Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUS5765140 A
Tipo de publicaciónConcesión
Número de solicitudUS 08/559,970
Fecha de publicación9 Jun 1998
Fecha de presentación17 Nov 1995
Fecha de prioridad17 Nov 1995
TarifaPagadas
Número de publicación08559970, 559970, US 5765140 A, US 5765140A, US-A-5765140, US5765140 A, US5765140A
InventoresJames George Knudson, William Lawrence Vivian, Mark S. Crego
Cesionario originalMci Corporation
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Dynamic project management system
US 5765140 A
Resumen
A dynamic project management system includes a server network and a master database. The network is configured to identify a personnel resource pool including a plurality of users. A project planning tool is used to effect the project plan including a plurality of tasks to be performed by the users in accordance with respective time schedules. The network is configured for translating the project plan into the master database to effect an assignments table including a list of project tasks assigned for completion by each of the users. Time sheets are periodically prepared in the master database from the assignments table and include a list of the project tasks assigned to a respective user and a time period record for recording time entries therein. Actual time expended in performing the tasks is fed back to the project plan for managing completion of the tasks in accordance with the time schedules. In a preferred embodiment, a funding source is mapped to the project plan so that cumulative labor cost may be tracked based on actual time expended for the project tasks.
Imágenes(3)
Previous page
Next page
Reclamaciones(16)
We claim:
1. A dynamic project management system comprising:
a server network including a programmable computer server operatively joined to a plurality of personal computer user terminals;
a master database operatively accessible by said server and said user terminals;
means for identifying a personnel resource pool including a plurality of users each having an identification profile;
means for planning a project to effect a project plan including a plurality of tasks to be performed by said users from said resource pool in accordance with respective time schedules;
means for interfacing said project plan with said server network to effect in said master database an assignments table including a list of said project tasks assigned for completion by each of said users;
means for periodically preparing in said master database a plurality of time sheets from said assignments table including a list of said project tasks assigned to a respective user and a time period record for recording time entries indicative of actual time expended by each user in performing said tasks; and
said interfacing means being effective also for feeding back to said planning means from said master database said actual time expended for said tasks for managing completion of said tasks in accordance with said time schedules.
2. A system according to claim 1 further comprising means for administering said personnel resource pool to effect changes thereto and in turn changes to said assignments table.
3. A system according to claim 2 wherein said administering means is effective also for mapping a funding source to said project and tracking cumulative labor cost therefore based on said actual time expended for said project tasks.
4. A system according to claim 3 further comprising a plurality of said server networks operatively joined to said master database to define a respective plurality of director-level computer servers each having a respective plurality of said user terminals, and wherein said planning and interfacing means reside at said director-level servers.
5. A system according to claim 4 further comprising a supernova-level programmable computer server operatively joined to said plurality of director-level servers and said master database, and including said personnel identifying means.
6. A system according to claim 5 further comprising a programmable mainframe computer system operatively joined to said supernova server and including personnel and funding data, and wherein said identifying means effect said personnel resource pool from said personnel data and organize said user profiles to correspond with respective ones of said director servers, and wherein said administering means map said funding source from said funding data to said project.
7. A system according to claim 6 wherein said user profile includes a unique identifier, and said planning means are effective to plan said project around users identified by said identifiers.
8. A system according to claim 7 wherein said user profile further includes a directorate identification for assigning said users to respective ones of said director servers.
9. A method for dynamically managing a project in a server network including a programmable computer server and a master database operatively joined to a plurality of personal computer user terminals, said method comprising:
identifying a personnel resource pool including a plurality of users each having identification profile;
planning a project to effect a project plan including a plurality of tasks to be performed by said users from said resource pool in accordance with respective time schedules;
translating said project plan into said master database to effect an assignments table including a list of project tasks assigned for completion by each of said users;
preparing periodically in said master database time sheets from said assignments table including a list of said project tasks assigned to a respective user and a time period record for recording time entries indicative of actual time expended by each user in performing said tasks; and
feeding back to said project plan said actual time expended in performing said tasks for managing completion of said tasks in according with said time schedules.
10. A method according to claim 9 further comprising:
mapping a funding source to said project plan; and
tracking cumulative labor cost for said project plan based on said actual time expended for said project tasks.
11. A method according to claim 10 further comprising administering said personnel resource pool to effect changes thereto and in turn changes to said assignments table.
12. A method according to claim 10 further comprising revising said project plan based on at least one of progress in meeting said time schedules and said cumulative labor cost.
13. A method according to claim 10 further comprising planning and translating a plurality of said projects into a common assignments table to effect time sheets for said users containing all project tasks for each user.
14. A method according to claim 10 wherein said project planning step utilizes a preexisting project management tool to effect said project plan.
15. A method according to claim 10 wherein said user profile includes a unique identifier, and further comprising providing said user identifiers to said planning step for planning said project around users identified by said identifier.
16. A method according to claim 10 further comprising downloading personnel data from a preexisting computer system for identifying said personnel resource pool.
Descripción
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to data processing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to management applications used in data processing systems.

2. Background Information

Large companies employ numerous employees and external contractors for performing various projects in conducting business. Various levels of managers define projects to be performed by employee and contractor personnel in accordance with project plans containing specified tasks requiring completion in accordance with respective time schedules.

Large companies typically utilize programmable computers and associated databases to more effectively manage available personnel and track expended labor hours for following established financial budgets. Various internal and external funding accounts may exist to which personnel may charge their labor time. In one common example, it is required to track work performed in completing a capital project which can be depreciated for tax purposes. Accordingly, a specific Capital Project Appropriation Request (CPAR) is created to which personnel may charge expended time in performing work thereunder.

One conventional system is known as the Automated Issue Management System (AIMS) and is used in conjunction with another conventional system called Entry System (TES) which are used for capitalizing internal and external labor. The systems are contained in conventional programmable computers for more accurately managing the large number of personnel involved and the substantial number of individual tasks associated with various capital projects. A project manager typically initiates a project by opening a specific work request in the AIMS system. The system automatically provides a respective AIMS number, which typically has a correlation to a single CPAR number. The manager assigns personnel to complete tasks based on an AIMS number. The TES system allows personnel to record through a personal computer expended time per AIMS number as the work is completed. The TES system allows the manager to examine cumulative time expended for specific AIMS numbers, with the manager manually correlating the AIMS number to a specific CPAR.

Although the AIMS and TES systems facilitate managing projects in a large company, project planning and managing is nevertheless relatively complex in most circumstances. To further facilitate project management in large companies, commercially available software has been developed. One available management tool or product is conventionally known as Microsoft Project from Microsoft Corp., and another product is ABT Project Workbench from the Applied Business Technology Corporation. These software tools allow companies to define project plans in accordance with tasks and time schedules for available personnel resources, and are typically operated in stand-alone fashion or in conjunction with other commercially available software products for facilitating the overall management of projects. However, these commercially available products are designed for specific applications and are therefore limited in capability, as well as having no built in capability for managing project funding such as the CPAR example introduced above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A dynamic project management system includes a server network and a master database. The network is configured to identify a personnel resource pool including a plurality of users. A project planning tool is used to effect the project plan including a plurality of tasks to be performed by the users in accordance with respective time schedules. The network is configured for translating the project plan into the master database to effect an assignments table including a list of project tasks assigned for completion by each of the users. Time sheets are periodically prepared in the master database from the assignments table and include a list of the project tasks assigned to a respective user and a time period record for recording time entries therein. Actual time expended in performing the tasks is fed back to the project plan for managing completion of the tasks in accordance with the time schedules. In a preferred embodiment, a funding source is mapped to the project plan so that cumulative labor cost may be tracked based on actual time expended for the project tasks.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention, in accordance with preferred and exemplary embodiments, together with further objects and advantages thereof, is more particularly described in the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a plurality of projects to be completed by a personnel resource pool using various funding sources.

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a dynamic project management system having a master database in accordance with one architecture embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of one architecture embodiment for implementing the dynamic project management system illustrated in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating exemplary method steps in effecting the dynamic project management system illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

Illustrated schematically in FIG. 1 are a plurality of project plans, labeled projects 1 and 2 for example, each of which includes a plurality of project tasks which require completion in accordance with respective time schedules as is conventionally known. The various project tasks must be completed by available employees in a typical large company, and by external contractors as required. The employees and contractors define a resource personnel pool from which managers assign one or more tasks to selected individuals from the various projects which must be completed in accordance with respective time schedules. Associated with each of the projects is a respective internal or external source of funding to which each of the project tasks may be assigned.

In accordance with the present invention as illustrated schematically in FIG. 2, a dynamic project management system 10 is provided for automatically tracking and controlling project tasks in accordance with the various project time schedules, and the associated funding therefore. FIG. 3 illustrates schematically the architecture or hardware associated with the system 10, with FIG. 2 illustrating schematically the software associated therewith.

Referring firstly to FIG. 3, the system 10 includes one or more conventional server networks 12 each including a director-level programmable digital computer server 14 operatively joined to a respective plurality of programmable personal computer (PC) user terminals 16. The number of user terminals 16 is typically limited, to about 250 terminals for example, for each director server 14, and therefore additional server networks 12 are utilized as required for supporting the specific number of resource personnel available, who are also referred to as users. The director servers 14 may be located at one geographic site, or may be located at various geographically spaced apart sites depending upon the organizational structure of the corresponding company and its needs. Conventional software is used to operate the server networks 12.

The one or more director servers 14, and their associated user terminals 16, are conventionally operatively joined to a common or master database 18 to which data may be written and stored, and from which data may be read by each of the director servers 14 and the various user terminals 16. The master database 18 may reside at any one or all of the director servers 14, and may be defined redundantly at each of the servers 14 if desired.

In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, the system 10 further includes a supernova-level programmable computer server 20, also referred to simply as a superserver 20, operatively joined to the plurality of director servers 14 and the master database 18. The superserver 20 is conventionally configured and operatively joined to the director servers 14 for suitably downloading and uploading data as described in more detail below.

The system 10 preferably includes in part and cooperates with a pre-existing, conventional programmable mainframe computer system 22 which is operatively joined to the superserver 20. The mainframe system 22 includes a main database 24 having stored therein personnel resource data and funding data. In one company for example, the mainframe system 22 would be employed for maintaining suitable records of available company employees, and outside or external contractors typically used thereby as required, with these workers or users being collectively referred to as personnel. Similarly, the mainframe system 22 would also be used for storing suitable identification of various funding sources, both internal and external to the company, as desired so that work tasks and non-work related charges such as vacation and sick days may be associated with a specific funding identification or source.

In one example, the mainframe system 22 conventionally includes a Human Resources Information System (HRIS) 26, which is software implemented and accessible by a conventional terminal 26a. The HRIS system 26 contains, among other things, various data regarding company employees.

The exemplary mainframe system 22 also includes a software implemented Resource Management System (RMS) 28 which is accessed through a corresponding terminal 28a. The RMS system 28 is used to maintain employee and contractor information required for monitoring utilization thereof and cost of development, maintenance, and support of software, for example.

The mainframe system 22 further includes another software implemented conventional Automated Issue Management System (AIMS) 30 which is used for capitalizing internal and external labor. In the AIMS system 30, a manager first opens a work request to begin a Capital project. The AIMS system 30 provides a corresponding AIMS number therefore, which number has a correlation to a single specific funding source such as a CPAR number. The AIMS system 30 is used in conjunction with the conventional time entry system introduced above in which personnel enter expended time in a computer terminal based on the AIMS number itself.

The mainframe system 22 also includes another conventional, software implemented Capital Budget Project Tracking Analysis (CBPTA) system 32 which is used for tracking Capital budgets independently of the AIMS system 30.

In order to effect the Dynamic Project Management System 10 illustrated in FIG. 3, it is desirable to use available or pre-existing hardware and software to advantage for automatically tracking and controlling funding progress and time schedules for various projects. In this regard, the hardware illustrated in FIG. 3 including the master database 18 is used in conjunction with software developed specifically therefore in accordance with the present invention. Although the conventional time entry system software introduced above facilitates time entry by the various users, such time entry is related to the simple AIMS numbers without any direct correlation to either project funding sources or project plans. In accordance with the present invention, the Dynamic Project Management System 10 includes an improved Time Entry System (TES) configured for specifically associating time tracking with separately developed project plans, as well as funding information.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, the TES software in accordance with the present invention includes three portions or modules referred to separately as TES Administrator (TES/Admin), TES planning (TES/Plan), and TES Personal Computer (TES/PC). Each of these three modules respectively addresses the specific need of personnel resource management, project planning, and time entry in an interrelated cooperation using the common or master TES database 18. The TES/Admin software resides in the exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2 on both the director servers 14 and the supernova server 20, with different functions being performed on each server as described in more detail below. The TES/PC software resides at the user terminals 16 which are used primarily for entering expended time into the master database 18. This setup allows users to act independently, with the common database 18 being readily maintained independently thereof. And, TES/Plan also resides on the director servers 14 for providing a specifically configured interface with a conventional, commercially available project management tool in accordance with the invention.

More specifically, two examples of commercially available project management or planning software tools include Microsoft Project from the Microsoft Corporation, and ABT Project Workbench by the Applied Business Technology Corporation. Each of these preexisting and predefined software tools provides means for a project manager to plan a desired project to effect a project plan including a plurality of described tasks to be performed by identified personnel or users in accordance with respective time schedules. The TES/Plan module in accordance with the invention as illustrated in FIG. 2 provides means for automatically interfacing the existing project management tool with the TES server network 12 through the common database 18. In order to maximize compatibility between the preexisting project management tool and the TES server network 12, the TES software modules including TES/Plan, TES/Admin, and TES/PC are created using the commercially available Microsoft Visual Basic software which allows users to interface with the system at their respective terminals using "windows" analogous to those found in the well known Microsoft Windows software.

Since the project management tool creates project tasks and assigns them to identified users, it is desirable to correlate identification of the users in the project tool to actual users in the Project Management System 10 already identified therein. More specifically, the mainframe system 22 previously described with respect to FIG. 3 includes the main database 24 which identifies available employee and contractor personnel. Accordingly, the TES/Admin software module which resides on the superserver 20 illustrated in FIG. 3 is used as a resource administrator for the TES applications and is used in conjunction with the existing mainframe system 22 as means for providing or identifying a personnel resource pool from the personnel data stored in the main database 24.

TES/Admin is used to provide each of the personnel or users with a corresponding identification profile which is used to advantage in the TES system including the project management tool. Each user profile includes a unique identifier, such as a four character identification (ID), that identifies each user in the system 10 and controls access thereto. The user profile also includes the user's name and a password which may be selected by the user; a reporting-to manager; a time sheet approving manager; and a security or access level flag, for example for levels 1 through 9, which determines permitted access to various functions of the TES system 10. The user profile also includes a directorate, or department and location, identification which allows the user profiles to be organized to correspond with respective ones of the director servers 14, with respective director servers 14 being used locally to service or administer each of the users assigned within its jurisdiction.

Since the superserver 20 is operatively joined to the mainframe system 22, the TES/Admin module at the superserver level is configured to effect the personnel resource pool by downloading employee information from the HRIS system 26 and may be used to manage employee transfers, additions, terminations, and associated information. Contractor profiles are maintained by downloading data from the RMS system 28 in a similar manner, with the respective personnel data being retrieved from the main database 24. The personnel profiles are organized by TES/Admin by directorate which is associated with a respective one of the director servers 14.

And, most significantly, the available personnel resource pool as identified by their respective profiles is also available for use in each of the director servers 14 by project managers for use in developing required project plans using the project management tool shown in FIG. 2. The project management tool may reside at any one or all of the director servers 14, and preferably uses a personnel resource template therein identifying users selected by project managers using TES/Admin from the available personnel resource pool maintained in the master database 18. The TES/Plan interface module illustrated in FIG. 2 downloads to the project management tool identified users from the personnel resource pool for use in assigning tasks thereto in accordance with the project plan separately developed by the project management tool.

Any project manager can create one or more project plans using the project management tool as accessed through any user terminal 16, with the manager's own user profile being associated therewith for in effect owning or controlling the respective project plans. These first two steps of the overall method are illustrated in flow chart form in FIG. 4 to initially create the user profiles using the TES/Admin module, and then creating one or more project plans using the commercially available project management tool based on the so created user profiles. Project managers may also use TES/Admin to define general tasks to be completed by selected users independently of the project management tool.

The TES/Plan interface module is also configured for translating the project plan developed in the project management tool into the TES master database 18 illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 to assign project tasks to individual users by effecting an assignments table in the master database 18 which includes a list of project tasks assigned for completion by each of the identified or assigned users. The assignments table resides in the common or master database 18 and is accessible by each of the director servers 14 and lists assigned tasks for one or more projects for each of the identified users.

The TES/Plan interface module extracts the tasks and assignments from the project management tool using one of two exemplary methods. For the Microsoft Project tool, conventional Object Linking Embedded (OLE) is used. The tasks and assignments are saved in the TES master database 18 exactly in the same format as the Microsoft Access database created by Microsoft Project which makes project loading and project updating extremely easy to perform in the TES software. For the ABT Project Workbench, the ABT project file is saved by the user manager in a conventional comma-delimited format. The TES/Plan module may then update directly this comma-delimited file. In all cases, the four character unique user identifier serves as the key database field to interface the project management tool with the remainder of the TES system 10.

Referring again to FIG. 4, after the assignments table is created in the master database 18 for assigning project tasks to users identified by their user profiles, the TES/PC software module illustrated in FIG. 2 is then used by the users for manually entering actual or expended time in accomplishing the project tasks using a visual or virtual time sheet.

More specifically, the TES/PC software module which resides at each of the user terminals 16 illustrated in FIG. 3 and allows access by authorized users to the common master database 18 illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3. The TES/PC module provides means for periodically, on a weekly schedule for example, preparing in the master database 18 from the assignments table therein a plurality of virtual time sheets, one for each respective user, with each time sheet listing the several project tasks assigned to a respective user and a time period record for manually recording time entries by the users indicative of actual time expended by each user in performing the respective task. As shown in FIG. 4, the times sheets are automatically prepared for each user and provide a simple vehicle for the user to enter actual time expended against identified and described project tasks, which is a significant advantage over the conventional time entry system which allows time entry based on the simple AIMS number.

A schematic representation of a portion of an exemplary time sheet is illustrated in FIG. 4 for a given time period such as an identified week during which listed tasks may be completed in accordance with the time schedules established in the project management tool. Since the TES/PC software module is also written in Microsoft Visual Basic software, it will have the typical Microsoft "windows" appearance although being configured to suitably identify individual users, and list their assigned project tasks by name and/or description, and provide suitable table records in which expended time may be recorded against assigned tasks. The time sheet preferably also includes a comments region in which the user may provide any suitable comments directed to the approving manager. The TES/PC module may be suitably configured as desired for displaying one or more suitable windows for informing each user of assigned tasks and time schedules therefore, while allowing the user to enter actual time expended in performing the tasks, as well as estimated time to completion for the tasks. Various other categories may also be presented in the windows which are typically used in conventional time sheets including recording vacation, illness, or personal business days for example. Of primary significance, however, is the ability for users to enter labor expended against specific tasks, instead of entering time on simple AIMS numbers which will allow project teams to track and control projects with improved efficiency and accuracy.

After a user completes a time sheet, it is stored in the master database 18 and may be printed by the user at any time using a conventional printer 16p as illustrated in FIG. 3. Each user is assigned a time approving manager who has security access to the time sheet data and is required to review the time sheets and either approve or reject the entries made therein. If rejected, the user is suitably alerted via the network so that any required corrections may be made thereto. Once time sheets are approved, the data contained therein are then available for further analysis and use in the TES system 10.

For example, and as shown in FIG. 4, the TES/Plan module is also configured to organize and consolidate the time sheet entries as desired for individual projects and tasks therein, which data is then fed back to the project plans in the project management tool. This provides the project manager an accurate feedback loop on actual progress made against a specific project plan. Suitable project progress reports may be configured for examination by the project manager either visually on his user terminal or may be printed as desired for managing completion of the project tasks in accordance with the various time schedules. The actual time expended by the user is simply fed back into the assignments table maintained in the master database 18 in the same format as required for access by the project management tool. In this way, project managers may periodically track and control project progress in accordance with the previously defined time schedules. If required, the project management tool may be used to revise the various project plans and in turn update the assignments table maintained in the master database 18 to adjust assigned tasks and time schedules as required for the various identified users.

The TES/Admin module residing at the superserver illustrated in FIG. 2 also provides means for administering the personnel resource pool to effect changes thereto and in turn changes to the assignments table maintained in the master database 18. The personnel resource pool may be modified in response to transfers, additions, and terminations of users, as well as changing user profiles as required. For example, user passwords may be reset as desired and changes of directorate and reporting or approving managers may also be changed. Security level access to the TES system 10 may be changed as required by modifying the corresponding security level flag or parameter. The lowest level security is that for the individual users for allowing their access to the user terminals 16 for entering time therein. Reporting and department managers have a correspondingly higher security level for allowing their access to the TES system 10 as required for completing their responsibilities. Project managers are given suitable security level access to load projects into TES/Plan which are created in the project management tool and develop or revise project plans. The highest level of security resides at the superserver level for administering all aspects of the TES system 10 including the personnel resource pool.

Another significant feature of the present invention is the ability of the TES/Admin module to map or assign a specific funding source to a specific project or project plan so that cumulative labor costs therefore may be tracked based on actual time expended for the project tasks by the assigned users.

As illustrated in FIG. 4, the TES/Admin module is suitably configured to map a desired funding source to specific projects and project tasks therein identified in the individual time sheets and stored in the assignments table in the master database 18. As illustrated in FIG. 3, existing funding sources are identified in the main database 24 of the mainframe system 22 which may be downloaded as desired for association with respective project plans identified in the master database 18. A specific funding source may be readily linked to a specific project plan in the master database 18 so that cumulative labor cost therefore may be tracked. The funding sources may either be internal to the company, or external such as joint venture credits and alliance reporting. Also, temporary funding sources may be generated in TES/Admin that can later be mapped to valid corporate accounts if desired. A typical corporate funding source is the conventional CPAR. And, funding sources for specific project plans may be changed periodically as desired using the TES/Admin module.

As illustrated in FIG. 4, tracking cumulative labor costs for the individual project plans may then be used for reporting funding progress for the plans, which allows a project manager to revise project plans as required in the project management tool and correspondingly revise the assignments table in turn. In this way, the TES system 10 allows tracking of not only project progress in accordance with the time schedules, but also tracking of cumulative labor cost as actually expended by users in performing the project tasks. The project plans may therefore be suitably revised as required to accommodate time schedule and funding concerns.

Although the TES/Admin software module and the TES/Plan module may be maintained on a single director level server 14, it is desirable to create the multi-level hierarchy architecture illustrated in FIG. 3 for integrating the TES modules with the mainframe system 22 for improving performance. For example, the TES/Admin module residing at the superserver 20 may be effectively used for identifying all director server locations; identifying all authorized users and their respective server locations; feeding all applicable data to the director servers 14; and consolidating and backing up data from the director servers 14. The superserver 20 provides a repository for consolidated project data from all downstream director servers 14, and performs all required interface functions with the corporate mainframe systems 22.

Through downloads from the corporate system 22, the TES/Admin module identifies available users based on active employees and contractors from the personnel data residing at the main database 24. It also validates the funding information for the various project plans based on the corporate accounting systems residing at the corporate level. Upgrades to the various TES software modules may be also downloaded as required.

Through uploads to the corporate mainframe system 22, the TES/Admin module provides managed labor feed to the appropriate corporate time accounting systems, including all applicable required edits. Conventional corporate time accounting requirements are expanded to include functionality for billing and charge back of labor to external alliances and joint ventures.

The TES/Admin module residing at the director level preferably provides at this level the ability to set user parameters including for example, user access to all TES software; passwords; approving managers and subordinate roll up structure; and user roles. User role definitions for TES/Admin use include identification of approving managers, without budget authorization; department managers, with complete authorization for selected departments; project managers, having complete authorization for selected projects; and director level administrators having complete authorization for corresponding functions. General tasks independent of the project management tool may be created by responsible managers at the director level for completion by assigned users using a generic time funding category.

The TES/Admin module is preferably also used to define funding relationships for the project plans loaded through the TES/Plan module by linking project plans to corporate funding sources, which may be changed periodically as desired. Temporary funding sources may also be assigned, and direct links to the corporate mainframe system 22 are preferred for validating funding sources and editing as required. And, any type of funding source may be identified including both internal and external funding.

The TES/Admin module is also configured to prepare various reports regarding performance as required. The commercially available Crystal Reports software available from the Crystal Computer Services Company, Inc., of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada may be used for example. Complete reporting functionality for both financial and project metrics is provided for tracking project time scheduled progress as well as funding progress as addressed above.

And, the TES/PC module residing at the various user terminals 16 allows the two primary functions of time entry interface for authorized employees and contractors, and subsequent approval by approving managers identified in the TES/Admin module. The users enter time against tasks assigned from the project plans loaded in by the TES/Plan module; or general tasks created in the TES/Admin module for the entire directorate; or administrative accounts for vacation, holiday, sickness, and other typical non-work related conditions. The TES/PC module allows for general as well as task level comments for subsequent status reporting and review by managers. The time sheets are entered periodically such as weekly, with the users being able to enter estimated time to completion against assigned tasks which is fed back into the external project planning tool through the update actuals option in the TES/Plan module. And, the individual users may print copies of the time sheets as desired. Approving managers have security level access to view all subordinate time sheets for approval or rejection thereof. Approving managers themselves are allowed to report delinquencies and administrator account information for all subordinates.

The project management system 10 disclosed above may be readily tailored as desired for integrating the various roles of the users and managers in conjunction with the preexisting project management tool and mainframe system 22. In this way, existing personnel data may be suitably downloaded to the project management tool for creating one or more project plans having tasks assigned to specific, pre-identified users in accordance with respective time schedules. The various tasks required in the one or more projects are maintained in the common assignments table residing in the master database 18 so that individual users may access the database via the corresponding time sheets for viewing tasks assigned to the users for completion in accordance with the defined time schedules. The individual users readily enter time expended in completing identified tasks, as well as time to completion if desired. The actual time expended is then consolidated in the master database 18 so that project progress in accordance with the various time schedules may be tracked, and most significantly, cumulative labor expended or labor costs may also be tracked. The original project plans may be revised as desired based on the feedback obtained from the project schedule or funding progress. And, of particular importance is the ability to identify project tasks by description or name instead of a non-descriptive AIMS number as was previously done, which allows integration with the project management tool for tracking and controlling identified projects in accordance with the assigned project task.

While there have been described herein what are considered to be preferred and exemplary embodiments of the present invention, other modifications of the invention shall be apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein, and it is, therefore, desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent of the United States is the invention as defined and differentiated in the following claims:

Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US4819162 *9 Feb 19884 Abr 1989Time Management CorporationTime clock system including scheduling payroll and productivity analysis capability
US4937743 *10 Sep 198726 Jun 1990Intellimed CorporationMethod and system for scheduling, monitoring and dynamically managing resources
US4942527 *11 Dic 198717 Jul 1990Schumacher Billy GComputerized management system
US5111391 *5 Oct 19895 May 1992Mrs. Fields, Inc.System and method for making staff schedules as a function of available resources as well as employee skill level, availability and priority
US5117353 *5 May 198926 May 1992Staff-Plus, Inc.System for use in a temporary help business
US5172313 *10 Ene 199015 Dic 1992Schumacher Billy GComputerized management system
US5459657 *21 Jun 199317 Oct 1995Mirage Resorts IncorporatedEmployee time entry and accounting system
US5557515 *17 Mar 199517 Sep 1996Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Inc.Computerized system and method for work management
Otras citas
Referencia
1MCI, "AIMS Users' Guide," revised Aug. 1994, pp.: 1-24.
2MCI, "TES Users' Guide-Employee & Contractor Edition," revised Aug. 1994 pp.: 1-23.
3MCI, "TES Users' Guide-Manager & Budget Coordinator Edition," revised Aug. 1994, pp.: 1-35.
4 *MCI, AIMS Users Guide, revised Aug. 1994, pp.: 1 24.
5 *MCI, TES Users Guide Employee & Contractor Edition, revised Aug. 1994 pp.: 1 23.
6 *MCI, TES Users Guide Manager & Budget Coordinator Edition, revised Aug. 1994, pp.: 1 35.
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US5907829 *9 Ene 199725 May 1999Nec CorporationSchedule management system and recording medium
US6044354 *19 Dic 199628 Mar 2000Sprint Communications Company, L.P.Computer-based product planning system
US6067549 *11 Dic 199823 May 2000American Management Systems, Inc.System for managing regulated entities
US6101481 *15 Ene 19978 Ago 2000Taskey Pty Ltd.Task management system
US6141778 *29 Jun 199831 Oct 2000Mci Communications CorporationMethod and apparatus for automating security functions in a computer system
US625664020 Mar 20003 Jul 2001American Management Systems, Inc.System for managing regulated entities
US6338097 *19 Jun 19988 Ene 2002Sap AktiengesellschaftCross application time sheet for communicating with one or more enterprise management applications during time data entry
US6405364 *31 Ago 199911 Jun 2002Accenture LlpBuilding techniques in a development architecture framework
US6415259 *15 Jul 19992 Jul 2002American Management Systems, Inc.Automatic work progress tracking and optimizing engine for a telecommunications customer care and billing system
US641842030 Jun 19989 Jul 2002Sun Microsystems, Inc.Distributed budgeting and accounting system with secure token device access
US65570091 Sep 200029 Abr 2003American Management Systems, Inc.Environmental permit web portal with data validation capabilities
US657460517 Nov 19993 Jun 2003Citibank, N.A.Method and system for strategic services enterprise workload management
US6604124 *24 Oct 20005 Ago 2003A:\Scribes CorporationSystems and methods for automatically managing work flow based on tracking job step completion status
US664365212 Ene 20014 Nov 2003Saba Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for managing data exchange among systems in a network
US667169223 Nov 199930 Dic 2003Accenture LlpSystem for facilitating the navigation of data
US667169323 Nov 199930 Dic 2003Accenture LlpSystem for effectively collecting and disseminating data
US6678671 *2 Nov 200013 Ene 2004Klocwork Solutions CorporationSystem for linking a resource management system with an event of a project in a project management system and a method therefor
US6678714 *12 Nov 199913 Ene 2004Taskserver.Com, Inc.Computer-implemented task management system
US672174712 Ene 200113 Abr 2004Saba Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for an information server
US6732079 *1 Nov 19994 May 2004General Motors CorporationMethod of determining the best mix of regular and contract employees
US67451874 Feb 20031 Jun 2004American Management System, Inc.Environmental permit web portal
US6745200 *12 Ago 20021 Jun 2004Mary StarkeyFacility management services defining, scheduling, executing series of tasks performed by service staff
US676393429 Ene 200220 Jul 2004Ishida Co., Ltd.Electromagnetically driven transport device and weighing apparatus using the same
US6810383 *6 Abr 200026 Oct 2004Xactware, Inc.Automated task management and evaluation
US685089312 Ene 20011 Feb 2005Saba Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for an improved security system mechanism in a business applications management system platform
US6850895 *30 May 20011 Feb 2005Siebel Systems, Inc.Assignment manager
US6873961 *9 Sep 199829 Mar 2005The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyMethod and apparatus for identifying and tracking project trends
US688919628 Mar 20003 May 2005Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning, monitoring, and illustrating multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US6901372 *5 Abr 200031 May 2005Ford Motor CompanyQuality operating system
US6918089 *5 Jul 200112 Jul 2005Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaSchedule management system
US6944622 *20 Ene 200013 Sep 2005International Business Machines CorporationUser interface for automated project management
US6968314 *22 Dic 199922 Nov 2005International Business Machines CorporationEnhanced security features for an automated order fulfillment system
US697600224 Ago 199913 Dic 2005Steelcase Development CorporationSystem and method of determining a knowledge management solution
US7006978 *14 May 200128 Feb 2006General Electric Capital CorporationMethod and systems for developing an acquisition integration project plan
US703199829 May 200318 Abr 2006A: /Scribes CorporationSystems and methods for automatically managing workflow based on optimization of job step scheduling
US70510363 Dic 200123 May 2006Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc.Computer-implemented system and method for project development
US7065764 *20 Jul 200120 Jun 2006Netrendered, Inc.Dynamically allocated cluster system
US706922928 Mar 200027 Jun 2006Metier Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning and monitoring multiple tasks and employee work performance based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US707293412 Ene 20014 Jul 2006Saba Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for a business applications server management system platform
US708958312 Ene 20018 Ago 2006Saba Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for a business applications server
US710019530 Jul 199929 Ago 2006Accenture LlpManaging user information on an e-commerce system
US7113923 *3 Feb 199926 Sep 2006Electronic Data Systems CorporationSystem and method of managing an office of programs
US71139337 Nov 200226 Sep 2006Ameriprise Financial, Inc.Method and system for automated generation of a requested report in a computer system
US7120664 *28 Mar 200210 Oct 2006Fujitsu LimitedWeb page providing method, server machine, web page providing program, and computer readable medium
US715894010 Jun 20032 Ene 2007Prosight, Ltd.Method and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment
US7159206 *26 Nov 20022 Ene 2007Unisys CorporationAutomated process execution for project management
US71716526 Dic 200230 Ene 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.Software development environment with design specification verification tool
US7185022 *23 Ene 200227 Feb 2007Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.Work data management system and work data management method
US7191141 *13 Jun 200113 Mar 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.Automated management of development project files over a network
US7212986 *16 Jun 19991 May 2007Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning and monitoring multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US721608826 Jul 20018 May 2007Perot Systems CorporationSystem and method for managing a project based on team member interdependency and impact relationships
US7221983 *25 Nov 200322 May 2007Fanuc LtdProduction cell
US723694016 May 200126 Jun 2007Perot Systems CorporationMethod and system for assessing and planning business operations utilizing rule-based statistical modeling
US724914513 Oct 200024 Jul 2007General Electric CompanyMethods and apparatus for selecting candidates to interview
US7286999 *9 May 200223 Oct 2007International Business Machines CorporationIntegrated project management and development environment for determining the time expended on project tasks
US7302401 *4 Abr 200027 Nov 2007Single Source OyData management mechanism for project planning
US7302674 *6 Ago 200327 Nov 2007Unisys CorporationAutomating document reviews in a project management system
US730867528 Ago 200311 Dic 2007Ricoh Company, Ltd.Data structure used for directory structure navigation in a skeleton code creation tool
US7313531 *29 Nov 200125 Dic 2007Perot Systems CorporationMethod and system for quantitatively assessing project risk and effectiveness
US7321864 *3 Nov 200022 Ene 2008Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.System and method for providing funding approval associated with a project based on a document collection
US73632618 May 200222 Abr 2008Regions Asset CompanyMethod, computer program product and system for verifying financial data
US7376577 *30 Ago 199920 May 2008Mitsubishi Automotive Engin. Co., Ltd.System for managing process and man-hour
US738321526 Oct 20003 Jun 2008Fair Isaac CorporationData center for account management
US738652621 Oct 200310 Jun 2008Perot Systems CorporationMethod of and system for rules-based population of a knowledge base used for medical claims processing
US740113129 Mar 200215 Jul 2008Verizon Business Global LlcMethod and system for implementing improved containers in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US740643228 Ene 200229 Jul 2008Ricoh Company, Ltd.Project management over a network with automated task schedule update
US748711528 Mar 20053 Feb 2009Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning, monitoring, and illustrating multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US753303410 Ene 200212 May 2009Brainbank, Inc.Idea management
US75590498 Dic 20037 Jul 2009Sprint Communications Company L.P.Integrated advance scheduling of indeterminate projects in an integrated development process
US7562029 *2 Oct 200714 Jul 2009International Business Machines CorporationIntegrated project management and development environment for determining the time expended on project tasks
US7596754 *28 Jul 200529 Sep 2009Microsoft CorporationApplication assistance
US76071308 Mar 200420 Oct 2009Microsoft CorporationWorkflow as data-transition driven, scriptable state machines
US76137127 Oct 20053 Nov 2009Metatomix, Inc.Methods and apparatus for identifying related nodes in a directed graph having named arcs
US76171549 Jun 200410 Nov 2009Legal Systems Holding CompanyEnsuring the accurateness and currentness of information provided by the submitter of an electronic invoice throughout the life of a matter
US7617232 *2 Sep 200410 Nov 2009Microsoft CorporationCentralized terminology and glossary development
US763459816 Ago 200615 Dic 2009Permanent Solution Industries, Inc.Dynamic total asset management system (TAMS) and method for managing building facility services
US76402394 Ene 200529 Dic 2009Metatomix, Inc.Methods and apparatus for real-time business visibility using persistent schema-less data storage
US7640250 *25 Ene 200729 Dic 2009Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.Work data management system and work data management method
US7657445 *5 Jul 20022 Feb 2010Rise Above Technologies, LLCMethod and system for managing healthcare facility resources
US76574549 Ago 20052 Feb 2010Microsoft CorporationServer-side project manager
US7689449 *19 Ene 200030 Mar 2010Fujitsu LimitedMessage processing apparatus, message processing system, message managing method, and storage medium storing message management program
US772538412 Sep 200725 May 2010Textura CorporationConstruction payment management system and method with one-time registration features
US772993930 Abr 20071 Jun 2010Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning and monitoring multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US773448923 Dic 20058 Jun 2010Oracle International CorporationMethod and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment
US77344906 Ene 20068 Jun 2010Oracle International CorporationMethod and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment
US7734491 *15 Jun 20048 Jun 2010Microsoft CorporationHierarchical projects in a computer-enabled project management method and system
US7739137 *4 Feb 200515 Jun 2010Suresh JagtianiProject management software
US7752065 *20 Ago 20046 Jul 2010Leonard BuzzDigital percent complete process
US775243719 Ene 20066 Jul 2010Sprint Communications Company L.P.Classification of data in data flows in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US77567344 Ene 200613 Jul 2010Oracle International CorporationMethod and apparatus for facilitating management of information technology investment
US778830219 Ene 200631 Ago 2010Sprint Communications Company L.P.Interactive display of a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US779739519 Ene 200614 Sep 2010Sprint Communications Company L.P.Assignment of data flows to storage systems in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US780197319 Ene 200621 Sep 2010Sprint Communications Company L.P.Classification of information in data flows in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US780226429 Mar 200221 Sep 2010Verizon Business Global LlcMethod and system for implementing a databus in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US78095986 Oct 20055 Oct 2010International Business Machines CorporationComputer-implemented method, tool, and program product for scheduling an information technology (IT) migration
US782262121 Oct 200326 Oct 2010Perot Systems CorporationMethod of and system for populating knowledge bases using rule based systems and object-oriented software
US782278124 Jun 200526 Oct 2010Verizon Business Global LlcMethod and system for managing partitioned data resources
US78314423 Ene 20039 Nov 2010Perot Systems CorporationSystem and method for minimizing edits for medical insurance claims processing
US783160429 Oct 20079 Nov 2010Britton Colin PMethods and apparatus for enterprise application integration
US784943827 May 20047 Dic 2010Sprint Communications Company L.P.Enterprise software development process for outsourced developers
US785648629 Mar 200221 Dic 2010Verizon Business Global LlcMethod and system for implementing a global lookup in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US786122728 Jul 200628 Dic 2010Ricoh Company Ltd.Software development environment with design specification validation tool
US7885843 *31 Ago 20048 Feb 2011Sap AgComputer-implemented decision support system and method
US788594929 Feb 20088 Feb 2011Microsoft CorporationCentralized terminology and glossary management
US789051723 Feb 200515 Feb 2011Metatomix, Inc.Appliance for enterprise information integration and enterprise resource interoperability platform and methods
US789529519 Ene 200622 Feb 2011Sprint Communications Company L.P.Scoring data flow characteristics to assign data flows to storage systems in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US789533229 Oct 200722 Feb 2011Quest Software, Inc.Identity migration system apparatus and method
US7900152 *23 Sep 20051 Mar 2011Microsoft CorporationAdaptable user interface for business software
US7904322 *6 Abr 20078 Mar 2011Gauger Derek KNetwork based, interactive project management apparatus and method
US790494919 Dic 20058 Mar 2011Quest Software, Inc.Apparatus, systems and methods to provide authentication services to a legacy application
US791755523 Nov 200529 Mar 2011Microsoft CorporationCreating, storing and viewing process models
US792554015 Oct 200412 Abr 2011Rearden Commerce, Inc.Method and system for an automated trip planner
US7930201 *19 Ago 200319 Abr 2011Sprint Communications Company L.P.EDP portal cross-process integrated view
US79302034 Ago 200519 Abr 2011International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for systems integration
US79377059 Jun 20063 May 2011I2Z Technology, LlcDynamic job processing based on estimated completion time and specified tolerance time
US794137430 Jun 200610 May 2011Rearden Commerce, Inc.System and method for changing a personal profile or context during a transaction
US796622011 Nov 200821 Jun 2011Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning, monitoring and illustrating multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
US797066621 Abr 200528 Jun 2011Rearden Commerce, Inc.Aggregate collection of travel data
US798744715 May 200726 Jul 2011Ricoh Company, Ltd.Approach for automatically generating program code
US802430329 Jul 200520 Sep 2011Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Software release validation
US80509537 Jun 20061 Nov 2011Ricoh Company, Ltd.Use of a database in a network-based project schedule management system
US8065177 *27 Jul 200722 Nov 2011Bank Of America CorporationProject management system and method
US8078487 *28 Mar 200713 Dic 2011British Telecommunications PlcWorkflow scheduler
US808671030 Oct 200727 Dic 2011Quest Software, Inc.Identity migration apparatus and method
US808707513 Feb 200627 Dic 2011Quest Software, Inc.Disconnected credential validation using pre-fetched service tickets
US810823226 May 200531 Ene 2012Sprint Communications Company L.P.System and method for project contract management
US8108428 *30 Nov 200431 Ene 2012Legal Systems Holding CompanyVendor/client information system architecture
US8117073 *17 Sep 200414 Feb 2012Rearden Commerce, Inc.Method and system for delegation of travel arrangements by a temporary agent
US81455791 Sep 201027 Mar 2012International Business Machines CorporationSystem, method and program product to estimate cost of integrating and utilizing heterogeneous data sources
US819550224 Jun 20115 Jun 2012International Business Machines CorporationSystem, method and program to estimate cost of distributing software
US8209417 *8 Mar 200726 Jun 2012Oracle International CorporationDynamic resource profiles for clusterware-managed resources
US8219430 *27 Nov 200010 Jul 2012Nintendo Co., Ltd.Resource management system
US82199697 May 200710 Jul 2012Ricoh Company, Ltd.Data structure used for directory structure navigation in a skeleton code creation tool
US82452424 Nov 200914 Ago 2012Quest Software, Inc.Systems and methods for managing policies on a computer
US82505252 Mar 200721 Ago 2012Pegasystems Inc.Proactive performance management for multi-user enterprise software systems
US82559841 Jul 201028 Ago 2012Quest Software, Inc.Single sign-on system for shared resource environments
US827161423 Jul 200818 Sep 2012Ca, Inc.Single point of entry for web applications
US828081224 Sep 20092 Oct 2012Legal Systems Holding CompanyEnsuring the accurateness and currentness of information provided by the submitter of an electronic invoice throughout the life of a matter
US8296147 *7 Ago 200623 Oct 2012Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.Interactive voice controlled project management system
US833570428 Ene 200518 Dic 2012Pegasystems Inc.Methods and apparatus for work management and routing
US83357928 May 200618 Dic 2012Britton Colin PMethods and apparatus for enterprise application integration
US834690813 Dic 20111 Ene 2013Quest Software, Inc.Identity migration apparatus and method
US8370192 *23 Sep 20085 Feb 2013At&T Intellectual Property I, LpMethod and system for dynamic project management and capacity management
US841272029 Oct 20072 Abr 2013Colin P. BrittonMethods and apparatus for querying a relational data store using schema-less queries
US842971218 Jun 200623 Abr 2013Quest Software, Inc.Centralized user authentication system apparatus and method
US8458657 *18 Jun 20094 Jun 2013International Business Machines CorporationDocumentation roadmaps and community networking for developers on large projects
US847915729 Dic 20092 Jul 2013Pegasystems Inc.Methods and apparatus for integration of declarative rule-based processing with procedural programming in a digital data-processing evironment
US848406514 Jul 20059 Jul 2013Sprint Communications Company L.P.Small enhancement process workflow manager
US848944817 Abr 201216 Jul 2013International Business Machines CorporationSystem, method and program to estimate cost of distributing software
US851042919 Ene 200613 Ago 2013Sprint Communications Company L.P.Inventory modeling in a data storage infrastructure for a communication network
US853374431 Jul 201210 Sep 2013Dell Software, Inc.Systems and methods for managing policies on a computer
US853876718 Ago 200317 Sep 2013Sprint Communications Company L.P.Method for discovering functional and system requirements in an integrated development process
US8543603 *23 Feb 200924 Sep 2013Numoda Technologies, Inc.Visualization of data relationships between components of a project
US85440171 Abr 201124 Sep 2013Searchlite Advances, LlcDynamic job processing based on estimated completion time and specified tolerance time
US8554599 *25 Mar 20058 Oct 2013Microsoft CorporationWork item rules for a work item tracking system
US857190515 Jul 200829 Oct 2013IT Casino Solutions, LLCCasino operations management system
US85720597 Jul 200429 Oct 2013Colin P. BrittonSurveillance, monitoring and real-time events platform
US858421821 Dic 201112 Nov 2013Quest Software, Inc.Disconnected credential validation using pre-fetched service tickets
US8606588 *23 Nov 199910 Dic 2013Accenture Global Services LimitedMerger and acquisition knowledgebase
US862687729 Mar 20027 Ene 2014Verizon Business Global LlcMethod and system for implementing a global information bus in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US863512617 Nov 201021 Ene 2014It Casino Solutions LlcCasino operations management system
US8645907 *11 Sep 20074 Feb 2014Sandeep JainCapturing effort level by task upon check-in to source control management system
US87006942 Dic 200415 Abr 2014Anthurium Solutions, Inc.Systems and methods for managing workflow based on multi-level specification of job processing requirements
US8713523 *13 Mar 201229 Abr 2014International Business Machines CorporationDocumentation roadmaps and community networking for developers on large projects
US87135839 Sep 201329 Abr 2014Dell Software Inc.Systems and methods for managing policies on a computer
US8744885 *28 Mar 20073 Jun 2014Snowflake Itm, Inc.Task based organizational management system and method
US8788308 *29 Mar 200422 Jul 2014West CorporationEmployee scheduling and schedule modification method and apparatus
US20070150327 *21 Ene 200528 Jun 2007Rncc Global ProjectsProject management method and system
US20070244736 *28 Mar 200718 Oct 2007Snowflake Itm, Inc.Task based organizational management system and method
US20080066071 *11 Sep 200713 Mar 2008Sandeep JainCapturing effort level by task upon check-in to source control management system
US20080222642 *8 Mar 200711 Sep 2008Oracle International CorporationDynamic resource profiles for clusterware-managed resources
US20090144256 *29 Nov 20074 Jun 2009Moises CasesWorkflow control in a resource hierarchy
US20090193001 *23 Feb 200930 Jul 2009Numoda Technologies, Inc.Visualization of data relationships between components of a project
US20100030595 *27 Feb 20064 Feb 2010Employment Management Systems Pty LimitedTransactional Engine Linking Businesses to Multiple Recruitment Companies for Engagement & Management of Labour
US20100076803 *23 Sep 200825 Mar 2010Christopher DeoMethod and System for Dynamic Project Management and Capacity Management and capacity management
US20100250322 *29 Mar 201030 Sep 2010Michael Roy NorwoodSimplified user interface and method for computerized task management systems
US20100325613 *18 Jun 200923 Dic 2010International Business Machines CorporationDocumentation Roadmaps and Community Networking for Developers on Large Projects
US20110276358 *10 May 201110 Nov 2011Tibco Software Inc.Allocation of work items via queries of organizational structure and dynamic work item allocation
US20120053976 *31 Ago 20101 Mar 2012Xerox CorporationSystem and method for determining whether service costs can be reduced
US20120174066 *13 Mar 20125 Jul 2012International Business Machines CorporationDocumentation Roadmaps and Community Networking for Developers on Large Projects
US20120253864 *29 Ago 20114 Oct 2012Infosys Technologies, Ltd.Methods for recording and tracking projects and devices thereof
USRE42858 *29 Mar 200718 Oct 2011The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyMethod and apparatus for identifying and tracking project trends
DE10007584A1 *21 Feb 200030 Ago 2001Primasoft GmbhAutomatic project plan scheduling method involves adjusting deadline for completing project, based on available resources
EP0892960A1 *15 Ene 199727 Ene 1999Task Solutions Pty. Ltd.Task management system
EP1226533A1 *16 Jun 200031 Jul 2002Metier, Ltd.Method and apparatus for planning and monitoring multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
WO1999067749A1 *18 Jun 199929 Dic 1999Ralf DentzerMulti-application time sheet
WO2000000937A1 *30 Jun 19996 Ene 2000Sun Microsystems IncDistributed budgeting and accounting system with secure token device access
WO2000077710A1 *16 Jun 200021 Dic 2000Matthew BennettMethod and apparatus for planning and monitoring multiple tasks based on user defined criteria and predictive ability
WO2001003023A2 *8 Jun 200011 Ene 2001Nortel Networks LtdProcess management graphical user interface, system and method
WO2001003037A2 *30 Jun 200011 Ene 2001Microsoft CorpWorkflow method and system
WO2001055840A2 *26 Ene 20012 Ago 2001Data Control CorpOpportunity tracking information system
WO2001073583A2 *27 Mar 20004 Oct 2001Allied Signal IncMethod and apparatus for a closed loop real time working assignment tracking system
WO2002044981A1 *28 Nov 20016 Jun 2002Ahmad Sameh AtassiMethod for expediting entry of information into a timesheet system
WO2003010632A2 *24 Jul 20026 Feb 2003Accenture Global Services GmbhAn automated tool set for improving operations in an ecommerce business
WO2004095172A2 *14 Abr 20044 Nov 2004John RuskSystem and method for project management
WO2004102431A1 *17 May 200425 Nov 2004Crux Cybernetics Pty LtdA system for scheduling at least one task having a plurality of activities to be performed by one or more users of the system
WO2005004013A1 *30 Jun 200413 Ene 2005QuadratElectronic appointment scheduling
WO2005006142A2 *29 Jun 200420 Ene 2005Jeffrey C CameronMethod and system for scheduling and sharing a pool of resources across multiple distributed forecasted workloads
WO2005071564A1 *21 Ene 20054 Ago 2005Diane DromgoldA project management method and system
WO2007023485A2 *10 Ago 20061 Mar 2007Gand SystemsA system and a method for managing building projects
Clasificaciones
Clasificación de EE.UU.705/7.15, 705/7.37, 705/7.21, 705/7.17
Clasificación internacionalG06Q10/00
Clasificación cooperativaG06Q10/10, G06Q10/063114, G06Q10/063118, G06Q10/1097, G06Q10/06375
Clasificación europeaG06Q10/10, G06Q10/06375, G06Q10/06311H, G06Q10/06311D, G06Q10/1097
Eventos legales
FechaCódigoEventoDescripción
22 Abr 2014ASAssignment
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:032725/0001
Effective date: 20140409
Owner name: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC., NEW JERSEY
9 Dic 2009FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
31 Mar 2006FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
31 Mar 2006SULPSurcharge for late payment
Year of fee payment: 7
28 Dic 2005REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
28 Sep 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMB
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME AND MISSING PAGES OF THE ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 007968 FRAME 0093;ASSIGNORS:KNUDSON, JAMES GEORGE;VIVIAN, WILLIAM LAWRENCE;CREGO, MARK S.;REEL/FRAME:016593/0201
Effective date: 19960523
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME AND MISSING PAGES OF THE ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 007968 FRAME 0093. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF ASSIGNEE NAME TO MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND INCLUSION OF MISSING PAGES.;ASSIGNORS:KNUDSON, JAMES GEORGE;VIVIAN, WILLIAM LAWRENCE;CREGO, MARK S.;REEL/FRAME:016593/0201
2 Ene 2002REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
7 Dic 2001FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
29 May 1996ASAssignment
Owner name: TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KNUDSON, JAMES;VIVIAN, WILLIAM;CREGO, MARK;REEL/FRAME:007968/0093
Effective date: 19960523
17 Nov 1995ASAssignment
Owner name: MCI COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMB
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KNUDSON, JAMES GEORGE;VIVIAN, WILLIAM LAWRENCE;REEL/FRAME:008033/0687;SIGNING DATES FROM 19950922 TO 19950928