US 8043797 B2
A method for transferring an image of a mask pattern through a pitch range onto a substrate is presented. In an embodiment, the method includes illuminating the mask pattern of an attenuated phase shift mask using a multipole illumination that includes an on-axis component and an off-axis component, the mask pattern including non-printing assist features configured for a pitch larger than twice a minimum pitch of the mask pattern, and projecting an image of the illuminated mask pattern onto the substrate.
1. A method for transferring an image of a mask pattern through a pitch range onto a substrate, the mask pattern including printing features arranged in different pitches, the method comprising:
determining a plurality of illumination shapes to image the printing features on the substrate at the different pitches of the pitch range so that, for each of the different pitches of the pitch range, an illumination shape that is suitable to image the printing features on the substrate is determined;
determining a multipole illumination to be used to illuminate the mask pattern based on the plurality of illumination shapes obtained for the different pitches of the pitch range;
illuminating the mask pattern of an attenuated phase shift mask using the multipole illumination, the mask pattern on said attenuated phase shift mask including the printing features arranged in the different pitches and anti-scattering bars, wherein the anti-scattering bars are placed only within said printing features that are arranged in a pitch at least equal to or larger than twice a minimum pitch of the printing features, and
projecting an image of the illuminated mask pattern onto the substrate.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. A device manufacturing method for transferring an image of a mask pattern through a pitch range onto a substrate, the mask pattern including printing features arranged in different pitches, the method comprising:
determining a plurality of illumination shapes to image the printing features on the substrate at the different pitches of the pitch range so that, for each of the different pitches of the pitch range, an illumination shape that is suitable to image the printing features on the substrate is determined;
determining a multipole illumination to be used to illuminate the mask pattern based on the plurality of illumination shapes determined for the different pitches of the pitch range;
conditioning a beam of radiation, said beam of radiation including the multipole illumination;
patterning said beam of radiation with an attenuated phase shift mask to form a patterned beam of radiation, said attenuated phase shift mask including the printing features arranged in the different pitches and anti-scattering bars, wherein the anti-scattering bars are placed only within said printing features that are arranged in a pitch at least equal to or larger than twice a minimum pitch of the printing features; and
projecting said patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate.
19. The method of
20. The method of
21. The method of
22. The method of
23. The method of
24. The method of
25. The method of
26. The method of
27. The method of
28. The method of
29. The method of
30. The method of
This application claims priority and benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/617,211, entitled “Lithographic Apparatus And Device Manufacturing Method”, filed on Oct. 12, 2004. The content of that application is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to lithographic apparatus and methods.
2. Summary of the Related Art
A lithographic apparatus is a machine that applies a desired pattern onto a target portion of a substrate. Lithographic apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacturing of integrated circuits (ICs). In that circumstance, a patterning device, which is alternatively referred to as a mask or a reticle, may be used to generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g., including part of, one or several dies) on a substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer) that has a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single substrate will contain a network of adjacent target portions that are successively exposed. Conventional lithographic apparatus include so-called steppers, in which each target portion is irradiated by exposing an entire pattern onto the target portion at once, and so-called scanners, in which each target portion is irradiated by scanning the pattern through the beam of radiation in a given direction (the “scanning”-direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate parallel or anti-parallel to this direction.
Photolithography is widely recognized as one of the key steps in the manufacturing of ICs and other devices and products with small features. However, as the dimensions of features become smaller, photolithography is becoming one of the most, if not the most, critical gating factors for enabling ICs and other devices and products with small features to be manufactured on a massive scale.
Fabrication of these ICs and other devices and products with small features involves the control of space tolerances between such small features, e.g., contact holes and interconnecting lines, as well as the control of the size of these features. The smallest space between two features and/or the smallest width of a feature such as, for example, a contact hole or an interconnecting line, is referred to as the critical dimension or CD. For an array of features, a pitch P of the periodicity may also be defined. The pitch refers to the mutual distance between two corresponding points of two substantially identical, neighboring features.
In order to control the critical dimension of these features during manufacturing, several lithographic responses may be used. These responses generally include the depth of focus (DOF), the exposure latitude (EL), the dense isolated bias (DIB), and the mask error enhancement factor (MEEF). The depth of focus is generally viewed as one of the most critical factors in determining the resolution of the lithographic apparatus. It is defined as the distance along the optical axis over which the image of the pattern is adequately sharp. The mathematical representation of DOF is:
With increasing demands on the number of features per area of die to be printed, there have been tremendous efforts within the industry to lower the CD and the pitch of these features. Typically, the industry has used the Rayleigh criterion to provide a theoretical estimate of the limits of feature printing for a given process. The Rayleigh criterion for resolution CD is shown in equation (2):
The effectiveness of a given lithographic process is generally weighed based on its capability to print arrays of dense features with sufficient latitude. However, any given photolithographic layer may also include small features that are positioned in one or more arrays at a pitch larger than the smallest distance between two features. Therefore, the printing of layers including small features occurring at both minimum pitch, i.e., dense features, and larger pitches, i.e., semi-dense features and isolated features, is of importance. Dense features are commonly known to be separated by a distance that is substantially equal to the target feature dimension, isolated features are commonly known to be separated by a distance that is more than about five times the target dimension, and semi-dense features are spaced apart by a distance ranging between about one and about five times the target feature dimension.
Thus, the printing of features arranged in the full pitch range may be complicated because the requirements for printing dense features generally differ from those for printing isolated features. Finding process conditions that simultaneously satisfy high depth of focus, low mask error enhancement factor, low sidelobe printing, and good pattern fidelity for dense, semi-dense and isolated features may be difficult and may become even more difficult as k1 decreases below 0.4.
Embodiments of the invention include a method for transferring an image of a mask pattern through a pitch range onto a substrate. In an embodiment of the invention, the method includes illuminating the mask pattern of an attenuated phase shift mask using a multipole illumination that includes an on-axis component and an off-axis component, the mask pattern including non-printing assist features configured for a pitch larger than twice a minimum pitch of the mask pattern, and projecting an image of the illuminated mask pattern onto the substrate.
In another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a lithographic apparatus including an illumination system configured to provide a multipole illumination that includes an on-axis component and an off-axis component; a support structure configured to hold a patterning device, the patterning device being an attenuated phase shift mask configured to pattern the beam of radiation according to a desired mask pattern, the mask pattern including non-printing assist features configured for a pitch(s) larger than twice a minimum pitch of the mask pattern; a substrate table configured to hold a substrate, and a projection system configured to project the patterned beam of radiation onto the substrate.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method, including: conditioning a beam of radiation, the beam of radiation including an on-axis component and an off-axis component; patterning the beam of radiation with an attenuated phase shift mask to form a patterned beam of radiation, the attenuated phase shift mask including non-printing assist features that are configured for a pitch larger than twice a minimum pitch included in the mask; and projecting the patterned beam of radiation onto a substrate.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
As depicted here, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g., employing a transmissive mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may be of a reflective type (e.g., employing a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to below or a reflective mask).
The illuminator IL receives a beam of radiation from a radiation source SO. The source and the lithographic apparatus may be separate entities, for example when the source is an excimer laser. In such cases, the source is not considered to form part of the lithographic apparatus and the radiation beam is passed from the source SO to the illuminator IL with the aid of a beam delivery system BD, including for example suitable directing mirrors and/or a beam expander. In other cases the source may be an integral part of the apparatus, for example when the source is a mercury lamp. The source SO and the illuminator IL, together with the beam delivery system BD if required, may be referred to as a radiation system.
The illuminator IL may include an adjusting device AD configured to adjust the angular intensity distribution of the beam. Generally, at least the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in a pupil plane of the illuminator can be adjusted. In addition, the illuminator IL generally includes various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. The illuminator provides a conditioned beam of radiation B.
The beam of radiation B is incident on the patterning device MA, which is held on the support structure MT. Having traversed the patterning device MA, the beam of radiation B passes through the projection system PS, which focuses the beam onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning device PW and position sensor IF (e.g., an interferometric device), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g., so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam B. Similarly, the first positioning device PM and another position sensor (which is not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus may be used in the following preferred modes:
1. In step mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are kept essentially stationary, while an entire pattern imparted to the beam of radiation is projected onto a target portion C at once (i.e., a single static exposure). The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y direction so that a different target portion C can be exposed. In step mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the size of the target portion C imaged in a single static exposure.
2. In scan mode, the support structure MT and the substrate table WT are scanned synchronously while a pattern imparted to the beam of radiation is projected onto a target portion C (i.e., a single dynamic exposure). The velocity and direction of the substrate table WT relative to the support structure MT is determined by the (de-)magnification and image reversal characteristics of the projection system PS. In scan mode, the maximum size of the exposure field limits the width (in the non-scanning direction) of the target portion in a single dynamic exposure, whereas the length of the scanning motion determines the height (in the scanning direction) of the target portion.
3. In another mode, the support structure MT is kept essentially stationary holding a programmable patterning device, and the substrate table WT is moved or scanned while a pattern imparted to the projection beam is projected onto a target portion C. In this mode, generally a pulsed radiation source is employed and the programmable patterning device is updated as required after each movement of the substrate table WT or in between successive radiation pulses during a scan. This mode of operation can be readily applied to maskless lithography that utilizes a programmable patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
Combinations and/or variations of the above described modes of use or entirely different modes of use may also be employed.
The resolution limit of a lithographic projection apparatus may be optimized by the control of the relative size of the illuminator numerical aperture (NAill). Control of NAill with respect to the projection system's numerical aperture (NAps) allows for modification of spatial coherence at the patterning device (mask) plane, commonly referred to as partial coherence σ, where:
A system where illumination is obliquely incident on the mask at an angle so that the zero-th and first diffraction orders are distributed on alternative sides of the optical axis may allow for improvements of the image resolution. Such an approach is generally referred to as off-axis illumination. Off-axis illumination improves resolution by illuminating the mask with radiation that is at an angle to the optical axis of the projector system. The incidence of the radiation on the mask, which acts as a diffraction grating, improves the contrast of the image by transmitting more of the diffracted orders through the projector system. Off-axis illumination techniques used with conventional masks produce resolution enhancement effects similar to resolution enhancement effects obtained with phase shifting masks.
A first approach for printing small features through the full pitch range is to use off-axis illumination in combination with a binary mask (BIM) and assist features. Assist features are elements that are placed on the patterning device next to isolated or semi-isolated features enabling such isolated or semi-isolated features (such as gate lines or contact holes) to image more like dense features, so that the depth of focus of the isolated features are improved. Assist features are dimensioned such that they do not print on the substrate during exposure. They are below the resolution limit of the lithographic apparatus. Assist features may be used as an effective technique for enhancing the process window. Generally, they are generated during creation of the electronic file of the ICs.
Examples of assist features include scattering bars and anti-scattering bars. Scattering bars are small lines that have the same transparency as the feature around which they are disposed, and have dimensions that are less than the resolution limit of the lithographic apparatus. Anti-scattering bars are openings that may be used to improve the resolution of small features, such as, for example, small contact holes. They serve a dual purpose. First, they increase the intensity of radiation that is transferred onto the substrate so that the intensity level of small features may match that of larger features. Second, they increase the intensity level of the feature, thereby enhancing the depth of focus.
Several parameters may govern the application of these scattering and anti-scattering bars: the width of the bars, the separation of the bars from the edge of the main feature (e.g., gate line or contact hole), and the number of scattering or anti-scattering bars on each side of the main feature. Using scattering and anti-scattering bars, it may be possible to make isolated and semi-isolated features achieve performance comparable to dense features.
A patterning device including these arrays of features may be used in combination with a multipole illumination in order to print contact holes with sufficient process latitude. This patterning device may be a binary mask or a chrome mask.
As shown in
Creation of the illumination configuration shown in
A second approach for printing small features through the full pitch range is to use a multipole illumination, including on and off axis components, in combination with an attenuated phase shift mask (att-PSM). Attenuated phase shift masks (Att-PSM) are fabricated by replacing the opaque part of a conventional mask with a halftone film—one that is partially transmissive. The transmissivity of such a halftone film is generally on the order of about 10% transmission. The halftone film is chosen to desirably shift the phase of the radiation it transmits by 180 degrees. The radiation which passes through the clear area of the phase shift mask, in contrast, is not phase shifted. In this manner, destructive interference occurs between some diffracted waves which can be beneficial for imaging. In such an approach, the off-axis illumination may be used to favorably image the dense pitches while the on-axis component and the attenuated phase shift mask may be used to image isolated features.
Optimization of the illumination configuration shown in
As disclosed in these two patent applications, optimization of the illumination configuration includes several acts.
First, the beam of radiation in the pupil plane of the illuminator may be divided into a plurality of source points. In practice, the grid of source points may be defined by an illumination file that includes the spatial coordinates of each source point contained in the grid. The physical location of each source point relative to the full illuminator aperture may be varied depending on the degree of accuracy desired. A small spacing between each light source point may provide more detailed information about the source response but may increase the calculation time. Conversely, a large spacing between each source point may provide less accurate information about the source response but may decrease the calculation time. In an embodiment, the spacing of the grid relative to the full illuminator aperture is approximately 0.1. In other embodiments, the grid spacing is approximately 0.01 to 0.2.
Second, a lithographic response for each source point may be calculated. In practice, an image of the pattern may be calculated for each source point and this image may be evaluated versus one or more criteria to judge whether the image has appropriate optical qualities to successfully print the desired pattern on the substrate. The procedure can be performed iteratively to arrive at the optimal value of the lithographic response. The image can be analyzed, for example, through a focus range to provide estimates of the exposure latitude and depth of focus. Additional lithographic responses that may be determined for each source point include: critical dimension of the pattern studied, intensity threshold necessary to define the target critical dimension (CD) on the substrate, depth of focus at 8% EL (DOF@8% EL), exposure latitude, dose-to-size E1:1, dense to isolated feature bias, arbitrary feature size biases, sidelobe printing, film loss, sidewall angle, mask error enhancement factor (MEEF), linear resolution, absolute resolution, or critical dimension uniformity.
Calculation of the lithographic response for each source point may be done by simulation. Generally, simulations may be performed with an aerial image model in order to determine the incident radiation energy distribution onto the radiation sensitive material (resist). Calculation of the aerial image may be performed either in the scalar or vector form of the Fourier optics. Characteristics of the lithographic apparatus and process, like the numerical aperture (NA) or the specific pattern, may be entered as input parameters for the simulation. The quality of the aerial image may be determined by using a contrast or normalized aerial image log-slope (NILS) metric (normalized to the feature size). This value corresponds to the slope of the image intensity (or aerial image).
Relevant parameters to perform the aerial image simulation may include the distance from the focal plane of the Gaussian image plane, meaning the distance to the plane where the best plane of focus exists, as determined by geometrical ray optics, or the center wavelength of the quasi-monochromatic radiation source. The parameters may also include a measure of degree of spatial partial coherence of the illumination system, the numerical aperture of the projection system exposing the substrate, the aberrations of the optical system and a description of the spatial transmission function representing the pattern.
The lithographic simulation may be performed with a resist model. In an implementation, the resist model may take into account, in the calculation of the critical dimension (or size) and its variation with variables such as dose/exposure energy and focus, the resist exposure, the resist baking and the resist developing. Likewise, the resist model may take into account, in an embodiment, a nonplanar topography and vector effects. The vector effects refer to the fact that an electromagnetic wave propagates obliquely when a high numerical aperture is used. Although vector effects can be accounted for when calculating the aerial image, a calculation of the vector effects in a low refractive index medium (e.g., in air) may greatly overestimate the contrast loss obtained on the substrate because the incident rays tend to be straightened when they propagate in the resist because of the resist's higher refractive index. Therefore, a resist model with a rigorous electromagnetic calculation may be desirable to accurately determine the actual experimental response.
Additional models like a lumped parameter model or a variable threshold resist model may also be used in other embodiments. It will be appreciated that the simulation model is selected because it matches experimental data.
Third, the shape of the illumination beam may be determined based on the analysis of the separate lithographic responses.
The procedure for optimizing the best conditions of illumination (source shape and mask bias) is performed iteratively. In practice, a candidate source shape and a mask bias are selected and tested in the simulator and then iteratively adjusted to get a high process latitude (i.e., optimized value for each lithographic response) with, for example, acceptable sidelobing. An iterative fitting algorithm may be used to cycle through the initial lithographic parameters that define the candidate source in order to optimize that source shape.
In order to qualitatively determine the candidate source shape, or illumination configuration, calculation results of selected lithographic responses may be visualized on contour maps. These contour maps show the values of lithographic responses as a function of source point location.
As can be seen in
However, as the pitch value increases, source points located closer to the origin (0,0) may contribute to a favorable value of DOF@% 8EL.
Referring now to
A comparison of the first and second approaches discussed above indicates that off-axis illumination in combination with a binary mask and assist features for isolated features (first approach) may be deficient at extreme pitches (dense and isolated pitch). The first approach may however provide better imaging performances for intermediary pitches (i.e., situation where extreme pitches are excluded). The second approach may be a good candidate for imaging patterns through the entire pitch range. In particular, the use of on-axis illumination and an attenuated phase shift mask may be beneficial at extreme pitches. However, sidelobe printing may occur for some pitches.
Sidelobe printing can occur with attenuated phase shift masks exposed with high doses (i.e., low biases). Sidelobes are unwanted images in the final pattern caused by constructive interference between adjacent clear features in the mask pattern when the adjacent clear features are closely spaced and are separated by a distance on the order of the radiation wavelength. They typically appear as spurious windows or ring structures in dense patterns, and are highly sensitive to pattern details (e.g., pitch) and optical conditions (e.g., source shape and numerical aperture). Sidelobe printing may be most problematic for hole patterns with pitches near 1.2*λ/NA (where λ is the radiation wavelength and NA is the numerical aperture of the lithographic apparatus), with small pattern bias (i.e., relatively high printing dose) and where high transmission masks are used. It may also be most problematic for 193 nm lithography, where current radiation sensitive materials may not have sufficient surface inhibition to prevent sidelobe formation. Sidelobe printing may drastically affect manufacturing yield since unwanted additional features in the pattern may be transferred into the substrate.
In order to reduce sidelobe printing and to provide good imaging performance for the entire pitch range, in an embodiment that consists of a third approach, a multipole illumination configuration including on and off-axis components is combined with an attenuated phase shift mask and assist features (e.g., anti-scattering bars). Sidelobe printing may be reduced because the presence of assist features may provide better depth of focus for isolated patterns, thereby allowing smaller size on-axis illumination (smaller central pole). Furthermore, the illumination/global bias optimization may focus on dense pitches. This imaging solution may be beneficial for printing random hole patterns where the addition of assist features (e.g., anti-scattering bars) may sometimes be difficult or impossible. In particular, the number of assist features needed for a random pattern may be much less than for the first approach described above.
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
It will be appreciated that the transmission of the phase shift mask in the third approach may not be limited to 6%. The mask transmission is selected because of its aptitude to provide satisfactory results for a given lithographic problem (i.e., feature size and pitch range). Therefore, the mask transmission may vary in other embodiments of the invention. For example, the mask transmission may be in the range of about 3% to 30% depending on the features and the pitch range studied.
Furthermore, it will be appreciated that the off-axis illumination used in the third approach is not limited to off-axis poles arranged at about +/−45° relative to the horizontal axis of the illuminator. Similarly to the mask transmission, it will be appreciated that the off-axis illumination is selected for its aptitude to provide satisfactory results for a given lithographic problem (i.e., feature size and pitch range). In an embodiment of the invention, the off-axis component may consist of a dipole arranged on the horizontal axis or the vertical axis of the illuminator. In another embodiment of the invention, the off-axis component may consist of a quadrupole arranged on the horizontal and vertical axis of the illuminator.
Placement of anti-scattering bars at relaxed pitches, e.g., twice the minimum pitch, may greatly improve the imaging performance since there is less focus sensitivity. In an embodiment, the anti-scattering bars are 150 nm long and 60 nm wide.
Results shown in
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of lithographic apparatus in the manufacture of ICs, it should be understood that the lithographic apparatus described herein may have other applications, such as the manufacturing of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal displays (LCDs), thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “wafer” or “die” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general terms “substrate” or “target portion,” respectively. The substrate referred to herein may be processed, before or after exposure, in for example a track (a tool that typically applies a layer of resist to a substrate and develops the exposed resist) or a metrology or inspection tool. Where applicable, the disclosure herein may be applied to such and other substrate processing tools. Further, the substrate may be processed more than once, for example in order to create a multi-layer IC, so that the term substrate used herein may also refer to a substrate that already contains multiple processed layers.
The terms “radiation” and “beam” used herein encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (e.g., having a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm) and extreme ultra-violet (EUV) radiation (e.g., having a wavelength in the range of 5-20 nm), as well as particle beams, or electron beams.
The term “patterning device” used herein should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to impart a beam with a pattern in its cross-section such as to create a pattern in a target portion of the substrate. It should be noted that the pattern imparted to the beam may not exactly correspond to the desired pattern in the target portion of the substrate. Generally, the pattern imparted to the beam will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit.
A patterning device may be transmissive or reflective. Examples of patterning devices include masks, programmable mirror arrays, and programmable LCD panels. Masks are well known in lithography, and include mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. An example of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of small mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted so as to reflect an incoming radiation beam in different directions; in this manner, the reflected beam is patterned.
The support structure holds the patterning device in a way depending on the orientation of the patterning device, the design of the lithographic apparatus, and other conditions, such as, for example, whether or not the patterning device is held in a vacuum environment. The support can use mechanical clamping, vacuum, or other clamping techniques, for example electrostatic clamping under vacuum conditions. The support structure may be a frame or a table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required and which may ensure that the patterning device is at a desired position, for example with respect to the projection system. Any use of the terms “reticle” or “mask” herein may be considered synonymous with the more general term “patterning device.”
The term “projection system” used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection systems, including refractive optical systems, reflective optical systems, and catadioptric optical systems, as appropriate for example for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion fluid or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term “projection lens” herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term “projection system.”
The illumination system may also encompass various types of optical components, including refractive, reflective, and catadioptric optical components for directing, shaping, or controlling the beam of radiation, and such components may be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens.”
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such “multiple stage” machines the additional tables or support structures may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables or support structures while one or more other tables or support structures are being used for exposure.
The lithographic apparatus may also be of a type wherein a surface of the substrate is immersed in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g., water, so as to fill a space between a final element of the projection system and the substrate. Immersion liquids may also be applied to other spaces in the lithographic apparatus, for example, between the mask and a first element of the projection system. Immersion techniques are well known in the art for increasing the numerical aperture of projection systems.
The methods described herein may be implemented as software, hardware or a combination. In an embodiment, there is provided a computer program comprising a program code that, when executed on a computer system, instructs the computer system to perform any or all of the methods described herein.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. The description is not intended to limit the invention.
Citas de patentes