US3915841A - Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock - Google Patents

Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3915841A
US3915841A US460499A US46049974A US3915841A US 3915841 A US3915841 A US 3915841A US 460499 A US460499 A US 460499A US 46049974 A US46049974 A US 46049974A US 3915841 A US3915841 A US 3915841A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
hydrotreating
zone
hydrodesulfurization
range
sulfide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US460499A
Inventor
Jr Harry C Murphy
Harry C Stauffer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chevron USA Inc
Gulf Research and Development Co
Original Assignee
Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Gulf Research and Development Co filed Critical Gulf Research and Development Co
Priority to US460499A priority Critical patent/US3915841A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3915841A publication Critical patent/US3915841A/en
Assigned to CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. A CORP. OF DE. reassignment CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. A CORP. OF DE. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: GULF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/04Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G45/06Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof
    • C10G45/08Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel or cobalt metal, or compounds thereof in combination with chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/10Lubricating oil

Definitions

  • hydrocracking is meant to describe an extremely severe hydrogen treatment, usually conducted at comparatively high temperatures and requiring the employment of a catalyst having substantial cracking activity, e.g., an activity index (Al) greater than 40 and generally greater than 60.
  • This type of process is conducted to effect extensive and somewhat random severing of carbon to carbon bonds resulting in a substantial overall reduction in molecular weight and boiling point of treated material.
  • hydrocracking processes are generally employed to effect an extremely high conversion, e.g., 90 percent by volume, to materials boiling below the boiling range of the feed stock or below a designated boiling point.
  • a hydrocracking process is employed to produce a product boiling predominantly, if not completely, below about 600 to 650 F.
  • hydrofinishing is an extremely mild hydrogen treatment process employing a catalyst having substantially no cracking activity. This process effects removal of contaminants such as color forming bodies and a reduction of minor quantities of sulfur, oxygen and nitrogen compounds, but effects substantially no saturation of unsaturated compounds such as aromatics. This process, of course, effects no cracking.
  • hydrofinishing is employed in lieu of the older techniques of acid and clay contacting.
  • hydrotreating is employed herein to describe a processing technique significantly more severe than hydrofinishing although substantially less severe than hydrocracking.
  • the catalyst required in a hydrotreating process must possess cracking activity and generally possess a particular type of activity termed ring scission activity.” The degree of cracking and ring scission activity is dependent upon feedstock and product desired.
  • a hydrotreating process effects a substantial molecular rearrangement as compared to hydrofinishing but does not effect the extensive and somewhat random breakdown of molecules effected in hydrocracking.
  • this type of process effects substantial saturation of aromatics and the reactions are believed to follow the course of converting condensed aromatics to condensed naphthenes followed by selective cracking of the condensed naphthenes to form single ring alkylnaphthenes.
  • polynuclear compounds are attacked and the rings are opened, while mononuclear cyclic compounds are not substantially affected.
  • the alkyl side chains formed by opening the rings are not further reacted to sever the alkyl side chains.
  • Hydrotreating processes are also effective for the isomerization of paraffins. As with the less severe hydrofinishing process and the more severe hydrocracking process, hydrotreating is also effective to remove contaminants such as sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen.
  • a hydrotreating process removes contaminants, reduces the quantity of aromatics and polynuclear cyclic compounds and increases the quantity of paraffins, thereby enhancing the quality of the material treated, reducing its iodine number and increasing its viscosity index.
  • a hydrotreating process can also be identified by the fact that the particular combination of operating conditions and catalyst selected to accomplish the abovementioned results produces a product wherein there is a general decrease in VI from the highest viscosity fraction to the lowest viscosity fraction of the lubricating oil. While at times the rate of decrease in VI with de creasing viscosity may be extremely slight or even appear to-be non-existent amont extremely high viscosity fractions, the rate of decrease in VI tends to become greater as the viscosity of the lubricating oil fraction decreases.
  • Catalyst compositions employed in hydrotreating processes normally comprise an alumina or silicaalumina support containing at least 20 percent by weight of one or more hydrogenating metals.
  • hydrogen partial pressures in the range of about 2000 to about 10,000 lbs. per square inch (141 to 704 kg/sq.cm.) and hydrogen feed rates in the range of about 2000 to about 10,000 standard cubic foot/barrel (56,500 to 283,200 liters/159 liters) are utilized.
  • Hydrogen consumption (measured as standard cubic feet per barrel of fresh feed) is normally less than the product of 30 multiplied by volume percent (measured at 60 F.
  • an object of this invention is to provide an improved process for hydrotreating a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a process for hydrotreating a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur wherein higher space velocities are obtained.
  • Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved process for the hydrotreating of lubricating oil base stocks containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur whereby catalyst compositions containing substantially reduced hydrogenation metal concentrations and substantially lower hydrogen partial pressures are employed.
  • a two-stage hydrogenation process whereby a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur is initially hydrodesulfurized in the presence of a catalyst composite containing a low concentration of metals under a substantially reduced hydrogen partial pressure and the substantially desulfurized lubricating oil base stock containing from 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent sulfur is thereafter hydrotreated in the presence of a catalyst composition containing a relatively high concentration of metals and under a substantially increased hydrogen partial pressure.
  • the feed stock charge to the initial hydrogenation stage or hydrodesulfurization step is a substantially asphaltic-free lubricating oil base stock boiling completely above about 650 F. (343 C.
  • a pretreatment step such as propane deasphalting to provide a lubricating oil base stock feed to the inventive two-stage hydrogenation process which is substantially asphaltic-free.
  • the operating conditions employed in the initial hydrogenation or hydrodesulfurization stage include a temperature in the range of about 600 to about 900 F. (316 to about 482 C. a pressure in the range of about 300 to about 2500 psi (14.1 to 176 kgs/sq.cm.) and a space velocity in the range of about 0.1 to about 10 volumes of charge stock per volume of catalyst per hour. A hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 200 to 2000 psi (14.1 to 141 kgs/sq.cm.) is maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone.
  • the hy drogen feed rate to the initial stage is maintained in the range from about 1000 to about 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel (28,320 to 141,500 liters/159 liters) of charge stock. It is not necessary to employ a pure hydrogen stream in the hydrodesulfurization step and, preferably, the hydrogen stream from the second hydrogenation or hydrotreating stage can be employed as a hydrogen source in the initial stage.
  • the hydrogen content of the gas stream should be at least about 50 percent by volume.
  • the catalyst composition employed in the hydrodesulfurization step comprises a combination of at least one hydrogenation component selected from each of Groups Vl-B and VIII metals, their oxides and sulfides or mixtures thereof, and a refractory metal oxide.
  • the total concentration of the hydrogenation metals em ployed in the hydrodesulfurization stage will range from 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent. It is within the scope of the invention to employ a combination of metalliferous components, such as cobalt-molybdenum, nickelmolybdenum, nickel-cobalt-molybdenum, nickeltungsten, etc.
  • the hydrogenation component is dispersed on a refractory oxide carrier of high surface area, such as, for example, alumina, silicaalumina, silica-magnesia, etc.
  • the hydrogen consumption is in the range of about 1 to about 5 and preferably at about 2 to about 4 molecular weights of hydrogen per atomic weight of sulfur removed.
  • the range of hydrogen consumption is in excess of about 6 mols of hydrogen per atomic weight of sulfur removed from the feed stock.
  • the operating conditions and catalysts employed in the hydrodesulfurization step are selected so as to reduce the concentration of sulfur to the range of 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent of the lubricating oil base stock effluent withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization step.
  • the sulfur concentration in the effluent withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization stage and passed as feed to the hydrotreating stage is maintained at a level of at least 0.15 weight percent.
  • the substantially desulfurized lubricating oil base stock withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization stage is then subjected to a second treatment process step so as to hydrotreat the lubricating oil base stock. It is within the scope of the invention to employ a single vessel for the novel two-stage process of this invention with the effluent from the hydrodesulfurization catalyst bed being passed directly to the hydrotreating zone containing the hydrotreatin g catalyst composition. It is also within the scope of this invention to employ separate vessels for the hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreating process steps as illustrated by the attached drawing and hereafter discussed.
  • the operating conditions employed in the hydrotreating stage of the invention include a temperature in the range of about 600 to about 900 F. (316 to about 482 C.), and preferably about 700 to about 850 F. (371 to about 454 C.); a pressure in the range from about 2500 to about 10,000 psi (176 to 705 kgs/sq.cm.), and a liquid hourly space velocity in the range from about 0.1 to about volumes of crude lubricating oil feed stock per volume of catalyst per hour.
  • a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 2,200 to about 10,000 psi (155 to 705 kgs/sq.cm.) and a hydrogen feed rate in the range from about 3,000 to about 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (84,000 to 283,200 liters/159 liters) of charge stock are maintained in the hydrotreating zone.
  • Hydrogen streams containing from about 70 to about 90 percent hydrogen are employed as feed to the hydrotreating zone.
  • the catalyst employed in the hydrotreating stage is comprised of hydrogenating components comprising at least one component selected from Group VI and one component selected from Group VIII metals and their sulfides.
  • concentration of the hydrogenation metals in the hydrotreating catalyst composition will be at least weight percent.
  • Suitable hydrogenating components include nickel-tungsten, nickel-cobaltmolybdenum, and cobalt-molybdenum, with nickeltungsten being a preferred combination, particularly in a ratio of about 1 to 4 mols of nickel per mol of tungsten.
  • the catalyst composition can contain from 0.5 to 5.0 weight percent of a halogen, preferably fluorine.
  • operating conditions employed in the hydrotreating stage are selected so as to obtain a yield of at least 50 percent by volume, based upon the charge to the hydrodesulfurizing step, 650 F.+ (343 C.+) material. Accordingly, the operating conditions are selected so at the hydrotreating reactor conditions 650 F.+ (343 C.+) material comprises at least 22.0 mols of the product which is normally at liquid 60 F. (16C.) and one atmosphere. Furthermore, operating conditions are selected so that the actual hydrogen consumption measured as standard cubic feet per barrel is less than the product of 30 multiplied by the volume percent [measured at 60 F. (16 C.) and one atmosphere] of 625 F.+ (330C.+) liquid in the total C liquid product.
  • the product of the hydrotreating stage is substantially free of sulfur and contains a substantially reduced concentration of aromatics and polynuclear cyclic compounds than that present in the feed to the hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreating process stages.
  • the viscosity index of the lubricating oil stock has been substantially improved.
  • a lubricating oil feed stock is passed via conduit 11 in combination with a hydrogen gas as hereafter described to the top of reactor 10.
  • the feed is contacted with a catalyst at a liquid hourly space velocity of 2.0.
  • the catalyst comprises nickel, cobalt and molybdenum dispersed on an alumina support.
  • a temperature of 690 F. 366 C.) is maintained in reactor l0 and the reactor inlet pressure is 1500 psi (105.6 Kgs/sq.cm.)
  • Circulating gas having a hydrogen concentration of 65 mol percent is passed to reactor 10 at the rate of 2000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (56,500 liters/159 liters).
  • the effluent is withdrawn from reactor 10 via conduit 12 and passed to a separator 13.
  • separator 13 normally operating at a pressure of about 1450 psi, the effluent is separated into a gaseous stream which is withdrawn via conduit 14 and a liquid product stream which is withdrawn from separator 13 via conduit 20.
  • the liquid stream is heated by a heat exchanger 21 and passed via conduit 22 to the top of reactor 23 in combination with a hereafter described hydrogen feed stream.
  • the gaseous stream withdrawn from separator 13 via conduit 14 is passed to a conventional hydrogen sulfide separation step such as an amine scrubber 16.
  • a hydrogen stream substantially free of hydrogen sulfide is withdrawn from the top of scrubber 16 via conduit 17 and passed to a compressor 18.
  • Compressor 18 compresses the recycle hydrogen gas stream and passes the compressed recycle stream via conduit 19 to conduit 33 where it is combined with makeup hydrogen from the hydrotreating stage via conduit 33 and pressure letdown 31 as required and the resultant combined gaseous stream mixed with the lubricating oil feed stock in conduit 1 l.
  • the lubricating oil feed to reactor 23 is heated via heat exchanger 21 to a temperature so as to maintain the temperature within reactor 23 at 745F. (397 C.). Hydrogen is introduced into reactor 23 via conduit 30 and conduit 22 so as to maintain a reactor inlet pressure of 3000 psi. A gas circulation rate of 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (141,800 liters/159 liters) with a hydrogen concentration of mol percent is maintained to reactor 23.
  • the lubricating oil feed is passed through reactor 23 at a liquid hourly space velocity of 2.0.
  • the catalyst composition within reactor 23 comprises nickel and tungsten on a fluorinepromoted silica-alumina support.
  • An effluent stream is withdrawn from reactor 23 via conduit 24 and passed to a separator 26.
  • the pressure within separator 26 is about 2950 psi.
  • a liquid lubricating oil product stream substantially sulfur-free is withdrawn from separator 26 via conduit 27 and a gaseous stream is withdrawn from separator26 via conduit 28.
  • a portion of the recycle gaseous stream in conduit 28 is passed to a compressor 29.
  • Compressor 29 functions so as to provide a compressed hydrogen gaseous stream in conduit 30 that when mixed with the lubricating oil feed to reactor 23 will provide an inlet pressure in reactor 23 of 3000 psi.
  • Makeup hydrogen as required is introduced to conduit 30 via conduit 32.
  • a portion of the gaseous stream from separator 26 is passed as makeup hydrogen to reactor 10 via conduits 28, 33, and 11 and pressure letdown means 31 (such as a valve).
  • the catalyst employed in the hydrodesulfurization stage comprises 2.25 weight percent nickel, 1.25 weight percent cobalt, and 11.0 weight percent molybdenum dispersed on an alumina support.
  • the lubricating oil feed to the hydrodesulfurization reactor is characterized as follows:
  • the catalyst comprises 5.5 weight percent nickel, 18.5 weight percent tungsten, and 2.0 weight percent fluorine dispersed on a silicaalumina support. Hydrogen at the rate of 475 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (13,430 liters/159 liters) is consumed in the hydrotreating stage.
  • the yield of hydrotreated products based on the feed to the hydrodesulfurization stage is 85.0 volume percent and the mol percent liquid in the C product is 61.5.
  • the hydrotreated liquid product is solvent dewaxed and the properties of the dewaxed product are as follows:
  • EXAMPLE II In this example the effect of employing a single stage hydrotreating process in the treatment of the lubricating oil feed stock of Example I is demonstrated.
  • the lubricating oil feed is passed through the hydrotreater at a liquid hourly space velocity of 1.0.
  • the reaction zone is maintained at a total pressure of 3000 psi with a hydrogen partial pressure of 2500 psi.
  • the gas circulation rate is 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed with a hydrogen purity of 80 mol percent.
  • the average temperature in the hydrotreating zone is 745 F.
  • Hydrogen at the rate of 925 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed is consumed in the hydrotreating zone.
  • the yield of waxy lubricating oil stock based on the feed to the hydrotreating zone is 85.0 volume percent.
  • the mol percent liquid in the C product is 61.5.
  • the hydrotreated product is solvent dewaxed to produce a product having the characteristics essentially identical to the characteristics of the product of Example I.
  • Example II A comparison of the runs of Example I and II illustrates the advantage of the inventive process to obtain a satisfactory lubricating oil product at twice the space velocity as that of the more conventional process exemplified in Example II. Therefore, a substantially smaller high pressure reactor with fewer catalyst beds can be employed in the novel twostage process than that required by the single-stage hydrotreating process of the prior art.
  • Yet another advantage of the two-stage hydrogenation process of this invention is the substantially lower catalyst cost when compared with the conventional single-stage hydrotreating process.
  • the desulfurization catalyst contains a substantially lower metals concentration than that required in the hydrotreating catalyst of Example II.
  • a process which comprises contacting a substantially asphaltic-free 650F. lubricating oil feed containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur with a catalyst composition comprising at least one Group VI-B hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof and at least one Group VIII hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof on alumina support, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrodesulfurization catalyst composition being in the range of 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent, in a hydrodesulfurization zone under hydrodesulfurization conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 200 to about 2000 psi, passing an effluent mixture from said hydrodesulfurization zone to a first separation zone, separating the hydrogen sulfide from a gaseous phase withdrawn from said first separation zone, and recycling said gaseous phase substantially free of hydrogen sulfide to said hydrodesulfurization zone, passing a liquid lubricating oil from said first separation zone to a hydrotreating zone, contacting said oil from said hydrodesulfurization step
  • the catalyst in the hydrotreating zone comprises nickel, tungsten, fluorine and a silica-alumina support.

Abstract

An improved process for producing lubricating oils from a lubricating oil stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur by subjecting such stock to hydrodesulfurization so as to obtain a product containing a maximum of 1.0 weight percent sulfur. The desulfurized effluent is then subjected to hydrotreating.

Description

United States Patent Murphy, Jr. et al.
1 51 Oct. 28, 1975 [5 PROCESS FOR HYDRODESULFURIZING 3,682,813 8/1972 Dun et a1. 208/89 AND HYDROTREATING LUBRICATING 3,728,250 4/1973 Hass et a]. 208/89 OILS FROM SULFUR CONTAINING STOCK 3,801,494 4/1974 Moore et al. 208/89 [75] Inventors: Harry C. Murphy, Jr., Apollo;
Harry stauffer Cheswick both Primary ExaminerDelbert E. Gantz of Assistant ExaminerG. J. Crasanakis [73] Assignee: Gulf Research & Development Company, Pittsburgh, Pa.
[22] Flledz Apr. 12, 1974 ABSTRACT [21] Appl. No.: 460,499
An improved process for producing lubricating oils [52] US. Cl. 208/89; 208/210; 208/143 from a ing oil ck n ining at le 2.0 [51] Int. Cl. C10G 23/02 Weight pe cent sulfur by subjecting such stock to hy- [58] Field of Search 208/210, 89 drodcsulfurization so as to Obtain a pr n ining a maximum of 1.0 weight percent sulfur. The desulfur- [56] Referen e Cit d ized effluent is then subjected to hydrotreating.
UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,189,540 6/1965 Kozlowski et a1 208/89 8 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure 4/4/65!!! WEN FRESSURE 32 LETDOW/V 33 COAIPRESSOR 3/ F550 /9 BN6 /7 30 COAIAQFSSOR RflcmQ- /6 xSCRUBBER 29 /REAC7UR SEPARATOR [SEPARATOR ,2 i 24 27 PRODUCT U.S. Patent Oct.28, 1975 PROCESS FOR HYDRODESULFURIZING AND HYDROTREATING LUBRICATING OILS FROM SULFUR-CONTAINING STOCK BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Our invention relates to an improved process for the production of lubricating oil from sulfur-containing lubricating oil base stocks. More particularly, it is directed to an improved process for producing lubricating oils from a sulfur-containing stock employing the techniques of hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreating.
Due to the variety of terms applied to hydrogen treatment techniques, particularly in the field of lubricating oil production, and due to the fact that the definition of such terms tend to overlap depending upon the individual employing such terms, it is believed necessary to set forth particular definitions of the terms we will employ in our specification and claims. We term the three most common hydrogen treatment techniques associated with lubricating oil production hydrocracking, hydrofinishing and hydrotreating.
As employed herein the term hydrocracking is meant to describe an extremely severe hydrogen treatment, usually conducted at comparatively high temperatures and requiring the employment of a catalyst having substantial cracking activity, e.g., an activity index (Al) greater than 40 and generally greater than 60. This type of process is conducted to effect extensive and somewhat random severing of carbon to carbon bonds resulting in a substantial overall reduction in molecular weight and boiling point of treated material. Thus, for example, hydrocracking processes are generally employed to effect an extremely high conversion, e.g., 90 percent by volume, to materials boiling below the boiling range of the feed stock or below a designated boiling point. Usually a hydrocracking process is employed to produce a product boiling predominantly, if not completely, below about 600 to 650 F. (316 to 343 C.) Most frequently this type of process is employed to convert higher boiling hydrocarbons into products boiling in the furnace oil and naphtha range. When applied in connection with lubricating oils, hydrocracking processes produce only a minor quantity of materials boiling in the lubricating oil range, i.e. 625 to 650 F.+ (329 to 343 C.), to the extent that, at times, the production of a lubricating oil is merely incidental to the production of naphtha and furnace oil. Hydrocracking is the most severe of the three types of processes mentioned above.
On the other end of the spectrum, hydrofinishing is an extremely mild hydrogen treatment process employing a catalyst having substantially no cracking activity. This process effects removal of contaminants such as color forming bodies and a reduction of minor quantities of sulfur, oxygen and nitrogen compounds, but effects substantially no saturation of unsaturated compounds such as aromatics. This process, of course, effects no cracking. As a general rule, hydrofinishing is employed in lieu of the older techniques of acid and clay contacting.
As distinguished from hydrocracking and hydrofinishing, the term hydrotreating is employed herein to describe a processing technique significantly more severe than hydrofinishing although substantially less severe than hydrocracking. The catalyst required in a hydrotreating process must possess cracking activity and generally possess a particular type of activity termed ring scission activity." The degree of cracking and ring scission activity is dependent upon feedstock and product desired. Thus, a hydrotreating process effects a substantial molecular rearrangement as compared to hydrofinishing but does not effect the extensive and somewhat random breakdown of molecules effected in hydrocracking. Accordingly, this type of process effects substantial saturation of aromatics and the reactions are believed to follow the course of converting condensed aromatics to condensed naphthenes followed by selective cracking of the condensed naphthenes to form single ring alkylnaphthenes. Thus, polynuclear compounds are attacked and the rings are opened, while mononuclear cyclic compounds are not substantially affected. The alkyl side chains formed by opening the rings are not further reacted to sever the alkyl side chains. Hydrotreating processes are also effective for the isomerization of paraffins. As with the less severe hydrofinishing process and the more severe hydrocracking process, hydrotreating is also effective to remove contaminants such as sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen. Thus, a hydrotreating process removes contaminants, reduces the quantity of aromatics and polynuclear cyclic compounds and increases the quantity of paraffins, thereby enhancing the quality of the material treated, reducing its iodine number and increasing its viscosity index.
A hydrotreating process can also be identified by the fact that the particular combination of operating conditions and catalyst selected to accomplish the abovementioned results produces a product wherein there is a general decrease in VI from the highest viscosity fraction to the lowest viscosity fraction of the lubricating oil. While at times the rate of decrease in VI with de creasing viscosity may be extremely slight or even appear to-be non-existent amont extremely high viscosity fractions, the rate of decrease in VI tends to become greater as the viscosity of the lubricating oil fraction decreases. Usually this decrease in VI with decreasing viscosity is particularly pronounced among the lighter lubricating oils having the lowest viscosities, such as, for example, materials whose viscosity is usually measured in Saybolt Universal Seconds (SUS) at F. (38 C.). Additionally, this phenomenon is evidenced quite drastically in hydrotreated lubricating oil products having viscosities of less than about 300 SUS at 100 F. (38 C.) and obtained from distillate charge stocks. This is not to say, however, that the decrease in VI with decreasing viscosity cannot be seen quite clearly in the hydrotreated products of residual stocks whose viscosities, at times, are more conveniently measured in SUS at 210 F. (99 C.).
Catalyst compositions employed in hydrotreating processes normally comprise an alumina or silicaalumina support containing at least 20 percent by weight of one or more hydrogenating metals. In the hydrotreating of lubricating oil base stocks, hydrogen partial pressures in the range of about 2000 to about 10,000 lbs. per square inch (141 to 704 kg/sq.cm.) and hydrogen feed rates in the range of about 2000 to about 10,000 standard cubic foot/barrel (56,500 to 283,200 liters/159 liters) are utilized. Hydrogen consumption (measured as standard cubic feet per barrel of fresh feed) is normally less than the product of 30 multiplied by volume percent (measured at 60 F. and one atmosphere) of 625 F.+ material in the total C reactor In the catalytic hydrotreating of sulfur-containing lubricating oil base stocks it has been discovered that a substantial upstream portion of the fixed catalyst bed is employed to desulfurize the feed and that the hydrotreating reaction occurs in only a downstream portion of the catalyst bed. As a result, the space velocity of the feed flow through the hydrotreating zone must be substantially reduced. Therefore, the conventional hydrotreating process employing catalyst compositions containing high concentrations of metals and requiring high hydrogen pressures is very inefficient for the hydrotreating of lubricating oil base stocks containing a significant concentration of sulfur. Lubricating oil base stocks containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur are considered to contain a significant concentration of sulfur.
Accordingly, an object of this invention is to provide an improved process for hydrotreating a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur.
Another object of the invention is to provide a process for hydrotreating a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur wherein higher space velocities are obtained.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved process for the hydrotreating of lubricating oil base stocks containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur whereby catalyst compositions containing substantially reduced hydrogenation metal concentrations and substantially lower hydrogen partial pressures are employed.
Other objects, advantages and features of this invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description and appended claims.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION By the invention, a two-stage hydrogenation process is provided whereby a lubricating oil base stock containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur is initially hydrodesulfurized in the presence of a catalyst composite containing a low concentration of metals under a substantially reduced hydrogen partial pressure and the substantially desulfurized lubricating oil base stock containing from 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent sulfur is thereafter hydrotreated in the presence of a catalyst composition containing a relatively high concentration of metals and under a substantially increased hydrogen partial pressure.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The drawing is a schematic representation of one embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The feed stock charge to the initial hydrogenation stage or hydrodesulfurization step is a substantially asphaltic-free lubricating oil base stock boiling completely above about 650 F. (343 C. Depending upon the source of the crude oil from which the lubricating oil base stock is obtained, it may be necessary to suject the 650 F.+ boiling fraction to a pretreatment step such as propane deasphalting to provide a lubricating oil base stock feed to the inventive two-stage hydrogenation process which is substantially asphaltic-free.
Generally, the operating conditions employed in the initial hydrogenation or hydrodesulfurization stage include a temperature in the range of about 600 to about 900 F. (316 to about 482 C. a pressure in the range of about 300 to about 2500 psi (14.1 to 176 kgs/sq.cm.) and a space velocity in the range of about 0.1 to about 10 volumes of charge stock per volume of catalyst per hour. A hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 200 to 2000 psi (14.1 to 141 kgs/sq.cm.) is maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone. The hy drogen feed rate to the initial stage is maintained in the range from about 1000 to about 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel (28,320 to 141,500 liters/159 liters) of charge stock. It is not necessary to employ a pure hydrogen stream in the hydrodesulfurization step and, preferably, the hydrogen stream from the second hydrogenation or hydrotreating stage can be employed as a hydrogen source in the initial stage. The hydrogen content of the gas stream should be at least about 50 percent by volume.
The catalyst composition employed in the hydrodesulfurization step comprises a combination of at least one hydrogenation component selected from each of Groups Vl-B and VIII metals, their oxides and sulfides or mixtures thereof, and a refractory metal oxide. The total concentration of the hydrogenation metals em ployed in the hydrodesulfurization stage will range from 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent. It is within the scope of the invention to employ a combination of metalliferous components, such as cobalt-molybdenum, nickelmolybdenum, nickel-cobalt-molybdenum, nickeltungsten, etc. Preferably, the hydrogenation component is dispersed on a refractory oxide carrier of high surface area, such as, for example, alumina, silicaalumina, silica-magnesia, etc.
Generally, in the hydrodesulfurization step, it will be found that the hydrogen consumption is in the range of about 1 to about 5 and preferably at about 2 to about 4 molecular weights of hydrogen per atomic weight of sulfur removed. As distinguished from hydrodesulfurization, it will generally be found that in the hydrotreating step the range of hydrogen consumption is in excess of about 6 mols of hydrogen per atomic weight of sulfur removed from the feed stock.
The operating conditions and catalysts employed in the hydrodesulfurization step are selected so as to reduce the concentration of sulfur to the range of 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent of the lubricating oil base stock effluent withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization step. As it is desired to maintain a sulfided catalyst composition in the second hydrogenation stage, the sulfur concentration in the effluent withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization stage and passed as feed to the hydrotreating stage is maintained at a level of at least 0.15 weight percent.
The substantially desulfurized lubricating oil base stock withdrawn from the hydrodesulfurization stage is then subjected to a second treatment process step so as to hydrotreat the lubricating oil base stock. It is within the scope of the invention to employ a single vessel for the novel two-stage process of this invention with the effluent from the hydrodesulfurization catalyst bed being passed directly to the hydrotreating zone containing the hydrotreatin g catalyst composition. It is also within the scope of this invention to employ separate vessels for the hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreating process steps as illustrated by the attached drawing and hereafter discussed.
The operating conditions employed in the hydrotreating stage of the invention include a temperature in the range of about 600 to about 900 F. (316 to about 482 C.), and preferably about 700 to about 850 F. (371 to about 454 C.); a pressure in the range from about 2500 to about 10,000 psi (176 to 705 kgs/sq.cm.), and a liquid hourly space velocity in the range from about 0.1 to about volumes of crude lubricating oil feed stock per volume of catalyst per hour. A hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 2,200 to about 10,000 psi (155 to 705 kgs/sq.cm.) and a hydrogen feed rate in the range from about 3,000 to about 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (84,000 to 283,200 liters/159 liters) of charge stock are maintained in the hydrotreating zone. Hydrogen streams containing from about 70 to about 90 percent hydrogen are employed as feed to the hydrotreating zone.
The catalyst employed in the hydrotreating stage is comprised of hydrogenating components comprising at least one component selected from Group VI and one component selected from Group VIII metals and their sulfides. The concentration of the hydrogenation metals in the hydrotreating catalyst composition will be at least weight percent. Suitable hydrogenating components include nickel-tungsten, nickel-cobaltmolybdenum, and cobalt-molybdenum, with nickeltungsten being a preferred combination, particularly in a ratio of about 1 to 4 mols of nickel per mol of tungsten. With the feed to the hydrotreating stage containing sulfur, the metalliferous components are employed in their sulfided form. While such catalysts can be supported or unsupported, it is preferred to employ the catalyst supported on a refractory oxide such as silica, alumina, magnesia, silica-alumina, silica-magnesia, etc. Additionally, the catalyst composition can contain from 0.5 to 5.0 weight percent of a halogen, preferably fluorine.
Further, operating conditions employed in the hydrotreating stage are selected so as to obtain a yield of at least 50 percent by volume, based upon the charge to the hydrodesulfurizing step, 650 F.+ (343 C.+) material. Accordingly, the operating conditions are selected so at the hydrotreating reactor conditions 650 F.+ (343 C.+) material comprises at least 22.0 mols of the product which is normally at liquid 60 F. (16C.) and one atmosphere. Furthermore, operating conditions are selected so that the actual hydrogen consumption measured as standard cubic feet per barrel is less than the product of 30 multiplied by the volume percent [measured at 60 F. (16 C.) and one atmosphere] of 625 F.+ (330C.+) liquid in the total C liquid product.
The product of the hydrotreating stage is substantially free of sulfur and contains a substantially reduced concentration of aromatics and polynuclear cyclic compounds than that present in the feed to the hydrodesulfurization and hydrotreating process stages. The viscosity index of the lubricating oil stock has been substantially improved.
Referring to the drawing, the invention will hereafter be described as it relates to a specific embodiment. A lubricating oil feed stock is passed via conduit 11 in combination with a hydrogen gas as hereafter described to the top of reactor 10. Within reactor 10, the feed is contacted with a catalyst at a liquid hourly space velocity of 2.0. The catalyst comprises nickel, cobalt and molybdenum dispersed on an alumina support. A temperature of 690 F. 366 C.) is maintained in reactor l0 and the reactor inlet pressure is 1500 psi (105.6 Kgs/sq.cm.) Circulating gas having a hydrogen concentration of 65 mol percent is passed to reactor 10 at the rate of 2000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (56,500 liters/159 liters).
The effluent is withdrawn from reactor 10 via conduit 12 and passed to a separator 13. Within separator 13, normally operating at a pressure of about 1450 psi, the effluent is separated into a gaseous stream which is withdrawn via conduit 14 and a liquid product stream which is withdrawn from separator 13 via conduit 20. The liquid stream is heated by a heat exchanger 21 and passed via conduit 22 to the top of reactor 23 in combination with a hereafter described hydrogen feed stream. I
The gaseous stream withdrawn from separator 13 via conduit 14 is passed to a conventional hydrogen sulfide separation step such as an amine scrubber 16. A hydrogen stream substantially free of hydrogen sulfide is withdrawn from the top of scrubber 16 via conduit 17 and passed to a compressor 18. Compressor 18 compresses the recycle hydrogen gas stream and passes the compressed recycle stream via conduit 19 to conduit 33 where it is combined with makeup hydrogen from the hydrotreating stage via conduit 33 and pressure letdown 31 as required and the resultant combined gaseous stream mixed with the lubricating oil feed stock in conduit 1 l.
The lubricating oil feed to reactor 23 is heated via heat exchanger 21 to a temperature so as to maintain the temperature within reactor 23 at 745F. (397 C.). Hydrogen is introduced into reactor 23 via conduit 30 and conduit 22 so as to maintain a reactor inlet pressure of 3000 psi. A gas circulation rate of 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (141,800 liters/159 liters) with a hydrogen concentration of mol percent is maintained to reactor 23. The lubricating oil feed is passed through reactor 23 at a liquid hourly space velocity of 2.0. The catalyst composition within reactor 23 comprises nickel and tungsten on a fluorinepromoted silica-alumina support.
An effluent stream is withdrawn from reactor 23 via conduit 24 and passed to a separator 26. The pressure within separator 26 is about 2950 psi. A liquid lubricating oil product stream substantially sulfur-free is withdrawn from separator 26 via conduit 27 and a gaseous stream is withdrawn from separator26 via conduit 28.
A portion of the recycle gaseous stream in conduit 28 is passed to a compressor 29. Compressor 29 functions so as to provide a compressed hydrogen gaseous stream in conduit 30 that when mixed with the lubricating oil feed to reactor 23 will provide an inlet pressure in reactor 23 of 3000 psi. Makeup hydrogen as required is introduced to conduit 30 via conduit 32. A portion of the gaseous stream from separator 26 is passed as makeup hydrogen to reactor 10 via conduits 28, 33, and 11 and pressure letdown means 31 (such as a valve).
The following examples are presented to demonstrate the objects and advantages of the invention. It is not intended, however, to limit the invention to the specific embodiments presented therein.
EXAMPLE I In this example, the invention will be illustrated employing the process parameters described in the specific embodiment, referred above and as illustrated in the drawing. The catalyst employed in the hydrodesulfurization stage comprises 2.25 weight percent nickel, 1.25 weight percent cobalt, and 11.0 weight percent molybdenum dispersed on an alumina support. The lubricating oil feed to the hydrodesulfurization reactor is characterized as follows:
Gravity: API 19.5 Viscosity: SUV at 210F., secs. 125.4 Sulfur: weight 7: 3.07
Distillation, Vacuum:
10% Condensed 905 F. (485C) 949 (5 10C) 989 (537C) In the hydrodesulfurization stage, 450 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed (12,700 liters/159 liters) is consumed. The API gravity of the product recovered from the hydrodesulfurization reactor is 25.4, the viscosity, SUV at 210 F., is 80.0 seconds and the concentration of sulfur in the desulfurized product is 0.37 weight percent.
In the hydrotreating stage, the catalyst comprises 5.5 weight percent nickel, 18.5 weight percent tungsten, and 2.0 weight percent fluorine dispersed on a silicaalumina support. Hydrogen at the rate of 475 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (13,430 liters/159 liters) is consumed in the hydrotreating stage. The yield of hydrotreated products based on the feed to the hydrodesulfurization stage is 85.0 volume percent and the mol percent liquid in the C product is 61.5.
The hydrotreated liquid product is solvent dewaxed and the properties of the dewaxed product are as follows:
Viscosity:
SUV at 100 F., secs. 317 SUV at 210 F, secs. 54.3 Viscosity Index 105 Four Point: F. l0
EXAMPLE II In this example the effect of employing a single stage hydrotreating process in the treatment of the lubricating oil feed stock of Example I is demonstrated. The lubricating oil feed is passed through the hydrotreater at a liquid hourly space velocity of 1.0. The reaction zone is maintained at a total pressure of 3000 psi with a hydrogen partial pressure of 2500 psi. The gas circulation rate is 5000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed with a hydrogen purity of 80 mol percent. The average temperature in the hydrotreating zone is 745 F.
Hydrogen at the rate of 925 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed is consumed in the hydrotreating zone. The yield of waxy lubricating oil stock based on the feed to the hydrotreating zone is 85.0 volume percent. The mol percent liquid in the C product is 61.5.
The hydrotreated product is solvent dewaxed to produce a product having the characteristics essentially identical to the characteristics of the product of Example I.
A comparison of the runs of Example I and II illustrates the advantage of the inventive process to obtain a satisfactory lubricating oil product at twice the space velocity as that of the more conventional process exemplified in Example II. Therefore, a substantially smaller high pressure reactor with fewer catalyst beds can be employed in the novel twostage process than that required by the single-stage hydrotreating process of the prior art.
Additionally, less capacity is required of a makeup compressor having an outlet pressure of 3000 psig when operating according to the novel process of this invention than would be required by the conventional single-stage hydrotreating process. Reference is made to the drawing wherein it is illustrated that by employing prior desulfurization and therefore a smaller reactor in the second high pressure stage, substantially less 3000 psi hydrogen would be required.
Further, by employing the two-stage process of this invention, no scrubbing of a gas recovered from the high pressure separator of the hydrotreating stage would be required to separate hydrogen sulfide therefrom. Makeup hydrogen to the hydrodesulfurization stage can be supplied by the hydrotreating operation. Obviously, by employing a single-stage hydrotreating process as exemplified in Example II, it would be necessary to employ a gas scrubber operating at nominally 2950 psi to separate the hydrogen sulfide generated in the hydrotreating zone and present in the gaseous stream withdrawn from the high pressure separator.
Yet another advantage of the two-stage hydrogenation process of this invention is the substantially lower catalyst cost when compared with the conventional single-stage hydrotreating process. The desulfurization catalyst contains a substantially lower metals concentration than that required in the hydrotreating catalyst of Example II.
Although the invention has been described with references to specific embodiments, references, and details, various modifications and changes will be apparent to one skilled in the art and are contemplated to be embraced in this invention.
We claim:
1. A process which comprises contacting a substantially asphaltic-free lubricating oil feed boiling completely above 650F. and containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur with a catalyst composition in a hydrodesulfurization zone under hydrodesulfurization conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 200 to 2000 psi, the hydrodesulfurization catalyst composition comprising at least one Group VI-B hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof and at least one Group VIII hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof or alumina support, the total concentration of hydrogenation metals in said hydrodesulfurization catalyst composition being in the range of 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent, contacting the product of said hydrodesulfurization step containing from 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent sulfur with a hydrotreating catalyst composition in a hydrotreating zone under hydrotreating conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 2200 to about 10,000 psi, the hydrotreating catalyst composition comprising at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group Vl-B metals and at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group VIII metals on a support selected from the group consisting of alumina and silica-alumina, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrotreating catalyst composition being at least 20 weight percent, and recovering therefrom a substantially sulfur-free lubricating oil product of reduced aromatics concentration and increased viscosity index.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone is in the range from about 600 to about 900F. and the temperature in said hydrotreating zone is maintained in the range from about 700 to about 850F.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the catalyst in the hydrodesulfurization zone comprises nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and an alumina support.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the catalyst in the hydrotreating zone comprises nickel, tungsten, fluorine and a silica-alumina support.
5. A process which comprises contacting a substantially asphaltic-free 650F. lubricating oil feed containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur with a catalyst composition comprising at least one Group VI-B hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof and at least one Group VIII hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof on alumina support, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrodesulfurization catalyst composition being in the range of 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent, in a hydrodesulfurization zone under hydrodesulfurization conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 200 to about 2000 psi, passing an effluent mixture from said hydrodesulfurization zone to a first separation zone, separating the hydrogen sulfide from a gaseous phase withdrawn from said first separation zone, and recycling said gaseous phase substantially free of hydrogen sulfide to said hydrodesulfurization zone, passing a liquid lubricating oil from said first separation zone to a hydrotreating zone, contacting said oil from said hydrodesulfurization step containing from 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent sulfur with a hydrotreating catalyst composition comprising at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group VI-B metals and at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group VIII metals on a support selected from the group consisting of alumina and silicaalumina, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrotreating catalyst composition being at least 20 weight percent, said contacting being carried out in said hydrotreating zone under hydrotreating conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range of about 2200 to about 10,000 psi, passing an effluent mixture from said hydrotreating zone to a second separation zone, withdrawing a liquid lubricating oil product from said second separation zone, recycling a first portion of the gaseous phase withdrawn from said second separation zone to said hydrotreating zone, and passing a second portion of the gaseous phase withdrawn from said second separation zone to said hydrodesulfurization zone.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the temperature maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone is in the range from about 600 to about 900F. and the temperature in said hydrotreating zone is maintained in the range from about 700 to about 850F.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the catalyst in the hydrodesulfurization zone comprises nickel, cobalt,
molybdenum and an alumina support.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the catalyst in the hydrotreating zone comprises nickel, tungsten, fluorine and a silica-alumina support.

Claims (8)

1. A PROCESS WHICH COMPRISES CONTACTING A SUBSTANTIALLY ASPHALIC-FREE LUBERATING OIL FEED BOILING COMPLETELY ABOVE 650*F. AND CONTAINING AT LEST 2.0 WEIGHT PERCENT SULFUR WITH A CATALYST COMPOSITION IN A HYDRODESULFURIZATION ZONE UNDER HYDRODESULFURIZATION CONDITIONS TO INCLUDE A HYDROGEN PARTIAL PRESSURE IN THE RANGE FROM ABOUT 200 TO 2000PSI, TE HYDRODESULFURIZATION CATALYST COMPOSITION COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE GROUP VI-B HYDROGENATION METAL, OXIDE OR SULFIDE THEREOF AND AT LEAST ONE GROUP VIII HYDROGENATION METAL, OXIDE OR SULFIDE THEREOF OR ALUMINA SUPPORT, THE TOTAL CONCENTRATION OF HYDROGENETION METALS IN SAID HYDRODESULFURIZATION CATALYST COMPOSITION BEING IN THE RANGE OF 5.0 T 15.0 WEIGHT PERCENT, CONTACTING THE PRODUCT OF SAID HYDRODESULFURIZATION STEP CONTAINING FROM 0.15 TO 1.0 PERCENT SULFUR WITH A HYDROTREATING CATALYST COMPOSITION IN A HYDROTREATING ZONE UNDER HYDROTREATING CONDITIONS TO INCLUDE A HYDROGEN PARTIAL PRESSURE IN THE RANGE FROM ABOUT 2200 TO ABOUT 10,000 PSI, THE HYDROTREATING CATALYST COMPOSITION COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE HYDROGENATION METAL OR SULFIDE THEREOF SELECTED FROM GROUP VI-B METALS AND AT LEAST ONE HYDROGENERATION METAL OR SULFIDE THEREOF SELECTED FROM GROUP VIII METALS ON A SUPPORT SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF ALUMINA AND SILICA-ALUMINA, THE TOTAL CONCENTRATION OF SAID HYDROGENATION METALS IN SAID HYDROTREATING CATALYST COMPOSITION BEING AT LEAST 20 WEIGHT PERCENT, AND RECOVERING THEREFROM A SUBSTANTIALLY SULFUR-FREE LUBRICATING OIL PRODUCT OF REDUCED AROMATICS CONCENTRATION AND INCREASED VICOSITY INDEX.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone is in the range from about 600* to about 900*F. and the temperature in said hydrotreating zone is maintained in the range from about 700* to about 850*F.
3. The process of claim 2 wherein the catalyst in the hydrodesulfurization zone comprises nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and an alumina support.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the catalyst in the hydrotreating zone comprises nickel, tungsten, fluorine and a silica-alumina support.
5. A process which comprises contacting a substantially asphaltic-free 650*F. + lubricating oil feed containing at least 2.0 weight percent sulfur with a catalyst composition comprising at least one Group VI-B hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof and at least one Group VIII hydrogenation metal, oxide or sulfide thereof on alumina support, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrodesulfurization catalyst composition being in the range of 5.0 to 15.0 weight percent, in a hydrodesulfurization zone under hydrodesulfurization conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range from about 200 to about 2000 psi, passing an effluent mixture from said hydrodesulfurization zone to a first separation zone, separating the hydrogen sulfide from a gaseous phase withdrawn from said first separation zone, and recycling said gaseous phase substantially free of hydrogen sulfide to said hydrodesulfurization zone, passing a liquid lubricating oil from said first separation zone to a hydrotreating zone, contacting said oil from said hydrodesulfurization step containing from 0.15 to 1.0 weight percent sulfur with a hydrotreating catalyst composition comprising at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group VI-B metals and at least one hydrogenation metal or sulfide thereof selected from Group VIII metals on a support selected from the group consisting of alumina and silica-alumina, the total concentration of said hydrogenation metals in said hydrotreating catalyst composition being at least 20 weight percent, said contacting being carried out in said hydrotreating zone under hydrotreating conditions to include a hydrogen partial pressure in the range of about 2200 to about 10, 000 psi, passing an effluent mixture from said hydrotreating zone to a second separation zone, withdrawing a liquid lubricating oil product from said second separation zone, recycling a first portion of the gaseous phase withdrawn from said second separation zone to said hydrotreating zone, and passing a second portion of the gaseous phase withdrawn from said second separation zone to said hydrodesulfurization zone.
6. The process of claim 5 wherein the temperature maintained in the hydrodesulfurization zone is in the range from about 600* to about 900*F. and the temperature in said hydrotreating zone is maintained in the range from about 700* to about 850*F.
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the catalyst in the hydrodesulfurization zone comprises nickel, cobalt, molybdenum and an alumina support.
8. The process of claim 7 wherein the catalyst in the hydrotreating zone comprises nickel, tungsten, fluorine and a silica-alumina support.
US460499A 1974-04-12 1974-04-12 Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock Expired - Lifetime US3915841A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US460499A US3915841A (en) 1974-04-12 1974-04-12 Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US460499A US3915841A (en) 1974-04-12 1974-04-12 Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3915841A true US3915841A (en) 1975-10-28

Family

ID=23828956

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US460499A Expired - Lifetime US3915841A (en) 1974-04-12 1974-04-12 Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3915841A (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4055481A (en) * 1976-07-23 1977-10-25 Pennzoil Company Two-stage process for manufacture of white oils
US4057489A (en) * 1976-12-29 1977-11-08 Gulf Research & Development Company Process for producing a transformer oil having lower pour point and improved oxidation stability
US4065380A (en) * 1975-10-17 1977-12-27 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodenitrification using a tungsten containing Ni-SMM composite catalyst
US4113603A (en) * 1977-10-19 1978-09-12 The Lummus Company Two-stage hydrotreating of pyrolysis gasoline to remove mercaptan sulfur and dienes
US5275718A (en) * 1991-04-19 1994-01-04 Lyondell Petrochemical Company Lubricant base oil processing
EP0611816A1 (en) * 1993-02-15 1994-08-24 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Hydrotreating process
US5906729A (en) * 1997-12-08 1999-05-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Process scheme for processing sour feed in isomerization dewaxing
WO1999057228A1 (en) * 1998-05-07 1999-11-11 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Multi-stage hydroprocessing of middle distillates to avoid color bodies
US6835301B1 (en) * 1998-12-08 2004-12-28 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
US20050133411A1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2005-06-23 Per Zeuthen Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
US20090139902A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US20100018904A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System
US20100025291A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Treatment of Heavy Oils Using Light Hydrocarbon Components as a Diluent
US20100025293A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Sequential Hydroconversion and Hydrodesulfurization of Whole Crude Oil
US20110083996A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2011-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative Process for Treatment of Heavy Crudes in a Coking Refinery

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3189540A (en) * 1962-01-02 1965-06-15 California Research Corp Production of lubricating oils by catalytic hydrogenation
US3682813A (en) * 1969-06-04 1972-08-08 Shell Oil Co Multizone hydrocracking process for hvi lubricating oils
US3728250A (en) * 1970-07-02 1973-04-17 Union Oil Co Integral hydrofining-hydrogenation process
US3801494A (en) * 1972-09-15 1974-04-02 Standard Oil Co Combination hydrodesulfurization and reforming process

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3189540A (en) * 1962-01-02 1965-06-15 California Research Corp Production of lubricating oils by catalytic hydrogenation
US3682813A (en) * 1969-06-04 1972-08-08 Shell Oil Co Multizone hydrocracking process for hvi lubricating oils
US3728250A (en) * 1970-07-02 1973-04-17 Union Oil Co Integral hydrofining-hydrogenation process
US3801494A (en) * 1972-09-15 1974-04-02 Standard Oil Co Combination hydrodesulfurization and reforming process

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4065380A (en) * 1975-10-17 1977-12-27 Gulf Research & Development Company Hydrodenitrification using a tungsten containing Ni-SMM composite catalyst
US4055481A (en) * 1976-07-23 1977-10-25 Pennzoil Company Two-stage process for manufacture of white oils
US4057489A (en) * 1976-12-29 1977-11-08 Gulf Research & Development Company Process for producing a transformer oil having lower pour point and improved oxidation stability
US4113603A (en) * 1977-10-19 1978-09-12 The Lummus Company Two-stage hydrotreating of pyrolysis gasoline to remove mercaptan sulfur and dienes
US5275718A (en) * 1991-04-19 1994-01-04 Lyondell Petrochemical Company Lubricant base oil processing
EP0611816A1 (en) * 1993-02-15 1994-08-24 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Hydrotreating process
US5906729A (en) * 1997-12-08 1999-05-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Process scheme for processing sour feed in isomerization dewaxing
WO1999029809A1 (en) * 1997-12-08 1999-06-17 Mobil Oil Corporation An improved process scheme for processing sour feed in midw
WO1999057228A1 (en) * 1998-05-07 1999-11-11 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Multi-stage hydroprocessing of middle distillates to avoid color bodies
US6103104A (en) * 1998-05-07 2000-08-15 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Multi-stage hydroprocessing of middle distillates to avoid color bodies
US6835301B1 (en) * 1998-12-08 2004-12-28 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
US20050133411A1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2005-06-23 Per Zeuthen Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
US20090139902A1 (en) * 2007-11-28 2009-06-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US8632673B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2014-01-21 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
US20100018904A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-01-28 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Prerefining Process for the Hydrodesulfurization of Heavy Sour Crude Oils to Produce Sweeter Lighter Crudes Using Moving Catalyst System
US20100025291A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Treatment of Heavy Oils Using Light Hydrocarbon Components as a Diluent
US20100025293A1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2010-02-04 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the Sequential Hydroconversion and Hydrodesulfurization of Whole Crude Oil
US8372267B2 (en) 2008-07-14 2013-02-12 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the sequential hydroconversion and hydrodesulfurization of whole crude oil
US9260671B2 (en) 2008-07-14 2016-02-16 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for the treatment of heavy oils using light hydrocarbon components as a diluent
US20110083996A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2011-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative Process for Treatment of Heavy Crudes in a Coking Refinery
US8491779B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2013-07-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Alternative process for treatment of heavy crudes in a coking refinery

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4885080A (en) Process for demetallizing and desulfurizing heavy crude oil
US4306964A (en) Multi-stage process for demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils
US3915841A (en) Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
US4062758A (en) Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons in atmospheric crude residue
JP4786102B2 (en) Two-stage advanced naphtha desulfurization with reduced formation of mercaptans
US2917448A (en) Hydrogenation and distillation of lubricating oils
US5403470A (en) Color removal with post-hydrotreating
US4340466A (en) Process for hydrotreating heavy oils containing metals
US3682813A (en) Multizone hydrocracking process for hvi lubricating oils
US3642610A (en) Two-stage hydrocracking-hydrotreating process to make lube oil
US2787582A (en) Production of lubricating oils
JP2005514474A (en) A method to precondition Fischer-Tropsch light products before upgrading
CA1117058A (en) Process for the conversion of hydrocarbons
US3472759A (en) Process for removal of sulfur and metals from petroleum materials
US3666657A (en) Oil stabilizing sequential hydrocracking and hydrogenation treatment
US3905893A (en) Plural stage residue hydrodesulfurization process
US3594307A (en) Production of high quality jet fuels by two-stage hydrogenation
US3941680A (en) Lube oil hydrotreating process
US4011154A (en) Production of lubricating oils
US3347779A (en) Manufacture of petroleum distillates by hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation
US4283270A (en) Process for removing sulfur from petroleum oils
US3686095A (en) Desulfurization of residue-containing hydrocarbon oils
US3763033A (en) Lube oil hydrotreating process
US3562149A (en) Process for producing lubricating oil by hydrogen treatment
CA1326464C (en) Heavy oil cracking process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. A COR

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GULF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE.;REEL/FRAME:004610/0801

Effective date: 19860423

Owner name: CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, SAN FRANCISCO, CA. A COR

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GULF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE.;REEL/FRAME:004610/0801

Effective date: 19860423