|Número de publicación||US8392298 B2|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Número de solicitud||US 10/688,094|
|Fecha de publicación||5 Mar 2013|
|Fecha de presentación||16 Oct 2003|
|Fecha de prioridad||4 Mar 2003|
|También publicado como||US20070250419|
|Número de publicación||10688094, 688094, US 8392298 B2, US 8392298B2, US-B2-8392298, US8392298 B2, US8392298B2|
|Inventores||Darshan Kumar, Nardo B. Catahan, Jr., Joshua Roper|
|Cesionario original||Siebel Systems, Inc.|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (149), Otras citas (27), Citada por (2), Clasificaciones (5), Eventos legales (4)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
This application is related to, and hereby claims the benefit of provisional application No. 60/451,983 which was filed Mar. 4, 2003.
Embodiments of the invention relate generally to computer software applications, and more specifically to common data object formats for such applications.
Various business entities, such as companies, store information electronically in furtherance of their business needs. These companies may have extensive databases of information that include customer tables, supplier tables, employee tables, and so on. The structure of the database system (schema) and the data object format (DOF) of each database may be customized to help meet the business needs of the company. For example, an automotive manufacturer may organize information about its customers in a way that is very different from the way that an online bookstore may organize information about its customers. Even within a single company, that company may use many different application programs that employ very different schemas and DOFs. For example, a customer relationship management application program may use a DOF that is very different from the DOF used by an accounting program. The use of customized DOFs by a company and by applications within the company has the advantage that it allows information to be modeled in a way that is appropriate for the business needs of the company. Unfortunately, because of this diversity in the DOFs, it is not easy for the company to share its information with other companies or for applications to share their information.
The inter-exchange of information between applications of different business entities or even between different applications of the same business entity can be problematic due to the variation in DOFs between applications.
For example, a business entity may use a proprietary billing system. If the business entity decides to integrate a number of related applications from each of several software vendors, a translation mechanism may have to be created and implemented between the underlying billing system and each related application. This is because each application from a different software vendor may have a unique, or substantially different, DOF. Moreover, full integration of the multiple applications may require creation and implementation of a translation mechanism between each of the related applications as well.
A change in the underlying billing system may necessitate recreating and implementing such translation mechanisms.
Various attempts have been made to define standard data models so that information can be more easily shared between companies and applications. For example, the Open Applications Group has designed a standard data model that can be used by companies and applications when sharing information. A problem with such data models is that they did not provide effective ways to model relationships between various parties, such as a person or a company. In addition, if a company or an application developer wants to customize the standard data model, the customized data model may not be compatible with future upgrades of the standard data model. It would be desirable to have a data model that would more effectively model relationships and facilitate the upgrading of customizations of the data model.
Embodiments of the invention provide methods and data structures for the effective and efficient synchronization or inter-exchange of invoice adjustment information between business applications employing disparate DOFs. For one embodiment a DOF is provided that allows for relationships between entities, also referred to as invoice adjustments, to be modeled as attributes of an entity and for customization of the DOF in a manner that facilitates upgrading of the DOF. For one embodiment the invoice adjustment DOF is provided in a common software language (i.e., software specification). In one embodiment, the common DOF defines an invoice adjustment class that includes multiple data types and the relationships between the data types of the invoice adjustment class. The relationships may include basic elements of invoice adjustment DOFs from various business applications.
For one embodiment, a method is provided for efficient synchronization or inter-exchange of invoice adjustment information between business applications using different invoice adjustment DOFs. For such an embodiment, invoice adjustment information from each of several business applications is translated to a common DOF. The invoice adjustment information, in the common DOF, is then inter-exchanged among the several business applications. Each application has only to translate the invoice adjustment information from the common DOF to the application-specific DOF of the respective business application.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
Reference throughout the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearance of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Moreover, inventive aspects lie in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of this invention.
At operation 110 a common DOF for the invoice adjustment information is created. For one embodiment the common DOF includes the determined essential elements. For various alternative embodiments, the common DOF may include some or all of the determined essential elements as well as other elements. The common DOF is created in a common format that may be selected based upon the extent to which the format is interoperable with various business applications. For one embodiment the common DOF is created in extensible markup language (XML) format that allows application designers to create customized tags that enable the transmission, validation, and interpretation of data between applications.
At operation 115 the invoice adjustment information from a plurality of business applications having different invoice adjustment DOFs is translated into the common DOF. That is, for each application, the invoice adjustment information in an application-specific DOF is translated into the common DOF.
At operation 120 the invoice adjustment information in the common DOF is exchanged between two or more of the business applications. At this point a business integration server completes the translation of the invoice adjustment information in the common DOF to the application-specific DOF for each respective business application as described below.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, each of the business systems implements a translation mechanism to translate invoice adjustment information, in an application-specific DOF, into a common DOF. The invoice adjustment information in the common DOF may then be inter-exchanged between the business systems through the universal business application network. A business integration server then translates the invoice adjustment information from the common DOF into a particular application-specific DOF for a respective business system as described more fully below in reference to
The architecture of the universal business application network allows new business applications that access legacy business systems to be developed with minimum customization. The legacy business systems can be provided by a single business organization or by different business organizations. The universal business application network also allows the business applications to exchange invoice adjustment information using an invoice adjustment common DOF. In one embodiment, the universal business application network uses the XML and Web services standards.
As discussed above, the common DOF may include the definition of various invoice adjustment-related objects. The objects may be defined using standard object definition tools such as an XML schema definition tool. The transformation store contains transformations for translating information received from the business systems to the common DOF, and vice versa. For example, an invoice adjustment object may include a globally unique identifier for each person. A transformation for a business system that does not use globally unique identifiers may need to access an identification server to determine the globally unique identifier for each invoice adjustment. The transformations may be specified as a computer program, an XML Stylesheet Language Transform (“XSL T”), etc. The business process store contains the business processes that have been defined. A business process may be specified as a script, a process flow, an executable program, etc. In one embodiment, the business processes are defined using the Web Services Flow Language (“WSFL”). The business processes orchestrate a sequence of steps across multiple applications provided by the business systems to achieve a business objective. The business process controller coordinates the execution of the business processes. The business process controller may instantiate objects and invoke functions of the objects in accordance with the various business processes. The business process controller may also initiate the execution of business processes based on predefined conditions and events. For example, the business process controller may launch a certain business process each time an alert is received. Although not shown, the business integration network may provide a standard library of business routines that may be invoked by the business processes. For example, a standard business routine might be to identify whether two invoice adjustment objects represent the same individual or to apply business rules to various objects and take the appropriate action as defined by those rules. The business integration server may also include various tools to facilitate the development of business processes. These tools may aid in the development of transformations, the defining of common objects, and the writing of process flows.
The common DOF may include basic elements of invoice adjustment DOFs from various business applications. For example, common DOF may include a common identification object, to allow unique identification of information exchanged between applications; invoice adjustment base data; billing data; status data; and list of invoice adjustment line item details consisting all the detail information of an invoice adjustment. Additionally, for alternative embodiments, the common DOF may include such elements as related employee, list of related parties, related invoice adjustment type, list of invoice adjustment items, and list of comments.
In one embodiment, the common DOF defines a hierarchy of the data elements for describing an invoice adjustment. The common DOF may define data elements that are complex. A complex data element is a data element that comprises data sub-elements. For example, a list of related party data element may be a complex data element that includes communication data, address data, and relationship data sub-elements among others.
The customData data element initially contains no data elements, but custom data elements can be added by defining data elements in the CustomDataType as described below.
Embodiments of the invention provide a common DOF for invoice adjustment information that can be used as an intermediate DOF during translation of invoice adjustment information from one application-specific DOF to another.
For one embodiment, the common DOF may contain a custom data element at various places within the hierarchy of data elements that allow a customer to put in more attributes. A custom data element is of a custom data element type. The custom data element type initially defines no data elements. The data model can be customized by defining custom data elements for the custom data element type. For example, the data elements relating to the relationship of an invoice adjustment may have a custom data element through which data elements relating to the history of previously related invoice adjustments can be defined. Because the custom data elements are defined at various places within the hierarchy, the customizations of the data model can be associated with related data elements within the hierarchy.
In one embodiment, each of the types of an invoice adjustment specifies a custom data element for that type. For example, the related party data element may be defined as the related party data type. If so, the data type can be customized by adding data elements to the definition of the related party data type. The definition may be stored in a file that is separate from the file in which the data type is defined. A portion of an XML schema that defines the custom data a related party is
At operation 510, the schema for the types of custom data is retrieved and opened. The schema may be stored in an XML schema file that contains the definition for each type of custom data.
At operation 515, the tags relating to the custom data type of interest are located and the custom data elements are added to the tags.
At operation 520, the custom data schema with the newly defined data elements added to the custom data type is closed.
Embodiments of the invention include various operations. Many of the methods are described in their most basic form, but operations can be added to or deleted from any of the methods without departing from the basic scope of the invention.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the data structure and operations of embodiments of the invention may be stored upon or embodied in machine-executable instructions, which may be used to cause a general-purpose or special-purpose processor or logic circuits programmed with the instructions to perform specific operations.
Alternatively, the operations of embodiments of the invention may be performed by a combination of hardware and software. Embodiments of the invention present may be provided as a computer program product that may include a machine-readable medium having stored thereon instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to various embodiments of the invention. Likewise, embodiments of the invention present may be provided as data structures stored upon a machine-readable medium. Such machine-readable medium may include, but are not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, ROMs, RAMs, EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnet or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions. Moreover, the invention may also be downloaded as a computer program product, wherein the program may be transferred from a remote computer to a requesting computer by way of data signals embodied in a carrier wave or other propagation medium via a communication cell (e.g., a modem or network connection). The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
The processes and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein.
The computers (e.g., universal business application network computer and business systems computer) may include a central processing unit, memory, input devices (e.g., keyboard and pointing devices), output devices (e.g., display devices), and storage devices (e.g., disk drives) The memory and storage devices may be computer-readable media that may contain instructions that implement the security system. In addition, the data structures and message structures may be stored or transmitted via a data transmission medium, such as a signal on a communications link.
The computer system 600 includes a processor 602, a main memory 604 and a static memory 606, which communicate with each other via a bus 608. The computer system 600 may further include a video display unit 610 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 600 also includes an alpha-numeric input device 612 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 614 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 616, a signal generation device 620 (e.g., a speaker) and a network interface device 622.
The disk drive unit 616 includes a computer-readable medium 624 on which is stored a set of instructions (i.e., software) 626 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described above. The software 626 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 604 and/or within the processor 602. The software 626 may further be transmitted or received via the network interface device 622. For the purposes of this specification, the term “computer-readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by the computer and that cause the computer to perform any one of the methodologies of the present invention. The term “computer-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, and carrier wave signals.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that although specific embodiments of technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the class definitions that have been described using XML schema can be equivalently described using other class definition tools such as a C class. The classes described can be instantiated in memory and be initialized with information. Therefore, while the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US4714995||13 Sep 1985||22 Dic 1987||Trw Inc.||Computer integration system|
|US5220500||19 Sep 1989||15 Jun 1993||Batterymarch Investment System||Financial management system|
|US5311438||31 Ene 1992||10 May 1994||Andersen Consulting||Integrated manufacturing system|
|US5349643||10 May 1993||20 Sep 1994||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method for secure initial program load for diskless workstations|
|US5416917||21 May 1993||16 May 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Heterogenous database communication system in which communicating systems identify themselves and convert any requests/responses into their own data format|
|US5446880||31 Ago 1992||29 Ago 1995||At&T Corp.||Database communication system that provides automatic format translation and transmission of records when the owner identified for the record is changed|
|US5566332||11 Ago 1994||15 Oct 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and combination for minimizing data conversions when data is transferred between a first database storing data in a first format and a second database storing data in a second format|
|US5646862||29 Sep 1994||8 Jul 1997||Ford Motor Company||Vendor-neutral integrated vehicle electrical design and analysis system and method|
|US5699527||1 May 1995||16 Dic 1997||Davidson; David Edward||Method and system for processing loan|
|US5708828||25 May 1995||13 Ene 1998||Reliant Data Systems||System for converting data from input data environment using first format to output data environment using second format by executing the associations between their fields|
|US5724575||1 Jul 1996||3 Mar 1998||Actamed Corp.||Method and system for object-based relational distributed databases|
|US5727158||22 Sep 1995||10 Mar 1998||Integra Soft, Inc.||Information repository for storing information for enterprise computing system|
|US5742588||18 Sep 1995||21 Abr 1998||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Packet switched traffic management in a cellular telecommunications system|
|US5758355||7 Ago 1996||26 May 1998||Aurum Software, Inc.||Synchronization of server database with client database using distribution tables|
|US5764543||16 Jun 1995||9 Jun 1998||I2 Technologies, Inc.||Extensible model network representation system for process planning|
|US5806075||14 Ene 1997||8 Sep 1998||Oracle Corporation||Method and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication|
|US5930156||8 Abr 1998||27 Jul 1999||I2 Technologies, Inc.||Extensible model network representation system for process planning|
|US5930764||23 Ago 1996||27 Jul 1999||Citibank, N.A.||Sales and marketing support system using a customer information database|
|US5953710||9 Oct 1996||14 Sep 1999||Fleming; Stephen S.||Children's credit or debit card system|
|US5970490||4 Nov 1997||19 Oct 1999||Xerox Corporation||Integration platform for heterogeneous databases|
|US5983194||25 Feb 1997||9 Nov 1999||I2 Technologies, Inc.||Planning coordination systems for coordinating separate factory planning systems and a method of operation|
|US6032136||17 Nov 1998||29 Feb 2000||First Usa Bank, N.A.||Customer activated multi-value (CAM) card|
|US6053947||31 May 1997||25 Abr 2000||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Simulation model using object-oriented programming|
|US6167380||18 Feb 1997||26 Dic 2000||I2 Technologies, Inc.||System and method for allocating manufactured products to sellers|
|US6178418||28 Jul 1998||23 Ene 2001||Noetix Corporation||Distributed data warehouse query and resource management system|
|US6182053||26 Mar 1996||30 Ene 2001||Recovery Sales Corporation||Method and apparatus for managing inventory|
|US6216130||21 Abr 1999||10 Abr 2001||Ingeo Acquisitions, Inc.||Geographic-based information technology management system|
|US6226649||3 Sep 1999||1 May 2001||Oracle Corporation||Apparatus and method for transparent access of foreign databases in a heterogeneous database system|
|US6233566||18 Mar 1999||15 May 2001||Ultraprise Corporation||System, method and computer program product for online financial products trading|
|US6236997||23 Jun 1997||22 May 2001||Oracle Corporation||Apparatus and method for accessing foreign databases in a heterogeneous database system|
|US6275812||8 Dic 1998||14 Ago 2001||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Intelligent system for dynamic resource management|
|US6336124||7 Jul 1999||1 Ene 2002||Bcl Computers, Inc.||Conversion data representing a document to other formats for manipulation and display|
|US6341289||6 May 1999||22 Ene 2002||International Business Machines Corporation||Object identity and partitioning for user defined extents|
|US6343275||16 Jul 1999||29 Ene 2002||Charles Wong||Integrated business-to-business web commerce and business automation system|
|US6377952||27 Oct 1998||23 Abr 2002||Hitachi, Ltd.||File format conversion method, and file system, information processing system, electronic commerce system using the method|
|US6385620||16 Ago 1999||7 May 2002||Psisearch,Llc||System and method for the management of candidate recruiting information|
|US6434567||4 Jun 1999||13 Ago 2002||Carlos De La Huerga||Method for specifying enterprise-wide database address formats|
|US6463430||10 Jul 2000||8 Oct 2002||Mohomine, Inc.||Devices and methods for generating and managing a database|
|US6556950||30 Sep 1999||29 Abr 2003||Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.||Diagnostic method and apparatus for use with enterprise control|
|US6569207||5 Oct 1998||27 May 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Converting schemas to component models|
|US6591260 *||28 Ene 2000||8 Jul 2003||Commerce One Operations, Inc.||Method of retrieving schemas for interpreting documents in an electronic commerce system|
|US6631382||31 Jul 2000||7 Oct 2003||Timeline, Inc.||Data retrieval method and apparatus with multiple source capability|
|US6668253||30 Ago 2000||23 Dic 2003||Reynolds & Reynolds Holdings, Inc.||Enterprise information management system and methods|
|US6681223||27 Jul 2000||20 Ene 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||System and method of performing profile matching with a structured document|
|US6738975||5 Oct 1999||18 May 2004||Software Ag, Inc.||Extensible distributed enterprise application integration system|
|US6754679||30 Mar 2001||22 Jun 2004||Hitachi, Ltd.||Computer system with a plurality of database management systems|
|US6778651||13 Feb 1998||17 Ago 2004||Southwestern Bell Telephone Company||Apparatus and method for facilitating service management of communications services in a communications network|
|US6792431||7 May 2001||14 Sep 2004||Anadarko Petroleum Corporation||Method, system, and product for data integration through a dynamic common model|
|US6826542 *||22 Nov 2000||30 Nov 2004||Ipayables, Inc.||System and method for collecting, enhancing and distributing invoices electronically via the internet|
|US6826568||20 Dic 2001||30 Nov 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Methods and system for model matching|
|US6828963||6 Sep 2000||7 Dic 2004||Proficiency Ltd.||Pattern matching for data exchange between computer aided design systems|
|US6883004 *||29 Nov 2001||19 Abr 2005||Bottomline Technologies (De), Inc.||Automated invoice receipt and management system|
|US6889260||10 Jun 1999||3 May 2005||Ec Enabler, Ltd||Method and system for transferring information|
|US6898783||3 Ago 2000||24 May 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Object oriented based methodology for modeling business functionality for enabling implementation in a web based environment|
|US6912719||4 May 2001||28 Jun 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Type descriptor metamodel|
|US6944514||6 Oct 2000||13 Sep 2005||Hewlett-Packard Company||Innovation information management model|
|US6947947||4 Mar 2002||20 Sep 2005||Universal Business Matrix Llc||Method for adding metadata to data|
|US6961760||17 Jul 2001||1 Nov 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Transforming data automatically between communications parties in a computing network|
|US6996776||16 May 2000||7 Feb 2006||International Business Machines Corporation||Method and system for SGML-to-HTML migration to XML-based system|
|US7013485||5 Mar 2001||14 Mar 2006||I2 Technologies U.S., Inc.||Computer security system|
|US7043687 *||21 Dic 2001||9 May 2006||G. E. Information Services, Inc.||Document/message management|
|US7062540||5 Ene 2001||13 Jun 2006||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||System and method for remotely monitoring and managing applications across multiple domains|
|US7065499||7 Sep 2001||20 Jun 2006||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Intelligent order promising|
|US7085729||15 Feb 2000||1 Ago 2006||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||System and method for allocating manufactured products to sellers|
|US7093200||6 Jul 2001||15 Ago 2006||Zvi Schreiber||Instance browser for ontology|
|US7099350 *||22 Jun 2001||29 Ago 2006||Atitania, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for converting data between two dissimilar systems|
|US7111010||24 Sep 2001||19 Sep 2006||Hon Hai Precision Industry, Ltd.||Method and system for managing event attributes|
|US7111077||22 Dic 2000||19 Sep 2006||Unisys Corporation||Method and apparatus for passing service requests and data from web based workstations directly to online transaction processing (OLTP) server systems|
|US7124112||22 Sep 2000||17 Oct 2006||Accenture Llp||Providing evaluation and processing of line items|
|US7133882||5 Ago 2002||7 Nov 2006||Demandtec, Inc.||Method and apparatus for creating and using a master catalog|
|US7139766||16 Dic 2002||21 Nov 2006||Business Objects, S.A.||Universal drill-down system for coordinated presentation of items in different databases|
|US7143100||12 Jun 2002||28 Nov 2006||Mci, Llc||Method, system and program product for viewing and manipulating graphical objects representing hierarchically arranged elements of a modeled environment|
|US7162540||15 May 2001||9 Ene 2007||Catchfire Systems, Inc.||Method and system for prioritizing network services|
|US7257594||6 Abr 2004||14 Ago 2007||Petris Technology Corporation||Method, system, and product for data integration through a dynamic common model|
|US7257820||9 Abr 2002||14 Ago 2007||Siebel Systems, Inc.||Method and system for using integration objects with enterprise business applications|
|US7287041||24 Mar 2004||23 Oct 2007||Siebel Systems, Inc.||Data modeling using custom data types|
|US7337192||31 Ago 2005||26 Feb 2008||David Stark||Data exchange tool|
|US7349861||28 Ago 2001||25 Mar 2008||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Value chain management|
|US7370009||23 Abr 2001||6 May 2008||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Extreme capacity management in an electronic marketplace environment|
|US7412404||19 Oct 2001||12 Ago 2008||I2 Technologies Us, Inc.||Generating, updating, and managing multi-taxonomy environments|
|US7680818||18 Dic 2002||16 Mar 2010||Oracle International Corporation||Analyzing the dependencies between objects in a system|
|US20010011245||11 Jun 1998||2 Ago 2001||Eric M. Duhon||On-line consumer credit data reporting system|
|US20010051907||4 Abr 2001||13 Dic 2001||Srihari Kumar||Interactive financial portfolio tracking interface|
|US20020007343||31 Mar 1997||17 Ene 2002||Fujitsu Limitedof Kawasaki, Japan||Network transaction system with authentication based on existing bank account|
|US20020019765||24 Abr 2001||14 Feb 2002||Robert Mann||Performance measurement and management|
|US20020023004||22 Jun 2001||21 Feb 2002||Richard Hollander||Online store management system|
|US20020035431||17 Oct 2001||21 Mar 2002||Todd Ell||System and method for creating application maps for site-specific farming|
|US20020035488||3 Abr 2001||21 Mar 2002||Anthony Aquila||System and method of administering, tracking and managing of claims processing|
|US20020040313||5 Sep 2001||4 Abr 2002||Hunter David Scott||System and method of real time deployment|
|US20020040339||2 Oct 2001||4 Abr 2002||Dhar Kuldeep K.||Automated loan processing system and method|
|US20020085020||14 Sep 2001||4 Jul 2002||Carroll Thomas J.||XML-based graphical user interface application development toolkit|
|US20020095456||13 Jul 2001||18 Jul 2002||Li Wensheng||System and computer program for managing information on individuals|
|US20020116234||31 Ago 2001||22 Ago 2002||Mikio Nagasawa||Method for providing information service and for managing information processing resources|
|US20020123983||19 Oct 2001||5 Sep 2002||Riley Karen E.||Method for implementing service desk capability|
|US20020133510||13 Mar 2002||19 Sep 2002||International Business Machines Corp.||Exporting and importing of data in object-relational databases|
|US20020138532||4 Feb 2002||26 Sep 2002||3G.Com, Inc.||Simplified circuit for correlating binary and non-binary sequences|
|US20020169863||8 May 2001||14 Nov 2002||Robert Beckwith||Multi-client to multi-server simulation environment control system (JULEP)|
|US20020169867||4 Ene 1999||14 Nov 2002||Joe Mann||Remote system administration and seamless service integration of a data communication network management system|
|US20020174417||30 Mar 2001||21 Nov 2002||Michael Sijacic||Defining and creating custom data fields within process management software|
|US20020178077||25 May 2001||28 Nov 2002||Katz Steven Bruce||Method for automatically invoking a software module in response to an internal or external event affecting the procurement of an item|
|US20020184085||31 May 2001||5 Dic 2002||Lindia Stephen A.||Employee performance monitoring system|
|US20020184148||8 May 2002||5 Dic 2002||David Kahn||System for web-based payroll and benefits administration|
|US20020188513||19 Dic 2001||12 Dic 2002||World Chain, Inc.||Reporting in a supply chain|
|US20020188538||29 Mar 2002||12 Dic 2002||Robertson James A.||Method and system for implementing a databus in a global ecosystem of interrelated services|
|US20030014440||13 Nov 2001||16 Ene 2003||Jurgen Bussert||Provision of project and/or project planning data of an automation project in a format which is defined by a standardized meta language, in particular XML|
|US20030018502||24 May 2001||23 Ene 2003||John Rodriguez||Order scheduling system and methodology|
|US20030023580||3 Abr 2001||30 Ene 2003||Braud Kristopher P.||Method and system for assimilating data from ancillary preumbra systems onto an enterprise system|
|US20030033437||9 Abr 2002||13 Feb 2003||Fischer Jeffrey Michael||Method and system for using integration objects with enterprise business applications|
|US20030071852||4 Jun 2002||17 Abr 2003||Stimac Damir Joseph||System and method for screening of job applicants|
|US20030097642||24 Oct 2002||22 May 2003||Shuko Arai||Parts design change supporting system, program, and recording medium|
|US20030110104||21 Oct 2002||12 Jun 2003||Isuppli Corp.||Enhanced vendor managed inventory system and process|
|US20030131018||9 Ene 2002||10 Jul 2003||International Business Machines Corporation||Common business data management|
|US20030163597||25 May 2001||28 Ago 2003||Hellman Ziv Zalman||Method and system for collaborative ontology modeling|
|US20030163603||26 Nov 2002||28 Ago 2003||Chris Fry||System and method for XML data binding|
|US20030229529||23 Feb 2001||11 Dic 2003||Yet Mui||Method for enterprise workforce planning|
|US20040002982||27 Jun 2002||1 Ene 2004||Ersek Richard A.||Dynamic metabase store|
|US20040015515||18 Jul 2002||22 Ene 2004||International Business Machines Corporation||Two meta-level modeling approach for mapping typed data|
|US20040034661||6 Feb 2003||19 Feb 2004||Lydia Barron||Customer information management system and method|
|US20040039576||13 Jun 2002||26 Feb 2004||Zhigang He||Sales data exchange system and method|
|US20040093351||30 Dic 2002||13 May 2004||Chung-I Lee||System and method for controlling task assignment and work schedules|
|US20040122826||20 Dic 2002||24 Jun 2004||Kevin Mackie||Data model and applications|
|US20040128188||30 Dic 2002||1 Jul 2004||Brian Leither||System and method for managing employee accountability and performance|
|US20040162773||26 Sep 2001||19 Ago 2004||Del Rey Bernard M.||System and method for aggregate portfolio client support|
|US20040199536||31 Dic 2003||7 Oct 2004||Barnes Leon Maria Theresa||Product common object|
|US20040215503||17 Jun 2002||28 Oct 2004||Allpress Keith Neville||Performance management system|
|US20040249854||24 Mar 2004||9 Dic 2004||Barnes-Leon Maria Theresa||Common common object|
|US20050021383||25 Jul 2003||27 Ene 2005||Fliess Kevin V.||Dynamic role generator|
|US20050021391||23 Dic 2003||27 Ene 2005||Via Technologies, Inc.||Employee performance reviewing method and system|
|US20050091249||29 Abr 2004||28 Abr 2005||International Business Machines Corporation||Single file serialization for physical and logical meta-model information|
|US20050160361||26 Jul 2004||21 Jul 2005||Alan Young||System and method for transforming business process policy data|
|US20050197880||14 Abr 2005||8 Sep 2005||Walsh John G.||Method for visually programming instruction set for process|
|US20060271446||26 May 2006||30 Nov 2006||Siebel Systems, Inc.||Product common object|
|US20070033531||4 Ago 2005||8 Feb 2007||Christopher Marsh||Method and apparatus for context-specific content delivery|
|US20070203710||29 Mar 2002||30 Ago 2007||Juergen Habichler||Managing future career paths|
|US20070208577||31 Dic 2003||6 Sep 2007||Leon Maria T B||Position common object|
|US20070208878||24 Mar 2004||6 Sep 2007||Barnes-Leon Maria T||Service request common object|
|US20070214020||18 Mar 2003||13 Sep 2007||Balaji Srinivasan||Modeling of insurance product data|
|US20070214063||28 Oct 2003||13 Sep 2007||Paramjit Kahlon||Inventory balance common object|
|US20070214064||28 Oct 2003||13 Sep 2007||Paramjit Kahlon||Inventory location common object|
|US20070214065||28 Oct 2003||13 Sep 2007||Paramjit Kahlon||Inventory transaction common object|
|US20070225949||25 Mar 2003||27 Sep 2007||Ramaswamy Sundararajan||Modeling of forecasting and production planning data|
|US20070226037||30 Dic 2003||27 Sep 2007||Shailendra Garg||Modeling of opportunity data|
|US20070226049||21 May 2004||27 Sep 2007||Caroline Muralitharan||Modeling of employee performance result data|
|US20070226093||8 May 2003||27 Sep 2007||Chan Cynthia M||Financial services data model|
|US20070250408||24 Mar 2003||25 Oct 2007||Leon Maria T B||Data model for business relationships|
|US20070265944||16 Oct 2003||15 Nov 2007||Catahan Nardo B Jr||Invoice data object for a common data object format|
|JP2001256308A||Título no disponible|
|WO2001088759A1||11 May 2001||22 Nov 2001||Don Brown||Electronic product design system|
|WO2003003641A2||31 May 2002||9 Ene 2003||Melia Technologies, Ltd.||Content management and transformation system for digital content|
|1||"Cross Access Introduces SERIESfour; Offers Native, Fast, Scalable Legacy Data Connectivity for Data Marts, ERP Applications," PR Newswire; New York; Jan. 18, 1999; pp. 1-3. Downloaded from http://proquest.umit.com.|
|2||"Extract simplifies file conversion" Software Markets, Dec. 2, 1991. Retrieved via Dialog on Aug. 16, 2010.|
|3||"Fortis Investments Implements Unified Employee Management System Across 12 Countries" (Business Wire, Jul. 2004).|
|4||Anonymous; "HR-XML Consortium Sponsors Panel Discussion/Demonstrates Draft Protocol at IHRIM Conference and Expo;" Business Wire; Jun. 28, 2000; 4 pages.|
|5||Anonymous; CambridgeDocs Releases xDoc SML Converter; Information Today; Mar. 1, 2001; vol. 20, Issue 3; p. 49.|
|6||Cover Pages "Siebel Announces Success with Universal Application Network (UAN)" Apr. 21, 2004 downloaded from xml.coverpages.org May 6, 2010.|
|7||Cover Pages "Siebel's Universal Application Network" Apr. 8, 2002 downloaded from xml.coverpages.org May 6, 2010.|
|8||Eric Gropp "Transforming XML Schemas" Jan. 15, 2003, downloaded from xml.com May 6, 2010.|
|9||Hardwick, Martin, David L. Spooner, Rom Rando, and K.C. Morris, "Sharing Manufacturing Information in Virtual Enterprises;" Communication of the ACM; vol. 39, No. 2; Feb. 1996; pp. 46-54. Downloaded from http://delivery.acm.org.|
|10||Kappelhoff, Ralph, "Integration of ERP to the Final Control Elements;" ISA Transactions; 1998; vol. 36, No. 4; pp. 229-238. Downloaded from http://www.sciencedirect.com.|
|11||Michael Kay, Editor "XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0 W3C Working Draft May 2, 2003" downloaded from http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xslt20-20030502/ May 6, 2010.|
|12||Nori, Anil K. et al., "Bringing Objects to the Mainstream," Compcon Proceedings, IEEE San Jose, California, Feb. 23-26, 1997, pp. 136-142.|
|13||*||NPL-XML-Schema-CE.pdf, A tutorial published bythe SML governing body of w3.org regarding the use of XML Schemas and Complex Data Elements. Downloaded on Jun. 10, 2009 from http://www.w3schools.com/Schema/schema-intro.asp? and http://www.w3schools.com/Schema/schema-complex.asp? and http://www.w3.schools.com/Schema/schema-complex-empty.asp? , 7 page.|
|14||*||NPL—XML—Schema—CE.pdf, A tutorial published bythe SML governing body of w3.org regarding the use of XML Schemas and Complex Data Elements. Downloaded on Jun. 10, 2009 from http://www.w3schools.com/Schema/schema—intro.asp? and http://www.w3schools.com/Schema/schema—complex.asp? and http://www.w3.schools.com/Schema/schema—complex—empty.asp? , 7 page.|
|15||Ohlhorst, Frank J., "ScanSoft's OmniForm Fills Bill for Forms-Driven Customers," CRN; Jericho: Feb. 17, 2003, Issue 1033; p. 51 (1 page).|
|16||PTC: Siebel Systems and PTC create strategic alliance to leverage entriched ifnormation across product development, sales and service; Combination of Siebel eBusiness Applications and PTC Collaborative Product Development solutions to deliver competitive advantage, M2 Presswire, Conventry: Jan. 24, 2002, 3 pages. (retrieved from ProQuest.com).|
|17||Routledge et al., UML and XML Schema, 2002, pp. 1-10.|
|18||Seminerio, Maria, "Job Agencies Will Hire HR-XML-Protocol Promises a Lingua Franca for Resumes;" eWeek; Jan. 1, 2001; vol., 18, Issue 1; p. 45.|
|19||Seminerio, Maria, "Job Agencies Will Hire HR-XML—Protocol Promises a Lingua Franca for Resumes;" eWeek; Jan. 1, 2001; vol., 18, Issue 1; p. 45.|
|20||Sonic Software Corporation, Power Schemas With Stylus Studio(TM) Jan. 2004.|
|21||Sonic Software Corporation, Power Schemas With Stylus Studio™ Jan. 2004.|
|22||Walter J. Savitch, Java an Introduction to Computer Science & Programming, 2000, p. 1.|
|23||Walter J. Savitch, Java an Introduction to Computer Science & Programming, 2000, p. 478.|
|24||Walter J. Savitch, Java an Introduction to Computer Science & Programming, 2000, pp. 458-467.|
|25||Wilson, J.R., "Aerospace Looks for Lift from e-commerce," Intervia, Geneva, Jul./Aug. 2001; vol. 56, Issue 655, 6 pages (retrieved from ProQuest.com).|
|26||*||XML/EDI Group. "Guidlines for using XML for Electronic Data Interchange." Presented at XML One-San Jose Sep./Oct. 2001. Downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20040413182700/http://www.xmledi-group.org/.|
|27||*||XML/EDI Group. "Guidlines for using XML for Electronic Data Interchange." Presented at XML One—San Jose Sep./Oct. 2001. Downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20040413182700/http://www.xmledi-group.org/.|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US8965837 *||22 Nov 2011||24 Feb 2015||Accenture Global Services Limited||Data collection framework|
|US20120130941 *||22 Nov 2011||24 May 2012||Accenture Global Services Limited||Data Collection Framework|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||705/30, 705/34|
|Clasificación internacional||G07F19/00, H04M15/00|
|15 Mar 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: SIEBEL SYSTEMS INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DARSHAN, KUMAR;CATAHAN, JR., NARDO B.;ROPER, JOSHUA;REEL/FRAME:015071/0581;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040310 TO 20040312
Owner name: SIEBEL SYSTEMS INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DARSHAN, KUMAR;CATAHAN, JR., NARDO B.;ROPER, JOSHUA;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040310 TO 20040312;REEL/FRAME:015071/0581
|13 Ago 2013||CC||Certificate of correction|
|5 Feb 2016||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:037702/0505
Effective date: 20150522
|25 Ago 2016||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4