Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUS9039681 B2
Tipo de publicaciónConcesión
Número de solicitudUS 12/173,963
Fecha de publicación26 May 2015
Fecha de presentación16 Jul 2008
Fecha de prioridad16 Ene 2002
También publicado comoEP1471830A1, EP1471830A4, US6852107, US9786203, US20030135203, US20090099576, US20130023898, US20150248847, WO2003061482A1
Número de publicación12173963, 173963, US 9039681 B2, US 9039681B2, US-B2-9039681, US9039681 B2, US9039681B2
InventoresYulun Wang, Modjtaba Ghodoussi, Darrin Uecker, James Wright, Amante Mangaser, Ranjan Mukherjee
Cesionario originalIntuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Minimally invasive surgical training using robotics and telecollaboration
US 9039681 B2
Resumen
A medical system that allows a mentor to teach a pupil how to use a robotically controlled medical instrument. The system may include a first handle that can be controlled by a mentor to move the medical instrument. The system may further have a second handle that can be moved by a pupil to control the same instrument. Deviations between movement of the handles by the mentor and the pupil can be provided as force feedback to the pupil and mentor handles. The force feedback pushes the pupil's hand to correspond with the mentor's handle movement. The force feedback will also push the mentor's hand to provide information to the mentor on pupil's movements. The mentor is thus able to guide the pupil's hands through force feedback of the pupil handles to teach the pupil how to use the system.
Imágenes(14)
Previous page
Next page
Reclamaciones(8)
What is claimed is:
1. A medical robotic system, comprising:
a first medical device;
a first input device operable by a first operator to move the first input device a first input distance;
a second input device operable by a second operator to move the second input device a second input distance; and,
an instrument controller programmed to provide shared control of the first medical device by the first operator and second operator by commanding movement of the first medical device according to a sum of first and second products wherein the first product is of the first input distance and a first factor that is proportional to the number one minus a user settable parameter value and the second product is of the second input distance and a second factor that is proportional to the user settable parameter value; and generate and provide a first visual indication so as to be viewable by the first operator wherein the first visual indication indicates a difference between the first and second input distances.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first visual indication is provided on a first bar graph viewable by the first operator.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the instrument controller is programmed to generate and provide a second visual indication so as to be viewable by the second operator, wherein the second visual indication indicates the difference between the first and second input distances.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the second visual indication is provided on a second bar graph viewable by the second operator.
5. A medical robotic system, comprising:
a first medical device;
first input means operable by a first operator to move the first input means a first input distance;
second input means operable by a second operator to move the second input means a second input distance; and
controller means for providing shared control of the first medical device by the first operator and the second operator by commanding movement of the first medical device according to a sum of first and second products wherein the first product is of the first input distance and a first factor that is proportional to the number one minus a user settable parameter value and the second product is of the second input distance and a second factor that is proportional to the user settable parameter value; and generating and providing a first visual indication so as to be viewed by the first operator wherein the first visual indication indicates a difference between the first and second input distances.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the first visual indication is provided on a first bar graph viewable by the first operator.
7. The system of claim 5, wherein the controller means generates and provides a second visual indication so as to be viewable by the second operator, wherein the second visual indication indicates the difference between the first and second input distances.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the second visual indication is provided on a second bar graph viewable by the second operator.
Descripción
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/948,853, filed Sep. 23, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,413,565, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/246,236, filed Sep. 17, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,951,535, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a medical robotic system.

Historically, surgery has been performed by making large incisions in a patient to provide access to the surgical site. There has been developed instruments that allow a surgeon to perform a procedure through small incisions in the patient. The instruments include an endoscope which has a camera that allows the surgeon to view the internal organs of the patient through a small incision. Such procedures are less traumatic to the patient and have shorter recovery times than conventional surgical procedures.

Such instruments have even been used to perform minimally invasive heart surgery. Blockage of a coronary artery may deprive the heart of blood and oxygen required to sustain life. The blockage may be removed with medication or by an angioplasty. For severe blockage “a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is performed to bypass the blocked area of the artery. CABG procedures are typically performed by splitting the sternum and pulling open the chest cavity to provide access to the heart. An incision is made in the artery adjacent to the blocked area. The internal mammary artery is then severed and attached to the artery at the point of incision. The internal mammary artery bypasses the blocked area of the artery to again provide a full flow of blood to the heart. Splitting the sternum and opening the chest cavity can create a tremendous trauma to the patient. Additionally, the cracked sternum prolongs the recovery period of the patient.

Computer Motion of Goleta, Calif. provides a system under the trademark ZEUS that allows a surgeon to perform minimally invasive surgery, including CABG procedures. The procedure is performed with instruments that are inserted through small incisions in the patient's chest. The instruments are controlled by robotic arms. Movement of the robotic arms and actuation of instrument end effectors are controlled by the surgeon through a pair of handles and a foot pedal that are coupled to an electronic controller. Alternatively, the surgeon can control the movement of an endoscope used to view the internal organs of the patient through voice commands.

The handles and a screen are typically integrated into a console that is operated by the surgeon to control the various robotic arms and medical instruments of a ZEUS system. Utilizing a robotic system to perform surgery requires a certain amount of training. It would be desirable to provide a system that would allow a second surgeon to assist another surgeon in controlling a robotic medical system. The second surgeon could both teach and assist a surgeon learning to perform a medical procedure with a ZEUS system. This would greatly reduce the time required to learn the operation of a robotically assisted medical system.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,217,003 issued to Wilk discloses a surgical system which allows a surgeon to remotely operate robotically controlled medical instruments through a telecommunication link. The Wilk system only allows for one surgeon to operate the robotic arms at a given time. Wilk does not disclose or contemplate a system which allows two different surgeons to operate the same set of robotic arms.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,560 issued to Ichikawa et al. and assigned to Olympus Optical Co. Ltd. discloses a system that allows an operator to control a plurality of different medical devices through a single interface. The Olympus patent does not disclose a system which allows multiple surgeons to simultaneously perform a surgical procedure.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A medical system that includes a first input device that can move a first input distance to move a first medical device and a second input device that can move a second input distance to move said first medical device. The system may further have a feedback device that can provide an indication of a difference between the first and second input distances.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a medical robotic system;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a control unit;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a handle assembly of the control unit;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a handle/wrist subassembly;

FIG. 5 is a sectional perspective view of the handle/wrist subassembly;

FIG. 6 is an exploded side view of an instrument of the robotic system;

FIG. 7 is an illustration of a network system;

FIG. 8 is an illustration of a “surgeon” side of the network system;

FIG. 9 is an illustration of a “patient” side of the network system;

FIG. 10 is a schematic showing various fields of a packet transmitted across a communication network;

FIG. 11 is an illustration showing an alternate embodiment of the network system;

FIG. 12 is a schematic of a control system;

FIG. 13 is an illustration depicting collaboration between a mentor and pupil controlling a single degree of freedom instrument.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers, FIG. 1 shows a system 10 that can perform minimally invasive surgery. In one embodiment, the system 10 is used to perform a minimally invasive coronary artery bypass graft (MI-CABG) and other anastomostic procedures. Although a MI-CABG procedure is shown and described, it is to be understood that the system may be used for other surgical procedures. For example, the system can be used to suture any pair of vessels. The system 10 can be used to perform a procedure on a patient 12 that is typically lying on an operating table 14. Mounted to the operating table 14 is a first articulate arm 16, a second articulate arm 18, a third articulate arm 20, a fourth articulate arm 22 and a fifth articulate arm 24 which may also be referred to as medical devices. The articulate arms 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 are preferably mounted to the table 14 so that the arms are at a same reference plane as the patient. Although five articulate arms are shown and described, it is to be understood that the system may have any number of arms.

The first 16, second 18, third 20 and fourth 22 articulate arms may each have a surgical instrument 26, 28, 30 and 32, respectively, coupled to robotic arms 34, 36, 38 and 40, respectively. The fifth articulate arm 24 includes a robotic arm 42 that holds and moves an endoscope 44. The instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32, and endoscope 44 are inserted through incisions cut into the skin of the patient 12. The endoscope 44 has a camera 46 that is coupled to video consoles 48 which display images of the internal organs of the patient.

The system 10 may include a mentor control unit (MCU) 50 and a pupil control unit (PCU) 52. Each control unit 50 and 52 has a controller 54 and a pair of handle assemblies 56 that allow a mentor surgeon at the MCU 50 to teach and assist a pupil surgeon at the PCU 52. The PCU 52 is typically in the operating room. The MCU 50 may be at a remote location. Each controller. 54 contains electrical circuits, such as a processor(s), memory, I/O interface, drivers, etc. that control the movement and actuation of robotic arms 34, 36, 38, 40 and 42 and instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32. The surgeon can view a different portion of the patient by providing a voice command(s) that moves the arm 42 holding the endoscope 44. The robotic arm(s) may be devices that are sold by the assignee of the present invention, Computer Motion, Inc. of Goleta, Calif., under the trademark AESOP. The system is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,657,429 issued to Wang et al. and assigned to Computer Motion, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Any two instruments 26, 28, 30 or 32 can be controlled by the handle assemblies 56 of each control unit 50 and 52. For example, instruments 26 and 28 can be controlled by the handle assemblies 56 of the MCU 50 and instruments 30 and 32 can be controlled by the handle assemblies of the PCU 52. Alternatively, a single instrument may be controlled by handle assemblies 56 of both the MCU 50 and PCU 52.

The handle assemblies 56 and articulate arms 16, 18, 20 and 22 have a master-slave relationship so that movement of the handles 56 produces a corresponding movement of the surgical instruments 26, 28, 30 and/or 32. The controller 54 receives input signals from the handle assemblies 56 of each control unit 50 and 52, computes a corresponding movement of the surgical instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32, and provides output signals to move the robotic arms 34, 36, 38 and 40 and instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32. The entire system may be similar to a product marketed by Computer Motion under the trademark ZEUS. The operation of the system is also described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,458 issued to Wang et al. and assigned to Computer Motion, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

FIG. 2 shows a control unit 50 or 52. The handle assemblies 56 are located adjacent to a surgeon's chair 58. The handle assemblies 56 are coupled to the controller 54. The controller 54 is coupled to the robotic arms 34, 36, 38, 40 and 42 and medical instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32. The controller 54 may include one or more microprocessors, memory devices, drivers, etc. that convert input information from the handle assemblies 56 into output control signals which move the robotic arms 34, 36, 38 and 40 and/or actuate the medical instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32.

The surgeon's chair 58 and handle assemblies 56 may be in front of the video console 48. The video console 48 may be linked to the endoscope 44 shown in FIG. 1 to provide video images of the patient. The control unit 50 or 52 may also include a computer screen 60 coupled to the controller 54. The screen 60 may display graphical user interfaces (GUIs) that allow the surgeon to control various functions and parameters of the system 10. The control unit 50 or 52 may further have a microphone (not shown) to accept voice commands. One or more voice commands may be used to move the endoscope. Other voice commands can be used to vary parameters of the system. The voice control and parameter changing system may be the same or similar to a product sold by Computer Motion under the trademark HERMES.

Each handle assembly 56 may include a handle/wrist assembly 62. The handle/wrist assembly 62 has a handle 64 that is coupled to a wrist 66. The wrist 66 is connected to a forearm linkage 68 that slides along a slide bar 70. The slide bar 70 is pivotally connected to an elbow joint 72. The elbow joint 72 is pivotally connected to a shoulder joint 74 that is attached to the controller 54.

FIG. 3 shows a handle assembly 56 superimposed with a medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32. The instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 may include an end effector 75 attached to an instrument shaft 77. The shaft 77 extends through a cannula 78 inserted through an incision of a patient 12. The incision defines a pivot point P for the medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32.

The shoulder joint 74 includes a sensor (not shown) that provides feedback on the movement of the handle 64 about a shoulder axis 76. The sensor may be a mechanical encoder, optical encoder, etc. or other device which provides an output signal that corresponds to a position of the handle 64 about the shoulder axis 76. The output of the shoulder sensor is provided to the controller 54. The controller 54 performs a series of computations to determine a corresponding movement of the medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32. The computations may include one or more transformation and kinematic equations. The controller 54 provides output signals to the corresponding robotic arm to move the instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 as indicated by the arrow 79. The transformation and kinematic equations may be similar to the equations used in the AESOP and ZEUS products with the signs (+/−) reversed to account for the shoulder axis 76 being behind the surgeon.

The shoulder joint 74 may have a force actuator (not shown) that can provide a resistive force to movement of the handle 64 about the axis 76. The force actuator may be an active device or a passive device such as a friction clutch.

The elbow joint 72 includes a sensor (not shown) that provides positional feedback on the position of the assembly about an elbow axis 80. The controller 54 utilizes the positional feedback to drive the robotic arm and move the instrument in the direction indicated by the arrow 82.

The elbow joint 72 may also have a force actuator (not shown) that can provide resistance to movement of the handle about the axis 80. When transforming movement of the handle 64 to movement of the instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 the controller 54 may equate the elbow axis 80 to the instrument pivot point P. Equating the elbow axis 80 with the pivot point P provides a kinematic relationship such that the surgeon “feels” like they are actually moving the instrument. Additionally, the length of the forearm linkage and location of the handle are such that the surgeon is provided with the sensation that they are holding and moving the distal end of the instrument. These relationships also improve the ergonomics of the handle assembly and the ease of use of the robotic system as a whole.

The forearm linkage 68 and slide bar 70 create a translator 84 that allows linear movement of the linkage 68 along a translator axis 86. The translator 84 has a sensor (not shown) that provides feedback information that is used to drive the robotic arm and move the instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 in the direction indicated by the arrows 88. The translator 84 may also have a force actuator (not shown) that can provide resistance to movement along axis 86.

FIGS. 4 and 5 show the wrist/handle assembly 62. The wrist 66 includes a joint shaft 90 that is coupled to the forearm linkage (not shown) by a roll bearing 92. The roll bearing 92 allows the handle 64 to rotate about a roll axis 94. The wrist 66 may further include a sensor 96 that provides positional feedback to the controller 54. Movement of the handle 64 about the roll axis 94 may cause a corresponding rotation of the instrument end effector 75 in the direction indicated by the arrows 98 in FIG. 3. The wrist 66 may have a force actuator (not shown) that provides resistance to movement of the handle 64 about the roll axis 94.

The handle 64 includes a grasper 100 that is coupled to a handle housing 102. The housing 102 and grasper 100 are preferably shaped as an ellipsoid to allow the user to more easily grasp the handle 64 with their hand. The housing 102 may have a thumb groove 104 that receives the user's thumb. The grasper 100 may have a pair of grooves 106 and 108 to receive the index and middle fingers of the user, respectively.

The handle 64 may spin about wrist axis 110. The handle 64 may include a sensor 112 that provides positional feedback information to the controller 54 which is used to rotate the end effector 75 of the medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 as indicated by the arrows 114 in FIG. 3. The handle 64 may also have a force actuator (not shown) that may provide resistance to rotation about axis.

The grasper 100 can be depressed by the user. The grasper 100 is coupled to a sensor 116 which provides feedback information to the controller 54. The feedback information is used by the controller 54 to actuate the end effector 75 shown in FIG. 3. By way of example, depressing the grasper 100 may close the end effector 75. The grasper 100 may include a switch 118 that allows the user to lock the position of the grasper 100 and the end effector 75 of the corresponding medical instrument. The locking switch 118 may be coupled to a ratchet (not shown) that allows the grasper 100 and corresponding end effector 75 to be locked at one of a number of positions. The handle 64 may also have a force actuator (not shown) that provides resistance to movement of the grasper 100.

The handle 64 have a plurality of buttons 120, 122 and 124 that can be depressed by the user. By way of example, button 120 may be used to activate a cutting mode on a cauterizing end effector. Button 122 may be used to activate a coagulating medical instrument. The button 124 may be used to vary different functions of the system.

FIG. 6 shows one of the surgical instruments 26, 28, 30 or 32. The instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 may include the end effector 75 that is coupled to an actuator rod 126 located within the instrument shaft 77. The actuator rod 126 is coupled to a motor 130 by an adapter 132. The motor 130 actuates the end effector 75 by moving the actuator rod 126. The actuator rod 126 is coupled to a force sensor 134 that can sense the force being applied by the end effector 75. The force sensor 134 provides an analog output signal that is sent to a controller 54 shown in FIG. 1. Additionally, the instrument 26, 28, 30, 32 may allow movement along the arrows 114 and have a force sensor (not shown) to sense force in this direction. Each joint of the robotic arms 34, 36, 38 and 40 may also have force sensor that provide feedback to the controller 54.

The adapter 132 may be coupled to a gear assembly 136 located at the end of a robotic arm 34, 36, 38 or 40. The gear assembly 136 can rotate the adapter 132 and end effector 75. The actuator rod 126 and end effector 75 may be coupled to the force sensor 134 and motor 130 by a spring biased lever 138. The instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 may be the same or similar to an instrument described in the '458 patent.

FIG. 7 depicts the MCU 50 and PCU 52 coupled to the articulate arms 16, 18, 20, 22 and 28 by a network port 140 and a pair of interconnect devices 142 and 144. The network port 140 may be a computer that contains the necessary hardware and software to transmit and receive information through a communication link 146 in a communication network 148.

The control units 50 and 52 may provide output signals and commands that are incompatible with a computer. The interconnect devices 142 and 144 may provide an interface that conditions the signals for transmitting and receiving signals between the control units 50 and 52 and the network computer 140.

It is to be understood that the computer 140 and/or control units 50 and 52 may be constructed so that the system does not require the interconnect devices 142 and 144. Additionally, the control units 50 and 52 may be constructed so that the system does not require a separate networking computer 140. For example, the control units 50 and 52 may be constructed and/or configured to directly transmit information through the communication network 148.

The system 10 may include a second network port 150 that is coupled to a robot/device controller(s) 152 and the communication network 148. The device controller 152 controls the articulate arms 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24. The second network port 150 may be a computer that is coupled to the controller 152 by an interconnect device 154. Although an interconnect device 154 and network computer 150 are shown and described, it is to be understood that the controller 152 can be constructed and configured to eliminate the device 154 and/or computer 150.

The communication network 148 may be any type of communication system including but not limited to, the internet and other types of wide area networks (WANs), intranets, local area networks (LANs), public switched telephone networks (PSTN), integrated services digital networks (ISDN). It is preferable to establish a communication link through a fiber optic network to reduce latency in the system. Depending upon the type of communication link selected, by way of example, the information can be transmitted in accordance with the user datagram protocol/internet protocol (UDP/IP) or asynchronous transfer mode/ATM Adaptation Layer 1 (ATM/AAL1) network protocols. The computers 140 and 150 may operate in accordance with an operating system sold under the designation VxWorks by Wind River. By way of example, the computers 140 and 150 may be constructed and configured to operate with 100-base T Ethernet and/or 155 Mbps fiber ATM systems.

FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of a mentor control unit 50. The control unit 50 may be accompanied by a touchscreen computer 156 and an endoscope interface computer 158. The touchscreen computer 156 may be a device sold by Computer Motion under the trademark HERMES. The touchscreen 156 allows the surgeon to control and vary different functions and operations of the instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32. For example, the surgeon may vary the scale between movement of the handle assemblies 56 and movement of the instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32 through a graphical user interface (GUI) of the touchscreen 156. The touchscreen 156 may have another GUI that allows the surgeon to initiate an action such as closing the gripper of an instrument.

The endoscope computer 158 may allow the surgeon to control the movement of the robotic arm 42 and the endoscope 44 shown in FIG. 1. Alternatively, the surgeon can control the endoscope through a foot pedal (not shown). The endoscope computer 158 may be a device sold by Computer Motion under the trademark SOCRATES. The touchscreen 156 and endoscope computers 158 may be coupled to the network computer 140 by RS232 interfaces or other serial interfaces.

A ZEUS control unit 50 will transmit and receive information that is communicated as analog, digital or quadrature signals. The network computer 140 may have analog input/output (I/O) 160, digital I/O 162 and quadrature 164 interfaces that allow communication between the control unit 50 and the network 148. By way of example, the analog interface 160 may transceive data relating to handle position, tilt position, in/out position and foot pedal information (if used). The quadrature signals may relate to roll and pan position data. The digital I/O interface 162 may relate to cable wire sensing data, handle buttons, illuminators (LEDs) and audio feedback (buzzers).

The position data is preferably absolute position information. By using absolute position information the robotic arms can still be moved even when some information is not successfully transmitted across the network 148. If incremental position information is provided, an error in the transmission would create a gap in the data and possibly inaccurate arm movement. The network computer 140 may further have a screen and input device (e.g. keyboard) 166 that allows for a user to operate the computer 140.

FIG. 9 shows an embodiment of a patient side network and control computer. The controller 152 may include three separate controllers 168, 170 and 172. The controller 168 may receive input commands, perform kinematic computations based on the commands, and drive output signals to move the robotic arms 34, 36, 38 and 40 and accompanying instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32 to a desired position. The controller 170 may receive commands that are processed to both move and actuate the instruments. Controller 172 may receive input commands, perform kinematic computations based on the commands, and drive output signals to move the robotic arm 42 and accompanying endoscope 44.

Controllers 168 and 170 may be coupled to the network computer by digital I/O 176 and analog I/O 174 interfaces. The computer 150 may be coupled to the controller 172 by an RS232 interface or other serial type interfaces. Additionally, the computer 150 may be coupled to corresponding RS232 ports or other serial ports of the controllers 168 and 170. The RS232 ports or other serial ports of the controllers 168 and 170 may receive data such as movement scaling and end effector actuation.

The robotic arms and instruments contain sensors, encoders, etc. that provide feedback information including force and position data. Some or all of this feedback information may be transmitted over the network 148 to the surgeon side of the system. By way of example, the analog feedback information may include handle feedback, tilt feedback, in/out feedback and foot pedal feedback. Digital feedback may include cable sensing, buttons, illumination and auditory feedback. The computer 150 may be coupled to a screen and input device (e.g. keyboard) 178. Referring to FIG. 7, the computers 140 and 150 may packetize the information for transmission through the communication network 148. Each packet will contain two types of data, robotic data and other needed non-robotic data. Robotic data may include position information of the robots, including input commands to move the robots and position feedback from the robots. Other data may include functioning data such as instrument scaling and actuation.

Because the system transmits absolute position data the packets of robotic data can be received out of sequence. This may occur when using a UDP/IP protocol which uses a best efforts methodology. The computers 140 and 150 are constructed and configured to properly treat any “late” arriving packets with robotic data. For example, the computer 140 may sequentially transmit packets 1, 2 and 3. The computer 150 may receive the packets in the order of 1, 3 and 2. The computer 150 can disregard the second packet 2. Disregarding the packet instead of requesting a re-transmission of the data reduces the latency of the system. It is desirable to minimize latency to create a “real time” operation of the system.

It is preferable to have some information received in strict sequential order. Therefore the receiving computer will request a re-transmission of such data from the transmitting computer if the data is not errorlessly received. The data such as motion scaling and instrument actuation must be accurately transmitted and processed to insure that there is not an inadvertent command.

The computers 140 and 150 can multiplex the RS232 data from the various input sources. The computers 140 and 150 may have first-in first-out queues (FIFO) for transmitting information. Data transmitted between the computer 140 and the various components within the surgeon side of the system may be communicated through a protocol provided by Computer Motion under the name HERMES NETWORK PROTOCOL (HNP). Likewise, information may be transmitted between components on the patient side of the system in accordance with HNP.

In addition to the robotic and non-robotic data, the patient side of the system will transmit video data from the endoscope camera 46. To reduce latency in the system, the video data can be multiplexed with the robotic/other data onto the communication network. The video data may be compressed using conventional JPEG, etc., compression techniques for transmission to the surgeon side of the system.

Each packet may have the fields shown in FIG. 10. The SOURCE ID field includes identification information of the input device or medical device from where the data originates. The DESTINATION ID field includes identification information identifying the input device or medical device that is to receive the data. The OPCODE field defines the type of commands being transmitted.

The PRIORITY field defines the priority of the input device. The priority data may be utilized to determine which input device has control of the medical device. The PRIORITY field may contain data that allows relative shared control of a particular instrument. For example, the mentor may have 50% control and the pupil may have 50% control.

The SEQ # field provides a packet sequence number so that the receiving computer can determine whether the packet is out of sequence. The TX Rate field is the average rate at which packets are being transmitted. The RX Rate field is the average rate that packets are being received. The RS232 or serial ACK field includes an acknowledgement count for RS232 data. RS232 data is typically maintained within the queue of a computer until an acknowledgement is received from the receiving computer that the data has been received.

The RS232 POS field is a counter relating to transmitted RS232 data. The RS232 ID field is an identification for RS232 data. The RS232 MESS SZ field contains the size of the packet. The RS232 BUFFER field contains the content length of the packet. The DATA field contains data being transmitted and may contain separate subfields for robotic and RS232 data. CS is a checksum field used to detect errors in the transmission of the packet.

Either computer 140 or 150 can be used as an arbitrator between the input devices and the medical devices. For example, the computer 150 may receive data from both control units 50 and 52. The packets of information from each control units 50 and 52 may include priority data in the PRIORITY fields. The computer 150 will route the data to the relevant device (e.g. robot, instrument, etc.) in accordance with the priority data. For example, control unit 50 may have a higher priority than control unit 52. The computer will route data to control a robot from control unit 50 to the exclusion of data from control unit 52 so that the surgeon at 50 has control of the arm.

As an alternate embodiment, the computer 150 may be constructed and configured to provide priority according to the data in the SOURCE ID field. For example, the computer 150 may be programmed to always provide priority for data that has the source ID from control unit 50. The computer 150 may have a hierarchical tree that assigns priority for a number of different input devices.

Alternatively, the computer 140 may function as the arbitrator, screening the data before transmission across the network 148. The computer 140 may have a priority scheme that always awards priority to one of the control units 50 or 52. Additionally, or alternatively, one or more of the control units 50 and/or 52 may have a mechanical and/or software switch that can be actuated to give the console priority. The switch may function as an override feature to allow a surgeon to assume control of a procedure.

In operation, the system initially performs a start-up routine. The ZEUS system is typically configured to start-up with data from the consoles. The consoles may not be in communication during the start-up routine of the robotic arms, instruments, etc. therefore the system does not have the console data required for system boot. The computer 150 may automatically drive the missing console input data to default values. The default values allow the patient side of the system to complete the start-up routine. Likewise, the computer 140 may also drive missing incoming signals from the patient side of the system to default values to allow the control units 50 and/or 52 to boot-up. Driving missing signals to a default value may be part of a network local mode. The local mode allows one or more consoles to “hot plug” into the system without shutting the system down.

Additionally, if communication between the surgeon and patient sides of the system are interrupted during operation the computer 140 will again force the missing data to the last valid or default values as appropriate. The default values may be quiescent signal values to prevent unsafe operation of the system. The components on the patient side will be left at the last known value so that the instruments and arms do not move.

Once the start-up routines have been completed and the communication link has been established the surgeons can operate the consoles. The system is quite useful for medical procedures wherein one of the surgeons is a teacher and the other surgeon is a pupil. The arbitration function of the system allows the teacher to take control of robot movement and instrument actuation at anytime during the procedure. This allows the teacher to instruct the pupil on the procedure and/or the use of a medical robotic system.

Additionally, the system may allow one surgeon to control one medical device and another surgeon to control the other device. For example, one surgeon-may move the instruments 26, 28, 30 and 32 while the other surgeon moves the endoscope 44, or one surgeon may move one instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 while the other surgeon moves the other instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32. Alternatively, one surgeon may control one arm(s), the other surgeon can control the other arm(s), and both surgeons may jointly control another arm.

FIG. 11 shows an alternate embodiment, wherein one or more of the control units 50 and 52 has an alternate communication link 180. The alternate link may be a telecommunication network that allows the control unit 50 to be located at a remote location while control unit 52 is in relative close proximity to the robotic arms, etc. For example, control unit 50 may be connected to a public phone network, while control unit 52 is coupled to the controller 152 by a LAN. Such a system would allow telesurgery with the robotic arms, instruments, etc. The surgeon and patient sides of the system may be coupled to the link 180 by network computers 182 and 150.

FIG. 12 shows a schematic of a control system 190 to allow joint control of a single medical instrument with handles from two different control units 50 and 52. The control system 190 may include an instrument controller 192 coupled to a medical instrument 26, 28, 30 and 32. The instrument controller 192 minimizes the error between the desired position xdes of the medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32 and the actual position x of the instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32.

The instrument controller 192 is coupled to the position controllers 194 and 196 for the MCU 50 and PCU 52, respectively. The position controllers 194 and 196 are each connected to a corresponding handle controller 198 and 200, respectively, which is coupled to the handles 56 of each control unit. The handle controllers 198 and 200 provide output x1 and x2, respectively, that corresponds to the movement of the handles 56. The output is transformed to position output signals to drive the actuators of the medical instrument 26, 28, 30 or 32. The value of xdes can be computed from x.sub.1 and x.sub.2 and a proportional control variable.

The instrument controller 192 also computes force feedback information from the force sensors of the instrument. The force feedback information is relayed back to the handle controllers 198 and 200 and handles 56 to provide force feedback to the surgeon. The amount of force feedback to each set of handles may depend on the shared control of the mentor 50 and pupil 52 control units.

Referring to FIG. 13, the displacements of the mentor and pupil are represented by x1 and x2, respectively. The motion of the instrument is a convex combination of the motion of the mentor and pupil, namely,
x=(1−α)x 1 +αx 2  (1)

The springs in FIG. 13 are undeformed when x1=x2, irrespective of the value of α.

When x1≠x2, the deformation of the spring at the mentor end is
x−x 1=α(x 2 −x 1)  (2)

The mentor therefore feels the force
F 1 =Kα(x 2 −x 1)  (3)

Where K is the spring constant.

At the same time, the deformation of the spring at the pupil end is:
(x 2 −x)=(1−α)(x 2 −x 1)  (4)

The pupil therefore feels the force:
F 2 =K(1−α)(x 2 −x 1)  (5)

There are typically a set of equations to determine the movement x and force feedback F1 and F2 for each axis of each instrument. There may also be a set of equations for actuation of each end effector. For angular movement the distance is typically computed in degrees, radians or some other angular unit of measure.

When the mentor has complete control, α is set to 1 and the mentor handles provide no force feedback. The variable α can be set through the computer interfaces of the system 10. The force feedback to the pupil handles corresponds to the position information generated by the mentor handles and the position information generated by the pupil handles. Thus if the pupil handle movement deviates from the mentor handle movement, the system provides α force feedback to push the pupil into the desired hand movement. This is similar to teaching one to write with a pencil by grabbing their hand and moving the pencil. The system thus allows the mentor to guide the pupil through the motion of using the handles to move the medical instrument and perform a medical procedure. This can be a valuable instructional guide in learning how to use the system and perform robotically assisted minimally invasive procedures.

The proportional variable α allows the mentor and pupil to jointly control the movement of an instrument 26, 28, 30 and/or 32. The instrument controller 192 can compute the xdes using equation (3). The feedback forces F1 and F2 are computed using equations (1) and (2) and fed back to the mentor and pupil through the force actuator for each joint.

In operation, the users may set the value of α. For example, a may be set at 0.5 for split control. Both the mentor and pupil move their handles a distance x1 and x2, respectively. There may in fact be multiple movements including wrist and roll movement. The controllers compute the corresponding movement x from the equation and drive the robotic arm to move the instrument. The controllers also calculate the forces F1 and F2 and drive the force actuators for each corresponding joint. If the pupil's and mentor's movements are in sync then the system does not provide force feedback. If the movements are out of sync the system provides a force feedback that allows the participants to “feel” the discrepancy between their movement commands.

While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.

Although force feedback is described, it is to be understood that other means for showing pupil handle deviation may be used in the system. For example, the system may have a visual indicator such as a bar graph that indicates the deviation between the mentor and pupil handles.

Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US9778258 Ene 19106 Dic 1910George N MurphySurgical instrument.
US132757711 Mar 19196 Ene 1920Joseph S TurnerSurgical-needle holder
US317154918 Jul 19622 Mar 1965Molins Machine Co LtdMechanical handling apparatus
US328099128 Abr 196425 Oct 1966Programmed & Remote Syst CorpPosition control manipulator
US349766825 Ago 196624 Feb 1970Joseph HirschTactile control system
US362853512 Nov 196921 Dic 1971Nibot CorpSurgical instrument for implanting a prosthetic heart valve or the like
US369879119 Abr 197117 Oct 1972Xerox CorpDrape for operating microscope
US388016620 Ago 197329 Abr 1975Fogarty Thomas JVessel occluder
US391028021 Jun 19747 Oct 1975Sherwood Medical Ind IncBody member tourniquet
US396192115 Oct 19748 Jun 1976Vernco CorporationVacuum cleaner with an impermeable collector bag
US399307621 Abr 197523 Nov 1976Fogarty Thomas JVessel occluding instrument
US404194215 Jun 197616 Ago 1977American Hospital Supply CorporationSurgical drape
US40580012 Ago 197615 Nov 1977G. D. Searle & Co.Ultrasound imaging system with improved scan conversion
US406245522 Nov 197613 Dic 1977Flatau Carl RRemote manipulator
US407856812 Oct 197614 Mar 1978Northern Illinois Research, Inc.Plastic composition and method
US410196116 Feb 197718 Jul 1978NasaContour detector and data acquisition system for the left ventricular outline
US412888030 Jun 19765 Dic 1978Cray Research, Inc.Computer vector register processing
US418231122 Abr 19778 Ene 1980Varian Associates, Inc.Method and system for cardiac computed tomography
US422199718 Dic 19789 Sep 1980Western Electric Company, IncorporatedArticulated robot arm and method of moving same
US433704521 Ago 198029 Jun 1982Jones And Healy Marine LimitedNavigation training aids
US43498376 May 198014 Sep 1982Spar Aerospace LimitedSatellite servicing
US43679985 Sep 198011 Ene 1983United Kingdom Atomic Energy AuthorityManipulators
US440185213 Ene 198230 Ago 1983Nissan Motor Company, LimitedVoice response control system
US44569615 Mar 198226 Jun 1984Texas Instruments IncorporatedApparatus for teaching and transforming noncoincident coordinate systems
US446030212 May 198117 Jul 1984Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueHandling equipment comprising a telescopic supporting assembly carrying a motorized orientation support for at least one articulated slave arm
US447417423 Feb 19832 Oct 1984American Hospital Supply CorporationSurgical instrument for an endoscope
US44911353 Nov 19821 Ene 1985Klein Harvey ASurgical needle holder
US450385416 Jun 198312 Mar 1985Jako Geza JLaser surgery
US451130513 Ene 198316 Abr 1985Meidensha Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd.Manipulator
US45179634 Ene 198321 May 1985Harold UngerImage-erecting barrel rotator for articulated optical arm
US45238848 Oct 198118 Jun 1985Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueRemote manipulation assembly
US458639829 Sep 19836 May 1986Hamilton IndustriesFoot control assembly for power-operated tables and the like
US459872516 Ene 19858 Jul 1986Brewer Barney JConvertible poncho
US46040163 Ago 19835 Ago 1986Joyce Stephen AMulti-dimensional force-torque hand controller having force feedback
US461449929 Abr 198530 Sep 1986Universite LavalSimulator for use as a neurosurgical aid in determining potential paths for the implantation of probes through the human body
US461663714 Sep 198414 Oct 1986Precision Surgical Instruments, Inc.Shoulder traction apparatus
US462401128 Ene 198318 Nov 1986Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki KaishaSpeech recognition system
US46333891 Feb 198330 Dic 1986Hitachi, Ltd.Vector processor system comprised of plural vector processors
US463529217 Dic 19846 Ene 1987Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Image processor
US463547915 Ene 198613 Ene 1987Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyForce sensing apparatus
US464129221 Oct 19853 Feb 1987George TunnellVoice controlled welding system
US46499301 Jul 198517 Mar 1987Siemens Gammasonics, Inc.Apparatus for beat buffering techniques varified by arrhythmias detection for stopaction frames of cardiac function
US46552571 Nov 19857 Abr 1987Kabushiki Kaisha Machida SeisakushoGuide tube assembly for industrial endoscope
US465567310 May 19837 Abr 1987Graham S. HawkesApparatus providing tactile feedback to operators of remotely controlled manipulators
US46729637 Jun 198516 Jun 1987Israel BarkenApparatus and method for computer controlled laser surgery
US467624331 Oct 198430 Jun 1987Aldebaran Xiii Consulting CompanyAutomated anterior capsulectomy instrument
US472897430 May 19861 Mar 1988Yaskawa Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Apparatus for supporting an imaging device
US475063624 Sep 198714 Jun 1988Wortham Eastol GTest tube opening hood and process
US47624551 Jun 19879 Ago 1988Remote Technology CorporationRemote manipulator
US476494418 Jun 198616 Ago 1988University Of FloridaMethods for positioning an internal portion of a body relative to an extracorporeal referent
US47919347 Ago 198620 Dic 1988Picker International, Inc.Computer tomography assisted stereotactic surgery system and method
US47919402 Feb 198720 Dic 1988Florida Probe CorporationElectronic periodontal probe with a constant force applier
US479491217 Ago 19873 Ene 1989Welch Allyn, Inc.Borescope or endoscope with fluid dynamic muscle
US479977922 Mar 198824 Ene 1989Mesmer Jeffrey CMicroscope drape
US480061430 Abr 198731 Ene 1989Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.Adaptor and bag insert
US481500616 Sep 198721 Mar 1989Asea AktiebolagMethod and device for calibrating a sensor on an industrial robot
US48154501 Feb 198828 Mar 1989Patel Jayendra IEndoscope having variable flexibility
US481759222 Dic 19874 Abr 1989Andronic Devices, Ltd.Toroidal surgical shield
US481997827 Jun 198611 Abr 1989California Institute Of TechnologyGrasp force sensor for robotic hands
US482639231 Mar 19862 May 1989California Institute Of TechnologyMethod and apparatus for hybrid position/force control of multi-arm cooperating robots
US483773426 Feb 19876 Jun 1989Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for master-slave manipulation supplemented by automatic control based on level of operator skill
US485208322 Jun 198725 Jul 1989Texas Instruments IncorporatedDigital crossbar switch
US485387420 Nov 19871 Ago 1989Hitachi, Ltd.Master-slave manipulators with scaling
US485430112 Nov 19878 Ago 1989Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Endoscope apparatus having a chair with a switch
US48602156 Abr 198722 Ago 1989California Institute Of TechnologyMethod and apparatus for adaptive force and position control of manipulators
US486313326 May 19875 Sep 1989Leonard MedicalArm device for adjustable positioning of a medical instrument or the like
US488340024 Ago 198828 Nov 1989Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.Dual arm master controller for a bilateral servo-manipulator
US48917672 Jun 19882 Ene 1990Combustion Engineering, Inc.Machine vision system for position sensing
US493049428 Dic 19885 Jun 1990Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Apparatus for bending an insertion section of an endoscope using a shape memory alloy
US494253823 Feb 198917 Jul 1990Spar Aerospace LimitedTelerobotic tracker
US494253921 Dic 198817 Jul 1990Gmf Robotics CorporationMethod and system for automatically determining the position and orientation of an object in 3-D space
US494547931 Jul 198531 Jul 1990Unisys CorporationTightly coupled scientific processing system
US494971717 Mar 198821 Ago 1990Shaw Edward LSurgical instrument with suture cutter
US49549522 Oct 19894 Sep 1990Trw Inc.Robotic arm systems
US496541727 Mar 198923 Oct 1990Massie Philip EFoot-operated control
US496970911 Oct 198913 Nov 1990Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.Mechanism for bending elongated body
US49698907 Jul 198813 Nov 1990Nippon Zeon Co., Ltd.Catheter
US49799331 Mar 198925 Dic 1990Kraft, Inc.Reclosable bag
US497994926 Abr 198825 Dic 1990The Board Of Regents Of The University Of WashingtonRobot-aided system for surgery
US498062610 Ago 198925 Dic 1990The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationMethod and apparatus for positioning a robotic end effector
US498925315 Abr 198829 Ene 1991The Montefiore Hospital Association Of Western PennsylvaniaVoice activated microscope
US49969751 Jun 19905 Mar 1991Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaElectronic endoscope apparatus capable of warning lifetime of electronic scope
US501996829 Mar 198828 May 1991Yulan WangThree-dimensional vector processor
US502000115 Sep 198928 May 1991Toyoda Koki Kabushiki KaishaRobot controller
US503646323 Nov 198830 Jul 1991University Of FloridaAngioscopic system and method for dimensional measurement including measurement of the distance from angioscopic ends to designated planes
US504602210 Mar 19883 Sep 1991The Regents Of The University Of MichiganTele-autonomous system and method employing time/position synchrony/desynchrony
US504637517 Nov 198910 Sep 1991Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyCompact cable transmission with cable differential
US505368715 Mar 19891 Oct 1991Inria Institut National De Recherche En Information Et En AutomotiqueArticulated device, for use in particular in robotics
US50539758 Jun 19891 Oct 1991Hitachi, Ltd.Master-slave manipulator control
US50560319 Nov 19898 Oct 1991Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Chuo KenyushoApparatus for detecting the collision of moving objects
US50657419 Ene 199119 Nov 1991Olympus Optical Co. Ltd.Extracoporeal ultrasonic lithotripter with a variable focus
US507814023 Sep 19867 Ene 1992Kwoh Yik SImaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system
US508640111 May 19904 Feb 1992International Business Machines CorporationImage-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking
US509165627 Oct 198925 Feb 1992Storz Instrument CompanyFootswitch assembly with electrically engaged detents
US509782919 Mar 199024 Mar 1992Tony QuisenberryTemperature controlled cooling system
US509783913 Feb 199024 Mar 1992Allen George SApparatus for imaging the anatomy
US50984266 Feb 198924 Mar 1992Phoenix Laser Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for precision laser surgery
US510536716 Oct 198914 Abr 1992Hitachi, Ltd.Master slave manipulator system
US510949929 Ago 198828 Abr 1992Hitachi, Ltd.Vector multiprocessor system which individually indicates the data element stored in common vector register
US511981719 Ene 19909 Jun 1992Allen George SApparatus for imaging the anatomy
US512309517 Ene 198916 Jun 1992Ergo Computing, Inc.Integrated scalar and vector processors with vector addressing by the scalar processor
US513110521 Nov 199021 Jul 1992Diasonics, Inc.Patient support table
US514293029 Mar 19911 Sep 1992Allen George SInteractive image-guided surgical system
US514522731 Dic 19908 Sep 1992The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationElectromagnetic attachment mechanism
US51665136 May 199124 Nov 1992Coherent, Inc.Dual actuation photoelectric foot switch
US51756948 Feb 199029 Dic 1992The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyCentroid target tracking system utilizing parallel processing of digital data patterns
US518264117 Jun 199126 Ene 1993The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationComposite video and graphics display for camera viewing systems in robotics and teleoperation
US51843192 Feb 19902 Feb 1993Kramer James FForce feedback and textures simulating interface device
US51846015 Ago 19919 Feb 1993Putman John MEndoscope stabilizer
US518623218 May 199216 Feb 1993David ZahnerAccessory
US518757421 Ago 199116 Feb 1993Kanda Tsushin Kogyo Co., Ltd.Method for automatically adjusting field of view of television monitor system and apparatus for carrying out the same
US519396331 Oct 199016 Mar 1993The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationForce reflecting hand controller
US519668821 Feb 197823 Mar 1993Telefunken Systemtechnik GmbhApparatus for recognizing and following a target
US519889424 Sep 199130 Mar 1993Hicks John WDrape for endoscope
US520132518 Sep 199113 Abr 1993Andronic Devices Ltd.Advanced surgical retractor
US52017435 May 199213 Abr 1993Habley Medical Technology Corp.Axially extendable endoscopic surgical instrument
US521091121 Jul 199218 May 1993Zel Products Inc.Wrapping device
US521314126 Oct 199025 May 1993Dorman Ira SDebris collection and disposal system and method
US521700318 Mar 19918 Jun 1993Wilk Peter JAutomated surgical system and apparatus
US52174538 Abr 19918 Jun 1993Wilk Peter JAutomated surgical system and apparatus
US522128315 May 199222 Jun 1993General Electric CompanyApparatus and method for stereotactic surgery
US522249926 Mar 199229 Jun 1993Allen George SMethod and apparatus for imaging the anatomy
US522842930 Nov 199220 Jul 1993Tadashi HatanoPosition measuring device for endoscope
US523033822 Abr 199227 Jul 1993Allen George SInteractive image-guided surgical system for displaying images corresponding to the placement of a surgical tool or the like
US523062310 Dic 199127 Jul 1993Radionics, Inc.Operating pointer with interactive computergraphics
US52316939 May 199127 Jul 1993The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationTelerobot control system
US523351615 Jun 19883 Ago 1993General Electric Cgr S.A.Method for recording movements inside an object and for showing on an image display the effects of these movements
US523643224 Ago 199217 Ago 1993Board Of Regents Of The University Of WashingtonRobot-aided system for surgery
US523988326 Sep 199131 Ago 1993Rosheim Mark EModular robot wrist
US523998114 Nov 199031 Ago 1993Effner Biomet GmbhFilm covering to protect a surgical instrument and an endoscope to be used with the film covering
US524001127 Nov 199131 Ago 1993Fischer Imaging CorporationMotorized biopsy needle positioner
US525112731 Jul 19905 Oct 1993Faro Medical Technologies Inc.Computer-aided surgery apparatus
US525112819 Nov 19905 Oct 1993General Electric CompanyMotion artifact reduction in projection imaging
US52532891 Jul 199112 Oct 1993Murata Kikai Kabushiki KaishaTerminal connection device
US52579994 Jun 19922 Nov 1993Slanetz Jr Charles ASelf-oriented laparoscopic needle holder for curved needles
US527138423 Ene 199221 Dic 1993Mcewen James APowered surgical retractor
US527450023 Jul 199228 Dic 1993Kansas City Medical, Inc.Video camera drape with lens
US527560816 Oct 19914 Ene 1994Implemed, Inc.Generic endoscopic instrument
US527930927 Jul 199218 Ene 1994International Business Machines CorporationSignaling device and method for monitoring positions in a surgical operation
US528280621 Ago 19921 Feb 1994Habley Medical Technology CorporationEndoscopic surgical instrument having a removable, rotatable, end effector assembly
US52828265 Mar 19921 Feb 1994Quadtello CorporationDissector for endoscopic and laparoscopic use
US52841303 Jun 19928 Feb 1994Ratliff Jack LSurgical instrument positioning and securing apparatus
US52892735 Nov 199222 Feb 1994Semborg-Recrob, Corp.Animated character system with real-time control
US528936523 Dic 199122 Feb 1994Donnelly CorporationModular network control system
US52970345 Ene 199322 Mar 1994Corabi International Telemetrics, Inc.Telepathology diagnostic network
US529928818 Sep 199129 Mar 1994International Business Machines CorporationImage-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking
US53009262 May 19915 Abr 1994Siemens AktiengesellschaftMedical apparatus, having a single actuating device
US530165721 Ago 199212 Abr 1994Citation Medical CorporationSleeve for maintaining the sterility of an arthroscopic procedure
US530314830 Oct 199012 Abr 1994Picker International, Inc.Voice actuated volume image controller and display controller
US530414912 Jun 199219 Abr 1994Becton, Dickinson And CompanyMedical device with a lockable needle shield
US53041854 Nov 199219 Abr 1994Unisurge, Inc.Needle holder
US530514922 Mar 199319 Abr 1994Eastman Kodak CompanyZoom lens drive mechanism
US53052032 Oct 199019 Abr 1994Faro Medical Technologies Inc.Computer-aided surgery apparatus
US530542715 May 199219 Abr 1994Sony CorporationRobot with virtual arm positioning based on sensed camera image
US530971722 Mar 199310 May 1994Minch Richard BRapid shape memory effect micro-actuators
US53133061 Jun 199317 May 1994Telerobotics International, Inc.Omniview motionless camera endoscopy system
US532063023 Feb 199314 Jun 1994Munir AhmedEndoscopic ligating instrument for applying elastic bands
US532135313 May 199214 Jun 1994Storage Technolgy CorporationSystem and method for precisely positioning a robotic tool
US533773216 Sep 199216 Ago 1994Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterRobotic endoscopy
US533979917 Abr 199223 Ago 1994Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Medical system for reproducing a state of contact of the treatment section in the operation unit
US534338517 Ago 199330 Ago 1994International Business Machines CorporationInterference-free insertion of a solid body into a cavity
US534339112 Feb 199230 Ago 1994Mushabac David RDevice for obtaining three dimensional contour data and for operating on a patient and related method
US534553827 Ene 19926 Sep 1994Krishna NarayannanVoice activated control apparatus
US535796227 Ene 199225 Oct 1994Sri InternationalUltrasonic imaging system and method wtih focusing correction
US53680157 Jun 199329 Nov 1994Wilk; Peter J.Automated surgical system and apparatus
US53684285 Ene 199329 Nov 1994Grumman Aerospace CorporationApparatus and method for producing a video display
US537153630 Nov 19936 Dic 1994Fujitsu LimitedAutomatic control of image pick-up position of object
US53828859 Ago 199317 Ene 1995The University Of British ColumbiaMotion scaling tele-operating system with force feedback suitable for microsurgery
US538898717 Abr 199114 Feb 1995Cheval Freres, SaLaser beam dental instrument
US539536913 Jul 19937 Mar 1995Symbiosis CorporationEndoscopic bipolar electrocautery instruments
US539732330 Oct 199214 Mar 1995International Business Machines CorporationRemote center-of-motion robot for surgery
US540280128 Abr 19944 Abr 1995International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of surgery
US54033194 Jun 19934 Abr 1995Board Of Regents Of The University Of WashingtonBone imobilization device
US54033324 Mar 19944 Abr 1995Christoudias; George C.Maritsa tissue approximator and method of using the same
US540840920 Dic 199318 Abr 1995International Business Machines CorporationImage-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking
US54106383 May 199325 Abr 1995Northwestern UniversitySystem for positioning a medical instrument within a biotic structure using a micromanipulator
US54109443 Jun 19932 May 1995Cushman; William B.Telescoping robot arm with spherical joints
US541309229 Jul 19939 May 1995Xomed-Treace, Inc.Sheath for endoscope
US541721027 May 199223 May 1995International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery
US541770130 Mar 199323 May 1995Holmed CorporationSurgical instrument with magnetic needle holder
US542252118 Nov 19936 Jun 1995Liebel-Flarsheim Co.Foot operated control system for a multi-function device
US542364821 Ene 199213 Jun 1995Fanuc Robotics North America, Inc.Method and system for quickly and efficiently transferring a workpiece from a first station to a second station
US542914227 May 19934 Jul 1995Linvatec CorporationSurgical video systems cover
US543164517 May 199311 Jul 1995Symbiosis CorporationRemotely activated endoscopic tools such as endoscopic biopsy forceps
US543445730 Jul 199318 Jul 1995Josephs; HaroldFoot pedal safety switch and safety circuit
US544104222 Dic 199315 Ago 1995Putman; John M.Endoscope instrument holder
US544272822 Sep 199315 Ago 1995Healthtech Services Corp.Interactive patient assistance device for storing and dispensing a testing device
US544348414 Mar 199422 Ago 1995Loma Linda University Medical CenterTrocar and method for endoscopic surgery
US54451666 Abr 199429 Ago 1995International Business Machines CorporationSystem for advising a surgeon
US54518522 Ago 199319 Sep 1995Gusakov; IgnatyControl system having signal tracking window filters
US545192414 Ene 199319 Sep 1995Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyApparatus for providing sensory substitution of force feedback
US545273322 Feb 199326 Sep 1995Stanford Surgical Technologies, Inc.Methods for performing thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass
US54536868 Abr 199326 Sep 1995Polhemus IncorporatedPulsed-DC position and orientation measurement system
US545482724 May 19943 Oct 1995Aust; Gilbert M.Surgical instrument
US545576613 Oct 19933 Oct 1995Storz Instrument CompanyControl system for ophthalmic surgical instruments
US545854716 Jul 199317 Oct 1995Tochigifujisangyo Kabushiki KaishaDifferential apparatus with speed and torque sensitive differential limiting forces
US545857416 Mar 199417 Oct 1995Heartport, Inc.System for performing a cardiac procedure
US54644106 Jul 19927 Nov 1995University Of PittsburghImaging fixation and localization system with respiratory feedback device
US546722316 Dic 199314 Nov 1995Xomed-Treace Inc.Drape adapter
US54745717 Feb 199412 Dic 1995Karl Storz Gmbh & Co.Medical forceps with jaws which first tilt and then open
US547601014 Dic 199419 Dic 1995Sierra Matrix, Inc.Hands-free ultrasonic test view (HF-UTV)
US54783518 Ago 199426 Dic 1995Microsurge, Inc.Endoscopic surgical tool with handle and detachable tool assembly
US548929229 Nov 19946 Feb 1996United States Surgical CorporationEndoscopic surgical instrument with grip enhancing means
US549011723 Mar 19946 Feb 1996Seiko Epson CorporationIC card with dual level power supply interface and method for operating the IC card
US54908436 Ene 199413 Feb 1996Ethicon, Inc.Flexible endoscopic surgical port
US55069129 Nov 19949 Abr 1996Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Imaging device capable of tracking an object
US551291930 Mar 199330 Abr 1996Pioneer Electronic CorporationThree-dimensional coordinates input apparatus
US551415731 Mar 19957 May 1996United States Surgical CorporationArticulating endoscopic surgical apparatus
US551547813 Sep 19947 May 1996Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US55241803 Jun 19934 Jun 1996Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US55315201 Sep 19942 Jul 1996Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologySystem and method of registration of three-dimensional data sets including anatomical body data
US55446546 Jun 199513 Ago 1996Acuson CorporationVoice control of a medical ultrasound scanning machine
US555319829 Nov 19943 Sep 1996Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US55625035 Dic 19948 Oct 1996Ellman; Alan G.Bipolar adaptor for electrosurgical instrument
US55711107 Jun 19955 Nov 1996Board Of Regents Of The University Of WashingtonOrthopedic saw guide for use in a robot-aided system for surgery
US557299926 Ene 199512 Nov 1996International Business Machines CorporationRobotic system for positioning a surgical instrument relative to a patient's body
US558843210 Jul 199531 Dic 1996Boston Scientific CorporationCatheters for imaging, sensing electrical potentials, and ablating tissue
US559714628 Sep 199428 Ene 1997Putman; J. MichaelRail-mounted stabilizer for surgical instrument
US56088476 Jun 19954 Mar 1997Sensor Adaptive Machines, Inc.Vision target based assembly
US560956010 Abr 199511 Mar 1997Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Medical operation device control system for controlling a operation devices accessed respectively by ID codes
US561393723 Ago 199425 Mar 1997Heartport, Inc.Method of retracting heart tissue in closed-chest heart surgery using endo-scopic retraction
US562659511 Oct 19946 May 1997Automated Medical Instruments, Inc.Automated surgical instrument
US562959416 Oct 199513 May 1997Cybernet Systems CorporationForce feedback system
US563043111 Oct 199420 May 1997International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of surgery
US56319735 May 199420 May 1997Sri InternationalMethod for telemanipulation with telepresence
US563625918 May 19953 Jun 1997Continental X-Ray CorporationUniversal radiographic/fluoroscopic digital room
US56473611 Mar 199315 Jul 1997Fonar CorporationMagnetic resonance imaging method and apparatus for guiding invasive therapy
US56499567 Jun 199522 Jul 1997Sri InternationalSystem and method for releasably holding a surgical instrument
US56574296 Jun 199512 Ago 1997Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system optimal positioning
US56582508 Nov 199519 Ago 1997Sims Deltec, Inc.Systems and methods for operating ambulatory medical devices such as drug delivery devices
US567667324 Abr 199614 Oct 1997Visualization Technology, Inc.Position tracking and imaging system with error detection for use in medical applications
US569307123 Ene 19962 Dic 1997United States Surgical CorporationTapered surgical needles and surgical incision members
US56955006 Abr 19949 Dic 1997International Business Machines CorporationSystem for manipulating movement of a surgical instrument with computer controlled brake
US569657413 Ene 19979 Dic 1997Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Ophthalmic instrument support and lighting system
US569683720 Abr 19959 Dic 1997Sri InternationalMethod and apparatus for transforming coordinate systems in a telemanipulation system
US569793918 Abr 199516 Dic 1997Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Apparatus for holding a medical instrument in place
US570479111 Jul 19966 Ene 1998Gillio; Robert G.Virtual surgery system instrument
US571572928 Nov 199510 Feb 1998Toyoda Koki Kabushiki KaishaMachine tool having parallel structure
US571583615 Feb 199410 Feb 1998Kliegis; UlrichMethod and apparatus for planning and monitoring a surgical operation
US57180386 Jun 199517 Feb 1998National Semiconductor CorporationElectronic assembly for connecting to an electronic system and method of manufacture thereof
US572756920 Feb 199617 Mar 1998Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc.Surgical devices for imposing a negative pressure to fix the position of cardiac tissue during surgery
US573529028 Jul 19947 Abr 1998Heartport, Inc.Methods and systems for performing thoracoscopic coronary bypass and other procedures
US573750028 Abr 19957 Abr 1998California Institute Of TechnologyMobile dexterous siren degree of freedom robot arm with real-time control system
US57375061 Jun 19957 Abr 1998Medical Media SystemsAnatomical visualization system
US573771130 Oct 19957 Abr 1998Fuji Jukogyo Kabuishiki KaishaDiagnosis system for motor vehicle
US573864916 Abr 199614 Abr 1998Cardeon CorporationPeripheral entry biventricular catheter system for providing access to the heart for cardiopulmonary surgery or for prolonged circulatory support of the heart
US57406996 Abr 199521 Abr 1998Spar Aerospace LimitedWrist joint which is longitudinally extendible
US57408028 Dic 199521 Abr 1998General Electric CompanyComputer graphic and live video system for enhancing visualization of body structures during surgery
US574388422 Jun 199528 Abr 1998Hasson; Harrith M.Sealing structure for medical instrument
US574436313 Dic 199628 Abr 1998National Institute Of ImmunologyMethod for establishing a tumor-cell line by preparing single-cell suspension of tumor cells from tumor biopsies
US574876710 Ago 19935 May 1998Faro Technology, Inc.Computer-aided surgery apparatus
US574936226 Ene 199512 May 1998International Business Machines CorporationMethod of creating an image of an anatomical feature where the feature is within a patient's body
US574989224 Jul 199612 May 1998Heartport, Inc.Device for isolating a surgical site
US575474116 Dic 199619 May 1998Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope for optimal positioning
US576245820 Feb 19969 Jun 1998Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures
US576556512 Jul 199616 Jun 1998Adair; Edwin L.Sterile encapsulated operating room video monitor and video monitor support device
US57661266 Sep 199616 Jun 1998Armstrong Healthcare LimitedGoniometric robotic arrangement
US576964010 Ago 199523 Jun 1998Cybernet Systems CorporationMethod and system for simulating medical procedures including virtual reality and control method and system for use therein
US577612623 Sep 19937 Jul 1998Wilk; Peter J.Laparoscopic surgical apparatus and associated method
US577888930 Ago 199614 Jul 1998Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Craniotomy drape
US577962329 Nov 199514 Jul 1998Leonard Medical, Inc.Positioner for medical instruments
US578454223 Oct 199621 Jul 1998California Institute Of TechnologyDecoupled six degree-of-freedom teleoperated robot system
US579190811 Jul 199611 Ago 1998Gillio; Robert G.Apparatus and method for telesurgery
US57920454 Mar 199611 Ago 1998Adair; Edwin L.Sterile surgical coupler and drape
US579213516 May 199711 Ago 1998Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity
US579217811 Jun 199611 Ago 1998Ethicon Endo Surgery, Inc.Handle latching mechanism with release trigger
US579790016 May 199725 Ago 1998Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Wrist mechanism for surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity
US580017923 Jul 19961 Sep 1998Medical Simulation CorporationSystem for training persons to perform minimally invasive surgical procedures
US580042320 Jul 19951 Sep 1998Sri InternationalRemote center positioner with channel shaped linkage element
US580724320 Feb 199615 Sep 1998Heartport, Inc.Method for isolating a surgical site
US580728425 Jun 199715 Sep 1998Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyInertial orientation tracker apparatus method having automatic drift compensation for tracking human head and other similarly sized body
US580737716 May 199715 Sep 1998Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Force-reflecting surgical instrument and positioning mechanism for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity
US58073786 Oct 199715 Sep 1998Sri InternationalSurgical manipulator for a telerobotic system
US58073796 Jun 199515 Sep 1998Visx, IncorporatedOphthalmic method and apparatus for laser surgery of the cornea
US5808665 *9 Sep 199615 Sep 1998Sri InternationalEndoscopic surgical instrument and method for use
US58108801 May 199722 Sep 1998Sri InternationalSystem and method for releasably holding a surgical instrument
US58138133 Nov 199729 Sep 1998Daum GmbhSurgical manipulator
US581403827 Mar 199729 Sep 1998Sri InternationalSurgical manipulator for a telerobotic system
US581564031 Jul 199729 Sep 1998Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US581708420 Jul 19956 Oct 1998Sri InternationalRemote center positioning device with flexible drive
US582586230 Nov 199520 Oct 1998Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.Method of altering the destination telephone number of an incoming call
US582590829 Dic 199520 Oct 1998Medical Media SystemsAnatomical visualization and measurement system
US582598215 Sep 199520 Oct 1998Wright; JamesHead cursor control interface for an automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US582731920 May 199627 Oct 1998Innerdyne, Inc.Radially expandable access system having disposable and reusable components
US582819725 Oct 199627 Oct 1998Immersion Human Interface CorporationMechanical interface having multiple grounded actuators
US582881323 Oct 199627 Oct 1998California Institute Of TechnologySix axis force feedback input device
US58368691 Nov 199517 Nov 1998Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Image tracking endoscope system
US584482422 May 19971 Dic 1998Xybernaut CorporationHands-free, portable computer and system
US585555316 Feb 19965 Ene 1999Hitchi, Ltd.Remote surgery support system and method thereof
US585558322 Nov 19965 Ene 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures
US585993414 Ene 199712 Ene 1999Sri InternationalMethod and apparatus for transforming coordinate systems in a telemanipulation system
US586042010 Abr 199619 Ene 1999Rotecno AgSurgical draping system having a reusable and a disposable component
US586098518 Oct 199619 Ene 1999Anschutz; Till RainerOphthalmic instrument for cataract surgery
US586099523 Sep 199619 Ene 1999Misener Medical Co. Inc.Laparoscopic endoscopic surgical instrument
US58657307 Oct 19972 Feb 1999Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Tissue stabilization device for use during surgery having remotely actuated feet
US58672109 Feb 19962 Feb 1999Rod; Samuel R.Stereoscopic on-screen surgical microscope systems
US587632530 Sep 19972 Mar 1999Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Surgical manipulation system
US587819316 Oct 19962 Mar 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US588220629 Mar 199516 Mar 1999Gillio; Robert G.Virtual surgery system
US58855838 Dic 199723 Mar 1999Nagase & Company, Ltd.Method for inhibiting hyperlipemia with emmeisou or an extract thereof
US588712117 Jul 199723 Mar 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethod of constrained Cartesian control of robotic mechanisms with active and passive joints
US589484320 Feb 199620 Abr 1999Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc.Surgical method for stabilizing the beating heart during coronary artery bypass graft surgery
US589859923 Dic 199627 Abr 1999Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyForce reflecting haptic interface
US590470214 Ago 199718 May 1999University Of MassachusettsInstrument for thoracic surgical procedures
US590663030 Jun 199825 May 1999Boston Scientific LimitedEccentric surgical forceps
US590766411 Mar 199625 May 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US591103631 Jul 19978 Jun 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Head cursor control interface for an automated endoscope system for optimal positioning
US592039512 Nov 19976 Jul 1999Image Guided Technologies, Inc.System for locating relative positions of objects in three dimensional space
US592377030 Sep 199613 Jul 1999Siemens Corporate Research, Inc.3D cardiac motion recovery system using tagged MR images
US593183220 Jul 19953 Ago 1999Sri InternationalMethods for positioning a surgical instrument about a remote spherical center of rotation
US593867811 Jun 199717 Ago 1999Endius IncorporatedSurgical instrument
US595062928 Abr 199414 Sep 1999International Business Machines CorporationSystem for assisting a surgeon during surgery
US595147525 Sep 199714 Sep 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethods and apparatus for registering CT-scan data to multiple fluoroscopic images
US59515879 Oct 199714 Sep 1999Ethicon-Endo-Surgery, Inc.Needle holder with suture filament grasping abilities
US59546929 Jul 199721 Sep 1999SymbiosisEndoscopic robotic surgical tools and methods
US595473129 Jul 199721 Sep 1999Yoon; InbaeSurgical instrument with multiple rotatably mounted spreadable end effectors
US59578319 Jun 199828 Sep 1999Adair; Edwin L.Sterile encapsulated endoscopic video monitor
US595790228 Sep 199828 Sep 1999Teves; Leonides Y.Surgical tool for enlarging puncture opening made by trocar
US597197628 Ene 199826 Oct 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Motion minimization and compensation system for use in surgical procedures
US597612225 Feb 19982 Nov 1999Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc.Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity
US598078225 Abr 19979 Nov 1999Exxon Research And Engineering Co.Face-mixing fluid bed process and apparatus for producing synthesis gas
US59849321 May 199716 Nov 1999Yoon; InbaeSuturing instrument with one or more spreadable needle holders mounted for arcuate movement
US600110830 Dic 199714 Dic 1999Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures
US600111116 Ene 199814 Dic 1999Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc.Low profile vessel occluder with and without detachable applicator
US601302715 Jul 199811 Ene 2000Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Method for using a tissue stabilization device during surgery
US601730420 Abr 199825 Ene 2000Vierra; Mark A.Device and method for isolating a surgical site
US601972217 Sep 19971 Feb 2000Guidant CorporationDevice to permit offpump beating heart coronary bypass surgery
US60246956 May 199915 Feb 2000International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of surgery
US603336225 Abr 19977 Mar 2000Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterSurgical retractor and method of use
US603664116 Sep 199714 Mar 2000Cardiothoracic System, Inc.Surgical instruments for stabilizing the beating heart during coronary artery bypass graft surgery
US60386414 Oct 199314 Mar 2000Packard Bell NecTwo stage cache memory system and method
US605026618 Jun 199818 Abr 2000Cardiothracic Systems, Inc.Procedures for stabilizing the beating heart during coronary artery bypass graft surgery
US606302131 Jul 199816 May 2000Pilling Weck IncorporatedStabilizer for surgery
US608018126 Jun 199827 Jun 2000Sri InternationalSystem and method for releasably holding a surgical instrument
US610285011 Jun 199715 Ago 2000Computer Motion, Inc.Medical robotic system
US610285430 Sep 199715 Ago 2000Coroneo Inc.Sternum retractor for performing bypass surgery on a beating heart
US61065118 Sep 199822 Ago 2000Sri InternationalMethods and devices for positioning a surgical instrument at a surgical site
US611353419 Mar 19985 Sep 2000Koros; Tibor B.Adjustable heart surface stabilizer
US612043314 Oct 199719 Sep 2000Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Surgical manipulator system
US613236821 Nov 199717 Oct 2000Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Multi-component telepresence system and method
US61324417 Abr 199917 Oct 2000Computer Motion, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
US61495836 May 199921 Nov 2000Heartport, Inc.Device and method for isolating a surgical site
US61960813 Feb 19996 Mar 2001Hexel CorporationSystems and methods employing a rotary track for machining and manufacturing
US619701717 Ago 19996 Mar 2001Brock Rogers Surgical, Inc.Articulated apparatus for telemanipulator system
US620198426 Ene 199513 Mar 2001International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery
US62057167 Ene 200027 Mar 2001Diane P. PeltzModular video conference enclosure
US62069038 Oct 199927 Mar 2001Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Surgical tool with mechanical advantage
US621032312 May 19993 Abr 2001The University Of British ColumbiaSurgical arm and tissue stabilizer
US621312413 Jun 199410 Abr 2001Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc.Surgical drape with a sealable pouch
US622310025 Mar 199824 Abr 2001Sri, InternationalApparatus and method for performing computer enhanced surgery with articulated instrument
US622656618 Feb 19991 May 2001International Business Machines CorporationMethod of constrained cartesian control of robotic mechanisms with active and passive joints
US62315268 Dic 199915 May 2001International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for augmentation of surgery
US62315859 Jun 199915 May 2001Medivas, LlcDevice for stabilizing a treatment site and method of use
US624480930 Dic 199712 Jun 2001Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures
US62462003 Ago 199912 Jun 2001Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Manipulator positioning linkage for robotic surgery
US62468988 May 199812 Jun 2001Sonometrics CorporationMethod for carrying out a medical procedure using a three-dimensional tracking and imaging system
US625453221 May 19993 Jul 2001Coroneo Inc.Surgical apparatus and method
US625980615 Oct 199810 Jul 2001Sri InternationalMethod and apparatus for transforming coordinate systems in a telemanipulation system
US627045327 Dic 19997 Ago 2001Suzuki Motor CorporationBending device for examining insertion tube
US629271229 Ene 199818 Sep 2001Northrop Grumman CorporationComputer interface system for a robotic system
US63072856 Nov 200023 Oct 2001Coactive Drive CorporationActuator with repulsive magnetic forces
US63093972 Dic 199930 Oct 2001Sri InternationalAccessories for minimally invasive robotic surgery and methods
US63124358 Oct 19996 Nov 2001Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Surgical instrument with extended reach for use in minimally invasive surgery
US633083727 Ago 199818 Dic 2001Microdexterity Systems, Inc.Parallel mechanism
US633118115 Oct 199918 Dic 2001Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Surgical robotic tools, data architecture, and use
US634607228 Sep 199912 Feb 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Multi-component telepresence system and method
US634607727 Ene 199712 Feb 2002Cardiothoracic Systems, Inc.Surgical instrument for stabilizing the beating heart during coronary artery bypass graft surgery
US63648887 Abr 19992 Abr 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Alignment of master and slave in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus
US63683327 Mar 20009 Abr 2002Septimiu Edmund SalcudeanMotion tracking platform for relative motion cancellation for surgery
US637195228 Jun 199916 Abr 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity
US63987269 Nov 19994 Jun 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
US640273719 Mar 199911 Jun 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Surgical apparatus
US642488513 Ago 199923 Jul 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Camera referenced control in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus
US64361073 Mar 199920 Ago 2002Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US645992617 Sep 19991 Oct 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Repositioning and reorientation of master/slave relationship in minimally invasive telesurgery
US646469111 Oct 200015 Oct 2002Popcab, LlcPort device for port off-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery system
US64682659 Nov 199922 Oct 2002Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
US647023618 Dic 200122 Oct 2002Sony CorporationSystem and method for controlling master and slave manipulator
US649049010 Mar 20003 Dic 2002Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Remote operation support system and method
US649609915 Jul 199917 Dic 2002Computer Motion, Inc.General purpose distributed operating room control system
US652290614 Dic 199918 Feb 2003Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Devices and methods for presenting and regulating auxiliary information on an image display of a telesurgical system to assist an operator in performing a surgical procedure
US654992626 Oct 199915 Abr 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.SRT divider having several bits of each partial remainder one-hot encoded to minimize the logic levels needed to estimate quotient bits
US657435521 Mar 20013 Jun 2003Intuitive Surigical, Inc.Method and apparatus for transforming coordinate systems in a telemanipulation system
US657450324 Abr 20013 Jun 2003Medtronic, Inc.GUI coding for identification of displayable data quality from medical devices
US658916415 Feb 20008 Jul 2003Transvascular, Inc.Sterility barriers for insertion of non-sterile apparatus into catheters or other medical devices
US66465416 Ago 199611 Nov 2003Computer Motion, Inc.General purpose distributed operating room control system
US66599393 Nov 19999 Dic 2003Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US669917724 Abr 20002 Mar 2004Computer Motion, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US669923528 Jun 20022 Mar 2004Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Platform link wrist mechanism
US671483917 Sep 199930 Mar 2004Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Master having redundant degrees of freedom
US672098820 Ago 199913 Abr 2004Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Stereo imaging system and method for use in telerobotic systems
US67285997 Sep 200127 Abr 2004Computer Motion, Inc.Modularity system for computer assisted surgery
US674002813 Mar 200225 May 2004Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for temporarily immobilizing a local area of tissue
US676444514 Dic 200120 Jul 2004Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
US679366913 Mar 200221 Sep 2004The University Of TokyoActive forceps
US67990657 Dic 199928 Sep 2004Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Image shifting apparatus and method for a telerobotic system
US681797229 May 200116 Nov 2004Computer Motion, Inc.Heart stabilizer
US68378835 Oct 20014 Ene 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Arm cart for telerobotic surgical system
US685210716 Ene 20028 Feb 2005Computer Motion, Inc.Minimally invasive surgical training using robotics and tele-collaboration
US68580036 Ago 200222 Feb 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
US689211217 Abr 200310 May 2005Computer Motion, Inc.Modularity system for computer assisted surgery
US69054607 Ene 200314 Jun 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US69360011 Oct 199930 Ago 2005Computer Motion, Inc.Heart stabilizer
US695153517 Sep 20024 Oct 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Tele-medicine system that transmits an entire state of a subsystem
US708357115 Dic 20031 Ago 2006Intuitive SurgicalMedical robotic arm that is attached to an operating table
US708704915 Ene 20028 Ago 2006Intuitive SurgicalRepositioning and reorientation of master/slave relationship in minimally invasive telesurgery
US725002828 Nov 200131 Jul 2007Intuitive Surgical IncEndoscopic beating-heart stabilizer and vessel occlusion fastener
US7413565 *23 Sep 200419 Ago 2008Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Minimally invasive surgical training using robotics and telecollaboration
US768235719 May 200523 Mar 2010Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Tele-medicine system that transmits an entire state of a subsystem
US769548117 Jul 200613 Abr 2010Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Medical robotic system with different scaling factors
US780689115 Mar 20065 Oct 2010Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Repositioning and reorientation of master/slave relationship in minimally invasive telesurgery
US786526624 Abr 20034 Ene 2011Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US81052358 Jun 200431 Ene 2012Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
US82413066 May 201014 Ago 2012Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
US829291630 Nov 200723 Oct 2012Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
US84892353 Dic 201016 Jul 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US850420118 Nov 20116 Ago 2013Intuitive Sugrical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US852709427 Dic 20053 Sep 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US86005517 Abr 20103 Dic 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Medical robotic system with operatively couplable simulator unit for surgeon training
US866654410 Jul 20134 Mar 2014Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US887090021 Mar 200728 Oct 2014Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Endoscopic beating-heart stabilizer and vessel occlusion fastener
US2002006243516 Dic 199823 May 2002Mario D. NemirovskyPrioritized instruction scheduling for multi-streaming processors
US2002014066527 Mar 20013 Oct 2002Gary GordonMethod for framing viewports on a computer screen, and for pointing therein
US200300836486 Dic 20021 May 2003Yulun WangMethod and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US200301008177 Ene 200329 May 2003Yulun WangMethod and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US2005010780828 Dic 200419 May 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
US2005022836530 Mar 200513 Oct 2005Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US200601666818 Ago 200327 Jul 2006Andrew LohbihlerMethod and apparatus for position sensing
US2007020822321 Mar 20076 Sep 2007Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Endoscopic beating-heart stabilizer and vessel occlusion fastener
US2008004612226 Sep 200621 Feb 2008Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Maximum torque driving of robotic surgical tools in robotic surgical systems
US2008022819616 Abr 200818 Sep 2008Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Surgical robotic system for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures
US2008031266830 Nov 200718 Dic 2008Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
US201002252099 Mar 20099 Sep 2010Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Ergonomic surgeon control console in robotic surgical systems
US201002282499 Mar 20099 Sep 2010Intuitive Surgical, Inc.User interfaces for electrosurgical tools in robotic surgical systems
US2011011257113 Ene 201112 May 2011Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
US2012012321713 Ene 201217 May 2012Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
US2012013039918 Nov 201124 May 2012Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative Minimally Invasive Telesurgical System
US2013030425610 Jul 201314 Nov 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
US2013033185913 Ago 201312 Dic 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US2014019504824 Ene 201410 Jul 2014Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
USRE430497 Jun 200227 Dic 2011Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission
DE4310842C22 Abr 199325 Ene 1996Viktor Dr Med GrablowitzVorrichtung für die Durchführung von minimal invasiven Operationen
DE9204118U127 Mar 199221 May 1992Fa. Carl Zeiss, 7920 Heidenheim, DeTítulo no disponible
DE69735708T219 Feb 199728 Sep 2006Intuitive Surgical, Inc., SunnyvaleVorrichtung zum durchführen von minimal invasiven prozeduren am herzen
EP0239409A127 Mar 198730 Sep 1987Life Technology Research FoundationRobot for surgical operation
EP0424687A117 Oct 19902 May 1991Storz Instrument CompanyRemote control console for surgical control system
EP0494343A217 Sep 199115 Jul 1992Firma Carl FreudenbergRegulation valve for venting and aerating
EP0494943B15 Oct 199030 Ago 1995Deemed InternationalLocal intervention interactive system inside a region of a non homogeneous structure
EP0776738B114 Ene 19933 Abr 2002Sri InternationalAn endoscopic surgical instrument
EP1083830A17 Abr 200021 Mar 2001Computer Motion, Inc.Suturing articulating device for tissue and needle manipulation during minimally invasive endoscopic procedure
EP1131004B118 Nov 199928 Oct 2009Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
EP2016908A27 Abr 200021 Ene 2009Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Suturing articulating device for tissue and needle manipulation during minimally invasive endoscopic procedure
EP2138105A218 Nov 199930 Dic 2009Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
EP2298222A218 Nov 199923 Mar 2011Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
JPH11262492A Título no disponible
WO1991004711A15 Oct 199018 Abr 1991Diadix S.A.Local intervention interactive system inside a region of a non homogeneous structure
WO1992020295A122 May 199226 Nov 1992John KoivukangasSurgical operation device
WO1993013916A114 Ene 199322 Jul 1993Sri InternationalTeleoperator system and method with telepresence
WO1994018881A110 Ene 19941 Sep 1994Stanford Surgical Technologies, Inc.Method for performing thoracoscopic cardiac bypass procedures
WO1994026167A14 May 199424 Nov 1994Sri InternationalRemote center positioner
WO1995001757A15 Jul 199419 Ene 1995Cornelius BorstRobotic system for close inspection and remote treatment of moving parts
WO1997015240A124 Oct 19961 May 1997Johns Hopkins UniversityVoice command and control medical care system
WO1997029690A119 Feb 199721 Ago 1997Computer Motion, Inc.A method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures
WO1998017182A125 Sep 199730 Abr 1998Genzyme CorporationAdjustable multi-purpose coronary stabilizing retractor
WO1998025666A110 Dic 199718 Jun 1998Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Multi-component telepresence system and method
WO1998048704A124 Abr 19985 Nov 1998Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterSurgical retractor
WO1999009892A127 Ago 19984 Mar 1999Coroneo Inc.Sternum retractor for stabilizing the beating heart during coronary artery bypass graft surgery
WO1999016367A124 Sep 19988 Abr 1999Alliance Medical Technologies, Inc.Stabilizer
WO1999050721A118 Sep 19987 Oct 1999Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyRobotic apparatus
WO2000007503A13 Ago 199917 Feb 2000Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Manipulator positioning linkage for robotic surgery
WO2000015119A23 Sep 199923 Mar 2000Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for temporarily immobilizing a local area of tissue
WO2000015119A33 Sep 199931 May 2001Eric BooneMethod and apparatus for temporarily immobilizing a local area of tissue
WO2000015119A93 Sep 199924 Ago 2000Medtronic IncMethod and apparatus for temporarily immobilizing a local area of tissue
WO2000030548A118 Nov 19992 Jun 2000Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
WO2000030548A818 Nov 199926 Jul 2001Intuitive Surgical IncCooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
WO2000030548A918 Nov 199922 Ago 2002Intuitive Surgical IncCooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
WO2000030548B118 Nov 199914 Sep 2000Intuitive Surgical IncCooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system
WO2000030551A118 Nov 19992 Jun 2000Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
WO2000030551A918 Nov 199930 Nov 2000Intuitive Surgical IncStabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery
WO2000033726A17 Dic 199915 Jun 2000Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Image shifting telerobotic system
WO2000059384A17 Abr 200012 Oct 2000Computer Motion, Inc.Suturing articulating device for tissue and needle manipulation during minimally invasive endoscopic procedure
Otras citas
Referencia
1Abstract of a presentation "3 D Vision Technology Applied to Advanced Minimally Invasive Surgery Systems" (Session 15/3) given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, Jun. 18-20, 1992, (1 page total).
2Abstract of a presentation "A Pneumatic Controlled Sewing Device for Endoscopic Application the MIS Sewing Instrument MSI" given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, Jun. 18-20, 1992, (1 page total).
3Abstract of a presentation "Concept and Experimental Application of a Surgical Robotic System the Steerable MIS Instrument SMI," given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, Jun. 18-20, 1992, 1 page total.
4Abstract of a presentation given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux entitled "Session 15/1", Jun. 18-20, 1992.
5Abstract of a presentation given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux entitled "Session 15/4", Jun. 18-20, 1992, (1 page total).
6Abstract of a presentation given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux entitled "Session 15/5", Jun. 18-20, 1992, (1 page total).
7Abstract of a presentation given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, entitled "Session 15/2", Jun. 18-20, 1992, 1 page total.
8Adachi, Yoshitaka, "Touch and Trace on the Free-Form Surface of Virtual Objects, Research & Development Center," Suzuki Motor Corporation, Yokohama, Japan, Sep. 18-22, 1993, pp. 162-168, IEEE.
9Alexander, Arthur D. III, "Impacts of Telemation on Modem Society," Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Centre for Mechanical Sciences 1st CISM IFToMM Symposium, Sep. 5-8, 1973, pp. 121-136, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag.
10Alexander, Arthur D., "A Survey Study of Teleoperators Robotics and Remote Systems Technology," Remotely Manned Systems-Exploration and Operation in Space, California Institute of Technology, 1973.
11Alexander, Arthur D., "A Survey Study of Teleoperators Robotics and Remote Systems Technology," Remotely Manned Systems—Exploration and Operation in Space, California Institute of Technology, 1973.
12Anderson, Robert J., "Bilateral Control of Teleoperators with Time Delay," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, IEEE, 1989, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 494-501.
13Asada Haruhiko et al., "Development of a direct drive arm using high torque brushless motors," Proc. of 1st Int. Symp. on Robotics Research, 1984, pp. 583-599, Chapter 7, MIT Press.
14Askew, Scott R. et al., "Ground control testbed for space station freedom robot manipulators," IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1993, pp. 69-75, IEEE.
15B-1 Bomber Simulator, 8 pages [online], [retrieved on Jun. 28, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: .
16B-1 Bomber Simulator, 8 pages [online], [retrieved on Jun. 28, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.seeingtheusa.com/2012/10/b-1-bomber-simulator.html>.
17Baumann, Roger, "Haptic Interface for Virtual Reality Based Laparoscopic Surgery Training Environment," These No. 1734 Ecole Pholytechnique Federate de Lausanne, 1997, 104 Total Pages.
18Bejczy, Antal K. et al., "A synchronized computational architecture for generalized bilateral control of robot arms," SPIE Space Station Automation III, 1987, pp. 123-134, vol. 851.
19Bejczy, Antal K. et al., "Controlling Remote Manipulators through Kinesthetic Coupling," Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 1983, pp. 48-60, vol. 1-Issue 1.
20Ben Gayed et al., "An Advanced Control Micromanipulator for Surgical Applications," Systems Science, 1987, pp. 123-134, vol. 13.
21Ben Gayed, M. et al., "An Advanced Control Micromanipulator for Surgical Application," Systems Science, 1987, pp. 23-34, vol. 13 No. 1-2ol 13 No. 1-2.
22Besant, Colin et al., Abstract of presentation "Camera Control for Laparoscopic Surgery by Speech recognizing Robot: Constant Attention and Better Use of Personnel," 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic surgery, 1993, p. 271, vol. 3, issue 3.
23Bose, Bijo et al., "Tremor compensation for robotics assisted microsurgery," Annual Intl Conf. of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct.-Nov. 1992, pp. 1067-1068, vol. 14-Issue 3, IEEE.
24Bose, Bijo et al., "Tremor compensation for robotics assisted microsurgery," Annual Intl Conf. of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Oct.-Nov. 1992, pp. 1067-1068, vol. 14—Issue 3, IEEE.
25Bowersox, Jon C. et al., "Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: Initial feasibility studies in swine," J. Vascular Surgery, Feb 1996, pp. 281-287, vol. 23-Issue 2.
26Bowersox, Jon C. et al., "Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: Initial feasibility studies in swine," J. Vascular Surgery, Feb 1996, pp. 281-287, vol. 23—Issue 2.
27Butner, Steven E. et al., "A real-time system for tele-surgery," IEEE 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2001, pp. 236-243, IEEE.
28Cavusoglu, Murat Cenk et al., "A Laparoscopic Telesurgical Workstation," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Aug. 1999, vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 728-739.
29Charles, Steve et al., "Design of a Surgeon Machine Interface for Teleoperated Microsurgery," Proceedings of IEEE Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 1989, pp. 0883-0884, vol. 11, IEEE.
30Christensen, B. et al., "Model based sensor directed remediation of underground storage tanks," International Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, CA, Apr. 1991, pp. 1377-1383, vol. 2. IEEE.
31Cohn, Michael C., "Medical Robotics," http://www-bsac.eecs.berkeley.edu/, 1996, pp. 1-8 and 4.
32Colgate, Edward, J., "Power and Impedance Scaling in Bilateral Manipulation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California, Apr. 1991, pp. 2292-2297, vol. 3, IEEE.
33Colgate, J. Edward, "Robust Impedance Shaping Telemanipulation," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1993, pp. 374-384, vol. 9-No. 4, IEEE.
34Computer Motion, Inc., "AESOP: Automated Endoscopic System for Optimal Positioning," Press Release, 1994, 2 pages.
35Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/111,710, filed on Dec. 8, 1998.
36Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/111,711, filed on Dec. 8, 1998.
37Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/111,713, filed on Dec. 8, 1998.
38Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/111,714, filed on Dec. 8, 1998.
39Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 60/116,891, filed on Jan. 1, 1999.
40Corcoran, Elizabeth, "Robots for the Operating Room," The New York Times, 2 pages total, Jul. 19, 1992, Section 3 p. 9C.
41Das, Hari et al., "Kinematic Control and Visual Display of Redundant Teleoperators," IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1989, pp. 1072-1077, vol. 3, IEEE.
42Dolan J.M. et al., "A Robot in an Operating Room: A Bull in a China Shop," 1987, pp. 1096-1097, vol. 2.
43Elder, Matthew C. et al., "Specifying user interfaces for safety critical medical systems," Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Nov. 1995, pp. 148-155.
44EP Patent Application No. 00921806.6 Extended European Search Report, mailed on Jul. 9, 2004, 3 pages.
45EP Patent Application No. 08017470.9 Extended European Search Report, mailed Oct. 28, 2009, 6 pages.
46EP Patent Application No. 09171392 European Search Report dated Feb 22, 2010, 7 pages total.
47EP Patent Application No. 11150512 Partial European Search Report, mailed on Feb. 7, 2012, 9 pages.
48EP Patent Application No. 99965017 Supplementary European Search Report mailed on Jun. 12, 2007, 3 pages.
49EP10181123.0 Extended European Search Report, mailed Apr. 14, 2011, 9 pages.
50European Search Report for Application No. EP09166502, mailed on Nov. 25, 2009, 10 pages.
51European Search Report for Application No. EP12151644, mailed on Jun. 8, 2012, 2 pages.
52European Search Report for Application No. EP12151647, mailed on Jun. 7, 2012, 4 pages.
53European Search Report for Application No. EP12151648, mailed on Jun. 8, 2012, 3 pages..
54Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP11188641, mailed on May 20, 2014, 6 pages.
55Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP11188649, mailed on Jun. 4, 2014, 6 pages.
56Finlay, Patrick A., "Orthosista, An Active Surgical Localiser for Assisting Orthopaedic Fracture Fixation," Proceedings of the Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery; Baltimore, MD; Nov. 4-7, 1995, pp. 203-207.
57Fu, K.S. et al., "Robotics: control, sensing, vision, and intelligence," 1987, pp. 12-76 and 201-265, Ch. 2 & 5, McGraw-Hill Book Company.
58Funda, Janez et al., "Constrained Cartesian Motion Control for Teleoperated Surgical Robots," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, Jun. 1996, vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 453- 465.
59Galloway, Robert L. et al., "A new device for interactive image guided surgery," Proceedings The International Society of Optical Engineering SPIE Medical Imaging V: Image Capture Formatting and Display Kim Y Ed, 1991, pp. 9-18, vol. 1444, SPIE.
60Goertz, Ray et al., "ANL mark E4A electric master slave manipulator," Proc 14th Conf. on Remote System Technology, 1966, pp. 115-123.
61Graves, Sean et al., "Dynamic Session Management for Telerobotic Control and Simulation," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 1740-1745, vol. 2, IEEE.
62Green, Philip S. et al., "Abstract of a presentation: Telepresence: Advanced Teleoperator Technology for Minimally Invasive Surgery," given at Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR) symposium in San Diego, Jun. 4-7, 1992, 2 pages.
63Green, Philip S. et al., "Statutory Declaration of the presenter of the video entitled ‘Telepresence Surgery the Future of Minimally Invasive Medicine,’" (32 page total), Dr. Philip S Green, Sep. 12, 2000.
64Green, Philip S. et al., "Statutory Declaration of the presenter of the video entitled 'Telepresence Surgery the Future of Minimally Invasive Medicine,'" (32 page total), Dr. Philip S Green, Sep. 12, 2000.
65Green, Philip S. et al., Abstract of a presentation "Telepresence: Advanced Teleoperator Technology for Minimally Invasive Surgery," given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, Jun. 18-20, 1992, 2 pages total.
66Green, Philip S., "A Pneumatic Controlled Sewing Device for Endoscopic Application the MIS Sewing Instrument MSI," Abstract No. 7, 1992.
67Green, Philip, S. et al., "Mobile telepresence surgery," 2nd Annual Intl Symposium on Med. Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Maryland Nov. 1995, pp. 97-103.
68Guerrouad, Aicha et al., "S.M.O.S.: Stereotaxical Microtelemanipulator for Ocular Surgery," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 11th Annual Int'l Conf, Nov. 9-12, 1989, vol. 3, pp. 879-880, IEEE.
69Guo, Shuxinng et al., "Micro active guide wire catheter system-characteristic evaluation, electrical model and operability evaluation of micro active catheter," Sixth International IEEE Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995, pp. 131-136, IEEE.
70Guthart, Gary S. et al., "The IntuitiveT telesurgery system: overview and application," Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2000, pp. 618-621, vol. 1, IEEE.
71Hamilton, E.C. et al., "Comparision of Video Trainer and Virtual Reality Training Systems on acquisitation of Laparoscopic Skills," Surgical endoscopy, 2001, pp. 406-411, vol. 16, Springer Verlang New York Inc.
72Heer, Ewald, "Remotely Manned Systems: Exploration and Operation in Space," Proceedings of the First National Conference Pasadena, CA, Sep. 13-15, 1972, pp. 449-458 and 483-492.
73Hill, John W. et al., "Telepresence Technology in Medicine: Principles and Applications," Proceedings of IEEE, 1998, vol. 86-Issue 3, pp. 569-80, IEEE.
74Hill, John W. et al., "Telepresence Technology in Medicine: Principles and Applications," Proceedings of IEEE, 1998, vol. 86—Issue 3, pp. 569-80, IEEE.
75Hill, John W., "Telepresence surgery demonstration system," Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 2302-2307, vol. 3, SRI International.
76Hill, John, W. et al., "Tactile Perception Studies Related to Teleoperator Systems," Final Report, Contract NAS 2-5409, SRI Project 7948, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, 1971, 45 pages.
77Hogan, Neville, "Controlling Impedance at the Man/Machine Interface," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 1626-1631, vol. 3, IEEE.
78Holler, Elmar et al., "An ATM based local communication system for telesurgery," Interactive Tech. and New Paradigm Healthcare, 1995, pp. 137-146.
79Hunter, Ian W. et al., "A teleoperated microsurgical robot and associated virtual environment for eye surgery," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1993, pp. 265-280, vol. 2-No. 4, MIT Press.
80Hunter, Ian W. et al., "A teleoperated microsurgical robot and associated virtual environment for eye surgery," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1993, pp. 265-280, vol. 2—No. 4, MIT Press.
81Hunter, Ian, W. et al., "Manipulation and dynamic mechanical testing of microscopic objects using a tele-micro-robot system," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 1990, pp. 3-9, vol. 10-Issue 2, IEEE.
82Hunter, Ian, W. et al., "Manipulation and dynamic mechanical testing of microscopic objects using a tele-micro-robot system," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 1990, pp. 3-9, vol. 10—Issue 2, IEEE.
83Hurteau et al., "Laparoscopic surgery assisted by a robotic cameraman: Concept and Experimental results," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 8-13, 1994, pp. 2286-2289, vol. 3, IEEE.
84Ikuta, Koji et al., "Hyper redundant active endoscope for minimum invasive surgery," pp. 230-237, Proc. IEEE The First International Conference on Medical Robot and Computer Aided Surgery (MRCAS'94), (1994).
85Imaida, Takashi et al., "Ground-Space Bilateral Teleoperation of ETS-VII Robot Arm by Direct Bilateral Coupling Under 7-s Time Delay Condition," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2004, pp. 499-511, vol. 20-No. 3,IEEE.
86Imaida, Takashi et al., "Ground-Space Bilateral Teleoperation of ETS-VII Robot Arm by Direct Bilateral Coupling Under 7-s Time Delay Condition," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2004, pp. 499-511, vol. 20—No. 3,IEEE.
87Inoue, Masao, "Six-Axis bilateral control of an articulated slave manipulator using a Cartesian master manipulator," Advanced robotics, 1990, pp. 139-150, vol. 4-Issue 2, Robotic society of Japan.
88International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US01/44771, mailed on Feb. 26, 2004, 5 pages.
89International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US03/01348, mailed on Apr. 19, 2004, 4 pages.
90International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US1999/27632, mailed on Aug. 14, 2001, 6 pages.
91International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US99/27616, mailed on May 16, 2001, 4 pages.
92International Search Report for application No. PCT/US03/01348, Mailed on Jun. 5, 2003, 1 page.
93International Search Report for application No. PCT/US99/27632, Mailed on Feb. 23, 2001, 2 pages.
94Iwata, Hiroo, "Pen based haptic virtual environment," IEEE Institute of Engineering Mechanics U. of Tsukuba Japan, 1993, pp. 287-292, IEEE.
95Jackson, Bernie G. et al., "Force Feedback and Medical Simulation," Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Morgan et al. (Eds ), 1995, pp. 147-151, vol. 24, IOS Press and Ohms.
96Jau, B. M., "Anthropomorphic Remote Manipulator," NASA Tech Briefs, Apr. 1991, pp. 92, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.
97Kazerooni, H, "Human/Robot Interaction via the Transfer of Power and Information Signals-Part II," an Experimental Analysis, Proc. of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 1641-1647, vol. 3, IEEE.
98Kazerooni, H, "Human/Robot Interaction via the Transfer of Power and Information Signals—Part II," an Experimental Analysis, Proc. of the 1989 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 1641-1647, vol. 3, IEEE.
99Kazerooni, H. , "Human Extenders," ASME J. Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control, 1993, pp. 281-290, vol. 115 No. 2(B).
100Kazerooni, H., "Design and analysis of the statically balanced direct-drive robot manipulator," Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1989, pp. 287-293, vol. 6, Issue 4.
101Kazerooni, H., "Human/Robot Interaction via the Transfer of Power and Information Signals Part I: Dynamics and Control Analysis," IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 1632-1640, IEEE.
102Kim, Won S., "Developments of New Force Reflecting Control Schemes and an Application to a Teleoperation Training Simulator," Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1992, pp. 1412-1419, vol. 2, IEEE.
103Kirklin, John W. et al., "Cardiac Surgery," 1993, 4 Pages Total, vol. 1 and 2, Second ed John Wiley and Sons Inc N Y (Table of Contents).
104Kosuge, Kazuhiro, "Bilateral Feedback Control of Telemanipulators via Computer Network," IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1996, pp. 1380-1385. vol. 3, IEEE.
105Krishnan, S.M. et al., Abstract of a presentation "Design Considerations of a New Generation Endoscope Using Robotics and Computer Vision Technology," given at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, Jun. 18-20, 1992, (1 page total).
106Landreneau, Rodney J. et al., "Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Basic Technical Concepts and Intercostal Approach Strategies," The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992, pp. 800-807, vol. 54—Issue 4, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
107Lappalainen J., et al., Direct Connection of Simulator and DCS Enhances Testing and Operator Training, 8 pages, [online], [retrieved on Jul. 2, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.tappi.org/Downloads/unsorted/UNTITLED-ENG99495pdf.aspx>.
108Lavallee, Stephane, "A New System for Computer Assisted Neurosurgery," IEEE Eng. in Med. and Biol. Soc. 11th Annual International Conference, Jun. 1989, pp. 926-927, vol. 11.
109Lazarevic, Zoran, "Feasibility of a Stewart Platform with Fixed Actuators as a Platform for CABG Surgery Device," 1997, 45 pages, Master's Thesis Columbia University Department of Bioengineering.
110Liu, Alan et al., "A Survey of Surgical Simulation: Applications, Technology and Education," Presence, 2003, pp. 599-614, MIT Press.
111Mack, Michael J. et al., "Video-assisted coronary bypass grafting on the beating heart," The Annals of thoracic surgery, 1997, pp. S100-S103, vol. 63 (6 Suppl).
112Madhani, Akhil J. et al., "The black falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery," IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) Victoria B.C. Canada ), 1998, pp. 936-944, vol. 2, IEEE.
113Madhani, Akhil, "Thesis Proposal: Force-Reflecting Teleoperated Endoscopic Surgery," 1995, pp. 1-6 w/attachments pp. 1-2.
114Mair, Gordon M., Industrial Robotics, Prentice Hall, 1988, pp. 41-43, 49-50, 54, 203-209.
115Majima S. et al., "On a Micro Manipulator for Medical Application Stability Consideration of its Bilateral Controller Mechatronics," 1991, pp. 293-309, vol. 1, issue 3.
116Medical Simulation, 7 pages, [online], [retrieved on Jul. 2, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical—simulation>.
117Moravec, Hans, Peter, "Obstacle Avoidance and Navigation in the Real World by a Seeing Robot Rover," PhD thesis, 1980, Chapter 3, pp. 13-18, Stanford University.
118Neisius B. et al., "Robotic manipulator for endoscopic handling of surgical effectors and cameras," 1st Intl. Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 1994, pp. 169-176, vol. 2.
119Nudehi, Shahin S. et al., "A Shared-Control Approach to Haptic Interface Design for Minimally Invasive Telesurgical Training," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2005, pp. 588-592, vol. 13—No. 4, IEEE.
120PCT/US00/09201 International Search Report, mailed Aug. 30, 2000, 1 page.
121PCT/US01/44771 International Search Report, mailed Apr. 23, 2003, 7 pages; and Written Opinion, mailed Aug. 12, 2003, 6 pages.
122PCT/US99/27610 International Search Report, mailed Apr. 25, 2000, 3 pages.
123PCT/US99/27616 International Search Report mailed on May 3, 2000, 1 page.
124Preising, B. et al., "A Literature Review: Robots in Medicine," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 1991, pp. 13-22, 71, vol. 10-Issue 2, IEEE.
125Preising, B. et al., "A Literature Review: Robots in Medicine," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 1991, pp. 13-22, 71, vol. 10—Issue 2, IEEE.
126Rasor, Ned S. et al., "Endocorporeal Surgery Using Remote Manipulators," Proceedings of the First National Conference held at California Institute of Technology, 1973, pp. 483-492.
127Richardson, I. E. G. et al., "SAVIOUR: Telemedicine in Action," IEE Colloquium on Teleworking and Teleconferencing, 1994, pp. 4/1-4/2, IEEE.
128Rosheim, Mark E., Chapter 5: "Pitch-Yaw-Roll Wrists," Robot Wrist Actuators, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989, pp. 95-206.
129Rovetta, Alberto et al., "The first experiment in the world of robot telesurgery for laparoscopy carried out by means of satellites networks and optical fibers networks on Jul. 7, 1993," 1993, pp. 51-56, vol. 1, IEEE.
130Sabatini, A. M. et al., "Force Feedback Based Telemicromanipulation for Robot Surgery on Soft Tissue," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 11th Annual International Conference, 1989, pp. 890-891, vol. 3, IEEE.
131Sackier J.M., et al., "Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery, From Concept to Development," Surgical Endoscopy, Springer-Verlag, 1994, vol. 8 (8), pp. 63-66.
132Sastry, Shankar et al., "Millirobotics for remote minamally invasive surgery," Proceedings of the Intl. Workshop on Some Critical Issues in Robotics, Singapore, Oct. 2-3, 1995, pp. 81-98.
133Sato, Yoshinobu et al., "The Safety Assessment of Human-Robot Systems(Architectonic principles of hazard-control systems)," JSME International Journal, 1989, pp. 67-74, vol. 32—Issue 1.
134Schenker Paul S. et al., "Development of a New High Dexterity Manipulator for Robot Assisted Microsurgery," Proceedings of SPIE, The Intl.Society for Optical Engineering, 1994, pp. 191-198, vol. 2351.
135Schenker, Paul S. et al., "Development of a Telemanipulator for Dexterity Enhanced Microsurgery," 2nd Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Nov. 4-7, Baltimore, Maryland, 1995, pp. 81-88.
136Seymour, Neal E. et al., "Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance," Annals of Surgery, 2002, pp. 458-464, vol. 236—No. 4, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
137Shimoga, K.B. et al., "Touch and Force Reflection for Telepresence Surgery," Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers, 1994, pp. 1049-1050, vol. 2, IEEE. 1:1.
138Simulation, 22 pages, [online], [retrieved on Jul. 2, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation>.
139Smith, Warren E. et al., "Correction of Distortion in Endoscope Images," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Mar. 1992, pp. 117-122, vol. 11—Issue 1, IEEE.
140Stevens, Jane E., "Cyber Surgery Computers cameras and robots are creating an improved operating system for doctors," Los Angeles Times, Nov. 30, 1995, p. 2.
141Sukthankar, Sujat M. et al., "Towards force feedback in laparoscopic surgical tools," IEEE Human Interface Laboratory Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Ohio, 1994, pp. 1041-1042, IEEE.
142Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP03707420, mailed on Sep. 13, 2010, 2 pages.
143Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP99960536, mailed on Jun. 12, 2007, 3 pages.
144Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP99961747, mailed on Jul. 18, 2007, 3 pages.
145Supplementary Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP01987142, mailed on Jul.28, 2009, 6 pages.
146Taubes, Gary et al., "Surgery in Cyberspace", Discover magazine, Dec. 1994, vol. 15-Issue 12, pp. 85-92.
147Taubes, Gary et al., "Surgery in Cyberspace", Discover magazine, Dec. 1994, vol. 15—Issue 12, pp. 85-92.
148Taylor, Russell H. et al., "A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery," IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May/Jun. 1995, pp. 279-288, vol. 14, Issue 3, IEEE.
149Taylor, Russell H. et al., "Computer Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications," 1996, pp. vii-xii, MIT Press Cambridge MA.
150Taylor, Russell H. et al., "Computer-Integrated Surgery," 1995, 8 pages, MIT Press.
151Taylor, Russell H. et al., "Research Report: A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery," Accepted to IEEE EIMBS Magazine, Special Issue on "Robotics in Surgery," Dec. 1994, 24 pages.
152Taylor, Russell H. et al., "Taming the Bull: Safety in a Precise Surgical Robot," Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics (91 ICAR), Jun. 19-22, 1991, vol. 1, pp. 865-870, IEEE.
153Taylor, Russell H., et al., "Chapter 46: A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery," in Computer-Integrated Surgery, R. H. Taylor, et al., Editors, 1996, MIT Press. pp. 581-592.
154Tejima, Noriyuki et al., "A New Microsurgical Robot System for Corneal Transplantation," Precision Machinery, 1988, pp. 1-9, vol. 2, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Inc.
155Tendick, Frank et al., "Analysis of the Surgeon's Grasp for Telerobotic Surgical Manipulation," IEEE 11th Annual Int Conf on Engineering in Medicine and Biology , Jun. 1989, pp. 914-915, IEEE.
156Tendick, Frank et al., "Comparison of laproscopic imaging systems and conditions using a knot tying task," Second Annual International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Nov. 4-7, 1995, 9 pages.
157Thring, M.W., "Robots and Telechirs: Manipulators with Memory; Remote Manipulators; Machine Limbs for the Handicapped," 1983, pp. 9-11, 108-131, 194-195, 235-279; Ellis Horwood Limited.
158Transcript of a video presented by SRI at the 3rd World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery in Bordeaux, France on Jun. 18-20, 1992; in Washington D.C. on Apr. 9, 1992; and in San Diego, CA on Jun. 4-7, 1992; entitled "Telepresence Surgery: The Future of Minimally Invasive Medicine," 3 pages.
159Trevelyan, James P. et al., "Motion Control for a Sheep Shearing Robot," IEEE Robotics Research Conference, the 1st International Symposium, Carroll, NH, USA, 1983, pp. 175-190, MIT Press.
160Trinder J. C. et al., "A Close Range Digital Photogrammetry System," 1990, pp. 440-447, vol. 1395, SPIE.
161Tsai, Roger Y., "A Versatile Camera Calibration Technique for High Accuracy 3D Machine Vision Metrology Using," IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 323-344, vol. RA-3—Issue 4, IEEE.
162U.S. Appl. No. 09/399,457, filed Sep. 17, 1999 (now abandoned), RAMANS, Andris D.
163Vertut, Jean et al., Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, 1986, vol. 3A, English translation Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
164Vibet, C., "Properties of Master Slave Robots," Motor-con, 1987, pp. 309-316.
165Wapler, M., "Medical manipulators—A Realistic Concept", Minimally Invasice Therapy, 1995, pp. 261-266, vol. 4, Blackwell Science Ltd.
166Wolf, Stanley et al., Student Reference Manual for Electronic Instrumentation Laboratories, 1990, pp. 498 and 499, Prentice Hall New Jersey.
167Yan, Joseph et al., "Teleoperation Controller Design Using H Optimization with Application to Motion Scaling," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1996, pp. 244-258, vol. 4—No. 3, IEEE.
168Yan, Joseph, et al., "Design and Control of a Motion Scaling System for Microsurgery Experiments," Proc of First Intl Symp on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 1994, pp. 211-216.
169Yokokohji, Yasuyoshi and Tsuneo Yoshikawa, "Bilateral Control of Master-Slave Manipulators for Ideal Kinesthetic Coupling Formulation and Experiment," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, 1994, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 605-620.
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US921805330 Ene 201422 Dic 2015Olympus CorporationSurgical assistant system
US9271798 *13 Ago 20131 Mar 2016Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US9301809 *30 Jul 20135 Abr 2016David Byron DouglasPrecision external control of interventional medical procedures
US942386917 Ene 201423 Ago 2016Olympus CorporationOperation support device
US947730110 Ene 201425 Oct 2016Olympus CorporationOperation support device and assembly method thereof
US95193413 Ago 201213 Dic 2016Olympus CorporationMedical manipulator and surgical support apparatus
US95240223 Feb 201420 Dic 2016Olympus CorporationMedical equipment
US956899230 Ene 201414 Feb 2017Olympus CorporationMedical manipulator
US9632573 *3 Ago 201225 Abr 2017Olympus CorporationMedical manipulator and method of controlling the same
US963257731 Ene 201425 Abr 2017Olympus CorporationOperation support device and control method thereof
US9636186 *26 Ene 20162 May 2017Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US9666101 *26 Ene 201630 May 2017Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US967186031 Ene 20146 Jun 2017Olympus CorporationManipulation input device and manipulator system having the same
US978620322 Abr 201510 Oct 2017Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Minimally invasive surgical training using robotics and telecollaboration
US20130035697 *3 Ago 20127 Feb 2013Olympus CorporationMedical manipulator and method of controllling the same
US20130331859 *13 Ago 201312 Dic 2013Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US20140039516 *30 Jul 20136 Feb 2014David Byron DouglasPrecision External Control of Interventional Medical Procedures
US20160140875 *26 Ene 201619 May 2016Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
US20160166345 *26 Ene 201616 Jun 2016Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures
USD770617 *17 Nov 20141 Nov 2016Olympus (Beijing) Sales Service Co., Ltd.Endoscope system workstation
Eventos legales
FechaCódigoEventoDescripción
9 Jul 2012ASAssignment
Owner name: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTUITIVE SURGICAL , INC.;REEL/FRAME:028515/0922
Effective date: 20100219