US7814161B2 - System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches - Google Patents

System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7814161B2
US7814161B2 US11/473,313 US47331306A US7814161B2 US 7814161 B2 US7814161 B2 US 7814161B2 US 47331306 A US47331306 A US 47331306A US 7814161 B2 US7814161 B2 US 7814161B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
certificate
sender
recipient
address
name
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US11/473,313
Other versions
US20070299921A1 (en
Inventor
Michael K. Brown
Michael S. Brown
Timothy Segato
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Malikie Innovations Ltd
Original Assignee
Research in Motion Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US11/473,313 priority Critical patent/US7814161B2/en
Application filed by Research in Motion Ltd filed Critical Research in Motion Ltd
Assigned to RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED reassignment RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BROWN, MICHAEL K., BROWN, MICHAEL S., SEGATO, TIMOTHY
Publication of US20070299921A1 publication Critical patent/US20070299921A1/en
Priority to US12/896,224 priority patent/US8312165B2/en
Publication of US7814161B2 publication Critical patent/US7814161B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Priority to US13/672,073 priority patent/US8473561B2/en
Priority to US13/905,207 priority patent/US8943156B2/en
Assigned to BLACKBERRY LIMITED reassignment BLACKBERRY LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
Assigned to MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED reassignment MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Assigned to MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED reassignment MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/107Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
    • H04L51/48Message addressing, e.g. address format or anonymous messages, aliases
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L61/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
    • H04L61/45Network directories; Name-to-address mapping
    • H04L61/4555Directories for electronic mail or instant messaging
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0823Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using certificates
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3263Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving certificates, e.g. public key certificate [PKC] or attribute certificate [AC]; Public key infrastructure [PKI] arrangements
    • H04L9/3268Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving certificates, e.g. public key certificate [PKC] or attribute certificate [AC]; Public key infrastructure [PKI] arrangements using certificate validation, registration, distribution or revocation, e.g. certificate revocation list [CRL]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/50Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols using hash chains, e.g. blockchains or hash trees
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2209/00Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
    • H04L2209/80Wireless

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to the processing of secure electronic messages and information.
  • the instant disclosure is directed to a system and method for resolving mismatches that may occur between, for example, an e-mail address contained in the certificate of a sender or recipient of an electronic message, and the e-mail address actually used in the sender or recipient field of an e-mail.
  • Secure electronic messaging may involve the use of digital signatures, encryption, or the like.
  • a recipient of an electronic message may verify that the sender of an electronic message is trusted by comparing the address of the sender to an address that may be contained in a certificate or certificate chain of the sender.
  • Some organizations such as, for example, government agencies like the Department of Defense, are moving to systems in which a user has an e-mail address that they will keep for the life of their tenure with that organization.
  • This sort of lifelong address will typically be contained within the user's certificate.
  • the address for their account may change, for example, based on location.
  • the lifelong address may appear as John.Doe@agency.gov, while the address being used when the user is working at a particular site within the organization may change to reflect the location of the user, for example, John.Doe@locationA.agency.gov.
  • John Doe moves about throughout the agency, the lifelong address of John Doe will not change, but John Doe's outlook address may change based on John Doe's location.
  • This arrangement can create many problems with signed electronic messages, such as, for example, S/MIME, because it depends on the e-mail address found in the user's certificate matching the e-mail address of the account for verification.
  • S/MIME signed electronic message
  • What is needed is a system and method for resolving the potential mismatch errors, for example, those that might occur in organizations that use lifelong e-mail addresses and shorter term addresses that are used as the user moves around within the organization.
  • FIG. 1 is an overall system wide schematic view of an exemplary wireless e-mail communication system incorporating a mobile wireless communications device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a further exemplary communication system including multiple networks and multiple mobile communication devices;
  • FIG. 3 is an abbreviated schematic diagram of hardware included within an exemplary mobile wireless communications device
  • FIG. 4 is an abbreviated schematic functional diagram of the hardware/software utilized in an exemplary mobile wireless communication device in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a recipient address
  • FIG. 6 is another exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a recipient address
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a sender's address
  • FIG. 8 is another exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a sender's address.
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating an exemplary administrator screen that may be used to assign a generic or canonical name to a user's certificate.
  • one or more canonical, e.g., generic, domain name(s) may, for example, be used as a lifelong address of a user that is contained in the user's certificate.
  • the system and method disclosed herein may automatically re-check the certificate or search for a certificate containing the canonical or generic domain or user name to attempt to resolve the mismatch. This mismatch resolution is preferably transparent to the user and occurs automatically.
  • the canonical or generic domain or user names that are available to the device may be typically controlled by IT policy that is in place on the system for the device. While this system is suitable for any type of electronic messaging system, it has particular applicability to systems that use mobile wireless communication devices with electronic messaging capability.
  • a canonical or generic domain name may be included in the search.
  • the search may be retried using a canonical or generic domain name, such as, for example, John.Doe@agency.gov.
  • the system may be preferably configured to automatically retry a certificate search of a recipient using the canonical or generic domain name, or in the case of an address mismatch when attempting to verify a received message, retry the check substituting the canonical or generic domain name(s).
  • a faster and perhaps even more efficient approach when searching for a certificate or attempting to resolve a mismatch is to automatically check certificates for both the address of the account being used and canonical or generic domain name simultaneously, and transparently provide the user with the matching result. While it is preferred in this example to perform these certificate checks at the device level, it is also envisioned that a server or service resident on a server within the system, such as, for example, an e-mail server may perform these checks thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of the search, while alleviating processor overhead of the device. As with the device, a server-based implementation, the canonical or generic domain names that are available to the device via the server may be typically controlled by IT policy that is in place on the system.
  • the system may be configured to search for a generic name that includes canonical or generic user name(s) in place of (or in addition to) a canonical or generic domain name to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch.
  • e-mail addresses are composed of two main parts—the user name and the domain name, for example, user name@domain name.
  • the examples set forth above are described with respect to using a canonical or generic domain name when searching for a certificate or when attempting to resolve a mismatch.
  • a canonical or generic user name may be used to search for a certificate or resolve a mismatch.
  • the user name may change as an employee moves or is assigned to different departments within an agency.
  • the lifelong address may be John.Doe@agency.gov, but the user name may change as John Doe is assigned to different offices or departments within the agency, for example, John.Doe_Legal@agency.gov, John.Doe_accounting@agency.gov, John.Doe_Solicitor@agency.gov, etc.
  • the system may utilize a canonical or generic user name, e.g., by truncating the portion of the user name following the underscore in the examples set forth above.
  • the system administrator would be able to set the rules for using canonical or generic user names or domain names based on the structure of the address via IT policy.
  • using a combination of canonical or generic domain names and user names to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch may also be used to provide a more robust solution.
  • FIG. 1 is an overview of an example communication system in which a wireless communication device may be used.
  • a wireless communication device may be used.
  • FIG. 1 helps demonstrate the operation of the encoded message processing systems and methods described in the present application.
  • the simple system shown in FIG. 1 is for illustrative purposes only, and shows perhaps the most prevalent Internet e-mail environment where security is not generally used.
  • FIG. 1 shows an e-mail sender 10 , the Internet 20 , a message server system 40 , a wireless gateway 85 , wireless infrastructure 90 , a wireless network 105 and a mobile communication device 100 .
  • An e-mail sender system 10 may, for example, be connected to an ISP (Internet Service Provider) on which a user of the system 10 has an account, located within a company, possibly connected to a local area network (LAN), and connected to the Internet 20 , or connected to the Internet 20 through a large ASP (application service provider) such as America Online (AOL).
  • ISP Internet Service Provider
  • LAN local area network
  • ASP application service provider
  • FIG. 1 may instead be connected to a wide area network (WAN) other than the Internet, although e-mail transfers are commonly accomplished through Internet-connected arrangements as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the message server 40 may be implemented, for example, on a network computer within the firewall of a corporation, a computer within an ISP or ASP system or the like, and acts as the main interface for e-mail exchange over the Internet 20 .
  • a mobile device 100 configured for receiving and possibly sending e-mail will normally be associated with an account on a message server.
  • the two most common message servers are Microsoft ExchangeTM and Lotus DominoTM. These products are often used in conjunction with Internet mail routers that route and deliver mail. These intermediate components are not shown in FIG. 1 , as they do not directly play a role in the secure message processing described below.
  • Message servers such as server 40 typically extend beyond just e-mail sending and receiving; they also include dynamic database storage engines that have predefined database formats for data like calendars, to-do lists, task lists, e-mail and documentation.
  • the wireless gateway 85 and infrastructure 90 provide a link between the Internet 20 and wireless network 105 .
  • the wireless infrastructure 90 determines the most likely network for locating a given user and tracks the user as they roam between countries or networks.
  • a message is then delivered to the mobile device 100 via wireless transmission, typically at a radio frequency (RF), from a base station in the wireless network 105 to the mobile device 100 .
  • RF radio frequency
  • the particular network 105 may be virtually any wireless network over which messages may be exchanged with a mobile communication device.
  • a composed e-mail message 15 is sent by the e-mail sender 10 , located somewhere on the Internet 20 .
  • This message 15 is normally fully in the clear and uses traditional Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), RFC822 headers and Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME) body parts to define the format of the mail message. These techniques are all well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the message 15 arrives at the message server 40 and is normally stored in a message store.
  • Most known messaging systems support a so-called “pull” message access scheme, wherein the mobile device 100 must request that stored messages be forwarded by the message server to the mobile device 100 .
  • Some systems provide for automatic routing of such messages which are addressed using a specific e-mail address associated with the mobile device 100 .
  • messages addressed to a message server account associated with a host system such as a home computer or office computer which belongs to the user of a mobile device 100 are redirected from the message server 40 to the mobile device 100 as they are received.
  • the wireless gateway 85 Regardless of the specific mechanism controlling the forwarding of messages to the mobile device 100 , the message 15 , or possibly a translated or reformatted version thereof, is sent to the wireless gateway 85 .
  • the wireless infrastructure 90 includes a series of connections to wireless network 105 . These connections could be Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), Frame Relay or T1 connections using the TCP/IP protocol used throughout the Internet.
  • ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
  • Frame Relay or T1 connections using the TCP/IP protocol used throughout the Internet.
  • the term “wireless network” is intended to include at least one of three different types of networks, those being (1) data-centric wireless networks, (2) voice-centric wireless networks and (3) dual-mode networks that can support both voice and data communications over the same physical base stations.
  • Combined dual-mode networks include, but are not limited to, (1) Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) networks, (2) the Groupe Special Mobile or the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) and the General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) networks, and (3) future third-generation (3G) networks like Enhanced Data-rates for Global Evolution (EDGE), integrated Digital Enhanced Network (iDEN), Evolution Data Optimized (EvDO), High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS) or the like.
  • CDMA Code Division Multiple Access
  • GSM Global System for Mobile Communications
  • GPRS General Packet Radio Service
  • 3G Third-generation
  • EDGE Enhanced Data-rates for Global Evolution
  • iDEN integrated Digital Enhanced Network
  • EvDO Evolution Data Optimized
  • HSDPA High-Speed Downlink Packet Access
  • UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a further example communication system including multiple networks and multiple mobile communication devices.
  • the system of FIG. 2 is substantially similar to the FIG. 1 system, but includes a host system 300 , a redirection program 45 , a mobile device cradle 65 , a wireless virtual private network (VPN) router 75 , an additional wireless network 110 and multiple mobile communication devices 100 .
  • FIG. 2 represents an overview of a sample network topology. Although the encoded message processing systems and methods described herein may be applied to networks having many different topologies, the network of FIG. 2 is useful in understanding an automatic e-mail redirection system mentioned briefly above.
  • the central host system 300 will typically be a corporate office or other LAN, but may instead be a home office computer or some other private system where mail messages are being exchanged.
  • the message server 400 running on some computer within the firewall of the host system, that acts as the main interface for the host system to exchange e-mail with the Internet 20 .
  • the redirection program 45 enables redirection of data items from the server 400 to a mobile communication device 100 .
  • the redirection program 45 is shown to reside on the same machine as the message server 400 for ease of presentation, there is no requirement that it must reside on the message server.
  • the redirection program 45 and the message server 400 are designed to co-operate and interact to allow the pushing of information to mobile devices 100 .
  • the redirection program 45 takes confidential and non-confidential corporate information for a specific user and redirects it out through the corporate firewall to mobile devices 100 .
  • a more detailed description of the redirection software 45 may be found in the commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,694 (“the '694 Patent”), entitled “System and Method for Pushing Information From A Host System To A Mobile Data Communication Device Having A Shared Electronic Address”, and issued to the assignee of the instant application on Apr. 17, 2001 which is hereby incorporated into the present application by reference.
  • This push technique may use a wireless friendly encoding, compression and encryption technique to deliver all information to a mobile device, thus effectively extending the security firewall to include each mobile device 100 associated with the host system 300 .
  • FIG. 2 there may be many alternative paths for getting information to the mobile device 100 .
  • One method for loading information onto the mobile device 100 is through a port designated 50 , using a device cradle 65 .
  • This method tends to be useful for bulk information updates often performed at initialization of a mobile device 100 with the host system 300 or a computer 35 within the system 300 .
  • the other main method for data exchange is over-the-air using wireless networks to deliver the information. As shown in FIG. 2 , this may be accomplished through a wireless VPN router 75 or through a traditional Internet connection 95 to a wireless gateway 85 and a wireless infrastructure 90 , as described above.
  • the concept of a wireless VPN router 75 is new in the wireless industry and implies that a VPN connection could be established directly through a specific wireless network 110 to a mobile device 100 .
  • the possibility of using a wireless VPN router 75 has only recently been available and could be used when the new Internet Protocol (IP) Version 6 (IPV6) arrives into IP-based wireless networks.
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • IPV6 Internet Protocol Version 6
  • This new protocol will provide enough IP addresses to dedicate an IP address to every mobile device 100 and thus make it possible to push information to a mobile device 100 at any time.
  • a principal advantage of using this wireless VPN router 75 is that it could be an off-the-shelf VPN component, thus it would not require a separate wireless gateway 85 and wireless infrastructure 90 to be used.
  • a VPN connection would preferably be a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)/IP or User Datagram Protocol (UDP)/IP connection to deliver the messages directly to the mobile device 100 . If a wireless VPN 75 is not available then a link 95 to the Internet 20 is the most common connection mechanism available and has been described above.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • UDP User Datagram Protocol
  • a composed e-mail message 15 leaving the e-mail sender 10 arrives at the message server 400 and is redirected by the redirection program 45 to the mobile device 100 .
  • the message 15 is re-enveloped, as indicated at 80 , and a possibly proprietary compression and encryption algorithm can then be applied to the original message 15 .
  • a possibly proprietary compression and encryption algorithm can then be applied to the original message 15 .
  • messages being read on the mobile device 100 are no less secure than if they were read on a desktop workstation such as 35 within the firewall. All messages exchanged between the redirection program 45 and the mobile device 100 preferably use this message repackaging technique.
  • Another goal of this outer envelope is to maintain the addressing information of the original message except the sender's and the receiver's address. This allows reply messages to reach the appropriate destination, and also allows the “from” field to reflect the mobile user's desktop address. Using the user's e-mail address from the mobile device 100 allows the received message to appear as though the message originated from the user's desktop system 35 rather than the mobile device 100 .
  • this connection path offers many advantages for enabling one-time data exchange of large items.
  • PIM Personal Information Management
  • This serial link may also be used for other purposes, including setting up a private security key 111 such as an S/MIME or PGP specific private key, the Certificate (Cert) of the user and their Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) 60 .
  • the private key is preferably exchanged so that the desktop 35 and mobile device 100 share one personality and one method for accessing all mail.
  • the Cert and CRLs are normally exchanged over such a link because they represent a large amount of the data that is required by the device for S/MIME, PGP and other public key security methods.
  • S/MIME S/MIME
  • PGP PGP
  • other public key security methods there are situations where a user does not have the ability to establish such a link to their desktop 35 in order to update the key store of the mobile device 100 with the appropriate private keys. In these situations, the system and method described herein allow the secure transfer of cryptographic information over a wireless link.
  • mobile communications device 100 includes a suitable RF antenna 102 for wireless communication to/from wireless network 20 .
  • Conventional RF, demodulation/modulation and decoding/coding circuits 104 are provided.
  • DSPs digital signal processors
  • microprocessors filters
  • analog and digital circuits and the like.
  • the mobile communications device 100 will also typically include a main control CPU 106 that operates under the control of a stored program in program memory 108 , and which has access to data memory 110 .
  • CPU 106 also communicates with a conventional keyboard 112 and display 114 (for example, a liquid crystal display or LCD) and audio transducer or speaker 116 .
  • a portion of the data memory 310 is available for storing data required for decrypting encrypted messages, such as, for example, private keys, digital certificates, and the like.
  • Suitable computer program executable code is stored in portions of the program memory 108 to constitute stored program logic for receiving and using new or added private keys and/or digital certificates or the like as described below (for example, via a wired serial I/O port or the wireless RF antenna 102 ).
  • a secure wired synchronization connection 26 (for example, between serial I/O ports of the user's base unit 24 and the wireless device 100 ) is typically provided for normal data synchronization purposes (for example, to synchronize databases in the two devices with respect to such things as calendars, to-do lists, task lists, address books, etc.).
  • Part of prior data synchronization processes has included a program logic such as Cert Sync for maintaining synchronization between cryptographic message certificates. If a secure over the air (OTA) synchronization connection 28 is available, it may also be used by Cert Sync to maintain synchronization of cryptographic message certificates.
  • OTA over the air
  • a communications link typically found between the device user's base unit 24 and a system message server 14 . Accordingly, there is an existing communication path that may be utilized for passing synchronization data from the user's base unit 24 via channel 30 , the server 14 , Internet 12 , wireless gateway 16 and wireless infrastructure 18 via the OTA synchronization connection 28 .
  • the user's base unit 24 may be used to update the mobile wireless communications device 100 with information including, for example, private key information and digital certificate information.
  • the user's base station 24 is typically a desktop PC, and may be of conventional hardware and operating system design. It will typically include desktop manager program logic 304 (in the form of, for example, executable computer program logic) for managing, among other things, a normal data synchronization connection to device 100 .
  • desktop manager program logic 304 in the form of, for example, executable computer program logic
  • a desktop manager may typically include logic for synchronizing cryptographic message certificates. Such logic is denoted here as Cert Sync.
  • E-mail messages generated using the S/MIME and PGP techniques may include encrypted information, a digital signature on the message contents, or both.
  • the sender takes a digest of a message and signs the digest using the sender's private key.
  • a digest is essentially a checksum, CRC or other preferably non-reversible operation such as a hash of the message, which is then signed.
  • the signed digest is appended to the outgoing message, possibly along with the certificate of the sender and possibly any required certificates or CRLs.
  • the receiver of this signed message must also take a digest of the message, compare this digest with the digest appended to the message, retrieve the sender's public key, and verify the signature on the appended digest.
  • the digests will be different or the signature on the digest will not verify properly. If the message is not encrypted, this signature does not prevent anyone from seeing the contents of the message, but does ensure that the message has not been tampered with and is from the actual person as indicated on the “from” field of the message.
  • the receiver may also verify the certificate and CRL if they were appended to the message.
  • a certificate chain is a certificate along with a number of other certificates required to verify that the original certificate is authentic. While verifying the signature on a signed message, the receiver of the message will also typically obtain a certificate chain for the signing certificate and verify that each certificate in the chain was signed by the next certificate in the chain, until a certificate is found that was signed by a root certificate from a trusted source, such as, for example, a large Public Key Server (PKS) associated with a Certificate Authority (CA), such as; for example, Verisign or Entrust, both prominent companies in the field of public key cryptography.
  • PPS Public Key Server
  • CA Certificate Authority
  • a one-time session key is generated and used to encrypt the body of the message, typically with a symmetric cipher, such as, for example, Triple DES.
  • the session key is then encrypted using the receiver's public key, typically with a public key encryption algorithm like RSA. If the message is addressed to more than one receiver, the same session key is encrypted using the public key of each receiver.
  • the encrypted message body, as well as all encrypted session keys, is sent to every receiver. Each receiver must then locate its own session key, possibly based on a generated Recipient Info summary of the receivers that may be attached to the message, and decrypt the session key using its private key. Once the session key is decrypted, it is then used to decrypt the message body.
  • the S/MIME Recipient Info attachment can also specify the particular encryption scheme that must be used to decrypt the message. This information is normally placed in the header of the S/MIME message. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that these operations relate to an illustrative example of S/MIME messaging and its associated encoding operations, namely encryption. It will also be understood that the instant disclosure is in no way limited thereto.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a recipient's certificate using a recipient address.
  • a user first enters an electronic messaging application 501 resident on or accessible to the device being used by the user.
  • Such devices may include, for example, a mobile wireless communication device that is capable of supporting electronic mail functions, as discussed above.
  • the user then enters a recipient address 503 in the appropriate field of the electronic mail message to be sent.
  • the system then conducts a search for the recipient's certificate by attempting to locate the recipient address in certificates resident on the device 507 .
  • the system may be configured to search certificates stored on a server of the system.
  • the system and method searches for the recipient certificate using a canonical or generic domain name and/or a canonical or generic user name 513 .
  • a canonical or generic domain name For simplicity, the examples described herein refer generally to a canonical or generic domain name. However, it will be understood that the application applies equally to the use of a canonical or generic user name in place of a generic or canonical domain name, and to a combination of canonical or generic domain and user names.
  • the canonical or generic domain name may be, for example, a lifelong address that is assigned to a person for the duration of their tenure with a specific agency, organization, company, or the like. If the certificate is found using the canonical or generic domain name 515 , the user may continue the messaging process 511 . If no certificate is found 515 , a notification may be provided to the user that no certificate match for the address was found 517 .
  • FIG. 6 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of an alternative method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a recipient's certificate using a recipient address.
  • the exemplary method illustrated in FIG. 6 is similar to that of FIG. 5 .
  • the search for the recipient certificate is conducted using the recipient address and canonical or generic domain name concurrently.
  • the user enters the electronic messaging application 601 , and enters recipient e-mail address in the appropriate field 603 .
  • the system then conducts a search for the recipient's certificate by attempting to locate the recipient address in certificates resident on or accessible to the device and by attempting to locate a canonical or generic domain name associated with the recipient concurrently 605 .
  • a certificate is found 607 , the user may continue the messaging process 609 . If no match is found 607 , a notification may be provided to the user of a mismatch 611 . As discussed above, searching for both the recipient address and a canonical or generic domain name associated with the recipient concurrently may provide efficiencies of speed and processing overhead.
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a sender's certificate using a sender's address.
  • the process illustrated in FIG. 7 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 5 , with the certificate search being based on the sender's e-mail address or canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender.
  • the system institutes a search for the sender's certificate based on the sender's e-mail address that was used to send the message 703 .
  • the user may continue the process of verifying the user's information, such as, for example, the user's digital signature 709 . If no certificate corresponding to the sender is found 705 , the system may then search for the sender certificate using a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender's lifelong address 711 . If a certificate associated with the sender is found 713 , the user may then continue the processing of the received mail 709 . If no match is found 713 , the user may be notified of a mismatch 715 .
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of an alternative method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a sender's certificate using a sender's address.
  • the exemplary method illustrated in FIG. 8 is similar to that of FIG. 7 .
  • the search for the sender's certificate is conducted using the sender's address and canonical or generic domain name concurrently.
  • the user receives an electronic message 801 .
  • the system then conducts a search for the sender's certificate by attempting to locate the sender's address in certificates resident on or accessible to the device and by attempting to locate a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender concurrently 803 .
  • a certificate is found 805
  • the user may continue the messaging process 809 . If no match is found 805 , a notification may be provided to the user of a mismatch 807 .
  • searching for both the sender's address and a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender concurrently may provide efficiencies of speed and processing overhead.
  • the device within the system that provides the electronic message mismatch handling as described with respect to the illustrative embodiments discussed in detail above may be any device within the system, including, but not limited to the electronic messaging device itself, a server within the system, or the like.
  • the system may be configured to search for a canonical or generic user name in place of (or in addition to) a canonical or generic domain name to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch.
  • e-mail addresses are composed of two main parts—the user name and the domain name, for example, user name@domain name.
  • the examples set forth above are described with respect to using a canonical or generic domain name when searching for a certificate or when attempting to resolve a mismatch.
  • a canonical or generic user name may be used to search for a certificate or resolve a mismatch.
  • the user name may change as an employee moves or is assigned to different departments within an agency.
  • the lifelong address may be John.Doe@agency.gov, but the user name may change as John Doe is assigned to different offices or departments within the agency, for example, John.Doe_Legal@agency.gov, John.Doe_accounting@agency.gov, John.Doe_Solicitor@agency.gov, etc.
  • the system may utilize a canonical or generic user name, e.g., by truncating the portion of the user name following the underscore in the examples set forth above.
  • the system administrator would be able to set the rules for using canonical and/or generic user names or domain names based on the structure of the address via IT policy.
  • FIG. 9 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating an exemplary administrator screen that may be used to assign a generic or canonical name to a user's certificate.
  • the system administrator may be provided with the ability to enter data in a field that reflects a long-lived (e.g., canonical or generic name) associated with a particular user.
  • the screen shot also provides a rule associated with the field relating to the use of canonical or generic names for long-lived addresses.
  • using a combination of canonical or generic domain names and user names to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch may also be used to provide a more robust solution.
  • the methods described herein for locating a certificate of a sender or recipient of an electronic message may be embodied in executable program logic.
  • the executable program logic may reside on the device or on a server within the system that processes electronic messages.
  • the executable program logic may be transmitted or received by various devices and circuits within devices of the system on a carrier wave modulated by a signal representing the corresponding program logic or executable code, or the like, or any other suitable communication medium.

Abstract

A system and method for handling e-mail address mismatches between the address contained within a user's certificate or certificate chain, and the account address actually being used is disclosed. In order to resolve address mismatches a canonical or generic domain name or user name may, for example, be used as a lifelong address of a user that is contained in the user's certificate. Upon detection of an address mismatch, the system and method disclosed herein may automatically re-check the certificate or search for a certificate containing the canonical or generic domain name and/or user name to attempt to resolve the mismatch. This mismatch resolution is preferably transparent to the user and occurs automatically. The canonical or generic domain and/or user names that are available to the device may be typically controlled by IT policy that is in place on the system for the device. While this system is suitable for any type of electronic messaging system, it has particular applicability to systems that use mobile wireless communication devices with electronic messaging capability.

Description

BACKGROUND
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to the processing of secure electronic messages and information. In particular, the instant disclosure is directed to a system and method for resolving mismatches that may occur between, for example, an e-mail address contained in the certificate of a sender or recipient of an electronic message, and the e-mail address actually used in the sender or recipient field of an e-mail.
2. Related Art
Exchanging secured electronic messages and data, such as, for example, e-mail messages, is well known. Secure electronic messaging may involve the use of digital signatures, encryption, or the like. For example, a recipient of an electronic message may verify that the sender of an electronic message is trusted by comparing the address of the sender to an address that may be contained in a certificate or certificate chain of the sender.
Some organizations, such as, for example, government agencies like the Department of Defense, are moving to systems in which a user has an e-mail address that they will keep for the life of their tenure with that organization. This sort of lifelong address will typically be contained within the user's certificate. As a user moves around within the organization, the address for their account may change, for example, based on location. For example, the lifelong address may appear as John.Doe@agency.gov, while the address being used when the user is working at a particular site within the organization may change to reflect the location of the user, for example, John.Doe@locationA.agency.gov. Thus, in this example, as John Doe moves about throughout the agency, the lifelong address of John Doe will not change, but John Doe's outlook address may change based on John Doe's location.
This arrangement can create many problems with signed electronic messages, such as, for example, S/MIME, because it depends on the e-mail address found in the user's certificate matching the e-mail address of the account for verification. In this example, if someone wants to send an e-mail to John Doe when he is stationed at location A, the system would search for the certificate containing the address John.Doe@locationA.agency.gov, but the address contained in John Doe's lifelong certificate is John.Doe@agency.gov. This difference will result in a mismatch. Similarly, if John Doe were to send a signed e-mail to someone, when the recipient attempts to verify it, the recipient will see the originating address is John.Doe@locationA.agency.gov, but the address in the certificate is John.Doe@agency.gov. Again, this will result as an e-mail mismatch error.
What is needed is a system and method for resolving the potential mismatch errors, for example, those that might occur in organizations that use lifelong e-mail addresses and shorter term addresses that are used as the user moves around within the organization.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other objects and advantages of exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be better understood and appreciated in conjunction with the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is an overall system wide schematic view of an exemplary wireless e-mail communication system incorporating a mobile wireless communications device in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a further exemplary communication system including multiple networks and multiple mobile communication devices;
FIG. 3 is an abbreviated schematic diagram of hardware included within an exemplary mobile wireless communications device;
FIG. 4 is an abbreviated schematic functional diagram of the hardware/software utilized in an exemplary mobile wireless communication device in the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a recipient address;
FIG. 6 is another exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a recipient address;
FIG. 7 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a sender's address;
FIG. 8 is another exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches in a sender's address; and
FIG. 9 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating an exemplary administrator screen that may be used to assign a generic or canonical name to a user's certificate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
In view of the foregoing, we have now identified an efficient, accurate and easy to implement system and method for handling e-mail address mismatches between the address contained within a user's certificate or certificate chain, and the account address actually being used. In order to resolve address mismatches one or more canonical, e.g., generic, domain name(s) may, for example, be used as a lifelong address of a user that is contained in the user's certificate. Upon detection of an address mismatch, the system and method disclosed herein may automatically re-check the certificate or search for a certificate containing the canonical or generic domain or user name to attempt to resolve the mismatch. This mismatch resolution is preferably transparent to the user and occurs automatically. The canonical or generic domain or user names that are available to the device may be typically controlled by IT policy that is in place on the system for the device. While this system is suitable for any type of electronic messaging system, it has particular applicability to systems that use mobile wireless communication devices with electronic messaging capability.
According to an exemplary embodiment, if a search for a recipient's certificate, or when performing an address mismatch check when receiving a signed message, a canonical or generic domain name may be included in the search. Thus, if someone is trying to send an e-mail to John.Doe@locationA.agency.gov, and a matching certificate is not found, the search may be retried using a canonical or generic domain name, such as, for example, John.Doe@agency.gov. The system may be preferably configured to automatically retry a certificate search of a recipient using the canonical or generic domain name, or in the case of an address mismatch when attempting to verify a received message, retry the check substituting the canonical or generic domain name(s). A faster and perhaps even more efficient approach when searching for a certificate or attempting to resolve a mismatch, is to automatically check certificates for both the address of the account being used and canonical or generic domain name simultaneously, and transparently provide the user with the matching result. While it is preferred in this example to perform these certificate checks at the device level, it is also envisioned that a server or service resident on a server within the system, such as, for example, an e-mail server may perform these checks thereby increasing the speed and efficiency of the search, while alleviating processor overhead of the device. As with the device, a server-based implementation, the canonical or generic domain names that are available to the device via the server may be typically controlled by IT policy that is in place on the system.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the system may be configured to search for a generic name that includes canonical or generic user name(s) in place of (or in addition to) a canonical or generic domain name to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch. Typically, e-mail addresses are composed of two main parts—the user name and the domain name, for example, user name@domain name. The examples set forth above are described with respect to using a canonical or generic domain name when searching for a certificate or when attempting to resolve a mismatch. However, it is also contemplated that a canonical or generic user name may be used to search for a certificate or resolve a mismatch. For example, the user name may change as an employee moves or is assigned to different departments within an agency. For instance, the lifelong address may be John.Doe@agency.gov, but the user name may change as John Doe is assigned to different offices or departments within the agency, for example, John.Doe_Legal@agency.gov, John.Doe_accounting@agency.gov, John.Doe_Solicitor@agency.gov, etc. In this example, to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch, the system may utilize a canonical or generic user name, e.g., by truncating the portion of the user name following the underscore in the examples set forth above. The system administrator would be able to set the rules for using canonical or generic user names or domain names based on the structure of the address via IT policy.
In yet a further exemplary implementation, using a combination of canonical or generic domain names and user names to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch may also be used to provide a more robust solution.
FIG. 1 is an overview of an example communication system in which a wireless communication device may be used. One skilled in the art will appreciate that there may be hundreds of different topologies, but the system shown in FIG. 1 helps demonstrate the operation of the encoded message processing systems and methods described in the present application. There may also be many message senders and recipients. The simple system shown in FIG. 1 is for illustrative purposes only, and shows perhaps the most prevalent Internet e-mail environment where security is not generally used.
FIG. 1 shows an e-mail sender 10, the Internet 20, a message server system 40, a wireless gateway 85, wireless infrastructure 90, a wireless network 105 and a mobile communication device 100.
An e-mail sender system 10 may, for example, be connected to an ISP (Internet Service Provider) on which a user of the system 10 has an account, located within a company, possibly connected to a local area network (LAN), and connected to the Internet 20, or connected to the Internet 20 through a large ASP (application service provider) such as America Online (AOL). Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the systems shown in FIG. 1 may instead be connected to a wide area network (WAN) other than the Internet, although e-mail transfers are commonly accomplished through Internet-connected arrangements as shown in FIG. 1.
The message server 40 may be implemented, for example, on a network computer within the firewall of a corporation, a computer within an ISP or ASP system or the like, and acts as the main interface for e-mail exchange over the Internet 20. Although other messaging systems might not require a message server system 40, a mobile device 100 configured for receiving and possibly sending e-mail will normally be associated with an account on a message server. Perhaps the two most common message servers are Microsoft Exchange™ and Lotus Domino™. These products are often used in conjunction with Internet mail routers that route and deliver mail. These intermediate components are not shown in FIG. 1, as they do not directly play a role in the secure message processing described below. Message servers such as server 40 typically extend beyond just e-mail sending and receiving; they also include dynamic database storage engines that have predefined database formats for data like calendars, to-do lists, task lists, e-mail and documentation.
The wireless gateway 85 and infrastructure 90 provide a link between the Internet 20 and wireless network 105. The wireless infrastructure 90 determines the most likely network for locating a given user and tracks the user as they roam between countries or networks. A message is then delivered to the mobile device 100 via wireless transmission, typically at a radio frequency (RF), from a base station in the wireless network 105 to the mobile device 100. The particular network 105 may be virtually any wireless network over which messages may be exchanged with a mobile communication device.
As shown in FIG. 1, a composed e-mail message 15 is sent by the e-mail sender 10, located somewhere on the Internet 20. This message 15 is normally fully in the clear and uses traditional Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), RFC822 headers and Multipurpose Internet Mail Extension (MIME) body parts to define the format of the mail message. These techniques are all well known to those skilled in the art. The message 15 arrives at the message server 40 and is normally stored in a message store. Most known messaging systems support a so-called “pull” message access scheme, wherein the mobile device 100 must request that stored messages be forwarded by the message server to the mobile device 100. Some systems provide for automatic routing of such messages which are addressed using a specific e-mail address associated with the mobile device 100. In a preferred embodiment described in further detail below, messages addressed to a message server account associated with a host system such as a home computer or office computer which belongs to the user of a mobile device 100 are redirected from the message server 40 to the mobile device 100 as they are received.
Regardless of the specific mechanism controlling the forwarding of messages to the mobile device 100, the message 15, or possibly a translated or reformatted version thereof, is sent to the wireless gateway 85. The wireless infrastructure 90 includes a series of connections to wireless network 105. These connections could be Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN), Frame Relay or T1 connections using the TCP/IP protocol used throughout the Internet. As used herein, the term “wireless network” is intended to include at least one of three different types of networks, those being (1) data-centric wireless networks, (2) voice-centric wireless networks and (3) dual-mode networks that can support both voice and data communications over the same physical base stations. Combined dual-mode networks include, but are not limited to, (1) Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) networks, (2) the Groupe Special Mobile or the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) and the General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) networks, and (3) future third-generation (3G) networks like Enhanced Data-rates for Global Evolution (EDGE), integrated Digital Enhanced Network (iDEN), Evolution Data Optimized (EvDO), High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA), Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS) or the like. Some older examples of data-centric network include the Mobitex™ Radio Network and the DataTAC™ Radio Network. Examples of older voice-centric data networks include Personal Communication Systems (PCS) networks like GSM, and TDMA systems.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a further example communication system including multiple networks and multiple mobile communication devices. The system of FIG. 2 is substantially similar to the FIG. 1 system, but includes a host system 300, a redirection program 45, a mobile device cradle 65, a wireless virtual private network (VPN) router 75, an additional wireless network 110 and multiple mobile communication devices 100. As described above in conjunction with FIG. 1, FIG. 2 represents an overview of a sample network topology. Although the encoded message processing systems and methods described herein may be applied to networks having many different topologies, the network of FIG. 2 is useful in understanding an automatic e-mail redirection system mentioned briefly above.
The central host system 300 will typically be a corporate office or other LAN, but may instead be a home office computer or some other private system where mail messages are being exchanged. Within the host system 300 is the message server 400, running on some computer within the firewall of the host system, that acts as the main interface for the host system to exchange e-mail with the Internet 20. In the system of FIG. 2, the redirection program 45 enables redirection of data items from the server 400 to a mobile communication device 100. Although the redirection program 45 is shown to reside on the same machine as the message server 400 for ease of presentation, there is no requirement that it must reside on the message server. The redirection program 45 and the message server 400 are designed to co-operate and interact to allow the pushing of information to mobile devices 100. In this installation, the redirection program 45 takes confidential and non-confidential corporate information for a specific user and redirects it out through the corporate firewall to mobile devices 100. A more detailed description of the redirection software 45 may be found in the commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,219,694 (“the '694 Patent”), entitled “System and Method for Pushing Information From A Host System To A Mobile Data Communication Device Having A Shared Electronic Address”, and issued to the assignee of the instant application on Apr. 17, 2001 which is hereby incorporated into the present application by reference. This push technique may use a wireless friendly encoding, compression and encryption technique to deliver all information to a mobile device, thus effectively extending the security firewall to include each mobile device 100 associated with the host system 300.
As shown in FIG. 2, there may be many alternative paths for getting information to the mobile device 100. One method for loading information onto the mobile device 100 is through a port designated 50, using a device cradle 65. This method tends to be useful for bulk information updates often performed at initialization of a mobile device 100 with the host system 300 or a computer 35 within the system 300. The other main method for data exchange is over-the-air using wireless networks to deliver the information. As shown in FIG. 2, this may be accomplished through a wireless VPN router 75 or through a traditional Internet connection 95 to a wireless gateway 85 and a wireless infrastructure 90, as described above. The concept of a wireless VPN router 75 is new in the wireless industry and implies that a VPN connection could be established directly through a specific wireless network 110 to a mobile device 100. The possibility of using a wireless VPN router 75 has only recently been available and could be used when the new Internet Protocol (IP) Version 6 (IPV6) arrives into IP-based wireless networks. This new protocol will provide enough IP addresses to dedicate an IP address to every mobile device 100 and thus make it possible to push information to a mobile device 100 at any time. A principal advantage of using this wireless VPN router 75 is that it could be an off-the-shelf VPN component, thus it would not require a separate wireless gateway 85 and wireless infrastructure 90 to be used. A VPN connection would preferably be a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)/IP or User Datagram Protocol (UDP)/IP connection to deliver the messages directly to the mobile device 100. If a wireless VPN 75 is not available then a link 95 to the Internet 20 is the most common connection mechanism available and has been described above.
In the automatic redirection system of FIG. 2, a composed e-mail message 15 leaving the e-mail sender 10 arrives at the message server 400 and is redirected by the redirection program 45 to the mobile device 100. As this redirection takes place the message 15 is re-enveloped, as indicated at 80, and a possibly proprietary compression and encryption algorithm can then be applied to the original message 15. In this way, messages being read on the mobile device 100 are no less secure than if they were read on a desktop workstation such as 35 within the firewall. All messages exchanged between the redirection program 45 and the mobile device 100 preferably use this message repackaging technique. Another goal of this outer envelope is to maintain the addressing information of the original message except the sender's and the receiver's address. This allows reply messages to reach the appropriate destination, and also allows the “from” field to reflect the mobile user's desktop address. Using the user's e-mail address from the mobile device 100 allows the received message to appear as though the message originated from the user's desktop system 35 rather than the mobile device 100.
With reference back to the port 50 and cradle 65 connectivity to the mobile device 100, this connection path offers many advantages for enabling one-time data exchange of large items. For those skilled in the art of personal digital assistants (PDAs) and synchronization, the most common data exchanged over this link is Personal Information Management (PIM) data 55. When exchanged for the first time this data tends to be large in quantity, bulky in nature and requires a large bandwidth to get loaded onto the mobile device 100 where it can be used on the road. This serial link may also be used for other purposes, including setting up a private security key 111 such as an S/MIME or PGP specific private key, the Certificate (Cert) of the user and their Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) 60. The private key is preferably exchanged so that the desktop 35 and mobile device 100 share one personality and one method for accessing all mail. The Cert and CRLs are normally exchanged over such a link because they represent a large amount of the data that is required by the device for S/MIME, PGP and other public key security methods. However, there are situations where a user does not have the ability to establish such a link to their desktop 35 in order to update the key store of the mobile device 100 with the appropriate private keys. In these situations, the system and method described herein allow the secure transfer of cryptographic information over a wireless link.
As depicted in FIG. 3, mobile communications device 100 includes a suitable RF antenna 102 for wireless communication to/from wireless network 20. Conventional RF, demodulation/modulation and decoding/coding circuits 104 are provided. As those in the art will appreciate, such circuits may involve possibly many digital signal processors (DSPs), microprocessors, filters, analog and digital circuits and the like. However, since such circuitry is well known in the art, it is not further described herein.
The mobile communications device 100 will also typically include a main control CPU 106 that operates under the control of a stored program in program memory 108, and which has access to data memory 110. CPU 106 also communicates with a conventional keyboard 112 and display 114 (for example, a liquid crystal display or LCD) and audio transducer or speaker 116. A portion of the data memory 310 is available for storing data required for decrypting encrypted messages, such as, for example, private keys, digital certificates, and the like. Suitable computer program executable code is stored in portions of the program memory 108 to constitute stored program logic for receiving and using new or added private keys and/or digital certificates or the like as described below (for example, via a wired serial I/O port or the wireless RF antenna 102).
As depicted in FIG. 1, a secure wired synchronization connection 26 (for example, between serial I/O ports of the user's base unit 24 and the wireless device 100) is typically provided for normal data synchronization purposes (for example, to synchronize databases in the two devices with respect to such things as calendars, to-do lists, task lists, address books, etc.). Part of prior data synchronization processes has included a program logic such as Cert Sync for maintaining synchronization between cryptographic message certificates. If a secure over the air (OTA) synchronization connection 28 is available, it may also be used by Cert Sync to maintain synchronization of cryptographic message certificates.
As previously described, there is a communications link (for example, depicted in dotted lines at 20 in FIG. 1) typically found between the device user's base unit 24 and a system message server 14. Accordingly, there is an existing communication path that may be utilized for passing synchronization data from the user's base unit 24 via channel 30, the server 14, Internet 12, wireless gateway 16 and wireless infrastructure 18 via the OTA synchronization connection 28.
As depicted in FIG. 4, the user's base unit 24 may be used to update the mobile wireless communications device 100 with information including, for example, private key information and digital certificate information. The user's base station 24 is typically a desktop PC, and may be of conventional hardware and operating system design. It will typically include desktop manager program logic 304 (in the form of, for example, executable computer program logic) for managing, among other things, a normal data synchronization connection to device 100. As previously mentioned, in the environment of mobile wireless communications systems, such a desktop manager may typically include logic for synchronizing cryptographic message certificates. Such logic is denoted here as Cert Sync.
E-mail messages generated using the S/MIME and PGP techniques may include encrypted information, a digital signature on the message contents, or both. In signed S/MIME operations the sender takes a digest of a message and signs the digest using the sender's private key. A digest is essentially a checksum, CRC or other preferably non-reversible operation such as a hash of the message, which is then signed. The signed digest is appended to the outgoing message, possibly along with the certificate of the sender and possibly any required certificates or CRLs. The receiver of this signed message must also take a digest of the message, compare this digest with the digest appended to the message, retrieve the sender's public key, and verify the signature on the appended digest. If the message content has been changed, the digests will be different or the signature on the digest will not verify properly. If the message is not encrypted, this signature does not prevent anyone from seeing the contents of the message, but does ensure that the message has not been tampered with and is from the actual person as indicated on the “from” field of the message.
The receiver may also verify the certificate and CRL if they were appended to the message. A certificate chain is a certificate along with a number of other certificates required to verify that the original certificate is authentic. While verifying the signature on a signed message, the receiver of the message will also typically obtain a certificate chain for the signing certificate and verify that each certificate in the chain was signed by the next certificate in the chain, until a certificate is found that was signed by a root certificate from a trusted source, such as, for example, a large Public Key Server (PKS) associated with a Certificate Authority (CA), such as; for example, Verisign or Entrust, both prominent companies in the field of public key cryptography. Once such a root certificate is found, a signature can be verified and trusted, since both the sender and receiver trust the source of the root certificate.
In encrypted S/MIME message operations, a one-time session key is generated and used to encrypt the body of the message, typically with a symmetric cipher, such as, for example, Triple DES. The session key is then encrypted using the receiver's public key, typically with a public key encryption algorithm like RSA. If the message is addressed to more than one receiver, the same session key is encrypted using the public key of each receiver. The encrypted message body, as well as all encrypted session keys, is sent to every receiver. Each receiver must then locate its own session key, possibly based on a generated Recipient Info summary of the receivers that may be attached to the message, and decrypt the session key using its private key. Once the session key is decrypted, it is then used to decrypt the message body. The S/MIME Recipient Info attachment can also specify the particular encryption scheme that must be used to decrypt the message. This information is normally placed in the header of the S/MIME message. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that these operations relate to an illustrative example of S/MIME messaging and its associated encoding operations, namely encryption. It will also be understood that the instant disclosure is in no way limited thereto.
FIG. 5 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a recipient's certificate using a recipient address. According to this exemplary illustration, a user first enters an electronic messaging application 501 resident on or accessible to the device being used by the user. Such devices may include, for example, a mobile wireless communication device that is capable of supporting electronic mail functions, as discussed above. The user then enters a recipient address 503 in the appropriate field of the electronic mail message to be sent. The system then conducts a search for the recipient's certificate by attempting to locate the recipient address in certificates resident on the device 507. Alternatively, the system may be configured to search certificates stored on a server of the system. If the recipient address is found in a certificate available to the device 509, the user may continue with the electronic mailing process using the recipient's certificate 511. On the other hand, if no certificate containing the recipient address is found 509, the system and method according to an exemplary embodiment then searches for the recipient certificate using a canonical or generic domain name and/or a canonical or generic user name 513. For simplicity, the examples described herein refer generally to a canonical or generic domain name. However, it will be understood that the application applies equally to the use of a canonical or generic user name in place of a generic or canonical domain name, and to a combination of canonical or generic domain and user names. As described above, the canonical or generic domain name may be, for example, a lifelong address that is assigned to a person for the duration of their tenure with a specific agency, organization, company, or the like. If the certificate is found using the canonical or generic domain name 515, the user may continue the messaging process 511. If no certificate is found 515, a notification may be provided to the user that no certificate match for the address was found 517. While the electronic mail handling system and method is described herein with respect to processing at the electronic mail device itself, it will be understood that the system and method may be implemented by any suitable means, such as, for example, an e-mail server, or the like, and that the disclosure is directed to a system and method for handling electronic mail mismatches regardless of where the certificates are stored or which device(s) in the system implement the method.
FIG. 6 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of an alternative method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a recipient's certificate using a recipient address. The exemplary method illustrated in FIG. 6 is similar to that of FIG. 5. However, in the FIG. 6 embodiment, the search for the recipient certificate is conducted using the recipient address and canonical or generic domain name concurrently. According to this exemplary embodiment, the user enters the electronic messaging application 601, and enters recipient e-mail address in the appropriate field 603. The system then conducts a search for the recipient's certificate by attempting to locate the recipient address in certificates resident on or accessible to the device and by attempting to locate a canonical or generic domain name associated with the recipient concurrently 605. If a certificate is found 607, the user may continue the messaging process 609. If no match is found 607, a notification may be provided to the user of a mismatch 611. As discussed above, searching for both the recipient address and a canonical or generic domain name associated with the recipient concurrently may provide efficiencies of speed and processing overhead.
FIG. 7 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of a method used in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a sender's certificate using a sender's address. The process illustrated in FIG. 7 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 5, with the certificate search being based on the sender's e-mail address or canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender. According to this exemplary embodiment, after a user receives an electronic message 701, the system institutes a search for the sender's certificate based on the sender's e-mail address that was used to send the message 703. If a corresponding certificate is found based on the sender's address 705, the user may continue the process of verifying the user's information, such as, for example, the user's digital signature 709. If no certificate corresponding to the sender is found 705, the system may then search for the sender certificate using a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender's lifelong address 711. If a certificate associated with the sender is found 713, the user may then continue the processing of the received mail 709. If no match is found 713, the user may be notified of a mismatch 715. While the electronic mail handling system and method is described herein with respect to processing at the electronic mail device itself, it will be understood that the system and method may be implemented by any suitable means, such as, for example, an e-mail server, or the like, and that the disclosure is directed to a system and method for handling electronic mail mismatches regardless of where the certificates are stored or which device(s) in the system implement the method.
FIG. 8 is an exemplary abbreviated flow diagram of an alternative method for use in a system for handling electronic mail mismatches when searching for a sender's certificate using a sender's address. The exemplary method illustrated in FIG. 8 is similar to that of FIG. 7. However, in the FIG. 8 embodiment, the search for the sender's certificate is conducted using the sender's address and canonical or generic domain name concurrently. According to the example illustrated in FIG. 8, the user receives an electronic message 801. The system then conducts a search for the sender's certificate by attempting to locate the sender's address in certificates resident on or accessible to the device and by attempting to locate a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender concurrently 803. If a certificate is found 805, the user may continue the messaging process 809. If no match is found 805, a notification may be provided to the user of a mismatch 807. As discussed above, searching for both the sender's address and a canonical or generic domain name associated with the sender concurrently may provide efficiencies of speed and processing overhead.
As discussed herein, the device within the system that provides the electronic message mismatch handling as described with respect to the illustrative embodiments discussed in detail above, may be any device within the system, including, but not limited to the electronic messaging device itself, a server within the system, or the like.
Furthermore, as discussed above, the system may be configured to search for a canonical or generic user name in place of (or in addition to) a canonical or generic domain name to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch. Typically, e-mail addresses are composed of two main parts—the user name and the domain name, for example, user name@domain name. The examples set forth above are described with respect to using a canonical or generic domain name when searching for a certificate or when attempting to resolve a mismatch. However, it is also contemplated that a canonical or generic user name may be used to search for a certificate or resolve a mismatch. For example, the user name may change as an employee moves or is assigned to different departments within an agency. For instance, the lifelong address may be John.Doe@agency.gov, but the user name may change as John Doe is assigned to different offices or departments within the agency, for example, John.Doe_Legal@agency.gov, John.Doe_accounting@agency.gov, John.Doe_Solicitor@agency.gov, etc. In this example, to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch, the system may utilize a canonical or generic user name, e.g., by truncating the portion of the user name following the underscore in the examples set forth above. The system administrator would be able to set the rules for using canonical and/or generic user names or domain names based on the structure of the address via IT policy. FIG. 9 is an exemplary screen shot illustrating an exemplary administrator screen that may be used to assign a generic or canonical name to a user's certificate. As illustrated in this exemplary screen shot, the system administrator, for example, may be provided with the ability to enter data in a field that reflects a long-lived (e.g., canonical or generic name) associated with a particular user. The screen shot also provides a rule associated with the field relating to the use of canonical or generic names for long-lived addresses.
In yet a further exemplary implementation, using a combination of canonical or generic domain names and user names to search for a certificate or to resolve a mismatch may also be used to provide a more robust solution.
It will be understood that the methods described herein for locating a certificate of a sender or recipient of an electronic message may be embodied in executable program logic. The executable program logic may reside on the device or on a server within the system that processes electronic messages. Moreover, the executable program logic may be transmitted or received by various devices and circuits within devices of the system on a carrier wave modulated by a signal representing the corresponding program logic or executable code, or the like, or any other suitable communication medium.
While the foregoing has been described in conjunction with specific exemplary embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments set forth herein are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the true spirit and full scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (39)

1. A method for locating a certificate in an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, comprising:
obtaining a recipient address for an electronic message to be sent by the electronic messaging system, said recipient address comprising a first user name and a first domain name;
searching for a certificate of the recipient based on a match with the recipient address;
automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on a canonical name associated with the recipient address if no match occurs based on the recipient address, wherein the canonical name is the recipient address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name; and
providing an indication of whether the certificate of the recipient has been found.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address comprises:
first searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and if no matching certificate is found then searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address comprises:
searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name, concurrently.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electronic messaging system resides on a mobile wireless communication device.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the match with the recipient address, and said automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address if no match occurs based on the recipient address are conducted on said mobile wireless communication device.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the match with the recipient address, and said automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address if no match occurs based on the recipient address are conducted on a server associated with said electronic messaging system.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein said canonical name comprises at least one of multiple canonical domain names and multiple canonical user names.
8. A method for locating a certificate for an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, the acts comprising:
searching for a certificate of a recipient of an electronic message based on a canonical name associated with a recipient address of the recipient,
wherein the recipient address comprises at least a first user name and at least a first domain name and wherein the canonical name is the recipient address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said canonical name comprises at least one of multiple canonical domain names and multiple canonical user names.
10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the searching for the certificate of the recipient of the electronic message based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address comprises:
first searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and if no matching certificate is found then searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the searching, for the certificate of the recipient of the electronic message based on the canonical name associated with the recipient address comprises:
searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name, concurrently.
12. The method according to claim 8, wherein the electronic messaging system resides on a mobile wireless communication device, and wherein the searching is conducted on at least one of said mobile wireless communication device and a server associated with said electronic messaging system.
13. A method for locating a certificate in an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, comprising:
obtaining a sender address for an electronic message received by the electronic messaging system, said sender address comprising a first user name and a first domain name;
searching for a certificate of the sender based on a match with the sender address;
automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on a canonical name associated with the sender address if no certificate of the sender is found based on a match with the sender address, wherein the canonical name is the sender address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name; and
providing an indication of whether the certificate of the sender has been found.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on the canonical name associated with the sender address comprises:
first searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and if no matching certificate is found then searching for the certificate of the sender based on the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
15. The method according to claim 13, wherein the automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on the canonical name associated with the sender address comprises:
searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and searching for the certificate of the sender based on the first user name truncated to identify the second user name, concurrently.
16. The method according to claim 13, wherein said searching for the certificate of the sender based on the match with the sender address, and said automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on the canonical name associated with the sender address if no certificate of the sender is found based on the match with the sender address are conducted on a mobile wireless communication device.
17. The method according to claim 13, wherein said searching for the certificate of the sender based on the match with the sender address, and said automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on the canonical name associated with the sender address if no certificate of the sender is found based on the match with the sender address are conducted on a server of the messaging system.
18. The method according to claim 13, wherein said canonical name comprises at least one of multiple canonical domain names and multiple canonical user names.
19. A method for locating a certificate for an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, the acts comprising:
searching for a certificate of a sender of an electronic message based on a canonical name associated with a sender address of the sender,
wherein the sender address comprises at least a first user name and at least a first domain name and wherein the canonical name is the sender address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name.
20. The method according to claim 19, wherein said canonical name comprises at least one of multiple canonical domain names and multiple canonical user names.
21. The method according to claim 19, wherein the searching for the certificate of the sender of the electronic message based on the canonical name associated with the sender address of the sender comprises:
first searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and if no matching certificate is found then searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
22. The method according to claim 19, wherein the searching for the certificate of the sender of the electronic message based on the canonical name associated with the sender address of the sender comprises:
searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name, concurrently.
23. The method according to claim 19, wherein the electronic messaging system resides on a mobile wireless communication device, and wherein the searching is conducted on at least one of said mobile wireless communication device and a server associated with said electronic messaging system.
24. A method for locating a certificate for an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, comprising:
obtaining a recipient address of a recipient of an electronic message to be sent by the electronic messaging system, said recipient address comprising a first user name and a first domain name;
searching for a certificate of the recipient based on a match with the recipient address, and automatically searching for the certificate of the recipient based on a canonical name associated with the recipient address concurrently with said searching for the certificate of the recipient based on the recipient address, wherein the canonical name is the recipient address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name; and
providing an indication of whether the certificate of the recipient has been found.
25. A method for locating a certificate for an electronic messaging system, wherein acts of the method are performed by a processor of a computing device, comprising:
receiving a sender address for an electronic message received by the electronic messaging system, said sender address comprising a first user name and a first domain name;
searching for a certificate of the sender based on a match with the sender address, and automatically searching for the certificate of the sender based on a canonical name associated with the sender address concurrently with said searching for the certificate of the sender based on the sender address, wherein the canonical name is the sender address with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name; and
providing an indication of whether the certificate of the sender has been found.
26. A system for locating a certificate in an electronic messaging system, comprising:
a plurality of devices capable of sending and receiving electronic messages;
a server for processing at least some electronic messages;
program logic executable by a processor and operable to locate a certificate of a sender or a recipient of an electronic message based on a canonical name associated with the sender or the recipient respectively, wherein said program logic operates to search for the certificate based on an address of the sender or recipient of the message, said address comprising a first user name and a first domain name, and if no certificate is found, wherein said program logic further operates to automatically search for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the address of the sender or the recipient of the message, and provide an indication of whether the certificate of the sender or the recipient has been found, wherein the canonical name is the address of the sender or the recipient with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name.
27. The system according to claim 26, wherein said program logic is resident on at least one of said plurality of devices capable of sending and receiving electronic messages.
28. The system according to claim 26, wherein said program logic is resident on said server.
29. The system according to claim 27, wherein said plurality of devices comprises a mobile wireless communication device.
30. The system according to claim 26, wherein said program logic is embodied in a computer readable medium capable of being read by at least one of said plurality of devices or said server.
31. A system for locating a certificate for an electronic messaging system, the system comprising:
a plurality of devices capable of sending and receiving electronic messages;
a server for processing at least some electronic messages;
program logic executable by a processor and operable to search for a certificate of a sender or a recipient of an electronic message based on a canonical name associated with an address of the sender or the recipient respectively,
wherein the address of the sender or the recipient comprises at least a first user name and at least a first domain name, and wherein the canonical name is the address of the sender or the recipient with both the first domain name truncated to identify a second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify a second user name.
32. The system according to claim 31, wherein said program logic is resident on at least one of said plurality of devices capable of sending and receiving electronic messages.
33. The system according to claim 31, wherein said program logic is resident on said server.
34. The system according to claim 32, wherein said plurality of devices comprises a mobile wireless communication device.
35. The system according to claim 31, wherein said program logic is embodied in a computer readable medium capable of being read by at least one of said plurality of devices or said server.
36. The system according to claim 31, wherein before searching for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the address of the sender or the recipient respectively, said program logic operates to obtain the address of the sender or the recipient and to search for a certificate of the sender or the recipient based on a match with the address of the sender or the recipient respectively, wherein the program logic operates to automatically perform said searching for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the address of the sender or the recipient respectively if no match occurs when searching based on the address of the sender or the recipient, and provide an indication of whether the certificate of the sender or the recipient has been found.
37. The system according to claim 31, wherein when searching for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the address of the sender or the recipient respectively address, the program logic operates to first search for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the address of the sender or the recipient with the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name, and if no matching certificate is found then searching for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the address of the sender or the recipient with the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
38. The system according to claim 31, wherein when searching for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the canonical name associated with the address of the sender or the recipient respectively, the program logic operates to concurrently search for the certificate of the sender or the recipient based on the address of the sender or the recipient with both the first domain name truncated to identify the second domain name and the first user name truncated to identify the second user name.
39. The system according to claim 31, wherein said canonical name comprises at least one of multiple canonical domain names and multiple canonical user names.
US11/473,313 2006-06-23 2006-06-23 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches Active 2028-09-05 US7814161B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/473,313 US7814161B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2006-06-23 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US12/896,224 US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-01 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/672,073 US8473561B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2012-11-08 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/905,207 US8943156B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2013-05-30 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/473,313 US7814161B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2006-06-23 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/896,224 Continuation US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-01 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070299921A1 US20070299921A1 (en) 2007-12-27
US7814161B2 true US7814161B2 (en) 2010-10-12

Family

ID=38874711

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/473,313 Active 2028-09-05 US7814161B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2006-06-23 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US12/896,224 Active US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-01 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/672,073 Active US8473561B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2012-11-08 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/905,207 Active US8943156B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2013-05-30 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/896,224 Active US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-01 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/672,073 Active US8473561B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2012-11-08 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US13/905,207 Active US8943156B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2013-05-30 System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US7814161B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090061912A1 (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-05 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US20090080661A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Research In Motion Limited System and method for controlling message attachment handling functions on a mobile device
US8103875B1 (en) * 2007-05-30 2012-01-24 Symantec Corporation Detecting email fraud through fingerprinting
US8209530B2 (en) 2004-09-02 2012-06-26 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8296829B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2012-10-23 Research In Motion Limited Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2012-11-13 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US8589677B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2013-11-19 Blackberry Limited System and method for retrieving related certificates
US10439825B1 (en) * 2018-11-13 2019-10-08 INTEGRITY Security Services, Inc. Providing quality of service for certificate management systems

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5166524B2 (en) * 2007-06-11 2013-03-21 テレフオンアクチーボラゲット エル エム エリクソン(パブル) Method and apparatus for certificate processing
KR101237175B1 (en) 2008-04-30 2013-02-25 엔이씨 유럽 리미티드 Method and system for verifying the identity of a communication partner
US9983835B2 (en) * 2013-10-25 2018-05-29 Next Print Technologies Aps Method, performed by a server interposed between a user device and an authenticated printing system, of handling a guest print job for processing by the authenticated printing system and system for performing the method
US9888037B1 (en) 2015-08-27 2018-02-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Cipher suite negotiation
US9912486B1 (en) * 2015-08-27 2018-03-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Countersigned certificates
US10454689B1 (en) 2015-08-27 2019-10-22 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Digital certificate management
US9967290B2 (en) * 2016-03-21 2018-05-08 Verisign, Inc. Systems and methods for automating client-side discovery of public keys of external contacts that are secured by DANE using DNSSEC
CN111786781B (en) * 2020-06-29 2021-03-26 友谊时光科技股份有限公司 SSL certificate monitoring method, system, device, equipment and storage medium

Citations (113)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028500A (en) 1973-05-15 1977-06-07 Martin Marietta Corporation Mobile unit supervisory control sequencer and method
EP0500245A2 (en) 1991-02-08 1992-08-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Cipher communication system for transaction data
EP0500222A1 (en) 1991-02-14 1992-08-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for reconciling entries in a plurality of schedules
JPH06276221A (en) 1993-03-17 1994-09-30 Toshiba Corp Electronic mail system containing top secret mail function
US5410602A (en) 1993-09-27 1995-04-25 Motorola, Inc. Method for key management of point-to-point communications
JPH07162407A (en) 1993-12-03 1995-06-23 Fujitsu Ltd User support device for ciphering communication in network system
US5457748A (en) 1992-11-30 1995-10-10 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for improved security within encrypted communication devices
US5623546A (en) 1995-06-23 1997-04-22 Motorola, Inc. Encryption method and system for portable data
US5634051A (en) 1993-10-28 1997-05-27 Teltech Resource Network Corporation Information management system
US5666530A (en) 1992-12-02 1997-09-09 Compaq Computer Corporation System for automatic synchronization of common file between portable computer and host computer via communication channel selected from a plurality of usable channels there between
US5710922A (en) 1993-06-02 1998-01-20 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for synchronizing and archiving information between computer systems
US5727202A (en) 1995-10-18 1998-03-10 Palm Computing, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing information on two different computer systems
EP0841770A2 (en) 1996-11-06 1998-05-13 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Method for sending a secure message in a telecommunications system
US5778346A (en) 1992-01-21 1998-07-07 Starfish Software, Inc. System and methods for appointment reconcilation
US5778068A (en) 1995-02-13 1998-07-07 Eta Technologies Corporation Personal access management system
US5812671A (en) 1996-07-17 1998-09-22 Xante Corporation Cryptographic communication system
US5870030A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-02-09 Motorola, Inc. Advertiser pays information and messaging system and apparatus
GB2328125A (en) 1997-08-08 1999-02-10 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Network control system
EP0942568A2 (en) 1998-02-17 1999-09-15 Unwired Planet, Inc. Centralized cerificate management system for two-way interactive communication devices in data networks
US5956707A (en) 1997-02-13 1999-09-21 Chu; Wesley W. Database system with query relaxation using type abstraction hierarchy (TAH) as query condition relaxation structure
US5991399A (en) 1997-12-18 1999-11-23 Intel Corporation Method for securely distributing a conditional use private key to a trusted entity on a remote system
US6000000A (en) 1995-10-13 1999-12-07 3Com Corporation Extendible method and apparatus for synchronizing multiple files on two different computer systems
US6061448A (en) 1997-04-01 2000-05-09 Tumbleweed Communications Corp. Method and system for dynamic server document encryption
US6073237A (en) 1997-11-06 2000-06-06 Cybercash, Inc. Tamper resistant method and apparatus
US6081601A (en) 1998-01-08 2000-06-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method of implementing connection security in a wireless network
US6084969A (en) 1997-12-31 2000-07-04 V-One Corporation Key encryption system and method, pager unit, and pager proxy for a two-way alphanumeric pager network
US6085323A (en) 1996-04-15 2000-07-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information processing system having function of securely protecting confidential information
US6119228A (en) 1997-08-22 2000-09-12 Compaq Computer Corporation Method for securely communicating remote control commands in a computer network
US6125369A (en) 1997-10-02 2000-09-26 Microsoft Corporation Continuous object sychronization between object stores on different computers
US6209098B1 (en) 1996-10-25 2001-03-27 Intel Corporation Circuit and method for ensuring interconnect security with a multi-chip integrated circuit package
JP2001103571A (en) 1999-10-01 2001-04-13 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Mobile communication service providing system
EP1096725A2 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-05-02 Research In Motion Limited System and method for pushing information from a host system to a mobile data communication device
US6230186B1 (en) 1998-04-28 2001-05-08 Rhoda Yaker Private electronic message system
US6229894B1 (en) 1997-07-14 2001-05-08 Entrust Technologies, Ltd. Method and apparatus for access to user-specific encryption information
JP2001197055A (en) 2000-01-07 2001-07-19 Nippon Steel Corp Device, method, and service system for proxy authentication and computer-readable recording medium
US6266420B1 (en) 1998-10-08 2001-07-24 Entrust Technologies Limited Method and apparatus for secure group communications
US6266775B1 (en) 1997-08-25 2001-07-24 Nec Corporation Method and apparatus for displaying information and information recording medium having information displaying means
US6289105B1 (en) 1995-07-28 2001-09-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and apparatus for encrypting and transferring electronic mails
US20010046307A1 (en) 1998-04-30 2001-11-29 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and apparatus for digital watermarking of images
US20010050990A1 (en) 1997-02-19 2001-12-13 Frank Wells Sudia Method for initiating a stream-oriented encrypted communication
US20020007453A1 (en) 2000-05-23 2002-01-17 Nemovicher C. Kerry Secured electronic mail system and method
US6348972B1 (en) 1995-06-01 2002-02-19 Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co Network print system for allowing a printer or printers to select a host
US20020032861A1 (en) 2000-07-14 2002-03-14 Nec Corporation System and method for executing and assuring security of electronic mail for users, and storage medium storing program to cause computer to implement same method
US20020035687A1 (en) 2000-06-07 2002-03-21 Kristofer Skantze Method and device for secure wireless transmission of information
US20020035685A1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-21 Masahiro Ono Client-server system with security function intermediary
US20020051544A1 (en) 1993-12-03 2002-05-02 Fujitsu Limited User support system for cryptographic communication in network systems
US6389455B1 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-05-14 Richard C. Fuisz Method and apparatus for bouncing electronic messages
US20020059383A1 (en) 2000-06-19 2002-05-16 Takeo Katsuda Apparatus, portable terminal unit, and system for controlling E-mail, and its method, computer-readable recording medium and program product for processing E-mail
US20020059375A1 (en) 1999-04-08 2002-05-16 Alvin Pivowar System and method for sharing data among a plurality of personal digital assistants
US20020169954A1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-11-14 Bandini Jean-Christophe Denis Method and system for e-mail message transmission
US20020176067A1 (en) 2001-05-23 2002-11-28 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance dynamic range conversion useable with CMOS three-dimensional imaging
US20030002671A1 (en) 2001-06-11 2003-01-02 Eastman Kodak Company Delivery of electronic content over a network using a hybrid optical disk for authentication
US6531985B1 (en) 2000-08-14 2003-03-11 3Com Corporation Integrated laptop antenna using two or more antennas
US6564320B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2003-05-13 Verisign, Inc. Local hosting of digital certificate services
US20030172122A1 (en) 2002-03-06 2003-09-11 Little Herbert A. System and method for providing secure message signature status and trust status indication
US6633873B1 (en) 1999-02-16 2003-10-14 Fujitsu Limited Distributed data retrieval system including mechanism for predicting an amount of response data
US20030196084A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-10-16 Emeka Okereke System and method for secure wireless communications using PKI
US20030198350A1 (en) 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for managing a size of a key management block during content distribution
US6661927B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2003-12-09 Motorola, Inc. System and method for efficiently encoding an image by prioritizing groups of spatially correlated coefficients based on an activity measure
JP2004048139A (en) 2002-07-09 2004-02-12 Nikon Corp Image transmission system, image relay apparatus and electronic image apparatus
US20040030681A1 (en) 2000-11-21 2004-02-12 Shannon Paul Thurmond System and process for network site fragmented search
US20040052356A1 (en) 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Sbc Properties, L.P., Of Reno, Nv Multi-modal address book
US6725262B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2004-04-20 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for synchronizing multiple computing devices
US20040083364A1 (en) 2000-12-07 2004-04-29 Jean-Pierre Andreaux Method of secure transmission of digital data from a source to a receiver
US6732144B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2004-05-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication method for data synchronization processing and electronic device therefor
US20040133520A1 (en) * 2003-01-07 2004-07-08 Callas Jonathan D. System and method for secure and transparent electronic communication
US20040133775A1 (en) * 2003-01-07 2004-07-08 Callas Jonathan D. System and method for secure electronic communication in a partially keyless environment
US6779115B1 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-08-17 Digital5, Inc. Portable device using a smart card to receive and decrypt digital data
US20040196978A1 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-10-07 Godfrey James A. System and method for processing encoded messages for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US20040202327A1 (en) 2001-08-06 2004-10-14 Little Herbert A. System and method for processing encoded messages
US20040205248A1 (en) 2001-07-10 2004-10-14 Herbert A Little System and method for secure message key caching in a mobile communication device
US6819766B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2004-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for managing keys for encrypted data
US6829357B1 (en) 1999-12-14 2004-12-07 Trw Inc. Communication system having a transmitter and a receiver that engage in reduced size encrypted data communication
US20050039100A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for automatic error recovery in an electronic mail system
US20050080642A1 (en) 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Daniell W. Todd Consolidated email filtering user interface
US20050114671A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2005-05-26 Research In Motion Ltd. System and method for transmitting and utilizing attachments
US6904521B1 (en) 2001-02-16 2005-06-07 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Non-repudiation of e-mail messages
US20050149442A1 (en) * 2002-03-20 2005-07-07 Research In Motion Limited Certificate information storage system and method
US6918038B1 (en) 1996-08-13 2005-07-12 Angel Secure Networks, Inc. System and method for installing an auditable secure network
US6925568B1 (en) 1998-01-16 2005-08-02 Sonera Oyj Method and system for the processing of messages in a telecommunication system
US20050188219A1 (en) 2003-12-26 2005-08-25 Orange France Method and a system for communication between a terminal and at least one communication equipment
US20050210289A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Brown Michael K System and method for viewing message attachments
EP1580953A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-28 Research In Motion Limited System and method for viewing message attachments
US20050222991A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2005-10-06 Kazuyuki Ikenoya Information providing apparatus, information providing method, information providing program, and recording medium
US20050246763A1 (en) 2004-03-25 2005-11-03 National University Of Ireland Secure digital content reproduction using biometrically derived hybrid encryption techniques
US6983367B2 (en) 2000-03-14 2006-01-03 Sony Corporation Information providing apparatus and method, information processing apparatus and method, and program storage medium
US20060015722A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2006-01-19 Geotrust Security systems and services to provide identity and uniform resource identifier verification
US6993137B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2006-01-31 Entriq, Inc. Method and system to securely distribute content via a network
US6996720B1 (en) 1999-12-17 2006-02-07 Microsoft Corporation System and method for accessing protected content in a rights-management architecture
US20060036848A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for enabling bulk retrieval of certificates
US20060036865A1 (en) 2004-08-10 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited Server verification of secure electronic messages
US20060036849A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for certificate searching and retrieval
US7003667B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2006-02-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Targeted secure printing
EP1633101A1 (en) 2004-09-02 2006-03-08 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US20060059332A1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2006-03-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US7020708B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2006-03-28 Cingular Wireless Ii, Llc Aircraft data services
US7032240B1 (en) 1999-12-07 2006-04-18 Pace Anti-Piracy, Inc. Portable authorization device for authorizing use of protected information and associated method
US20060143700A1 (en) * 2004-12-24 2006-06-29 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. Security System Providing Methodology for Cooperative Enforcement of Security Policies During SSL Sessions
US7113927B1 (en) 1998-10-09 2006-09-26 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Data distribution system, data distribution method, portable terminal with data receiving capability, portable terminal with data transmitting/receiving capability, recording medium onto which data content is recorded, encoding apparatus, and decoding apparatus
US7127604B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2006-10-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Changing a codec or MAC size without affecting the encryption key in PacketCable communication
US7171552B1 (en) 1999-11-29 2007-01-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Encrypting information in a communications network
US20070083749A1 (en) * 2005-10-12 2007-04-12 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for automated exchange of electronic mail encryption certificates
US7213047B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2007-05-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Peer trust evaluation using mobile agents in peer-to-peer networks
US20070118874A1 (en) 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic messages
US20070123307A1 (en) 2005-11-30 2007-05-31 Research In Motion Limited Display of secure messages on a mobile communication device
US7228418B1 (en) 1999-04-08 2007-06-05 France Telecom Authentication and signature method for messages using reduced size of binary units of information content and corresponding systems
EP1806683A1 (en) 2005-11-30 2007-07-11 Research In Motion Limited Display of secure messages on a mobile communication device
US20070165844A1 (en) 2005-10-14 2007-07-19 Research In Motion Limited System and method for protecting master encryption keys
US7254712B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2007-08-07 Research In Motion Limited System and method for compressing secure e-mail for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US7254608B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2007-08-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Managing distribution of content using mobile agents in peer-topeer networks
US7299502B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2007-11-20 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for providing customized secure access to shared documents
US7529374B2 (en) 2002-02-02 2009-05-05 F-Secure Oyj Method and apparatus for encrypting data
US7546453B2 (en) 2001-06-12 2009-06-09 Research In Motion Limited Certificate management and transfer system and method

Family Cites Families (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5613012A (en) 1994-11-28 1997-03-18 Smarttouch, Llc. Tokenless identification system for authorization of electronic transactions and electronic transmissions
US7743248B2 (en) 1995-01-17 2010-06-22 Eoriginal, Inc. System and method for a remote access service enabling trust and interoperability when retrieving certificate status from multiple certification authority reporting components
JPH08251221A (en) 1995-03-13 1996-09-27 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Message handling method
US5751813A (en) 1996-04-29 1998-05-12 Motorola, Inc. Use of an encryption server for encrypting messages
JPH1022992A (en) 1996-07-05 1998-01-23 Hitachi Inf Syst Ltd Multi-address cipher communication method for message and storage medium
JPH10107832A (en) 1996-09-25 1998-04-24 Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd Cipher multi-address mail system
US6009173A (en) 1997-01-31 1999-12-28 Motorola, Inc. Encryption and decryption method and apparatus
ATE347200T1 (en) 1997-07-24 2006-12-15 Tumbleweed Comm Corp ELECTRONIC MAIL FIREWALL WITH ENCRYPTION/DECRYPTION USING STORED KEYS
ATE483204T1 (en) 1997-07-30 2010-10-15 Visto Corp SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GLOBAL AND SECURE ACCESS TO UNITED INFORMATION IN A COMPUTER NETWORK
WO1999017564A1 (en) 1997-09-29 1999-04-08 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for providing subscriber identification protection to a receiver
FI974341A (en) 1997-11-26 1999-05-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Data protection for data connections
US6421707B1 (en) 1998-02-13 2002-07-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Wireless multi-media messaging communications method and apparatus
JP3692764B2 (en) 1998-02-25 2005-09-07 株式会社日立製作所 Structured document registration method, search method, and portable medium used therefor
JPH11272582A (en) 1998-03-25 1999-10-08 Sony Corp Electronic mail providing device and electronic mail providing method
JPH11272581A (en) 1998-03-25 1999-10-08 Toshiba Corp Method, system for transmitting mail and recording medium in which the same is programmed and recorded
JP2002517044A (en) 1998-05-28 2002-06-11 アイ2・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレイテッド Computer-implemented system and method for high-level control search of problem space
JP3801782B2 (en) 1998-06-22 2006-07-26 三菱電機株式会社 Certificate collection information generation device, certificate verification device, and public key cryptographic operation system
US6567914B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-05-20 Entrust Technologies Limited Apparatus and method for reducing transmission bandwidth and storage requirements in a cryptographic security system
US6397197B1 (en) 1998-08-26 2002-05-28 E-Lynxx Corporation Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US6301658B1 (en) 1998-09-09 2001-10-09 Secure Computing Corporation Method and system for authenticating digital certificates issued by an authentication hierarchy
JP2000104774A (en) 1998-09-25 2000-04-11 Kurashiki Kako Co Ltd Long life elastic structure
US6732273B1 (en) 1998-10-21 2004-05-04 Lucent Technologies Inc. Priority and security coding system for electronic mail messages
CN1328735A (en) 1998-11-24 2001-12-26 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Method and system for securing data objects
CA2357016A1 (en) 1999-01-14 2000-07-20 Tumbleweed Communications Corp. Web-based delivery of secure e-mail messages
US6697942B1 (en) 1999-02-04 2004-02-24 Earthlink, Inc. Method for remotely managing a remote device using an electronic mail message
US7032030B1 (en) 1999-03-11 2006-04-18 John David Codignotto Message publishing system and method
US6779111B1 (en) 1999-05-10 2004-08-17 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Indirect public-key encryption
AU5084500A (en) 1999-05-21 2000-12-12 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for initializing secure communications among, and for exclusively pairing wireless devices
KR20010004791A (en) 1999-06-29 2001-01-15 윤종용 Apparatus for securing user's informaton and method thereof in mobile communication system connecting with internet
JP4010482B2 (en) 1999-08-30 2007-11-21 富士通株式会社 Data reproduction device and data reproduction module
IL132147A0 (en) 1999-09-30 2001-03-19 B M N Technology System for providing messages
US6931532B1 (en) 1999-10-21 2005-08-16 International Business Machines Corporation Selective data encryption using style sheet processing
US6912656B1 (en) 1999-11-30 2005-06-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for sending encrypted electronic mail through a distribution list exploder
US6745024B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2004-06-01 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for preparing and sending an electronic mail communication using a wireless communications device
US7028186B1 (en) 2000-02-11 2006-04-11 Nokia, Inc. Key management methods for wireless LANs
GB0004287D0 (en) 2000-02-23 2000-04-12 Leeper Kim System and method for authenticating electronic documents
JP2001265216A (en) 2000-03-16 2001-09-28 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Method and device for publishing public key certificate
US20040193900A1 (en) 2000-03-17 2004-09-30 Mark Nair System, method and apparatus for controlling the dissemination of digital works
US7373512B1 (en) 2000-03-27 2008-05-13 Entrust Limited Method and apparatus for providing information security to prevent digital signature forgery
WO2001078491A2 (en) 2000-04-14 2001-10-25 Postx Corporation Systems and methods for encrypting/decrypting data using a broker agent
GB2366013B (en) 2000-08-17 2002-11-27 Sun Microsystems Inc Certificate validation mechanism
US7136897B1 (en) 2000-08-22 2006-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Minimizing electronic mailbox congestion
US7039678B1 (en) 2000-09-07 2006-05-02 Axis Mobile, Ltd. E-mail proxy
GB0027280D0 (en) 2000-11-08 2000-12-27 Malcolm Peter An information management system
JP2002163395A (en) 2000-11-27 2002-06-07 Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd Method for supporting confirmation of electronic certificate validity and information processor used for the same
US7333482B2 (en) 2000-12-22 2008-02-19 Interactive People Unplugged Ab Route optimization technique for mobile IP
US6928461B2 (en) 2001-01-24 2005-08-09 Raja Singh Tuli Portable high speed internet access device with encryption
US20020147905A1 (en) 2001-04-05 2002-10-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for shortening certificate chains
US20020165967A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2002-11-07 Morgan Paul A. Global personalization engine
US6714778B2 (en) 2001-05-15 2004-03-30 Nokia Corporation Context sensitive web services
EP1405243A2 (en) 2001-06-28 2004-04-07 Symbian Limited E-mail manager program for a wireless information device
SE522647C2 (en) 2001-07-04 2004-02-24 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Secure letterhead information for multi-content type emails
BRPI0211215B1 (en) 2001-07-16 2016-07-05 Blackberry Ltd system to support multiple certification authorities on one mobile communication device
WO2003013080A1 (en) 2001-07-31 2003-02-13 Comverse Ltd. Email protocol for a mobile environment and gateway using same
JP3761432B2 (en) 2001-08-03 2006-03-29 日本電気株式会社 Communication system, user terminal, IC card, authentication system, connection and communication control system, and program
US20030074555A1 (en) 2001-10-17 2003-04-17 Fahn Paul Neil URL-based certificate in a PKI
US20030126085A1 (en) 2001-12-27 2003-07-03 Slamdunk Networks, Inc. Dynamic authentication of electronic messages using a reference to a certificate
US20030163567A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-08-28 Mcmorris Patrick Domain name validation using mapping table
CA2642320A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2003-09-25 Research In Motion Limited System and method for supporting multiple certificate status providers on a mobile communication device
JP2003348078A (en) 2002-05-27 2003-12-05 Hitachi Ltd Location authentication system and method thereof
AU2003270139A1 (en) 2002-08-30 2004-03-19 Koninklijke Kpn N.V. Method and system for the phased retrieval of data
US7773106B2 (en) 2002-11-12 2010-08-10 Microsoft Corporation System and apparatus for sending complete responses to truncated electronic mail messages on a mobile device
US7131003B2 (en) 2003-02-20 2006-10-31 America Online, Inc. Secure instant messaging system
US7284121B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2007-10-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for transmitting reduced information from a certificate to perform encryption operations
JP4323163B2 (en) 2002-11-25 2009-09-02 三菱電機株式会社 Server device
JP4507623B2 (en) 2003-03-05 2010-07-21 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Network connection system
US7653698B2 (en) * 2003-05-29 2010-01-26 Sonicwall, Inc. Identifying e-mail messages from allowed senders
JP3928589B2 (en) 2003-06-12 2007-06-13 コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社 Communication system and method
CN100531108C (en) 2003-08-12 2009-08-19 捷讯研究有限公司 System and method for processing encoded messages
US7546288B2 (en) 2003-09-04 2009-06-09 Microsoft Corporation Matching media file metadata to standardized metadata
US7293171B2 (en) 2004-01-21 2007-11-06 Microsoft Corporation Encryption to BCC recipients with S/MIME
CA2476914A1 (en) 2004-08-09 2006-02-09 Research In Motion Limited System and method for certificate searching and retrieval
US7549043B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2009-06-16 Research In Motion Limited Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates
ATE400131T1 (en) 2004-09-01 2008-07-15 Research In Motion Ltd PROVIDING CERTIFICATE PASSAGES IN A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEARCHING AND RETRIEVING CERTIFICATES
US7814161B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2010-10-12 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
EP1871060A1 (en) 2006-06-23 2007-12-26 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching a sender certificate when an e-mail address of the certificate and the sender address do not coincide
DE102009051008B4 (en) 2009-10-28 2013-05-23 Siltronic Ag Method for producing a semiconductor wafer

Patent Citations (120)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4028500A (en) 1973-05-15 1977-06-07 Martin Marietta Corporation Mobile unit supervisory control sequencer and method
EP0500245A2 (en) 1991-02-08 1992-08-26 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Cipher communication system for transaction data
EP0500222A1 (en) 1991-02-14 1992-08-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for reconciling entries in a plurality of schedules
US5778346A (en) 1992-01-21 1998-07-07 Starfish Software, Inc. System and methods for appointment reconcilation
US5457748A (en) 1992-11-30 1995-10-10 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for improved security within encrypted communication devices
US20010011308A1 (en) 1992-12-02 2001-08-02 Ted H. Clark Handheld computer synchronized with a host computer
US5666530A (en) 1992-12-02 1997-09-09 Compaq Computer Corporation System for automatic synchronization of common file between portable computer and host computer via communication channel selected from a plurality of usable channels there between
JPH06276221A (en) 1993-03-17 1994-09-30 Toshiba Corp Electronic mail system containing top secret mail function
US5710922A (en) 1993-06-02 1998-01-20 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for synchronizing and archiving information between computer systems
US5410602A (en) 1993-09-27 1995-04-25 Motorola, Inc. Method for key management of point-to-point communications
US5634051A (en) 1993-10-28 1997-05-27 Teltech Resource Network Corporation Information management system
JPH07162407A (en) 1993-12-03 1995-06-23 Fujitsu Ltd User support device for ciphering communication in network system
US20020051544A1 (en) 1993-12-03 2002-05-02 Fujitsu Limited User support system for cryptographic communication in network systems
US5778068A (en) 1995-02-13 1998-07-07 Eta Technologies Corporation Personal access management system
US6348972B1 (en) 1995-06-01 2002-02-19 Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co Network print system for allowing a printer or printers to select a host
US5623546A (en) 1995-06-23 1997-04-22 Motorola, Inc. Encryption method and system for portable data
US6289105B1 (en) 1995-07-28 2001-09-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and apparatus for encrypting and transferring electronic mails
US6000000A (en) 1995-10-13 1999-12-07 3Com Corporation Extendible method and apparatus for synchronizing multiple files on two different computer systems
US5727202A (en) 1995-10-18 1998-03-10 Palm Computing, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing information on two different computer systems
US6313732B1 (en) 1996-04-04 2001-11-06 Motorola, Inc. Advertiser pays information and messaging system, apparatus and method
US5870030A (en) 1996-04-04 1999-02-09 Motorola, Inc. Advertiser pays information and messaging system and apparatus
US6085323A (en) 1996-04-15 2000-07-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information processing system having function of securely protecting confidential information
US5812671A (en) 1996-07-17 1998-09-22 Xante Corporation Cryptographic communication system
US6918038B1 (en) 1996-08-13 2005-07-12 Angel Secure Networks, Inc. System and method for installing an auditable secure network
US6209098B1 (en) 1996-10-25 2001-03-27 Intel Corporation Circuit and method for ensuring interconnect security with a multi-chip integrated circuit package
EP0841770A2 (en) 1996-11-06 1998-05-13 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Method for sending a secure message in a telecommunications system
US5956707A (en) 1997-02-13 1999-09-21 Chu; Wesley W. Database system with query relaxation using type abstraction hierarchy (TAH) as query condition relaxation structure
US20010050990A1 (en) 1997-02-19 2001-12-13 Frank Wells Sudia Method for initiating a stream-oriented encrypted communication
US6061448A (en) 1997-04-01 2000-05-09 Tumbleweed Communications Corp. Method and system for dynamic server document encryption
US6229894B1 (en) 1997-07-14 2001-05-08 Entrust Technologies, Ltd. Method and apparatus for access to user-specific encryption information
GB2328125A (en) 1997-08-08 1999-02-10 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Network control system
US6119228A (en) 1997-08-22 2000-09-12 Compaq Computer Corporation Method for securely communicating remote control commands in a computer network
US6266775B1 (en) 1997-08-25 2001-07-24 Nec Corporation Method and apparatus for displaying information and information recording medium having information displaying means
US6125369A (en) 1997-10-02 2000-09-26 Microsoft Corporation Continuous object sychronization between object stores on different computers
US6073237A (en) 1997-11-06 2000-06-06 Cybercash, Inc. Tamper resistant method and apparatus
US5991399A (en) 1997-12-18 1999-11-23 Intel Corporation Method for securely distributing a conditional use private key to a trusted entity on a remote system
US6084969A (en) 1997-12-31 2000-07-04 V-One Corporation Key encryption system and method, pager unit, and pager proxy for a two-way alphanumeric pager network
US6081601A (en) 1998-01-08 2000-06-27 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Method of implementing connection security in a wireless network
US6925568B1 (en) 1998-01-16 2005-08-02 Sonera Oyj Method and system for the processing of messages in a telecommunication system
EP0942568A2 (en) 1998-02-17 1999-09-15 Unwired Planet, Inc. Centralized cerificate management system for two-way interactive communication devices in data networks
US6230186B1 (en) 1998-04-28 2001-05-08 Rhoda Yaker Private electronic message system
US20010046307A1 (en) 1998-04-30 2001-11-29 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and apparatus for digital watermarking of images
EP1096725A2 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-05-02 Research In Motion Limited System and method for pushing information from a host system to a mobile data communication device
EP1096727A2 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-05-02 Research In Motion Limited System and method for pushing information from a host system to a mobile data communication device
US6564320B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2003-05-13 Verisign, Inc. Local hosting of digital certificate services
US6389455B1 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-05-14 Richard C. Fuisz Method and apparatus for bouncing electronic messages
US6266420B1 (en) 1998-10-08 2001-07-24 Entrust Technologies Limited Method and apparatus for secure group communications
US7113927B1 (en) 1998-10-09 2006-09-26 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Data distribution system, data distribution method, portable terminal with data receiving capability, portable terminal with data transmitting/receiving capability, recording medium onto which data content is recorded, encoding apparatus, and decoding apparatus
US20020169954A1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-11-14 Bandini Jean-Christophe Denis Method and system for e-mail message transmission
US6633873B1 (en) 1999-02-16 2003-10-14 Fujitsu Limited Distributed data retrieval system including mechanism for predicting an amount of response data
US6819766B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2004-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for managing keys for encrypted data
US7228418B1 (en) 1999-04-08 2007-06-05 France Telecom Authentication and signature method for messages using reduced size of binary units of information content and corresponding systems
US20020059375A1 (en) 1999-04-08 2002-05-16 Alvin Pivowar System and method for sharing data among a plurality of personal digital assistants
US7020708B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2006-03-28 Cingular Wireless Ii, Llc Aircraft data services
JP2001103571A (en) 1999-10-01 2001-04-13 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Mobile communication service providing system
US7003667B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2006-02-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Targeted secure printing
US6732144B1 (en) 1999-11-19 2004-05-04 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication method for data synchronization processing and electronic device therefor
US7171552B1 (en) 1999-11-29 2007-01-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Encrypting information in a communications network
US7032240B1 (en) 1999-12-07 2006-04-18 Pace Anti-Piracy, Inc. Portable authorization device for authorizing use of protected information and associated method
US6829357B1 (en) 1999-12-14 2004-12-07 Trw Inc. Communication system having a transmitter and a receiver that engage in reduced size encrypted data communication
US6996720B1 (en) 1999-12-17 2006-02-07 Microsoft Corporation System and method for accessing protected content in a rights-management architecture
JP2001197055A (en) 2000-01-07 2001-07-19 Nippon Steel Corp Device, method, and service system for proxy authentication and computer-readable recording medium
US6779115B1 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-08-17 Digital5, Inc. Portable device using a smart card to receive and decrypt digital data
US6983367B2 (en) 2000-03-14 2006-01-03 Sony Corporation Information providing apparatus and method, information processing apparatus and method, and program storage medium
US6725262B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2004-04-20 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for synchronizing multiple computing devices
US20020007453A1 (en) 2000-05-23 2002-01-17 Nemovicher C. Kerry Secured electronic mail system and method
US20020035687A1 (en) 2000-06-07 2002-03-21 Kristofer Skantze Method and device for secure wireless transmission of information
US6993137B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2006-01-31 Entriq, Inc. Method and system to securely distribute content via a network
US20020059383A1 (en) 2000-06-19 2002-05-16 Takeo Katsuda Apparatus, portable terminal unit, and system for controlling E-mail, and its method, computer-readable recording medium and program product for processing E-mail
US20020032861A1 (en) 2000-07-14 2002-03-14 Nec Corporation System and method for executing and assuring security of electronic mail for users, and storage medium storing program to cause computer to implement same method
US6661927B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2003-12-09 Motorola, Inc. System and method for efficiently encoding an image by prioritizing groups of spatially correlated coefficients based on an activity measure
US6531985B1 (en) 2000-08-14 2003-03-11 3Com Corporation Integrated laptop antenna using two or more antennas
US20020035685A1 (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-21 Masahiro Ono Client-server system with security function intermediary
US20040030681A1 (en) 2000-11-21 2004-02-12 Shannon Paul Thurmond System and process for network site fragmented search
US20040083364A1 (en) 2000-12-07 2004-04-29 Jean-Pierre Andreaux Method of secure transmission of digital data from a source to a receiver
US7299502B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2007-11-20 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for providing customized secure access to shared documents
US6904521B1 (en) 2001-02-16 2005-06-07 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. Non-repudiation of e-mail messages
US20020176067A1 (en) 2001-05-23 2002-11-28 Canesta, Inc. Method and system to enhance dynamic range conversion useable with CMOS three-dimensional imaging
US20030002671A1 (en) 2001-06-11 2003-01-02 Eastman Kodak Company Delivery of electronic content over a network using a hybrid optical disk for authentication
US7546453B2 (en) 2001-06-12 2009-06-09 Research In Motion Limited Certificate management and transfer system and method
US20050163320A1 (en) * 2001-06-12 2005-07-28 Brown Michael S. System and method for processing encoded messages for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US7254712B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2007-08-07 Research In Motion Limited System and method for compressing secure e-mail for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US20040196978A1 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-10-07 Godfrey James A. System and method for processing encoded messages for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US20080016359A1 (en) 2001-06-12 2008-01-17 Godfrey James A System and method for compressing secure e-mail for exchange with a mobile data communication device
US20040205248A1 (en) 2001-07-10 2004-10-14 Herbert A Little System and method for secure message key caching in a mobile communication device
US20040202327A1 (en) 2001-08-06 2004-10-14 Little Herbert A. System and method for processing encoded messages
US7529374B2 (en) 2002-02-02 2009-05-05 F-Secure Oyj Method and apparatus for encrypting data
US20030172122A1 (en) 2002-03-06 2003-09-11 Little Herbert A. System and method for providing secure message signature status and trust status indication
US20050149442A1 (en) * 2002-03-20 2005-07-07 Research In Motion Limited Certificate information storage system and method
US20050114671A1 (en) 2002-03-20 2005-05-26 Research In Motion Ltd. System and method for transmitting and utilizing attachments
US20030196084A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-10-16 Emeka Okereke System and method for secure wireless communications using PKI
US20030198350A1 (en) 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for managing a size of a key management block during content distribution
US7127604B2 (en) 2002-07-09 2006-10-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Changing a codec or MAC size without affecting the encryption key in PacketCable communication
JP2004048139A (en) 2002-07-09 2004-02-12 Nikon Corp Image transmission system, image relay apparatus and electronic image apparatus
US20040052356A1 (en) 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Sbc Properties, L.P., Of Reno, Nv Multi-modal address book
US7213047B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2007-05-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Peer trust evaluation using mobile agents in peer-to-peer networks
US7254608B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2007-08-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Managing distribution of content using mobile agents in peer-topeer networks
US20040133520A1 (en) * 2003-01-07 2004-07-08 Callas Jonathan D. System and method for secure and transparent electronic communication
US20040133775A1 (en) * 2003-01-07 2004-07-08 Callas Jonathan D. System and method for secure electronic communication in a partially keyless environment
US20050039100A1 (en) * 2003-08-14 2005-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for automatic error recovery in an electronic mail system
US20050080642A1 (en) 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Daniell W. Todd Consolidated email filtering user interface
US20050188219A1 (en) 2003-12-26 2005-08-25 Orange France Method and a system for communication between a terminal and at least one communication equipment
US20050222991A1 (en) * 2004-02-04 2005-10-06 Kazuyuki Ikenoya Information providing apparatus, information providing method, information providing program, and recording medium
EP1580953A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-28 Research In Motion Limited System and method for viewing message attachments
US20050210289A1 (en) 2004-03-22 2005-09-22 Brown Michael K System and method for viewing message attachments
US20050246763A1 (en) 2004-03-25 2005-11-03 National University Of Ireland Secure digital content reproduction using biometrically derived hybrid encryption techniques
US20060015722A1 (en) * 2004-07-16 2006-01-19 Geotrust Security systems and services to provide identity and uniform resource identifier verification
US20060036849A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for certificate searching and retrieval
US7430663B2 (en) * 2004-08-09 2008-09-30 Research In Motion Limited System and method for enabling bulk retrieval of certificates
US20060036848A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for enabling bulk retrieval of certificates
US20060036865A1 (en) 2004-08-10 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited Server verification of secure electronic messages
US20060059332A1 (en) * 2004-09-02 2006-03-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
EP1633101A1 (en) 2004-09-02 2006-03-08 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US20060143700A1 (en) * 2004-12-24 2006-06-29 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. Security System Providing Methodology for Cooperative Enforcement of Security Policies During SSL Sessions
US7627896B2 (en) * 2004-12-24 2009-12-01 Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. Security system providing methodology for cooperative enforcement of security policies during SSL sessions
US20070083749A1 (en) * 2005-10-12 2007-04-12 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for automated exchange of electronic mail encryption certificates
US20070165844A1 (en) 2005-10-14 2007-07-19 Research In Motion Limited System and method for protecting master encryption keys
US20070118874A1 (en) 2005-11-18 2007-05-24 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic messages
US20070123307A1 (en) 2005-11-30 2007-05-31 Research In Motion Limited Display of secure messages on a mobile communication device
EP1806683A1 (en) 2005-11-30 2007-07-11 Research In Motion Limited Display of secure messages on a mobile communication device

Non-Patent Citations (73)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"BlackBerry with the S/MIME Support Package Version 4.0 User Guide Supplement", URL:http://www.blackberry.com/knowlesdgecenterpublic/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/8067/645045/8533/348781/1181993/S-MIME-Support-Package-version-4.0-User-Guide-Supplement?nodeid=1181919&vernum=0>, Dec. 4 2006, paragraphs 0001-0005, XP002410691.
"BlackBerry with the S/MIME Support Package Version 4.0 User Guide Supplement", URL:http://www.blackberry.com/knowlesdgecenterpublic/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/8067/645045/8533/348781/1181993/S—MIME—Support—Package—version—4.0—User—Guide—Supplement?nodeid=1181919&vernum=0>, Dec. 4 2006, paragraphs 0001-0005, XP002410691.
Amendment dated Dec. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
Amendment dated Nov. 11, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,693.
Blom et al. "Conversational IP Multimedia Security", 4th International Workshop on Mobile and Wireless Communications Network, Sep. 9-11, 2002, pp. 147-151.
Brown et al., "PGP in Constrained Wireless Devices," Proceedings of the 9th Usenix Security Symposium, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 247-261 (Aug. 14-17, 2000).
Brown, Ian. et al., "A Proxy Approach to E-mail Security," Software Practice & Experience, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, GB, vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 1049-1060 (Oct. 1999).
Butrico, M., et al.: "Enterprise Data Access from Mobile Computers: An End-to-end Story", Research Issues in Data Engineering, Feb. 28, 2000, pp. 9-16, XP010377083-8 pgs.
Butrico, M., et al.: "Enterprise Data Access from Mobile Computers: An End-to-end Story", Research Issues in Data Engineering, Feb. 28, 2000, pp. 9-16, XP010377083—8 pgs.
Cole, "An Architecture for a Mobile OSI Mail Access System," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Inc., New York, USA, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 249-256 (Feb. 1989).
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,693, "System and Method for Enabling Bulk Retrieval of Certificates", filed Aug. 9, 2004.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694, "System and Method for Certificate Searching and Retrieval", filed Aug. 9, 2004.
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983, "System and Method for Searching and Retrieving Certificates", filed Sep. 2, 2004. (File history retrievable from PAIR).
Crocker, S. et al.: "MIME Object Security Services; rfc1848.text", IETF Standard, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, CH, Oct. 1995, XP015007633.
Deroest, J.: "Ubiquitous Mobile Computing"; Sunexpert Magazine: Jul. 1998, pp. 54-56, XP002213003-3 pgs.
Deroest, J.: "Ubiquitous Mobile Computing"; Sunexpert Magazine: Jul. 1998, pp. 54-56, XP002213003—3 pgs.
Dusse, "S/MIME Version 2 Message Specification," The Internet Society, pp. 1-37 (Mar. 1998).
Encrypt Pre-shared Keys in Cisco IOS Router Configuration Example, Document 1D 46420 Cisco Systems, Internet Address: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies-configuration-example09186a00801f2336.shtml.
Encrypt Pre-shared Keys in Cisco IOS Router Configuration Example, Document 1D 46420 Cisco Systems, Internet Address: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies—configuration—example09186a00801f2336.shtml.
Eskicioglu et al. "A Key Transport Protocol Based on Secret Sharing Applications to Information Security", IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 48, No. 4, Nov. 2002, pp. 816-824.
European Examination Report dated Mar. 18, 2009, European Patent Application No. 06253267.6.
Fumy et al. Principles of Key Management, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, VDI, 11, No. 5, Jun. 1993, pp. 785-793.
Gong, "Multicast Security and its Extension to a Mobile Environment," Wireless Networks 1, J.C. Baltzer AG, Science Publishers, pp. 281-295 (1995).
Harris, "Content Privacy and Content Security Working Together," Internet Article, Content Technologies White Paper, pp. 1-10 (Sep. 1999).
Hoffman: "Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME", Database IETF RFC Online IETF; RFC 2634, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-58 (Chapter 3, pp. 24-32), XP002220386.
International Search Report App. No. EP 06 25 3267, dated Jan. 22, 2007.
Interview Summary dated Jul. 2, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
Jing, Jin et al.: "Client-server Computing in Mobile Environments"; ACM Computing Surveys; Jun. 1999, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 117-157, XP002212945-41 pgs.
Jing, Jin et al.: "Client-server Computing in Mobile Environments"; ACM Computing Surveys; Jun. 1999, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 117-157, XP002212945—41 pgs.
Katsuro Inaya et al., Imakoso tsukau Windows CE (time to use Windows CE), Monthly ASCII, Oct. 1, 1999, vol. 23, No. 10, pp. 266-285.
Kiely, Don, SQL Server 2005 Secures Your Data Like Never Before, Sep. 29, 2005. Internet Address: http://www.devx.com/codemag/Article/29351?trk=DXRSS-DB.
Kiely, Don, SQL Server 2005 Secures Your Data Like Never Before, Sep. 29, 2005. Internet Address: http://www.devx.com/codemag/Article/29351?trk=DXRSS—DB.
Kotzanikolaou et al., "Hybrid Key Establishment for Multiphase Self-Organized Sensor Networks", 6th IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Jun. 13-16, 2005, pp. 581-587.
Lai, "A mobile subscriber proxy preserving writer-to-reader message security," Military Communications Conference, Milcom '96, Conference Proceedings, IEEE McLean, VA, USA Oct. 21-24, 1996, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, pp. 461-467 (Oct. 21, 1996).
Levien, R.: "Protecting Internet E-Mail From Prying Eyes", Data Communications, McGraw Hill. New York, US, vol. 25, No. 6 (May 1, 1996), pp. 117-118, 120, 122, XP000587586.
Mambo, "Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages," IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, IEICE Tokyo, Japan, vol. E79-A, No. 9, pp. 1338-1353 (Sep. 1, 1996).
Nakajima, Tatsuo et al.: "Adaptive Continuous Media Applications in Mobile Computing Environments"; Multimedia Computing and Systems '97 Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Ottawa, Ont., Canada, Jun. 3, 1997, pp. 152-160, XP010239184-9 pgs.
Nakajima, Tatsuo et al.: "Adaptive Continuous Media Applications in Mobile Computing Environments"; Multimedia Computing and Systems '97 Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Ottawa, Ont., Canada, Jun. 3, 1997, pp. 152-160, XP010239184—9 pgs.
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 9, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
Office Action Response dated Mar. 11, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
Office Action Response dated Mar. 12, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
Office Action Response dated Sep. 15, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
Policht, Marcin, SQL Server 2005 Security-Part 3 Encryption, Database Journal Internet Address: http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3483931.
Policht, Marcin, SQL Server 2005 Security—Part 3 Encryption, Database Journal Internet Address: http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3483931.
Research in Motion Limited, Blackberry Security White Paper Release 4.0 2005 Internet Address: http://blackberry.comIknowledgecenterpublicIlivelink.exe?func=II&objId=S2S044&objAction=browse&sort=name.
Russell, S.: "Fast Checking of Individual Certificate Revocation on Small Systems"; Computer Security Applications Conference, Phoenix, AZ, Dec. 6, 1999, pp. 249-255, XP010368617-7pgs.
Russell, S.: "Fast Checking of Individual Certificate Revocation on Small Systems"; Computer Security Applications Conference, Phoenix, AZ, Dec. 6, 1999, pp. 249-255, XP010368617—7pgs.
Sawano, Hiroyuki, Create a Secure Electronic Mail Environment with S/MIME!, @IT Security & Trust, May 30, 2001, URL: http://www.atmarkit.co.jp/fsecurity/special/04smime/smime01.html.
Schumacher: "AutoPGP FAQ, Version 1", Internet Newsgroup, ′Online! (Apr. 19, 1994), XP002230742.
Schumacher: "AutoPGP FAQ, Version 1", Internet Newsgroup, 'Online! (Apr. 19, 1994), XP002230742.
Stallings, W.: "S/MIME: E-Mail Gets Secure", Byte, McGraw-Hill Inc., St. Peterborough, US vol. 23, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 41-42, XP000774260.
Subramanyam, "Security in Mobile Systems," Reliable Distributed Systems, 1998 Proceedings, 17th IEEE Symposium on W. Lafayette, IN, USA, Oct. 20-23, 1998, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc., USA, pp. 407-412 (Oct. 20, 1998).
Syverson, "Limitations on Design Principles for Public Key Protocols," Security and Privacy, 1996, Proceedings, 1996 IEEE Symposium on Oakland, CA, USA, May 6-8, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE Comput. Soc., USA, pp. 62-72 (May 6, 1996).
Torvinen, "Wireless PKI: Fundamentals," Internet Article, Radicchio White Paper, pp. 1-15 (2000).
United States Advisory Action dated Oct. 17, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Final Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Final Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Notice of Allowance dated May 20, 2008 and Amendment after Allowance dated Aug. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,693.
United States Office Action dated Dec. 16, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
United States Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
United States Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/931,983.
United States Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,693.
United States Office Action Response dated Apr. 25, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action Response dated Feb. 20, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,693.
United States Office Action Response dated Jan. 18, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action Response dated Jun. 3, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action Response dated Nov. 27, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
United States Office Action Response dated Sep. 29, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/913,694.
Wasley, D.L.: "Improving Digital Credential Management in Browsers"; Internet article, Jul. 21, 2000, pp. 1-8, XP002213004-9 pgs.
Wasley, D.L.: "Improving Digital Credential Management in Browsers"; Internet article, Jul. 21, 2000, pp. 1-8, XP002213004—9 pgs.

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8589677B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2013-11-19 Blackberry Limited System and method for retrieving related certificates
US8561158B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2013-10-15 Blackberry Limited Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8296829B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2012-10-23 Research In Motion Limited Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8566582B2 (en) 2004-09-02 2013-10-22 Blackberry Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8209530B2 (en) 2004-09-02 2012-06-26 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US8312165B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2012-11-13 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US8943156B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2015-01-27 Blackberry Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US8473561B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2013-06-25 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US8103875B1 (en) * 2007-05-30 2012-01-24 Symantec Corporation Detecting email fraud through fingerprinting
US8315601B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2012-11-20 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US7949355B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2011-05-24 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US20090061912A1 (en) * 2007-09-04 2009-03-05 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US8195128B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2012-06-05 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US20110195690A1 (en) * 2007-09-04 2011-08-11 Research In Motion Limited System and method for processing attachments to messages sent to a mobile device
US20090080661A1 (en) * 2007-09-24 2009-03-26 Research In Motion Limited System and method for controlling message attachment handling functions on a mobile device
US8804966B2 (en) 2007-09-24 2014-08-12 Blackberry Limited System and method for controlling message attachment handling functions on a mobile device
US8254582B2 (en) * 2007-09-24 2012-08-28 Research In Motion Limited System and method for controlling message attachment handling functions on a mobile device
US10439825B1 (en) * 2018-11-13 2019-10-08 INTEGRITY Security Services, Inc. Providing quality of service for certificate management systems
US10749691B2 (en) * 2018-11-13 2020-08-18 Integrity Security Services Llc Providing quality of service for certificate management systems
US10917248B2 (en) * 2018-11-13 2021-02-09 Integrity Security Services Llc Providing quality of service for certificate management systems
US11177965B2 (en) * 2018-11-13 2021-11-16 Integrity Security Services Llc Providing quality of service for certificate management systems
US20220078030A1 (en) * 2018-11-13 2022-03-10 Integrity Security Services Llc Providing quality of service for certificate management systems
US11792019B2 (en) * 2018-11-13 2023-10-17 Integrity Security Services Llc Providing quality of service for certificate management systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110029627A1 (en) 2011-02-03
US8312165B2 (en) 2012-11-13
US20130067009A1 (en) 2013-03-14
US20070299921A1 (en) 2007-12-27
US20130268607A1 (en) 2013-10-10
US8943156B2 (en) 2015-01-27
US8473561B2 (en) 2013-06-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8473561B2 (en) System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US9398023B2 (en) Server verification of secure electronic messages
US8023656B2 (en) Automated key management system and method
US10476677B2 (en) System and method for updating message trust status
US8396211B2 (en) System and method for dynamic modification of allowable electronic message properties
AU2005203786B2 (en) System and method for updating message trust status
CA2592680C (en) System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
CA2476919C (en) Automated key management system and method
US20090220084A1 (en) System and method for dynamically updating message list indicators
CA2476966C (en) Server verification of secure electronic messages
EP1879135B1 (en) System and method for dynamic modification of allowable electronic message properties
CA2654549C (en) System and method for dynamically updating message list indicators

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BROWN, MICHAEL K.;BROWN, MICHAEL S.;SEGATO, TIMOTHY;REEL/FRAME:018394/0961

Effective date: 20060907

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: BLACKBERRY LIMITED, ONTARIO

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:033134/0228

Effective date: 20130709

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552)

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED, IRELAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BLACKBERRY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:064104/0103

Effective date: 20230511

AS Assignment

Owner name: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED, IRELAND

Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:BLACKBERRY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:064269/0001

Effective date: 20230511