USRE43282E1 - Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment - Google Patents
Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE43282E1 USRE43282E1 US12/193,907 US19390708A USRE43282E US RE43282 E1 USRE43282 E1 US RE43282E1 US 19390708 A US19390708 A US 19390708A US RE43282 E USRE43282 E US RE43282E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cartilage
- joint
- tissue
- volume
- thickness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B23/00—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes
- G09B23/28—Models for scientific, medical, or mathematical purposes, e.g. full-sized devices for demonstration purposes for medicine
- G09B23/30—Anatomical models
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves
- A61B5/055—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves involving electronic [EMR] or nuclear [NMR] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
- A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/112—Gait analysis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
- A61B5/1127—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique using markers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4514—Cartilage
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/7235—Details of waveform analysis
- A61B5/7253—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms
- A61B5/7257—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms using Fourier transforms
Definitions
- This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint and the use of the assessment in aiding in prevention of damage to the joint or treatment of diseased cartilage in the joint.
- Osteoarthritis is the most common condition to affect human joints as well as a frequent cause of locomotor pain and disability. More particularly, osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee occurs in a substantial portion of the population over the age of fifty.
- osteoarthritis is now increasingly viewed as a dynamic process with potential for new pharmacologic and surgical treatment modalites such as cartilage transplantation, osteochondral allo- or autografting, osteotomies and tibial corticotomies with angular distraction.
- Magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate non-invasive imaging technique for visualization of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis, particularly in knees.
- current MRI techniques cannot provide information on the relationship between the location of the cartilage loss and variations in the load bearing areas during the walking cycle. This information is important since it has been shown that dynamic loads during walking are related to the progression of knee OA.
- the ability to locate cartilage defects or areas of cartilage thinning relative to the load bearing areas of the knee could be valuable in evaluating factors influencing the progression of osteoarthritis.
- This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint of a mammal, particularly a human subject, using the assessment to treat and monitor the subject as needed for cartilage degeneration problems. While the numerous aspects of the invention are useful for joints generally, they are particularly suited for dealing with the human knee. Some aspects related the static images and degeneration patterns of a cartilage, while others relate to the interaction of such images and patterns to provide a better means of assessing the condition of a cartilage.
- One aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a cartilage.
- the method comprises obtaining an image of a cartilage, (preferably a magnetic resonance image), converting the image to a three-dimensional degeneration pattern, and evaluating the degree of degeneration in a volume of interest of the cartilage.
- Another aspect of this invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint.
- the method comprises obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the initial time, obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at a later time, and calculating the thickness or regional volume of the region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the later time, and determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the cartilage between the later and initial times.
- the 3D map may be a thickness map, a biochemical map or a combination.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; receiving the transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal.
- the method comprises (a) determining the thickness, D N , of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect; (b) obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, D D , of the region; (c) subtracting D D from D N to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, D L ; and (d) multiplying the D L value times the area of the cartilage defect, A D , to give the volume of cartilage loss.
- Still another aspect of the-invention is a method of estimating the change of a region of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time.
- the method comprises (a) estimating the width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T 1 , (b) estimating the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T 2 , and (c) determining the change in the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
- Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint.
- the method comprises (a) defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T 1 ; (b) identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system; (c) defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage; (d) defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T 2 ; (e) placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T 2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T 1 ; (f) and measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T 1 and T 2 .
- Another aspect of this invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage.
- the method comprises measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage, determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage; mapping the amounts of the biochemical component through the cartilage; and determining the areas of cartilage deficit by identifying the areas having an altered amount of the biochemical component present.
- the biochemical map may be used in the method aspects of the invention in a manner similar to the cartilage thickness map.
- Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint from a distant location.
- the method comprises electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; receiving the transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
- kit for aiding in assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a mammal comprises a software program, which when installed and executed on a computer reads a cartilage degeneration pattern presented in a standard graphics format and produces a computer readout showing a cartilage thickness map of the degenerated cartilage.
- Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a subject's cartilage in a joint, the method comprises obtaining a three dimensional biochemical representation of the cartilage, obtaining a morphological representation of the cartilage, and merging the two representations, and simultaneously displaying the merged representations on a medium.
- the merged representations are then used to assess the condition of a cartilage, estimate the loss of cartilage in a joint, determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of cartilage defect, or estimating the change of a region of cartilage at a particular point in time or over a period of time.
- a method for correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and opto-electrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint comprises (a) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in externally near the joint, (b) obtaining the opto-electrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a), and (c) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a) and (b) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the bone data and the opto-electrical data.
- the method also can be used to further evaluate cartilage image data that is obtained using a similarly positioned set of skin reference markers.
- a skin reference marker that comprises (a) a material detectable by an imaging technique; (b) a container for holding the material, (c) a material that causes the container to adhere to the skin of a human, and (d) a reflective material placed on the surface of the container.
- Another aspect of the invention is a biochemical map of a cartilage that comprises a three-dimensional representation of the distribution of the amount of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage; (b) determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage; (c) mapping th e amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage; and (d) determining the areas of abnormal joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for deriving the motion of bones about a joint from markers placed on the skin, which method comprises (a) placing at least three external markers on the patient's limb segments surrounding the joint, (b) registering the location of each marker on the patient's limb while the patient is standing completely still and while moving the limb, (c) calculating the principal axis, principal moments and deformation of rigidity of the cluster of markers, and (d) calculating a correction to the artifact induced by the motion of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone.
- Another aspect of the invention is a system for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which system comprises (a) a device for electronically transferring a cartilage degeneration pattern for the joint to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; (b) a device for receiving the cartilage degeneration pattern at the remote location; (c) a database accessible at the remote location for generating a movement pattern for the joint of the human wherein the database includes a collection of movement patterns of human joints, which patterns are organized and can be accessed by reference to characteristics such as type of joint, gender, age, height, weight, bone size, type of movement, and distance of movement; (d) a device for generating a movement pattern that most closely approximates a movement pattern for the human patient based on the characteristics of the human patient; (e) a device for correlating the movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern; and (f) a device for transmitting the correlated movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern back to the source of the cartilage degeneration pattern.
- a method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint comprises (a) obtaining the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the knee showing at least the bones on either side of the joint, (b) segmenting the MRI data from step (a), (c) generating a geometrical representation of the bone of the joint from the segmented MRI data, (d) assessing the patient's gait to determine the load pattern or the cartilage contact pattern of the articular cartilage in the joint during the gait assessment, and (e) correlating the load pattern or cartilage contact pattern obtained in step (d) with the geometrical representation obtained in step (c).
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- Another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the rate of degeneration of cartilage in the joint of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and the bones on either side of the cartilage, which method comprises (a) obtaining a cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint that shows an area of greater than normal degeneration, (b) obtaining a movement pattern of the joint that shows where the opposing cartilage surfaces contact, (c) comparing the cartilage degeneration pattern with the movement pattern of the joint, and (d) determining if the movement pattern shows contact of one cartilage surface with a portion of the opposing cartilage surface showing greater than normal degeneration in the cartilage degeneration pattern.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for monitoring the treatment of a degenerative joint condition in a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern; (c) treating the mammal to minimize further degeneration of the joint condition; and (d) monitoring the treatment to the mammal.
- Still another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; and (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern
- FIG. 1 shows an overview schematic representation of some aspects of the invention of this application.
- FIG. 2 shows a DEFT pulse sequence
- FIG. 4 shows the mean contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of cartilage to joint fluid for various MRI pulse sequences.
- FIG. 5 shows the mean contrast for cartilage and joint fluid for various MRI pulse sequences.
- FIG. 6 shows a DEFT acquisition using non-selective refocusing pulses to maximize the SNR efficiency and a partial K- Echo-Plainer acquisition gradients in order to minimize the required scan time for 3D volume.
- FIG. 7 shows four sample images acquired with a DEFT pulse sequence combined with a partial K- Echo-Plainer acquisition in order to provide efficient 3D coverage.
- FIGS. 8A and 8B show a 3-point Dixon GRE image of the articular cartilage of medial femorotibial compartment in a normal 35-year old volunteer.
- FIG. 8A has the subject in a supine position and
- FIG. 8B has the subject in an upright position.
- FIGS. 9A-9C show patient position and application of imaging coil and tracker coil for kinetic MR imaging of the knee. Patient is in upright weight-bearing position for active flexion and extension study of the knee.
- FIG. 9B is a 2D cartilage thickness map demonstrating abrupt decrease in cartilage thickness in the area of the defect (arrows).
- the ⁇ thickness between the neighboring pixels can be use to define the borders of the cartilage defect. Note defused cartilage thinning in the area enclosed by the asterisks (*).
- FIGS. 10A-10C show a 3D surface registration of femoral condyles based on T1-weighted spin-echo MR images.
- FIG. 10A is baseline with a knee in neutral position.
- FIG. 10B is a follow-up with knee and external rotation with a 3D view that is the identical to the one used in 10 A but the difference in knee rotation is apparent.
- transformation and re-registration of Scan B to the object coordinate system of Scan A shows the anatomic match to A is excellent.
- FIG. 11B is a 2D cartilage thickness map demonstrating abrupt decrease in cartilage thickness in an area of the defect (arrows).
- the ⁇ thickness between the neighboring pixels can be used to define the borders of the cartilage defect. Note diffuse cartilage thinning in the area enclosed by the asterisks (*).
- FIG. 12 shows the anatomic coordinate system in the femur and in the tibia.
- FIG. 13 shows calculation of the anatomic coordinate system from palpable bony landmarks.
- FIG. 14 shows additional marker names and locations for MR to optical cross registration.
- FIG. 15 shows the marker names and locations for the standard point-cluster technique protocol.
- FIG. 16 shows the error in the tibial location estimate for the rigid body model and the intrical deformation correction technique.
- FIG. 17 shows the error in tibial orientation estimate for the rigid body model and the interval reformation correction technique.
- FIGS. 18A-18I show functional joint imaging.
- FIG. 19 shows the superimposition of the tibiofemoral contact line onto the 3D cartilage thickness map.
- FIG. 20 shows the determination of the natural line of curvature as the cutting plain is rotated about the transepicondyear reference, the cartilage-plain intersection results in a curve.
- FIG. 21 shows the determination of the tibiofemoral contact line through the proximity detection and approach algorithm.
- FIGS. 22A and 22B show a 2D MRI (3D SPGR) and 3D cartilage thickness map.
- FIGS. 23A-E show the matching of 3D thickness maps generated from MR images obtained with a knee neutral position and external rotation.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic overview of some of the various aspects of the invention. While a complete description of the many aspects of the invention is found in the specification and claims, the schematic overview gives some of the broad aspects of the invention.
- This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal.
- One aspect is a method for such an assessment.
- the assessment can be done using internal images, or maps, of the cartilage alone or in combination with a movement pattern of the joint. If used alone, a map obtained at an initial time is compared with a map obtained at a later time to provide a view of the change in cartilage over time.
- Another aspect is a method is comparing the movement pattern for a joint of a subject being studied with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the subject, then determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the degeneration pattern. If, in determining the relationship between the two patterns, one finds that the movement pattern has caused the degeneration pattern or will continue to adversely affect the degeneration pattern, therapy can be prescribed to minimize the adverse effects, such as further degeneration or inflammation.
- FIG. 1 is based on the full range of processes, preferably applied to a knee and surrounding cartilage.
- the first step 10 represents obtaining an image of the cartilage itself. This is typically achieved using MRI techniques to take an image of the entire knee and then, optionally, manipulating (e.g., “subtracting out” or “extracting”) the non-cartilage images as shown in step 12 .
- Non-cartilage images typically come from bone and fluid.
- the MRI is taken using external markers to provide reference points to the MRI image (step 11 ). If the cartilage is imaged with a 2D MRI acquisition technique, the resulting stack of 2D images so obtained can be combined into a 3D image, as indicated in step 14 .
- a preferred alternative is to use 3D MRI acquisition techniques to acquire a 3D image directly. In either case, the same “non-cartilage image extraction techniques referred to in step 12 can be used.
- various “maps” or displays of the cartilage can be constructed to give a cartilage degeneration pattern. This is represented by step 16 .
- One such display can, for example, be a color-coding of a displayed image to reflect the thickness for the cartilage. This will allow easy visual identification of actual or potential defects in the cartilage.
- a 3D image of the knee joint is taken, again preferably using MRI. Many of the same techniques as applied in steps 10 to 14 are used to do this. However, as illustrated by sub-step 22 , it is useful to define and register a skin-external frame of reference around the joint. This is achieved by placing fiduciary markers on the skin around the outside of the knee (step 22 ) prior to taking the image.
- an image is manipulated to enhance the image of the position of the markers (step 24 ).
- the resulting manipulated image is used to give a 3D image of the joint and associated bones (step 26 ).
- an additional set of markers is placed on the skin along the outside of the leg, and an external image of the limb is obtained.
- images are then taken of the subject in a static state.
- images are also taken of the subject while moving. This is shown collectively by step 32 .
- the images obtained are then processed to relate the movement of the skin relative to the bone.
- certain calculations are performed, for example, the center of mass is calculated.
- step 40 the combination of 3D cartilage image (from step 14 ), 3D knee joint image (step 26 ), and the moving leg co-ordinates (step 34 ) will, after appropriate corrections, result in a displayable, 3D motion image of the joint moving as per step 46 .
- the moving images, showing the contact areas of the knee joint can be used in conjunction with the various “maps” or displays generated at step 16 to provide a visual indication of potential or actual cartilage defects and help in determining their relation between movement and degeneration patterns. This is shown in step 48 .
- real measurements such as cartilage thickness
- later or earlier measurements and/or imaging This allows the tracking of the progression of a defect, or conversely, continued tracking of healthy cartilage. This aids a health worker in providing therapy for the patients.
- the method allows monitoring and evaluation of remedial actions as well as possible treatment prescriptions.
- this invention discloses, for example, a method to examine the relationship between articular cartilage morphology and the functional load bearing areas of a knee joint measured during movement.
- the method includes enhanced imaging techniques to reconstruct the volumetric and biochemical parameters of the articular cartilage in three dimensions; and a method for in vivo kinematic measurements of the knee.
- the kinematic measurement permits direct in vivo measurements of complete six-degrees of freedom motion of the femur or the tibia or associated bones during normal activities. This permits the study of load bearing of articular cartilage during movement.
- this method can aid in locating cartilage defects relative to the changing load bearing areas of the knee joint during daily activities. While the various aspects of the invention are useful in mammals generally, they are particularly useful for human patients.
- the joint of a patient is that place of union, more or less movable, between two or more bones.
- a joint comprises cartilage and other elements such as the accompanying bones on either side of the joint, fluid, and other anatomical elements.
- Joints arc classified into three general morphological types: fibrous, cartilaginous, and synovial. This invention is particularly useful for assessing synovial joints, particularly the knee.
- MRI magnetic resonance imaging
- CT computed tomography scanning
- CAT computerized axial tomography
- ultrasound imaging techniques Others may be apparent to one of skill in the art. MRI techniques are preferred.
- MRI with its superior soft tissue contrast, is the best technique available for assessing tissue and its defects, for example articular cartilage and cartilage lesions, to obtain a cartilage degeneration can provide morphologic information about the area of damage. Specifically, changes such as fissuring, partial or full thickness cartilage loss, and signal changes within residual cartilage can be detected.
- MR imaging techniques are particularly suitable for cartilage is because they can provide accurate assessment of cartilage thickness, demonstrate internal cartilage signal changes, evaluate the subchondral bone for signal abnormalities, and demonstrate morphologic changes of the cartilage surface.
- MRI provides several important advantages over other techniques in this invention.
- One advantage is good contrast between cartilage, bone, joint fluid, ligaments, and muscle in order to facilitate the delineation and segmentation of the data sets.
- Another is the coverage of the entire region of interest in a single scan within acceptable acquisition times.
- MRI employs pulse sequences that allow for better contrast of different parts of the area being imaged. Different pulse sequences are better fitted for visualization of different anatomic areas, for example, hyaline cartilage or joint fluid. More than one pulse sequence can be employed at the same time. A brief discussion of different types of pulse sequences is provided below.
- Routine MRI pulse sequences available for imaging tissue include conventional T1 and T2-weighted spin-echo imaging, gradient recalled echo (GRE) imaging, magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) imaging, fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging, contrast enhanced imaging, rapid acquisition relaxation enhancement, (RARE) imaging, gradient echo acquisition in the steady state, (GRASS), and driven equilibrium Fourier transform (DEFT) imaging.
- GRE gradient recalled echo
- MTC magnetization transfer contrast
- FSE fast spin-echo
- RARE rapid acquisition relaxation enhancement
- GASS gradient echo acquisition in the steady state
- DEFT driven equilibrium Fourier transform
- T1 and T2-weighted MRI depicts articular cartilage, and can demonstrate defects and gross morphologic changes.
- T1-weighted images show excellent intra-substance anatomic detail of hyaline cartilage.
- T1-weighted imaging does not show significant contrast between joint effusions and the cartilage surface, making surface irregularities difficult to detect.
- T2-weighted imaging demonstrates joint effusions and thus surface cartilage abnormalities, but since some components of cartilage have relatively short T2 relaxation times, these are not as well depicted as other preferred imaging.
- Gradient-recalled echo imaging has 3D capability and ability to provide high resolution images with relatively short scan times.
- Fat suppressed 3D spoiled gradient echo (FS-3D-SPGR) imaging has been shown to be more sensitive than standard MR imaging for the detection of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee.
- Magnetization transfer imaging can be used to separate articular cartilage from adjacent joint fluid and inflamed synovium.
- Fast spin-echo imaging is another useful pulse sequence to evaluate articular cartilage.
- Incidental magnetization transfer contrast contributes to the signal characteristics of articular cartilage on fast spin-echo images and can enhance the contrast between cartilage and joint fluid.
- Sensitivity and specificity of fast spin-echo imaging have been reported to be 87% and 94% in a study with arthroscopic correlation.
- gadolinium for imaging of articular cartilage has been applied in several different forms.
- Direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography wherein a dilute solution containing gadolinium is injected directly into the joint, improves contrast between cartilage and the arthrographic fluid.
- Indirect MR arthrography with a less invasive intravenous injection, can also been applied.
- Gadolinium enhanced imaging has the potential to monitor glycosaminoglycan content within the cartilage, which may have implications for longitudinal evaluations of injured cartilage.
- DEFT driven equilibrium fourier transform
- SPGR spoiled gradient echo
- the basic DEFT pulse sequence is shown in FIG. 2 .
- a conventional spin echo pulse sequence was followed by an additional refocusing pulse to form another echo, and then a reversed, negated, excitation pulse to return any residual magnetization to the +z axis.
- Typical MRI parameters for cartilage are a T1-relaxation time of 900 Milliseconds (ms) and a T2-relaxation time of 40 ms, while synovial fluid has a T1-relaxation time of 3000 ms and a T2-relaxation time of 200 ms.
- synovial fluid has a 30% greater proton density than cartilage.
- the signal levels of cartilage and synovial fluid were plotted in FIG. 3 for a RARE pulse sequence and for DEFT, and show that DEFT maintains excellent contrast for any relaxation time (TR). It achieves this contrast while maintaining a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency (SNR/(T acquisition )) that is equal to or better than other methods with much lower contrast, such as T1-weighted GRASS.
- SNR signal-to-noise ratio
- the patella IS was scanned in 10 normal volunteer knees using a 1.5T whole-body system (GE Signa) with a 3 inch surface coil. All images were acquired with field of view (FOV) 10 ⁇ 10 cm, matrix 256 ⁇ 256 elements, slice thickness 4 mm using fat-saturation.
- FSE fast spin-echo
- GRE gradient-echo
- SPGR spoiled gradient-echo
- CNR Contrast-to-noise ratios
- SI is signal intensity.
- DEFT demonstrated greater contrast-to-noise ratio and contrast between cartilage and joint fluid than SPGR, GRE, and FSE sequences ( FIGS. 4 & 5 ).
- Cartilage had intermediate signal intensity with DEFT, while joint fluid was high in signal intensity.
- the difference in CNR between DEFT and SPGR was statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.001).
- DEFT was combined with a partial k-space echo-planar data acquisition. This pulse sequence is illustrated in FIG. 6 above.
- a slab selective pulse in z defines the imaging volume, which is then resolved with phase-encoding gradients in the y and z axes, and an oscillating EPI gradient in the x axis.
- Example images acquired with this approach are shown in FIG. 7 .
- This case was optimized for resolution, in order to image the patellar cartilage.
- the EPI readout acquired 5 echoes for each DEFT sequence.
- Partial k-space acquisition collected only 60% of the data along the x-axis. Correction for the missing data was performed using a homodyne reconstruction.
- the image matrix was 192 ⁇ 192 ⁇ 32, with a resolution of 0.5 ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ 2.5 mm, resulting in a 10 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 8 cm FOV.
- the echo time TE was 22 ms, and the TR was 400 ms. Fat was suppressed with a fat presaturation pulse. The total scan time for this acquisition was 5 minutes.
- Additional image studies that can be performed using this approach may require greater spatial coverage, but one can permit slightly less spatial resolution, and a longer scan time similar to the one used with the 3D SPGR approach. If one relaxes the resolution to 0.75 ⁇ 0.75 ⁇ 1.5 mm, and doubles the z slab thickness and z phase encodes, the result will be a FOV of 15 ⁇ 15 ⁇ 16 cm, and a total scan time of approximately 15 minutes, which exactly fits the desired scan protocol. Similar to the 3D SPGR acquisition, one can acquire a first 3D DEFT scan in the sagittal plane with fat saturation. The 3D DEFT acquisition can then be repeated without fat saturation using the identical parameters and slice coordinates used during the previous acquisition with fat saturation. The resultant non-fat-saturated 3D DEFT images can be used for 3D rendering of the femoral and tibial bone contours.
- Driven Equilibrium Fourier Transform is a pulse sequence preferred for cartilage imaging that provides higher contrast-to-noise ratios and contrast between cartilage and joint fluid than SPGR, GRE, and FSE sequences.
- Cartilage morphology is better delineated with DEFT sequences than with SPGR, GRE, and FSE images.
- the combination of high anatomic detail and high cartilage-joint fluid CNR and contrast may render this sequence particularly useful for longitudinal studies of cartilage in patients with osteoarthritis.
- a MR image can be performed using a whole body magnet operating at a field strength of 1.5 T (GE Signa, for example, equipped with the GE SR-120 high speed gradients [2.2 Gauss/cm in 184 ⁇ sec risetimes]).
- Gd-DTPA Magneticnevist®, Berlex Inc., Wayne, N.J.
- T1relaxation time approximately 1.0 sec can be applied to the skin around the knee joint and optionally at the same positions used for gait analysis in a biomotion laboratory (discussed below).
- the external markers can be included in the field of view of all imaging studies. Patients can be placed in the scanner in supine position.
- the scanner table can then be moved to obtain coronal and sagittal images of the knee joint and tibia using the same sequence parameters.
- These T1-weighted scans can be employed to identify axes through the femur and tibia which can be used later for defining the geometry of the knee joint.
- GASS gradient echo sequence
- 2DFT 2D Fourier Transform
- This scout scan can be used to demonstrate the position of the knee joint space in the coil and to prescribe all subsequent high resolution imaging sequences centered over the joint space. Additionally, using the graphic, image based sequence prescription mode provided with the scanner software, the scout scan can help to ensure that all external markers around the knee joint are included in the field of view of the high resolution cartilage sensitive MR sequences.
- the fat-saturated 3D SPGR sequences can be used for rendering the cartilage in three dimensions (see description below).
- the 3D SPGR sequence can then be repeated in the sagittal plane without fat saturation using the identical parameters and slice coordinates used during the previous acquisition with fat saturation.
- the resultant non-fat-saturated 3D SPGR images demonstrate good contrast between low signal intensity cortical bone and high signal intensity bone marrow thereby facilitating 3D rendering of the femoral and tibial bone contours. It is to be understood that this approach is representative only and should not be viewed as limiting in any way.
- VAI Volumes of Interest
- the invention allows a health practitioner to determine cartilage loss in a reproducible fashion and thus follow the progression of a cartilage defect over time.
- a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence can be used for surfaces extraction of the femoral condyles.
- the T1-weighted spin-echo sequence provides high contrast between low signal intensity cortical bone and high signal intensity fatty marrow.
- a step-by-step problem solving procedure i.e., an algorithm, can convolve a data set with a 3D kernel to locate the maximum gradient location.
- the maximum gradient location corresponds to the zero crossing of a spatial location.
- This operation is preferably three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional.
- the surface of the joint, e.g. the femoral condyles, on the baseline scan can be registered in an object coordinate system A.
- the surface of the joint, e.g. the femoral condyles, on the follow-up scan can be registered in an object coordinate system B.
- a transformation B to B′ can be performed that best matches B′ with A.
- Such transformations can, for example, be performed using a Levenberg Marquardt technique.
- the transformations and matching can be applied to the cartilage only. The same transformation can be applied to the cartilage sensitive images on the follow-up scan in order to match the cartilage surfaces.
- the size of the targeted volumes of interest can be selected to exceed that of the cartilage defect in anteroposterior and mediolateral direction, e.g. by 0.5 to 1 cm.
- the targeted VOI can be chosen so that its size exceeds that of the cartilage defect in supero-inferior and mediolateral direction.
- the third dimension of the targeted VOI (parallel to the surface normal of the cartilage) can be fixed, for example at 1 cm.
- VOI size and placement can be manual or automatic on the baseline study.
- the 3D coordinates of the targeted VOI relative to the 3D contour of the joint and object coordinate system A can be registered and saved.
- follow-up studies e.g. scans inadvertently obtained with slightly different patient position
- the 3D surface of the joint is registered to match the orientation of the baseline scan and the targeted VOI is then automatically placed on the joint using object coordinate system B′ and the coordinates saved on the baseline study.
- Cartilage volume within the targeted VOI on baseline and follow-up studies can, for example, be determined using standard thresholding and seed growing techniques.
- external reference markers can be placed on the skin around the joint of the subject being imaged.
- the external marker can be designed not only to show up in the MRI, but also to show up if an external image of the joint is obtained. The importance and value of such unique reference markers will be discussed in more detail hereinafter.
- one embodiment of the invention is a skin reference marker that can be used in the assessment of the condition of a joint of a human.
- Multiple skin reference markers can be placed upon one or more limbs of a patient prior to internal imaging and external imaging.
- Each skin reference marker comprises a material detectable by an imaging technique, a container for the material in which the container preferably has multiple surfaces, a means for affixing the container to the skin (e.g. an adhesive placed on at least one surface of the container in an amount sufficient to adhere the container to the skin of a human), and a reflective material (preferably retro-reflective) placed on another surface of the container located away from the adhesive.
- Several imaging techniques can be used that are able to detect the marker.
- the material detectable by an imaging can be either in a liquid form or a solid form.
- the material can be any imaging contrast agent or solution, e.g. a paramagnetic material.
- the material can be a lanthanide, such as one belonging to the yttrium group of rare earth metals. More specifically, the material can be gadolinium.
- the shape of the container can be any shape allowing it to be placed on the skin of a human.
- the size of the container can be any size, but optimally a size allowing it to be recorded by an imaging machine.
- the longest dimension of the container can be up to 5.0 cm, but preferably is about 0.25 to 2.0 cm.
- the reflective or retro-reflective material can be any material that is able to reflect light directly back to the source of the light so that the position of the reference marker is captured by the opto-electrical recording means, e.g. a video camera. 3M Corporation makes several retro-reflective materials.
- a magnetic resonance image Once a magnetic resonance image is obtained, it can be manipulated to improve the image by reducing unwanted, non-cartilage images.
- the cartilage can be segmented image by image using a signal-intensity-based threshold combined with a seed growing technique.
- the femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage can be segmented separately based on the fat-saturated 3D SPGR or 3D DEFT sequence.
- Manual disarticulation can be performed by outlining the cartilage contour in areas where the signal intensity of the articular cartilage is similar to that of adjacent structures.
- the contours of the femoral, tibial, and patellar bone can be segmented separately using the non-fat-saturated 3D SPGR or 3D DEFT sequence. Segmentation software can allow for manual editing of cartilage thickness maps and cartilage defects detected using the above embodiments.
- Such software includes seed-growing algorithms and active-contour algorithms that are run on standard PC's.
- a sharp interface is present between the high signal intensity bone marrow and the low signal intensity cortical bone thereby facilitating seed growing.
- Fat-saturated and non-fat-saturated 3D sequences can be acquired with the same field of view, slice thickness and slice positions, thereby enabling superimposition and cross registration of any resultant 3D renderings of the femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage and bone.
- External reference markers can aid in registering the 3D data in the same object coordinate system.
- 3D maps of cartilage thickness can be generated using several different techniques.
- One representative, but not limiting, approach uses a 3D surface detection technique which is based on a 2D edge detector (Wang-Binford) that has been extended to 3D.
- This surface detection technique can generate surface points and their corresponding surface normal.
- the program samples 25 percent of the surface points and fits a cubic spline to the sample points.
- the program can compute the curvature along sample spline points and find two sample points that have the maximum curvature and are separated by about half the number of voxels on the contour. These points partition the spline into two subcontours. For each subcontour, the program can compute the average distance between the points and the center of the mass.
- the program can designate the subcontour with the smaller average distance as the inner cartilage surface and the other subcontour as the outer cartilage surface (OCS).
- OCS outer cartilage surface
- the intersect between the inner cartilage surface (ICS) (located at the subchondral bone interface) and the outer cartilage surface with the surface normal can be used to compute the 3D thickness of the articular cartilage on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
- the set of segmented two dimensional MR images can be transformed to a voxel representation using a computer program developed in the AVS Express (Advanced Visual Systems, Inc., Waltham, Mass.). Every voxel has a value of zero if it is not within an object of interest or a value ranging from one to 4095, depending on the signal intensity as recorded by the MRI machine.
- An isosurface can then be calculated that corresponds to the boundary elements of the volume of interest. A tesselation of this isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal of each polygon of the tesselation. These polygons are written to a file in a standard graphics format (Virtual Reality Modeling Language Version 1.0: VRML output language).
- the program can read in a scene, which scene consists of the various 3D geometric representations or “actors” (for example, VRML files of the tibia, tibia cartilage, femur, femoral cartilage), the static relationship transformations between these actors, and, if available, sequence of transformations describing how these actors move with respect to each other as the patient performs some activity, such as walking, jogging, etc.
- actors for example, VRML files of the tibia, tibia cartilage, femur, femoral cartilage
- the program can allow the user, through the use of the mouse and/or keyboard, the ability to observe the scene from arbitrary angles; to start and stop the animation derived from the motion profiles and to observe the contact line and any cartilage lesions while the animation is running. Additionally, the user can derive quantitative information on the scene through selecting points with the mouse.
- the software program can be written in the CTT computer language and can be compiled to run on both Silicon Graphics Workstations and Windows/Intel personal computers.
- Cartilage thickness can be determined by several methods.
- One example is detecting the locations of the bone—cartilage and the cartilage—joint fluid interface along the surface normal using the same edge detector described below, and subtracting them. This procedure can be repeated for each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface.
- the x, y, and z position of each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface can be registered on a 3D map or multiple. 2D maps and thickness values are translated into color values. In this fashion, the anatomic location of each pixel at the bone cartilage interface can be displayed simultaneously with the thickness of the cartilage in this location.
- the edge detector can produce accurate surface points and their corresponding surface normal.
- the detector can be applied to the baseline and the follow-up data set.
- both the surface points and surface normals can be used to form locally supporting planes (for each voxel). These planes can form an approximated surface for the baseline skeletal site.
- the surface points can be matched in the registration procedure onto the surface of the baseline data set.
- a possible approach for calculating the cartilage thickness is based on a 3D Euclidian distance transformation (EDT).
- EDT Euclidian distance transformation
- the voxels on the edge of the cartilage structure can be extracted using a slice by slice 8-neighbor search, resulting in a binary volume with the voxels on the cartilage surface having a value of 1 and all others being 0.
- a semi-automatic approach which requires the user to enter a point that lies outside the cartilage structure and faces the ICS, can be useful. From this point, rays are cast in all directions of the volume using a modified Bresenham's line drawing algorithm.
- a ray hits a voxel with a value of 1, this point is classified as part of the ICS.
- the ICS voxels are given a value of 0, whereas all other voxels are set to 1.
- the following representative algorithm can be useful. It can decompose the calculation into a series of 3 one-dimensional transformations and can use the square of the actual distances, which accelerates the process by avoiding the determination of square roots.
- each point can be assigned the square of the distance to the closest feature point in the same row in i-direction.
- h ijk min y ⁇ ⁇ g iyk + ( ⁇ ⁇ ( j - y ) ) 2 ; 1 ⁇ y ⁇ M ⁇ [ Eq . ⁇ 4 ]
- the algorithm can search each column in the j-direction.
- the sum of the square distance between a point (i,j,k) and a point (i,y,k) in the same column, ( ⁇ (j ⁇ y)) 2 , and the square distance between (i,y,k) and a particular feature point, g iyk equals the square distance between the point (i,j,k) and that feature point.
- the minimum of these sums is the square distance between (i,j,k) and the closest feature point in the two-dimensional i-j-plane.
- the third dimension can be added by equation (5), which is the same transformation as described in the equation for the k-direction (4).
- s ijk min ⁇ h ijz +( ⁇ (k ⁇ z)) 2 ; 1 ⁇ z ⁇ N ⁇ [Eq. 5]
- the thickness of the cartilage for a given point (a,b,c) on the OCS equals the square root of S abc .
- the x, y, and z position of each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface can be registered on a 3D map and thickness values are translated into color values. In this fashion, the anatomic location of each pixel at the bone cartilage interface can be displayed simultaneous with the thickness of the cartilage in this location.
- the cartilage thickness maps obtained using the algorithm described above display only a visual assessment of cartilage thickness along the articular surface.
- a 25% decrement in cartilage thickness will be the smallest change that can be observed with most current imaging sequences. Therefore, for example, pixels along the bone—cartilage interface that demonstrate a decrease exceeding the smallest change observable on a given MRI pulse sequence, in this example 25% or greater, in overlying cartilage thickness when compared to cartilage thickness at the neighboring bone—cartilage interface pixels, can be used to define the margins of a focal cartilage defect. Other criteria can be employed to define a cartilage defect based on comparisons of neighboring pixels.
- a fixed value can be used. If the difference in cartilage thickness between neighboring pixels exceeds the fixed value, e.g. 1mm, the pixel where this difference is observed can be used to define the margin of the cartilage defect.
- This comparison can be performed for each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface for the entire data set. This comparison is preferably performed in three dimensions. Pixels that demonstrate a decrease in cartilage thickness exceeding defined criteria but that are completely surrounded by other pixels fulfilling the same criteria may not be considered to be part of the margin of the cartilage defect, but will typically be considered to lie inside the cartilage defect.
- the invention provides for means for calculating the area covered by the cartilage defect A cartilage defect and the mean thickness of the cartilage in the region of the defect D cartilage defect as well as the mean thickness of a defined area of surrounding normal cartilage.
- FIGS. 22A and 22B show a 2D MRI (3D SPGR) and 3D cartilage thickness map.
- the 2D MRI demonstrates a full thickness cartilage defect in the posterior lateral femorl condyle (arrows).
- FIG. 22B shows a 3D cartilage thickness map generated using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation.
- the thickness of the articular cartilage is color encoded and displayed on a pixel-by-pixel basis along the 3D surface of the articular cartilage.
- the cartilage defect is black reflecting a thickness of zero (arrows) (M: medial, L: lateral, S: superior, I: inferior).
- FIGS. 23A-23E one can see the matching of 3D thickness maps generated from MR images obtained with the knee in neutral position and in external rotation.
- A. Sagittal baseline MR image (3D SPGR) with-the knee in neutral position.
- B. Sagittal follow-up MR image of the same volunteer obtained two weeks later with the knee in 40 degree external rotation (note the artificially widened appearance of the femur resulting from the rotation).
- D 3D thickness map generated based on follow-up MRI in external rotation (note segmentation error between condyles in trochlear region).
- One aspect is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint.
- the method comprises
- this aspect of the invention is directed to a volume of interest in the cartilage, i.e., a region of the cartilage that includes a cartilage defect.
- a defect may be the result of a disease of the cartilage (e.g., osteoarthritis) or the result of degeneration due to overuse or age.
- the volume of interest may include only the region of cartilage that has the defect, but preferably will also include contiguous parts of the cartilage surrounding the cartilage defect.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal.
- the method comprises (a) determining the thickness, D N , of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect; (b) obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, D D , of the region; (c) subtracting D D from D N to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, D L ; and (d) multiplying the D L value times the area of the cartilage defect, A D , to give the volume of cartilage loss.
- the method is useful for situations wherein the region of cartilage defect is limited to the defective cartilage and preferably wherein the region of the cartilage defect includes a portion of the cartilage contiguous to the defect.
- the normal thickness of the defect area could be estimated. It may be estimated from measurements of cartilage of other subjects having similar characteristics such as gender, age, body type, height, weight, and other factors. It may be estimated from measurements of a similar normal” cartilage from another corresponding joint (e.g., if the right knee has the defect, measure the normal left knee). It may have been measured at an initial time T 1 when the cartilage was normal to provide a baseline. Other means of determining the normal thickness may be available to one of skill in the art. Once the thickness D N is obtained and the thickness D D is obtained the two are subtracted to give the D L . The D L is multiplied by the area of the defect A D to give the volume of cartilage loss. By determining the volume of cartilage loss at an initial T 1 and again at a later time T 2 , one can determine the change in volume loss over time.
- Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the change of a region of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time.
- the method comprises (a) estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T 1 , (b) estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T 2 , and (c) determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
- the method is particularly useful for regions of degenerated cartilage or diseased cartilage.
- Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint.
- the method comprises (a) defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T 1 ; (b) identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system; (c) defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage; (d) defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T 2 ; (e) placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T 2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T 1 ; (f) and measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T 1 and T 2 .
- thickness of the articular cartilage can be estimated using an imaging test.
- This imaging test can be an x-ray, ultrasound, CT scan or MRI scan.
- Thickness can be determined using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation as well as other techniques feasible for this purpose. Thickness can be determined in selected regions or across the entire cartilage of a joint. Thickness can be determined in areas adjacent to diseased cartilage, in areas of diseased cartilage and in areas of normal cartilage.
- the curvature of the cartilage can be determined.
- the curvature of the inner cartilage surface i.e. the surface facing the subchondral bone, or the outer cartilage surface, i.e. the surface facing the joint cavity
- the inner cartilage surface at the interface with the subchondral bone will be used, since the outer cartilage surface may be subject to fraying, fissuring or more advanced stages of cartilage loss.
- the curvature of the subchondral bone can be determined. In this case, the curvature of the subchondral bone can serve as an approximation of the curvature of the articular cartilage.
- Curvature can be determined from an imaging test, typically an ultrasound, a CT or an MRI scan. Curvature can be determined from a three-dimensional model of the cartilage. The three-dimensional model of the cartilage can be determined using the 3D Euclidian distance transformation mentioned above. Curvature can be determined in selected regions or across the entire cartilage of a joint. Curvature can be determined in areas adjacent to diseased cartilage, in areas of diseased cartilage and in areas of normal cartilage.
- a physical model of the surfaces of the articular cartilage and of the underlying bone can be created.
- This physical model can be representative of a limited area within the joint or it can encompass the entire joint.
- the physical model can encompass only the medial or lateral femoral condyle, both femoral condyles and the notch region, the medial tibial plateau, the lateral tibial plateau, the entire tibial plateau, the medial patella, the lateral patella, the entire patella or the entire joint.
- the location of a diseased area of cartilage can be determined, for example using a 3D coordinate system or a 3D Euclidian distance transformation in combination with some of the techniques outlined above.
- the anteroposterior, mediolateral or superoinferior dimension of an area or multiple areas of diseased cartilage can be determined.
- the area, depth and volume of a cartilage defect can be determined, for example using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation in combination with some of the techniques outlined above
- information on thickness of the cartilage can be used to devise a treatment.
- the dimensions of a defect determined in this manner can be used to determine the dimensions of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system.
- the curvature of the inner cartilage surface or the subchondral bone can be measured and this information can be used to determine the shape of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system.
- the thickness of normal cartilage adjacent to the defect can be measured and the thickness values measured in this fashion can be used to determine the optimal thickness for a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system.
- the thickness of the cartilage can be measured in the contralateral joint, e.g.
- an optimal fit can be achieved between the surrounding normal cartilage and a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system thereby minimizing incongruity at the joint surface and improving the therapeutic result.
- the invention provides for means to create a cast or a mold for shaping a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system.
- This can be generated using computer devices and automation, e.g. computer assisted design (CAD) and, for example, computer assisted modeling (CAM).
- CAD computer assisted design
- CAM computer assisted modeling
- the invention provides for means to measure and visualize the curvature of the surfaces of cartilage and bone. In another embodiment, the invention provides for means to compare the thickness and the curvatures of surfaces of a cartilage transplant and a transplantation site, a cartilage graft and a graft site, a cartilage implant and an implantation site, a cartilage replacement material and an implantation site, a cartilage scaffold and a cartilage defect, a cartilage regenerating material and an area of diseased cartilage, or a cartilage repair system and an area of diseased cartilage.
- the invention is useful for determining the shape, dimensions and thickness of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system prior to treatment.
- the shape, dimensions and thickness of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system can be designed to follow the physical shape and thickness of the cartilage adjacent to an area of diseased cartilage determined using the imaging test.
- the invention is applicable to a host of current and future treatments of arthritis including but not limited to cartilage transplants, cartilage implants, cartilage grafts, cartilage replacement materials, cartilage scaffolds, cartilage regenerating materials, auto-, allo- and xeno-transplants, osteochondral allo- and autografting, stem cell based repair systems and transfer systems, and, principally, any other current and future treatments and devices for cartilage repair or regeneration.
- the cartilage and bone contours can be segmented from the MR images using for example a modified live wire technique [Steines D, Cheng C, Wong A, Berger F, Napel S, Lang P. CARS—Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, p. 578-583, San Francisco, 2000].
- a 3-dimensional surface representation can be created, which yields a triangular tesselation of the surface.
- a 3-dimensional Wang-Binford edge detector [Yan C H: Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density: new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, 1998, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University] or the marching cubes algorithm [Lorensen W E, Cline H E. Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163-169] can be used.
- This surface representation can be imported into a CAD system, which is used to generate a physical model or a cast by means of rapid prototyping techniques.
- the segmented data can also be used for measuring the surface curvature at the surface points.
- ⁇ ⁇ ( t ) x ′ ⁇ ( t ) ⁇ y ′′ ⁇ ( t ) - x ′′ ⁇ ( t ) ⁇ y ′ ⁇ ( t ) ( x ′ ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ ( t ) + y ′ ⁇ ⁇ 2 ⁇ ( t ) ) 3 2 [ Eq . ⁇ 8 ]
- smooth derivatives for equation (8) can be obtained by convolution with differentiated Gaussian kernels [Worring M, Smeulders A W M. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 1993. 58(3): p. 366-382].
- the curvature values can be calculated for each pixel on the segmented surface in each slice. They can subsequently be color-mapped onto a 3-dimensional rendering of the surface for visualization purposes.
- this procedure can be repeated for a direction perpendicular to the imaging plane.
- the one with the lower degree of parallelism to the surface can be chosen, and reformatted slices of the MR data set can be obtained for this direction.
- the data set would typically be reformatted for a coronal slicing plane.
- the procedure of segmentation and curvature calculation can then be repeated for the reformatted images.
- a second curvature map can be calculated, yielding complementary information to the first one.
- curvature values for different surface patches can be manually or automatically registered, overlaying one surface patch on top of the other.
- Corresponding curvature values that are calculated in the same directions can now be subtracted from each other, thereby yielding a measure of how well curvatures of two surfaces match.
- a patient with arthritis of the knee joint is referred for an MRI scan.
- the MRI scan is performed using a cartilage sensitive MRI pulse sequence such as a fat saturated spoiled gradient echo sequence or a water selective 3D gradient echo sequence using a spectral spatial pulse.
- the MR images are transferred via a local network or, for example, the internet into a computer workstation.
- the computer workstation uses software to extract or segment the articular cartilage from the surrounding tissue.
- Such software can include snake algorithms, livewire algorithms, signal intensity based thresholding, or seed growing algorithms as well as any other technique useful for this purpose.
- the software can then generate a three-dimensional map of cartilage thickness across the femoral condyles, the tibial plateau, or the patella.
- the software can provide information on cartilage curvature or curvature of the subchondral bone as described above. Furthermore, the software can determine the location, dimensions, size, area, depth, or volume of areas of diseased cartilage.
- a bone replacement material can be formed with a CAD/CAM system using the above information.
- One of the surfaces of the bone replacement material can be shaped so that it matches the 3D curvature of the subchondral bone subjacent to the area of diseased cartilage.
- the anteroposterior, mediolateral or superoinferior dimensions of this surface of the bone replacement material can be such that it matches the dimensions of the area of diseased cartilage.
- Cartilage cells can be affixed to the bone replacement material and can be grown on the bone replacement material until the thickness of the resultant cartilage matches that of the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map.
- a layer of cartilage of known thickness can be applied to the bone replacement material whereby the thickness can be chosen to match the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map.
- an artificial non-human material with properties similar to cartilage can be applied to the bone replacement material whereby the thickness of this material can be chosen to match the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map.
- cartilage can be grown on a mold matching the curvature of the subchondral bone in an area of diseased cartilage whereby the dimensions of the surface of the mold on which the cartilage is grown matches the dimensions of an area of diseased cartilage.
- Cartilage can then be grown on the mold until its thickness matches the thickness of cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage as measured, for example, on a 3D cartilage thickness map.
- an orthopedic surgeon can excise the area of diseased cartilage and can implant the cartilage or cartilage replacement material.
- the invention provides for techniques to represent one or more biochemical components of articular cartilage.
- a biochemical component includes, but is not limited to, glycosaminoglycan, water, sodium, or hyaluronic acid.
- Biochemical data can be generated with other magnetic resonance based techniques including the use of signal intensity measurements, relaxation time measurements, paramagnetic and other contrast media and sodium rather than proton MR imaging. Other imaging tests such as positron emission tomography scanning can also be used for this purpose.
- one aspect of this invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage. The method comprises
- the biochemical map may be used in the method aspects of the invention in a manner similar to the cartilage thickness map.
- one aspect is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint.
- the method comprises
- this aspect of the invention is directed to a volume of interest in the cartilage, i.e., a region of the cartilage that includes a cartilage defect.
- a defect may be the result of a disease of the cartilage (e.g., osteoarthritis) or the result of degeneration due to overuse or age.
- This invention allows a health practitioner to evaluate and treat such defects.
- the volume of interest may include only the region of cartilage that has the defect, but preferably will also include contiguous parts of the cartilage surrounding the cartilage defect.
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint using a relaxation time or the biochemical map.
- the method comprises
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the change of biochemical content in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal.
- the method comprises
- the normal content of the defect area could be estimated. It may be estimated from measurements of cartilage of other subjects having similar characteristics such as gender, age, body type, height, weight, and other factors. It may be estimated from measurements of a similar ‘normal” cartilage from another corresponding joint (e.g., if the right knee has the defect, measure the normal left knee). It may have been measured at an initial time T 1 when the cartilage was normal to provide a baseline. Other means of determining the normal content may be available to one of skill in the art. Once BC N is obtained and BC D is obtained the two are subtracted to give the ⁇ . By determining the change of content at an initial T 1 and again at a later time T 2 , one can determine the change in biochemical content over time.
- morphological maps of articular cartilage obtained with MR imaging can be superimposed, merged or fused with the biochemical map or data.
- Several different techniques can be applied in order to superimpose, merge, or fuse morphological data with biochemical data.
- 2D or 3D morphological data of articular cartilage can be acquired with the same object coordinates as the biochemical data. Morphological data and biochemical data can then be easily displayed simultaneously using different colors, opacities, and or gray scales.
- 2D or 3D morphological data or articular cartilage can be acquired with different object coordinates as the biochemical data.
- a 3D surface registration can be applied in order to superimpose, merge, or fuse the morphological data and the biochemical data.
- anatomic landmarks can be used to register the morphological data and subsequently the biochemical data in a 3D object coordinate system. 3D object coordinate systems can then be matched by matching the landmarks obtained from the morphological data with those obtained from the biochemical data.
- another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a subject's cartilage in a joint, the method comprises obtaining a three dimensional biochemical representation of the cartilage, obtaining a morphological representation of the cartilage, and merging the two representations, and simultaneously displaying the merged representations on a medium.
- the merged representations are then used to assess the condition of a cartilage, estimate the loss of cartilage in a joint, determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of cartilage defect, or estimating the change of a region of cartilage at a particular point in time or over a period of time.
- Similar steps would be followed as spelled out for the use of a thickness map or biochemical map.
- Simultaneous display of morphological data with biochemical data provides a useful tool to assess longitudinal changes in morphology or articular cartilage and biochemical composition of articular cartilage, for example during treatment with chondroprotective and chondroregenerative agents.
- one aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint from a distant location. The method comprises
- the degeneration pattern includes a measure of cartilage thickness or regional cartilage volume.
- the electronically generated image of the cartilage preferably is an MR image and the degeneration pattern can be displayed as a three-dimensional image as a thickness pattern, a biochemical content pattern or a merged thickness biochemical pattern.
- the electronically generated image is transmitted via Dicom, using the international standards for transmission of such images.
- kit for aiding in assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a mammal comprises a software program, which that when installed and executed on a computer reads a cartilage degeneration pattern presented in a standard graphics format and produces a computer readout showing a cartilage thickness map of the degenerated cartilage.
- the software can be installed in a PC, a Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI) computer or a Macintosh computer.
- the software calculates the thickness or regional volume of a region of degeneration of the cartilage which does not include the entire volume of the articular cartilage.
- a movement pattern of a joint in accordance with this invention, one obtains an internal image of the bones in a joint, preferably using MRI techniques, and obtains an external image of the bones in motion.
- the images are correlated, preferably through the use of external marker sets, to give a pattern that shows a static or moving condition.
- the correlated images are then displayed and the relation between the movement and degeneration patterns is determined.
- MRI techniques that provide an image of the bones on either side of the joint.
- the external markers can be placed at any landmarks about the joint of interest. At least three markers are used for each limb being imaged.
- the markers will be made of a material that not only will be detected by MRI imaging techniques, but also will be detected by external imaging techniques.
- the markers will be associated with a means to affix them to the skin and preferably have an adhesive portion for adhering to the skin and a detectable entity that will show up on the MRI image.
- the preferred MRI imaging technique useful for obtaining an internal image is a spoiled 3D gradient echo, a water selective 3D gradient echo or a 3D DEFT sequence.
- the set of segmented two dimensional MR images can be transformed to a voxel representation inside AVS Express (Advanced Visual Systems, Inc., Waltham, Mass.). Every voxel has a value of zero if it is not within an object of interest or a value ranging from one to 4095, depending on the signal intensity as recorded by the 1.5 T MR.
- An isosurface can then be calculated that corresponds to the boundary elements of the region of interest. A tesselation of this isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal of each polygon of the tesselation. These polygons can then be written to a file in a standard graphics format (Virtual Reality Modeling Language Version 1.0).
- the use of reference markers on the skin around the joint and the bones can provide an image that can later be matched to the reference markers for the cartilage image and the bone images obtained from external measurements.
- a semi-automated, 3D surface-based registration technique that does not require the use of an external frame or fiducial markers can be used.
- This 3D surface-based registration technique can be used to match the anatomic orientation of a skeletal structure on a baseline and a follow-up CT or MRI scan.
- FIG. 10 A registration technique for the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau is shown in FIG. 10 . It shows an example where 3D surfaces of the femoral condyles were extracted from two differently oriented T1-weighted spin-echo MRI scans (baseline A and follow-up B, respectively) obtained in the same patient in neutral position (A) and in 40 degree external rotation (B). The 3D surfaces were used to derive a coordinate transformation relating the two scans.
- FIG. 10C demonstrates the use of the derived transformation to re-register scan B in the object coordinate system of scan A. Such a transformation relating two T1-weighted scans can then be used to register DEFT cartilage-sensitive scans that are acquired in the same respective orientations as the A and B T1-weighted scans.
- FIG. 11 shows an example of a 2D map of cartilage thickness derived from the surface normals of the lateral femoral condyle.
- FIG. 11A shows a proton density fast spin-echo MR image that demonstrates a focal cartilage defect in the posterior lateral femoral condyle (black arrows).
- White arrows indicate endpoints of thickness map.
- FIG. 11B is a 2D cartilage thickness map that demonstrates abrupt decrease in cartilage thickness in the area of the defect (arrows). The ⁇ thickness between neighboring pixels can be used to define the borders of the cartilage defect. Note diffuse cartilage thinning in area enclosed by the astericks (*).
- cartilage sensitive images can be used instead of T1-weighted or T2-weighted scans and the surface match can be performed based on the cartilage contour.
- anatomic landmarks present on both baseline and follow-up scans can be used to match the data obtained during the baseline and those obtained during the follow-up scan.
- Another alternative for matching the baseline and the follow-up scan includes the use of external or internal fiducial markers that can been detected with MR imaging. In that case, a transformation is performed that matches the position of the markers on the follow-up scan with the position of the markers on the baseline scan or vice versa.
- biomechanical data include, but are not limited to, estimations of static loading alignment in standing or weight-bearing position and lying or non-weight-bearing position, as well as during joint motion, e.g., the movement of load-bearing pathway on the cartilage in the knee joint during gait.
- Biomechanical data may be generated using theoretical computations, based on data stored in a database that can be accessed by calling up and screening for certain characteristics.
- gait analysis may be performed for an individual and data obtained during gait analysis may be merged or fused with morphological MRI data. Morphological data and biomechanical data can then be easily displayed simultaneously using different colors, opacities, and or gray scales.
- the load-bearing pathway for example around a cartilage defect, can be plotted or superimposed onto morphological maps.
- reference markers or fiducial markers can be applied to the external surface on the skin overlying the joint.
- These markers adhere to the skin are typically made of materials that can be detected with MRI and that can be used to register joint motion during biomechanical analysis, e.g. gait analysis. These markers can then be used to correlate the morphological with the biomechanical data.
- Simultaneous display of morphological data with biomechanical data provides a useful tool to assess the load pathway applied to articular cartilage and inside and around cartilage defects.
- Estimation of load pathway applied in and around a cartilage defect can be used to assess a cartilage defect and to guide the choice of therapy, e.g. treatment with chondroprotective or chondroregenerative agents, osteochondral allografting, cartilage transplantation, femoral or tibial osteotomy, or joint replacement surgery.
- the level walking measurements can include, but is not limited to, six stride cycles for each side over a range of walking speeds.
- the subject can be instructed to walk at a comfortable speed (normal), slower than normal and faster than normal.
- this protocol produces gait measurements over a range of walking speeds.
- the standing and laying portions of the protocol can be used in the cross registration to the MR data.
- the instrumentation preferably includes, at least a two camera, video-based opto-electronic system for 3-D motion analysis, a multi-component force plate for measurement of foot-ground reaction force and a computer system for acquisition, processing and analysis of data.
- the anatomic coordinate systems are defined through bony landmarks which can be identified through palpation.
- bony landmarks which can be identified through palpation.
- a subset of the markers in a point cluster technique are referenced to bony landmarks on the femur and tibia. Techniques described previously by Hopenfeld and Benedetti can be used to locate these bony landmarks.
- the anatomic coordinate systems used can be similar to that previously described by LaFortune with the exception of the origin of the femoral coordinate system.
- a coordinate system is located in the femoral condyles.
- the femoral condyles medial(M)-lateral(L) axis ( FIG.
- the trans-epicondylar line (a line drawn between the medial-lateral femoral epicondyles). The midpoint of this axis is the origin.
- the inferior(I)-superior(S) axis runs parallel to the long axis of the femur, passing through the midpoint of the trans-epicondylar line.
- the anterior(A)-posterior(P) axis is the cross product of the medial-lateral and inferior-superior axes. The final position of the inferior-superior axis is made orthogonal to the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axis through a cross product operation ( FIG. 13 ).
- the tibial coordinate system begins with the medial-lateral axis running through the most medial and lateral edges of the plateau.
- the inferior-superior axis is perpendicular to the medial-lateral axis passing through the tibial eminence.
- the anterior-posterior axis is the cross product of the medial-lateral and inferior-superior axes.
- the lower extremity can be idealized as 3 segments with six degree-of-freedom joints at the knee and ankle.
- at least 3 markers per segment are used.
- FIG. 14 shows 21 passive retro-reflective markers located on the leg: some at bony prominences (greater trochanter, lateral malleolus, lateral epicondyle, lateral tibial plateau), some clustered on the thigh and shank (Fal-3,11-3, Fpl-3; Tal-3, T11-13). Additionally, two markers are placed on the foot at the lateral aspect of the calcaneus and base of the fifth metatarsal and one on the pelvis at theiliac crest).
- markers medial malleolus, medial epicondyle, medial tibial plateau, medial and lateral superior patella, medial and lateral inferior patella.
- the eight markers nearest to the knee joint can be filled with Gadolinium, and can be be replaced at these same locations prior to the MR images ( FIG. 15 ). The locations can be marked with a non-toxic marker-pen.
- the reference database is typically a compendium of demographic and motion analysis data for all subjects whose data has been processed by a central processing site.
- This database can contain fields describing each of the subject's name, age, height, weight, injury types, orthopedic medical history, other anatomic measurements (thigh length, shank length, shoe size, etc.).
- the database can also contain the results of any and all gait analysis run on these patients. This can include, for all activities tested (walk, run, jog, etc.), a number of peak valves (peak knee flexing, peak hip adduction movement; toe-out, angle, etc). along with the motion trajectories of the limb segments while the subjects are performing different activities.
- the sex, age, height, weight, limb length, and type of activity desired can be entered as an average into the database.
- the database searches for a set of subjects most closely watching the input average. From this set of data, a typical motion pattern is distilled and a data set is output. This data set can include, over a time interval, the motion characteristics: hip/knee/ankle/flexion/extension angles, knee/hip/ankle adduction/abduction angles, movement, stride length, cadence, etc. This data can then be used to drive an animation of the motion of the desired joint.
- Each limb segment (thigh, shank and foot) can idealized as a rigid body with a local coordinate system defined to coincide with a set of anatomical axes (the assumption of rigidity is dropped in calculating the location of the femur and tibia).
- the intersegmental moments and forces can be calculated from the estimated position of the bones, the ground reaction force measurements, and the limb segment mass/inertia properties.
- the moment at the knee can be resolved into a coordinate system fixed in a tibial reference system with axes defining flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation.
- the Point Cluster Technique (PCT) movement analysis protocol is an extensible and accurate approach to bone motion estimation. Basically, a number of retro-reflective markers (e.g. retro-reflective material from 3M, Corp.) are attached to each limb segment under observation. Multiple video cameras can acquire data with the subject standing still and during activities of interest. An over-abundance of markers on each limb segment is used to define a cluster coordinate system, which is tied to an anatomically relevant coordinate system calculated with the subject at rest.
- PCT Point Cluster Technique
- each marker is assigned a unit mass and the inertia tensor, center of mass, principal axes and principal moments of inertia are calculated. By treating the center of mass and principal axes as a transformation, local coordinates are calculated. Another set of coordinate systems is established; limb segment specific anatomic landmarks are identified through palpation and a clinically relevant coordinate system defined. For the femur and tibia, these anatomic coordinate systems are shown in FIG. 12 .
- the transformation from the reference cluster coordinate system to the anatomic coordinate system is determined with the subject at rest by vector operations.
- the transformation from the global coordinate system to the cluster coordinate system is calculated at each time step. To place the anatomic coordinate in the global system during the activity, the reference coordinate system to anatomic system transformation is applied, followed by the inverse global coordinate system to cluster coordinate system transformation for each time step.
- a cluster of N markers can be placed on a limb segment of the subject.
- a unit weight factor is assigned to each marker for the purpose of calculating the center of mass, inertia tensor, principal axes and principal moments of inertia of the cluster of markers.
- the cluster center of mass and principal axes form an orthogonal coordinate system described as the cluster system. The local coordinates of each of the markers relative to this coordinate system are calculated.
- G(t) is a matrix of all marker coordinate vectors
- C(t) is the center of mass of G(t)
- E(t) is the matrix of eigenvectors of the inertia tensor of G(t)
- L(i,t) are the local coordinates of marker i.
- markers are observed by opto-electronic means while the subject performs activities and while standing completely still in a reference position. With the subject in this same reference position, a subset of the markers is observed relative to the underlying bones by other techniques, which might include x-rays, CT scan, or palpation.
- these systems can be used to describe joint motion.
- the motion that is of interest is how the femoral condyles move with respect to the tibial plateau. This is done by first defining a set of coordinate axes in the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau.
- a coordinate system is located in both the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau.
- the femoral condyles medial-lateral (ML) axis runs through the trans-epicondylar line (TEL), a line drawn between the ML femoral epicondyles. The midpoint of this axis is the origin.
- the inferior-superior (IS) runs parallel to the long axis of the femur, passing through the midpoint of the TEL.
- the anterior-posterior (AP) is the cross product of the ML and IS axes.
- the tibial coordinate system begins with the ML axis running through the most medial and lateral edges of the plateau.
- the IS axis is perpendicular to the ML axis passing through the tibial eminence.
- the AP axis is the cross product of the ML and IS axes. These are known as the anatomic coordinate system (A(t) thigh , A(t) shank ).
- Relating the cluster system to the anatomic coordinate system is done by use of another transformation matrix. This is done by relating the thigh cluster to a cluster of markers, a sub cluster, that is related to the femoral condyles and femur (cluster to anatomic transformation).
- R(t) thigh U(t) thigh A(t) thigh
- the tibia has a similar transformation matrix.
- TS(t) is the motion of the thigh with respect to the shank.
- Angles are calculated by a projection angle system, an axis from the femoral anatomic system and one from the tibia are projected onto a plane in the tibial coordinate system.
- flexion/extension can be determined by projecting the IS axis of the femur and tibia onto the sagittal plane (AP-IS plane) of the tibia.
- the point cluster technique was evaluated as a method for measuring in vivo limb segment movement from skin placed marker clusters.
- An Ilizarov device is an external fixture where 5 mm diameter pins are placed directly into the bone on either side of a bony defect. The rigid external struts affixed to these pins form a rigid system fixed in the underlying bone.
- Two subjects were tested with Ilizarov fixation devices. One subject had the Ilizarov device placed on the femur and second subject had the device placed on the tibia. Each subject was instrumented with point clusters placed on the thigh and shank segment. In addition, markers were placed on the Ilizarov device to establish a system fixed in the underlying bone.
- the relative angular movement and translational displacement between the system affixed in the bone and the point cluster coordinate system were calculated while ascending a 20-cm step (Step Test). Angular changes between the three orthogonal axes fixed in the bone versus three axes in the point cluster were calculated. The average difference over the trials for three axes were 0.95 ⁇ 1.26, 2.33 ⁇ 1.63, and 0.58 ⁇ 0.58 degrees. Similarly, the average error for the distance between coordinate systems was 0.28 ⁇ 0.14 cm.
- the second subject with the Ilizarov device placed on the femur could not perform the Step-Test, but was able to perform a weight-bearing flexion test where his knee flexed to approximately 20° from a standing position. The average change between the coordinate origin was 0.28 ⁇ 0.14 cm. The changes in axis orientation were 1.92 ⁇ 0.42, 1.11 ⁇ 0.69 and 1.24 ⁇ 0.16 degrees.
- the simultaneously acquired motion for a coordinate system embedded in bone (Ilizarov system) and a set of skin-based markers was compared.
- the location and orientation of the Ilizarov system, the rigid body model skin marker system, and the interval deformation technique skin marker system were determined.
- the change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to one of the skin marker systems over time is a measure of the deformation unaccounted for in the skin marker system.
- the interval deformation technique produced a substantial improvement in the estimate of the location and orientation of the underlying bone.
- the change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to the skin marker systems are shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 , for location and orientation respectively, for both a rigid body model and the interval deformation technique.
- the location error was reduced from 7.1 cm to 2.3 cm and the orientation error from 107 degrees to 24 degrees, with the error summed over the entire time interval.
- the subject performed a 10 cm step-up; the marker deformation was modeled as a single Gaussian function.
- the Point Cluster Technique decreases the effects of marker movement relative to the underlying bone through averaging. If more correction is required, one of a number of deformation correction techniques may be added. In order of increasing computational complexity and deformation correction ability, these are rigid body linear least square error correction, global optimization correction, anatomic artifact correlation correction and interval deformation correction.
- the technique provides a maximum likelihood estimate of the bone pose, assuming that each marker on a limb segment deforms relative to the underlying bone in some functional form.
- the technique parameterizes these functional forms and then performs a multi-objective non-linear optimization with constraints to calculate these parameters. This is an extremely computationally intensive technique, with the current instantiation of the algorithm requiring 6-8 hours per limb segment of running time on 266 MHz Pentium 2 computer.
- Tc can be calculated directly from the global coordinates of the markers, the remainder of this development only examines the determination of R(i,t) and subsequently T cb (t).
- the input data is the local coordinates in the cluster system L(i,t) for all i, T o ⁇ t ⁇ t f .
- the indeterminate problem can be converted to a chi-squared estimate problem through a series of steps.
- An observation of the truly unobservables at the time boundaries is inferred; that is, it is assumed that T cb (t ⁇ t o ) and T cb (t ⁇ t f ) are observed.
- the probability of the entire data set being a realization is a product of each of the individual probabilities:
- deformation constraints allow the formulation of the problem as a general non-linear programming problem.
- the constraints arise from two sources; human limb segments do not deform outside a small range, and the locations of the markers are chosen with specific properties in mind.
- the deformation constraints are selected to be:
- the Point Cluster Technique marker set was designed to ensure that the cluster of points is non-coplanar and possess no axes of rotational symmetry. These properties ensure a local coordinate system that is well defined and unambiguous over the entire time interval. The constraints are then:
- D is the total number of parameters
- m e the number of equality constraints, is 0
- m the total number of constraints
- the Point Cluster Marker set was affixed to the subject's shank (6 markers), along with a set of four markers rigidly attached to the Ilizarov device, which is rigidly connected to the tibia with bone pins. These four markers define a true bone embedded coordinate system. Data were acquired by GaitLink software (Computerized Functional Testing Corporation) controlling four Qualisys cameras operating at a video frequency of 120 Hz. Three dimensional coordinates were calculated using the modified direct linear transform.
- the subject was a 46 year old male (height 1.75 m, weight 84.1 kg) fitted with a tibial Ilizarov external fixation device.
- the device was rigidly attached to the tibia with nine bone pins, located in three sets (top, middle, and bottom) of three (medial, anterior, and lateral).
- the clinical purpose of the device was tibial lengthening; the test on the subject was performed two days prior to final removal of the device.
- the subject exhibited a limited range of motion and was tested performing a 10 cm step-up onto a platform.
- the simultaneously acquired motion for a coordinate system embedded in bone (Ilizarov system) and a set of skin-based markers was compared.
- the location and orientation of the Ilizarov system, the rigid body model skin marker system, and the interval deformation technique skin marker system was determined.
- the change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to one of the skin marker systems over time is a measure of the deformation unaccounted for in the skin marker system.
- the interval deformation technique produced a substantial improvement in the estimate of the location and orientation of the underlying bone.
- the change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to the skin marker systems are shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 for location and orientation respectively, for both a rigid body model and the interval deformation technique.
- the location error was reduced from 7.1 cm to 2.3 cm and the orientation error from 107 degrees to 24 degrees, with the error summed over the entire time interval.
- the subject performed a 10 cm step-up; the marker deformation was modeled as a single Gaussian function.
- the process comprises:
- a patient can have a number of retro-reflective markers attached to each limb segment under observation.
- Multiple video cameras acquire data with the subject standing still and during activities of interest.
- another reference data set (subject standing still, prescribed posture) can be acquired using 8 additional markers clustered about the knee. These markers are filled with gadolinium-DTPA and covered with a retro-reflective material to allow for correlation between the MRI image and the video data.
- each marker can be assigned a unit mass and the inertia tensor, center of mass, principal axes and principal moments of inertia can be calculated.
- center of mass and principal axes can be treated as a transformation.
- local coordinates arcan be e calculated.
- Another set of coordinate systems can also be required for this technique; limb segment specific anatomic landmarks can be identified through palpation and a clinically relevant coordinate system can be defined.
- Table 1 The required transformations are summarized in Table 1 below.
- Optimization 1 One can calculate the linear least square error rigid body transformation from the MRI common local coordinate system to the VID common local coordinate system.
- the MR slices are segmented for the multiple anatomic and fiducial elements.
- the slices are combined to a voxel representation.
- An isosurface can be calculated from the boundary voxel elements.
- a tessellation of the isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal for each surface element.
- This data can then be stored in a standard 3D graphic format, the Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML).
- VRML Virtual Reality Modeling Language
- transformation sequence is provided below in Table 1. This transformation sequence can be applied to each of the anatomic elements over each time step of the activity, starting with sequence 6.
- the use of external reference markers that are detectable by both MRI and optical techniques can be an important and useful tool in the method of this invention.
- the use of the reference markers can form the basis for an aspect of this invention that is a method for correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and/or optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint of a human. This method comprises, obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint, obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint, obtaining the external bone image data optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint.
- the cartilage image data and the bone image data can be obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, ultrasound, computed tomography or X-ray. Typically, MRI will be preferred. In the case of X-ray, further manipulations must be performed in which multiple X-ray images are assimilated by a computer into a 2 dimensional cross-sectional image called a Computed Tomography (CT) Scan.
- CT Computed Tomography
- the opto-electrical image data can be obtained by any means, for example, a video camera or a movie camera. Multiple skin reference markers can be placed on one or more limbs of the patient prior to imaging. The skin reference markers are described hereinbefore.
- the first required transformation can be from the MR global coordinate system to the MR center of mass/principal axis coordinate system. This can be done by calculating the center of mass of each of the individual markers, resulting in a set of eight three dimensional points. Each of these points can be assigned a unit mass, and the center of mass, inertia tensor, and principal axes can be calculated. The same procedure can be performed on these markers as determined by the optical system, providing a transformation from the optical global system to a center of mass/principal axis system.
- the relative orientation of the tibia and femur as determined by the MR system and the optical system are identical, it is only necessary to apply the optical reference system to the anatomic system transformation of the MR local data. If this is not the case, an optimization calculation can be performed to determine the rotation and translation of, for example, the femur with respect to the tibia.
- FIG. 18 For visualization or contact surface determination, one can examine the relative motion of one segment to the other, for example the motion of the femur relative to a fixed tibial frame. This can be accomplished by applying the global to tibial anatomic system transform to all of the elements.
- FIG. 18A is a photograph demonstrating the position of the external markers positioned around the knee joint. The markers are filled with dilute Gd-solution.
- B is Sagittal 3D SPGR image through the medial femorotibial compartment. Two of the external markers are seen anteriorly as rounded structures with high signal intensity.
- C is 3D reconstruction of femoral and tibial bones (light grey), external markers (dark grey), femoral cartilage (red), and tibial cartilage (blue) based on the original SPGR MR images.
- D-I show a functional joint imaging sequence at selected phases of leg extension from a seated position, D-F, anterior projection. The vectors represent the relative location and orientation of the femur with respect to the tibia.
- G-I is a lateral projection.
- the thickness map is embedded in the femoral geometry, one can define a scalar metric that characterizes the location of any cartilage lesions relative to the point of contact line.
- One approach is a simple 3D distance along the surface from the center of the cartilage lesion to the point of closest approach of the contact line.
- Another metric that could be useful would be to multiply the area of the lesion by the adduction moment at that time instant, then divide by the distance from lesion center to point of closest approach. This could result in a metric that increases with lesion area, adduction moment, and closeness of approach.
- the first approach is based on anatomic planes; the second is a natural approach building on the three dimensional cartilage thickness map.
- the location of the pathway of loading relative to the femoral and tibial anatomy and geometry can be assessed by defining sagittal planes bisecting the medial femoral condyle, the lateral femoral condyle, the medial tibial plateau, and the lateral tibial plateau.
- the operator can manually delete surface points located along the trochlea.
- a sagittal plane parallel to the sagittal midfemoral plane can be defined through the most medial aspect of the medial femoral condyle followed by a sagittal plane parallel to the sagittal midfemoral plane through the most lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle.
- the sagittal plane that is located halfway between these two planes can be defined as the “midcondylar sagittal plane”.
- the intersection between the midcondylar sagittal plane and the external cartilage surface yields the “anatomic midcondylar cartilage line”.
- the location of the pathway of loading can be assessed relative to the anatomic midcondylar cartilage line of the medial femoral condyle.
- the identical procedure can be repeated for the lateral femoral condyle.
- a plane parallel to the sagittal tibial plateau plane can be defined through the most medial point of the medial tibial plateau.
- a parallel plane located halfway between this plane and the sagittal tibial plateau plane can yield the “midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau.”
- the intersection of the midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau and the external cartilage surface can yield the “anatomic midtibial plateau cartilage line” of the medial tibial plateau.
- the identical procedure can be repeated for the lateral tibial plateau.
- the next step is to rotate the plane by some increment, for example by one degree, and repeat the procedure.
- the operator can identify the rotation angles where the plane is intersecting the distinct medial—lateral compartments of the cartilage, and two points can be chosen, one from the medial femoral condyle and one from the lateral femoral condyle. If cartilage defects are present, in which case a compartment will not intersect in a curve but in a set of points, one can fit a spline through the points, then take the peak point of the spline as the contact point.
- the calculations in this section can begin with the relative motion of the subject specific femoral anatomy with respect to the subject specific tibial anatomy, and end with a line describing the point of closest approach between the femur and tibia during some activity of daily living.
- PDAA proximity detection and approach algorithm
- the PDAA has been designed to incrementally displace and rotate one of the surfaces until a realizable contact is achieved. It is understood that this is not a true point contact line, but rather a reproducible representation of contact location ( FIG. 21 ).
- the MR generated subject specific geometries can be used to detect rigid body contact proximity when the subject is in full extension.
- the femoral component can then be incrementally displaced until simultaneous medial and lateral condyle contact occur. This is a first order approximation to the location of the contact point; slip velocity calculations can then be used to determine the final estimate of the contact point.
- the next time step in the activity can now be examined, using the previous time step solution as a starting point for the calculation.
- the full extension time step can be chosen to match with the static reference posture; should it be necessary, one can add in other reference postures.
- a coordinate system can be defined on the surface of the femoral cartilage, choosing as a reference line the point of contact the femoral component would have had were it rolled along a flat plane. This allows one to determine a contact line relative to the subject specific anatomy.
- a 2D or 3D surface registration technique can be used as an aid to providing therapy to match the anatomic orientation of the cartilage thickness map of a baseline and follow-up scan of a patient.
- the re-registered cartilage thickness map of the follow-up scan can then be subtracted from the baseline scan. This will yield the thickness difference, i.e. cartilage loss, as a function of x, y, and z. This can also be expressed as percentage difference.
- biomechanical loading conditions can be assessed in normal articular cartilage in various anatomic regions.
- these anatomic regions include the posterior, central, and anterior medial femoral condyle, the posterior, central, and anterior medial tibial plateau, the posterior, central, and anterior lateral femoral condyle, the posterior, central, and anterior lateral tibial plateau, the medial and lateral aspect of the trochlea, and the medial and lateral facet and the median ridge of the patella.
- a risk profile can be established for each individual based on the biomechanical stresses applied to cartilage.
- patients who are at risk for developing early cartilage loss and osteoarthritis can be identified.
- patients with a valgus or varus deformity of the knee joint will demonstrate higher biomechanical stresses applied to the articular cartilage in the medial femorotibial or lateral femorotibial or patellofemoral compartments than patients with normal joint anatomy.
- patients with disturbances of joint congruity will demonstrate higher biomechanical stress applied to certain regions of the articular cartilage. Such disturbances of joint congruity are often difficult to detect using standard clinical and imaging assessment.
- the amount of stress applied to the articular cartilage can be used to determine the patient's individual prognosis for developing cartilage loss and osteoarthritis.
- biomechanical loading conditions can be assessed in normal and diseased articular cartilage.
- An intervention that can alter load bearing can then be simulated.
- Such interventions include but are not limited to braces, orthotic devices, methods and devices to alter neuromuscular function or activation, arthroscopic and surgical procedures.
- the change in load bearing induced by the intervention can be assessed prior to actually performing the intervention in a patient.
- a tibial osteotomy can be simulated in the manner and the optimal degree of angular correction with regard to biomechanical loading conditions of normal and diseased cartilage can be determined before the patient will actually undergo surgery.
- Estimation of biomechanical forces applied to normal cartilage can be used to determine a patient's risk for developing cartilage loss and osteoarthritis.
- Estimation of forces applied in and around a cartilage defect can be used to determine the prognosis of a cartilage defect and to guide the choice of therapy, e.g. treatment with chondroprotective or chondroregenerative agents, osteochondral allografting, cartilage transplantation, femoral or tibial osteotomy, or joint replacement surgery.
- One aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal.
- the method comprises:
- Another aspect of the invention is a method for monitoring the treatment of a degenerative joint condition in a mammal.
- the method comprises
- Still another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the rate of degeneration of cartilage in the joint of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and the bones on either side of the cartilage, which method comprises
- Another aspect of the specification is a method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint.
- the method comprises
- Still another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint.
- the method comprises
- Another aspect of this invention is a method for deriving the motion of bones about a joint from markers placed on the skin, which method comprises
- Another aspect of the invention is a system for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which system comprises
- a cartilage degeneration pattern may be, i.a., 2D or 3D thickness map of the cartilage or a biochemical map of the cartilage.
Abstract
Methods are disclosed for assessing the condition of a cartilage in a joint, particularly in a human knee. The methods include converting an image such as an MRI to a three dimensional map of the cartilage. The cartilage map can be correlated to a movement pattern of the joint to assess the affect of movement on cartilage wear. Changes in the thickness of cartilage over time can be determined so that therapies can be provided. Information on thickness of cartilage and curvature of cartilage or subchondral bone can be used to plan therapy. Information on movement pattern can be used to plan therapy.
Description
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/112,989, filed Dec. 16, 1998 and is a continuation continuation-in-part of PCT/US99/30265, filed Dec. 16, 1999, both of which are herein incorporated by reference.
This invention was supported in part by a National Institute of Health Grant No. PAR-97-014, and the government may have rights in this invention.
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint and the use of the assessment in aiding in prevention of damage to the joint or treatment of diseased cartilage in the joint.
2. Background
Osteoarthritis is the most common condition to affect human joints as well as a frequent cause of locomotor pain and disability. More particularly, osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee occurs in a substantial portion of the population over the age of fifty.
In spite of its societal impact and prevalence, however, there is a paucity of information on the factors that cause osteoarthritis to progress more rapidly in some individuals and not in others. Previously considered a “wear and tear” degenerative disease with little opportunity for therapeutic intervention, osteoarthritis is now increasingly viewed as a dynamic process with potential for new pharmacologic and surgical treatment modalites such as cartilage transplantation, osteochondral allo- or autografting, osteotomies and tibial corticotomies with angular distraction.
However, the appropriate deployment and selection of treatment interventions for OA is dependent on the development of better methods for the assessment of the condition of a patient's joint and the degeneration process.
There is, therefore, a need for improved methods for examining the factors that influence as well as quantification of the progression of the disease.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate non-invasive imaging technique for visualization of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis, particularly in knees. However, current MRI techniques cannot provide information on the relationship between the location of the cartilage loss and variations in the load bearing areas during the walking cycle. This information is important since it has been shown that dynamic loads during walking are related to the progression of knee OA. Thus, the ability to locate cartilage defects or areas of cartilage thinning relative to the load bearing areas of the knee could be valuable in evaluating factors influencing the progression of osteoarthritis.
- 1. Alexander E J: Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Illinois at Chicago; 1998.
- 2. Alexander E J, Andriacchi T P: Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. Proceedings of the 3rd. Annual Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, Calif., 1998.
- 3. Alexander E J, Andriacchi T P: Internal to external correspondence in the analysis of lower limb bone motion. Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Mont., 1999.
- 4. Alexander E J, Andriacchi T P: State estimation theory in human movement analysis. Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, 1998.
- 5. Alexander E J, Andriacchi T P, Lang P K: Dynamic functional imaging of the musculoskeletal system. ASME Winter International Congress and Exposition, Nashville, Tenn., 1999.
- 6. Alexander E J, Andriacchi T P, Naylor D L: Optimization techniques for skin deformation correction. International Symposium on 3-D Human Movement Conference, Chattanooga, Tenn., 1998.
- 7. Allen P R, Denham R A, Swan A V: Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy: factors affecting the knee after operations. J Bone Joint Surg 1984; 66B: 666-671.
- 8. Alley M T, Shifrin R Y, Pelc N J, Herfkens R J: Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR angiography: state of the art. Radiographics 1998; 18: 273-285.
- 9. Andriacchi T P: Dynamics of knee malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 1994; 25: 395-403.
- 10. Andriacchi T P, Alexander E J, Toney M K, Dyrby C O, Sum J: A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. J Biomech Eng 1998; 120(12): 743-749.
- 11. Andriacchi T P, Lang P, Alexander E, Hurwitz D: Methods for evaluating the progression of osteoarthritis. J Rehab Res Develop 2000; 37, 2: 163-170.
- 12. Andriacchi T P, Sen K, Toney M K, Yoder D: New developments in musculoskeletal testing. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Biomechanics, 1994.
- 13. Andriacchi T P, Strickland A B: Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints. Nijhoff, Series E 1985; 93: 83-102.
- 14. Andriacchi T P, Toney M K: In vivo measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom knee movement during functional testing. Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society 1995: 698.
- 15. Beaulieu C F, Hodge D K, Bergman A G: Glenohumeral relationships during physiological shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MRI and active scan-plane registration. Radiology 1999: accepted for publication.
- 16. Beaulieu C F, Hodge D K, Thabit G, Lang P K, Bergman A G: Dynamic imaging of glenohumeral instability with open MRI. Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, 1998.
- 17. Benedetti M G, Cappozzo A: Anatomical landmark definition and identification in computer aided movement analysis in a rehabilitation context II (Internal Report). U Degli Studi La Sapienza 1994: 1-31.
- 18. Bergman A G, Beaulieu C F, Pearle A D, et al.: Joint motion: assessment by upright interactive dynamic near-real time MR imaging. Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, Ill., 1997.
- 19. Biswal S, Hastie T, Andriacchi T, Bergman G, Dillingham M F, Lang P: The rate of progressive cartilage loss at the knee is dependent on the location of the lesion: a longitudinal MRI study in 43 patients. Arthritis&Rheumatism 2000: submitted for publication.
- 20. Bobic V: Arthoscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1996; 3 (4): 262-264.
- 21. Boe S, Hansen H: Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients aged over 50. J Bone Joint Surg 1986; 68B: 707.
- 22. Bregler C, Hertzmann A, Biermann H: Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams. Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2000: in press.
- 23. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Homminga G, Nilsson A, lsaksson O, Peterson L: A critical analysis of cartilage repair. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68 (2)186-191.
- 24. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L: Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994; 331 (14): 889-895.
- 25. Broderick L S, Turner D A, Renfrew D L, Schnitzer T J, Huff J P, Harris C: Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. AJR 1994; 162: 99-103.
- 26. Butts K, Pauly J M, Kerr A B, Bergman A G, Beaulieu C F: Real-Time MR imaging of joint motion on an open MR imaging scanner. Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, Ill., 1997.
- 27. Cohen Z A, McCarthy D M, Kwak, S D, Legrand P, Fogarasi F, Ciaccio E J, Ateshian G A: Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1999; 7: 95-109.
- 28. Daniel. B, Butts K, Glover G, Herfkens R: Breast cancer: gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5T open imager and three-point Dixon technique. Radiology 1998; 207 (1): 183-190.
- 29. Disler D G: Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. AJR 1997; 169: 1117-1123.
- 30. Disler D G, McCauley T R, Kelman C G, et al.: Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR 1996; 167: 127-132.
- 31. Disler D G, McCauley T R, Wirth C R, Fuchs M D: Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensnional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthrosocpy. AJR 1995; 165: 377-382.
- 32. Doherty M, Hutton C, Bayliss M T: Osteoarthritis. In: Maddison P J, Isenberg D A, Woo P, et al., eds. Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology,
vol 1. Oxford, N.Y., Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 1993; 959-983. - 33. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nguyen M, et al.: Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 378-384.
- 34. Du Y P, Parker D L, Davis W L: Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Res Imaging 1995; 5: 151-157.
- 35. Du Y P, Parker D L, Davis W L, Cao G: Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero-filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Res Imaging 1994; 4: 733-741.
- 36. Dumoulin C L, Souza S P, Darrow R D: Real-time position monitoring of invasive devices using magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 411-5.
- 37. Dyrby C O: The three-dimensional kinematics of knee joint motion: functional differences in two populations [Master's Thesis]. University of Illinois at Chicago; 1998.
- 38. Eckstein F, Westhoff J, Sittek H, et al.: In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. AJR 1998; 170(3): 593-597.
- 39. Elting J J, Hubbell J C: Unilateral frame distraction: proximal tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthritis. Contemp Orthop 1993; 27(6): 522-524.
- 40. Falcāo A X, Udupa J K, Samarasekera S, Sharma S: User-steered image segmentation paradigms: Live wire and live lane. Graphical Models and Image Processing 1998; 60: 233-260.
- 41. Felson D T, Zhang Y, Anthony J M, Naimark A, Anderson J J: Weight loss reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 535-539.
- 42. Garrett J C: Osteochondral allografts for reconstruction of articular defects of the knee. Instr Course Lect 1998; 47: 517-522.
- 43. Ghosh S, Newitt D C, Majumdar S: Watershed segmentation of high resolution articular cartilage image. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, 1999.
- 44. Gouraud H: Continuous shading of curved surfaces. IEEE Trans on Computers 1971; C-20(6).
- 45. Gray A: Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. 1993: CRC Press, Inc.
- 46. Hargreaves B A, Gold G E, Conolly S M, Nishimura D G: Technical considerations for DEFT imaging. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, 1998.
- 47. Hargreaves B A, Gold G E, Lang P K, Bergman G, Conolly S M, Nishimura D G: Imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium. International Society for Magnetic Resonane in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, 1998.
- 48. Hayes C, Conway W: Evaluation of articular cartilage: radiographic and cross-sectional imaging techniques. Radiographics 1992; 12: 409-428.
- 49. Henkelman R M, Stanisz G, Kim J, Bronskill M: Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magn Res Med 1994; 32: 592-601.
- 50. Hoppenfeld S, Huton R: Physical Examination of the Knee. In: Hoppenfeld S. ed. Physical Examination of the Spine and Extremities: Appleton-Century-Crofts/Prentice-Hall, 1976; 171-196.
- 51. Hyhlik-Durr A, Faber S, Burgkart R, et al.: Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence. European Radiology 2000; 10 (2): 297-303.
- 52. Irarrazabal P, Nishimura D G: Fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Mag Res Med 1995; 33: 656-662.
- 53. Johnson F, Leitl S, Waugh W: The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62B: 346-349.
- 54. Johnson T S: In vivo contact kinematics of the knee joint: Advancing the point cluster technique. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota 1999.
- 55. Johnson T S, Andriacchi T P, Laurent M: Development of a knee wear method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity. Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society, 46th Annual Meeting, March, 2000.
- 56. LaFortune M A, Cavanagh P R, Sommer H J, Kalenak A: Three dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J. Biomechanics 1992; 25: 347-357.
- 57. Lang P, Alexander E, Andriacchi T: Funcional joint imaging: a new technique integrating MRI and biomotion studies. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver, Apr. 18, 2000-Apr. 24, 2000, 2000.
- 58. Lang P. Biswal S, Dillingham M, Bergman G, Hastie T, Andriacchi T: Risk factors for progression of cartilage loss: a longitudinal MRI study. European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6th Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999.
- 59. Lang P, Hargreaves B A, Gold G, et al.; Cartilage imaging: comparison of driven equilibrium with gradient-echo, SPGR, and fast spin-echo sequences. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Apr. 17-24, 1998.
- 60. Ledingham J, Regan M, Jones A, Doherty M: Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 53-58.
- 61. Lorensen W E, Cline H E: Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. Comput to Graph 1987; 21: 163-169.
- 62. Losch A, Eckstein F, Haubner M, Englmeier K H: A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI part 1: devel- opment of a computational method. Magn Res Imaging 1997; 15, 7: 795-804.
- 63. Lu T W, O'Connor J J: Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using globals optimisation with joint constraints. J Biomechanics 1999; 32: 129-134.
- 64. Lucchetti L, Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Della Croce U: Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee joint kinematics. J Biomechanics 1998; 31: 977-984.
- 65. Lynch J A, Zaim S, Zhao Stork A, Genant H K: Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours. Proc. SPIE 3979 Medical Imaging, San Diego, February 2000.
- 66. Maki J H, Johnson G A, Cofer G P, MacFall J R: SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT. J Mag Res 1988.
- 67. Meyer C H, Pauly J M, Macovski A, Nishimura D G: Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Res Med 1990; 15: 287-304.
- 68. Mollica Q, Leonardi W, Longo G, Travaglianti G: Surgical treatment of arthritic varus knee by tibial corticotomy and angular distraction with an external fixator. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1992; 18 (1): 17-23.
- 69. Nizard R S: Role of tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medial femorotibial osteoarthritis. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1998; 65 (7-9): 443-446.
- 70. Noll D C, Nishimura D, Macovski A: Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imag10 1991; 10 (2): 154-163.
- 71. Ogilvie-Harris D J, Fitsialos D P: Arthroscopic management of the degenerative knee. Arthroscopy 1991; 7: 151-157.
- 72. Pearle A, Bergman A G, Daniels B, et al.: Use of an external MR-tracking coil for active scan plane registration during dynamic musculoskeletal MR imaging in a vertically open MRT unit. American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, Calif., 1998.
- 73. Pearle A D, Daniel B L, Bergman A G: Joint motion in an open MR unit using MR tracking. JMRI 1999; 10 (10): 1566-1576.
- 74. Peterfy C, van Dijke C, Lu Y, et al.: Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging. AJR 1995; 165: 371-375.
- 75. Peterfy C G, Majumdar S, Lang P, van Dijke. C, Sack K, Genant H K: MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. Radiology 1994; 191(2): 413-419.
- 76. Peterfy C G, van Dijke C F, Janzen D L, et al.: Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994; 192(2): 485-491.
- 77. Piplani M A, Disler D G, McCauley T R, Holmes T J, Cousins J P: Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images. Radiology 1996; 198: 855-859.
- 78. Potter H G, Linklater J M, Allen AA, Hannafin J A, Haas S B: Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-A(9): 1276-1284.
- 79. Prodromos C C, Andriacchi T P, Galante J O: A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1985; 67A: 1188-1194.
- 80. Radin E L, Burr D B, Caterson B, Fyhrie D, Brown T D, Boyd R D: Mechanical determinants of osteoarthrosis. Sem Arthr Rheum 1991; 21(3): 12-21.
- 81. Radin E L, Burr D B, Fyhrie D: Characteristics of joint loading as it applies to osteoarthrosis. In: Mow V C, Woo S-Y, Ratcliffe T, eds. Symposium on Biomechanics of Diarthrodial Joints,
vol 2. New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1990; 437-451. - 82. Recht M P, Piraino D W, Paletta G A, Schils J P, Belhobek G H: Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996; 198: 209-212.
- 83. Recht M P, Resnick D: MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. AJR 1994; 163: 283-290.
- 84. Ritter M A, Faris P M, Keating E M, Meding J B: Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1994; 299: 153-156.
- 85. Saito T, Toriwaki J-I: New algorithms for Euclidean distance transformation of an n-dimensional digitized picture with applications. Pattern Recognition 1994; 27 (11): 1551-1565.
- 86. Schipplein O D, Andriacchi T P: Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 113-119.
- 87. Schouten J S A G, van den Ouweland F A, Valkenburg H A: A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51: 932-937.
- 88. Sharif M, George E, Shepstone L, et al.: Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarhritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 760-767.
- 89. Sharma L, D. E. H, Thonar E J M A, et al.: Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronic acid level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 1998; 41(7): 1233-40.
- 90. Shoup R R, Becker E D: The driven equilibrium Fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study. J Mag Res 1972; 8.
- 91. Slemenda C, Mazzuca S, Brandt K, Katz B: Lower extremity lean tissue mass and strength predict increases in pain and in functional impairment in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39(suppl): S212.
- 92. Slemenda C, Mazzuca S, Brandt K, Katz B: Lower extremity strength, lean tissue mass and bone density in progression of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheunm 1996; 39(suppl): S169.
- 93. Solloway S, Hutchinson C E, Waterton J C, Taylor C J: The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images. Mag Res Med 1997; 37:943-952.
- 94. Spoor C W, Veldpas F E: Rigid body motion calculated from spatial coordinates of markers. J Biomechanics 1980; 13: 391-393.
- 95. Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Englmeier K H, Reiser M: Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Mag Res Med 1999; 41: 529-536.
- 96. Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Michaelis M, Englmeier K H, Reiser M: Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. Mag Res Imaging 1999; 17:1033-1042.
- 97. Steines D, Berger F, Cheng C, Napel S, Lang P: 3D thickness maps of articular cartilage for quantitative assessment of osteoarthritis. To be presented at ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, October 2000.
- 98. Steins D, Cheng C, Wong A, Berger F, Napel S, Lang P: Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage from MR images. CARS-Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 578-583, San Francisco, 2000.
- 99. Steines D, Napel S, Lang P: Measuring volume of articular cartilage defects in osteoarthritis using MRI. To be presented at ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, October 2000.
- 100. Stevenson S, Dannucci G A, Sharkey N A, Pool R R: The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mis-matched osteochondral allografts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71 (9): 1297-1307.
- 101. Tieschky M, Faber S, Haubner M, et al.: Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing. J Orthop Res 1997; 15(6): 808-813.
- 102. Tomasi C, Kanade T: Shape and motion from image streams under orthography—a factorization method. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1993; 90(21): 9795-9802.
- 103. Tsai J, Ashjaee S, Adalsteinsson E, et al.: Application of a flexible loop-gap resonator for MR imaging of articular cartilage at 3.0T. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver, Apr. 18, 2000-Apr. 24, 2000, 2000.
- 104. Wang J W, Kuo K N, Andriacchi T P, Galante J O: The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72A: 905-909.
- 105. Waterton J C, Solloway S, Foster J E, Keen M C, Gandy S, Middleton B J, Maciewicz R A, Watt I, Dieppe P A, Taylor C J: Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans. Mag Res Med, 2000, 43: 126-132.
- 106. Woolf S D, Chesnick F, Frank J, Lim K, Balaban R: Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 1991; 179: 623-628.
- 107. Worring M, Smeulders A W M: Digital curvature estimation. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 1993. 58(3): p. 366-382.
- 108. Yan C H: Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density: new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, 1998, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University
- 109. Yao L, Gentili A, Thomas A: Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in fast spin-echo imaging of cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6 (1): 180-184.
- 110. Yao L, Sinha S, Seeger L: MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T. AJR 1992; 158(2): 339-345.
- 111. Yasuda K, T. M, Tsuchida T, Kameda K: A 10 to 15 year follow up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 1992; 282: 186-195.
- 112. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D: Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vision 1988; 1:321-331
- 113. Falcao A X, Udupa J K, Samarasekera S, Sharma S, Hirsch B E, Lotufo R A: User-steered image segmentation paradigms: Live wire and live lane. GMIP 1998; 60, 233-260
- 114. Steines, D., et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, ISMRM Eight Scientific Meeting, Denver Colo., 2000
This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint of a mammal, particularly a human subject, using the assessment to treat and monitor the subject as needed for cartilage degeneration problems. While the numerous aspects of the invention are useful for joints generally, they are particularly suited for dealing with the human knee. Some aspects related the static images and degeneration patterns of a cartilage, while others relate to the interaction of such images and patterns to provide a better means of assessing the condition of a cartilage.
One aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a cartilage. The method comprises obtaining an image of a cartilage, (preferably a magnetic resonance image), converting the image to a three-dimensional degeneration pattern, and evaluating the degree of degeneration in a volume of interest of the cartilage. By performing this method at an initial time T, and a later time T2, one can determine the change in the volume of interest and evaluate what steps to take for treatment.
Another aspect of this invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint. The method comprises obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the initial time, obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at a later time, and calculating the thickness or regional volume of the region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the later time, and determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the cartilage between the later and initial times. The 3D map may be a thickness map, a biochemical map or a combination.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; receiving the transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal. The method comprises (a) determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect; (b) obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region; (c) subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL; and (d) multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
Still another aspect of the-invention is a method of estimating the change of a region of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time. The method comprises (a) estimating the width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1, (b) estimating the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and (c) determining the change in the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint. The method comprises (a) defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1; (b) identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system; (c) defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage; (d) defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2; (e) placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1; (f) and measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
Another aspect of this invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage. The method comprises measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage, determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage; mapping the amounts of the biochemical component through the cartilage; and determining the areas of cartilage deficit by identifying the areas having an altered amount of the biochemical component present.
Once a map is obtained, it can be used in assessing the condition of a cartilage at an initial time and over a time period. Thus, the biochemical map may be used in the method aspects of the invention in a manner similar to the cartilage thickness map.
Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint from a distant location. The method comprises electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; receiving the transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
Another aspect of the invention is a kit for aiding in assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a mammal, which kit comprises a software program, which when installed and executed on a computer reads a cartilage degeneration pattern presented in a standard graphics format and produces a computer readout showing a cartilage thickness map of the degenerated cartilage.
Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a subject's cartilage in a joint, the method comprises obtaining a three dimensional biochemical representation of the cartilage, obtaining a morphological representation of the cartilage, and merging the two representations, and simultaneously displaying the merged representations on a medium. The merged representations are then used to assess the condition of a cartilage, estimate the loss of cartilage in a joint, determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of cartilage defect, or estimating the change of a region of cartilage at a particular point in time or over a period of time.
A method for correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and opto-electrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises (a) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in externally near the joint, (b) obtaining the opto-electrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a), and (c) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a) and (b) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the bone data and the opto-electrical data. The method also can be used to further evaluate cartilage image data that is obtained using a similarly positioned set of skin reference markers.
Another aspect of the invention is a skin reference marker that comprises (a) a material detectable by an imaging technique; (b) a container for holding the material, (c) a material that causes the container to adhere to the skin of a human, and (d) a reflective material placed on the surface of the container.
Another aspect of the invention is a biochemical map of a cartilage that comprises a three-dimensional representation of the distribution of the amount of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage; (b) determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage; (c) mapping th e amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage; and (d) determining the areas of abnormal joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for deriving the motion of bones about a joint from markers placed on the skin, which method comprises (a) placing at least three external markers on the patient's limb segments surrounding the joint, (b) registering the location of each marker on the patient's limb while the patient is standing completely still and while moving the limb, (c) calculating the principal axis, principal moments and deformation of rigidity of the cluster of markers, and (d) calculating a correction to the artifact induced by the motion of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone.
Another aspect of the invention is a system for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which system comprises (a) a device for electronically transferring a cartilage degeneration pattern for the joint to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; (b) a device for receiving the cartilage degeneration pattern at the remote location; (c) a database accessible at the remote location for generating a movement pattern for the joint of the human wherein the database includes a collection of movement patterns of human joints, which patterns are organized and can be accessed by reference to characteristics such as type of joint, gender, age, height, weight, bone size, type of movement, and distance of movement; (d) a device for generating a movement pattern that most closely approximates a movement pattern for the human patient based on the characteristics of the human patient; (e) a device for correlating the movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern; and (f) a device for transmitting the correlated movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern back to the source of the cartilage degeneration pattern.
A method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) obtaining the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the knee showing at least the bones on either side of the joint, (b) segmenting the MRI data from step (a), (c) generating a geometrical representation of the bone of the joint from the segmented MRI data, (d) assessing the patient's gait to determine the load pattern or the cartilage contact pattern of the articular cartilage in the joint during the gait assessment, and (e) correlating the load pattern or cartilage contact pattern obtained in step (d) with the geometrical representation obtained in step (c).
Another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the rate of degeneration of cartilage in the joint of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and the bones on either side of the cartilage, which method comprises (a) obtaining a cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint that shows an area of greater than normal degeneration, (b) obtaining a movement pattern of the joint that shows where the opposing cartilage surfaces contact, (c) comparing the cartilage degeneration pattern with the movement pattern of the joint, and (d) determining if the movement pattern shows contact of one cartilage surface with a portion of the opposing cartilage surface showing greater than normal degeneration in the cartilage degeneration pattern.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for monitoring the treatment of a degenerative joint condition in a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern; (c) treating the mammal to minimize further degeneration of the joint condition; and (d) monitoring the treatment to the mammal. Still another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; and (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern
Other aspects of the invention may be apparent upon further reading the specification and claims of the patent application.
In the accompanying drawings:
This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal. One aspect is a method for such an assessment. The assessment can be done using internal images, or maps, of the cartilage alone or in combination with a movement pattern of the joint. If used alone, a map obtained at an initial time is compared with a map obtained at a later time to provide a view of the change in cartilage over time. Another aspect is a method is comparing the movement pattern for a joint of a subject being studied with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the subject, then determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the degeneration pattern. If, in determining the relationship between the two patterns, one finds that the movement pattern has caused the degeneration pattern or will continue to adversely affect the degeneration pattern, therapy can be prescribed to minimize the adverse effects, such as further degeneration or inflammation.
In overview, some of the systems and methods of this invention are illustrated by the flow chart in the attached FIG. 1 . FIG. 1 is based on the full range of processes, preferably applied to a knee and surrounding cartilage.
In FIG. 1 , the first step 10 represents obtaining an image of the cartilage itself. This is typically achieved using MRI techniques to take an image of the entire knee and then, optionally, manipulating (e.g., “subtracting out” or “extracting”) the non-cartilage images as shown in step 12. Non-cartilage images typically come from bone and fluid. Preferably, the MRI is taken using external markers to provide reference points to the MRI image (step 11). If the cartilage is imaged with a 2D MRI acquisition technique, the resulting stack of 2D images so obtained can be combined into a 3D image, as indicated in step 14. A preferred alternative is to use 3D MRI acquisition techniques to acquire a 3D image directly. In either case, the same “non-cartilage image extraction techniques referred to in step 12 can be used.
With a full 3D image captured, various “maps” or displays of the cartilage can be constructed to give a cartilage degeneration pattern. This is represented by step 16. One such display can, for example, be a color-coding of a displayed image to reflect the thickness for the cartilage. This will allow easy visual identification of actual or potential defects in the cartilage.
Together with or independently of the cartilage imaging, and as represented by parallel step 20, a 3D image of the knee joint is taken, again preferably using MRI. Many of the same techniques as applied in steps 10 to 14 are used to do this. However, as illustrated by sub-step 22, it is useful to define and register a skin-external frame of reference around the joint. This is achieved by placing fiduciary markers on the skin around the outside of the knee (step 22) prior to taking the image.
In addition to an image extraction technique (as described above in step 12), an image is manipulated to enhance the image of the position of the markers (step 24). The resulting manipulated image is used to give a 3D image of the joint and associated bones (step 26). With the markers in place, and as shown by step 30, an additional set of markers is placed on the skin along the outside of the leg, and an external image of the limb is obtained. Using at least two cameras, images are then taken of the subject in a static state. In addition, images are also taken of the subject while moving. This is shown collectively by step 32. The images obtained are then processed to relate the movement of the skin relative to the bone. In addition, certain calculations are performed, for example, the center of mass is calculated. These manipulations are shown in Step 34. Further, as the fiduciary markers are still in place during the video image capture, a correlation between the fiduciary and the addi- tional set of markers can be made. This is shown in step 36.
Once this marker-to-marker correlation is made, the static 3D image of the joint (with associated fiduciary markers) and the movement images of the leg bones (also with fiduciary markers in place) can be combined. The fiduciary markers, therefore, serve as baseline references. The combination (step 40) of 3D cartilage image (from step 14), 3D knee joint image (step 26), and the moving leg co-ordinates (step 34) will, after appropriate corrections, result in a displayable, 3D motion image of the joint moving as per step 46.
The moving images, showing the contact areas of the knee joint can be used in conjunction with the various “maps” or displays generated at step 16 to provide a visual indication of potential or actual cartilage defects and help in determining their relation between movement and degeneration patterns. This is shown in step 48.
Furthermore, as the various images are supported by actual mathematical quantification, real measurements (such as cartilage thickness) can be taken and compared with later or earlier measurements and/or imaging. This allows the tracking of the progression of a defect, or conversely, continued tracking of healthy cartilage. This aids a health worker in providing therapy for the patients. The method allows monitoring and evaluation of remedial actions as well as possible treatment prescriptions.
Thus, this invention discloses, for example, a method to examine the relationship between articular cartilage morphology and the functional load bearing areas of a knee joint measured during movement. The method includes enhanced imaging techniques to reconstruct the volumetric and biochemical parameters of the articular cartilage in three dimensions; and a method for in vivo kinematic measurements of the knee. The kinematic measurement permits direct in vivo measurements of complete six-degrees of freedom motion of the femur or the tibia or associated bones during normal activities. This permits the study of load bearing of articular cartilage during movement. In particular, this method can aid in locating cartilage defects relative to the changing load bearing areas of the knee joint during daily activities. While the various aspects of the invention are useful in mammals generally, they are particularly useful for human patients.
Imaging Articular Cartilage
In general, the joint of a patient is that place of union, more or less movable, between two or more bones. A joint comprises cartilage and other elements such as the accompanying bones on either side of the joint, fluid, and other anatomical elements. Joints arc classified into three general morphological types: fibrous, cartilaginous, and synovial. This invention is particularly useful for assessing synovial joints, particularly the knee.
In obtaining an image of the cartilage of a joint in a mammal, a number of internal imaging techniques known in the art are useful for electronically generating a cartilage image. These include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography scanning (CT, also known as computerized axial tomography or CAT), and ultrasound imaging techniques. Others may be apparent to one of skill in the art. MRI techniques are preferred.
MRI, with its superior soft tissue contrast, is the best technique available for assessing tissue and its defects, for example articular cartilage and cartilage lesions, to obtain a cartilage degeneration can provide morphologic information about the area of damage. Specifically, changes such as fissuring, partial or full thickness cartilage loss, and signal changes within residual cartilage can be detected.
The reason MR imaging techniques are particularly suitable for cartilage is because they can provide accurate assessment of cartilage thickness, demonstrate internal cartilage signal changes, evaluate the subchondral bone for signal abnormalities, and demonstrate morphologic changes of the cartilage surface.
MRI provides several important advantages over other techniques in this invention. One advantage is good contrast between cartilage, bone, joint fluid, ligaments, and muscle in order to facilitate the delineation and segmentation of the data sets. Another is the coverage of the entire region of interest in a single scan within acceptable acquisition times. For a brief discussion of the basic MRI principles and techniques, see MRI Basic Principles and Applications, Second Edition, Mark A. Brown and Richard C. Semelka, Wiley-Liss, Inc. (1999).
MRI employs pulse sequences that allow for better contrast of different parts of the area being imaged. Different pulse sequences are better fitted for visualization of different anatomic areas, for example, hyaline cartilage or joint fluid. More than one pulse sequence can be employed at the same time. A brief discussion of different types of pulse sequences is provided below.
Routine MRI pulse sequences available for imaging tissue, such as cartilage, include conventional T1 and T2-weighted spin-echo imaging, gradient recalled echo (GRE) imaging, magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) imaging, fast spin-echo (FSE) imaging, contrast enhanced imaging, rapid acquisition relaxation enhancement, (RARE) imaging, gradient echo acquisition in the steady state, (GRASS), and driven equilibrium Fourier transform (DEFT) imaging. As these imaging techniques are well known to one of skill in the art, e.g. someone having an advanced degree in imaging technology, each is discussed only generally hereinafter. While each technique is useful for obtaining a cartilage degeneration pattern, some are better than others.
Conventional T1 and T2-Weighted Spin-Echo Imaging
Conventional T1 and T2-weighted MRI depicts articular cartilage, and can demonstrate defects and gross morphologic changes. T1-weighted images show excellent intra-substance anatomic detail of hyaline cartilage. However, T1-weighted imaging does not show significant contrast between joint effusions and the cartilage surface, making surface irregularities difficult to detect. T2-weighted imaging demonstrates joint effusions and thus surface cartilage abnormalities, but since some components of cartilage have relatively short T2 relaxation times, these are not as well depicted as other preferred imaging.
Gradient-Recalled Echo Imaging
Gradient-recalled echo imaging has 3D capability and ability to provide high resolution images with relatively short scan times. Fat suppressed 3D spoiled gradient echo (FS-3D-SPGR) imaging has been shown to be more sensitive than standard MR imaging for the detection of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee.
Magnetization Transfer Contrast Imaging
Cartilage, as well as other ordered tissues, demonstrate the effects of magnetization transfer. Magnetization transfer imaging can be used to separate articular cartilage from adjacent joint fluid and inflamed synovium.
Fast Spin-Echo Imaging
Fast spin-echo imaging is another useful pulse sequence to evaluate articular cartilage. Incidental magnetization transfer contrast contributes to the signal characteristics of articular cartilage on fast spin-echo images and can enhance the contrast between cartilage and joint fluid. Sensitivity and specificity of fast spin-echo imaging have been reported to be 87% and 94% in a study with arthroscopic correlation.
Contrast Enhanced Imaging
The use of gadolinium for imaging of articular cartilage has been applied in several different forms. Direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography, wherein a dilute solution containing gadolinium is injected directly into the joint, improves contrast between cartilage and the arthrographic fluid. Indirect MR arthrography, with a less invasive intravenous injection, can also been applied. Gadolinium enhanced imaging has the potential to monitor glycosaminoglycan content within the cartilage, which may have implications for longitudinal evaluations of injured cartilage.
Driven Equilibrium Fourier Transform
Another 3D imaging method that has been developed is based on the driven equilibrium fourier transform (DEFT) pulse sequence (U.S. Pat. No. 5,671,741), and is specifically designed for cartilage imaging. DEFT provides an effective tradeoff between T2/T1 weighting and spin density contrast that delineates the structures of interest in the knee. Contrast-to-noise ratio between cartilage and joint fluid is greater with DEFT than with spoiled gradient echo (SPGR). DEFT is an alternative approach to SPGR. DEFT contrast is very well suited to imaging articular cartilage. Synovial fluid is high in signal intensity, and articular cartilage intermediate in signal intensity. Bone is dark, and lipids are suppressed using a fat saturation pulse. Hence, cartilage is easily distinguished from all of the adjacent tissues based on signal intensity alone, which will greatly aid segmentation and subsequent volume calculations.
The basic DEFT pulse sequence is shown in FIG. 2 . A conventional spin echo pulse sequence was followed by an additional refocusing pulse to form another echo, and then a reversed, negated, excitation pulse to return any residual magnetization to the +z axis. This preserved the magnetization of longer T2 species, such as synovial fluid. Typical MRI parameters for cartilage are a T1-relaxation time of 900 Milliseconds (ms) and a T2-relaxation time of 40 ms, while synovial fluid has a T1-relaxation time of 3000 ms and a T2-relaxation time of 200 ms. In addition, synovial fluid has a 30% greater proton density than cartilage. The signal levels of cartilage and synovial fluid were plotted in FIG. 3 for a RARE pulse sequence and for DEFT, and show that DEFT maintains excellent contrast for any relaxation time (TR). It achieves this contrast while maintaining a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) efficiency (SNR/(Tacquisition)) that is equal to or better than other methods with much lower contrast, such as T1-weighted GRASS.
DEFT was compared with a fast spin-echo (FSE), a gradient-echo (GRE), and a spoiled gradient-echo (SPGR) sequence with parameters similar to the ones published by Disler et al. The patella IS was scanned in 10 normal volunteer knees using a 1.5T whole-body system (GE Signa) with a 3 inch surface coil. All images were acquired with field of view (FOV) 10×10 cm, matrix 256×256 elements, slice thickness 4 mm using fat-saturation. DEFT (400/15 [TRITE in msec], 2 NEX (number of excitations), FSE (3500/15, echo train length [ETL] 8, 2 NEX (number of excitations), FSE (3500/15, ETL 4, 2 NEX), GRE (400/20, 30°, 2 NEX), and SPGR (50/15, 30° [flip angle], 2 NEX) images were obtained. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between cartilage and joint fluid were calculated as:
CNR=|(SIJoint Fluid−SIcartilage)/SIBackground Noise| [Eq. 1]
CNR=|(SIJoint Fluid−SIcartilage)/SIBackground Noise| [Eq. 1]
Contrast (C) between cartilage and joint fluid was calculated as:
C=|[(SIJoint Fluid−SIcartilage)/SIJoint Fluid]×100 | [Eq. 2]
In the equations SI is signal intensity. DEFT demonstrated greater contrast-to-noise ratio and contrast between cartilage and joint fluid than SPGR, GRE, and FSE sequences (FIGS. 4 & 5 ). Cartilage had intermediate signal intensity with DEFT, while joint fluid was high in signal intensity. The difference in CNR between DEFT and SPGR was statistically significant (p<0.001). Cartilage morphology, i.e. cartilage layers, were consistently best delineated with the DEFT sequence. At the resolution used in this study, FSE sequences suffered from image blurring. Blurring was improved with ETL 4 when compared to ETL8; nonetheless, even with ETL 4, cartilage morphology seen on FSE images was inferior to the DEFT sequence. In light of these results, DEFT imaging is a preferred MRI technique.
Another Application of DEFT
C=|[(SIJoint Fluid−SIcartilage)/SIJoint Fluid]×100 | [Eq. 2]
In the equations SI is signal intensity. DEFT demonstrated greater contrast-to-noise ratio and contrast between cartilage and joint fluid than SPGR, GRE, and FSE sequences (
Another Application of DEFT
DEFT was combined with a partial k-space echo-planar data acquisition. This pulse sequence is illustrated in FIG. 6 above. A slab selective pulse in z defines the imaging volume, which is then resolved with phase-encoding gradients in the y and z axes, and an oscillating EPI gradient in the x axis.
Example images acquired with this approach are shown in FIG. 7 . This case was optimized for resolution, in order to image the patellar cartilage. The EPI readout acquired 5 echoes for each DEFT sequence. Partial k-space acquisition collected only 60% of the data along the x-axis. Correction for the missing data was performed using a homodyne reconstruction. The image matrix was 192×192×32, with a resolution of 0.5×0.5×2.5 mm, resulting in a 10×10×8 cm FOV. The echo time TE was 22 ms, and the TR was 400 ms. Fat was suppressed with a fat presaturation pulse. The total scan time for this acquisition was 5 minutes.
Additional image studies that can be performed using this approach may require greater spatial coverage, but one can permit slightly less spatial resolution, and a longer scan time similar to the one used with the 3D SPGR approach. If one relaxes the resolution to 0.75×0.75×1.5 mm, and doubles the z slab thickness and z phase encodes, the result will be a FOV of 15×15×16 cm, and a total scan time of approximately 15 minutes, which exactly fits the desired scan protocol. Similar to the 3D SPGR acquisition, one can acquire a first 3D DEFT scan in the sagittal plane with fat saturation. The 3D DEFT acquisition can then be repeated without fat saturation using the identical parameters and slice coordinates used during the previous acquisition with fat saturation. The resultant non-fat-saturated 3D DEFT images can be used for 3D rendering of the femoral and tibial bone contours.
In summary, Driven Equilibrium Fourier Transform is a pulse sequence preferred for cartilage imaging that provides higher contrast-to-noise ratios and contrast between cartilage and joint fluid than SPGR, GRE, and FSE sequences. Cartilage morphology is better delineated with DEFT sequences than with SPGR, GRE, and FSE images. The combination of high anatomic detail and high cartilage-joint fluid CNR and contrast may render this sequence particularly useful for longitudinal studies of cartilage in patients with osteoarthritis.
A Representative Example of MR Imaging is described below:
A MR image can be performed using a whole body magnet operating at a field strength of 1.5 T (GE Signa, for example, equipped with the GE SR-120 high speed gradients [2.2 Gauss/cm in 184 μsec risetimes]). Prior to MR imaging, external markers filled with Gd-DTPA (Magnevist®, Berlex Inc., Wayne, N.J.) doped water (T1relaxation time approximately 1.0 sec) can be applied to the skin around the knee joint and optionally at the same positions used for gait analysis in a biomotion laboratory (discussed below). The external markers can be included in the field of view of all imaging studies. Patients can be placed in the scanner in supine position. After an axial scout sequence, coronal and sagittal T1-weighted images of the femur can be acquired using the body coil (spin-echo, TR=500 msec, TE=15 msec, 1 excitation (NEX), matrix 256×128 elements, field of view (FOV) 48 cm, slice thickness 7 mm, interslice spacing 1 mm). The scanner table can then be moved to obtain coronal and sagittal images of the knee joint and tibia using the same sequence parameters. These T1-weighted scans can be employed to identify axes through the femur and tibia which can be used later for defining the geometry of the knee joint. The knee can then be placed in the knee coil with the joint space located in the center of the coil. The knee can be secured in the coil with padding. Additionally, the foot and ankle region can be secured in neutral position to the scanner table using adhesive tape in order to minimize motion artifacts. A rapid scout scan can be acquired in the axial plane using a gradient echo sequence (GRASS, 2D Fourier Transform (2DFT), TR=50 msec, TE=10 msec, flip angle 40°, 1 excitation (NEX), matrix 256×128 elements, field of view (FOV) 24 cm, slice thickness 7 mm, interslice spacing 3 mm). This scout scan can be used to demonstrate the position of the knee joint space in the coil and to prescribe all subsequent high resolution imaging sequences centered over the joint space. Additionally, using the graphic, image based sequence prescription mode provided with the scanner software, the scout scan can help to ensure that all external markers around the knee joint are included in the field of view of the high resolution cartilage sensitive MR sequences.
There are several issues to consider in obtaining a good image. One issue is good contrast between cartilage, bone, joint fluid, ligaments, and muscle in order to facilitate the delineation and segmentation of the data sets. Another is the coverage of both condyles of the knee in a single scan within acceptable acquisition times. In addition, if there are external markers, these must be visualized. One way to address these issues is to use a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo sequence in the sagittal plane with the following parameters (SPGR, 3DFT, fat-saturated, TR=60 msec, TE=5 msec, flip angle 40°, 1 excitation (NEX), matrix 256×160 elements rectangular FOV 16×12 cm, slice thickness 1.3 mm, 128 slices, acquisition time approximately 15 min). Using these parameters, one can obtain complete coverage across the knee joint and the external markers both in mediolateral and anteroposterior direction while achieving good spatial resolution and contrast-to-noise ratios between cartilage, bone and joint fluid (FIGS. 8 and 9 ). The fat-saturated 3D SPGR sequences can be used for rendering the cartilage in three dimensions (see description below). The 3D SPGR sequence can then be repeated in the sagittal plane without fat saturation using the identical parameters and slice coordinates used during the previous acquisition with fat saturation. The resultant non-fat-saturated 3D SPGR images demonstrate good contrast between low signal intensity cortical bone and high signal intensity bone marrow thereby facilitating 3D rendering of the femoral and tibial bone contours. It is to be understood that this approach is representative only and should not be viewed as limiting in any way.
Volumes of Interest (VOI)
The invention allows a health practitioner to determine cartilage loss in a reproducible fashion and thus follow the progression of a cartilage defect over time.
In one embodiment of the invention, one can use a 2D or a 3D surface detection technique to extract the surface of the joint, e.g. the femoral condyles, on both baseline and follow-up scans. For example, a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence can be used for surfaces extraction of the femoral condyles. The T1-weighted spin-echo sequence provides high contrast between low signal intensity cortical bone and high signal intensity fatty marrow. For detection of the surface of the femoral condyles, a step-by-step problem solving procedure, i.e., an algorithm, can convolve a data set with a 3D kernel to locate the maximum gradient location. The maximum gradient location corresponds to the zero crossing of a spatial location. When the kernel is designed properly, then there will be only one zero crossing in the mask. Thus, that zero crossing is the surface. This operation is preferably three-dimensional rather than two-dimensional. The surface of the joint, e.g. the femoral condyles, on the baseline scan can be registered in an object coordinate system A. The surface of the joint, e.g. the femoral condyles, on the follow-up scan can be registered in an object coordinate system B. Once these surfaces have been defined, a transformation B to B′ can be performed that best matches B′ with A. Such transformations can, for example, be performed using a Levenberg Marquardt technique. Alternatively, the transformations and matching can be applied to the cartilage only. The same transformation can be applied to the cartilage sensitive images on the follow-up scan in order to match the cartilage surfaces.
Using the 3D surface registration of the joint on the baseline scan and resultant object coordinate system A, one can place volumes of interest over the area of a cartilage defect seen on the cartilage sensitive images. For example, in the knee joint, the size of the targeted volumes of interest can be selected to exceed that of the cartilage defect in anteroposterior and mediolateral direction, e.g. by 0.5 to 1 cm. If the defect is located high on the femoral condyle or in the trochlear region, the targeted VOI can be chosen so that its size exceeds that of the cartilage defect in supero-inferior and mediolateral direction. The third dimension of the targeted VOI (parallel to the surface normal of the cartilage) can be fixed, for example at 1 cm. VOI size and placement can be manual or automatic on the baseline study. Once the targeted VOI has been placed on the image using visual or automated computer control, the 3D coordinates of the targeted VOI relative to the 3D contour of the joint and object coordinate system A can be registered and saved. On follow-up studies, e.g. scans inadvertently obtained with slightly different patient position, the 3D surface of the joint is registered to match the orientation of the baseline scan and the targeted VOI is then automatically placed on the joint using object coordinate system B′ and the coordinates saved on the baseline study. Cartilage volume within the targeted VOI on baseline and follow-up studies can, for example, be determined using standard thresholding and seed growing techniques.
Reference Markers
When obtaining the MR images for use in this invention, whether the MRI is of cartilage or of bone, external reference markers can be placed on the skin around the joint of the subject being imaged. The external marker can be designed not only to show up in the MRI, but also to show up if an external image of the joint is obtained. The importance and value of such unique reference markers will be discussed in more detail hereinafter.
Thus, one embodiment of the invention is a skin reference marker that can be used in the assessment of the condition of a joint of a human. Multiple skin reference markers can be placed upon one or more limbs of a patient prior to internal imaging and external imaging. Each skin reference marker comprises a material detectable by an imaging technique, a container for the material in which the container preferably has multiple surfaces, a means for affixing the container to the skin (e.g. an adhesive placed on at least one surface of the container in an amount sufficient to adhere the container to the skin of a human), and a reflective material (preferably retro-reflective) placed on another surface of the container located away from the adhesive. Several imaging techniques can be used that are able to detect the marker. For example, magnetic resonance imaging is preferred, but, ultrasound, or X-ray are also useful. In the case of X-ray, further manipulations must be performed in which multiple X-ray images are assimilated by a computer into a 2 dimensional cross-sectional image called a Computed Tomography (CT) Scan. The material detectable by an imaging can be either in a liquid form or a solid form. The material can be any imaging contrast agent or solution, e.g. a paramagnetic material. The material can be a lanthanide, such as one belonging to the yttrium group of rare earth metals. More specifically, the material can be gadolinium. The shape of the container can be any shape allowing it to be placed on the skin of a human. For example, it can be cubical, spherical, elliptical, discoid or cylindrical. The size of the container can be any size, but optimally a size allowing it to be recorded by an imaging machine. The longest dimension of the container can be up to 5.0 cm, but preferably is about 0.25 to 2.0 cm. The reflective or retro-reflective material can be any material that is able to reflect light directly back to the source of the light so that the position of the reference marker is captured by the opto-electrical recording means, e.g. a video camera. 3M Corporation makes several retro-reflective materials.
Once a magnetic resonance image is obtained, it can be manipulated to improve the image by reducing unwanted, non-cartilage images.
Segmentation
To prepare the data set for 3D rendering, the cartilage can be segmented image by image using a signal-intensity-based threshold combined with a seed growing technique. The femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage can be segmented separately based on the fat-saturated 3D SPGR or 3D DEFT sequence. Manual disarticulation can be performed by outlining the cartilage contour in areas where the signal intensity of the articular cartilage is similar to that of adjacent structures. The contours of the femoral, tibial, and patellar bone can be segmented separately using the non-fat-saturated 3D SPGR or 3D DEFT sequence. Segmentation software can allow for manual editing of cartilage thickness maps and cartilage defects detected using the above embodiments. In this fashion, the operator can correct erroneous detection of cartilage defects in areas where the cartilage may be naturally thinner. Such software includes seed-growing algorithms and active-contour algorithms that are run on standard PC's. A sharp interface is present between the high signal intensity bone marrow and the low signal intensity cortical bone thereby facilitating seed growing. Fat-saturated and non-fat-saturated 3D sequences can be acquired with the same field of view, slice thickness and slice positions, thereby enabling superimposition and cross registration of any resultant 3D renderings of the femoral, tibial, and patellar cartilage and bone. External reference markers can aid in registering the 3D data in the same object coordinate system.
3D maps of cartilage thickness can be generated using several different techniques. One representative, but not limiting, approach uses a 3D surface detection technique which is based on a 2D edge detector (Wang-Binford) that has been extended to 3D. This surface detection technique can generate surface points and their corresponding surface normal. To smooth the contour, the program samples 25 percent of the surface points and fits a cubic spline to the sample points. The program can compute the curvature along sample spline points and find two sample points that have the maximum curvature and are separated by about half the number of voxels on the contour. These points partition the spline into two subcontours. For each subcontour, the program can compute the average distance between the points and the center of the mass. The program can designate the subcontour with the smaller average distance as the inner cartilage surface and the other subcontour as the outer cartilage surface (OCS). The intersect between the inner cartilage surface (ICS) (located at the subchondral bone interface) and the outer cartilage surface with the surface normal can be used to compute the 3D thickness of the articular cartilage on a pixel-by-pixel basis.
Three Dimensional Geometric Model Generation
After the 3D image of cartilage and the 3D image of joint with bones (as discussed hereinafter), are obtained, for example, the set of segmented two dimensional MR images can be transformed to a voxel representation using a computer program developed in the AVS Express (Advanced Visual Systems, Inc., Waltham, Mass.). Every voxel has a value of zero if it is not within an object of interest or a value ranging from one to 4095, depending on the signal intensity as recorded by the MRI machine. An isosurface can then be calculated that corresponds to the boundary elements of the volume of interest. A tesselation of this isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal of each polygon of the tesselation. These polygons are written to a file in a standard graphics format (Virtual Reality Modeling Language Version 1.0: VRML output language).
Visualization Software
One possible choice for the software program used to assess the cartilage degeneration pattern, the bones of the joint, and the motion pattern of the patient is a user controllable 3D visual analysis tool. The program can read in a scene, which scene consists of the various 3D geometric representations or “actors” (for example, VRML files of the tibia, tibia cartilage, femur, femoral cartilage), the static relationship transformations between these actors, and, if available, sequence of transformations describing how these actors move with respect to each other as the patient performs some activity, such as walking, jogging, etc.
The program can allow the user, through the use of the mouse and/or keyboard, the ability to observe the scene from arbitrary angles; to start and stop the animation derived from the motion profiles and to observe the contact line and any cartilage lesions while the animation is running. Additionally, the user can derive quantitative information on the scene through selecting points with the mouse.
The software program can be written in the CTT computer language and can be compiled to run on both Silicon Graphics Workstations and Windows/Intel personal computers.
Cartilage Thickness Maps
Cartilage thickness can be determined by several methods. One example is detecting the locations of the bone—cartilage and the cartilage—joint fluid interface along the surface normal using the same edge detector described below, and subtracting them. This procedure can be repeated for each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface. The x, y, and z position of each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface can be registered on a 3D map or multiple. 2D maps and thickness values are translated into color values. In this fashion, the anatomic location of each pixel at the bone cartilage interface can be displayed simultaneously with the thickness of the cartilage in this location.
The edge detector can produce accurate surface points and their corresponding surface normal. The detector can be applied to the baseline and the follow-up data set. For the baseline data set, both the surface points and surface normals can be used to form locally supporting planes (for each voxel). These planes can form an approximated surface for the baseline skeletal site. As for the follow-up data set, the surface points can be matched in the registration procedure onto the surface of the baseline data set. One can use a newly developed 3D surface detection technique to extract the surface of the skeletal site on both the baseline scan and the follow-up scan. Once these surfaces are detected, one can use the Levenberg Marquardt procedure to find the transformation that best matches these two surfaces.
A possible approach for calculating the cartilage thickness is based on a 3D Euclidian distance transformation (EDT). After thresholding, the voxels on the edge of the cartilage structure can be extracted using a slice by slice 8-neighbor search, resulting in a binary volume with the voxels on the cartilage surface having a value of 1 and all others being 0. To classify these surface points as part of the ICS or OCS, a semi-automatic approach, which requires the user to enter a point that lies outside the cartilage structure and faces the ICS, can be useful. From this point, rays are cast in all directions of the volume using a modified Bresenham's line drawing algorithm. If a ray hits a voxel with a value of 1, this point is classified as part of the ICS. After a complete sweep of the volume, for initialization of the EDT the ICS voxels are given a value of 0, whereas all other voxels are set to 1.
For computation of the EDT, the following representative algorithm can be useful. It can decompose the calculation into a series of 3 one-dimensional transformations and can use the square of the actual distances, which accelerates the process by avoiding the determination of square roots.
First, for a binary input picture F={fijk} (1≦i≦L, 1≦j≦M,≦1≦k≦N) a new picture G={gijk} can be derived using equations (3-5) (α, β, and γ denote the voxel dimensions). Here F is a set of all voxels initially and G is a set of all voxels at the later time.
Thus, each point can be assigned the square of the distance to the closest feature point in the same row in i-direction. Second, G can be converted into H={hijk} using equation (4).
The algorithm can search each column in the j-direction. According to the Pythagorean theorem, the sum of the square distance between a point (i,j,k) and a point (i,y,k) in the same column, (β(j−y))2, and the square distance between (i,y,k) and a particular feature point, giyk, equals the square distance between the point (i,j,k) and that feature point. The minimum of these sums is the square distance between (i,j,k) and the closest feature point in the two-dimensional i-j-plane. The third dimension can be added by equation (5), which is the same transformation as described in the equation for the k-direction (4).
sijk=min{hijz+(γ(k−z))2; 1≦z≦N} [Eq. 5]
sijk=min{hijz+(γ(k−z))2; 1≦z≦N} [Eq. 5]
After completion of the EDT, the thickness of the cartilage for a given point (a,b,c) on the OCS equals the square root of Sabc. The x, y, and z position of each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface can be registered on a 3D map and thickness values are translated into color values. In this fashion, the anatomic location of each pixel at the bone cartilage interface can be displayed simultaneous with the thickness of the cartilage in this location.
In an approach the cartilage thickness maps obtained using the algorithm described above display only a visual assessment of cartilage thickness along the articular surface. In another approach, in order to derive a true quantitative assessment of the location, size, and depth of a focal cartilage defect, one can use an iterative approach comparing cartilage thickness of neighboring pixels located along the bone cartilage interface.
For example, assuming an image resolution of 0.5×0.5×1.0 mm and an average thickness of the articular cartilage in the femoral condyles ranging between 2 to 3 mm, a 25% decrement in cartilage thickness will be the smallest change that can be observed with most current imaging sequences. Therefore, for example, pixels along the bone—cartilage interface that demonstrate a decrease exceeding the smallest change observable on a given MRI pulse sequence, in this example 25% or greater, in overlying cartilage thickness when compared to cartilage thickness at the neighboring bone—cartilage interface pixels, can be used to define the margins of a focal cartilage defect. Other criteria can be employed to define a cartilage defect based on comparisons of neighboring pixels. For example, a fixed value can be used. If the difference in cartilage thickness between neighboring pixels exceeds the fixed value, e.g. 1mm, the pixel where this difference is observed can be used to define the margin of the cartilage defect. This comparison can be performed for each pixel located along the bone—cartilage interface for the entire data set. This comparison is preferably performed in three dimensions. Pixels that demonstrate a decrease in cartilage thickness exceeding defined criteria but that are completely surrounded by other pixels fulfilling the same criteria may not be considered to be part of the margin of the cartilage defect, but will typically be considered to lie inside the cartilage defect.
The invention provides for means for calculating the area covered by the cartilage defect Acartilage defect and the mean thickness of the cartilage in the region of the defect Dcartilage defect as well as the mean thickness of a defined area of surrounding normal cartilage. The thickness of the cartilage previously lost in the defect can be estimated then as:
Dcartilage loss=Dnormal cartilage−Dcartilage defect [Eq. 6]
Dcartilage loss=Dnormal cartilage−Dcartilage defect [Eq. 6]
Since the area A of the cartilage defect is known, the volume of cartilage loss can be computed as:
Vcartilage loss=Acartilage defect×Dcartilage loss [Eq. 7]
Turning now toFIGS. 22A and 22B , one can see a 2D MRI (3D SPGR) and 3D cartilage thickness map. In A, the 2D MRI demonstrates a full thickness cartilage defect in the posterior lateral femorl condyle (arrows). FIG. 22B shows a 3D cartilage thickness map generated using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation. The thickness of the articular cartilage is color encoded and displayed on a pixel-by-pixel basis along the 3D surface of the articular cartilage. The cartilage defect is black reflecting a thickness of zero (arrows) (M: medial, L: lateral, S: superior, I: inferior).
Vcartilage loss=Acartilage defect×Dcartilage loss [Eq. 7]
Turning now to
In FIGS. 23A-23E , one can see the matching of 3D thickness maps generated from MR images obtained with the knee in neutral position and in external rotation. A. Sagittal baseline MR image (3D SPGR) with-the knee in neutral position. B. Sagittal follow-up MR image of the same volunteer obtained two weeks later with the knee in 40 degree external rotation (note the artificially widened appearance of the femur resulting from the rotation). C. 3D thickness map generated based on baseline MRI in neutral position. D. 3D thickness map generated based on follow-up MRI in external rotation (note segmentation error between condyles in trochlear region). E. Transformation of D into the object coordinate system of C. Despite extreme differences in joint orientation between baseline and follow-up MRI scans and despite segmentation errors, the thickness distribution on the matched follow-up scan demonstrates great similarity with that seen on the baseline scan in neutral position (in C.).
Having now described how to obtain an image of a cartilage of a joint, both with and without external reference markers; how to enhance the image by manipulating non-cartilage images, and creating and displaying 3-D images of the cartilage, i.e. a 3-D map, certain aspects of the invention are apparent.
One aspect is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint. The method comprises
-
- (a) obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the initial time,
- (b) obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at a later time, and calculating the thickness or regional volume of the region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the later time, and
- (c) determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the cartilage between the later and initial times.
Preferably, this aspect of the invention is directed to a volume of interest in the cartilage, i.e., a region of the cartilage that includes a cartilage defect. Such a defect may be the result of a disease of the cartilage (e.g., osteoarthritis) or the result of degeneration due to overuse or age.
This invention allows a health practitioner to evaluate and treat such defects. The volume of interest may include only the region of cartilage that has the defect, but preferably will also include contiguous parts of the cartilage surrounding the cartilage defect.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises
-
- (a) electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device;
- (b) receiving the transferred image at the distant location;
- (c) converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and
- (d) transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal. The method comprises (a) determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect; (b) obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region; (c) subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL; and (d) multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss. The method is useful for situations wherein the region of cartilage defect is limited to the defective cartilage and preferably wherein the region of the cartilage defect includes a portion of the cartilage contiguous to the defect.
Alternatively, for step (a) the normal thickness of the defect area could be estimated. It may be estimated from measurements of cartilage of other subjects having similar characteristics such as gender, age, body type, height, weight, and other factors. It may be estimated from measurements of a similar normal” cartilage from another corresponding joint (e.g., if the right knee has the defect, measure the normal left knee). It may have been measured at an initial time T1 when the cartilage was normal to provide a baseline. Other means of determining the normal thickness may be available to one of skill in the art. Once the thickness DN is obtained and the thickness DD is obtained the two are subtracted to give the DL. The DL is multiplied by the area of the defect AD to give the volume of cartilage loss. By determining the volume of cartilage loss at an initial T1 and again at a later time T2, one can determine the change in volume loss over time.
Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the change of a region of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time. The method comprises (a) estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1, (b) estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and (c) determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times. The method is particularly useful for regions of degenerated cartilage or diseased cartilage.
Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint. The method comprises (a) defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1; (b) identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system; (c) defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage; (d) defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2; (e) placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1; (f) and measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
Therapeutic Planning, Devising New Therapies
In another embodiment of the invention, thickness of the articular cartilage can be estimated using an imaging test. This imaging test can be an x-ray, ultrasound, CT scan or MRI scan. Thickness can be determined using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation as well as other techniques feasible for this purpose. Thickness can be determined in selected regions or across the entire cartilage of a joint. Thickness can be determined in areas adjacent to diseased cartilage, in areas of diseased cartilage and in areas of normal cartilage.
Furthermore, the curvature of the cartilage can be determined. For this purpose, the curvature of the inner cartilage surface, i.e. the surface facing the subchondral bone, or the outer cartilage surface, i.e. the surface facing the joint cavity, can be determined. Preferably, the inner cartilage surface at the interface with the subchondral bone will be used, since the outer cartilage surface may be subject to fraying, fissuring or more advanced stages of cartilage loss. Alternatively, the curvature of the subchondral bone can be determined. In this case, the curvature of the subchondral bone can serve as an approximation of the curvature of the articular cartilage. Curvature can be determined from an imaging test, typically an ultrasound, a CT or an MRI scan. Curvature can be determined from a three-dimensional model of the cartilage. The three-dimensional model of the cartilage can be determined using the 3D Euclidian distance transformation mentioned above. Curvature can be determined in selected regions or across the entire cartilage of a joint. Curvature can be determined in areas adjacent to diseased cartilage, in areas of diseased cartilage and in areas of normal cartilage.
Using information on thickness and curvature of the cartilage, a physical model of the surfaces of the articular cartilage and of the underlying bone can be created. This physical model can be representative of a limited area within the joint or it can encompass the entire joint. For example, in the knee joint, the physical model can encompass only the medial or lateral femoral condyle, both femoral condyles and the notch region, the medial tibial plateau, the lateral tibial plateau, the entire tibial plateau, the medial patella, the lateral patella, the entire patella or the entire joint.
In another embodiment, the location of a diseased area of cartilage can be determined, for example using a 3D coordinate system or a 3D Euclidian distance transformation in combination with some of the techniques outlined above. In another embodiment of the invention, the anteroposterior, mediolateral or superoinferior dimension of an area or multiple areas of diseased cartilage can be determined. Furthermore, the area, depth and volume of a cartilage defect can be determined, for example using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation in combination with some of the techniques outlined above
In one embodiment of the invention, information on thickness of the cartilage, information on curvature of the cartilage, information on curvature of the subchondral bone or information on the location, dimensions, area, depth and volume of a defect or combinations thereof can be used to devise a treatment. For example, the dimensions of a defect determined in this manner can be used to determine the dimensions of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system. Additionally, the curvature of the inner cartilage surface or the subchondral bone can be measured and this information can be used to determine the shape of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system. Additionally, the thickness of normal cartilage adjacent to the defect can be measured and the thickness values measured in this fashion can be used to determine the optimal thickness for a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system. Alternatively, the thickness of the cartilage can be measured in the contralateral joint, e.g. the knee joint, in an area corresponding to the area of diseased cartilage in the affected joint. Using any of these techniques or, preferably, a combination thereof, an optimal fit can be achieved between the surrounding normal cartilage and a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system thereby minimizing incongruity at the joint surface and improving the therapeutic result.
The invention provides for means to create a cast or a mold for shaping a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system. This can be generated using computer devices and automation, e.g. computer assisted design (CAD) and, for example, computer assisted modeling (CAM).
In another embodiment, the invention provides for means to measure and visualize the curvature of the surfaces of cartilage and bone. In another embodiment, the invention provides for means to compare the thickness and the curvatures of surfaces of a cartilage transplant and a transplantation site, a cartilage graft and a graft site, a cartilage implant and an implantation site, a cartilage replacement material and an implantation site, a cartilage scaffold and a cartilage defect, a cartilage regenerating material and an area of diseased cartilage, or a cartilage repair system and an area of diseased cartilage.
The invention is useful for determining the shape, dimensions and thickness of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system prior to treatment. For example, the shape, dimensions and thickness of a cartilage transplant, a cartilage graft, a cartilage implant, a cartilage replacement material, a cartilage scaffold or a cartilage regenerating material or any cartilage repair system can be designed to follow the physical shape and thickness of the cartilage adjacent to an area of diseased cartilage determined using the imaging test.
The invention is applicable to a host of current and future treatments of arthritis including but not limited to cartilage transplants, cartilage implants, cartilage grafts, cartilage replacement materials, cartilage scaffolds, cartilage regenerating materials, auto-, allo- and xeno-transplants, osteochondral allo- and autografting, stem cell based repair systems and transfer systems, and, principally, any other current and future treatments and devices for cartilage repair or regeneration.
The example described below shows one possibility how aspects of the invention can be implemented. It demonstrates one possible way how the invention can be practiced. It is in no way meant to limit the invention. One skilled in the art will easily recognize other means of practicing the invention.
In a first step, the cartilage and bone contours can be segmented from the MR images using for example a modified live wire technique [Steines D, Cheng C, Wong A, Berger F, Napel S, Lang P. CARS—Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, p. 578-583, San Francisco, 2000].
From the segmented data, a 3-dimensional surface representation can be created, which yields a triangular tesselation of the surface. For this calculation, a 3-dimensional Wang-Binford edge detector [Yan C H: Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density: new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, 1998, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University] or the marching cubes algorithm [Lorensen W E, Cline H E. Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163-169] can be used. This surface representation can be imported into a CAD system, which is used to generate a physical model or a cast by means of rapid prototyping techniques.
The segmented data can also be used for measuring the surface curvature at the surface points. The curvature is calculated according to formula xx. If α(a,b)→IR2 is a curve defined over the parameter interval (a,b) by α(t)=(x(t),y(t)), then the curvature κ is given by [Gray A: Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. 1993; CRC Press]:
For the digitized contours that result from the segmentation, smooth derivatives for equation (8) can be obtained by convolution with differentiated Gaussian kernels [Worring M, Smeulders A W M. CVGIP: Image Understanding, 1993. 58(3): p. 366-382].
The curvature values can be calculated for each pixel on the segmented surface in each slice. They can subsequently be color-mapped onto a 3-dimensional rendering of the surface for visualization purposes.
For full curvature information this procedure can be repeated for a direction perpendicular to the imaging plane. Of the remaining two main directions the one with the lower degree of parallelism to the surface can be chosen, and reformatted slices of the MR data set can be obtained for this direction. For instance, when curvature values for the femoral condyles are calculated from sagittal MR images of the knee, the data set would typically be reformatted for a coronal slicing plane.
The procedure of segmentation and curvature calculation can then be repeated for the reformatted images. A second curvature map can be calculated, yielding complementary information to the first one.
In order to compare curvature values for different surface patches, these can be manually or automatically registered, overlaying one surface patch on top of the other. Corresponding curvature values that are calculated in the same directions can now be subtracted from each other, thereby yielding a measure of how well curvatures of two surfaces match.
An example how aspects of the invention can be practiced clinically in a patient is given below. It demonstrates one possible way how the invention can be practiced. It is in no way meant to limit the invention. One skilled in the art will easily recognize other means of practicing the invention.
A patient with arthritis of the knee joint is referred for an MRI scan. The MRI scan is performed using a cartilage sensitive MRI pulse sequence such as a fat saturated spoiled gradient echo sequence or a water selective 3D gradient echo sequence using a spectral spatial pulse. The MR images are transferred via a local network or, for example, the internet into a computer workstation. The computer workstation uses software to extract or segment the articular cartilage from the surrounding tissue. Such software can include snake algorithms, livewire algorithms, signal intensity based thresholding, or seed growing algorithms as well as any other technique useful for this purpose. The software can then generate a three-dimensional map of cartilage thickness across the femoral condyles, the tibial plateau, or the patella. This can be achieved using a 3D Euclidian distance transformation. Additionally, the software can provide information on cartilage curvature or curvature of the subchondral bone as described above. Furthermore, the software can determine the location, dimensions, size, area, depth, or volume of areas of diseased cartilage.
The information generated in this fashion can be used to generate a physical model of the area of diseased cartilage. For example, a bone replacement material can be formed with a CAD/CAM system using the above information. One of the surfaces of the bone replacement material can be shaped so that it matches the 3D curvature of the subchondral bone subjacent to the area of diseased cartilage. Additionally, the anteroposterior, mediolateral or superoinferior dimensions of this surface of the bone replacement material can be such that it matches the dimensions of the area of diseased cartilage. Cartilage cells can be affixed to the bone replacement material and can be grown on the bone replacement material until the thickness of the resultant cartilage matches that of the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map. Alternatively, a layer of cartilage of known thickness can be applied to the bone replacement material whereby the thickness can be chosen to match the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map.
Alternatively, an artificial non-human material with properties similar to cartilage can be applied to the bone replacement material whereby the thickness of this material can be chosen to match the thickness of the cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage measured on the 3D cartilage thickness map.
Alternatively, cartilage can be grown on a mold matching the curvature of the subchondral bone in an area of diseased cartilage whereby the dimensions of the surface of the mold on which the cartilage is grown matches the dimensions of an area of diseased cartilage. Cartilage can then be grown on the mold until its thickness matches the thickness of cartilage adjacent to the area of diseased cartilage as measured, for example, on a 3D cartilage thickness map. At this point, for example, an orthopedic surgeon can excise the area of diseased cartilage and can implant the cartilage or cartilage replacement material. Since the curvature of the cartilage or cartilage replacement material matches that of the underlying subchondral bone and since the thickness of the cartilage or cartilage replacement material matches that of the cartilage adjacent to the area of excised diseased cartilage, normal or near normal joint congruity can be achieved with a resultant decrease in wear on the implanted cartilage or cartilage replacement material and also a decrease in wear on the adjacent cartilage or the cartilage of the opposing joint surface.
Display of Biochemical Information In addition to providing a 2D or 3D representation of the morphological properties of cartilage, the invention provides for techniques to represent one or more biochemical components of articular cartilage.
A biochemical component includes, but is not limited to, glycosaminoglycan, water, sodium, or hyaluronic acid. Biochemical data can be generated with other magnetic resonance based techniques including the use of signal intensity measurements, relaxation time measurements, paramagnetic and other contrast media and sodium rather than proton MR imaging. Other imaging tests such as positron emission tomography scanning can also be used for this purpose. Thus, one aspect of this invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map of joint cartilage. The method comprises
-
- (a) measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
- (b) determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage;
- (c) mapping the amounts of the biochemical component through the cartilage; and
- (d) determining the areas of cartilage deficit by identifying the areas having an altered amount of the biochemical component present.
Once a map is obtained, it can be used in assessing the condition of a cartilage at an initial time and over a time period. Thus, the biochemical map may be used in the method aspects of the invention in a manner similar to the cartilage thickness map.
For example, one aspect is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint. The method comprises
-
- (a) obtaining a relaxation time or biochemical map of the cartilage at an initial time and analyzing the relaxation time or biochemical content of a region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the initial time,
- (b) obtaining a relaxation time or biochemical map of the cartilage at a later time, and time analyzing the relaxation time or biochemical content of the region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the later time, and
- (c) determining the change in relaxation time or biochemical content of the cartilage between the later and initial times.
Preferably, this aspect of the invention is directed to a volume of interest in the cartilage, i.e., a region of the cartilage that includes a cartilage defect. Such a defect may be the result of a disease of the cartilage (e.g., osteoarthritis) or the result of degeneration due to overuse or age. This invention allows a health practitioner to evaluate and treat such defects. The volume of interest may include only the region of cartilage that has the defect, but preferably will also include contiguous parts of the cartilage surrounding the cartilage defect.
As discussed herein before, another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint using a relaxation time or the biochemical map. The method comprises
-
- (a) electronically transferring an electronically-generated relaxation time or biochemically based image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device;
- (b) receiving the transferred image at the distant location;
- (c) converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and
- (d) transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the change of biochemical content in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal. The method comprises
-
- (a) determining the biochemical content (BCN) of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect;
- (b) obtaining the biochemical content of the cartilage defect (BCD) of the region; and
- (c) subtracting BCD from BCN to give the value of the cartilage change, BCD. The method is useful for situations wherein the region of cartilage defect is limited to the defective cartilage and preferably wherein the region of the cartilage defect includes a portion of the cartilage contiguous to the defect.
Alternatively, for step (a) the normal content of the defect area could be estimated. It may be estimated from measurements of cartilage of other subjects having similar characteristics such as gender, age, body type, height, weight, and other factors. It may be estimated from measurements of a similar ‘normal” cartilage from another corresponding joint (e.g., if the right knee has the defect, measure the normal left knee). It may have been measured at an initial time T1 when the cartilage was normal to provide a baseline. Other means of determining the normal content may be available to one of skill in the art. Once BCN is obtained and BCD is obtained the two are subtracted to give the Δ. By determining the change of content at an initial T1 and again at a later time T2, one can determine the change in biochemical content over time.
Once a relaxation time or biochemically-based map is provided, morphological maps of articular cartilage obtained with MR imaging can be superimposed, merged or fused with the biochemical map or data. Several different techniques can be applied in order to superimpose, merge, or fuse morphological data with biochemical data. For example, 2D or 3D morphological data of articular cartilage can be acquired with the same object coordinates as the biochemical data. Morphological data and biochemical data can then be easily displayed simultaneously using different colors, opacities, and or gray scales. Alternatively, 2D or 3D morphological data or articular cartilage can be acquired with different object coordinates as the biochemical data. In this case, a 3D surface registration can be applied in order to superimpose, merge, or fuse the morphological data and the biochemical data. As an alternative to 3D object coordinates, anatomic landmarks can be used to register the morphological data and subsequently the biochemical data in a 3D object coordinate system. 3D object coordinate systems can then be matched by matching the landmarks obtained from the morphological data with those obtained from the biochemical data.
Thus, another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a subject's cartilage in a joint, the method comprises obtaining a three dimensional biochemical representation of the cartilage, obtaining a morphological representation of the cartilage, and merging the two representations, and simultaneously displaying the merged representations on a medium. The merged representations are then used to assess the condition of a cartilage, estimate the loss of cartilage in a joint, determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of cartilage defect, or estimating the change of a region of cartilage at a particular point in time or over a period of time. One can see that similar steps would be followed as spelled out for the use of a thickness map or biochemical map.
Simultaneous display of morphological data with biochemical data provides a useful tool to assess longitudinal changes in morphology or articular cartilage and biochemical composition of articular cartilage, for example during treatment with chondroprotective and chondroregenerative agents.
Part of the unique aspect of this technology is that it lends itself to assessment of a patient from a distant position after an image is taken of the joint under evaluation. Thus one aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint from a distant location. The method comprises
-
- (a) electronically transferring an electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device;
- (b) receiving the transferred image at the distant location;
- (c) converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and
- (d) transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
The degeneration pattern includes a measure of cartilage thickness or regional cartilage volume.
The electronically generated image of the cartilage preferably is an MR image and the degeneration pattern can be displayed as a three-dimensional image as a thickness pattern, a biochemical content pattern or a merged thickness biochemical pattern. The electronically generated image is transmitted via Dicom, using the international standards for transmission of such images.
Another aspect of the invention is a kit for aiding in assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a mammal, which kit comprises a software program, which that when installed and executed on a computer reads a cartilage degeneration pattern presented in a standard graphics format and produces a computer readout showing a cartilage thickness map of the degenerated cartilage.
The software can be installed in a PC, a Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI) computer or a Macintosh computer. Preferably, the software calculates the thickness or regional volume of a region of degeneration of the cartilage which does not include the entire volume of the articular cartilage.
To acquire a movement pattern of a joint in accordance with this invention, one obtains an internal image of the bones in a joint, preferably using MRI techniques, and obtains an external image of the bones in motion. The images are correlated, preferably through the use of external marker sets, to give a pattern that shows a static or moving condition. The correlated images are then displayed and the relation between the movement and degeneration patterns is determined.
To obtain an internal image of a joint with the associated bones, one preferably uses MRI techniques that provide an image of the bones on either side of the joint. Here, it is important to use the imaging technique that gives the best image of the bones and how they interact. Because the internal image of the bones can be combined with the image of the bones obtained by external measurements, it is particularly useful, and therefore preferred, to use external reference markers that can be similarly-positioned to the markers used in obtaining the external measurements. The external markers can be placed at any landmarks about the joint of interest. At least three markers are used for each limb being imaged. Preferably the markers will be made of a material that not only will be detected by MRI imaging techniques, but also will be detected by external imaging techniques. The markers will be associated with a means to affix them to the skin and preferably have an adhesive portion for adhering to the skin and a detectable entity that will show up on the MRI image.
The preferred MRI imaging technique useful for obtaining an internal image is a spoiled 3D gradient echo, a water selective 3D gradient echo or a 3D DEFT sequence. A further discussion may be found hereinbefore or in the 2nd Edition of Brown and Semelka's book entitled “MRI Basic Principles and Applications.”
Once an MR image is obtained the image is manipulated to enhance the image of the bones. Procedures similar to those discussed hereinbefore for cartilage may be used, but modified for application to bone images.
Three-Dimensional Geometric Model Generation
After the 3D image of a joint with bones, the set of segmented two dimensional MR images can be transformed to a voxel representation inside AVS Express (Advanced Visual Systems, Inc., Waltham, Mass.). Every voxel has a value of zero if it is not within an object of interest or a value ranging from one to 4095, depending on the signal intensity as recorded by the 1.5 T MR. An isosurface can then be calculated that corresponds to the boundary elements of the region of interest. A tesselation of this isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal of each polygon of the tesselation. These polygons can then be written to a file in a standard graphics format (Virtual Reality Modeling Language Version 1.0).
As discussed hereinbefore, the use of reference markers on the skin around the joint and the bones can provide an image that can later be matched to the reference markers for the cartilage image and the bone images obtained from external measurements.
Alternatively, a semi-automated, 3D surface-based registration technique that does not require the use of an external frame or fiducial markers can be used. This 3D surface-based registration technique can be used to match the anatomic orientation of a skeletal structure on a baseline and a follow-up CT or MRI scan. We extended a robust and accurate 2D edge detector (Wang-Binford) to 3D. This detector is described hereinbefore.
A registration technique for the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau is shown in FIG. 10 . It shows an example where 3D surfaces of the femoral condyles were extracted from two differently oriented T1-weighted spin-echo MRI scans (baseline A and follow-up B, respectively) obtained in the same patient in neutral position (A) and in 40 degree external rotation (B). The 3D surfaces were used to derive a coordinate transformation relating the two scans. FIG. 10C demonstrates the use of the derived transformation to re-register scan B in the object coordinate system of scan A. Such a transformation relating two T1-weighted scans can then be used to register DEFT cartilage-sensitive scans that are acquired in the same respective orientations as the A and B T1-weighted scans.
We performed the registration using a Sun Sparc 20 workstation with 128 MBytes of memory. The surface detection algorithm extracted approximately 12,000 surface patches from each data set. The surface extraction and registration routines took about 1 hour in total.
Since the algorithm for 3D surface registration of the femoral condyles also computes the surface normals for the medial and lateral femoral condyles on a pixel-by-pixel basis, it can form the basis for developing maps of cartilage thickness. FIG. 11 shows an example of a 2D map of cartilage thickness derived from the surface normals of the lateral femoral condyle. FIG. 11A shows a proton density fast spin-echo MR image that demonstrates a focal cartilage defect in the posterior lateral femoral condyle (black arrows). White arrows indicate endpoints of thickness map. FIG. 11B is a 2D cartilage thickness map that demonstrates abrupt decrease in cartilage thickness in the area of the defect (arrows). The Δ thickness between neighboring pixels can be used to define the borders of the cartilage defect. Note diffuse cartilage thinning in area enclosed by the astericks (*).
In another embodiment, cartilage sensitive images can be used instead of T1-weighted or T2-weighted scans and the surface match can be performed based on the cartilage contour.
Alternatively, anatomic landmarks present on both baseline and follow-up scans can be used to match the data obtained during the baseline and those obtained during the follow-up scan. Another alternative for matching the baseline and the follow-up scan includes the use of external or internal fiducial markers that can been detected with MR imaging. In that case, a transformation is performed that matches the position of the markers on the follow-up scan with the position of the markers on the baseline scan or vice versa.
Before merging or superimposing morphological maps of articular cartilage obtained by MR imaging with biomechanical data, one must obtain the biomechanical data. Such biomechanical data include, but are not limited to, estimations of static loading alignment in standing or weight-bearing position and lying or non-weight-bearing position, as well as during joint motion, e.g., the movement of load-bearing pathway on the cartilage in the knee joint during gait. Biomechanical data may be generated using theoretical computations, based on data stored in a database that can be accessed by calling up and screening for certain characteristics. Alternatively, gait analysis may be performed for an individual and data obtained during gait analysis may be merged or fused with morphological MRI data. Morphological data and biomechanical data can then be easily displayed simultaneously using different colors, opacities, and or gray scales. Additionally, the load-bearing pathway, for example around a cartilage defect, can be plotted or superimposed onto morphological maps.
Preferably, reference markers or fiducial markers can be applied to the external surface on the skin overlying the joint. These markers adhere to the skin are typically made of materials that can be detected with MRI and that can be used to register joint motion during biomechanical analysis, e.g. gait analysis. These markers can then be used to correlate the morphological with the biomechanical data.
Simultaneous display of morphological data with biomechanical data provides a useful tool to assess the load pathway applied to articular cartilage and inside and around cartilage defects. Estimation of load pathway applied in and around a cartilage defect can be used to assess a cartilage defect and to guide the choice of therapy, e.g. treatment with chondroprotective or chondroregenerative agents, osteochondral allografting, cartilage transplantation, femoral or tibial osteotomy, or joint replacement surgery.
In obtaining an external image of the bones on either side of a joint, one must record a static image as well as a moving image of the subject joint and bones. For analysis of the knee joint, gait analysis techniques have been shown to be very effective in generating accurate, reproducible data on the six degree of freedom motion of the knee. The motion of the knee joint can be quantified in terms of flexion, rotation and displacement. Fidelity in the dynamic visualizations of subject specific MR generated knee geometry and subsequent contact surface determination call for a high degree of accuracy for the motion capture portion of the studies.
Gait Analysis Activities
In performing a gait analysis, a subject is tested standing still, laying down, walking or running on a level surface, flexing a leg in a standing position, ascending and descending stairs, flexing the leg in a seated position, and the like. The level walking measurements can include, but is not limited to, six stride cycles for each side over a range of walking speeds. The subject can be instructed to walk at a comfortable speed (normal), slower than normal and faster than normal. Typically, this protocol produces gait measurements over a range of walking speeds. The standing and laying portions of the protocol can be used in the cross registration to the MR data. The instrumentation preferably includes, at least a two camera, video-based opto-electronic system for 3-D motion analysis, a multi-component force plate for measurement of foot-ground reaction force and a computer system for acquisition, processing and analysis of data.
Anatomic Coordinate Systems
Currently, the anatomic coordinate systems are defined through bony landmarks which can be identified through palpation. To describe the motion of the underlying bones in terms of the global coordinate system a subset of the markers in a point cluster technique (discussed hereinafter) are referenced to bony landmarks on the femur and tibia. Techniques described previously by Hopenfeld and Benedetti can be used to locate these bony landmarks. The anatomic coordinate systems used can be similar to that previously described by LaFortune with the exception of the origin of the femoral coordinate system. For the thigh segment, a coordinate system is located in the femoral condyles. The femoral condyles medial(M)-lateral(L) axis (FIG. 12 ) runs through the trans-epicondylar line (a line drawn between the medial-lateral femoral epicondyles). The midpoint of this axis is the origin. The inferior(I)-superior(S) axis runs parallel to the long axis of the femur, passing through the midpoint of the trans-epicondylar line. The anterior(A)-posterior(P) axis is the cross product of the medial-lateral and inferior-superior axes. The final position of the inferior-superior axis is made orthogonal to the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axis through a cross product operation (FIG. 13 ). For the shank segment, the tibial coordinate system begins with the medial-lateral axis running through the most medial and lateral edges of the plateau. The inferior-superior axis is perpendicular to the medial-lateral axis passing through the tibial eminence. The anterior-posterior axis is the cross product of the medial-lateral and inferior-superior axes.
Placement of Markers Prior to Activity
In assessing a joint, the lower extremity can be idealized as 3 segments with six degree-of-freedom joints at the knee and ankle. For the mobile activities described above, at least 3 markers per segment are used. FIG. 14 shows 21 passive retro-reflective markers located on the leg: some at bony prominences (greater trochanter, lateral malleolus, lateral epicondyle, lateral tibial plateau), some clustered on the thigh and shank (Fal-3,11-3, Fpl-3; Tal-3, T11-13). Additionally, two markers are placed on the foot at the lateral aspect of the calcaneus and base of the fifth metatarsal and one on the pelvis at theiliac crest). During the static activities (standing still, laying down) 7 additional markers are placed: medial malleolus, medial epicondyle, medial tibial plateau, medial and lateral superior patella, medial and lateral inferior patella. The eight markers nearest to the knee joint can be filled with Gadolinium, and can be be replaced at these same locations prior to the MR images (FIG. 15 ). The locations can be marked with a non-toxic marker-pen.
The reference database is typically a compendium of demographic and motion analysis data for all subjects whose data has been processed by a central processing site. This database can contain fields describing each of the subject's name, age, height, weight, injury types, orthopedic medical history, other anatomic measurements (thigh length, shank length, shoe size, etc.). The database can also contain the results of any and all gait analysis run on these patients. This can include, for all activities tested (walk, run, jog, etc.), a number of peak valves (peak knee flexing, peak hip adduction movement; toe-out, angle, etc). along with the motion trajectories of the limb segments while the subjects are performing different activities.
In order to obtain a typical motion profile, the sex, age, height, weight, limb length, and type of activity desired can be entered as an average into the database. The database searches for a set of subjects most closely watching the input average. From this set of data, a typical motion pattern is distilled and a data set is output. This data set can include, over a time interval, the motion characteristics: hip/knee/ankle/flexion/extension angles, knee/hip/ankle adduction/abduction angles, movement, stride length, cadence, etc. This data can then be used to drive an animation of the motion of the desired joint.
Calculation of Limb Segment Parameters
Each limb segment (thigh, shank and foot) can idealized as a rigid body with a local coordinate system defined to coincide with a set of anatomical axes (the assumption of rigidity is dropped in calculating the location of the femur and tibia). The intersegmental moments and forces can be calculated from the estimated position of the bones, the ground reaction force measurements, and the limb segment mass/inertia properties. The moment at the knee can be resolved into a coordinate system fixed in a tibial reference system with axes defining flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation.
This approach provides results in a range of patients in a highly reproducible mariner. Typically the magnitudes of the moments are dependent on walking speed. To control for the influence of walking speed, the walking speed closest to 1 meter/second is used. This speed is within the normal range for the type of patients for which the invention is particularly useful. In addition to the gait trial collected at 1 meter/second, self-selected speeds can also be evaluated to give a good correlation between gait-quantitative estimates of joint load lines and other measures when using self-selected speeds. In order to test patients under their typical daily conditions, medications should not be modified prior to gait analyses.
Point Cluster Technique
The Point Cluster Technique (PCT) movement analysis protocol is an extensible and accurate approach to bone motion estimation. Basically, a number of retro-reflective markers (e.g. retro-reflective material from 3M, Corp.) are attached to each limb segment under observation. Multiple video cameras can acquire data with the subject standing still and during activities of interest. An over-abundance of markers on each limb segment is used to define a cluster coordinate system, which is tied to an anatomically relevant coordinate system calculated with the subject at rest.
The standard PCT transformations are described below. In short, each marker is assigned a unit mass and the inertia tensor, center of mass, principal axes and principal moments of inertia are calculated. By treating the center of mass and principal axes as a transformation, local coordinates are calculated. Another set of coordinate systems is established; limb segment specific anatomic landmarks are identified through palpation and a clinically relevant coordinate system defined. For the femur and tibia, these anatomic coordinate systems are shown in FIG. 12 . The transformation from the reference cluster coordinate system to the anatomic coordinate system is determined with the subject at rest by vector operations. During an activity, the transformation from the global coordinate system to the cluster coordinate system is calculated at each time step. To place the anatomic coordinate in the global system during the activity, the reference coordinate system to anatomic system transformation is applied, followed by the inverse global coordinate system to cluster coordinate system transformation for each time step.
In the Point Cluster Technique (PCT) a cluster of N markers can be placed on a limb segment of the subject. The location vector of each marker in the laboratory coordinate system is denoted as G(i,t) for marker i, (i=1,2, . . . , N) at time t, t0≦t≦tf. A unit weight factor is assigned to each marker for the purpose of calculating the center of mass, inertia tensor, principal axes and principal moments of inertia of the cluster of markers. The cluster center of mass and principal axes form an orthogonal coordinate system described as the cluster system. The local coordinates of each of the markers relative to this coordinate system are calculated. Then
G(i,t)=C(t)+E(t)·L(i,t)=Tc(t)·L(i,t) i=1 . . . N
where G(t) is a matrix of all marker coordinate vectors, C(t) is the center of mass of G(t), E(t) is the matrix of eigenvectors of the inertia tensor of G(t), and L(i,t) are the local coordinates of marker i.
G(i,t)=C(t)+E(t)·L(i,t)=Tc(t)·L(i,t) i=1 . . . N
where G(t) is a matrix of all marker coordinate vectors, C(t) is the center of mass of G(t), E(t) is the matrix of eigenvectors of the inertia tensor of G(t), and L(i,t) are the local coordinates of marker i.
These markers are observed by opto-electronic means while the subject performs activities and while standing completely still in a reference position. With the subject in this same reference position, a subset of the markers is observed relative to the underlying bones by other techniques, which might include x-rays, CT scan, or palpation.
The measured marker locations are defined with respect to the unobservable location and orientation of the bone by
G(i, t) = P(t) ÷ O(t) · R(i, t) = Tb(t) · R(i, t)
i=1 N
where P(t) is the location and O(t) is the orientation of a coordinate system embedded in the bone and R(i,t), also unobservable, are the trajectories of the markers relative to the underlying rigid body coordinate system at time t. The bone and cluster systems are each orthogonal systems, related by the rigid body transformation Tbc(t):
L(i,t)=Tbc(t)·R(i,t)
substituting and eliminating R(i,t) yields
Tb(t)=Tc(t)·Tcb(t)
To maintain physical consistency, Tcb(t)Tbc(t)−1 must be the inertia tensor eigendecomposition transformation of R(i,t). Once R(i,t) are specified, Tcb(t) and subsequently Tb(t) are calculable.
Point Cluster to Anatomic Coordinate System Transformation
G(i, t) = P(t) ÷ O(t) · R(i, t) = Tb(t) · R(i, t)
i=1 N
where P(t) is the location and O(t) is the orientation of a coordinate system embedded in the bone and R(i,t), also unobservable, are the trajectories of the markers relative to the underlying rigid body coordinate system at time t. The bone and cluster systems are each orthogonal systems, related by the rigid body transformation Tbc(t):
L(i,t)=Tbc(t)·R(i,t)
substituting and eliminating R(i,t) yields
Tb(t)=Tc(t)·Tcb(t)
To maintain physical consistency, Tcb(t)Tbc(t)−1 must be the inertia tensor eigendecomposition transformation of R(i,t). Once R(i,t) are specified, Tcb(t) and subsequently Tb(t) are calculable.
Point Cluster to Anatomic Coordinate System Transformation
From these equations one can also relate the global coordinate system with respect to a limb segment system. As an example of how these systems can be used to describe joint motion, one can consider the tibio-femoral joint. The motion that is of interest is how the femoral condyles move with respect to the tibial plateau. This is done by first defining a set of coordinate axes in the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau.
A coordinate system is located in both the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau. The femoral condyles medial-lateral (ML) axis runs through the trans-epicondylar line (TEL), a line drawn between the ML femoral epicondyles. The midpoint of this axis is the origin. The inferior-superior (IS) runs parallel to the long axis of the femur, passing through the midpoint of the TEL. The anterior-posterior (AP) is the cross product of the ML and IS axes. The tibial coordinate system begins with the ML axis running through the most medial and lateral edges of the plateau. The IS axis is perpendicular to the ML axis passing through the tibial eminence. The AP axis is the cross product of the ML and IS axes. These are known as the anatomic coordinate system (A(t)thigh, A(t)shank).
Relating the cluster system to the anatomic coordinate system is done by use of another transformation matrix. This is done by relating the thigh cluster to a cluster of markers, a sub cluster, that is related to the femoral condyles and femur (cluster to anatomic transformation).
R(t)thigh=U(t)thighA(t)thigh
The tibia has a similar transformation matrix.
R(t)shank=U(t)shankA(t)shank
Therefore, from a cluster of markers in the global system, motion of the femur with respect to the tibia can be determined by:
TS(t)=A(t)thigh·G(t)thigh·R(t)shank·A(t)shank
Here TS(t) is the motion of the thigh with respect to the shank.
R(t)thigh=U(t)thighA(t)thigh
The tibia has a similar transformation matrix.
R(t)shank=U(t)shankA(t)shank
Therefore, from a cluster of markers in the global system, motion of the femur with respect to the tibia can be determined by:
TS(t)=A(t)thigh·G(t)thigh·R(t)shank·A(t)shank
Here TS(t) is the motion of the thigh with respect to the shank.
Angles are calculated by a projection angle system, an axis from the femoral anatomic system and one from the tibia are projected onto a plane in the tibial coordinate system. For example, flexion/extension can be determined by projecting the IS axis of the femur and tibia onto the sagittal plane (AP-IS plane) of the tibia.
Validation of the Point Cluster Technique
The point cluster technique was evaluated as a method for measuring in vivo limb segment movement from skin placed marker clusters. An Ilizarov device is an external fixture where 5 mm diameter pins are placed directly into the bone on either side of a bony defect. The rigid external struts affixed to these pins form a rigid system fixed in the underlying bone. Two subjects were tested with Ilizarov fixation devices. One subject had the Ilizarov device placed on the femur and second subject had the device placed on the tibia. Each subject was instrumented with point clusters placed on the thigh and shank segment. In addition, markers were placed on the Ilizarov device to establish a system fixed in the underlying bone.
The relative angular movement and translational displacement between the system affixed in the bone and the point cluster coordinate system were calculated while ascending a 20-cm step (Step Test). Angular changes between the three orthogonal axes fixed in the bone versus three axes in the point cluster were calculated. The average difference over the trials for three axes were 0.95±1.26, 2.33±1.63, and 0.58±0.58 degrees. Similarly, the average error for the distance between coordinate systems was 0.28±0.14 cm. The second subject with the Ilizarov device placed on the femur could not perform the Step-Test, but was able to perform a weight-bearing flexion test where his knee flexed to approximately 20° from a standing position. The average change between the coordinate origin was 0.28±0.14 cm. The changes in axis orientation were 1.92±0.42, 1.11±0.69 and 1.24±0.16 degrees.
The simultaneously acquired motion for a coordinate system embedded in bone (Ilizarov system) and a set of skin-based markers was compared. At every time instant the location and orientation of the Ilizarov system, the rigid body model skin marker system, and the interval deformation technique skin marker system were determined. The change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to one of the skin marker systems over time is a measure of the deformation unaccounted for in the skin marker system.
The interval deformation technique produced a substantial improvement in the estimate of the location and orientation of the underlying bone. For perfectly modeled motion there would be no relative motion between the Ilizarov system and the skin marker system over the time interval. The change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to the skin marker systems are shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 , for location and orientation respectively, for both a rigid body model and the interval deformation technique. For this single data set, the location error was reduced from 7.1 cm to 2.3 cm and the orientation error from 107 degrees to 24 degrees, with the error summed over the entire time interval. The subject performed a 10 cm step-up; the marker deformation was modeled as a single Gaussian function.
Deformation Correction
There are a number of algorithmic alternatives available to minimize the effects of skin motion, soft tissue deformation, or muscle activation that deform the externally applied markers relative to the underlying bone. The Point Cluster Technique decreases the effects of marker movement relative to the underlying bone through averaging. If more correction is required, one of a number of deformation correction techniques may be added. In order of increasing computational complexity and deformation correction ability, these are rigid body linear least square error correction, global optimization correction, anatomic artifact correlation correction and interval deformation correction.
An overview of the Interval Deformation Correction Technique is given below. In short, the technique provides a maximum likelihood estimate of the bone pose, assuming that each marker on a limb segment deforms relative to the underlying bone in some functional form. The technique parameterizes these functional forms and then performs a multi-objective non-linear optimization with constraints to calculate these parameters. This is an extremely computationally intensive technique, with the current instantiation of the algorithm requiring 6-8 hours per limb segment of running time on 266 MHz Pentium 2 computer.
Interval Deformation Technique
Since Tc can be calculated directly from the global coordinates of the markers, the remainder of this development only examines the determination of R(i,t) and subsequently Tcb(t). For this reduced problem, the input data is the local coordinates in the cluster system L(i,t) for all i, To≦t≦tf. It can be assumed that each marker has some parameterized trajectory, d(aij, t), relative to the underlying bone at each time step, with independent and identically distributed noises v(i,j,t)
Rj(i, t)=d(ai,j, t)+v(i, j, t)
j=1 ... 3
i=1 ... N
or, equivalently
R(i, t)=F(ai, t)+v(i, t)
i=1 ... N
where aij is a vector of parameters for marker i, ordinate j; ai is a vector of parameters combining all of the parameters for all of the ordinates of marker i. Then the estimate of the data, M(i,t), can be given by
M(i,t)=Tbc(t)·R(i,t)
Without further restrictions the problem is indeterminate, as the locations of the markers in the bone system R(i,t) are never observable with the opto-electronic system. The indeterminate problem can be converted to a chi-squared estimate problem through a series of steps. An observation of the truly unobservables at the time boundaries is inferred; that is, it is assumed that Tcb(t≦to) and Tcb(t≧tf) are observed. The value of Tcb can be selected depending on the activity being studied. For example, consider the step up activity, where the subject starts and stops in the reference position. For this activity the body is not deforming outside the estimation interval; that is, the markers are not moving with respect to the bone:
Tcb(t<to)=Tcb(t=to) and Tcb(t>tf)=Tcb(tf).
Rj(i, t)=d(ai,j, t)+v(i, j, t)
j=1 ... 3
i=1 ... N
or, equivalently
R(i, t)=F(ai, t)+v(i, t)
i=1 ... N
where aij is a vector of parameters for marker i, ordinate j; ai is a vector of parameters combining all of the parameters for all of the ordinates of marker i. Then the estimate of the data, M(i,t), can be given by
M(i,t)=Tbc(t)·R(i,t)
Without further restrictions the problem is indeterminate, as the locations of the markers in the bone system R(i,t) are never observable with the opto-electronic system. The indeterminate problem can be converted to a chi-squared estimate problem through a series of steps. An observation of the truly unobservables at the time boundaries is inferred; that is, it is assumed that Tcb(t≦to) and Tcb(t≧tf) are observed. The value of Tcb can be selected depending on the activity being studied. For example, consider the step up activity, where the subject starts and stops in the reference position. For this activity the body is not deforming outside the estimation interval; that is, the markers are not moving with respect to the bone:
Tcb(t<to)=Tcb(t=to) and Tcb(t>tf)=Tcb(tf).
It can now be assumed that the noise functions v(i, j, t) are normal distributions with individual standard deviations a(i, j, t), the probability P(i,j,t) of the data for ordinate j, marker i, time t being a realization of the stochastic process is given by:
Provided the noise functions v(i, j, t) are independent of each other, the probability of the entire data set being a realization is a product of each of the individual probabilities:
Maximizing this probability can be equivalent to minimizing the negative of its logarithm, yielding the familiar chi-square criteria. As an intermediate step the following error matrices can be defined:
i=1 ... N
j=1 ... 3
and seek a which in some sense minimizes X(a), a matrix whose elements represent the error over the entire time interval for each ordinate of each marker. If the normal noise distribution assumption is true, then this minimization results in, the maximum likelihood estimate of the parameterization, and by inference maximum likelihood estimate of the transformation from the bone system to the cluster system. If the normal noise assumption is not true, the chi-squared estimate is still appropriate for parameter estimation; the results cannot be interpreted as a maximum likelihood estimate, but, for example, confidence regions on the estimate or the formal covariance matrix of the fit can be determined.
Obtaining the parameter set a is a computationally complex operation. The approach taken was to define a scalar to represent this entire error matrix,
and seek a that minimizes f(a).
The limits on marker motion previously discussed can now be converted into deformation constraints, which allow the formulation of the problem as a general non-linear programming problem. The constraints arise from two sources; human limb segments do not deform outside a small range, and the locations of the markers are chosen with specific properties in mind. For computational purposes, the deformation constraints are selected to be:
- 1. The axes of the cluster system moves by less than 15 degrees relative to the bone system.
- 2. The center of mass of the cluster system moves by less than 3 cm relative to the bone system.
- 3. The markers move by less than 4 cm relative to the bone system.
- 4. Each of the principal moments of inertia of the cluster system change by less than 25 percent from the reference values.
The Point Cluster Technique marker set was designed to ensure that the cluster of points is non-coplanar and possess no axes of rotational symmetry. These properties ensure a local coordinate system that is well defined and unambiguous over the entire time interval. The constraints are then:
- 5. The ratio of the smallest principal moment of inertia of the cluster system to the largest is more than 5 percent; the magnitude of the smallest principal moment of inertia of the cluster system is greater than some small positive value.
- 6. The principal moments of each axis are different from each other by at least 5 percent.
The general problem can then be formulated:
Minimize f(a)
aεRD
Subject to:
aεRD
Subject to:
gi(a)=0i=1 . . . me
gi(a)≦0i=me+1 . . . m
a1≦a≦au
where D is the total number of parameters; me, the number of equality constraints, is 0; and m, the total number of constraints, is 10.
The approach taken to verify the operation of the algorithm implementation began with generating a set of 50 synthetic data sets with known characteristics. The program was then applied to all of the data sets. The program results were then compared to the known, generated deformation. Error results were calculated for both the interval deformation technique descried herein and for the standard rigid body model formulation.
The 50 trial data sets were processed through the algorithm. The results over all of the trial sets are summarized in Table 1, where the center of mass and direction cosine error of the interval deformation technique and the rigid body model are compared. After processing by the interval deformation algorithm the center of mass error has been reduced to 29% and the direction cosine error has been reduced to 19% of the rigid body model error. In a t-test for paired samples, both of these decreases were significant at p<0.001.
Validation of the Interval Deformation Correction Technique
A subject fitted with an Ilizarov external fixation was observed with the optoelectronic system. The Point Cluster Marker set was affixed to the subject's shank (6 markers), along with a set of four markers rigidly attached to the Ilizarov device, which is rigidly connected to the tibia with bone pins. These four markers define a true bone embedded coordinate system. Data were acquired by GaitLink software (Computerized Functional Testing Corporation) controlling four Qualisys cameras operating at a video frequency of 120 Hz. Three dimensional coordinates were calculated using the modified direct linear transform.
The subject was a 46 year old male (height 1.75 m, weight 84.1 kg) fitted with a tibial Ilizarov external fixation device. The device was rigidly attached to the tibia with nine bone pins, located in three sets (top, middle, and bottom) of three (medial, anterior, and lateral). The clinical purpose of the device was tibial lengthening; the test on the subject was performed two days prior to final removal of the device. The subject exhibited a limited range of motion and was tested performing a 10 cm step-up onto a platform.
The simultaneously acquired motion for a coordinate system embedded in bone (Ilizarov system) and a set of skin-based markers was compared. At every time instant the location and orientation of the Ilizarov system, the rigid body model skin marker system, and the interval deformation technique skin marker system was determined. The change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to one of the skin marker systems over time is a measure of the deformation unaccounted for in the skin marker system.
The interval deformation technique produced a substantial improvement in the estimate of the location and orientation of the underlying bone. For perfectly modeled motion there would be no relative motion between the Ilizarov system and the skin marker system over the time interval. The change in the transformation from the Ilizarov system to the skin marker systems are shown in FIGS. 14 and 15 for location and orientation respectively, for both a rigid body model and the interval deformation technique. For this single data set, the location error was reduced from 7.1 cm to 2.3 cm and the orientation error from 107 degrees to 24 degrees, with the error summed over the entire time interval. The subject performed a 10 cm step-up; the marker deformation was modeled as a single Gaussian function.
In correlating the load pattern obtained from a gait analysis using, e.g. the PCT, with the geometrical representation of the bone from the segmented MRI data, one can be guided by the general process as described below. The process allows for dynamic visualization (i.e. animations) of high-resolution geometrical representations derived from MRI scans (or other imaging techniques). The motion of the subject specific anatomic elements is generally driven by data acquired from the motion (gait) lab. Fidelity of these animations requires calculation and application of a sequence of rigid body transformations, some of which are directly calculable and some of which are the result of optimizations (the correction for skin marker deformation from rigidity does not use the rigid body assumption, but generates a correction that is applied as a rigid body transform).
The process comprises:
-
- a) acquiring data from MRI (or other imaging techniques), and PCT gait protocols;
- b) directly calculating a set of transformations from the data;
- c) calculating a set of transformations from optimizations, as needed;
- d) generating a 3D geometric representation of the anatomic element from the MR data; and
- e) applying the transformations of (b) and (c) to the 3D geometric representation.
Each of these steps are described in detail below.
Acquiring the Data from MRI (or other imaging techniques) and PCT Gait Protocols
In the Point Cluster Technique (PCT) protocol, a patient can have a number of retro-reflective markers attached to each limb segment under observation. Multiple video cameras acquire data with the subject standing still and during activities of interest.
In addition, in order to correspond activities in the gait lab with the MRI scans, another reference data set (subject standing still, prescribed posture) can be acquired using 8 additional markers clustered about the knee. These markers are filled with gadolinium-DTPA and covered with a retro-reflective material to allow for correlation between the MRI image and the video data.
Directly Calculating a Set of Transformations from the Data
The transformations are described in detail in [Andriacchi T P, Alexander E J, Toney M K, Dyrby C O, Sum J. J Biomech Eng 1998; 120(12): 743-749]. In short, each marker can be assigned a unit mass and the inertia tensor, center of mass, principal axes and principal moments of inertia can be calculated. By treating the center of mass and principal axes as a transformation, local coordinates arcan be e calculated. Another set of coordinate systems can also be required for this technique; limb segment specific anatomic landmarks can be identified through palpation and a clinically relevant coordinate system can be defined. The required transformations are summarized in Table 1 below.
Calculating a Set of Transformations from Optimizations
There are three required transformations:
Generating a 3D Geometric Representation of the Anatomic Element from the MR Data
The MR slices are segmented for the multiple anatomic and fiducial elements. The slices are combined to a voxel representation. An isosurface can be calculated from the boundary voxel elements. A tessellation of the isosurface can be calculated, along with the outward pointing normal for each surface element. This data can then be stored in a standard 3D graphic format, the Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML).
Appling the Transformation Sequence to the Geometric Representation
The transformation sequence is provided below in Table 1. This transformation sequence can be applied to each of the anatomic elements over each time step of the activity, starting with sequence 6.
TABLE 1 | ||||
SEQ | FROM SYSTEM | To | XFORM | |
1 | MR Global | | ED1 | |
2 | MR Local | | OPT1 | |
3 | Common Local | | ANA2 | |
4 | MR Anatomic | VID Anatomic | OPT2 | |
5 | VID Anatomic | | ANA3 | |
6 | VID Ref | VID Deformed(t) | ED3 | |
7 | VID Deformed(t) | VID Bone(t) | |
|
8 | VID Bone(t) | VID Global(t) | ED4 | |
As pointed out at numerous places in the specification, the use of external reference markers that are detectable by both MRI and optical techniques can be an important and useful tool in the method of this invention. The use of the reference markers can form the basis for an aspect of this invention that is a method for correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and/or optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint of a human. This method comprises, obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint, obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint, obtaining the external bone image data optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint. Using the skin reference markers, one can then correlate the cartilage image, bone image and opto-electrical image with each other, due to the fact that each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage, bone and opto-electrical data. The cartilage image data and the bone image data can be obtained by magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, ultrasound, computed tomography or X-ray. Typically, MRI will be preferred. In the case of X-ray, further manipulations must be performed in which multiple X-ray images are assimilated by a computer into a 2 dimensional cross-sectional image called a Computed Tomography (CT) Scan. The opto-electrical image data can be obtained by any means, for example, a video camera or a movie camera. Multiple skin reference markers can be placed on one or more limbs of the patient prior to imaging. The skin reference markers are described hereinbefore.
By a sequence of calculations a set of transformations that will take the subject specific geometric representation of anatomic elements determined from the MR image set to the optical reference coordinate system. From the optical reference coordinate system, the standard Point Cluster Technique transformation sequence is applied to generate dynamic visualizations of these anatomic elements during activities previously recorded in the motion lab. Fidelity of these dynamic visualizations (and subsequent contact surface determination) requires the calculation and application of a sequence of rigid body transformations. Some of these are directly calculable and some are the result of optimizations (the correction for skin marker deformation from rigidity does not use the rigid body assumption, but generates a correction that is applied as a rigid body transform).
The first required transformation can be from the MR global coordinate system to the MR center of mass/principal axis coordinate system. This can be done by calculating the center of mass of each of the individual markers, resulting in a set of eight three dimensional points. Each of these points can be assigned a unit mass, and the center of mass, inertia tensor, and principal axes can be calculated. The same procedure can be performed on these markers as determined by the optical system, providing a transformation from the optical global system to a center of mass/principal axis system.
If the relative orientation of the tibia and femur as determined by the MR system and the optical system are identical, it is only necessary to apply the optical reference system to the anatomic system transformation of the MR local data. If this is not the case, an optimization calculation can be performed to determine the rotation and translation of, for example, the femur with respect to the tibia. One then can calculate the linear least square rigid body transformation from the MR limb segment anatomic coordinate system to the video limb segment anatomic coordinate system prior to applying the Point Cluster Transformations.
For visualization or contact surface determination, one can examine the relative motion of one segment to the other, for example the motion of the femur relative to a fixed tibial frame. This can be accomplished by applying the global to tibial anatomic system transform to all of the elements. An example of this type of visualization is given in FIG. 18 . The Figure shows what can be referred to as functional joint imaging. FIG. 18A is a photograph demonstrating the position of the external markers positioned around the knee joint. The markers are filled with dilute Gd-solution. B is Sagittal 3D SPGR image through the medial femorotibial compartment. Two of the external markers are seen anteriorly as rounded structures with high signal intensity. C is 3D reconstruction of femoral and tibial bones (light grey), external markers (dark grey), femoral cartilage (red), and tibial cartilage (blue) based on the original SPGR MR images. D-I show a functional joint imaging sequence at selected phases of leg extension from a seated position, D-F, anterior projection. The vectors represent the relative location and orientation of the femur with respect to the tibia. G-I is a lateral projection. These dynamic visualizations can be used to demonstrate tibiofemoral contact areas during various phases if gait or other physical activities.
Superimposition of Cartilage Thickness Map onto Subject Specific Anatomic Model and Determination of Distance of Cartilage Defect from Load Bearing Line
Superimposing the cartilage thickness maps onto the subject specific geometric models can follow the same approach taken to bring the MR generated geometries into the optical reference system. Since the thickness maps and the geometric models are initially in the same coordinate system; one possible approach is to perform a simple surface mapping of the thickness map onto the geometric model. Another alternative approach is to convert the thickness map directly into a geometric representation (FIG. 19 ).
Once the thickness map is embedded in the femoral geometry, one can define a scalar metric that characterizes the location of any cartilage lesions relative to the point of contact line. One approach is a simple 3D distance along the surface from the center of the cartilage lesion to the point of closest approach of the contact line. Another metric that could be useful would be to multiply the area of the lesion by the adduction moment at that time instant, then divide by the distance from lesion center to point of closest approach. This could result in a metric that increases with lesion area, adduction moment, and closeness of approach.
Determination of Anatomic and Natural Reference Lines
There are two alternative approaches one can consider for determining a reference line on the cartilage surfaces. One skilled in the art will easily recognize other approaches that can be suitable for this purpose. The first approach is based on anatomic planes; the second is a natural approach building on the three dimensional cartilage thickness map.
The location of the pathway of loading relative to the femoral and tibial anatomy and geometry can be assessed by defining sagittal planes bisecting the medial femoral condyle, the lateral femoral condyle, the medial tibial plateau, and the lateral tibial plateau. For the medial femoral condyle, the operator can manually delete surface points located along the trochlea. Then, a sagittal plane parallel to the sagittal midfemoral plane can be defined through the most medial aspect of the medial femoral condyle followed by a sagittal plane parallel to the sagittal midfemoral plane through the most lateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle. The sagittal plane that is located halfway between these two planes can be defined as the “midcondylar sagittal plane”. The intersection between the midcondylar sagittal plane and the external cartilage surface yields the “anatomic midcondylar cartilage line”. The location of the pathway of loading can be assessed relative to the anatomic midcondylar cartilage line of the medial femoral condyle. The identical procedure can be repeated for the lateral femoral condyle.
The following method can be used for the medial tibial plateau: A plane parallel to the sagittal tibial plateau plane can be defined through the most medial point of the medial tibial plateau. A parallel plane located halfway between this plane and the sagittal tibial plateau plane can yield the “midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau.” The intersection of the midsagittal plane of the medial tibial plateau and the external cartilage surface can yield the “anatomic midtibial plateau cartilage line” of the medial tibial plateau. The identical procedure can be repeated for the lateral tibial plateau.
In the second approach, one can calculate a “natural” line of curvature for each femoral cartilage component (FIG. 20 ). Intuitively, if one could roll the femoral condyles along a hard, flat surface, the line of contact with the flat surface would be the natural line of curvature. One can compare the actual tibiofemoral contact line to this reference line. Since one cannot physically remove the femur and roll it around, one can apply some geometric calculations to estimate this reference line. One can begin with the trans-epicondylar reference line previously described. One can then generate a plane coincident with this line oriented in an arbitrary initial position. The intersection of this plane and the external surface of the cartilage will produce a curve. One can then take the point furthest from the trans-epicondylar reference line as the natural contact point for this plane location. The next step is to rotate the plane by some increment, for example by one degree, and repeat the procedure. The operator can identify the rotation angles where the plane is intersecting the distinct medial—lateral compartments of the cartilage, and two points can be chosen, one from the medial femoral condyle and one from the lateral femoral condyle. If cartilage defects are present, in which case a compartment will not intersect in a curve but in a set of points, one can fit a spline through the points, then take the peak point of the spline as the contact point.
This can be repeated for the entire extent of the cartilage, resulting in a set of points that branch at the intercondylar notch. One can treat these points as two lines, and fit them with two splines. These can be the “natural” lines of curvature for each compartment.
Load Bearing Line Determination
The calculations in this section can begin with the relative motion of the subject specific femoral anatomy with respect to the subject specific tibial anatomy, and end with a line describing the point of closest approach between the femur and tibia during some activity of daily living. A number of approaches to this problem have been described in the literature; Crosset, Dennis, Stiehl, and Johnson have all described techniques which might be applicable. One can implement a proximity detection and approach algorithm (PDAA) as it was specifically designed to work with the Point Cluster Technique (albeit with prosthetic knee joint components). Physically, the tibial and femoral cartilage components deform under load, leading in general to a contact patch between opposing surfaces. As the geometric models are rigid, they will not deform under this load, but will instead intersect in a non-realizable manner. The PDAA has been designed to incrementally displace and rotate one of the surfaces until a realizable contact is achieved. It is understood that this is not a true point contact line, but rather a reproducible representation of contact location (FIG. 21 ).
The MR generated subject specific geometries can be used to detect rigid body contact proximity when the subject is in full extension. The femoral component can then be incrementally displaced until simultaneous medial and lateral condyle contact occur. This is a first order approximation to the location of the contact point; slip velocity calculations can then be used to determine the final estimate of the contact point. The next time step in the activity can now be examined, using the previous time step solution as a starting point for the calculation. The full extension time step can be chosen to match with the static reference posture; should it be necessary, one can add in other reference postures.
Once the contact points have been determined for all time steps of the activity, one can map the locations of these points onto the femoral cartilage. A coordinate system can be defined on the surface of the femoral cartilage, choosing as a reference line the point of contact the femoral component would have had were it rolled along a flat plane. This allows one to determine a contact line relative to the subject specific anatomy.
A 2D or 3D surface registration technique can be used as an aid to providing therapy to match the anatomic orientation of the cartilage thickness map of a baseline and follow-up scan of a patient. The re-registered cartilage thickness map of the follow-up scan can then be subtracted from the baseline scan. This will yield the thickness difference, i.e. cartilage loss, as a function of x, y, and z. This can also be expressed as percentage difference.
The invention provides for techniques to assess biomechanical loading conditions of articular cartilage in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging and to use the assessment as an aid in providing therapy to a patient. In one embodiment, biomechanical loading conditions can be assessed in normal articular cartilage in various anatomic regions. In the knee joint, these anatomic regions include the posterior, central, and anterior medial femoral condyle, the posterior, central, and anterior medial tibial plateau, the posterior, central, and anterior lateral femoral condyle, the posterior, central, and anterior lateral tibial plateau, the medial and lateral aspect of the trochlea, and the medial and lateral facet and the median ridge of the patella. Since biomechanical loading conditions are assessed in vivo based on the anatomic features of each individual patient, a risk profile can be established for each individual based on the biomechanical stresses applied to cartilage. In this fashion, patients who are at risk for developing early cartilage loss and osteoarthritis can be identified. For example, patients with a valgus or varus deformity of the knee joint will demonstrate higher biomechanical stresses applied to the articular cartilage in the medial femorotibial or lateral femorotibial or patellofemoral compartments than patients with normal joint anatomy. Similarly, patients with disturbances of joint congruity will demonstrate higher biomechanical stress applied to certain regions of the articular cartilage. Such disturbances of joint congruity are often difficult to detect using standard clinical and imaging assessment. The amount of stress applied to the articular cartilage can be used to determine the patient's individual prognosis for developing cartilage loss and osteoarthritis. In another embodiment, biomechanical loading conditions can be assessed in normal and diseased articular cartilage. An intervention that can alter load bearing can then be simulated. Such interventions include but are not limited to braces, orthotic devices, methods and devices to alter neuromuscular function or activation, arthroscopic and surgical procedures. The change in load bearing induced by the intervention can be assessed prior to actually performing the intervention in a patient. In this fashion, the most efficacious treatment modality can be determined, For example, a tibial osteotomy can be simulated in the manner and the optimal degree of angular correction with regard to biomechanical loading conditions of normal and diseased cartilage can be determined before the patient will actually undergo surgery.
Estimation of biomechanical forces applied to normal cartilage can be used to determine a patient's risk for developing cartilage loss and osteoarthritis. Estimation of forces applied in and around a cartilage defect can be used to determine the prognosis of a cartilage defect and to guide the choice of therapy, e.g. treatment with chondroprotective or chondroregenerative agents, osteochondral allografting, cartilage transplantation, femoral or tibial osteotomy, or joint replacement surgery.
Having now provided a full discussion of various aspects of the technology relating to this invention, several further aspects of the invention can be seen.
One aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal. The method comprises:
-
- (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; and
- (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern
Another aspect of the invention is a method for monitoring the treatment of a degenerative joint condition in a mammal. The method comprises
-
- (a) comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint;
- (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern;
- (c) treating the mammal to minimize further degeneration of the joint condition; and
- (d) monitoring the treatment to the mammal.
Still another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the rate of degeneration of cartilage in the joint of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and the bones on either side of the cartilage, which method comprises
-
- (a) obtaining a cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint that shows an area of greater than normal degeneration,
- (b) obtaining a movement pattern of the joint that shows where the opposing cartilage surface contact,
- (c) comparing the cartilage degeneration pattern with the movement pattern of the joint, and
- (d) determining if the movement pattern shows contact of one cartilage surface with a portion of the opposing cartilage surface showing greater than normal degeneration in the cartilage degeneration pattern.
Another aspect of the specification is a method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint. The method comprises
-
- (a) obtaining the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the knee showing at least the cartilage on at least one side of the joint,
- (b) segmenting the MRI data from step (a),
- (c) generating a geometrical or biochemical representation of the cartilage of the joint from the segmented MRI data,
- (d) assessing the patient's gait to determine the cartilage surface contact pattern in the joint during the gait assessment, and
- (e) correlating the contact pattern obtained in step (d) with the geometrical representation obtained in step (c).
Still another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint. The method comprises
-
- (a) obtaining the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the knee showing at least the bones on either side of the joint,
- (b) segmenting the MRI data from step (a),
- (c) generating a geometrical representation of the bone of the joint from the segmented MRI data,
- (d) assessing the patient's gait to determine the load pattern of the articular cartilage in the joint during the gait assessment,
- (e) correlating the load pattern obtained in step (d) with the geometrical representation obtained in step (c).
Another aspect of this invention is a method for deriving the motion of bones about a joint from markers placed on the skin, which method comprises
-
- (a) placing at least three external markers on the patient's limb segments surrounding the joint,
- (b) registering the location of each marker on the patient's limb while the patient is standing completing still and while moving the limb,
- (c) calculating the principal axis, principal moments and deformation of rigidity of the cluster of markers, and
- (d) calculating a correction to the artifact induced by the motion of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone.
Another aspect of the invention is a system for assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which system comprises
-
- (a) a device for electronically transferring a cartilage degeneration pattern for the joint to receiving device located distant from the transferring device;
- (b) a device for receiving the cartilage degeneration pattern at the remote location;
- (c) a database accessible at the remote location for generating a movement pattern for the joint of the human wherein the database includes a collection of movement patterns for human joints, which patterns are organized and can be accessed by reference to characteristics such as type of joint, gender, age, height, weight, bone size, type of movement, and distance of movement;
- (d) a device for generating a movement pattern that most closely approximates a movement pattern for the human patient based on the characteristics of the human patient;
- (e) a device for correlating the movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern; and
- (f) a device for transmitting the correlated movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern back to the source of the cartilage degeneration pattern.
In each of these aspects of the invention it is to be understood that a cartilage degeneration pattern may be, i.a., 2D or 3D thickness map of the cartilage or a biochemical map of the cartilage.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The invention now being fully described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
Claims (140)
1. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating the joint along one or more vectors tangent or perpendicular to the cartilage or bone surface; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an inital time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at an later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the area of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said electronic image data provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
10. The method claim 1 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material, a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral osteotomy or tibial osteotomy.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
16. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating the joint along one or more vectors tangent or perpendicular to the cartilage or bone surface; and
determining at least one of size and shape for at least one of a transplant, a graft, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material and a repair system based on said three dimensional evaluation.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
18. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
19. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
20. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
21. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
22. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
identifying the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
23. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
24. The method of claim 16 , wherein said electronic image provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
25. The method claim 16 , wherein said articular repair comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, tibial corticotomy, femoral or tibial osteotomy.
26. The method of claim 16 , wherein said articular repair uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
27. The method of claim 16 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
28. The method of claim 16 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
29. The method of claim 28 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
30. The method of claim 29 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
31. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating the joint along one or more vectors tangent or perpendicular to the cartilage or bone surface; and
designing a therapy based on said three dimensional evaluation.
32. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
33. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
34. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
35. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
36. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the area of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
37. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
identifying the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
38. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
39. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronic data provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
40. The mehtod of claim 31 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material and a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral or tibial osteotomy.
41. The method of claim 31 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
42. The method of claim 31 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
43. The method of claim 31 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
44. The method of claim 43 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
45. The method of claim 44 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
46. The method of claim 31 , wherein said electronic data provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
47. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about volume, area, thickness, curvature, water content, sodium content, hyaluronic acid content, glycosaminoglycan content, signal intensity or relaxation time of said normal or diseased tissue, or three dimensional geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating said image data along one or more vectors tangent or perpendicular to the cartilage or bone surface; and
selecting or designing a therapy based on said three dimensional evaluation.
48. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
49. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value time the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
50. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
51. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component in the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component in the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions in the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
52. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
53. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating further including:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
54. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic data associated with an image of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three-dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating cartilage or bone in said image along at least three vectors, at least one of the vectors being non-coplanar and non-parallel with at least two of the other vectors defining a vector plane; and
selecting or designing a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
55. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
56. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
57. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DL to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
58. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
59. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component in the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component in the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions in the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormal joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
60. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
61. A method of claim 54 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
62. The method of claim 54 , wherein said electronic image provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
63. The method of claim 54 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material and a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral or tibial osteotomy.
64. The method of claim 54 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
65. The method of claim 54 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
66. The method of claim 54 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
67. The method of claim 66 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
68. The method of claim 67 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
69. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining electronic image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions cartilage or bone in said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint at a first point and a second point, wherein information related to the first point is derived based on at least one point of the joint that forms, with the first point, a first vector, wherein information related to the second point is derived based on at least one point of the joint that forms, with the second point, a second vector, and wherein the first and second vectors are non-coplanar and non-parallel; and
selecting or designing a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
70. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
71. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
72. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
73. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
74. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
75. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
76. A method of claim 69 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
77. The method of claim 69 , wherein said electronic image data provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
78. The method of claim 69 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material and a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral or tibial osteotomy.
79. The method of claim 69 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
80. The method of claim 69 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
81. The method of claim 69 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
82. The method of claim 81 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
83. The method of claim 82 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
84. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
imaging a joint on an imaging plane to obtain electronic image data, the image data including both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating cartilage or bone in said image along a vector that is non-parallel to the imaging plane; and
selecting or designing a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
85. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional vlume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
86. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferring image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
87. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
88. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
89. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the area having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
90. A method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
91. A method of claim 84 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelectrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
92. The method of claim 84 , wherein said electronic image data provide information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
93. The method of claim 84 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material, a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral osteotomy or tibial osteotomy.
94. The method of claim 84 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
95. The method of claim 84 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
96. The method of claim 84 , wherein said image is obtained using ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, a single photon emission computed tomography scan, or MRI.
97. The method of claim 96 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
98. The method of claim 97 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
99. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining CT or MRI image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating the joint along at least two non-parallel planes; and
selecting a therapy based on said three-dimensional evaluation.
100. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
101. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device, receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
102. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
103. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
104. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
105. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
placing the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
106. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelctrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
107. The method of claim 99 , wherein said electronic image data provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
108. The method of claim 99 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material, a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral osteotomy or tibial osteotomy.
109. The method of claim 99 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
110. The method of claim 99 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
111. The method of claim 99 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
112. The method of claim 111 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
113. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining CT or MRI image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating said joint along at least two non-parallel planes; and
determining at least one of size and shape for at least one of a transplant, a graft, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material and a repair system based on said three dimensional evaluation.
114. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
115. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
116. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
117. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
118. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
119. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
identifying the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
120. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelctrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
121. The method of claim 113 , wherein said electronic image provides information on the thickness, shape, or curvature of said normal and said diseased tissue or the location and size of said diseased tissue.
122. The method of claim 113 , wherein said articular repair comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, tibial corticotomy, femoral or tibial osteotomy.
123. The method of claim 113 , wherein said articular repair uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
124. The method of claim 113 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
125. The method of claim 113 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
126. The method of claim 125 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
127. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining CT or MRI image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating said joint along at least two non-parallel planes; and
designing a therapy based on said three dimensional evaluation.
128. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the loss of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at an initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the initial time,
obtaining a three-dimensional representation of the cartilage at a later time,
calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region of degenerated cartilage evaluated at the later time, and
determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the region of degenerated cartilage between the later and initial times.
129. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
assessing the condition of cartilage in a joint of a human, which method comprises,
electronically transferring an electronically generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to a receiving device located distant from the transferring device,
receiving the transferred image at the distant location,
converting the transferred image to a degeneration pattern of the cartilage, and
transmitting the degeneration pattern to a site for analysis.
130. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
determining the volume of cartilage loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in a joint of a mammal which method comprises,
determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage defect,
obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, DD, of the region,
subtracting DD from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL, and
multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, AD, to give the volume of cartilage loss.
131. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time, which method comprises,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T1,
estimating the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T2, and
determining the change in the thickness or width or area or volume of the region of cartilage between the initial and the later times.
132. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
providing a biochemically based representation of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises,
measuring a detectable biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
determining the relative amounts of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage,
evaluating the amounts of the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage, and
determining the areas of abnormally joint cartilage by identifying the areas having altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
133. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
estimating the change of cartilage in a joint, wherein the joint comprises articular cartilage, which method comprises,
defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at an initial time, T1,
identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object coordinate system,
defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but does not encompass the entire articular cartilage,
defining the 3D object coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T2,
identifying the identically-sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T2 using the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T1, and
measuring any differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T1 and T2.
134. The method of claim 127 , wherein said electronically evaluating further comprises:
correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and optoelctrical image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises,
(a) obtaining the cartilage image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers placed externally near the joint,
(b) obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as the markers in (a),
(c) obtaining the optoelectrical image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a) and (b), and
(d) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a), (b) and (c) with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the cartilage and bone data and the opto-electrical data.
135. The method of claim 127 , wherein said therapy comprises autologous chondrocyte transplantation, osteochondral allografting, osteochondral autografting, an implant, a replacement material, a scaffold, a regenerating material, a repair system, tibial corticotomy, femoral osteotomy or tibial osteotomy.
136. The method of claim 127 , wherein said therapy uses cartilage or bone tissue grown ex vivo, stem cells, an artificial non-human material, an agent that stimulates repair of said diseased tissue, or an agent.
137. The method of claim 127 , wherein said information is used to determine the thickness or other geometrical feature of a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold, or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
138. The method of claim 127 , wherein said information is used to generate a three-dimensional representation of cartilage thickness or a physical model of said normal or said diseased tissue or both.
139. The method of claim 138 , wherein said physical model is used to shape a tissue transplant, a tissue graft, a tissue implant, a tissue replacement material, a tissue scaffold or a tissue regenerating material or tissue repair system.
140. A method of treating a human joint disease involving cartilage comprising:
obtaining CT or MRI image data of a joint, wherein said image data includes both normal and diseased cartilage tissue;
electronically evaluating in three dimensions said image data to obtain information about volume, area, thickness, curvature, water content, sodium content, hyaluronic acid content, glycosaminoglycan content, signal intensity or relaxation time of said normal or diseased tissue, or three dimensional geometry of the joint, said electronically evaluating including evaluating said joint along at least two non-parallel planes; and
selecting or designing a therapy based on said three dimensional evaluation.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/193,907 USRE43282E1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2008-08-19 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11298998P | 1998-09-14 | 1998-09-14 | |
PCT/US1999/030265 WO2000035346A2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 1999-12-16 | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US09/662,224 US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-09-14 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US12/193,907 USRE43282E1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2008-08-19 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/662,224 Reissue US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-09-14 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USRE43282E1 true USRE43282E1 (en) | 2012-03-27 |
Family
ID=32871423
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/662,224 Ceased US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-09-14 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US10/764,010 Expired - Fee Related US8036729B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2004-01-22 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US11/769,434 Expired - Lifetime US8112142B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-06-27 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US12/193,907 Expired - Lifetime USRE43282E1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2008-08-19 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US13/209,373 Expired - Fee Related US8306601B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2011-08-13 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US13/667,177 Abandoned US20130071828A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2012-11-02 | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/662,224 Ceased US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-09-14 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US10/764,010 Expired - Fee Related US8036729B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2004-01-22 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US11/769,434 Expired - Lifetime US8112142B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-06-27 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/209,373 Expired - Fee Related US8306601B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2011-08-13 | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US13/667,177 Abandoned US20130071828A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2012-11-02 | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US7239908B1 (en) |
Cited By (69)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030055502A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2003-03-20 | Philipp Lang | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US20040147927A1 (en) * | 2002-11-07 | 2004-07-29 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US20070015995A1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2007-01-18 | Philipp Lang | Joint and cartilage diagnosis, assessment and modeling |
US20070083266A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2007-04-12 | Vertegen, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
US20070233269A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Interpositional Joint Implant |
US20080147072A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-19 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US20080275452A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Cutting Guide |
US20090004267A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2009-01-01 | Gruenenthal Gmbh | Dosage Form with Impeded Abuse |
US20090110498A1 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-04-30 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty systems and devices, and related methods |
US20090131941A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2009-05-21 | Ilwhan Park | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US20090138020A1 (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2009-05-28 | Otismed Corporation | Generating mri images usable for the creation of 3d bone models employed to make customized arthroplasty jigs |
US20090169300A1 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2009-07-02 | Allen J Dewayne | Hydraulic riding trowel with automatic load sensing system |
US20090222014A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100002921A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-07 | Matthias Fenchel | Medical image acquisition apparatus and operating method therefor |
US20100023015A1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2010-01-28 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs having improved mating accuracy |
US20100145231A1 (en) * | 2008-12-04 | 2010-06-10 | Fujifilm Corporation | System for measuring space width of joint, method for measuring space width of joint and recording medium |
US20100153076A1 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2010-06-17 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using areas representing cartilage |
US20100160917A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-06-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100256504A1 (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2010-10-07 | Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine | Methods and apparatus for assisting cartilage diagnostic and therapeutic procedures |
US20100281678A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools Facilitating Increased Accuracy, Speed and Simplicity in Performing Joint Arthroplasty |
US20100305907A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Knee Arthroplasty Devices |
US20100305573A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110188726A1 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2011-08-04 | Ram Nathaniel | Method and system for stitching multiple images into a panoramic image |
US20110213368A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110214279A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2011-09-08 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US20120183184A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2012-07-19 | Dan Rappaport | Medical image analysis |
US20120259224A1 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Mon-Ju Wu | Ultrasound Machine for Improved Longitudinal Tissue Analysis |
US8306601B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2012-11-06 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US8369926B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2013-02-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US8480754B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-07-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8483469B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US8480679B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US8500740B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-08-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific joint arthroplasty devices for ligament repair |
US8532361B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2013-09-10 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
USD691719S1 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-10-15 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty jig blank |
US8556983B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools |
US8617242B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-12-31 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US8617175B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Unicompartmental customized arthroplasty cutting jigs and methods of making the same |
US8623026B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2014-01-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools incorporating anatomical relief |
US8638998B2 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2014-01-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in MRI and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US8682052B2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2014-03-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
US8709089B2 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2014-04-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
US8715291B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-06 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8737700B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8734455B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Hip resurfacing surgical guide tool |
US8735773B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2014-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US8771365B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2014-07-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs, and related tools |
US8808303B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2014-08-19 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US8862202B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2014-10-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US8882847B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US8968320B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2015-03-03 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs |
US9017334B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2015-04-28 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US9017336B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2015-04-28 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US9020788B2 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2015-04-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US9091628B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2015-07-28 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | 3D mapping with two orthogonal imaging views |
US9286686B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2016-03-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss |
US9308091B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices and methods for treatment of facet and other joints |
US9387083B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2016-07-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Acquiring and utilizing kinematic information for patient-adapted implants, tools and surgical procedures |
US9402637B2 (en) | 2012-10-11 | 2016-08-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Customized arthroplasty cutting guides and surgical methods using the same |
US9408686B1 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2016-08-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for manufacturing orthopedic implants |
US9433390B2 (en) | 2007-06-21 | 2016-09-06 | Surgix Ltd. | System for measuring the true dimensions and orientation of objects in a two dimensional image |
US9486226B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2016-11-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Tibial guides, tools, and techniques for resecting the tibial plateau |
US9495483B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-11-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Automated Systems for manufacturing patient-specific orthopedic implants and instrumentation |
US9603711B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-03-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US9649170B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2017-05-16 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US9649117B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2017-05-16 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US9675471B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2017-06-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, techniques and methods for assessing joint spacing, balancing soft tissues and obtaining desired kinematics for joint implant components |
US9808262B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2017-11-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US10085839B2 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2018-10-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific and patient-engineered orthopedic implants |
Families Citing this family (231)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110071645A1 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2011-03-24 | Ray Bojarski | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US7618451B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US20110071802A1 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2011-03-24 | Ray Bojarski | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20090222103A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Articular Implants Providing Lower Adjacent Cartilage Wear |
US9208558B2 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2015-12-08 | Osteoplastics Llc | Methods and systems for producing an implant |
AU6634800A (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2001-03-05 | Case Western Reserve University | Method and apparatus for producing an implant |
US8781557B2 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2014-07-15 | Osteoplastics, Llc | Producing a three dimensional model of an implant |
AU2621601A (en) * | 1999-11-03 | 2001-05-14 | Case Western Reserve University | System and method for producing a three-dimensional model |
US6712856B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2004-03-30 | Kinamed, Inc. | Custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
IL138123A0 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2001-10-31 | Accuramed 1999 Ltd | Medical decision support system and method |
JP4049312B2 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2008-02-20 | イメージング セラピューティクス,インコーポレーテッド | X-ray image quantitative analysis method and apparatus |
US7467892B2 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2008-12-23 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
US20020186818A1 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2002-12-12 | Osteonet, Inc. | System and method for building and manipulating a centralized measurement value database |
US6904123B2 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2005-06-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7660453B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2010-02-09 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US8639009B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2014-01-28 | Imatx, Inc. | Methods and devices for evaluating and treating a bone condition based on x-ray image analysis |
FR2816200A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-05-10 | Praxim | DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A KNEE PROSTHESIS |
WO2002067800A2 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2002-09-06 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical navigation systems and processes for high tibial osteotomy |
EP1382297B1 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2012-01-04 | Teijin Limited | Three-dimensional joint structure measuring method |
DE60233485D1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-10-08 | Imaging Therapeutics Inc | METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF BONE LOSS |
US20130211531A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2013-08-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US7840247B2 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2010-11-23 | Imatx, Inc. | Methods of predicting musculoskeletal disease |
US8965075B2 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2015-02-24 | Imatx, Inc. | System and method for predicting future fractures |
CA2519187A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2004-10-14 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for the compensation of imaging technique in the processing of radiographic images |
KR100891885B1 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2009-04-03 | 닛본 덴끼 가부시끼가이샤 | Form changing device, object action encoding device, and object action decoding device |
EP1663002A4 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2007-11-28 | Imaging Therapeutics Inc | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
US8290564B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2012-10-16 | Imatx, Inc. | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
US9492114B2 (en) | 2004-06-18 | 2016-11-15 | Banner Health Systems, Inc. | Accelerated evaluation of treatments to prevent clinical onset of alzheimer's disease |
WO2006009887A2 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2006-01-26 | Banner Health | Evaluation of brain treatment |
DE102004043057A1 (en) * | 2004-09-06 | 2006-03-30 | Siemens Ag | Method for the determination of excellent coronal and sagittal planes for the subsequent acquisition of new magnetic resonance tomograms or the display of magnetic resonance tomograms from an already existing image dataset of a knee joint |
WO2006034018A2 (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2006-03-30 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | System and method of predicting future fractures |
US8043315B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-10-25 | Arthrex, Inc. | Osteochondral repair using plug fashioned from partial distal allograft femur or condyle |
US9471978B2 (en) | 2004-10-04 | 2016-10-18 | Banner Health | Methodologies linking patterns from multi-modality datasets |
US7760909B2 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2010-07-20 | Brainlab Ag | Video tracking and registering |
US20060247864A1 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Jose Tamez-Pena | Method and system for assessment of biomarkers by measurement of response to surgical implant |
US7623731B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2009-11-24 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Direct method for modeling non-rigid motion with thin plate spline transformation |
AU2006297137A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-12 | Conformis Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices |
FI119160B (en) * | 2005-10-10 | 2008-08-15 | Medicel Oy | Database Management System |
GB0521640D0 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2005-11-30 | Ccbr As | Automatic quantification of a pathology indicating measure from cartilage scan data |
JP2007175431A (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-07-12 | Olympus Medical Systems Corp | Ultrasonograph |
US9907659B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2018-03-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8535387B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-09-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific tools and implants |
US8377066B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-02-19 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific elbow guides and associated methods |
US8864769B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2014-10-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Alignment guides with patient-specific anchoring elements |
US8407067B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-03-26 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8568487B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-10-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific hip joint devices |
US9173661B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific alignment guide with cutting surface and laser indicator |
US8608748B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific guides |
US8608749B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US10278711B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral guide |
US8282646B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-10-09 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US9918740B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2018-03-20 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Backup surgical instrument system and method |
US8092465B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-01-10 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US20150335438A1 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Patient-specific augments |
US7967868B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-06-28 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-modified implant and associated method |
US9113971B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2015-08-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Femoral acetabular impingement guide |
US8133234B2 (en) * | 2006-02-27 | 2012-03-13 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific acetabular guide and method |
US8603180B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-12-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular alignment guides |
US8473305B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2013-06-25 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method and apparatus for manufacturing an implant |
US8241293B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-08-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific high tibia osteotomy |
US8858561B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2014-10-14 | Blomet Manufacturing, LLC | Patient-specific alignment guide |
US8298237B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2012-10-30 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient-specific alignment guide for multiple incisions |
US9345548B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pre-operative planning |
US8070752B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2011-12-06 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Patient specific alignment guide and inter-operative adjustment |
US9339278B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-05-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guides and associated instruments |
US8591516B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-11-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US9289253B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2016-03-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific shoulder guide |
ES2405879T3 (en) * | 2006-03-13 | 2013-06-04 | Given Imaging Ltd. | Device, system and method for automatic detection of contractile activity in an image frame |
US9795399B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2017-10-24 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific knee alignment guide and associated method |
US7860280B2 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2010-12-28 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Facial feature detection method and device |
US20080004520A1 (en) * | 2006-06-15 | 2008-01-03 | Theriault Richard H | System for and method of diagnostic coding using medical image data |
WO2008005946A2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-10 | Imagemovers Digital Llc | Capturing and rendering dynamic surface deformations in human motion |
JP4703504B2 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2011-06-15 | ソニー株式会社 | Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and program |
WO2008034845A2 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2008-03-27 | Nordic Bioscience Imaging A/S | Pathology indicating measure related to cartilage structure and automatic quantification thereof |
US7646936B2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2010-01-12 | Varian Medical Systems International Ag | Spatially variant image deformation |
US7620147B2 (en) | 2006-12-13 | 2009-11-17 | Oraya Therapeutics, Inc. | Orthovoltage radiotherapy |
US7496174B2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2009-02-24 | Oraya Therapeutics, Inc. | Portable orthovoltage radiotherapy |
US8214016B2 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2012-07-03 | Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine | System and method for determining an optimal type and position of an implant |
EP2095147A1 (en) * | 2006-12-19 | 2009-09-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Motion correction in a pet/mri hybrid imaging system |
US7778488B2 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2010-08-17 | Varian Medical Systems International Ag | Image deformation using multiple image regions |
AU2007351804B2 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2013-09-05 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using captured joint motion information |
US8934961B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2015-01-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Trackable diagnostic scope apparatus and methods of use |
US8920406B2 (en) | 2008-01-11 | 2014-12-30 | Oraya Therapeutics, Inc. | Device and assembly for positioning and stabilizing an eye |
US8363783B2 (en) | 2007-06-04 | 2013-01-29 | Oraya Therapeutics, Inc. | Method and device for ocular alignment and coupling of ocular structures |
US7959742B2 (en) * | 2007-07-11 | 2011-06-14 | Whirlpool Corporation | Outer support body for a drawer-type dishwasher |
US8027430B2 (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2011-09-27 | Varian Medical Systems International Ag | Systems and methods for adapting a movement model based on an image |
GB0714940D0 (en) * | 2007-08-01 | 2007-09-12 | Depuy Orthopaedie Gmbh | Image processing |
US8831302B2 (en) | 2007-08-17 | 2014-09-09 | Mohamed Rashwan Mahfouz | Implant design analysis suite |
US20090060366A1 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2009-03-05 | Riverain Medical Group, Llc | Object segmentation in images |
US8265949B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2012-09-11 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Customized patient surgical plan |
US8357111B2 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2013-01-22 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Method and system for designing patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instruments |
ES2802126T3 (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2021-01-15 | Depuy Products Inc | Patient Specific Custom Orthopedic Surgical Instrument |
US8065166B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2011-11-22 | Onemednet Corporation | Methods, systems, and devices for managing medical images and records |
US9760677B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2017-09-12 | Onemednet Corporation | Methods, systems, and devices for managing medical images and records |
US9171344B2 (en) | 2007-10-30 | 2015-10-27 | Onemednet Corporation | Methods, systems, and devices for managing medical images and records |
CN106037872B (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2020-01-07 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | System and method for determining a mechanical axis of a femur |
WO2014145691A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Otismed Corporation | Generation of a mating surface model for patient specific cutting guide based on anatomical model segmentation |
EP3272395B1 (en) | 2007-12-23 | 2019-07-17 | Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. | Devices for detecting, controlling, and predicting radiation delivery |
US7801271B2 (en) | 2007-12-23 | 2010-09-21 | Oraya Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for orthovoltage ocular radiotherapy and treatment planning |
GB0803514D0 (en) * | 2008-02-27 | 2008-04-02 | Depuy Int Ltd | Customised surgical apparatus |
EP2901969B1 (en) * | 2008-03-05 | 2018-07-04 | ConforMIS, Inc. | Method of making an edge-matched articular implant |
EP2105107A1 (en) * | 2008-03-27 | 2009-09-30 | BrainLAB AG | Method for calibrating axial medicinal or medical technical instruments |
TWI394554B (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2013-05-01 | Univ Ishou | Multi - media Full - size Stereoscopic Bone Surgery Preoperative Planning System |
US9020577B2 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2015-04-28 | Yale University | Systems, devices and methods for cartilage and bone grafting |
US9451809B2 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2016-09-27 | Nike, Inc. | Article of footwear with a marking system |
US9408432B2 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2016-08-09 | Nike, Inc. | Article of footwear with a marking system |
US8706188B2 (en) * | 2008-06-04 | 2014-04-22 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Automatic segmentation of articular cartilage from MRI |
JP5302595B2 (en) * | 2008-08-06 | 2013-10-02 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Inclination observation method and observation apparatus |
US8078440B2 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2011-12-13 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Operatively tuning implants for increased performance |
WO2010038138A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-08 | University Of Cape Town | Fluid flow assessment |
US8538102B2 (en) * | 2008-12-17 | 2013-09-17 | Synarc Inc | Optimised region of interest selection |
US8444564B2 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2013-05-21 | Jointvue, Llc | Noninvasive diagnostic system |
US8939917B2 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2015-01-27 | Imatx, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of bone and cartilage |
US8170641B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2012-05-01 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Method of imaging an extremity of a patient |
WO2010099360A1 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2010-09-02 | Mohamed Rashwan Mahfouz | Customized orthopaedic implants and related methods |
US9078755B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2015-07-14 | Zimmer, Inc. | Ethnic-specific orthopaedic implants and custom cutting jigs |
WO2010134295A1 (en) * | 2009-05-22 | 2010-11-25 | 株式会社島津製作所 | Method of removing the foil shadow of a synchronisation type grid, and radiation image pickup device employing the same |
DE102009028503B4 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2013-11-14 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Resection template for the resection of bones, method for producing such a resection template and operation set for performing knee joint surgery |
US20110082389A1 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-07 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus and method for assessing condition of articular cartilage |
GB0917524D0 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2009-11-25 | Cambridge Entpr Ltd | Image data processing systems |
CN102596037B (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2016-03-16 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | To the three dimensional analysis of the focus of pictorial data representation |
US9826942B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2017-11-28 | Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation | Correcting and reconstructing x-ray images using patient motion vectors extracted from marker positions in x-ray images |
US9082036B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2015-07-14 | Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation | Method for accurate sub-pixel localization of markers on X-ray images |
US9082177B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2015-07-14 | Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation | Method for tracking X-ray markers in serial CT projection images |
US8363919B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2013-01-29 | Imaging Sciences International Llc | Marker identification and processing in x-ray images |
US9082182B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2015-07-14 | Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation | Extracting patient motion vectors from marker positions in x-ray images |
US9170313B2 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2015-10-27 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Coronary magnetic resonance angiography with signal separation for water and fat |
US8632547B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2014-01-21 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Patient-specific osteotomy devices and methods |
US9066727B2 (en) | 2010-03-04 | 2015-06-30 | Materialise Nv | Patient-specific computed tomography guides |
US8693634B2 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2014-04-08 | Hologic Inc | System and method for generating enhanced density distribution in a three dimensional model of a structure for use in skeletal assessment using a limited number of two-dimensional views |
US20110268365A1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | Acer Incorporated | 3d hand posture recognition system and vision based hand posture recognition method thereof |
US9532732B2 (en) * | 2010-05-03 | 2017-01-03 | Emovi Inc. | Method and system for knee joint evaluation and diagnostic aid in normal and pathologic state |
US8974459B1 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2015-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Natural alignment knee instruments |
US8543611B1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2013-09-24 | Brian Mirtich | Managing dynamic state of a physical system |
US8768652B1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2014-07-01 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Managing dynamic state of a physical system |
US9201986B1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2015-12-01 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Managing dynamic state of a physical system |
US8738784B1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2014-05-27 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Managing dynamic state of a physical system |
US8380467B1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2013-02-19 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Representing geometry of a system in a modeling environment |
CN103379924B (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2015-07-29 | 凯斯西储大学 | Manufacture is added in the continuous number optical processing of implant |
US11865785B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2024-01-09 | H. David Dean | Continuous digital light processing additive manufacturing of implants |
US9271744B2 (en) | 2010-09-29 | 2016-03-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific guide for partial acetabular socket replacement |
US8495527B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2013-07-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Pattern recognition with edge correction for design based metrology |
US8429570B2 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2013-04-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Pattern recognition with edge correction for design based metrology |
US9968376B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2018-05-15 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific orthopedic instruments |
US8398611B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2013-03-19 | Depuy Mitek, Inc. | Compositions and methods for treating joints |
US8455436B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2013-06-04 | Depuy Mitek, Llc | Compositions and methods for treating joints |
US8524662B2 (en) | 2010-12-28 | 2013-09-03 | Depuy Mitek, Llc | Compositions and methods for treating joints |
US9241745B2 (en) | 2011-03-07 | 2016-01-26 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoral version guide |
US8306299B2 (en) * | 2011-03-25 | 2012-11-06 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Method for reconstructing motion-compensated magnetic resonance images from non-Cartesian k-space data |
US8715289B2 (en) | 2011-04-15 | 2014-05-06 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific numerically controlled instrument |
US9675400B2 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2017-06-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific fracture fixation instrumentation and method |
US8668700B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2014-03-11 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific convertible guides |
US8956364B2 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2015-02-17 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific partial knee guides and other instruments |
US8532807B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2013-09-10 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Pre-operative planning and manufacturing method for orthopedic procedure |
US9084618B2 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2015-07-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Drill guides for confirming alignment of patient-specific alignment guides |
EP2720631B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2022-01-26 | Smith&Nephew, Inc. | Surgical alignment using references |
US8623839B2 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2014-01-07 | Depuy Mitek, Llc | Compositions and methods for stabilized polysaccharide formulations |
US8764760B2 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2014-07-01 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific bone-cutting guidance instruments and methods |
US20130001121A1 (en) | 2011-07-01 | 2013-01-03 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Backup kit for a patient-specific arthroplasty kit assembly |
US8597365B2 (en) | 2011-08-04 | 2013-12-03 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific pelvic implants for acetabular reconstruction |
MY155595A (en) * | 2011-08-08 | 2015-11-13 | Inst Of Technology Petronas Sdn Bhd | Methodology and apparatus for early in vivo detection and grading of knee osteoarthritis |
US9066734B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2015-06-30 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac guides and associated methods |
US9295497B2 (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2016-03-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific sacroiliac and pedicle guides |
US9386993B2 (en) | 2011-09-29 | 2016-07-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific femoroacetabular impingement instruments and methods |
WO2013062848A1 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2013-05-02 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Patient-specific glenoid guides |
KR20130046337A (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2013-05-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Multi-view device and contol method thereof, display apparatus and contol method thereof, and display system |
US9554910B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2017-01-31 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide and implants |
US9451973B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-09-27 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient specific glenoid guide |
US9301812B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2016-04-05 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Methods for patient-specific shoulder arthroplasty |
IN2014MN01458A (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2015-04-17 | Materialise Nv | |
AU2013210797C1 (en) * | 2012-01-16 | 2018-01-25 | Emovi Inc. | Method and system for human joint treatment plan and personalized surgery planning using 3-D kinematics, fusion imaging and simulation |
US9237950B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2016-01-19 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Implant with patient-specific porous structure |
US9636229B2 (en) | 2012-09-20 | 2017-05-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Solid freeform fabrication of implant components |
US9218524B2 (en) * | 2012-12-06 | 2015-12-22 | Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. | Automatic spatial context based multi-object segmentation in 3D images |
US9204977B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-12-08 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
US9060788B2 (en) | 2012-12-11 | 2015-06-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific acetabular guide for anterior approach |
JP5982726B2 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2016-08-31 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Volume data analysis system and method |
US9839438B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid guide with a reusable guide holder |
US9579107B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-02-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Multi-point fit for patient specific guide |
US9498233B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-11-22 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc. | Universal acetabular guide and associated hardware |
US9826981B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Tangential fit of patient-specific guides |
US20160038291A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-02-11 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Process for creating unique patterns in bone for cartilage replacement |
US9517145B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Guide alignment system and method |
USD752222S1 (en) | 2013-05-14 | 2016-03-22 | Laboratoires Bodycad Inc. | Femoral prosthesis |
USD702349S1 (en) | 2013-05-14 | 2014-04-08 | Laboratories Bodycad Inc. | Tibial prosthesis |
US20150112349A1 (en) | 2013-10-21 | 2015-04-23 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Ligament Guide Registration |
KR101594994B1 (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2016-02-17 | 광주과학기술원 | Method and apparatus for generating 3-d knee joint image |
US10327848B2 (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2019-06-25 | Brainlab Ag | Method and apparatus for determining implant positions of two medical implant components forming a joint |
CA2936595C (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2022-06-21 | Eiffel Medtech Inc. | Method and system for the visual representation of the kinematics of a patient's joint and associated parameters |
WO2015117663A1 (en) * | 2014-02-07 | 2015-08-13 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Method and node for manufacturing a surgical kit for cartilage repair |
WO2015142781A1 (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2015-09-24 | Rmg, Inc. | Mobile based exercise and rehabilitation |
US10282488B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2019-05-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | HTO guide with optional guided ACL/PCL tunnels |
US9408616B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2016-08-09 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Humeral cut guide |
US9561040B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-02-07 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9839436B2 (en) | 2014-06-03 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific glenoid depth control |
US9833245B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-12-05 | Biomet Sports Medicine, Llc | Tibial tubercule osteotomy |
US9826994B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-11-28 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Adjustable glenoid pin insertion guide |
JP2016096889A (en) * | 2014-11-19 | 2016-05-30 | 株式会社東芝 | Image analysis apparatus, image analysis method and program |
US11432734B2 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2022-09-06 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled, Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | System and apparatus for securing knee joint with a load for magnetic resonance imaging |
US9682099B2 (en) | 2015-01-20 | 2017-06-20 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Compositions and methods for treating joints |
EP3273846A1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2018-01-31 | Consensus Orthopedics, Inc | Joint sensor system and method of operation thereof |
US11684260B2 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2023-06-27 | Tracpatch Health, Inc. | System and methods with user interfaces for monitoring physical therapy and rehabilitation |
US10582891B2 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2020-03-10 | Consensus Orthopedics, Inc. | System and methods for monitoring physical therapy and rehabilitation of joints |
US11272879B2 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2022-03-15 | Consensus Orthopedics, Inc. | Systems and methods using a wearable device for monitoring an orthopedic implant and rehabilitation |
US9820868B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2017-11-21 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Method and apparatus for a pin apparatus |
WO2016192759A2 (en) * | 2015-05-29 | 2016-12-08 | Brainlab Ag | Method for registering articulated anatomical structures |
DE102015110020B4 (en) * | 2015-06-23 | 2022-01-05 | Sicat Gmbh & Co. Kg | Process for the representation of anatomical conditions in the temporomandibular joint |
US10568647B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2020-02-25 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
US10226262B2 (en) | 2015-06-25 | 2019-03-12 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patient-specific humeral guide designs |
WO2017007518A1 (en) * | 2015-07-07 | 2017-01-12 | Obma Padraic R | Noninvasive medical monitoring device, system and method |
EP3181050B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2020-02-12 | Episurf IP Management AB | System and method for creating a decision support material indicating damage to an anatomical joint |
US11526988B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2022-12-13 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | System and method for creating a decision support material indicating damage to an anatomical joint |
DE102016200202B4 (en) * | 2016-01-11 | 2023-07-13 | Siemens Healthcare Gmbh | Method for the automatic determination of joint load information, image recording device, patient couch and computer program |
US10980419B2 (en) * | 2016-11-07 | 2021-04-20 | Orthodx Inc | Systems and methods for monitoring implantable devices for detection of implant failure utilizing wireless in vivo micro sensors |
USD808524S1 (en) | 2016-11-29 | 2018-01-23 | Laboratoires Bodycad Inc. | Femoral implant |
WO2018113984A1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | System and method for optimizing an implant position in an anatomical joint |
WO2018115469A1 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2018-06-28 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | System and method for optimizing an implant position in an anatomical joint |
US10638970B2 (en) | 2017-03-08 | 2020-05-05 | Strive Orthopedics, Inc | Method for identifying human joint characteristics |
US10722310B2 (en) | 2017-03-13 | 2020-07-28 | Zimmer Biomet CMF and Thoracic, LLC | Virtual surgery planning system and method |
US11010506B2 (en) * | 2017-03-28 | 2021-05-18 | Hexagon Technology Center Gmbh | Method for designing a die surface |
JP6712965B2 (en) * | 2017-04-25 | 2020-06-24 | 京セラ株式会社 | Electronic device, generation method, and generation system |
US11250561B2 (en) | 2017-06-16 | 2022-02-15 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Determination and visualization of damage to an anatomical joint |
US11229484B2 (en) * | 2018-01-26 | 2022-01-25 | Mit Entwicklungs Gmbh | Patient-specific arthroplasty system |
US11051829B2 (en) | 2018-06-26 | 2021-07-06 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Customized patient-specific orthopaedic surgical instrument |
CN109165447B (en) * | 2018-08-27 | 2022-12-13 | 武汉理工大学 | Method and system for evaluating wall thickness loss of space steel pipe structure |
US11645749B2 (en) | 2018-12-14 | 2023-05-09 | Episurf Ip-Management Ab | Determination and visualization of damage to an anatomical joint |
CN111744056B (en) * | 2019-03-29 | 2022-06-21 | 北京纳通医学科技研究院有限公司 | Mussel protein modified acellular cartilage material and preparation method and application thereof |
US11633879B2 (en) * | 2020-01-21 | 2023-04-25 | United States Government As Represented By The Department Of Veterans Affairs | Anatomic tissue-engineered osteochondral implant and method for fabrication thereof |
US10863928B1 (en) | 2020-01-28 | 2020-12-15 | Consensus Orthopedics, Inc. | System and methods for monitoring the spine, balance, gait, or posture of a patient |
CN111710416A (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2020-09-25 | 北京爱康宜诚医疗器材有限公司 | Treatment scheme selection method and device |
CN113814974B (en) * | 2021-09-14 | 2022-08-12 | 北京精密机电控制设备研究所 | Six-joint mechanical arm motion control debugging method |
Citations (491)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3314420A (en) | 1961-10-23 | 1967-04-18 | Haeger Potteries Inc | Prosthetic parts and methods of making the same |
US3605123A (en) | 1969-04-29 | 1971-09-20 | Melpar Inc | Bone implant |
US3694820A (en) | 1969-08-25 | 1972-10-03 | Nat Res Dev | Prosthetic shoulder joint |
US3798679A (en) | 1971-07-09 | 1974-03-26 | Ewald Frederick | Joint prostheses |
US3808606A (en) | 1972-02-22 | 1974-05-07 | R Tronzo | Bone implant with porous exterior surface |
US3816855A (en) | 1971-06-01 | 1974-06-18 | Nat Res Dev | Knee joint prosthesis |
US3843975A (en) | 1973-04-09 | 1974-10-29 | R Tronzo | Prosthesis for femoral shaft |
US3852830A (en) | 1973-02-15 | 1974-12-10 | Richards Mfg Co | Knee prosthesis |
US3855638A (en) | 1970-06-04 | 1974-12-24 | Ontario Research Foundation | Surgical prosthetic device with porous metal coating |
US3938198A (en) | 1970-08-04 | 1976-02-17 | Cutter Laboratories, Inc. | Hip joint prosthesis |
GB1451283A (en) | 1973-02-10 | 1976-09-29 | Friedrichsfeld Gmbh | Joint endoprostheses |
US3987499A (en) | 1973-08-10 | 1976-10-26 | Sybron Corporation | Surgical implant and method for its production |
US3991425A (en) | 1975-11-20 | 1976-11-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Prosthetic bone joint devices |
US4052753A (en) | 1976-08-02 | 1977-10-11 | Dedo Richard G | Knee spacer and method of reforming sliding body surfaces |
US4055862A (en) | 1976-01-23 | 1977-11-01 | Zimmer Usa, Inc. | Human body implant of graphitic carbon fiber reinforced ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene |
US4085466A (en) | 1974-11-18 | 1978-04-25 | National Research Development Corporation | Prosthetic joint device |
US4098626A (en) | 1976-11-15 | 1978-07-04 | Thiokol Corporation | Hydroxy terminated polybutadiene based polyurethane bound propellant grains |
US4164793A (en) | 1978-04-26 | 1979-08-21 | Swanson Alfred B | Lunate implant |
US4178641A (en) | 1977-01-26 | 1979-12-18 | Schutt and Grundei O.H.G. | Knee-joint-endoprothese |
US4203444A (en) | 1977-11-07 | 1980-05-20 | Dyonics, Inc. | Surgical instrument suitable for closed surgery such as of the knee |
US4213816A (en) | 1978-06-12 | 1980-07-22 | Glasrock Products, Inc. | Method for bonding porous coating to rigid structural member |
US4219893A (en) | 1977-09-01 | 1980-09-02 | United States Surgical Corporation | Prosthetic knee joint |
JPS5683343U (en) | 1979-11-30 | 1981-07-04 | ||
US4280231A (en) | 1979-06-14 | 1981-07-28 | Swanson Alfred B | Elbow prosthesis |
US4309778A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1982-01-12 | Biomedical Engineering Corp. | New Jersey meniscal bearing knee replacement |
US4340978A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1982-07-27 | Biomedical Engineering Corp. | New Jersey meniscal bearing knee replacement |
US4344193A (en) | 1980-11-28 | 1982-08-17 | Kenny Charles H | Meniscus prosthesis |
US4364389A (en) | 1980-03-19 | 1982-12-21 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Instrument for holding and inserting the tibia plate for an endo-knee prosthesis having sliding surfaces |
US4368040A (en) | 1981-06-01 | 1983-01-11 | Ipco Corporation | Dental impression tray for forming a dental prosthesis in situ |
US4436684A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1984-03-13 | Contour Med Partners, Ltd. | Method of forming implantable prostheses for reconstructive surgery |
US4459985A (en) | 1983-03-04 | 1984-07-17 | Howmedica Inc. | Tibial prosthesis extractor and method for extracting a tibial implant |
US4501266A (en) | 1983-03-04 | 1985-02-26 | Biomet, Inc. | Knee distraction device |
US4502161A (en) | 1981-09-21 | 1985-03-05 | Wall W H | Prosthetic meniscus for the repair of joints |
US4575805A (en) | 1980-12-24 | 1986-03-11 | Moermann Werner H | Method and apparatus for the fabrication of custom-shaped implants |
US4586496A (en) | 1984-03-05 | 1986-05-06 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Surgical chisel |
US4594380A (en) | 1985-05-01 | 1986-06-10 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Elastomeric controlled release formulation and article comprising same |
US4601290A (en) | 1983-10-11 | 1986-07-22 | Cabot Medical Corporation | Surgical instrument for cutting body tissue from a body area having a restricted space |
US4609551A (en) | 1984-03-20 | 1986-09-02 | Arnold Caplan | Process of and material for stimulating growth of cartilage and bony tissue at anatomical sites |
JPS61247448A (en) | 1985-04-25 | 1986-11-04 | 日石三菱株式会社 | Production of artificial joint |
DE3516743A1 (en) | 1985-05-09 | 1986-11-13 | orthoplant Endoprothetik GmbH, 2800 Bremen | Endoprosthesis for a femoral head |
US4627853A (en) | 1985-05-29 | 1986-12-09 | American Hospital Supply Corporation | Method of producing prostheses for replacement of articular cartilage and prostheses so produced |
US4631676A (en) | 1983-05-25 | 1986-12-23 | Hospital For Joint Diseases Or | Computerized video gait and motion analysis system and method |
US4655227A (en) | 1985-06-06 | 1987-04-07 | Diagnospine Research Inc. | Equipment for the detection of mechanical injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, using a mathematical model |
FR2589720A1 (en) | 1985-11-14 | 1987-05-15 | Aubaniac Jean | KNEE JOINT PROSTHETIC ASSEMBLY |
US4673409A (en) | 1984-04-25 | 1987-06-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Implant with attachment surface |
US4699156A (en) | 1985-06-06 | 1987-10-13 | Diagnospine Research Inc. | Non invasive method and equipment for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumar spine of a patient |
CN86209787U (en) | 1986-11-29 | 1987-11-18 | 于也宽 | Sleeve-shaped artificial elbow joint |
US4714472A (en) | 1987-01-20 | 1987-12-22 | Osteonics Corp. | Knee prosthesis with accommodation for angular misalignment |
US4714474A (en) | 1986-05-12 | 1987-12-22 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Tibial knee joint prosthesis with removable articulating surface insert |
US4721104A (en) | 1985-12-02 | 1988-01-26 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Femoral surface shaping apparatus for posterior-stabilized knee implants |
US4769040A (en) | 1986-11-18 | 1988-09-06 | Queen's University At Kingston | Tibial prosthesis |
US4813436A (en) | 1987-07-30 | 1989-03-21 | Human Performance Technologies, Inc. | Motion analysis system employing various operating modes |
US4822365A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1989-04-18 | Walker Peter S | Method of design of human joint prosthesis |
US4823807A (en) | 1988-02-11 | 1989-04-25 | Board Of Regents, Univ. Of Texas System | Device for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of articular and periarticular pathology |
US4841975A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1989-06-27 | Cemax, Inc. | Preoperative planning of bone cuts and joint replacement using radiant energy scan imaging |
US4846835A (en) | 1987-06-15 | 1989-07-11 | Grande Daniel A | Technique for healing lesions in cartilage |
US4865607A (en) | 1985-10-02 | 1989-09-12 | Ulrich Witzel | Tibial plate for a knee-joint endoprosthesis |
JPH01249049A (en) | 1988-03-30 | 1989-10-04 | Kyocera Corp | Artificial knee joint |
US4872452A (en) | 1989-01-09 | 1989-10-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Bone rasp |
EP0337901A1 (en) | 1988-04-01 | 1989-10-18 | Christian Broc | Mounting device especially for the tibial and/or femoral part of a two-piece knee joint prosthesis |
US4880429A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1989-11-14 | Stone Kevin R | Prosthetic meniscus |
US4888021A (en) | 1988-02-02 | 1989-12-19 | Joint Medical Products Corporation | Knee and patellar prosthesis |
US4936862A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1990-06-26 | Walker Peter S | Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis |
US4944757A (en) | 1988-11-07 | 1990-07-31 | Martinez David M | Modulator knee prosthesis system |
WO1990009769A1 (en) | 1989-03-02 | 1990-09-07 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic meniscus |
US5002547A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1991-03-26 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
DE3933459A1 (en) | 1989-10-06 | 1991-04-18 | Karsten Dipl Ing Reumann | Biomedical implant production equipment - uses computer tomographic image to generate implant profile for component mfr. |
US5021061A (en) | 1990-09-26 | 1991-06-04 | Queen's University At Kingston | Prosthetic patello-femoral joint |
US5041138A (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1991-08-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture |
US5059216A (en) | 1989-09-29 | 1991-10-22 | Winters Thomas F | Knee joint replacement apparatus |
US5067964A (en) | 1989-12-13 | 1991-11-26 | Stryker Corporation | Articular surface repair |
US5099859A (en) | 1988-12-06 | 1992-03-31 | Bell Gene D | Method and apparatus for comparative analysis of videofluoroscopic joint motion |
US5108452A (en) | 1989-02-08 | 1992-04-28 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Modular hip prosthesis |
US5123927A (en) | 1990-12-05 | 1992-06-23 | University Of British Columbia | Method and apparatus for antibiotic knee prothesis |
US5129908A (en) | 1990-01-23 | 1992-07-14 | Petersen Thomas D | Method and instruments for resection of the patella |
US5133759A (en) | 1991-05-24 | 1992-07-28 | Turner Richard H | Asymmetrical femoral condye total knee arthroplasty prosthesis |
US5147365A (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1992-09-15 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Patellar osteotomy guide |
US5150304A (en) | 1989-10-28 | 1992-09-22 | Metalpraecis Berchem+Schaberg Gesellschaft Fur Metallformgebung Mbh | Method of making an implantable joint prosthesis |
US5154178A (en) | 1990-10-09 | 1992-10-13 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for obtaining in-vivo nmr data from a moving subject |
US5154717A (en) | 1988-04-26 | 1992-10-13 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
US5162430A (en) | 1988-11-21 | 1992-11-10 | Collagen Corporation | Collagen-polymer conjugates |
US5171322A (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1992-12-15 | Kenny Charles H | Stabilized meniscus prosthesis |
EP0528080A1 (en) | 1989-12-13 | 1993-02-24 | Stryker Corporation | Articular cartilage repair piece |
US5197985A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1993-03-30 | Caplan Arnold I | Method for enhancing the implantation and differentiation of marrow-derived mesenchymal cells |
WO1993004710A3 (en) | 1991-09-06 | 1993-04-15 | Shaw Robert F | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone |
US5206023A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1993-04-27 | Robert F. Shaw | Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage |
WO1993009819A1 (en) | 1991-11-18 | 1993-05-27 | Michael Braden | The use of biomaterials for tissue repair |
US5226914A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1993-07-13 | Caplan Arnold I | Method for treating connective tissue disorders |
JPH05184612A (en) | 1991-06-17 | 1993-07-27 | Andre Bahler | Artificial joint with which natural joint is replaced, particularly artificial knee joint |
US5234433A (en) | 1989-09-26 | 1993-08-10 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
US5245282A (en) | 1991-06-28 | 1993-09-14 | University Of Virginia Alumni Patents Foundation | Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging |
US5246013A (en) | 1989-12-22 | 1993-09-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Probe, system and method for detecting cartilage degeneration |
US5246530A (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1993-09-21 | Dynamet Incorporated | Method of producing porous metal surface |
US5250050A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1993-10-05 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US5258032A (en) | 1992-04-03 | 1993-11-02 | Bertin Kim C | Knee prosthesis provisional apparatus and resection guide and method of use in knee replacement surgery |
WO1993025157A1 (en) | 1992-06-18 | 1993-12-23 | Klaus Radermacher | Template for treatment tools and method for the treatment of osseous structures |
US5274565A (en) | 1990-10-03 | 1993-12-28 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Process for making custom joint replacements |
US5288797A (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1994-02-22 | Tremco Ltd. | Moisture curable polyurethane composition |
US5291401A (en) | 1991-11-15 | 1994-03-01 | Telescan, Limited | Teleradiology system |
US5303148A (en) | 1987-11-27 | 1994-04-12 | Picker International, Inc. | Voice actuated volume image controller and display controller |
US5306311A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1994-04-26 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic articular cartilage |
US5306307A (en) | 1991-07-22 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant |
US5314482A (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1994-05-24 | British Technology Group Ltd. | Femoral component, tool and method |
US5314478A (en) | 1991-03-29 | 1994-05-24 | Kyocera Corporation | Artificial bone connection prosthesis |
US5320102A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1994-06-14 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Method for diagnosing proteoglycan deficiency in cartilage based on magnetic resonance image (MRI) |
US5326365A (en) | 1992-04-10 | 1994-07-05 | Alvine Franklin G | Ankle implant |
US5329924A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 1994-07-19 | Apogee Medical Products, Inc. | Sequential imaging apparatus |
US5344459A (en) | 1991-12-03 | 1994-09-06 | Swartz Stephen J | Arthroscopically implantable prosthesis |
US5360446A (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1994-11-01 | Zimmer, Inc. | Interactive prosthesis design system for implantable prosthesis |
US5365996A (en) | 1992-06-10 | 1994-11-22 | Amei Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for making customized fixation devices |
US5380332A (en) | 1992-11-16 | 1995-01-10 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | System and method for profiling an anatomic patella |
US5387216A (en) | 1993-02-18 | 1995-02-07 | Thornhill; Thomas S. | Intramedullary based instrument systems for total knee revision |
US5413116A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1995-05-09 | Bioresearch | Method and apparatus for diagnosing joints |
US5423828A (en) | 1992-05-14 | 1995-06-13 | Bentwood Place, Inc. | Method and apparatus for simplifying prosthetic joint replacements |
US5427099A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1995-06-27 | Adams; Timothy L. | Marker for magnetic resonance imaging |
US5433215A (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1995-07-18 | Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System | Arthroscopic indenter |
US5445152A (en) | 1992-11-23 | 1995-08-29 | Resonex Holding Company | Kinematic device for producing precise incremental flexing of the knee |
JPH07236648A (en) | 1994-03-01 | 1995-09-12 | Sankyo Seiki Mfg Co Ltd | Artificial bone material and its processing method |
WO1995027450A1 (en) | 1994-04-11 | 1995-10-19 | Corin Medical Limited | Unicompartmental knee prosthesis________________________________ |
WO1995028688A1 (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1995-10-26 | Materialise, Naamloze Vennootschap | Method for making a perfected medical model on the basis of digital image information of a part of the body |
WO1995030390A1 (en) | 1994-05-04 | 1995-11-16 | Ysebaert S.A. | Knee prosthesis with a movable meniscus |
WO1995032623A1 (en) | 1994-05-27 | 1995-12-07 | Regen Biologics, Inc. | Meniscal augmentation device |
US5474559A (en) | 1993-07-06 | 1995-12-12 | Zimmer, Inc. | Femoral milling instrumentation for use in total knee arthroplasty with optional cutting guide attachment |
US5478739A (en) | 1992-10-23 | 1995-12-26 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Three-dimensional stromal cell and tissue culture system |
US5480430A (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1996-01-02 | Mcghan Medical Corporation | Shape-retaining shell for a fluid filled prosthesis |
US5501687A (en) | 1992-11-20 | 1996-03-26 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | Body for distributing bone cement for the anchoring of implants |
US5503162A (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1996-04-02 | Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System | Arthroscopic cartilage evaluator and method for using the same |
EP0704193A1 (en) | 1994-09-27 | 1996-04-03 | Schuster, Luis, Dr.med. | Process for making an endoprosthesis suited for knee joint replacement |
US5507820A (en) | 1992-12-14 | 1996-04-16 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Fixed bearing joint endoprosthesis |
US5510121A (en) | 1988-11-21 | 1996-04-23 | Rhee; Woonza M. | Glycosaminoglycan-synthetic polymer conjugates |
US5522900A (en) | 1993-12-17 | 1996-06-04 | Avanta Orthopaedics | Prosthetic joint and method of manufacture |
US5523843A (en) | 1990-07-09 | 1996-06-04 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Position detecting system |
JPH08173465A (en) | 1994-12-26 | 1996-07-09 | Kyocera Corp | Artificial knee joint |
US5541515A (en) | 1994-01-11 | 1996-07-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | MRI joint imaging system |
US5540696A (en) | 1995-01-06 | 1996-07-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Instrumentation for use in orthopaedic surgery |
US5542947A (en) | 1995-05-12 | 1996-08-06 | Huwmedica Inc. | Slotted patella resection guide and stylus |
WO1996024302A1 (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1996-08-15 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Surgical implantation of cartilage repair unit |
US5554190A (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1996-09-10 | Draenert; Klaus | Prosthesis component and a method of producing it |
US5556432A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1996-09-17 | Joachim Theusner | Artificial joint |
WO1996025123A3 (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1996-09-26 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc | Trial knee prosthesis and bone preparation system |
US5560096A (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1996-10-01 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Method of manufacturing femoral knee implant |
GB2291355B (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1996-10-02 | British Tech Group | Endoprosthetic knee joint device |
US5564437A (en) | 1992-12-15 | 1996-10-15 | Universite Joseph Fourier | Method and system for determining the fixation point on the femur of a crossed ligament of the knee |
US5571191A (en) | 1995-03-16 | 1996-11-05 | Fitz; William R. | Artificial facet joint |
US5575793A (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1996-11-19 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Patella clamp apparatus |
US5578037A (en) | 1994-11-14 | 1996-11-26 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Surgical guide for femoral resection |
US5591165A (en) | 1992-11-09 | 1997-01-07 | Sofamor, S.N.C. | Apparatus and method for spinal fixation and correction of spinal deformities |
US5593450A (en) | 1995-02-27 | 1997-01-14 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Oval domed shaped patella prosthesis |
US5597379A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1997-01-28 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for femoral resection alignment |
US5601563A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1997-02-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic milling template with attachable cutting guide |
US5609640A (en) | 1991-07-05 | 1997-03-11 | Johnson; David P. | Patella prostheses |
US5616146A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1997-04-01 | Murray; William M. | Method and apparatus for machining bone to fit an orthopedic surgical implant |
US5630820A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-05-20 | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. | Surgical bicompartmental tensiometer for revision knee surgery |
EP0600806B1 (en) | 1992-12-01 | 1997-06-04 | Medinov Sa | Tricompartimental knee prosthesis |
EP0780090A1 (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1997-06-25 | JOHNSON & JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL Inc. | Knee prosthesis implantation system with universal handle |
US5649929A (en) | 1995-07-10 | 1997-07-22 | Callaway; George Hadley | Knee joint flexion-gap distraction device |
EP0626156B1 (en) | 1991-02-04 | 1997-07-23 | WALKER, Peter Stanley, The Institute of Orthopaedics Department of Biomedical Engineering | Prosthesis for knee replacement |
WO1997026847A1 (en) | 1996-01-23 | 1997-07-31 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Articulating joint repair |
WO1997027885A1 (en) | 1996-01-29 | 1997-08-07 | John Michael Lee | Preparation of biological material for implants |
JPH09206322A (en) | 1996-02-02 | 1997-08-12 | Naohide Tomita | Artificial knee articulation |
US5671741A (en) | 1995-08-04 | 1997-09-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Magnetic resonance imaging technique for tissue characterization |
WO1997038676A1 (en) | 1996-04-16 | 1997-10-23 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Bioerodable polymeric adhesives for tissue repair |
US5681354A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-10-28 | Board Of Regents, University Of Colorado | Asymmetrical femoral component for knee prosthesis |
US5683468A (en) | 1995-03-13 | 1997-11-04 | Pappas; Michael J. | Mobile bearing total joint replacement |
US5683466A (en) | 1996-03-26 | 1997-11-04 | Vitale; Glenn C. | Joint surface replacement system |
US5682886A (en) | 1995-12-26 | 1997-11-04 | Musculographics Inc | Computer-assisted surgical system |
US5684562A (en) | 1994-12-12 | 1997-11-04 | Nidek Company, Ltd. | Ophthalmic apparatus |
US5687210A (en) | 1993-05-28 | 1997-11-11 | Europ Scan | Method and device for determining the attenuation function of an object with respect to the transmission of a reference material thickness |
WO1997046665A1 (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1997-12-11 | Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. | Method for making cartilage and implants |
US5702463A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-12-30 | Smith & Nephew Inc. | Tibial prosthesis with polymeric liner and liner insertion/removal instrument |
FR2740326B1 (en) | 1995-10-31 | 1998-02-20 | Osteal Medical Lab | FEMORO-PATELLAR PROSTHESIS OF THE KNEE |
US5723331A (en) | 1994-05-05 | 1998-03-03 | Genzyme Corporation | Methods and compositions for the repair of articular cartilage defects in mammals |
US5728162A (en) | 1993-01-28 | 1998-03-17 | Board Of Regents Of University Of Colorado | Asymmetric condylar and trochlear femoral knee component |
WO1998012994A1 (en) | 1996-09-27 | 1998-04-02 | Ingvar Eriksson | Orthopedic device |
WO1998008469A3 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1998-04-23 | Vts Holdings Ltd | Method, instruments and kit for autologous transplantation |
US5749874A (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1998-05-12 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit and method of assembling same |
US5749362A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1998-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of creating an image of an anatomical feature where the feature is within a patient's body |
US5749876A (en) | 1994-07-12 | 1998-05-12 | Biomicron | Apparatus for resection of the condyles of the knee for putting a prosthesis into place, and method for putting such an apparatus into position |
WO1998020816A1 (en) | 1996-11-13 | 1998-05-22 | Theusner, Joachim | Artificial joint, in particular endoprosthesis for replacing natural joints |
US5759205A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1998-06-02 | Brown University Research Foundation | Negatively charged polymeric electret implant |
US5769899A (en) | 1994-08-12 | 1998-06-23 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
US5772595A (en) | 1993-04-06 | 1998-06-30 | Fonar Corporation | Multipositional MRI for kinematic studies of movable joints |
US5779651A (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-07-14 | Bio Syntech | Medical apparatus for the diagnosis of cartilage degeneration via spatial mapping of compression-induced electrical potentials |
WO1998030617A1 (en) | 1997-01-11 | 1998-07-16 | Smith & Nephew Plc | Hydrogels |
WO1998032384A1 (en) | 1997-01-28 | 1998-07-30 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Method and apparatus for femoral resection |
US5824102A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1998-10-20 | Buscayret; Christian | Total knee prosthesis |
US5824085A (en) | 1996-09-30 | 1998-10-20 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | System and method for cavity generation for surgical planning and initial placement of a bone prosthesis |
US5827289A (en) | 1994-01-26 | 1998-10-27 | Reiley; Mark A. | Inflatable device for use in surgical protocols relating to treatment of fractured or diseased bones |
US5832422A (en) | 1995-04-11 | 1998-11-03 | Wiedenhoefer; Curt | Measuring device |
US5835619A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Teijin Limited | Method of processing a sectional image of a sample bone including a cortical bone portion and a cancellous bone portion |
WO1998052498A1 (en) | 1997-05-23 | 1998-11-26 | Volkmar Jansson | Replacement structures for bones and cartilage |
US5842477A (en) | 1996-02-21 | 1998-12-01 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Method for repairing cartilage |
US5847804A (en) | 1994-10-28 | 1998-12-08 | Eyesys Technologies, Inc. | Multi-camera corneal analysis system |
US5853746A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1998-12-29 | Robert Francis Shaw | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone using functional barrier |
US5861175A (en) | 1996-03-15 | 1999-01-19 | Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. | Use of fluorocarbons for diagnosis and treatment of articular disorders |
WO1999002654A1 (en) | 1997-07-14 | 1999-01-21 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Isolation of bone and cartilage precursor cells |
JPH1119104A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 1999-01-26 | Kazumasa Itokazu | Artificial bone replenishing material for knee tibia round part sinking fracture |
GB2304051B (en) | 1995-08-09 | 1999-01-27 | Corin Medical Ltd | A knee prosthesis |
CN2305966Y (en) | 1997-06-09 | 1999-02-03 | 山东省文登整骨医院 | Artificial body for generating bone and joint |
US5871546A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1999-02-16 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Femoral component condyle design for knee prosthesis |
US5871540A (en) | 1996-07-30 | 1999-02-16 | Osteonics Corp. | Patellar implant component and method |
WO1999008598A1 (en) | 1997-08-19 | 1999-02-25 | Mendlein John D | Ultrasonic transmission films and devices, particularly for hygienic transducer surfaces |
WO1999008728A1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 1999-02-25 | Sulzer Innotec Ag | Composition and device for in vivo cartilage repair |
US5880976A (en) | 1997-02-21 | 1999-03-09 | Carnegie Mellon University | Apparatus and method for facilitating the implantation of artificial components in joints |
US5885298A (en) | 1994-02-23 | 1999-03-23 | Biomet, Inc. | Patellar clamp and reamer with adjustable stop |
US5885296A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 1999-03-23 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides with removable housings for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US5895428A (en) | 1996-11-01 | 1999-04-20 | Berry; Don | Load bearing spinal joint implant |
US5900245A (en) | 1996-03-22 | 1999-05-04 | Focal, Inc. | Compliant tissue sealants |
US5906934A (en) | 1995-03-14 | 1999-05-25 | Morphogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair |
US5911723A (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1999-06-15 | Howmedice International Inc. | Surgical apparatus |
US5913821A (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1999-06-22 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Diagnostic method and apparatus for assessing canine hip dysplasia |
US5916220A (en) | 1998-02-02 | 1999-06-29 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guide and method to accommodate different-sized implants |
US5928945A (en) | 1996-11-20 | 1999-07-27 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Application of shear flow stress to chondrocytes or chondrocyte stem cells to produce cartilage |
US5939323A (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1999-08-17 | Brown University | Hyaluronan based biodegradable scaffolds for tissue repair |
WO1999042061A1 (en) | 1998-02-17 | 1999-08-26 | Krehl Frieder W | Method for guiding external air from the outside through a window in a forced ventilated space and window for the same |
WO1999047186A1 (en) | 1998-03-18 | 1999-09-23 | University Of Pittsburgh | Chitosan-based composite materials containing glycosaminoglycan for cartilage repair |
US5961454A (en) | 1993-08-13 | 1999-10-05 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital | Fusion of anatomical data sets into stereotactic coordinates |
JPH11276510A (en) | 1998-03-31 | 1999-10-12 | Kyocera Corp | Surface modifying bone prothesis member and method for manufacturing the same |
WO1999051719A1 (en) | 1998-04-07 | 1999-10-14 | Tissue Engineering, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for the conditioning of cartilage replacement tissue |
US5968051A (en) | 1995-07-27 | 1999-10-19 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Patella clamping device |
US5972385A (en) | 1997-01-15 | 1999-10-26 | Orquest, Inc. | Collagen-polysaccharide matrix for bone and cartilage repair |
WO1999056674A1 (en) | 1998-05-01 | 1999-11-11 | Weiss James M | Hip replacement methods and apparatus |
US6001895A (en) | 1993-03-22 | 1999-12-14 | Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. | Composite surgical material |
US6007537A (en) | 1998-06-15 | 1999-12-28 | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. | Nested cutting block |
US6010509A (en) | 1998-07-01 | 2000-01-04 | The Dana Center For Orthopaedic Implants | Patella resection drill and prosthesis implantation device |
US6013103A (en) | 1996-07-11 | 2000-01-11 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Medial pivot knee prosthesis |
WO2000015153A1 (en) | 1998-09-10 | 2000-03-23 | Mansmann Kevin A | Arthroscopic replacement of cartilage using flexible inflatable envelopes |
US6044289A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 2000-03-28 | Bonutti; Peter M. | Apparatus and method for controlling bending of a joint of a patient during imaging |
US6046379A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2000-04-04 | Stone; Kevin R. | Meniscal xenografts |
US6056754A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2000-05-02 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for patella resection and guide handle |
US6056756A (en) | 1998-08-11 | 2000-05-02 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Femoral tensing and sizing device |
US6057927A (en) | 1998-02-25 | 2000-05-02 | American Iron And Steel Institute | Laser-ultrasound spectroscopy apparatus and method with detection of shear resonances for measuring anisotropy, thickness, and other properties |
WO2000009179A3 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2000-06-02 | Verigen Transplantation Serv | Methods, instruments and materials for chondrocyte cell transplantation |
US6074352A (en) | 1998-03-26 | 2000-06-13 | Brigham And Women's Hospital | Method for the treatment of joint diseases characterized by unwanted pannus |
US6078680A (en) | 1997-07-25 | 2000-06-20 | Arch Development Corporation | Method, apparatus, and storage medium for detection of nodules in biological tissue using wavelet snakes to characterize features in radiographic images |
US6081577A (en) | 1998-07-24 | 2000-06-27 | Wake Forest University | Method and system for creating task-dependent three-dimensional images |
US6082364A (en) | 1997-12-15 | 2000-07-04 | Musculoskeletal Development Enterprises, Llc | Pluripotential bone marrow cell line and methods of using the same |
US6090144A (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2000-07-18 | Letot; Patrick | Synthetic knee system |
US6093204A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2000-07-25 | Crosscart, Inc. | Meniscal heterografts |
US6102955A (en) | 1995-01-19 | 2000-08-15 | Mendes; David | Surgical method, surgical tool and artificial implants for repairing knee joints |
US6106529A (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2000-08-22 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Epicondylar axis referencing drill guide |
US6110209A (en) | 1997-08-07 | 2000-08-29 | Stone; Kevin R. | Method and paste for articular cartilage transplantation |
US6112109A (en) | 1993-09-10 | 2000-08-29 | The University Of Queensland | Constructive modelling of articles |
US6120541A (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2000-09-19 | Johnson; Lanny L. | Apparatus for use in grafting articular cartilage |
US6126690A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2000-10-03 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Anatomically correct prosthesis and method and apparatus for manufacturing prosthesis |
WO2000059411A1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2000-10-12 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
WO2000035346A3 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-10-26 | Univ Stanford | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US6139578A (en) | 1995-05-19 | 2000-10-31 | Etex Corporation | Preparation of cell seeded ceramic compositions |
US6146422A (en) | 1999-01-25 | 2000-11-14 | Lawson; Kevin Jon | Prosthetic nucleus replacement for surgical reconstruction of intervertebral discs and treatment method |
WO2000068749A1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2000-11-16 | 3Di Gmbh | Method for generating patient-specific implants |
US6151521A (en) | 1997-11-19 | 2000-11-21 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Medical support system |
US6156069A (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2000-12-05 | Amstutz; Harlan C. | Precision hip joint replacement method |
US6161080A (en) | 1997-11-17 | 2000-12-12 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Three dimensional multibody modeling of anatomical joints |
WO2000048550A3 (en) | 1999-02-16 | 2000-12-14 | Sulzer Biolog Inc | Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage lesions |
DE19926083A1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2000-12-14 | Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg | Biological joint construct |
US6165221A (en) | 1996-11-14 | 2000-12-26 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Implant |
US6171340B1 (en) | 1998-02-27 | 2001-01-09 | Mcdowell Charles L. | Method and device for regenerating cartilage in articulating joints |
US6175655B1 (en) | 1996-09-19 | 2001-01-16 | Integrated Medical Systems, Inc. | Medical imaging system for displaying, manipulating and analyzing three-dimensional images |
US6178225B1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-01-23 | Edge Medical Devices Ltd. | System and method for management of X-ray imaging facilities |
US6197064B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2001-03-06 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Prosthetic implant |
GB2348373B (en) | 1999-03-09 | 2001-03-14 | Corin Medical Ltd | A knee prosthesis |
WO2001017463A1 (en) | 1999-09-10 | 2001-03-15 | Mansmann Kevin A | Improved resorbable scaffolds to promote cartilage regeneration |
US6203546B1 (en) | 1999-07-27 | 2001-03-20 | Macmahon Edward B | Method and apparatus for medial tibial osteotomy |
US6203576B1 (en) | 1996-12-09 | 2001-03-20 | Groupe Controle Dedienne Gcd Societe De Droit Francais | Complete knee joint prosthesis |
US6205411B1 (en) | 1997-02-21 | 2001-03-20 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-assisted surgery planner and intra-operative guidance system |
US6206927B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2001-03-27 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prothesis |
US6219571B1 (en) | 1998-04-06 | 2001-04-17 | Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Magnetic resonance imaging using driven equilibrium fourier transform |
US6224632B1 (en) | 1994-10-27 | 2001-05-01 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Prosthesis fixturing device |
US6228116B1 (en) | 1987-12-22 | 2001-05-08 | Walter J. Ledergerber | Tissue expander |
WO2001035968A1 (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2001-05-25 | Children's Medical Center Corporation | Methods for inducing chondrogenesis and producing de novo cartilage in vitro |
US6249692B1 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2001-06-19 | The Research Foundation Of City University Of New York | Method for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis |
US6251143B1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-06-26 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
WO2001045764A1 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2001-06-28 | Verigen Transplantation Service International Ag | Cellular matrix |
US6261296B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2001-07-17 | Synthes U.S.A. | Spinal disc space distractor |
WO2001010356A3 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2001-08-23 | Nicolaas Jacobus J Verdonschot | Method and apparatus for delivering cement to bones and/or positioning components |
US6281195B1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 2001-08-28 | Stryker Corporation | Matrix-free osteogenic devices, implants and methods of use thereof |
US6289115B1 (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2001-09-11 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Medical network system |
US6289753B1 (en) | 1997-02-14 | 2001-09-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Method for measuring mechanical properties of the collagen network in cartilage |
WO2001068800A1 (en) | 2000-03-11 | 2001-09-20 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Bioreactor for generating functional cartilaginous tissue |
WO2001070142A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2001-09-27 | Kinamed, Inc. | A custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
US6296646B1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2001-10-02 | Richard V. Williamson | Instruments and methods for use in performing knee surgery |
US6302582B1 (en) | 1998-12-22 | 2001-10-16 | Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Spine phantom simulating cortical and trabecular bone for calibration of dual energy x-ray bone densitometers |
WO2001019254A3 (en) | 1999-09-17 | 2001-10-25 | Genzyme Corp | Surgical fastener and device and method for applying it |
FR2795945B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2001-10-26 | Scient X | ANATOMICAL INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT AND GRIPPER FOR SUCH AN IMPLANT |
US6311083B1 (en) | 1997-07-21 | 2001-10-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for determining an examination point for the diaphanoscopic examination of a being and device for realizing the same |
US6310619B1 (en) | 1998-11-10 | 2001-10-30 | Robert W. Rice | Virtual reality, tissue-specific body model having user-variable tissue-specific attributes and a system and method for implementing the same |
US6310477B1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2001-10-30 | General Electric Company | MR imaging of lesions and detection of malignant tumors |
US20010039455A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-08 | Timothy Simon | Cartilage repair plug |
US6316153B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2001-11-13 | The University Of Connecticut | Free-form fabricaton using multi-photon excitation |
US6319712B1 (en) | 1998-01-30 | 2001-11-20 | Deutsche Institute Fur Textil-Und Faserforschung Stuttgart | Biohybrid articular surface replacement |
US6322588B1 (en) | 1999-08-17 | 2001-11-27 | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | Medical devices with metal/polymer composites |
US6328765B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2001-12-11 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Methods and articles for regenerating living tissue |
US20010051830A1 (en) | 1997-03-14 | 2001-12-13 | Kurt F. James | Prosthetic implant and surgical tool |
US6334006B1 (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2001-12-25 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Loading device and electronic equipment system |
US6334066B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2001-12-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for monitoring growth disorder therapy |
WO2002000270A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-03 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
WO2002000275A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-03 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
WO2002002158A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-10 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
US6342075B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2002-01-29 | Macarthur A. Creig | Prosthesis and methods for total knee arthroplasty |
US20020013626A1 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2002-01-31 | Peter Geistlich | Bone material and collagen combination for repair of injured joints |
US6344059B1 (en) | 1996-02-26 | 2002-02-05 | Gabor Krakovits | Knee surface replacement prosthesis |
US6344043B1 (en) | 1997-11-18 | 2002-02-05 | Michael J. Pappas | Anterior-posterior femoral resection guide with set of detachable collets |
US20020016543A1 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2002-02-07 | Tyler Jenny A. | Method for diagnosis of and prognosis for damaged tissue |
US20020022884A1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2002-02-21 | Mansmann Kevin A. | Meniscus-type implant with hydrogel surface reinforced by three-dimensional mesh |
US6352558B1 (en) | 1996-02-22 | 2002-03-05 | Ed. Geistlich Soehne Ag Fuer Chemische Industrie | Method for promoting regeneration of surface cartilage in a damage joint |
US20020029038A1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2002-03-07 | Haines Timothy G. | Methods and apparatus for femoral and tibial resection |
US6358253B1 (en) | 1997-02-11 | 2002-03-19 | Smith & Newhew Inc | Repairing cartilage |
WO2002022014A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-03-21 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
WO2002022013A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-03-21 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing condition of a joint and cartilage loss |
US6365405B1 (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2002-04-02 | Universite Pierre Et Marie Curie (Paris Iv) | Compositions of chondrocytes, preparation and utilization |
WO2001082677A3 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2002-04-11 | Std Mfg Inc | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US6371958B1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2002-04-16 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
US6373250B1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2002-04-16 | Ramot University Authority For Applied Research And Industrial Development Ltd. | Method of magnetic resonance imaging |
US6375658B1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2002-04-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Cartilage grafting |
US20020049382A1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2002-04-25 | Suh Jun-Kyo | Arthroscopic diagnostic probe to measure mechanical properties of articular cartilage |
US6379388B1 (en) | 1999-12-08 | 2002-04-30 | Ortho Development Corporation | Tibial prosthesis locking system and method of repairing knee joint |
US6383228B1 (en) | 1998-02-11 | 2002-05-07 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Femoral hip-joint prosthesis with a logarithmically extending curvature |
US6382028B1 (en) | 2000-02-23 | 2002-05-07 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Ultrasonic defect detection system |
WO2002036147A1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2002-05-10 | Orquest, Inc. | Mineralized collagen-polysaccharide matrix for bone and cartilage repair |
US6387131B1 (en) | 1997-10-21 | 2002-05-14 | Aesculap | Knee prosthesis comprising a tibial wedge |
US20020059049A1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2002-05-16 | Therics, Inc | System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices |
DE10055465A1 (en) | 2000-11-09 | 2002-05-23 | Blz Gmbh | Material useful for making bone replacement implants comprises nonmetallic inorganic filler particles embedded in a laser-sinterable biocompatible polymer matrix |
US20020068979A1 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2002-06-06 | Brown David Ray | Unicondylar femoral prosthesis and instruments |
US20020067798A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-06-06 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US6405068B1 (en) | 1997-02-04 | 2002-06-11 | Osteometer Meditech A/S | Diagnostic imaging in relation to arthritic conditions |
US20020082703A1 (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2002-06-27 | Repicci John A. | Prosthetic knee |
US6425920B1 (en) | 1999-10-13 | 2002-07-30 | James S. Hamada | Spinal fusion implant |
US6429013B1 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2002-08-06 | Artecel Science, Inc. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
US20020106625A1 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2002-08-08 | Hung Clark T. | Bioreactor for generating functional cartilaginous tissue |
US20020111694A1 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2002-08-15 | Bioti As | Medical prosthetic devices and implants having improved biocompatibility |
US20020114425A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-08-22 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of X-ray images |
US20020120281A1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2002-08-29 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
US20020120274A1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2002-08-29 | Ethicon, Inc. | Tissue scaffold anchor for cartilage repair |
US6443991B1 (en) | 1998-09-21 | 2002-09-03 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Posterior stabilized mobile bearing knee |
US6444222B1 (en) | 2001-05-08 | 2002-09-03 | Verigen Transplantation Services International Ag | Reinforced matrices |
US6443988B2 (en) | 1994-05-06 | 2002-09-03 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Mold apparatus and kit for in situ tissue repair |
US20020127264A1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2002-09-12 | Felt Jeffrey C. | Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing |
US6450978B1 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2002-09-17 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Interactive computer-assisted surgical system and method thereof |
US20020143402A1 (en) | 1995-09-04 | 2002-10-03 | Limber Ltd. | Hip joint prostheses |
EP0833620B1 (en) | 1995-06-12 | 2002-10-09 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Fgfr3 as a marker for mesenchymal skeletal progenitor cells |
EP0809987B1 (en) | 1996-05-28 | 2002-10-09 | Howmedica International S. De R.L. | Tibial element for a replacement knee prosthesis |
US20020147392A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-10-10 | Daniel Steines | Technique for manipulating medical images |
US20020151986A1 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 2002-10-17 | Asculai Samuel S. | Method, Instruments,and kit for autologous tansplantation |
US20020156150A1 (en) | 1999-03-25 | 2002-10-24 | Metabolix, Inc. | Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers |
US6478799B1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2002-11-12 | Richard V. Williamson | Instruments and methods for use in performing knee surgery |
US6479996B1 (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2002-11-12 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics | Magnetic resonance imaging of several volumes |
US6482209B1 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2002-11-19 | Gerard A. Engh | Apparatus and method for sculpting the surface of a joint |
US20020186818A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-12-12 | Osteonet, Inc. | System and method for building and manipulating a centralized measurement value database |
US6500208B1 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2002-12-31 | Biomet, Inc. | Nonmodular joint prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular prosthesis |
US6510334B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2003-01-21 | Luis Schuster | Method of producing an endoprosthesis as a joint substitute for a knee joint |
US20030015208A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-01-23 | Philipp Lang | Methods to diagnose treat and prevent bone loss |
US20030028196A1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2003-02-06 | Bonutti Peter M. | Method of performing surgery |
US20030031292A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2003-02-13 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US6520964B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-02-18 | Std Manufacturing, Inc. | System and method for joint resurface repair |
WO2002034310B1 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2003-02-20 | Sdgi Holdings Inc | Self-forming orthopedic implants |
WO2001077988A3 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2003-03-06 | Therics Inc | System and method for rapidly customizing a design and remotely manufacturing biomedical devices using a computer system |
US20030045935A1 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-03-06 | Angelucci Christopher M. | Laminoplasty implants and methods of use |
US20030055501A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-20 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having different tibial and femoral surface profiles |
US20030055502A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-03-20 | Philipp Lang | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US20030055500A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-20 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having two-piece keyed components |
US20030060885A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having enlarged femoral surface |
US20030060882A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having medially shifted tibial surface |
US20030060884A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
US20030060883A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having attachment apertures |
US20030063704A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2003-04-03 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
WO2003028566A1 (en) | 2001-10-04 | 2003-04-10 | Stryker Spine | Spinal osteosynthesis assembly comprising the head of an anchoring member and a tool for fixing said head |
US6556855B2 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2003-04-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the implementation of a perfusion measurement with magnetic resonance imaging |
US6558421B1 (en) | 2000-09-19 | 2003-05-06 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US6560476B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-05-06 | Arthrovision, Inc. | Evaluating disease progression using magnetic resonance imaging |
WO2003007788A3 (en) | 2001-07-16 | 2003-05-22 | Depuy Products Inc | Unitary surgical device and method |
US20030100953A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-05-29 | Rosa Richard A. | Knee joint prostheses |
US20030100907A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-05-29 | Rosa Richard A. | Instrumentation for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
WO2003047470A2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2003-06-12 | Discure Ltd. | Cushion bearing implants for load bearing applications |
US20030112921A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2003-06-19 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
DE20303498U1 (en) | 2003-02-26 | 2003-07-03 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Surgical adjusting and holding device for tool guiding arrangement, in particular for performance of operation at femur or tibia |
US20030158606A1 (en) | 2002-02-20 | 2003-08-21 | Coon Thomas M. | Knee arthroplasty prosthesis and method |
US20030158558A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-21 | Horn Paul C | Long oblique ulna shortening osteotomy jig |
US6610089B1 (en) | 1997-08-26 | 2003-08-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Spinal implant and cutting tool preparation accessory for mounting the implant |
US20030163137A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2003-08-28 | Smucker Donald M. | Patella resection guide |
US6620168B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2003-09-16 | Stryker Technologies Corporation | Methods and tools for tibial intermedullary revision surgery and associated tibial components |
US20030173695A1 (en) | 1999-11-12 | 2003-09-18 | Therics, Inc. | Rapid prototyping and manufacturing process |
US6623526B1 (en) | 1999-01-08 | 2003-09-23 | Corin Limited | Knee prosthesis |
US6626948B2 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2003-09-30 | Benoist Girard Sas | Femoral hip prosthesis |
US6632246B1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2003-10-14 | Chondrosite, Llc | Cartilage repair plug |
US6632235B2 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2003-10-14 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Inflatable device and method for reducing fractures in bone and in treating the spine |
US20030216669A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-11-20 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US20030225457A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2003-12-04 | Justin Daniel F. | Femoral components for knee arthroplasty |
US20030236521A1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Scott Brown | Prosthesis cutting guide, cutting tool and method |
US20030236473A1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2003-12-25 | Sylvie Dore | High precision modeling of a body part using a 3D imaging system |
US6679917B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2004-01-20 | Arthrosurface, Incorporated | System and method for joint resurface repair |
WO2004006811A2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2004-01-22 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Method and kit for interpositional arthroplasty |
US6690816B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2004-02-10 | The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Systems and methods for tubular object processing |
US6702821B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2004-03-09 | The Bonutti 2003 Trust A | Instrumentation for minimally invasive joint replacement and methods for using same |
EP1219269B1 (en) | 2000-12-27 | 2004-04-07 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Prosthesis evaluation assembly |
US6719794B2 (en) | 2001-05-03 | 2004-04-13 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Intervertebral implant for transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure |
US20040098132A1 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2004-05-20 | Thomas Andriacchi | Femoral prosthesis |
US20040102851A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Joseph Saladino | Modular knee prosthesis |
US20040102852A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Johnson Erin M. | Modular knee prosthesis |
WO2004032806A9 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2004-05-27 | Imaging Therapeutics Inc | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
WO2004043305A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2004-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determing meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US20040106868A1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2004-06-03 | Siau-Way Liew | Novel imaging markers in musculoskeletal disease |
WO2004047688A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-06-10 | Juridical Foundation Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization | Artificial joint, medical implant, and methods of producing the artificial joint and medical implant |
US20040117015A1 (en) | 2000-12-04 | 2004-06-17 | Spineco | Molded surgical implant and method |
US20040122521A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Lee Chelynne Nicole | Prosthetic knee implant with modular augment |
US20040153164A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-05 | Adam Sanford | Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee |
US20040153162A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-05 | Sanford Adam H. | Provisional orthopedic prosthesis for partially resected bone |
EP1132061B1 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2004-08-18 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Polymer filled spinal fusion cage |
US20040167630A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | Rolston Lindsey R. | Device and method for bicompartmental arthroplasty |
US20040167390A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2004-08-26 | Alexander Eugene J. | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US20040193280A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-09-30 | Webster Vincent A. | Mobile bearing unicondylar tibial knee prosthesis |
US20040204766A1 (en) | 2003-04-08 | 2004-10-14 | Thomas Siebel | Anatomical knee prosthesis |
US20040204644A1 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2004-10-14 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in MRI and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US20040204760A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-10-14 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US6816607B2 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2004-11-09 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | System for modeling static and dynamic three dimensional anatomical structures by 3-D models |
US20040236424A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-11-25 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US20040242987A1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2004-12-02 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods of predicting musculoskeletal disease |
US20040249386A1 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2004-12-09 | Francisco Faoro | Apparatus for the preparation of a femoral condyle |
EP1437101A3 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2004-12-22 | DePuy Spine, Inc. | Prosthetic facet joint ligament |
US6835377B2 (en) | 1998-05-13 | 2004-12-28 | Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. | Osteoarthritis cartilage regeneration |
US20050010106A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2005-01-13 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for the compensation of imaging technique in the processing of radiographic images |
US20050015153A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2005-01-20 | Medicine Lodge, Inc. | Implants and related methods and apparatus for securing an implant on an articulating surface of an orthopedic joint |
US20050021039A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-01-27 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Apparatus for aligning an instrument during a surgical procedure |
US20050043807A1 (en) | 2003-08-18 | 2005-02-24 | Wood David John | Two-thirds prosthetic arthroplasty |
WO2004073550A3 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2005-03-03 | Ian P Murray | Knee spacer |
US6873741B2 (en) | 2002-01-10 | 2005-03-29 | Sharp Laboratories Of America | Nonlinear edge-enhancement filter |
US20050078802A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2005-04-14 | Philipp Lang | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
WO2003061522A9 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2005-04-28 | Advanced Bio Surfaces Inc | Interpositional arthroplasty system and method |
WO2005016175A3 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2005-05-12 | Advanced Bio Surfaces Inc | Meniscus preserving implant method and apparatus |
US20050107883A1 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2005-05-19 | Goodfried Gary P. | Modular implant system with fully porous coated sleeve |
US20050119751A1 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2005-06-02 | Lawson Kevin J. | Intervertebral bone fusion device |
US20050143745A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-06-30 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Instruments and methods for preparing a joint articulation surface for an implant |
EP1550416A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-07-06 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Instrument augments for filling a bone joint gap |
US20050148843A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-07-07 | Roose Jeffrey R. | System and method of designing and manufacturing customized instrumentation for accurate implantation of prosthesis by utilizing computed tomography data |
US20050148860A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2005-07-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
US20050192588A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Garcia Daniel X. | Instrumentation and method for prosthetic knee |
EP1070487B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2005-09-14 | Ethicon, Inc. | Graft fixation device |
WO2005020850B1 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2005-09-29 | Gerraspine A G | Facet implant |
EP1074229B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2005-10-05 | Schuster, Luis, Dr.med. | Method of manufacturing a knee joint replacing endoprosthesis |
US20050234461A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-10-20 | Burdulis Albert G Jr | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
US20050267584A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-12-01 | Burdulis Albert G Jr | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US6984981B2 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-01-10 | Virtualscopics, Llc | Magnetic resonance method and system forming an isotropic, high resolution, three-dimensional diagnostic image of a subject from two-dimensional image data scans |
DE10135771B4 (en) | 2001-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Facet joint implant |
US7008430B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2006-03-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Adjustable reamer with tip tracker linkage |
US20060062442A1 (en) | 2004-09-16 | 2006-03-23 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | System and method of predicting future fractures |
US7020314B1 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2006-03-28 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Black blood angiography method and apparatus |
EP1327423B1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2006-03-29 | Zimmer GmbH | A surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
US20060074432A1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-06 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Modular medical tool and connector |
US20060111722A1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-25 | Hacene Bouadi | Surgical cutting tool |
US7058209B2 (en) | 2001-09-20 | 2006-06-06 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and computer program product for locating facial features |
WO2006065774A1 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2006-06-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Inter-facet implant |
US20060136067A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-22 | Pendleton John E | Tibial tray inserter |
EP1683593A2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-26 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Laser produced porous structure |
US20060184176A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial trialing assembly and method of trialing a tibial implant |
US20060195196A1 (en) | 2005-02-26 | 2006-08-31 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Modular tibial implant with a mortise coupling |
US20060200162A1 (en) | 2005-02-21 | 2006-09-07 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Total knee arthroplasty instruments |
US7104997B2 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2006-09-12 | Lionberger Jr David R | Cutting guide apparatus and surgical method for use in knee arthroplasty |
US7117027B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2006-10-03 | Synthes (Usa) | Method for establishing a three-dimensional representation of a bone from image data |
EP1550418B1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2006-10-11 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Implant systems with fastener for mounting on an articulation surface of an orthopedic joint |
US7141053B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-11-28 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Methods of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US20070015995A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-01-18 | Philipp Lang | Joint and cartilage diagnosis, assessment and modeling |
US7174282B2 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2007-02-06 | Scott J Hollister | Design methodology for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterial implants |
US20070047794A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2007-03-01 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US20070083266A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-04-12 | Vertegen, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
WO2007041375A2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices |
WO2006127283A3 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2007-05-03 | Zimmer Tech Inc | Milling system for resecting a joint articulation surface |
US20070118141A1 (en) | 2003-02-13 | 2007-05-24 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Modular patella instrument |
US20070118222A1 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2007-05-24 | Vertegen, Inc. | Intervertebral devices and methods |
US20070156171A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-07-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant Grasper |
US20070198022A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-08-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20070233269A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Interpositional Joint Implant |
US7282054B2 (en) | 2003-12-26 | 2007-10-16 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Adjustable cut block |
WO2007109641A3 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2007-12-06 | Conformis Inc | Interpositional joint implant |
US20070293868A1 (en) | 2004-10-19 | 2007-12-20 | Daniel Delfosse | Ligament-Tentioning Device, Section Template and Osteotomy Method |
US20080004709A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2008-01-03 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Laser-produced implants |
US20080009950A1 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2008-01-10 | Richardson Rodney Lan W | Prosthetic Knee |
US20080031412A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-02-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method for Bone Structure Prognosis and Simulated Bone Remodeling |
US20080058613A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-03-06 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method and System for Providing Fracture/No Fracture Classification |
US20080172125A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2008-07-17 | Arthrosurface Incorporated | System and Method for Joint Resurface Repair |
US20080195216A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-08-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant Device and Method for Manufacture |
WO2008112996A1 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-18 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US20080243127A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-10-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US7438685B2 (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2008-10-21 | Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for registration, guidance and targeting of external beam radiation therapy |
US20080275452A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Cutting Guide |
EP1120087B1 (en) | 2000-01-28 | 2008-11-12 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus for affixing tissue repair material to bone |
US20090131941A1 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2009-05-21 | Ilwhan Park | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US20090222014A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
WO2009111639A1 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2009-09-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20090276045A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices and Methods for Treatment of Facet and Other Joints |
US20100298894A1 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2010-11-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-Specific Joint Arthroplasty Devices for Ligament Repair |
US20100331991A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-30 | Zachary Christopher Wilkinson | Methods and Apparatus for Performing Knee Arthroplasty |
DE102006037067B4 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2011-06-16 | Metoxit Ag | Method for producing an implant with a porous, ceramic surface layer |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4207627A (en) | 1979-01-18 | 1980-06-17 | Cloutier Jean Marie | Knee prosthesis |
US5266480A (en) * | 1986-04-18 | 1993-11-30 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Three-dimensional skin culture system |
US4759350A (en) | 1986-10-17 | 1988-07-26 | Dunn Harold K | Instruments for shaping distal femoral and proximal tibial surfaces |
US5122144A (en) | 1989-09-26 | 1992-06-16 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
US20050033424A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-02-10 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US7013191B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2006-03-14 | Orametrix, Inc. | Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth |
PL356006A1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 2004-05-31 | CARTIFICIAL A/S, Medico Chemical Lab.ApS | A prosthetic device |
US7635390B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2009-12-22 | Marctec, Llc | Joint replacement component having a modular articulating surface |
FR2819714B1 (en) | 2001-01-19 | 2004-02-06 | Frederic Fortin | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION METHOD |
EP1481325A4 (en) * | 2002-02-05 | 2008-02-20 | Asaca Corp | Data storage system |
US7983777B2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2011-07-19 | Mark Melton | System for biomedical implant creation and procurement |
WO2007045000A2 (en) | 2005-10-14 | 2007-04-19 | Vantus Technology Corporation | Personal fit medical implants and orthopedic surgical instruments and methods for making |
-
2000
- 2000-09-14 US US09/662,224 patent/US7239908B1/en not_active Ceased
-
2004
- 2004-01-22 US US10/764,010 patent/US8036729B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-06-27 US US11/769,434 patent/US8112142B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-08-19 US US12/193,907 patent/USRE43282E1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2011
- 2011-08-13 US US13/209,373 patent/US8306601B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2012
- 2012-11-02 US US13/667,177 patent/US20130071828A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (689)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3314420A (en) | 1961-10-23 | 1967-04-18 | Haeger Potteries Inc | Prosthetic parts and methods of making the same |
US3605123A (en) | 1969-04-29 | 1971-09-20 | Melpar Inc | Bone implant |
US3694820A (en) | 1969-08-25 | 1972-10-03 | Nat Res Dev | Prosthetic shoulder joint |
US3855638A (en) | 1970-06-04 | 1974-12-24 | Ontario Research Foundation | Surgical prosthetic device with porous metal coating |
US3938198A (en) | 1970-08-04 | 1976-02-17 | Cutter Laboratories, Inc. | Hip joint prosthesis |
US3816855A (en) | 1971-06-01 | 1974-06-18 | Nat Res Dev | Knee joint prosthesis |
US3798679A (en) | 1971-07-09 | 1974-03-26 | Ewald Frederick | Joint prostheses |
US3808606A (en) | 1972-02-22 | 1974-05-07 | R Tronzo | Bone implant with porous exterior surface |
GB1451283A (en) | 1973-02-10 | 1976-09-29 | Friedrichsfeld Gmbh | Joint endoprostheses |
US3852830A (en) | 1973-02-15 | 1974-12-10 | Richards Mfg Co | Knee prosthesis |
US3843975A (en) | 1973-04-09 | 1974-10-29 | R Tronzo | Prosthesis for femoral shaft |
US3987499A (en) | 1973-08-10 | 1976-10-26 | Sybron Corporation | Surgical implant and method for its production |
US4085466A (en) | 1974-11-18 | 1978-04-25 | National Research Development Corporation | Prosthetic joint device |
US3991425A (en) | 1975-11-20 | 1976-11-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Prosthetic bone joint devices |
US4055862A (en) | 1976-01-23 | 1977-11-01 | Zimmer Usa, Inc. | Human body implant of graphitic carbon fiber reinforced ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene |
US4052753A (en) | 1976-08-02 | 1977-10-11 | Dedo Richard G | Knee spacer and method of reforming sliding body surfaces |
US4098626A (en) | 1976-11-15 | 1978-07-04 | Thiokol Corporation | Hydroxy terminated polybutadiene based polyurethane bound propellant grains |
US4178641A (en) | 1977-01-26 | 1979-12-18 | Schutt and Grundei O.H.G. | Knee-joint-endoprothese |
US4219893A (en) | 1977-09-01 | 1980-09-02 | United States Surgical Corporation | Prosthetic knee joint |
US4203444A (en) | 1977-11-07 | 1980-05-20 | Dyonics, Inc. | Surgical instrument suitable for closed surgery such as of the knee |
US4203444B1 (en) | 1977-11-07 | 1987-07-21 | ||
US4164793A (en) | 1978-04-26 | 1979-08-21 | Swanson Alfred B | Lunate implant |
US4213816A (en) | 1978-06-12 | 1980-07-22 | Glasrock Products, Inc. | Method for bonding porous coating to rigid structural member |
US4280231A (en) | 1979-06-14 | 1981-07-28 | Swanson Alfred B | Elbow prosthesis |
US4309778A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1982-01-12 | Biomedical Engineering Corp. | New Jersey meniscal bearing knee replacement |
US4340978A (en) | 1979-07-02 | 1982-07-27 | Biomedical Engineering Corp. | New Jersey meniscal bearing knee replacement |
JPS5683343U (en) | 1979-11-30 | 1981-07-04 | ||
US4364389A (en) | 1980-03-19 | 1982-12-21 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Instrument for holding and inserting the tibia plate for an endo-knee prosthesis having sliding surfaces |
US4344193A (en) | 1980-11-28 | 1982-08-17 | Kenny Charles H | Meniscus prosthesis |
US4575805A (en) | 1980-12-24 | 1986-03-11 | Moermann Werner H | Method and apparatus for the fabrication of custom-shaped implants |
US4368040A (en) | 1981-06-01 | 1983-01-11 | Ipco Corporation | Dental impression tray for forming a dental prosthesis in situ |
US4502161A (en) | 1981-09-21 | 1985-03-05 | Wall W H | Prosthetic meniscus for the repair of joints |
US4502161B1 (en) | 1981-09-21 | 1989-07-25 | ||
US4436684A (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1984-03-13 | Contour Med Partners, Ltd. | Method of forming implantable prostheses for reconstructive surgery |
US4436684B1 (en) | 1982-06-03 | 1988-05-31 | ||
US4501266A (en) | 1983-03-04 | 1985-02-26 | Biomet, Inc. | Knee distraction device |
US4459985A (en) | 1983-03-04 | 1984-07-17 | Howmedica Inc. | Tibial prosthesis extractor and method for extracting a tibial implant |
US4631676A (en) | 1983-05-25 | 1986-12-23 | Hospital For Joint Diseases Or | Computerized video gait and motion analysis system and method |
US4601290A (en) | 1983-10-11 | 1986-07-22 | Cabot Medical Corporation | Surgical instrument for cutting body tissue from a body area having a restricted space |
US4586496A (en) | 1984-03-05 | 1986-05-06 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Surgical chisel |
US4609551A (en) | 1984-03-20 | 1986-09-02 | Arnold Caplan | Process of and material for stimulating growth of cartilage and bony tissue at anatomical sites |
US4673409A (en) | 1984-04-25 | 1987-06-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Implant with attachment surface |
JPS61247448A (en) | 1985-04-25 | 1986-11-04 | 日石三菱株式会社 | Production of artificial joint |
US4594380A (en) | 1985-05-01 | 1986-06-10 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Elastomeric controlled release formulation and article comprising same |
DE3516743A1 (en) | 1985-05-09 | 1986-11-13 | orthoplant Endoprothetik GmbH, 2800 Bremen | Endoprosthesis for a femoral head |
US4627853A (en) | 1985-05-29 | 1986-12-09 | American Hospital Supply Corporation | Method of producing prostheses for replacement of articular cartilage and prostheses so produced |
US4699156A (en) | 1985-06-06 | 1987-10-13 | Diagnospine Research Inc. | Non invasive method and equipment for the detection of torsional injuries in the lumar spine of a patient |
US4655227A (en) | 1985-06-06 | 1987-04-07 | Diagnospine Research Inc. | Equipment for the detection of mechanical injuries in the lumbar spine of a patient, using a mathematical model |
US4865607A (en) | 1985-10-02 | 1989-09-12 | Ulrich Witzel | Tibial plate for a knee-joint endoprosthesis |
WO1987002882A1 (en) | 1985-11-14 | 1987-05-21 | Jean Manuel Aubaniac | Prosthetic assembly for the knee joint |
FR2589720A1 (en) | 1985-11-14 | 1987-05-15 | Aubaniac Jean | KNEE JOINT PROSTHETIC ASSEMBLY |
US4721104A (en) | 1985-12-02 | 1988-01-26 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Femoral surface shaping apparatus for posterior-stabilized knee implants |
US4714474A (en) | 1986-05-12 | 1987-12-22 | Dow Corning Wright Corporation | Tibial knee joint prosthesis with removable articulating surface insert |
US4822365A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1989-04-18 | Walker Peter S | Method of design of human joint prosthesis |
US4936862A (en) | 1986-05-30 | 1990-06-26 | Walker Peter S | Method of designing and manufacturing a human joint prosthesis |
US4769040A (en) | 1986-11-18 | 1988-09-06 | Queen's University At Kingston | Tibial prosthesis |
US5041138A (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1991-08-20 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Neomorphogenesis of cartilage in vivo from cell culture |
CN86209787U (en) | 1986-11-29 | 1987-11-18 | 于也宽 | Sleeve-shaped artificial elbow joint |
US4714472A (en) | 1987-01-20 | 1987-12-22 | Osteonics Corp. | Knee prosthesis with accommodation for angular misalignment |
US5250050A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1993-10-05 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US5002547A (en) | 1987-02-07 | 1991-03-26 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Apparatus for knee prosthesis |
US4841975A (en) | 1987-04-15 | 1989-06-27 | Cemax, Inc. | Preoperative planning of bone cuts and joint replacement using radiant energy scan imaging |
US4846835A (en) | 1987-06-15 | 1989-07-11 | Grande Daniel A | Technique for healing lesions in cartilage |
US5306311A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1994-04-26 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic articular cartilage |
US4880429A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1989-11-14 | Stone Kevin R | Prosthetic meniscus |
US4813436A (en) | 1987-07-30 | 1989-03-21 | Human Performance Technologies, Inc. | Motion analysis system employing various operating modes |
US5303148A (en) | 1987-11-27 | 1994-04-12 | Picker International, Inc. | Voice actuated volume image controller and display controller |
US6228116B1 (en) | 1987-12-22 | 2001-05-08 | Walter J. Ledergerber | Tissue expander |
US4888021A (en) | 1988-02-02 | 1989-12-19 | Joint Medical Products Corporation | Knee and patellar prosthesis |
US5314482A (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1994-05-24 | British Technology Group Ltd. | Femoral component, tool and method |
US4823807A (en) | 1988-02-11 | 1989-04-25 | Board Of Regents, Univ. Of Texas System | Device for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of articular and periarticular pathology |
JPH01249049A (en) | 1988-03-30 | 1989-10-04 | Kyocera Corp | Artificial knee joint |
EP0337901A1 (en) | 1988-04-01 | 1989-10-18 | Christian Broc | Mounting device especially for the tibial and/or femoral part of a two-piece knee joint prosthesis |
US5154717A (en) | 1988-04-26 | 1992-10-13 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington | Robot-aided system for surgery |
US5690635A (en) | 1988-04-26 | 1997-11-25 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington | Prosthesis template for use in a robot-aided system for surgery |
US4944757A (en) | 1988-11-07 | 1990-07-31 | Martinez David M | Modulator knee prosthesis system |
US5510121A (en) | 1988-11-21 | 1996-04-23 | Rhee; Woonza M. | Glycosaminoglycan-synthetic polymer conjugates |
US5162430A (en) | 1988-11-21 | 1992-11-10 | Collagen Corporation | Collagen-polymer conjugates |
US5099859A (en) | 1988-12-06 | 1992-03-31 | Bell Gene D | Method and apparatus for comparative analysis of videofluoroscopic joint motion |
US4872452A (en) | 1989-01-09 | 1989-10-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Bone rasp |
US5108452A (en) | 1989-02-08 | 1992-04-28 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Modular hip prosthesis |
WO1990009769A1 (en) | 1989-03-02 | 1990-09-07 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic meniscus |
US5234433A (en) | 1989-09-26 | 1993-08-10 | Kirschner Medical Corporation | Method and instrumentation for unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty |
US5059216A (en) | 1989-09-29 | 1991-10-22 | Winters Thomas F | Knee joint replacement apparatus |
DE3933459A1 (en) | 1989-10-06 | 1991-04-18 | Karsten Dipl Ing Reumann | Biomedical implant production equipment - uses computer tomographic image to generate implant profile for component mfr. |
US5150304A (en) | 1989-10-28 | 1992-09-22 | Metalpraecis Berchem+Schaberg Gesellschaft Fur Metallformgebung Mbh | Method of making an implantable joint prosthesis |
EP0528080A1 (en) | 1989-12-13 | 1993-02-24 | Stryker Corporation | Articular cartilage repair piece |
US5067964A (en) | 1989-12-13 | 1991-11-26 | Stryker Corporation | Articular surface repair |
US5246013A (en) | 1989-12-22 | 1993-09-21 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Probe, system and method for detecting cartilage degeneration |
US5129908A (en) | 1990-01-23 | 1992-07-14 | Petersen Thomas D | Method and instruments for resection of the patella |
US5171322A (en) | 1990-02-13 | 1992-12-15 | Kenny Charles H | Stabilized meniscus prosthesis |
US5246530A (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1993-09-21 | Dynamet Incorporated | Method of producing porous metal surface |
US5523843A (en) | 1990-07-09 | 1996-06-04 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Position detecting system |
US5021061A (en) | 1990-09-26 | 1991-06-04 | Queen's University At Kingston | Prosthetic patello-femoral joint |
US5274565A (en) | 1990-10-03 | 1993-12-28 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Process for making custom joint replacements |
US5448489A (en) | 1990-10-03 | 1995-09-05 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Process for making custom joint replacements |
US5154178A (en) | 1990-10-09 | 1992-10-13 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for obtaining in-vivo nmr data from a moving subject |
US5197985A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1993-03-30 | Caplan Arnold I | Method for enhancing the implantation and differentiation of marrow-derived mesenchymal cells |
US5226914A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1993-07-13 | Caplan Arnold I | Method for treating connective tissue disorders |
US5123927A (en) | 1990-12-05 | 1992-06-23 | University Of British Columbia | Method and apparatus for antibiotic knee prothesis |
US5853746A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1998-12-29 | Robert Francis Shaw | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone using functional barrier |
US5206023A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1993-04-27 | Robert F. Shaw | Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage |
US5368858A (en) | 1991-01-31 | 1994-11-29 | Robert F. Shaw | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage |
EP0626156B1 (en) | 1991-02-04 | 1997-07-23 | WALKER, Peter Stanley, The Institute of Orthopaedics Department of Biomedical Engineering | Prosthesis for knee replacement |
US5314478A (en) | 1991-03-29 | 1994-05-24 | Kyocera Corporation | Artificial bone connection prosthesis |
US5288797A (en) | 1991-04-30 | 1994-02-22 | Tremco Ltd. | Moisture curable polyurethane composition |
US5133759A (en) | 1991-05-24 | 1992-07-28 | Turner Richard H | Asymmetrical femoral condye total knee arthroplasty prosthesis |
US5282868A (en) | 1991-06-17 | 1994-02-01 | Andre Bahler | Prosthetic arrangement for a complex joint, especially knee joint |
JPH05184612A (en) | 1991-06-17 | 1993-07-27 | Andre Bahler | Artificial joint with which natural joint is replaced, particularly artificial knee joint |
US5245282A (en) | 1991-06-28 | 1993-09-14 | University Of Virginia Alumni Patents Foundation | Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging |
US5609640A (en) | 1991-07-05 | 1997-03-11 | Johnson; David P. | Patella prostheses |
US5306307A (en) | 1991-07-22 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant |
US5147365A (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1992-09-15 | Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. | Patellar osteotomy guide |
WO1993004710A3 (en) | 1991-09-06 | 1993-04-15 | Shaw Robert F | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone |
EP0530804B1 (en) | 1991-09-06 | 2004-06-02 | Shaw, Robert Francis | Kits and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone |
US5270300A (en) | 1991-09-06 | 1993-12-14 | Robert Francis Shaw | Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone |
US5291401A (en) | 1991-11-15 | 1994-03-01 | Telescan, Limited | Teleradiology system |
US5468787A (en) | 1991-11-18 | 1995-11-21 | Braden; Michael | Biomaterials for tissue repair |
WO1993009819A1 (en) | 1991-11-18 | 1993-05-27 | Michael Braden | The use of biomaterials for tissue repair |
EP0613380B1 (en) | 1991-11-18 | 1999-12-29 | BRADEN, Michael | The use of monomeric/polymeric materials in the preparation of a curable composition for cartilage repair |
US5344459A (en) | 1991-12-03 | 1994-09-06 | Swartz Stephen J | Arthroscopically implantable prosthesis |
US6044289A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 2000-03-28 | Bonutti; Peter M. | Apparatus and method for controlling bending of a joint of a patient during imaging |
US6141579A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 2000-10-31 | Bonutti; Peter M. | Sequential imaging apparatus |
US5562094A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 1996-10-08 | Apogee Medical Products, Inc. | Sequential imaging apparatus |
US5329924A (en) | 1991-12-04 | 1994-07-19 | Apogee Medical Products, Inc. | Sequential imaging apparatus |
US5879390A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1999-03-09 | Joachim Theusner | Artificial joint |
US5556432A (en) | 1991-12-11 | 1996-09-17 | Joachim Theusner | Artificial joint |
US5258032A (en) | 1992-04-03 | 1993-11-02 | Bertin Kim C | Knee prosthesis provisional apparatus and resection guide and method of use in knee replacement surgery |
US5326365A (en) | 1992-04-10 | 1994-07-05 | Alvine Franklin G | Ankle implant |
US5503162A (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1996-04-02 | Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System | Arthroscopic cartilage evaluator and method for using the same |
US5433215A (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1995-07-18 | Board Of Regents, University Of Texas System | Arthroscopic indenter |
US5554190A (en) | 1992-04-24 | 1996-09-10 | Draenert; Klaus | Prosthesis component and a method of producing it |
US5423828A (en) | 1992-05-14 | 1995-06-13 | Bentwood Place, Inc. | Method and apparatus for simplifying prosthetic joint replacements |
US5749362A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1998-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of creating an image of an anatomical feature where the feature is within a patient's body |
US5365996A (en) | 1992-06-10 | 1994-11-22 | Amei Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for making customized fixation devices |
WO1993025157A1 (en) | 1992-06-18 | 1993-12-23 | Klaus Radermacher | Template for treatment tools and method for the treatment of osseous structures |
US5824102A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1998-10-20 | Buscayret; Christian | Total knee prosthesis |
US5478739A (en) | 1992-10-23 | 1995-12-26 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Three-dimensional stromal cell and tissue culture system |
US5591165A (en) | 1992-11-09 | 1997-01-07 | Sofamor, S.N.C. | Apparatus and method for spinal fixation and correction of spinal deformities |
US5380332A (en) | 1992-11-16 | 1995-01-10 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | System and method for profiling an anatomic patella |
US5320102A (en) | 1992-11-18 | 1994-06-14 | Ciba-Geigy Corporation | Method for diagnosing proteoglycan deficiency in cartilage based on magnetic resonance image (MRI) |
US5501687A (en) | 1992-11-20 | 1996-03-26 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | Body for distributing bone cement for the anchoring of implants |
US5445152A (en) | 1992-11-23 | 1995-08-29 | Resonex Holding Company | Kinematic device for producing precise incremental flexing of the knee |
EP0600806B1 (en) | 1992-12-01 | 1997-06-04 | Medinov Sa | Tricompartimental knee prosthesis |
US5507820A (en) | 1992-12-14 | 1996-04-16 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Fixed bearing joint endoprosthesis |
US5564437A (en) | 1992-12-15 | 1996-10-15 | Universite Joseph Fourier | Method and system for determining the fixation point on the femur of a crossed ligament of the knee |
US5360446A (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1994-11-01 | Zimmer, Inc. | Interactive prosthesis design system for implantable prosthesis |
US5728162A (en) | 1993-01-28 | 1998-03-17 | Board Of Regents Of University Of Colorado | Asymmetric condylar and trochlear femoral knee component |
US5387216A (en) | 1993-02-18 | 1995-02-07 | Thornhill; Thomas S. | Intramedullary based instrument systems for total knee revision |
US6001895A (en) | 1993-03-22 | 1999-12-14 | Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. | Composite surgical material |
US5772595A (en) | 1993-04-06 | 1998-06-30 | Fonar Corporation | Multipositional MRI for kinematic studies of movable joints |
US5899859A (en) | 1993-04-06 | 1999-05-04 | Fonar Corporation | Multipositional MRI for kinematic studies of movable joints |
US5810006A (en) | 1993-04-06 | 1998-09-22 | Fonar Corporation | Multipositional MRI for kinematic studies of movable joints |
US5687210A (en) | 1993-05-28 | 1997-11-11 | Europ Scan | Method and device for determining the attenuation function of an object with respect to the transmission of a reference material thickness |
US5480430A (en) | 1993-06-04 | 1996-01-02 | Mcghan Medical Corporation | Shape-retaining shell for a fluid filled prosthesis |
US5533519A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1996-07-09 | Radke; John C. | Method and apparatus for diagnosing joints |
US5413116A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1995-05-09 | Bioresearch | Method and apparatus for diagnosing joints |
US5474559A (en) | 1993-07-06 | 1995-12-12 | Zimmer, Inc. | Femoral milling instrumentation for use in total knee arthroplasty with optional cutting guide attachment |
US5961454A (en) | 1993-08-13 | 1999-10-05 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital | Fusion of anatomical data sets into stereotactic coordinates |
US6112109A (en) | 1993-09-10 | 2000-08-29 | The University Of Queensland | Constructive modelling of articles |
US5549690A (en) | 1993-12-17 | 1996-08-27 | Avanta Orthopaedics | Prosthetic thumb joint and method of manufacture |
US5522900A (en) | 1993-12-17 | 1996-06-04 | Avanta Orthopaedics | Prosthetic joint and method of manufacture |
US5541515A (en) | 1994-01-11 | 1996-07-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | MRI joint imaging system |
US5759205A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1998-06-02 | Brown University Research Foundation | Negatively charged polymeric electret implant |
US5827289A (en) | 1994-01-26 | 1998-10-27 | Reiley; Mark A. | Inflatable device for use in surgical protocols relating to treatment of fractured or diseased bones |
US5885298A (en) | 1994-02-23 | 1999-03-23 | Biomet, Inc. | Patellar clamp and reamer with adjustable stop |
JPH07236648A (en) | 1994-03-01 | 1995-09-12 | Sankyo Seiki Mfg Co Ltd | Artificial bone material and its processing method |
US5427099A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1995-06-27 | Adams; Timothy L. | Marker for magnetic resonance imaging |
WO1995027450A1 (en) | 1994-04-11 | 1995-10-19 | Corin Medical Limited | Unicompartmental knee prosthesis________________________________ |
US5768134A (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1998-06-16 | Materialise, Naamloze Vennootschap | Method for making a perfected medical model on the basis of digital image information of a part of the body |
WO1995028688A1 (en) | 1994-04-19 | 1995-10-26 | Materialise, Naamloze Vennootschap | Method for making a perfected medical model on the basis of digital image information of a part of the body |
WO1995030390A1 (en) | 1994-05-04 | 1995-11-16 | Ysebaert S.A. | Knee prosthesis with a movable meniscus |
US5786217A (en) | 1994-05-05 | 1998-07-28 | Genzyme Corporation | Methods and compositions for the repair of articular cartilage defects in mammals |
US5723331A (en) | 1994-05-05 | 1998-03-03 | Genzyme Corporation | Methods and compositions for the repair of articular cartilage defects in mammals |
US6443988B2 (en) | 1994-05-06 | 2002-09-03 | Disc Dynamics, Inc. | Mold apparatus and kit for in situ tissue repair |
US5616146A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1997-04-01 | Murray; William M. | Method and apparatus for machining bone to fit an orthopedic surgical implant |
WO1995032623A1 (en) | 1994-05-27 | 1995-12-07 | Regen Biologics, Inc. | Meniscal augmentation device |
US5871542A (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1999-02-16 | British Technology Group Limited | Endoprosthetic knee joint device |
GB2291355B (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1996-10-02 | British Tech Group | Endoprosthetic knee joint device |
US5749876A (en) | 1994-07-12 | 1998-05-12 | Biomicron | Apparatus for resection of the condyles of the knee for putting a prosthesis into place, and method for putting such an apparatus into position |
US5769899A (en) | 1994-08-12 | 1998-06-23 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
US5597379A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 1997-01-28 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for femoral resection alignment |
US6197064B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2001-03-06 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Prosthetic implant |
US6695848B2 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2004-02-24 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods for femoral and tibial resection |
US6056754A (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2000-05-02 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Method and apparatus for patella resection and guide handle |
US20020029038A1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2002-03-07 | Haines Timothy G. | Methods and apparatus for femoral and tibial resection |
US7344541B2 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2008-03-18 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for femoral and tibial resection |
US20050055028A1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2005-03-10 | Hudson Surgical Design, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for femoral and tibial resection |
DE4434539C2 (en) | 1994-09-27 | 1998-06-04 | Luis Dr Med Schuster | Process for the production of an endoprosthesis as a joint replacement for knee joints |
US5735277A (en) | 1994-09-27 | 1998-04-07 | Schuster; Luis | Method of producing an endoprosthesis as a joint substitute for knee-joints |
EP0704193A1 (en) | 1994-09-27 | 1996-04-03 | Schuster, Luis, Dr.med. | Process for making an endoprosthesis suited for knee joint replacement |
US6224632B1 (en) | 1994-10-27 | 2001-05-01 | Biomedical Engineering Trust I | Prosthesis fixturing device |
US5847804A (en) | 1994-10-28 | 1998-12-08 | Eyesys Technologies, Inc. | Multi-camera corneal analysis system |
US5578037A (en) | 1994-11-14 | 1996-11-26 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Surgical guide for femoral resection |
US5630820A (en) | 1994-12-05 | 1997-05-20 | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. | Surgical bicompartmental tensiometer for revision knee surgery |
US5684562A (en) | 1994-12-12 | 1997-11-04 | Nidek Company, Ltd. | Ophthalmic apparatus |
JPH08173465A (en) | 1994-12-26 | 1996-07-09 | Kyocera Corp | Artificial knee joint |
US5540696A (en) | 1995-01-06 | 1996-07-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Instrumentation for use in orthopaedic surgery |
US6102955A (en) | 1995-01-19 | 2000-08-15 | Mendes; David | Surgical method, surgical tool and artificial implants for repairing knee joints |
US5560096A (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1996-10-01 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Method of manufacturing femoral knee implant |
US5560096B1 (en) | 1995-01-23 | 1998-03-10 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc | Method of manufacturing femoral knee implant |
WO1996024302A1 (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1996-08-15 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Surgical implantation of cartilage repair unit |
US5749874A (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1998-05-12 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit and method of assembling same |
WO1997025942A1 (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1997-07-24 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
US5632745A (en) | 1995-02-07 | 1997-05-27 | R&D Biologicals, Inc. | Surgical implantation of cartilage repair unit |
EP0814731B1 (en) | 1995-02-07 | 2002-08-21 | Matrix Biotechnologies, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
US5575793A (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1996-11-19 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Patella clamp apparatus |
WO1996025123A3 (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1996-09-26 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc | Trial knee prosthesis and bone preparation system |
US5683470A (en) | 1995-02-15 | 1997-11-04 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Tibial trial prosthesis and bone preparation system |
US5593450A (en) | 1995-02-27 | 1997-01-14 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Oval domed shaped patella prosthesis |
EP0732091B1 (en) | 1995-03-13 | 2001-12-05 | Michael J. Pappas | Mobile bearing total joint replacement |
US5683468A (en) | 1995-03-13 | 1997-11-04 | Pappas; Michael J. | Mobile bearing total joint replacement |
US6214369B1 (en) | 1995-03-14 | 2001-04-10 | Morphogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair |
US5906934A (en) | 1995-03-14 | 1999-05-25 | Morphogen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair |
US5571191A (en) | 1995-03-16 | 1996-11-05 | Fitz; William R. | Artificial facet joint |
US5832422A (en) | 1995-04-11 | 1998-11-03 | Wiedenhoefer; Curt | Measuring device |
US5542947A (en) | 1995-05-12 | 1996-08-06 | Huwmedica Inc. | Slotted patella resection guide and stylus |
US6277151B1 (en) | 1995-05-19 | 2001-08-21 | Etex Corporation | Cartilage growth from cell seeded ceramic compositions |
US6139578A (en) | 1995-05-19 | 2000-10-31 | Etex Corporation | Preparation of cell seeded ceramic compositions |
US6046379A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2000-04-04 | Stone; Kevin R. | Meniscal xenografts |
US6093204A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2000-07-25 | Crosscart, Inc. | Meniscal heterografts |
EP0833620B1 (en) | 1995-06-12 | 2002-10-09 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Fgfr3 as a marker for mesenchymal skeletal progenitor cells |
US5649929A (en) | 1995-07-10 | 1997-07-22 | Callaway; George Hadley | Knee joint flexion-gap distraction device |
US5968051A (en) | 1995-07-27 | 1999-10-19 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Patella clamping device |
US5671741A (en) | 1995-08-04 | 1997-09-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Magnetic resonance imaging technique for tissue characterization |
GB2304051B (en) | 1995-08-09 | 1999-01-27 | Corin Medical Ltd | A knee prosthesis |
US5601563A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1997-02-11 | Zimmer, Inc. | Orthopaedic milling template with attachable cutting guide |
US20020143402A1 (en) | 1995-09-04 | 2002-10-03 | Limber Ltd. | Hip joint prostheses |
US20030120347A1 (en) | 1995-09-04 | 2003-06-26 | Limber Ltd. | Joint prostheses |
US5871546A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1999-02-16 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Femoral component condyle design for knee prosthesis |
FR2740326B1 (en) | 1995-10-31 | 1998-02-20 | Osteal Medical Lab | FEMORO-PATELLAR PROSTHESIS OF THE KNEE |
US5897559A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 1999-04-27 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US6102916A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 2000-08-15 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides with removable housings for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US5961523A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 1999-10-05 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides to accommodate variable thicknesses of augmentation for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US5885296A (en) | 1995-11-02 | 1999-03-23 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides with removable housings for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US6187010B1 (en) | 1995-11-02 | 2001-02-13 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guides for use in the implantation of prosthetic joint components |
US20010001120A1 (en) | 1995-11-02 | 2001-05-10 | Medldea, Llc | Apparatus and method for preparing box cuts in a distal femur with a cutting guide attached to an intramedullary stem |
US5788701A (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1998-08-04 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Instrument system for knee prothesis implantation with universal handle or slap hammer |
EP0780090A1 (en) | 1995-12-21 | 1997-06-25 | JOHNSON & JOHNSON PROFESSIONAL Inc. | Knee prosthesis implantation system with universal handle |
US5871018A (en) | 1995-12-26 | 1999-02-16 | Delp; Scott L. | Computer-assisted surgical method |
US5682886A (en) | 1995-12-26 | 1997-11-04 | Musculographics Inc | Computer-assisted surgical system |
US6200606B1 (en) | 1996-01-16 | 2001-03-13 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Isolation of precursor cells from hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissues and their use in vivo bone and cartilage regeneration |
WO1997026847A1 (en) | 1996-01-23 | 1997-07-31 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Articulating joint repair |
WO1997027885A1 (en) | 1996-01-29 | 1997-08-07 | John Michael Lee | Preparation of biological material for implants |
JPH09206322A (en) | 1996-02-02 | 1997-08-12 | Naohide Tomita | Artificial knee articulation |
US5702463A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-12-30 | Smith & Nephew Inc. | Tibial prosthesis with polymeric liner and liner insertion/removal instrument |
US5681354A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1997-10-28 | Board Of Regents, University Of Colorado | Asymmetrical femoral component for knee prosthesis |
US5842477A (en) | 1996-02-21 | 1998-12-01 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Method for repairing cartilage |
US6352558B1 (en) | 1996-02-22 | 2002-03-05 | Ed. Geistlich Soehne Ag Fuer Chemische Industrie | Method for promoting regeneration of surface cartilage in a damage joint |
US6344059B1 (en) | 1996-02-26 | 2002-02-05 | Gabor Krakovits | Knee surface replacement prosthesis |
US5861175A (en) | 1996-03-15 | 1999-01-19 | Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. | Use of fluorocarbons for diagnosis and treatment of articular disorders |
US6368613B1 (en) | 1996-03-15 | 2002-04-09 | Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. | Use of fluorocarbons for diagnosis and treatment of articular disorders |
US6217894B1 (en) | 1996-03-22 | 2001-04-17 | Focal, Inc. | Compliant tissue sealants |
US5900245A (en) | 1996-03-22 | 1999-05-04 | Focal, Inc. | Compliant tissue sealants |
US5683466A (en) | 1996-03-26 | 1997-11-04 | Vitale; Glenn C. | Joint surface replacement system |
US5835619A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Teijin Limited | Method of processing a sectional image of a sample bone including a cortical bone portion and a cancellous bone portion |
US6299905B1 (en) | 1996-04-16 | 2001-10-09 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Bioerodable polymeric adhesives for tissue repair |
WO1997038676A1 (en) | 1996-04-16 | 1997-10-23 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Bioerodable polymeric adhesives for tissue repair |
EP0809987B1 (en) | 1996-05-28 | 2002-10-09 | Howmedica International S. De R.L. | Tibial element for a replacement knee prosthesis |
US5911723A (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1999-06-15 | Howmedice International Inc. | Surgical apparatus |
US5939323A (en) | 1996-05-28 | 1999-08-17 | Brown University | Hyaluronan based biodegradable scaffolds for tissue repair |
WO1997046665A1 (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1997-12-11 | Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. | Method for making cartilage and implants |
US6459948B1 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2002-10-01 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Anatomically correct prosthesis and method and apparatus for manufacturing prosthesis |
US6126690A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2000-10-03 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Anatomically correct prosthesis and method and apparatus for manufacturing prosthesis |
US6013103A (en) | 1996-07-11 | 2000-01-11 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Medial pivot knee prosthesis |
US5871540A (en) | 1996-07-30 | 1999-02-16 | Osteonics Corp. | Patellar implant component and method |
US20020151986A1 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 2002-10-17 | Asculai Samuel S. | Method, Instruments,and kit for autologous tansplantation |
WO1998008469A3 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1998-04-23 | Vts Holdings Ltd | Method, instruments and kit for autologous transplantation |
US6569172B2 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 2003-05-27 | Verigen Transplantation Service International (Vtsi) | Method, instruments, and kit for autologous transplantation |
US6379367B1 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 2002-04-30 | Verigen Transplantation Service International (Vtsi) Ag | Method instruments and kit for autologous transplantation |
US6283980B1 (en) | 1996-08-30 | 2001-09-04 | Verigen Transplantation Services Internt'l | Method, instruments, and kit for autologous transplantation |
US6175655B1 (en) | 1996-09-19 | 2001-01-16 | Integrated Medical Systems, Inc. | Medical imaging system for displaying, manipulating and analyzing three-dimensional images |
WO1998012994A1 (en) | 1996-09-27 | 1998-04-02 | Ingvar Eriksson | Orthopedic device |
US5824085A (en) | 1996-09-30 | 1998-10-20 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | System and method for cavity generation for surgical planning and initial placement of a bone prosthesis |
US5895428A (en) | 1996-11-01 | 1999-04-20 | Berry; Don | Load bearing spinal joint implant |
US6235060B1 (en) | 1996-11-13 | 2001-05-22 | Hjs Gelenk System Gmbh | Artificial joint, in particular endoprosthesis for replacing natural joints |
WO1998020816A1 (en) | 1996-11-13 | 1998-05-22 | Theusner, Joachim | Artificial joint, in particular endoprosthesis for replacing natural joints |
US6165221A (en) | 1996-11-14 | 2000-12-26 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Implant |
US5928945A (en) | 1996-11-20 | 1999-07-27 | Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. | Application of shear flow stress to chondrocytes or chondrocyte stem cells to produce cartilage |
US6203576B1 (en) | 1996-12-09 | 2001-03-20 | Groupe Controle Dedienne Gcd Societe De Droit Francais | Complete knee joint prosthesis |
WO1998030617A1 (en) | 1997-01-11 | 1998-07-16 | Smith & Nephew Plc | Hydrogels |
US5972385A (en) | 1997-01-15 | 1999-10-26 | Orquest, Inc. | Collagen-polysaccharide matrix for bone and cartilage repair |
WO1998032384A1 (en) | 1997-01-28 | 1998-07-30 | New York Society For The Relief Of The Ruptured And Crippled Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Method and apparatus for femoral resection |
US6575980B1 (en) | 1997-01-28 | 2003-06-10 | New York Society For The Ruptured And Crippled Maintaining The Hospital For Special Surgery | Method and apparatus for femoral resection |
US6405068B1 (en) | 1997-02-04 | 2002-06-11 | Osteometer Meditech A/S | Diagnostic imaging in relation to arthritic conditions |
US5779651A (en) | 1997-02-07 | 1998-07-14 | Bio Syntech | Medical apparatus for the diagnosis of cartilage degeneration via spatial mapping of compression-induced electrical potentials |
US6281195B1 (en) | 1997-02-07 | 2001-08-28 | Stryker Corporation | Matrix-free osteogenic devices, implants and methods of use thereof |
US6358253B1 (en) | 1997-02-11 | 2002-03-19 | Smith & Newhew Inc | Repairing cartilage |
US6289753B1 (en) | 1997-02-14 | 2001-09-18 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Method for measuring mechanical properties of the collagen network in cartilage |
US5880976A (en) | 1997-02-21 | 1999-03-09 | Carnegie Mellon University | Apparatus and method for facilitating the implantation of artificial components in joints |
US6205411B1 (en) | 1997-02-21 | 2001-03-20 | Carnegie Mellon University | Computer-assisted surgery planner and intra-operative guidance system |
US5995738A (en) | 1997-02-21 | 1999-11-30 | Carnegie Mellon University | Apparatus and method for facilitating the implantation of artificial components in joints |
US6002859A (en) | 1997-02-21 | 1999-12-14 | Carnegie Mellon University | Apparatus and method facilitating the implantation of artificial components in joints |
US20010051830A1 (en) | 1997-03-14 | 2001-12-13 | Kurt F. James | Prosthetic implant and surgical tool |
WO1998052498A1 (en) | 1997-05-23 | 1998-11-26 | Volkmar Jansson | Replacement structures for bones and cartilage |
CN2305966Y (en) | 1997-06-09 | 1999-02-03 | 山东省文登整骨医院 | Artificial body for generating bone and joint |
JPH1119104A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 1999-01-26 | Kazumasa Itokazu | Artificial bone replenishing material for knee tibia round part sinking fracture |
WO1999002654A1 (en) | 1997-07-14 | 1999-01-21 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Isolation of bone and cartilage precursor cells |
US6311083B1 (en) | 1997-07-21 | 2001-10-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for determining an examination point for the diaphanoscopic examination of a being and device for realizing the same |
US6078680A (en) | 1997-07-25 | 2000-06-20 | Arch Development Corporation | Method, apparatus, and storage medium for detection of nodules in biological tissue using wavelet snakes to characterize features in radiographic images |
US6110209A (en) | 1997-08-07 | 2000-08-29 | Stone; Kevin R. | Method and paste for articular cartilage transplantation |
US6514514B1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 2003-02-04 | Sùlzer Biologics Inc. | Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage lesions |
WO1999008728A1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 1999-02-25 | Sulzer Innotec Ag | Composition and device for in vivo cartilage repair |
EP0896825B1 (en) | 1997-08-14 | 2002-07-17 | Sulzer Innotec Ag | Composition and device for in vivo cartilage repair comprising nanocapsules with osteoinductive and/or chondroinductive factors |
WO1999008598A1 (en) | 1997-08-19 | 1999-02-25 | Mendlein John D | Ultrasonic transmission films and devices, particularly for hygienic transducer surfaces |
US6610089B1 (en) | 1997-08-26 | 2003-08-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Spinal implant and cutting tool preparation accessory for mounting the implant |
US5913821A (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1999-06-22 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Diagnostic method and apparatus for assessing canine hip dysplasia |
US6387131B1 (en) | 1997-10-21 | 2002-05-14 | Aesculap | Knee prosthesis comprising a tibial wedge |
US6161080A (en) | 1997-11-17 | 2000-12-12 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Three dimensional multibody modeling of anatomical joints |
US6344043B1 (en) | 1997-11-18 | 2002-02-05 | Michael J. Pappas | Anterior-posterior femoral resection guide with set of detachable collets |
US6151521A (en) | 1997-11-19 | 2000-11-21 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Medical support system |
US6082364A (en) | 1997-12-15 | 2000-07-04 | Musculoskeletal Development Enterprises, Llc | Pluripotential bone marrow cell line and methods of using the same |
US6319712B1 (en) | 1998-01-30 | 2001-11-20 | Deutsche Institute Fur Textil-Und Faserforschung Stuttgart | Biohybrid articular surface replacement |
US5916220A (en) | 1998-02-02 | 1999-06-29 | Medidea, Llc | Bone cutting guide and method to accommodate different-sized implants |
US6383228B1 (en) | 1998-02-11 | 2002-05-07 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Femoral hip-joint prosthesis with a logarithmically extending curvature |
WO1999042061A1 (en) | 1998-02-17 | 1999-08-26 | Krehl Frieder W | Method for guiding external air from the outside through a window in a forced ventilated space and window for the same |
US6289115B1 (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2001-09-11 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Medical network system |
US6057927A (en) | 1998-02-25 | 2000-05-02 | American Iron And Steel Institute | Laser-ultrasound spectroscopy apparatus and method with detection of shear resonances for measuring anisotropy, thickness, and other properties |
US6171340B1 (en) | 1998-02-27 | 2001-01-09 | Mcdowell Charles L. | Method and device for regenerating cartilage in articulating joints |
WO1999047186A1 (en) | 1998-03-18 | 1999-09-23 | University Of Pittsburgh | Chitosan-based composite materials containing glycosaminoglycan for cartilage repair |
US6074352A (en) | 1998-03-26 | 2000-06-13 | Brigham And Women's Hospital | Method for the treatment of joint diseases characterized by unwanted pannus |
JPH11276510A (en) | 1998-03-31 | 1999-10-12 | Kyocera Corp | Surface modifying bone prothesis member and method for manufacturing the same |
US6219571B1 (en) | 1998-04-06 | 2001-04-17 | Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Magnetic resonance imaging using driven equilibrium fourier transform |
WO1999051719A1 (en) | 1998-04-07 | 1999-10-14 | Tissue Engineering, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for the conditioning of cartilage replacement tissue |
US6316153B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2001-11-13 | The University Of Connecticut | Free-form fabricaton using multi-photon excitation |
WO1999056674A1 (en) | 1998-05-01 | 1999-11-11 | Weiss James M | Hip replacement methods and apparatus |
US6090144A (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2000-07-18 | Letot; Patrick | Synthetic knee system |
US6835377B2 (en) | 1998-05-13 | 2004-12-28 | Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. | Osteoarthritis cartilage regeneration |
US6533737B1 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2003-03-18 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Interactive computer-assisted surgical system and method thereof |
US6450978B1 (en) | 1998-05-28 | 2002-09-17 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Interactive computer-assisted surgical system and method thereof |
US6007537A (en) | 1998-06-15 | 1999-12-28 | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. | Nested cutting block |
US6334006B1 (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2001-12-25 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Loading device and electronic equipment system |
US6010509A (en) | 1998-07-01 | 2000-01-04 | The Dana Center For Orthopaedic Implants | Patella resection drill and prosthesis implantation device |
US6081577A (en) | 1998-07-24 | 2000-06-27 | Wake Forest University | Method and system for creating task-dependent three-dimensional images |
US6056756A (en) | 1998-08-11 | 2000-05-02 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Femoral tensing and sizing device |
WO2000009179A3 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2000-06-02 | Verigen Transplantation Serv | Methods, instruments and materials for chondrocyte cell transplantation |
US6866668B2 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2005-03-15 | Verigen Transplantation Service International (“VTSL”) AG | Methods, instruments and materials for chondrocyte cell transplantation |
US20020045940A1 (en) | 1998-08-14 | 2002-04-18 | Bruno Giannetti | Methods, instruments and materials for chondrocyte cell transplantation |
US6132468A (en) | 1998-09-10 | 2000-10-17 | Mansmann; Kevin A. | Arthroscopic replacement of cartilage using flexible inflatable envelopes |
WO2000015153A1 (en) | 1998-09-10 | 2000-03-23 | Mansmann Kevin A | Arthroscopic replacement of cartilage using flexible inflatable envelopes |
US20090076371A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Joint and Cartilage Diagnosis, Assessment and Modeling |
US20110125009A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2011-05-26 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
US7239908B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-07-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US7881768B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2011-02-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US20070203430A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-08-30 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Assessing Cartilage Loss |
WO2000035346A3 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-10-26 | Univ Stanford | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US20020177770A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2002-11-28 | Philipp Lang | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss |
US7184814B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-02-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss |
US20040167390A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2004-08-26 | Alexander Eugene J. | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US20020087274A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2002-07-04 | Alexander Eugene J. | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US20070276224A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-11-29 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
US20070015995A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2007-01-18 | Philipp Lang | Joint and cartilage diagnosis, assessment and modeling |
US20080015433A1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2008-01-17 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the Condition of a Joint and Devising Treatment |
US6443991B1 (en) | 1998-09-21 | 2002-09-03 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Posterior stabilized mobile bearing knee |
US6261296B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2001-07-17 | Synthes U.S.A. | Spinal disc space distractor |
US20020049382A1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2002-04-25 | Suh Jun-Kyo | Arthroscopic diagnostic probe to measure mechanical properties of articular cartilage |
US6620168B1 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2003-09-16 | Stryker Technologies Corporation | Methods and tools for tibial intermedullary revision surgery and associated tibial components |
US6585666B2 (en) | 1998-10-13 | 2003-07-01 | The Administrators Of The Tulane Educational Fund | Arthroscopic diagnostic probe to measure mechanical properties of articular cartilage |
US6500208B1 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2002-12-31 | Biomet, Inc. | Nonmodular joint prosthesis convertible in vivo to a modular prosthesis |
US6310619B1 (en) | 1998-11-10 | 2001-10-30 | Robert W. Rice | Virtual reality, tissue-specific body model having user-variable tissue-specific attributes and a system and method for implementing the same |
US6328765B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2001-12-11 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | Methods and articles for regenerating living tissue |
US6106529A (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2000-08-22 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Epicondylar axis referencing drill guide |
US6302582B1 (en) | 1998-12-22 | 2001-10-16 | Bio-Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Spine phantom simulating cortical and trabecular bone for calibration of dual energy x-ray bone densitometers |
US6623526B1 (en) | 1999-01-08 | 2003-09-23 | Corin Limited | Knee prosthesis |
US6146422A (en) | 1999-01-25 | 2000-11-14 | Lawson; Kevin Jon | Prosthetic nucleus replacement for surgical reconstruction of intervertebral discs and treatment method |
US6156069A (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2000-12-05 | Amstutz; Harlan C. | Precision hip joint replacement method |
WO2000048550A3 (en) | 1999-02-16 | 2000-12-14 | Sulzer Biolog Inc | Device and method for regeneration and repair of cartilage lesions |
GB2348373B (en) | 1999-03-09 | 2001-03-14 | Corin Medical Ltd | A knee prosthesis |
US6120541A (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2000-09-19 | Johnson; Lanny L. | Apparatus for use in grafting articular cartilage |
US6838493B2 (en) | 1999-03-25 | 2005-01-04 | Metabolix, Inc. | Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers |
US20020156150A1 (en) | 1999-03-25 | 2002-10-24 | Metabolix, Inc. | Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers |
US6206927B1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2001-03-27 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prothesis |
WO2000059411A1 (en) | 1999-04-02 | 2000-10-12 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US6866684B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-03-15 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having different tibial and femoral surface profiles |
US6855165B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-02-15 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having enlarged femoral surface |
US6310477B1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2001-10-30 | General Electric Company | MR imaging of lesions and detection of malignant tumors |
US20030060885A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having enlarged femoral surface |
US6966928B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-11-22 | Fell Barry M | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
US20030060882A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having medially shifted tibial surface |
US20030060884A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
US6893463B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-05-17 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having two-piece keyed components |
US6911044B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-06-28 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having medially shifted tibial surface |
US20030055500A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-20 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having two-piece keyed components |
US20030055501A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-20 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having different tibial and femoral surface profiles |
US20030060883A1 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2003-03-27 | Fell Barry M. | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having attachment apertures |
US6923831B2 (en) | 1999-05-10 | 2005-08-02 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis having attachment apertures |
WO2000068749A1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2000-11-16 | 3Di Gmbh | Method for generating patient-specific implants |
US6178225B1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-01-23 | Edge Medical Devices Ltd. | System and method for management of X-ray imaging facilities |
US6468314B2 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2002-10-22 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
WO2000074554A3 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2003-11-06 | Depuy Orthopaedics Inc | Cartilage repair unit |
US20010010023A1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-07-26 | Schwartz Robert E. | Cartilage repair unit |
US6251143B1 (en) | 1999-06-04 | 2001-06-26 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Cartilage repair unit |
DE19926083A1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2000-12-14 | Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg | Biological joint construct |
WO2000074741A3 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2002-07-18 | Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg | Biological joint construct |
FR2795945B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2001-10-26 | Scient X | ANATOMICAL INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT AND GRIPPER FOR SUCH AN IMPLANT |
EP1070487B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2005-09-14 | Ethicon, Inc. | Graft fixation device |
US6203546B1 (en) | 1999-07-27 | 2001-03-20 | Macmahon Edward B | Method and apparatus for medial tibial osteotomy |
EP1074229B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2005-10-05 | Schuster, Luis, Dr.med. | Method of manufacturing a knee joint replacing endoprosthesis |
WO2001010356A3 (en) | 1999-08-10 | 2001-08-23 | Nicolaas Jacobus J Verdonschot | Method and apparatus for delivering cement to bones and/or positioning components |
US6322588B1 (en) | 1999-08-17 | 2001-11-27 | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | Medical devices with metal/polymer composites |
US6841150B2 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2005-01-11 | Artecal, Sciences, Inc. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
US6429013B1 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2002-08-06 | Artecel Science, Inc. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
US20020115647A1 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2002-08-22 | Halvorsen Yuan-Di C. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
EP1077253B1 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2006-06-14 | Zen-Bio, Inc. | Use of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells for chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage repair |
WO2001017463A1 (en) | 1999-09-10 | 2001-03-15 | Mansmann Kevin A | Improved resorbable scaffolds to promote cartilage regeneration |
US6365405B1 (en) | 1999-09-16 | 2002-04-02 | Universite Pierre Et Marie Curie (Paris Iv) | Compositions of chondrocytes, preparation and utilization |
WO2001019254A3 (en) | 1999-09-17 | 2001-10-25 | Genzyme Corp | Surgical fastener and device and method for applying it |
US6425920B1 (en) | 1999-10-13 | 2002-07-30 | James S. Hamada | Spinal fusion implant |
US6560476B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-05-06 | Arthrovision, Inc. | Evaluating disease progression using magnetic resonance imaging |
US20030173695A1 (en) | 1999-11-12 | 2003-09-18 | Therics, Inc. | Rapid prototyping and manufacturing process |
WO2001035968A1 (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2001-05-25 | Children's Medical Center Corporation | Methods for inducing chondrogenesis and producing de novo cartilage in vitro |
US6379388B1 (en) | 1999-12-08 | 2002-04-30 | Ortho Development Corporation | Tibial prosthesis locking system and method of repairing knee joint |
WO2001045764A1 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2001-06-28 | Verigen Transplantation Service International Ag | Cellular matrix |
US6334066B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2001-12-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for monitoring growth disorder therapy |
US7104996B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-12 | Marctec. Llc | Method of performing surgery |
US20030028196A1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2003-02-06 | Bonutti Peter M. | Method of performing surgery |
US6702821B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2004-03-09 | The Bonutti 2003 Trust A | Instrumentation for minimally invasive joint replacement and methods for using same |
EP1120087B1 (en) | 2000-01-28 | 2008-11-12 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus for affixing tissue repair material to bone |
US6342075B1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2002-01-29 | Macarthur A. Creig | Prosthesis and methods for total knee arthroplasty |
US6382028B1 (en) | 2000-02-23 | 2002-05-07 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Ultrasonic defect detection system |
EP1129675A3 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2003-02-26 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
US6371958B1 (en) | 2000-03-02 | 2002-04-16 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
EP1132061B1 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2004-08-18 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Polymer filled spinal fusion cage |
WO2001068800A1 (en) | 2000-03-11 | 2001-09-20 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Bioreactor for generating functional cartilaginous tissue |
US6626945B2 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2003-09-30 | Chondrosite, Llc | Cartilage repair plug |
WO2001091672A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-12-06 | Timothy Simon | Cartilage repair plug |
US20010039455A1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2001-11-08 | Timothy Simon | Cartilage repair plug |
US6632246B1 (en) | 2000-03-14 | 2003-10-14 | Chondrosite, Llc | Cartilage repair plug |
US6712856B1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2004-03-30 | Kinamed, Inc. | Custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
US20040098133A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2004-05-20 | Roger Carignan | Custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
WO2001070142A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2001-09-27 | Kinamed, Inc. | A custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
US20080215059A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2008-09-04 | Kinamed, Inc. | Marking template for installing a custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and associated installation method |
US6905514B2 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2005-06-14 | Kinamed, Inc. | Custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and method of making the same |
US20050119664A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2005-06-02 | Kinamed, Inc. | Marking template for installing a custom replacement device for resurfacing a femur and associated installation method |
US20020022884A1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2002-02-21 | Mansmann Kevin A. | Meniscus-type implant with hydrogel surface reinforced by three-dimensional mesh |
US6626948B2 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2003-09-30 | Benoist Girard Sas | Femoral hip prosthesis |
US6998841B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-02-14 | Virtualscopics, Llc | Method and system which forms an isotropic, high-resolution, three-dimensional diagnostic image of a subject from two-dimensional image data scans |
US6984981B2 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-01-10 | Virtualscopics, Llc | Magnetic resonance method and system forming an isotropic, high resolution, three-dimensional diagnostic image of a subject from two-dimensional image data scans |
US6772026B2 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2004-08-03 | Therics, Inc. | System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices |
US20020059049A1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2002-05-16 | Therics, Inc | System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices |
WO2001077988A3 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2003-03-06 | Therics Inc | System and method for rapidly customizing a design and remotely manufacturing biomedical devices using a computer system |
US20020016543A1 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2002-02-07 | Tyler Jenny A. | Method for diagnosis of and prognosis for damaged tissue |
US6690816B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2004-02-10 | The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Systems and methods for tubular object processing |
US6375658B1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2002-04-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Cartilage grafting |
WO2001082677A3 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2002-04-11 | Std Mfg Inc | System and method for joint resurface repair |
WO2003051210A3 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2004-03-25 | Arthrosurface Inc | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US6679917B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2004-01-20 | Arthrosurface, Incorporated | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US20080172125A1 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2008-07-17 | Arthrosurface Incorporated | System and Method for Joint Resurface Repair |
US6520964B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2003-02-18 | Std Manufacturing, Inc. | System and method for joint resurface repair |
US6373250B1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2002-04-16 | Ramot University Authority For Applied Research And Industrial Development Ltd. | Method of magnetic resonance imaging |
WO2002002158A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-10 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
WO2002000275A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-03 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
WO2002000270A1 (en) | 2000-06-24 | 2002-01-03 | Victrex Manufacturing Limited | Bio-compatible polymeric materials |
US6296646B1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2001-10-02 | Richard V. Williamson | Instruments and methods for use in performing knee surgery |
US20050085920A1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2005-04-21 | Williamson Richard V. | Instruments and methods for use in performing knee surgery |
US6478799B1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2002-11-12 | Richard V. Williamson | Instruments and methods for use in performing knee surgery |
US6479996B1 (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2002-11-12 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics | Magnetic resonance imaging of several volumes |
US6576015B2 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2003-06-10 | Ed. Geistlich Soehne Ag Fuer Chemische Industrie | Bone material and collagen combination for repair of injured joints |
US20020013626A1 (en) | 2000-07-19 | 2002-01-31 | Peter Geistlich | Bone material and collagen combination for repair of injured joints |
US6556855B2 (en) | 2000-07-25 | 2003-04-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for the implementation of a perfusion measurement with magnetic resonance imaging |
US6249692B1 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2001-06-19 | The Research Foundation Of City University Of New York | Method for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis |
US20020173852A1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2002-11-21 | Felt Jeffrey C. | Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing |
US20020183850A1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2002-12-05 | Felt Jeffrey C. | Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing |
US6652587B2 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2003-11-25 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing |
US20020127264A1 (en) | 2000-08-28 | 2002-09-12 | Felt Jeffrey C. | Method and system for mammalian joint resurfacing |
US20080219412A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-09-11 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and Devices for Quantitative Analysis of X-Ray Images |
US20050078802A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2005-04-14 | Philipp Lang | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
US20060210018A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2006-09-21 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20060210017A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2006-09-21 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20020067798A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-06-06 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7245697B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2007-07-17 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7676023B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2010-03-09 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US6904123B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2005-06-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7580504B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2009-08-25 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
US8000441B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2011-08-16 | Imatx, Inc. | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
US7545964B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2009-06-09 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7467892B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-12-23 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Calibration devices and methods of use thereof |
US20020186818A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2002-12-12 | Osteonet, Inc. | System and method for building and manipulating a centralized measurement value database |
US20050226374A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2005-10-13 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20030031292A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2003-02-13 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7292674B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2007-11-06 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20080097794A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-04-24 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | System and Method for Building and Manipulating a Centralized Measurement Value Database |
US7379529B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-05-27 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20080025463A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-01-31 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and Devices for Quantitative Analysis of X-Ray Images |
US20030063704A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2003-04-03 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US20080170659A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-07-17 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Calibration Devices and Methods of use Thereof |
US20070274444A1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2007-11-29 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and Devices for Quantitative Analysis of X-Ray Images |
US7050534B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2006-05-23 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
US7058159B2 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2006-06-06 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for quantitative analysis of x-ray images |
WO2002022013A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-03-21 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing condition of a joint and cartilage loss |
WO2002023483A3 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2003-03-27 | Univ Leland Stanford Junior | Technique for manipulating medical images |
WO2002022014A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-03-21 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US20020147392A1 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2002-10-10 | Daniel Steines | Technique for manipulating medical images |
US6799066B2 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2004-09-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Technique for manipulating medical images |
US6558421B1 (en) | 2000-09-19 | 2003-05-06 | Barry M. Fell | Surgically implantable knee prosthesis |
US20040081287A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2004-04-29 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US20020114425A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-08-22 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of X-ray images |
US20030112921A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2003-06-19 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US6690761B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2004-02-10 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of X-ray images |
US7660453B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2010-02-09 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US7120225B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2006-10-10 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US20040062358A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2004-04-01 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of X-ray images |
US20070047794A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2007-03-01 | Philipp Lang | Methods and devices for analysis of x-ray images |
US6811310B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2004-11-02 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and devices for analysis of X-ray images |
WO2002034310B1 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2003-02-20 | Sdgi Holdings Inc | Self-forming orthopedic implants |
WO2002036147A1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2002-05-10 | Orquest, Inc. | Mineralized collagen-polysaccharide matrix for bone and cartilage repair |
US20030236473A1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2003-12-25 | Sylvie Dore | High precision modeling of a body part using a 3D imaging system |
DE10055465A1 (en) | 2000-11-09 | 2002-05-23 | Blz Gmbh | Material useful for making bone replacement implants comprises nonmetallic inorganic filler particles embedded in a laser-sinterable biocompatible polymer matrix |
US6510334B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2003-01-21 | Luis Schuster | Method of producing an endoprosthesis as a joint substitute for a knee joint |
US20040117015A1 (en) | 2000-12-04 | 2004-06-17 | Spineco | Molded surgical implant and method |
US20020068979A1 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2002-06-06 | Brown David Ray | Unicondylar femoral prosthesis and instruments |
US6494914B2 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2002-12-17 | Biomet, Inc. | Unicondylar femoral prosthesis and instruments |
US20020111694A1 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2002-08-15 | Bioti As | Medical prosthetic devices and implants having improved biocompatibility |
US6726724B2 (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2004-04-27 | John A. Repicci | Prosthetic knee |
US20020082703A1 (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2002-06-27 | Repicci John A. | Prosthetic knee |
US20020133230A1 (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2002-09-19 | Repicci John A. | Prosthetic knee |
US6503280B2 (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2003-01-07 | John A. Repicci | Prosthetic knee and method of inserting |
EP1219269B1 (en) | 2000-12-27 | 2004-04-07 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Prosthesis evaluation assembly |
US7117027B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2006-10-03 | Synthes (Usa) | Method for establishing a three-dimensional representation of a bone from image data |
US6743232B2 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2004-06-01 | David W. Overaker | Tissue scaffold anchor for cartilage repair |
EP1234552B1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2006-08-16 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
US20020120281A1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2002-08-29 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
US20020120274A1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2002-08-29 | Ethicon, Inc. | Tissue scaffold anchor for cartilage repair |
US6575986B2 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2003-06-10 | Ethicon, Inc. | Scaffold fixation device for use in articular cartilage repair |
EP1234555B1 (en) | 2001-02-26 | 2007-02-07 | Ethicon, Inc. | Tissue scaffold anchor for cartilage repair |
US20030045935A1 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-03-06 | Angelucci Christopher M. | Laminoplasty implants and methods of use |
US6632235B2 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2003-10-14 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Inflatable device and method for reducing fractures in bone and in treating the spine |
US6719794B2 (en) | 2001-05-03 | 2004-04-13 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Intervertebral implant for transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure |
US6444222B1 (en) | 2001-05-08 | 2002-09-03 | Verigen Transplantation Services International Ag | Reinforced matrices |
US6816607B2 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2004-11-09 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | System for modeling static and dynamic three dimensional anatomical structures by 3-D models |
US7468075B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-12-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US20080275452A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Cutting Guide |
US20070156171A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-07-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant Grasper |
US20090312805A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-12-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US20090307893A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-12-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools Facilitating Increased Accuracy, Speed and Simplicity in Performing Joint Arthroplasty |
US20030015208A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-01-23 | Philipp Lang | Methods to diagnose treat and prevent bone loss |
US20090306676A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-12-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US7717956B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-05-18 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices formed in situ |
US7618451B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US20070233269A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Interpositional Joint Implant |
US20090276045A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices and Methods for Treatment of Facet and Other Joints |
US20090222014A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20070100462A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-05-03 | Conformis, Inc | Joint Arthroplasty Devices |
US20070250169A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-25 | Philipp Lang | Joint arthroplasty devices formed in situ |
US20100281678A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools Facilitating Increased Accuracy, Speed and Simplicity in Performing Joint Arthroplasty |
US20030055502A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-03-20 | Philipp Lang | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US20070083266A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-04-12 | Vertegen, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
US7534263B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2009-05-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
WO2002096268A9 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-04-10 | Imaging Therapeutics | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US20030216669A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2003-11-20 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US20040236424A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-11-25 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US20040204760A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2004-10-14 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US20070198022A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2007-08-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100305573A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20080281328A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US20080281329A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100305574A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110066193A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-03-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US20050234461A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-10-20 | Burdulis Albert G Jr | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
US20110071581A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-03-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US20050267584A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2005-12-01 | Burdulis Albert G Jr | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US20080195216A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-08-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant Device and Method for Manufacture |
US7981158B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2011-07-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20080243127A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-10-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US20080281426A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US7115131B2 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2006-10-03 | Alexandria Research Technologies, Llc | Apparatus and method for sculpting the surface of a joint |
US6482209B1 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2002-11-19 | Gerard A. Engh | Apparatus and method for sculpting the surface of a joint |
US7520901B2 (en) | 2001-06-14 | 2009-04-21 | Alexandria Research Technologies, Inc. | Bicompartmental implants and method of use |
US7174282B2 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2007-02-06 | Scott J Hollister | Design methodology for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterial implants |
WO2003007788A3 (en) | 2001-07-16 | 2003-05-22 | Depuy Products Inc | Unitary surgical device and method |
DE10135771B4 (en) | 2001-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Facet joint implant |
US7058209B2 (en) | 2001-09-20 | 2006-06-06 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and computer program product for locating facial features |
WO2003028566A1 (en) | 2001-10-04 | 2003-04-10 | Stryker Spine | Spinal osteosynthesis assembly comprising the head of an anchoring member and a tool for fixing said head |
US7438685B2 (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2008-10-21 | Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for registration, guidance and targeting of external beam radiation therapy |
US7020314B1 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2006-03-28 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Black blood angiography method and apparatus |
US20030100907A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-05-29 | Rosa Richard A. | Instrumentation for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US7141053B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-11-28 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Methods of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US7060074B2 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-06-13 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation for minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement |
US20060235421A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2006-10-19 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Replacement |
US20030100953A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-05-29 | Rosa Richard A. | Knee joint prostheses |
WO2003047470A2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2003-06-12 | Discure Ltd. | Cushion bearing implants for load bearing applications |
US6873741B2 (en) | 2002-01-10 | 2005-03-29 | Sharp Laboratories Of America | Nonlinear edge-enhancement filter |
EP1327423B1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2006-03-29 | Zimmer GmbH | A surgically implantable knee prosthesis having keels |
WO2003061522A9 (en) | 2002-01-22 | 2005-04-28 | Advanced Bio Surfaces Inc | Interpositional arthroplasty system and method |
US20020106625A1 (en) | 2002-02-07 | 2002-08-08 | Hung Clark T. | Bioreactor for generating functional cartilaginous tissue |
US6689139B2 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2004-02-10 | Paul C. Horn | Long oblique ulna shortening osteotomy jig |
US20030158558A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-21 | Horn Paul C | Long oblique ulna shortening osteotomy jig |
US20030158606A1 (en) | 2002-02-20 | 2003-08-21 | Coon Thomas M. | Knee arthroplasty prosthesis and method |
US20030163137A1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2003-08-28 | Smucker Donald M. | Patella resection guide |
US7344540B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2008-03-18 | Zimmer, Inc. | Patella resection guide |
US20090131941A1 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2009-05-21 | Ilwhan Park | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US20030225457A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2003-12-04 | Justin Daniel F. | Femoral components for knee arthroplasty |
US20050015153A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2005-01-20 | Medicine Lodge, Inc. | Implants and related methods and apparatus for securing an implant on an articulating surface of an orthopedic joint |
US20030236521A1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Scott Brown | Prosthesis cutting guide, cutting tool and method |
WO2004006811A2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2004-01-22 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Method and kit for interpositional arthroplasty |
US20060111726A1 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2006-05-25 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Method and kit for interpositional arthroplasty |
US20040106868A1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2004-06-03 | Siau-Way Liew | Novel imaging markers in musculoskeletal disease |
US20040242987A1 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2004-12-02 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods of predicting musculoskeletal disease |
US7840247B2 (en) | 2002-09-16 | 2010-11-23 | Imatx, Inc. | Methods of predicting musculoskeletal disease |
US20040138754A1 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2004-07-15 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-Dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
WO2004032806A9 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2004-05-27 | Imaging Therapeutics Inc | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
US20040133276A1 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2004-07-08 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-Dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
US7799077B2 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2010-09-21 | Conformis, Inc. | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
US20040147927A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2004-07-29 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
WO2004043305A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2004-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determing meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US20040153079A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2004-08-05 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US7796791B2 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2010-09-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US6770099B2 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2004-08-03 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Femoral prosthesis |
US20040098132A1 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2004-05-20 | Thomas Andriacchi | Femoral prosthesis |
US20040102852A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Johnson Erin M. | Modular knee prosthesis |
US20050107884A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2005-05-19 | Johnson Erin M. | Modular knee prosthesis |
WO2004047688A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-06-10 | Juridical Foundation Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization | Artificial joint, medical implant, and methods of producing the artificial joint and medical implant |
US20040102851A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Joseph Saladino | Modular knee prosthesis |
US7105026B2 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2006-09-12 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Modular knee prosthesis |
WO2004049981A3 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2005-04-14 | Conformis Inc | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
US20040204644A1 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2004-10-14 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in MRI and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US20100054572A1 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2010-03-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Fusion of Multiple Imaging Planes for Isotropic Imaging in MRI and Quantitative Image Analysis using Isotropic or Near-isotropic Imaging |
WO2004051301A3 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2004-12-02 | Conformis Inc | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in mri and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US7634119B2 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2009-12-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in MRI and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US6869447B2 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2005-03-22 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Prosthetic knee implant with modular augment |
US20040122521A1 (en) | 2002-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Lee Chelynne Nicole | Prosthetic knee implant with modular augment |
EP1437101A3 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2004-12-22 | DePuy Spine, Inc. | Prosthetic facet joint ligament |
US7008430B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2006-03-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Adjustable reamer with tip tracker linkage |
US20040153164A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-05 | Adam Sanford | Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee |
US6946001B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2005-09-20 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Mobile bearing unicompartmental knee |
US20040193280A1 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2004-09-30 | Webster Vincent A. | Mobile bearing unicondylar tibial knee prosthesis |
US20040153162A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-05 | Sanford Adam H. | Provisional orthopedic prosthesis for partially resected bone |
US20050021039A1 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-01-27 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Apparatus for aligning an instrument during a surgical procedure |
US6916324B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2005-07-12 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Provisional orthopedic prosthesis for partially resected bone |
US20070118141A1 (en) | 2003-02-13 | 2007-05-24 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Modular patella instrument |
US20040167630A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2004-08-26 | Rolston Lindsey R. | Device and method for bicompartmental arthroplasty |
US6916341B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2005-07-12 | Lindsey R. Rolston | Device and method for bicompartmental arthroplasty |
US20050171612A1 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2005-08-04 | Rolston Lindsey R. | Device and method for bicompartmental arthroplasty |
WO2004073550A3 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2005-03-03 | Ian P Murray | Knee spacer |
DE20303498U1 (en) | 2003-02-26 | 2003-07-03 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Surgical adjusting and holding device for tool guiding arrangement, in particular for performance of operation at femur or tibia |
US20050010106A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2005-01-13 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for the compensation of imaging technique in the processing of radiographic images |
US7995822B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2011-08-09 | Imatx, Inc. | Methods for the compensation of imaging technique in the processing of radiographic images |
US7664298B2 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2010-02-16 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for the compensation of imaging technique in the processing of radiographic images |
US20040204766A1 (en) | 2003-04-08 | 2004-10-14 | Thomas Siebel | Anatomical knee prosthesis |
US7201755B2 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2007-04-10 | Zimmer Gmbh | Apparatus for the preparation of a femoral condyle |
US20040249386A1 (en) | 2003-04-25 | 2004-12-09 | Francisco Faoro | Apparatus for the preparation of a femoral condyle |
US7104997B2 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2006-09-12 | Lionberger Jr David R | Cutting guide apparatus and surgical method for use in knee arthroplasty |
US20070073305A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2007-03-29 | Lionberger David R | Cutting guide apparatus and surgical method for use in knee arthroplasty |
WO2005016175A3 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2005-05-12 | Advanced Bio Surfaces Inc | Meniscus preserving implant method and apparatus |
US20070067032A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2007-03-22 | Felt Jeffrey C | Meniscus preserving implant method and apparatus |
US20050043807A1 (en) | 2003-08-18 | 2005-02-24 | Wood David John | Two-thirds prosthetic arthroplasty |
WO2005020850B1 (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2005-09-29 | Gerraspine A G | Facet implant |
US20080058613A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-03-06 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method and System for Providing Fracture/No Fracture Classification |
US20050148860A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2005-07-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method for bone structure prognosis and simulated bone remodeling |
US20080031412A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2008-02-07 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Method for Bone Structure Prognosis and Simulated Bone Remodeling |
US20050107883A1 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2005-05-19 | Goodfried Gary P. | Modular implant system with fully porous coated sleeve |
WO2005051239A1 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2005-06-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices formed in situ |
WO2005051240A1 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2005-06-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US20050119751A1 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2005-06-02 | Lawson Kevin J. | Intervertebral bone fusion device |
US7282054B2 (en) | 2003-12-26 | 2007-10-16 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Adjustable cut block |
EP1550418B1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2006-10-11 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Implant systems with fastener for mounting on an articulation surface of an orthopedic joint |
US20050148843A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-07-07 | Roose Jeffrey R. | System and method of designing and manufacturing customized instrumentation for accurate implantation of prosthesis by utilizing computed tomography data |
EP1550416A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-07-06 | DePuy Products, Inc. | Instrument augments for filling a bone joint gap |
US20050143745A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-06-30 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Instruments and methods for preparing a joint articulation surface for an implant |
EP1550419B1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2007-02-21 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tethered implant systems with fastener for mounting on an articulation surface of an orthopedic joint |
US20050192588A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Garcia Daniel X. | Instrumentation and method for prosthetic knee |
US20060062442A1 (en) | 2004-09-16 | 2006-03-23 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | System and method of predicting future fractures |
US20060074432A1 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-06 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Modular medical tool and connector |
US20070293868A1 (en) | 2004-10-19 | 2007-12-20 | Daniel Delfosse | Ligament-Tentioning Device, Section Template and Osteotomy Method |
US20060111722A1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2006-05-25 | Hacene Bouadi | Surgical cutting tool |
WO2006058057A8 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2006-07-13 | Conformis Inc | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
WO2006060795A1 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
WO2006065774A1 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2006-06-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Inter-facet implant |
US20060136067A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-22 | Pendleton John E | Tibial tray inserter |
EP1683593A2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-26 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Laser produced porous structure |
US20080009950A1 (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2008-01-10 | Richardson Rodney Lan W | Prosthetic Knee |
US20060184176A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial trialing assembly and method of trialing a tibial implant |
US20060200162A1 (en) | 2005-02-21 | 2006-09-07 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Total knee arthroplasty instruments |
US20060195196A1 (en) | 2005-02-26 | 2006-08-31 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Modular tibial implant with a mortise coupling |
WO2006127283A3 (en) | 2005-05-26 | 2007-05-03 | Zimmer Tech Inc | Milling system for resecting a joint articulation surface |
WO2007041375A2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices |
US20070118222A1 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2007-05-24 | Vertegen, Inc. | Intervertebral devices and methods |
WO2007062079A3 (en) | 2005-11-21 | 2007-09-07 | Philipp Lang | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
US20080004709A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2008-01-03 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Laser-produced implants |
US20100298894A1 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2010-11-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-Specific Joint Arthroplasty Devices for Ligament Repair |
WO2007092841A3 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2007-11-08 | Conformis Inc | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
WO2007109641A3 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2007-12-06 | Conformis Inc | Interpositional joint implant |
DE102006037067B4 (en) | 2006-08-08 | 2011-06-16 | Metoxit Ag | Method for producing an implant with a porous, ceramic surface layer |
WO2008101090A2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2008-08-21 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
WO2008112996A1 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-18 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
WO2008157412A2 (en) | 2007-06-13 | 2008-12-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical cutting guide |
WO2009111639A1 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2009-09-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
WO2009140294A1 (en) | 2008-05-12 | 2009-11-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices and methods for treatment of facet and other joints |
US20100331991A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-30 | Zachary Christopher Wilkinson | Methods and Apparatus for Performing Knee Arthroplasty |
Non-Patent Citations (406)
Title |
---|
Adam D, et al. "MR Imaging of the Knee: Three-Dimensional Volume Imaging Combined with Fast Processing," J Comput Asst Tomogr Nov.-Dec. 1989; 13(6): 984-988. |
Adam et al., "MR Imaging of the Knee: Three-Dimensional Volume Imaging Combined with Fast Processing,"J. Compt. Asst. Tomogr., 13(6): 984-988 (1989). |
Adam et al., "NMR tomography of the cartilage structures of the knee joint with 3-D volume image combined with a rapid optical-imaging computer," ROFO Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. Nuklearmed., 150(1): 44-48 (1989). |
Adams et al., "Quantitative Imaging of Osteoarthritis," Semin Arthritis Rheum, 20(6) Suppl. 2: 26-39 (Jun. 1991). |
Adams ME, et al. "Quanitative Imaging of Osteoarthritis." Semin Arthritis Rheum Jun. 1991; 20(6) Suppl. 2:26-39. |
Ahmad CS, et al. "Biomechanical and Topographic Considerations for Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee." Am J Sports Med Mar-Apr. 2001; 29(2): 201-206. |
Ahmad et al., "Biomechanical and Topographic Considerations for Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee," Am J Sports Med, 29(2): 201-206 (Mar.-Apr. 2001). |
Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., "Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems," Proceedings of the 3rd Annual and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, CA (1998). |
Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., "Internal to external corresponding in the analysis of lower limb bone motion," Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana (1999). |
Alexander E.J. and Andriacchi, T.P., "State estimation theory in human movement analysis," Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress (1998). |
Alexander E.J., "Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin (Doctoral Disseration)," University of Illinois at Chicago (1998). |
Alexander et al., "Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems," Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Meeting, San Diego, CA (1998). |
Alexander et al., "Dynamic Functional Imaging Of The Musculoskeletal System," ASME Winter International Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN (1999). |
Alexander et al., "Internal to external correspondence in the analysis of lower limb bone motion," Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, Montana (1999) . |
Alexander et al., "Optimization techniques for skin deformation," International Symposium on 3-D Human Movement Conference, Chattanooga, TN, (1998). |
Alexander et al., "State estimation theory in human movement analysis," Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress (1998). |
Alexander, "Estimating the motion of bones from markers on the skin," University of Illinois at Chicago (Doctoral Dissertation) (1998). |
Allen et al., "Late degenerative changes after meniscectomy 5 factors affecting the knee after operations," J Bone Joint Surg 66B: 666-671 (1984). |
Alley et al., "Ultrafast contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR Aagiography: State of the art," Radiographics 18: 273-285 (1998). |
Andersson et al., "MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Acta. Orthrop. Scand. 45(2):245-259 (1974). |
Andriacchi and Strickland, "Gait analysis as a tool to assess joint kinetics biomechanics of normal and pathological human articulating joints," Nijhoff, Series E 93:83-102 (1985). |
Andriacchi and Toney, "In vivo measurement of six-degrees-of-freedom knee movement during functional testing," Transactions of the Orthopedic Research Society pp. 698 (1995). |
Andriacchi, et al., "A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: Applied to a study of knee kinematics," J. Biomech Eng 120(12): 743-749 (1998). |
Andriacchi, et al., "Methods for evaluating the progression of Osterarthiritis," Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37(2): 163-170 (2000). |
Andriacchi, T.P., "Dynamics of knee Malalignment," Orthop Clin North Am 25:395-403 (1994). |
Aragenson et al., "Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, pp. 162-167 (1995). |
Argenson et al., "Is There a Place for Patellofemoral Arthroplasty?," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research No. 321, pp. 162-167 (1995). |
Aro et al., "Clinical Use of Bone Allografts," Ann Med 25:403-412 (1993). |
Aro HT, et al. "Clinical Use of Bone Allografts." Ann Med 1993; 25: 405-412. |
Atheshian et al., "Curvature Characteristics and Congruence of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint-Differences Between Female and Male Joints," J. Biomechanics 25(6): 591-607 (1992). |
Atheshian et al., "Quantitation of Articular Surface Topography and Cartilage Thickenss in Knee Joints Using Stereophotogammetry," Biomechanics, 24(8): 761-776 (1991). |
Atheshian et al., "A B-Spline Least—Squares Surface-Fitting Method for Articular Surfaces of Diarthrodial Joints," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Division, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 115, pp. 366-373, Nov. 1993. |
Atheshian, "A B-Spline Least-Squares Surface-Fitting Method for Articular Surfaces of Diarthrodial Joints," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering Division, Transactions of the ASME 115: 366-373 (Nov. 1993). |
Athesian et al., "Curvature Characteristics and Congruence of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint—Differences Between Female and Male Joints," J. Biomechanics, vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 591-607, 1992. |
Athesian et al., "Quanitation of Articular Surface Topography and Cartilage Thickness in Knee Joints Using Stereogrammetry," Biomechanics, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 761-776, 1991. |
Bashir et al., "Validation of Gadolinium—Enhanced MRI of GAG Measurement in Human Cartilage". |
Bashir, "Validation of Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI of FAF Measurement in Human Cartilage," Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med. (1998). |
Beaulieu et al., "Dynamic imaging of glenohumeral instability with open MRI," Int. Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Sydney, Australia (1998). |
Beaulieu et al., "Glenohumeral relationships during physiological shoulder motion and stress testing: Initial experience with open MRI and active Scan-25 plane registration," Radiology (1999). |
Beckmann et al., "Noninvasive 3D MR Microscopy as Tool in Pharmacological Research: Application to a Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis," Magn Reson Imaging 13(7): 1013-1017 (1995). |
Beckmann N, et al. "Noninvasive 3D MR Microscopy as a Tool in Pharmacological Research: Application to a Model of Rheumatoid Arthritis." Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 13(7): 1013-1017. |
Billet, Philippe, Translated Version—"Gliding Knee Prostheses—Analysis of Mechanical Failures", Thesis, Medical School of Marseilles, 1982, 64 pages. |
Blazina et al., "Patellofemoral replacement: Utilizing a customized femoral groove replacement," 5(1)53-55 (1990). |
Blum et al., "Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis," ANN. Rheum. Dis. 33 (1): 1-11 (1974). |
Bobic, "Arthoroscopic osteochondral autogaft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study," Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(4): 262-264 (1996). |
Bobic, V., "Arthoscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study," Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3(4):262-264 (1996). |
Boe S., and Hansen H., "Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in patients aged over 50," J. Bone Joint Surg 68B:707 (1986). |
Bogoch, et al., "Supracondylar Fractures of the Femur Adjacent to Resurfacing and MacIntosh Arthroplasties of the Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis," Clin. Orthop. (229):213-220 (Apr. 1988). |
Borgefors, "Distance Transformations in Digital Images," Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 34: 344-371 (1986). |
Borgefors, Gunilla, "Distance Transformations in Digital Images," Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 34, pp. 344-371, 1986. |
Borthakur et al., "In Vivo Triple Quantum Filtered Sodium MRI of Human Articular Cartilage," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:549 (1999). |
Brandt et al., "Crigos-Entwicklung eines Kompaktrobotersystems für die bildgeführte orthopädische Chirurgie", Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000). |
Brandt et al., [English Translation], "Crigos-Development of a Compact Robot System for Image-Guided Orthopedic Surgery," Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 645-649 (Jul. 2000). |
Bregler et al., "Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams," Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Jun. 2000). |
Bregler et al., "Recovering non-rigid 3D shape from image streams," Proc.IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2000) in press. |
Brett et al., "Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images," Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/~ads/imv (1998). |
Brett et al., "Quantitative Analysis of Biomedical Images," Univ. of Manchester, Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, IBM UK, http://www.wiau.man.ac.uk/˜ads/imv (1998). |
Brittberg et al., "A critical analysis of cartilage repair," Acta Orthop Scand 68(2): 186-191 (1997). |
Brittberg et al., "Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chrondrocyte transplantation," N. Engl J Med 331(14): 889-895 (1994). |
Broderick et al., "Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs. arthroscopy," AJR 162: 99-103 (1994). |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment dated Aug. 12, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 25 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Amendment dated Sep. 22, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 15 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Feb. 27, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 19 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination and Response dated Nov. 4, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 15 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Request for Continued Examination dated Jul. 6, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 9 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 14 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 16 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 7 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 12 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, Response to Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 21 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, United States Patent Application—U.S. Appl. No. 12/361,213, filed Jan. 28, 2009, 76 pages. |
Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, United States Patent Application—U.S. Appl. No. 12/398,753, filed Mar. 5, 2009, 141 pages. |
Brown et al., "MRI Basic Principles and Applications", Second Ed., Mark A. Brown and Richard C. Semelka, 1999, Wiley-Liss Inc., Title page and Table of Contents Pages Only (ISBN 0471330620). |
Burgkart et al., "Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis," Arth Rheum; 44(9): 2072-2077 (Sep. 2001). |
Burgkart R, et al. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Assessment of Cartilage Loss in Severe Osteoarthritis." Arth Rheum Sep. 2001; 44(9): 2072-2077. |
Butterworth et al., "A T1O2 Dielectric-Filled Toroidal Resonator," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:169 (1999). |
Butterworth et al., Depts of Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Neurolory, & Center for Nuclear Imaging Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. |
Butts et al., "Real-Time MR imaging of joint motion on an open MR imaging scanner," Radiological Society of North America, 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL (1997). |
Cameron, et al., "Review of a Failed Knee Replacement and Some Observations on the Design of a Knee Resurfacing Prosthesis," Arch. Orthop Trauma Surg. 97(2):87-89 (1980). |
Caos, "Mis meets Caos Spring 2005 Symposium Schedule," Caos Spring 2005 Symposium, 9 pages (May 2005). |
Carano et al., "Estimation Of Erosive Changes In Rheumatoid Arthritis By Temporal Multispectral Analysis," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:408 (1999). |
Carr et al., "Surface Interpolation with Radial Basis Functions for Medical Imaging," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE, Inc. New York, vol. 16, pp. 96-107 (Feb. 1997). |
Castriota-Scanderbeg et al., "Precision of Sonographic Measurement of Articular Cartilage: Inter-and Intraobserver Analysis," Skeletal Radiol 25: 545-549 (1996). |
Castriota-Scanderberg A, et al. "Precision of Sonographic Measurement of Articular Cartilage: Inter-and Intraobserver Analysis." Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 545-549. |
Chan et al., "Osteoarthritis Of The Knee: Comparison Of Radiography, CT And MR Imaging To Asses Extent And Severity," AJR Am J Roentgenol 157(4): 799-806 (1991). |
Chan et al., "Osteoarthritis of the knee: comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to asse extent and severity," AJR Am J Roentrgenol 157(4):799-806, 1991. |
Chelule et al., "Patient-Specific Template to Preserve Bone Stock in Total Knee Replacement: Preliminary Results," 15th Annual ISTA Symposium, 1 page (Sep. 2002). |
Clarke et al., "Human Hip Joint Geometry and Hemiarthroplasty Selection," The Hip. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis 63-89 (1975). |
Clarke IC, et al. "Human Hip Joint Geometry and Hemiarthroplasty Selection." The Hip. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis; 1975. pp. 63-89. |
Clary et al., "Experience with the MacIntosh Knee Prosthesis," South Med. J. 65(3):265-272 (1972). |
Cohen et al., "Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements," Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 7: 95-109 (1999). |
Conaty, et al., "Surgery of the Hip and Knee in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis," J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 55(2):301-314 (1973). |
Creamer et al., "Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Method of Measuring Response to Intra-Articular Treatments," Ann Rheum Dis. 378-381 (1997). |
Creamer P, et al. "Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Knee: A Method of Measuring Response to Intra-Articular Treatments." Ann Rheum Dis 1997; 56: 378-381. |
Daniel et al., "Breast cancer-gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with a 0.5T open imager and three-point Dixon technique," Radiology 207(1): 183-190 (1998). |
Dardzinski et al., "Entropy Mapping of Articular Cartilage," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1018 (1999). |
Dardzinski et al., "T1-T2 Comparison in Adult Articular Cartilage," ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA (May 22-28, 1999). |
De Winter et al., "The Richards Type II Patellofemoral Arthroplasty", Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (5): 487-490. |
Delp et al., "A Graphics-Based Software System to Develop and Analyze Models of Musculoskeletal Structures," Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 21-34, 1995. |
Disler et al., "Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy," AJR 165: 377-382 (1995). |
Disler et al., "Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy," AJR 167: 127-132 (1996). |
Disler, "Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage," AJR 169: 1117-1123 (1997). |
Doherty M, Hutton C, Bayliss MT: Osteoarthritis. In: Maddison PJ, Isenberg DA, Woo P, et al., eds. Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology, vol. 1. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 959-983 (1993). |
Dougados et al., "Longitudinal radiologic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee," J Theumatol 19: 378-394 (1992). |
Du et al., "Reduction of partial-volume artifacts with zero filled interpolation in three-dimensional MR Angiography," J Magn Res Imaging 4: 733-741 (1994). |
Du et al., "Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography," J. Magn Res Imaging 5: 151-157 (1995). |
Dufour et al., "A Technique for the Dynamical Evaluation of the Acromiohumeral Distance of the Shoulder in the Seated Position under Open-field MRI," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:406 (1999). |
Dumoulin et al., "Real-time position monitoring of invasive devises using magnetic resonance," Magn Reson Med 29: 411-5 (1993). |
Dupuy DE, et al. "Quantification of Articular Cartilage in the Knee with Three-Dimensional MR Imaging." Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 919-924. |
Dupuy et al., "Quantification of Articular Cartilage in the Knee with Three-Dimensional MR Imaging," Acad Radiol 3: 919-924 (1996). |
Eckstein et al., "Determination of Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness Using Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (3D MR-CCM)," Magn. Reson. Med. 36(2):256-265, (1996). |
Eckstein et al., "Effect of Gradient And Section Orientation On Quantitative Analyses of Knee Joint Cartilage," Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 11: 161-167 (2000). |
Eckstein et al., "Effect Of Physical Exercise On Cartilage volume And Thickness In Vivo: An MR Imaging Study," Radiology 207: 243-248 (1998). |
Eckstein et al., "Functional Analysis Of Articular Cartilage Deformation, Recovery, And Fluid Flow Following Dynamic Exercise In Vivo," Anatomy and Embryology 200: 419-424 (1999). |
Eckstein et al., "In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging," AJR 170(3): 593-597 (1998). |
Eckstein et al., "Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (MR CCM): A Method for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness?" Magn. Reson. Med. 35: 89-96 (1996). |
Eckstein et al., "New Quantitative Approaches With 3-D MRI: Cartilage Morphology, Function And Degeneration," Medical Imaging International (Nov.-Dec. 1998). |
Eckstein et al., "Side Differences Of Knee Joint Cartilage Volume, Thickness, And Surface Area, And Correlation With Lower Limb Dominance-An MRI-Based Study," Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 10: 914-921 (2002). |
Eckstein et al., "The Influence of Geometry on the Stress Distribution in Joints-A Finite Element Analysis," Anat Embryol, 189: 545-552 (1994). |
Eckstein et al., "The Morphology of Articular Cartilage Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reproducibility and Anatomical Correlation," Sur. Radiol Anat 16: 429-438 (1994). |
Eckstein F, et al. "Accuracy of Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements with Magnetic Resonance Imaging." Clin Orthop 1998; 352: 137-148. |
Eckstein F, et al. "Magnetic Resonance Chondro-Crassometry (MR CCM): A Method for Accurate Determination of Articular Cartilage Thickness?" Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 89-96. |
Eckstein F, et al. "The Influence of Geometry on the Stress Distribution in Joints—A Finite Element Analysis." Anat Embryol 1994; 189: 545-552. |
Eckstein F, et al. "The Morphology of Articular Cartilage Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Reproducibility and Anatomical Correlation." Surg Radiol Anat 1994; 16: 429-438. |
Eckstein F, et al., "Accuracy of Cartilage Volume and Thickness Measurements with Magnetic Resonance Imaging," Clin. Orthop. 352: 137-148 (1998). |
Elting and Hubbell, "Unilateral frame distrction: proximal tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthritis," Contemp Orthop 27(6):522-524 (1993). |
Embrechts et al., "A Parallel Euclidean Distance Transformation Algorithm," Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 15-26, 1996. |
European Searching Authority, European Search Report—Application No. EP 03790194, dated Jul. 13, 2006, 7 pages. |
European Searching Authority, Supplementary European Search Report—Application No. 04812187.5, dated Sep. 27, 2007, 3 pages. |
Faber et al., "Gender Differences In Knee Joint Cartilage Thickness, Volume And Articular Surface Areas: Assessment With Quantitative Three-Dimensional MR Imaging," Skeletal Radiology 30 (3): 144-150 (2001). |
Faber et al., "Quantitative Changes of Articular Cartilage Microstructure During Compression of an Intact Joint," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:547 (1999). |
Falcao et al., "User-steered image segmentation paradigms: Live wire and live lane," Graphical Models and Image Processing 60: 233-260 (1998). |
Farrar et al., "Computed Tomography Scan Scout Film for Measurement of Femoral Axis in Knee Arthroplasty," J. Arthroplasty, vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 1030-1031, 1999. |
Felson et al., "Weight Loss Reduces the risk for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study," Ann Intern Med 116: 535-539 (1992). |
Gandy et al., "One-year longitudinal study of femoral cartilage lesions in knee arthritis", 1999. |
Garrett, J. C., "Osteochondral allografts for reconstruction of articular defects of the knee," Instr Course Lect 47:517-522 (1998). |
Gerscovich EO. "A Radiologist's Guide to the Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip." Skeletal Radiol 1997; 26: 447-456. |
Gerscovich, "A Radiologist's Guide to the Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip," Skeletal Radiol 26: 447-456 (1997). |
Ghelman et al., "Kinematics of the Knee After Prosthetic Replacements", Clin. Orthop. May 1975: (108): 149-157. |
Ghosh et al., "Watershed Segmentation Of High Resolution Articular Cartilage Images For Assessment Of Osteoarthritis," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Philadelphia, (1999). |
Glaser et al., "Optimization And Validation Of A Rapid Highresolution T1-W 3-D Flash Waterexcitation MR Sequence For The Quantitative Assessment Of Articular Cartilage Volume And Thickness," Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19: 177-185 (2001). |
Goodwin et al., "MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Striations in the Radial Layer Reflect the Fibrous Structure of Cartilage," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:546 (1999). |
Gouraud, "Continuous shading of curved surfaces," IEEE Trans on Computers C-20(6) (1971). |
Graichen et al., "Three-Dimensional Analysis Of The Width Of The Subacromial Space In Healthy Subjects And Patients With Impingement Syndrome," American Journal of Roentgenology 172: 1081-1086 (1999). |
Hafez et al., "Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement: Could A Two-Piece Custom Template Replace The Complex Conventional Instrumentations?", Session 6: Novel Instruments; Computer Aided Surgery, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 93-94 (Jun. 2004). |
Hafez et al., "Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating", Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 444, pp. 184-192 (Mar. 2006). |
Hall et al., "Quantitative MRI For Clinical Drug Trials Of Joint Diseases; Virtual Biopsy Of Articular Cartilage" NIH-FDA Conf. on Biomarkers and Surrogate Endpoints: Advancing Clinical Research and Applications (1998). |
Hardy et al., "Measuring The Thickness Of Articular Cartilage From MR Images," J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13 (2001). |
Hardy et al., "The Influence of The Resolution And Contrast On Measuring The Articular Cartilage volume In Magnetic Resonance Images" Magn Reson Imaging. 18(8): 965-972 (Oct. 2000). |
Hargreaves et al., "MR Imaging of Articular Cartilage Using Driven Equilibrium," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42(4): 695-703 (Oct. 1999). |
Hargreaves et al., "Imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Hargreaves et al., "Technical considerations for DEFT imaging," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Hastings et al., "Double Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis," A Survey of Fifty Consecutive Cases, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 55(1):112-118 (1973). |
Haubner M, et al. "A Non-Invasive Technique for 3-Dimensional Assessment of Articular Cartilage Thickness Based on MRI Part 2: Validation Using CT Arthrography." Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15(7): 805-813. |
Haubner M, et al., "A Non-Invasive Technique for 3-Dimensional Assessment of Articular Cartilage Thickness Based on Mri Part @: Validation Using CT Arthrography," Magn Reson Imaging; 15(7): 805-813 (1997). |
Haut et al., "A High Accuracy Three-Dimensional Coordinate Digitizing System for Reconstructing the Geometry of Diarthrodial Joints," J. Biomechanics 31: 571-577 (1998). |
Hayes and Conway, "Evaluation of Articular Cartilage: Radiographic and Cross-Sectional Imaging Techniques," Radiographics 12:409-428 (1992). |
Henderson et al., "Experience with the Use of the Macintosh Prosthesis in Knees of Patients with Pheumatoid Arthritis," South. Med. J. 62(11):1311-1315 (1969). |
Henkelman et al., "Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues," Magn Res Med. 32: 592-601 (1994). |
Herberhold C, et al., "An MR-Based Technique for Quantifying the Deformation of Articular Cartilage During Mechanical Loading in an Intact Cadaver Joint," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1998, 39(5): 843-850. |
Herberhold et al., "An MR-Based Technique for Quantifying the Deformation of Articular Cartilage During Mechanical Loading in an Intact Cadaver Joint," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 39(5): 843-850 (1998). |
Herberhold et al., "In Situ Measurement Of Articular Cartilage Deformation In Intact Femorapatellar Joints Under Static Loading," Journal of biomechanics 32: 1287-1295 (1999). |
Herrmann et al., "High Resolution Imaging of Normal and Osteoarthritic Cartilage with Optical Coherence Tomogrqaphy," J. Rheumatoil 26: 627-635 (1999). |
Herrmann JM, et al. "High Resolution Imaging of Normal Osteoarthritic Cartilage with Optical Coherence Tomography." J Rhematol 1999; 26: 627-635. |
High et al., "Early Macromolecular Collagen Changes in Articular Cartilage of Osteoarthritis (OA): An In Vivo MT-MRI and Histopathologic Study," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:550 (1999). |
Hohe et al., "Surface Size, Curvature Analysis, And Assessment Of Knee Joint Incongruity With MR Imaging In Vivo," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47: 554-561 (2002). |
Holdsworth et al., "Benefits of Articular Cartilage Imaging at 4 Tesla: An In Vivo Study of Normal Volunteers," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1028 (1999). |
Hughes et al., "Technical Note: A Technique for Measuring the Surface Area of Articular Cartilage in Acetabular Fractures," Br. J. Radio!: 67: 584-588 (1994). |
Hughes SW, et al. "Technical Note: A Technique for Measuring the Surface Area of Articular Cartilage in Acetabular Fractures." Br J Radiol 1994; 67: 584-588. |
Husmann et al., "Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Proximal Femur," J. Arthroplasty; 12(4): 444-450 (Jun. 1997). |
Husmann O, et al. "Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Proximal Femur." J Arthroplasty Jun. 1997; 12(4): 444-450. |
Hyhlik-Durr et al., "Precision of Tibial Cartilage Morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence," European Radiology 10(2): 297-303 (2000). |
Ihara H. "Double-contrast CT Arthrography of the Cartilage of the Patellofemoral Joint." Clin Orthop Sep. 1985 ; 198: 50-55. |
Ihara H., "Double-Contrast CT Arthrography of the Cartilage of the Patellofemoral Joint," Clin. Orthop.; 198: 50-55 (Sep. 1985). |
Iida et al., "Socket Location in Total Hip Replacement: Preoperative Computed Tomography and Computer Simulation" Acta Orthop Scand; 59(1): 1-5 (1998). |
Iida H, et al. "Socket Location in Total Hip Replacement: Preoperative Computed Tomography and Computer Simulation," Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 59(1):1-5. |
International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28679, dated Aug. 5, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28680, dated Jul. 29, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Examination Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/42155, dated Jan. 3, 2003, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Preliminary Report on Patentability—International Application No. PCT/US2005/044008, dated Jun. 14, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/32123, dated Mar. 17, 2004, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US03/38158, dated Feb. 23, 2005, 7 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/39616, dated Mar. 28, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 6 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US04/39714, dated May 13, 2005, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 8 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US05/044008, dated Mar. 30, 2006, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/045172, dated Apr. 19, 2007, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US07/061681, dated Sep. 7, 2007, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 12 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28679, dated Feb. 27, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/28680, dated Feb. 27, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US01/42155, dated Oct. 29, 2002, 2 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US2008/066994, dated Feb. 19, 2009, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 16 pages. |
International Searching Authority, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/US99/30265, dated Aug. 2, 2000, 5 pages. |
Irarrazabal et al., "Fast three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging," Mag Res. Med. 33: 656-662 (1995). |
Jessop et al., "Follow-up of the MacIntosh Arthroplasty of the Knee Joint," Rheumatol Phys. Med. 11(5):217-224 (1972). |
Johnson et al., "Development of a knee wear method based on prosthetic in vivo slip velocity," Transaction of the Orthopedic Research Society, 46th Annual Meeting (Mar. 2000). |
Johnson et al., "The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements," J. Bone Joint Surg 62B: 346-349 (1980). |
Johnson, T.S., "In vivo contact kinematics of the knee joint: Advancing the point cluster technique," Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota (1999). |
Jonsson et al., "Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements," Acta Radiol 1992; 33(3): 234-239 (1992). |
Jonsson K, et al. "Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements." Acta Radiol 1992; 33(3): 234-239. |
Kaneuji A, et al. "Three-Dimensional Morphological Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Canal, Using Computer-Aided Design System, in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthrosis of the Hip." H Orthop Sci 2000; 5(4): 361-368. |
Kaneuji et al., "Three Dimensional Morphological Analysis of the Proximal Femoral Canal, Using Computer-Aided Design System, in Japanese Patients with Osteoarthrosis of the Hip," J. Orthop Sci; 5(4): 361-368 (2000). |
Karvonen et al., "Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Pathology," Ann Rheum Dis. 49: 672-675 (1990). |
Karvonen RL, et al. "Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gross Pathology." Ann Rheum Dis 1990; 49: 672-675. |
Kass et al., "Snakes: Active contour models.," Int J Comput Vision 1: 321-331 (1988). |
Kates, et al., "Experiences of Arthroplasty of the Rheumatoid Knee Using MacIntosh Prostheses," Ann. Rheum. Dis. 28(3):328 (1969). |
Kaufman et al., "Articular Cartilage Sodium content as a function of compression,"Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1022 (1999). |
Kay et al., The MacIntosh Tibial Plateau Hemiprosthesis for the Rheumatoid Knee, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 54(2):256-262 (1972). |
Kidder et al., "3D Model Acquisition, Design, Planning And Manufacturing Of Orthopaedic Devices: A Framework," Proceedings of the SPIE—Advanced Sensor and Control-System Interface, Boston, MA, vol. 2911, pp. 9-22, 21 (Nov. 1996). |
Kim et al., "Measurement of Femoral Neck Anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D Imaging Method," Med. And Viol. Eng. And Computing, vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 603-609, 2000. |
Kiryati, "On Length Estimators, Distance Tranformations and Digital Lines in Three Dimensions," Progress in Image Analysis and Processing III, Proc. Of the 7th International Conference in Image Analysis and Processing, Capitolo, Italy, pp. 22-29 (1993). |
Kiryati, Nahum, "On Length Estimators, Distance Tranformations and Digital Lines in Three Dimensions," Progress in Image Analysis and Processing III, Proc. of the 7th International Conference in Image Analysis and Processing, Capitolo, Italy, pp. 22-29, 1993. |
Klosterman et al., "T2 Measurements in Adult Patellar Cartilage at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla," ISMRM Seventh Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, (May 22-28, 1999). |
Knauss et al., "Self-Diffusion of Water in Cartilage and Cartilage Components as Studied by Pulsed Field Gradient NMR," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 41:285-292 (1999). |
Koh et al., "Visualization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Focal Cartilage Lesions in the Excised Mini-Pig Knee," J. Orthop. Res; 14(4): 554-561 (Jul. 1996). |
Koh HL, et al. "Visualization by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Focal Cartilage Lesions in the Excised Mini-Pig Knee." J Orthop Res Jul. 1996; 14(4): 554-561. |
Korhonen et al., "Importance Of The Superficial Tissue Layer For The Indentation Stiffness Of Articular Cartilage," Med. Eng. Phys; 24(2): 99-108 (Mar. 2002). |
Korkala et al., "Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts in the Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Joint Surface Defects," Int. Orthop.; 15(3): 233-237 (1991). |
Korkala O, et al. "Autogenous Osteoperiosteal Grafts in the Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Joint Surface Defects." Int Orthop 1991; 15(3): 233-237. |
Kshirsagar et al., "Measurement Of Localized Cartilage Volume And Thickness Of Human Knee Joints By Computer Analysis Of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Images," Invest Radiol. 33(5): 289-299 (May 1998). |
Kwak et al., "Anatomy of Human Patellofemoral Joint Articular Cartilage: Surface Curvature Analysis," J. Orthop. Res.; 15: 468-472 (1997). |
Kwak SD, et al. "Anatomy of Human Patellofemoral Joint Articular Cartilage: Surface Curvature Analysis." J Orthop Res 1997; 15: 468-42. |
LaFortune et al., "Three dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking," J. Biomechanics 25: 347-357 (1992). |
Lam et al., "Varus/Valgus Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty," The Knee, vol. 10, pp. 237-241, 2003. |
Lam et al., "X-Ray Diagnosis: A Physician's Approach", Editor Lam, 1998, Springer-Verlag publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 9813083247). |
Lang et al., "Functional joint imaging: a new technique integrating MRI and biomotion studies," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 18-24, 2000). |
Lang et al., Cartilage imaging: comparison of driven equilibrium with gradient-echo, SPAR, and fast spin-echo sequences. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, Australia, (Apr. 17-24 1998). |
Lang et al., Risk factors for progression of cartilage loss: a longitudinal MRI study. European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6th Annual Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland (1999). |
Ledingham et al., "Factors affecting radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis," Ann Rheum Dis 54: 53-58 (1995). |
Leenslag et al., "A Porous Composite for Reconstruction of Meniscus Lesions," Biological and Biomechanical Perform. of Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers Amsterdam pp. 147-152 (1986). |
Lefebvre et al., "Automatic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Characterization of Articular Cartilage from High-Resolution Ultrasound Acquisitions," Ultrasound Med. Biol.; 24(9): 1369-1381 (Nov. 1998). |
Lefebvre F, et al. "Automatic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Characterization of Articular Cartilage from High-Resolution Ultrasound Acquisitions." Ultrasound Med Biol Nov. 1998; 24(9): 1369-1381. |
Li et al., A Boundary Optimization Algorithm for Delineating Brain Objects from CT Scans: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1993 IEEE Conference Record, San Francisco, CA (1993). |
Lin CJ, et al. "Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Cartilagenous and Bony Components of Dysplastic Hips in Children: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis." J Pediatr Orthop 1997; 17: 152-157. |
Lin et al., "Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Cartilagenous and Bony Components of Dysplastic Hips in Children: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantitative Analysis," J. Pediatr. Orthop.; 17: 152-157 (1997). |
Lorensen et al., "Marching cubes: a high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm," Comput Graph 21: 163-169 (1987). |
Losch et al., "A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI part 1: development of a computational method," Magn Res Imaging 15(7): 795-804 (1997). |
Lu et al., "Bone position estimation from skin marker coordinates using globals optimization with joint constraints," J Biomechanics 32: 129-134 (1999). |
Lu et al., "In vitro degradation of porous poly(L-lactic acid) foams", Biomaterials, 21(15):1595-1605, Aug. 2000. |
Lucchetti et al., "Skin movement artifact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics," J Biomechanics 31: 977-984 (1998). |
Lusse et al., "Measurement Of Distribution Of Water Content Of Human Articular Cartilage Based On Transverse Relaxation Times: An In Vitro Study," Seventh Scientific Meeting of ISMRM, p. 1020 (1999). |
Lynch et al., "Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRI scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours," Proc. SPIE 3979 Medical Imaging, San Diego (Feb. 2000). |
MacIntosh et al., "The Use of the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis for Advanced Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Knee," J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 54B, No. 2, pp. 244-255 (1972). |
MacIntosh, "Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Hemiarthroplasty Prosthesis," Synovectomy and Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis pp. 79-80, Second Int'l. Symposium, Jan. 27-29, 1967 (Basle, Switzerland). |
MacIntosh, "Arthroplasty Of The Knee In Rheumatoid Arthritis," Proceedings and Reports of Councils and Assotions, J. Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 48B No. (1): 179 (Feb. 1996). |
MacIntosh, "Hemiarthroplasty of the Knee Using a Space Occupying Prosthesis for Painful Varus and Valgus Deformities," J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Dec. 1958:40-A:1431. |
Mahaisavariya et al., "Morphological Study of the Proximal Femur: A New Method of Geometrical Assessment Using 3 Dimensional Reverse Engineering," Med. Eng. And Phys., vol. 24, pp. 617-622, 2002. |
Maki et al., "SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT," J Mag Res (1988). |
Marler et al., "Soft-Tissue Augmentation with Injectable Alginate and Syngeneic Fibroblasts", Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 105(6):2049-2058, May 2000. |
Marshall et al., "Quantitation Of Articular Cartilage Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Three-Dimensional Reconstruction," J. Orthop. Res.; 13: 814-823 (1995). |
Marshall KW, et al. "Quantitation of Articular Cartilage Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction." J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 814-823. |
Matsen, III et al., "Robotic Assistance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proof of Principle Using Distal Femoral Arthroplasty", Clinical Ortho. and Related Research, 296:178-186 (1993). |
Mattila et al., "Massive Osteoarticular Knee Allografts: Structural Changes Evaluated with CT," Radiology; 196: 657-660 (1995). |
Mattila KT, et al. "Massive Osteoarticular Knee Allografts: Structural Changes Evaluated with Ct." Radiology 1995; 196: 657-660. |
McCollum et al., "Tibial Plateau Prosthesis in Arthroplasty of the Knee," J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1970 52(4):827-8 (Feb. 1996). |
McKeever, "The Classic Tibial Plateau Prosthesis," Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (192):3-12 (1985). |
Merkle et al., "A Transceiver Coil Assembly For Hetero-Nuclear Investigations Of Human Breast At 4T," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:170 (1999). |
Meyer et al., "Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation," Magn Res Med 15: 287-304 (1990). |
Mills et al, "Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: evaluation of meniscal disease," Curr. Opin. Radiol 4(6):77-82, 1992. |
Mills et al., "Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of The Knee: Evaluation Of Meniscal Disease," Curr. Opin. Radiol. 4(6): 77-82 (1992). |
Milz et al., "The Thickness of the Subchondral Plate and Its Correlation with the thickness of the Uncalcified Articular Cartilage in the Human Patella," Anat. Embryol.; 192: 437-444 (1995). |
Milz S, et al. "The Thickness of the Subchondral Plate and Its Correlation with the Thickness of the Uncalcified Articular Cartilage in the Human Patell." Anat Embryol 1995 ; 192: 437-444. |
Minas T. "Chondrocyte Implantation in the Repair of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Economics and Quality of Life." Am J Orthop 1998 Biv; 27: 739-744. |
Minas, "Chondrocyte Implantation in the Repair of Chondral Lesions of the Knee: Economics and Quality of Life," Am. J. Orthop. 739-744 (Nov. 27, 1998). |
Modest et al., "Optical Verification Of A Technique For In Situ Ultrasonic Measurement Of Articular Cartilage Thickness," J. Biomechanics 22(2): 171-176 (1989). |
Mollica et al., "Surgical treatment of arthritic varus knee by tibial corticotomy and angular distraction with an external fixator," Ital J Orthrop Traumatol 18(1): 17-23 (1992). |
Moussa M. "Rotational Malalignment and Femoral Torsion in Osteoarthritic Knees with Patellofemoral Joint Involvement: A CT Scan Study." Clin Orthop Jul. 1994; 304: 176-183. |
Moussa, "Rotational Malalignment and Femoral Torsion in Osteoarthritic Knees with Patellofemoral Joint lmvolvement: A CT Scan Study," Clin. Orthop.; 304: 176-183 (Jul. 1994). |
Mundinger et al., "Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnosis of peripheral joints," Schweiz Med. Wochenschr 121(15):517-527, 1991. |
Myers et al., "Experimental Assessment by High Frequency Ultrasound of Articular Cartilage Thickness and Osteoarthritic Changes," J. Rheumatol; 22: 109-116 (1995). |
Myers SL, et al. "Experimental Assessment by High Frequency Ultrasound of Articular Cartilage Thickness and Osteoarthritic Changes," J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 109-116. |
Nelson et al., "Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis of the Knee Joint," Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2 (1): 245-64 (1971). |
Nieminen et al., "T2 Indicates Incompletely the Biomechanical Status of Enzymatically Degraded Articular Cartilage of 9.4T," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:551 (1999). |
Nishii et al., "Three Dimensional Evaluation Of The Acetabular And Femoral Articular Cartilage In The Osteoarthritis Of The Hip Joint," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:1030 (1999). |
Nizard, R.S., "Role of tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medical femorotibial osteoarthritis," Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65(7-9):443-446 (1998). |
Noll et al., "Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging," IEEE Trans Med Imag 10(2): 154-163 (1991). |
Ogilvie-Harris et al., "Arthroscopic management of the degenerative knee," Arthroscopy 7: 151-157 (1991). |
Parkkinen et al., "A Mechanical Apparatus With Microprocessor Controlled Stress Profile For Cyclic Compression Of Cultured Articular Cartilage Explants," J. Biomech.; 22 (11-12): 1285-1290 (1989). |
Pearle et al., "Use of an external MR-tracking coil for active scan plane registration during dynamic Musculoskeletal MR imaging in a vertically open MR unit," American Roentgen Ray Society, San Francisco, CA (1998). |
Peterfy CG, et al. "Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Articular Cartilage." Radiol Clin North Am Mar. 1996; 34(2): 195-213. |
Peterfy et al., "Emerging Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Articular Cartilage," Radiol Clin North Am.; 34(2): 195-213 (Mar. 1996). |
Peterfy et al., "MR Imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed TI-weighted sequences," Radiology 191(2): 413-419 (1994). |
Peterfy et al., "Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation," Radiology 192(2): 485-491 (1994). |
Peterfy et al., "Quantification of the volume of articular cartilage in the carpophalangeal joints of the hand: accuracy and precision of three-dimensional MR imaging," AJR 165: 371-375 (1995). |
Pilch et al,. "Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotbial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction," J. Rheumatol.21(12):2307-2321, 1994. |
Pilch et al., "Assessment Of Cartilage volume In The Femorotibial Joint With Magnetic Resonance Imaging And 3D Computer Reconstruction," J. Rheumatol. 21(12): 2307-2319 (1994). |
Piplani et al., "Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images," Radiology 198: 855-859 (1996). |
Platt et al., "Mould Arthroplasty of the Knee: A Ten-Yr Follow-up Study," Oxford Regional Rheumatic Diseases Resch. Ctre, J. of Bone & Joint Surg., vol. 51 B, pp. 76-87 (1969). |
Porter et al., "MacIntosh Arthroplasty: A Long-Term Review," J. R. Coll. Surg. Edin. (192):199-201 (1988). |
Portheine et al. "CT-Based Planning and Individual Template Navigation in TKA", Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery, Springer, 48:336-342 (2004). |
Portheine et al., "Development of a Clinical Demonstrator for Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery with CT Image Based Individual Templates," Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Amsterdam, Elsevier 944-949 (1997). |
Potter et al., "Arthroplasty of the Knee in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis: A Follow-up Study After Implantation of the McKeever and MacIntosh Prostheses," J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 54(1):1-24 (1972). |
Potter et al., "Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee: an evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging," J Bone Joint Surg 80-A(9): 1276-1284 (1998). |
Potter et al., "Sensitivity of Quantitative NMR Imaging to Matrix Composition in Engineered Cartilage Tissue" Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:552 (1999). |
Potter, "Arthroplasty of the Knee With Tibial Metallic Implants of the McKeever and MacIntosh Design," Sug. Clin. North Am. 49(4):903-915 (1969). |
Probst et al., "Technique For Measuring The Area Of Canine Articular Surfaces," Am. J. Vet. Res. 48(4): 608-609 (1987). |
Prodromos et al., "A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy," J Bone Joint Surg 67A: 1188-1194 (1985). |
Radermacher et al., "Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery By Means of Individual Templates.Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications" Proceedings of the First International Symposium On Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1: Sessions I-III, MRCAS '94, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 42-48 (Sep. 22-24, 1994). |
Radermacher et al., "Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery With Image Based Individual Templates" Clinical Orthopaedics, vol. 354, pp. 28-38 (Sep. 1998). |
Radermacher et al., "Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery By Means of Individual Templates•Aspects and Analysis of Potential Applications" Proceedings of the First International Symposium On Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1: Sessions I-III, MRCAS '94, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 42-48 (Sep. 22-24, 1994). |
Radermacher et al., "Computer Integrated Orthopedic Surgery—Connection of Planning and Execution in Surgical Inventions," Computer Integrated Surgery, MIT Press, pp. 451-463 (1996). |
Radermacher et al., "CT Image Based Planning and Execution of Interventions in Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of Clinical Applications," Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Bern, Hans Huber (1998). |
Radermacher et al., "Image Guided Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Templates—Experimental Results and Aspects of the Development of a Demonstrator for Pelvis Surgery," Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 606-616 (1997). |
Radermacher et al., "Technique for Better Execution of CT Scan Planned Orthopedic Surgery on Bone Structures," Computer Assisted Radiology, Berlin, Springer, pp. 933-938 (1995). |
Radermacher, K., "Computer-Assisted Planning and Execution of Orthopedic Surgery Using Individual Surgical Templates," Helmholtz Institute of Biomedical Technology (May 18, 1999). |
Radin et al., "Mechanical Determination of Osteoarthrosis," Sem Arthr Rheum 21(3): 12-21 (1991). |
Radin et al., Characteristics of Joint Loading as it Applies to Osteoarthrosis in: Mow VC, Woo S.Y., Ratcliffe T., eds. Symposium on Biomechanics of Diathrodial Joints, vol. 2, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 437-451 (1990). |
Ragnemalm, "The Euclidean Distance Transform in Arbitrary Dimensions," Pattern Recognition Letters, North-Holland, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 883-888 (Nov. 1993). |
Ragnemalm, Ingemar, "The Euclidean Distance Transform in Arbitrary Dimensions," Pattern Recognition Letters, North-Holland, vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 883-888, Nov. 1993. |
Ranawat et al., "MacIntosh Hemiarthroplasty in Rheumatoid Knee," Acta Orthop Belg., 39 (1): 1-11 (1973). |
Recht et al., "Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo Flash MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities," Radiology 198: 209-212 (1996). |
Recht et al., "MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions," AJR 163: 283-290 (1994). |
Reddy et al., "Triple Quantum Sodium Imaging of Articular Cartilage," Dept. of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, pp. 279-284 (1997). |
Reiser et al., "Magnetic Resonance In Cartilaginous Lesions Of The Knee Joint With Three-Dimensional Gradient-Echo Imaging," Skeletal Radiol. 17(7): 465-471, (1988). |
Ritter et al., "Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement," Clin Orthop 299: 153-156 (1994). |
Robarts Research Institute, Abstract #1028. |
Robson et al., "A Combined Analysis And Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technique For Computerized Automatic Measurement Of Cartilage Thickness In Distal Interphalangeal Joint," Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13(5): 709-718 (1995). |
Rushfeldt et al., "Improved Techniques for Measuring In Vitro the Geometry and Pressure Distribution in the Human Acetabulum—1. Ultrasonic Measurement of Acetabular Surfaces, Sphericity and Cartilage Thickness," J. Biomech; 14(4): 253-260 (1981). |
Rushfeldt PD, et al. "Improved Techniques for Measuring In Vitro the Geometry and Pressure Distribution in the Human Acetabulum-I. Ultrasonic Measurement of Acetabular Surfaces, Sphericity and Cartilage Thickness." J Biomech 1981; 14(4) 253-260. |
Saied A, et al. "Assessment of Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone: Subtle and Progressive Changes in Experimental Osteoarthritis Using 50 MHz Echography In Vitro" J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12(9): 1378-1386. |
Saied et al., "Assessment of Articular Cartilage and Subchondral Bone: Subtle and Progressive Changes in Experimental Osteoarthritis Using 50 MHz Echography In Vitro," J. Bone Miner Res.; 12(9): 1378-1386 (1997). |
Saito et al., "New algorithms for Euclidean distance transformation of an—dimensional digitized picture with applications," Pattern Recognition 27(11): 1551-1565 (1994). |
Schiffers et al., "Planung und Ausführung von orthopädischen Operationen mit Hilfe von Individualschablonen", Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640, (Jul. 2000). |
Schiffers et al., [English Translation], "Planning and execution of orthopedic surgery using individualized templates," Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 636-640 (Jul. 2000). |
Schipplein et al., "Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking," J Orthop Res 9: 113-119 (1991). |
Schorn et al., "MacIntosh Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Rheumatol Rehabil. Aug. 1978:17(3):155-163. |
Schouten et al., "A 12 year follow up study in the general population on prognostic factors of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis of the knee," Ann Rheum Dis 51: 932-937 (1992). |
Shapiro et al., "In-Vivo Evaluation of Human Cartilage Compression and Recovery using 1H and 23Na MRI," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:548 (1999). |
Sharif et al., "Serum hyaluronic acid level as a predictor of disease progression in osteoarthritis of the knee," Arthritis Rheum 38: 760-767 (1995). |
Sharma et al., "Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronic acid level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis," Arthritis and Rheumatism 41(7): 1233-40 (1998). |
Shoup et al., "The driven equilibrium Fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study," J Mag Res p. 8 (1972). |
Sittek et al., "Assessment of Normal Patellar Cartilage Volume and Thickness Using MRI: an Analysis of Currently Available Pulse Sequences," Skeletal Radiol; 25: 55-61 (1996). |
Sittek H, et al. "Assessment of Normal Patellar Cartilage Volume Thickness Using MRI: and Analysis of Currently Available Pulse Sequences." Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 55-62. |
Slemenda et al., "Lower extremity lean tissue mass strength predict increases in pain and in functional impairment in knee osteoarthritis," Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S212 (1996). |
Slemenda et al., "Lower extremity strength, lean tissue mass and bone density in progression of knee osteoarthritis," Arthritis Rheum 39(suppl): S169 (1996). |
Slone et al., "Body CT: A Practical Approach", Editor Slone, 1999 McGraw-Hill publishers, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 007058219). |
Solloway et al., "The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images," Mag Res Med 37: 943-952 (1997). |
Soslowsky et al., "Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint," Clin. Orthop.; 285: 181-190 (Dec. 1992). |
Soslowsky LJ, et al. "Articular Geometry of the Glenohumeral Joint." Clin Orthop Dec. 1992; 181-190. |
Spoor et al., "Rigid body motion calculated from spatial coordinates of markers," J. Biomechanics 13: 391-393 (1980). |
Stammberger et al., "A Method For Quantifying Tithe Dependent Changes In MR Signal Intensity Of Articular Cartilage As A Function Of Tissue Deformation In Intact Joints" Medical Engineering & Physics 20: 741-749 (1998). |
Stammberger et al., "A New Method for 3D Cartilage Thickness Measurement with MRI, Based on Euclidean Distance Transformation, and its Reproducibility in the Living," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 6:562 (1998). |
Stammberger et al., "Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living," Mag Res Med 41: 529-536 (1999). |
Stammberger et al., "Elastic Registration Of 3D Cartilage Surfaces From MR Image Data For Detecting Local Changes Of The Cartilage Thickness," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44: 592-601 (2000). |
Stammberger et al., "Interobserver to reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: Comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation," Mag Res Imaging 17: 1033-1042 (1999). |
Stauffer et al., "The MacIntosh Prosthesis. Prospective Clinical and Gait Evaluation," Arch. Surg. 110(6):717-720 (1975). |
Steines et al., "Measuring volume of articular cartilage defects in osteoarthritis using MRI," ACR 64th Annual Scientific Meeting, Philadelphia, (Oct. 2000). |
Steines et al., "Segmentation of osteoarthritis femoral cartilage from MR images," CARS— Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp. 578-583, San Francisco (2000). |
Steines et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 8:1022 (2000). |
Steines, D., et al., Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire, ISMRM Eight Scientific Meeting, Denver Colorado, 2000. |
Stevenson et al., "The fate of articular cartilage after transplantation of fresh and cryopreserved tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs," J. Bone Joint Surg 71(9): 1297-1307 (1989). |
Stout et al., "X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide", 2nd Ed. Editors Stout and Jensen, 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Title page and Table of Contents pgs. Only (ISBN 0471607118). |
Taha et al., "Modeling And Design Of A Custom Made Cranium Implant For Large Skull Reconstruction Before A Tumor Removal", Phidias Newsletter No. 6, pp. 3, 6, Jun. 2001. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.materialise.com/medical/files/pdf. |
Tamez-Pena et al., MRI Isotropic Resolution Reconstruction from two Orthogonal Scans:, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SOIE-OMT. vol. 4322, pp. 87-97, 2001. |
Tebben et al., "Three-Dimensional Computerized Reconstruction. Illustration Of Incremental Articula Cartilage Thinning," Invest. Radiol. 32(8): 475-484 (1997). |
Testi et al., "Border Tracing Algorithm Implementation for the Femoral Geometry Reconstruction," Comp. Meth. And Programs in Biomed., vol. 65, pp. 175-182, 2001. |
Thoma et al., "Einsatz eines neuen 3D-computertomographischen Subtraktionsverfahrens zur individuellen Versorgung von Knochendefekten an Hüften und Knie", Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999). |
Thoma et al., "Endoprothetischen Versorgung des Kniegelenks auf der Basis eines 3D-computertomographischen Subtraktionsverfahrens", Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000). |
Thoma et al., [English Translation], "Custom-made knee endoprosthetics using subtraction data of three-dimensional CT scans-A new approach," Der Orthopäde, Springer-Verlag, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 641-644, (Jul. 2000). |
Thoma et al., [English Translation], "Use of a New Subtraction Procedure Based on Three-Dimensional CT Scans for the Individual Treatment of Bone Defects in the Hip and Knee," Journal DGPW, No. 17, pp. 27-28 (May 1999). |
Tieschky et al., "Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing," J. Orthop Res 15(6): 808-813 (1997). |
Tomasi et al., "Shape and motion from image streams under orthography—a factorization method," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90(21): 9795-9802 (1993). |
Tsai et al., "Application of a flexible loop-gap resonator for MR imaging of articular cartilage at 3.TO," International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Denver (Apr. 24-28, 2000). |
Tyler et al., "Detection and Monitoring of Progressive Degeneration of Osteoarthritic Cartilage by MRI," Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 Suppl. 266: 130-138 (1995). |
Tyler JA, et al. "Detection and Monitoring of Progressive Degeneration of Osteoarthritici Cartilage by MRI." Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 Suppl. 266: 130-138. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/410,515, filed Apr. 25, 2009, Lang et al. Van der Linden et al. "Mar imaging of hyaline cartilage of 0.5 T: a quatitative and qualitative in virto evalution of three types of sequences." Skeletal Radiol 1998, 27:297-305. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due dated Sep. 22, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 19 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office action dated Jan. 26, 2010, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/671,745, 48 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2009, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 9 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,363, 12 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 16 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 5, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 10/724,010, 31 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated May 9, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 17 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2007, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 15 pages. |
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Nov. 28, 2008, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,573, 21 pages. |
Van der Linden et al., "MR Imaging of Hyaline Cartilage at 0.5 T: A Quantitative and Qualitative in vitro Evaluation of Three Types of Sequences" (Jun. 1998). |
Van Leersum et al., "Thickness of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage as Measured on MR Imaging: Sequence Comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation," Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24: 431-435 (1995). |
Van Leersum MD, et al. "Thickness of Patellofemoral Articular Cartilage as Measured on MR Imagin: Sequence Comparison of accuracy, reproducibility, and interobserver variation." Skeletal Radiol 1995; 24:431-435. |
Vande Berg et al., "Assessment of Knee Cartilage In Cadavers With Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography and MR Imaging," Radiology,: 222(2): 430-435 (Feb. 2002). |
Velyvis et al., "Evaluation of Articular Cartilage with Delayed Gd(DTPA)2-Enhanced MRI: Promise and Pitfalls," Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Resonance Med., 7:554 (1999). |
Wang et al., "The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy," J. Bone Joint Surg 72A: 905-909 (1990). |
Warfield et al., "Adaptive Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification," Proc. First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted, MICCAI, pp. 231-238 (1998). |
Warfield et al., "Adaptive, Template Moderated Spatially Varying Statistical Classification," Medical Image Analysis 4(1): 43-55 (2000). |
Warfield et al., "Automatic Segmentation of MRI of the Knee," ISMRM Sixth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition p. 563, Sydney, Australia (Apr. 17-24, 1998). |
Warfield et al., "Automatic Segmentation of MRI of the Knee," Medical Image Alanysis 4(1), Proc. ISMRM, p. 563, 1998. |
Waterton et al., "Diurnal variation in the femoral articular cartilage of the knee in young adult humans," Mag Res Med 43: 126-132 (2000). |
Waterton et al., "Magnetic Resonance Methods for Measurement of Disease Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis," Mag. Res. Imaging; 11: 1033-1038 (1993). |
Waterton JC, et al. "Magnetic Resonance Methods for Measurement of Disease Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis." Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 1033-1038. |
Watson et al., "MR Protocols for Imaging the Guinea Pig Knee," Mag. Res. Imaging 15(8): 957-970 (1997). |
Watson PJ, et al. "MR Protocols for Imaging the Guinea Pig Knee." Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15(8): 957-970. |
Wayne et al., "Finite Element Analyses of Repaired Articular Surfaces," Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng.; 205(3): 155-162 (1991). |
Wayne et al., "Measurement of Articular Cartilage Thickness In The Articulated Knee," ANN Biomed Eng.; 26(1): 96-102 (1998). |
Wayne JS, et al. "Finite Element Analyses of Repaired Articular Surfaces." Proc Instn Mech Eng 1991; 205(3): 155-162. |
Wiese et al., "Biomaterial properties and biocompatibility in cell culture of a novel self-inflating hydrogel tissue expander", J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(2):179-188, Nov. 2000. |
Woolf et al., "Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee," Radiology 179: 623-628 (1991). |
Wordsworth et al., "MacIntosh Arthroplasty for the Rheumatoid Knee: A 10-year Follow Up," Ann. Rheum. Dis. 44(11):738-741 (1985). |
Worring et al., "Digital curvature estimation. CVGIP," Image Understanding 58(3): 366-382 (1993). |
Yan, "Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density," new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University (1998). |
Yan, C.H., "Measuring changes in local volumetric bone density," new approaches to quantitative computed tomography, Ph.D. thesis, 1998, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University. |
Yao et al., "Incidental magnetization transfer contrast in fast spin-echo imaging of cartilage," J. Magn Reson Imaging 6(1): 180-184 (1996). |
Yao et al., "MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5T," AJR 158(2): 339-345 (1992). |
Yasuda et al., "A 10 to 15 year follow up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis," Clin Orthop 282: 186-195 (1992). |
Yusof et al., "Preparation and characterization of chitin beads as a wound dressing precursor", J. Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 54(1):59-68, Oct. 2000. |
Zimmer, Inc., "There's a New Addition to the Flex Family! The Zimmer® Unicompartmental Knee System", pp. 1-8 (2004). |
Cited By (198)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9020788B2 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2015-04-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20090076371A1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2009-03-19 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Joint and Cartilage Diagnosis, Assessment and Modeling |
US8862202B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2014-10-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage |
US20070015995A1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2007-01-18 | Philipp Lang | Joint and cartilage diagnosis, assessment and modeling |
US8369926B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2013-02-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US8306601B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2012-11-06 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
US9286686B2 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2016-03-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss |
US8366771B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-02-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
US9186254B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US9775680B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-10-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8768028B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-07-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US9700971B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-07-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US9603711B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-03-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20090222014A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-09-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20090312805A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-12-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US9579110B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2017-02-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9495483B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-11-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Automated Systems for manufacturing patient-specific orthopedic implants and instrumentation |
US9439767B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-09-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US9387079B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-07-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US20100160917A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-06-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100168754A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-07-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20030055502A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2003-03-20 | Philipp Lang | Methods and compositions for articular resurfacing |
US20100281678A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools Facilitating Increased Accuracy, Speed and Simplicity in Performing Joint Arthroplasty |
US20100305907A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Knee Arthroplasty Devices |
US20100303313A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and Compositions for Articular Repair |
US20100305573A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20100303324A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2010-12-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and Compositions for Articular Repair |
US20110071581A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2011-03-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Tools for Arthroplasty |
US9358018B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-06-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9333085B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-05-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US9308091B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices and methods for treatment of facet and other joints |
US9295482B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2016-03-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20080275452A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2008-11-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical Cutting Guide |
US9216025B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-12-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8460304B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-06-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9066728B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-06-30 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing joint arthroplasty |
US9125673B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-09-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9072531B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-07-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9107680B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-08-18 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9107679B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-08-18 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9084617B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-07-21 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9913723B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2018-03-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US8337507B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2012-12-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US8337501B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2012-12-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8343218B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-01-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US8882847B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-11-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US20070233269A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2007-10-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Interpositional Joint Implant |
US8377129B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-02-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8439926B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-05-14 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9125672B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-09-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9877790B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2018-01-30 | Conformis, Inc. | Tibial implant and systems with variable slope |
US9186161B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US8480754B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-07-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US9055953B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-06-16 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods and compositions for articular repair |
US9023050B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-05-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US20070083266A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2007-04-12 | Vertegen, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating facet joints, uncovertebral joints, costovertebral joints and other joints |
US8529630B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-09-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8998915B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-04-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8545569B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US8551102B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8551103B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8551169B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8551099B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US8974539B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-03-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8556983B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools |
US8556906B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8556907B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-15 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8562611B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8562618B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8561278B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8568479B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8568480B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-10-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8585708B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-11-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8617172B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-12-31 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8617242B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2013-12-31 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US8906107B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-12-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs and related tools |
US8951260B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-02-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical cutting guide |
US8951259B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-02-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8926706B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-01-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US8690945B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-04-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee arthroplasty devices |
US8641716B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-02-04 | Conformis, Inc. | Joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8657827B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2014-02-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Surgical tools for arthroplasty |
US8945230B2 (en) | 2001-05-25 | 2015-02-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable knee joint arthroplasty devices |
US8801719B2 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2014-08-12 | Otismed Corporation | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US20090131941A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2009-05-21 | Ilwhan Park | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US8801720B2 (en) | 2002-05-15 | 2014-08-12 | Otismed Corporation | Total joint arthroplasty system |
US8709089B2 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2014-04-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Minimally invasive joint implant with 3-dimensional geometry matching the articular surfaces |
US8932363B2 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2015-01-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US8634617B2 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2014-01-21 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US8965088B2 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2015-02-24 | Conformis, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US20040147927A1 (en) * | 2002-11-07 | 2004-07-29 | Imaging Therapeutics, Inc. | Methods for determining meniscal size and shape and for devising treatment |
US8638998B2 (en) | 2002-12-04 | 2014-01-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Fusion of multiple imaging planes for isotropic imaging in MRI and quantitative image analysis using isotropic or near-isotropic imaging |
US9375222B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-06-28 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9381025B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-07-05 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US11147568B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2021-10-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20110213430A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110213431A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US9295481B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-03-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20110213373A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US9241724B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-01-26 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9308005B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9241725B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-01-26 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20110218539A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110238073A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US9408615B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-08-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20110213374A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110230888A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-22 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US9113921B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2015-08-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US20110213368A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US20110213427A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2011-09-01 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient Selectable Joint Arthroplasty Devices and Surgical Tools |
US9314256B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2016-04-19 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US10085839B2 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2018-10-02 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific and patient-engineered orthopedic implants |
US8500740B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2013-08-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific joint arthroplasty devices for ligament repair |
US9326780B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2016-05-03 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools incorporating anatomical relief |
US9220516B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2015-12-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US8623026B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2014-01-07 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools incorporating anatomical relief |
US9308053B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2016-04-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-specific joint arthroplasty devices for ligament repair |
US9220517B2 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2015-12-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools |
US9017336B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2015-04-28 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US9808262B2 (en) | 2006-02-15 | 2017-11-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US9111180B2 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2015-08-18 | Orthopedic Navigation Ltd. | Medical image analysis |
US20120183184A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2012-07-19 | Dan Rappaport | Medical image analysis |
US8460302B2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US20080147072A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-19 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty devices and related methods |
US8735773B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2014-05-27 | Conformis, Inc. | Implant device and method for manufacture |
US20090004267A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2009-01-01 | Gruenenthal Gmbh | Dosage Form with Impeded Abuse |
US9433390B2 (en) | 2007-06-21 | 2016-09-06 | Surgix Ltd. | System for measuring the true dimensions and orientation of objects in a two dimensional image |
US20100256504A1 (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2010-10-07 | Perception Raisonnement Action En Medecine | Methods and apparatus for assisting cartilage diagnostic and therapeutic procedures |
US10028722B2 (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2018-07-24 | Hospital For Special Surgery | Methods and apparatus for assisting cartilage diagnostic and therapeutic procedures |
US8460303B2 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-06-11 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty systems and devices, and related methods |
USD691719S1 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-10-15 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty jig blank |
US20090110498A1 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-04-30 | Ilwhan Park | Arthroplasty systems and devices, and related methods |
US20090138020A1 (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2009-05-28 | Otismed Corporation | Generating mri images usable for the creation of 3d bone models employed to make customized arthroplasty jigs |
US10582934B2 (en) | 2007-11-27 | 2020-03-10 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generating MRI images usable for the creation of 3D bone models employed to make customized arthroplasty jigs |
US8715291B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-06 | Otismed Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US20110214279A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2011-09-08 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8737700B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8968320B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2015-03-03 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs |
US9649170B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2017-05-16 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Arthroplasty system and related methods |
US8617171B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US20090169300A1 (en) * | 2007-12-27 | 2009-07-02 | Allen J Dewayne | Hydraulic riding trowel with automatic load sensing system |
US8734455B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2014-05-27 | Otismed Corporation | Hip resurfacing surgical guide tool |
US9408618B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2016-08-09 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Total hip replacement surgical guide tool |
US9180015B2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2015-11-10 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
US9700420B2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2017-07-11 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
US8682052B2 (en) | 2008-03-05 | 2014-03-25 | Conformis, Inc. | Implants for altering wear patterns of articular surfaces |
US9646113B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2017-05-09 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US8480679B2 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | Generation of a computerized bone model representative of a pre-degenerated state and useable in the design and manufacture of arthroplasty devices |
US9208263B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2015-12-08 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US8532361B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2013-09-10 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US8483469B2 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2013-07-09 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty |
US20110188726A1 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2011-08-04 | Ram Nathaniel | Method and system for stitching multiple images into a panoramic image |
US9109998B2 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2015-08-18 | Orthopedic Navigation Ltd. | Method and system for stitching multiple images into a panoramic image |
US20100002921A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-07 | Matthias Fenchel | Medical image acquisition apparatus and operating method therefor |
US8848997B2 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2014-09-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Medical image acquisition apparatus and operating method therefor |
US20100023015A1 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2010-01-28 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs having improved mating accuracy |
US8777875B2 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2014-07-15 | Otismed Corporation | System and method for manufacturing arthroplasty jigs having improved mating accuracy |
US8696603B2 (en) * | 2008-12-04 | 2014-04-15 | Fujifilm Corporation | System for measuring space width of joint, method for measuring space width of joint and recording medium |
US20100145231A1 (en) * | 2008-12-04 | 2010-06-10 | Fujifilm Corporation | System for measuring space width of joint, method for measuring space width of joint and recording medium |
US9364291B2 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2016-06-14 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using areas representing cartilage |
US20100153076A1 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2010-06-17 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Implant planning using areas representing cartilage |
US8617175B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Unicompartmental customized arthroplasty cutting jigs and methods of making the same |
US9566075B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2017-02-14 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US11464527B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2022-10-11 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Systems and methods for installing an orthopedic implant |
US11911046B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2024-02-27 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US9320620B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2016-04-26 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved articular implants, designs and related guide tools |
US9649117B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2017-05-16 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US9675365B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2017-06-13 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | System and method for anterior approach for installing tibial stem |
US11779347B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2023-10-10 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | System for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount |
US11779356B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2023-10-10 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US9017334B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2015-04-28 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US11154305B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2021-10-26 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US10973536B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2021-04-13 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US11534186B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2022-12-27 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US9089342B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2015-07-28 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US9883870B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2018-02-06 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Method for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount |
US9901353B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2018-02-27 | Microport Holdings Inc. | Patient specific surgical guide locator and mount |
US11389177B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2022-07-19 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Method for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount |
US9949747B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2018-04-24 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for installing an orthopedic implant |
US9642632B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2017-05-09 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US10039557B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2018-08-07 | Micorport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US8808303B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2014-08-19 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US10660654B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2020-05-26 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Method for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount |
US10512476B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2019-12-24 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Orthopedic surgical guide |
US9113914B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2015-08-25 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings Inc. | Method for forming a patient specific surgical guide mount |
US10646238B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2020-05-12 | Microport Orthopedics Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for installing an orthopedic implant |
US8771365B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2014-07-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient-adapted and improved orthopedic implants, designs, and related tools |
US20120259224A1 (en) * | 2011-04-08 | 2012-10-11 | Mon-Ju Wu | Ultrasound Machine for Improved Longitudinal Tissue Analysis |
US10456261B2 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2019-10-29 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for manufacturing orthopedic implants |
US11419726B2 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2022-08-23 | Conformis, Inc. | Systems and methods for manufacturing, preparation and use of blanks in orthopedic implants |
US9408686B1 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2016-08-09 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for manufacturing orthopedic implants |
US10966732B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2021-04-06 | Conformis, Inc. | Tibial guides, tools and techniques for resecting the tibial plateau |
US9486226B2 (en) | 2012-04-18 | 2016-11-08 | Conformis, Inc. | Tibial guides, tools, and techniques for resecting the tibial plateau |
US9675471B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2017-06-13 | Conformis, Inc. | Devices, techniques and methods for assessing joint spacing, balancing soft tissues and obtaining desired kinematics for joint implant components |
US9402637B2 (en) | 2012-10-11 | 2016-08-02 | Howmedica Osteonics Corporation | Customized arthroplasty cutting guides and surgical methods using the same |
US9091628B2 (en) | 2012-12-21 | 2015-07-28 | L-3 Communications Security And Detection Systems, Inc. | 3D mapping with two orthogonal imaging views |
US9387083B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2016-07-12 | Conformis, Inc. | Acquiring and utilizing kinematic information for patient-adapted implants, tools and surgical procedures |
US9681956B2 (en) | 2013-01-30 | 2017-06-20 | Conformis, Inc. | Acquiring and utilizing kinematic information for patient-adapted implants, tools and surgical procedures |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8112142B2 (en) | 2012-02-07 |
US8306601B2 (en) | 2012-11-06 |
US20040167390A1 (en) | 2004-08-26 |
US8036729B2 (en) | 2011-10-11 |
US20080015433A1 (en) | 2008-01-17 |
US20130071828A1 (en) | 2013-03-21 |
US7239908B1 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
US20120072183A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
USRE43282E1 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment | |
US8369926B2 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment | |
US9289153B2 (en) | Joint and cartilage diagnosis, assessment and modeling | |
US9286686B2 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and assessing cartilage loss | |
US8265730B2 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage | |
AU2001290887A1 (en) | Assessing condition of a joint and cartilage loss | |
AU2001290888A1 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment | |
AU2007209792A1 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and preventing damage | |
AU2007201573A1 (en) | Assessing the condition of a joint and devising treatment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALEXANDER, EUGENE J.;ANDRIACCHI, THOMAS P.;LANG, PHILIPP;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20061113 TO 20061226;REEL/FRAME:021713/0694 |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |