US3804750A - Shale oil treatment - Google Patents

Shale oil treatment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3804750A
US3804750A US00317625A US31762572A US3804750A US 3804750 A US3804750 A US 3804750A US 00317625 A US00317625 A US 00317625A US 31762572 A US31762572 A US 31762572A US 3804750 A US3804750 A US 3804750A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
arsenic
mixture
oil
sulfide
weight percent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00317625A
Inventor
G Myers
D Wunderlich
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Atlantic Richfield Co
Original Assignee
Atlantic Richfield Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Atlantic Richfield Co filed Critical Atlantic Richfield Co
Priority to US00317625A priority Critical patent/US3804750A/en
Priority to AU59944/73A priority patent/AU5994473A/en
Priority to BR7622/73A priority patent/BR7307622D0/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3804750A publication Critical patent/US3804750A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G1/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal
    • C10G1/002Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from oil-shale, oil-sand, or non-melting solid carbonaceous or similar materials, e.g. wood, coal in combination with oil conversion- or refining processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof
    • C10G45/08Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof in combination with chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof

Definitions

  • the cobalt-molybdenum catalyst must be discarded when the catalyst has been contacted with the hydrocarbon a sufficient time to deposit on the catalyst about 1.5 lbs. of arsenic per 2000 lbs. of catalyst, i.e., when 07 weight percent arsenic is deposited on the cobalt oxide-molybdenum oxide mixture, using a weight hourly space velocity in the range of from one to ten.
  • non-naturally occurring shale oil is contacted with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide, the nickel sulfide being nickelous or nickelic (Ni S and/ or M 5 and the molybdenum being of any valence from 2 through 6, preferably NiS and M08
  • the contacting is carried out at an elevated temperature, preferably at least about 300 F., still more preferably from about 300 to about 850 F., and under a reducing atmosphere, preferably containing some molecular hydrogen, still more preferably being essentially molecular hydrogen.
  • the contacting is terminated at least by the time that the equivalent of about 7 .7 weight percent arsenic at one WHSV has been deposited on the sulfide mixture.
  • this invention applies to WHSV values which are different from unity, the 7.7 value at one WHSV being chosen for sake of clarity. Any WHSV value can be used and the percent arsenic deposition at the chosen WHSV value translated to the equivalent percent arsenic deposition for one WHSV.
  • the drawing is a graph of data obtained by carrying out the process of this invention up to and beyond the 7.7 weight percent arsenic deposition limit at one WHSV, and clearly shows that above the 7.7 weight percent cutoff line or its equivalent if a WHSV different from one is used, the amount of arsenic in the iol product, i.e., the shale oil after it has passed over the sulfide mixture increases very dramatically, but that below the 7.7 weight percent limit and above the 0.07 weight percent limit described in the above-identified US. patent, the amount of arsenic in the oil product is substantially nil.
  • the nickel sulfide-molybdenum sulfide mixture can contain the various sulfides in varying weight ratios but preferably in the weight ratio range of nickel sulfide to molybdenum sulfide of from about 1/99 to about 99/1.
  • the sulfide mixture can be supported or unsupported and any conventional support such as silica, alumina, magnesia, zirconia, thoria, zinc oxide, naturally occurring supports such as clays, kieselguhr, fullers earth, pumice, bauxite, and the like, and combinations of two or more thereof whether naturally occurring or synthetically prepared can be employed.
  • the sulfide mixture should be in particulate form, the particle size not being critical although the greater the surface area the better from a point of view of completeness of contacting between the shale oil and the sulfides.
  • the material should be in a particulate form such that at least about 50 weight percent thereof has a large cross-sectional dimension (i.e., the diameter of a particle if it is round or the longest dimension through the center of a particle if it is not round) of no larger than about one-quarter inch.
  • the sulfides, supported or unsupported still more preferably will have a surface area of at least one square meter per gram and can have a surface area of at least fifty square meters per gram depending upon the intimacy of contacting desired between the shale oil and sulfides.
  • the sulfides, supported or unsupported can be in any physical form including powders, pellets, granules, spheres, flakes, cylinders, and the like.
  • the nickel sulfide is preferably present in an amount of from about 1 to about 7, still more preferably from about 2 to about 5, weight percent, and the molybdenum sulfide is present in an amount of from about 10 to about 30, still more preferably from about 15 to about 25, weight percent, all weight percents being based upon the total weight of the supported sulfide mixture.
  • the sulfide mixture can be made in any conventional manner, e.g., impregnating a porous support material such as alumina with an aqueous solution of nickel nitrate and molybdenum nitrate, calcining the nitrate containing support to form nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide on said support, followed by sulfiding to convert the oxides to sulfides.
  • a porous support material such as alumina
  • calcining the nitrate containing support to form nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide on said support
  • sulfiding to convert the oxides to sulfides.
  • arsenic in the free or elemental form as well as arsenic in any combined form.
  • the time of contacting of the sulfide mixture and shale oil will vary widely but it will generally be for a time sufficient to achieve the desired degree of arsenic removal, and will generally be at least about one minute.
  • the pressure of contacting can vary widely from atmospheric and on to an elevated pressure as desired.
  • the hydrogen partial pressure is preferably at least 500 p.s.i.g., still more preferably at least 1500 p.s.i.g.
  • the oil can be treated in other ways for removal of arsenic.
  • the liquid can be pretreated for partial removal of arsenic before treatment in accordance with this invention. After treatment in accordance with this invention, the oil can be further treated for cleanup removal of arsenic if desired.
  • caustic washing One suitable method that can be practiced in conjunction with this invention is conventional caustic washing.
  • one way for carrying out caustic washing is to contact the shale oil with an aqueous solution of at least one alkali metal hydroxide such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, the hydroxide or combination of hydroxides being present in an amount of from about 1 to about 20 weight percent based on the total weight of the aqueous solution.
  • the caustic solution is contacted with the oil in a solution/liquid weight ratio of from about 1/1 to about 1/10, the contacting being carried out at a temperature of at least 200 F., preferably at least 300 F., with the pressure being maintained sufficient to prevent substantial vaporization of solution or oil, e.g., at least about 300 p.s.i.g.
  • the atmosphere present during the contacting with caustic solution can be ambient, although if desired, neutral or reducing atmospheres can be employed but are not necessary.
  • the aqueous solution is separated from the oil by a conventional method such as employing a settling tank followed by a centrifuge and the like.
  • the shale oil after treatment with the caustic solution can be washed with water or other suitable solvent to remove residual caustic solution and any arsenic associated with that solution.
  • the catalyst had a surface area of 180 square meters per gram, a particle size of 0.07 inch in diameter and 0.18 inch in length, and a bulk density of 40 pounds per cubic foot.
  • a process for removing arsenic from shale oil comprising contacting said oil with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide at an elevated temperature and under a reducing atmosphere, and terminating said contacting at least by the time that the equivalent of about 7.7 weight percent arsenic at one weight hourly space velocity has been deposited on said mixture.
  • nickel sulfide is essentially NiS and said molybdenum sulfide is essentially MoS said sulfides being present in said mixture in the weight ratio range of NiS/MoS of from about 1/99 to about 99/1.
  • a process according to claim 1 wherein one of prior to, after, or both said contacting of said shale oil and said sulfides, said oil is contacted with at least one alkali metal hydroxide to remove part of the arsenic present in said oil.

Abstract

A METHOD FOR REMOVING ARSENIC FROM SHALE OIL BY COMTACTING THE OIL WITH A MIXTURE OF NICKEL SULFIDE AND MOLYBDENUM SULFIDE, EMPLOYING AN ELEVATED TEMPERATURE AND REDUCING ATMOSPHERE FOR SAID CONTACTING, AND TERMINATING THE CONTACTING AT LEAST BY THE TIME THAT THE EQUIVALENT OF ABOUT 7.7 WEIGHT PERCENT ARSENIC AT ONE WEIGHT HOURLY SPACE VELOCITY (WHSV) HAS BEEN DEPOSITED ON THE SULFIDE MIXTURE.

Description

April 16, 1974 MYERS ETAL 3,804,750
' I SHALE OIL TREATMENT Filed Dec.- 22, 1972 WT% ARSENIC ON CATALYST-0.67 {LNU/WEIGHT HOURLY SPACE VELOCITW} HO i'QflCIOHd NI OlNBSHV NOIT'IIW 83d SlHVd United States Patent Office 3,804,750 Patented Apr. 16, 1974 3,804,750 SHALE OIL TREATMENT Gary A. Myers, Plano, and Donald K. Wunderhch,
Richardson, Tex., assignors to Atlantic Richfield Coman New York NY. p Filed Dec. 22,1972, Ser. No. 317,625
Int. Cl. C10g 17/00 US. Cl. 208253 12 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A method for removing arsenic from shale oil by contacting the oil with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide, employing an elevated temperature and reducing atmosphere for said contacting, and terminating the contacting at least by the time that the equivalent of about 7.7 weight percent arsenic at one weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) has been deposited on the sulfide mixture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Heretofore, various metal oxides including mixtures thereof have been employed to remove arsenic from hydrocarbon charge stocks such as naphtha, all such charge stocks having been obtained from naturally occurring crude oil. For example, in US. Pat. 3.069,350, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, the removal of arsenic from naphthas obtained from naturally occurring crude oil in a conventional refining process, can have arsenic removed therefrom when contacted with a mixture of cobalt oxide and molybdenum oxide on an alumina carrier. It is taught in this patent that the cobalt-molybdenum catalyst must be discarded when the catalyst has been contacted with the hydrocarbon a sufficient time to deposit on the catalyst about 1.5 lbs. of arsenic per 2000 lbs. of catalyst, i.e., when 07 weight percent arsenic is deposited on the cobalt oxide-molybdenum oxide mixture, using a weight hourly space velocity in the range of from one to ten.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION It has now been discovered that with shale oil which is obtained from normally solid oil shale and which is not derived from naturally occurring crude oil, arsenic can be removed therefrom by contacting same with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide and that if this particular mixture of sulfides is employed at an elevated temperature and under a reducing atmosphere, contacting of the shale oil with the sulfide mixture to remove arsenic need not be terminated until the equivalent of about 7.7 weight percent arsenic at one WHSV has been deposited on the sulfide mixture.
This is a substantially higher amount of arsenic deposition on the sulfide mixture of this invention before termination of the process than is suggested by the prior art for oxide mixtures and was a surprising discovery. Further, this discovery is of substantial economic advantage in that it means that with shale oil the sulfide mixture can be employed for arsenic removal for substantially longer periods of time and for greater volumes of shale oil than would be obvious from the prior art.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to pro 'vide a new and improved method for purifying shale oil. It is another object to provide a new and improved method for removing arsenic from shale oil. It is another object to provide a new and improved method for employing certain metal sulfides for the removal of impurities from shale oil. It is another object to provide a new and improved method for treating shale oil to improve the quality thereof.
Other aspects, object and advantages of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from this d1sclosure and the appended claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION According to this invention non-naturally occurring shale oil is contacted with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide, the nickel sulfide being nickelous or nickelic (Ni S and/ or M 5 and the molybdenum being of any valence from 2 through 6, preferably NiS and M08 The contacting is carried out at an elevated temperature, preferably at least about 300 F., still more preferably from about 300 to about 850 F., and under a reducing atmosphere, preferably containing some molecular hydrogen, still more preferably being essentially molecular hydrogen. The contacting is terminated at least by the time that the equivalent of about 7 .7 weight percent arsenic at one WHSV has been deposited on the sulfide mixture. Thus, this invention applies to WHSV values which are different from unity, the 7.7 value at one WHSV being chosen for sake of clarity. Any WHSV value can be used and the percent arsenic deposition at the chosen WHSV value translated to the equivalent percent arsenic deposition for one WHSV.
The drawing is a graph of data obtained by carrying out the process of this invention up to and beyond the 7.7 weight percent arsenic deposition limit at one WHSV, and clearly shows that above the 7.7 weight percent cutoff line or its equivalent if a WHSV different from one is used, the amount of arsenic in the iol product, i.e., the shale oil after it has passed over the sulfide mixture increases very dramatically, but that below the 7.7 weight percent limit and above the 0.07 weight percent limit described in the above-identified US. patent, the amount of arsenic in the oil product is substantially nil.
The nickel sulfide-molybdenum sulfide mixture can contain the various sulfides in varying weight ratios but preferably in the weight ratio range of nickel sulfide to molybdenum sulfide of from about 1/99 to about 99/1. The sulfide mixture can be supported or unsupported and any conventional support such as silica, alumina, magnesia, zirconia, thoria, zinc oxide, naturally occurring supports such as clays, kieselguhr, fullers earth, pumice, bauxite, and the like, and combinations of two or more thereof whether naturally occurring or synthetically prepared can be employed. The sulfide mixture, whether supported or unsupported, should be in particulate form, the particle size not being critical although the greater the surface area the better from a point of view of completeness of contacting between the shale oil and the sulfides. Generally, the material should be in a particulate form such that at least about 50 weight percent thereof has a large cross-sectional dimension (i.e., the diameter of a particle if it is round or the longest dimension through the center of a particle if it is not round) of no larger than about one-quarter inch. The sulfides, supported or unsupported still more preferably will have a surface area of at least one square meter per gram and can have a surface area of at least fifty square meters per gram depending upon the intimacy of contacting desired between the shale oil and sulfides. The sulfides, supported or unsupported, can be in any physical form including powders, pellets, granules, spheres, flakes, cylinders, and the like. When the sulfides are supported, the nickel sulfide is preferably present in an amount of from about 1 to about 7, still more preferably from about 2 to about 5, weight percent, and the molybdenum sulfide is present in an amount of from about 10 to about 30, still more preferably from about 15 to about 25, weight percent, all weight percents being based upon the total weight of the supported sulfide mixture.
The sulfide mixture can be made in any conventional manner, e.g., impregnating a porous support material such as alumina with an aqueous solution of nickel nitrate and molybdenum nitrate, calcining the nitrate containing support to form nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide on said support, followed by sulfiding to convert the oxides to sulfides. This is all well-known in the art and therefore will not be described in greater detail.
In the discussion of this invention, reference to arsenic is intended to include arsenic in the free or elemental form as well as arsenic in any combined form.
The time of contacting of the sulfide mixture and shale oil will vary widely but it will generally be for a time sufficient to achieve the desired degree of arsenic removal, and will generally be at least about one minute. The pressure of contacting can vary widely from atmospheric and on to an elevated pressure as desired. When molecular hydrogen is employed as part or all of the reducing atmosphere, the hydrogen partial pressure is preferably at least 500 p.s.i.g., still more preferably at least 1500 p.s.i.g.
Either before, after, Or before and after the shale oil is contacted with the above-described sulfide mixture for arsenic removal, the oil can be treated in other ways for removal of arsenic. The liquid can be pretreated for partial removal of arsenic before treatment in accordance with this invention. After treatment in accordance with this invention, the oil can be further treated for cleanup removal of arsenic if desired.
One suitable method that can be practiced in conjunction with this invention is conventional caustic washing. For example, one way for carrying out caustic washing is to contact the shale oil with an aqueous solution of at least one alkali metal hydroxide such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, the hydroxide or combination of hydroxides being present in an amount of from about 1 to about 20 weight percent based on the total weight of the aqueous solution. The caustic solution is contacted with the oil in a solution/liquid weight ratio of from about 1/1 to about 1/10, the contacting being carried out at a temperature of at least 200 F., preferably at least 300 F., with the pressure being maintained sufficient to prevent substantial vaporization of solution or oil, e.g., at least about 300 p.s.i.g. The atmosphere present during the contacting with caustic solution can be ambient, although if desired, neutral or reducing atmospheres can be employed but are not necessary.
After treatment, the aqueous solution is separated from the oil by a conventional method such as employing a settling tank followed by a centrifuge and the like. The shale oil after treatment with the caustic solution can be washed with water or other suitable solvent to remove residual caustic solution and any arsenic associated with that solution.
EXAMPLE A nominal 400 to 800 F. cut of shale oil obtained by retorting normally solid Colorado oil shale and containing 82 parts per million of arsenic was contacted with a commercial nickel-molybdenum hydrotreating catalyst that had been sulfided which contained 3.2 weight percent NiO and 1.5.1 weight percent M and the remainder essentially alpha alumina prior to sulfiding. The catalyst had a surface area of 180 square meters per gram, a particle size of 0.07 inch in diameter and 0.18 inch in length, and a bulk density of 40 pounds per cubic foot.
Seventy-five grams of the oxide mixture were charged to a one-inch diameter reactor after which the reactor was purged first with nitrogen, and then with hydrogen, and then heated to 400 F. The catalyst was treated at 400 F. with a gas mixture of volume percent hydrogen sulfide in hydrogen for four hours to convert the nickel and molybdenum oxides to sulfides. The reactor was then pressured with molecular hydrogen to 2000 p.s.i.g. Thereafter, the shale oil was charged to the reactor at the rate of 750 grams per hour, 10 weight hourly space velocity (10 WHSV), the temperature raised to 720 F., and the hydrogen pressure maintained at 2000 p.s.i.g. with a hydrogen flow rate of 10 standard cubic feet per hour.
Samples of product oil, after passing over the sulfide mixture (catalyst), were taken and analyzed by conventional X-ray spectroscopy using triphenylarsine in mineral oil as the arsenic standard to determine the arsenic content in the product oil. The arsenic removed from the oil was deposited on the catalyst. Thus, the arsenic deposition at various points were used to determine how much arsenic had been deposited on the catalyst. Analysis of the catalyst following the competion of the test showed that the arsenic had deposited on the catalyst in the amounts previously determined. The data showed that below 6.1 weight percent arsenic on the catalyst substantially no arsenic was present in the shale oil product whereas above 6.1 weight percent arsenic on the catalyst the amount of arsenic in the shale oil product increased dramatically. To convert this 6.1 weight percent value obtained at 10 WHSV to a value of one WHSV the formula; wt. percent-0.67 [Ln l/WHSV]; was used and gave a curve as shown in the drawing.
When the experiment was repeated in all respects except that a 1.5 weight hourly space velocity was established for the shale oil feed to the reactor, substantial amounts of arsenic in the oil product did not appear until about 7.2 weight percent arsenic was deposited on the catalyst. For example, with the 1.5 weight hourly space velocity feed rate, with about 7.4 weight percent arsenic on the catalyst (refeernce numeral 1 in the drawing) the amount of arsenic in the oil product was about 4 parts per million. As greater amounts of arsenic were deposited on the catalyst the amount of arsenic in the oil product increased dramatically along the slope as shown in the drawing so that at at about 8.8 weight percent arsenic on the catalyst (reference numeral 2 in the drawing) the amount of arsenic in the oil product was 44 parts per million. In contrast, at the 1.5 WHSV value and at 1.6, 3.1, 5.0, and 6.4 weight percent arsenic on the catalyst the amount of arsenic in the oil product was less than 5 parts per billion (p.p.b.), 5 p.p.b., 15 p.p.b., and 35 p.p.b., respectively. Converting all these values to a value for one WHSV by using the above formula, the points shown on the drawing by reference numerals 3 through 6, respectively, were obtained.
Reasonable variations and modifications are possible within the scope of this disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A process for removing arsenic from shale oil comprising contacting said oil with a mixture of nickel sulfide and molybdenum sulfide at an elevated temperature and under a reducing atmosphere, and terminating said contacting at least by the time that the equivalent of about 7.7 weight percent arsenic at one weight hourly space velocity has been deposited on said mixture.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said nickel sulfide is essentially NiS and said molybdenum sulfide is essentially MoS said sulfides being present in said mixture in the weight ratio range of NiS/MoS of from about 1/99 to about 99/1.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein said mixture of sulfides is supported on alumina.
4. A process according to claim 3 wherein said NiS is present in an amount of from about 1 to about 7 weight percent and said MoS is present in an amount of from about 10 to about 30 weight percent, both weight percents being based on the total weight of the alumina supported mixture.
5. A process according to claim 4 wherein said alumina is alpha alumina.
6. A process according to claim 1 wherein said mixture is in a particulate form such that at least about 50 weight percent thereof has a largest cross-sectional dimension of no larger than about one-quarter inch, said elevated temperature is at least about 300 F., and said reducing atmosphere contains molecular hydrogen.
7. A process according to claim 2 wherein said mixture has a surface area of at least about one square meter per gram, said elevated temperature is from about 300 to about 850 F., and said reducing atmosphere is essentially molecular hydrogen.
8. A process according to claim 3 wherein said NiS is present in an amount of from about 2 to about 5 weight percent, and said M08 is present in an amount of from about 15 to about 25 weight percent, both wegiht percents being based upon the total weight of the alumina supported mixture.
9. A process according to claim 2 wherein said NiS is present in an amount of from about 1 to about 7 weight percent and said M08 is present in an amount of from about to about 30 weight percent, both weight percents being based on the total weight of the mixture.
10. A process according to claim 9 wherein said mixture is in particulate form such that it has a surface area of at least about one square meter per gram, said elevated temperature is from about 300 to about 850 F., and said reducing atmosphere is essentially molecular hydrogen.
11. A process according to claim 1 wherein one of prior to, after, or both said contacting of said shale oil and said sulfides, said oil is contacted with at least one alkali metal hydroxide to remove part of the arsenic present in said oil.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,367,861 2/1968 Aldridge et al 208-251 3,496,099 2/1970 Bridge 208251 H 2,897,131 7/ 1959 Berger 208-253 3,069,350 12/1962 Ramella "1..- 208-89 FOREIGN PATENTS 7/ 1958 Great Britain 208--251 H DELBERT E. GANTZ, Primary Examiner J. M. NELSON, Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R.
US00317625A 1972-12-22 1972-12-22 Shale oil treatment Expired - Lifetime US3804750A (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00317625A US3804750A (en) 1972-12-22 1972-12-22 Shale oil treatment
AU59944/73A AU5994473A (en) 1972-12-22 1973-09-03 Process for removing arsenic from shale oil
BR7622/73A BR7307622D0 (en) 1972-12-22 1973-10-01 PROCESS FOR REMOVAL OF SHALE OIL ARSENE

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00317625A US3804750A (en) 1972-12-22 1972-12-22 Shale oil treatment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3804750A true US3804750A (en) 1974-04-16

Family

ID=23234527

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00317625A Expired - Lifetime US3804750A (en) 1972-12-22 1972-12-22 Shale oil treatment

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US3804750A (en)
AU (1) AU5994473A (en)
BR (1) BR7307622D0 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3876533A (en) * 1974-02-07 1975-04-08 Atlantic Richfield Co Guard bed system for removing contaminant from synthetic oil
US3933624A (en) * 1974-01-23 1976-01-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Slurry system for removal of contaminant from synthetic oil
US4046674A (en) * 1976-06-25 1977-09-06 Union Oil Company Of California Process for removing arsenic from hydrocarbons
US4051022A (en) * 1973-12-03 1977-09-27 Atlantic Richfield Company Synthetic oil treatment
FR2366353A1 (en) * 1976-10-04 1978-04-28 Metallgesellschaft Ag PROCESS FOR REMOVING CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY
US4127469A (en) * 1977-08-22 1978-11-28 Union Oil Company Of California Oil shale retorting process
FR2417541A1 (en) * 1978-02-17 1979-09-14 Metallgesellschaft Ag PROCESS FOR TRANSFORMING SHALE OILS OR TAR CONTAINING SOLID MATERIALS
US4188280A (en) * 1978-09-25 1980-02-12 Chevron Research Company Method for removing arsenic from shale oil
US4354927A (en) * 1981-01-06 1982-10-19 Mobil Oil Corporation Method of removing contaminants from hydrocarbonaceous fluids using high-sodium alumina
US4454027A (en) * 1982-08-16 1984-06-12 Union Oil Company Of California Arsenic removal method
US4600497A (en) * 1981-05-08 1986-07-15 Union Oil Company Of California Process for treating waxy shale oils
US4719006A (en) * 1985-07-31 1988-01-12 Amoco Corporation Process and system continuously removing arsenic from shale oil with a catalyst and regenerating the catalyst
US4839029A (en) * 1986-04-23 1989-06-13 Tonen Sekiyu Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha Process for removing arsenic from a petroleum fraction
US5024683A (en) * 1990-06-12 1991-06-18 Phillips Petroleum Company Sorption of trialkyl arsines
US5037286A (en) * 1988-06-24 1991-08-06 Rolite, Inc. Incineration residue treatment apparatus
US5064626A (en) * 1990-11-28 1991-11-12 Phillips Petroleum Company Trialkyl arsine sorbents
US5085844A (en) * 1990-11-28 1992-02-04 Phillips Petroleum Company Sorption of trialkyl arsines
US5401392A (en) * 1989-03-16 1995-03-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for eliminating mercury and possibly arsenic in hydrocarbons
US5421994A (en) * 1992-05-11 1995-06-06 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for the recovery of mercury and arsenic in a hydrocarbon cut
US5531886A (en) * 1993-02-08 1996-07-02 Institut Francals Du Petrole Process for the elimination of arsenic from hydrocarbons by passage over a presulphurated retention mass
CN110479313A (en) * 2018-05-15 2019-11-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst and its preparation method and application and the method for hydrofinishing
CN110479300A (en) * 2018-05-15 2019-11-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst and its preparation method and application and the method for hydrofinishing

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4051022A (en) * 1973-12-03 1977-09-27 Atlantic Richfield Company Synthetic oil treatment
US3933624A (en) * 1974-01-23 1976-01-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Slurry system for removal of contaminant from synthetic oil
US3876533A (en) * 1974-02-07 1975-04-08 Atlantic Richfield Co Guard bed system for removing contaminant from synthetic oil
US4046674A (en) * 1976-06-25 1977-09-06 Union Oil Company Of California Process for removing arsenic from hydrocarbons
FR2366353A1 (en) * 1976-10-04 1978-04-28 Metallgesellschaft Ag PROCESS FOR REMOVING CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OF ARSENIC AND ANTIMONY
US4127469A (en) * 1977-08-22 1978-11-28 Union Oil Company Of California Oil shale retorting process
FR2417541A1 (en) * 1978-02-17 1979-09-14 Metallgesellschaft Ag PROCESS FOR TRANSFORMING SHALE OILS OR TAR CONTAINING SOLID MATERIALS
US4188280A (en) * 1978-09-25 1980-02-12 Chevron Research Company Method for removing arsenic from shale oil
US4354927A (en) * 1981-01-06 1982-10-19 Mobil Oil Corporation Method of removing contaminants from hydrocarbonaceous fluids using high-sodium alumina
US4600497A (en) * 1981-05-08 1986-07-15 Union Oil Company Of California Process for treating waxy shale oils
US4454027A (en) * 1982-08-16 1984-06-12 Union Oil Company Of California Arsenic removal method
US4719006A (en) * 1985-07-31 1988-01-12 Amoco Corporation Process and system continuously removing arsenic from shale oil with a catalyst and regenerating the catalyst
US4839029A (en) * 1986-04-23 1989-06-13 Tonen Sekiyu Kagaku Kabushiki Kaisha Process for removing arsenic from a petroleum fraction
US5037286A (en) * 1988-06-24 1991-08-06 Rolite, Inc. Incineration residue treatment apparatus
US5401392A (en) * 1989-03-16 1995-03-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for eliminating mercury and possibly arsenic in hydrocarbons
US5024683A (en) * 1990-06-12 1991-06-18 Phillips Petroleum Company Sorption of trialkyl arsines
US5064626A (en) * 1990-11-28 1991-11-12 Phillips Petroleum Company Trialkyl arsine sorbents
US5085844A (en) * 1990-11-28 1992-02-04 Phillips Petroleum Company Sorption of trialkyl arsines
US5421994A (en) * 1992-05-11 1995-06-06 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for the recovery of mercury and arsenic in a hydrocarbon cut
US5531886A (en) * 1993-02-08 1996-07-02 Institut Francals Du Petrole Process for the elimination of arsenic from hydrocarbons by passage over a presulphurated retention mass
CN110479313A (en) * 2018-05-15 2019-11-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst and its preparation method and application and the method for hydrofinishing
CN110479300A (en) * 2018-05-15 2019-11-22 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst and its preparation method and application and the method for hydrofinishing
CN110479313B (en) * 2018-05-15 2022-03-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst, preparation method and application thereof, and hydrofining method
CN110479300B (en) * 2018-05-15 2022-03-11 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation catalyst, preparation method and application thereof, and hydrofining method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU5994473A (en) 1975-03-06
BR7307622D0 (en) 1974-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3804750A (en) Shale oil treatment
US4003829A (en) Method of removing contaminant from a hydrocarbonaceous fluid
US4588709A (en) Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
US3530066A (en) Catalytic hydrotreating process of petroleum hydrocarbons containing asphaltenes
US4089774A (en) Process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US3696027A (en) Multi-stage desulfurization
US3947347A (en) Process for removing metalliferous contaminants from hydrocarbons
US4046674A (en) Process for removing arsenic from hydrocarbons
US4306964A (en) Multi-stage process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US3114701A (en) Catalytic hydrodenitrification process
US4048060A (en) Two-stage hydrodesulfurization of oil utilizing a narrow pore size distribution catalyst
US4271042A (en) Process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US4016067A (en) Process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US3716479A (en) Demetalation of hydrocarbon charge stocks
US4374020A (en) Catalytic hydroconversion process with catalyst retainer
US4404097A (en) Residua demetalation/desulfurization catalyst and methods for its use
US3025231A (en) Catalytic hydrogenation of heavy oils such as shale oil
US3663434A (en) Desulfurization
US3576737A (en) Vanadium removal from hydrocarbons
GB1575434A (en) Method of presulphiding hydrodesulphurization catalysts
US2764525A (en) Removal of vanadium and/or sodium from petroleum and petroleum products with alumina and iron oxide
US3766054A (en) Demetalation of hydrocarbon charge stocks
US3078221A (en) Hydrogenation process for preparation of lubricating oils
US4642179A (en) Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues
CN101376835B (en) Gasoline hydrofinishing startup method and gasoline hydrofinishing operation method