US5923521A - Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US5923521A US5923521A US09/092,600 US9260098A US5923521A US 5923521 A US5923521 A US 5923521A US 9260098 A US9260098 A US 9260098A US 5923521 A US5923521 A US 5923521A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- chuck
- wafer
- power supply
- electrostatic
- electrodes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/67—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
- H01L21/68—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for positioning, orientation or alignment
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/67—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
- H01L21/683—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for supporting or gripping
- H01L21/6831—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for supporting or gripping using electrostatic chucks
- H01L21/6833—Details of electrostatic chucks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02N—ELECTRIC MACHINES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H02N13/00—Clutches or holding devices using electrostatic attraction, e.g. using Johnson-Rahbek effect
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T279/00—Chucks or sockets
- Y10T279/23—Chucks or sockets with magnetic or electrostatic means
Definitions
- the invention relates to a substrate support chuck for electrostatically retaining a workpiece upon the support surface of the chuck. More particularly, the invention relates to a bipolar electrostatic chuck having apparatus for balancing the electrostatic force applied to a workpiece supported by the chuck.
- Substrate support chucks are widely used to support substrates within semiconductor processing systems.
- An electrostatic chuck is described in commonly assigned European Patent Publication Number 0 439 000 B1, published Sep. 14, 1994.
- This electrostatic chuck has a conventional chuck body containing a dielectric material having a pair of coplanar electrodes embedded therein.
- the electrodes are half-moon or D-shaped such that each electrode provides clamping force to half the workpiece that is supported by a support surface of the chuck body.
- a chucking voltage is applied to each electrode which causes an electric field to form between the electrodes.
- This electric field causes charge to distribute on the underside of the wafer that is oppositely polarized to charge located on the chuck surface.
- the Coulomb force between the charge on the wafer and the charge on the chuck surface attracts the wafer to the chuck. As such, the wafer is retained (clamped) upon the chuck surface.
- the electrostatic force that retains the wafer should be uniform across the entire underside of the wafer. However, in reality, this electrostatic force may vary substantially across the wafer. The force may vary because of differences in dielectric thickness, wafer backside roughness, chuck surface roughness, variations in chuck surface conductivity and the like. These differences cause an uneven distribution of clamping voltage relative to each electrode.
- the combination of the two electrodes and the wafer form, in effect, a pair of series connected capacitors. If, for example, the spacing between the wafer and each of the electrodes is unequal, the voltage drop from one electrode to the wafer (first capacitor) will be different from the voltage drop across the space between the other electrode and the wafer (second capacitor). These unequal voltage drops will cause unequal clamping forces to be applied to each half of the wafer.
- each electrode and the wafer form, in effect, a pair of series connected resistors. If, for example, the spacing between the wafer and each of the electrodes is unequal, the voltage drop from one electrode to the wafer (first resistor) will be different from the voltage drop across the space between the other electrode and the wafer (second resistor). As a result of these unequal voltage drops, unequal clamping forces are applied to each half of the wafer.
- This patent discloses a bipolar dielectric chuck that is driven by a dual power supply.
- the center tap of the dual power supply is connected to a reference electrode that extends into a plasma that is formed proximate the wafer during wafer processing.
- the center tap of the power supply attains the plasma voltage, i.e., the power supply voltages that are applied to the electrodes are referenced to the plasma potential.
- the wafer which is generally in contact with the plasma, is indirectly connected to the reference contact. Consequently, an unequal voltage drop from the wafer to each of the electrodes would be adjusted to achieve equal voltages as the center tap voltage changed to compensate for the unequal voltage drops.
- a plasma must be generated proximate the wafer and the reference contact exposed to the plasma.
- the wafer is processed, e.g., heated, prior to being exposed to a plasma.
- PVD physical vapor deposition
- the apparatus of the above described chuck that requires the presence of a plasma would not be effective until processing began.
- the foregoing chuck arrangement is not useful for processes that do not utilize plasmas or do not utilize plasmas for the entire process period.
- the invention is a bipolar electrostatic chuck containing a chuck body having a pair of coplanar electrodes embedded therein.
- the chuck includes a wafer spacing mask containing a plurality of support members deposited upon a support surface of the chuck body.
- the wafer spacing mask is fabricated from a conductive material such as titanium, titanium nitride, stainless steel and the like.
- the support members maintain a wafer, or other workpiece, in a spaced-part relation with respect to the support surface of the chuck. The distance between the underside surface of the wafer and the chuck is defined by the thickness of the support members.
- Each electrode within the bipolar chuck is respectively connected to a terminal of a dual power supply having a center tap.
- the center tap of the power supply is connected to the wafer spacing mask.
- Dechucking is accomplished by deactivating the power supplies, e.g., disconnecting the output terminals and center tap respectively from the electrodes and spacing mask.
- the charge accumulated on both the surface of chuck and the underside of the wafer remain even after the power supply is deactivated.
- both the electrodes and the wafer spacing mask are connected to earth ground. After a short time, the residual charge is removed and the wafer can be easily removed from the chuck.
- FIG. 1 depicts a vertical cross-sectional view of an electrostatic chuck being biased in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 2 depicts a top plan view of a pattern for the wafer spacing mask.
- FIG. 1 depicts a vertical cross-sectional view of a wafer spacing mask 102 positioned atop a support surface 122 of the chuck body 110 of an electrostatic chuck 100.
- FIG. 1 depicts a spacing mask 102 supporting a semiconductor wafer 108 as well as a schematic of a power supply 126 used to bias both the electrodes within the chuck as well as a wafer spacing mask.
- FIG. 2 depicts a top plan view of the wafer spacing mask 102 of FIG. 1 (without the wafer 108).
- the reader should refer to both FIGS. 1 and 2 while reading the following disclosure.
- the electrostatic chuck 100 contains at least two electrodes 106 embedded within a ceramic or dielectric chuck body 110.
- the chuck body is, for example, fabricated of aluminum nitride, boron nitride, or alumina. During high temperature processing, the ceramic materials of the chuck body become partially conductive, thus promoting the Johnsen-Rahbek effect which retains the wafer upon the chuck. If the chuck is to be used at low temperatures only, then either ceramic or dielectric materials are used to form the chuck body.
- An illustrative ceramic electrostatic chuck is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,117,121, issued May 26, 1992 herein incorporated by reference. Examples of dielectric electrostatic chucks are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,184,188 issued Jan. 15, 1980 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,918 issued May 24, 1983, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- the wafer spacing mask 102 is deposited upon the support surface 122 of the chuck body 110, typically using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process.
- the material may also be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma spray deposition, braising, flame spray deposition, and the like.
- CVD chemical vapor deposition
- the material used to form the mask is a metal such as titanium, titanium nitride, stainless steel, and the like.
- the spacing mask material is deposited to a pre-defined thickness that maintains the wafer 108, or the workpiece, above the support surface, such that contaminant particles on the support surface 122 do not contact the wafer.
- An illustrative thickness is approximately 2 microns.
- FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative mask pattern having the support members formed as a plurality of spaced-apart pads 118 of deposited material.
- Each pad 118 has a diameter of approximately 0.25 centimeters (0.1 inches).
- the concentric rings (shown as dashed lines) are spaced apart by 0.64 centimeters (0.25 inches) and the pads within each ring are spaced from one another by approximately 0.64 centimeters (0.25 inches).
- the number, spacing and size of the pads is determined by the amount of clamping force applied by the electrostatic chuck. For example, if the amount of force is large and the pads are spaced relatively distant from one another, the wafer may bow between the pads. On the other hand, placing too many pads on the surface of the chuck could interfere with the electrostatic fields that facilitate the clamping force. Therefore, the pads must be judiciously positioned to optimize support, yet limit their interference with the clamping force.
- the chuck When using a ceramic chuck at high temperatures, the chuck becomes semiconducting at high temperatures (e.g., 300° C. or more). As such, conductive pads should not be positioned over the electrodes. To produce the Johnsen-Rahbek effect that generates the clamping force, current must be conducted from the wafer to the ceramic chuck. However, these currents must be maintained at a relatively low level to avoid damaging the wafer. As such, the pads are generally positioned between the electrode locations to avoid lying within the highest electrostatic fields and causing substantial amounts of current to flow through the wafer to the mask to wafer contact point. In the embodiment of the invention depicted in FIGS.
- the electrode structure e.g., two half-moon shaped electrodes
- the electrode structure contains holes 112 that are concentrically aligned with the spacing mask pads 118.
- the diameter of each hole 112 is slightly larger (e.g., by approximately 0.25 centimeters (0.1 inches)) than the diameter of a corresponding pad 118. Additionally, minimizing the size of the area of contact between the mask and the wafer also adds and aids in reducing current flow through the wafer.
- the ceramic chuck conducts less current or no current and, for these applications of the invention, the support members can be positioned anywhere on the chuck support surface. Furthermore, the application of the spacing mask on dielectric chucks, the positioning of the support members relative to the electrodes is generally irrelevant. To ensure adequate and uniform support of the wafer above the chuck, the support members should be evenly distributed over the entire surface of the chuck that, absent the spacing mask, would contact the underside of the wafer.
- At least one support member 120 is connected to a center tap of the voltage supply 126.
- a plurality of support members 120--120 e.g., four
- the conductive connection from the support members 120--120 to the power supply 126 can be accomplished in many ways.
- the embodiment shown contains four "biased" support members 120--120 that are evenly distributed about the circumference of the chuck body support surface 122.
- many biased support members e.g., nine
- support members located at inner locations on the chuck body can be interconnected by optional interconnection traces such as traces 150 and 152.
- the biased support members 120 that are adapted for connection to the power supply are oval in plan form and "overhang" the support surface 122 of the chuck body. As such, during deposition of the spacing mask, these support members are formed along the support surface 122, the sidewall 114, and flange 116 of the chuck body 105. Furthermore, during deposition, an interconnection trace 124 is formed to interconnect all of the biased support members 120--120. Specifically, the interconnection trace 124 is formed upon the flange 116 and circumscribes the entire chuck body. Of course, additional ones of the support members could be biased by interconnecting selected members with conductive traces deposited upon the surface of the chuck body. To bias the support members 120, the interconnection trace 124 is connected to a conductive wire that is, in turn, connected to one terminal (center tap) of the high voltage power supply 126.
- Electrode 106 1 is connected to the negative terminal of power supply 128 while electrode 106 2 is connected to the positive terminal of power supply 130.
- the negative terminal of power supply 128 and the positive terminal of power supply 130 are connected to one another forming a common terminal or center tap 132.
- This center tap is connected to the wafer spacing mask 102 via a wire 134.
- the distal end of wire 134 is connected to the interconnection trace 124 such that the potential at the center tap is applied to the "biased" support members 120--120.
- a common terminal on the flange 116 of the chuck body 110 interconnects all of the biased support members 120--120 of the wafer spacing mask 102.
- a typical voltage for each power supply is 300 volts DC.
- the floating center tap voltage will ensure that the voltage applied between the wafer and each of the electrodes is relatively equal such that the electrostatic force retaining the wafer will be balanced.
- the floating center tap voltage adjusts to maintain equal voltage drops for each electrode to the wafer.
- the electrostatic force retaining the wafer will self-balance. As such, the force across the entire surface of the wafer is maintained at a substantially uniform magnitude.
- switch 136 is provided. Switch 136 is connected between the center tap 132 and earth ground. This switch, when closed, connects the biased support elements 120 as well as the electrodes 106 to earth ground. The support elements 120 are connected directly to ground, while the electrodes are coupled to ground through the respective power supplies (a relatively low impedance). As such, the residual charge is relatively quickly eliminated and the wafer can be removed from the chuck.
- switches 138 and 140 can be used to directly connect the electrodes 106 to ground and the mask to ground through the power supplies. This arrangement will also eliminate the residual charge. Also, all three switches 136, 138 and 140 could be used to connect the mask and the electrodes directly to ground, thus avoiding discharge through the power supply impedance.
Abstract
An electrostatic chuck containing apparatus, and a concomitant method, for balancing the electrostatic force that the chuck imparts upon a workpiece. More specifically, the electrostatic chuck contains a chuck body having a pair of coplanar electrodes embedded therein and a wafer spacing mask containing a plurality of conductive support members deposited upon a support surface of the chuck body. The support members maintain a wafer, or other workpiece, in a spaced-part relation with respect to the support surface of the chuck body. Each electrode within the chuck is respectively connected to a terminal dual voltage power supply having a center tap. The center tap of the power supply is connected to the wafer spacing mask. As such, variations in the distance between the wafer and the electrodes due to variations in dielectric thickness, wafer backside roughness, chuck surface roughness, chuck surface conductivity or other physical variations that may cause changes in the electrostatic force are balanced by having the spacing mask connected to the center tap of the power supply.
Description
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/639,841, filed May 8, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,764,471.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a substrate support chuck for electrostatically retaining a workpiece upon the support surface of the chuck. More particularly, the invention relates to a bipolar electrostatic chuck having apparatus for balancing the electrostatic force applied to a workpiece supported by the chuck.
2. Description of the Background Art
Substrate support chucks are widely used to support substrates within semiconductor processing systems. One example of an electrostatic chuck is described in commonly assigned European Patent Publication Number 0 439 000 B1, published Sep. 14, 1994. This electrostatic chuck has a conventional chuck body containing a dielectric material having a pair of coplanar electrodes embedded therein. The electrodes are half-moon or D-shaped such that each electrode provides clamping force to half the workpiece that is supported by a support surface of the chuck body.
In operation, a chucking voltage is applied to each electrode which causes an electric field to form between the electrodes. This electric field causes charge to distribute on the underside of the wafer that is oppositely polarized to charge located on the chuck surface. The Coulomb force between the charge on the wafer and the charge on the chuck surface attracts the wafer to the chuck. As such, the wafer is retained (clamped) upon the chuck surface.
Ideally, the electrostatic force that retains the wafer should be uniform across the entire underside of the wafer. However, in reality, this electrostatic force may vary substantially across the wafer. The force may vary because of differences in dielectric thickness, wafer backside roughness, chuck surface roughness, variations in chuck surface conductivity and the like. These differences cause an uneven distribution of clamping voltage relative to each electrode.
For example, in a bipolar, dielectric electrostatic chuck such as that described in European Patent discussed above, the combination of the two electrodes and the wafer form, in effect, a pair of series connected capacitors. If, for example, the spacing between the wafer and each of the electrodes is unequal, the voltage drop from one electrode to the wafer (first capacitor) will be different from the voltage drop across the space between the other electrode and the wafer (second capacitor). These unequal voltage drops will cause unequal clamping forces to be applied to each half of the wafer.
As another example, in a bipolar, ceramic electrostatic chuck (e.g., a Johnsen-Rahbek type chuck such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,121 issued May 26, 1992), each electrode and the wafer form, in effect, a pair of series connected resistors. If, for example, the spacing between the wafer and each of the electrodes is unequal, the voltage drop from one electrode to the wafer (first resistor) will be different from the voltage drop across the space between the other electrode and the wafer (second resistor). As a result of these unequal voltage drops, unequal clamping forces are applied to each half of the wafer.
One example of apparatus used to balance these electrostatic forces is disclosed in the European Patent cited above. This patent discloses a bipolar dielectric chuck that is driven by a dual power supply. The center tap of the dual power supply is connected to a reference electrode that extends into a plasma that is formed proximate the wafer during wafer processing. As such, the center tap of the power supply attains the plasma voltage, i.e., the power supply voltages that are applied to the electrodes are referenced to the plasma potential. Thus, the wafer, which is generally in contact with the plasma, is indirectly connected to the reference contact. Consequently, an unequal voltage drop from the wafer to each of the electrodes would be adjusted to achieve equal voltages as the center tap voltage changed to compensate for the unequal voltage drops.
However, to achieve this balancing effect, a plasma must be generated proximate the wafer and the reference contact exposed to the plasma. In some semiconductor processing applications, such as physical vapor deposition (PVD) processes, the wafer is processed, e.g., heated, prior to being exposed to a plasma. Thus, the apparatus of the above described chuck that requires the presence of a plasma would not be effective until processing began. As such, the foregoing chuck arrangement is not useful for processes that do not utilize plasmas or do not utilize plasmas for the entire process period.
Therefore, a need exists in the art for apparatus and a concomitant method of automatically balancing the electrostatic force between an electrostatic chuck and a workpiece without relying on the presence of a plasma proximate the workpiece.
The disadvantages of the prior art are overcome by the present invention of an electrostatic chuck containing apparatus for balancing the electrostatic force which the chuck imparts to a workpiece positioned upon the chuck. More specifically, the invention is a bipolar electrostatic chuck containing a chuck body having a pair of coplanar electrodes embedded therein. Additionally, the chuck includes a wafer spacing mask containing a plurality of support members deposited upon a support surface of the chuck body. The wafer spacing mask is fabricated from a conductive material such as titanium, titanium nitride, stainless steel and the like. The support members maintain a wafer, or other workpiece, in a spaced-part relation with respect to the support surface of the chuck. The distance between the underside surface of the wafer and the chuck is defined by the thickness of the support members.
Each electrode within the bipolar chuck is respectively connected to a terminal of a dual power supply having a center tap. The center tap of the power supply is connected to the wafer spacing mask. As such, variations in the distance between the wafer and the electrodes due to variations in dielectric thickness, wafer backside roughness, chuck surface roughness, chuck surface conductivity or other physical variations that may cause changes in the electrostatic force are balanced by having the spacing mask connected to the center tap of the power supply. In effect, a feedback loop is generated such that an increase in the electrostatic force on one side of the wafer compared to the other side of the wafer will cause a respective increase in the relative value of the center tap voltage. As such, the voltage differential which generates the electrostatic force is maintained constant on both sides of the wafer. When interdigital electrodes are used, the electrostatic force is even more uniformly distributed across the entire underside of the wafer.
After the wafer is processed in the process chamber, the wafer must be "dechucked" before it can be removed from the chuck. Dechucking is accomplished by deactivating the power supplies, e.g., disconnecting the output terminals and center tap respectively from the electrodes and spacing mask. However, the charge accumulated on both the surface of chuck and the underside of the wafer remain even after the power supply is deactivated. To remove this residual charge, both the electrodes and the wafer spacing mask are connected to earth ground. After a short time, the residual charge is removed and the wafer can be easily removed from the chuck.
The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 depicts a vertical cross-sectional view of an electrostatic chuck being biased in accordance with the present invention; and
FIG. 2 depicts a top plan view of a pattern for the wafer spacing mask.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
FIG. 1 depicts a vertical cross-sectional view of a wafer spacing mask 102 positioned atop a support surface 122 of the chuck body 110 of an electrostatic chuck 100. To illustrate the use of the invention, FIG. 1 depicts a spacing mask 102 supporting a semiconductor wafer 108 as well as a schematic of a power supply 126 used to bias both the electrodes within the chuck as well as a wafer spacing mask. FIG. 2 depicts a top plan view of the wafer spacing mask 102 of FIG. 1 (without the wafer 108). For best understanding of the invention, the reader should refer to both FIGS. 1 and 2 while reading the following disclosure.
In the preferred embodiment, the electrostatic chuck 100 contains at least two electrodes 106 embedded within a ceramic or dielectric chuck body 110. The chuck body is, for example, fabricated of aluminum nitride, boron nitride, or alumina. During high temperature processing, the ceramic materials of the chuck body become partially conductive, thus promoting the Johnsen-Rahbek effect which retains the wafer upon the chuck. If the chuck is to be used at low temperatures only, then either ceramic or dielectric materials are used to form the chuck body. An illustrative ceramic electrostatic chuck is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,117,121, issued May 26, 1992 herein incorporated by reference. Examples of dielectric electrostatic chucks are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,184,188 issued Jan. 15, 1980 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,918 issued May 24, 1983, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The wafer spacing mask 102 is deposited upon the support surface 122 of the chuck body 110, typically using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process. The material may also be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), plasma spray deposition, braising, flame spray deposition, and the like. Typically, the material used to form the mask is a metal such as titanium, titanium nitride, stainless steel, and the like.
The spacing mask material is deposited to a pre-defined thickness that maintains the wafer 108, or the workpiece, above the support surface, such that contaminant particles on the support surface 122 do not contact the wafer. An illustrative thickness is approximately 2 microns.
FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative mask pattern having the support members formed as a plurality of spaced-apart pads 118 of deposited material. Each pad 118 has a diameter of approximately 0.25 centimeters (0.1 inches). The concentric rings (shown as dashed lines) are spaced apart by 0.64 centimeters (0.25 inches) and the pads within each ring are spaced from one another by approximately 0.64 centimeters (0.25 inches). Generally speaking, the number, spacing and size of the pads is determined by the amount of clamping force applied by the electrostatic chuck. For example, if the amount of force is large and the pads are spaced relatively distant from one another, the wafer may bow between the pads. On the other hand, placing too many pads on the surface of the chuck could interfere with the electrostatic fields that facilitate the clamping force. Therefore, the pads must be judiciously positioned to optimize support, yet limit their interference with the clamping force.
When using a ceramic chuck at high temperatures, the chuck becomes semiconducting at high temperatures (e.g., 300° C. or more). As such, conductive pads should not be positioned over the electrodes. To produce the Johnsen-Rahbek effect that generates the clamping force, current must be conducted from the wafer to the ceramic chuck. However, these currents must be maintained at a relatively low level to avoid damaging the wafer. As such, the pads are generally positioned between the electrode locations to avoid lying within the highest electrostatic fields and causing substantial amounts of current to flow through the wafer to the mask to wafer contact point. In the embodiment of the invention depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, the electrode structure (e.g., two half-moon shaped electrodes) contains holes 112 that are concentrically aligned with the spacing mask pads 118. The diameter of each hole 112 is slightly larger (e.g., by approximately 0.25 centimeters (0.1 inches)) than the diameter of a corresponding pad 118. Additionally, minimizing the size of the area of contact between the mask and the wafer also adds and aids in reducing current flow through the wafer.
On the other hand, at low temperatures (e.g., less than 300° C.) the ceramic chuck conducts less current or no current and, for these applications of the invention, the support members can be positioned anywhere on the chuck support surface. Furthermore, the application of the spacing mask on dielectric chucks, the positioning of the support members relative to the electrodes is generally irrelevant. To ensure adequate and uniform support of the wafer above the chuck, the support members should be evenly distributed over the entire surface of the chuck that, absent the spacing mask, would contact the underside of the wafer.
To facilitate connection of the chucking voltage to the wafer, at least one support member 120 is connected to a center tap of the voltage supply 126. Generally speaking, to achieve reliable connection of the power supply to the underside of the wafer, a plurality of support members 120--120 (e.g., four) are connected to one terminal of the voltage supply 126. The conductive connection from the support members 120--120 to the power supply 126 can be accomplished in many ways. The embodiment shown contains four "biased" support members 120--120 that are evenly distributed about the circumference of the chuck body support surface 122. However, to ensure that a connection is made to the wafer, even when a wafer is severely warped, many biased support members (e.g., nine) can be used. Additionally, support members located at inner locations on the chuck body can be interconnected by optional interconnection traces such as traces 150 and 152.
The biased support members 120 that are adapted for connection to the power supply are oval in plan form and "overhang" the support surface 122 of the chuck body. As such, during deposition of the spacing mask, these support members are formed along the support surface 122, the sidewall 114, and flange 116 of the chuck body 105. Furthermore, during deposition, an interconnection trace 124 is formed to interconnect all of the biased support members 120--120. Specifically, the interconnection trace 124 is formed upon the flange 116 and circumscribes the entire chuck body. Of course, additional ones of the support members could be biased by interconnecting selected members with conductive traces deposited upon the surface of the chuck body. To bias the support members 120, the interconnection trace 124 is connected to a conductive wire that is, in turn, connected to one terminal (center tap) of the high voltage power supply 126.
Each electrode is connected to one terminal of a respective power supply within the dual voltage power supply 126. Electrode 1061 is connected to the negative terminal of power supply 128 while electrode 1062 is connected to the positive terminal of power supply 130. The negative terminal of power supply 128 and the positive terminal of power supply 130 are connected to one another forming a common terminal or center tap 132. This center tap is connected to the wafer spacing mask 102 via a wire 134. The distal end of wire 134 is connected to the interconnection trace 124 such that the potential at the center tap is applied to the "biased" support members 120--120. As such, a common terminal on the flange 116 of the chuck body 110 interconnects all of the biased support members 120--120 of the wafer spacing mask 102. A typical voltage for each power supply is 300 volts DC.
In operation, as the wafer is chucked, the floating center tap voltage will ensure that the voltage applied between the wafer and each of the electrodes is relatively equal such that the electrostatic force retaining the wafer will be balanced. The floating center tap voltage adjusts to maintain equal voltage drops for each electrode to the wafer. Thus, the electrostatic force retaining the wafer will self-balance. As such, the force across the entire surface of the wafer is maintained at a substantially uniform magnitude.
When the wafer is to be removed from the chuck, i.e., dechucked, the power supply 126 is deactivated. However, a residual charge remains on the wafer and the support surface of the chuck. This residual charge retains the wafer upon the chuck. To "bleed off" or discharge the residual charge, switch 136 is provided. Switch 136 is connected between the center tap 132 and earth ground. This switch, when closed, connects the biased support elements 120 as well as the electrodes 106 to earth ground. The support elements 120 are connected directly to ground, while the electrodes are coupled to ground through the respective power supplies (a relatively low impedance). As such, the residual charge is relatively quickly eliminated and the wafer can be removed from the chuck.
Alternatively, two switches 138 and 140 can be used to directly connect the electrodes 106 to ground and the mask to ground through the power supplies. This arrangement will also eliminate the residual charge. Also, all three switches 136, 138 and 140 could be used to connect the mask and the electrodes directly to ground, thus avoiding discharge through the power supply impedance.
Many alternative dechucking techniques are available for achieving rapid elimination of residual charge on a bipolar chuck. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,459,632 issued Oct. 17, 1995, incorporated herein by reference, discloses an alternative dechucking method that applies particular dechucking voltage levels to the electrodes to optimally draining the residual charge. This active dechucking technique, as well as others, may find use as part of the present invention.
Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings.
Claims (6)
1. A bipolar electrostatic chuck for retaining a workpiece comprising:
a chuck body containing at least two electrodes and a support surface;
a plurality of individual support members disposed on said support surface; and
a conductive trace circumscribing the chuck body and contacting at least one of said plurality of support members.
2. The electrostatic chuck of claim 1 wherein the chuck body further comprises a circumferential sidewall and flange.
3. The electrostatic chuck of claim 2 wherein said conductive trace is formed upon the flange.
4. The electrostatic chuck of claim 3 wherein said plurality of individual support members are further disposed on the sidewall and flange of the chuck body.
5. The electrostatic chuck of claim 4, wherein said electrodes are embedded within a dielectric chuck body.
6. The electrostatic chuck of claim 5, wherein said plurality of individual support member are for connecting a backside of the workpiece to a power supply, said connection facilitated by connecting one terminal of the power supply to one of the electrodes, connecting a second terminal of the power supply to the other electrode and connecting a center tap of the power supply to the conductive trace.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/092,600 US5923521A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-05 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/639,841 US5764471A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
US09/092,600 US5923521A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-05 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/639,841 Continuation US5764471A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US5923521A true US5923521A (en) | 1999-07-13 |
Family
ID=24565779
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/639,841 Expired - Lifetime US5764471A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
US09/092,600 Expired - Lifetime US5923521A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-05 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/639,841 Expired - Lifetime US5764471A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1996-05-08 | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5764471A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0806834A3 (en) |
JP (2) | JP3943188B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR970077472A (en) |
TW (1) | TW365039B (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6219219B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2001-04-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cathode assembly containing an electrostatic chuck for retaining a wafer in a semiconductor wafer processing system |
WO2001043184A2 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2001-06-14 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | Electrostatic chucks with flat film electrode |
FR2806210A1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-09-14 | Schlumberger Technologies Inc | ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK WITH WAFER CONTACT ELECTRODE AND METHOD FOR TIGHTENING A WAFER |
US6603650B1 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2003-08-05 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics And Plastics, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck susceptor and method for fabrication |
DE10240356A1 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2004-01-22 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Electrostatic holding element used in the lithographic structuring of semiconductor elements or substrates has a dielectric part with a specified thickness and having a structured surface |
US20040027781A1 (en) * | 2002-08-12 | 2004-02-12 | Hiroji Hanawa | Low loss RF bias electrode for a plasma reactor with enhanced wafer edge RF coupling and highly efficient wafer cooling |
US6723274B1 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2004-04-20 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | High-purity low-resistivity electrostatic chucks |
US20040142108A1 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2004-07-22 | Mitsuro Atobe | Mask vapor deposition method, mask vapor deposition system, mask, process for manufacturing mask, apparatus for manufacturing display panel, display panel, and electronic device |
GB2401722A (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2004-11-17 | Agere Systems Inc | Wafer pedestal cover |
US20050248746A1 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2005-11-10 | Asml Netherland B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, article support member, and method |
US20060043065A1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2006-03-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Gasless high voltage high contact force wafer contact-cooling electrostatic chuck |
US20070297118A1 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2007-12-27 | Yoshinori Fujii | Electrostatic Chuck Device |
EP1500984A3 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2009-06-17 | ASML Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby |
US20100039747A1 (en) * | 2008-08-12 | 2010-02-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck assembly |
US8861170B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-10-14 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US8879233B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-11-04 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with polymer protrusions |
US9025305B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2015-05-05 | Entegris, Inc. | High surface resistivity electrostatic chuck |
US9101038B2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2015-08-04 | Lam Research Corporation | Electrostatic chuck including declamping electrode and method of declamping |
US9429857B2 (en) | 2012-04-23 | 2016-08-30 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Electrostatic clamp, lithographic apparatus and method |
US9543187B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2017-01-10 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US10002782B2 (en) | 2014-10-17 | 2018-06-19 | Lam Research Corporation | ESC assembly including an electrically conductive gasket for uniform RF power delivery therethrough |
US20180374736A1 (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2018-12-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic carrier for die bonding applications |
US20220006015A1 (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2022-01-06 | Samsung Display Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method of manufacturing display apparatus |
Families Citing this family (60)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5997962A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1999-12-07 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma process utilizing an electrostatic chuck |
US6370007B2 (en) * | 1995-09-20 | 2002-04-09 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Electrostatic chuck |
US5764471A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
US5745332A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1998-04-28 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Monopolar electrostatic chuck having an electrode in contact with a workpiece |
US6117246A (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 2000-09-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Conductive polymer pad for supporting a workpiece upon a workpiece support surface of an electrostatic chuck |
US6217655B1 (en) | 1997-01-31 | 2001-04-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Stand-off pad for supporting a wafer on a substrate support chuck |
JP3650248B2 (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 2005-05-18 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Plasma processing equipment |
US5880924A (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 1999-03-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck capable of rapidly dechucking a substrate |
US6104595A (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2000-08-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for discharging an electrostatic chuck |
US6159055A (en) * | 1998-07-31 | 2000-12-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | RF electrode contact assembly for a detachable electrostatic chuck |
US6572814B2 (en) | 1998-09-08 | 2003-06-03 | Applied Materials Inc. | Method of fabricating a semiconductor wafer support chuck apparatus having small diameter gas distribution ports for distributing a heat transfer gas |
US6790375B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2004-09-14 | Lam Research Corporation | Dechucking method and apparatus for workpieces in vacuum processors |
US6965506B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2005-11-15 | Lam Research Corporation | System and method for dechucking a workpiece from an electrostatic chuck |
US6125025A (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2000-09-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Electrostatic dechucking method and apparatus for dielectric workpieces in vacuum processors |
US6259592B1 (en) | 1998-11-19 | 2001-07-10 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus for retaining a workpiece upon a workpiece support and method of manufacturing same |
US6215642B1 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2001-04-10 | Nikon Corporation Of Japan | Vacuum compatible, deformable electrostatic chuck with high thermal conductivity |
US6466426B1 (en) | 1999-08-03 | 2002-10-15 | Applied Materials Inc. | Method and apparatus for thermal control of a semiconductor substrate |
US6567257B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2003-05-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for conditioning an electrostatic chuck |
JP3626933B2 (en) * | 2001-02-08 | 2005-03-09 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Manufacturing method of substrate mounting table |
KR20030001813A (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2003-01-08 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | ESC Device, Method for Chemical Vapor Deposition and Etching with the same |
KR100511854B1 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2005-09-02 | 아네르바 가부시키가이샤 | Electrostatic chuck device |
US7352554B2 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2008-04-01 | Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | Method for fabricating a Johnsen-Rahbek electrostatic wafer clamp |
US7375946B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2008-05-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dechucking a substrate |
US7511936B2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2009-03-31 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for dynamic plasma treatment of bipolar ESC system |
US7881036B2 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2011-02-01 | Creative Technology Corporation | Electrode sheet for electrostatic chuck, and electrostatic chuck |
US7715170B2 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2010-05-11 | Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with separated electrodes |
US8198567B2 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2012-06-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | High temperature vacuum chuck assembly |
US20100089319A1 (en) * | 2008-10-09 | 2010-04-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Rf return path for large plasma processing chamber |
WO2011063246A2 (en) * | 2009-11-19 | 2011-05-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for controlling a plasma processing system |
US8501631B2 (en) * | 2009-11-19 | 2013-08-06 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma processing system control based on RF voltage |
US8901935B2 (en) * | 2009-11-19 | 2014-12-02 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for detecting the confinement state of plasma in a plasma processing system |
FR2985087B1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2014-03-07 | Ion Beam Services | SUPPORT COMPRISING AN ELECTROSTATIC SUBSTRATE CARRIER |
US10128090B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-11-13 | Lam Research Corporation | RF impedance model based fault detection |
US9842725B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-12-12 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling to determine ion energy associated with a plasma system |
US9462672B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2016-10-04 | Lam Research Corporation | Adjustment of power and frequency based on three or more states |
US9390893B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2016-07-12 | Lam Research Corporation | Sub-pulsing during a state |
US10325759B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2019-06-18 | Lam Research Corporation | Multiple control modes |
US9502216B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2016-11-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling to determine wafer bias associated with a plasma system |
US9114666B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-08-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for controlling plasma in a plasma processing system |
US9171699B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-10-27 | Lam Research Corporation | Impedance-based adjustment of power and frequency |
US9320126B2 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2016-04-19 | Lam Research Corporation | Determining a value of a variable on an RF transmission model |
US10157729B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-12-18 | Lam Research Corporation | Soft pulsing |
US9368329B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2016-06-14 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for synchronizing RF pulses in a plasma processing system |
US9295148B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2016-03-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Computation of statistics for statistical data decimation |
US9197196B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-11-24 | Lam Research Corporation | State-based adjustment of power and frequency |
JP5971556B2 (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2016-08-17 | 日新イオン機器株式会社 | Electrostatic chuck and electrostatic chuck module |
US9408288B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2016-08-02 | Lam Research Corporation | Edge ramping |
JP6100564B2 (en) * | 2013-01-24 | 2017-03-22 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Substrate processing apparatus and mounting table |
US9779196B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-10-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Segmenting a model within a plasma system |
US9620337B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-04-11 | Lam Research Corporation | Determining a malfunctioning device in a plasma system |
US9107284B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2015-08-11 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber matching using voltage control mode |
US9119283B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-08-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber matching for power control mode |
US20140273825A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Semiconductor Chip Configuration with a Coupler |
US9502221B2 (en) | 2013-07-26 | 2016-11-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Etch rate modeling and use thereof with multiple parameters for in-chamber and chamber-to-chamber matching |
US9594105B2 (en) | 2014-01-10 | 2017-03-14 | Lam Research Corporation | Cable power loss determination for virtual metrology |
US10950421B2 (en) | 2014-04-21 | 2021-03-16 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling for identifying a location of a fault in an RF transmission system for a plasma system |
CN104051495B (en) * | 2014-05-28 | 2017-02-15 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Packaging device and packaging equipment |
US9536749B2 (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2017-01-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion energy control by RF pulse shape |
US10510625B2 (en) * | 2015-11-17 | 2019-12-17 | Lam Research Corporation | Systems and methods for controlling plasma instability in semiconductor fabrication |
US9623679B1 (en) * | 2015-11-18 | 2017-04-18 | Xerox Corporation | Electrostatic platen for conductive pet film printing |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4502094A (en) * | 1981-09-14 | 1985-02-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Electrostatic chuck |
US4665463A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1987-05-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Electrostatic chuck |
US5452177A (en) * | 1990-06-08 | 1995-09-19 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Electrostatic wafer clamp |
US5572398A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1996-11-05 | Hewlett-Packard Co. | Tri-polar electrostatic chuck |
US5764471A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1443215A (en) * | 1973-11-07 | 1976-07-21 | Mullard Ltd | Electrostatically clamping a semiconductor wafer during device manufacture |
US4384918A (en) * | 1980-09-30 | 1983-05-24 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and apparatus for dry etching and electrostatic chucking device used therein |
GB2154365A (en) * | 1984-02-10 | 1985-09-04 | Philips Electronic Associated | Loading semiconductor wafers on an electrostatic chuck |
JPS60261377A (en) * | 1984-06-08 | 1985-12-24 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Electrostatic chuck and manufacture thereof |
JPH0697676B2 (en) * | 1985-11-26 | 1994-11-30 | 忠弘 大見 | Wafer susceptor device |
JPH0652758B2 (en) * | 1987-02-09 | 1994-07-06 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Electrostatic check |
US5103367A (en) * | 1987-05-06 | 1992-04-07 | Unisearch Limited | Electrostatic chuck using A.C. field excitation |
JP2779950B2 (en) * | 1989-04-25 | 1998-07-23 | 東陶機器株式会社 | Method and apparatus for applying voltage to electrostatic chuck |
US5001594A (en) * | 1989-09-06 | 1991-03-19 | Mcnc | Electrostatic handling device |
EP0439000B1 (en) * | 1990-01-25 | 1994-09-14 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic clamp and method |
FR2661039B1 (en) * | 1990-04-12 | 1997-04-30 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | ELECTROSTATIC SUBSTRATE HOLDER. |
US5179498A (en) * | 1990-05-17 | 1993-01-12 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Electrostatic chuck device |
US5310453A (en) * | 1992-02-13 | 1994-05-10 | Tokyo Electron Yamanashi Limited | Plasma process method using an electrostatic chuck |
US5460684A (en) * | 1992-12-04 | 1995-10-24 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Stage having electrostatic chuck and plasma processing apparatus using same |
US5463526A (en) * | 1994-01-21 | 1995-10-31 | Lam Research Corporation | Hybrid electrostatic chuck |
US5459632A (en) * | 1994-03-07 | 1995-10-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Releasing a workpiece from an electrostatic chuck |
US5531835A (en) * | 1994-05-18 | 1996-07-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Patterned susceptor to reduce electrostatic force in a CVD chamber |
-
1996
- 1996-05-08 US US08/639,841 patent/US5764471A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-05-15 TW TW085105761A patent/TW365039B/en active
-
1997
- 1997-04-25 EP EP97302865A patent/EP0806834A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-05-08 KR KR1019970017574A patent/KR970077472A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-05-08 JP JP11768697A patent/JP3943188B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-06-05 US US09/092,600 patent/US5923521A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2007
- 2007-01-09 JP JP2007001072A patent/JP4448860B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4502094A (en) * | 1981-09-14 | 1985-02-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Electrostatic chuck |
US4665463A (en) * | 1983-09-30 | 1987-05-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Electrostatic chuck |
US5452177A (en) * | 1990-06-08 | 1995-09-19 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Electrostatic wafer clamp |
US5572398A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1996-11-05 | Hewlett-Packard Co. | Tri-polar electrostatic chuck |
US5764471A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1998-06-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck |
Cited By (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6219219B1 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2001-04-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cathode assembly containing an electrostatic chuck for retaining a wafer in a semiconductor wafer processing system |
FR2806210A1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-09-14 | Schlumberger Technologies Inc | ELECTROSTATIC CHUCK WITH WAFER CONTACT ELECTRODE AND METHOD FOR TIGHTENING A WAFER |
US6723274B1 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2004-04-20 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | High-purity low-resistivity electrostatic chucks |
WO2001043184A2 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2001-06-14 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | Electrostatic chucks with flat film electrode |
WO2001043184A3 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2001-12-13 | Saint Gobain Ceramics | Electrostatic chucks with flat film electrode |
GB2375231A (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2002-11-06 | Saint Gobain Ceramics | Electrostatic chucks with flat film electrode |
US6603650B1 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2003-08-05 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics And Plastics, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck susceptor and method for fabrication |
US6744618B2 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2004-06-01 | Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. | Electrostatic chucks with flat film electrode |
DE10240356B4 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2007-08-30 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Electrostatic holding element |
DE10240356A1 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2004-01-22 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Electrostatic holding element used in the lithographic structuring of semiconductor elements or substrates has a dielectric part with a specified thickness and having a structured surface |
US20040027781A1 (en) * | 2002-08-12 | 2004-02-12 | Hiroji Hanawa | Low loss RF bias electrode for a plasma reactor with enhanced wafer edge RF coupling and highly efficient wafer cooling |
US20040142108A1 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2004-07-22 | Mitsuro Atobe | Mask vapor deposition method, mask vapor deposition system, mask, process for manufacturing mask, apparatus for manufacturing display panel, display panel, and electronic device |
GB2401722A (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2004-11-17 | Agere Systems Inc | Wafer pedestal cover |
US20040226516A1 (en) * | 2003-05-13 | 2004-11-18 | Daniel Timothy J. | Wafer pedestal cover |
EP1500984A3 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2009-06-17 | ASML Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby |
US20050248746A1 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2005-11-10 | Asml Netherland B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, article support member, and method |
US7133120B2 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2006-11-07 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, article support member, and method |
US20060043065A1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2006-03-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Gasless high voltage high contact force wafer contact-cooling electrostatic chuck |
US7479456B2 (en) | 2004-08-26 | 2009-01-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Gasless high voltage high contact force wafer contact-cooling electrostatic chuck |
US7821767B2 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2010-10-26 | Ulvac, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck device |
US20070297118A1 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2007-12-27 | Yoshinori Fujii | Electrostatic Chuck Device |
US9543187B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2017-01-10 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US10395963B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2019-08-27 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US8390980B2 (en) | 2008-08-12 | 2013-03-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck assembly |
US20100039747A1 (en) * | 2008-08-12 | 2010-02-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck assembly |
US9721821B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2017-08-01 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US8879233B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-11-04 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with polymer protrusions |
US8861170B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-10-14 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US9025305B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2015-05-05 | Entegris, Inc. | High surface resistivity electrostatic chuck |
US9429857B2 (en) | 2012-04-23 | 2016-08-30 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Electrostatic clamp, lithographic apparatus and method |
US9101038B2 (en) | 2013-12-20 | 2015-08-04 | Lam Research Corporation | Electrostatic chuck including declamping electrode and method of declamping |
US10002782B2 (en) | 2014-10-17 | 2018-06-19 | Lam Research Corporation | ESC assembly including an electrically conductive gasket for uniform RF power delivery therethrough |
US10804129B2 (en) | 2014-10-17 | 2020-10-13 | Lam Research Corporation | Electrostatic chuck assembly incorporation a gasket for distributing RF power to a ceramic embedded electrode |
US20180374736A1 (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2018-12-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic carrier for die bonding applications |
US20220006015A1 (en) * | 2020-07-03 | 2022-01-06 | Samsung Display Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method of manufacturing display apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0806834A3 (en) | 1998-11-25 |
KR970077472A (en) | 1997-12-12 |
JP4448860B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 |
US5764471A (en) | 1998-06-09 |
JP3943188B2 (en) | 2007-07-11 |
JPH1098092A (en) | 1998-04-14 |
TW365039B (en) | 1999-07-21 |
EP0806834A2 (en) | 1997-11-12 |
JP2007165915A (en) | 2007-06-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5923521A (en) | Method and apparatus for balancing an electrostatic force produced by an electrostatic chuck | |
US5656093A (en) | Wafer spacing mask for a substrate support chuck and method of fabricating same | |
US5737175A (en) | Bias-tracking D.C. power circuit for an electrostatic chuck | |
US5812361A (en) | Dynamic feedback electrostatic wafer chuck | |
US5684669A (en) | Method for dechucking a workpiece from an electrostatic chuck | |
US6373681B2 (en) | Electrostatic chuck, and method of and apparatus for processing sample using the chuck | |
US5885428A (en) | Method and apparatus for both mechanically and electrostatically clamping a wafer to a pedestal within a semiconductor wafer processing system | |
US5631803A (en) | Erosion resistant electrostatic chuck with improved cooling system | |
TWI438861B (en) | Annulus clamping and backside gas cooled electrostatic chuck | |
US5740009A (en) | Apparatus for improving wafer and chuck edge protection | |
JP3911787B2 (en) | Sample processing apparatus and sample processing method | |
US5880923A (en) | Method and apparatus for improved retention of a semiconductor wafer within a semiconductor wafer processing system | |
US5982607A (en) | Monopolar electrostatic chuck having an electrode in contact with a workpiece | |
US6304424B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for minimizing plasma destabilization within a semiconductor wafer processing system | |
US6117246A (en) | Conductive polymer pad for supporting a workpiece upon a workpiece support surface of an electrostatic chuck | |
EP1061639A2 (en) | Chucking system amd method | |
US5835333A (en) | Negative offset bipolar electrostatic chucks | |
WO2011063084A2 (en) | Electrostatic chuck with reduced arcing | |
JP2002507326A (en) | Method and apparatus for offsetting plasma bias voltage in bipolar electrostatic chuck | |
DE69501018T2 (en) | Multiple electrode electrostatic chuck | |
CN113056816A (en) | Electrostatic chuck with charge dissipative coating | |
KR20030020072A (en) | Unipolar electro-static chuck |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |