Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUS4843468 A
Tipo de publicaciónConcesión
Número de solicitudUS 07/072,889
Fecha de publicación27 Jun 1989
Fecha de presentación14 Jul 1987
Fecha de prioridad14 Jul 1986
TarifaCaducada
También publicado comoDE3783525D1, DE3783525T2, EP0253608A2, EP0253608A3, EP0253608B1
Número de publicación07072889, 072889, US 4843468 A, US 4843468A, US-A-4843468, US4843468 A, US4843468A
InventoresJohn O. Drewery
Cesionario originalBritish Broadcasting Corporation
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Scanning techniques using hierarchical set of curves
US 4843468 A
Resumen
Conventionally, transmission of television images is performed by Raster scanning. To avoid the problems associated with flyback, and the limiting of Raster scanning to image scanning standards it is proposed to transmit images by scanning along a locus defined by a fractal curve. A Peano curve is particularly suitable. Image resolution may be varied by varying the order of curve used to scan the image. Smoothing of a curve of a given order results in a graceful degradation to a curve of lower order so that the image created by a given order is still recognizable when displayed by a lower or higher order.
Imágenes(13)
Previous page
Next page
Reclamaciones(14)
I claim:
1. A method of scanning an image to produce a signal for transmission and display, comprising scanning an image in a coordinate sequence defined by one order of a hierarchical set of fractal curves.
2. A method of scanning according to claim 1 comprising filtering the co-ordinate sequence by means of a filter having a raised-cosine pulse response.
3. A method of scanning according to claim 1 comprising filtering the co-ordinate sequence according to a filter characteristic which cuts at half the pixel frequency, to smooth the fractal curve.
4. A method according to claim 3 comprising filtering the running average of four coordinate values to smooth said fractal curve.
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein the co-ordinate sequence is defined by a Hilbert curve.
6. A method according to claim 1 wherein the co-ordinate sequence is defined by a Sierpinski curve.
7. A television camera, comprising means for forming a signal indicative of an image to be transmitted, the signal forming means comprising means for scanning the image in a co-ordinate sequence defined by one order of a hierarchical set of fractal curves.
8. A television camera according to claim 7 wherein the camera is one of a plurality of synchronised cameras each having said signal forming means, each camera being coupled to a selector means for selecting the output from one of said cameras and transmitting the output to a display, the selector being capable of selecting signals representing different orders of fractal curves.
9. A television receiver, comprising means for receiving a signal indicative of an image to be displayed, the signal receiving means comprising means for scanning the display along a co-ordinate sequence defined by one order of a hierarchical set of fractal curves to form said image from said signal.
10. A television receiver according to claim 9, comprising signal converting means for converting the received fractal signal into a signal suitable for display on a raster display.
11. Apparatus according to claim 7 wherein the scanning means comprises means for scanning along a co-ordinate sequence defined by one order of a Hilbert curve.
12. Apparatus according to claim 7 wherein the scanning means comprises means for scanning along a co-ordinate sequence defined by one order of a Sierpinski curve.
13. A television camera comprising a conventional raster camera, the raster output of which is coupled with converting means for converting a signal produced by a raster scan to a fractal signal.
14. A television camera according to claim 13 wherein the converting means comprises picture storage means, means for writing pixel data from the raster scan into said picture storage means in a given sequence; and means for reading said pixel data from said storage means in a different given sequence.
Descripción

This invention relates to video scanning systems for use for example in television.

Transmission of images by television is conventionally performed by raster scanning in which a signal is formed by scanning the image in a series of parallel lines, either horizontal or vertical. In broadcast television the scan starts at the top left hand corner and finishes at the bottom right hand corner, the scan lines being horizontal. Moreover, each line is scanned in the same direction so that the scan must return to the beginning of each line in, ideally, an infinitessimally short time. Such an action is known as the flyback.

The scanning in conventional imaging and display devices is by way of a continuously moving electronic beam which is deflected by electric or, usually, magnetic fields. With such devices the beam flyback takes a finite time which is, therefore, an "overhead". The horizontal scanning waveform, which is proportional to the deflecting field, therefore appears as in FIG. 1, the idealised version of which is known as a sawtooth waveform.

Similarly, the vertical scanning waveform needed to ensure the equal spacing of the scan lines is another sawtooth, though of much lower frequency. This has a corresponding flyback, imposing a further "overhead". It should be noted that the continuous nature of the vertical scan imposes a continuous vertical displacement on the scan lines so that they are not strictly horizontal. However, the skew thus imposed is negligible.

The large rate of change of the flyback in the horizontal scan waveform is used to provide the high voltage needed in a conventional CRT display. However, it can cause problems if the line rate is increased to provide scanning for higher definition formats since the flyback time of conventional deflection circuits may become a significant proportion of the line period. For this reason, UK Patent Application No. 2,137,844A has proposed a boustrophedonic scanning format in which lines are alternately scanned in opposite directions. This requires a triangular form for the horizontal scan waveform as shown in FIG. 2 (a). This eliminates the flyback, but the sawtooth of the vertical scan must now be modified to a stepped form as shown in FIG. 2 (b) to ensure that adjacent lines are parallel. It also requires that nonlinearities in the horizontal scan waveform result in a symmetrical function as shown in FIG. 3.

A disadvantage of raster-based scanning is that it is committed to a standard in the form of lines in the picture. This means that once an image scanning standard is chosen the display must adopt the same standard, or convert the incoming signal to its own line standard, which is a complex and costly process. Moreover, any curtailment in the bandwidth of an analogue channel used to carry the signal will affect only the horizontal resolution of the image, not the vertical resolution. Excessive curtailment will therefore give an unacceptable image quality, inferior to that which could be obtained with equal horizontal and vertical resolutions.

The present invention is defined by the appended claims to which reference should now be made.

The invention is applicable to both analogue and digital scans. In the former case the image is scanned along a trace formed by a defined co-ordinate sequence, and in the latter case the pixels of the image are scanned in that co-ordinate sequence.

We have appreciated that it would be possible to have a scanning format which is not committed to a line standard and therefore is open to evolution, i.e., the image scanning may be upgraded in acuity without needing a change in the structure of the display. This means that it is downwards compatible. Moreover, it is possible for such a format to be upwards compatible such that the display can be upgraded without changing the source scanning format. Such a technique relies on the use of FRACTALS for defining the scanning locus.

Fractals may be described as structures whose length is undefinable or infinite as the finer the scale used to observe the structure, the greater the apparent length. An example of such a structure is a coastline. The closer it is observed, the greater its length becomes as finer detail becomes resolved.

Such self-similar shapes are neither one- nor two-dimensional shapes as they are defined by conventional Euclidian geometry. That is, they have a fractional dimension.

Fractals may be identical on each level or scale, or may be irregular. A coastline is an irregular fractal. FIG. 4 shows how a regular fractal may be generated. This example is the well known Koch curve or Koch snowflake. The straight sides of an equilateral triangle FIG. 4b (the initiator shown in FIG. 4a ) are operated on by a generator shown in FIG. 4a . This operation produces the result shown in FIG. 4c. The operator is then applied to each of the sides of the shape of FIG. 4c and then subsequently to the sides of the resultant figure, and so on. The result is a figure resembling a snowflake.

It can be shown that the fractal dimension can be defined as

D=-log (N)/log (1/r)

where N is the number of parts of the objected generated and 1/r is the similarity ratio which is used to divide the initiator. For the Koch curve of FIG. 4; N=4 and 1/r=1/3

so that D=1.26

A fuller description of fractals can be found in the book: Mandlebrot FRACTALS--Form, Chance and Dimension, W.H. Freeman, ISBN 0-7167-0473-0. The use of fractals in the field of computer graphics to simulate texture is well established. The use of a fractal curve to explore a multi-dimensional space is known from Stevens, R. J., Lehar, A. F. and Preston, F. H. 1982, "Data ordering and compression of multi-spectral images using the Peano scan", International Conference on electronic image processing July 26-28 1982, IEE conference publication No. 214 pages 209-213. However, the use of a fractal curve to scan an image for transmission and display, with its attendant advantages is thought to be novel.

The invention will be disclosed in terms of a particular fractal--The Peano curve, named after the Italian mathematician Giuseppe Peano, see "Selected works of Guiseppe Peano" translated and edited by Hubert C. Kennedy, ISBN 0-04-164002-0, Allen and Unwin. It is also called Hilbert curve. However, other forms of fractal may be more suitable, in particular the Sierpinski curve, described by Writh, N. in "Algorithms+data structures=programs", Prentice-Hall Inc., ISBN 0-13-022418-9 pages 134-137. In general, the curve may be multi-dimensional; only the two dimensional form is discussed in detail here.

The invention will be described by way of example with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 (referred to above) illustrates the sawtooth waveform of conventional raster scanning;

FIG. 2 (referred to above) shows the waveforms required for boustrophedonic scanning in (a) the horizontal (b) the vertical directions;

FIG. 3 (referred to above) illustrates the permissible nonlinearity of the horizontal scan in boustrophedonic scanning;

FIG. 4 (referred to above) illustrates the steps in generating a Koch curve;

FIG. 5 illustrates a fifth-order (32×32) Peano curve;

FIG. 6 illustrates a first-order (basic) Peano curve;

FIG. 7 illustrates a second-order Peano curve;

FIG. 8 illustrates a third-order Peano curve;

FIG. 9 shows the smoothed third-order curve resulting from band-limiting

the coordinate waveforms fairly sharp to half the pixel frequency;

FIG. 10 illustrates a portion of the horizontal and vertical waveforms interpolated by a raised cosine filter;

FIG. 11 illustrates the effect of four-fold averaging and interpolation (filtering) of the scan;

FIG. 12 illustrates the effect of two-fold averaging of the scan;

FIG. 13 illustrates the effect of three-fold averaging of the scan;

FIG. 14 illustrates the effect of 16-fold averaging of the scan;

FIG. 15 illustrates the superposition of the third and fourth-order scans;

FIG. 16 shows the starting and finishing points for various aspect ratios: (a) 2:1 (b) 3:1 (c) 4:1 (d) 3:2 (e) 4:3;

FIG. 17 is a block diagram of a television system embodying the invention;

FIG. 18 is a block diagram illustrating conversion for compatibility with the current technology; and

FIG. 19 is a block diagram of a basic current for generating an n-th order scan.

FIG. 5 shows a two-dimensional fifth-order Peano curve, i.e., a curve connecting an array of 32×32 points. Close inspection shows that it can be divided into quarters, each of which is connected by a single step. The quarters, in turn, can be further subdivided into quarters, again connected by only a single step, and so on. Further, the quarters are seen to be replicas, either directly or rotated through a right angle.

FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 show the first, second and third order curves respectively. It can be seen that each order is derived from the previous order according to simple geometrical rules. Alternatively, the derivation of each order can be considered by way of the Cartesian coordinate sequences as shown in the Appendix below. These sequences, when interpolated, are the waveforms that would need to be applied to the horizontal and vertical deflection circuits of a conventional camera tube or CRT display. Alternatively, they are the horizontal and vertical addressing sequences that would be needed for a discrete display device. The derivation process can be repeated indefinitely to yield higher and higher order curves connecting more and more points.

The Peano scan has three important properties relevant to scanned images:

1. It gives a means of simultaneously altering the horizontal and vertical resolution of the image.

2. The set of curves for different orders form a hierarchical family capable of resolving finer and finer detail.

3. The curves for a particular order `gracefully degrades` to the previous order when smoothed.

The first property arises because the signal obtained by scanning has information in the horizontal and vertical directions in alternating or near alternating fashion. As a result, if the bandwidth of the signal is limited by a bearer channel the resolution of the image is limited equally in both directions. This is the optimum way of using the available bandwidth.

The second property arises because each order is derived from the previous one and so creates compatibility. Taking a running average of four coordinate values and then selecting every fourth average produces the coordinate values of the previous order.

The third property is relevant only to continuous scanning devices such as those using electron beams. The curves in FIGS. 5 to 8 are idealised in the sense that, if the continuously moving scanning spot traces the curve at a constant speed, the x and y coordinate waveforms would be band-limited which would, in general, smooth the corners of the scan. FIG. 9 shows the effect of limiting the bandwidth of the waveforms using a particular filter characteristic which cuts at half the pixel frequency, that is the frequency at which x,y point co-ordinates are generated. This operation would be carried out by the filters following the digital-to-analogue converters generating the waveforms from the coordinate sequences.

There is, however one special case where limiting the bandwidth of the waveforms does not smooth the curve. This is the case of a simple raised-cosine filter pulse response, the base width of the pulse being the pixel spacing. FIG. 10 shows a portion of the waveforms when so filtered. As can be seen, at the ideal point values, each coordinate has zero rate of change and neither overshoots. This means that the spot comes momentarily to rest and, as only one coordinate changes at any time, the motion passes smoothly from one coordinate to the other.

FIG. 11 shows the result of smoothing the scan by taking a running average of four coordinate values and filtering with the first filter. As can be seen, the scan closely resembles that of the previous order except for slight overshoots. FIGS. 12 and 13 show the intermediate situations of two- and three-fold averaging and these clearly show how the scan gradually changes from one order to the next. The two-fold averager appears to join half the number of points, corresponding to a step of half an order. To obtain the next lowest order, appearing to join one sixteenth of the number of points, a 16-fold averaging is necessary, shown in FIG. 14. This again closely resembles the ideal curve. Likewise, an eight-fold averager appears like the two-fold averager of FIG. 12 but one order lower. Averaging by any amount in between corresponds to a curve with intermediate detail. As averaging is a form of low-pass filtering this means that gradually reducing the bandwidth of the coordinate functions causes the curve to gradually change from one order to the next, always retaining its fractal nature.

Given that either the video signal or the scan waveforms may be band-limited to an arbitrary degree, three cases arise at the display. These are:

1. The video and scan bandwidths are equal.

2. The video bandwidth is less than the scan bandwidth.

3. The video bandwidth is greater than the scan bandwidth.

The first case is straightforward in that there are as many independent video samples as there are points in the scan so that each point contributes maximally to the resolution. In the second case the video signal is not changing as fast as it can from point to point and so the resolution is limited by the signal. In the third case the source scan is assumed to be of a higher order than the display. In this case the display will average out of the signal by superposition, either exactly, if discrete, or approximately, if continuous. This can be appreciated by considering adjacent orders of scan. FIG. 15 shows the superposition of third and fourth-order scans. As can be seen, the higher order scan is never more than half a pixel displaced from the lower order. Thus, four adjacent samples of a signal derived on the higher order, if displayed by a continuous scan on the lower order, will suffer no more than half a pixel displacement and so will tend to superpose.

This compatibility between different situations carries the important implication that it is not necessary to know the order of the scan in order to reproduce a version of the image. Thus we have an image transmission system which is independent of the number of pixels in the image. Only the number of fields per second, the form of the fractal (i.e., that it is a Peano curve) and the starting and finishing points need to be standardised.

Thus we have a hierarchical family of scanning standards for transmitting and displaying images such that an image scanned by one member of the family may be displayed by another member of the family without knowledge of the first member. Such an arrangement allows an evolution of scanning acuity to occur.

An apparent theoretical objection to the idea is that it can be applied only to square arrays of points. Arbitrary image aspect ratios are not possible. However, ratios of 2:1 3:1 4:1 3:2 and 4:3 are possible by starting and finishing at the points shown in Figure 16. Small deviations from these values are possible by altering the pixel aspect ratio without departing significantly from the spirit of isotropic resolution.

Because the scan is contiguous there is no flyback except between fields and thus time is saved. Even field flybacks may be eliminated by using a modified square scan consisting of two 2:1 scans joined at their endpoints. Alternatively, a Sierpinski curve may be used which has an inherently endless form. In such a case, synchronising information would have to be sparse, compared with the present systems, possibly consisting of a recognisable framing pattern.

The system is particularly suitable for use with imaging and display devices which are based on discrete rather than continuous scanning. These include systems comprising cameras based on charge-coupled devices (CCDs) for example. Addressable display devices would be particularly suitable.

An outline block diagram of a television system embodying the invention is shown in FIG. 17. Synchronised cameras operating with various orders of scan may be selected at will and their signals transmitted through the channel. The ninth-order scan camera represents, approximately, the current system. The eighth order scan camera represents, say, a low-resolution lightweight `electronic journalism` camera whilst the 10th-order scan camera represents a high definition camera. They could be used in different programmes or even in the same programme. The 11th-order scan camera represents a camera which could be developed in the future, being introduced when required. The same remarks apply to the hierarchy of displays, the eighth-order display representing, say, a wrist-watch receiver based on a liquid crystal display.

The system is capable of being introduced piecemeal and so thus coexisting with current scanning technology. If it were introduced on the channel then compatibility with current technology would require raster-to-Peano converters in conventional cameras and Peano-to-Raster converters in conventional displays, as shown in FIG. 18, the converters merely re-ordering the sequence of incoming pixel values. Such converters would consist simply of a picture store which would write the pixel data in one sequence and read it in another. This re-ordering of data could also be regarded as a scrambling technique to prevent unauthorised reception of a newly-introduced service.

The scan could be generated using a memory addressed by a counter as shown in FIG. 19. An nth order scan would require a memory of 22n locations, each of 2n bits, containing n-bit x and y values and a 2n-bit memory counter able to count from 0 to 22n -1. The contents of the memory could be derived according to the method described in the appendix below. The two outputs of the memory can be used directly to address a discrete scanning device. However, for a continuous scanning device the memory outputs need to be fed to two n-bit digital-to-analogue converters to produce continuous wave forms.

APPENDIX Derivation of the Sequences

The x and y coordinate sequences for the first order case of Figure 6 are shown in Table 1, in units of the scan step. The y sequence is a palindrome and the x sequence is a complementary palindrome. The coordinate sequences of the second-order case, written in binary form, are shown in Table 2. As there are 4×4 points, each coordinate requires 2 bits and there are 16 entries. The more significant bit is seen to be a replication of the corresponding first-order pattern, each entry being replicated four times. The less significant bit is seen to be the sequence yxxy for the x coordinate or yxxy for the y coordinate where X and Y are the first-order patterns of the x and y coordinates. The first of these sequences is a complementary palindrome and the second is a palindrome.

              TABLE 1______________________________________    x   y______________________________________    0   0    0   1    1   1    1   0______________________________________

              TABLE 2______________________________________x        y              x     y______________________________________00       00             10    1001       00             10    1101       01             11    1100       01             11    1000       10             11    0100       11             10    0101       11             10    0001       10             11    00______________________________________

              TABLE 3______________________________________x    y        x      y      x    y      x    y______________________________________000  000      000    100    100  100    111  011000  001      001    100    101  100    111  010001  001      001    101    101  101    110  010001  000      000    101    100  101    110  011010  000      000    110    100  110    101  011011  000      000    111    100  111    100  011011  001      001    111    101  111    100  010010  001      001    110    101  110    101  010010  010      010    110    110  110    101  001011  010      010    111    110  111    100  001011  011      011    111    111  111    100  000010  011      011    110    111  110    101  000001  011      011    101    111  101    110  000001  010      010    101    110  101    110  001000  010      010    100    110  100    111  001000  011      011    100    111  100    111  000______________________________________

Development of the higher order cases proceeds along the same rules. The third-order case, shown in Table 3, has 64 entries of three bit values, the sequences of the first two bits of x and y being the same as those of the corresponding second-order case, each entry being replicated four times. The least significant bit of the x coordinate has the sequence XYYX YXXY YXXY XYYX where X and Y represent the same sequences as before. It can be seen that the initial sequence of each group of four follows the same pattern as the sequences in the first group. Likewise, the least significant bit of the y coordinate has the sequence YXXY XYYX XYYX YXXY. It will be noted that the least significant bits are appropriately palindromic or complementary palindromic.

The rule for derivation of the higher order cases is therefore.

1. The sequence of all but the least significant bit are those of the previous order, each entry being replicated four times.

2. The sequence of the least significant bit consists of groups of four sub-sequences, each taking the form ABBA.

3. The first sub-sequence of the nth group of four is the same as the nth sub-sequence.

4. A can be X or Y or X or Y. If A is X then B is Y and vice versa.

5. The first sub-sequence of x is X if the order is odd and Y if it is even, and vice versa for y.

6. X and Y are the x and y sequences of the first order case.

Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US2222934 *12 Oct 193826 Nov 1940Emi LtdTelevision transmitting and receiving system
US2899495 *1 Feb 195511 Ago 1959 ml output
US2911463 *30 Dic 19573 Nov 1959Bell Telephone Labor IncHigh resolution scanning system
US3200195 *12 May 196110 Ago 1965Marconi Co LtdTelevision systems
US3309461 *1 Ago 196214 Mar 1967Battelle Development CorpPseudo-random electron beam scanning system for narrow bandwidth image transmission
US3342937 *2 Dic 196619 Sep 1967Battelle Development CorpSynchronizing of electron beam scanning in a narrow bandwidth pseudorandom dot scan television system
US3499980 *4 May 196710 Mar 1970IttSequential dot interlace system and method for television
US3792196 *23 Jun 197212 Feb 1974Licentia GmbhPicture transmission system
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US4982283 *6 May 19881 Ene 1991General Electric CompanyLine-sequential pyramid processing of a plurality of raster-scanned image variables
US5268994 *30 Ene 19917 Dic 1993Societe Nationale Elf Aquitaine (Production)Method of plotting surfaces in a 3D volume
US5444491 *6 Dic 199422 Ago 1995Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyTelevision system with multiple transmission formats
US5453792 *18 Mar 199426 Sep 1995Prime Image, Inc.Double video standards converter
US5519438 *30 Jun 199421 May 1996Intel CorporationComputer with a video subsystem that contains timers which are used to create calibration tables correlating time intervals with the decoding and converting of video input signals
US5557318 *7 Jul 199517 Sep 1996Koninklijke Ptt Nederland N.V.Method and apparatus for permitting a viewer to scan through a plurality of video signals provided by a transmitter
US5602943 *7 Nov 199411 Feb 1997Velho; Luiz C.Digital halftoning space filling curves
US5680172 *14 Feb 199421 Oct 1997Video Post & Transfer, Inc.Consecutive frame scanning of cinematographic film
US5737448 *15 Jun 19957 Abr 1998Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for low bit rate image compression
US5771073 *7 Jun 199523 Jun 1998Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyAdvanced television system using a different encoding technique for non-image areas
US5920359 *19 May 19976 Jul 1999International Business Machines CorporationVideo encoding method, system and computer program product for optimizing center of picture quality
US5982386 *1 Abr 19979 Nov 1999Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd.Image boundary correction by fractal processing
US6038573 *4 Abr 199714 Mar 2000Avid Technology, Inc.News story markup language and system and process for editing and processing documents
US6091446 *31 Mar 199718 Jul 2000Walker; Bradley WilliamConsecutive frame scanning of cinematographic film
US6141007 *4 Abr 199731 Oct 2000Avid Technology, Inc.Newsroom user interface including multiple panel workspaces
US6211869 *27 May 19993 Abr 2001Avid Technology, Inc.Simultaneous storage and network transmission of multimedia data with video host that requests stored data according to response time from a server
US6211889 *30 Jun 19983 Abr 2001Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for visualizing locality within an address space
US63175153 Abr 199813 Nov 2001Avid Technology, Inc.Method and apparatus for encoding and decoding a data stream using inferential techniques
US6473122 *6 Dic 199929 Oct 2002Hemanth G. KanekalMethod and apparatus to capture high resolution images using low resolution sensors and optical spatial image sampling
US6628846 *5 Feb 200130 Sep 2003Intel CorporationCreating a linearized data structure for ordering images based on their attributes
US680969217 Oct 200226 Oct 2004Advanced Automotive Antennas, S.L.Advanced multilevel antenna for motor vehicles
US68705071 Ago 200322 Mar 2005Fractus S.A.Miniature broadband ring-like microstrip patch antenna
US693719123 Abr 200230 Ago 2005Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US693720615 Oct 200330 Ago 2005Fractus, S.A.Dual-band dual-polarized antenna array
US701586812 Oct 200421 Mar 2006Fractus, S.A.Multilevel Antennae
US70165535 Mar 200321 Mar 2006Intel CorporationLinearized data structure ordering images based on their attributes
US70792891 Oct 200118 Jul 2006Xerox CorporationRank-order error diffusion image processing
US71232088 Abr 200517 Oct 2006Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US714885020 Abr 200512 Dic 2006Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US716438616 Jun 200516 Ene 2007Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US720281813 Abr 200410 Abr 2007Fractus, S.A.Multifrequency microstrip patch antenna with parasitic coupled elements
US720282212 Jul 200510 Abr 2007Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US721528713 Abr 20048 May 2007Fractus S.A.Multiband antenna
US725091812 Nov 200431 Jul 2007Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US731276213 Abr 200425 Dic 2007Fractus, S.A.Loaded antenna
US739443217 Oct 20061 Jul 2008Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antenna
US739743112 Jul 20058 Jul 2008Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US74399236 Feb 200721 Oct 2008Fractus, S.A.Multiband antenna
US750500717 Oct 200617 Mar 2009Fractus, S.A.Multi-level antennae
US751167524 Abr 200331 Mar 2009Advanced Automotive Antennas, S.L.Antenna system for a motor vehicle
US752878220 Jul 20075 May 2009Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US75419973 Jul 20072 Jun 2009Fractus, S.A.Loaded antenna
US755449015 Mar 200730 Jun 2009Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US755776816 May 20077 Jul 2009Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US778226914 Nov 200524 Ago 2010Fractus, S.A.Antenna structure for a wireless device with a ground plane shaped as a loop
US77915393 Nov 20067 Sep 2010Fractus, S.A.Radio-frequency system in package including antenna
US792009722 Ago 20085 Abr 2011Fractus, S.A.Multiband antenna
US79242261 Sep 200512 Abr 2011Fractus, S.A.Tunable antenna
US79328702 Jun 200926 Abr 2011Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US800911110 Mar 200930 Ago 2011Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US807711012 Jul 201013 Dic 2011Fractus, S.A.Antenna structure for a wireless device with a ground plane shaped as a loop
US815446228 Feb 201110 Abr 2012Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US81544639 Mar 201110 Abr 2012Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US820348829 Sep 200819 Jun 2012Fractus, S.A.Integrated circuit package including miniature antenna
US820349231 Jul 200919 Jun 2012Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device
US82078936 Jul 200926 Jun 2012Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US821272631 Dic 20083 Jul 2012Fractus, SaSpace-filling miniature antennas
US822824522 Oct 201024 Jul 2012Fractus, S.A.Multiband antenna
US822825610 Mar 201124 Jul 2012Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US823761531 Jul 20097 Ago 2012Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device capable of operation in multiple frequency regions
US82536336 Ene 201028 Ago 2012Fractus, S.A.Multi-band monopole antenna for a mobile communications device
US825901617 Feb 20114 Sep 2012Fractus, S.A.Multi-band monopole antenna for a mobile communications device
US833025922 Jul 200511 Dic 2012Fractus, S.A.Antenna in package with reduced electromagnetic interaction with on chip elements
US83306592 Mar 201211 Dic 2012Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US842168628 Jul 201016 Abr 2013Fractus, S.A.Radio-frequency system in package including antenna
US845636513 Ago 20084 Jun 2013Fractus, S.A.Multi-band monopole antennas for mobile communications devices
US84717723 Feb 201125 Jun 2013Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US849328027 Oct 201123 Jul 2013Fractus, S.A.Antenna structure for a wireless device with a ground plane shaped as a loop
US853133712 May 200610 Sep 2013Fractus, S.A.Antenna diversity system and slot antenna component
US85587419 Mar 201115 Oct 2013Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US86106272 Mar 201117 Dic 2013Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US867488724 Jul 201218 Mar 2014Fractus, S.A.Multi-band monopole antenna for a mobile communications device
US872374226 Jun 201213 May 2014Fractus, S.A.Multiband antenna
US873649722 Jun 201227 May 2014Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device capable of operation in multiple frequency regions
US873810321 Dic 200627 May 2014Fractus, S.A.Multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices
US889649322 Jun 201225 Nov 2014Fractus, S.A.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US89415412 Ene 201327 Ene 2015Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US895285531 Ene 201310 Feb 2015Fractus, S.A.Wireless device capable of multiband MIMO operation
US89760692 Ene 201310 Mar 2015Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US90009852 Ene 20137 Abr 2015Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US905441824 Jun 20139 Jun 2015Fractus, S.A.Antenna structure for a wireless device with a ground plane shaped as a loop
US90544212 Ene 20139 Jun 2015Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US907707318 May 20127 Jul 2015Fractus, S.A.Integrated circuit package including miniature antenna
US90997737 Abr 20144 Ago 2015Fractus, S.A.Multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices
US911228423 Dic 201418 Ago 2015Fractus, S.A.Wireless device capable of multiband MIMO operation
US913025921 May 20128 Sep 2015Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device
US914792918 Jul 201229 Sep 2015Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device comprising one or more bodies
US924063227 Jun 201319 Ene 2016Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US927630712 Jun 20151 Mar 2016Fractus Antennas, S.L.Antennaless wireless device
US93313823 Oct 20133 May 2016Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US935007021 Abr 201424 May 2016Fractus Antennas, S.L.Antennaless wireless device capable of operation in multiple frequency regions
US936261713 Ago 20157 Jun 2016Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US975531414 Mar 20115 Sep 2017Fractus S.A.Loaded antenna
US976193425 Abr 201612 Sep 2017Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US976194422 Ene 201612 Sep 2017Fractus Antennas, S.L.Antennaless wireless device
US97619488 Jun 201512 Sep 2017Fractus, S.A.Integrated circuit package including miniature antenna
US20020140615 *18 Mar 20023 Oct 2002Carles Puente BaliardaMultilevel antennae
US20020171601 *23 Abr 200221 Nov 2002Carles Puente BaliardaInterlaced multiband antenna arrays
US20030090729 *1 Oct 200115 May 2003Xerox CorporationRank-order error diffusion image processing
US20030112190 *17 Oct 200219 Jun 2003Baliarda Carles PuenteAdvanced multilevel antenna for motor vehicles
US20030174905 *5 Mar 200318 Sep 2003Craver Scott A.Linearized data structure ordering images based on their attributes
US20040119644 *24 Abr 200324 Jun 2004Carles Puente-BaliardaAntenna system for a motor vehicle
US20040145526 *15 Oct 200329 Jul 2004Carles Puente BaliardaDual-band dual-polarized antenna array
US20040210482 *13 Abr 200421 Oct 2004Tetsuhiko KeneakiGift certificate, gift certificate, issuing system, gift certificate using system
US20040257285 *13 Abr 200423 Dic 2004Quintero Lllera RamiroMultiband antenna
US20050146481 *12 Nov 20047 Jul 2005Baliarda Carles P.Interlaced multiband antenna arrays
US20050190106 *13 Abr 20041 Sep 2005Jaume Anguera ProsMultifrequency microstrip patch antenna with parasitic coupled elements
US20050231427 *16 Jun 200520 Oct 2005Carles Puente BaliardaSpace-filling miniature antennas
US20050264453 *12 Jul 20051 Dic 2005Baliarda Carles PSpace-filling miniature antennas
US20060077101 *13 Abr 200413 Abr 2006Carles Puente BaliardaLoaded antenna
US20070120742 *3 Nov 200631 May 2007Fractus, S.A.Radio-frequency system in package including antenna
US20070132658 *6 Feb 200714 Jun 2007Ramiro Quintero IlleraMultiband antenna
US20070152886 *15 Mar 20075 Jul 2007Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US20070194992 *17 Oct 200623 Ago 2007Fractus, S.A.Multi-level antennae
US20070252773 *14 Nov 20051 Nov 2007Fractus, S.A.Antenna Structure for a Wireless Device with a Ground Plane Shaped as a Loop
US20080018543 *21 Dic 200624 Ene 2008Carles Puente BaliardaMultiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices
US20080042909 *20 Jul 200721 Feb 2008Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US20080062049 *1 Sep 200513 Mar 2008Fractus, S.A.Tunable Antenna
US20080198082 *12 May 200621 Ago 2008Fractus, S.A.Antenna Diversity System and Slot Antenna Component
US20080265038 *22 Jul 200530 Oct 2008Fractus, S.A.Antenna in Package with Reduced Electromagnetic Interaction with on Chip Elements
US20090033561 *13 Ago 20085 Feb 2009Jaume Anguera ProsMulti-band monopole antennas for mobile communications devices
US20090085810 *29 Sep 20082 Abr 2009Fractus, S.A.Integrated circuit package including miniature antenna
US20090109101 *31 Dic 200830 Abr 2009Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US20090237316 *24 Abr 200924 Sep 2009Carles Puente BaliardaLoaded antenna
US20090267863 *2 Jun 200929 Oct 2009Carles Puente BaliardaInterlaced multiband antenna arrays
US20090303134 *6 Jul 200910 Dic 2009Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US20100123642 *6 Ene 201020 May 2010Alfonso SanzMulti-band monopole antenna for a mobile communications device
US20100176999 *31 Jul 200915 Jul 2010Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device capable of operation in multiple frequency regions
US20100188300 *31 Jul 200929 Jul 2010Fractus, S.A.Antennaless wireless device
US20100302122 *12 Jul 20102 Dic 2010Jordi Soler CastanyAntenna structure for a wireless device with a ground plane shaped as a loop
US20100328185 *28 Jul 201030 Dic 2010Jordi Soler CastanyRadio-frequency system in package including antenna
US20110163923 *9 Mar 20117 Jul 2011Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US20110175777 *28 Feb 201121 Jul 2011Fractus, S.A.Multilevel antennae
US20110177839 *9 Mar 201121 Jul 2011Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US20110181478 *2 Mar 201128 Jul 2011Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
US20110181481 *3 Feb 201128 Jul 2011Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1538699A2 *19 Ene 20008 Jun 2005Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1538699A3 *19 Ene 20004 Ene 2006Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1592083A2 *19 Ene 20002 Nov 2005Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1592083A3 *19 Ene 200025 Ene 2006Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1699110A2 *19 Ene 20006 Sep 2006Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1699110A3 *19 Ene 200015 Nov 2006Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP1724874A3 *19 Ene 200025 Jul 2007Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
EP2267838A3 *19 Ene 20004 May 2011Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
WO2001054225A1 *19 Ene 200026 Jul 2001Fractus, S.A.Space-filling miniature antennas
Clasificaciones
Clasificación de EE.UU.348/441, 345/25, 365/23, 345/428, 348/325, 348/E03.051
Clasificación internacionalH04N7/01, H04N3/30
Clasificación cooperativaH04N3/30
Clasificación europeaH04N3/30
Eventos legales
FechaCódigoEventoDescripción
11 Ene 1988ASAssignment
Owner name: BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION, BROADCASTING HOU
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:DREWERY, JOHN O.;REEL/FRAME:004818/0342
Effective date: 19871023
Owner name: BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION,UNITED KINGDOM
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DREWERY, JOHN O.;REEL/FRAME:004818/0342
Effective date: 19871023
9 Oct 1992FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
27 Oct 1992RRRequest for reexamination filed
Effective date: 19920928
21 Dic 1993B1Reexamination certificate first reexamination
4 Feb 1997REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
29 Jun 1997LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
9 Sep 1997FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance fee
Effective date: 19970702