WO1991010377A1 - Shoe sole structures - Google Patents

Shoe sole structures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1991010377A1
WO1991010377A1 PCT/US1991/000028 US9100028W WO9110377A1 WO 1991010377 A1 WO1991010377 A1 WO 1991010377A1 US 9100028 W US9100028 W US 9100028W WO 9110377 A1 WO9110377 A1 WO 9110377A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
shoe
sole
shoe sole
set forth
compartments
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1991/000028
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Frampton E. Ellis, Iii
Original Assignee
Ellis Frampton E Iii
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ellis Frampton E Iii filed Critical Ellis Frampton E Iii
Priority to AT91902613T priority Critical patent/ATE199120T1/en
Priority to DK91902613T priority patent/DK0594579T3/en
Priority to DE69132537T priority patent/DE69132537T2/en
Priority to EP91902613A priority patent/EP0594579B1/en
Publication of WO1991010377A1 publication Critical patent/WO1991010377A1/en
Priority to GR20010400648T priority patent/GR3035800T3/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/18Resilient soles
    • A43B13/20Pneumatic soles filled with a compressible fluid, e.g. air, gas
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/145Convex portions, e.g. with a bump or projection, e.g. 'Masai' type shoes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/146Concave end portions, e.g. with a cavity or cut-out portion
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/143Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form provided with wedged, concave or convex end portions, e.g. for improving roll-off of the foot
    • A43B13/148Wedged end portions
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43BCHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/18Resilient soles
    • A43B13/189Resilient soles filled with a non-compressible fluid, e.g. gel, water

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the structure of shoes. More specifically, this invention relates to the structure of athletic shoes. Still more particularly, this invention relates to a shoe having an anthropomorphic sole that copies the underlying support, stability and cushionin structures of the human foot. Natural stability is provide by attaching a completely flexible but relatively inelastic shoe sole upper directly to the bottom sole, enveloping the sides of the midsole, instead of attaching it to the top surface of the shoe sole. Doing so puts the flexible side of the shoe upper under tension in reaction to destabilizin .ideways forces on the shoe causing it to tilt. That tension force is balanced and in equilibrium because the bottom sole is firmly anchored by body weight, so the destabilizing sideways motion is neutralized by the tension in the flexible sides of the shoe upper.
  • this invention relates to support and cushioning which is provided by shoe sole compartments filled with a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel.
  • a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel.
  • direct physical contact occurs between the upper surface and the lower surface of the compartments, providing firm, stable support Cushioning is provided by the transmitting medium progressively causing tension in the flexible and semi- elastic sides of the shoe sole.
  • the compartments providing support and cushioning are similar in structure to the fat pads of the foot, which simultaneously provide both firm support and progressive cushioning.
  • the barefoot provides stability at it sides by putting those sides, which are flexible and
  • the applicant's new invention simply attempts, as closely as possible, to replicate the naturally effective structures of the foot that provide stability, support, and cushioning.
  • a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel
  • Fig. 1 is a perspective view of a typical athletic shoe for running known to the prior art to which the invention is applicable.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates in a close-up frontal plane cross section of the heel at the ankle joint the typical shoe of existing art, undeformed by body weight, when tilted sideways on the bottom edge.
  • Fig. 3 shows, in the same close-up cross section as Fig. 2, the applicant's prior invention of a naturally contoured shoe sole design, also tilted out.
  • Fig. 4 shows a rear view of a barefoot heel tilted laterally 20 degrees.
  • Fig. 5 shows, in a frontal plane cross section at the ankle joint area of the heel, the applicant's new invention of tension stabilized sides applied to his prior naturally contoured shoe sole.
  • Fig. 6 shows, in a frontal plane cross section close-up, the Fig. 5 design when tilted to its edge, but undeformed by load.
  • Fig. 7 shows, in frontal plane cross section at the ankle joint area ox * the heel, the Fig. 5 design when tilted to its edge and naturally deformed by body weight, though constant shoe sole thickness is maintained undeformed.
  • Fig. 8 is a sequential series of frontal plane cross sections of the barefoot heel at the ankle joint are Fig. 8A is unloaded and upright; Fig. 8B is moderately loaded by full body weight and upright; Fig. 8C is heavily loaded at peak landing force while running and upright; an Fig. 8D is heavily loaded and tilted out laterally to its about 20 degree maximum.
  • Fig. 9 is the applicant's new shoe sole design in a sequential series of frontal plane cross sections of the heel at the ankle joint area that corresponds exactly to t Fig. 8 series above.
  • Fig. 10 is two perspective views and a close-up view of the structure of fibrous connective tissue of the groups of fat cells of the human heel.
  • Fig. 10A shows a quartered section of the calcaneus and the fat pad chambers below it;
  • Fig. 10B shows a horizontal plane close-up of the inner structures of an individual chamber;
  • Fig. 10D shows a horizontal section of the whorl arrangement of fat pad underneath the calcaneus.
  • Fig. 1 shows a perspective view of a shoe, such a typical athletic shoe specifically for running, accordin to the prior art, wherein the running shoe 20 includes an upper portion 21 and a sole 22.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates, in a close-up cross section a typical shoe of existing art (undeformed by body weight) on the ground 43 when tilted on the bottom outside edge 23 of the shoe sole 22, that an inherent stability problem remains in existing designs, even when the abnormal torque producing rigid heel counter and other motion devices are removed, as illustrated in Fig- 5 of pending U.S. application No. 07/400,714, filed on August 30, 1989.
  • the problem is that the remaining shoe upper 21 (shown in the thickened and darkened line), while providing no lever arm extension, since it is flexible instead of rigid, nonetheless creates unnatural destabilizing torque on the shoe sole.
  • the torque is due to the tension force 155a along the top surface of the shoe sole 22 caused by a compression force 150 (a composite of the force of gravity on the body and a sideways motion force) to the side by the foot 27, due simply to the shoe being tilted to the side, for example.
  • the resulting destabilizing force acts to pull the shoe sole in rotation around a lever arm 23a that is the width of the shoe sole at the edge. Roughly speaking, the force of the foot on the shoe upper pulls the shoe over on its side when the shoe is tilted sideways.
  • the compression force 150 also creates a tension force 155b, which is the mirror image of tension force 155a
  • Fig. 3 shows, in a close-up cross section of a naturally contoured design shoe sole 28, described in pending U.S. application No. 07/239,667, filed on September 2, 1988, (also shown undeformed by body weight) when tilted on the bottom edge, that the same inherent stability problem remains in the naturally contoured shoe sole design, though to a reduced degree.
  • the problem is less since the direction of the force vector 155 along the lower surface of the shoe upper 21 is parallel to the ground 43 at the outer sole edge 32 edge, instead of angled toward the ground as in a conventional design like that shown in Fig. 2, so the resulting torque produced by lever arm created by the outer sole edge 32 would be less, and the contoured shoe sole 28 provides direct structural support when tilted, unlike conventional designs.
  • Fig. 4 shows (in a rear view) that, in contrast, the barefoot is naturally stable because, when deformed by body weight and tilted to its natural lateral limit of about 20 degrees, it does not create any destabilizing torque due to tension force. Even though tension paralleling that on the shoe upper is created on the outer surface 29, both bottom and sides, of the bare foot by the compression force of weight-bearing, no destabilizing torque is created because the lower surface under tension (ie the foot's bottom sole, shown in the darkened line) is resting directl in contact with the ground. Consequently, there is no unnatural lever arm artificially created against which to pull.
  • the weight of the body firmly anchors the outer surface of the foot underneath the foot so that even considerable pressure against the outer surface 29 of the side of the foot results in no destabilizing motion.
  • the supporting structures of the foot like the calcaneus, slide against the side of the strong bu flexible outer surface of the foot and create very substantial pressure on that outer surface at the sides of the foot. But that pressure is precisely resisted and balanced by tension along the outer surface of the foot, resulting in a stable equilibrium.
  • Fig. 5 shows, in cross section of the upright hee deformed by body weight, the principle of the tension stabilized sides of the barefoot applied to the naturally contoured shoe sole design; the same principle can be applied to conventional shoes, but is not shown.
  • the key change from the existing art of shoes is that the sides of the shoe upper 21 (shown as darkened lines) must wrap aroun the outside e: ⁇ es 32 of the shoe sole 28, instead of attaching unc-: .neath the foot to the upper surface 30 of th shoe sole, as done conventionally.
  • the shoe upper sides ca overlap and be attached to either the inner (shown on the left) or outer surface (shown on the right) of the bottom sole, since those sides are not unusually load-bearing, as shown; or the bottom sole, optimally thin and tapering as shown, can extend upward around the outside edges 32 of the shoe sole to overlap and attach to the shoe upper sides (shown Fig. 5B) ; their optimal position coincides with the Theoretically Ideal Stability Plane, so that the tension force on the shoe sides is transmitted directly all the way down to the bottom shoe, which anchors it on the ground with virtually no intervening artificial lever arm.
  • the attachment of the shoe upper sides should be at or near the lower or bottom surface of the shoe sole.
  • Fig. 5 The design shown in Fig. 5 is based on a fundamentally different conception: that the shoe upper is integrated into the shoe sole, instead of attached on top of it, and the shoe sole is treated as a natural extension of the foot sole, not attached to it separately.
  • the fabric (or other flexible material, like leather) of the shoe uppers would preferably be non-stretch or relatively so, so as not to be deformed excessively by the tension place upon its sides when compressed as the foot and shoe tilt.
  • the fabric can be reinforced in areas of particularly high tension, like the essential structural support and propulsion elements defined in the applicant's earlier applications (the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus, the base of the fifth metatarsal, the heads of the metatarsals, and the first distal phalange; the reinforcement can take many forms, such as like that of corners of the jib sail of a racing sailboat or more simple straps. As closely as possible, it should have the same performance characteristics as the heavily calloused skin of the sole of an habitually bare foot.
  • the relative density of the shoe sole is preferred as indicated in Fig. 9 of pending U.S. application No. 07/400,714, filed on August 30, 1989, with the softest density nearest the foot sole, so that the conforming sides of the shoe sole do not provide a rigid destabilizing lever arm.
  • the shoe uppers may be joined or bonded only to the bottom sole, not the midsole, so that pressure shown o the side of the shoe upper produces side tension only and not the destabilizing torque from pulling similar to that described in Fig. 2.
  • the upper areas 147 of the shoe midsole, which forms a sha corner should be composed of relatively soft midsole material; in this case, bonding the shoe uppers to the midsole would not create very much destabilizing torque.
  • the bottom sole is preferably thin, at least on the stability sides, so that its attachment overlap with the shoe upper sides coincide as close as possible to the Theoretically Ideal Stability Plane, so that force is transmitted on the outer shoe sole surface to the ground.
  • the Fig. 5 design is for a shoe construction, including: a shoe upper that is composed of material that is flexible and relatively inelastic at leas where the shoe upper contacts the areas of the structural bone elements of the human foot, and a shoe sole that has relatively flexible sides; and at least a portion of the sides of the shoe upper -being attached directly to the bottom sole, while enveloping on the outside the other sole portions of said shoe sole.
  • This construction can either b applied to convention shoe sole structures or to the applicant's prior shoe sole inventions, such as the naturally contoured shoe sole conforming to the theoretically ideal stability plane.
  • Fig. 7 shows, in cross section at the heel, the tension stabilized sides concept applied to naturally contoured design shoe sole when the shoe and foot are tilte out fully and naturally deformed by body weight (although constant shoe sole thickness is shown undeformed) .
  • the figure shows that the shape and stability function of the shoe sole and shoe uppers irror almost exactly that of the human foot.
  • Figs. 8A-8D show the natural cushioning of the human barefoot, in cross sections at the heel.
  • Fig. 8A shows the bare heel upright and unloaded, with little pressure on the subcalcaneal fat pad 158, which is evenly distributed between the calcaneus 159, which is the heel bone, and the bottom sole 160 of the foot.
  • Fig. 8B shows the bare heel upright but under the moderate pressure of full body weight.
  • the compression of the calcaneus against the subcalcaneal fat pad produces evenly balanced pressure within the subcalcaneal fat pad because it is contained and surrounded by a relatively unstretchable fibrous capsule, the bottom sole of the foot. Underneath the foot, where the bottom sole is in direct contact with the ground, the pressure caused by the calcaneus on the compressed subcalcaneal fat pad is transmitted directly to the ground. Simultaneously, substantial tension is created on the sides of the bottom sole of the foot because of the surrounding relatively tough fibrous capsule.
  • That combination of bottom pressure and side tension is the foot's natural shock absorption system for support structures like the calcaneus and the other bones of the foot that come in cont ct with the ground.
  • lower surface 167 of those support structures of the foot like th calcaneus and other bones make firm contact with the upper surface 168 of the foot's bottom sole underneath, with relatively little uncompressed fat pad intervening.
  • the support structures of the foot land on the ground and are firmly supported; they are not suspended on top of springy material in a buoyant manner analogous to a water bed or pneumatic tire, like the existing proprietary shoe sole cushioning systems like Nike Air or Asics Gel.
  • Fig. 8C shows the human heel under the heavy pressure of roughly three times body weight force of landing during routine running. This can be easily verified: when one stands barefoot on a hard floor, the heel feels very firmly supported and yet can be lifted and virtually slammed onto the floor with little increase in the feeling of firmness; the heel simply becomes harder as the pressure increases.
  • this system allows the relatively narrow base of the calcaneus to pivot from side to side freely in normal pronation/supination motion, without any obstructing torsion on it, despite the very much greater width of compressed foot sole providing protection and cushioning; this is crucially important in maintaining natural alignment of joints above the ankle joint such as the knee, hip and back, particularly in the horizontal plane, so that the entire body is properly adjusted to absorb shock correctly.
  • existing shoe sole designs which are generally relatively wide to provide stability, produce unnatural frontal plane torsion on the calcaneus, restricting its natural motion, and causing misalignment of the joints operating above it, resulting in the overuse injuries unusually common with such shoes.
  • existing shoe sole designs are forced by lack of other alternatives to use relatively rigid sides in an attempt to provide sufficient stability to offset the otherwise uncontrollable buoyancy and lack of firm support of air or gel cushions.
  • Fig. 8D shows the barefoot deformed under full body weight and tilted laterally to the roughly 20 degree limit of normal range. Again it is clear that the natural system provides both firm lateral support and stability by providing relatively direct contact with the ground, while at the same time providing a cushioning mechanism through side tension and subcalcaneal fat pad pressure.
  • Figs. 9A-9D show, also in cross sections at the heel, a naturally contoured shoe sole design that parallels as closely as possible the overall natural cushioning and stability system of the barefoot described in Fig. 8, including a cushioning compartment 161 under support structures ofthe foot containing a pressure-transmitting medium like gas, gel, or liquid, like the subcalcaneal fat pad under the calcaneus and other bones of the foot; consequently.
  • Figs. 9A-D directly correspond to Figs.
  • the optimal pressure-transmitting medium is that which mos closely approximates the fat pads of the foot; silicone ge is probably most optimal of materials currently readily available, but future improvements are probable; since it transmits pressure indirectly, in that it compresses in volume under pressure, gas is significantly less optimal.
  • the gas, gel, or liquid, or any other effective material can be further encapsulated itself, in addition to the sid of the shoe sole, to control leakage and maintain uniformity, as is common conventionally, and can be subdivided into any practical number of encapsulated areas within a compartment, again as is common conventionally.
  • the relative thickness of the cushioning compartment 161 c vary, as can the bottom sole 149 and the upper midsole 147, and can be consistent or differ in various areas of the sh sole; the optimal relative sizes should be those that approximate most closely those of the average human foot, which suggests both smaller upper and lower soles and a larger cushioning compartment than shown in Fig. 9.
  • t cushioning compartments or pads 161 can be placed anywhere from directly underneath the foot, like an insole, to directly above the bottom sole. Optimally, the amount of compression created by a given load in any cushioning compartment 161 should be tuned to approximate as closely possible the compression under the corresponding fat pad o the foot.
  • Fig. 9 conform to the natural contour of the foot and to the natural meth of transmitting bottom pressure into side tension in the flexible but relatively non-stretching (the actual optimal elasticity will require empirical studies) sides of the sho sole.
  • Fig. 9 provides firm support to foot support structures by providing for actual contact between the lower surface 165 of the upper midsole 147 and the upper surface 166 of the bottom sole 149 when fully loaded under moderate ' body weight pressure, as indicated in Fig. 9B, or under maximum normal peak landing force during running, as indicated in Fig. 9C, just as- the human foot does in Figs. 8B and 8C.
  • the greater the downward force transmitted through the foot to the shoe the greater the compression pressure in the cushioning compartment 161 and the greater the resulting tension of the shoe sole sides.
  • Fig. 9D shows the same shoe sole design when fully loaded and tilted to the natural 20 degree lateral limit, like Fig. 8D.
  • Fig. 9D shows that an added stability benefit of the natural cushioning system for shoe soles is that the effective thickness of the shoe sole is reduced by compression on the side so that the potential destabilizing lever arm represented by the shoe sole thickness is also reduced, so foot and ankle stability is increased.
  • Another benefit of the Fig. 9 design is that the upper midsole shoe surface can move in any horizontal direction, either sideways or front to back in order to absorb shearing forces; that shearing motion is controlled by tension in the sides. Note that the right side of Figs.
  • FIG. 9A-D is modified to provide a natural crease or upward taper 162, which allows complete side compression without binding or bunching between the upper and lower shoe sole layers 147, 148, and 149; the shoe sole crease 162 parallels exactly a similar crease or taper 163 in the human foot.
  • Another possible variation of joining shoe upper to shoe bottom sole is on the right (lateral) side of Figs. 9A-D, which makes use of the fact that it is optimal for th tension absorbing shoe sole sides, whether shoe upper or bottom sole, to coincide with the Theoretically Ideal
  • the joint may be moved up slightly so that the fabric side does not come in contact with the ground, or it may be cover wit a coating to provide both traction and fabric protection.
  • Fig. 9 design provide a structural basis for the shoe sole to conform very easily to the natural shape of the human foot and to parallel easily the natural deformation flattening of the foot durin load-bearing motion on the ground. This is true even if th shoe sole is made conventionally with a flat sole, as long as rigid structures such as heel counters and motion contro devices are not used; though not optimal, such a conventional flat shoe made like Fig. 9 would provide the essential features of the new invention resulting in significantly improved cushioning and stability.
  • the Fig. design could also be applied to intermediate-shaped shoe soles that neither conform to the flat ground or the naturally contoured foot.
  • the Fig. 9 could also be applied to intermediate-shaped shoe soles that neither conform to the flat ground or the naturally contoured foot.
  • the Fig. 9 design shows a shoe construction for a shoe, including: a shoe sole with a compartment or compartments under the structural elements o the human foot, including at least the heel; the compartment or compartments contains a pressure-transmittin medium like liquid, gas, or gel; a portion of the upper surface of the shoe sole compartment firmly contacts the lower surface of said compartment during normal load- bearing; and pressure from the load-bearing is transmitted progressively at least in part to the relatively inelastic sides, top and bottom of the shoe sole compartment or compartments, producing tension.
  • FIG. 9 design copies in a simplified way the macro structure of the foot.
  • Figs. 10 A-C focus on a more on the exact detail of the natural structures, including at the micro level.
  • Figs. 10A and IOC are perspective views of cross sections of the human heel showing the matrix of elastic fibrous connective tissue arranged into chambers 164 holding closely packed fat cells; the chambers are structured as whorls radiating out from the calcaneus. These fibrous-tissue strands are firmly attached to the undersurface of the calcaneus and extend to the subcutaneous tissues. They are usually in the form of the letter U, with the open end of the U pointing toward the calcaneus.
  • Fig. 10B shows a close-up of the interior structure of the large chambers shown in Fig. 10A and IOC.
  • FIG. 10 design shows a shoe construction including: a shoe sole with a compartments under the structural elements of the human foot, including at least the heel; the compartments containing a pressure- transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel; the compartments having a whorled structure like that of the f pads of the human foot sole;load-bearing pressure being transmitted progressively at least in part to the relative inelastic sides, top and bottom of the shoe sole compartments, producing tension therein; the elasticity of the material of the compartments and the pressure- transmitting medium are such that normal weight-bearing loads produce sufficient tension within the structure of the compartments to provide adequate structural rigidity to allow firm natural support to the foot structural elements, like that provided the barefoot by its fat pads.
  • That shoe sole construction can have shoe sole compartments that are subdivided into micro chambers like those of the fat pads of the foot sole.
  • socks could be produced to serve the same function, with the area of the sock that corresponds to the foot bottom sole (and sides of the bottom sole) made of a material coarse enough to stimulate the production of callouses on the bottom sole of the foot, with different grades of coarseness available, from fine to coarse, corresponding to feet from soft to naturally tough.
  • the toe area of the sock could be relatively less abrasive than the heel area.

Abstract

A shoe (20) having an anthropomorphic sole (22) that copies the underlying stability, support, and cushioning structures of the human foot. Natural stability is provided by attaching a completely flexible but relatively inelastic shoe sole upper (21) directly to the bottom sole (22), enveloping the sides of the midsole, instead of attaching it to the top surface of the shoe sole (22). Doing so puts the flexible side of the shoe upper (21) under tension in reaction to destabilizing sideways forces on the shoe causing it to tilt. That tension force is balanced and in equilibrium because the bottom sole (22) is firmly anchored by body weight so the destabilizing sideways motion is neutralized by the tension in the flexible sides of the shoe upper (21). Support and cushioning is provided by shoe sole compartments (16) filled with a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel. Unlike similar existing systems, direct physical contact occurs between the upper surface and the lower surface of the compartments, providing firm, stable support. Cushioning is provided by the transmitting medium progressively causing tension in the flexible and semi-elastic sides of the shoe sole. The support and cushioning compartments are similar in structure to the fat pads of the human foot, which simultaneously provide both firm support and progressive cushioning.

Description

SHOE SOLE STRUCTURES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the structure of shoes. More specifically, this invention relates to the structure of athletic shoes. Still more particularly, this invention relates to a shoe having an anthropomorphic sole that copies the underlying support, stability and cushionin structures of the human foot. Natural stability is provide by attaching a completely flexible but relatively inelastic shoe sole upper directly to the bottom sole, enveloping the sides of the midsole, instead of attaching it to the top surface of the shoe sole. Doing so puts the flexible side of the shoe upper under tension in reaction to destabilizin .ideways forces on the shoe causing it to tilt. That tension force is balanced and in equilibrium because the bottom sole is firmly anchored by body weight, so the destabilizing sideways motion is neutralized by the tension in the flexible sides of the shoe upper. Still more particularly, this invention relates to support and cushioning which is provided by shoe sole compartments filled with a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel. Unlike similar existing systems, direct physical contact occurs between the upper surface and the lower surface of the compartments, providing firm, stable support Cushioning is provided by the transmitting medium progressively causing tension in the flexible and semi- elastic sides of the shoe sole. The compartments providing support and cushioning are similar in structure to the fat pads of the foot, which simultaneously provide both firm support and progressive cushioning.
Existing cushioning systems cannot provide both firm support and progressive cushioning without also obstructing the natural pronation and supination motion of the foot, because the overall conception on which they are based is inherently flawed. The two most commercially successful proprietary systems are Nike Air, based on U.S. patents Nos. 4,219,945 issued September 2, 1980, 4,183,156 issued September 15, 1980, 4,271,606 issued June 9, 1981,. and 4,340,626 issued July 20, 1982; and Asics Gel, based on U.S. patent No. 4,768,295 issued September 6, 1988. Both of these cushioning systems and all of the other less popular ones have two essential flaws.
First, all such systems suspend the upper surface of the shoe sole directly under the important structural elements of the foot, particularly the critical the heel bone, known as the calcaneus, in order to cushion it. That is, to provide good cushioning and energy return, all such systems support the foot's bone structures in buoyant manner, as if floating on a water bed or bouncing on a trampoline. None provide firm, direct structural support to those foot support structures; the shoe sole surface above the cushioning system never comes in contact with the lower shoe sole surface under routine loads, like normal weight- bearing. In existing cushioning systems, firm structural support directly under the calcaneus and progressive cushioning are mutually incompatible. In marked contrast, it is obvious with the simplest tests that the barefoot is provided by very firm direct structural support by the fat pads underneath the bones contacting the sole, while at the same time it is effectively cushioned, though this property is underdeveloped in habitually shoe shod feet.
Second, because such existing proprietary cushioning systems do not provide adequate control of foot motion or stability, they are generally augmented with rigid structures on the sides of the shoe uppers and the shoe soles, like heel counters and motion control devices, in order to provide control and stability. Unfortunately, these rigid structures seriously obstruct natural pronation and supination motion and actually increase lateral instability, as noted in the applicant's pending U.S. applications Nos. 07/219,387, filed on July 15, 1988; 07/239,667, filed on September 2, 1988; 07/400,714, filed on August 30, 1989; 07/416,478, filed on October 3, 1989; and 07/424,509, filed on October 20, 1989, as well as in PC 5 Application No. PCT/US89/03076 filed on July 14, 1989. The purpose of the inventions disclosed in these applications was primarily to provide a neutral design that allows for natural foot and ankle biomechanics as close as possible to that between the foot and the ground, and to avoid the
10. serious interference with natural foot and ankle biomechanics inherent in existing shoes.
In marked contrast to the rigid-sided proprietary designs discussed above, the barefoot provides stability at it sides by putting those sides, which are flexible and
15 relatively inelastic, under extreme tension caused by the pressure of the compressed fat pads; they thereby become temporarily rigid when outside forces make that rigidity appropriate, producing none of the destabilizing lever arm torque problems of the permanently rigid sides of existing
20 designs.
The applicant's new invention simply attempts, as closely as possible, to replicate the naturally effective structures of the foot that provide stability, support, and cushioning.
25 Accordingly, it is a general object of this invention to elaborate upon the application of the principl of the natural basis for the support, stability and cushioning of the barefoot to shoe structures.
It is still another object of this invention to
30 provide a shoe having a sole with natural stability provide by attaching a completely flexible but relatively inelastic shoe sole upper directly to the bottom sole, enveloping the sides of the midsole, to put the side of the shoe upper under tension in reaction to destabilizing sideways forces
35 on a tilting shoe. It is still another object of this invention to have that tension force is balanced and in equilibrium because the bottom sole is firmly anchored by body weight, so the destabilizing sideways motion is neutralized by the tension in the sides of the shoe upper.
It is another object of this invention to create a shoe sole with support and cushioning which is provided by shoe sole compartments, filled with a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel, that are similar in structure to the fat pads of the foot, which simultaneously provide both firm support and progressive cushioning.
These and other objects of the invention will become apparent from a detailed description of the invention which follows taken with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a perspective view of a typical athletic shoe for running known to the prior art to which the invention is applicable. Fig. 2 illustrates in a close-up frontal plane cross section of the heel at the ankle joint the typical shoe of existing art, undeformed by body weight, when tilted sideways on the bottom edge.
Fig. 3 shows, in the same close-up cross section as Fig. 2, the applicant's prior invention of a naturally contoured shoe sole design, also tilted out.
Fig. 4 shows a rear view of a barefoot heel tilted laterally 20 degrees.
Fig. 5 shows, in a frontal plane cross section at the ankle joint area of the heel, the applicant's new invention of tension stabilized sides applied to his prior naturally contoured shoe sole.
Fig. 6 shows, in a frontal plane cross section close-up, the Fig. 5 design when tilted to its edge, but undeformed by load. Fig. 7 shows, in frontal plane cross section at the ankle joint area ox* the heel, the Fig. 5 design when tilted to its edge and naturally deformed by body weight, though constant shoe sole thickness is maintained undeformed.
Fig. 8 is a sequential series of frontal plane cross sections of the barefoot heel at the ankle joint are Fig. 8A is unloaded and upright; Fig. 8B is moderately loaded by full body weight and upright; Fig. 8C is heavily loaded at peak landing force while running and upright; an Fig. 8D is heavily loaded and tilted out laterally to its about 20 degree maximum.
Fig. 9 is the applicant's new shoe sole design in a sequential series of frontal plane cross sections of the heel at the ankle joint area that corresponds exactly to t Fig. 8 series above.
Fig. 10 is two perspective views and a close-up view of the structure of fibrous connective tissue of the groups of fat cells of the human heel. Fig. 10A shows a quartered section of the calcaneus and the fat pad chambers below it; Fig. 10B shows a horizontal plane close-up of the inner structures of an individual chamber; and Fig. 10D shows a horizontal section of the whorl arrangement of fat pad underneath the calcaneus.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Fig. 1 shows a perspective view of a shoe, such a typical athletic shoe specifically for running, accordin to the prior art, wherein the running shoe 20 includes an upper portion 21 and a sole 22.
Fig. 2 illustrates, in a close-up cross section a typical shoe of existing art (undeformed by body weight) on the ground 43 when tilted on the bottom outside edge 23 of the shoe sole 22, that an inherent stability problem remains in existing designs, even when the abnormal torque producing rigid heel counter and other motion devices are removed, as illustrated in Fig- 5 of pending U.S. application No. 07/400,714, filed on August 30, 1989. The problem is that the remaining shoe upper 21 (shown in the thickened and darkened line), while providing no lever arm extension, since it is flexible instead of rigid, nonetheless creates unnatural destabilizing torque on the shoe sole. The torque is due to the tension force 155a along the top surface of the shoe sole 22 caused by a compression force 150 (a composite of the force of gravity on the body and a sideways motion force) to the side by the foot 27, due simply to the shoe being tilted to the side, for example. The resulting destabilizing force acts to pull the shoe sole in rotation around a lever arm 23a that is the width of the shoe sole at the edge. Roughly speaking, the force of the foot on the shoe upper pulls the shoe over on its side when the shoe is tilted sideways. The compression force 150 also creates a tension force 155b, which is the mirror image of tension force 155a
Fig. 3 shows, in a close-up cross section of a naturally contoured design shoe sole 28, described in pending U.S. application No. 07/239,667, filed on September 2, 1988, (also shown undeformed by body weight) when tilted on the bottom edge, that the same inherent stability problem remains in the naturally contoured shoe sole design, though to a reduced degree. The problem is less since the direction of the force vector 155 along the lower surface of the shoe upper 21 is parallel to the ground 43 at the outer sole edge 32 edge, instead of angled toward the ground as in a conventional design like that shown in Fig. 2, so the resulting torque produced by lever arm created by the outer sole edge 32 would be less, and the contoured shoe sole 28 provides direct structural support when tilted, unlike conventional designs.
Fig. 4 shows (in a rear view) that, in contrast, the barefoot is naturally stable because, when deformed by body weight and tilted to its natural lateral limit of about 20 degrees, it does not create any destabilizing torque due to tension force. Even though tension paralleling that on the shoe upper is created on the outer surface 29, both bottom and sides, of the bare foot by the compression force of weight-bearing, no destabilizing torque is created because the lower surface under tension (ie the foot's bottom sole, shown in the darkened line) is resting directl in contact with the ground. Consequently, there is no unnatural lever arm artificially created against which to pull. The weight of the body firmly anchors the outer surface of the foot underneath the foot so that even considerable pressure against the outer surface 29 of the side of the foot results in no destabilizing motion. When the foot is tilted, the supporting structures of the foot, like the calcaneus, slide against the side of the strong bu flexible outer surface of the foot and create very substantial pressure on that outer surface at the sides of the foot. But that pressure is precisely resisted and balanced by tension along the outer surface of the foot, resulting in a stable equilibrium.
Fig. 5 shows, in cross section of the upright hee deformed by body weight, the principle of the tension stabilized sides of the barefoot applied to the naturally contoured shoe sole design; the same principle can be applied to conventional shoes, but is not shown. The key change from the existing art of shoes is that the sides of the shoe upper 21 (shown as darkened lines) must wrap aroun the outside e: ~es 32 of the shoe sole 28, instead of attaching unc-: .neath the foot to the upper surface 30 of th shoe sole, as done conventionally. The shoe upper sides ca overlap and be attached to either the inner (shown on the left) or outer surface (shown on the right) of the bottom sole, since those sides are not unusually load-bearing, as shown; or the bottom sole, optimally thin and tapering as shown, can extend upward around the outside edges 32 of the shoe sole to overlap and attach to the shoe upper sides (shown Fig. 5B) ; their optimal position coincides with the Theoretically Ideal Stability Plane, so that the tension force on the shoe sides is transmitted directly all the way down to the bottom shoe, which anchors it on the ground with virtually no intervening artificial lever arm. For shoes with only one sole layer, the attachment of the shoe upper sides should be at or near the lower or bottom surface of the shoe sole.
The design shown in Fig. 5 is based on a fundamentally different conception: that the shoe upper is integrated into the shoe sole, instead of attached on top of it, and the shoe sole is treated as a natural extension of the foot sole, not attached to it separately.
The fabric (or other flexible material, like leather) of the shoe uppers would preferably be non-stretch or relatively so, so as not to be deformed excessively by the tension place upon its sides when compressed as the foot and shoe tilt. The fabric can be reinforced in areas of particularly high tension, like the essential structural support and propulsion elements defined in the applicant's earlier applications (the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus, the base of the fifth metatarsal, the heads of the metatarsals, and the first distal phalange; the reinforcement can take many forms, such as like that of corners of the jib sail of a racing sailboat or more simple straps. As closely as possible, it should have the same performance characteristics as the heavily calloused skin of the sole of an habitually bare foot. The relative density of the shoe sole is preferred as indicated in Fig. 9 of pending U.S. application No. 07/400,714, filed on August 30, 1989, with the softest density nearest the foot sole, so that the conforming sides of the shoe sole do not provide a rigid destabilizing lever arm.
The change from existing art of the tension stabilized sides shown in Fig. 5 is that the shoe upper is directly integrated functionally with the shoe sole, instead of simply being attached on top of it. The advantage of t tension stabilized sides design is that it provides natura stability as close to that of the barefoot as possible, an does so economically, with the minimum shoe sole side widt possible.
The result is a shoe sole that is naturally stabilized in the same way that the barefoot is stabilized, as seen in Fig. 6, which shows a close-up cross section of naturally contoured design shoe sole 28 (undeformed by bod weight) when tilted to the edge. The same destabilizing force against the side of the shoe shown in Fig. 2 is now stably resisted by offsetting tension in the surface of th shoe upper 21 extended down the side of the shoe sole so that it is anchored by the weight of the body when the sho and foot are tilted.
In order to avoid creating unnatural torque on t shoe sole, the shoe uppers may be joined or bonded only to the bottom sole, not the midsole, so that pressure shown o the side of the shoe upper produces side tension only and not the destabilizing torque from pulling similar to that described in Fig. 2. However, to avoid unnatural torque, the upper areas 147 of the shoe midsole, which forms a sha corner, should be composed of relatively soft midsole material; in this case, bonding the shoe uppers to the midsole would not create very much destabilizing torque. The bottom sole is preferably thin, at least on the stability sides, so that its attachment overlap with the shoe upper sides coincide as close as possible to the Theoretically Ideal Stability Plane, so that force is transmitted on the outer shoe sole surface to the ground.
In summary, the Fig. 5 design is for a shoe construction, including: a shoe upper that is composed of material that is flexible and relatively inelastic at leas where the shoe upper contacts the areas of the structural bone elements of the human foot, and a shoe sole that has relatively flexible sides; and at least a portion of the sides of the shoe upper -being attached directly to the bottom sole, while enveloping on the outside the other sole portions of said shoe sole. This construction can either b applied to convention shoe sole structures or to the applicant's prior shoe sole inventions, such as the naturally contoured shoe sole conforming to the theoretically ideal stability plane.
Fig. 7 shows, in cross section at the heel, the tension stabilized sides concept applied to naturally contoured design shoe sole when the shoe and foot are tilte out fully and naturally deformed by body weight (although constant shoe sole thickness is shown undeformed) . The figure shows that the shape and stability function of the shoe sole and shoe uppers irror almost exactly that of the human foot.
Figs. 8A-8D show the natural cushioning of the human barefoot, in cross sections at the heel. Fig. 8A shows the bare heel upright and unloaded, with little pressure on the subcalcaneal fat pad 158, which is evenly distributed between the calcaneus 159, which is the heel bone, and the bottom sole 160 of the foot.
Fig. 8B shows the bare heel upright but under the moderate pressure of full body weight. The compression of the calcaneus against the subcalcaneal fat pad produces evenly balanced pressure within the subcalcaneal fat pad because it is contained and surrounded by a relatively unstretchable fibrous capsule, the bottom sole of the foot. Underneath the foot, where the bottom sole is in direct contact with the ground, the pressure caused by the calcaneus on the compressed subcalcaneal fat pad is transmitted directly to the ground. Simultaneously, substantial tension is created on the sides of the bottom sole of the foot because of the surrounding relatively tough fibrous capsule. That combination of bottom pressure and side tension is the foot's natural shock absorption system for support structures like the calcaneus and the other bones of the foot that come in cont ct with the ground. Of equal functional importance is that lower surface 167 of those support structures of the foot like th calcaneus and other bones make firm contact with the upper surface 168 of the foot's bottom sole underneath, with relatively little uncompressed fat pad intervening. In effect, the support structures of the foot land on the ground and are firmly supported; they are not suspended on top of springy material in a buoyant manner analogous to a water bed or pneumatic tire, like the existing proprietary shoe sole cushioning systems like Nike Air or Asics Gel. This simultaneously firm and yet cushioned support provided by the foot sole must have a significantly beneficial impac on energy efficiency, also called energy return, and is not paralleled by existing shoe designs to provide cushioning, all of which provide shock absorption cushioning during the landing and support phases of locomotion at the expense of firm support during the take-off phase. The incredible and unique feature of the foot's natural system is that, once the calcaneus is in fairly direct contact with the bottom sole and therefore providing firm support and stability, increased pressure produces a more rigid fibrous capsule that protects the calcaneus and greater tension at the sides to absorb shock. So, in a sense, even when the foot's suspension system would seem in a conventional way to have bottomed out under normal body weight pressure, it continues to react with a mechanism to protect and cushion the foot even under very much more extreme pressure. This is seen in Fig. 8C, which shows the human heel under the heavy pressure of roughly three times body weight force of landing during routine running. This can be easily verified: when one stands barefoot on a hard floor, the heel feels very firmly supported and yet can be lifted and virtually slammed onto the floor with little increase in the feeling of firmness; the heel simply becomes harder as the pressure increases.
In addition, it should be noted that this system allows the relatively narrow base of the calcaneus to pivot from side to side freely in normal pronation/supination motion, without any obstructing torsion on it, despite the very much greater width of compressed foot sole providing protection and cushioning; this is crucially important in maintaining natural alignment of joints above the ankle joint such as the knee, hip and back, particularly in the horizontal plane, so that the entire body is properly adjusted to absorb shock correctly. In contrast, existing shoe sole designs, which are generally relatively wide to provide stability, produce unnatural frontal plane torsion on the calcaneus, restricting its natural motion, and causing misalignment of the joints operating above it, resulting in the overuse injuries unusually common with such shoes. Instead of flexible sides that harden under tension caused by pressure like that of the foot, existing shoe sole designs are forced by lack of other alternatives to use relatively rigid sides in an attempt to provide sufficient stability to offset the otherwise uncontrollable buoyancy and lack of firm support of air or gel cushions.
Fig. 8D shows the barefoot deformed under full body weight and tilted laterally to the roughly 20 degree limit of normal range. Again it is clear that the natural system provides both firm lateral support and stability by providing relatively direct contact with the ground, while at the same time providing a cushioning mechanism through side tension and subcalcaneal fat pad pressure.
Figs. 9A-9D show, also in cross sections at the heel, a naturally contoured shoe sole design that parallels as closely as possible the overall natural cushioning and stability system of the barefoot described in Fig. 8, including a cushioning compartment 161 under support structures ofthe foot containing a pressure-transmitting medium like gas, gel, or liquid, like the subcalcaneal fat pad under the calcaneus and other bones of the foot; consequently. Figs. 9A-D directly correspond to Figs. 8A-D The optimal pressure-transmitting medium is that which mos closely approximates the fat pads of the foot; silicone ge is probably most optimal of materials currently readily available, but future improvements are probable; since it transmits pressure indirectly, in that it compresses in volume under pressure, gas is significantly less optimal. The gas, gel, or liquid, or any other effective material, can be further encapsulated itself, in addition to the sid of the shoe sole, to control leakage and maintain uniformity, as is common conventionally, and can be subdivided into any practical number of encapsulated areas within a compartment, again as is common conventionally.
The relative thickness of the cushioning compartment 161 c vary, as can the bottom sole 149 and the upper midsole 147, and can be consistent or differ in various areas of the sh sole; the optimal relative sizes should be those that approximate most closely those of the average human foot, which suggests both smaller upper and lower soles and a larger cushioning compartment than shown in Fig. 9. And t cushioning compartments or pads 161 can be placed anywhere from directly underneath the foot, like an insole, to directly above the bottom sole. Optimally, the amount of compression created by a given load in any cushioning compartment 161 should be tuned to approximate as closely possible the compression under the corresponding fat pad o the foot. The function of the subcalcaneal fat pad is not met satisfactorily with existing proprietary cushioning systems, even those featuring gas, gel or liquid as a pressure transmitting medium. In contrast to those artificial systems, the new design shown is Fig. 9 conform to the natural contour of the foot and to the natural meth of transmitting bottom pressure into side tension in the flexible but relatively non-stretching (the actual optimal elasticity will require empirical studies) sides of the sho sole.
Existing cushioning systems like Nike Air or Asic Gel do not bottom out under moderate loads and rarely if ever do so under extreme loads; the upper surface of the cushioning device remains suspended above the lower surface. In contrast, the new design in Fig. 9 provides firm support to foot support structures by providing for actual contact between the lower surface 165 of the upper midsole 147 and the upper surface 166 of the bottom sole 149 when fully loaded under moderate'body weight pressure, as indicated in Fig. 9B, or under maximum normal peak landing force during running, as indicated in Fig. 9C, just as- the human foot does in Figs. 8B and 8C. The greater the downward force transmitted through the foot to the shoe, the greater the compression pressure in the cushioning compartment 161 and the greater the resulting tension of the shoe sole sides.
Fig. 9D shows the same shoe sole design when fully loaded and tilted to the natural 20 degree lateral limit, like Fig. 8D. Fig. 9D shows that an added stability benefit of the natural cushioning system for shoe soles is that the effective thickness of the shoe sole is reduced by compression on the side so that the potential destabilizing lever arm represented by the shoe sole thickness is also reduced, so foot and ankle stability is increased. Another benefit of the Fig. 9 design is that the upper midsole shoe surface can move in any horizontal direction, either sideways or front to back in order to absorb shearing forces; that shearing motion is controlled by tension in the sides. Note that the right side of Figs. 9A-D is modified to provide a natural crease or upward taper 162, which allows complete side compression without binding or bunching between the upper and lower shoe sole layers 147, 148, and 149; the shoe sole crease 162 parallels exactly a similar crease or taper 163 in the human foot. Another possible variation of joining shoe upper to shoe bottom sole is on the right (lateral) side of Figs. 9A-D, which makes use of the fact that it is optimal for th tension absorbing shoe sole sides, whether shoe upper or bottom sole, to coincide with the Theoretically Ideal
Stability Plane along the side of the shoe sole beyond that point reached when the shoe is tilted to the foot's natural limit, so that no destabilizing shoe sole lever arm is created when the shoe is tilted fully, as in Fig. 9D. The joint may be moved up slightly so that the fabric side does not come in contact with the ground, or it may be cover wit a coating to provide both traction and fabric protection.
It should be noted that the Fig. 9 design provide a structural basis for the shoe sole to conform very easily to the natural shape of the human foot and to parallel easily the natural deformation flattening of the foot durin load-bearing motion on the ground. This is true even if th shoe sole is made conventionally with a flat sole, as long as rigid structures such as heel counters and motion contro devices are not used; though not optimal, such a conventional flat shoe made like Fig. 9 would provide the essential features of the new invention resulting in significantly improved cushioning and stability. The Fig. design could also be applied to intermediate-shaped shoe soles that neither conform to the flat ground or the naturally contoured foot. In addition, the Fig. 9 design can be applied to the applicant's other designs, such as those described in his pending U.S. application No. 07/416,478, filed on October 3, 1989. In summary, the Fig. 9 design shows a shoe construction for a shoe, including: a shoe sole with a compartment or compartments under the structural elements o the human foot, including at least the heel; the compartment or compartments contains a pressure-transmittin medium like liquid, gas, or gel; a portion of the upper surface of the shoe sole compartment firmly contacts the lower surface of said compartment during normal load- bearing; and pressure from the load-bearing is transmitted progressively at least in part to the relatively inelastic sides, top and bottom of the shoe sole compartment or compartments, producing tension.
While the Fig. 9 design copies in a simplified way the macro structure of the foot. Figs. 10 A-C focus on a more on the exact detail of the natural structures, including at the micro level. Figs. 10A and IOC are perspective views of cross sections of the human heel showing the matrix of elastic fibrous connective tissue arranged into chambers 164 holding closely packed fat cells; the chambers are structured as whorls radiating out from the calcaneus. These fibrous-tissue strands are firmly attached to the undersurface of the calcaneus and extend to the subcutaneous tissues. They are usually in the form of the letter U, with the open end of the U pointing toward the calcaneus.
As the most natural, an approximation of this specific chamber structure would appear to be the most optimal as an accurate model for the structure of the shoe sole cushioning compartments 161, at least in an ultimate sense, although the complicated nature of the design will require some time to overcome exact design and construction difficulties; however, the description of the structure of calcaneal padding provided by Erich Blechschmidt in Foot and Ankle, March, 1982, (translated from the original 1933 article in German) is so detailed and comprehensive that copying the same structure as a model in shoe sole design is not difficult technically, once the crucial connection is made that such copying of this natural system is necessary to overcome inherent weaknesses in the design of existing shoes. Other arrangements and orientations of the whorls are possible, but would probably be less optimal. Pursuing this nearly exact design analogy, the lower surface 165 of the upper midsole 147 would correspond to the outer surface 167 of the calcaneus 159 and would be the origin of the U shaped whorl chambers 164 noted above.
Fig. 10B shows a close-up of the interior structure of the large chambers shown in Fig. 10A and IOC. It is clear from the fine interior structure and compressio characteristics of the mini-chambers 165 that those directl under the calcaneus become very hard quite easily, due to the high local pressure on them and the limited degree of their elasticity, so they are able to provide very firm support to the calcaneus or other bones of the foot sole; b being fairly inelastic, the compression forces on those compartments are dissipated to other areas of the network o fat pads under any given support structure of the foot, lik the calcaneus. Consequently, if a cushioning compartment 161, such as the compartment under the heel shown in Fig. 9 is subdivided into smaller chambers, like those shown in Fig. 10, then actual contact between the upper surface 165 and the lower surface 166 would no longer be required to provide firm support, so long as those compartments and the pressure-transmitting medium contained in them have materia characteristics similar to those of the foot, as described above; the use of gas may not be satisfactory in this approach, since its compressibility may not allow adequate firmness. In summary, the Fig. 10 design shows a shoe construction including: a shoe sole with a compartments under the structural elements of the human foot, including at least the heel; the compartments containing a pressure- transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel; the compartments having a whorled structure like that of the f pads of the human foot sole;load-bearing pressure being transmitted progressively at least in part to the relative inelastic sides, top and bottom of the shoe sole compartments, producing tension therein; the elasticity of the material of the compartments and the pressure- transmitting medium are such that normal weight-bearing loads produce sufficient tension within the structure of the compartments to provide adequate structural rigidity to allow firm natural support to the foot structural elements, like that provided the barefoot by its fat pads. That shoe sole construction can have shoe sole compartments that are subdivided into micro chambers like those of the fat pads of the foot sole.
Since the bare foot that is never shod is protected by very hard callouses (called a "seri boot") which the shod foot lacks, it seems reasonable to infer that natural protection and shock absorption system of the shod foot is adversely affected by its unnaturally undeveloped fibrous capsules (surrounding the subcalcaneal and other fat pads under foot bone support structures) . A solution would be to produce a shoe intended for use without socks (ie with smooth surfaces above the foot bottom sole) that uses insoles that coincide with the foot bottom sole, including its sides. The upper surface of those insoles, which would be in contact with the bottom sole of the foot (and its sides) , would be coarse enough to stimulate the production of natural barefoot callouses. The insoles would be removable and available in different uniform grades of coarseness, as is sandpaper, so that the user can progress from finer grades to coarser grades as his foot soles toughen with use.
Similarly, socks could be produced to serve the same function, with the area of the sock that corresponds to the foot bottom sole (and sides of the bottom sole) made of a material coarse enough to stimulate the production of callouses on the bottom sole of the foot, with different grades of coarseness available, from fine to coarse, corresponding to feet from soft to naturally tough. Using a tube sock design with uniform coarseness, rather than conventional sock design assumed above, would allow the user to rotate the sock on his foot to eliminate any "hot spot" irritation points that might develop. Also, since the toes are most prone to blistering and the heel is most important in shock absorption, the toe area of the sock could be relatively less abrasive than the heel area.
The foregoing shoe designs meet the obj-ectives of this invention as stated above. However, it will clearly b understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing description has been made in terms of the preferred embodiments and various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention which is to be defined by the appended claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A shoe construction for a shoe, comprising: shoe upper that is composed of material that is flexible and relatively inelastic at least where said shoe upper contacts the areas of the structural bone elements of the human foot, and a shoe sole that has relatively flexible sides; at least a portion of the sides of said shoe upper being attached directly to the bottom sole, while enveloping on the outside the other sole portions of said shoe sole.
2. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 1 wherein said shoe sole conforms to at least a heel portion of the natural contour of the human foot, whether under a load or unloaded, including at least a portion of its sides; and said shoe sole maintaining constant frontal plane thickness and varying sagittal plane thickness, with the heel area thicker than the forefoot area.
3. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 2 wherein said bottom sole extends partly up the side of the midsole to join with said shoe sole upper sides.
4. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 2 wherein said shoe upper is reinforced in the area of some or all essential structural support and propulsion elements, comprising the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus, the base of the fifth metatarsal, the heads of the metatarsals, and the first distal phalange.
5. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 2 wherein said shoe upper is attached on either the outer or inner surface of said bottom sole.
6. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 2 wherein said shoe upper is attached at or near the lower or bottom surface of said shoe sole.
7. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 2, wherein said shoe upper overlaps on either side th bottom sole or lower sole surface when they join.
8. A shoe construction for a shoe, comprising: a shoe sole with a compartment or compartments under the structural elements of the human foot, including at least the heel; said compartment or compartments containing a pressure-transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel; a portion of the upper surface of said shoe sole compartment firmly contacts the lower surface of said compartment during normal load-bearing; pressure from said load-bearing is transmitted progressively at least in part to the relatively inelastic sides, top and bottom of said shoe sole compartment or compartments, producing tension.
9. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 8, wherein shoe upper that is composed of material that is flexible and relatively inelastic at least where said shoe upper contacts the areas of the structural bone elements of the human foot, and a shoe sole that has relatively flexible sides; at least a portion of the sides of said shoe uppe being attached directly to the bottom sole, while envelopin on the outside the other sole portions of said shoe sole.
10. The shoe -sole construction as set forth in claim 9 wherein said shoe sole conforms to at least a heel portion of the natural contour of the huma foot, whether under a load or unloaded, including at least a portion of its sides; and said shoe sole maintaining constant frontal plane thickness and varying sagittal plane thickness, with the heel area thicker than the forefoot area.
11. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 9 wherein said bottom sole extends partly up the side of the midsole to join with said shpe sole upper sides.
12. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 9 wherein said shoe upper is reinforced in the area o some or all essential structural support and propulsion elements, comprising the base and lateral tuberosity of the calcaneus, the base of the fifth metatarsal, the heads of the metatarsals, and the first distal phalange.
13. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 9 wherein said shoe upper is attached on either the outer or inner surface of said bottom sole.
14. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 9 wherein said shoe upper is attached to the lower surface of said shoe sole.
15. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 9, wherein said shoe upper overlaps on either side th bottom sole or lower sole surface when they join. 16. The shoe -sole construction as set forth in claim 10 wherein a sole having a naturally contoured shape defined by a design which conforms to the natural shape of the unloaded foot; wherein the theoretically ideal stability plane i determined by the desired shoe sole thickness which is normally constant in a frontal plane cross section; said sole including a midsole having a thickness or density variation to approximate a greater than natural stability, said midsole having material of greater thicknes or density nearer to the theoretically ideal stability plan and material of lesser thickness or density remote from sai stability plane.
16. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 10 wherein said compartments can be subdivided.
17. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 10 wherein said sole has at least a portion using a natural whorl structure to the subcalcaneal fat pad.
18. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 10 wherein said sole has a least a portion using fibers interconnecting compartments or subdivisions thereof
19. A shoe construction for a shoe, comprising: a shoe sole with, a compartments under the structural elements of the human foot, including at least the heel; said compartments containing a pressure- transmitting medium like liquid, gas, or gel; said compartments having a whorled structure like that of the fat pads of the human foot sole; load-bearing pressure being transmitted progressively at least in part to the relatively inelastic sides, top and bottom of said shoe sole compartments, producing tension therein; the elasticity of the material of said compartments and said pressure-transmitting medium are such that normal weight-bearing loads produce sufficient tension within the structure of said compartments to provide adequate structural rigidity to allow firm natural support to said foot structural elements, like that provided the barefoot by its fat pads.
20. The shoe sole construction as set forth in claim 19 wherein said shoe sole compartments are subdivided into micro chambers like those of the fat pads of the foot sole.
PCT/US1991/000028 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 Shoe sole structures WO1991010377A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT91902613T ATE199120T1 (en) 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 SHOE SOLE CONSTRUCTION
DK91902613T DK0594579T3 (en) 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 Shoe sole constructions
DE69132537T DE69132537T2 (en) 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 FOOTWEAR COMPOSITION
EP91902613A EP0594579B1 (en) 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 Shoe sole structures
GR20010400648T GR3035800T3 (en) 1990-01-10 2001-04-27 Shoe sole structures.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US46330290A 1990-01-10 1990-01-10
US463,302 1990-01-10

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1991010377A1 true WO1991010377A1 (en) 1991-07-25

Family

ID=23839637

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1991/000028 WO1991010377A1 (en) 1990-01-10 1991-01-10 Shoe sole structures

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (7) US6584706B1 (en)
EP (2) EP0594579B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3293071B2 (en)
AT (2) ATE228785T1 (en)
AU (1) AU7177291A (en)
DE (2) DE69133171T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0594579T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2155820T3 (en)
GR (1) GR3035800T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1991010377A1 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994003080A1 (en) * 1992-08-10 1994-02-17 Ellis Frampton E Iii Shoe sole structures
WO1997001295A1 (en) 1995-06-26 1997-01-16 Frampton Erroll Ellis, Iii Shoe sole structures
US5595004A (en) * 1994-03-30 1997-01-21 Nike, Inc. Shoe sole including a peripherally-disposed cushioning bladder
US5794359A (en) * 1996-07-15 1998-08-18 Energaire Corporation Sole and heel structure with peripheral fluid filled pockets
US6115941A (en) * 1988-07-15 2000-09-12 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe with naturally contoured sole
US6487795B1 (en) * 1990-01-10 2002-12-03 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
US7010869B1 (en) 1999-04-26 2006-03-14 Frampton E. Ellis, III Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US7334350B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2008-02-26 Anatomic Research, Inc Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US7707742B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2010-05-04 Ellis Iii Frampton E Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US8873914B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2014-10-28 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole sections including bladders with internal flexibility sipes therebetween and an attachment between sipe surfaces
US9568946B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2017-02-14 Frampton E. Ellis Microchip with faraday cages and internal flexibility sipes
CN109665310A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-23 季华实验室 A kind of flexible crawl mechanism of shoe body palletizing apparatus

Families Citing this family (82)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6675499B2 (en) * 1989-08-30 2004-01-13 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
US7546699B2 (en) 1992-08-10 2009-06-16 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
US7634529B2 (en) 1996-11-29 2009-12-15 Ellis Iii Frampton E Personal and server computers having microchips with multiple processing units and internal firewalls
US20100122164A1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2010-05-13 Tegic Communications, Inc. Contextual prediction of user words and user actions
DE102005006267B3 (en) * 2005-02-11 2006-03-16 Adidas International Marketing B.V. Shoe sole e.g. for sport shoe, has heel which has bowl or edge having form corresponding to heel of foot and underneath bowl and or edge of heel side panels which are connected to separate rear side panel
US7401419B2 (en) * 2002-07-31 2008-07-22 Adidas International Marketing B.V, Structural element for a shoe sole
US7290357B2 (en) 2003-10-09 2007-11-06 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with an articulated sole structure
US6990755B2 (en) * 2003-10-09 2006-01-31 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with a stretchable upper and an articulated sole structure
US8303885B2 (en) 2003-10-09 2012-11-06 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with a stretchable upper and an articulated sole structure
US7383648B1 (en) 2004-02-23 2008-06-10 Reebok International Ltd. Inflatable support system for an article of footwear
WO2006032014A2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2006-03-23 Tripod, L.L.C. Sole unit for footwear and footwear incorporating same
US8291618B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2012-10-23 Frampton E. Ellis Devices with internal flexibility sipes, including siped chambers for footwear
EP1819251B1 (en) 2004-11-22 2016-01-20 Frampton E. Ellis Sole or orthotic with siped chambers for footwear
US20090265961A1 (en) * 2005-10-10 2009-10-29 Karl Muller Footwear as Mat-Socks
US8919012B2 (en) 2005-10-10 2014-12-30 Kybun Ag Footwear as mat-socks
US20070101611A1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2007-05-10 Wei Li Shoe Sole
US7555851B2 (en) * 2006-01-24 2009-07-07 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a fluid-filled chamber with flexion zones
US7752772B2 (en) * 2006-01-24 2010-07-13 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a fluid-filled chamber with flexion zones
CA2687650C (en) * 2006-05-19 2016-02-16 Frampton E. Ellis Devices with internal flexibility sipes, including siped chambers for footwear
US7954261B2 (en) * 2006-09-27 2011-06-07 Rush University Medical Center Joint load reducing footwear
US9402438B2 (en) 2006-09-27 2016-08-02 Rush University Medical Center Joint load reducing footwear
US20080078106A1 (en) * 2006-10-02 2008-04-03 Donna Ilene Montgomery Shoe for enhanced foot-to-ground tactile sensation and associated method
US7946058B2 (en) * 2007-03-21 2011-05-24 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a sole structure with an articulated midsole and outsole
US8819961B1 (en) 2007-06-29 2014-09-02 Frampton E. Ellis Sets of orthotic or other footwear inserts and/or soles with progressive corrections
US7941941B2 (en) 2007-07-13 2011-05-17 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear incorporating foam-filled elements and methods for manufacturing the foam-filled elements
US7955333B2 (en) * 2007-11-15 2011-06-07 Yeager David A Method of preparing a patient's leg in need of treatment, for ambulation
US8959798B2 (en) 2008-06-11 2015-02-24 Zurinvest Ag Shoe sole element
EP2132999B1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2015-10-28 Zurinvest AG Shoe sole element
US9072337B2 (en) 2008-10-06 2015-07-07 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear incorporating an impact absorber and having an upper decoupled from its sole in a midfoot region
US8099880B2 (en) * 2009-01-05 2012-01-24 Under Armour, Inc. Athletic shoe with cushion structures
US20100261582A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Little Anthony A Exercise device and method of use
US20110113649A1 (en) 2009-11-18 2011-05-19 Srl, Llc Articles of Footwear
DE102010028889A1 (en) * 2010-05-11 2012-04-19 Kom*Sport Kompetenzzentrum Sport Gbr Vertreten Durch Oliver Elsenbach Shoe insert and shoe
US20120204449A1 (en) * 2011-02-16 2012-08-16 Skechers U.S.A., Inc. Ii Shoe
US20120260527A1 (en) * 2011-04-15 2012-10-18 Ls Networks Corporated Limited shoe having triple-hardness midsole, outsole, and upper with support for preventing an overpronation
US20130133230A1 (en) * 2011-11-29 2013-05-30 Natasha V. Pavone Athletic Shoe
KR101346260B1 (en) 2011-12-07 2014-01-06 양재호 sole which allows free pronation and supination and shoe having the same
US8919015B2 (en) 2012-03-08 2014-12-30 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a sole structure with a flexible groove
US9609912B2 (en) 2012-03-23 2017-04-04 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a sole structure with a fluid-filled chamber
US9877523B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2018-01-30 Frampton E. Ellis Bladders, compartments, chambers or internal sipes controlled by a computer system using big data techniques and a smartphone device
US11901072B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2024-02-13 Frampton E. Ellis Big data artificial intelligence computer system used for medical care connected to millions of sensor-equipped smartphones connected to their users' configurable footwear soles with sensors and to body sensors
US10226082B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2019-03-12 Frampton E. Ellis Smartphone-controlled active configuration of footwear, including with concavely rounded soles
US9030335B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2015-05-12 Frampton E. Ellis Smartphones app-controlled configuration of footwear soles using sensors in the smartphone and the soles
US20200367605A1 (en) 2012-04-18 2020-11-26 Frampton E. Ellis Smartphone-controlled active configuration of footwear, including with concavely rounded soles
US9510646B2 (en) 2012-07-17 2016-12-06 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear having a flexible fluid-filled chamber
USD731766S1 (en) 2013-04-10 2015-06-16 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole
USD787167S1 (en) 2013-04-10 2017-05-23 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole
US9549590B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-01-24 Nike, Inc. Auxetic structures and footwear with soles having auxetic structures
US9402439B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2016-08-02 Nike, Inc. Auxetic structures and footwear with soles having auxetic structures
US9554622B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-01-31 Nike, Inc. Multi-component sole structure having an auxetic configuration
US9456656B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2016-10-04 Nike, Inc. Midsole component and outer sole members with auxetic structure
US9554624B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-01-31 Nike, Inc. Footwear soles with auxetic material
US9554620B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-01-31 Nike, Inc. Auxetic soles with corresponding inner or outer liners
US9538811B2 (en) 2013-09-18 2017-01-10 Nike, Inc. Sole structure with holes arranged in auxetic configuration
CN103734995B (en) * 2013-12-26 2015-11-25 温州职业技术学院 The processing method of a kind of footwear chamber circle side angie type footwear
US9320320B1 (en) 2014-01-10 2016-04-26 Harry A. Shamir Exercise shoe
US9861162B2 (en) 2014-04-08 2018-01-09 Nike, Inc. Components for articles of footwear including lightweight, selectively supported textile components
US9872537B2 (en) 2014-04-08 2018-01-23 Nike, Inc. Components for articles of footwear including lightweight, selectively supported textile components
US9474326B2 (en) 2014-07-11 2016-10-25 Nike, Inc. Footwear having auxetic structures with controlled properties
US10064448B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2018-09-04 Nike, Inc. Auxetic sole with upper cabling
US9854869B2 (en) 2014-10-01 2018-01-02 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with one or more auxetic bladders
US9635903B2 (en) 2015-08-14 2017-05-02 Nike, Inc. Sole structure having auxetic structures and sipes
US10070688B2 (en) 2015-08-14 2018-09-11 Nike, Inc. Sole structures with regionally applied auxetic openings and siping
US9668542B2 (en) 2015-08-14 2017-06-06 Nike, Inc. Sole structure including sipes
USD811717S1 (en) * 2016-11-30 2018-03-06 Nike, Inc. Shoe
USD816962S1 (en) 2017-06-30 2018-05-08 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole
USD837497S1 (en) 2017-07-14 2019-01-08 Anatomic Research, Inc. Footwear sole
USD838090S1 (en) 2017-07-14 2019-01-15 Anatomic Research, Inc. Footwear sole
USD812876S1 (en) * 2017-09-29 2018-03-20 Nike, Inc. Shoe outsole
USD838088S1 (en) 2017-12-06 2019-01-15 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal
USD845592S1 (en) 2017-12-07 2019-04-16 Anatomic Research, Inc. Sandal
USD840645S1 (en) 2018-02-06 2019-02-19 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal upper
USD844304S1 (en) 2018-02-06 2019-04-02 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal upper
USD841953S1 (en) 2018-02-06 2019-03-05 Anatomic Research, Inc. Footwear sole
US11567463B2 (en) * 2018-08-17 2023-01-31 Frampton E. Ellis Smartphone-controlled active configuration of footwear, including with concavely rounded soles
USD863739S1 (en) 2018-08-21 2019-10-22 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal sole
US20200171767A1 (en) * 2018-12-01 2020-06-04 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear Soles And Other Structures With Internal Sipes Created By 3D Printing
US11603854B2 (en) 2019-07-31 2023-03-14 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Electrical submersible pump seal section reduced leakage features
USD921337S1 (en) 2020-07-16 2021-06-08 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal
USD988660S1 (en) 2021-07-27 2023-06-13 Frampton E. Ellis Lateral side extension for the midfoot of a shoe sole
USD973314S1 (en) 2021-08-04 2022-12-27 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal
USD1003012S1 (en) 2022-02-04 2023-10-31 Anatomic Research, Inc. Athletic sandal

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2433329A (en) * 1944-11-07 1947-12-30 Arthur H Adler Height increasing device for footwear
US3110971A (en) * 1962-03-16 1963-11-19 Chang Sing-Wu Anti-skid textile shoe sole structures
US3535799A (en) * 1969-03-04 1970-10-27 Kihachiro Onitsuka Athletic shoes
US4227320A (en) * 1979-01-15 1980-10-14 Borgeas Alexander T Cushioned sole for footwear
US4271606A (en) * 1979-10-15 1981-06-09 Robert C. Bogert Shoes with studded soles
US4354319A (en) * 1979-04-11 1982-10-19 Block Barry H Athletic shoe
US4370817A (en) * 1981-02-13 1983-02-01 Ratanangsu Karl S Elevating boot
US4484397A (en) * 1983-06-21 1984-11-27 Curley Jr John J Stabilization device
US4756098A (en) * 1987-01-21 1988-07-12 Gencorp Inc. Athletic shoe
US4768295A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-09-06 Asics Corporation Sole
US4934073A (en) * 1989-07-13 1990-06-19 Robinson Fred M Exercise-enhancing walking shoe

Family Cites Families (236)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US532429A (en) 1895-01-08 Elastic oe antiqonotfssion heel and sole foe boots
US272294A (en) * 1883-02-13 Car-coupling
US444293A (en) * 1891-01-06 Tobacco-pouch
US288127A (en) * 1883-11-06 Zfew jeeset
US280791A (en) 1883-07-10 Boot or shoe sole
US310906A (en) * 1885-01-20 Banjo
DE1888119U (en) 1964-02-20 Continental Gummi-Werke Aktiengesellschaft, Hannover Sole made of elastic material
US256400A (en) * 1882-04-11 James h
US298684A (en) * 1884-05-13 Preserving the aroma of goffee
US193914A (en) 1877-08-07 Improvement in moccasins
US256180A (en) * 1882-04-11 dk veb wakniir
US584373A (en) 1897-06-15 Sporting-shoe
US320302A (en) * 1885-06-16 Pressure-governor and regulating-valve
US500385A (en) 1893-06-27 William hall
US55115A (en) * 1866-05-29 Thomas kennedy
US450916A (en) * 1891-04-21 Charles k
US1289106A (en) 1916-10-24 1918-12-31 Converse Rubber Shoe Company Sole.
US1283335A (en) 1918-03-06 1918-10-29 Frederick John Shillcock Boot for foot-ball and other athletic purposes.
US1458446A (en) 1921-04-29 1923-06-12 Clarence W Shaeffer Rubber heel
FR602501A (en) 1925-08-26 1926-03-20 Manufacturing process of soles for shoes and resulting products
US1622860A (en) 1926-09-22 1927-03-29 Alfred Hale Rubber Company Rubber-sole shoe
US1639381A (en) 1926-11-29 1927-08-16 Manelas George Pneumatic shoe sole
US1701260A (en) * 1927-08-23 1929-02-05 Fischer William Resilient sole pad for shoes
US1735986A (en) 1927-11-26 1929-11-19 Goodrich Co B F Rubber-soled shoe and method of making the same
US1853034A (en) 1930-11-01 1932-04-12 Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg Rubber soled shoe and method of making same
US2120987A (en) 1935-08-06 1938-06-21 Alan E Murray Process of producing orthopedic shoes and product thereof
US2155166A (en) * 1936-04-01 1939-04-18 Gen Tire & Rubber Co Tread surface for footwear
US2162912A (en) 1936-06-13 1939-06-20 Us Rubber Co Rubber sole
US2170652A (en) 1936-09-08 1939-08-22 Martin M Brennan Appliance for protecting portions of a shoe during cleaning or polishing
US2147197A (en) * 1936-11-25 1939-02-14 Hood Rubber Co Inc Article of footwear
US2206860A (en) 1937-11-30 1940-07-09 Paul A Sperry Shoe
US2201300A (en) 1938-05-26 1940-05-21 United Shoe Machinery Corp Flexible shoe and method of making same
US2179942A (en) 1938-07-11 1939-11-14 Robert A Lyne Golf shoe attachment
US2251468A (en) 1939-04-05 1941-08-05 Salta Corp Rubber shoe sole
US2328242A (en) 1942-11-09 1943-08-31 Witherill Lathrop Milton Sole
US2345831A (en) 1943-03-01 1944-04-04 E P Reed & Co Shoe sole and method of making the same
US2434770A (en) 1945-09-26 1948-01-20 William J Lutey Shoe sole
US2434821A (en) * 1945-11-19 1948-01-20 Francis J Ulrich Necktie holder
US2470200A (en) 1946-04-04 1949-05-17 Associated Dev & Res Corp Shoe sole
FR925961A (en) 1946-04-06 1947-09-18 Detachable sole shoe
FR1004472A (en) 1947-04-28 1952-03-31 Le Caoutchouc S I T Improvements to rubber boots
US2627676A (en) 1949-12-10 1953-02-10 Hack Shoe Company Corrugated sole and heel tread for shoes
US2718715A (en) 1952-03-27 1955-09-27 Virginia G Spilman Footwear in the nature of a pac
GB764956A (en) 1953-06-22 1957-01-02 Brevitt Ltd Improvements in or relating to the manufacture of shoes
DE1685260U (en) 1953-09-08 1954-10-21 Richard Gierth ELECTRIC MASSAGE DEVICE, BASED ON VIBRATION AND VIBRATION.
GB807305A (en) 1955-06-18 1959-01-14 Clark Ltd C & J Improvements in or relating to the manufacture of soles, heels and soling material for footwear
US2814133A (en) 1955-09-01 1957-11-26 Carl W Herbst Formed heel portion of shoe outsole
AT200963B (en) 1955-11-19 1958-12-10 Adolf Dr Schuetz Shoe insert
US3005272A (en) 1959-06-08 1961-10-24 Shelare Robert Pneumatic shoe sole
DE1287477B (en) 1961-07-08 1969-01-16 Opel Georg Von Pneumatic sole for shoes
FR1323455A (en) 1962-06-01 1963-04-05 Footwear improvements
DE1290844B (en) * 1962-08-29 1969-03-13 Continental Gummi Werke Ag Molded sole for footwear
CH416381A (en) 1962-10-06 1966-06-30 Julie Kalsoy Anne Sofie Footwear
US3100354A (en) 1962-12-13 1963-08-13 Lombard Herman Resilient shoe sole
US3416174A (en) 1964-08-19 1968-12-17 Ripon Knitting Works Method of making footwear having an elastomeric dipped outsole
US3308560A (en) 1965-06-28 1967-03-14 Endicott Johnson Corp Rubber boot with fibreglass instep guard
US3533171A (en) 1968-04-16 1970-10-13 Fukuoka Kagaku Kogyo Co Ltd Footwear
US3512274A (en) 1968-07-26 1970-05-19 B W Footwear Co Inc Golf shoe
US3824716A (en) 1972-01-10 1974-07-23 Paolo A Di Footwear
US3806974A (en) 1972-01-10 1974-04-30 Paolo A Di Process of making footwear
US4068395A (en) 1972-03-05 1978-01-17 Jonas Senter Shoe construction with upper of leather or like material anchored to inner sole and sole structure sealed with foxing strip or simulated foxing strip
US3863366A (en) 1974-01-23 1975-02-04 Ro Search Inc Footwear with molded sole
US4003145A (en) 1974-08-01 1977-01-18 Ro-Search, Inc. Footwear
FR2261721A1 (en) 1974-02-22 1975-09-19 Beneteau Charles Sole of sports shoe for outdoor use - has deformable protuberances on the base of the sole
US3958291A (en) 1974-10-18 1976-05-25 Spier Martin I Outer shell construction for boot and method of forming same
US3964181A (en) 1975-02-07 1976-06-22 Holcombe Cressie E Jun Shoe construction
US4128951A (en) 1975-05-07 1978-12-12 Falk Construction, Inc. Custom-formed insert
CH611140A5 (en) 1975-06-09 1979-05-31 Dassler Puma Sportschuh
US4161828A (en) 1975-06-09 1979-07-24 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg Outer sole for shoe especially sport shoes as well as shoes provided with such outer sole
US3997984A (en) 1975-11-19 1976-12-21 Hayward George J Orthopedic canvas shoe
DE2613312A1 (en) 1976-03-29 1977-10-13 Dassler Puma Sportschuh PROFILED OUTSOLE MANUFACTURED IN A SHAPE FOR FOOTWEAR, IN PARTICULAR SPORTSHOES
US4043058A (en) 1976-05-21 1977-08-23 Brs, Inc. Athletic training shoe having foam core and apertured sole layers
US4030213A (en) 1976-09-30 1977-06-21 Daswick Alexander C Sporting shoe
DE2706645B2 (en) 1976-11-29 1979-04-19 Adolf 8522 Herzogenaurach Dassler Sports shoe
US4096649A (en) 1976-12-03 1978-06-27 Saurwein Albert C Athletic shoe sole
US4183156A (en) 1977-01-14 1980-01-15 Robert C. Bogert Insole construction for articles of footwear
US4128950A (en) 1977-02-07 1978-12-12 Brs, Inc. Multilayered sole athletic shoe with improved foam mid-sole
US4217705A (en) 1977-03-04 1980-08-19 Donzis Byron A Self-contained fluid pressure foot support device
US4098011A (en) 1977-04-27 1978-07-04 Brs, Inc. Cleated sole for athletic shoe
GB1599175A (en) 1977-07-01 1981-09-30 British United Shoe Machinery Manufacture of shoes
US4240214A (en) 1977-07-06 1980-12-23 Jakob Sigle Foot-supporting sole
DE2737765A1 (en) 1977-08-22 1979-03-08 Dassler Puma Sportschuh Sports shoe sole for indoor use - has tread consisting of clusters of protuberances, and ridges round edges
USD256400S (en) 1977-09-19 1980-08-19 Famolare, Inc. Shoe sole
DE2752301C2 (en) 1977-11-23 1983-09-22 Schmohl, Michael W., Dipl.-Kfm., 5100 Aachen Sports shoe
DE2753205C3 (en) 1977-11-29 1985-12-12 Michael W. Dipl.-Kfm. 5100 Aachen Schmohl Full outsole for sports shoes
US4149324A (en) 1978-01-25 1979-04-17 Les Lesser Golf shoes
US4272858A (en) 1978-01-26 1981-06-16 K. Shoemakers Limited Method of making a moccasin shoe
DE2805426A1 (en) 1978-02-09 1979-08-16 Adolf Dassler Sprinting shoe sole of polyamide - has stability increased by moulded lateral support portions
USD256180S (en) 1978-03-06 1980-08-05 Brooks Shoe Manufacturing Co., Inc. Cleated sports shoe sole
GB1598541A (en) 1978-03-14 1981-09-23 Clarks Ltd Footwear
US4170078A (en) 1978-03-30 1979-10-09 Ronald Moss Cushioned foot sole
DE2813958A1 (en) 1978-03-31 1979-10-04 Funck Herbert SHOE SOLE
US4340626A (en) 1978-05-05 1982-07-20 Rudy Marion F Diffusion pumping apparatus self-inflating device
US4161829A (en) 1978-06-12 1979-07-24 Alain Wayser Shoes intended for playing golf
US4219945B1 (en) 1978-06-26 1993-10-19 Robert C. Bogert Footwear
DE2829645A1 (en) 1978-07-06 1980-01-17 Friedrich Linnemann THREAD-THREADED SHOE
US4258480A (en) 1978-08-04 1981-03-31 Famolare, Inc. Running shoe
US4262433A (en) 1978-08-08 1981-04-21 Hagg Vernon A Sole body for footwear
ZA784637B (en) 1978-08-15 1979-09-26 J Halberstadt Footware
US4305212A (en) * 1978-09-08 1981-12-15 Coomer Sven O Orthotically dynamic footwear
US4235026A (en) 1978-09-13 1980-11-25 Motion Analysis, Inc. Elastomeric shoesole
US4223457A (en) * 1978-09-21 1980-09-23 Borgeas Alexander T Heel shock absorber for footwear
US4241523A (en) 1978-09-25 1980-12-30 Daswick Alexander C Shoe sole structure
US4194310A (en) 1978-10-30 1980-03-25 Brs, Inc. Athletic shoe for artificial turf with molded cleats on the sides thereof
US4268980A (en) 1978-11-06 1981-05-26 Scholl, Inc. Detorquing heel control device for footwear
US4335529A (en) 1978-12-04 1982-06-22 Badalamenti Michael J Traction device for shoes
US4297797A (en) 1978-12-18 1981-11-03 Meyers Stuart R Therapeutic shoe
DE2924716A1 (en) 1979-01-19 1980-07-31 Karhu Titan Oy SPORTSHOE WITH A SOLE IN A LAYER DESIGN
USD264017S (en) 1979-01-29 1982-04-27 Jerome Turner Cleated shoe sole
US4263728A (en) 1979-01-31 1981-04-28 Frank Frecentese Jogging shoe with adjustable shock absorbing system for the heel impact surface thereof
US4237627A (en) 1979-02-07 1980-12-09 Turner Shoe Company, Inc. Running shoe with perforated midsole
US4316335A (en) 1979-04-05 1982-02-23 Comfort Products, Inc. Athletic shoe construction
US4316332A (en) 1979-04-23 1982-02-23 Comfort Products, Inc. Athletic shoe construction having shock absorbing elements
US4245406A (en) 1979-05-03 1981-01-20 Brookfield Athletic Shoe Company, Inc. Athletic shoe
US4319412A (en) 1979-10-03 1982-03-16 Pony International, Inc. Shoe having fluid pressure supporting means
USD265017S (en) 1979-11-06 1982-06-22 Societe Technisynthese (S.A.R.L.) Shoe sole
US4322895B1 (en) 1979-12-10 1995-08-08 Stan Hockerson Stabilized athletic shoe
US4309832A (en) 1980-03-27 1982-01-12 Hunt Helen M Articulated shoe sole
US4302892A (en) 1980-04-21 1981-12-01 Sunstar Incorporated Athletic shoe and sole therefor
US4361971A (en) 1980-04-28 1982-12-07 Brs, Inc. Track shoe having metatarsal cushion on spike plate
US4302982A (en) 1980-05-08 1981-12-01 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Key and keyway arrangement
US4308671A (en) 1980-05-23 1982-01-05 Walter Bretschneider Stitched-down shoe
CA1138194A (en) 1980-06-02 1982-12-28 Dale Bullock Slider assembly for curling boots or shoes
US4348821A (en) 1980-06-02 1982-09-14 Daswick Alexander C Shoe sole structure
DE3024587A1 (en) 1980-06-28 1982-01-28 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg, 8522 Herzogenaurach Indoor sports or tennis shoe with fibre reinforced sole - has heavily reinforced hard wearing zone esp. at ball of foot
DE3037108A1 (en) 1980-10-01 1982-05-13 Herbert Dr.-Ing. 8032 Lochham Funck UPHOLSTERED SOLE WITH ORTHOPEDIC CHARACTERISTICS
US4366634A (en) 1981-01-09 1983-01-04 Converse Inc. Athletic shoe
US4372059A (en) 1981-03-04 1983-02-08 Frank Ambrose Sole body for shoes with upwardly deformable arch-supporting segment
US4455767A (en) * 1981-04-29 1984-06-26 Clarks Of England, Inc. Shoe construction
US4398357A (en) 1981-06-01 1983-08-16 Stride Rite International, Ltd. Outsole
FR2511850A1 (en) 1981-08-25 1983-03-04 Camuset Sole for sport shoe - has widened central part joined to front and back of sole by curved sections
DE3152011A1 (en) 1981-12-31 1983-07-21 Top-Man Oy, 65100 Våsa SHOE WITH INSOLE
US4455765A (en) 1982-01-06 1984-06-26 Sjoeswaerd Lars E G Sports shoe soles
US4454662A (en) 1982-02-10 1984-06-19 Stubblefield Jerry D Athletic shoe sole
US4854057A (en) 1982-02-10 1989-08-08 Tretorn Ab Dynamic support for an athletic shoe
CA1176458A (en) 1982-04-13 1984-10-23 Denys Gardner Anti-skidding footwear
US4451994A (en) 1982-05-26 1984-06-05 Fowler Donald M Resilient midsole component for footwear
GB2122872B (en) 1982-06-09 1985-10-09 Griplite S L Sports shoes
US4506462A (en) 1982-06-11 1985-03-26 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg Running shoe sole with pronation limiting heel
DE3233792A1 (en) 1982-09-11 1984-03-15 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg, 8522 Herzogenaurach SPORTSHOE FOR LIGHTWEIGHT
US4505055A (en) * 1982-09-29 1985-03-19 Clarks Of England, Inc. Shoe having an improved attachment of the upper to the sole
US4449306A (en) 1982-10-13 1984-05-22 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg Running shoe sole construction
US4494321A (en) 1982-11-15 1985-01-22 Kevin Lawlor Shock resistant shoe sole
DE3245182A1 (en) 1982-12-07 1983-05-26 Krohm, Reinold, 4690 Herne Running shoe
JPS59103605U (en) 1982-12-28 1984-07-12 美津濃株式会社 athletic shoe soles
US4542598A (en) 1983-01-10 1985-09-24 Colgate Palmolive Company Athletic type shoe for tennis and other court games
CA1213139A (en) 1983-01-17 1986-10-28 Norbert Hamy Sports shoe
US4468870A (en) 1983-01-24 1984-09-04 Sternberg Joseph E Bowling shoe
US4557059A (en) 1983-02-08 1985-12-10 Colgate-Palmolive Company Athletic running shoe
DE3317462A1 (en) 1983-05-13 1983-10-13 Krohm, Reinold, 4690 Herne Sports shoe
JPS6014805A (en) 1983-07-01 1985-01-25 ウルヴリン・ワ−ルド・ワイド・インコ−ポレイテツド Shoe sole of athletic shoes having pre-molded structure
BR8305086A (en) * 1983-09-19 1984-03-20 Antonio Signori DAMPING DEVICE APPLICABLE TO FOOTWEAR IN GENERAL
US4580359A (en) 1983-10-24 1986-04-08 Pro-Shu Company Golf shoes
US4559724A (en) 1983-11-08 1985-12-24 Nike, Inc. Track shoe with a improved sole
US4521979A (en) 1984-03-01 1985-06-11 Blaser Anton J Shock absorbing shoe sole
CA1232446A (en) 1984-04-04 1988-02-09 Terry Mackness Running shoes
US4577417A (en) 1984-04-27 1986-03-25 Energaire Corporation Sole-and-heel structure having premolded bulges
US4578882A (en) 1984-07-31 1986-04-01 Talarico Ii Louis C Forefoot compensated footwear
US4641438A (en) 1984-11-15 1987-02-10 Laird Bruce A Athletic shoe for runner and joggers
DE3471870D1 (en) 1984-12-19 1988-07-14 Funck Herbert Shoe sole of plastic material or rubber
US4642917A (en) 1985-02-05 1987-02-17 Hyde Athletic Industries, Inc. Athletic shoe having improved sole construction
US4894933A (en) * 1985-02-26 1990-01-23 Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc. Cushioning and impact absorptive means for footwear
US4670995A (en) 1985-03-13 1987-06-09 Huang Ing Chung Air cushion shoe sole
US4694591A (en) 1985-04-15 1987-09-22 Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Toe off athletic shoe
US4731939A (en) 1985-04-24 1988-03-22 Converse Inc. Athletic shoe with external counter and cushion assembly
US4676010A (en) 1985-06-10 1987-06-30 Quabaug Corporation Vulcanized composite sole for footwear
DE3520786A1 (en) 1985-06-10 1986-12-11 Puma-Sportschuhfabriken Rudolf Dassler Kg, 8522 Herzogenaurach SHOE FOR REHABILITATION PURPOSES
US4624062A (en) 1985-06-17 1986-11-25 Autry Industries, Inc. Sole with cushioning and braking spiroidal contact surfaces
AT388488B (en) * 1985-06-18 1989-06-26 Hartjes Rudolf GOLF SHOE
DE3527938A1 (en) 1985-08-03 1987-02-12 Paul Ganter SHOE OR OUTSOLE
AU564808B2 (en) 1985-08-23 1987-08-27 Huang, I-C. Manufacturing shoe soles with an air cushion
US4651445A (en) 1985-09-03 1987-03-24 Hannibal Alan J Composite sole for a shoe
USD293275S (en) 1985-09-06 1987-12-22 Reebok International, Ltd. Shoe sole
FI71866C (en) 1985-09-10 1987-03-09 Karhu Titan Oy Sole construction for sports shoes.
IT1188618B (en) 1986-03-24 1988-01-20 Antonino Ammendolea FOOTBED FOR FOOTWEAR WITH ELASTIC CUSHIONING
US4730402A (en) 1986-04-04 1988-03-15 New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. Construction of sole unit for footwear
US4785077A (en) 1986-05-05 1988-11-15 Scripps Clinic And Research Foundation Substantially pure cytotoxicity triggering factor
FR2598293B1 (en) 1986-05-09 1988-09-09 Salomon Sa GOLF SHOE
US5025573A (en) 1986-06-04 1991-06-25 Comfort Products, Inc. Multi-density shoe sole
WO1987007480A1 (en) 1986-06-12 1987-12-17 Boots & Boats, Inc. Golf shoes
US4724622A (en) 1986-07-24 1988-02-16 Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Non-slip outsole
JPS6341677A (en) * 1986-08-08 1988-02-22 Sanden Corp Variable capacity compressor
DE3629245A1 (en) 1986-08-28 1988-03-03 Dassler Puma Sportschuh Outsole for sports shoes, in particular for indoor sports
AU586049B2 (en) 1986-09-19 1989-06-29 Malcolm G. Blissett Parabola-flex sole
US4785557A (en) 1986-10-24 1988-11-22 Avia Group International, Inc. Shoe sole construction
USD294425S (en) 1986-12-08 1988-03-01 Reebok International Ltd. Shoe sole
US5052130A (en) 1987-12-08 1991-10-01 Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Spring plate shoe
US5191727A (en) * 1986-12-15 1993-03-09 Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Propulsion plate hydrodynamic footwear
FR2608387B1 (en) 1986-12-23 1989-04-21 Salomon Sa STEP SOLE FOR A SPORTS SHOE, ESPECIALLY A GOLF SHOE AND A SHOE EQUIPPED WITH SUCH A SOLE
US4747220A (en) 1987-01-20 1988-05-31 Autry Industries, Inc. Cleated sole for activewear shoe
US4833795A (en) 1987-02-06 1989-05-30 Reebok Group International Ltd. Outsole construction for athletic shoe
US4759136A (en) 1987-02-06 1988-07-26 Reebok International Ltd. Athletic shoe with dynamic cradle
US4748753A (en) * 1987-03-06 1988-06-07 Ju Chang N Golf shoes
DE8709091U1 (en) 1987-04-24 1987-08-20 Adidas Sportschuhfabriken Adi Dassler Stiftung & Co Kg, 8522 Herzogenaurach, De
DE3716424A1 (en) 1987-05-15 1988-12-01 Adidas Sportschuhe OUTSOLE FOR SPORTSHOES
FI76479C (en) 1987-07-01 1988-11-10 Karhu Titan Oy SKODON, I SYNNERHET ETT BOLLSPELSSKODON, FOERFARANDE FOER FRAMSTAELLNING AV SKODONET OCH SULAAEMNE FOER SKODONET AVSETT FOER FOERVERKLIGANDE AV FOERFARANDET.
USD296149S (en) 1987-07-16 1988-06-14 Reebok International Ltd. Shoe sole
US4779359A (en) 1987-07-30 1988-10-25 Famolare, Inc. Shoe construction with air cushioning
US4817304A (en) 1987-08-31 1989-04-04 Nike, Inc. And Nike International Ltd. Footwear with adjustable viscoelastic unit
USD296152S (en) 1987-09-02 1988-06-14 Avia Group International, Inc. Shoe sole
US4874640A (en) * 1987-09-21 1989-10-17 Donzis Byron A Impact absorbing composites and their production
US5010662A (en) 1987-12-29 1991-04-30 Dabuzhsky Leonid V Sole for reactive distribution of stress on the foot
FR2622411B1 (en) 1987-11-04 1990-03-23 Duc Pierre SOLE FOR LEISURE AND WORK SHOE ALLOWING EASY DEVELOPMENT ON FURNISHED LANDS, AND INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF SWIMMING POOLS
US4890398A (en) * 1987-11-23 1990-01-02 Robert Thomasson Shoe sole
DK157387C (en) 1987-12-08 1990-06-05 Eccolet Sko As shoe sole
MY106949A (en) 1988-02-05 1995-08-30 Rudy Marion F Pressurizable envelope and method
US4906502A (en) 1988-02-05 1990-03-06 Robert C. Bogert Pressurizable envelope and method
US4922631A (en) 1988-02-08 1990-05-08 Adidas Sportschuhfabriken Adi Dassier Stiftung & Co. Kg Shoe bottom for sports shoes
US4858340A (en) * 1988-02-16 1989-08-22 Prince Manufacturing, Inc. Shoe with form fitting sole
US4897936A (en) * 1988-02-16 1990-02-06 Kaepa, Inc. Shoe sole construction
FR2632497A1 (en) 1988-03-22 1989-12-15 Beneteau Charles Marie SOLE OF SHOES FOR THE PRACTICE OF SPORTS AND SIMILAR ACTIVITIES
FR2628946B1 (en) 1988-03-28 1990-12-14 Mauger Jean SHOE SOLE OR FIRST WITH CIRCULATION OF AN INCORPORATED FLUID
US4827631A (en) 1988-06-20 1989-05-09 Anthony Thornton Walking shoe
US4989349A (en) 1988-07-15 1991-02-05 Ellis Iii Frampton E Shoe with contoured sole
US5317819A (en) * 1988-09-02 1994-06-07 Ellis Iii Frampton E Shoe with naturally contoured sole
ES2166631T3 (en) * 1988-07-15 2002-04-16 Anatomic Res Inc SOILS OF SHOES WITH DECRECIENT THICKNESS IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE.
US6115941A (en) * 1988-07-15 2000-09-12 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe with naturally contoured sole
US4866861A (en) 1988-07-21 1989-09-19 Macgregor Golf Corporation Supports for golf shoes to restrain rollout during a golf backswing and to resist excessive weight transfer during a golf downswing
US4967492A (en) * 1988-07-29 1990-11-06 Rosen Henri E Adjustable girth shoes
USD315634S (en) 1988-08-25 1991-03-26 Autry Industries, Inc. Midsole with bottom projections
US4947560A (en) 1989-02-09 1990-08-14 Kaepa, Inc. Split vamp shoe with lateral stabilizer system
FR2646060B1 (en) 1989-04-25 1991-08-16 Salomon Sa STEP SOLE FOR A SPORTS SHOE, ESPECIALLY A GOLF SHOE AND SHOE PROVIDED WITH SUCH A SOLE
US4914836A (en) 1989-05-11 1990-04-10 Zvi Horovitz Cushioning and impact absorptive structure
IT1226514B (en) 1989-05-24 1991-01-24 Fila Sport SPORTS FOOTWEAR INCORPORATING, IN THE HEEL, AN ELASTIC INSERT.
US4982737A (en) 1989-06-08 1991-01-08 Guttmann Jaime C Orthotic support construction
US6163982A (en) 1989-08-30 2000-12-26 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
US5014449A (en) 1989-09-22 1991-05-14 Avia Group International, Inc. Shoe sole construction
DE69133171T2 (en) * 1990-01-10 2003-11-13 Anatomic Res Inc Construction of a shoe sole with extensive edges
AU7324591A (en) 1990-02-08 1991-09-03 Frampton E. Ellis Iii Shoe sole structures with deformation sipes
AU8057891A (en) * 1990-06-18 1992-01-07 Frampton E. Ellis Iii Shoe sole structures
AU8932491A (en) * 1990-11-05 1992-05-26 Frampton E. Ellis Iii Shoe sole structures
US5093060A (en) * 1991-02-25 1992-03-03 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Coupled spinning and dewatering process
JPH0622481B2 (en) 1991-03-08 1994-03-30 株式会社アシックス Shoe sole
US5224810A (en) 1991-06-13 1993-07-06 Pitkin Mark R Athletic shoe
US5224280A (en) 1991-08-28 1993-07-06 Pagoda Trading Company, Inc. Support structure for footwear and footwear incorporating same
US5237758A (en) 1992-04-07 1993-08-24 Zachman Harry L Safety shoe sole construction

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2433329A (en) * 1944-11-07 1947-12-30 Arthur H Adler Height increasing device for footwear
US3110971A (en) * 1962-03-16 1963-11-19 Chang Sing-Wu Anti-skid textile shoe sole structures
US3535799A (en) * 1969-03-04 1970-10-27 Kihachiro Onitsuka Athletic shoes
US4227320A (en) * 1979-01-15 1980-10-14 Borgeas Alexander T Cushioned sole for footwear
US4354319A (en) * 1979-04-11 1982-10-19 Block Barry H Athletic shoe
US4271606A (en) * 1979-10-15 1981-06-09 Robert C. Bogert Shoes with studded soles
US4370817A (en) * 1981-02-13 1983-02-01 Ratanangsu Karl S Elevating boot
US4484397A (en) * 1983-06-21 1984-11-27 Curley Jr John J Stabilization device
US4768295A (en) * 1986-04-11 1988-09-06 Asics Corporation Sole
US4756098A (en) * 1987-01-21 1988-07-12 Gencorp Inc. Athletic shoe
US4934073A (en) * 1989-07-13 1990-06-19 Robinson Fred M Exercise-enhancing walking shoe

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6115941A (en) * 1988-07-15 2000-09-12 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe with naturally contoured sole
US7174658B2 (en) * 1990-01-10 2007-02-13 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
US6487795B1 (en) * 1990-01-10 2002-12-03 Anatomic Research, Inc. Shoe sole structures
WO1994003080A1 (en) * 1992-08-10 1994-02-17 Ellis Frampton E Iii Shoe sole structures
US5595004A (en) * 1994-03-30 1997-01-21 Nike, Inc. Shoe sole including a peripherally-disposed cushioning bladder
US5987780A (en) * 1994-03-30 1999-11-23 Nike, Inc. Shoe sole including a peripherally-disposed cushioning bladder
WO1997001295A1 (en) 1995-06-26 1997-01-16 Frampton Erroll Ellis, Iii Shoe sole structures
US5794359A (en) * 1996-07-15 1998-08-18 Energaire Corporation Sole and heel structure with peripheral fluid filled pockets
US10016015B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2018-07-10 Anatomic Research, Inc. Footwear soles with computer controlled configurable structures
US7334350B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2008-02-26 Anatomic Research, Inc Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US7562468B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2009-07-21 Anatomic Research, Inc Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US9398787B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2016-07-26 Frampton E. Ellis, III Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US8291614B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2012-10-23 Anatomic Research, Inc. Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US8656607B2 (en) 1999-03-16 2014-02-25 Anatomic Research, Inc. Soles for shoes or other footwear having compartments with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US8667709B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2014-03-11 Frampton E. Ellis Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US7707742B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2010-05-04 Ellis Iii Frampton E Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US7793429B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2010-09-14 Ellis Iii Frampton E Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US7010869B1 (en) 1999-04-26 2006-03-14 Frampton E. Ellis, III Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US9414641B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2016-08-16 Frampton E. Ellis Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US8261468B2 (en) 1999-04-26 2012-09-11 Frampton E. Ellis Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US8959804B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2015-02-24 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole sections including bladders with internal flexibility sipes therebetween and an attachment between sipe surfaces
US9271538B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2016-03-01 Frampton E. Ellis Microprocessor control of magnetorheological liquid in footwear with bladders and internal flexibility sipes
US9339074B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2016-05-17 Frampton E. Ellis Microprocessor control of bladders in footwear soles with internal flexibility sipes
US9107475B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2015-08-18 Frampton E. Ellis Microprocessor control of bladders in footwear soles with internal flexibility sipes
US8925117B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2015-01-06 Frampton E. Ellis Clothing and apparel with internal flexibility sipes and at least one attachment between surfaces defining a sipe
US9642411B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2017-05-09 Frampton E. Ellis Surgically implantable device enclosed in two bladders configured to slide relative to each other and including a faraday cage
US9681696B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2017-06-20 Frampton E. Ellis Helmet and/or a helmet liner including an electronic control system controlling the flow resistance of a magnetorheological liquid in compartments
US8873914B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2014-10-28 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear sole sections including bladders with internal flexibility sipes therebetween and an attachment between sipe surfaces
US10021938B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2018-07-17 Frampton E. Ellis Furniture with internal flexibility sipes, including chairs and beds
US11039658B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2021-06-22 Frampton E. Ellis Structural elements or support elements with internal flexibility sipes
US11503876B2 (en) 2004-11-22 2022-11-22 Frampton E. Ellis Footwear or orthotic sole with microprocessor control of a bladder with magnetorheological fluid
US9568946B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2017-02-14 Frampton E. Ellis Microchip with faraday cages and internal flexibility sipes
CN109665310A (en) * 2018-12-21 2019-04-23 季华实验室 A kind of flexible crawl mechanism of shoe body palletizing apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6487795B1 (en) 2002-12-03
US6918197B2 (en) 2005-07-19
US20030046830A1 (en) 2003-03-13
ATE199120T1 (en) 2001-02-15
ES2155820T3 (en) 2001-06-01
DE69133171D1 (en) 2003-01-16
AU7177291A (en) 1991-08-05
DE69132537D1 (en) 2001-03-22
US7234249B2 (en) 2007-06-26
DE69132537T2 (en) 2001-06-07
DE69133171T2 (en) 2003-11-13
EP0594579B1 (en) 2001-02-14
ATE228785T1 (en) 2002-12-15
US7174658B2 (en) 2007-02-13
GR3035800T3 (en) 2001-07-31
US20050241183A1 (en) 2005-11-03
JPH05503642A (en) 1993-06-17
DK0594579T3 (en) 2001-06-18
US20050086837A1 (en) 2005-04-28
US6584706B1 (en) 2003-07-01
US7334356B2 (en) 2008-02-26
EP0594579A1 (en) 1994-05-04
EP0998860A1 (en) 2000-05-10
JP3293071B2 (en) 2002-06-17
US20030208926A1 (en) 2003-11-13
EP0998860B1 (en) 2002-12-04
EP0594579A4 (en) 1993-04-15
US20050217143A1 (en) 2005-10-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6584706B1 (en) Shoe sole structures
US7647710B2 (en) Shoe sole structures
US7562468B2 (en) Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
US7793429B2 (en) Shoe sole orthotic structures and computer controlled compartments
US20020014021A1 (en) Shoe sole structures
CA2367633A1 (en) Removable rounded midsole structures and chambers with computer processor-controlled variable pressure
EP1002475B1 (en) Shoe sole structures with Stacked Compartments

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LU NL SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1991902613

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1991902613

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1991902613

Country of ref document: EP