US3853540A - Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys - Google Patents

Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3853540A
US3853540A US00349999A US34999973A US3853540A US 3853540 A US3853540 A US 3853540A US 00349999 A US00349999 A US 00349999A US 34999973 A US34999973 A US 34999973A US 3853540 A US3853540 A US 3853540A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
percent
slag
alloy
oxide
furnace
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00349999A
Inventor
R Schlatter
J Stroup
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Latrobe Steel Co
Original Assignee
Latrobe Steel Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Latrobe Steel Co filed Critical Latrobe Steel Co
Priority to US00349999A priority Critical patent/US3853540A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3853540A publication Critical patent/US3853540A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B9/00General processes of refining or remelting of metals; Apparatus for electroslag or arc remelting of metals
    • C22B9/10General processes of refining or remelting of metals; Apparatus for electroslag or arc remelting of metals with refining or fluxing agents; Use of materials therefor, e.g. slagging or scorifying agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21CPROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/04Removing impurities by adding a treating agent
    • C21C7/064Dephosphorising; Desulfurising

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the desulfurization of nickelbase, cobalt-base and iron-base alloys melted in vacuum-induction furnaces. It is more particularly concerned with processes for treating melts of such alloys so as to reduce their sulfur contents to very low levels.
  • the pouring pit may be at some distance from the furnace. There is an appreciable loss in temperature of the metal from the time it leaves the furnace to the time it goes into the last mold, and this is allowed for in adjusting the tapping temperature of the alloy.
  • the furnace slag therefore, is necessarily hot. It is wellknown that desulfurization is facilitated by high slag temperatures.
  • compositions of many of the high performance alloys are such that it is not feasible to melt them in air. They are melted in vacuum-induction furnaces. Refining of the metal under a slag for desulfurization can be carried out in addition to the usual vacuum refining done in these furnaces at usual production rates. The conditions in these furnaces as concern slag-metal reactions are in most respects, however, quite different from those in arc furnaces.
  • the bath is relatively deep. The metallic charge is heated by currents induced in it, but the slag, being a poor conductor, is not so heated. It receives heat from the metal underneath it, and can never be hotter than the metal.
  • tapping and teeming practice is different from are furnace practice because of the nature of the vacuum-induction furnace layout.
  • the furnace is operated inside an evacuated tank or shell and the in-' gots must be poured within the shell.
  • a ladle is not used, but the metal is tapped from the furnace into a tundish which is constructed so that its tap hole can be aligned with respect to the ingot molds which are positioned within the tank.
  • the heat loss is substantially less than in air-melting practice and the tapping temperature of the furnace is lower than it would have to be for the alloy if it were melted and cast by conventional arc furnace practice.
  • the slag on a vacuum-induction-furnace-melted heat is several hundred degrees colder than the slag on a heat air-melted in an arc furnace, and its desulfurizing action is much less vigorous. Desulfurizing practices which are effective in arc-furnace melting are generally not effective in vacuum-induction-furnaces.
  • a melt of cobalt-base, nickelbase or iron-base alloy can be desulfurized in a vacuum-induction-furnace to a low sulfur content by causing it to react in a basic-lined crucible under reducing conditions with a slagforming mixture comprising high purity lime and a fluxing agent, in the manner hereinafter set out.
  • the principal constituent of our slag-forming mixture is high-purity metallurgical lime comprising more than 98 percent calcium oxide.
  • the burnt lime used in conventional alloy melting practice has a considerably lower calcium oxide content, on the order of to percent.
  • the high purity lime we use should not contain more than 0.5 percent by weight of silica, not more than 0.3 percent iron oxide and not more than 0.3 percent manganese oxide for maximum effectiveness in desulfurization.
  • lt should also contain not more than 0.05 percent lead oxide, or oxides of other undesirable constituents, as in our process oxides tend to be reduced from the slag into the melt.
  • Our mixture includes one or more neutral fluxing compounds such as calcium fluoride, barium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, sodium-aluminum fluoride (cryolite) or the rare earth fluorides.
  • neutral fluxing compounds such as calcium fluoride, barium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, sodium-aluminum fluoride (cryolite) or the rare earth fluorides.
  • We may supplement these fluorides with alumina, barium oxide, nickel oxide, or molybdenum oxide.
  • a fluxing agent is essential in our process to render the slag fluid and reactive at the relatively low slag temperatures in a vacuum induction-furnace.
  • the neutral fluxing compounds should be incorporated in amounts between about 5 percent and about 25 percent by weight of the mix.
  • the total amount of slag mixture required for effective desulfurization of iron, nickel, and cobalt-base alloys in large vacuum induction melting furnaces of l to 30 ton capacity is between 0.1 and 2 percent of the metal weight in the crucible.
  • the desulfurizing flux mixture can be added in one portion to the charge materials or in one or several small portions to the liquid metal under inductive stirring. If the addition is made to the charge, care must be taken in cleaning the metallic raw material to avoid the presence of excessive amounts of heavy metal oxides. No principal changes in the usual melting practice or pressure level is necessary to accomplish desulfurization through the use of above described treatment mixture.
  • the forging must be interrupted from time to time to allow the partially reduced billet to be reheated.
  • the successive reduction and reheating stages are detrimental to the surfaceof the billet and therefore it is common practice at some point in processing to condition the billet surface, by grinding or the like, to remove defects.
  • the number of these steps is directly proportional to the sulfur content of thealloy.
  • the limit of solid 5 Squaw solubility of sulfur, for each alloy marks the point at tensile 17] 193 [3
  • the attached figures are photomicrographs of specimens from heats of D979 alloy having different sulfur contents, the lower sulfur contents being obtained by the process of our invention.
  • FIG. 1 is an unetched photomicrograph at a magnification of 500X of metal from a heat having a sulfur content of 0.009 percent.
  • the elongated gray areas indicated by arrows are sulfide films.
  • the isolated grains with black borders are remnants of carbide stringers.
  • the photomicrograph shows that microcracking has commenced along the sulfide-matrix interface.
  • FIG. 2 is another photomicrograph of the same heat at the same magnification but etched with modified Frys reagent. It shows another microcrack formed along a sulfide-matrix interface. Arrows point to the remnants of sulfide films.
  • FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph of another heat of the same alloy in which, by the process of our invention, the sulfur content has been reduced to 0.002 percent. It was taken at the same magnification as FIGS. 1 and 2 and the specimen was etched with the same modified Fry's reagent. N sulfide films or evidences of microcracking are observable. Some remnants of carbide stringers are visible as isolated grains surrounded by heavy black borders. It is in these areas that sulfides would have appeared first, if any had been present.
  • the method of desulfurizing an alloy of the group consisting of nickel-base, cobalt-base and iron-base alloys in a basic-lined vacuum vessel under reduced pressure comprising bringing the molten alloy into contact under reducing conditions with a basic slag having a temperature no higher than that of the alloy, the slag being formed by adding to the alloy a slag-forming mixture comprising lime having a calcium oxide content greater than about 98 percent and a neutral fluxing agent capable of rendering slag fluid and reactive at relatively low slag temperatures, in amount between about 5 percent and about 25 percent of the mixture by weight.
  • the methodof claim 1 in which the lime contains not more than about 0.5 percent silica, not more than 0.3 percent iron oxide and not more than about 0.3 percent manganese oxide.
  • the neutral fluxing agent also includes one or more members selected from the group consisting of alumina, barium oxide, nickel oxide .and molybdenum oxide.
  • the reducing agent is one or more of the constituents carbon, calcium carbide, silicon, silicon carbide, calcium, calcium silicide, aluminum, magnesium, the rare earth metals, the rare refractory.

Abstract

Nickel-base, cobalt-base and iron-base alloys melted in vacuuminduction furnaces are desulfurized to very low sulfur levels by reacting them with slag-forming mixtures comprising high purity lime and a fluxing agent, under reducing conditions, so as to form a slag no hotter than the melt. The alloys so produced display unexpected improvements in physical properties and in hot workability.

Description

United States Patent [1 1 Schlatter et al.
[ DESULFURIZATION 0F VACUUM-INDUCTION-FURNACE-MELTED ALLOYS [75 Inventors: Rene Schlatter, Derry Township;
James P. Stroup, Ligonier Township, both of Westmoreland County, Pa.
[73] Assignee: Latrobe Steel Company, Latrobe,
[22] Filed: Apr. 11, 1973 [211 App]. No.: 349,999
[52] US. Cl 75/53, 75/57, 75/58, 75/82, 75/94 [51] Int. Cl C21c 7/02, C22b 9/10 [58] Field of Search 75/53, 57, 58, 82, 94, 75/130.5, 49, 10-l2 [56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Landigd 75/54 Dec. 10, 1974 7/1965 Okazaki 75/l30.5 3,198,624 8/1965 Bell 1 75/130.5 3,218,156 11/1965 Vander Sluis. 75/49 3,396,100 8/1968 Gould 75/53 3,547,622 12/1970 Hutchinson 75/49 3,695,946 10/1972 Demeaux 75/49 Primary ExaminerL. Dewayne Rutledge Assistant Examiner-Peter D. Rosenburg Attorney, Agent, or FirmBuell, Blenko & Ziesenheim 57] ABSTRACT 10 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures PATENTED EEC] 0l974 FIG. I
DESULFURIZATION OF VACUUM-INDUCTION-FURNACE-MELTED ALLOYS This invention relates to the desulfurization of nickelbase, cobalt-base and iron-base alloys melted in vacuum-induction furnaces. It is more particularly concerned with processes for treating melts of such alloys so as to reduce their sulfur contents to very low levels.
The properties of a considerable number of alloys are known to be sensitive to their sulfur contents. This is particularly true of some of the high-performance ironbase, nickel-base and cobalt-base alloys, sometimes called super alloys, and most of them have maximum sulfur content specifications of 0.01 percent.-
Many alloys can be air-melted in the arc furnace, in which desulfurization of the charge is accomplished by the use of a basic slag. In the arc furnace, after melt down, the heat generated by the arc is transmitted to the slag which floats on the melt and then from the slag to the melt. The hearth is relatively shallow and the roof is domed, and reflects heat onto the slag below. The slag is, therefore, always hotter than the melt, by perhaps 200 to 300F. The metal from an arc furnace is normally tapped into a ladle, which is then moved over a pit in which are located the ingot molds, and the metal is teemed from the ladleinto the molds, one after another. The pouring pit may be at some distance from the furnace. There is an appreciable loss in temperature of the metal from the time it leaves the furnace to the time it goes into the last mold, and this is allowed for in adjusting the tapping temperature of the alloy. The furnace slag therefore, is necessarily hot. It is wellknown that desulfurization is facilitated by high slag temperatures.
The compositions of many of the high performance alloys, however, are such that it is not feasible to melt them in air. They are melted in vacuum-induction furnaces. Refining of the metal under a slag for desulfurization can be carried out in addition to the usual vacuum refining done in these furnaces at usual production rates. The conditions in these furnaces as concern slag-metal reactions are in most respects, however, quite different from those in arc furnaces. The bath is relatively deep. The metallic charge is heated by currents induced in it, but the slag, being a poor conductor, is not so heated. It receives heat from the metal underneath it, and can never be hotter than the metal.
Furthermore, the tapping and teeming practice is different from are furnace practice because of the nature of the vacuum-induction furnace layout. The furnace is operated inside an evacuated tank or shell and the in-' gots must be poured within the shell. A ladle is not used, but the metal is tapped from the furnace into a tundish which is constructed so that its tap hole can be aligned with respect to the ingot molds which are positioned within the tank. As heat can continue to be supplied to the melt while it is being tapped, the heat loss is substantially less than in air-melting practice and the tapping temperature of the furnace is lower than it would have to be for the alloy if it were melted and cast by conventional arc furnace practice. The slag on a vacuum-induction-furnace-melted heat is several hundred degrees colder than the slag on a heat air-melted in an arc furnace, and its desulfurizing action is much less vigorous. Desulfurizing practices which are effective in arc-furnace melting are generally not effective in vacuum-induction-furnaces.
It is an object of our invention to provide a process for reducing the sulfur content of vacuum-inductionfurnace alloy melts to low levels. It is another object to provide such a process which comprehends reacting alloy melts with a slag of specified composition which has a temperature no greater than the metal temperature. Other objects of our invention will appear in the course of the description thereof which follows.
We have found that a melt of cobalt-base, nickelbase or iron-base alloy can be desulfurized in a vacuum-induction-furnace to a low sulfur content by causing it to react in a basic-lined crucible under reducing conditions with a slagforming mixture comprising high purity lime and a fluxing agent, in the manner hereinafter set out.
We have discovered that our process reduces the sulfur content of the alloy to a value which we believe to be below the solid solubility limit of the alloy and we have found that alloys made by our process exhibit unexpected improvements both in physical properties and in hot workability.
We preferably carry out our process in a vacuuminduction-furnace lined with magnesia-spinel refractory bricks. The charge is introduced into the furnace either in solid or in liquid form. Our desulfurizing mixture to be described may be added to the cold charge, or it may be added after the charge has melted and refining is in progress. Our mixture may be added in granulated or powder form, packed in bags, or it may be briquetted or otherwise compacted and added in that form.
The principal constituent of our slag-forming mixture is high-purity metallurgical lime comprising more than 98 percent calcium oxide. The burnt lime used in conventional alloy melting practice has a considerably lower calcium oxide content, on the order of to percent. The high purity lime we use should not contain more than 0.5 percent by weight of silica, not more than 0.3 percent iron oxide and not more than 0.3 percent manganese oxide for maximum effectiveness in desulfurization. lt should also contain not more than 0.05 percent lead oxide, or oxides of other undesirable constituents, as in our process oxides tend to be reduced from the slag into the melt. We prefer to screen the lime through an 8 mesh screen and over a 32 mesh screen. Our mixture includes one or more neutral fluxing compounds such as calcium fluoride, barium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, sodium-aluminum fluoride (cryolite) or the rare earth fluorides. We may supplement these fluorides with alumina, barium oxide, nickel oxide, or molybdenum oxide. A fluxing agent is essential in our process to render the slag fluid and reactive at the relatively low slag temperatures in a vacuum induction-furnace. The neutral fluxing compounds should be incorporated in amounts between about 5 percent and about 25 percent by weight of the mix.
' Our process, to be fully effective, requires reducing conditions for the reaction between the slag-forming compound and the sulfur in the charge. If the charge contains strong reducing agents, such as aluminum or titanium in amounts of a few percent, or carbon in excess of about 0.3 percent, no reducing agents may be necessary in our slag forming mix. If the composition of the charge is deficient in reducing substances our mix also includes one or more reducing agents. Suitable num rare earth metals, rare earth silicides or alloys of the above. The weight of the reducing agents should be between about 1 percent and about IS-pereent of the mixture. The constituents of the mixture are well blended in any convenientmixing apparatus before the mixture is added to the alloy. In induction furnace melting of the alloys here concerned, the induced currents in the melt cause a circulation which effectively exposes the molten charge to the slag and so causes them to react on each other.
It has been found that the total amount of slag mixture required for effective desulfurization of iron, nickel, and cobalt-base alloys in large vacuum induction melting furnaces of l to 30 ton capacity is between 0.1 and 2 percent of the metal weight in the crucible. The desulfurizing flux mixture can be added in one portion to the charge materials or in one or several small portions to the liquid metal under inductive stirring. If the addition is made to the charge, care must be taken in cleaning the metallic raw material to avoid the presence of excessive amounts of heavy metal oxides. No principal changes in the usual melting practice or pressure level is necessary to accomplish desulfurization through the use of above described treatment mixture.
The. nominal compositions of several alloys for which. ourprocess is suitable are set out in the accompanying Table l.
TABLE II Continued SULFUR CONTENT OF Starting SPECIMENS Billet Stock Property .012%S .006%S .()07%S Elongation l l -20 Reduction in area I3 20 The hot-workability of alloys of the types above mentioned is also sensitive to their sulfur contents. This dependency is perhaps of even more importance to the producers of the alloys than to their users. The alloy is usually cast into an ingot of considerably greater crosssection than the bar or other shape supplied the customer. The ingot is then hot-worked, usually by forging, to a billet of. a size which can be conveniently rolled to final dimensions. As the ranges of forging temperatures of the alloys here concerned are rather narrow, the forging must be interrupted from time to time to allow the partially reduced billet to be reheated. The successive reduction and reheating stages are detrimental to the surfaceof the billet and therefore it is common practice at some point in processing to condition the billet surface, by grinding or the like, to remove defects. The number of these steps is directly proportional to the sulfur content of thealloy. A l6 inch diameter ingot of the D979 alloy previously mentioned containing0.0l percent sulfurmayrequire 9 or TABLE I ALLOY COMPOSITION Cr Co Ni w Mo Al Ti Cb-i-Ta c Mn Si s v Fe lnconel 718 l8.5 1.0+ 53 3 .5 1 .04 .1 .1 .01+ Bal. Rene 95 14 8 Bal. 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.5 .15 .1 .1 .01+ Marvac 315 15 I8 3 .1 .2 .01 .1+ .1+ 005+ .5 Bal. M50 4 4 .8 .3 .2 .01+ 1 Bal. D-979 15 43 4 4 1 3 .04 .1 .1 .01+ Bal. Waspalloy I4 Bal. 4 L4 3 .06 .l .l '.Ol+ 2+ MP M 20 35 34 10 .7 .01 .1 .1 .005+ 1+ Maximum I H VA w M H U h 7 We have discovered that these alloys are sensitive to 10 reheatings and 2 or 3 reconditioning treatments to even lower sulfur contents than were previouslyattamb i i d to a 4% i h square bill t, If it lf able- Specimens of D979 y for example, Containing content is halved, it may require only 5 to 6 reheatings 0009 Percent Sulfur have F P and one reconditioning treatment, while if its sulfur tions of about 5 percent and reductlons of area of about content is reduced to 0002 percent i can b h P wh'le slm'lar specmens of the P made worked to billet size with only 2 to 3 reheatings and no wlth sulfur of 0-005 P exhlblt room reconditioning. The reduction in manufacturing cost of temperature elongatlons of about 1 1 P 14 alloys with sulfur contents of this order is thus very subductions of area of about 15.6 percent. The sensitivity Stamiah t0 Sulfur f' of wasPalloy sp'eclmens q q to The detrimental effect of sulfur on the properties of the same size from two different slzes of starting b1llet the ahoys in question, even When the Sulfur content is w" by the Sung 9 slglf'ficam Physlcal L low by ordinary standards, appears to be occasioned by ert1es 1n Table II. Ult1mate tensile strength and y eld the presence f attenuated sulfide films Which form Strength are expressed thousands of Pounds P along the grain boundaries of the alloy during its solidi Square fication. These films facilitate micro-cracking of the al- TABLE II loy, which leads to subsequent failure. There is evidence, however, that these films do not form when the Starting gg ggyg gg OF sulfur content of the alloy is less than some low value, Billet Stock Property (HMS 006%5 007% wh1ch 1s postulated to be the lim t of solid solubility of sulfur in the alloy 1n question. Th1s limit no doubt varies 8" square Ultimate 194 93 from one alloy to another and, as far as we know, has f z igg :21 142 l 35 not been determined precisely forany of the alloys here Elongation concerned. Our experlment's mdlcate that it must be zg 8 25 less than about 0.006-0.007 percent and in some alloys I, in area 11 21 30 as low as perhaps 0.002 percent. Thus, the limit of solid 5 Squaw solubility of sulfur, for each alloy, marks the point at tensile 17] 193 [3| |30 which a physical change in the alloy structure occurs,
.2% Yield and this change is accompanied by a very substantial change both in the response of the alloy to hot working and in the physical properties of the worked alloy.
The attached figures are photomicrographs of specimens from heats of D979 alloy having different sulfur contents, the lower sulfur contents being obtained by the process of our invention.
FIG. 1 is an unetched photomicrograph at a magnification of 500X of metal from a heat having a sulfur content of 0.009 percent. The elongated gray areas indicated by arrows are sulfide films. The isolated grains with black borders are remnants of carbide stringers. The photomicrograph shows that microcracking has commenced along the sulfide-matrix interface.
FIG. 2 is another photomicrograph of the same heat at the same magnification but etched with modified Frys reagent. It shows another microcrack formed along a sulfide-matrix interface. Arrows point to the remnants of sulfide films.
FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph of another heat of the same alloy in which, by the process of our invention, the sulfur content has been reduced to 0.002 percent. It was taken at the same magnification as FIGS. 1 and 2 and the specimen was etched with the same modified Fry's reagent. N sulfide films or evidences of microcracking are observable. Some remnants of carbide stringers are visible as isolated grains surrounded by heavy black borders. It is in these areas that sulfides would have appeared first, if any had been present.
The following are examples of our process:
High Temperature Alloy lnconel -7l8 A 30,000 pound charge of this alloy having a calculated sulfur content of 0.005 percent was melted in a magnesia-spine] lined vacuum-induction-furnace together with a slag-forming mixture consisting of 100 pounds of high purity lime and 20 pounds of calcium fluoride. The melt was tapped at a temperature of 2,750F. The sulfur content of the alloy at tap was 0.002 percent.
III
I High Strength Steel Marvac -3l5 A 15,000 pound charge of this steel having a calculated sulfur content of 0.004 percent was melted in a magnesia-spinel lined vacuum-induction-furnace with a slag-forming mixture consisting of 50 pounds of high purity lime, pounds of calcium fluoride and pounds of nickel oxide. The tapping temperature was 2,830F. The sulfur content of the steel at tap was 0.002 percent.
Bearing Steel M 50 Cobalt-Nickel Alloy MP3SN A 30,000 pound charge of this alloy having a calculated sulfur content of 0.005 percent was melted in a magnesia-spine] lined vacuum-induction-furnace together with a slag-forming mixture consisting of 90 pounds of high purity lime, 10 pounds of calcium fluoride and 80 pounds of metallic calcium. The melt was tapped at a temperature of 2,750F. The sulfur content of the alloy at tap was 0.002 percent.
High Temperature Alloy D979 A l6,000 pound virgin charge of this alloy having a calculated sulfur content of 0.0041 percent was melted in a magnesia-spinel lined vacuum-induction-furnace together with a slag-forming mixture consisting of pounds of high purity lime, 3 pounds of cryolite, and 1 pound of calcium carbide. The melt was tapped at a temperature of 2,700F.The sulfur content of the alloy at tap was 0.002 percent.
In all the examples the heats were melted from a cold charge. Thus, the sulfur content of the charge had to be calculated from the known sulfur contents of the scrap and other charge constituents.
In the foregoing specification we have described a presently preferred embodiment of this invention, however, it will be understood that this invention can be otherwise embodied within the scope of the following claims.
We claim:
1. The method of desulfurizing an alloy of the group consisting of nickel-base, cobalt-base and iron-base alloys in a basic-lined vacuum vessel under reduced pressure comprising bringing the molten alloy into contact under reducing conditions with a basic slag having a temperature no higher than that of the alloy, the slag being formed by adding to the alloy a slag-forming mixture comprising lime having a calcium oxide content greater than about 98 percent and a neutral fluxing agent capable of rendering slag fluid and reactive at relatively low slag temperatures, in amount between about 5 percent and about 25 percent of the mixture by weight.
2. The methodof claim 1 in which the lime contains not more than about 0.5 percent silica, not more than 0.3 percent iron oxide and not more than about 0.3 percent manganese oxide.
3. The method of claim 2 in which the lime contains sium fluoride, sodium-aluminum fluoride and the rare earth fluorides.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the neutral fluxing agent also includes one or more members selected from the group consisting of alumina, barium oxide, nickel oxide .and molybdenum oxide. I
6. The method of claim 1 in which the reducing conditions are obtained by including in the slag-forming mixture a reducing agent in amounts between about 1 percent and about percent of the mixture by weight.
7. The method of claim 6 in which the reducing agent is one or more of the constituents carbon, calcium carbide, silicon, silicon carbide, calcium, calcium silicide, aluminum, magnesium, the rare earth metals, the rare refractory.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE v CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3, 853,540 Dated December 10, 1974 Inventor(s) Rene Schlatter and James P. Stroup It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Signed and sealed this 4t y of March 1975 'Attest:
1 c. MARSHALL DANN Commissioner of Patents 7 RUTH C. MASON and Trademarks Attesting Officer USCOMM-DC 6037 6-P69 FORM PO-1050 (10-69) 9: us. GOVERNMENT rnm'rms orncz: leis o-au-au.

Claims (10)

1. THE METHOD OF DESULFURIZING AN ALLOY OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF NICKEL-BASE, COBALT-BASE AND IRON-BASE ALLOYS IN A BASICLINED VACUUM VESSEL UNDER REDUCED PRESSURE COMPRISING BRINGING THE MOLTEN ALLOY INTO CONTACT UNDER REDUCING CONDITIONS WITH A BASIC SLAGE HAVING A TEMPERATURE NO HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE ALLOY, THE SLAG BEING FORMED BY ADDING TO THE ALLOY A SLAGFORMING MIXTURE COMPRISING LIME HAVING A CALCIUM OXIDE CONTENT GREATER THAN ABOUT 98 PERCENT AND A NEUTRAL FLUXING AGENT CAPABLE OF RENDERING SLAG FLUID AND REACTIVE AT RELATIVELY LOW SLAG TEMPERATURES, IN AMOUNT BETWEEN ABOUT 5 PERCENT AND ABOUT 25 PERCENT OF THE MIXTURE BY WEIGHT.
2. The method of claim 1 in which the lime contains not more than about 0.5 percent silica, not more than 0.3 percent iron oxide and not more than about 0.3 percent manganese oxide.
3. The method of claim 2 in which the lime contains not more than 0.05 percent lead oxide.
4. The method of claim 1 in which the neutral fluxing agent is one or more members selected from the group consisting of calcium fluoride, barium fluoride, magnesium fluoride, sodium-aluminum fluoride and the rare earth fluorides.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the neutral fluxing agent also includes one or more members selected from the group consisting of alumina, barium oxide, nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide.
6. The method of claim 1 in which the reducing conditions are obtained by including in the slag-forming mixture a reducing agent in amounts between about 1 percent and about 15 percent of the mixture by weight.
7. The method of claim 6 in which the reducing agent is one or more of the constituents carbon, calcium carbide, silicon, silicon carbide, calcium, calcium silicide, aluminum, magnesium, the rare earth metals, the rare earth silicides, and alloys thereof.
8. The method of claim 1 in which the weight of the slag-forming mixture is between about 0.1 percent and about 2 percent of the weight of the melt.
9. The method of claim 1 in which the vessel is a vacuum-induction-furnace.
10. The method of claim 9 in which the basic lining of the vacuum-induction-furnace is a magnesia spinel refractory.
US00349999A 1973-04-11 1973-04-11 Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys Expired - Lifetime US3853540A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00349999A US3853540A (en) 1973-04-11 1973-04-11 Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00349999A US3853540A (en) 1973-04-11 1973-04-11 Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3853540A true US3853540A (en) 1974-12-10

Family

ID=23374840

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00349999A Expired - Lifetime US3853540A (en) 1973-04-11 1973-04-11 Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3853540A (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4049470A (en) * 1976-04-29 1977-09-20 Special Metals Corporation Refining nickel base superalloys
WO1979000398A1 (en) * 1977-12-16 1979-07-12 Foseco Int Desulphurisation of ferrous metals
US4473398A (en) * 1982-09-22 1984-09-25 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method for desulfurizing a molten iron by injection
US4612164A (en) * 1984-11-01 1986-09-16 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel copper alloys with enhanced malleability and improved sulfide distribution
US4826738A (en) * 1987-07-07 1989-05-02 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation and corrosion resistant chromia forming coatings
US4895201A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant superalloys containing low sulfur levels
US5344510A (en) * 1993-04-14 1994-09-06 United Technologies Corporation Method for removing sulfur from superalloy articles to improve their oxidation resistance
US5346563A (en) * 1991-11-25 1994-09-13 United Technologies Corporation Method for removing sulfur from superalloy articles to improve their oxidation resistance
US5538796A (en) * 1992-10-13 1996-07-23 General Electric Company Thermal barrier coating system having no bond coat
US5922148A (en) * 1997-02-25 1999-07-13 Howmet Research Corporation Ultra low sulfur superalloy castings and method of making
US6333121B1 (en) 1992-10-13 2001-12-25 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer and its preparation
US6656605B1 (en) * 1992-10-13 2003-12-02 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article coated with a platinum-group metal and a ceramic layer, and its preparation
WO2012006660A1 (en) * 2010-07-15 2012-01-19 Xstrata Technology Pty Ltd Pyrometallurgical method

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3099552A (en) * 1958-10-21 1963-07-30 Gen Electric Method of making low sulfur steel
US3194649A (en) * 1962-04-27 1965-07-13 Okazaki Shigeyuki Filling substance for producing chromium-molybdenum steel
US3198624A (en) * 1961-08-24 1965-08-03 Interlake Steel Corp Process for the manufacture of stainless steel
US3218156A (en) * 1963-10-16 1965-11-16 Howe Sound Co Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys
US3396100A (en) * 1965-09-24 1968-08-06 Petrolite Corp Process for separating oil-water mixtures
US3547622A (en) * 1968-06-12 1970-12-15 Pennwalt Corp D.c. powered plasma arc method and apparatus for refining molten metal
US3695946A (en) * 1971-11-24 1972-10-03 Forges De La Loire Comp D Atel Method of manufacturing oriented grain magnetic steel sheets

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3099552A (en) * 1958-10-21 1963-07-30 Gen Electric Method of making low sulfur steel
US3198624A (en) * 1961-08-24 1965-08-03 Interlake Steel Corp Process for the manufacture of stainless steel
US3194649A (en) * 1962-04-27 1965-07-13 Okazaki Shigeyuki Filling substance for producing chromium-molybdenum steel
US3218156A (en) * 1963-10-16 1965-11-16 Howe Sound Co Process for vacuum deoxidation of alloys
US3396100A (en) * 1965-09-24 1968-08-06 Petrolite Corp Process for separating oil-water mixtures
US3547622A (en) * 1968-06-12 1970-12-15 Pennwalt Corp D.c. powered plasma arc method and apparatus for refining molten metal
US3695946A (en) * 1971-11-24 1972-10-03 Forges De La Loire Comp D Atel Method of manufacturing oriented grain magnetic steel sheets

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4049470A (en) * 1976-04-29 1977-09-20 Special Metals Corporation Refining nickel base superalloys
WO1979000398A1 (en) * 1977-12-16 1979-07-12 Foseco Int Desulphurisation of ferrous metals
US4209325A (en) * 1977-12-16 1980-06-24 Foseco International Limited Desulphuration of metals
US4473398A (en) * 1982-09-22 1984-09-25 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method for desulfurizing a molten iron by injection
US4612164A (en) * 1984-11-01 1986-09-16 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel copper alloys with enhanced malleability and improved sulfide distribution
US4826738A (en) * 1987-07-07 1989-05-02 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation and corrosion resistant chromia forming coatings
US4895201A (en) * 1987-07-07 1990-01-23 United Technologies Corporation Oxidation resistant superalloys containing low sulfur levels
US5346563A (en) * 1991-11-25 1994-09-13 United Technologies Corporation Method for removing sulfur from superalloy articles to improve their oxidation resistance
US6797408B2 (en) 1992-10-13 2004-09-28 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer, and its preparation
US7510779B2 (en) 1992-10-13 2009-03-31 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article having a platinum aluminide protective layer and its preparation
US5538796A (en) * 1992-10-13 1996-07-23 General Electric Company Thermal barrier coating system having no bond coat
US6333121B1 (en) 1992-10-13 2001-12-25 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer and its preparation
US6656605B1 (en) * 1992-10-13 2003-12-02 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article coated with a platinum-group metal and a ceramic layer, and its preparation
US6656533B2 (en) 1992-10-13 2003-12-02 William S. Walston Low-sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer, and its preparation
US20040123923A1 (en) * 1992-10-13 2004-07-01 Walston William S. Low sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer, and its preparation
US6969558B2 (en) 1992-10-13 2005-11-29 General Electric Company Low sulfur article having a platinum-aluminide protective layer, and its preparation
US20050121116A1 (en) * 1992-10-13 2005-06-09 General Electric Company Low-sulfur article having a platinum aluminide protective layer and its preparation
US5344510A (en) * 1993-04-14 1994-09-06 United Technologies Corporation Method for removing sulfur from superalloy articles to improve their oxidation resistance
US5922148A (en) * 1997-02-25 1999-07-13 Howmet Research Corporation Ultra low sulfur superalloy castings and method of making
WO2012006660A1 (en) * 2010-07-15 2012-01-19 Xstrata Technology Pty Ltd Pyrometallurgical method
CN103052726A (en) * 2010-07-15 2013-04-17 超达科技有限公司 Pyrometallurgical method
US8657916B2 (en) 2010-07-15 2014-02-25 Xstrata Technology Pty Ltd Pyrometallurgical method
CN103052726B (en) * 2010-07-15 2015-04-22 超达科技有限公司 Pyrometallurgical method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Waudby Rare earth additions to steel
US3853540A (en) Desulfurization of vacuum-induction-furnace-melted alloys
CN108330245A (en) A kind of high-purity smelting process of stainless steel
US3336132A (en) Stainless steel manufacturing process and equipment
US3198624A (en) Process for the manufacture of stainless steel
US3615348A (en) Stainless steel melting practice
US3728101A (en) Process for making stainless steel
JP3672832B2 (en) Ductile cast iron pipe and manufacturing method thereof
US2867555A (en) Nodular cast iron and process of manufacture thereof
US3172758A (en) Oxygen process for producing high
US3907547A (en) Method of preparing vacuum-treated steel for making ingots for forging
US4853034A (en) Method of ladle desulfurizing molten steel
US2990272A (en) Desulphurizing molten iron
US2458651A (en) Processes for producing low carbon chromium steels
US3607227A (en) Production of spheroidal graphite irons
US2262887A (en) Manufacture of ferrous metals
US2811436A (en) Process of producing steel
SU1044641A1 (en) Method for alloying steel with manganese
CN108588340A (en) A kind of method that low-temperature refining prepares low aluminium calcium impurities Antaciron
US2855289A (en) Fluidizing slags of open hearth and electric furnace steel making processes using eutectic mixture
US1825463A (en) Method of reclaiming stainless steel scrap
CA1090140A (en) Conversion of molybdenite concentrate to ferro- molybdenum and simultaneous removal of impurities by direct reduction with sulfide forming reducing agents
US2422299A (en) Manufacture of chrome alloy steel from a charge containing chrome scrap
US2096317A (en) Method of utilizing stainless steel scrap
US1925916A (en) Process of producing alloys