|Número de publicación||USRE44570 E1|
|Tipo de publicación||Concesión|
|Número de solicitud||US 13/470,185|
|Fecha de publicación||5 Nov 2013|
|Fecha de presentación||11 May 2012|
|Fecha de prioridad||4 Dic 2002|
|También publicado como||EP1567453A1, US7399416, US7713423, US20040144728, US20080277349, US20130341278, WO2004050561A1|
|Número de publicación||13470185, 470185, US RE44570 E1, US RE44570E1, US-E1-RE44570, USRE44570 E1, USRE44570E1|
|Inventores||Gregory Moller, Kevin Marshall Brackney, Roger Alan Korus, Gerald Michael Keller, Jr., Brian Keith Hart, Remembrance Louisa Newcombe|
|Cesionario original||Board Of Regents Of The University Of Idaho|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (77), Otras citas (54), Clasificaciones (47), Eventos legales (5)|
|Enlaces externos: USPTO, Cesión de USPTO, Espacenet|
The present patent application is a reissue application of commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,713,423, issued May 11, 2010, which is a divisional of, and claims priority from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/727,963, filed Dec. 3, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,399,416 and entitled “Reactive Filtration” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/430,756, filed Dec. 4, 2002. The disclosures disclosure of the above mentioned patent applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Part of the work performed during the development of embodiments of the invention was funded by the United states Environmental Protection Agency under contract no. EPA-EPSCoR GR827683-01-0. The United States government may have certain rights in the invention.
Phosphorus exists in waters as dissolved ortho-phosphate, polyphosphate, and complex organo-phosphorus compounds. In typical phosphorus-containing waste waters, such as the secondary or tertiary effluents of municipal waste water treatment plants, there is a dissolved fraction of phosphorus compounds, primarily in the form of ortho-phosphate and poly-phosphates, and a suspended fraction of micro-particulate phosphorus-containing solids. Trace levels of arsenic are sometimes found in some sources of drinking water and in higher concentrations in some waste waters. Arsenic can occur in natural waters as reduced arsenite, As(III), or oxidized arsenate, As(V).
Several methods are currently utilized for the removal of phosphorus compounds, arsenic, and other contaminants from waste water. Micro-particulate and other solid contaminants are typically removed by filtration using a solid media such as sand, and sedimentation, where solid contaminants with higher densities than water are allowed to settle. Dissolved contaminants are typically removed by flocculation and sorption. In flocculation, metal salt solutions are mixed with waste water to precipitate the contaminant out of solution, where it can then be removed through filtration or sedimentation. In sorption, contaminated waste water is passed through a stationary filtration media, typically iron oxide coated sand, having a partially charged cationic boundary layer that is reactive with a target contaminant dissolved in the waste water.
In conventional fixed-bed filtration systems, filtration media can quickly lose its filtration efficiency as the interstitial spaces between the particles of the filtration media become saturated with micro-particulate and solid contaminants. Thus, the filtration media must be flushed or replaced, which tends to be costly and time intensive. Additionally, the filtration process must be stopped while the filtration media is being flushed or replaced.
Moving-bed filtration devices seek to mitigate these limitations by utilizing processes that remove micro-particulate and solid contaminants from the filtration media while simultaneously filtering water. These moving-bed filtration devices still have a disadvantage in that they do not remove dissolved contaminants from waste water.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,369,072 to Benjamin et al. describes methods of preparing iron-oxide coated sand to be used as a filtration media in either fixed-bed or moving-bed systems to remove both solid and dissolved contaminants from waste water. When such a filtration media is used in a fixed-bed system, there remains the disadvantage of having to flush or replace the filter media on a regular basis to remove the solid contaminant waste. Although the use of this media in a moving-bed system may overcome these disadvantages, it does not overcome a disadvantage common to the use of the described iron oxide coated sand in either system. That is, the reactive surface of the iron oxide coated sand becomes saturated with adsorbed contaminants, and therefore needs to be either replaced or regenerated. Benjamin states that the adsorbed contaminant can be desorbed by treating the saturated filtration media with a solution with a pH range that is known to desorb the specific contaminant ion from the specific adsorbing surface. Therefore, in either a fixed-bed or moving-bed system, filtration of water must stop to allow the filtration media to be rinsed with pH solution.
Environmental concerns and increasingly stricter government regulations have many industries searching for cost-effective and efficient water-treatment solutions. Additionally, there is a recognized need to be able to filter out water contaminants that exist in what may be considered trace amounts. For example, the removal capability of conventional coagulation-precipitation methods drop off significantly at contaminant levels lower than 500 parts per billion (ppb). However, science has recognized that ambient phosphorus levels in water greater than 10-20 ppb can lead to eutrophication. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is pushing for lower limits of phosphorus in effluents. Currently, the EPA estuarine water criteria for total phosphorus is 0.10 mg/L. High volume dischargers are experiencing a reduction in the levels allowed in their regulatory permits.
Embodiments of the invention were developed in an effort to more efficiently remove contaminants from waste water by increasing flows through a filtration system, even when contaminants are present in relatively small amounts. “Waste water” as used in this Description and in the Claims means any water to be treated—it is not necessarily highly contaminated water and may contain only trace amounts of phosphorus, arsenic, or other contaminants (organic or inorganic and in single or mixed solution).
The comparatively narrow stem 18 of vessel 12 connects filter chamber 16 with expansion chamber 20. A sludge removal port 32 is positioned near the bottom of expansion chamber 20. A recirculation pipe 34 extends from the bottom of filter chamber 16 to the top of expansion chamber 20. An air compressor 36 pumps air into recirculation pipe 34 at the bottom of filter chamber 16 causing a counterclockwise motion of air, water, sand and filtered particulates through vessel 12. A back flow preventer 38, such as a flapper valve, prevents materials in recirculation pipe 34 from flowing back into compressor 36. A flow control valve 39, sampling tube 40, sampling valve 42 and clean-out 43 on recirculation pipe 34, and a sight glass 44 in stem 18, may be provided if necessary or desirable.
In operation, waste water pumped into filter chamber 16 through inlet pipe 14 passes radially through sand 22 into sleeve 28 and flows out outlet pipe 30 as treated water. Sand 22 moves continuously down through vessel 12 under the influence of gravity. An aerated mixture of used sand and water flows from the bottom of filter chamber 16 back up to expansion chamber 20 through recirculation pipe 34 along with contaminants removed from the waste water. Air is vented to the atmosphere at the top of expansion chamber 20 to prevent pressurization of the system. The pressure head of water in sand 22 is kept such that some of the treated water flows from filter chamber 16 up through stem 18 into expansion chamber 20 to rinse contaminants from the used sand particles returning to expansion chamber 20. This rinse water, now carrying a high concentration of contaminants less dense than sand, is removed from chamber 22 and flows out through sludge removal port 32. In a preferred operation, the top of the sand bed for filtration is three fourths the height of filter chamber 16. Expansion chamber 20 and narrow stem 18 contain a dilute sand and water mixture that contains filtered particles that have been moved first to the bottom of sand 22 and circulated via pipe 34 into the water residing in expansion chamber 20. Water flow at inlet pipe 14, outlets 30 and 32 and recirculation pipe 34 can be balanced so that a preferred rate of 5-10% of the inlet water carrying contaminants is discharged through sludge removal port 32.
The system of
In an alternative embodiment, a reagent capable of creating a reactive surface on the filter media is added to the incoming flow of waste water at molar ratios such as 5:1 to 200:1 with the target contaminant. While it is expected that soluble forms of manganese, aluminum or other metals such as zinc and copper will provide suitable reagents, iron will typically be used as the reagent due to its proven reactivity with a variety of contaminants and its current widespread use in water treatment. Ferric chloride, for example, is a preferred reagent when phosphorus or arsenic is the target contaminant. In any particular water targeted for treatment, their may be alternate and competitive reactive pathways for the added active reagents. These pathways will be the result of the specific water chemistry in the waste water. For example, waste water with high levels of dissolved carbonate or phosphate can react with added iron salts in competition to the target contaminant such as arsenic. Molar ratios of Fe(III) to water arsenic in field studies have been in excess of 100:1. In these studies, inlet concentrations of arsenic in source water for drinking were reduced from approximately 40 parts per billion to less than 5 parts per billion treating at a rate of 10 gallon per minute in a pilot scale operation. However, other water types may have less alternate, competitive reactive pathways. It is preferred to field test to determine the optimal molar ratio for any particular treatment environment to ensure sufficient excess reagent is delivered to the reactive sand surface to form iron oxide coated sand. Additional considerations in reagent balancing direct efforts to minimizing reagent addition to ensure that the process effluents are not overly high in dissolved iron or other reagent, thereby creating an additional treatment or discharge concern. Excess reagent consumption will also undesirably increase the cost of operation of the process.
In the removal of dissolved and suspended phosphorus, field studies have demonstrated that successful high flow, low concentration removal occurs in this process in iron to phosphorous molar rations of 5:1 to 40:1. It is preferred that the actual reagent dose is optimized to ensure near complete solution reaction and saturation of all of the competing reactive pathways and allowing for residual iron in the solution to react with the sand bed. In some phosphorus contaminated test waste waters, optimizing the correct balance of conditions yields a preferred ratio of iron to phosphorus at 8:1. The metal salt reagent, ferric chloride in this example, reacts with the surface of the sand to form iron oxide coated sand (IOCS). IOCS provides a stationary phase removal pathway for water borne contaminants such as phosphorus and arsenic. Contaminants in the waste water are exposed as a “mobile” phase over the “stationary” (slowly moving) IOCS bed for high efficiency sorptive and ion exchange removal. The physical action of the moving sand abrades the surface of the sand granules, regenerating active sites for additional iron salt and water contaminant reactions. Hence, regenerated reactive sites for contaminant binding are continually presented to the flowing water. Abraded sand-iron-contaminant solids are removed by the screen filtering action of the sand bed. The treated water exits the sand filter bed with contaminants substantially removed, ready for discharge or post-treatment processing.
Sorption is the removal of undersaturated solutes from solution onto minerals. Sorbate is the species removed from solution and the sorbent is the solid onto which solution species are sorbed. There are three types of sorption: adsorption wherein solutes are held at the mineral surface as a hydrated species; absorption wherein solute is incorporated into the mineral structure at the surface; and ion exchange wherein an ion becomes sorbed to a surface by changing places with a similarly charged ion previously residing on the sorbent. Mineral surfaces, such as the silicates in sand, have fixed or acquired surface charges that can be modified by water chemistry such as pH and dissolved solutes such as iron salts that can complex with the surface charges of sand. As a result of fixed surface charges, a property of the mineral, and pH, a property of the water, mineral surfaces develop a point of zero net proton charge (PZNPC). The PZNPC is the pH at which net surface charge is zero. At lower pH than PZNPC, the net surface charge is positive and at higher pH, the net surface charge is negative. These surface charges allow attraction of oppositely charged anions or cations, respectively, from solution. Larger amounts of dissolved constituents, such as positively charged Fe(III) can be attracted to a negatively charged surface such as the silicates in sand to such a degree that the surface becomes overall positively charged and therefore attractive to anions such as phosphate and arsenate. Silica, SiO2 has a low PZNPC of 2, whereas iron oxyhydroxide, α-FeOOH has a PZNPC of 7.8, and iron hydroxide, Fe(OH)3 has a PZNPC of 8.5. Increasing quantities of iron oxide forming on a sand surface will increase the PZNCP of the sand grains such that net surface charge is positive and thereby attractive to anions such as phosphate and arsenate at higher pH levels of about 6-8. Most environmental waters, including drinking water and wastewaters exist at these circum-neutral pH levels. Hence, the selective addition of iron oxides to the sand creates a useful sorbent.
In a moving sand bed system such as the one shown in
The waste water/reagent mix flows through straight-aways 64 and gentle bends 66 of serpentine piping 56. The waste water/reagent mix exits serpentine piping 56 into an outlet pipe 68 that takes the mix into reactive filter system 54. Prescribed overdosing introduces the reagent in sufficient quantities and concentrations to (1) allow for the co-precipitation and flocculation reactions between the reagent and the dissolved contaminants in pre-reactor system 52 to go to near completion to dilute levels where equilibrium and diffusion limited processes limit further reaction, (2) saturate competing reactive pathways with natural waters with reagent, and (3) leave enough excess reagent in the mix to activate the filter media in reactive filter system 54. The amount of excess reagent is determined by the reactive capacity of the influent solution and the desire to deliver excess reagent to the sand filtration bed for the continuous formation of iron oxide coated sand.
The comparatively slow flow through serpentine piping 56 allows for better coagulation of precipitates. The straight-aways 64 allow for less turbulent flow to enhance coagulation. Periodic gentle bends 66 introduce and maintain additional turbulent flow and introduce flow vortices to periodically mix the flowing solution. Preferably, the serpentine mixing array allows for a decrease in flow velocity for 2-8 minutes to allow for sufficient pre-reaction time. Design of the array needs to consider maintaining sufficient flow to prevent deposition of precipitation solids in the pre-reactor assembly. The actual length and diameter of serpentine piping 56 for most applications will result for an optimization of the required reaction time (usually 1-5 minutes), the desired flow rate, the space available at the site of deployment, and the presence of competing reactions in the treatment water.
The pre-treated waste water flows into the vertically oriented cylindrical treatment vessel 70 of reactive filtration system 54 through an inlet pipe 72. Inlet pipe 72 is positioned at the center of vessel 70. Vessel 70 includes a filter chamber 74 that contains a bed of sand 76 or another suitable filter media. Inlet pipe 72 extends down into filter chamber 74 to discharge the waste water into the lower portion of sand bed 76 through a perforated manifold 78. Waste water pumped into filter chamber 74 passes up through sand 76, over a baffle 80 near the top of filter chamber 74 as fully treated water, into a basin 82 and is removed from vessel 70 through an outlet pipe 84.
A recirculation tube 86 extends from the bottom to the top of filter chamber 74 at the center of vessel 70. Inlet pipe 72 extends down the center of recirculation tube 86. Inlet flow discharge manifold 78 extends out through openings in recirculation tube 86. An air compressor 88 pumps air into used sand and water at the bottom of vessel 70 through an air inlet pipe 89. The aerated mixture of used sand and water rises through recirculation tube 86 along with contaminants removed from the waste water up to a sand and particulate/water separator 90. Separator 90 represents generally any suitable separation device that may use, for example, physical separation, gravity separation, particle size separation, magnetic separation, membrane separation, or cyclonic separation. The sand removed from the mix by separator 90 is recycled back to filter chamber 74. The now highly contaminated waste water is removed through a sludge removal port 94. Sand 76 moves continuously down through vessel 70 under the influence of gravity.
Phosphorus exists in waters and waste waters as dissolved ortho-phosphate, polyphosphate and complex organo-phosphorus compounds. In typical phosphorus containing waste waters, such as the secondary or tertiary effluents of municipal waste water treatment plants, there is a dissolved fraction, primarily as ortho-phosphate (PO4 3−) and poly-phosphates and as a micro-particulate or suspended fraction of phosphorous containing solids. Trace levels of arsenic are sometimes found in some sources of drinking water and in higher concentrations in some waste waters. Arsenic can occur in natural waters in the reduced arsenite, As(III) or oxidized arsenate, As(V) forms. Arsenate reacts with iron and aluminum salts to form insoluble compounds. Waters with arsenite contamination can be treated with an oxidizer such as chlorine to allow for further reaction with reactive metal salts. Ferric chloride or sulfate is typically used as a metal salt reagent to remove phosphorus and arsenic from water, although other salts and ferrous compounds can be used.
In the system described above, excess ferric iron enters sand bed 76 along with the particulate Fe—As or Fe—P solids and residual As or P in solution in the waste water. Ferric ions react with sand surfaces to form iron oxide coated sand (IOCS). IOCS sorbs residual solution As/P out of solution. The physical action of the moving sand abrades the surface of the sand granules, refreshing active sites for additional IOCS formation and Fe—As or Fe—P reactions. Hence, fresh reactive sites for As/P binding are continually presented to the flowing water via microscopic erosion of the sand surface.
For phosphorus, ferric chloride is added at a preferred molar ratio of 5:1 to 40:1 with the phosphorus in the waste water. The pre-reactor system allows for a pre-reaction to form metal phosphate salts such as FePO4, Vivianite and humic-fulvic organic phosphorus solids that are amenable to filtration in the sand bed reactive filter system. Vivianite is a very thermodynamically stable compound that is rapidly formed in solutions of iron cations and phosphate. Excess iron salt reagent is passed unreacted into the sand bed where it binds to the surface of the sand to form iron coated sand, a phosphate and polyphosphate reactive surface. Metal cations will selectively bind to the silicate and other negatively charged groups on the solid sand surface. This binding will yield a partially charged cationic boundary layer on the iron coated sand surface that will be reactive with soluble ortho-phosphate and poly-phosphate. The mobile phase (treatment water) and stationary phase (iron coated sand) configuration of this process allows for near quantitative removal of phosphorus because diffusion processes are nearly eliminated in the dilute solution reactive pathway of this process. Testing has shown that this process can remove ortho-phosphate to less than detection limits (10 parts per billion) at efficiencies greater than 99% and total phosphorus to less than 40 parts per billion at greater than 90% efficiency of removal from the original concentration.
The processes described above have been shown to produce iron arsenic solids that are classified non-hazardous by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) directed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA 42 U.S.C. s/s 6901 et seq.) and can be disposed in a landfill, and iron phosphate solids that may be used in agricultural applications as a low grade slow release fertilizer.
The reactive filter media are deployed in a moving bed to assist in continuous renewal of the reactive iron oxide layer. Movement may be accomplished, for example, by fluidizing or moving the bed using the fluid flow, by mechanical action such as augers or mixing bars, by acoustic action such as the application of ultrasonic waves or by physical transport using compressed air.
Other embodiments are possible. For example, the filter media can be any natural or synthetic, organic or inorganic substrate that can react with dissolved iron to form a reactive oxide surface. The particle size of the filter media will be a size suitable for the level of filtration and flow desired. It is expected that the following inorganic materials will provide suitable filtration media: sand; silica beads or granules; high silicate glass; glass beads; glass sand; zeolite; mineral sands such as olivine, hematite, goethite; diatomaceous earth; iron oxyhydroxide granules; iron oxide granules; ceramic beads or granules; iron metal granules or beads; iron metal coated beads or granules; and synthetic or natural iron coated sand. It is expected that the following organic materials will provide suitable filtration media: polystyrene beads; polyethylene beads; modified cationic surface polymer beads; modified anionic surface polymer beads; mixed or pure polymer beads or granules; and polymer coated inorganic beads or granules. Some of these materials can have naturally occurring reactive sites that can be maintained or supplemented by the addition of active reagents such as ferric chloride solution. Because of the well known filtration properties of sand, its inexpensive use, its routine application in water treatment, its natural reactive silicate surface for inner sphere and outer sphere metal oxide binding to form iron oxide coated sand, and its abrasion properties, it is the preferred embodiment of an active filtration media in a moving bed process.
Suitable filtration media include corroding iron metal granules or ion exchange resins with the ability to bind iron compounds. Corroding iron metal granules allow for reductive processes that can be used to remove trace amounts of chlorinated solvents in water. Testing has shown that a 30% by volume iron-sand bed deployed in the system of
In some circumstances, removing arsenic for example, it may be desirable to pre-oxidize the waste water to convert arsenite to the iron reactive arsenate. Arsenite in natural solutions at circumneutral pH is non-ionic and therefore typically non-reactive in most treatment deployments. Pre-oxidation can be accomplished using conventional water oxidation operations such as chlorination, sonication or ozonation. The pre-oxidation operation can be part of a full water treatment process train and may be preceded or followed by other conventional water treatment processes such as filtration, aeration, chemical treatment, flocculation, clarification and others that may be required in the normal processing and disinfection of drinking water.
The present invention has been shown and described with reference to the foregoing exemplary embodiments. It is to be understood, however, that other forms, details, and embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention which is defined in the following claims.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US2528099||11 Jun 1949||31 Oct 1950||Dorr Co||Method and apparatus for conducting ion exchange operations|
|US2696462||8 Abr 1952||7 Dic 1954||Socony Vacuum Oil Co Inc||Method for regulating the flow of solid adsorbents|
|US2730239||22 Mar 1952||10 Ene 1956||Shell Dev||Continuous fluid-solid contacting apparatus|
|US2863829||9 Ago 1956||9 Dic 1958||Gulf Research Development Co||Process and apparatus for selective adsorption|
|US3056743||19 Ago 1959||2 Oct 1962||Dow Chemical Co||Movement of confined particulate solids|
|US3499837||20 Nov 1967||10 Mar 1970||Johns Manville||Waste water treatment phosphate removal by iron oxide|
|US3537582||13 Mar 1967||3 Nov 1970||Simonacco Ltd||Filtration|
|US3619425||9 Feb 1970||9 Nov 1971||Commissariat Energie Atomique||Counterflow liquid-granular material transfer process and apparatus|
|US3674684||13 Jul 1970||4 Jul 1972||Hydronautics||Continuous fluid-solid contact method and apparatus|
|US3679581||15 Abr 1970||25 Jul 1972||Ghh M A N Technik Ges Fur Anla||Method and apparatus for softening or desalting water by ion exchange|
|US4003832||24 Nov 1975||18 Ene 1977||Tii Corporation||Method of applying ozone and sonic energy to sterilize and oxidize waste water|
|US4049545||8 Jul 1976||20 Sep 1977||Rocky Carvalho||Chemical waste water treatment method|
|US4126546||23 Feb 1977||21 Nov 1978||Rederiaktiebolaget Nordstjernan||Method for the filtration of a suspension or emulsion|
|US4145280||14 Oct 1977||20 Mar 1979||Ballast-Nedam Groep N.V.||Method and device for separating a mixture|
|US4269716||28 Ene 1980||26 May 1981||Advanced Systems, Inc.||Ion exchange separation method|
|US4366128||1 Oct 1980||28 Dic 1982||Sherritt Gordon Mines Limited||Removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions|
|US4689154||15 Nov 1985||25 Ago 1987||Occidental Chemical Corporation||Process for removing phosphorus from industrial waste water|
|US4842744||12 May 1988||27 Jun 1989||Horst Schade||Method for continuous filteration of fluids|
|US5087374||5 Mar 1990||11 Feb 1992||Ding Lambert L||Removal of contaminates from granular solids|
|US5173194||5 Dic 1989||22 Dic 1992||Hering Jr Carl J||Filtration method and apparatus having a filtrate collection chamber within the filter bed|
|US5190659||6 Jul 1990||2 Mar 1993||International Environmental Systems Inc.||Contamination removal system employing filtration and plural ultraviolet and chemical treatment steps and treatment mode controller|
|US5236595||2 Jul 1992||17 Ago 1993||International Environmental Systems, Inc., Usa||Method and apparatus for filtration with plural ultraviolet treatment stages|
|US5302356||4 Mar 1992||12 Abr 1994||Arizona Board Of Reagents Acting On Behalf Of University Of Arizona||Ultrapure water treatment system|
|US5369072||17 Dic 1992||29 Nov 1994||University Of Washington||Granular media for removing contaminants from water and methods for making the same|
|US5372720||4 Sep 1991||13 Dic 1994||Nordic Water Products Ab||Method for purification of wastewater|
|US5439595||25 Ago 1993||8 Ago 1995||Downey, Jr.; Wayne F.||Water decontamination method using peroxide photolysis ionizer|
|US5443729||26 Oct 1992||22 Ago 1995||The University Of Queensland||Method for removing manganese from water|
|US5454959||5 Dic 1994||3 Oct 1995||Stevens; Jay S.||Moving bed filters|
|US5534153||24 Jul 1992||9 Jul 1996||Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.||Continuous fluidized-bed contactor with recycle of sorbent|
|US5573666||15 Mar 1995||12 Nov 1996||Korin; Amon||Replaceable integrated water filtration and sterilization cartridge and assembly therefor|
|US5670046||30 Oct 1995||23 Sep 1997||Rjjb & G, Inc.||Treatment of nutrient-rich water|
|US5679257||8 Sep 1995||21 Oct 1997||John T. Towles||Industrial waste water treatment|
|US5707528||20 May 1996||13 Ene 1998||Berry; William Wesley||System and process for treating organic-contaminated aqueous waste streams|
|US5746913 *||6 Feb 1997||5 May 1998||Chang; Hsiu-Chuan||Continuous sand filter|
|US5755977||3 Jul 1996||26 May 1998||Drexel University||Continuous catalytic oxidation process|
|US5843308||5 Nov 1996||1 Dic 1998||Dss Environmental, Inc.||Wastewater management system|
|US5855787||26 Dic 1996||5 Ene 1999||De La Rue Giori S.A.||Process for producing a fresh wiping solution and for treating a used solution and apparatus for carrying out the process|
|US5876606||12 Nov 1996||2 Mar 1999||University Of Waterloo||Treatment of contaminated water|
|US5904855||27 Feb 1997||18 May 1999||David H. Manz||Closed chemically enhanced treatment system|
|US5911882||29 Feb 1996||15 Jun 1999||University Of Washington||Removing contaminants from water using iron oxide coated mineral having olivine structure|
|US6077446||31 Mar 1998||20 Jun 2000||Tm Industrial Supply, Inc.||Sand filtration filtering system using ozone|
|US6132623||18 Jun 1998||17 Oct 2000||The University Of Connecticut||Immobilization of inorganic arsenic species using iron|
|US6143186||11 Ago 1997||7 Nov 2000||Van Unen; Sabine||Device for continuous filtration of liquids|
|US6200482||28 Sep 1999||13 Mar 2001||Adi International Inc.||Arsenic filtering media|
|US6217765||6 Ago 1999||17 Abr 2001||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Waste water treatment method and waste water treatment equipment capable of treating fluorine waste water containing organic matter, phosphor and hydrogen peroxide|
|US6334956||13 Jul 1998||1 Ene 2002||Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Tno)||Adsorption or desorption of dissolved constituents in liquids and apparatus therefor|
|US6426005||18 Abr 2000||30 Jul 2002||Parkson Corporation||Sequential descending bed filters with reject/washwater containing impurities being fed to a separate unit for elimination of impurities|
|US6432312||13 Mar 1999||13 Ago 2002||Joseph T. Fuss||Closed system for rearing aquatic life|
|US6464877||5 Nov 1998||15 Oct 2002||Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha||Water treating method|
|US6468942||16 Nov 2000||22 Oct 2002||John J. Sansalone||Absorptive-filtration media for the capture of waterborne or airborne constituents|
|US6471857||24 Oct 2000||29 Oct 2002||Koyo Engineering Co., Ltd.||Filter apparatus with sand filter bed|
|US6630071||29 Dic 1999||7 Oct 2003||Paques Bio Systems B.V.||Process for the treatment of waste water containing heavy metals|
|US6663781||28 Ago 2000||16 Dic 2003||U.S. Environmental Protection Agency||Contaminant adsorption and oxidation via the Fenton reaction|
|US6716344||2 Oct 2000||6 Abr 2004||The University Of Western Ontario||Liquid-solids circulating fluidized bed|
|US6942786||3 Feb 2000||13 Sep 2005||Salnes Filter As||Cleaning device for waste water|
|US6942807||28 Jun 2000||13 Sep 2005||Trustees Of Stevens Institute Of Technology||Iron powder and sand filtration process for treatment of water contaminated with heavy metals and organic compounds|
|US7029589||4 Abr 2001||18 Abr 2006||Mcginness Michael P||Universal method and apparatus for conversion of volatile compounds|
|US7399416||3 Dic 2003||15 Jul 2008||Idaho Research Foundation, Inc.||Reactive filtration|
|US7445721||29 Jun 2005||4 Nov 2008||Idaho Research Foundation, Inc.||Reactive filtration|
|US20010052495||25 Sep 1998||20 Dic 2001||Paul H. Friot||Method and apparatus for the removal of arsenic from water|
|US20020003116||27 Jun 2001||10 Ene 2002||Golden Josh H.||System and method for removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions|
|US20040144728||3 Dic 2003||29 Jul 2004||Greg Moller||Reactive filtration|
|US20050127003||30 May 2003||16 Jun 2005||Severn Trent Services, Inc.||Process for continuous ion exchange|
|US20050173348||7 Feb 2005||11 Ago 2005||Drake Ronald N.||Particle separation system|
|US20050263447||25 May 2005||1 Dic 2005||Mcgrew Henry E Jr||Wastewater treatment system|
|US20060000784||30 Jun 2004||5 Ene 2006||Khudenko Boris M||Water treatment|
|US20060000785||29 Jun 2005||5 Ene 2006||Gregory Moller||Reactive filtration|
|US20070136919||12 Dic 2005||14 Jun 2007||Corn. Bak B.V.||Vriesea plant named 'Stream'|
|US20070187329||26 Ene 2007||16 Ago 2007||Blue Water Technologies, Inc.||Water Treatment System and Method|
|GB471277A||Título no disponible|
|GB1596205A||Título no disponible|
|JP2002159977A||Título no disponible|
|JPH03137990A||Título no disponible|
|JPH07232161A||Título no disponible|
|KR20010070954A||Título no disponible|
|WO2001010786A1||28 Jun 2000||15 Feb 2001||Trustees Of Stevens Institute Of Technology||An iron powder and sand filtration process for treatment of water contaminated with heavy metals and organic compounds|
|WO2004050561A1||2 Dic 2003||17 Jun 2004||Idaho Research Foundation, Inc.||Reactive filtration|
|1||Beltran, "Ozone Reaction Kinetics for Wastewater Systems", Heterogeneous Catalytic Ozonation, 2004, Chapter 10, Lewis Publishers, pp. 227-276.|
|2||Benjamin, Mark M. et al., "Sorption and Filtration of Metals Using Iron-OxideCoated Sand", May 1, 1996 , pp. 1-13.|
|3||Dzombak, D. A. et al., Surface Complexation Modeling, 1990; John Wiley & Sons; New York, NY.|
|4||Gustafsson, John P. , "Visual MINTEQ. MINTEQA2 4.0", Royal Institution of Technology Land and Water Resources Engineering; Stockholm, Sweden 2006.|
|5||Gustafsson, John P., "Modelling Molybdate and Tungstate Adsorption to Ferrihydrite", Chemical Geology-vol. 200, Issues 1-2, Oct. 16, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? .sub.--ob=ArticleURL&.sub.-- udi=B6V5Y-48TMHH4-3&.sub.-- user=10&.sub.-- rdoc=1&.sub.-- fmt=&.sub.-- orig=search&.sub.-- sort=d&.sub.-- docanchor=&view=c&.sub.-- searchStrld=1066144960&.sub.-- rerunOrigin=google&.sub.-- acct=C000050221&.sub.-- version=1 &.sub.--urlVersion=0&.sub.-- userid=10&md5=3a,(Jul. 11, 2003),pp. 105-115.|
|6||Gustafsson, John P., "Modelling Molybdate and Tungstate Adsorption to Ferrihydrite", Chemical Geology—vol. 200, Issues 1-2, Oct. 16, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science? .sub.--ob=ArticleURL&.sub.-- udi=B6V5Y-48TMHH4-3&.sub.-- user=10&.sub.-- rdoc=1&.sub.-- fmt=&.sub.-- orig=search&.sub.-- sort=d&.sub.-- docanchor=&view=c&.sub.-- searchStrld=1066144960&.sub.-- rerunOrigin=google&.sub.-- acct=C000050221&.sub.-- version=1 &.sub.--urlVersion=0&.sub.-- userid=10&md5=3a,(Jul. 11, 2003),pp. 105-115.|
|7||Gustafsson, John P., "Modelling Molybdate and Tungstate Adsorption to Ferrihydrite", Chemical Geology-vol. 200, Issues 1-2, Oct. 16, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?-ob=ArticleURL&-udi=B6V5Y-48TMHH4-3&-user=10&-rdoc=1&-fmt=&-orig=search&-sort=d&-docanchor=&view=c&-searchStrId=1066144960&-rerunOrigin=google&-acct=C000050221&-version=1 &-urlVersion=0&-userid=10&md5=3a,(Jul. 11, 2003),pp. 105-115.|
|8||Gustafsson, John P., "Modelling Molybdate and Tungstate Adsorption to Ferrihydrite", Chemical Geology—vol. 200, Issues 1-2, Oct. 16, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?—ob=ArticleURL&—udi=B6V5Y-48TMHH4-3&—user=10&—rdoc=1&—fmt=&—orig=search&—sort=d&—docanchor=&view=c&—searchStrId=1066144960&—rerunOrigin=google&—acct=C000050221&—version=1 &—urlVersion=0&—userid=10&md5=3a,(Jul. 11, 2003),pp. 105-115.|
|9||Hermanowicz, S. W., "Chemical Phosphorus Removal", Biological and Chemical Systems for Nutrient Removal; Water Environment Federation: Alexandria, Virginia, 39., (2005),p. 39.|
|10||International Organization for, Standardization "Water Quality—Determination of Nitrogen—Part 2: Determination of Bound Nitrogen, After Combustion and Oxidation to Nitrogen Dioxide, Chemiluminescence Detection", ISOm.sub.-- 11905-2; Geneva, Switzerland, Retrieved from <<http:/wwwlsaiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/ISO/ISO.sub.--12345.- sub.--03-01/T023630E.PDF>>, (Mar. 15, 1997),pp. 1-5.|
|11||International Organization for, Standardization "Water Quality-Determination of Nitrogen-Part 2: Determination of Bound Nitrogen, After Combustion and Oxidation to Nitrogen Dioxide, Chemiluminescence Detection", ISOm.sub.-- 11905-2; Geneva, Switzerland, Retrieved from >, (Mar. 15, 1997),pp. 1-5.|
|12||International Organization for, Standardization "Water Quality—Determination of Nitrogen—Part 2: Determination of Bound Nitrogen, After Combustion and Oxidation to Nitrogen Dioxide, Chemiluminescence Detection", ISOm—11905-2; Geneva, Switzerland, Retrieved from <<http:/wwwlsaiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/ISO/ISO—12345—03-01/T023630E.PDF>>, (Mar. 15, 1997),pp. 1-5.|
|13||International Organization for, Standardization "Water Quality-Determination of Nitrogen-Part 2: Determination of Bound Nitrogen, After Combustion and Oxidation to Nitrogen Dioxide, Chemiluminescence Detection", ISOm-11905-2; Geneva, Switzerland, Retrieved from >, (Mar. 15, 1997),pp. 1-5.|
|14||Ivanov, V. et al., "Phosphate Removal from the Returned Liquor of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Using Iron-Reducing Bacteria", J. Appl. Microbiol, (2005),pp. 98, 1152-1161.|
|15||Jenkins, D. , "Chemical Processes for Phosphate Removal", Water Res. Retreived from <<http://books.google.com/books?id=bBSRPv87Ms8C&pg=PA94&lpg=PA94&dq-=%22chemical+processes+phosphate+removal%22&source=bl&ots=kVPUAz08Jp&sig=k- eK-5nOkxZZdx4itR2.sub.--Jd.sub.--YNcfE&hl=en&ei=gFnSsCCLpCMtAPEz9ilBQ&sa=X-&oi=bood.sub.--result&ct=result&resnum=1991 , pp. 5, 369-387.|
|16||Jenkins, D., "Chemical Processes for Phosphate Removal", Water Res. Retreived from <<http://books.google.com/books?id=bBSRPv87Ms8C&pg=PA94&Ipg=PA94&dq=%22chemical+processes+phosphate+removal%22&source=bl&ots=kVPUAz08Jp&sig=keK-5nOkxZZdx4itR2-Jd-YNcfE&hl=en&ei=gFnSsCCLpCMtAPEz9ilBQ&sa=X&oi=blood-result&ct=result&resnum=1991, pp. 5, 369-387.|
|17||Jenkins, D., "Chemical Processes for Phosphate Removal", Water Res. Retreived from <<http://books.google.com/books?id=bBSRPv87Ms8C&pg=PA94&Ipg=PA94&dq=%22chemical+processes+phosphate+removal%22&source=bl&ots=kVPUAz08Jp&sig=keK-5nOkxZZdx4itR2—Jd—YNcfE&hl=en&ei=gFnSsCCLpCMtAPEz9ilBQ&sa=X&oi=blood—result&ct=result&resnum=1991, pp. 5, 369-387.|
|18||Joshi, Arun et al., "Removal of Arsenic from Ground Water by Iron Oxide-Coated Sand", Aug. 1, 1996 , pp. 1-4.|
|19||Joshi, Arun et al., "Removal of Arsenic from Ground Water by Iron Oxide-Coated Sand", Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 1-4.|
|20||Khare, N. et al., "XANES Determination of Absorbed Phosphate Distribution between Ferrihydrite and Boehmite in Mixtures", Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:460-469 (2004)., Retrieved from <<http://soil.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/68/2/460>>,(2004),pp. 68, 460-469.|
|21||Khare, N. et al., "XANES Determination of Absorbed Phosphate Distribution between Ferrihydrite and Boehmite in Mixtures", Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:460-469 (2004)., Retrieved from >,(2004),pp. 68, 460-469.|
|22||Khare, N. et al., "Xanes Determination of Adsorbed Phosphate Distribution between Ferrihydrite and Boehmite in Mixtures", Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:460-469 (2004)., Retrieved from <<http://soil.scijournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/68/2/460>>- ,(2004),pp. 68, 460-469.|
|23||Khare, N. et al., "Xanes Determination of Adsorbed Phosphate Distribution between Ferrihydrite and Boehmite in Mixtures", Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68:460-469 (2004)., Retrieved from >- ,(2004),pp. 68, 460-469.|
|24||Leaf, William et al., "Evaluation of Blue PRO Process at the Hayden Wastewater Research Facility—Final Summary Report No. 331243, 01.RP", CH2M Hill; Denver, CO, July, Retrieved from <<http://cforjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hayden-3rd-party-blue-pro-report.pdf>>,(Jul. 12, 2006),pp. 1-21.|
|25||Leaf, William et al., "Evaluation of Blue PRO Process at the Hayden Wastewater Research Facility-Final Summary Report No. 331243, 01.RP", CH2M Hill; Denver, CO, July, Retrieved from >,(Jul. 12, 2006),pp. 1-21.|
|26||Leaf, William et al., "Evaluation of Blue PRO Process at the Hayden Wastewater Research Facility—Final Summary Report No. 331243.01.RP", CH2M Hill; Denver, CO, Jul., Retrieved from <<http://cforjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hayden-3rd-part- y-blue-pro-report.pdf>>,(Jul. 12, 2006),pp. 1-21.|
|27||Leaf, William et al., "Evaluation of Blue PRO Process at the Hayden Wastewater Research Facility-Final Summary Report No. 331243.01.RP", CH2M Hill; Denver, CO, Jul., Retrieved from >,(Jul. 12, 2006),pp. 1-21.|
|28||Lo, Shang-Lien et al., "Characteristics and Adsorption Properties of Iron-Coated Sand", 1997, pp. 1-9.|
|29||Lovley, Derek. R., et al., "Organic Matter Mineralization with Reduction of Ferric Iron in Anaerobic Sediments", Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Apr. 1986, Retrieved from <<http://www.nici.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC238947/pdf/aem00139-0- 019.pdf>>(Apr. 1986),pp. 51, 683-689.|
|30||Lovley, Derek. R., et al., "Organic Matter Mineralization with Reduction of Ferric Iron in Anaerobic Sediments", Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Apr. 1986, Retrieved from <<http://www.nici.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC238947/pdf/aem00139-0019.pdf>>(Apr. 1986),pp. 51, 683-689.|
|31||Lovley, Derek. R., et al., "Organic Matter Mineralization with Reduction of Ferric Iron in Anaerobic Sediments", Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Apr. 1986, Retrieved from >(Apr. 1986),pp. 51, 683-689.|
|32||Matott, L. S. , "IsoFit Version 1.0", State University of New York at Buffalo 2004.|
|33||Meima, J. A., et al., "Application of Surface Complexation/Precipitation Modeling to Contaminant Leaching from Weathered Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Bottom Ash", Environ. Sci. Technol., (1998),pp. 32, 688-693.|
|34||Newcombe, R. L., et al., "Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water by Moving Bed Active Filtration", J. Environ. Eng., (2006),pp. 132, 5-12.|
|35||Newcombe, R. L., et al., "Phosphorus Removal from Municipal Wastewater by Hydrous Ferric Oxide Reactive Filtration and Coupled Chemically Enhanced Secondary Treatment: Part II-Mechanism", (Mar. 1, 2008),.|
|36||Newcombe, R.L. et al., "Phosphorus Removal from Municipal Wastewater by Hydrous Ferric Oxide Reactive Filtration and Coupled Chemically Enhanced Secondary Treatment: Part 1-Performance", (Mar. 1, 2008),pp. 1-9.|
|37||Nowack, Bernd et al., "Modeling the Adsorption of Metal-EDTA Complexes onto Oxides", Environ. Sci. Technol., Retrieved from <<http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/78480/---/1=2>>, (1996),pp. 30, 2397-2405.|
|38||Nowack, Bernd et al., "Modeling the Adsorption of Metal-EDTA Complexes onto Oxides", Environ. Sci. Technol., Retrieved from >, (1996),pp. 30, 2397-2405.|
|39||Nowak, Bernd et al., "Modeling the Adsorption of Metal-EDTA Complexes onto Oxides", Environ. Sci. Technol., Retrieved from <<http://www.empa.ch/plugin/template/empa/*/78480/---/1=2>>, (1996),pp. 30, 2397-2405.|
|40||Nowak, Bernd et al., "Modeling the Adsorption of Metal-EDTA Complexes onto Oxides", Environ. Sci. Technol., Retrieved from >, (1996),pp. 30, 2397-2405.|
|41||Parfitt, R. L. et al., "The Mechanism of Phosphate Fixation by Iron Oxides", Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1975 , pp. 39, 837-841.|
|42||Parker, Denny S., et al., "The Future of Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment: Evolution Not Revolution", Retrieved from Retrieved from <<http://www.cd3wd.com/cd3wd.sub.--40/ASDB.sub.--SMARTSAN/CEPT-Deba- te-2.pdf>>, (Mar. 15, 2001).|
|43||Parker, Denny S., et al., "The Future of Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment: Evolution Not Revolution", Retrieved from Retrieved from <<http://www.cd3wd.com/cd3wd—40/ASDB—SMARTSAN/CEPT-Debate-2.pdf>>, (Mar. 15, 2001).|
|44||Parker, Denny S., et al., "The Future of Chemically Enhanced Primary Treatment: Evolution Not Revolution", Retrieved from Retrieved from >, (Mar. 15, 2001).|
|45||Pestovsky, Oleg et al., "Aqueous Ferryl(IV) Ion: Kinetics of Oxygen Atom Transfer to Substrates and Oxo Exchange with Solvent water",Inorganic Chemistry Article Inora. Chem. 2006, 45, 814-820, (Oct. 27, 2005),pp. 814-820.|
|46||Ravikumar, et al., "Chemical Oxidation of Chlorinated Organics by Hydrogen Perioxide in the Presence of Sand", Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, 28, pp. 394-400, 394-400.|
|47||Ravikumat et al., "Chemical Oxidation of Chlorinated Organics by Hydrogen Peroxide in the Presence of Sand", Envior. Sci. Technol. Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Studies Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. 1994. pp. 394-400, vol. 28, No. 3.|
|48||Schwertman, U. et al., "Iron Oxides in the Laboratory: Preparation and Characterization", Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Hermany 2000.|
|49||Sigg, L. et al., "The Interaction of Anions and Weak Acids with the Hydrous Goethite Surface", Colloids Surf. 1980 , pp. 2, 101-107.|
|50||Smith, S. et al., "The Significance of Chemical Phosphorus Removal Theory for Engineering Practice", (2007),pp. 1-24.|
|51||Stabnikov, V. P., et al., "Effect of Iron Hydroxide on Phosphate Removal During Anaerobic Digestion of Activated Sludge", Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., (2004),pp. 40, 376-380.|
|52||Thirunavukkarasu, O. S. et al., "Removal of Arsenic in Drinking Water by Iron Oxide-Coated Sand and Ferrihydrite-Batch Studies", 2001, pp. 1-17.|
|53||Thirunavukkarasu, O. S. et al., "Removal of Arsenic in Drinking Water by Iron Oxide-Coated Sand and Ferrihydrite—Batch Studies", 2001, pp. 1-17.|
|54||Wouter, "Effluent polishing at Sewage Works Ruurlo and Wehl, The Netherlands" Translated from H2O, vol. 19, 1999 pp. 1-3.|
|Clasificación de EE.UU.||210/667, 210/669, 210/911, 210/683, 210/716, 210/912, 210/738, 210/673, 210/906, 210/676|
|Clasificación internacional||B01D24/10, B01J20/32, B01J20/34, B01D41/02, C02F1/00, B01D21/01, C02F1/42, C02F1/76, C02F1/62, C02F1/28, C02F1/52, B01J20/06|
|Clasificación cooperativa||Y10S210/911, B01J20/3236, C02F2303/16, B01D24/105, C02F1/5236, C02F2101/103, B01D21/01, Y10S210/912, C02F1/42, Y10S210/906, C02F2101/105, B01J20/06, C02F2301/024, C02F1/004, C02F1/288, C02F2101/20, C02F2209/40, C02F1/76, B01D41/02, C02F1/281, B01J20/3204, B01J20/3475, B01J20/3433, B01J2220/56, B01J20/0229|
|27 Ago 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: IDAHO RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MOLLER, GREG;BRACKNEY, KEVIN;KORUS, ROGER;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030522 TO 20030609;REEL/FRAME:031094/0757
|28 Ago 2013||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IDAHO RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031098/0127
Effective date: 20080109
|20 Dic 2013||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|30 Dic 2013||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|30 Dic 2013||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|