US5011516A - Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash - Google Patents

Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5011516A
US5011516A US07/432,068 US43206889A US5011516A US 5011516 A US5011516 A US 5011516A US 43206889 A US43206889 A US 43206889A US 5011516 A US5011516 A US 5011516A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
combustion gases
flue
minor amount
gases
catalytic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US07/432,068
Inventor
Ralph A. Altman
John P. Gooch
Edward B. Dismukes
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Electric Power Research Institute Inc
Original Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Electric Power Research Institute Inc filed Critical Electric Power Research Institute Inc
Priority to US07/432,068 priority Critical patent/US5011516A/en
Assigned to ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., A CORP. OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA reassignment ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., A CORP. OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: DISMUKES, EDWARD B., GOOCH, JOHN P., ALTMAN, RALPH A.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5011516A publication Critical patent/US5011516A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03CMAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/01Pretreatment of the gases prior to electrostatic precipitation
    • B03C3/013Conditioning by chemical additives, e.g. with SO3

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to an improved method for conditioning combustion gas for removal of particulates using electrostatic precipitation.
  • the fly ash is conventionally removed from combustion gases by electrostatic precipitation wherein the surface resistivity of the ash is reduced for efficient precipitation.
  • a high sulfur-content fuel such as high sulfur-content coal
  • SO X and in particular SO 3 sulfur-containing gases
  • the concentration of sulfur-containing gases (SO X and in particular SO 3 ) in the combustion gas will usually be sufficient to reduce the resistivity of the fly ash to a level at which the electrostatic precipitator can efficiently function (usually about 5 ⁇ 10 10 ohm-cm).
  • SO X and SO 3 sulfur-containing gases
  • One of the methods of making sulfur trioxide is to add ammonium sulfate into the flue system at a temperature above approximately 700° F., where the additive is thermally decomposed to form SO 3 , ammonia and water.
  • the formation of ammonia then creates a different environmental problem.
  • Ammonia may be removed by treating the flue gas with a catalyst which converts ammonia to nitrogen gas.
  • the catalyst design has two preferred configurations. The first is a collection of parallel hollow tubes separated by spacers. The second is a honeycomb with parallel passages which can be triangular, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, etc., or round.
  • a method is provided to enhance the removal of particulates from a combustion gas by electrostatic precipitation.
  • the improvement comprises the step of withdrawing from a location upstream of the electrostatic precipitator a minor amount of the total volume of the combustion gases entering the flue, including the particulates associated with that minor amount of combustion gases, contacting the minor amount of combustion gases and associated particulates with catalytic means to convert SO 2 to SO 3 ; and mixing the remainder of the minor amount of withdrawn combustion gases and the SO 3 with the main stream of combustion gases and subjecting the mixture to electrostatic precipitation.
  • the catalytic means is disposed within a passage substantially parallel to the flow of the main stream whereby particulates freely flow through the passage without substantially interfering with the catalytic conversion of SO 2 to SO 3 .
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a combustor flue system, electrostatic precipitator and stack showing the principles in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2A is a view of a module
  • FIG. 2B is a detailed view of tubes which comprise the module.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a second preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 3A is a view of a module
  • FIG. 3B is a detailed view of the rectangularly-shaped honeycomb which comprises the module.
  • sulfur trioxide In a typical combustor which burns coal, essentially the entire sulfur content of the coal, which may vary from less than 1% to over 6% of the coal, is oxidized to sulfur dioxide during combustion. Usually 1.0% or less of the sulfur dioxide is further oxidized to sulfur trioxide.
  • the sulfur trioxide combines with the entrained moisture to form sulfuric acid which, in turn, adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles as the flue gases cool.
  • the sulfuric acid which adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles determines the electrical resistivity of the particles and thus the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation in the precipitator.
  • Most precipitators are designed to receive flue gases at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F. However, when the sulfur content of the coal being used is too low, there is insufficient sulfur trioxide in the combustion gases to reduce the electrical resistivity of the particles. Therefore sulfur trioxide may be injected into the flue stream from an external system.
  • the present invention is particularly useful for the conditioning of combustion gas produced by the combustion of low-to-medium-sulfur-content coal.
  • the fuel is burned within the combustor 10 and the combustion gases are directed into the flue system.
  • a portion of the flue gases is withdrawn through conduit 14.
  • Preferably about 1-5% of the total volume of gases entering the flue is withdrawn through the conduit 14 at a point at which the flue gases are in temperature range of approximately about 750°-900° F.
  • the major portion of the flue gas continues through the flue system where it is passed through air heater 16 and then into the electrostatic precipitator 12 at the optimum temperature for precipitation of fly ash of about 250°-400° F.
  • the path of the minor amount of withdrawn flue gases directed through conduit 14 is passed through a series of parallel airflow passages 20 which are lined with a catalytic material for converting SO 2 to SO 3 .
  • a catalytic material for converting SO 2 to SO 3 .
  • Such catalysts can contain vanadium pentoxide with an alkali modifier such as K 2 O, or the lining can contain other conventional catalysts used for the conversion of SO 2 to SO 3 in the presence of combustion gases and moisture.
  • the parallel flow-through passages 20 are of the hollow-tube or honeycomb type, preferably as described earlier and illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, and allow for passage therethrough of gases and particulates without fouling of the catalytic material which lines or is incorporated in the walls of the passages.
  • the withdrawn combustion gases and the SO 3 produced by catalytic conversion at passages 20 are then reintroduced into the main flue stream at injectors 22.
  • the SO 3 produced at the passages 20, when admixed with the main flue gases, is sufficient to raise the level of SO 3 within the flue to thereby enhance the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation of fly ash in the precipitator 12.
  • the mixture of gases just prior to being introduced into the precipitator 12 are at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a perspective view of a preferred configuration of the parallel passage catalysts which may comprise passages 20 in FIG. 1.
  • the catalyst configuration may be in the form of a module 30 into which are stacked a series of hollow parallel tubes 32 having the catalytic material on the inner surfaces thereof.
  • the module 30 is not completely filled with tubes 32, however, the module 30 will in actual use be tightly packed with tubes 32.
  • FIG. 2B there is shown a closeup view of a portion of the module 30.
  • the tubes 32 as shown need not be circular in cross-section but may assume other shapes, such as octagonal, hexagonal, etc. Most particularly preferred are the dimensions of tubes 32 such that the minimum diameter X (or other minimum dimension of opposing surfaces containing catalytic material) should be greater than about 0.25 inches.
  • each of the passages 20 of FIG. 1 comprising a module 40 wherein each of the passages is defined by walls 42 in a honeycomb structure whereby the walls form the passages.
  • the minimum dimension Y between opposing surfaces containing catalytic material should be at least about 0.25 inches.
  • the catalytic material will line both sides of each of the walls 42.
  • the present invention is particularly useful for enhancing SO 3 content in combustion gases which contain less than 0.1% sulfur oxide and less than 5 ppm sulfur trioxide.
  • Suitable means for injecting of the sulfur trioxide containing gas into the flue gas streams at 22 are known in the art.
  • conduit 14 may be equipped with a suitable control means programmed to respond to the SO 2 and/or SO 3 content of the combustion gases to regulate the volume of gases which are withdrawn for treatment with the catalyst.
  • the control means may respond to the flow rate of flue gas in the flue, the level of combustor operation or the efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator as determined by the opacity of the flue gas exiting the precipitator.

Abstract

A method is provided for improving the electrostatic precipitation of particulates, i.e., from combustion gases by withdrawing part of the flue gases, catalytically converting the SO2 to SO3 and reinjecting it into the main flue stream.

Description

The present invention is directed to an improved method for conditioning combustion gas for removal of particulates using electrostatic precipitation. The fly ash is conventionally removed from combustion gases by electrostatic precipitation wherein the surface resistivity of the ash is reduced for efficient precipitation. If a high sulfur-content fuel, such as high sulfur-content coal, is used in the combustor, the concentration of sulfur-containing gases (SOX and in particular SO3) in the combustion gas will usually be sufficient to reduce the resistivity of the fly ash to a level at which the electrostatic precipitator can efficiently function (usually about 5×1010 ohm-cm). However, if the coal used as fuel in the combustor produces combustion gases which contain less than approximately 0.1% of SOX (SO2 +SO3) then the flue gas needs to be augmented with sulfur trioxide (SO3).
One of the methods of making sulfur trioxide is to add ammonium sulfate into the flue system at a temperature above approximately 700° F., where the additive is thermally decomposed to form SO3, ammonia and water. However, the formation of ammonia then creates a different environmental problem. Ammonia may be removed by treating the flue gas with a catalyst which converts ammonia to nitrogen gas.
In Pat. No. 3,581,463, a portion of the flue gas is withdrawn, electrostatically cleaned to remove particulates, then passed through a catalyst chamber to convert sulfur dioxide contained in the flue gas to sulfur trioxide. Then the sulfur trioxide is returned to the main flue gas stream which passes through an electrostatic precipitator. A disadvantage of this method is that the portion of the withdrawn flue gases to be catalytically treated must first be cleaned of the particulate matter, to avoid fouling of the catalytic material.
It is thus an object of the present invention to provide a novel method of conditioning combustion gases by which the combustion gases are not first cleaned of particulate matter. Rather, a portion of the combustion gases is diverted into a slip stream where the gases particulate matter together pass through a catalyst with a particular design wherein a major portion of SO2 in the diverted gases is converted to SO3. The catalyst design has two preferred configurations. The first is a collection of parallel hollow tubes separated by spacers. The second is a honeycomb with parallel passages which can be triangular, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, etc., or round.
These and other objects will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments and from the accompanying figures and practice of the invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method is provided to enhance the removal of particulates from a combustion gas by electrostatic precipitation. The improvement comprises the step of withdrawing from a location upstream of the electrostatic precipitator a minor amount of the total volume of the combustion gases entering the flue, including the particulates associated with that minor amount of combustion gases, contacting the minor amount of combustion gases and associated particulates with catalytic means to convert SO2 to SO3 ; and mixing the remainder of the minor amount of withdrawn combustion gases and the SO3 with the main stream of combustion gases and subjecting the mixture to electrostatic precipitation. The catalytic means is disposed within a passage substantially parallel to the flow of the main stream whereby particulates freely flow through the passage without substantially interfering with the catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a combustor flue system, electrostatic precipitator and stack showing the principles in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 2A is a view of a module, and FIG. 2B is a detailed view of tubes which comprise the module.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a second preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 3A is a view of a module, and FIG. 3B is a detailed view of the rectangularly-shaped honeycomb which comprises the module.
SUMMARY OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In a typical combustor which burns coal, essentially the entire sulfur content of the coal, which may vary from less than 1% to over 6% of the coal, is oxidized to sulfur dioxide during combustion. Usually 1.0% or less of the sulfur dioxide is further oxidized to sulfur trioxide. The sulfur trioxide combines with the entrained moisture to form sulfuric acid which, in turn, adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles as the flue gases cool. The sulfuric acid which adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles determines the electrical resistivity of the particles and thus the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation in the precipitator. Most precipitators are designed to receive flue gases at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F. However, when the sulfur content of the coal being used is too low, there is insufficient sulfur trioxide in the combustion gases to reduce the electrical resistivity of the particles. Therefore sulfur trioxide may be injected into the flue stream from an external system.
The present invention is particularly useful for the conditioning of combustion gas produced by the combustion of low-to-medium-sulfur-content coal. Referring to FIG. 1, the fuel is burned within the combustor 10 and the combustion gases are directed into the flue system. At a point in the flue system upstream of the electrostatic precipitator 12 a portion of the flue gases is withdrawn through conduit 14. Preferably about 1-5% of the total volume of gases entering the flue is withdrawn through the conduit 14 at a point at which the flue gases are in temperature range of approximately about 750°-900° F. The major portion of the flue gas continues through the flue system where it is passed through air heater 16 and then into the electrostatic precipitator 12 at the optimum temperature for precipitation of fly ash of about 250°-400° F. The gases then exit the stack 18. The path of the minor amount of withdrawn flue gases directed through conduit 14 is passed through a series of parallel airflow passages 20 which are lined with a catalytic material for converting SO2 to SO3. Such catalysts can contain vanadium pentoxide with an alkali modifier such as K2 O, or the lining can contain other conventional catalysts used for the conversion of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of combustion gases and moisture. The parallel flow-through passages 20 are of the hollow-tube or honeycomb type, preferably as described earlier and illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, and allow for passage therethrough of gases and particulates without fouling of the catalytic material which lines or is incorporated in the walls of the passages. The withdrawn combustion gases and the SO3 produced by catalytic conversion at passages 20 are then reintroduced into the main flue stream at injectors 22. The SO3 produced at the passages 20, when admixed with the main flue gases, is sufficient to raise the level of SO3 within the flue to thereby enhance the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation of fly ash in the precipitator 12. Normally and conveniently, the mixture of gases just prior to being introduced into the precipitator 12 are at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F.
Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a perspective view of a preferred configuration of the parallel passage catalysts which may comprise passages 20 in FIG. 1. The catalyst configuration may be in the form of a module 30 into which are stacked a series of hollow parallel tubes 32 having the catalytic material on the inner surfaces thereof. As shown, the module 30 is not completely filled with tubes 32, however, the module 30 will in actual use be tightly packed with tubes 32. Referring to FIG. 2B, there is shown a closeup view of a portion of the module 30. The tubes 32 as shown need not be circular in cross-section but may assume other shapes, such as octagonal, hexagonal, etc. Most particularly preferred are the dimensions of tubes 32 such that the minimum diameter X (or other minimum dimension of opposing surfaces containing catalytic material) should be greater than about 0.25 inches.
Referring to FIG. 3 there is shown a second preferred embodiment of the passages 20 of FIG. 1 comprising a module 40 wherein each of the passages is defined by walls 42 in a honeycomb structure whereby the walls form the passages. In a particular preferred embodiment the minimum dimension Y between opposing surfaces containing catalytic material should be at least about 0.25 inches. As shown in FIG. 3B, the catalytic material will line both sides of each of the walls 42.
The present invention is particularly useful for enhancing SO3 content in combustion gases which contain less than 0.1% sulfur oxide and less than 5 ppm sulfur trioxide. Suitable means for injecting of the sulfur trioxide containing gas into the flue gas streams at 22 are known in the art.
It will be understood that various control features may be utilized in connection with the invention which are readily adaptable by those of ordinary skill in the art to the features in the apparatus disclosed herein. For example, conduit 14 may be equipped with a suitable control means programmed to respond to the SO2 and/or SO3 content of the combustion gases to regulate the volume of gases which are withdrawn for treatment with the catalyst. Alternatively, the control means may respond to the flow rate of flue gas in the flue, the level of combustor operation or the efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator as determined by the opacity of the flue gas exiting the precipitator.
The description hereinabove presents the preferred embodiment in accordance with the principle of the present invention; however, it is understood that various modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present invention is not intended to be limited, except by the scope of the following claims.

Claims (11)

What is claimed is:
1. A combustion gas conditioning method whereby particulates are removed from the main stream of combustion gases containing sulfur dioxide in a flue by electrostatic precipitation means, said method comprising the steps of withdrawing from a location upstream of said electrostatic precipitation means a minor amount of the total volume of said combustion gases entering said flue, including the particulates associated with said minor amount of combustion gases; contacting said minor amount of combustion gases and particulates associated therewith with catalytic means to convert SO2 contained therein to SO3 ; and mixing said minor amount of combustion gases and SO3 into said main stream of combustion gases and subjecting the mixture formed thereby to electrostatic precipitation; wherein said catalytic means is exposed to said combustion gases within an open gas flow passage whereby particulates freely flow therethrough without substantially interfering with the catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3 by said catalytic means.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said minor amount of combustion gases is removed at a temperature in the range of about 750°-900° F. from said flue gases.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein said combustion gases contain less than 0.1% by volume of SO2.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein said combustion gases and SO3 are remixed with said main stream of combustion gases at a temperature in the range of 250°-400° F.
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein said catalytic means comprises alkali-modified vanadium pentoxide.
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein the catalytic conversion efficiency of SO2 to SO3 by said catalytic means is greater or equal to 50%.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein said minor amount of combustion gases comprises from 1-5% by volume of the total combustion gases entering said flue.
8. A method according to claim 1 wherein said gas flow passages are substantially parallel.
9. A method according to claim 8 wherein said passages comprise hollow tubes.
10. A method according to claim 8 wherein said passages are formed by contiguous walls in a honeycomb configuration.
11. A method according to claim 9 or 10 wherein the minimum transverse dimension between opposing surfaces within each of said passages is at least about 0.25 inches.
US07/432,068 1989-11-06 1989-11-06 Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash Expired - Lifetime US5011516A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/432,068 US5011516A (en) 1989-11-06 1989-11-06 Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/432,068 US5011516A (en) 1989-11-06 1989-11-06 Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5011516A true US5011516A (en) 1991-04-30

Family

ID=23714625

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/432,068 Expired - Lifetime US5011516A (en) 1989-11-06 1989-11-06 Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US5011516A (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5196038A (en) * 1990-03-15 1993-03-23 Wright Robert A Flue gas conditioning system
US5240470A (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-08-31 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. In-duct flue gas conditioning system
WO1993019852A1 (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-10-14 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5261931A (en) * 1990-03-15 1993-11-16 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5288303A (en) * 1992-04-07 1994-02-22 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5350441A (en) * 1990-03-15 1994-09-27 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5356597A (en) * 1992-04-07 1994-10-18 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. In-duct flue gas conditioning system
US5370720A (en) * 1993-07-23 1994-12-06 Welhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
DE4410213C1 (en) * 1994-03-24 1995-08-31 Abb Management Ag Exhaust gas conditioning process
US5449390A (en) * 1994-03-08 1995-09-12 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system using vaporized sulfuric acid
US5538539A (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-07-23 Wahlco, Inc. Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
US5587138A (en) * 1991-12-18 1996-12-24 Austrian Energy & Environment, Sgp/Waagner-Biro Gmbh Process for preventing the formation of harmful organic substances and steam generator for carrying out the process
US5665142A (en) * 1994-04-12 1997-09-09 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system and method using native SO2 feedstock
DE19611332A1 (en) * 1996-03-22 1997-09-25 Abb Research Ltd Process for conditioning waste gas
US5678493A (en) * 1995-08-07 1997-10-21 Wilson Eugene Kelley Boiler flue gas conditioning system
US5862873A (en) * 1995-03-24 1999-01-26 Camco Drilling Group Limited Elements faced with superhard material
US5980610A (en) * 1997-09-25 1999-11-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Apparatus and method for improving electrostatic precipitator performance by plasma reactor conversion of SO2 to SO3
US20030143501A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-07-31 Ferrigan James J. Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
US20030182020A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-09-25 Electric Power Research Institute Sulfur trioxide conditioning system control algorithm
US20050178303A1 (en) * 2004-02-14 2005-08-18 Higgins Brian S. Method for in-furnace reduction and control of sulfur trioxide
US20080036275A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-14 Hall David R Retainer Sleeve in a Degradation Assembly
WO2007035949A3 (en) * 2005-09-23 2008-03-13 Mecs Inc Ruthenium oxide catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide
US20120058035A1 (en) * 2010-09-06 2012-03-08 Krigmont Henry V System and Method for Flue Gas Conditioning

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581463A (en) * 1967-10-26 1971-06-01 Cottrell Res Inc Electrostatic gas cleaning
US3689213A (en) * 1970-02-19 1972-09-05 Salvatore A Guerrieri Process for treating flue gases
US3993429A (en) * 1974-10-29 1976-11-23 Wahlco, Inc. Gas conditioning means
US4770674A (en) * 1984-08-06 1988-09-13 Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581463A (en) * 1967-10-26 1971-06-01 Cottrell Res Inc Electrostatic gas cleaning
US3689213A (en) * 1970-02-19 1972-09-05 Salvatore A Guerrieri Process for treating flue gases
US3993429A (en) * 1974-10-29 1976-11-23 Wahlco, Inc. Gas conditioning means
US3993429B1 (en) * 1974-10-29 1992-01-14 Wahlco Int
US4770674A (en) * 1984-08-06 1988-09-13 Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator
US4770674B1 (en) * 1984-08-06 1992-07-28 Wilhelm Env Tech Inc
US4770674B2 (en) * 1984-08-06 1993-01-19 Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5350441A (en) * 1990-03-15 1994-09-27 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5196038A (en) * 1990-03-15 1993-03-23 Wright Robert A Flue gas conditioning system
US5261931A (en) * 1990-03-15 1993-11-16 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5587138A (en) * 1991-12-18 1996-12-24 Austrian Energy & Environment, Sgp/Waagner-Biro Gmbh Process for preventing the formation of harmful organic substances and steam generator for carrying out the process
US5547495A (en) * 1992-04-07 1996-08-20 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
WO1993019852A1 (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-10-14 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5288303A (en) * 1992-04-07 1994-02-22 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5356597A (en) * 1992-04-07 1994-10-18 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. In-duct flue gas conditioning system
US5288309A (en) * 1992-04-07 1994-02-22 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning agent demand control apparatus
US5240470A (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-08-31 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. In-duct flue gas conditioning system
US5370720A (en) * 1993-07-23 1994-12-06 Welhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
US5449390A (en) * 1994-03-08 1995-09-12 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system using vaporized sulfuric acid
DE4410213C1 (en) * 1994-03-24 1995-08-31 Abb Management Ag Exhaust gas conditioning process
US5665142A (en) * 1994-04-12 1997-09-09 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system and method using native SO2 feedstock
US5538539A (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-07-23 Wahlco, Inc. Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
US5540755A (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-07-30 Wahlco, Inc Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
EP0723804A1 (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-07-31 Wahlco, Inc. Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
US5862873A (en) * 1995-03-24 1999-01-26 Camco Drilling Group Limited Elements faced with superhard material
US5678493A (en) * 1995-08-07 1997-10-21 Wilson Eugene Kelley Boiler flue gas conditioning system
DE19611332A1 (en) * 1996-03-22 1997-09-25 Abb Research Ltd Process for conditioning waste gas
US5980610A (en) * 1997-09-25 1999-11-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Apparatus and method for improving electrostatic precipitator performance by plasma reactor conversion of SO2 to SO3
US20030182020A1 (en) * 2001-12-06 2003-09-25 Electric Power Research Institute Sulfur trioxide conditioning system control algorithm
US7078235B2 (en) 2001-12-06 2006-07-18 Electric Power Research Institute Sulfur trioxide conditioning system control algorithm
US20030143501A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-07-31 Ferrigan James J. Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
US20050178303A1 (en) * 2004-02-14 2005-08-18 Higgins Brian S. Method for in-furnace reduction and control of sulfur trioxide
WO2007035949A3 (en) * 2005-09-23 2008-03-13 Mecs Inc Ruthenium oxide catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide
US20080226540A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2008-09-18 Mecs, Inc. Ruthenium Oxide Catalysts for Conversion of Sulfur Dioxide to Sulfur Trioxide
US7740827B2 (en) 2005-09-23 2010-06-22 Mecs, Inc. Ruthenium oxide catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide
US20080036275A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-14 Hall David R Retainer Sleeve in a Degradation Assembly
US20120058035A1 (en) * 2010-09-06 2012-03-08 Krigmont Henry V System and Method for Flue Gas Conditioning
US8449653B2 (en) * 2010-09-06 2013-05-28 Henry Krigmont System and method for flue gas conditioning

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5011516A (en) Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash
CA2622064C (en) Method of removing sulfur trioxide from a flue gas stream
US6605263B2 (en) Sulfur dioxide removal using ammonia
US5525317A (en) Ammonia reagent application for NOX SOX and particulate emission control
US5403568A (en) Horizontal wet scrubbing apparatus and method for removing sulfur dioxide from a gaseous stream
US5670122A (en) Methods for removing air pollutants from combustion flue gas
CN204574069U (en) Coal fired power plant minimum discharge environmental protection island system
DE68919505T2 (en) Catalyst filter, method for producing a catalyst filter and method for treating combustion gases with a catalyst filter.
JPS5911329B2 (en) How to remove nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides from exhaust gas
WO1989009184A1 (en) Method for baghouse brown plume pollution control
US4670238A (en) Recycled sorbent flue gas desulfurization
CN109647158A (en) A kind of circulating fluidized bed boiler flue gas desulfurization and denitrification system and its processing method
Nihalani et al. Emission control technologies for thermal power plants
US4615871A (en) Flue gas desulfurization process
MX9703098A (en) Improved acid gas emission control.
Altman et al. Catalytic oxidation of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of fly ash, in
KR102048537B1 (en) Wet flue gas desulfurization apparatus
CN206613360U (en) A kind of smoke eliminator of coal-burning boiler
JPH0366006B2 (en)
US5524557A (en) Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning
RU1783989C (en) Method of removing sulfur oxides from flue gases
JPS583730B2 (en) Exhaust gas treatment method
CN211837254U (en) Integrated treatment equipment for treating coke oven flue gas
CA2210574A1 (en) Method for removing sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from combustion gases
Mathias Air Quality Control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., A CORP. O

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:ALTMAN, RALPH A.;GOOCH, JOHN P.;DISMUKES, EDWARD B.;REEL/FRAME:005204/0153;SIGNING DATES FROM 19891121 TO 19891127

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HLDR NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENT STAT AS NONPROFIT ORG (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LSM3); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY