|Número de publicación||US3823676 A|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Fecha de publicación||16 Jul 1974|
|Fecha de presentación||10 Oct 1972|
|Fecha de prioridad||10 Oct 1972|
|Número de publicación||US 3823676 A, US 3823676A, US-A-3823676, US3823676 A, US3823676A|
|Inventores||W Cook, J Maitland|
|Cesionario original||Warren Cook Chem Inc|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (3), Citada por (57), Clasificaciones (12)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
. United States Patent 1191 Cook et al. July 16, 1974 [5 METHOD OF REDUCING SULPHUR 3,723,291 3/1973 Thakker 201 17 DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS  Inventors: Webster Warren Cook; James 824,883 6/1957 Great Britain 110/1 K Maitland, both of c/o Warren Cook Chemlcal Monee 6-0449 Primary Examiner-Kenneth W. Sprague  Filed: Oct. 10, 1972 Assistant Examiner-Larry I. Schwartz Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Olson, Trexler, Wolters,  APPI- 2961147 Bushnell & Fosse, Ltd.
 US. Cl. 110/1 J llO/l K v 51 Int. (:1. F231)  ABSTRACT 53 Field f Search 1 10 1 1 1 K 10 44 R, A method of reducmg sulphur d1oxide emissions from 44/4; 201 17 coal by adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to the coal for combining with sulphur in the coal to 5 References Cited form a relatively heavy ash which 'is collected with UNITED STATES PATENTS other heavier ash for removal in the usual way. 3,540,387 11/1970 McLaren et a1. 110/1 J I 8 Claims, 1 Drawing Fi ure TRONA SUPPLY 20 PL/LVER/ZER 1 k) i F U) COMBUSTION BLOWE .4 ASH R CHAMBER REMOVAL Y l METHOD OF REDUCING SULPHUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL The present invention relates to a novel process of eliminating or substantially reducing to acceptable levels sulphur dioxide emissions which nonnally result from the burning of sulphur containing coal.
It has long been recognized that one serious contributor to the problem of air pollution is the emission of sulphur dioxide from burning coal used in furnaces or boilers such as in power plants and the like. The amount of such emissions varies with the sulphur content of the coal being used. The sulphur content varies widely in accordance-with the type and source of the coal and may, for example, range from-about 0.5 percent to percent or 6 percent by weight. In general, much of the more economical and readily available coal, particularly in the midwest, is a relatively soft coal having a rather high sulphur content.
Numerous attempts have been made to eliminate or reduce to acceptable levels the sulphur dioxide emissions such as by pre-treating the coal or by mixingan additive with the coal. For environmental purposes, it is usually desired to keep sulphur dioxide emissions at a level of about one percent or less of the gaseous emissions resulting from oxidation or combustion of the coal. Prior attempts to achieve this goal, particularly with high sulphur coal, have not been generally successful since they have either been too costly or have resulted in unacceptable side effects.'For example, at-,
tempts have been made to use limestone as an additive with coal, but this results in the formation of an unacceptable coating on the interior of the furnace or boiler.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an important object of the present invention to provide a novel process of eliminating or reducing to an acceptable level sulphur dioxide emissions when burning sulphur containing coal in a manner which is relatively economical and which has no unacceptable side effects.
A more specific object of the present invention is to provide a novel process for eliminating or reducing to anacceptable level sulphur dioxide emissions by introducing an additive at an effective point in the combustion of the coal so as to cause the sulphur in thecoal to combine with the additive in a manner which facilitates subsequent removal and which does not result in an unacceptable side effect such as coating or corrosion of the interior of the furnace or boiler.
In order to accomplish the objects of this invention, dry Wyoming Trona in powder or granular form is applied to or mixed with the coal. Preferably the Trona is mixed intimately with the coal prior to initiation of combustion. An amount of Trona is used which is effective to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to or below the desired level of 1 percent. The amount of Trona required to be so effective will vary in accordance with the amount of sulphur in the coal. In addi-' tion the amount of T rona required will vary in accordance with the moisture content of the coal. In general, the amount of Trona which is effective to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to a given level increases with the sulphur content of the coal and also increases with the moisture content of the coal. For example, relatively high sulphur (about 4 to 5 percent by weight) 2 and high moisture coal from Kentucky requires the addition of about 15 percent by weight of Trona to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions to 1 percent or less while relatively-dry coal having lower sulphur contents (about 12 to 3 percent sulphur) usually requires the addition of only about 10 percent by weight of Trona to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to 1 percent or less.
The Trona used in the present invention is a mineral mined from known deposits in the State of Wyoming and has an average composition as follows:
The chemical reaction which takes place is not fully known, but it is known that theTrona binds with and neutralizes the sulphur and forms a relatively heavy 'ash which is readily collected with other-ash material and does not pass up the stack with the gaseous combustion products. The ash is then removed from the furnace or boiler in the usual manner.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings. Wherein FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an installation which may be used in carrying out the process in the present invention. 7
While it is to be understood that'theprocess of the present invention may be utilized in known types of coal burning equipment, FIG. l'schematically shows one typical installation. In this installation a furnace or boiler is provided with the usual combustion chamber into which pulverized or powdered coal is injected by a blower 12. The coal is delivered to the blower from a pulverizer 14 which serves to reduce the coal particles or lumps to the desired pulverized or powdered condition. The pulverizer in turn is fed from hopper 16 which received the fuel from a conveyer 18 extending from a suitable source of supply.
In accordance with the present invention Trona in dry powdered or granulated or sand-like form is added to the coal, preferably prior to the introduction to the combustion chamber. For-example, the Trona may be delivered from a suitable source of supply by conveyer means 20 into a hopper 22 from which it may be di rected to the coal at any one of a number of locations as indicated by the arrows .24, 26 and 28. In other words, the Trona may be introduced into the coal at the Trona-as a layer on top of the coal. The Trona combines with the sulphur in the coal to form an ash which falls to the bottom of the combustion chamber along x with other ash materials and may be removed by. any
suitable means such as a conveyer 30.
in investigating the effect of the addition of Trona on sulphur dioxide emission during the combustion of high sulphur content coals, the following test was conducted. An amount of untreated coal was oxidized as a control reference followed by oxidation of a like amount of coal to which was added the Trona. The same conditions for all experiments were maintained and in these experiments the term oxidation is used to signify the chemical reaction and at no time were the samples observed to be burning with an open flame. The Trona used was acquired from a Texas Gulf Sulphur Company mine in Wyoming.
The untreated coal was first pulverized and sieved to be in the size range of 0.033 inch and 0.066 inch and was dried at l C for 1 hour to remove moisture. Two 2.000-gram samples of pulverized coal were weighed. Both were spread uniformly over the bottom of alundum combustion boats 3 /2 inches long [2 inch wide and 5/16 inch deep. One was oxidized as is. To the second, 0.400 grams of Trona was either spread on top of the coal or mixed with it.
4 i cess of the present invention, such refinement increases the cost of the-material and thus the process. As previously indicated, the amount of Trona added during the process should be sufficient to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to one percent or less by weight of the flue gases. The quantity of the .Trona additive necessary to accomplish this result will vary in The samples were placed in ahorizontal tube furnace with a Vycor combustion tube which contained alundum crucible during a two-hour heating cycle. A thermocouple at the crucible indicated the temperature in the oxidation zone. Each run began with the furnace at ambient temperature. It required about 1 hour to reach 700C with a final temperature of about 740 C. Air flowing at 1 liter per minute was introduced at one end of the Vycor tube, flowed over the sample and swept the effluent gases into an absorbing tray. Three iced absorbers in a series were used to make certain thatall gases were trapped. Each absorber contained 50 ml of H Q The results of several runs are shown-in table l.
' From this table it is concluded that the sulphur dioxide emissions were reduced about 10-fold by the use of 'Trona additive. The manner in which the additive was applied to the coal affected the oxidation characteristics with mixing producing more complete oxidation compared to the layering method.
accordance with the sulphur and moisture content of the coal. in general, the amount of Trona required increases with the amounts of sulphur and moisture in the coal so that for relatively high sulphur coals of about five percent sulphur, about 15 percent by weight of Trona should be added. On the other hand'for rela- =tively dry lower sulphur coals having the sulphur content of about two to three percent by weight, and an amount of Trona equal to about ten percent by weight of the coal should be added to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to the desired acceptable level of l percent or less.
While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described herein, it is obvious that many changes may bemade without departing from the spirit of the scope of the appended claims.
The invention is claimed as follows:
1. A process of reducing sulphur dioxide emissions substantially to or beneath a predetermined level when oxidizing coal containing sulphur in a furnace, comprising adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to said coal, and causing the Trona to be combined with at least a portion of the sulphur in said coal to provide an ash.
2. A process as defined in claim 1, comprising the step of adding the Trona in a particulate form to coal particles and mixing the Trona throughout the coal particles.
3. A process as defined in claim 1, comprising adding the nain a P r t rm a a. hwsw Wm- I TABLE 1 SUMMARY SO EMISSIONS FROM COAL Oxidation Time. 2 Hrs. Max Temp., 740C (l364F) Air Flow, 1 liter/min.
Coal Sample Weight grams Additive Weight Position of S0 Weight Grams S0 of Control Additive Southern Illinois 2 None 0.0173 Southern Illinois 2 0.40 on top 0.0016 9.3 East Kentucky 2 none 0.0148 East Kentucky 2 0.40 on'top 0.0019 12.8 East Kentucky 2 0.40 mined 0.00l3 8.8
The process of the present invention has been carried out in actual furnace installations and has been found v effective Jtoreduce'sulphur dioxide emissions without subjecting the coal and Trona to heat and causing the r top of a bed of coal particles.
4. A process of reducing-sulphur dioxideemissionsto or below apredeterm'ined level when burning'coalcontaining in excess of'one percent by weight of sulphur in I a furnace, comprising adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to particles of said coal to be burned,
Trona to combine with at least a portion of the sulphur to form as ash readily separable from gaseous products INGREDIENTS BY WEIGHT Silicates 0.21 Aluminum 0.24 Iron Oxide 0,045 Magnesium Oxide 0.23 Potassium 0.03 Chloride 0.02
% BY WEIGHT INGREDIENTS Soda Ash mace.) 57.65 Inerts 41.575
7. A process, as defined in claim 6, wherein the Wyoming Trona is at least partially refined prior to being added to the coal by the removal of part or substantially all of the inerts.
8. A process, according to claim 5, wherein the effective amount of Tronaadded is sufficient for reducing sulphur dioxide emissions in combustion gases to about 1 percent or less by weight.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US3540387 *||2 Oct 1968||17 Nov 1970||Coal Industry Patents Ltd||Process and apparatus for the combustion of carbonaceous material|
|US3723291 *||16 Abr 1971||27 Mar 1973||Continental Oil Co||Process for desulfurizing coke|
|GB824883A *||Título no disponible|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US3930989 *||21 Oct 1974||6 Ene 1976||The Superior Oil Company||Method for reduction of sulfur and nitrogen content in hydrocarbons|
|US3941552 *||29 Oct 1974||2 Mar 1976||Eric Charles Cottell||Burning water-in-oil emulsion containing pulverized coal|
|US3977844 *||9 May 1973||31 Ago 1976||Slyke William J Van||Process for producing a sulfur free combustible gas|
|US4060041 *||30 Jun 1975||29 Nov 1977||Energy Products Of Idaho||Low pollution incineration of solid waste|
|US4075953 *||20 Jun 1977||28 Feb 1978||Energy Products Of Idaho||Low pollution incineration of solid waste|
|US4084545 *||6 Jun 1977||18 Abr 1978||Battelle Development Corporation||Operating method|
|US4111755 *||27 Ene 1977||5 Sep 1978||Mcdowell-Wellman Engineering Company||Method of producing pelletized fixed sulfur fuel|
|US4142907 *||11 May 1978||6 Mar 1979||Fmc Corporation||High sodium oxide composition useful in the manufacture of glass|
|US4173454 *||29 Nov 1978||6 Nov 1979||Heins Sidney M||Method for removal of sulfur from coal in stoker furnaces|
|US4303477 *||9 Jun 1980||1 Dic 1981||Babcock Krauss-Maffei Industrieanlagen Gmbh||Process for the pyrolysis of waste materials|
|US4450777 *||27 Abr 1983||29 May 1984||Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke Ag||Process for removing noxious substances containing fluorine and/or sulfur from gaseous or liquid media|
|US4588568 *||23 Feb 1984||13 May 1986||L. & C. Steinmuller Gmbh||Method of binding sulfur compounds, which result as reaction products during the combustion of sulfur-containing fuels, by addition of additives|
|US4671804 *||29 Nov 1985||9 Jun 1987||Texaco Inc.||Partial oxidation process|
|US4783325 *||14 May 1985||8 Nov 1988||Jones Dale G||Process and apparatus for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfur from combustion gases|
|US5001994 *||17 Ago 1987||26 Mar 1991||Toa Trading Co., Ltd.||Method of controlling generation of clinker ash from exhaust gas dust of coal|
|US5120508 *||7 Abr 1988||9 Jun 1992||Jones Dale G||Apparatus for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfur from combustion gases|
|US6338305 *||10 Abr 2000||15 Ene 2002||Mchenry H. Thomas||On-line remediation of high sulfur coal and control of coal-fired power plant feedstock|
|US6484651||6 Oct 2000||26 Nov 2002||Crown Coal & Coke Co.||Method for operating a slag tap combustion apparatus|
|US6773471||30 Jul 2002||10 Ago 2004||Ada Environmental Solutions, Llc||Low sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation|
|US7332002||30 Jul 2002||19 Feb 2008||Ada Environmental Solutions, Llc||Low sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation|
|US7507083||16 Mar 2006||24 Mar 2009||Douglas C Comrie||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US7674442||9 Mar 2010||Comrie Douglas C||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US7758827||16 Mar 2006||20 Jul 2010||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US7776301||17 Ago 2010||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US7955418||11 Sep 2006||7 Jun 2011||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds or odors associated with same|
|US7955577||10 Jun 2010||7 Jun 2011||NOx II, Ltd||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US8124036||27 Oct 2006||28 Feb 2012||ADA-ES, Inc.||Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants|
|US8150776||11 Ene 2007||3 Abr 2012||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Methods of operating a coal burning facility|
|US8226913||2 May 2011||24 Jul 2012||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US8293196||4 Ago 2011||23 Oct 2012||ADA-ES, Inc.||Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants|
|US8298320||30 Oct 2012||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds, or odors associated with same|
|US8383071||10 Mar 2011||26 Feb 2013||Ada Environmental Solutions, Llc||Process for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials|
|US8435224||11 Sep 2006||7 May 2013||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Materials for facilitating administration of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and related compounds|
|US8439989||21 May 2010||14 May 2013||ADA-ES, Inc.||Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants|
|US8440001||24 Oct 2012||14 May 2013||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds, or odors associated with same|
|US8480797||2 May 2011||9 Jul 2013||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Activated carbon systems for facilitating use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by removal of same, related compounds, or associated odors|
|US8501128||22 Jun 2012||6 Ago 2013||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US8545778||16 Nov 2012||1 Oct 2013||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Sorbents for coal combustion|
|US8574324||8 Abr 2005||5 Nov 2013||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing sulfur gas emissions resulting from the burning of carbonaceous fuels|
|US8658115||5 Ago 2013||25 Feb 2014||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US8673061||2 May 2011||18 Mar 2014||Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.||Methods for facilitating use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by removal of same, related compounds, or associated odors|
|US8703081||25 Sep 2013||22 Abr 2014||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Sorbents for coal combustion|
|US8784757||4 Oct 2012||22 Jul 2014||ADA-ES, Inc.||Air treatment process for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials|
|US8919266||18 Jul 2003||30 Dic 2014||ADA-ES, Inc.||Low sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation|
|US8920158||24 Ene 2014||30 Dic 2014||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|US8974756||25 Jul 2013||10 Mar 2015||ADA-ES, Inc.||Process to enhance mixing of dry sorbents and flue gas for air pollution control|
|US9017452||14 Nov 2012||28 Abr 2015||ADA-ES, Inc.||System and method for dense phase sorbent injection|
|US9133408||4 Nov 2013||15 Sep 2015||Nox Ii, Ltd.||Reducing sulfur gas emissions resulting from the burning of carbonaceous fuels|
|US20060210463 *||16 Mar 2006||21 Sep 2006||Comrie Douglas C||Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal|
|DE3233200A1 *||7 Sep 1982||14 Abr 1983||Environmental Elements Corp||Verfahren zur entfernung von schwefeloxiden aus abgasen|
|DE3233201A1 *||7 Sep 1982||14 Abr 1983||Environmental Elements Corp||Verfahren zur entfernung von schwefeloxiden aus abgasen|
|EP0150501A2 *||27 Dic 1984||7 Ago 1985||Loesche Gmbh||Method and device using an air-swept mill for generating a homogeneous mixture of coal dust and lime stone dust or dolomite dust|
|EP0258708A2 *||13 Ago 1987||9 Mar 1988||Toa Nekken Corp., Ltd.||Method of controlling generation of clinker ash from exhaust gas dust of coal|
|WO1986006711A1 *||3 Jun 1985||20 Nov 1986||Gordon Dale Jones||Process and apparatus for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfur from combustion gases|
|WO1993011070A1 *||4 Ago 1992||10 Jun 1993||Church & Dwight Co Inc||Dry carbonation of trona|
|WO2002029323A1 *||4 Oct 2001||11 Abr 2002||Crown Coal & Coke Co||Method for operating a slag tap combustion apparatus|
|WO2010096026A2 *||22 Feb 2010||26 Ago 2010||Ali Nizami Ozcan||Full automatic smokeless coal burner adjustable for coal type|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||110/342, 423/206.2, 423/552, 423/244.5, 423/551|
|Clasificación internacional||C10L9/10, F23K3/00|
|Clasificación cooperativa||F23K2203/008, C10L9/10, F23K3/00|
|Clasificación europea||F23K3/00, C10L9/10|