Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUS3823676 A
Tipo de publicaciónConcesión
Fecha de publicación16 Jul 1974
Fecha de presentación10 Oct 1972
Fecha de prioridad10 Oct 1972
Número de publicaciónUS 3823676 A, US 3823676A, US-A-3823676, US3823676 A, US3823676A
InventoresW Cook, J Maitland
Cesionario originalWarren Cook Chem Inc
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Method of reducing sulphur dioxide emissions from coal
US 3823676 A
Resumen
A method of reducing sulphur dioxide emissions from coal by adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to the coal for combining with sulphur in the coal to form a relatively heavy ash which is collected with other heavier ash for removal in the usual way.
Imágenes(1)
Previous page
Next page
Descripción  (El texto procesado por OCR puede contener errores)

. United States Patent 1191 Cook et al. July 16, 1974 [5 METHOD OF REDUCING SULPHUR 3,723,291 3/1973 Thakker 201 17 DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS [76] Inventors: Webster Warren Cook; James 824,883 6/1957 Great Britain 110/1 K Maitland, both of c/o Warren Cook Chemlcal Monee 6-0449 Primary Examiner-Kenneth W. Sprague [22] Filed: Oct. 10, 1972 Assistant Examiner-Larry I. Schwartz Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Olson, Trexler, Wolters, [21] APPI- 2961147 Bushnell & Fosse, Ltd.

[52] US. Cl. 110/1 J llO/l K v 51 Int. (:1. F231) [57] ABSTRACT 53 Field f Search 1 10 1 1 1 K 10 44 R, A method of reducmg sulphur d1oxide emissions from 44/4; 201 17 coal by adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to the coal for combining with sulphur in the coal to 5 References Cited form a relatively heavy ash which 'is collected with UNITED STATES PATENTS other heavier ash for removal in the usual way. 3,540,387 11/1970 McLaren et a1. 110/1 J I 8 Claims, 1 Drawing Fi ure TRONA SUPPLY 20 PL/LVER/ZER 1 k) i F U) COMBUSTION BLOWE .4 ASH R CHAMBER REMOVAL Y l METHOD OF REDUCING SULPHUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM COAL The present invention relates to a novel process of eliminating or substantially reducing to acceptable levels sulphur dioxide emissions which nonnally result from the burning of sulphur containing coal.

It has long been recognized that one serious contributor to the problem of air pollution is the emission of sulphur dioxide from burning coal used in furnaces or boilers such as in power plants and the like. The amount of such emissions varies with the sulphur content of the coal being used. The sulphur content varies widely in accordance-with the type and source of the coal and may, for example, range from-about 0.5 percent to percent or 6 percent by weight. In general, much of the more economical and readily available coal, particularly in the midwest, is a relatively soft coal having a rather high sulphur content.

Numerous attempts have been made to eliminate or reduce to acceptable levels the sulphur dioxide emissions such as by pre-treating the coal or by mixingan additive with the coal. For environmental purposes, it is usually desired to keep sulphur dioxide emissions at a level of about one percent or less of the gaseous emissions resulting from oxidation or combustion of the coal. Prior attempts to achieve this goal, particularly with high sulphur coal, have not been generally successful since they have either been too costly or have resulted in unacceptable side effects.'For example, at-,

tempts have been made to use limestone as an additive with coal, but this results in the formation of an unacceptable coating on the interior of the furnace or boiler.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an important object of the present invention to provide a novel process of eliminating or reducing to an acceptable level sulphur dioxide emissions when burning sulphur containing coal in a manner which is relatively economical and which has no unacceptable side effects.

A more specific object of the present invention is to provide a novel process for eliminating or reducing to anacceptable level sulphur dioxide emissions by introducing an additive at an effective point in the combustion of the coal so as to cause the sulphur in thecoal to combine with the additive in a manner which facilitates subsequent removal and which does not result in an unacceptable side effect such as coating or corrosion of the interior of the furnace or boiler.

In order to accomplish the objects of this invention, dry Wyoming Trona in powder or granular form is applied to or mixed with the coal. Preferably the Trona is mixed intimately with the coal prior to initiation of combustion. An amount of Trona is used which is effective to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to or below the desired level of 1 percent. The amount of Trona required to be so effective will vary in accordance with the amount of sulphur in the coal. In addi-' tion the amount of T rona required will vary in accordance with the moisture content of the coal. In general, the amount of Trona which is effective to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to a given level increases with the sulphur content of the coal and also increases with the moisture content of the coal. For example, relatively high sulphur (about 4 to 5 percent by weight) 2 and high moisture coal from Kentucky requires the addition of about 15 percent by weight of Trona to reduce sulphur dioxide emissions to 1 percent or less while relatively-dry coal having lower sulphur contents (about 12 to 3 percent sulphur) usually requires the addition of only about 10 percent by weight of Trona to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to 1 percent or less.

The Trona used in the present invention is a mineral mined from known deposits in the State of Wyoming and has an average composition as follows:

The chemical reaction which takes place is not fully known, but it is known that theTrona binds with and neutralizes the sulphur and forms a relatively heavy 'ash which is readily collected with other-ash material and does not pass up the stack with the gaseous combustion products. The ash is then removed from the furnace or boiler in the usual manner.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings. Wherein FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an installation which may be used in carrying out the process in the present invention. 7

While it is to be understood that'theprocess of the present invention may be utilized in known types of coal burning equipment, FIG. l'schematically shows one typical installation. In this installation a furnace or boiler is provided with the usual combustion chamber into which pulverized or powdered coal is injected by a blower 12. The coal is delivered to the blower from a pulverizer 14 which serves to reduce the coal particles or lumps to the desired pulverized or powdered condition. The pulverizer in turn is fed from hopper 16 which received the fuel from a conveyer 18 extending from a suitable source of supply.

In accordance with the present invention Trona in dry powdered or granulated or sand-like form is added to the coal, preferably prior to the introduction to the combustion chamber. For-example, the Trona may be delivered from a suitable source of supply by conveyer means 20 into a hopper 22 from which it may be di rected to the coal at any one of a number of locations as indicated by the arrows .24, 26 and 28. In other words, the Trona may be introduced into the coal at the Trona-as a layer on top of the coal. The Trona combines with the sulphur in the coal to form an ash which falls to the bottom of the combustion chamber along x with other ash materials and may be removed by. any

suitable means such as a conveyer 30.

in investigating the effect of the addition of Trona on sulphur dioxide emission during the combustion of high sulphur content coals, the following test was conducted. An amount of untreated coal was oxidized as a control reference followed by oxidation of a like amount of coal to which was added the Trona. The same conditions for all experiments were maintained and in these experiments the term oxidation is used to signify the chemical reaction and at no time were the samples observed to be burning with an open flame. The Trona used was acquired from a Texas Gulf Sulphur Company mine in Wyoming.

The untreated coal was first pulverized and sieved to be in the size range of 0.033 inch and 0.066 inch and was dried at l C for 1 hour to remove moisture. Two 2.000-gram samples of pulverized coal were weighed. Both were spread uniformly over the bottom of alundum combustion boats 3 /2 inches long [2 inch wide and 5/16 inch deep. One was oxidized as is. To the second, 0.400 grams of Trona was either spread on top of the coal or mixed with it.

4 i cess of the present invention, such refinement increases the cost of the-material and thus the process. As previously indicated, the amount of Trona added during the process should be sufficient to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to one percent or less by weight of the flue gases. The quantity of the .Trona additive necessary to accomplish this result will vary in The samples were placed in ahorizontal tube furnace with a Vycor combustion tube which contained alundum crucible during a two-hour heating cycle. A thermocouple at the crucible indicated the temperature in the oxidation zone. Each run began with the furnace at ambient temperature. It required about 1 hour to reach 700C with a final temperature of about 740 C. Air flowing at 1 liter per minute was introduced at one end of the Vycor tube, flowed over the sample and swept the effluent gases into an absorbing tray. Three iced absorbers in a series were used to make certain thatall gases were trapped. Each absorber contained 50 ml of H Q The results of several runs are shown-in table l.

' From this table it is concluded that the sulphur dioxide emissions were reduced about 10-fold by the use of 'Trona additive. The manner in which the additive was applied to the coal affected the oxidation characteristics with mixing producing more complete oxidation compared to the layering method.

accordance with the sulphur and moisture content of the coal. in general, the amount of Trona required increases with the amounts of sulphur and moisture in the coal so that for relatively high sulphur coals of about five percent sulphur, about 15 percent by weight of Trona should be added. On the other hand'for rela- =tively dry lower sulphur coals having the sulphur content of about two to three percent by weight, and an amount of Trona equal to about ten percent by weight of the coal should be added to reduce the sulphur dioxide emissions to the desired acceptable level of l percent or less.

While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described herein, it is obvious that many changes may bemade without departing from the spirit of the scope of the appended claims.

The invention is claimed as follows:

1. A process of reducing sulphur dioxide emissions substantially to or beneath a predetermined level when oxidizing coal containing sulphur in a furnace, comprising adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to said coal, and causing the Trona to be combined with at least a portion of the sulphur in said coal to provide an ash.

2. A process as defined in claim 1, comprising the step of adding the Trona in a particulate form to coal particles and mixing the Trona throughout the coal particles.

3. A process as defined in claim 1, comprising adding the nain a P r t rm a a. hwsw Wm- I TABLE 1 SUMMARY SO EMISSIONS FROM COAL Oxidation Time. 2 Hrs. Max Temp., 740C (l364F) Air Flow, 1 liter/min.

Coal Sample Weight grams Additive Weight Position of S0 Weight Grams S0 of Control Additive Southern Illinois 2 None 0.0173 Southern Illinois 2 0.40 on top 0.0016 9.3 East Kentucky 2 none 0.0148 East Kentucky 2 0.40 on'top 0.0019 12.8 East Kentucky 2 0.40 mined 0.00l3 8.8

The process of the present invention has been carried out in actual furnace installations and has been found v effective Jtoreduce'sulphur dioxide emissions without subjecting the coal and Trona to heat and causing the r top of a bed of coal particles.

4. A process of reducing-sulphur dioxideemissionsto or below apredeterm'ined level when burning'coalcontaining in excess of'one percent by weight of sulphur in I a furnace, comprising adding an effective amount of Wyoming Trona to particles of said coal to be burned,

Trona to combine with at least a portion of the sulphur to form as ash readily separable from gaseous products INGREDIENTS BY WEIGHT Silicates 0.21 Aluminum 0.24 Iron Oxide 0,045 Magnesium Oxide 0.23 Potassium 0.03 Chloride 0.02

% BY WEIGHT INGREDIENTS Soda Ash mace.) 57.65 Inerts 41.575

7. A process, as defined in claim 6, wherein the Wyoming Trona is at least partially refined prior to being added to the coal by the removal of part or substantially all of the inerts.

8. A process, according to claim 5, wherein the effective amount of Tronaadded is sufficient for reducing sulphur dioxide emissions in combustion gases to about 1 percent or less by weight.

Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US3540387 *2 Oct 196817 Nov 1970Coal Industry Patents LtdProcess and apparatus for the combustion of carbonaceous material
US3723291 *16 Abr 197127 Mar 1973Continental Oil CoProcess for desulfurizing coke
GB824883A * Título no disponible
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US3930989 *21 Oct 19746 Ene 1976The Superior Oil CompanyMethod for reduction of sulfur and nitrogen content in hydrocarbons
US3941552 *29 Oct 19742 Mar 1976Eric Charles CottellBurning water-in-oil emulsion containing pulverized coal
US3977844 *9 May 197331 Ago 1976Slyke William J VanSulfur contaminated coal, steam, sodium sulfide intermediates
US4060041 *30 Jun 197529 Nov 1977Energy Products Of IdahoLow pollution incineration of solid waste
US4075953 *20 Jun 197728 Feb 1978Energy Products Of IdahoLow pollution incineration of solid waste
US4084545 *6 Jun 197718 Abr 1978Battelle Development CorporationOperating method
US4111755 *27 Ene 19775 Sep 1978Mcdowell-Wellman Engineering CompanyMethod of producing pelletized fixed sulfur fuel
US4142907 *11 May 19786 Mar 1979Fmc CorporationHigh sodium oxide composition useful in the manufacture of glass
US4173454 *29 Nov 19786 Nov 1979Heins Sidney MMethod for removal of sulfur from coal in stoker furnaces
US4303477 *9 Jun 19801 Dic 1981Babcock Krauss-Maffei Industrieanlagen GmbhProcess for the pyrolysis of waste materials
US4450777 *27 Abr 198329 May 1984Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke AgProcess for removing noxious substances containing fluorine and/or sulfur from gaseous or liquid media
US4588568 *23 Feb 198413 May 1986L. & C. Steinmuller GmbhMethod of binding sulfur compounds, which result as reaction products during the combustion of sulfur-containing fuels, by addition of additives
US4671804 *29 Nov 19859 Jun 1987Texaco Inc.Partial oxidation process
US4783325 *14 May 19858 Nov 1988Jones Dale GProcess and apparatus for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfur from combustion gases
US5001994 *17 Ago 198726 Mar 1991Toa Trading Co., Ltd.Method of controlling generation of clinker ash from exhaust gas dust of coal
US5120508 *7 Abr 19889 Jun 1992Jones Dale GConverting portion of nitrogen monoxide to nitrogen dioxide
US6338305 *10 Abr 200015 Ene 2002Mchenry H. ThomasOn-line remediation of high sulfur coal and control of coal-fired power plant feedstock
US64846516 Oct 200026 Nov 2002Crown Coal & Coke Co.Method for operating a slag tap combustion apparatus
US677347130 Jul 200210 Ago 2004Ada Environmental Solutions, LlcLow sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation
US733200230 Jul 200219 Feb 2008Ada Environmental Solutions, LlcIron, mineralizer, handling aid, flow aid, and/or abrasive material; lowering melting temperature of ash in low-iron, high alkali coals
US750708316 Mar 200624 Mar 2009Douglas C ComrieReducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US76744429 Ene 20099 Mar 2010Comrie Douglas Cdemetallization, desulfurization by absorption; alkaline powder sorbent is calcium bromide and an aluminosilicate mineral to capture sulfur, chloride, mercury, lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals in the ash; renders the harmful metals non-leaching and produces cementitious fly ash byproduct
US775882716 Mar 200620 Jul 2010Nox Ii, Ltd.alkaline powder sorbent is halogen compound (calcium bromide) and an aluminosilicate mineral to capture chloride as well as mercury, lead, arsenic, and other heavy metals in the ash; renders the harmful metals non-leaching and produces cementitious fly ash byproduct
US777630112 Feb 201017 Ago 2010Nox Ii, Ltd.Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US795541811 Sep 20067 Jun 2011Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds or odors associated with same
US795557710 Jun 20107 Jun 2011NOx II, LtdReducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US812403627 Oct 200628 Feb 2012ADA-ES, Inc.Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants
US815077611 Ene 20073 Abr 2012Nox Ii, Ltd.Methods of operating a coal burning facility
US82269132 May 201124 Jul 2012Nox Ii, Ltd.Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US82931964 Ago 201123 Oct 2012ADA-ES, Inc.Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants
US82983202 May 201130 Oct 2012Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds, or odors associated with same
US838307110 Mar 201126 Feb 2013Ada Environmental Solutions, LlcProcess for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials
US843522411 Sep 20067 May 2013Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Materials for facilitating administration of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and related compounds
US843998921 May 201014 May 2013ADA-ES, Inc.Additives for mercury oxidation in coal-fired power plants
US844000124 Oct 201214 May 2013Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Systems for removing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or related compounds, or odors associated with same
US84807972 May 20119 Jul 2013Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Activated carbon systems for facilitating use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by removal of same, related compounds, or associated odors
US850112822 Jun 20126 Ago 2013Nox Ii, Ltd.Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US854577816 Nov 20121 Oct 2013Nox Ii, Ltd.Sorbents for coal combustion
US85743248 Abr 20055 Nov 2013Nox Ii, Ltd.Reducing sulfur gas emissions resulting from the burning of carbonaceous fuels
US86581155 Ago 201325 Feb 2014Nox Ii, Ltd.Reducing mercury emissions from the burning of coal
US86730612 May 201118 Mar 2014Abela Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Methods for facilitating use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by removal of same, related compounds, or associated odors
US870308125 Sep 201322 Abr 2014Nox Ii, Ltd.Sorbents for coal combustion
US87847574 Oct 201222 Jul 2014ADA-ES, Inc.Air treatment process for dilute phase injection of dry alkaline materials
DE3233200A1 *7 Sep 198214 Abr 1983Environmental Elements CorpVerfahren zur entfernung von schwefeloxiden aus abgasen
DE3233201A1 *7 Sep 198214 Abr 1983Environmental Elements CorpVerfahren zur entfernung von schwefeloxiden aus abgasen
EP0150501A2 *27 Dic 19847 Ago 1985Loesche GmbhMethod and device using an air-swept mill for generating a homogeneous mixture of coal dust and lime stone dust or dolomite dust
EP0258708A2 *13 Ago 19879 Mar 1988Toa Nekken Corp., Ltd.Method of controlling generation of clinker ash from exhaust gas dust of coal
WO1986006711A1 *3 Jun 198520 Nov 1986Gordon Dale JonesProcess and apparatus for removing oxides of nitrogen and sulfur from combustion gases
WO1993011070A1 *4 Ago 199210 Jun 1993Church & Dwight Co IncDry carbonation of trona
WO2002029323A1 *4 Oct 200111 Abr 2002Crown Coal & Coke CoMethod for operating a slag tap combustion apparatus
WO2010096026A2 *22 Feb 201026 Ago 2010Ali Nizami OzcanFull automatic smokeless coal burner adjustable for coal type
Clasificaciones
Clasificación de EE.UU.110/342, 423/206.2, 423/552, 423/244.5, 423/551
Clasificación internacionalC10L9/10, F23K3/00
Clasificación cooperativaF23K2203/008, C10L9/10, F23K3/00
Clasificación europeaF23K3/00, C10L9/10