|Número de publicación||US4037367 A|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Número de solicitud||US 05/643,347|
|Fecha de publicación||26 Jul 1977|
|Fecha de presentación||22 Dic 1975|
|Fecha de prioridad||22 Dic 1975|
|Número de publicación||05643347, 643347, US 4037367 A, US 4037367A, US-A-4037367, US4037367 A, US4037367A|
|Inventores||James A. Kruse|
|Cesionario original||Kruse James A|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (4), Citada por (122), Clasificaciones (9)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
This invention relates to an improved rotary tool adapted for grinding under a flowing liquid film wherein the particles of abrasive are metal-bonded to a rigid supporting surface.
In the wet grinding of hard materials such as amethyst and sapphire with metal-bonded abrasive, e. g., diamond particles, it is known that a limiting factor governing the cutting rate is the accumulation and packing of detritus at the roots of the particles of abrasive, filling the intergranular spaces and ultimately burying the abrasive grains. For all practical purposes the cutting action ceases when the abrasive grains are buried in the detritus.
To improve the removal or scavenging of the detritus from the intergranular interstices it was taught, e.g., by G. F. Keeleric in U.S. Pat. No. 2,820,746 issued Jan. 21, 1958, to cluster the abrasive into tiny dots less than 1/4 inch in diameter leaving a major portion of the area unoccupied by abrasive. The density of population of abrasive particles per total working area of the tool was thereby reduced significantly. With this configuration the initial cutting rate was substantially increased. However, under hard grinding conditions, e.g., with a sapphire workpiece, the cutting rate dropped to about half of the initial rate within a relatively short service period.
One of the objects of the invention is to prolong the service life of the grinding tool.
Another object of the invention is to provide more abrasive particles per total area of the tool without necessarily increasing the local density of packing of abrasive particles within the working clusters or elements.
Another object of the invention is to improve the scavenging of detritus from the roots of the particles of abrasive.
Another object of the invention is to improve the quality of grinding and thereby to reduce the conventional number of grinding steps with progressively finer abrasive tools in the sequence prior to final polishing.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a grinding disk of the preferred embodiment with an annular grooved working area.
FIG. 2 is a section through 2--2 of FIG. 1 enlarged to show details of the grooves and of the bonding of the abrasive particles in the surface of the working elements.
FIG. 3 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 1, the remaining three quarters of the disk being of the same configuration.
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of a first alternative embodiment similar to FIGS. 1 and 3, but with the grooved working area covering the entire upper face of the disk instead of an annular portion thereof.
FIG. 5 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of a second alternative embodiment having radial grooves traversing the entire upper face of the disk.
FIG. 6 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of a third alternative embodiment featuring diamond-shaped working elements over the entire upper face of the disk.
FIG.7 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of a fourth alternative embodiment featuring square-shaped working elements over the entire upper face of the disk.
FIG. 8 is a fragmentary quarter sectional plan view of a fifth alternative embodiment featuring a network of grooves generated by a family of circular arcs.
FIG. 9 is an alternative embodiment of the invention as it applies to an edge-cutting grinding wheel, shown here in elevational view partly in section.
FIG. 10 is an enlarged fragmentary schematic drawing in perspective illustrating the grinding of one end of a cylindrical workpiece on a disk according to the invention.
Referring now to FIG. 1 the circular disk 1 is shown with a central opening 3 adapted for mounting on a vertical rotatable arbor, not shown. A network of grooves 4 traverses an annular portion of the top face of the disk, herein designated as the working area, subdividing the working area into working element surfaces 5 and grooves 4, leaving a central area 6 free of grooves and uncoated with abrasive particles and adapted to engage the washer and nut, not shown, of the arbor on which it is to be mounted.
FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view taken along 2--2 of FIG. 1 of disk 1 showing the rectangular cross-section of the groove 4 having a uniform depth D and a uniform width W. The working element surface 5 is studded with particles of abrasive 7 rigidly bonded to the supporting face 8 of the main body 9 of the disk by means of a coating of metal 10 deposited thereover to a thickness t which is greater than one half of the nominal diameter d of the abrasive particles 7 but less than the full diameter, i.e., d/2<t<d. A coating of such adequate thickness is seen in FIG. 2 to engage each particle of abrasive at its root at a re-entrant angle, firmly anchoring it in the coating and locking it into position. Each particle is thus rigidly bonded to the supporting surface 8. The strength of this bond depends on several factors, but primarily on the strength of the metal comprising the coating and secondarily on the strength of the material of construction of the body 9 of the disk 1.
The particles of abrasive may be selected from any of the materials commonly used for this purpose, e.g., diamond fragments, silicon carbide, and aluminum oxide products such as emery and corundum and, indeed, softer materials, all of these being well known in the art, but because of the high cost of producing the tool of the present disclosure I prefer to use industrial diamond fragments because this is the hardest abrasive material and outlasts all others, hence becomes cheaper in the long run. The abrasive particle size may range from 50,000 M (0.5 microns) to 20 M (840 microns).
The bonding metal coating 10 may be composed of nickel, cobalt, iron, copper, silver or any laminated combination of these metals or their alloys. Of these I prefer nickel for its reasonable cost and excellent physical strength. The coating 10 may be deposited by any process selected from the group consisting of electroless plating, electroplating, vacuum sputtering, sintering, and any combination of these processes. However, I prefer to use electroplated nickel because of the residual high compressive stresses remaining therein which tend to close the grasp of the coating around the root of each particle of abrasive and, secondarily, increases the hardness of the metal, hence its resistance to wear. The application of these metals are well known in the art. For example, a process for metal bonding of abrasive particles with nickel is the subject of U.S. Pat. No. 2,820,746 issued to G. F. Keeleric on Jan. 21, 1958, and is not the subject of this disclosure.
The body 9 of the disk 1 may be constructed of any rigid material selected from the group consisting of: thermoplastic resin, thermosetting resin, laminated resin, cast iron, steel, aluminum, zinc alloy die casting and copper. Of these I prefer the steel disk because of its superior mechanical strength, good electrical conductivity, reasonable cost, and the relatively simple process for preparing its surface for electroplating with nickel. The alternative materials have inferior mechanical strength and rigidity and the plastic materials have the added disadvantage of requiring extra procedures to render them electroconductive.
In FIG. 3 the preferred embodiment pattern of the network of grooves 4 is shown traversing a working area 11 and terminating at the edge of the vacant central area 6. The grooves subdivide the working area 11 into discrete lands or working elements which are predominantly quadrilateral in shape and measure 0.25 to 1.0 inch along any side for the 6 inch size disk illustrated here. For disks of other sizes these dimensions may be scaled up or down in proportion to the size of of the disk that is elected, or, alternately, the illustrated pattern may be trimmed down, or extrapolated outwardly, to the desired size. The pattern of the network of grooves is selected to include the mirror image of the sequence of repeating lines or curves. Therefore the pattern functions equally well regardless of whether the disk rotates clockwise or counter-clockwise. Additionally, I find that the criss-crossing of the grooves seems to improve the scavenging effectiveness and thereby also the cutting rate and quality of grinding.
The curvature of the grooves shown fits the shape of a hypocycloid best, however very close approximations can be made with appropriate segments of other curves to be found in the draftsman's kit, including even the circular arc, without significantly changing the drainage effectiveness of the network.
FIG. 4 is a first alternative embodiment identical to FIG. 3 except that the working area occupies the entire top surface of the disk and the vacant central area 6 with central opening 3 is absent. This type of disk may be mounted on the end of a vertical arbor by means of a concentric boss on the under side of the disk threaded to receive the threaded end of the arbor. This type of disk is used for grinding large workpieces, for example, in the lapidary trade for the grinding of book ends, where the arbor nut protruding above the top face of the disk would interfere with the workpiece.
FIG. 5 is a second alternative embodiment illustrating a straight line radial pattern with the working area occupying the entire top face of the disk. This version can be provided with a central arbor opening comparable to that shown in FIG. 3 and it is intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure.
FIG. 6 shows a third alternative embodiment derived from a mosaic of identical diamond-shaped working elements. The working area occupies the entire top surface in the embodiment of FIG. 6, but an alternative version having a central arbor opening, not shown, is intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure.
FIG. 7 shows a fourth alternative embodiment based on a pattern of identical squares covering the entire top face of the disk. The groove sides intersect the radius at acute angles ranging between 22.5° to 68°. An alternative version provided with a central arbor opening, not shown, is intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure.
FIG. 8 shows a fifth alternative embodiment based on a family of circular arcs of radius R== radius of the disk, the centers of these circular arcs being taken at uniformly spaced intervals along a circle of radius 0.7 R which is concentric with the disk. On account of the convergence of the grooves toward the center of the disk and ultimately these circular arcs intersecting tangentially a circle of radius 0.3 R concentric with the disk, the working area of this embodiment is confined to an annulus having inner and outer diameters both restricted within the range of 0.6 R and 2.0 R.
FIG. 9 is an alternative embodiment adapting the square configuration of the disk embodiment of FIG. 7 for an edge-cutting grinding wheel. An alternative version, not shown, adapting the diamond pattern of FIG. 6 is intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure. The centrifugal forces acting on the grinding fluid cannot be utilized the same way with an edge-cutting wheel as they are with the disks shown in FIGS. 1 - 8, inclusive. With the edge-cutting wheel one must rely instead on inertial forces to propel the film of grinding fluid laterally instead of radially along the grooves and through the intergranular interstices while momentarily confined by the body of the workpiece pressing against the wheel.
FIG. 10 illustrates schematically the operation on the radially grooved disk shown in FIG. 5. A workpiece 12 is held in place over the working area of the disk 1 and a vertical force P is applied downwardly upon it. The grinding fluid, water, is introduced near the center of the disk, upstream of the workpiece. A standing wave of water gathers and boils at the base of the workpiece like the foam at the prow of a ship. Within this standing wave is a bank of detritus the individual fragments of which cover a broad range of particle size. The finest particles are readily suspended in the water and are promptly carried away with it. The coarse grains require heavier and faster flows to carry them away. Such flows are provided in the grooves 5 of this disclosure. Failure to properly scavenge the coarse grains of detritus allows them to roll between the workpiece and the grinding tool tending to keep them apart; thereby reducing the cutting rate and quality.
As seen in FIG. 10 the groove which is momentarily under the workpiece 12, may be likened to the channel between two vanes of the impeller of a centrifugal pump. The vanes periodically sweep across the bottom of the workpiece like a squeegee. For the brief instant that the groove is functioning as a miniscule centrifugal pump there is generated therein a sudden pulse of hydraulic pressure and high flow rate capable of carrying away the coarsest particles of detritus.
The minimum depth and width of the groove accordingly, depend on the nominal diameter d of the abrasive particles of the grinding tool, whereas the dimensions of the working elements depend largely on the size of the workpiece. I have found that the minimum depth D of the groove should be at least twice the nominal diameter d of the particles of abrasive and that the minimum width W of the groove should be at least 10 times the nominal diameter, i.e., D≮2d and W≮10d. However, the grooves must not be excessively wide, since small workpieces bounce and become difficult to hold steady as they traverse wide grooves.
For most purposes I find satisfactory a groove depth broadly within the range of 0.00004 inch (1 micron) to 0.1 inch (2540 microns), preferably 0.00004 inch (1 micron) to 0.06 inch (1524 microns), and a groove width broadly within the range of 0.0002 inch (5 microns) to 0.15 inch (3810 microns), preferably 0.001 inch (25 microns) to 0.08 inch (2032 microns).
The preferred and alternative embodiments of this disclosure have in common a pattern of the network of grooves each providing a continuum of centrifugal drainage grooves in the radial direction subdividing the supporting surface into working elements which are predominantly quadrilateral in shape. At any point in the working area the groove intersects the radius at an acute angle within the range of 0° to 75°.
A number of 6 inch diameter grinding disks were prepared to investigate the effect of grooves in the working surface versus no grooves and also in various patterns of groove networks. All tests were run under constant conditions standardized as follows:
Arbor vertical, 800 rpm, rotation counter-clockwise
Nominal diameter of abrasive particles d = 80 microns(180 M)
Workpiece A: end of 1 inch diameter cylinder of amethyst
Workpiece B: end of 1 inch diameter cylinder of synthetic sapphire
Vertical loading of workpiece: 5 lbs.
Testing area: 0.25 inch inward from outer edge of disk
Before actual testing each disk was "run in" using the following procedure: 40 minutes with Workpiece A followed by 10 minutes with Workpiece B.
The actual test consisted of measuring the cumulative weight loss of Workpiece A after five grinding cycles of 2 minutes each, i.e., after a total of 10 minutes of grinding. The test results are shown in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________ Wt. LossDisk (gms.) A.sub.E /A.sub.G L.sub.E /L.sub.G Θ.sub.max______________________________________Plain, no grooves 0.28 ∞ ∞ **FIG. 3 0.85 9.18 9.27 56°FIG. 5 0.52 10.66 9.27 0°FIG. 6 0.60 4.23 6.77 68°FIG. 7 0.62 4.08 6.77 68°FIG. 8 0.45 3.02 4.19 50°Dot pattern* 0.55 0.14 0.2 **______________________________________ *U.S. Pat. No. 2,820,746 issued to G. F. Keeleric on Jan. 21, 1958 **Not applicable
The above results show that the grinding rate on amethyst for the preferred embodiment of FIG. 3 was 0.85/0.28 = 3 times that of the plain disk which had no grooves, while the alternative embodiments were about twice as fast. The dot pattern gave initially high grinding rates comparable to the FIG. 3 configuration, but only when applied exclusively to the relatively soft mineral: amethyst. However, after applying to the much harder synthetic sapphire for only 10 minutes, the rate for the dot pattern dropped 30% versus 2% for the FIG. 3 pattern.
The dot pattern disk was still on a rapidly decreasing part of its service life curve while the disks of the present disclosure were showing inconclusive signs of wear. The rapid deterioration of the dot pattern appears to follow simply from the fact that the total population of diamond particles in the working area is considerably less than that of the configurations disclosed herein. With the same loading on the same workpiece on fewer diamond points, each diamond must cut deeper into the workpiece and consequently the stresses on the individual diamond grains are much greater. The wear rate and the tendency for actual fracture or uprooting of the diamonds in the leading edge of each tiny dot cluster is much greater than with the configurations disclosed herein.
One criterion for the service life, accordingly, would be the percent of the working suface that is populated with abrasive particles, assuming that the density is the same in all populated areas. A more sensitive criterion is the ratio AE /AG of the total area AE of the working elements to the area AG of the network of grooves. The values of AE /AG appear in Table I, where it is shown that a minimum ratio of 1.5 effectively distinguishes the groove network patterns of this disclosure from the dot pattern of U.S. Pat. No. 2,820,746.
Another criterion is the ratio LE /LG obtained by scribing a circle at mid-radius of the working area of the disk, e.g., on a 6 inch disk at radius 1.78 inches, and then measuring the cumulative lengths of arc LE traversing the working elements and the cumulative lengths of arc LG traversing the grooves. The values of LE /LG appear in Table I, where it is shown that a minimum ratio of 1.5 effectively distinguishes the groove network patterns of this disclosure from the dot pattern of U.S. Pat. No. 2,820,746.
For good scavenging of the detritus the grooves must not be inclined too steeply to the radius at any point since they are useless when inclined at right angles to the radius. Designating θ as the acute angle at the intersection of a channel with the radius and θmax as the highest value of θ for the whole pattern of a given network, θmax is an important criterion for distinguishing network patterns. The values of θmax are listed in Table I, where it can be seen that all values for network patterns of this disclosure lie within the range of θ = 0° to 75°.
With improved scavenging of the detritus it follows that the quality of the cutting action and the surface finish are likewise improved. Although the procedure varies widely between lapidary artisans the following schedule is singled out as an example:
The workpiece is subjected to grinding with progressively finer abrasive grain sizes in the following sequence using metal-bonded abrasive disks,
a. without grooves:
100M - 260M - 600M - 1200M - 8000M - then polish*
b. with groove network pattern according to FIG. 3:
260m - 1200m - 8000m - then polish*
Thus 5 grinding steps are reduced to 3 without impairing the quality of work. The need to carry the 100M and 600M disks in inventory is eliminated, which is a substantial saving for the small artisan.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US2820746 *||25 Nov 1953||21 Ene 1958||George F Keeleric||Method of making an abrasive tool|
|US3628292 *||12 Mar 1969||21 Dic 1971||Itt||Abrasive cutting wheels|
|US3902873 *||28 Dic 1970||2 Sep 1975||Ind Distributors 1946 Limited||Metal coated synthetic diamonds embedded in a synthetic resinous matrix bond|
|DE364490C *||27 Nov 1922||Hermann Hustedt||Schleifstein fuer Holzschleifer zur Herstellung von Holzschliff|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US4205493 *||14 Mar 1978||3 Jun 1980||Kim Myung S||Portable chamfering grinding device|
|US4821461 *||23 Nov 1987||18 Abr 1989||Magnetic Peripherals Inc.||Textured lapping plate and process for its manufacture|
|US4918872 *||8 Jul 1988||24 Abr 1990||Kanebo Limited||Surface grinding apparatus|
|US5022191 *||13 Nov 1989||11 Jun 1991||Lam-Plan S.A.||Polishing plate|
|US5107626 *||6 Feb 1991||28 Abr 1992||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method of providing a patterned surface on a substrate|
|US5152917 *||6 Feb 1991||6 Oct 1992||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Structured abrasive article|
|US5243790 *||25 Jun 1992||14 Sep 1993||Abrasifs Vega, Inc.||Abrasive member|
|US5304223 *||8 Mar 1993||19 Abr 1994||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Structured abrasive article|
|US5378251 *||13 Sep 1993||3 Ene 1995||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Abrasive articles and methods of making and using same|
|US5431596 *||28 Abr 1994||11 Jul 1995||Akita; Hiroshi||Grinding wheel and a method for manufacturing the same|
|US5526898 *||6 Jul 1994||18 Jun 1996||Clark; Allen||Leg extension assembly|
|US5645476 *||6 Jun 1994||8 Jul 1997||Ernst Winter & Sohn (Gmbh & Co.)||Grinding wheel for grinding edges of eye glasses|
|US5669943 *||14 Nov 1996||23 Sep 1997||Norton Company||Cutting tools having textured cutting surface|
|US5997597 *||24 Feb 1998||7 Dic 1999||Norton Company||Abrasive tool with knurled surface|
|US6019668 *||27 Mar 1998||1 Feb 2000||Norton Company||Method for grinding precision components|
|US6102789 *||27 Mar 1998||15 Ago 2000||Norton Company||Abrasive tools|
|US6120356 *||2 Sep 1998||19 Sep 2000||Xerox Corporation||Grinding wheel with geometrical pattern|
|US6120361 *||2 Feb 1998||19 Sep 2000||Tokyo Electron Limited||Polishing apparatus, polishing member|
|US6244937||23 Jun 2000||12 Jun 2001||Xerox Corporation||Grinding wheel with geometrical pattern|
|US6277015 *||26 Abr 1999||21 Ago 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Polishing pad and system|
|US6409581||31 Jul 2000||25 Jun 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Belt polishing pad method|
|US6585559||31 Mar 2000||1 Jul 2003||Engis Corporation||Modular controlled platen preparation system and method|
|US6602108||17 May 2002||5 Ago 2003||Engis Corporation||Modular controlled platen preparation system and method|
|US6783450||25 Abr 1997||31 Ago 2004||Ernst Winter & Sohn Diamantwerkzeuge Gmbh & Co.||For grinding wheel for grinding process|
|US6796891 *||29 Jul 2002||28 Sep 2004||Noritake Co., Ltd.||Grinding wheel, a process of manufacturing the grinding wheel and a process of reclaiming the grinding wheel|
|US6802761||20 Mar 2003||12 Oct 2004||Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.||Pattern-electroplated lapping plates for reduced loads during single slider lapping and process for their fabrication|
|US6910944||22 May 2001||28 Jun 2005||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of forming a transparent window in a polishing pad|
|US6949012 *||10 Dic 2002||27 Sep 2005||Intel Corporation||Polishing pad conditioning method and apparatus|
|US7011565 *||1 Abr 2003||14 Mar 2006||Applied Materials, Inc.||Forming a transparent window in a polishing pad for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus|
|US7083504||14 Jun 2004||1 Ago 2006||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US7118450||12 Sep 2005||10 Oct 2006||Applied Materials, Inc.||Polishing pad with window and method of fabricating a window in a polishing pad|
|US7137872 *||30 Sep 2005||21 Nov 2006||Tcg International Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US7226344||16 Jun 2006||5 Jun 2007||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US7255629||15 Sep 2006||14 Ago 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Polishing assembly with a window|
|US7300342 *||11 Oct 2006||27 Nov 2007||Tcg International Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US7364497 *||30 Jun 2005||29 Abr 2008||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Polish pad and chemical mechanical polishing apparatus comprising the same|
|US7410410 *||13 Oct 2005||12 Ago 2008||Sae Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd.||Method and apparatus to produce a GRM lapping plate with fixed diamond using electro-deposition techniques|
|US7524238||5 Abr 2007||28 Abr 2009||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US7731566||14 Ago 2007||8 Jun 2010||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US7841926||3 Jun 2010||30 Nov 2010||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US7854647 *||11 Oct 2007||21 Dic 2010||Tcg International, Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US7988533||20 Ago 2010||2 Ago 2011||Tcg International Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US8092274||29 Nov 2010||10 Ene 2012||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US8287793 *||28 Nov 2007||16 Oct 2012||Nexplanar Corporation||Methods for producing in-situ grooves in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) pads, and novel CMP pad designs|
|US8556679||6 Ene 2012||15 Oct 2013||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US8622787||18 Mar 2010||7 Ene 2014||Chien-Min Sung||CMP pad dressers with hybridized abrasive surface and related methods|
|US8753558||31 Dic 2012||17 Jun 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Forming shaped abrasive particles|
|US8753742||10 Ene 2013||17 Jun 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having complex shapes and methods of forming same|
|US8758461||30 Dic 2011||24 Jun 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US8764863||31 Dic 2012||1 Jul 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Composite shaped abrasive particles and method of forming same|
|US8795029||18 Ene 2013||5 Ago 2014||Applied Materials, Inc.||Apparatus and method for in-situ endpoint detection for semiconductor processing operations|
|US8840694||30 Jun 2012||23 Sep 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Liquid phase sintered silicon carbide abrasive particles|
|US8840695||31 Dic 2012||23 Sep 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particle and method of forming same|
|US8840696||10 Ene 2013||23 Sep 2014||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US8932116||12 Sep 2012||13 Ene 2015||Nexplanar Corporation||Methods for producing in-situ grooves in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) pads, and novel CMP pad designs|
|US8986409||30 Jun 2012||24 Mar 2015||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive articles including abrasive particles of silicon nitride|
|US9011563||4 Dic 2008||21 Abr 2015||Chien-Min Sung||Methods for orienting superabrasive particles on a surface and associated tools|
|US9017439||7 May 2014||28 Abr 2015||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US9074119||30 Dic 2013||7 Jul 2015||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Particulate materials and methods of forming same|
|US9200187||23 May 2013||1 Dic 2015||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particles and methods of forming same|
|US9205530||7 Jul 2010||8 Dic 2015||Seagate Technology Llc||Lapping a workpiece|
|US9238768||7 Mar 2014||19 Ene 2016||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having complex shapes and methods of forming same|
|US9242346||29 Mar 2013||26 Ene 2016||Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.||Abrasive products having fibrillated fibers|
|US9303196||12 Ago 2014||5 Abr 2016||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Liquid phase sintered silicon carbide abrasive particles|
|US9370853 *||15 Dic 2014||21 Jun 2016||Fujibo Holdings, Inc.||Resin lapping plate and lapping method using the same|
|US9403258||27 Jun 2013||2 Ago 2016||Seagate Technology Llc||Method for forming an abrasive lapping plate|
|US9428681||28 Oct 2015||30 Ago 2016||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particles and methods of forming same|
|US9440332||15 Oct 2013||13 Sep 2016||Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US9457453||31 Mar 2014||4 Oct 2016||Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc./Saint-Gobain Abrasifs||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US9517546||26 Sep 2012||13 Dic 2016||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive articles including abrasive particulate materials, coated abrasives using the abrasive particulate materials and methods of forming|
|US9522454||17 Dic 2012||20 Dic 2016||Seagate Technology Llc||Method of patterning a lapping plate, and patterned lapping plates|
|US9566689||22 Dic 2014||14 Feb 2017||Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc.||Abrasive article including shaped abrasive particles|
|US9567505||9 Dic 2015||14 Feb 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having complex shapes and methods of forming same|
|US9598620||16 Ene 2015||21 Mar 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive articles including abrasive particles of silicon nitride|
|US9604346||27 Jun 2014||28 Mar 2017||Saint-Gobain Cermaics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive article including shaped abrasive particles|
|US9676980||13 Ago 2014||13 Jun 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles|
|US9676981||24 Dic 2014||13 Jun 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particle fractions and method of forming same|
|US9676982||2 Jun 2015||13 Jun 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Particulate materials and methods of forming same|
|US9688893||19 Jul 2016||27 Jun 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particles and methods of forming same|
|US9707529||23 Dic 2014||18 Jul 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Composite shaped abrasive particles and method of forming same|
|US9765249||18 Jul 2014||19 Sep 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particle and method of forming same|
|US9771506||10 Ene 2017||26 Sep 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive particles having complex shapes and methods of forming same|
|US9771507||28 Ene 2015||26 Sep 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particle including dopant material and method of forming same|
|US9783718||30 Sep 2014||10 Oct 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Shaped abrasive particles and methods of forming same|
|US9803119||14 Abr 2015||31 Oct 2017||Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc.||Abrasive article including shaped abrasive particles|
|US20010036805 *||22 May 2001||1 Nov 2001||Applied Materials, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Forming a transparent window in a polishing pad for a chemical mehcanical polishing apparatus|
|US20030032384 *||29 Jul 2002||13 Feb 2003||Noritake Co., Limited||Grinding wheel, a process of manufacturing the grinding wheel and a process of reclaiming the grinding wheel|
|US20030190867 *||1 Abr 2003||9 Oct 2003||Applied Materials, Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Forming a transparent window in a polishing pad for a chemical mechanical polishing apparatus|
|US20040029501 *||19 Oct 2001||12 Feb 2004||Middleton Stephen Victor||Segmented wafer polishing pad|
|US20040077294 *||10 Oct 2003||22 Abr 2004||Niraj Mahadev||Method and apparatus to provide a GMR lapping plate texturization using a photo-chemical process|
|US20040110453 *||10 Dic 2002||10 Jun 2004||Herb Barnett||Polishing pad conditioning method and apparatus|
|US20050164611 *||14 Jun 2004||28 Jul 2005||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US20060003677 *||30 Jun 2005||5 Ene 2006||Moo-Yong Park||Polishing pad and chemical mechanical polishing apparatus comprising the same|
|US20060014476 *||12 Sep 2005||19 Ene 2006||Manoocher Birang||Method of fabricating a window in a polishing pad|
|US20060234608 *||16 Jun 2006||19 Oct 2006||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US20070021037 *||15 Sep 2006||25 Ene 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Polishing Assembly With A Window|
|US20070077864 *||11 Oct 2006||5 Abr 2007||Tcg International Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US20070084132 *||13 Oct 2005||19 Abr 2007||Niraj Mahadev||Method and apparatus to produce a GMR lapping plate with fixed diamond using electro-deposition techniques|
|US20070128994 *||2 Dic 2005||7 Jun 2007||Chien-Min Sung||Electroplated abrasive tools, methods, and molds|
|US20070184764 *||5 Abr 2007||9 Ago 2007||Jtekt Corporation||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|US20080090503 *||16 Nov 2007||17 Abr 2008||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Polishing pad and chemical mechanical polishing apparatus comprising the same|
|US20080211141 *||28 Nov 2007||4 Sep 2008||Manish Deopura||Methods for producing in-situ grooves in chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) pads, and novel CMP pad designs|
|US20080227367 *||14 Ago 2007||18 Sep 2008||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US20080305719 *||5 Jun 2007||11 Dic 2008||Tcg International, Inc.,||Scratch removal device and method|
|US20090227186 *||11 Oct 2007||10 Sep 2009||Tcg International, Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|US20100240281 *||3 Jun 2010||23 Sep 2010||Applied Materials, Inc.||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US20100317268 *||20 Ago 2010||16 Dic 2010||Thomas Jonathan P||Scratch removal device and method|
|US20110070808 *||29 Nov 2010||24 Mar 2011||Manoocher Birang||Substrate polishing metrology using interference signals|
|US20150093977 *||5 Dic 2014||2 Abr 2015||Manish Deopura||Methods for producing in-situ grooves in chemical mechanical planarization (cmp) pads, and novel cmp pad designs|
|US20150165586 *||15 Dic 2014||18 Jun 2015||Fujibo Holdings, Inc.||Resin Lapping Plate and Lapping Method Using the Same|
|DE4006660A1 *||3 Mar 1990||5 Sep 1991||Winter & Sohn Ernst||Grinding disc for profiling spectacle lens edges - has plastic body with outer abrasive edge of diamond particles in metal, e.g. bronze, and a supporting copper ring|
|DE10016750A1 *||4 Abr 2000||11 Oct 2001||Omd Spa||Grinding device for face grinding of cylindrical or rod-form workpiece has numerous long grooves in grinding surface|
|DE19704746A1 *||8 Feb 1997||20 Ago 1998||August Heinr Schmidt Gmbh & Co||Grinding disc for machining workpieces|
|EP0345239A1 *||25 May 1989||6 Dic 1989||DIAMANT BOART Société Anonyme||Cup-type grinding wheel and use of the same for grinding and mechanically polishing glass|
|EP0370843A1 *||19 Oct 1989||30 May 1990||Societe Dite: Lam-Plan S.A.||Polishing plate|
|EP1074346A2 *||31 Jul 2000||7 Feb 2001||Giovanni Ficai||Toothed abrasive wheel|
|EP1074346A3 *||31 Jul 2000||10 Abr 2002||Giovanni Ficai||Toothed abrasive wheel|
|EP1486289A2 *||11 Jun 2004||15 Dic 2004||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|EP1486289A3 *||11 Jun 2004||9 Mar 2005||Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.||Method of processing antifriction bearing unit for wheel|
|WO2000059644A1 *||31 Mar 2000||12 Oct 2000||Engis Corporation||Modular controlled platen preparation system and method|
|WO2007040556A1 *||9 Nov 2005||12 Abr 2007||Tcg International, Inc.||Scratch removal device and method|
|WO2014156840A1 *||18 Mar 2014||2 Oct 2014||Fujibo Holdings, Inc.||Polishing pad and polishing method|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||451/551|
|Clasificación internacional||B24D7/06, B24D7/10|
|Clasificación cooperativa||B24D7/10, B24D7/063, B24D7/06|
|Clasificación europea||B24D7/06B, B24D7/10, B24D7/06|