US D660435 S1
The ornamental design for an orthodontic bracket, as shown and described.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an orthodontic bracket showing the new design;
FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 3 is a bottom plan view thereof;
FIG. 4 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 5 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 6 is a right elevation view thereof
FIG. 7 is a left elevation view thereof;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the orthodontic bracket wherein a swivel clip is shown in a second position of use;
FIG. 9 is a top plan view thereof;
FIG. 10 is a rear elevation view thereof;
FIG. 11 is a front elevation view thereof;
FIG. 12 is a right elevation view thereof; and,
FIG. 13 is a left elevation view thereof.
The broken lines shown in the figures represent portions of the orthodontic bracket that form no part of the claimed design.
|1||"Brinellium—A Harder, Stronger, and More Wettable Form of Aluminum Oxide," Technical Advances, Materials Technology, Mar./Apr. 1993, vol. 8(3/4), pp. 44-45.|
|2||"Direct Bond Tubes," American Orthodontics, date unknown, p. 76.|
|3||"Focus on Brackets," Orthodontic Products, Mar. 2005, pp. 1-2.|
|4||3M Unitek Corporation Catalog, 1990, pp. 1-1, 1-3, 3-7, Figs. A, B.|
|5||Milewski, John V., "Efficient Use of Whiskers in the Reinforcement of Ceramics," Advanced Ceramics, vol. 1(1), 1986, pp. 36-41.|
|6||Ortho Organizers, Inc. Advertisement, "The Supreme™ Mini-Twin®," Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, Sep. 1989, 3 pages.|
|7||Ricketts, "Provocations and Perceptions in Cranio-Facial Orthopedics," RMO, Inc., Denver, CO, USA, 1989, cover and pp. 982-1021.|