Búsqueda Imágenes Maps Play YouTube Noticias Gmail Drive Más »
Iniciar sesión
Usuarios de lectores de pantalla: deben hacer clic en este enlace para utilizar el modo de accesibilidad. Este modo tiene las mismas funciones esenciales pero funciona mejor con el lector.

Patentes

  1. Búsqueda avanzada de patentes
Número de publicaciónUSRE42391 E1
Tipo de publicaciónConcesión
Número de solicitudUS 10/366,531
Fecha de publicación24 May 2011
Fecha de presentación12 Feb 2003
Fecha de prioridad1 Dic 1998
TarifaPagadas
También publicado comoCA2352809A1, CA2352809C, EP1135080A1, EP1135080A4, EP1135080B1, EP1135080B2, EP2311403A1, US6174167, US6283754, WO2000032134A1
Número de publicación10366531, 366531, US RE42391 E1, US RE42391E1, US-E1-RE42391, USRE42391 E1, USRE42391E1
InventoresPeter S. Wöhrle
Cesionario originalWoehrle Peter S
Exportar citaBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet
Bioroot endosseous implant
US RE42391 E1
Resumen
The present invention relates to novel endosseous implants, which are designed so that the areas intended for bone soft tissue apposition exhibit a scalloped appearance, including both convex and concave patterns, to follow the naturally occurring bone morphology. Thus, the disclosed implants provide attachment possibilities for both bone and soft tissue, thereby effecting both hard- and soft-tissue preservation.
REEXAMINATION RESULTS
The questions raised in reexamination proceeding No. 90/007,836, filed Dec. 2, 2005, have been considered, and the results thereof are reflected in this reissue patent which constitutes the reexamination certificate required by 35 U.S.C. 307 as provided in 37 CFR 1.570(e) for ex parte reexaminations, or the reexamination certificate required by 35 U.S.C. 316 as provided in 37 CFR 1.997(e) for inter partes reexaminations.
Imágenes(7)
Previous page
Next page
Reclamaciones(106)
1. An endosseous dental implant, comprising:
a threaded shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
an abutment-implant interface disposed towards the proximal end of said shaft; and
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and having an edge disposed adjacent to said abutment-implant interface, said edge of the bone-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology and wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge.
2. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said edge of the bone-tissue apposition surface has a non-planar appearance.
3. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 2, wherein said edge of the bone tissue apposition surface has a highest point and a lowest point and the highest points point of said bone-tissue apposition surface is configured to substantially aligns align with the interproximal areas of the bone-tissue, and wherein the lowest points point of said bone-tissue apposition surface is configured to substantially aligns align with the buccal area of the bone-tissue.
4. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1 further comprising:
a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of the bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition and including an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology.
5. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1 further comprising: An endosseous dental implant, comprising:
a shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
an abutment-implant interface disposed towards the proximal end of said shaft;
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and having a boundary disposed adjacent to said abutment-implant interface, said boundary of said bone-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology; and
a means for connecting an abutment to said abutment-implant interface for use in a two-stage procedure;
wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said boundary but does not extend beyond said boundary.
6. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft, and wherein said planar upper surface substantially surrounds said means for connecting.
7. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a contoured upper surface, and wherein said contoured upper surface substantially surrounds said means for connecting.
8. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 7, further comprising an abutment wherein a lower surface of the abutment substantially abuts against said contoured upper surface, thereby providing improved lateral support.
9. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, further comprising:
an abutment permanently attached to said abutment-implant interface for use in a one-stage procedure.
10. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 9, wherein said shaft and said abutment are constructed from a single piece of material.
11. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 9, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft and wherein said planar upper surface substantially surrounds a chimney.
12. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 9, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper surface and wherein said contoured upper surface substantially surrounds a chimney.
13. A one-stage endosseous dental implant, comprising:
a threaded shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and comprising an edge disposed adjacent to said an abutment-implant interface, said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology; and
an abutment permanently attached to the proximal end of said shaft;
wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge.
14. The one-stage endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft, and wherein said planar upper surface substantially surrounds a chimney.
15. The one-stage endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper surface and wherein said contoured upper surface substantially surrounds a chimney.
16. A two-stage endosseous dental implant system, comprising:
a shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and an edge disposed adjacent to said an abutment-implant interface, said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge;
an abutment-implant interface disposed towards the proximal end of said shaft;
an abutment configured to attach to said abutment-implant interface;
a means for connecting said abutment to said shaft abutment-implant interface; and
a crown having a distal end configured to fit over said abutment.
17. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 16, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a substantially planar upper surface substantially surrounding said means for connecting a bore, and wherein said upper planar surface is approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
18. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 17, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper abutment-crown interface surface.
19. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 17, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper abutment-crown interface surface substantially surrounding a chimney, and wherein a distal end of said crown is configured such that at least an outside surface of said crown extends to and follows the contours of said upper abutment-crown interface surface, thereby providing a narrow depth between the distal end of said crown and said bone tissue apposition surface.
20. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 16, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a contoured upper surface substantially surrounding said means for connecting a bore, and said contoured upper surface approximately matches the contour of the natural bone morphology, and wherein said abutment has a lower surface configured to substantially abut said contoured upper surface.
21. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 20, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper abutment-crown interface surface.
22. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 20, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper abutment-crown interface surface substantially surrounding a chimney, and wherein a distal end of said crown is configured such that at least an outside surface of said crown extends to and follows the contours of said upper abutment-crown interface surface, thereby providing a narrow depth between the distal end of said crown and said bone-tissue apposition surface.
23. A one-stage endosseous dental implant system, comprising:
a threaded shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and comprising an edge disposed adjacent to said an abutment-implant interface, said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology;
an abutment permanently attached to the proximal end of said shaft; and
a crown having a distal end configured to secure to said abutment;
wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge.
24. The one-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 23, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper surface substantially surrounding a chimney, and wherein said upper planar surface is approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
25. The one-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 23, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper surface substantially surrounding a chimney, and wherein said contoured upper surface approximately matches the contour of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology.
26. The one-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 25, wherein a distal end of said crown is configured such that at least an outside surface of said crown extends to and follows the contours of said contoured upper surface, thereby providing a narrow depth between the distal end of said crown and the bone-tissue apposition surface.
27. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 4, wherein said soft-tissue apposition surface comprises a polished surface.
28. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, further comprising:
an anti-rotational feature and a bore for connecting an abutment to said abutment-implant interface for use in a two-stage procedure.
29. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 28, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft, and wherein said planar upper surface substantially surrounds said bore.
30. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 28, wherein said abutment-implant interface has a contoured upper surface, and wherein said contoured upper surface substantially surrounds said bore.
31. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 30, further comprising an abutment wherein a lower surface of the abutment substantially abuts against said contoured upper surface, thereby providing improved lateral support.
32. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied textured surface.
33. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied growth factor.
34. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied protein.
35. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an acid etched surface.
36. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises a surface blasted with particles.
37. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes a set of peaks and troughs.
38. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 1, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes two peaks and two troughs.
39. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied textured surface.
40. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied growth factor.
41. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied protein.
42. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an acid etched surface.
43. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises a surface blasted with particles.
44. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein said boundary of said bone-tissue apposition surface defines a set of peaks and troughs.
45. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, wherein an edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface defines two peaks and two troughs.
46. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 45, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least two peaks and troughs configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
47. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
48. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 5, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
49. The one-stage endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
50. The one-stage endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper surface.
51. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied textured surface.
52. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied growth factor.
53. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied protein.
54. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an acid etched surface.
55. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises a surface blasted with particles.
56. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes a set of peaks and troughs.
57. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes two peaks and two troughs.
58. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 57, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least two peaks and troughs configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
59. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
60. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 13, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
61. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 16, further comprising an anti-rotational member on said shaft for connecting said abutment to said shaft, wherein said anti-rotational feature is an external hex.
62. The two-stage endosseous dental implant system according to claim 16, wherein said abutment includes a through-bore.
63. An endosseous dental implant, comprising:
a shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end;
an upper surface disposed towards the proximal end of said shaft;
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and said bone-tissue apposition surface having an edge including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge;
a bore having an opening on said upper surface for connecting an abutment to said shaft; and
an anti-rotational member on said shaft also for connecting an abutment to said shaft.
64. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, wherein said anti-rotational member is an external hex.
65. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, wherein said anti-rotational member is an internal hex formed in said upper surface.
66. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, wherein said upper surface is substantially planar and approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
67. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, wherein said upper surface is contoured.
68. The endosseous dental implant of claim 67, wherein said shaft includes threads.
69. The endosseous dental implant of claim 67, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said upper surface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, and said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
70. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 69, wherein said soft-tissue apposition surface comprises a polished surface.
71. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, wherein the shaft includes threads.
72. The endosseous dental implant of claim 63, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said upper surface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, and said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
73. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 72, wherein said soft-tissue apposition surface comprises a polished surface.
74. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied textured surface.
75. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied growth factor.
76. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied protein.
77. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an acid etched surface.
78. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises a surface blasted with particles.
79. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes a set of peaks and troughs.
80. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes two peaks and two troughs.
81. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 80, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and an abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including an edge with at least two peaks and troughs configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
82. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and an abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
83. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 63, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and a abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
84. An endosseous dental implant, comprising:
a shaft made from a biocompatible material, said shaft having a distal end and a proximal end, said shaft being substantially symmetrical about a straight longitudinal axis of said shaft;
an upper surface disposed towards the proximal end of said shaft;
a bone tissue/soft tissue transition region between said shaft and said upper surface; and
a bone-tissue apposition surface formed on said bone tissue/soft tissue transition region, said bone-tissue apposition surface comprising an edge with at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises at least one of a roughened surface, a textured surface, or an applied biologic modifier that extends to said edge but does not extend beyond said edge.
85. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said edge of said bone tissue apposition surface has a highest point and a lowest point and the highest point of said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface substantially aligns with the interproximal areas of the bone-tissue, and wherein the lowest point of said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface substantially aligns with the buccal area of the bone-tissue.
86. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84 further comprising:
a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said bone-tissue apposition surface and said upper surface, said soft-tissue apposition surface having an edge including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology.
87. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 86, wherein said soft-tissue apposition surface comprises a polished surface.
88. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said upper surface has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
89. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein upper surface has a contoured upper surface.
90. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, further comprising:
an abutment permanently attached to said upper surface for use in a one-stage procedure.
91. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 90, wherein said shaft and said abutment are constructed from a single piece of material.
92. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 90, wherein said abutment has a substantially planar upper surface approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of said shaft.
93. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 90, wherein said abutment has a contoured upper surface.
94. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, further comprising a bore having an opening on said upper surface for connecting an abutment to said shaft and an anti-rotational member comprising a plurality of interconnected sides also for connecting an abutment to said shaft.
95. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 94, wherein said anti-rotational member is an external hex.
96. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 94, wherein said anti-rotational member is an internal hex.
97. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied textured surface.
98. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied growth factor.
99. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an applied protein.
100. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises an acid etched surface.
101. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said bone-tissue apposition surface comprises a surface blasted with particles.
102. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes a set of peaks and troughs.
103. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 102, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and a abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including at least two peaks and troughs configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
104. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface including at least one peak and trough configured to approximate the physiological contours of naturally occurring soft-tissue morpholoogy, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
105. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, further comprising a soft-tissue apposition surface formed on said shaft and disposed between said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface and said abutment-implant interface, said soft-tissue apposition surface being configured to promote, enhance or maintain soft-tissue growth or apposition.
106. The endosseous dental implant according to claim 84, wherein said edge of said bone-tissue apposition surface includes two peaks and two troughs.
Descripción

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/203,822, filed Dec. 1, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 6,174,167.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of implant dentistry, and more particularly to the design of one- and two-stage endosseous implants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Endosseous, i.e., intra boney, implants are commonly used to support fixed or removable prostheses where a patient's natural roots have been lost, and as a consequence, support is lacking to provide an adequate foundation onto which the dentist can rebuild a dentition. As the aging population retains more of their natural teeth, and as the younger generations want to take advantage of more conservative approaches offered by implant dentistry, e.g, using a single implant rather than cutting down adjacent teeth to support a short span bridge to replace a missing tooth, implant dentistry has gained more and more popularity and has moved into the mainstream of dentists worldwide.

The current implant design is based on an endosseous fixture, a titanium screw that acts as an artificial root: Br{dot over (a)}nemark, Tissue-Integrated Prostheses (1985). Modifications made to the endosseous fixture have centered on the macro structure of the implant (e.g., by exchanging the screw with a press-fit/cylindrical implant, a stepped screw or cylinder, or a tapered screw or cylinder), (Brunski J. B., Biomechanics Of Oral Implant,. Future Research Directions NIH Consensus Development Conference on Dental Implants, 1988; Kirsch A. et al., The IMZ Osseointegrated Implant System, Dent. Clin. North Am. 1989 (4), 33:733-791; Nimick G. A., A Multimodal Approach To Implant Prosthodontics, Dent. Clin. North Am. 1989(4), 33:869-878; Wennerberg A. et al., Design And Surface Characteristics Of 13 Commercially Available Oral Implant Systems, Id. 1993:8:622-633; Siegele D. et al., Numerical Investigations Of The Influence Of Implant Shape On Stress Distribution In The Jaw Bone, Id., 1989:4:333-340; Olsson M. et al., MkII-a Modified Self-Tapping Br{dot over (a)}nemark Implant: 3-Year Results, Id. at 1995:10:15-21; Langer B. et al., The Wide Fixture: A Solution For Special Bone Situations And A Rescue For The Compromised Implant, Part 1, Id., 1993:8:400-408; Schnitman P. A. et al., Implants For Partial Edentulism, NIH Consensus Development Conference On Dental Implants, 1988), on the micro structure (e.g., surface modifications such as use of machined titanium, blasted titanium, titanium alloy, acid-etched titanium, plasma-sprayed titanium and hydroxyappatite coating such as growth factors and proteins), (Baier R. E. et al., Future Directions In Surface Preparation Of Dental Implants, NIH Consensus Development Conference On Dental Implants, 1988; Young F. A., Future Directions In Dental Implant Materials Research, Id.; Krauser J., Hydroxylappatite-Coated Dental Implants, Dent. Clin. North Am. 1989, 33:4:879-903; Buser D. et al., Tissue Integration Of One-Stage ITI Implants: 3-Year Results Of A Longitudinal Study With Hollow-Cylinder And Hollow-Screw Implants, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 1991:6:405-412), on one-vs-two-stage designs, (Weber H. P. et al., Comparison Of Healed Tissues Adjacent To Submerged And Non-Submerged Unloaded Titanium Dental Implants, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 1996:7:11-19; Busser D. et al., Tissue Integration Of One-Stage ITI Implants: 3-Year Results Of A Longitudinal Study With Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw Implants, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991:6:405-412), and on modifying the connection between the implant and its abutment (e.g., either internal hex, external hex, standard hex, tall hex, wide hex, etc.), (U.S. Pat. No. 4,960,381; U.S. Pat. No. 5,407,359; U.S. Pat. No. 5,209,666; U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,292).

Irrespective of the design variables discussed above, current systems have two general characteristics in common: First, the abutment-implant interface is planar; and second, the area intended for bone apposition, i.e., osseointegration, terminates parallel to the abutment-implant interface, 360 degrees around the implant.

Traditionally, endosseous implants were designed for treatment of the fully edentulous patient. In general, this particular patient population exhibits reduced bone-tissue volume, both in height and width when compared to the partially edentulous patient with recent or impending tooth loss. However, the bone-tissue morphology of partially edentulous patients significantly differs from that of fully edentulous patients, in that the naturally occurring supporting bone structures reveal a scalloped architecture around the tooth.

Currently available implant technology does not take the different bone-tissue morphologies into consideration. Heretofore use of an implant with an intended bone-tissue apposition surface parallel to a flat abutment-implant interface has led to either (1) placement of soft-tissue intended parts of the implant within bone-tissue, leading to bone-tissue resorption in these areas, and/or (2) exposure of hard-tissue intended surfaces to the soft tissue, resulting in possible peri-implant infections due to bacterial colonization around the rough surface and potential loss of the implant.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed towards novel endosseous implants, which are structured to better maintain hard and soft-tissue in the area where the implant exits from the bone-tissue and transverses the soft-tissue. More particularly, the implants of the present invention are designed so that areas intended for hard- and soft-tissue apposition exhibit a scalloped appearance, including convex and/or concave patterns, which approximate the naturally occurring bone morphology. Thus, the implants of the present invention provide substantially increased attachment possibilities for both bone-tissue and soft-tissue, thereby facilitating bone-tissue and soft-tissue preservation and maintenance.

The present invention will enable the surgeon to place an implant into residual bone with the surface of the implant intended for bone-tissue contact and apposition (machined or roughened, surface coated or textured, altered with biologic modifiers such as proteins and growth factors, or any combination thereof) being substantially in contact with bone-tissue, and with the surface intended for soft-tissue apposition (polished/treated with soft tissue specific surface modifications) being substantially in contact with soft-tissue.

More specifically, the implant, according to an embodiment of the present invention, is a substantially cylindrical shaft made from a biocompatible material having a distal end and a proximal end. A bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region and a abutment-implant interface are both disposed towards the proximal end of the shaft. The bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region is defined as the approximate region of the shaft and/or the abutment-implant interface where the implant exits the bone-tissue and transverses into the soft-tissue. The bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region has a bone-tissue apposition surface configured to approximate the physiological contours of the alveolar bone. In a two-stage implant, the abutment-implant interface may be either substantially planar, approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of the shaft, or contoured to approximate the contour of the alveolar bone. In a one-stage implant the abutment is permanently attached to the abutment-implant interface, or an integral part of the implant itself. The abutment, in both one-and two-stage implants, has an abutment-crown interface, which is either substantially planar or contoured to approximate the contour of the alveolar bone, and a chimney onto which the crown is secured.

An implant constructed according to the principles of the present invention facilitates hard- and soft-tissue maintenance, increases longevity of the implant and improves its aesthetic appearance. As will be readily apparent to the skilled artisan, the present invention may be applied to numerous prosthetic applications, such as, but not limited to, a single tooth replacement, an abutment for a bridge (fixed partial denture) regardless of the nature of the other abutment (natural tooth or implant), a pier abutment or an over denture abutment.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a frontal view of a prior art implant;

FIG. 2 depicts an interproximal view of the prior art implant in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 depicts a frontal view an implant according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 depicts an interproximal view of the implant in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5A depicts a three-dimensional top frontal view of the implant in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5B depicts a three-dimensional interproximal top view of the implant in FIG. 3

FIG. 5C is a top view of an embodiment of an implant with an internal hex connection.

FIG. 6 depicts a frontal view of an implant according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 depicts an interproximal view of the implant in FIG. 6;

FIG. 8 depicts a three-dimensional top view of the implant in FIG. 6;

FIG. 9 shows a frontal view of an implant according to another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 depicts an interproximal view of the implant in FIG. 9;

FIG. 11 depicts a frontal view of an implant according to another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 12 depicts an interproximal view of the implant in FIG. 11.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIGS. 1 and 2 show prior art implant 10, abutment-implant interface 12, abutment 14 and crown 16 constructed according to the current state of the art. Implant 10, according to the current state of the art, has a bone apposition surface 17, typically threads or otherwise roughened surface, extending into alveolar bone 18. Abutment-implant interface 12 extends partially into the alveolar bone and has polished surface 20, which is not suitable for bone apposition. Use of implant 10, constructed according to the current state of the art, results in bone-tissue resorption in bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region 22 because polished surface 20 contacts bone-tissue, which as discussed, leads to bone resorption. Any loss of natural bone structure or topography is highly undesirable from both structural and aesthetic perspectives. Even the smallest bone-tissue loss between the tooth and an implant will lead to soft-tissue shrinkage due to lack of honey support, resulting in “black triangles” (open spaces) between the teeth-a highly unaesthetic situation.

FIGS. 3 and 4 show a two-stage implant according to an embodiment of the present invention. Implant 24 has shaft 26, substantially planar abutment-implant interface 28, distal end 30, proximal end 32 and bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region 34. Abutment 36 and crown 38 are attached to implant 24 using means well known to the skilled artisan for two-stage implants. Implant 24 is made from a biocompatible material, including but not limited to, metal, ceramic, glasses or any combination thereof. Preferably implant 24 is made from titanium or an alloy thereof.

Bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region 34 has a scalloped bone-tissue apposition surface 42, which approximately follows the naturally occurring contours of existing bone 40, and a scalloped soft-tissue apposition surface 44, which approximately follows the naturally occurring contours of the existing soft-tissue (not shown). Thus, there are two distinctive scalloped tissue-attachment surfaces: bone-tissue apposition surface 42 to maintain the naturally occurring bone-tissue morphology; and soft-tissue apposition surface 44 to maintain the naturally occurring soft-tissue morphology. The degree of scalloping or the height of the convex and concave regions depends on, inter alia, the degree of existing bone-tissue resorption, the size of the implant, the implant location within the arch, the bone morphology and the soft-tissue morphology. The dimensions are similar to the scalloped appearance of the cementoenanel (CE) junction observed on natural teeth. The vertical difference between the highest and lowest point of the scalloped margin ranges from less than 1 mm on posterior teeth to approximately 3-5mm on anterior teeth. By way of example, bone-tissue apposition surface 42 can be obtained by machining, application of textured surfaces, acid etching, blasting with particles, applying growth factor, applying protein, or other materials that promote, enhance, and/or maintain bone-tissue growth and/or apposition. Also by way of example, soft-tissue apposition surface 44 can be achieved by polishing or other treatment that leaves a surface to promote, enhance, and/or maintain soft-tissue growth and/or apposition. Below the bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region 34, shaft 26 has threads 45, or other means well known in the art, to anchor the implant into the alveolar bone.

In use, the surgeon inserts distal end 30 into the alveolar bone such that bone-tissue apposition surface 42 and soft-tissue apposition surface 44 approximately mirror the existing bone- and soft-tissue morphology respectively. The implant should be aligned such that the highest points of bone apposition surface 42 are substantially aligned with the interproximal areas of the bone-tissue and such that the lowest points are substantially aligned with the buccal and lingual area of the bone-tissue. In a two-stage process, the surgeon sutures tissue over the implant, waits several months for the bone to adhere to the implant, opens the tissue, attaches abutment 36 to abutment-implant interface 28 and attaches crown 38 to abutment 36. Bone-tissue apposition surface 42 and soft-tissue apposition surface 44 maintain bone- and soft-tissue attachment levels and facilitate prevention of peri-implant infections, which occur due to increased peri-implant pocket depths frequently observed with the prior art implant designs. Therefore, implants constructed according to the present invention increase the longevity of the implant and improve the aesthetic appearance of the restoration.

Referring to FIGS. 5A and 5B, abutment-implant interface 28 has substantially planar upper surface 25, which is approximately 90° to the longitudinal axis of shaft 26, and connecting means 46 for connecting abutment 36 (FIGS. 3 and 4) to abutment-implant interface 28. A bore 51 can be provided with an opening on the upper surface of the abutment-implant interface. Connecting means 46 is well known in the art and includes, but is not limited to, internal hex 55 (FIG. 5C), external hex, standard hex, tall hex, wide hex or camlog. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, as shown in FIGS. 6-8, abutment-implant interface 48 has at least its edges contoured to approximate the contours of the alveolar bone, thereby defining a contoured upper surface 50 (FIG. 8) surrounding connecting means 46. Also provided in this alternative embodiment is abutment 52, which has lower contoured surface 54 configured to substantially mate with contoured upper surface 50. The upper and lower contoured surfaces provide additional lateral support between abutment 52 and abutment-implant interface 48. Additionally, contoured upper surface 48 of this alternative embodiment results in a narrower depth between gum line 54 and abutment-implant interface 48 (FIGS. 6 and 7), thus enhancing longevity of the restoration as a result of decreased pocket depths. The bore 51 on the abutment-implant interface 48 corresponds with a through bore 63 in the abutment 52.

A skilled artisan will readily recognize that the principles of the present invention can be equally applied to one-stage as well as two-stage processes. For example, FIGS. 9 and 10 show one-stage implant 58, according to another embodiment of the present invention. Implant 58 includes shaft 60, distal end 62, proximal end 64 and bone-tissue/soft-tissue transition region 66 with scalloped bone-tissue apposition surface 42 and scalloped soft-tissue apposition surface 44, as substantially described above. Abutment 69 is permanently attached to the one-stage implant 58 as is well know in the art.

One-or two-stage implants, according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, may include either a planar abutment-crown interface 68 (FIGS. 3, 4, 9 and 10) or a contoured abutment-crown interface 70 (FIGS. 6, 7, 11 and 12), the latter of which substantially matches the natural contour of the alveolar bone. Contoured abutment-crown interface 70 allows for crown 38, in both one-and two-stage implants, to extend further towards the gum line, thereby resulting in a more aesthetically pleasing restoration. Chimney 72, or other means well known to the skilled artisan, is provided in both one-and two-stage implants according to the present invention for attaching crown 38 to the abutment.

Although various embodiments of the present invention have been described, the descriptions are intended to be merely illustrative. Thus, it will be apparent to the skilled artisan that modifications may be made to the embodiments as described herein without departing from the scope of the claims set forth below.

Citas de patentes
Patente citada Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US211200716 Ene 193722 Mar 1938Adams Pinkney BAnchoring means for false teeth
US384988716 Mar 197326 Nov 1974Vitredent CorpDental implant
US405159822 Abr 19754 Oct 1977Meer SneerDental implants
US44166296 Jul 198222 Nov 1983Mozsary Peter GOsseointerfaced implanted artificial tooth
US44682007 Nov 198328 Ago 1984Feldmuhle AktiengesellschaftHelical mandibular implant
US46246733 Ago 198225 Nov 1986United States Medical CorporationDevice system for dental prosthesis fixation to bone
US471300319 May 198615 Dic 1987University Of Toronto Innovations FoundationFixture for attaching prosthesis to bone
US48121202 Nov 198714 Mar 1989Flanagan Dennis FImplantable percutaneous device
US485699425 Ene 198815 Ago 1989Implant Innovations, Inc.Periodontal restoration components
US496038110 Ago 19882 Oct 1990Core-Vent CorporationScrew-type dental implant anchor
US50044229 Nov 19892 Abr 1991Propper Robert HOral endosteal implants and a process for preparing and implanting them
US50356195 Sep 199030 Jul 1991Fereidoun DaftaryAnatomical restoration dental implant system with improved healing cap and abutment
US504907429 Mar 199017 Sep 1991Sugio OtaniDental implant
US512583928 Sep 199030 Jun 1992Abraham IngberDental implant system
US524637027 Nov 199221 Sep 1993Coatoam Gary WDental implant method
US52827464 Nov 19921 Feb 1994Grady C. SellersMethod of installing a dental prosthesis
US531034314 Oct 199210 May 1994Jiro HasegawaEndo-osseous implant
US531647725 May 199331 May 1994Calderon Luis OUniversal implant abutment
US532837115 Oct 199312 Jul 1994Friatec AktiengesellschaftDental implant
US541756825 Feb 199423 May 1995Giglio; Graziano D.Gingival contoured abutment
US54175699 Oct 199123 May 1995Perisse; JeanMulti-element dental implant
US543156726 Nov 199311 Jul 1995Daftary; FereidounAnatomical restoration dental implant system with interlockable various shaped healing cap assembly and matching abutment member
US545848810 Feb 199417 Oct 1995Wellesley Research Associates, Inc.Dental implant and post construction
US546444013 Nov 19927 Nov 1995Lucocer AktiebolagPorous implant with two sets of pores
US552718223 Dic 199318 Jun 1996Adt Advanced Dental Technologies, Ltd.Implant abutment systems, devices, and techniques
US558469319 Sep 199417 Dic 1996Katsunari NishiharaArtificial dental root
US558883825 Oct 199331 Dic 1996Astra AktiebolagFixture for use in a dental implant system
US562250024 Feb 199422 Abr 1997Core-Vent CorporationInsertion tool/healing collar/abutment
US563698923 Ene 199510 Jun 1997Somborac; MilanDental implant
US566738417 May 199516 Sep 1997Institut Straumann AgDevice for forming a dental prosthesis and method of manufacturing such a device
US567406913 Ene 19957 Oct 1997Osorio; JulianCustomized dental abutment
US56953348 Dic 19959 Dic 1997Blacklock; Gordon D.Bendable and castable post and core
US575903429 Nov 19962 Jun 1998Daftary; FereidounAnatomical restoration dental implant system for posterior and anterior teeth
US577948020 May 199714 Jul 1998Degussa AktiengesellschaftProsthetic abutment for dental implants
US587645428 Jun 19962 Mar 1999Universite De MontrealModified implant with bioactive conjugates on its surface for improved integration
US590829823 Ene 19961 Jun 1999Duerr; WalterEnossal single tooth implant with spacer sleeve
US593167512 Mar 19983 Ago 1999Callan; Donald P.Dental prosthesis
US59890278 Dic 199523 Nov 1999Sulzer Calcitek Inc.Dental implant having multiple textured surfaces
US598902929 Oct 199723 Nov 1999Atlantis Components, Inc.Customized dental abutments and methods of preparing or selecting the same
US601292330 Jul 199811 Ene 2000Sulzer Calcitek Inc.Two-piece dental abutment with removable cuff
US60245678 Abr 199915 Feb 2000Callan; Donald P.Dental prosthesis
US614278222 May 19987 Nov 2000Lazarof; SargonImplant assembly and process for preparing a prosthetic device
US616205426 Ene 199919 Dic 2000Takacs; GyulaSubgingival jaw implant
US616496921 Mar 199726 Dic 2000Dinkelacker; WolfgangDental implant
US61741671 Dic 199816 Ene 2001Woehrle Peter S.Bioroot endosseous implant
US62173311 Oct 199817 Abr 2001Implant Innovations, Inc.Single-stage implant system
US62173339 May 200017 Abr 2001Carlo ErcoliDental implant for promoting reduced interpoximal resorption
US622785825 Feb 19978 May 2001Nobel Biocare AbBone anchoring element
US62313428 Oct 199915 May 2001Atlantis Components, Inc.Customized dental abutments and methods of preparing or selecting the same
US627372020 Abr 199914 Ago 2001Robert SpaltenDental implant system
US628019511 Jun 199928 Ago 2001Astra AktiebolagMethod of treating a partially or totally edentulous patient
US628375312 Jul 20004 Sep 2001The Millennium Business Group Ltd.Implant abutment systems, devices, and techniques
US62837543 Oct 20004 Sep 2001Woehrle Peter S.Bioroot endosseous implant
US628711517 Nov 199811 Sep 2001L. Paul LustigDental implant and tool and method for effecting a dental restoration using the same
US631226012 Ago 19996 Nov 2001Nobel Biocare AbOne-step threaded implant
US63501261 Sep 200026 Feb 2002Ricardo LevismanBone implant
US63646633 Dic 19992 Abr 2002Wolfgang DinkelackerTooth implant and method to make it
US643186710 Ago 200013 Ago 2002Glenn GittelsonDental implant system
US646450022 May 200115 Oct 2002Don Dragoljub PopovicDental implant and abutment system
US65275544 Jun 20014 Mar 2003Nobel Biocare AbNatural implant system
US654756414 Jul 199915 Abr 2003Astra AktiebolagBone implant having circumferentially oriented roughness
US661995819 Mar 200116 Sep 2003Implant Innovations, Inc.Implant delivery system
US66269119 Nov 199930 Sep 2003Nobel Biocare AbThreaded implant, and arrangement and method for such an implant
US66527656 Feb 200125 Nov 2003Implant Innovations, Inc.Implant surface preparation
US66559613 Dic 20012 Dic 2003Richard Day CottrellModified dental implant fixture
US667287219 Ago 20026 Ene 2004Dental Design Consultants, LlcModified dental implant fixture
US685497211 Ene 200015 Feb 2005Nicholas ElianDental implants and dental implant/prosthetic tooth systems
US69391353 Jun 20026 Sep 2005Schubert L. SapianGrowth factor releasing biofunctional dental implant
US72705425 Ene 200418 Sep 2007Astra Tech AbModified dental implant fixture
US2001002149814 May 200113 Sep 2001Julian OsorioCustomized dental abutments and methods of preparing or selecting the same
US200201825674 Jun 20015 Dic 2002Hurson Steven M.Natural implant system
US2003003198130 Ene 200213 Feb 2003Robert HoltProsthetic implant
US200300319829 Ago 200213 Feb 2003Abarno Juan CarlosSplit implant for dental reconstruction
US200300685993 Oct 200210 Abr 2003Balfour Alan R.Esthetic profile endosseous root-formed dental implant
US200301244895 Dic 20023 Jul 2003Hurson Steven M.Natural implant system
US2005001410814 May 200420 Ene 2005Wohrle Peter S.Dental implant system
US2005021471426 Ene 200529 Sep 2005Wohrle Peter SDental implant system
US2006018884619 Abr 200624 Ago 2006Wohrle Peter SDental implant system
US2006019417019 Abr 200631 Ago 2006Wohrle Peter SDental implant system
US2006024639819 Abr 20062 Nov 2006Friadent GmbhDental implant component
CH413224A Título no disponible
DD250052A1 Título no disponible
DE250052A1 Título no disponible
DE4339060A116 Nov 199318 May 1995Borsig Babcock AgGetriebeverdichter für die Verdichtung von Sauerstoff
EP0705574A25 Abr 199510 Abr 1996Core-Vent CorporationSelective surface, externally-threaded endosseous dental implant
EP0820737A225 Jul 199728 Ene 1998Injex CorporationArtificial dental implant
EP0868889A121 Mar 19977 Oct 1998Dinkelacker, Wolfgang, Dr. med. dent.Dental implant
EP0879580A215 May 199825 Nov 1998Core-Vent CorporationNon-submergible, one part, root form endosseous dental implants
EP0910297A13 Jul 199728 Abr 1999Vagn Erik DallCortical bone screw
EP1013236A111 Dic 199828 Jun 2000Dinkelacker, Wolfgang, Dr. med. dent.Dental implant and manufacturing method
FR2317904A1 Título no disponible
FR2634369A1 Título no disponible
GB1291470A Título no disponible
IT540713A Título no disponible
JPH1033562A Título no disponible
JPH08117250A Título no disponible
JPS63125260A Título no disponible
WO1996029020A115 Mar 199626 Sep 1996Institut Straumann AgDevice for connecting a dental implant to a conical secondary element
WO1997037610A14 Abr 199616 Oct 1997Julian OsorioCustomized dental abutment
WO1998023221A124 Nov 19974 Jun 1998Fereidoun DaftaryAnatomical restoration dental implant system for posterior and anterior teeth
WO2001049199A33 Ene 200112 Sep 2002Reto BaumgartnerIntraosteal dental implant and combined arrangement
WO2001050972A221 Dic 200019 Jul 2001Nicholas ElianDental implants and dental implant/prosthetic tooth systems
WO2003005928A110 Jul 200223 Ene 2003Innova Corp.Implant for use in aesthetic regions of the mouth
Otras citas
Referencia
1"Implantatsysteme und ihre Komponenten", 1998, Implantologie, 1:75-79.
2Albrektsson et al. "Osseointegrated Dental Implants", The Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 30 No. 1, Jan. 1986. p. 151-174.
3Appendix A to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
4Appendix B to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
5Appendix C to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
6Appendix D to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
7Appendix E to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
8Appendix F to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
9Appendix G to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
10Appendix H to Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754.
11Baier, et al., "Future Directions in Surface Preparation of Dental Implants", Journal of Dental Education, 52:788-791.
12Baier, et al., 1988, "Future Directions in Surface Preparation of Dental Implants", Journal of Dental Education, 52:788-791.
13Bengazi, et al., 1996, "Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:303-310.
14Bolind, P., et al., Influence Of External Administration Of Epinephrine On Bone Regeneration., Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants. (1989); 4:285-287; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
15Brånemark, et al., 1985, "Tissue-Integrated Prostheses", Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., p. 11-76.
16Branemark, et al., 1985, "Tissue-Integrated Prosthesis: Nature and Significance of the Edentulous State" Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., chapter 2:77-88.
17Brånemark, P.I. et al., Osseointegrated Implants In The Treatment Of The Edentulous Jaw. Experience From A 10-Year Period, Scand. J. Plastic Reconstruc. Surg., (1977) (Suppl. 16 at p. 9); Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden.
18Brunski, John B., 1988, Blomechanics of Oral Implants: Future Research Directions, Journal of Dental Education, 52:775-787.
19Buser, D., et al., Influence of Surface Characteristics on Bone Integration of Titanium Implants. A Histomorphometric Study In Miniature Pigs, J. Biomed. Materials Res., (1991); 25:889-902; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
20Buser, et al., 1991, "Tissue Integration of One-Stage ITI Implants: 3 year Results of a Longitudinal Study With Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw Implants.", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 6:405-412.
21Buser, et al., 1991, "Tissue Integration of One-Stage ITI Implants: 3-Year Results of a Longitudinal Study With Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw Implants", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 6:405-412.
22Buser, et al., 1996, "Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:11-19.
23Buser, et al., 1996m "Comparison of healed tissues adjacent to submerged and non-submerged unloaded titanium dental implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7:11-19.
24Chiche, el al., 1998, "Multidisplinary Implant Dentistry for improved Aesthetics and Function", Pract Periodont. Aesthet. Dent., 10:177-186.
25Chiche, et al., 1998, "Multidispilinary Implant Dentistry for Improved Aesthetics and Function", Pract Periodont. Aesthet. Dent., 10:177-186.
26Coatoam, Gary W. et al., "A Four-year Study Examining the Results of Indirect Sinus Augmentation Procedures". Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 23, No. 3/1997, pp. 117-127, 1997.
27Coatoam, Gary W. et al., "Immediate Placement of Anatomically Shaped Dental Implants". Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 26, No. 3/2000, p. 170-176, 2000.
28Coatoam, Gary W. et al., "The Segmental Ridge-Split Procedure". J Periodontal, vol. 74, No. 5, May 2003, p. 757-770.
29Coatoam, Gary W., "Indirect Sinus Augmentation Procedures Using One-Stage Anatomically Shaped Root-form Implants". Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 23, No. 1 & 2/1997, p. 25-42, 1997.
30Cochran, D.L., et al., Bone Response to Unloaded and Loaded Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-etched Surface: A Histometric Study in the Canine Mandible, J. Biomed. Materials res., (1997); 40:1-11; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
31Cochran, D.L., et al., Evaluation of an Endosseous Titanium Implant with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface in the Canine Mandible: Radiographic Results, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. (1996); 7:240-252; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
32Cook, S., et al., The Effect Of Surface Macrotexture On The Mechanical and Histologic Characteristics Of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Dental Implants, J. Oral Implant. (1993); 4:288-294; Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
33Dinkelacker, Wolfgang, "Vergleighende Untersuchung zur Passform metallkeramischer Kronen auf gegossener und galvanish hergestellter metallener Substruktur" Medizinischen Fakultat (Klinische Medizin) der Eberhard-Karls-Universitat Tubingen, 1990.
34Eckert et al. "Patient Evaluation and Prosthodontic Treatment Planning for Osseointegrated Implants", The Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 33 No. 4, Oct. 1989. p. 599-618.
35Examination Report received in corresponding European Patent Application No. 99968057.2, mailed Apr. 21, 2009, 5 pages.
36F.A. Young, D.Sc., 1988, "Future Directions in Dental Implants Materials Research", Journal of Dental Education 52:770-774.
37F.A. Young, D.Sc., 1988, "Future Directions in Dental Implants Materials Research", Journal of Dental Education, 52:770-774.
38Gerald A. Niznick, Oct. 1989, "A Multimodal Approach to Implant Prosthodontics", Dental Clinics of North America, 33:869-878.
39Gieloff et al., "Bio-Design-Implatantate Soforimplantate mit dem Re Implant System", ZWR, 104. Jahrg. 1995, Nr. 4, pp. 252-256.
40Gieloff et al., 1995, Bio-Design-Implantate Sofortimplantate mit dem Re Implant System, p. 252-256 ( with English translation).
41Gomez-Roman, et al., 1997, "The Frialit-2 Implant System: Five-Year Clinical Experience in Single-Tooth and Immediately Postextraction Applications", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implant, 12:299-309.
42Gomez-Roman, et al., 1997, "The Frialit-2 Implant System: Five-Year Clinical Experience in Single-Tooth and Immediately Postextraction Applications", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 12:299-309.
43Gotfredsen, K, et al., Anchorage of TiO2-Blasted, HA Coated, and Machined Implants: An Experimental Study With Rabbits. J. Biomed. Materials Res. (1995); 29:1223-1231; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
44Gotfredsen, K., et al., Histomorphometric And Removal Torque Analysis For TiO2-Blasted Titanium Implants-An Experimental Study On Dogs, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. (1992); 3:77-84; Copenhagen, Denmark.
45Gotfredsen, K., et al., Histomorphometric And Removal Torque Analysis For TiO2-Blasted Titanium Implants—An Experimental Study On Dogs, Clin. Oral Impl. Res. (1992); 3:77-84; Copenhagen, Denmark.
46Gottlander, M., et al., Histomorphometric Analyses Of Hydroxyapatite-Coated And Uncoated Titanium Implants. The Importance of The Implant Design., Clin. Oral Implants Res. (1992); 2:71-76; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
47Gottlander, M., et al., Short- and Long-Term Animal Studies With A Plasma-Sprayed Calcium Phosphate-Coated Implant, Clin. Oral Implants Res. (1997); 5:345-351; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
48Gottlander, M., et al., Short- and Long-Term Animal Studies With A Plasma-Sprayed Calcium Phosphate-Coated Implant, Clin. Oral Implants Res. (1997); 5:345-351; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
49Hansson, Stig, et al., The Relation Between Surface Roughness and Interfacial Shear Strength for Bone Anchored Implants-A Biomechanical Approach in Towards an Optimized Dental Implant and Implant Bridge Design-A Biomechanical Approach, Biomechanics, Department of Polymeric Materials, School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden (1997).
50Hansson, Stig, et al., The Relation Between Surface Roughness and Interfacial Shear Strength for Bone Anchored Implants—A Biomechanical Approach in Towards an Optimized Dental Implant and Implant Bridge Design—A Biomechanical Approach, Biomechanics, Department of Polymeric Materials, School of Mechanical and Vehicular Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden (1997).
51Heydecke et al., "Optimal Esthetics in Single Tooth Replacement with the Re-implant System: A Case Report". The International Journal of Prosthodontics 1999, vol. 12, pp. 184-189.
52Hobo et al. "Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation", 1989. p. 3-7.
53Jack T. Krauser, DMD, Oct. 1989, "Hydroxylapatite-Coated Dental Implants", Dental Clinics of North America, 33:879-903.
54Jansen, et al., 1997, "Microbial Leakage and Marginal Fit of the Implant-Abutment Interface", the International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 12:527-540.
55John B. Brunski, 1988, "Biomechanics of Oral Implants: Future Research Directions", Journal of Dental Education, 52:775-787.
56Kirsch, et al., 1989., "The IMZ Osteointegrated Implant System", Dental Clinics of North America, 33:733-791.
57Klokkevold, P., et al., Osseointegration Enhanced by Chemical Etching of The Titanium Surface-A Removal Torque Study in the Rabbit, Clin. Oral Impl. Res.(1997); 8:442-447; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
58Klokkevold, P., et al., Osseointegration Enhanced by Chemical Etching of The Titanium Surface—A Removal Torque Study in the Rabbit, Clin. Oral Impl. Res.(1997); 8:442-447; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
59Kohal et al., "Custom-made root analogue titanium implants placed into extraction sockets". Clinical Oral Implants Research 1997, vol. 8, pp. 386-392.
60Kohal et al., "Wurzelanaloge Titanimplantate (Bio-Design-Implantate) für die Sofortimplantation-Das Re-implant-System". Implantologie 1996, vol. 2, pp. 99-115 (with English Translation).
61Kohal et al., 1996., "Wurzetanagoge Titanimplantate (Bio-Design-Implantate) für die Sofortimplatnation-Das Re-Implant®-System", p. 99-115 (with English Translation).
62Krauser, Jack T., 1989., "Hydorxylapatite-Coated Dental Implants", Dental Clinics of North America, 33:879-903.
63Langer, et al., 1993, "The Wide Fixture: A Solution for Special Bone Situations and a Rescue for the Compromised Implant. Part 1", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8:400-408.
64Lefkove, Michael, D., et al., Immediate Loading of Cylinder Implants With Overdentures in the Mandibular Symphysis: The Titanium Plasma-Sprayed Screw Technique, J. Oral Implant. (1990); 16:265-271; Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
65Meffert, Roland M., DDS, 1988, "The Soft Tissue Interface in Dental Implantology", Journal of Dental Education, 52:810-878.
66Misch "Implant Terminology" Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 1993. p. 19-27.
67Najjar, T.A., et al., Enhanced Osseointegration Of Hydroxylapatite Implant Material, Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol. (1991) 1:9-15; Dept. of Oral Pathology, UMD-New Jersey Dental School, Newark, NJ.
68Najjar, T.A., et al., Enhanced Osseointegration Of Hydroxylapatite Implant Material, Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol. (1991) 1:9-15; Dept. of Oral Pathology, UMD—New Jersey Dental School, Newark, NJ.
69Niznick, Gerald A., Oct. 1989, "A Multimodal Approach to Implant Prosthodontics", Dental Clinics of North America, 33:869-878.
70Olefjord, I., et al., Surface Analysis of Four Dental Implant Systems, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants (1993); 8:32-40; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
71Olsson, et al., 1995, "MkII-A Modified Self-Tapping Branemark Implant: 3-Year Results of a Controlled Prospective Pilot Study", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implant, 10:15-21.
72Olsson, et al., 1995, "MkII—A Modified Self-Tapping Branemark Implant: 3-Year Results of a Controlled Prospective Pilot Study", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implant, 10:15-21.
73Olsson, et al., 1995, "MkII—A Modified Self-Tapping Brånemark Implant: 3-Year Results of a Controlled Prospective Pilot Study", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implant, 10:15-21.
74Order Granting Request For Ex Parte Reexamination (U.S. Appl. No. 90/007,836).
75Parel, et al., "Esthetics and Osseointegration", 1989. p. 36, 40, 41, and 121.
76Piattelli, A., et al., Immediate Loading of Titanium plasma-Sprayed Screw-Shaped Implants in Man: A Clinical and Histological Report of Two Cases, J. Periodontol. (1997); 68:591-597; Chicago, Illinois.
77Prestipino, et al., Jan./Feb. 1993, "esthetic High-Strength Implant Abutments. Part 1", Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, p. 29-35.
78Prestipino, et al., Jan./Feb. 1993, "Esthetic High-Strength Implant Abutments. Part 1",Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, p. 29-35.
79Product brochure published before Dec. 1, 1998.
80Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,283,754 (U.S. Appl. No. 90/007,836).
81Roland M. Meffert, DDS, 1988, "The Soft Tissue Interface in Dental Implantology", Journal of Dental Education, 52:810-811.
82Saadoun, et al., 1998, "Peridontal Implications in Implant Treatment Planning of Aesthtic Results", Pract. Periodont. Asthet. Dent., 10:655-664.
83Saadoun, et al., 1998, "Periodontal Implications in Implant Treatment Planning for Aesthetic Results", Pract. Periodont. Aesthet. Dent., 10:655-664.
84Schnitman, et al., 1988, "Implants for Partial Edentulism", Journal of Dental Education, 52:725-736.
85Schnitman, et al., 1988, Implants for Partial Edentulism, Journal of Dental Education, 52:725-736.
86Schwartz, Z., et al., Underlying Mechanisms at the Bone-Surface Interface During Regeneration, J. Periodont. Res. (1992); 32: 166-171; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
87Siegeie, et al., 1989, "Numerical Investigations of the Influence of Implant Shape on Stress Distribution in the Jaw Bone", the International Journal of Oral & maxillofacial Implants, 4:333-340.
88Siegele, et al., 1989, "Numerical Investigations of the Influence of Implant Shape on Stress Distribution in the Jaw Bone", The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 4:333-340.
89Spiekerman, et al., "Implantology". Color Atlas of Dental Medicine, 1995, pp. 15, 22-23, 274-275, and 307.
90Spiekermann, H., et al., A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of IMZ and TPS Implants In The Edentulous Mandible Using Bar-Retained Overdentures, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants (1995); 10:231-243; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
91Spierkermann et al. "Implant Systems" Color Atlas of Dental Medicine: Implantology, 1995. p. 25-58.
92Straumann Dental-Brochure; May 2000.
93Straumann Dental—Brochure; May 2000.
94Strub et al., "The Re Implant® System for Immediate Implant Placement". Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1997, vol. 9, pp. 187-196.
95Sullivan, et al., May/Jun. 1993, "Considerations for Successful Single tooth Implant Restorations", Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 5:119-124.
96Supplemental Search Report for European Application No. 99 96 8057 (European Counterpart of the current application), mailed Mar. 30, 2005.
97W. Eugene Roberts, DDS, Ph.D., 1998, "Bone Tissue Interface", Journal of Dental Education, 52:804-809.
98Wagner, W., A Brief Introduction To Advanced Surface Modification Techniques, J. Oral Implant., (1992); 18:231-235; Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
99Wennerberg et al., "Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography", 1996.
100Wennerberg, A., et al., A 1-Year Follow-Up Of Implants Of Differing Surface Roughness Placed in Rabbit Bone., Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants (1997); 4:486-494; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
101Wennerberg, A., et al., A Histomorphometric And Removal Torque Study Of Screw-Shaped Titanium Implants With Three Different Surface Topographies, Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. (1995); 6:24-30; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
102Wennerberg, A., et al., Bone Tissue Response To Commercially Pure Titanium Implants Blasted With Fine And Coarse Particles Of Aluminum Oxide., Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants (1996) 1:38-45; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
103Wennerberg, A., et al., Design and Surface Characteristics of 13 Commercially Available Oral Implant Systems, Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants (1993); 8:622-633; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
104Wennerberg, A., et al., Torque And Histomorphometric Evaluation Of C.P. Titanium Screws Blasted With 25- and 75-Microns-Sized Particles Of Al2O3, J Biomed. Materials Res. (1996) 2:251-60; John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
105Wennerberg, A.; On Surface Roughness and Implant Incorporation; Dept. Biomaterials & Handicap Research, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Dept. of Prosthetic Dentistry, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden (1996).
106Wennerberg, A.; T. Albrektsson; B. Andersson; J. J. Krol; A Histomorphometric and Removal Torque Study of Screw-Shaped Titanium Implants with Three Different Surface Topographies; Clinical Oral Implants Research; 6:24-30 (1995), Blackwell Munksgaard, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
107Wennerberg, A; T. Albrektsson; B. Andersson; Design and Surface Characteristics of 13 Commercially Available Oral Implant Systems; Int'l J. of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants; 6:622-633 (1993); Quintessence Publishing, Hanover Park, IL, USA.
108Wennerberg, et al., "Design and Surface Characteristics of 13 Commercially Available Oral Implant Systems", International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8:622-633.
109Wennerberg, et al., 1993, "Design and Surface Characteristics of 13 Commercially Available Oral Implant Systems", International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 8:622-633.
110Wismeijer, D., et al., Patient Satisfaction With Overdentures Supported by One-Stage TPS Implants, Int J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. (1992); 1: 51-55; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
111Zablotsky, M., et al., Histological And Clinical Comparisons Of Guided Tissue Regeneration On Dehisced Hydroxyapatite-Coated And Titanium Endosseous Implant Surfaces: A Pilot Study, Int. J Oral Maxillofac. Implants. (1991); 3:294-303; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois.
112Zablotsky, M., et al., Hydroxyapatite Coatings In Implant Dentistry, Implant Dent. (1992); 4:253-257; Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Hagerstown, Maryland.
113Zablotsky, M., et al., The Macroscopic, Microscopic And Spectrometric Effects Of Various Chemotherapeutic Agents On The Plasma-Sprayed Hydroxyapatite-Coated Implant Surface, Clin. Oral Implants Res. (1992); 4:189-98; Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom.
114Zablotsky, M., HA Coatings In Implant Dentistry: Hype, Hysteria, Or Clinical Reality?, Pract. Periodontics Aesthet. Dent. (1994); 2:60-65; USA.
Citada por
Patente citante Fecha de presentación Fecha de publicación Solicitante Título
US949830518 Feb 201422 Nov 2016Boris D. S. BabinerEndosseous dental implant and abutment for prevention of bone loss
Clasificaciones
Clasificación de EE.UU.433/173
Clasificación internacionalA61C8/00
Clasificación cooperativaA61C8/0018, A61C8/0012, A61C8/005, A61C8/006, A61C8/0068, A61C8/0075, A61C8/0077
Clasificación europeaA61C8/00G2, A61C8/00E, A61C8/00G1, A61C8/00F
Eventos legales
FechaCódigoEventoDescripción
19 Feb 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12