|Número de publicación||US7231029 B1|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Número de solicitud||US 09/935,540|
|Fecha de publicación||12 Jun 2007|
|Fecha de presentación||23 Ago 2001|
|Fecha de prioridad||23 Ago 2001|
|También publicado como||US8218752, US8406410, US8638921, US20120250838, US20130170635|
|Número de publicación||09935540, 935540, US 7231029 B1, US 7231029B1, US-B1-7231029, US7231029 B1, US7231029B1|
|Cesionario original||Bellsouth Ip Corporation|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (7), Otras citas (3), Citada por (49), Clasificaciones (8), Eventos legales (5)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention broadly relates to telecommunication services, and, more particularly, to a telephone service where a called party can block phone calls from a specific caller by simply instructing the telephone service provider's network for the same.
2. Description of the Related Art
Telephones and telephone communication are so prevalent in modern society that they may be justifiably considered an integral part of human existence. Telephones are useful not only to carry out personal communication, but also to transact business. Telephones give their operators access to the world. However, because of the ease with which a telephone call may be placed, there may be times when the called party (hereafter, the “callee”) prefers to block unwanted phone calls from a calling party (hereafter, the “caller”). For example, a callee may not wish to receive any more phone calls from a telemarketer who interrupted the callee's dinner conversation with callee's friends. As another example, a callee may want to place a block on harassing phone calls from an unknown caller prior to reporting the incident to the police.
Telephone service providers (or telephone companies) provide many calling services designed to protect a callee from unwanted or undesired phone calls and also to help the callee identify the calls that the callee considers important. For example, the caller ID service lets the callee see the name and phone number of the caller trying to reach the callee—all before the callee answers the phone. The display unit for the caller ID service may also display the date and time of the incoming call. Thus, the callee can decide beforehand whether or not to take the call. In the call waiting ID service, the callee can view the incoming caller's name and phone number while the callee is on phone with another caller. The callee does not need to hang up on the current caller to receive the incoming call. In the anonymous call blocking service, the callee may request the telephone service provider to block calls from callers who prevent their names and phone numbers from being displayed on the callee's caller ID device. When activated, the anonymous call blocking service plays a message to the blocked callers instructing them to hang-up, remove their blocking, and call again.
It is noted that the anonymous call blocking service may block all the anonymous phone calls regardless of the identity of the caller. Thus, a callee subscribing to such a service may not be able to receive phone calls from those desired callers (e.g., friends, relatives, etc.) who happen to have call blocks placed on their phone lines. Furthermore, the anonymous call blocking service may discourage certain callers to perform the removal of call blocking and initiate another phone call to the callee. In such a situation, it may be desirable that the callee be able to receive the phone call first, and, thereafter, place a block on all the future phone calls if the caller of the received phone call is found to be undesirable or unwanted.
Of course, the callee always has an option to directly contact a telemarketer and request the telemarketer to remove the callee's phone number from the telemarketer's call list. However, such requesting may be burdensome to the callee, and, even after the request, the telemarketer may still fail, for whatever reason, to comply with the callee's request. To remedy such a situation, there is a subscription-based call-blocking service available to telemarketers. The service allows a telemarketer to provide a list of “do-not-call” telephone, modem, and fax numbers to the service, which, in turn, blocks all the phone calls placed from the subscriber telemarketer's establishment to any of the phone numbers appearing in the “do-not-call” list. However, a telemarketer may not avail of such a service and may frequently end up calling the callee who had earlier requested the telemarketer not to call the callee. This may be quite annoying and disturbing to the callee.
In a privacy protection service offered on a subscription basis by Ameritech of Chicago, USA, all calls showing up as “blocked”, “private”, “out of area”, “unavailable”, or “unknown” on a caller ID display of the service subscriber (i.e., the callee) are first identified by the service. Thereafter, the service answers such calls without ringing the subscriber's (i.e., callee's) phone—i.e., the subscriber remains unaware of such phone calls until they are allowed to go through by the service. The service asks the caller to give his or her name, which is then displayed to the subscriber callee. The callee can thereafter select whether to answer the call or to reject the call with or without appropriate voice message. Although such an arrangement offers privacy protection against unscrupulous callers or telemarketers, the manner of call blocking may be analogized with the anonymous call blocking service described hereinbefore where the service blocks calls from all callers (regardless of the identity of the caller) who prevent their names and phone numbers from being displayed on the callee's caller ID device. Thus, in such a privacy protection service, some desirable callers may also face call blocking along with some undesirable ones. The subscriber (i.e., the callee) does not have control over which caller is to be blocked and which caller is to be allowed to contact the subscriber. Furthermore, if a caller is unable to clearly identify himself/herself to the service because of, for example, the caller's age, physical condition, or the place and atmosphere surrounding the calling area, etc., that caller may not get a chance to speak with the subscriber even if the caller is not one of the unwanted callers.
It is therefore desirable to allow the callee to control the call blocking process and to selectively block those callers who are found to be unwanted or undesirable. It is thus desirable to offer a telephone service that allows the service subscriber (i.e., the callee) to respond to a phone call first, and, then, instruct the service to place a block on future phone calls if the caller is found to be undesirable or unwanted.
In a telecommunication system configured to provide a connection between a caller and a callee via a telephone network, wherein the telephone network is configured to connect the caller and the callee, the present invention includes a method for allowing the callee to prevent the caller from establishing the connection with the callee. The method includes receiving an instruction from the callee to prevent the caller from establishing the connection with the callee and identifying a first telephone number associated with the caller. The method also includes preventing one or more phone calls from the first telephone number from being forwarded to a second telephone number associated with the callee.
The present invention has the advantage that it allows a callee to control the call blocking process and to selectively block those callers who are found to be unwanted or undesirable. The present invention also has the advantage that it allows a service subscriber (i.e., the callee) to respond to a phone call first, and, then, instruct the service to place a block on future phone calls if the caller is found to be undesirable or unwanted.
Further advantages of the present invention may be better understood by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It is observed that the caller 10 or the callee 12 may not be directly connected to the AIN 14, but, instead, through a local PSTN (Public Switched Telephone Network) or ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) as illustrated by the dotted clouds 16 and 18 respectively. A local PSTN/ISDN (e.g., the PSTN/ISDN 18) may be operated by a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC). In one embodiment, the same PSTN/ISDN (e.g., PSTN/ISDN 16) may be qualified to handle calls for both the caller 10 and the callee 12. A telephone company (telco) or CLEC central office switch may form part of the initial PSTN/ISDN platform that a call encounters first prior to being routed to the AIN platform 14. The AIN 14 may include a more advanced and sophisticated switching and call processing mechanism as discussed hereinbelow in more detail. Thus, in the discussion given herein, it is implicitly assumed that regular PSTNs may not be capable of performing AIN functionality. However, that may not hold true in every circumstance and, hence, in one embodiment, the PSTN/ISDN 16 and/or 18 may include the AIN functionality represented by block 14 in
An Advanced Intelligent Network (AIN) is a vendor- and platform-independent telecommunications network that is designed with distributed network intelligence in databases called Service Control Points (SCPs) (e.g., the SCP 22 in
In both wireline and wireless networks, the AIN architecture separates call processing intelligence and feature functionality from network switches, placing that intelligence and functionality in platforms spread across the network. The call processing intelligence is sometimes referred to as service logic. An AIN infrastructure typically involves service logic on network platforms, an out-of-band signaling system (e.g., the signaling system #7, or SS7), and AIN-capable software in the network switch. With this infrastructure in place, service providers, end users and third parties may be able to create and modify services independently of switch vendors. Some of the advantages of the AIN architecture (for wireline or wireless networks) include: reduced service provider dependence on switch generic availability for features and services; cost savings by having multiple applications reside on one platform and sharing resources; rapid creation and deployment of services; allows service providers to create differentiating services; facilitation of mobility management functions; reduced fraud; and in case of wireless intelligent networks (WIN), facilitation of interoperability with wireline networks.
The voice-associated functions may stay closely coupled to the AIN switch (e.g., the SSP 20), but SCPs may be used to deploy data-related services (such as Short Message Service, Unified Messaging, or Debit cards) and may be placed anywhere that a SS7 data connection can be maintained. The AIN provides advanced services which cannot be easily implemented in the switch or cannot be best offered from a central point in the network. To achieve this, the digital switch (e.g., the switch in the telco central office) is enhanced so that it becomes an AIN service switching point (SSP) 20, thus enabling it to notify the service control point (SCP) 22 when processing the call/connection requires an AIN interaction.
Additional AIN functional architecture is illustrated in
The software for the on-demand call blocking service of the present invention may be created on the SCE 28 and then loaded onto the SCP 22 as part of the SLPs 36 running on the SCP 22. Alternatively, upon creation, the software may first be stored on one or more data storage media (e.g., compact discs (CDs), floppy diskettes, magnetic tape cartridges, digital versatile disks (DVDs), etc.). Thereafter, the storage media may be transported to the SCP 22 to load the blocking service software thereon. A service (e.g., the blocking service of the present invention) is a software application on the AIN platform 14 that provides a defined set of functions that interact with the AIN platform 14 (and, hence, with the users of the AIN 14) and a set of service data. The software developer may define the functionality of the blocking service along with the type and scope of data used by the service. The blocking service of the present invention primarily creates and maintains (or stores) at least one caller block table 42 in the SDP 24 as shown in
The software for the on-demand call blocking service may be switch-independent. However, in one embodiment, the software that implements the functionality of the call blocking service is created for a Nortel switching platform. The software for the connection service is executed in a UNIX environment and is written in C++ and Java programming languages.
The specialized resource function (SRF) 40 (in the IP 26) can be temporarily connected to the callee/subscriber 12 to play announcements and collect digits from the callee. An IVR (Interactive Voice Response) system 44 may be implemented in the IP 26 through the SRF 40 so that the callee/subscriber 12 can interact with the call blocking service and can input data or call processing selections via a telephone handset in response to voice prompts received from the IVR system 44. The entire process may be generally explained as follows: When the callee dials a special sequence (comprising a combination of numerals, letters, and symbols) to access the call blocking service, the special sequence is first received by the SSP 20. The SSF 32 in the SSP 20 recognizes the special access sequence as different from regular telephone numbers and forwards the access sequence to the SCP 22 for further processing. The SCP 22 (via the SCF 34) identifies the service requested (i.e., the call blocking service) from part of the access sequence dialed by the callee 12 and returns information about how to handle the call to the SSP 20. Initially, when a customized voice announcement is to be played to greet the subscriber and to offer the call blocking service options to the subscriber, the SCF 34 may instruct the SRF 40 in the IP 26 to relay the customized voice announcement (using the IVR system 44) to the customer 12 via the CCF 30 acting as an interface between the IP 26 and the callee telephone unit 12. Any digits entered by the callee 12 when prompted by the call blocking service after the initial greeting are collected by the SRF 40 (through the CCF 30) and sent to the SCF 34 for further processing by the SCP 22. The SCP 22 may then instruct the SDF 38 to access the caller block table 42, if needed, to place or remove a block on a caller's telephone number as specified by the callee.
As noted hereinbefore, the callee 12 first answers the phone call from the caller 10, and, thereafter, decides whether to block the caller 10. If the callee 12 decides to place a block on all phone calls from the caller 10, the callee 12 dials a specific sequence that comprises a combination of numerals (digits), letters, and/or symbols (e.g., “*”, “#”). For example, one such sequence is “*75B”. The access sequence may be predefined by the commercial provider of the call blocking service so as to enable the SCP 22 to identify that the callee/subscriber 12 wishes to invoke the call blocking service. As shown in
The timeout period at block 54 may be predetermined by the service provider or by the developer of the call blocking service software. In an alternative embodiment, the service provider may offer one more chance to the callee 12 prior to disconnecting the line. Here, the service may prompt the callee 12 once again (block 50) and repeat the procedure given by blocks 52 and 54 prior to finally disconnecting the caller at block 56.
Once the call blocking service receives an input from the subscriber 12 (e.g., the digits “1” or “2”), the blocking service takes over further call processing. If the collected digit is a “1” (block 58), the blocking service (at block 60) places a block on future calls originating from the most recent telephone number that the callee 12 last received a call from immediately prior to accessing the blocking service (at block 48). In one embodiment, the call blocking service software places the to-be-blocked telephone number in the caller block table 42 and marks that number as blocked. For example, the service may place a “1” against that telephone number to indicate to the SCP 22 that all calls from that telephone number to the callee 12 are blocked. On the other hand, the service may place a “0” against a previously blocked telephone number to indicate to the SCP 22 that a block on the corresponding telephone number has been removed by the callee 12 (as discussed later hereinbelow) and, hence, any phone calls placed from that telephone number to the callee's telephone number be allowed to go through.
In one embodiment, the call blocking service may depend on the existing reverse caller-ID or reverse white pages look-up technology (e.g., the technology behind the “*69” service presently offered by some telephone service providers) to identify and obtain the telephone number to be blocked. The AIN network 14 may retrieve the telephone number to be blocked using the existing reverse caller-ID technology and supply that telephone number to the call blocking service software to be stored in the caller block table 42. It is noted that the AIN network 14 may be capable of obtaining the most recent caller's telephone number even if the caller has “blocked” the caller's telephone number. However, if the caller uses a PBX (Private Branch Exchange) or similar switching facility, the AIN network 14 may not be able to identify the actual telephone number used by the caller to place the call. In that event, the call blocking service according to the present invention may place a block on all telephone calls originating from that PBX or switching facility.
In one embodiment, after the callee 12 first enters the digit “1” (at block 58), the call blocking service may play a canned message to the callee/subscriber 12 prompting the callee 12 to enter another “1” to record a message in callee's voice for the blocked party (block 62), or to enter the digit “2” to select one of the pre-recorded messages supplied by the service provider (block 66), or to simply hang up (block 70). If the callee enters a “1” (at block 62), then the service further prompts the callee to record a voice message of predetermined duration (e.g., a maximum of 60 seconds). The blocking service will then answer all future calls from the blocked caller with the callee's voice message (block 64). If the callee 12 enters a “2” instead (at block 66), the blocking service may play a set of pre-recorded messages in sequence to allow the callee to select one of them (at block 68). The service may voice prompt the callee after each playback whether the callee wishes to select that voice message or to continue listening to other remaining messages. Alternatively, the service may assign a different number to each message and, after finishing playing back all the pre-recorded messages, prompt the callee to enter the number (using the keypad on the callee's telephone 12) for the message the callee wishes to select. Thus, the service not only places a block on the phone calls from the caller specified by the callee, but also plays a callee-selected voice message to the blocked caller whenever that caller attempts to call the callee. The callee may hang up after selecting the voice message, or without selecting one. If the callee hangs up (at block 70) without selecting/recording a voice message, the blocking service may not play any message to the blocked caller. In other words, the service may simply disconnect the caller's calls without any voice message.
After placing the subscriber-requested call block and after the callee/subscriber 12 selects/records the playback message, if any, the service may play a voice announcement (e.g., “Thanks for using the call blocking service from XYZ. The call block you requested has been placed. Good Bye.”) to the callee 12 before the callee hangs up. Thereafter, the blocking service will terminate the call (block 56). If the callee hangs up without recording/selecting a voice message, the service may not play any such voice announcement in that case.
If the callee 12 inputs the number “2” instead (at block 72), the blocking service software recognizes the input as a request by the callee 12 to perform administrative tasks. The blocking service then voice prompts the callee 12 to perform one or more pre-designated administrated tasks (block 74). Some exemplary administrative tasks include: (1) The callee 12 instructs the service to remove a block placed earlier on a specific telephone number. Here, the callee 12 supplies the telephone number to the blocking service software and then instructs the software to remove the block for that telephone number. The software may then access the telephone number in the caller block table 42 and enter a “0” against that telephone number; (2) The callee 12 may also instruct the blocking service to send a voice message to the caller whose telephone number has been unblocked. The callee may either record a voice message of a predefined maximum duration (e.g., 60 seconds) or select one from a set of pre-recorded messages in a manner similar to discussed hereinbefore with reference to blocks 62-68; and (3) The callee 12 may continue the block on a specific telephone number, but, may choose to record/select a new voice message for that telephone number or revise an earlier-recorded message. The service will then play the most recent voice message every time a call is received from the blocked telephone number. In one embodiment, the service provider may allow the callee/subscriber 12 to unsubscribe the call blocking service using the administrative function selection at block 72.
In an alternative embodiment, the call blocking software may allow the callee/subscriber 12 to specify one or more telephone numbers (using the DTMF keypad on the callee's telephone) that the callee wishes to be blocked in addition to the telephone number of the most recent caller. Such an option may be provided either as part of the administrative function choice (starting at block 72) or as part of the routine call block choice at block 58. For example, if the additional call blocking option is provided as part of the routine call block choice at block 58, the call blocking software may prompt the callee/subscriber 12 to enter additional telephone numbers, if any, that the callee wishes to place blocks on. Such a prompting may occur after a block is placed on the most recent caller (at block 60) and prior to the callee hanging up at block 70. In response to the prompting, the callee can enter one or more telephone numbers to be blocked and the call blocking software may store those telephone numbers in the caller block table 42 along with a “1” placed against each such telephone number. Thus, with such an option available to the callee/subscriber 12, the callee/subscriber does not need to wait to receive a call from a caller before placing a call block against that caller.
As noted hereinbefore, the service provider may specify a fixed value for the timeout interval at block 54. However, in one embodiment, the service provider may modify the call blocking software to allow selected callee/subscribers 12 to flexibly alter the value of the timeout period. For example, when a callee is an elderly or a disabled person, it may be desirable to offer the callee more time to respond to the service prompts. In that case, the service provider may either modify the timeout interval when the callee signs up for the call blocking service or allow the callee to modify the timeout interval using the administrative function selection at block 72. A timeout interval selection option may then be offered as part of the administrative tasks selection at block 74. Similarly, the service provider may also allow the callee to specify other parameters for the call blocking service (e.g., duration of callee's voice message at block 64) based on the callee's physical or mental condition, age, etc. The callee/subscriber can also change or modify values entered earlier and reenter new values for one or more parameters. The callee/subscriber 12 may enter various values using the DTMF keypad on the callee's telephone.
The service provider may require the callee/subscriber 12 to provide certain subscriber-specific information when the subscriber first subscribes to the call blocking service. The subscriber-specific information may include, for example, the subscriber's name, subscriber's billing address, the duration for which the subscriber wishes to activate and maintain the call blocking service, and any other data (e.g., extended timeout period at block 54) that the subscriber wishes to communicate to the service provider. The subscriber-specific information may also include the subscriber's phone number for which the subscriber wishes to have the call blocking service. The call blocking service software can then store the callee's telephone number (for example, in the SDP 24) and associate that number with the callee. Thus, any time the callee/subscriber (or someone else using the callee's telephone) dials the special access sequence (e.g., *88) to activate the call blocking service, the service software validates the subscriber's identity by comparing the telephone number (obtained using, for example, the reverse caller-ID technology) from which the access sequence is received with the subscriber telephone numbers stored in the AIN network 14. If a match is found, the call blocking software allows the service requester to access various features offered by the call blocking service. In one embodiment, the call blocking service software may allow the subscriber 12 to transmit various subscriber-specific information over the Internet to the service provider's computer. The subscriber 12 may be required to access over the Internet a webpage maintained by the service provider to enter the subscriber-specific information.
It is noted that all of the call blocking service features discussed hereinbefore (including, for example, the submission of subscriber-specific information) can be implemented in a wireless environment (e.g., in a cellular telephone network). Thus, a cellular phone subscriber may also be offered the call blocking service according to the present invention. Furthermore, as noted hereinbefore, the call blocking service may be offered, for example, on a subscription basis (e.g., monthly or yearly subscription with unlimited access during the subscription period) or the subscriber may be charged on a per-access basis.
The foregoing describes an intelligent telephone service that allows subscribers to control the call blocking process and to selectively block telephone calls to their telephone numbers from those callers who are found to be unwanted or undesirable. The call blocking service may be implemented on an AIN platform through the call blocking service software running on the AIN platform. With a special access code, the subscriber can access the blocking service using the subscriber's telephone and instruct the service to place a block on telephone calls from one or more callers. Upon receiving the special access code and validating the subscriber's subscription status, the service automatically prompts the subscriber whether the subscriber wishes to place a block on the future phone calls from the most recent caller. In addition to authorizing the block, the subscriber can record a voice message or select a pre-recorded voice message for the blocked caller. The service will play the recorded/selected voice message to the caller whenever a phone call to the subscriber's telephone number is received from that blocked caller. The service also allows the subscriber to perform various administrative tasks such as for example, subscriber account management, removal of one or more call blocks placed earlier, etc., using the subscriber's telephone. Thus, the service allows the service subscriber to respond to a phone call first, and, then, instruct the service to place a block on future phone calls if the caller is found to be undesirable or unwanted.
While several embodiments of the invention have been described, it should be apparent, however, that various modifications, alterations and adaptations to those embodiments may occur to persons skilled in the art with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the present invention. It is therefore intended to cover all such modifications, alterations and adaptations without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US5206900 *||31 May 1991||27 Abr 1993||David Callele||Automated attendant|
|US5436957 *||7 Nov 1994||25 Jul 1995||Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.||Subscriber control of access restrictions on a plurality of the subscriber's telephone lines|
|US6160877 *||10 Mar 1997||12 Dic 2000||Stentor Resource Centre, Inc.||Method of screening and prioritizing an incoming call|
|US6560323 *||1 Ago 1997||6 May 2003||T-Netix, Inc.||Computer-based method and apparatus for controlling, monitoring, recording and reporting telephone access|
|US7145898 *||18 Nov 1996||5 Dic 2006||Mci Communications Corporation||System, method and article of manufacture for selecting a gateway of a hybrid communication system architecture|
|US20020085700 *||16 Jul 2001||4 Jul 2002||Darrell Metcalf||System and method for disconnecting and preventing unwanted telephone calls and for enhancing desired calls|
|US20020122401||2 Mar 2001||5 Sep 2002||Zeng-Jun Xiang||System and method in a wireless telecommunication network for placing a voice call on hold and conducting a data session|
|1||Krill, "Vendor Unveils Telemarketer Access Blocking Services," InfoWorld Electric, Apr. 2, 1999.|
|2||*||LASS: Putting the telephone customer in charge (Brant Hirschman, Grant Swinehart, and Marie L. Todd). May 1985.|
|3||Sword, "Ameritech's Call-Blocking Service Too Costly, Trade Group Says," The Indianapolis Star and News Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News, Jan. 5, 1999.|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US7688958 *||30 Mar 2010||Callwave, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US7822188||26 Oct 2010||Callwave, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US7839987||23 Nov 2010||Callwave, Inc.||Methods and systems for creating a dynamic call log and contact records|
|US7974608 *||5 Jul 2011||Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.||Anonymous call blocking in wireless networks|
|US8139747||19 Mar 2009||20 Mar 2012||Steve Cha||Method and apparatus for selective silencing of telephone ringing|
|US8213581||3 Jul 2012||Callwave, Inc.||Apparatus and methods for telecommunication authentication|
|US8270582||5 Abr 2007||18 Sep 2012||Callwave, Inc.||Methods and systems for routing calls|
|US8351591||11 Oct 2010||8 Ene 2013||Callwave Communications Llc||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US8369311||5 Feb 2013||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for providing telephony services to fixed and mobile telephonic devices|
|US8369494||5 Feb 2013||Steve Cha||Method and apparatus for selective silencing of telephone ringing|
|US8406410 *||11 Jun 2012||26 Mar 2013||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||On-demand call blocking service|
|US8417791||9 Abr 2013||Google Inc.||Hosted calling service|
|US8503637||9 Nov 2010||6 Ago 2013||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for creating a dynamic call log and contact records|
|US8503646||21 Jun 2012||6 Ago 2013||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for routing calls|
|US8548447||2 Oct 2007||1 Oct 2013||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for blocking unwanted telecommunications|
|US8572113||2 Sep 2010||29 Oct 2013||Gryphon Networks Corp.||Network calling privacy with recording|
|US8594287||11 Feb 2010||26 Nov 2013||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US8634528 *||10 May 2013||21 Ene 2014||Gryphon Networks Corp.||System and method for control of communications connections and notifications|
|US8638921||26 Feb 2013||28 Ene 2014||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||On-demand call blocking service|
|US8732190||30 Nov 2010||20 May 2014||Gryphon Networks Corp.||Network calling privacy with recording|
|US8774785||11 Dic 2013||8 Jul 2014||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for blocking unwanted communications|
|US8855107||18 Ene 2012||7 Oct 2014||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for call routing via a telephone number|
|US8861694||1 Ago 2013||14 Oct 2014||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for creating a dynamic call log and contact records|
|US8891753||4 Ene 2013||18 Nov 2014||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US8958782||3 Jul 2014||17 Feb 2015||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for blocking unwanted communications|
|US8964951||20 Jun 2012||24 Feb 2015||Callwave Communications, Llc||Apparatus and methods for telecommunication authentication|
|US8964956||13 Dic 2005||24 Feb 2015||Gryphon Networks Corp.||System and method for integrated compliance and contact management|
|US9008298 *||10 Jun 2008||14 Abr 2015||Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.||Automatic denial of call request|
|US9020123 *||26 Ago 2008||28 Abr 2015||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.||Apparatus and method for managing priority communication|
|US9154597 *||21 Dic 2012||6 Oct 2015||Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc||No call list deterrent|
|US9167088||14 Ene 2013||20 Oct 2015||Steve Cha||Method and apparatus for selective silencing of telephone ringing|
|US9203955||30 Sep 2014||1 Dic 2015||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for creating a dynamic call log and contact records|
|US9232056 *||2 Abr 2014||5 Ene 2016||Xiang Liu||Apparatus for blocking unwanted telephone calls and faxes|
|US9253319||10 Sep 2014||2 Feb 2016||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and systems for call connecting calls|
|US9319523||31 Oct 2014||19 Abr 2016||Callwave Communications, Llc||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US9338292||2 Sep 2015||10 May 2016||Steve Cha||Method and apparatus for selective silencing of telephone ringing|
|US20040114747 *||13 Jun 2003||17 Jun 2004||Trandal David S.||Systems and methods for call processing|
|US20050207557 *||19 Ene 2005||22 Sep 2005||Dolan Robert A||Methods and apparatus for providing expanded telecommunications service|
|US20060199572 *||3 Mar 2005||7 Sep 2006||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Anonymous call blocking in wireless networks|
|US20070116218 *||18 Oct 2005||24 May 2007||Nortel Networks Limited||Preventing connections from calling terminals|
|US20070136789 *||13 Dic 2005||14 Jun 2007||Fotta Keith A||System and method for integrated compliance and contact management|
|US20080130860 *||19 Dic 2007||5 Jun 2008||Karen Mullis||Methods, systems, and products for managing communications|
|US20090238345 *||19 Mar 2009||24 Sep 2009||Steve Cha||Method and apparatus for selective silencing of telephone ringing|
|US20090304167 *||10 Jun 2008||10 Dic 2009||Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc.||Automatic denial of call rquest|
|US20100054437 *||26 Ago 2008||4 Mar 2010||Li-Jin Chung||Apparatus and method for managing priority communication|
|US20120250838 *||4 Oct 2012||At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Via Transfer From Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation||On-Demand Call Blocking Service|
|US20130251130 *||10 May 2013||26 Sep 2013||Gryphon Networks Corp.||System and Method for Control of Communications Connections and Notifications|
|US20140177479 *||21 Dic 2012||26 Jun 2014||Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc||No Call List Deterrent|
|US20150288817 *||2 Abr 2014||8 Oct 2015||Xiang Liu||Apparatus for blocking unwanted telephone calls and faxes|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||379/210.02, 379/244, 379/210.03|
|Clasificación cooperativa||H04M3/436, H04M2201/40, H04M2207/12|
|23 Ago 2001||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BELLSOUTH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORPORATION, DELAW
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KIRKPATRICK, MARK;REEL/FRAME:012116/0745
Effective date: 20010820
|22 Nov 2010||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|23 Ene 2015||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|12 Jun 2015||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|4 Ago 2015||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20150612