US3789462A - Abrasive-filled dental prophylactic cup - Google Patents

Abrasive-filled dental prophylactic cup Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3789462A
US3789462A US00345101A US3789462DA US3789462A US 3789462 A US3789462 A US 3789462A US 00345101 A US00345101 A US 00345101A US 3789462D A US3789462D A US 3789462DA US 3789462 A US3789462 A US 3789462A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
abrasive
cup
cups
dental
prophylactic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00345101A
Inventor
C Reich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
3M Co
Original Assignee
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co filed Critical Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3789462A publication Critical patent/US3789462A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C17/00Devices for cleaning, polishing, rinsing or drying teeth, teeth cavities or prostheses; Saliva removers; Dental appliances for receiving spittle
    • A61C17/005Devices for dental prophylaxis

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Dental Preparations (AREA)

Abstract

An abrasive-filled, paste-free dental prophylactic cup is formed from a urethane elastomer. The elastomer consists essentially of tolylene diisocyanate endcapped polytetrahydrofuran cured with 4,4''-methylene bis(o-chloroaniline). The elastomer has 25 - 50 percent by weight of pumice added to the elastomer as a dental abrasive. Prophylactic cups formed from the abrasive filled elastomer will perform a suitable dental prophylaxis without the addition of prophylactic paste.

Description

[11] 3,789,462 51. Feb. 5, 1974 ABRASIVE-FILLED DENTAL PROPHYLACTIC CUP [75] Inventor: Charles Reich, St. Paul, Minn.
[73] Assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, St Paul, Minn.
[22] Filed: Mar. 26, 1973 [211 App]. No.1 345,101
[52] US. Cl. 32/59 {5 1] Int. Cl. A6lc 3/06 [58] Field of Search 32/58, 59
561 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3/1966 Ellis 32/58 3,599,333 8/l97l Muhler 32/59 Primary ExaminerRobert Peshock Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Alexander, Sell, Steldt &
DeLaHunt abrasive. Prophylactic cups formed from the abrasive filled elastomer will perform a suitable dental prophylaxis without the addition of prophylactic paste.
3 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure ABRASIVE-FILLED DENTAL PROPIIYLACTIC CUP BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention In one aspect this invention relates to abrasive-filled articles. In another aspect this invention relates to dental prophylactic implements such as rubber prophylactic cups.
2. Description of the Prior Art There are or have been proposed abrasive-filled articles suitable for use in dentistry. Examples of such abrasive-filled implements are presently commercially available cups formed of a relatively rigid matrix material having dispersed throughout a harsh abrasive material forming an aggressive polishing implement suitable for polishing dental amalgams or restoratives. These cups have a relatively harsh abrasive action because the hard resins and amalgams used in dental restorations are difficult to polish. Therefore, these cups are not suitable for cleaning and polishing softer tooth enamel due to high rates of enamel removal and high heat buildup.
It has also been proposed to form a dental prophylactic cup from a flexible material such as butadienestyrene block copolymers and to disperse therein an abrasive agent such as zirconium silicate or alumina to aid in the cleaning and polishing of teeth, e.g. see U. S. Pat. No. 3,599,333. Such cups are not designed to be used without the addition of prophylaxis paste. Traditionally, dental prophylaxis articles have been cupshaped, as shown in U. S. Pat. No. 3,599,333, so that they can hold prophylaxis paste for polishing and in addition, the cup shape allows the formation of a lip for cleaning subgingival areas.
It is well known that some strains and pigmentations, which are left on the teeths enamel after ordinary daily brushing, are resistant to the abrasive combinations found in conventional tooth paste and can not be effectively removed by daily brushing with a tooth brush and tooth paste. As a result, dentists commonly recommend dental prophylaxis at regular intervals, such as once or twice a year, to remove dental calculus and accumulated strains left by daily brushing. The teeth after dental prophylaxis should have high luster and smooth polish for good cosmetic qualities and also a smooth enamel surface which is more resistant to the accumulation of bacterial plaque.
The present state of the art consists of a process involving the application of a prophylactic paste containing an abrasive to a rubber cup, followed by polishing the teeth using the paste and the rubber cup. The art of applying the paste to the cup and then to the teeth is repeated frequently throughout the operation'until the patients teeth have all been cleaned. The present method is wasteful in terms of the dentists and patients time. Furthermore, considerable excess paste is spewed onto the dentist, patient, and into the dental equipment used for the cleaning. Because of the scattering of the excess paste, disposable prophylactic angles, a portion of the dental handpiece, are generally used to prevent clogging the damage to the expensive standard dental equipment.
In order to form an acceptable paste-free abrasive cup for dental prophylaxis, the finished cup should perform an acceptable prophylaxis with water alone and without the use of a separate prophylactic paste when used on mouths having mild to moderate stains and plaque. In mouths with heavily stained teeth the use of a prophylactic paste with the abrasive cup may be necessary due to the severe cleaning requirements.
Another feature associated with a suitable abrasivefilled, paste-free prophylactic cup is the formation of a lip when a mild compressive force is applied to the cup. Lip formation is necessary for the cleaning of subgingival areas, and for adequate conformability of the cup to the'irregular surfaces of the teeth.
A further desirable feature in a dental prophylactic cup is the ability to clean one mouth without mechanical failure requiring replacement. Also, the cup should not undergo a loss of cleaning effectiveness during the cleaning procedure.
The abrasive-filled dental cups presently available which would not require the addition of paste for average cleaning conditions are highly abrasive and useful only for polishing dental amalgams. Use of these cups to polish teeth would result in the abrasion of undesirably large amounts of tooth enamel and also the buildup of high temperatures in the tooth dentine due to the heat generated by the highly abrasive cups. Therefore, they are not used for prophylactic cleaning procedures.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION I have discovered that an abrasive-loaded, paste-free dental prophylactic cup can be formed from a shaped body of resilient, elastomeric urethane material containing pumice uniformly dispersed therein. The shaped body has a mandrel and shaft or other means for removably mounting said body on a dental handpiece and is formed around said shaft from a urethane elastomer consisting essentially of 40 65 parts by weight of a tolylene diisocyanate endcapped polytetrahydrofuran having about 2.8 percent by weight isocyanate, cured by the use of 4,4-methylene bis (0- chloroaniline). About 25 50 percent by weight of pumice is used as the abrasive. The abrasive-loaded cup formed from these ingredients is suitable for performing dental prophylaxis under average conditions without the use of additional dental prophylactic paste. The cup may also contain from about 0.05 to 2 parts by weight of a coloring pigment and preferably contains small amounts of a complex organic phosphoric acid plasticizer.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING A further understanding may be had by referring to the accompanying drawing in which:
FIG. 1 is a view in elevation and partial section of the prophylactic cup of this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In the accompanying drawing a dental prophylactic cup 10 is formed from an abrasive-filled elastomeric urethane material 12. The elastomeric material 12 has sufficient flexibility so that when pressure is applied to cup 10 edge 14 will deform to form a lip, thatis edge 14 does not roll under but spreads and rolls outwardly so the interior surface 15 of the cup contacts the tooth to be cleaned, and the edge is also available for cleaning subgingival areas. The cup has means 13, here a threaded stud, for attachment to a dental handpiece (not shown). The threaded stud 13 is anchored in the elastomeric material by means of a head 16.
Numerous elastomeric materials have been used or proposed heretofore for use in dental prophylaxis cups, e.g. natural and synthetic rubbers, or plastics such as polyamides, flexible polystyrene, polyethylene, polypropylene, and the like. Also suggested have been butadiene-styrene block copolymers such as those available under the trademark Thermolastic, see U. S. Pat. No. 3,599,333. These materials while suitable for dental prophylactic cups used with paste do not provide the necessary mechanical properties for a paste-free cup having a high percentage of abrasive material evenly dispersed throughout.
In my invention, I use a urethane-type elastomer, such elastomers having excellent abrasion resistance and being suitable for forming a prophylactic cup even when the cup contains as much as 50 percent by weight of a dental abrasive. The abrasive-loaded material forms a cup suitable for cleaning the irregular surfaces of teeth and the subgingival areas.
Several abrasives have been used in dental cleannig and polishing, such as zirconium silicate and alumina as well as the commonly known and widely used pumice. Zirconium silicate and alumina when used with the urethane elastomer disclosed hereinbefore do not form cups which have the required flexibility and abrasion resistance. In addition, high concentrations of zirconium silicate and alumina in the prophylactic cup result in severe scratching and abrasion to the tooth enamel. However, pumice when used in combination with the urethane elastomer dicslosed hereinbefore, cooperates with the elastomer to form a prophylactic cup suitable for paste-free dental prophylaxis.
in producing the abrasive-filled elastomer, the pumice to be incorporated can be added directly to and mixed with the liquid isocyanate-terminated polytetrahydrofuran. Thereafter, the curing agent is added. The resulting mixture cures to form an abrasive-filled elastomeric material having the pumice evenly dispersed. The pumice will generally have an average particle size from about 10 to 200 microns, the larger particles providing faster cleaning and the smaller particles providing a smoother polished enamel surface. Pumice having an average particle size of from 25 to 50 microns provides a particularly desirable combination of rapid cleaning speed and smooth polish.
The cured abrasive-filled elastomeric material is formed into prophylactic cups of the desired shape by techniques well known in the art, e.g. compression or injection molding. Additives may also be added to the basic abrasive-elastomer mixture disclosed hereinbefore to develop desirable mechanical properties.
A particularly preferred additive, which brings about further improvement in the cups of this invention), is a plasticizer such as a complex organic phosphoric acid similar to the one sold under the tradename Gafstat AD-5 10. The complex organic phosphoric acid serves asa wetting agent, plasticizer, catalyst and coupling agent thereby improving the mechanical properties of the abrasive-filled urethane elastomer. Also, pigments such as titanium dioxide or copper phthalocyanine can be added to the starting materials to provide a cup having a pleasing and more esthetic color.
A further understanding may be had by reference to the following nonlimiting examples in which all parts are by weight. In the following examples, the pigments and abrasive were milled into the premixed molten coreactants, the coreactants comprising a tolylene diisocyanate endcapped polytetrahydrofuran and 4,4- methylene bis(o-chloroaniline). The resulting abrasivefilled elastomer was compression molded into prophylactic cups having a structure similar to FIG. 1. The abrasive particle size used is an average of the distribution as received.
In order to test the prophylactic cups it was felt that the development of a standard test suitable for laboratory use was desirable. The prophylactic cups were laboratory tested for their cleaning efficiency by spinning the formed cups against a lacquered metal surface, at 1,750 revolutions per minute with an impressed load of one pound while the metal and cup were immersed in water. The lacquer was 0.5 mils thick and had a 4H pencil hardness.
The removal rate of lacquer was equated with in vivo cleaning through clinical evaluations of cups having the same properties as the laboratory tested cups. Any cup requiring greater than 30 seconds for lacquer removal was found to be inadequate, for the clinical tests showed these cups required excessive cleaning time and lacked cleaning ability.
As a measure of present art acceptability a commonly used prophylactic paste, Nupro. Dental Prophy Paste (a trademarked product of Janar and Co.) in combination with a standard prophylactic rubber cup, BS Cups, Young Dental Manufacturing, was used under the same laboratory conditions as the abrasively loaded cups of this invention. The prophy paste and cup removed the lacquer in approximately 10 seconds.
The cups were further subjected to a second laboratory test to determine their mechanical strength. In this test, the cups were rotated at 1,750 revolutions per minute on a 400 grit silicone carbide paper under a 2 pound load. The cups were visually checked at 30 second intervals up to seconds for tearing, loss of lip formation, or general disintegration. Cups showing visual degeneration in less than 90 seconds were considered less desirable, inasmuch as clinical evaluation showed cups which did not withstand 90 seconds of this test generally would not clean one entire moutn. Cups which do not withstand 90 seconds of this test will provide a suitable prophylaxis for mildly stained teeth. Also in many cases more than one cup can be used.
EXAMPLE 1 A urethane elastomer was formed from 10 parts of tolylene diisocyanate endcapped polytetrahydrofuran, having 2.8 percent by weight isocyanate, (available as Adiprene L-42), and 0.88 part of 4,4'-methylene bis- (o-chloroaniline), (available as MOCA). Also, 0.5 parts of a complex organic phosphoric acid, (available as Gafstat AD-5l0), was added as a wetting agent and plasticizer to the liquid coreactants. For color, 0.4 parts of titanium dioxide pigment, (available as RF-30 from the Cabot Corp.) and 0.02 part of copper phthalocyamine was added. Ten parts of a line pumice powder having an average diameter of 55 microns was 7 added to the liquid formation and the ingredients molded to form prophylactic cups like FIG. 1. The prophylactic cups formed from the formulations of this example removed lacquer in approximately 10 seconds and withstood more than 90 seconds of abrasion when tested by the laboratory tests. Clinical evaluation by dentists and dental hygienists confirmed the laboratory test results that these cups were acceptable by cleaning coreactant, hereinafter referred to e s B. Ten one mouth without the addition of prophylactic paste. parts of abrasive were used in all runs and the other ln additional cups, the parts by weight of pumice was materials remained the same as in Example 1. varied from 4 parts to parts representing 25 to 56 The formulations and test results, both laboratory percent by weight of abrasive. Below the 25 percent 5 and clinical, are given in Table l.
m 'iliiiifi T M Elastomer Abrasive Size, Lacquer Mechanical Type Parts Type microns removal strength Clinical evaluation 12.2 Pumice..- 55 None Good Inadequate cleaning.
11.7 A 5 30 seconds... Inadequate cleaning life.
11. 7 do Do.
12. 2 Inadequate cleaning 12.2 d Do.
11. 7 13 30 seconds Do.
12.2 13 Not adequate.. Good Do.
werghtievei the cups faneatfie'iaseratbwfesi m Thecups made usin g el a s toiner tyaea'wersrrbiig clinical testing because they were too flexible and did due to the high concentration of isocyanate in the startnot provide sufficient abrasion to properly clean the 20 ing material. However, elastomer B held the abrasive teeth. At the 56 weight percent loading the cups were particles so tightly that no abrasive was released during mechanically too rigid for in vivo use and did not form cleaning; therefore, the cups made with elastomer B a lip suitable for cleaning subgingival areas and the irdid not clean adequately.
regular surfaces of teeth; although, the cups did clean Thus it is shown that the substitution of elastomers rapidly and were otherwise acceptable in terms of and abrasives, other than the preferred urethane elastocleaning performance. mer and pumice to form an abrasive-filled prophylaxis When the organic phosphoric acid was omitted from cup results in a prophylaxis cup deficient in cleaning the elastomer of this example the resulting cups and/or mechanical strength.
cleaned satisfactorily, but two cups would be required What is claimed is:
for the complete cleaning of one mouth in some cases. In an a rasive-loaded, paste-free dental prophylac- U swan, an a tic cup suitable for being removably mounted on a den- EXAMPLE 2 tal handpiece, comprising a shaped body of resilient, Example 1 was repeated with the substitution f abrasive, elastomeric material containing a dental flour of pumice, having a particle size of approxicleaning and Polishing agent uniformly dispersed mately 28 microns. The lacquer removal time was ap- 3 therein, Said Shaped y being Suitable for Performing proximately 20 seconds, slightly lower than the cups of dental P p y cleaning and having means for Example 1, but with no change in the mechanical permovably mounting said Shaped body on a dental handformance or clinical acceptability of the cups. P the impr m n hi h comprises:
using as said resilient material an elastomer consist- EXAMPLE 3 ing essentially of 40 to 65 parts by weight of tolyl- Example 1 was repeated with the substitution of diisocyanate pp polytetlahydroful'an course pumice, having a particle size of approximately having about Percent y Weight lsocyanate, Said 225 microns. The lacquer removal time was approxiendcapped Polytetrahydrofuran being cured with mately l0 seconds with mechanical performance ap- 4,4"methylene bi$(0-ehl01'0aniline) and Using as proximately equivalent to the cups formed in Example Said Cleaning and Polishing agent, 25 to Percent 1 by weight of finely divided pumice;
EXAMPLE 4 whereby said abrasive-loaded cup is suitable for per- Cups having a configuration like FIG. 1 were formed forming (,iemal prophylaxis without additio'lal using two different elastomeric compositions and varital abraswe' Pasteous types and sizes of abrasives. One elastomer was the 50 T abraswe'fined propbylacuc R of l composition of Example 1 hereinafter referred to as comfnilmg a complex ("game Phosphonc acld as a Type A. The second elastomer was a formulation complasnclzer' prising: 10 parts of a tolyene diisocyanate endcapped abraswe'fined prophylacnc P cllalm tggahyidlgtgirap having {4i pggm by weigmuiiwg contaming from 0.05 to*2.0*par:s o: a coloring pigment.
mate and 1.31 parts 4,4-methylene bis(o-clio roanilifiej UNITED STA'IES iA'lEN'i (WMMM QERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION y Patent No.3,789,462 Dated y %%97+- lnventofls) Charles Reich It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Line 53, Cel 1 sheuld read "act" instead of "art".
1 Ist occgrrence shouldread fld ifi'tfi =2; e
Gel. t, Line #3 should read "mouth" instead of"Moutn".
Signed and sealed this 17th day of September 1974.
(SEAL) Attest:
McCOY M. GIBSON JR. Attesting Officer C. MARSHALL DANN Commissioner of Patents

Claims (2)

  1. 2. The abrasive-filled prophylactic cup of claim 1, containing a complex organic phosphoric acid as a plasticizer.
  2. 3. The abrasive-filled prophylactic cup of claim 1, containing from 0.05 to 2.0 parts of a coloring pigment.
US00345101A 1973-03-26 1973-03-26 Abrasive-filled dental prophylactic cup Expired - Lifetime US3789462A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US34510173A 1973-03-26 1973-03-26

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3789462A true US3789462A (en) 1974-02-05

Family

ID=23353525

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00345101A Expired - Lifetime US3789462A (en) 1973-03-26 1973-03-26 Abrasive-filled dental prophylactic cup

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3789462A (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3977083A (en) * 1974-02-05 1976-08-31 Norman Leslie Dental instrument
WO1982000246A1 (en) * 1980-07-21 1982-02-04 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Dental mandrel and detachable abrasive disk
EP0353638A2 (en) * 1988-08-01 1990-02-07 Dentsply International, Inc. Finishing/polishing system
US4988294A (en) * 1980-07-21 1991-01-29 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Detachable abrasive disk
US5083922A (en) * 1991-03-29 1992-01-28 Yale Joyce K Abrasive lined prophy cup
WO1992007521A1 (en) * 1990-11-02 1992-05-14 Eckert Ronald C Improved dental prophylactic cup
US5273559A (en) * 1991-08-30 1993-12-28 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive dental articles
US5369916A (en) * 1988-08-01 1994-12-06 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Polishing element
US5484284A (en) * 1994-07-28 1996-01-16 Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. Dental prophylaxis tool and angle using it
US5642995A (en) * 1995-08-16 1997-07-01 Young Dental Manufacturing Company Dental prophylaxis angle with seal protector
US6191190B1 (en) 1993-04-19 2001-02-20 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to tooth structure
US6203322B1 (en) 1999-04-15 2001-03-20 David Kraenzle Dental prophylaxis angle
US6391940B1 (en) 1993-04-19 2002-05-21 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to metal dental structure
WO2009011868A1 (en) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Besson Frank R Tooth preparation solution and method

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3241239A (en) * 1959-03-20 1966-03-22 Charles A Ellis Dental tool drive mechanism
US3599333A (en) * 1970-04-29 1971-08-17 Indiana University Foundation Dental prophylaxis implement

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3241239A (en) * 1959-03-20 1966-03-22 Charles A Ellis Dental tool drive mechanism
US3599333A (en) * 1970-04-29 1971-08-17 Indiana University Foundation Dental prophylaxis implement

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3977083A (en) * 1974-02-05 1976-08-31 Norman Leslie Dental instrument
WO1982000246A1 (en) * 1980-07-21 1982-02-04 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Dental mandrel and detachable abrasive disk
US4601661A (en) * 1980-07-21 1986-07-22 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Dental mandrel and detachable abrasive disk
US4988294A (en) * 1980-07-21 1991-01-29 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Detachable abrasive disk
US5369916A (en) * 1988-08-01 1994-12-06 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Polishing element
EP0353638A2 (en) * 1988-08-01 1990-02-07 Dentsply International, Inc. Finishing/polishing system
EP0353638A3 (en) * 1988-08-01 1991-01-09 Dentsply International, Inc. Finishing/polishing system
US5078754A (en) * 1988-08-01 1992-01-07 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Finishing/polishing system
WO1992007521A1 (en) * 1990-11-02 1992-05-14 Eckert Ronald C Improved dental prophylactic cup
US5178538A (en) * 1990-11-02 1993-01-12 Eckert Ronald C Dental prophylactic cup
US5334020A (en) * 1990-11-02 1994-08-02 Eckert Ronald C Dental prophylaxis cup
US5083922A (en) * 1991-03-29 1992-01-28 Yale Joyce K Abrasive lined prophy cup
US5273559A (en) * 1991-08-30 1993-12-28 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive dental articles
US6191190B1 (en) 1993-04-19 2001-02-20 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to tooth structure
US6391940B1 (en) 1993-04-19 2002-05-21 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to metal dental structure
US5484284A (en) * 1994-07-28 1996-01-16 Young Dental Manufacturing Company, Inc. Dental prophylaxis tool and angle using it
US5642995A (en) * 1995-08-16 1997-07-01 Young Dental Manufacturing Company Dental prophylaxis angle with seal protector
US6203322B1 (en) 1999-04-15 2001-03-20 David Kraenzle Dental prophylaxis angle
WO2009011868A1 (en) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Besson Frank R Tooth preparation solution and method
US20090023114A1 (en) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Besson Frank R Tooth preparation solution and method
US20110226158A1 (en) * 2007-07-17 2011-09-22 Besson Frank R Tooth preparation solution and method
US8033829B2 (en) * 2007-07-17 2011-10-11 Besson Frank R Tooth preparation solution and method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3789462A (en) Abrasive-filled dental prophylactic cup
Pertiwi et al. Surface changes of enamel after brushing with charcoal toothpaste
US5273559A (en) Abrasive dental articles
US3613143A (en) Brush with abrasive-impregnated bristles
US3258805A (en) Tooth brush
Jefferies Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review
Heath et al. Abrasion of restorative materials by toothpaste
US5882201A (en) Dental debridement method and tool therefor
US3599333A (en) Dental prophylaxis implement
Haselden et al. A comparison between the wear resistance of three typesof denture resin to three different dentifrices
Krejci et al. Resin composite polishing--filling the gaps.
Hamza et al. RDA and REA values of commercially available toothpastes utilising diamond powder and traditional abrasives
Heath et al. The abrasion of acrylic resin by cleaning pastes
Attin et al. Abrasive effects of diamond dentifrices on dentine and enamel
US5660546A (en) Denture cleaning kit and process
Connell et al. Comparisons of abrasion produced by a simulated manual versus a mechanical toothbrush
US4322207A (en) Dental cleaning slurry
JPH01503142A (en) toothpaste
Lutz et al. Self-adjusting abrasiveness: Anew technology for prophylaxis pastes.
US3964166A (en) Dental prophylaxis implement
De Gee et al. Structural and physical factors affecting the brush wear of dental composites
Lutz et al. Comparison of the efficacy of prophylaxis pastes with conventional abrasives or a new self-adjusting abrasive.
JPH05245166A (en) Dental polishing article
CN112891228A (en) Dental glaze sealing agent and preparation method and application thereof
Rana et al. Evaluation of surface roughness of nanofilled composite restorations after simulated tooth brushing using various dentifrices