US3926568A - High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy - Google Patents

High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3926568A
US3926568A US501052A US50105274A US3926568A US 3926568 A US3926568 A US 3926568A US 501052 A US501052 A US 501052A US 50105274 A US50105274 A US 50105274A US 3926568 A US3926568 A US 3926568A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
alloy
titanium
tungsten
accordance
aluminum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US501052A
Inventor
John Stanwood Benjamin
Jay Ward Schultz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huntington Alloys Corp
Original Assignee
International Nickel Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Nickel Co Inc filed Critical International Nickel Co Inc
Priority to US501052A priority Critical patent/US3926568A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3926568A publication Critical patent/US3926568A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C32/00Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ
    • C22C32/001Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with only oxides
    • C22C32/0015Non-ferrous alloys containing at least 5% by weight but less than 50% by weight of oxides, carbides, borides, nitrides, silicides or other metal compounds, e.g. oxynitrides, sulfides, whether added as such or formed in situ with only oxides with only single oxides as main non-metallic constituents
    • C22C32/0026Matrix based on Ni, Co, Cr or alloys thereof
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S75/00Specialized metallurgical processes, compositions for use therein, consolidated metal powder compositions, and loose metal particulate mixtures
    • Y10S75/956Producing particles containing a dispersed phase

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to the so-termed superalloys, and particularly to precipitation harden able, dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloys capable of operating exceptionally well at both intermediate and elevated temperatures and under corrosive conditions.
  • the thrust of the subject invention is, accordingly, to bring together in one alloy the capability of delivering outstanding stress rupture strength at both intermediate (1400F.) and elevated (1900F.) temperature levels and good resistance to oxidation and/or sulfidation.
  • the subject alloys afford the highest combination of strength and corrosion resistance known in the superalloy art.
  • the alloys should contain at least 3.5% aluminum. 13.75% or more of chromium and not more than about 3% titanium. 1n striving for the optimum by way of resistance to sulfidation then the percentages of aluminum, titanium and tungsten should be correlated such that the aluminum is from 2.75% to 4.6%, the titanium is at least 2.4% and the tungsten is at least 4.75%, the sum of the titanium plus tungsten benefcially being at least 7.75%.
  • the alloys should contain about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.4 to 3% or 3.25% titanium, and from about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, the other constituents being within the ranges first given.
  • yttria With regard to yttria, it confers high stress-rupture strength, particularly at the higher temperature levels (1900F.). A small amount of this constituent, e.g., 0.4%, is effective in imparting this benefit, though it is preferred that about 0.5 to 1.5% be present. Percentages of yttria above 2% are unnecessary. Tantalum enhances strength characteristics especially in the 1200l400F. Temperature region. From 1.5 to 3% of this element is deemed beneficial.
  • the alloys may contain up to 3% columbium (although they are preferably columbium free); up to 10% cobalt; up to 3% hafnium; up to 0.75% or 1% oxygen; up to 3% iron (as a contaminant); and up to 0.3% nitrogen. But it is most preferred, as will be shown hereinafter, that nitrogen not exceeded about 0.1% particularly in seeking the optimum of sulfidation resistance.
  • Cobalt has a negative efiect at 1900F. and should, if present, he held to less than 8%.
  • yttria is very much preferred as the added dispersoid constituent
  • other refractory dispersoids e.g., thoria and lanthana
  • Other refractory dispersoids can be present aside from the aforementioned yttria, lanthana and thoria, including the oxides, carbides. borides, and nitrides (provided the total nitrogen content does not exceed about 0.1%) of one or more materials such as thorium, zirconium, hafnium, titanium and oxides of aluminum, yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, etc. It is to be also understood that a given range for a particular element of the alloys can be used with a given range for any other element.
  • the alloys should be produced by the mechanical alloying process as described in US. Pat. No. 3,591,362 and incorporated herein by reference.
  • mechanical alloying involves the dry, intensive high energy milling of a powder charge whereby the initial powder constituents are simultaneously fragmented and cold bonded to provide a homogeneous, intimate interdispersion of alloying elements in the form of composite particles corresponding to the alloy composition desired.
  • the impacting elements used are preferably hard and impact resistant such as through hardened 52100 steel.
  • a ball-to-powder ratio of about 15:1 to 25:1 by volume is preferred, the impeller speed being suitably conducted over the range of 250 to 300 rpm for a period of about 12 to 24 hours.
  • a speed of 150-200 rpm can be used, a period of 15-40 hours being satisfactory. Larger attritors permit of reduced impeller speeds.
  • the composite alloy product particles can be compacted as by hot extrusion.
  • a temperature of about 1800 to 2125F. is
  • the alloys were then subjected to a germinative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) consisting of heating for one half hour at 2300F. for Alloys A and B and 2250F. for Alloy C. After aging at 1550F. for approximately 24 hours, microstructural examination revealed that the alloys exhibited a desired coarse grain structure elongated in the direction of extrusion.
  • secondary recrystallization consisting of heating for one half hour at 2300F. for Alloys A and B and 2250F. for Alloy C.
  • Each of the three alloys was then stress rupture tested at both 1400F. and 1900F. and also tested for cyclic oxidation and sulfidation resistance.
  • the oxidation test was conducted at 1100C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature each 24 hours.
  • a crucible sulfidation test was used and this comprised partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a 90% Na SO 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F.
  • Alloy B which showed a remarkably low loss less than 30 mils; however, its susceptibility to oxidation was on the high side, this in part being a reflection of high titanium.
  • Alloy C had excellent resistance to both oxidation and sulfidation attack in combination with good stress rupture properties. Over an exceptionally severe sulfidation test period of 300 hours, Alloy C corroded virtually completely with Alloy B still showing a loss of less than 30 mils.
  • the alloys be produced by mechanical alloying.
  • mechanical alloying was conducted in the presence of a dynamic atmosphere largely, if not completely, comprised of an oxygennitrogen mixture.
  • a dynamic atmosphere largely, if not completely, comprised of an oxygennitrogen mixture.
  • scant attention was given to the role of nitrogen in the composite particles produced, probably because the retained amounts thereof, being on the order of 0.l5-0.2% or so, were quite low (in contrast to oxygen) and were likely considered inconsequential.
  • nitro gen rather than being passive or innocuous, can exercise a most detracting influence.
  • a series of alloys were prepared (compositions given in Table 1V) by mechanical alloying using both elemental and master alloy powders placed in a 4 gallon attritor containing about 162-163 pounds of 5/ 16 inch diameter through hardened steel balls. The charges were processed for about 16% hours, the impeller speed of the attritor being maintained at about 288 rpm. During the course of the processing a dynamic atmosphere of air and nitrogen was supplied for three of the alloys, but the nitrogen was largely replaced by argon in each of the other alloys (argon 2%. 0 being used in two instances and argon plus 0.25% oxalic acid in the other, where the first percentage refers to gas volume and the second to the weight of the powder charge).
  • the coarsest of the powders (approx. 5%) was removed, the remainder being packed in 3 inch diameter mild steel cans, sealed, heated to 1950F. and then extruded using an appropriate lubricant.
  • the alloys were then subjected to a gerrninative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) generally consisting of heating for one half hour at 2250F. or 2300F. which was followed by aging at 1500F. for approximately 24 hours.
  • each of the alloys was then subjected to a crucible sulfidation test involving partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a Na SO, 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F. for a time period as given in Table IV.
  • the alloys were also tested for cyclic oxidation and this involved an exposure to air at 1 C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature every 24 hours.
  • Alloys D and E are substantially the same in terms of composition except for nitrogen content, the former having a nitrogen level twice that of the latter.
  • Alloys C and F are also similar 7 compositionally except the respective percentages of nitrogen.
  • Alloys G and H are also different largely by reason of molybdenum and tungsten contents.
  • Alloy E withstood the 300-hour test notwithstanding that the alloy contained but 23% titanium and 4% tungsten. As indicated, above 2.4% titanium and 4.75% tungsten should be present in the alloys for optimum resistance to sulfidation. This is deemed beneficial for as also previously indicated, reduced titanium and tungsten levels would be expected to promote enhanced stress-rupture strength at the more elevated temperatures, such as 1900F.
  • the controlled use of low nitrogen levels is deemed applicable to not only the range of mechanically alloyed superalloys described herein, but also to such superalloys as those containing up to 65%, e.g., 2 to 35%, chromium; at least 1% of a hardening constituent from the group consisting of up to about or e.g., 0.5 to 8%, aluminum; up to about 10 or 15%, e.g., 0.5 to 8%, titanium, and up to 15 or e.g., 0.5 to 10%, columbium; up to e.g., 0.5 to 12 or 15%, molybdenum; up to 20 or 25%, e.g., up to 3%, tungsten; up to 20%, e.g., 1 to 10%, tantalum, up to 2 or 3% vanadium; up to 15%, e.g., up to 2 or 3%, manganese; up
  • alloys within the invention are deemed all the more surprising from structural stability considerations.
  • conventional wrought and cast superalloys are normally prone to sigma phase formation in respect of highly alloyed nickel-chromium base alloy compositions having an electron vacancy number, N,., equal to or greater than about 2.26 to 2.41.
  • Sigma of course, is rather synonymous with short term structural stability.
  • alloys within the invention when mechanically alloyed have shown virtually no loss in room temperature ductility after being heat treated (aged) for 2000 hours at 1500F., this obtaining notwithstanding N, values ranging from 2,39 to 2.59.
  • Alloy C had an N,. number of 2.57, well above the 2.26-2.41 range.
  • Metallographic examination did not reveal the presence of sigma. It is believed that mechanical alloying is largely, if not completely, responsible for this phenomenon.
  • a mechanically alloyed dispersion strengthenable, precipiation hardenable powder consisting essentially of about 13 to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance high temperature strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 characterized by a rnicrostructure having coarse elongated grains.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing 13.25 to 16.25% chromium, 2.75 to 5.25% aluminum, 2 to 4.25% titanium, 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.5 to 2% yttria, up to 3% tantalum, up to about 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum and about 2 to 3% titanium, said alloy being characterized by a high degree of oxidation resistance at elevated temperature levels.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.75 to about 4.6% aluminum and about 4.75 to about 6.25% tungsten, said alloy being characterized by good sulfidation resistance at elevated temperatures.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 2.4 to about 3.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.4 to 2% yttria, up to 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 8 containing 0.5 to 1.5% yttria and up to 3% tantalum.
  • tungsten up to 3% 10 about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.00l to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.

Abstract

Alloys containing controlled percentages of chromium, aluminum, titanium, molybdenum, tungsten, tantalum, zirconium, boron, carbon and a dispersoid such as yttria afford good stress rupture properties at intermediate temperatures, e.g., 1400*F., and at more elevated temperatures, e.g., 1900*F., together with good oxidation and/or control of nitrogen important for enhancing sulfidation resistance.

Description

United States Patent [1 Benjamin et al.
1 HIGH STRENGTH CORROSION RESISTANT NICKEL-BASE ALLOY [75] Inventors: John Stanwood Benjamin; Jay Ward Schultz, both of Suffern, NY.
[73] Assignee: The International Nickel Company,
Inc., New York, NY.
[22] Filed: Aug. 28, 1974 [21] Appl. No.: 501,052
Related US. Application Data [63] Continuation-impart of Ser. Nos. 375,530, July 2, 1973, abandoned, and Ser. No. 302.201, Oct. 30, 1972, abandoned,
[52] US. Cl. 29/1825; 75/.5 R; 75/.5 BC;
75/122; 75/171 [51] Int. Cl. C22C 29/00; C22C 19/05 [58] Field of Search 75/.5 BC, .5 BB, .5 BA,
[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,591,362 7/1971 Benjamin 75/211 X Dec. 16, 1975 Benjamin 29/1825 Benjamin 75!.5 BC
Primary Examiner-L. Dewayne Rutledge Assistant ExaminerArthur J. Steiner Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Raymond .1. Kenny; Ewan C. MacQueen [57] ABSTRACT 12 Claims, No Drawings HIGH STRENGTH CORROSION RESISTANT NICKEL-BASE ALLOY The subject application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. Nos. 375,530 filed 7/2/73 and 302,201, tiled 10/30/72 both of which are now abandoned.
The present invention is directed to the so-termed superalloys, and particularly to precipitation harden able, dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloys capable of operating exceptionally well at both intermediate and elevated temperatures and under corrosive conditions.
By reason of the many advances in aircraft design, the metallurgical community has been under a continuous challenge to develop alloys capable of withstanding the more severe service conditions inherently imposed, notably increased speeds at higher temperatures and greater load-bearing capacities. In recent years, primary emphasis has probably been addressed to performance characteristics at the more elevated temperature levels, to wit, 1700-2000F. There are, however, those components of which more is demanded witness, for example, the blades of a gas turbine engine. As is known, different sections of the blades are exposed to completely different combinations of temperature and stress. In this regard, the outer portions of the blades operate at temperatures upwards of 1700F. whereas the platform portion closer to the axis of the engine might operate at temperatures on the level of l200 to 1400F., but the latter is subjected to tremendously greater stress due to the centrifugal nature of the loading in a rotating part.
The fact that an alloy might respond favorably at the higher temperature plateaus, does not invoke the corollary that it is also capable of performing satisfactorily at temperatures on the order of 12001400F. The product known as TD nickel has fairly good strength at the high temperatures but manifests a distinct propensity to undergo premature creep at the intermediate temperature levels.
The problem becomes somewhat compounded where excellent resistance to corrosion, particularly oxidation and/or sulfidation, is of necessity. For as we have found a given alloy may display acceptable values in terms of stress rupture characteristics at temperature only to suffer a pronounced susceptibility to corrosive attack.
The thrust of the subject invention is, accordingly, to bring together in one alloy the capability of delivering outstanding stress rupture strength at both intermediate (1400F.) and elevated (1900F.) temperature levels and good resistance to oxidation and/or sulfidation. In this connection and insofar as we are aware, the subject alloys afford the highest combination of strength and corrosion resistance known in the superalloy art.
Generally speaking, alloys contemplated in accordance herewith contain (weight percent) about 13 to 17%, e.g., 13.25 to 16.25%, chromium; about 2.5 to 6%, e.g., 2.75 to 5.25%, aluminum; about 2 to 4.25% titanium, the sum of the aluminum plus titanium being preferably at least about about 1.75 to about 4.25% or 4.5% molybdenum; about 3.75 to about 6.25% tungsten; up to 4%, e.g., up to 3%, tantalum, about 0.02 to 0.5%, e.g., 0.05 to about 0.175%, zirco nium; about 0.001 to 0.025% boron. a small but effective amount, e.g., 0.2% or 0.5%, and up to about 2% of 2 yttria; up to 0.2% and advantageously not more than 0.125% carbon; and the balance essentially nickel.
Within the foregoing ranges, where the emphasis is on oxidation resistance as well as stress-rupture strength, the alloys should contain at least 3.5% aluminum. 13.75% or more of chromium and not more than about 3% titanium. 1n striving for the optimum by way of resistance to sulfidation then the percentages of aluminum, titanium and tungsten should be correlated such that the aluminum is from 2.75% to 4.6%, the titanium is at least 2.4% and the tungsten is at least 4.75%, the sum of the titanium plus tungsten benefcially being at least 7.75%. For both oxidation and sulfidation resistance coupled with high strength the alloys should contain about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.4 to 3% or 3.25% titanium, and from about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, the other constituents being within the ranges first given.
In terms of the individual alloying constituents, it would appear that a number of interactive or conflicting forces are involved, their respective roles being difficult to delineate at best. Seemingly, these interactions are particularly pronounced in respect of both oxidation and sulfidation resistance. For example, chromium, titanium and tungsten impart a most potent effect in achieving optimum resistance to sulfidation. By the same token, titanium and tungsten, for example, tend to detract from 1900F. stress rupture strength, although not at 1400F. Chromium and aluminum are indispensible in conferring resistance to oxidation yet aluminum at 1900" is deemed somewhat detrimental whereas chromium impairs stress-rupture properties at both 1400 and 1900F. Such considerations are indicative of the careful balance of chemistry required. Indeed, this balance is further required to develop a proper grain structure as detailed more fully herein.
With regard to yttria, it confers high stress-rupture strength, particularly at the higher temperature levels (1900F.). A small amount of this constituent, e.g., 0.4%, is effective in imparting this benefit, though it is preferred that about 0.5 to 1.5% be present. Percentages of yttria above 2% are unnecessary. Tantalum enhances strength characteristics especially in the 1200l400F. Temperature region. From 1.5 to 3% of this element is deemed beneficial.
1n referring to nickel as constituting the balance" or balance essentially in respect of the above composition, the presence of other elements in amounts which do not adversely affect the basic characteristics of the alloys is not excluded. In this connection, the alloys may contain up to 3% columbium (although they are preferably columbium free); up to 10% cobalt; up to 3% hafnium; up to 0.75% or 1% oxygen; up to 3% iron (as a contaminant); and up to 0.3% nitrogen. But it is most preferred, as will be shown hereinafter, that nitrogen not exceeded about 0.1% particularly in seeking the optimum of sulfidation resistance. Cobalt has a negative efiect at 1900F. and should, if present, he held to less than 8%. In addition, while yttria is very much preferred as the added dispersoid constituent, other refractory dispersoids, e.g., thoria and lanthana, can partially replace or be used in lieu thereof where a lesser combination of overall properties can be tolerated. Other refractory dispersoids can be present aside from the aforementioned yttria, lanthana and thoria, including the oxides, carbides. borides, and nitrides (provided the total nitrogen content does not exceed about 0.1%) of one or more materials such as thorium, zirconium, hafnium, titanium and oxides of aluminum, yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, etc. It is to be also understood that a given range for a particular element of the alloys can be used with a given range for any other element.
In carrying the invention into practice, the alloys should be produced by the mechanical alloying process as described in US. Pat. No. 3,591,362 and incorporated herein by reference. As is known, mechanical alloying involves the dry, intensive high energy milling of a powder charge whereby the initial powder constituents are simultaneously fragmented and cold bonded to provide a homogeneous, intimate interdispersion of alloying elements in the form of composite particles corresponding to the alloy composition desired. In this connection, the impacting elements used are preferably hard and impact resistant such as through hardened 52100 steel. Using a 4 gallon attritor mill, for example, a ball-to-powder ratio of about 15:1 to 25:1 by volume is preferred, the impeller speed being suitably conducted over the range of 250 to 300 rpm for a period of about 12 to 24 hours. For processing in a gal. attritor a speed of 150-200 rpm can be used, a period of 15-40 hours being satisfactory. Larger attritors permit of reduced impeller speeds.
Subsequent to mechanical alloying the composite alloy product particles can be compacted as by hot extrusion. A temperature of about 1800 to 2125F. is
of the processing, a dynamic atmosphere of air and nitrogen was supplied. 1n the case of Alloy A, 16 cc per minute of air and 400 cc per minute of nitrogen were used whereas for Alloys B and C 12 and 9 cc of air was employed, the amount of nitrogen being the same.
The coarsest 5% of the powders was removed, the remainder being packed in 3% inch diameter mild steel cans, sealed, heated to 1950F. and then extruded through dies (0.75 inch for Alloy A and 0.875 inch for Alloys B and C) using glass and grease as a lubricant. An extrusion speed of approximately 3 to 4 inches per second was measured.
The alloys were then subjected to a germinative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) consisting of heating for one half hour at 2300F. for Alloys A and B and 2250F. for Alloy C. After aging at 1550F. for approximately 24 hours, microstructural examination revealed that the alloys exhibited a desired coarse grain structure elongated in the direction of extrusion.
Each of the three alloys was then stress rupture tested at both 1400F. and 1900F. and also tested for cyclic oxidation and sulfidation resistance. The oxidation test was conducted at 1100C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature each 24 hours. A crucible sulfidation test was used and this comprised partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a 90% Na SO 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F. The analyzed comitions and results of the various tests are reported in suitable and an extrusion ratio of about 10:1 25:1 is Tables 1 [[1 below TABLE 1 COMPOSITION Cr Al Ti Mo w v 0, Zr B Fe 0 N Alloy m 13.9 4.8 2.4 3.7 3.9 1.1 0.1 0.005 1.1 0.58 0.16 B 13.5 4.2 3 4 s 1.1 0.15 0.01 0.7 0.5 0.14 c" 15.0 4.5 2.75 3.5 5.5 1.1 0.15- 0.015 1.6 0.67 0.17
contained 2.4% tantalum "nominal composition plus 2.5% tantalum balance nickel and impurities quite satisfactory. Thereupon, the extruded piece can T LE [I be hot worked if desired.
ES PT RE D It is most importan t thatthe alloys then be treated to Test i E S 38 9 a}: H RR develop a germinatlve grain growth such that a micro- Alloy ps Hrs. 7: structure is produced characterized by coarse elon- A 900 25900 10.3 2.4 u gated grains having a high aspect ratio, e.g., 2:1 to 900 20.000 113.3 2.4 2.4 upwards of 100:1 This comprises subjecting the alloys Q 32% gg:% 1%; a; :2 to a heat treatment within the temperature range of 1400 35,000 37.2 2.4 3.5 approximately 2125 to about 2300F. If lower temper- C fg-ggg. 33- a atures are used such as on the order of 2100 F., the 1400 75,000 1m alloys will retain the fine grain of the extruded structure 1400 35-000 0 8 and this is undesirable. On the other hand, should the .calcumd temperature appreciably exceed 2300F., then incipient liquation will develop and this is also undesirable. Following this treatment within the temperature range TA LE "I of about l250 to 2000F., beneficially from 1450 to CORROSON DATA 1600F., for a period of from about 16 to 30 hours. D Oxidation Sulfidation The following will serve to illustrate various aspects Alloy i AT of the invention. a
A series of three alloys were prepared, Alloys A, B Q and C, Table l, by mechanical alloying. The charges, c 500 13 rug/cm 100 21 which consisted of both elemental and master alloy powders, were placed in a 4 gallon attritor containing about 162-163 pounds of 5/16 inch diameter through hardened steel balls. The charges were processed for about 16 /2 hours, the impeller speed of the attritor being maintained at about 288 rpm. During the course With regard to the above data, it will be observed that Alloy A exhibited a stress rupture life of well over hours at 1900F. under a stress of 20,000 psi. At 1400F. it similarly displayed a stress rupture life above 100 hours notwithstanding the exceptionally high stress level of 80,000 psi. Moreover, it underwent only a weight loss of but 11 mg/cm This is deemed to be outstanding in terms of resistance to oxidation, particularly at the strength levels involved. Resistance to sulfidation, comparably speaking, was not as good as it might otherwise be since the alloy underwent a loss of approximately 80 mils during the period of test. By maintaining the total content of titanium plus tungsten over 7.75, e.g., about 8.25%, sulfidation resistance would be enhanced. This is reflected by Alloy B which showed a remarkably low loss less than 30 mils; however, its susceptibility to oxidation was on the high side, this in part being a reflection of high titanium. In contrast, Alloy C had excellent resistance to both oxidation and sulfidation attack in combination with good stress rupture properties. Over an exceptionally severe sulfidation test period of 300 hours, Alloy C corroded virtually completely with Alloy B still showing a loss of less than 30 mils.
As above-indicated, it is to advantage that the alloys be produced by mechanical alloying. In this connection and at least until recently, mechanical alloying was conducted in the presence of a dynamic atmosphere largely, if not completely, comprised of an oxygennitrogen mixture. However, such an environment has been found causative of certain problems in respect of both non-dispersion and dispersion strengthened alloys of the superalloy type. In this connection, and given the benefit of retrospective review, scant attention was given to the role of nitrogen in the composite particles produced, probably because the retained amounts thereof, being on the order of 0.l5-0.2% or so, were quite low (in contrast to oxygen) and were likely considered inconsequential. In any case and irrespective of what transpired heretofore, we have found that nitro gen, rather than being passive or innocuous, can exercise a most detracting influence.
The difficulty can be minimized by recourse to utilization of non-nitrogen atmospheres. This notwithstanding, nitrogen can nonetheless be introduced through the raw materials used, preprocessing procedures, the occurrence of leaks during the mechanical alloying process itself, etc. Moreover, and still important, nitrogen can lend to the efficiency of the mechanical alloying process. Thus, its specific contemplated use cannot be overlooked. But the point of concern is that it does 6 tageously not exceed 0.1% in mechanically alloyed" superalloys.
However, what we were unaware of (as is demonstrated herein) was that an otherwise small percentage of nitrogen, e.g., 0.15%, could subvert resistance to sulfidation. Furthermore, it now appears that by controlling the nitrogen content lower titanium and tungsten levels can be used for a sulfidation resistant alloy. This, in turn, offers the prospect of improving elevated stress-rupture strength.
The following description and data is given as illustrative of what can be accomplished in accordance herewith in terms of further improved sulfidation resistance.
A series of alloys were prepared (compositions given in Table 1V) by mechanical alloying using both elemental and master alloy powders placed in a 4 gallon attritor containing about 162-163 pounds of 5/ 16 inch diameter through hardened steel balls. The charges were processed for about 16% hours, the impeller speed of the attritor being maintained at about 288 rpm. During the course of the processing a dynamic atmosphere of air and nitrogen was supplied for three of the alloys, but the nitrogen was largely replaced by argon in each of the other alloys (argon 2%. 0 being used in two instances and argon plus 0.25% oxalic acid in the other, where the first percentage refers to gas volume and the second to the weight of the powder charge).
The coarsest of the powders (approx. 5%) was removed, the remainder being packed in 3 inch diameter mild steel cans, sealed, heated to 1950F. and then extruded using an appropriate lubricant. The alloys were then subjected to a gerrninative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) generally consisting of heating for one half hour at 2250F. or 2300F. which was followed by aging at 1500F. for approximately 24 hours.
Each of the alloys was then subjected to a crucible sulfidation test involving partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a Na SO, 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F. for a time period as given in Table IV. The alloys were also tested for cyclic oxidation and this involved an exposure to air at 1 C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature every 24 hours.
TABLE IV sulfidation Oxidation Composition by Weight Time Loss Max loss Alloy Al Ti Ta Cr Mo W Zr B C Fe Y203 0, N (Hrs) (Mils) Attack Descaled (Mils) (mg/cm) D 3.7 2.3 2.0 14.0 4.0 4.0 .15 0.1 .074 1.6 1.1 .52 .14 100 300 300 10 E 3.5 23 2.0 14.0 4.0 4.0.15.0] .075 2.1 1.1 .76 .071 300 67 79 19 300 27 42 38 C 4.5 2.75 2.5 15.0 3.5 5.5 .13 .015 .069 1.6 1.1 .67 .17 100 21 28 13 Argon 2'1 0., "Argon (25% oxalic acid added to powder) not require much nitrogen to impair one or more alloy characteristics, for example, corrosion resistance. In accordance herewith, the nitrogen level should advan- With regard to the above data, Alloys D and E are substantially the same in terms of composition except for nitrogen content, the former having a nitrogen level twice that of the latter. Alloys C and F are also similar 7 compositionally except the respective percentages of nitrogen. Alloys G and H are also different largely by reason of molybdenum and tungsten contents.
In comparing Alloys D and E, low nitrogen Alloy E survived the severe 300-hour sulfidation exposure whereas Alloy D had already manifested virtually total disintigration upon an exposure of but 100 hours. While it is difficult to think that such a small difference in nitrogen would bee causative of such a marked disparity in results, Alloys C and F and even Alloys G and H rather confirm this phenomenon.
it is further noteworthy of mention that Alloy E withstood the 300-hour test notwithstanding that the alloy contained but 23% titanium and 4% tungsten. As indicated, above 2.4% titanium and 4.75% tungsten should be present in the alloys for optimum resistance to sulfidation. This is deemed beneficial for as also previously indicated, reduced titanium and tungsten levels would be expected to promote enhanced stress-rupture strength at the more elevated temperatures, such as 1900F.
With regard to the remarkably low sulfidation loss of Alloy No. H (3 to 4 mils), it is considered that this was due to the low molybdenum content in addition to the reduced percentage of nitrogen, the tungsten being but 4.2%.
The controlled use of low nitrogen levels, i.e., not greater than 0.1% and advantageously less than about 0.075%, is deemed applicable to not only the range of mechanically alloyed superalloys described herein, but also to such superalloys as those containing up to 65%, e.g., 2 to 35%, chromium; at least 1% of a hardening constituent from the group consisting of up to about or e.g., 0.5 to 8%, aluminum; up to about 10 or 15%, e.g., 0.5 to 8%, titanium, and up to 15 or e.g., 0.5 to 10%, columbium; up to e.g., 0.5 to 12 or 15%, molybdenum; up to 20 or 25%, e.g., up to 3%, tungsten; up to 20%, e.g., 1 to 10%, tantalum, up to 2 or 3% vanadium; up to 15%, e.g., up to 2 or 3%, manganese; up to l or 2%, e.g., up to 0.5 or 1%, carbon; up to l or 2%, e.g., up to 0.5%, silicon; up to 2%, e.g., 0.05 to 1%, zirconium; up to 1%, e.g., 0.001 to 0.1%, boron; up to 4%, e.g., 0.5 to 3%, hafnium; up to about 25 volume percent, e.g., 0.05 to 10% by volume, of a refractory dispersoid such as yttria, lanthana, thoria, etc.; and at least one metal from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and iron, preferably in an amount of at least 25 or Since nitrogen can have a positive processing effect, a nitrogen level of at least 0.001%, preferably at least 0.01%, and up to 0.075% is considered beneficial in such superalloy compositions.
The attributes of alloys within the invention are deemed all the more surprising from structural stability considerations. By way of explanation conventional wrought and cast superalloys are normally prone to sigma phase formation in respect of highly alloyed nickel-chromium base alloy compositions having an electron vacancy number, N,., equal to or greater than about 2.26 to 2.41. Sigma, of course, is rather synonymous with short term structural stability. Yet, alloys within the invention when mechanically alloyed have shown virtually no loss in room temperature ductility after being heat treated (aged) for 2000 hours at 1500F., this obtaining notwithstanding N, values ranging from 2,39 to 2.59. For example, Alloy C had an N,. number of 2.57, well above the 2.26-2.41 range. Metallographic examination did not reveal the presence of sigma. It is believed that mechanical alloying is largely, if not completely, responsible for this phenomenon.
It might be further added that despite the levels of oxidation and sulfidation resistance attainable in accordance herewith, the artisan may wish, as is not uncommon, to provide the alloys with a corrosion resistant coating of aluminum or an alloy containing aluminum and chromium. Even if this be the case, should the coating be ruptured or otherwise penetrated alloys of the instant invention are markedly capable of retarding further corrosion attack.
Although the invention has been described in con nection with preferred embodiments, modifications may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the art will readily understand. Such are considered within the purview and scope of the invention and appended claims.
We claim:
1. A mechanically alloyed dispersion strengthenable, precipiation hardenable powder consisting essentially of about 13 to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance high temperature strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
2. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 characterized by a rnicrostructure having coarse elongated grains.
3. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing 13.25 to 16.25% chromium, 2.75 to 5.25% aluminum, 2 to 4.25% titanium, 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.5 to 2% yttria, up to 3% tantalum, up to about 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
4. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum and about 2 to 3% titanium, said alloy being characterized by a high degree of oxidation resistance at elevated temperature levels.
5. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.75 to about 4.6% aluminum and about 4.75 to about 6.25% tungsten, said alloy being characterized by good sulfidation resistance at elevated temperatures.
6. An alloy in accordance with claim 5 in which the sum of titanium plus tungsten is at least 7.75%.
7. An alloy in accordance with claim 6 in which the said sum is at least 8.5%.
8. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 2.4 to about 3.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.4 to 2% yttria, up to 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
9. An alloy in accordance with claim 8 containing 0.5 to 1.5% yttria and up to 3% tantalum.
10. An alloy made up of metallic powders consisting essentially of about 13% to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum. about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, about 0.2 to 2% yttria, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon. up to 10% cobalt. up to 3% 10 about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.00l to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
12. An alloy in accordance with claim 11 in which the nitrogen does not exceed about 0.075%.
* t t I

Claims (12)

1. A MECHANICALLY ALLOYED DISPERSION STRENGTHENABLE, PRECIPIATION HARDENABLE POWDER CONSISTING ESSENTIALLY OF ABOUT 13 TO 17% CHROMIUM, ABOUT 2.5 TO 6% ALUMINUM, ABOUT 2 TO 4.25% TITANIUM, ABOUT 1.75 TO 4.5% MOLYBDENUM, ABOUT 3.75 TO 6.25% TUNGSTEN, ABOUT 0.02 TO 0.5% ZIRCONIUM, ABOUT 0.001 TO 0.025% BORON, YTTRIA IN A SMALL BUT EFFECTIVE AMOUNT TO ENHANCE HIGH TEMPERATURE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTIS, UP TO 4% TANTALUM, UP TO 0.2% CARBON AND THE BALANCE ESSENTIALLY NICKEL.
2. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 characterized by a microstructure having coarse elongated grains.
3. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing 13.25 to 16.25% chromium, 2.75 to 5.25% aluminum, 2 to 4.25% titanium, 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.5 to 2% yttria, up to 3% tantalum, up to about 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
4. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum and about 2 to 3% titanium, said alloy being characterized by a high degree of oxidation resistance at elevated temperature levels.
5. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.75 to about 4.6% aluminum and about 4.75 to about 6.25% tungsten, said alloy being characterized by good sulfidation resistance at elevated temperatures.
6. An alloy in accordance with claim 5 in which the sum of titanium plus tungsten is at least 7.75%.
7. An alloy in accordance with claim 6 in which the said sum is at least 8.5%.
8. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 2.4 to about 3.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.4 to 2% yttria, up to 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
9. An alloy in accordance with claim 8 containing 0.5 to 1.5% yttria and up to 3% tantalum.
10. An alloy made up of metallic powders consisting essentially of about 13% to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, about 0.2 to 2% yttria, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon, up to 10% cobalt, up to 3% columbium, up to 3% hafnium, up to 0.3% nitrogen, up to about 1% oxygen, up to 3% iron and the balance nickel.
11. A dispersion-strengthened mechanically alloyed superalloy powder consisting essentially of nitrogen present in an amount up to 0.1% and from 13 to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
12. An alloy in accordance with claim 11 in which the nitrogen does not exceed about 0.075%.
US501052A 1972-10-30 1974-08-28 High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy Expired - Lifetime US3926568A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US501052A US3926568A (en) 1972-10-30 1974-08-28 High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US30220172A 1972-10-30 1972-10-30
US37553073A 1973-07-02 1973-07-02
US501052A US3926568A (en) 1972-10-30 1974-08-28 High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3926568A true US3926568A (en) 1975-12-16

Family

ID=27404869

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US501052A Expired - Lifetime US3926568A (en) 1972-10-30 1974-08-28 High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3926568A (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4101713A (en) * 1977-01-14 1978-07-18 General Electric Company Flame spray oxidation and corrosion resistant superalloys
US4386976A (en) * 1980-06-26 1983-06-07 Inco Research & Development Center, Inc. Dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloy
JPS6148550A (en) * 1984-08-14 1986-03-10 Natl Res Inst For Metals Gamma-phase precipitation-strengthened nickel base heat-resistant alloy containing dispersed yttria particles
US4579587A (en) * 1983-08-15 1986-04-01 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for producing high strength metal-ceramic composition
EP0194683A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-09-17 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase
EP0196513A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-10-08 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase
EP0197347A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-10-15 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloy having a dispersed phase
US4627959A (en) * 1985-06-18 1986-12-09 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Production of mechanically alloyed powder
US4717435A (en) * 1985-10-26 1988-01-05 National Research Institute For Metals Gamma-prime precipitation hardening nickel-base yttria particle-dispersion-strengthened superalloy
US4731117A (en) * 1986-11-04 1988-03-15 Crucible Materials Corporation Nickel-base powder metallurgy alloy
EP0260465A1 (en) * 1986-09-08 1988-03-23 BBC Brown Boveri AG Oxide dispersion-strengthened nickel-base superalloy with improved corrosion resistance
US4781772A (en) * 1988-02-22 1988-11-01 Inco Alloys International, Inc. ODS alloy having intermediate high temperature strength
US4836849A (en) * 1987-04-30 1989-06-06 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Oxidation resistant niobium alloy
US5002834A (en) * 1988-04-01 1991-03-26 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Oxidation resistant alloy
US5322666A (en) * 1992-03-24 1994-06-21 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Mechanical alloying method of titanium-base metals by use of a tin process control agent
US5427601A (en) * 1990-11-29 1995-06-27 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Sintered metal bodies and manufacturing method therefor
EP0831235A3 (en) * 1993-08-24 1998-07-15 Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha High-temperature gas blower impeller with vanes made of dispersion-strengthened alloy, gas blower using such impeller, and gas circulating furnace equipped with such gas blower
US20040208775A1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2004-10-21 National Research Council Of Canada Process for agglomeration and densification of nanometer sized particles
US20050265887A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2005-12-01 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat resistant alloy for use as material of engine valve
US7405454B2 (en) 2003-03-04 2008-07-29 Micron Technology, Inc. Electronic apparatus with deposited dielectric layers
US7446368B2 (en) 2001-08-30 2008-11-04 Micron Technology, Inc. Deposition of metal oxide and/or low asymmetrical tunnel barrier interpoly insulators
US7560793B2 (en) 2002-05-02 2009-07-14 Micron Technology, Inc. Atomic layer deposition and conversion
US7572695B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2009-08-11 Micron Technology, Inc. Hafnium titanium oxide films
US8501563B2 (en) 2005-07-20 2013-08-06 Micron Technology, Inc. Devices with nanocrystals and methods of formation
WO2015020007A1 (en) 2013-08-05 2015-02-12 独立行政法人物質・材料研究機構 Ni-group superalloy strengthened by oxide-particle dispersion

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3591362A (en) * 1968-03-01 1971-07-06 Int Nickel Co Composite metal powder
US3728088A (en) * 1968-03-01 1973-04-17 Int Nickel Co Superalloys by powder metallurgy
US3778249A (en) * 1970-06-09 1973-12-11 Int Nickel Co Dispersion strengthened electrical heating alloys by powder metallurgy

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3591362A (en) * 1968-03-01 1971-07-06 Int Nickel Co Composite metal powder
US3728088A (en) * 1968-03-01 1973-04-17 Int Nickel Co Superalloys by powder metallurgy
US3778249A (en) * 1970-06-09 1973-12-11 Int Nickel Co Dispersion strengthened electrical heating alloys by powder metallurgy

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4101713A (en) * 1977-01-14 1978-07-18 General Electric Company Flame spray oxidation and corrosion resistant superalloys
US4386976A (en) * 1980-06-26 1983-06-07 Inco Research & Development Center, Inc. Dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloy
US4579587A (en) * 1983-08-15 1986-04-01 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for producing high strength metal-ceramic composition
JPH0352525B2 (en) * 1984-08-14 1991-08-12 Kagaku Gijutsucho Kinzoku Zairyo Gijutsu Kenkyu Shocho
JPS6148550A (en) * 1984-08-14 1986-03-10 Natl Res Inst For Metals Gamma-phase precipitation-strengthened nickel base heat-resistant alloy containing dispersed yttria particles
US4668312A (en) * 1985-03-13 1987-05-26 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Turbine blade superalloy I
EP0197347A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-10-15 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloy having a dispersed phase
EP0196513A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-10-08 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase
EP0194683A1 (en) * 1985-03-13 1986-09-17 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase
US4627959A (en) * 1985-06-18 1986-12-09 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Production of mechanically alloyed powder
US4717435A (en) * 1985-10-26 1988-01-05 National Research Institute For Metals Gamma-prime precipitation hardening nickel-base yttria particle-dispersion-strengthened superalloy
EP0260465A1 (en) * 1986-09-08 1988-03-23 BBC Brown Boveri AG Oxide dispersion-strengthened nickel-base superalloy with improved corrosion resistance
US4731117A (en) * 1986-11-04 1988-03-15 Crucible Materials Corporation Nickel-base powder metallurgy alloy
US4836849A (en) * 1987-04-30 1989-06-06 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Oxidation resistant niobium alloy
US4781772A (en) * 1988-02-22 1988-11-01 Inco Alloys International, Inc. ODS alloy having intermediate high temperature strength
US5002834A (en) * 1988-04-01 1991-03-26 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Oxidation resistant alloy
US5427601A (en) * 1990-11-29 1995-06-27 Ngk Insulators, Ltd. Sintered metal bodies and manufacturing method therefor
US5322666A (en) * 1992-03-24 1994-06-21 Inco Alloys International, Inc. Mechanical alloying method of titanium-base metals by use of a tin process control agent
EP0831235A3 (en) * 1993-08-24 1998-07-15 Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha High-temperature gas blower impeller with vanes made of dispersion-strengthened alloy, gas blower using such impeller, and gas circulating furnace equipped with such gas blower
US7476925B2 (en) 2001-08-30 2009-01-13 Micron Technology, Inc. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxide and/or low asymmetrical tunnel barrier interploy insulators
US7446368B2 (en) 2001-08-30 2008-11-04 Micron Technology, Inc. Deposition of metal oxide and/or low asymmetrical tunnel barrier interpoly insulators
US7589029B2 (en) 2002-05-02 2009-09-15 Micron Technology, Inc. Atomic layer deposition and conversion
US7560793B2 (en) 2002-05-02 2009-07-14 Micron Technology, Inc. Atomic layer deposition and conversion
US7405454B2 (en) 2003-03-04 2008-07-29 Micron Technology, Inc. Electronic apparatus with deposited dielectric layers
US7235118B2 (en) 2003-04-16 2007-06-26 National Research Council Of Canada Process for agglomeration and densification of nanometer sized particles
US20040208775A1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2004-10-21 National Research Council Of Canada Process for agglomeration and densification of nanometer sized particles
US7481970B2 (en) * 2004-05-26 2009-01-27 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat resistant alloy for use as material of engine valve
US20050265887A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2005-12-01 Hitachi Metals, Ltd. Heat resistant alloy for use as material of engine valve
US7572695B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2009-08-11 Micron Technology, Inc. Hafnium titanium oxide films
US7700989B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2010-04-20 Micron Technology, Inc. Hafnium titanium oxide films
US8501563B2 (en) 2005-07-20 2013-08-06 Micron Technology, Inc. Devices with nanocrystals and methods of formation
US8921914B2 (en) 2005-07-20 2014-12-30 Micron Technology, Inc. Devices with nanocrystals and methods of formation
WO2015020007A1 (en) 2013-08-05 2015-02-12 独立行政法人物質・材料研究機構 Ni-group superalloy strengthened by oxide-particle dispersion

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3926568A (en) High strength corrosion resistant nickel-base alloy
US4677035A (en) High strength nickel base single crystal alloys
EP0433072B1 (en) Oxidation resistant low expansion superalloys
US5399313A (en) Nickel-based superalloys for producing single crystal articles having improved tolerance to low angle grain boundaries
US3869284A (en) High temperature alloys
US3754902A (en) Nickel base superalloy resistant to oxidation erosion
US3754903A (en) High temperature oxidation resistant coating alloy
US3676085A (en) Cobalt base coating for the superalloys
US4885216A (en) High strength nickel base single crystal alloys
US3837930A (en) Method of producing iron-chromium-aluminum alloys with improved high temperature properties
US3767385A (en) Cobalt-base alloys
US2752666A (en) Heat resistant titanium carbide containing body and method of making same
CA1281211C (en) Formation of intermetallic and intermetallic-type precursor alloys for subsequent mechanical alloying applications
EP0849370A1 (en) High strength nickel base superalloy articles having machined surfaces
EP0312966B1 (en) Alloys containing gamma prime phase and process for forming same
US4740354A (en) Nickel-base alloys for high-temperature forging dies usable in atmosphere
US3388010A (en) Dispersion-hardened metal sheet and process for making same
Kemp et al. Grain growth in liquid-phase-sintered W-Mo-Ni-Fe alloys
US3909309A (en) Post working of mechanically alloyed products
US3874938A (en) Hot working of dispersion-strengthened heat resistant alloys and the product thereof
GB2116211A (en) Oxidation resistant nickel alloy
US3912552A (en) Oxidation resistant dispersion strengthened alloy
US3000734A (en) Solid state fabrication of hard, high melting point, heat resistant materials
US3723108A (en) Nickel-chromium-cobalt alloys
Klopp Recent developments in chromium and chromium alloys