequently blended with the liquid carbon dioxide for injection into the well. A suitable alternate to alcohol is a light oil, condensate, or reformate (aromatic refinery by-product) gelled with additives such as aluminum stearate and time-dependant breakers.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method of fracturing the formations surrounding a well bore wherein propping agents contained in a suitable fluid are added to a liquified gas and injected into the formations.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a fracturing method wherein propping agents are added to a suitable fluid at atmospheric pressure and the fluid containing the propping agents is subsequently mixed with a liquified gas and injected into the formations surrounding a well bore.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a well fracturing method that prevents any fluid of questionable compatibility from contacting either the formation or reservoir fluids.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a well fracturing method that allows extension of the shut-in period of the well to an indefinite period of time for fracture healing, also allowing flow-back and evaluation at the operators convenience.
It is astill further object of the present invention to provide a well fracturing method that includes a combination of alcohol, surface active agents and liquified carbon dioxide to be injected into the formation surrounding a well bore.
The above and other objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 depicts a pressure enthalpy chart for CO in the re- I gion of interest of oil well servicing.
FIG. 2 shows the viscosity of CO FIG. 3 shows the thermodynamic properties of saturated carbon dioxide.
FIG. 4 shows the rate of reaction of gel breaker on the gelled alcohol.
FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a system used in this invention.
FIG. 6 shows a fracturing manifold that may be used to inject the fluids into the well bore.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention liquid carbon dioxide (CO is the primary fracturing fluid in a well fracturing method. Simultaneous injection of gelled alcohol (methanol) is used to carry the propping agent.
Referring now to FIG. 1, a pressure enthalpy chart for carbon dioxide in the region of interest in oil well servicing is shown. The probable path followed during a fracturing job is depicted by a dash line. Liquid carbon dioxide is pumped from a delivery transport at approximately 300 psi and F. It is pumped to an elevated pressure where it is comingled with gelled alcohol and propping agents. The temperature of the combined fluids rises due to mixing with warm fluid and as the mixed stream goes down the well, it picks up additional heat from the borehole and additional pressure due to hydrostatic head. At the perforation, pressure is at its peak and it declines after formation fracturing as fluid enters the reservoir. As the critical temperature of the carbon dioxide (87.8 F.) is exceeded, it changes to the vapor stage. When pressure is relieved at the well head after completion of the treatment, the gaseous carbon dioxide expands along a path similar to that shown, until it emerges as a gas at the well head at atmospheric pressure.
Referring now to FIG. 2, the viscosity of carbon dioxide determined by the method of Uyehara and Watson" was calculated over the range of 0 to 300 F. for pressures from 100 to 30,000 psi. This information may be used in calculating the friction pressure drop which may be encountered when pumping pure liquid carbon dioxide into a well. The density of carbon dioxide is calculated from the equation PV 0.243ZTM where P equals pressure in psia; V equals volume in cubic feet; Z equals compressibility factor; T equals temperature in degrees Rankin; M equals weight in pounds. This equation was solved for temperatures from 0 to 200 F. and pressures from 100 psi to 10,000 psi.
Knowing viscosity and density, friction pressures of liquid carbon dioxide may then be calculated using Crittendon's correlation for pressure drop in oilfield production pipe:
where P/L pressure drop per l ,000 feet p density, gm/cc u viscosity, cp
Q injection rate, BPM
D pipe diameter, inches An example of friction drop for carbon dioxide at high pressures was calculated at BPM for 3.548 in. I.D. tubing at 6,000 psi indicating that the pressure drop for carbon dioxide under these conditions is only 43 percent less than that of water with 1 cp viscosity. The addition of the gelled alcohol and sand slurry to the carbon dioxide injected into a well does not appear to change the pipe friction appreciably from that calculated, although variations in perforation friction are proportionate to the increased density of the slurry according to the equation:
P perforation friction, psi
Q injection rate, BPM
p density, gm/cc n diameter of perforation, inches D diameter of perforations in inches Orifice coefficient assumed 0.8
The thermodynamic properties of saturated carbon dioxide are shown in the Table of FIG. 3. As may be seen from this Table, the latent heat of vaporization is a function of temperature, ranging from 120.1 BTU/lb. at 0 F. (transport conditions) to 0.0 BTU/lb. at 87.8 F., when the CO is entirely gaseous.
In a fracture treatment using carbon dioxide as a base fluid, the total heat absorption from the tubing, casing and formation for a stimulation incorporating 10,000 gallons of liquid carbon dioxide would therefore be 1.0 X 10 BTU. This is usually well within the tolerable range for cooling effect corresponding to an average temperature drop throughout the system of only 20 F. to 30 F. which is quickly replaced by downhole heat transfer to equilibrium.
Under reservoir temperature and pressure conditions, the specific volume of carbon dioxide increases from that at the surface. This volume expansion increases the velocity of the fracturing fluid in the formation for improved fracture width and penetration. The volume occupied by 1,000 SCF of carbon dioxide prior to injection is 1.78 ft. (0 F 300 psi). This volume expands under reservoir conditions, with the greatest effect at lower pressures.
The volume of gaseous carbon dioxide in the well reservoir at any temperature may also be calculated according to the formula:
m X tn/p where V is the final volume,
V is the initial volume at standard conditions,
f is the compressibility factor at final conditions,
p is the final pressures in atmospheres.
The gelled alcohol used to carry the propping agent may be methanol or another alcohol with similar properties. Methanol is used as a proppant carrying agent in view of its compatibility with most gas and oil reservoirs, its low freezing point, and potential chemical benefits to the stimulation.
As shown in FIG. 4 the rate of reaction of gel breaker on the gelled alcohol is rapid, but allows adequate time for the displacement of the proppant into the formation at a high viscosity blend. From initial viscosity of 50 to 60 cp the gel breaks back to 2 cp as a final viscosity. By comparison, straight methanol has a viscosity of 0.6 cp. It is preferred that the alcohol be gelled to a viscosity of 20 cp or higher in order to be sufficient to carry the high concentration of propping agent through the pumping equipment and into the formation. In a low fluid residual treatment, the alcohol occupies as little as 16 percent of the total fluid volume. This alcohol is distributed over a total fracture area of many thousands of square feet, and in actual field use it is seldom recovered as a liquid.
Total recovery of the methanol without residual fluid saturation is realized by vaporization during subsequent production of the well. The saturation of alcohol in methane varies with temperature and pressure, but is generally over 250 lbs. per million cubic feet of gas under reservoir conditions.
Referring now to FIG. 5 one embodiment of a system of the present invention is shown in schematic form. An alcohol storage tank 11 is connected to a blender 12. The blender 12 may be of the type conventionally used in oil field fracturing operations and would normally include paddles, a ribbon mixer or jets for mixing and suspending propping agents in the gelled alcohol. The alcohol is gelled in this blender just prior to the addition of the propping agents. It is generally preferred to operate the blender 12 at a high speed to prevent buildup and slugging of the propping agent particles. A return line 13 from the blender to the alcohol storage tank 1] permits circulation to promote initial mixing of the fluid before the propping agent is added. A suitable propping agent from container 14 is added to blender 12. Discharge line 15 extends from blender 12 to high pressure fracturing pump or pumps 16. These pumps are normally positive displacement, Triplex pumps, truck mounted and specially equipped for pumping abrasive slurries at high rates and pressures.
Liquid carbon dioxide from tank or tanks 17 is injected into the well 18 by means of a pump or pumps 19. Unit 19 may be a pumping unit similar to that described in connection with pumping unit 16.
The pumps 16 and 19, blender 12, tanks 11 and 17 and other equipment are normally located some distance from the well 18 to minimize the danger in case of fire or blowout. Valves are provided throughout the system to permit control of the fluids and the disconnection of individual units of equipment as necessary.
Referring now to FIG. 6 another embodiment of the present invention is shown. A fracturing manifold particularly suited for the present invention is indicated generally at 20. Thegelled alcohol with proppant enters the manifold 20 at the inlet 21. It receives the gel breaking mixture which enters at 22 and the mixture then passes down the tubing 23. The liquid carbon dioxide enters at 24 and passes down the annulus between tubing 23 and tubing 25. As the gelled alcohol including the additives exits from tubing 23 it is completely mixed with the carbon dioxide prior to entry into the formation 26.
in a typical treatment, alcohol with between 5 to 8 lbs. of proppant per gallon, depending on the well conditions, is pumped into a manifold at the rate of 7 barrels per minute. The carbon dioxide is pumped at 14 barrels per minute into the manifold and a diluted sand/liquid ratio of approximately 2 lb./gal. is injected into the well. Additional additives such as surfactants and fluid loss additives may be added to the alcohol at the blender during the treatment.
When injecting the alcohol and carbon dioxide separately into the tubing and casing, a controlled screen-out may be effected at the conclusion of the fracture treatment. Simultaneous with the flush, the annulus carbon dioxide rate is reduced to increase the bottom hole sand concentration. After the sand is displaced into the formation, the well is shut in for any length of time desired prior to the flowing back to evaluate treatment.
It is generally recognized that the stimulation benefits resulting from the present invention are two-fold:
1. highly permeable channels are developed which have the effect of allowing increased flow into the well bore; and
2. the well bore area itself is cleaned out of water blocks,
mud contamination and emulsions by the scouring and flushing action of the fluids.
In the second (2) area of stimulation, the action of alcohol, carbon dioxide and surfactants would have significant benefit. It has been shown that the injection of alcohol, surfactants and carbon dioxide restores the permeability of the productive formation to gas by removing water from the capillary pores of the formation. The surfactant decreases the surface tension of the water causing a decrease in capillary pressure which allows the water to be more easily displaced by injected gas. The alcohol acts as a drying agent; thus, the combination of surfactant and dessicant forced into the formation by a gas at high pressure is very effective for removing a water block in the immediate vicinity of the well bore.
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A method of treating a subsurface earth formation penetrated by a well bore, comprising: injecting a liquified gas into the formation and injecting gelled alcohol containing entrained propping agents into said formation.
2. The method of claim 1 including the step of injecting a gel breaker into said formation.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said gelled alcohol is gelled methanol.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas is carbon dioxide.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein said steps of injecting a liquified gas and said step of injecting gelled alcohol containing entrained propping agents are performed simultaneously.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas and gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents are blended prior to injection into the formations.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas and gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents are mixed after each has been injected into the well bore.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein said gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents is at atmospheric pres sure prior to injection into the well bore.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the entrained propping agents are sand.
10. A method of treating subsurface earth formations penetrated b a borehole, comprising: mixing ropping agents with gelled cohol, mixing said gelled alcoho containing the propping agents with a liquified gas and injecting the mixture into the formation surrounding said borehole.
11. The method of claim 10 including the step of adding a gel breaker to the gelled alcohol.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein said liquified gas is liquified N 13. The method of claim 10 wherein said liquified gas is liquified CO 14. A system for treating subsurface earth formations comprising:
means for mixing propping agents with gelled alcohol;
means for blending the propping agents and gelled alcohol mixture with a liquified gas; and means for injecting the blend into said subsurface earth formations.
Claims (13)
- 2. The method of claim 1 including the step of injecting a gel breaker into said formation.
- 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said gelled alcohol is gelled methanol.
- 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas is carbon dioxide.
- 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said steps of injecting a liquified gas and said step of injecting gelled alcohol containing entrained propping agents are performed simultaneously.
- 6. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas and gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents are blended prior to injection into the formations.
- 7. The method of claim 1 wherein said liquified gas and gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents are mixed after each has been injected into the well bore.
- 8. The method of claim 1 wherein said gelled alcohol containing the entrained propping agents is at atmospheric pressure prior to injection into the well bore.
- 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the entrained propping agents are sand.
- 10. A method of treating subsurface earth formations penetrated by a borehole, comprising: mixing propping agents with gelled alcohol, mixing said gelled alcohol containing the propping agents with a liquified gas and injecting the mixture into the formation surrounding said borehole.
- 11. The method of claim 10 including the step of adding a gel breaker to the gelled alcohol.
- 12. The method of claim 10 wherein said liquified gas is liquified N2.
- 13. The method of claim 10 wherein said liquified gas is liquified CO2.
- 14. A system for treating subsurface earth formations comprising: means for mixing propping agents with gelled alcohol; means for blending the propping agents and gelled alcohol mixture with a liquified gas; and means for injecting the blend into said subsurface earth formations.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US6427170A | 1970-08-17 | 1970-08-17 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3664422A true US3664422A (en) | 1972-05-23 |
Family
ID=22054756
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US3664422D Expired - Lifetime US3664422A (en) | 1970-08-17 | 1970-08-17 | Well fracturing method employing a liquified gas and propping agents entrained in a fluid |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3664422A (en) |
CA (1) | CA932655A (en) |
Cited By (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3759329A (en) * | 1969-05-09 | 1973-09-18 | Shuffman O | Cryo-thermal process for fracturing rock formations |
US3765488A (en) * | 1972-04-06 | 1973-10-16 | Dow Chemical Co | Well treating method |
US3766986A (en) * | 1972-08-18 | 1973-10-23 | Exxon Production Research Co | Method of treating a well using a volatile hydrocarbon liquid |
US3858658A (en) * | 1973-11-19 | 1975-01-07 | Mobil Oil Corp | Hydraulic fracturing method for low permeability formations |
US3954626A (en) * | 1973-09-24 | 1976-05-04 | The Dow Chemical Company | Well treating composition and method |
US3954636A (en) * | 1973-08-30 | 1976-05-04 | The Dow Chemical Company | Acidizing fluid for stimulation of subterranean formations |
US3980136A (en) * | 1974-04-05 | 1976-09-14 | Big Three Industries, Inc. | Fracturing well formations using foam |
US4010803A (en) * | 1974-11-14 | 1977-03-08 | Rose Shuffman, executrix | Method for cryothermal fracturing of rock formations |
US4126181A (en) * | 1977-06-20 | 1978-11-21 | Palmer Engineering Company Ltd. | Method and apparatus for formation fracturing with foam having greater proppant concentration |
US4186802A (en) * | 1978-03-13 | 1980-02-05 | William Perlman | Fracing process |
US4212354A (en) * | 1979-03-19 | 1980-07-15 | Service Fracturing Company and Airry, Inc. | Method for injecting carbon dioxide into a well |
US4226475A (en) * | 1978-04-19 | 1980-10-07 | Frosch Robert A | Underground mineral extraction |
US4374545A (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1983-02-22 | L.H.B. Investment, Inc. | Carbon dioxide fracturing process and apparatus |
US4480696A (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1984-11-06 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4487025A (en) * | 1983-04-18 | 1984-12-11 | Halliburton Company | Passive booster for pumping liquified gases |
US4488975A (en) * | 1982-12-13 | 1984-12-18 | Halliburton Company | High temperature stable crosslinked gel fracturing fluid |
US4519455A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-05-28 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4554082A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-11-19 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4607699A (en) * | 1985-06-03 | 1986-08-26 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Method for treating a tar sand reservoir to enhance petroleum production by cyclic steam stimulation |
US4627495A (en) * | 1985-04-04 | 1986-12-09 | Halliburton Company | Method for stimulation of wells with carbon dioxide or nitrogen based fluids containing high proppant concentrations |
USRE32302E (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1986-12-09 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4701270A (en) * | 1985-02-28 | 1987-10-20 | Canadian Fracmaster Limited | Novel compositions suitable for treating deep wells |
US4825952A (en) * | 1987-11-13 | 1989-05-02 | Dwight N. Loree | Fracturing process for low permeability reservoirs employing a compatible hydrocarbon-liquid carbon dioxide mixture |
US4850750A (en) * | 1985-07-19 | 1989-07-25 | Halliburton Company | Integrated blending control system |
US4887671A (en) * | 1988-12-23 | 1989-12-19 | Texaco, Inc. | Fracturing with a mixture of carbon dioxide and alcohol |
US5515923A (en) * | 1994-08-26 | 1996-05-14 | Loree; Dwight N. | Oil and gas well productivity |
US5566760A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1996-10-22 | Halliburton Company | Method of using a foamed fracturing fluid |
US5575335A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1996-11-19 | Halliburton Company | Method for stimulation of subterranean formations |
EP0764235A1 (en) * | 1994-06-06 | 1997-03-26 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for fracturing and propping a subterranean formation |
US5674816A (en) * | 1995-01-25 | 1997-10-07 | Loree; Dwight N. | Olefin based frac fluid |
US6509300B1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2003-01-21 | B.J Services Company | Liquid CO2/hydrocarbon oil emulsion fracturing system |
US20050211439A1 (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2005-09-29 | Willett Ronald M | Methods of isolating hydrajet stimulated zones |
US20060260815A1 (en) * | 2005-04-06 | 2006-11-23 | Dahanayake Manilal S | Method of recycling fracturing fluids using a self-degrading foaming composition |
US20070204991A1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Loree Dwight N | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US20070261844A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-11-15 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and critical fluids |
WO2008037981A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of fracturing a subterranean formation using a jetting tool and a viscoelastic surfactant fluid to minimize formation damage |
US20090200011A1 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2009-08-13 | Decker Randal L | Truck-mounted pumping system for treating a subterranean formation via a well with a mixture of liquids |
US20110209882A1 (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2011-09-01 | Enis Ben M | Method and apparatus for sequestering CO2 gas and releasing natural gas from coal and gas shale formations |
EP2527586A1 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2012-11-28 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Method for induced fracturing in a subsurface formation |
US8833474B2 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2014-09-16 | Ben M. Enis | Method and apparatus for using pressure cycling and cold liquid CO2 for releasing natural gas from coal and shale formations |
US20140262292A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stimulation with Natural Gas |
US20140378354A1 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2014-12-25 | Richard M. Kelly | Fracturing fluid composition and method of using same in geological formations |
WO2013173725A3 (en) * | 2012-05-17 | 2015-03-19 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Fracturing rock formations using liquefied industrial gas |
US8991499B2 (en) | 2011-01-17 | 2015-03-31 | Millennium Stimulation Services Ltd. | Fracturing system and method for an underground formation |
US9187996B1 (en) | 2012-08-23 | 2015-11-17 | Millennium Stimulation Services, Ltd. | Reduced emissions method for recovering product from a hydraulic fracturing operation |
WO2015181028A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Statoil Gulf Services LLC | Applications of ultra-low viscosity fluids to stimulate ultra-tight hydrocarbon-bearing formations |
US9243182B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2016-01-26 | American Air Liquide Inc. | Hydraulic fracturing with improved viscosity liquefied industrial gas based solution |
US9683432B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2017-06-20 | Step Energy Services Llc | Hybrid LPG frac |
US10125592B2 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2018-11-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and systems for treatment of subterranean formations |
WO2019125622A1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2019-06-27 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Alternating liquid gas fracturing for enhanced oil recovery of well |
US11008842B2 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2021-05-18 | Cnooc Petroleum North America Ulc | Methods for hydraulic fracturing |
US20210388695A1 (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2021-12-16 | Spm Oil & Gas Inc. | Fluid delivery device for a hydraulic fracturing system |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2129613C (en) | 1994-08-05 | 1997-09-23 | Samuel Luk | High proppant concentration/high co2 ratio fracturing system |
CA2135719C (en) | 1994-11-14 | 1998-01-20 | Robin Tudor | Nitrogen/carbon dioxide combination fracture treatment |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2596844A (en) * | 1949-12-31 | 1952-05-13 | Stanolind Oil & Gas Co | Treatment of wells |
US2896717A (en) * | 1956-12-28 | 1959-07-28 | Pan American Petroleum Corp | Avoiding increased water production in fracturing operations |
US3108636A (en) * | 1961-05-01 | 1963-10-29 | Pacific Natural Gas Exploratio | Method and apparatus for fracturing underground earth formations |
US3136361A (en) * | 1959-05-11 | 1964-06-09 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Fracturing formations in wells |
US3170517A (en) * | 1962-11-13 | 1965-02-23 | Jersey Prod Res Co | Fracturing formation and stimulation of wells |
US3368627A (en) * | 1966-03-21 | 1968-02-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Method of well treatment employing volatile fluid composition |
US3393741A (en) * | 1966-05-27 | 1968-07-23 | Gulf Research Development Co | Method of fracturing subsurface formations |
US3396107A (en) * | 1962-08-09 | 1968-08-06 | Producers Chemical Company | Composition for fracturing process |
-
1970
- 1970-08-17 US US3664422D patent/US3664422A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1971
- 1971-03-09 CA CA107279A patent/CA932655A/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2596844A (en) * | 1949-12-31 | 1952-05-13 | Stanolind Oil & Gas Co | Treatment of wells |
US2896717A (en) * | 1956-12-28 | 1959-07-28 | Pan American Petroleum Corp | Avoiding increased water production in fracturing operations |
US3136361A (en) * | 1959-05-11 | 1964-06-09 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Fracturing formations in wells |
US3108636A (en) * | 1961-05-01 | 1963-10-29 | Pacific Natural Gas Exploratio | Method and apparatus for fracturing underground earth formations |
US3396107A (en) * | 1962-08-09 | 1968-08-06 | Producers Chemical Company | Composition for fracturing process |
US3170517A (en) * | 1962-11-13 | 1965-02-23 | Jersey Prod Res Co | Fracturing formation and stimulation of wells |
US3368627A (en) * | 1966-03-21 | 1968-02-13 | Dow Chemical Co | Method of well treatment employing volatile fluid composition |
US3393741A (en) * | 1966-05-27 | 1968-07-23 | Gulf Research Development Co | Method of fracturing subsurface formations |
Cited By (79)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3759329A (en) * | 1969-05-09 | 1973-09-18 | Shuffman O | Cryo-thermal process for fracturing rock formations |
US3765488A (en) * | 1972-04-06 | 1973-10-16 | Dow Chemical Co | Well treating method |
FR2179198A1 (en) * | 1972-04-06 | 1973-11-16 | Dow Chemical Co | |
US3766986A (en) * | 1972-08-18 | 1973-10-23 | Exxon Production Research Co | Method of treating a well using a volatile hydrocarbon liquid |
US3954636A (en) * | 1973-08-30 | 1976-05-04 | The Dow Chemical Company | Acidizing fluid for stimulation of subterranean formations |
US3954626A (en) * | 1973-09-24 | 1976-05-04 | The Dow Chemical Company | Well treating composition and method |
US3858658A (en) * | 1973-11-19 | 1975-01-07 | Mobil Oil Corp | Hydraulic fracturing method for low permeability formations |
US3980136A (en) * | 1974-04-05 | 1976-09-14 | Big Three Industries, Inc. | Fracturing well formations using foam |
US4010803A (en) * | 1974-11-14 | 1977-03-08 | Rose Shuffman, executrix | Method for cryothermal fracturing of rock formations |
US4126181A (en) * | 1977-06-20 | 1978-11-21 | Palmer Engineering Company Ltd. | Method and apparatus for formation fracturing with foam having greater proppant concentration |
US4186802A (en) * | 1978-03-13 | 1980-02-05 | William Perlman | Fracing process |
US4226475A (en) * | 1978-04-19 | 1980-10-07 | Frosch Robert A | Underground mineral extraction |
US4212354A (en) * | 1979-03-19 | 1980-07-15 | Service Fracturing Company and Airry, Inc. | Method for injecting carbon dioxide into a well |
US4374545A (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1983-02-22 | L.H.B. Investment, Inc. | Carbon dioxide fracturing process and apparatus |
DE3235845A1 (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1983-04-14 | Canadian Fracmaster Ltd., Calgary, Alberta | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SPLITTING UNDERGROUND STRATIGRAPHIC LAYERING |
NL8203477A (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1983-04-18 | Canadian Fracmaster Ltd | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR BREAKING AN UNDERGROUND STRATIGRAPHIC LAYER |
US4480696A (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1984-11-06 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
USRE32302E (en) * | 1982-10-25 | 1986-12-09 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4488975A (en) * | 1982-12-13 | 1984-12-18 | Halliburton Company | High temperature stable crosslinked gel fracturing fluid |
US4487025A (en) * | 1983-04-18 | 1984-12-11 | Halliburton Company | Passive booster for pumping liquified gases |
EP0150112A2 (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-07-31 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stmulation of wells |
US4554082A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-11-19 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
EP0150112A3 (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1986-02-12 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stmulation of wells |
US4519455A (en) * | 1984-01-20 | 1985-05-28 | Halliburton Company | Fracturing method for stimulation of wells utilizing carbon dioxide based fluids |
US4701270A (en) * | 1985-02-28 | 1987-10-20 | Canadian Fracmaster Limited | Novel compositions suitable for treating deep wells |
US4627495A (en) * | 1985-04-04 | 1986-12-09 | Halliburton Company | Method for stimulation of wells with carbon dioxide or nitrogen based fluids containing high proppant concentrations |
US4607699A (en) * | 1985-06-03 | 1986-08-26 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Method for treating a tar sand reservoir to enhance petroleum production by cyclic steam stimulation |
US4850750A (en) * | 1985-07-19 | 1989-07-25 | Halliburton Company | Integrated blending control system |
US4825952A (en) * | 1987-11-13 | 1989-05-02 | Dwight N. Loree | Fracturing process for low permeability reservoirs employing a compatible hydrocarbon-liquid carbon dioxide mixture |
US4887671A (en) * | 1988-12-23 | 1989-12-19 | Texaco, Inc. | Fracturing with a mixture of carbon dioxide and alcohol |
EP0764235A1 (en) * | 1994-06-06 | 1997-03-26 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for fracturing and propping a subterranean formation |
EP0764235A4 (en) * | 1994-06-06 | 2000-07-05 | Mobil Oil Corp | Method for fracturing and propping a subterranean formation |
US5515923A (en) * | 1994-08-26 | 1996-05-14 | Loree; Dwight N. | Oil and gas well productivity |
US5566760A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1996-10-22 | Halliburton Company | Method of using a foamed fracturing fluid |
US5990052A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1999-11-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Foamed fracturing fluid |
US5674816A (en) * | 1995-01-25 | 1997-10-07 | Loree; Dwight N. | Olefin based frac fluid |
US5575335A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1996-11-19 | Halliburton Company | Method for stimulation of subterranean formations |
US6509300B1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2003-01-21 | B.J Services Company | Liquid CO2/hydrocarbon oil emulsion fracturing system |
US20050211439A1 (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2005-09-29 | Willett Ronald M | Methods of isolating hydrajet stimulated zones |
US7766083B2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2010-08-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of isolating hydrajet stimulated zones |
US7225869B2 (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2007-06-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of isolating hydrajet stimulated zones |
US20060000610A1 (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2006-01-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of fracturing sensitive formations |
US7681635B2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2010-03-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of fracturing sensitive formations |
US20060260815A1 (en) * | 2005-04-06 | 2006-11-23 | Dahanayake Manilal S | Method of recycling fracturing fluids using a self-degrading foaming composition |
US7404442B2 (en) | 2005-04-06 | 2008-07-29 | Rhodia Inc. | Method of recycling fracturing fluids using a self-degrading foaming composition |
US8020615B2 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2011-09-20 | Decker Randal L | Truck-mounted pumping system for treating a subterranean formation via a well with a mixture of liquids |
US20090200011A1 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2009-08-13 | Decker Randal L | Truck-mounted pumping system for treating a subterranean formation via a well with a mixture of liquids |
US7694731B2 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2010-04-13 | Team Co2, Inc. | Truck-mounted pumping system for treating a subterranean formation via a well with a mixture of liquids |
US20100147506A1 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2010-06-17 | Team Co2, Inc. | Truck-mounted pumping system for treating a subterranean formation via a well with a mixture of liquids |
US20070204991A1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Loree Dwight N | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US8408289B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2013-04-02 | Gasfrac Energy Services Inc. | Liquified petroleum gas fracturing system |
US20070261844A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-11-15 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and critical fluids |
AU2007250001B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2010-06-24 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and critical fluids |
US7562708B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2009-07-21 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and critical fluids |
CN101438027B (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2013-09-18 | 雷斯昂公司 | Method and apparatus for capture and sequester of carbon dioxide and extraction of energy from large land masses during and after extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using energy and criti |
WO2008037981A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods of fracturing a subterranean formation using a jetting tool and a viscoelastic surfactant fluid to minimize formation damage |
US20110209882A1 (en) * | 2009-12-28 | 2011-09-01 | Enis Ben M | Method and apparatus for sequestering CO2 gas and releasing natural gas from coal and gas shale formations |
US8833474B2 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2014-09-16 | Ben M. Enis | Method and apparatus for using pressure cycling and cold liquid CO2 for releasing natural gas from coal and shale formations |
US8839875B2 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2014-09-23 | Ben M. Enis | Method and apparatus for sequestering CO2 gas and releasing natural gas from coal and gas shale formations |
US9453399B2 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2016-09-27 | Ben M. Enis | Method and apparatus for using pressure cycling and cold liquid CO2 for releasing natural gas from coal and shale formations |
US9796910B2 (en) | 2011-01-17 | 2017-10-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fracturing system and method for an underground formation using natural gas and an inert purging fluid |
US8991499B2 (en) | 2011-01-17 | 2015-03-31 | Millennium Stimulation Services Ltd. | Fracturing system and method for an underground formation |
US9033035B2 (en) | 2011-01-17 | 2015-05-19 | Millennium Stimulation Services, Ltd. | Method for fracturing a formation using a fracturing fluid mixture |
US9181789B2 (en) | 2011-01-17 | 2015-11-10 | Millennium Stimulation Servicesltd. | Fracturing system and method for an underground formation using natural gas and an inert purging fluid |
EP2527586A1 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2012-11-28 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Method for induced fracturing in a subsurface formation |
US9683432B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2017-06-20 | Step Energy Services Llc | Hybrid LPG frac |
WO2013173725A3 (en) * | 2012-05-17 | 2015-03-19 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Fracturing rock formations using liquefied industrial gas |
US9243182B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2016-01-26 | American Air Liquide Inc. | Hydraulic fracturing with improved viscosity liquefied industrial gas based solution |
US9187996B1 (en) | 2012-08-23 | 2015-11-17 | Millennium Stimulation Services, Ltd. | Reduced emissions method for recovering product from a hydraulic fracturing operation |
US9790775B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-10-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stimulation with natural gas |
US20140262292A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stimulation with Natural Gas |
US20140378354A1 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2014-12-25 | Richard M. Kelly | Fracturing fluid composition and method of using same in geological formations |
US10233384B2 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2019-03-19 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Fracturing fluid composition and method of using same in geological formations |
US10125592B2 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2018-11-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and systems for treatment of subterranean formations |
US20150345268A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Statoil Gulf Services LLC | Applications of ultra-low viscosity fluids to stimulate ultra-tight hydrocarbon-bearing formations |
WO2015181028A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Statoil Gulf Services LLC | Applications of ultra-low viscosity fluids to stimulate ultra-tight hydrocarbon-bearing formations |
US11008842B2 (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2021-05-18 | Cnooc Petroleum North America Ulc | Methods for hydraulic fracturing |
US20210388695A1 (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2021-12-16 | Spm Oil & Gas Inc. | Fluid delivery device for a hydraulic fracturing system |
WO2019125622A1 (en) | 2017-12-20 | 2019-06-27 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Alternating liquid gas fracturing for enhanced oil recovery of well |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA932655A (en) | 1973-08-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3664422A (en) | Well fracturing method employing a liquified gas and propping agents entrained in a fluid | |
US10883042B2 (en) | Enhancing acid fracture conductivity | |
CA1056590A (en) | Formation fracturing with stable foam | |
CA2129613C (en) | High proppant concentration/high co2 ratio fracturing system | |
US3100528A (en) | Methods for using inert gas | |
US4374545A (en) | Carbon dioxide fracturing process and apparatus | |
US3136361A (en) | Fracturing formations in wells | |
US3195634A (en) | Fracturing process | |
US5883053A (en) | Nitrogen/carbon dioxide combination fracture treatment | |
CA2405391C (en) | Method for acid stimulating a subterranean well formation for improving hydrocarbon production | |
US4410041A (en) | Process for gas-lifting liquid from a well by injecting liquid into the well | |
Crawford et al. | Carbon dioxide-a multipurpose additive for effective well stimulation | |
US6838418B2 (en) | Fracturing fluid | |
US20150218439A1 (en) | Cryogenic acid frack | |
US4424866A (en) | Method for production of hydrocarbons from hydrates | |
US20160289550A1 (en) | In-situ generation of acid for use in subterranean formation operations | |
CA1305659C (en) | Remedial treatment for coal degas wells | |
US3193014A (en) | Apparatus for fracturing subsurface formations | |
Gruber et al. | Carbonated hydrocarbons for improved gas well fracturing results | |
Shouldice | Liquid nitrogen developments and applications in drilling and completion operations | |
US20070131423A1 (en) | Method of extracting hydrocarbons | |
US11333012B2 (en) | Hybrid fracturing treatment with natural gas | |
Scott et al. | Air foam improves efficiency of completion and workover operations in low-pressure gas wells | |
CA2357973C (en) | Fracturing fluid | |
Bharadwaj et al. | Technological Advances in Water-less Fracking: A Case Study |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:004725/0094 Effective date: 19870430 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: B. J. TITAN SERVICES COMPANY, HOUSTON, TEXAS, A PA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL, INC., A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:004822/0834 Effective date: 19880119 |