|Número de publicación||US5682540 A|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Número de solicitud||US 08/352,327|
|Fecha de publicación||28 Oct 1997|
|Fecha de presentación||8 Dic 1994|
|Fecha de prioridad||22 Abr 1993|
|También publicado como||CA2121848A1, CA2121848C, DE69430081D1, DE69430081T2, EP0621721A2, EP0621721A3, EP0621721B1|
|Número de publicación||08352327, 352327, US 5682540 A, US 5682540A, US-A-5682540, US5682540 A, US5682540A|
|Inventores||Leigh L. Klotz, Jr., Ramana B. Rao, Walter A. L. Johnson, M. Margaret Withgott|
|Cesionario original||Xerox Corporation|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (31), Citada por (178), Clasificaciones (15), Eventos legales (5)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/052,088, filed Apr. 22, 1993 now abandoned.
The present invention relates in general to the creation and use of document summary sheets and, in particular, to document summary sheets that have a machine readable code that indicate the associated document in a storage area.
Prior to the advent of computer-based systems, paper was the primary medium of office communication. Reports were manually typed and filed away in filing cabinets. If duplicates were required, carbon paper copies were made. Interoffice communication was conducted primarily by way of written notes. These notes would merge with outside mail delivered by the Post Office in office "mail rooms" for subsequent distribution.
The introduction of copiers helped to automate some office work. For example, copiers obviated the need to manually type carbon copies to obtain copies of documents. This incremental increase in automation did not, however, diminish the reliance of paper as the primary medium of communication in the office. In fact, copiers made the wide distribution of documents easy; which, in turn, increased the volume of paper consumed in the office.
The nature of office work has changed considerably since the introduction of computer systems. Many office functions, such as wordprocessing, information management, form processing, and interoffice communications, have become streamlined due to the use of automated systems. Computer systems, in some cases, have succeeded in decreasing the amount of paper consumed in the office. For example, many interoffice communications occur on electronic mail systems. Unwanted communications may then be written and disposed of without the use of paper.
With the increasing use of electronic media, the demise of paper as a communication medium seemed plausible. However, the promise of the "paperless" office has not yet come to pass. This fact underlies the basic truth that both paper and electronic media have opposite strengths and weaknesses as communication media.
Among its disadvantages, paper is, in some respects, inflexible. For example, inscriptions written on paper are fixed and cannot be moved around. Additionally, paper is passive. Words cannot be automatically rearranged within paragraphs nor can misspellings be automatically detected and corrected. Large, paper documents are cumbersome and difficult to transport, as compared to files stored and transported on a floppy disk or transmitted electronically. These qualities are exactly the strengths that electronic media possess.
Among its advantages, paper is relatively cheap to manufacture, as compared with the computer systems needed to replace it. Paper is also easy to use. Putting pen to paper does not require any specialized knowledge beyond the penmanship skills taught at a very early age. A person using paper need only be concerned with the task at hand. By contrast, a person performing wordprocessing, for example, requires some knowledge about the operating system and specific application software. Such knowledge is not directly related to the immediate task. These advantages make it unlikely that paper will be completely replaced by electronic media.
Currently, there is interest in combining the relative strengths of paper and electronic media for the purposes of creating a more integrated medium. The fundamental idea is to allow paper to be used as an active interface into an electronic system. In one such application, paper forms are marked by the user in the usual fashion with pen or pencil. Those forms are subsequently scanned by the system. The scanned image can then be interpreted by the system as data, machine instructions, or other information. Such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,980 issued to Johnson et al. on Oct. 29, 1991 and assigned to Xerox Corporation. This patent is hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
This system, however, does not address the problem of reducing the amount of paper still being used in today's offices. In fact, far from eliminating paper, electronic media can add to the amount of paper generated in the office place. "Junk" faxes and mail generated from computer data bases clog mail rooms. Wordprocessors and copiers allow users to quickly and easily generate multiple copies of reports and notes. As a result, the potential exists for offices and users of these systems to drown in a sea of paper. Thus, a need has arisen to control and manage this "paper blizzard".
One way of reducing paper usage has been to summarize lengthy, original documents. With a summary, users may decide whether they want to see the original document or not without having to print its entirety. Summaries have been in common use for some time. Prior to the advent of automated systems, individuals read documents and summarized their contents.
Since then, various methods of automatically generating summaries have become known in the art. Today, artificially intelligent programs exist which extract and summarize semantic meanings from stored text files. These programs may also be used as back-end processes to optical character recognition systems that discern text from a scanned image.
Further, novel methods have been described that discern semantic and other kinds of meanings from document images without the necessity for decoding the image to text characters. These methods are described in several copending and cross-referenced U.S. patent applications, all filed on Nov. 19, 1991 and assigned to Xerox Corporation. These applications are U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 07/794,543; 07/794,555; 07/795,419 and 07/794,191 to Withgott et al.; 07/795,174 to Huttenlocher et al,; and 07/794,190 to Bloomberg et al. These applications are hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
Summaries and methods for creating them, however, fail to address the need to bridge the gap between the paper world and the electronic world. In short, these summaries are useful only to human users. It would be desirable to combine the strengths of both paper and electronic media to create a system that decreases the amount of paper generated while, simultaneously, allowing the user to use paper as an active interface into electronic media. One way of achieving this goal would be to create document surrogates that may incorporate summaries that are as useful to automated systems as they are to humans.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a novel form and a method of creating and using such a form that may reduce the amount of paper generated by automated systems used in the ordinary course of business.
It is further an object of the present invention to allow this novel form to be read and interpreted by the electronic system; thereby, providing additional integration between paper media and electronic media.
In summary, the present invention involves a novel form and methods for creating and using such forms. These forms are surrogates of associated objects such as original document, processes, or their copies, stored in a document processing system. A document surrogate made in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises at least one sheet of a information storing substrate material (commonly paper) that has a human readable area and a machine readable area. The human readable area may contain at least one area of material which summarizes the original document. This human usable summary may either be made manually by the user or created automatically by the document processing system or may be left blank according to the needs of the user.
The machine readable area comprises a document reference code that is readable and recognizable by the document processing system. The code is located and recognized from the image of the surrogate. The reference code encodes an indicator to its associated object. Upon encountering a document surrogate, the system interprets the surrogate to be the equivalent of its associated object and uses the indicator to access the appropriate object. A mechanism may be provided to the system to disable this equivalence. If disabled, the system would treat the document surrogate like a typical page in a document. Alternatively, the system could normally recognize and process a document surrogate as a typical page unless the equivalence was enabled.
One advantage of the present invention is that the user can condense a large document into a one page surrogate which can be physically or electronically stored or distributed in lieu of the original document.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the document surrogate may provide the user with a sufficient memory jog to allow the user to decide whether the information the user desires is contained within the original document.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the document surrogate is an integral part of a larger paper-based user interface because the document surrogate can be recognized as the symbolic equivalent of an original document stored in a document processing system.
Another advantage of the present invention is that the amount of paper used by such a system is decreased. As one example, a document surrogate can be automatically generated by the document processing system in response to an incoming facsimile message. A user may decide to discard any unwanted fax messages without having to print out the entire fax message. Another way to reduce paper usage is by distributing document surrogates among users instead of documents. Users may then decide whether they would like the original document in its entirety.
Another advantage of the present invention is portability. For example, a user need only carry document surrogates, instead of entire documents, to a remote location. The document surrogates can then be scanned and transmitted to the document processing system via a remote facsimile transmission or other transmission means. The document processing system may locate and transmit the original document from the machine readable indicator provided in the document surrogate.
Another advantage of the present invention is that a sheet of paper can be used to provide a catalog listing of multiple documents stored in the document processing system.
Additional objects and features of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The purpose and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description in conjunction with the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a high level block diagram of a document processing system that reads and recognizes document surrogates.
FIGS. 2A-2C are various preferred embodiments of document surrogates made in accordance with the principles of the present invention. The document surrogates vary according to the content and manner in which the human readable summaries are generated.
FIG. 3 depicts a typical use of document surrogates for the remote or local distribution of a document pointed by the document surrogate.
FIG. 4 depicts the use of the present invention as a document catalog.
FIG. 5 depicts a document surrogate which points at a process as opposed to a static document stored in the document processing system.
FIG. 6 depicts a way of retrieving an entire document from any page of the document embedded with a document surrogate code.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Referring to FIG. 1, document processing system 10 which can read and recognize document surrogates is depicted. System 10 comprises both hardware and software components. The hardware components comprising system 10 are central processing unit (CPU) 12, storage area 14, input terminal 16, and output terminal 18. Input terminal 16 is generically labeled and encompasses a wide variety of such devices. These input devices include copiers, fax scanners, optical character recognition scanners (OCR), bar scanners, and the like, as well as network and telephone communication ports. Similarly, output terminal 18 is generically labeled and may include printers, screen displays, fax terminals, network and telephone communication ports and the like. It will be appreciated that input terminal 16 and output terminal 18 may be included in the same device in actual practice.
Likewise, storage area 14 is generic and may comprise RAM, ROM, CD-ROM, or other media of storage such as hard disk, magnetic tape, or the like. Other devices for accepting, capturing and storing data are well known and the above list should not be construed as exhaustive. Storage area 14 may contain stored document files, such as document file 17, system software 15, and processes 19 that generate documents resulting from their execution. System software 15 which controls CPU 12 may reside in either ROM, RAM, or other units of storage. It will also be appreciated that storage 14 may be a shared or distributed resource among many processors (not shown in FIG. 1) in a networked configuration.
Software sufficient to manage and interpret form images is described in both above mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,980 and in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/530,677 by Zdybel et al. filed on May 30, 1990 and assigned to Xerox Corporation. Zdybel et al is hereby incorporated by reference into the present application.
In a typical application, document 20 is scanned or otherwise entered by input terminal 16. It should be appreciated that various input formats, such as bitmap representation, compressed image format, and the like are well known in the art, and that the present invention should not be limited to any particular format.
It should be noted that the documents stored in storage 14 are not limited to image documents. In particular, it may additionally contain structured electronic document of such formats as page description language (PDL) documents, wordprocessor formats, document interchange formats, or the like. Such formats are well known in the art, and the present invention should not be limited to documents of any particular format.
CPU 12, under action from software 15, processes the image of document 20. System 10 acts on the image one page at a time as a natural block of data. The action taken varies according to whether CPU 12 regards the page as representing data, machine instruction, or other information. If the page is a data item, it may be stored in storage 14. If the document page is construed as machine instructions, CPU 12 will execute the corresponding instructions. How the system inputs and processes a document in the context of document surrogates will be discussed in greater detail below.
Having discussed the system that processes document surrogates, various features and aspects of document surrogates will now be discussed. FIGS. 2A-2C are exemplary embodiments of document surrogates constructed in accordance to the principles of the present invention. The main difference between these examples lies in the manner of creation and content of the human readable summaries of the original document. It should be appreciated that the summaries may be either user supplied or automatically generated or any combination thereof.
FIG. 2A shows a preferred embodiment of a document surrogate made in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Document surrogate 30 comprises a sheet of paper with a human readable summary showing reduced images 36 of the first six pages of the original document. Methods of producing reduced page images from full images are well known in the arts of image processing and xerography. The size of the reduction should ideally be such that the reduced image gives the reader of surrogate 30 a reasonable memory jog as to the identity of the full document.
The upper left hand corner of surrogate 30 contains marker 34. Marker 34 can be used by system 10 as a "flag" to distinguish the page as a document surrogate from ordinary pages. Marker 34 is optional in the sense that the other methods for "flagging" are available and are discussed below. It will be appreciated that the actual shape and location of marker 34 is arbitrary to the extent that the system is able to uniquely identify the page as a document surrogate.
The upper right hand corner of surrogate 30 contains machine readable code 32. Code 32 may encode various types of information about the form. For example, code 32 may encode the fact that this page is a document surrogate, thus acting as a second method of "flagging". This might be accomplished by including a data field in code 32. The data field might be a boolean or some multi-valued data item. If code 32 acts as a flag, marker 34 would be a redundancy and may be deleted.
Another way of embedding a "flag" in code 32 is by using an "indicator". An "indicator", in the present context, is a general way of pointing to some object. An indicator could be an address pointer to a real or virtual address. An indicator may also involve a look-up table or a hash function. An indicator, embedded in code 32, might point to a routine that would cause system 10 to treat the current page as a document surrogate. This routine might be kept in storage 14 or in any other storage area accessible to system 10. It will be understood that other ways of indicating are well known in the art and the present invention should not be limited to those disclosed herein. Additionally, it will be understood that other methods of "flagging" are well known in the art and that the present invention should not be similarly limited.
Other information may be embedded in code 32. For example, code 32 may also contain information about which type of human readable document summary is included on surrogate 30. It will be appreciated that the actual locations of the human and machine readable information is unimportant.
In the preferred embodiment, code 32 is encoded in the form of "glyphs". Glyphs are a manner of encoding data with a series of marks that slant either from top-left to bottom-right or from bottom-left to top-right. The actual method of encoding in glyph forms is disclosed in the Zdybel et al. patent application, which is incorporated by reference. Although the preferred embodiment employs glyph codes, it should be appreciated that many machine readable codes are well known in the art and that the present invention should not be limited by the manner of encoding.
In the presently preferred embodiment, document surrogates may be construed by system 10 in two possible ways. Document surrogates may be construed to be to be the equivalent of either original documents or results of accessible processes or copies of such documents or results. In either case, document surrogates are always construed as an equivalence of one of these "associated objects" unless this equivalence is specifically disabled. A separate "indicator", embedded in code 32, points to which associated object it is equivalent. Accessible processes which generate results may either be external to system 10, such as outside processes 24 or internal to system 10, such as stored processes 19, as shown in FIG. 1.
It is the associated object that system 10 then processes in lieu of the document surrogate. For example, a copy command on a document surrogate will cause system 10 to copy the associated object as opposed to the document surrogate. This separation of objects from functions is one advantage of document surrogates. The document surrogate itself does not specify what function needs to be performed on the associated object. Thus, processing may occur at a later time. This separation gives users greater flexibility in the paper based user interface. Associated objects may be appended to other objects and documents to form larger documents. The document processing system may then process this greater document at some time later.
When the preferred embodiment inputs a document, such as document 20 and encounters a document surrogate, the system will either retrieve the associated document or invoke the accessible process and append its results to either a stored document file or an output document, such as file 17 or document 22 respectively. Although the presently preferred default is to always equate document surrogates with their associated documents unless disabled, it will be appreciated that the system could be designed to ignore this equivalence unless enabled and that such a design choice should not be construed to be a limitation on the present invention.
As mentioned above, this default mode of always treating document surrogates as equivalent to associated documents or processes may be disabled. If disabled, system 10 will treat a document surrogate as if it were any other page of a document. Thus, a user may be able to obtain a copy of an individual document surrogate without receiving the entire document in its place.
There are several ways in which this default mode may be disabled. First, a document surrogate may contain a check box on the face of the surrogate. Check box 38 in FIG. 2A is exemplary. If, for example, the user places a check mark in box 38, system 10 will detect its presence. Depending on convention, either the presence or absence of a check mark may mean to disable the default. For example, a mark present in box 38 would be construed as a disable request. Thus, system 10, detecting a mark in box 38, would treat surrogate 30 as a regular page. It will be appreciated that the mark could be a physical mark made with pen or pencil or the like and the surrogate could then be scanned in as an image. Alternatively, the mark might be invisible to the naked eye; but detectable in some other spectrum. Such invisible marking systems are well known in the art.
Another override box 39 is shown in FIG. 2A. System 10, detecting a mark in box 39, would respond by distributing a clean, unmarked copy of this document surrogate. This feature is desirable because after a surrogate has been physically marked, it may no longer serve as a document surrogate unless the mark can be effectively erased. Box 39 enables the regeneration of document surrogates after the user's marks have disabled the current page as a document surrogate.
A second disable mechanism could be to allow the user to set the mode of the system directly--either by physically setting switches on a panel (not shown in FIG. 1) connected to system 10 or by setting parameters in the operating system software 15 through an interface (not shown in FIG. 1) connected to system 10. The aforementioned switches might toggle system 10 between a straight "copy" mode in which surrogates are input as ordinary pages, or a "document machine" mode where all surrogates equate to their original documents. It will be appreciated that methods to allow users to change software parameters are well known in the art.
A third disable mechanism might be accomplished by forms processing. For example, the user could input a page which the system regards as a form containing machine instructions. This form might instruct system 10 to disable the equivalence until another enable command is received. Alternatively, the form would might instruct system 10 to override document surrogate processing for a specific period of time, pages or documents. For example, the form could instruct system 10 to override for the next N surrogates or documents inputted, where N is some integer greater than zero. For the purposes of the present invention, this form may either precede or follow the documents to be inputted. Forms processing is disclosed in the above mentioned Johnson et al. patent and Zdybel et al. patent application, both incorporated by reference. It will be appreciated that other disable mechanisms are possible and the scope of the present invention should not be limited by the ones listed herein.
FIG. 2B depicts a second preferred embodiment of the present invention. Document surrogate 40 has a human readable summary which comprises several reduced page images 36 from the original document as well as keyword section 42. Keyword section 42 may include a list of commonly appearing words or phrases or it may contain section heading rifles. While keyword section 42 may be input directly by the user, it is possible that section 42 can be automatically generated directly from a stored document image. The methods for automatically summarizing documents from their images are disclosed in the aforementioned patent applications which are incorporated by reference herein.
FIG. 2C depicts a third preferred embodiment of the present invention. Document surrogate 50 is shown having four window display summaries 52 which may each contain a separate summary of the document. For example, the summaries may include reduced images of pages of the document, a list of keywords and phrases, the largest figure included in the document, a list of section headings, or key passages. The methods for automatically extracting keywords/phrases/passages, largest figures, and section headings are disclosed in the above mentioned patent application which are incorporated by reference. It will be appreciated that the particular number of windows disclosed in FIG. 2C are arbitrary and that any number will suffice as long as it remains recognizable to human users.
Referring now to FIG. 3, a exemplary use of the present invention is illustrated. This example demonstrates how document surrogates can be used to locally or remotely request distribution of the associated objects that they indicate. In the case of remote distribution, document surrogate 62 and distribution cover sheet 60 are input into input terminal 16. Distribution cover sheet 60 is a form containing machine instructions. The instructions cause document processing system 10 to distribute any documents following sheet 60 to any addresses specified in distribution sheet 60. As mentioned above, this method of forms processing is disclosed in both the Zdybel et al. patent application and U.S. Pat. No. 5,060,980.
Document processing system 10 scans document surrogate 62 and parses the machine readable code resident on the surrogate. A flag indicates that the sheet is a document surrogate to be processed accordingly. System 10 extracts the location of associated object 64 from the indicator embedded in the code found on surrogate 62. Document 70 is then remotely distributed as the hardcopy version of associated object 64 via facsimile transmission or any other means of distribution, as depicted as output terminal 18.
In the case of a local request for distribution of associated objects, the user need only supply document surrogate 62 without cover sheet 60. The distribution addresses might be supplied by some user interface, such as a panel on the front of system 10 (not shown). System 10, in response to a print command, copy command, fax command or the like, treats document surrogate 62 as the original document and will print, copy or fax document 70 unless system 10 is overridden. If system 10 is overridden, then system 10 will distribute a copy or print of the document surrogate.
The example in FIG. 3 demonstrates how the presently preferred embodiment would scan or otherwise input a document. The functionality of the document processing system is better summarized below in the following tables. It will be appreciated that the following description facilitates an understanding of the presently preferred system that would process document surrogates.
The presently preferred system is intended to work in the field of system reprographics. System reprographics is a well known field that applies digital electronics to photocopying, facsimile transmission, document printing, and the like. Reprographics applications are structured around the creation, processing, and printing of documents consisting of electronically represented document pages.
The presently preferred system comprises three levels of operations. The first and highest level are system applications. The system applications include document copying, document facsimile transmission, document facsimile reception, document storage, document retrieval, document printing, and the like. Table 1 lists description for document copying, document facsimile transmission, and networked document printing. It will be appreciated that any other applications are Written in a similar fashion and will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________LEVEL 1 SYSTEM APPLICATIONS__________________________________________________________________________APPLICATION 1: DOCUMENT COPYINGTo Copy-- A-- Document Number-- of-- Copies!Let Document = Scan-- And-- Store-- DocumentRepeat Number-- of-- Copies Print-- Stored--Document(Document) !***Do not deleted stored Document, as is done in some SRimplementations. Add-- Attribute To Document "Copied at" (Date, Time)Let Document-- Surrogate = Create-- Document-- SurrogatefromDocumentPrint-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)Deleted-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)EndAPPLICATION 2: DOCUMENT FACSIMILE TRANSMISSIONTo Fax-- A-- Document Fax-- numbers!Let Document = Scan-- And-- Store-- DocumentFor each Fax-- number in Fax-- numbers Fax-- Stored-- Document(Document) to Fax-- Number !***Do not deleted stored Document, as is done in some SRimplementations.Add-- Attribute To Document "Faxed To" (Fax-- Numbers)"at"(Date,Time)Let Document-- Surrogate1 = Create-- Document-- SurrogatefromDocumentPrint-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)Delete-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)EndAPPLICATION 3: NETWORKED DOCUMENT PRINTING***This application accepts a structured electronic file describing a***document, perhaps in a commercially available Page Description***Language, and uses a separate facility to generate digital page***images from the description.***It then prints those pages, followed by a Document Surrogate.To Print-- Structured-- Document Structured-- Document!Let Document = Decompose-- PDL-- Document fromStructured-- DocumentPrint-- Stored-- Document(Document)***Do not delete the Structured Document, as is done in some SR systems.Add-- Attribute To Structured-- Document"Printed from file"(Structured-- Document)" at (Date, Time)Let Document-- Surrogate = Create-- Document-- SurrogatefromStructured-- Document & DocumentPrint-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)Deleted-- Stored-- Document(Document-- Surrogate)Delete-- Stored-- Document(Document)End__________________________________________________________________________
To implement the Level 1 applications, a second level of document specific operations are employed. Table 2 summarizes these Level 2 Document Operations.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________LEVEL 2 DOCUMENT OPERATIONS__________________________________________________________________________OPERATION 1: SCAN AND STORE DOCUMENT***Creates a new document consisting of all the pages in the document***scanner, substituting for any Document Surrogates the pages of the***Documents to which those Document Surrogates refer.To Scan-- and-- Store Document !Let Document = Create-- Empty-- DocumentLet Document-- UID = Create-- Unique-- IDAdd-- Attribute To Document "Document UID ="(Document-- UID)Loop Until Document-- Feeder-- EmptyLet Page = Scan-- PageIf (Document Surrogate Processing is inhibited) or(Page is not a Document Surrogate)ThenAdd Page to DocumentElse ***Page is a Document SurrogateLet data = Read-- Glyphs of PageLet ID = Parse-- Document-- Surrogate-- Glyphs dataLet Temp = Retrieve-- Document with Document UID = IDFor each Page in Temp do Add Page to Document!End LoopAdd-- Attribute To Document "Scanned at"(Date, Time)Return DocumentEndOPERATION 2-1: PRINT-- STORED-- DOCUMENT***The following subroutine describes a method for printing***stored image documents.To Print-- Stored-- Document Document!For each Page in Document Print-- Page (Page) !Add-- Attribute To Document "Printed from storage at"(Date, Time)EndOPERATION 2-2: PRINT-- STORED-- DOCUMENT***The following subroutine describes a method for printing***stored structured documents, which is accomplished***by Application Level 1.To Print-- Stored-- Document Structured-- Document!Print-- Structured-- Document(Structured-- Document)EndOPERATION 3: DELETE-- STORED-- DOCUMENTTo Delete-- Stored-- Document Document!For each Page in Document Delete-- Stored-- Page (Page) !Delete-- Attributes (Document)EndOPERATION 3: FAX-- STORED-- DOCUMENTTo Fax-- Stored-- Document Document, To: Fax-- Number!Let Connection = Connect-- to-- Fax-- machine At(Fax-- Number)For each Page in Document Fax-- Page (Page) using Connection !Disconnect-- Fax-- Connection (Connection)Add-- Attribute To Document "Faxed to" (Fax-- Number) at (Date,Time)EndOPERATION 4-1: CREATE-- DOCUMENT-- SURROGATE***The following subroutines describe one simple method for***creating Document Surrogates from Image documents:To Create-- Document-- Surrogate From: Document!Let This-- Document-- UID = Document-- UID of DocumentLet Result = Create-- Document-- Surrogate-- InternalFrom Document and This-- Document-- UIDReturn ResultEndOPERATION 4-2: CREATE-- DOCUMENT-- SURROGATE***The following subroutines describe one simple method for***creating Document Surrogates from Structured DOcuments for which***an image document of some pages is available or can be generated.To Create-- Document-- Surrogate From:Structured--Document & Document! Let This-- Document-- UID = Document-- UID ofStructured-- DocumentLet Result = Create-- Document-- Surrogate-- InternalFrom Document and This-- Document-- UID Return ResultEndOPERATION 4-3: CREATE-- DOCUMENT-- SURROGATE-- INTERNAL***The following subroutine is shared by the methods for***creating document surrogates described above.To Create-- Document-- Surrogate-- Internal From:Document,This-- Document-- UID!Let Document-- Surrogate = Create-- Empty-- Document***Create Docmuent Surrogate Page frameworkLet Surrogate-- Page = Create-- Blank-- PagePlace-- Image Document-- Surrogate-- Mark onSurrogate-- PagePlace-- Text"Document Surrogate" on Surrogate-- Page***Add the glyphs indicating the document surrogate correspondence.Let Glyph-- Image = Create-- Document-- Surrogate--Glyphsincorporating This-- Document-- UIDPlace-- Image Glyph-- Image on Surrogate-- Page***Place the visual and verbal summary of the document on the page:For each Document-- Page in 1,2,3,4,5,6!in DocumentPlace-- Image Reduced-- Image-- Of Document-- PageonSurrogate-- Page!For each Attribute in Attributes of DocumentPlace-- Text Attribute on Surrogate-- page!***Return resulting Document Surrogate, stored as a document in thedocument ***database.Add Surrogate-- Page to Document-- SurrogateReturn Document-- SurrogateEnd__________________________________________________________________________
The third level of operations to implement the presently preferred system would be primitive operations. These primitives are low level functions which operate on particular hardware apparatus and parts of page data. As an example of hardware specific primitives, functions such as: "create empty document", "delete stored page", "create unique ID", and the like would be implemented for mass storage use. Fax primitives might include: "connect to fax machine", "disconnect", and "fax a page". Other primitives for hardware available to system 10 are similarly defined.
Additionally, primitive operations would be implemented to operate on document surrogates. For example, for reading a document surrogate, primitive operations might include: "test for whether page is not a document surrogate", "test for whether document surrogate processing is disabled", "parse document surrogate glyphs" and the like. For printing a document surrogate, primitive operations might include: "mark a document surrogate", "create document surrogate glyphs", and the like.
Having discussed implementation details, additional advantages and features of document surrogates will now be discussed. For example, FIG. 4 shows a document surrogate that acts as a "document catalog". A document catalog is a document surrogate that contains summaries of more than one document. Document surrogate 80, as depicted, contains summaries of four different documents. Each document summary contains document selection box 82, first window 84, and second window 86. First window 84 may contain a summary of the document that is of primary importance or other information concerning the document. Second window 86 is depicted as a nine window summary of the document and may contain reduced images.
Selection box 82 is a way for a user to select a subset of documents that are summarized on the surrogate. The user need only place a check mark in each selection box 82 to make an appropriate selection. The document processing system will parse the machine readable code 32 for the existence of selection boxes affixed on the surrogate. The document processing system will then know to scan the image where selection boxes 82 are located and detect the presence or absence of user supplied selections. If the document processing system detects the presence of such a mark, the system knows to append the selected document to the new document the system is creating.
FIG. 5 depicts another type of document surrogate that requires additional processing. As discussed above, document surrogates may have accessible processes as their associated object. These processes generate results which may be stored or distributed as documents. Document surrogates that associate with processes may require that either the system execute the process or wait for results of an independent execution prior to appending the results into a document. Document surrogate 90 shows a weather map of the United States at a particular time. Each time the document processing system encounters document surrogate 90, it may reference an updated version of the weather map instead of the particular time referenced in document surrogate 90. The conceptual difference is that document surrogate 90 points to a process that is accessible by the document processing system, instead of a static document located in its storage area. The result of parsing document surrogate 90 is that an updated map is appended to the new document that the system is creating. It will be appreciated that other processes accessible to the system are possible to summarize with document surrogates.
Another application of document surrogates involves individual pages of a document that contain a machine readable code. The code is essentially identical to that contained in regular document surrogates as described above. The main difference is that the flag in the page's code instructs the system to ignore the equivalence as the default of the system. This equivalence may be specifically enabled by use of a cover sheet or by some other mechanism which sets the default as described above. This usage permits the recreation and retrieval of a full document or any portion thereof from any of its pages so coded when the default is enabled. The advantage of having the default normally disabled is that pages so coded are ordinarily considered as pages by the system instead of the full document.
In a preferred embodiment, the flags denoting that the equivalence is disabled and the flags denoting that the equivalence is enabled are distinguishable. FIG. 6 depicts an exemplary application. Document surrogate 102 is input together with cover sheet 100. Cover sheet 100 specifically instructs system 10 to enable the equivalence between surrogate 102 and its associated object 104 kept in storage 14. With the equivalence thus enabled, system 10 may process associated object 104 and, for example, output document 106 which is a hardcopy version of object 104.
In summary, it will be appreciated that the present invention provides a various ways to provide document summaries that are interpreted as the symbolic equivalent to original stored documents or accessible processes in the document processing system. This equivalency allows a great deal of flexibility in the remote processing of documents. It should be appreciated that the above disclosed methods of using the present invention is not exhaustive and that others skilled in the art may easily devise more.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US3632995 *||9 May 1968||4 Ene 1972||Wilson Howard W||Coded article|
|US3699518 *||18 Ene 1971||17 Oct 1972||Commerce Usa||Method and machine for reading handwritten cursive characters|
|US4179212 *||6 Sep 1977||18 Dic 1979||Xerox Corporation||Demand publishing royalty accounting system|
|US4310235 *||13 Mar 1980||12 Ene 1982||Xerox Corporation||Job programming|
|US4476381 *||24 Feb 1982||9 Oct 1984||Rubin Martin I||Patient treatment method|
|US4588211 *||9 Abr 1984||13 May 1986||Greene Edwin B||Machine readable document|
|US4651288 *||6 Nov 1984||17 Mar 1987||Olympia Werke Ag||Method and apparatus for filling out a form by a machine|
|US4677585 *||18 Dic 1985||30 Jun 1987||Fujitsu Limited||Method for obtaining common mode information and common field attribute information for a plurality of card images|
|US4728984 *||17 Nov 1986||1 Mar 1988||Xerox Corporation||Data handling and archiving system|
|US4786940 *||16 Oct 1987||22 Nov 1988||Xerox Corporation||Data handling and archiving system|
|US4943239 *||5 May 1989||24 Jul 1990||Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc.||Test answer and score sheet device|
|US4994987 *||15 Dic 1989||19 Feb 1991||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Image access system providing easier access to images|
|US5046005 *||15 May 1989||3 Sep 1991||Versatile Suppliers, Inc.||Test scoring machine|
|US5060980 *||30 May 1990||29 Oct 1991||Xerox Corporation||Form utilizing encoded indications for form field processing|
|US5140139 *||30 Jul 1991||18 Ago 1992||Cognitronics Corporation||Preparing mark/read documents with markable boxes and locating the boxes from the document scan data|
|US5168371 *||14 Dic 1990||1 Dic 1992||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Image processing system for generating, storing, and transmitting image datafiles associated with enciphered identification information|
|US5184003 *||24 Ene 1992||2 Feb 1993||National Computer Systems, Inc.||Scannable form having a control mark column with encoded data marks|
|US5224039 *||28 Dic 1990||29 Jun 1993||International Business Machines Corporation||Method of enabling the translation of machine readable information|
|US5235655 *||19 Jun 1992||10 Ago 1993||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Mark placing and canceling method and mark recognizing device|
|US5237394 *||30 Oct 1992||17 Ago 1993||Xerox Corporation||Method and apparatus for print verification|
|US5274468 *||27 Jun 1991||28 Dic 1993||Ojha Purnendu S||Reproduction apparatus and method with user-definable editing and machine operation functions|
|US5291592 *||9 May 1990||1 Mar 1994||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||System having document scanner for optically scanning information whereby a first information contains control information indicating a number of sheets to be scanned|
|US5331137 *||14 Jul 1992||19 Jul 1994||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Machine readable code combining preprinted indicia with hand-mark data|
|US5393962 *||28 Abr 1993||28 Feb 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image storing method and apparatus including detecting index information included in image information read out from a recording medium|
|US5465167 *||20 Mar 1992||7 Nov 1995||Xerox Corporation||Using an image from a form in automatic creation of a form or sheet|
|US5502577 *||25 Abr 1995||26 Mar 1996||Xerox Corporation||Paper user interface for image manipulations such as cut and paste|
|US5506697 *||20 Sep 1993||9 Abr 1996||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Apparatus for processing human-readable and machine-readable documents|
|US5513013 *||24 Ago 1992||30 Abr 1996||Xerox Corporation||Facsimile output job sorting unit and system|
|EP0561606A1 *||16 Mar 1993||22 Sep 1993||Xerox Corporation||Method and system for labeling a document for storage, manipulation, and retrieval|
|JPH04143257A *||Título no disponible|
|WO1992007440A1 *||4 Oct 1991||30 Abr 1992||Interfax Inc||Method and apparatus for the primary and secondary routing of fax messages using hand printed characters|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US5761686 *||27 Jun 1996||2 Jun 1998||Xerox Corporation||Embedding encoded information in an iconic version of a text image|
|US5915258 *||17 Oct 1996||22 Jun 1999||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus and method for generating and outputting a list of a plurality of stored forms|
|US5933829 *||8 Nov 1997||3 Ago 1999||Neomedia Technologies, Inc.||Automatic access of electronic information through secure machine-readable codes on printed documents|
|US5982507 *||14 Mar 1997||9 Nov 1999||Novell, Inc.||Method and system for generating in a headerless apparatus a communications header for use in routing of a message|
|US6000621 *||21 Dic 1995||14 Dic 1999||Xerox Corporation||Tilings of mono-code and dual-code embedded data pattern strips for robust asynchronous capture|
|US6014668 *||7 Oct 1997||11 Ene 2000||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Document information management system and method of generating a human-computer interactive document sheet allowing relevant information retrieval from a remote site|
|US6108656 *||11 May 1999||22 Ago 2000||Neomedia Technologies, Inc.||Automatic access of electronic information through machine-readable codes on printed documents|
|US6169997 *||29 Abr 1998||2 Ene 2001||Ncr Corporation||Method and apparatus for forming subject (context) map and presenting Internet data according to the subject map|
|US6182090 *||31 Mar 1997||30 Ene 2001||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for pointing to documents electronically using features extracted from a scanned icon representing a destination|
|US6279013 *||20 Jul 1998||21 Ago 2001||Xerox Corporation||Interactive newspaper|
|US6377986||1 Feb 2000||23 Abr 2002||Digital Convergence Corporation||Routing string indicative of a location of a database on a web associated with a product in commerce|
|US6384744||13 Jun 2000||7 May 2002||Digital:Convergence Corp.||Method and system for data transmission from an optical reader|
|US6526449||19 Ago 1999||25 Feb 2003||Digital Convergence Corporation||Method and apparatus for controlling a computer from a remote location|
|US6594705||20 Ene 2000||15 Jul 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet|
|US6615268||19 Ago 1999||2 Sep 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of dat media|
|US6622165||3 Feb 2000||16 Sep 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for allowing a remote site to interact with an intermediate database to facilitate access to the remote site|
|US6629133||19 Ago 1999||30 Sep 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Interactive doll|
|US6631404||11 May 2000||7 Oct 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and system for conducting a contest using a network|
|US6636892||15 Jun 2000||21 Oct 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for conducting a contest using a network|
|US6636896||20 Ene 2000||21 Oct 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet|
|US6643692||19 Ago 1999||4 Nov 2003||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of video tape media|
|US6674923||28 Mar 2000||6 Ene 2004||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and system for locating and accessing digitally stored images|
|US6688522||30 May 2000||10 Feb 2004||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Unique bar code|
|US6694356||6 Jul 2000||17 Feb 2004||L.V. Partner, L.P.||Remote control having an optical indicia reader|
|US6697949||24 Ago 1999||24 Feb 2004||L.V. Partner, L.P.||Method and apparatus for controlling a user's pc through an audio-visual broadcast to archive information in the users pc|
|US6701354||24 Ago 1999||2 Mar 2004||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method for interconnecting two locations over a network in response to using a tool|
|US6701369||29 Mar 2000||2 Mar 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by sensing a machine-resolvable code|
|US6704864||10 May 2000||9 Mar 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Automatic configuration of equipment software|
|US6708208||26 Ene 2000||16 Mar 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Unique bar code for indicating a link between a product and a remote location on a web network|
|US6725260||10 May 2000||20 Abr 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for configuring configurable equipment with configuration information received from a remote location|
|US6745234||19 Ago 1999||1 Jun 2004||Digital:Convergence Corporation||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by scanning an optical code|
|US6754698||23 Jun 2000||22 Jun 2004||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a dedicated memory system|
|US6758398||21 Jun 2000||6 Jul 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Optical reader with ultraviolet wavelength capability|
|US6791588||15 Jun 2000||14 Sep 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method for conducting a contest using a network|
|US6792452||10 May 2000||14 Sep 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method for configuring a piece of equipment with the use of an associated machine resolvable code|
|US6816894||1 Feb 2000||9 Nov 2004||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method for interfacing scanned product information with a source for the product over a global network|
|US6823388||30 Jun 2000||23 Nov 2004||L.V. Parners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system|
|US6826592||24 Ago 1999||30 Nov 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Digital ID for selecting web browser and use preferences of a user during use of a web application|
|US6829650||24 Ago 1999||7 Dic 2004||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for opening and launching a web browser in response to an audible signal|
|US6836799||24 Ago 1999||28 Dic 2004||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for tracking user profile and habits on a global network|
|US6843417||30 May 2000||18 Ene 2005||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Aiming indicia for a bar code and method of use|
|US6845388||2 Feb 2000||18 Ene 2005||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Web site access manual of a character string into a software interface|
|US6860424||30 May 2000||1 Mar 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Optical reader and use|
|US6868433||24 Ene 2000||15 Mar 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Input device having positional and scanning capabilities|
|US6873430||22 Dic 2000||29 Mar 2005||Xerox Corporation||Knowledge management system and method|
|US6877032||21 Jun 2000||5 Abr 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Launching a web site using a portable scanner|
|US6928413||14 Ene 2000||9 Ago 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method of product promotion|
|US6961555||31 Oct 2000||1 Nov 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||System and apparatus for connecting a wireless device to a remote location on a network|
|US6970914||19 Ago 1999||29 Nov 2005||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for embedding routing information to a remote web site in an audio/video track|
|US6970916||15 Jun 2000||29 Nov 2005||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method for conducting a contest using a network|
|US6973438||31 Mar 2000||6 Dic 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for delivering information from a remote site on a network based on statistical information|
|US6980332 *||26 Jun 2001||27 Dic 2005||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||System and method of automated scan workflow assignment|
|US6981059||1 Feb 2000||27 Dic 2005||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Audible designation for a node on a communication network|
|US6985954||26 Ene 2000||10 Ene 2006||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Input device for allowing input of a unique digital code to a user's computer to control access thereof to a web site|
|US6985962||16 Sep 2003||10 Ene 2006||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for allowing a remote site to interact with an intermediate database to facilitate access to the remote site|
|US6987506 *||23 May 2000||17 Ene 2006||Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd||Method and system for navigating a directory|
|US7010577||19 Ago 1999||7 Mar 2006||L. V. Partners, L.P.||Method of controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of DVD media|
|US7043536||19 Ago 1999||9 May 2006||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for controlling a computer using an embedded unique code in the content of CD media|
|US7069582||24 Feb 2004||27 Jun 2006||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for controlling a user's PC through an audio-visual broadcast to archive information in the user's PC|
|US7089291||27 Jul 2000||8 Ago 2006||L.V. Partners, L.P.||Battery pack having integral optical reader for wireless communication device|
|US7100110 *||22 May 2003||29 Ago 2006||Hitachi, Ltd.||System for filling in documents using an electronic pen|
|US7117240||24 Ago 1999||3 Oct 2006||Lv Partners, Lp||Method and apparatus for launching a web site with non-standard control input device|
|US7139094 *||28 Dic 2000||21 Nov 2006||Xerox Corporation||Systems and methods for simplified scanning using multi-function devices|
|US7142325 *||5 Dic 2000||28 Nov 2006||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Document management device, communications terminal device, document management program, communications control program and document management system|
|US7152206 *||2 Jun 2000||19 Dic 2006||Fujitsu Limited||Printed matter producing method, printed matter producing apparatus utilizing said method, and computer-readable recording medium|
|US7159037||24 Ago 1999||2 Ene 2007||Lv Partners, Lp||Method and apparatus for utilizing an existing product code to issue a match to a predetermined location on a global network|
|US7168036 *||13 Nov 1998||23 Ene 2007||Xerox Corporation||User interface identification and service tags for a document processing system|
|US7197543||22 Jun 2004||27 Mar 2007||Lv Partners, Lp||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a dedicated memory system|
|US7202977 *||16 Ene 2002||10 Abr 2007||Xerox Corporation||Methods for positioning a print integrity image capture device|
|US7228282||24 Ago 1999||5 Jun 2007||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for directing an existing product code to a remote location|
|US7237104||9 Mar 2004||26 Jun 2007||Lv Partners, L.P.||Automatic configuration of equipment software|
|US7257614||30 Nov 2004||14 Ago 2007||Lv Partners, Lp||Digital ID for selecting web browser and use preferences of a user during use of a web application|
|US7257619||29 Jun 2004||14 Ago 2007||Lv Partners, Lp||Bar code scanner and software interface interlock for performing encrypted handshaking and for disabling the scanner or input device in case of handshaking operation failure|
|US7284066||24 Ago 1999||16 Oct 2007||Lv Partners, Lp||Method and apparatus for matching a user's use profile in commerce with a broadcast|
|US7287091||7 Dic 2004||23 Oct 2007||L.V. Partners, Lp.||Method and apparatus for opening and launching a web browser in response to an audible signal|
|US7305702||9 Ene 2002||4 Dic 2007||Xerox Corporation||Systems and methods for distributed administration of public and private electronic markets|
|US7308483||20 Abr 2004||11 Dic 2007||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for automatic configuration of equipment|
|US7314173||2 Jul 2004||1 Ene 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Optical reader with ultraviolet wavelength capability|
|US7318106||15 Jul 2003||8 Ene 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet|
|US7321941||24 Ago 1999||22 Ene 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Network routing utilizing a product code|
|US7370114||13 Oct 1999||6 May 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Software downloading using a television broadcast channel|
|US7379901||11 Sep 2000||27 May 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Accessing a vendor web site using personal account information retrieved from a credit card company web site|
|US7383333||28 Dic 2004||3 Jun 2008||L.V. Partners, Lp||Method and apparatus for tracking user profile and habits on a global network|
|US7386600||12 Sep 2000||10 Jun 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Launching a web site using a personal device|
|US7392285||21 Oct 2003||24 Jun 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for conducting a contest using a network|
|US7392312||2 Nov 2000||24 Jun 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for utilizing visual cue in conjunction with web access|
|US7392945||20 Jun 2000||1 Jul 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Portable scanner for enabling automatic commerce transactions|
|US7412666 *||14 Sep 2004||12 Ago 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for conducting a contest using a network|
|US7415511||9 Nov 2004||19 Ago 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method for interfacing scanned product information with a source for the product over a global network|
|US7424129||30 Mar 2004||9 Sep 2008||Ricoh Company, Ltd||Printing system with embedded audio/video content recognition and processing|
|US7424521||24 Ago 1999||9 Sep 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method using database for facilitating computer based access to a location on a network after scanning a barcode disposed on a product|
|US7424672 *||3 Oct 2003||9 Sep 2008||Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.||System and method of specifying image document layout definition|
|US7437475||21 Oct 2003||14 Oct 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet|
|US7440126||30 Mar 2004||21 Oct 2008||Ricoh Co., Ltd||Printer with document-triggered processing|
|US7440993||24 Ago 1999||21 Oct 2008||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for launching a web browser in response to scanning of product information|
|US7454086||28 Sep 2004||18 Nov 2008||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Techniques for positioning images in electronic documents|
|US7475251||4 Sep 2007||6 Ene 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Multimedia output device having embedded encryption functionality|
|US7481374||8 Jun 2005||27 Ene 2009||Xerox Corporation||System and method for placement and retrieval of embedded information within a document|
|US7493283||11 Sep 2000||17 Feb 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Performing an e-commerce transaction from credit card account information retrieved from a credit card company web site|
|US7493384||23 Jun 2000||17 Feb 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Controlling a PC using a tone from a cellular telephone|
|US7496638||29 Mar 2005||24 Feb 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Launching a web site using a portable scanner|
|US7505163||30 Mar 2004||17 Mar 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||User interface for networked printer|
|US7505178||7 Ene 2005||17 Mar 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Semantic classification and enhancement processing of images for printing applications|
|US7505922||9 May 2000||17 Mar 2009||Lv Partners, L.P.||Method and apparatus for utilizing a unique transaction code to update a magazine subscription over the internet|
|US7508535||30 Mar 2004||24 Mar 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Stand alone multimedia printer with user interface for allocating processing|
|US7509569||19 Jul 2004||24 Mar 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Action stickers for nested collections|
|US7523161||18 Ene 2005||21 Abr 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Control of software interface with information input to access window|
|US7528976||30 Mar 2004||5 May 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Stand alone printer with hardware/software interfaces for sharing multimedia processing|
|US7528977||30 Mar 2004||5 May 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Printer with hardware and software interfaces for peripheral devices|
|US7533177||23 Nov 2004||12 May 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system|
|US7536638 *||16 Sep 2003||19 May 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Action stickers for identifying and processing stored documents|
|US7552381 *||31 Mar 2004||23 Jun 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Check boxes for identifying and processing stored documents|
|US7558838||14 Sep 2004||7 Jul 2009||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method for configuring a piece of equipment with the use of an associated machine resolvable code|
|US7570380||30 Mar 2004||4 Ago 2009||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Printer user interface|
|US7573604||1 Ago 2007||11 Ago 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Printer with embedded retrieval and publishing interface|
|US7603615||30 Mar 2005||13 Oct 2009||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Multimedia projector-printer|
|US7703002||31 Mar 2003||20 Abr 2010||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for composing multimedia documents|
|US7703044||23 Dic 2004||20 Abr 2010||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Techniques for generating a static representation for time-based media information|
|US7703683||12 Abr 2007||27 Abr 2010||Marshall Feature Recognition, Llc||Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium|
|US7712668||11 Abr 2007||11 May 2010||Marshall Feature Recognition, Llc||Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium|
|US7717344||10 Abr 2007||18 May 2010||Marshall Feature Recognition, Llc||Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium|
|US7739353||10 Jun 2008||15 Jun 2010||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Launching a web site using a personal device|
|US7739583||31 Mar 2003||15 Jun 2010||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Multimedia document sharing method and apparatus|
|US7743347 *||20 Ago 2003||22 Jun 2010||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Paper-based interface for specifying ranges|
|US7747655 *||30 Mar 2004||29 Jun 2010||Ricoh Co. Ltd.||Printable representations for time-based media|
|US7757162||15 Oct 2003||13 Jul 2010||Ricoh Co. Ltd.||Document collection manipulation|
|US7788080||8 Feb 2005||31 Ago 2010||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Paper interface for simulation environments|
|US7792696||24 Ago 1999||7 Sep 2010||RPX-LV Acquisition, LLC||Method and apparatus for allowing a broadcast to remotely control a computer|
|US7818423||21 Ago 2000||19 Oct 2010||RPX-LV Acquisition, LLC||Retrieving personal account information from a web site by reading a credit card|
|US7819316||8 Oct 2007||26 Oct 2010||Lv Partners, L.P.||Portable scanner for enabling automatic commerce transactions|
|US7822829||11 Ago 2008||26 Oct 2010||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method for interfacing scanned product information with a source for the product over a global network|
|US7861169||30 Mar 2004||28 Dic 2010||Ricoh Co. Ltd.||Multimedia print driver dialog interfaces|
|US7864352||30 Mar 2004||4 Ene 2011||Ricoh Co. Ltd.||Printer with multimedia server|
|US7870189||15 Mar 2005||11 Ene 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Input device having positional and scanning capabilities|
|US7886017||28 May 2004||8 Feb 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by receiving a product code|
|US7900224||24 Ago 1999||1 Mar 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for utilizing an audible signal to induce a user to select an E-commerce function|
|US7904344||29 Ene 2008||8 Mar 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Accessing a vendor web site using personal account information retrieved from a credit card company web site|
|US7908467||26 Jun 2007||15 Mar 2011||RPX-LV Acquistion LLC||Automatic configuration of equipment software|
|US7912760||17 Mar 2009||22 Mar 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for utilizing a unique transaction code to update a magazine subscription over the internet|
|US7912961||10 Ene 2006||22 Mar 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Input device for allowing input of unique digital code to a user's computer to control access thereof to a web site|
|US7913920||20 Dic 2006||29 Mar 2011||Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated||Document processing devices, systems and methods thereof|
|US7921166 *||15 Jun 2006||5 Abr 2011||Xerox Corporation||Methods and systems for accessing email|
|US7925780||13 Mar 2007||12 Abr 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method for connecting a wireless device to a remote location on a network|
|US7930213||24 Ago 1999||19 Abr 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Method and apparatus for completing, securing and conducting an E-commerce transaction|
|US7975022||23 Oct 2007||5 Jul 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Launching a web site using a passive transponder|
|US7979786||7 Dic 2006||12 Jul 2011||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Techniques for retrieving multimedia information using a paper-based interface|
|US8027055||27 Sep 2011||Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd||Mobile phone with retractable stylus|
|US8028036||11 Jul 2000||27 Sep 2011||Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc||Launching a web site using a passive transponder|
|US8077341||30 Mar 2004||13 Dic 2011||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Printer with audio or video receiver, recorder, and real-time content-based processing logic|
|US8116582||29 Sep 2008||14 Feb 2012||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Techniques for positioning images in electronic documents|
|US8131597||30 Jun 2010||6 Mar 2012||Neomedia Technologies, Inc.||System and method for using an ordinary article of commerce to access a remote computer|
|US8161409||31 Mar 2004||17 Abr 2012||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Re-writable cover sheets for collection management|
|US8181261||13 May 2005||15 May 2012||Xerox Corporation||System and method for controlling reproduction of documents containing sensitive information|
|US8189466||12 Mar 2009||29 May 2012||Neomedia Technologies, Inc||Messaging interchange system|
|US8274666||30 Mar 2005||25 Sep 2012||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Projector/printer for displaying or printing of documents|
|US8290929 *||26 Oct 2007||16 Oct 2012||Yahoo! Inc.||Media enhancement mechanism using embed code|
|US8303199||20 Dic 2010||6 Nov 2012||Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd||Mobile device with dual optical sensing pathways|
|US8363262||29 Ene 2013||Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd||Print medium having linear data track and contiguously tiled position-coding tags|
|US8373905||12 Dic 2008||12 Feb 2013||Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Semantic classification and enhancement processing of images for printing applications|
|US8453922||9 Feb 2010||4 Jun 2013||Xerox Corporation||Method for one-step document categorization and separation using stamped machine recognizable patterns|
|US8539344||19 Nov 2001||17 Sep 2013||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Paper-based interface for multimedia information stored by multiple multimedia documents|
|US8712835||24 Ago 1999||29 Abr 2014||Rpx Corporation||Method and apparatus for linking a web browser link to a promotional offer|
|US8826140 *||23 Oct 2009||2 Sep 2014||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Communication device for accessing content-related information from a network|
|US20010047426 *||29 Mar 2001||29 Nov 2001||Hunter Kevin D.||Device-based routing for web content retrieval|
|US20020015186 *||5 Dic 2000||7 Feb 2002||Yoshinori Nagata||Document management device, communications terminal device, document management program, communications control program and document management system|
|US20020080387 *||22 Dic 2000||27 Jun 2002||Xerox Corporation||Knowledge management system and method|
|US20040194026 *||31 Mar 2003||30 Sep 2004||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for composing multimedia documents|
|US20040205476 *||6 Ago 2002||14 Oct 2004||Long Timothy Merrick||System for referencing digital document from printed copy|
|US20040205626 *||13 Nov 1998||14 Oct 2004||Leigh L. Klotz||User interface identification and service tags for a document proceessing system|
|US20050076295 *||3 Oct 2003||7 Abr 2005||Simske Steven J.||System and method of specifying image document layout definition|
|US20050162686 *||31 Mar 2004||28 Jul 2005||Barrus John W.||Check boxes for identifying and processing stored documents|
|US20050223331 *||31 Mar 2004||6 Oct 2005||Wolff Gregory J||Re-writable cover sheets for collection management|
|US20090112839 *||26 Oct 2007||30 Abr 2009||Yahoo! Inc.||Media Enhancement Mechanism|
|US20100194976 *||8 Mar 2010||5 Ago 2010||Smith Peter H||Computer based aids for independent living and health|
|EP1139649A2 *||16 Mar 2001||4 Oct 2001||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and system for locating and accessing digitally stored images|
|EP1583347A1 *||17 Feb 2005||5 Oct 2005||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Re-writable cover sheets for collection management|
|EP1936944A2||19 Dic 2007||25 Jun 2008||Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated||Document processing devices, systems and methods thereof|
|EP2264995A2 *||15 Jun 2010||22 Dic 2010||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and computer program|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||715/209, 358/403, 358/448|
|Clasificación internacional||G06F17/30, H04N1/21, H04N1/32, G06T1/00|
|Clasificación cooperativa||H04N1/2166, H04N2201/3269, H04N2201/3226, H04N1/32122, H04N2201/3242, H04N2201/3271|
|Clasificación europea||H04N1/21C, H04N1/32C15D|
|7 Feb 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|28 Jun 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANK ONE, NA, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:XEROX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:013153/0001
Effective date: 20020621
|31 Oct 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT,TEXAS
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:XEROX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:015134/0476
Effective date: 20030625
|28 Oct 2005||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|27 Dic 2005||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20051028