WO1992017265A1 - Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes - Google Patents

Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1992017265A1
WO1992017265A1 PCT/US1992/001975 US9201975W WO9217265A1 WO 1992017265 A1 WO1992017265 A1 WO 1992017265A1 US 9201975 W US9201975 W US 9201975W WO 9217265 A1 WO9217265 A1 WO 9217265A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
membrane
membranes
less
polymer
casting
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1992/001975
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Robert F. Zepf
Original Assignee
Memtec America Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Memtec America Corporation filed Critical Memtec America Corporation
Priority to EP92908893A priority Critical patent/EP0589897B1/en
Priority to JP50833292A priority patent/JP3416131B2/en
Priority to DE69229861T priority patent/DE69229861T2/en
Publication of WO1992017265A1 publication Critical patent/WO1992017265A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/66Polymers having sulfur in the main chain, with or without nitrogen, oxygen or carbon only
    • B01D71/68Polysulfones; Polyethersulfones
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/228Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion characterised by specific membranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0011Casting solutions therefor
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0011Casting solutions therefor
    • B01D67/00113Pretreatment of the casting solutions, e.g. thermal treatment or ageing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D67/00Processes specially adapted for manufacturing semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus
    • B01D67/0002Organic membrane manufacture
    • B01D67/0009Organic membrane manufacture by phase separation, sol-gel transition, evaporation or solvent quenching
    • B01D67/0013Casting processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D69/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D69/02Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by their form, structure or properties; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor characterised by their properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2325/00Details relating to properties of membranes
    • B01D2325/02Details relating to pores or porosity of the membranes
    • B01D2325/022Asymmetric membranes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to ultraporous and microporous membranes which are useful in materials separations, by filtration, dialysis, and the like, and as supports and containment media for materials, and related uses.
  • it relates to highly asymmetric, integral membranes with a skin and a porous sub-structure or support region.
  • a wide diversity of polymer membranes are known, and have attained wide applicability in diverse uses. Such membranes are characterized by a variety of properties and characteristics, and the selection of a membranes for a particular use is generally a function of the properties required or desired.
  • Ultraporous membranes are generally those with an effective controlling pore diameter of less than about 0.050 micrometers (or sometimes considered to be less than about 0.025 micrometers), down to as 0.005 micrometers, which is the realm of the size of a molecule of, for example, simple sugars and the like.
  • Microporous membranes are those with effective limiting pore diameters of greater than ultraporous, normally greater than about 0.050 micrometers, up to about 1 micrometer, or occasionally more .
  • pore diameter is employed to represent the span across skin pores or controlling pores of a membrane. It is not intended to suggest that all pores are circular and, indeed, most are not, as those of ordinary skill in the art will understand and as FIG. 2 illustrates. Smaller pore membranes extend into the reverse osmosis region and below that into the gas separation region. Reverse osmosis membranes are used for ionic separations, under high applied pressure differentials, sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure, and are sometimes said to be dependent on a mechanism which is often characterized as intermolecular dissolution. Such membranes have a dense, non-porous surface skin, and do not function by effects dependent on seive-like characteristics.
  • reverse osmosis is, in material part, dependent on the os olarity of a solution as a determinant of the separatory characteristics of the reverse osmosis operation, while ultraporous and microporous membranes pass or retain materials predominantly on the basis of their size, at applied pressure differential which are commonly far less, often an order of magnitude less, than reverse osmosis operations, and are ordinarily considered to be substantially different in kind.
  • Gas separation membranes operate on a molecular scale and fractionate gas mixtures based on size and absorption/desorption characteristics.
  • porous membranes An important property of porous membranes is their permeability to flow. In the majority of applications, it is commonly desirable to process effectively the greatest volume of a feed material in the least amount of time. All other things being equal, the higher the flow rate of filtrate or related materials through the membrane, the higher the efficiency and economy of the procedure. It has long been known that flow rates are proportional to pore diameters, and pore population. Taken together, these define an effective area through which fluids may pass. In practice, the relationship is ordinarily very approximate and highly variable. Membranes may have a skin or may be skinless, i.e., with an isotropic structure from one face to the other.
  • a cast liquid film of adequate polymer concentration is quenched in a strong non-solvent, as with polysulfone solutions (or dispersions) quenched in water, the result is a "skinned" membrane, i.e., one with considerably smaller pores on the "skin" side than on the opposite side.
  • the quench liquid is a weak non-solvent, e.g., by adding solvent to the water, a more open skin and ultimately a skinless membrane can be produced.
  • Membranes can have different structures, generally determined by the technique by which it is synthesized. Examples include fibrous, granular, cellular, and spinodal, and they may be symmetrical, or asymmetric, isotropic or anisotropic (i.e., graded pore density) .
  • Fibrous microstructure is most commonly associated with biaxial stretching of films of polymers. This is commonly employed, for example, in the production of porous membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON) , in the microporous membranes commercially available as GORETEX, among others. It is inherent in the nature of the process that the result is a skinless, symmetrical membrane .
  • TEFLON polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Granular microstructure can be characteristic of membranes formed by the precipitation of polymer from certain formulations by a nucleation and growth mechanism. Globules or granules of precipitated polymer form and grow, and fuse with other such globules at their points of contact, leaving voids in the interstices which contribute the porosity of the granular mass. Such structures frequently contain "macrovoids” or "finger voids” in regions adjacent to skin imperfections which allow the quench liquid to penetrate the interior. The voids consequently are also skinned and lead to reduced membrane 5 permeability. This occurs most commonly in ultraporous and reverse osmosis membranes. The techniques for the formation of such membranes are illustrated by Michaels, U.S. 3,615,024. The granular microstructure and characteristic "macrovoids” are illustrated by the 0 photomicrographs shown in Wang, U.S. 3,988,245.
  • Cellular pore structures which are honeycombed or sponge-like in appearance, are dependent presumably on a precipitation rate that is slower than with granular structures containing macrovoids. They can be skinned cr 5 unskinned. The latter structure generally is formed when the precipitation agent is moisture in the air (nc liquid quenching during the curing process) .
  • a network cf thin struts creates the system of contiguous polyhedral shaped cells. Liquid quenched membranes of this type are often C associated with a dense or ultraporous skin.
  • Spinodal microstructure occurs when the polymer is precipitated by a spinodal decomposition mechanism, characterized by the formation of two separate liquid phases, one polymer rich and the ether 5 polymer poor, under conditions wherein each phase is continuous and dispersed in * a characteristic pattern at the point at which the polymer precipitation occurs.
  • the C resulting membrane may be, on the one hand, skinless, symmetrical, and uniform throughout, cr skinned, asymmetric, and non-isotropic.
  • spinodal structure is intended to mean the characteristic structure attained when a membrane is precipitated by spinodal decomposition, and to reflect the features illustrated ir.
  • FIG. 1 and, in different scale, FIG. 8 which illustrate, by S ⁇ M photo icroscopy the remaining structure when the two, intertangled and intermixed continuous phases of spinodal decomposition are achieved.
  • the spinodal structure represents one of the two continuous phases formed by the precipitated polymer, the other being the void volume within the structure.
  • the skinless symmetrical variety may be formed by thermal quench techniques or by solvent evaporation techniques. Thermal quenching techniques are illustrated by Castro, U.S. 4,247,498.
  • Skinned membranes with a highly asymmetric support structure are shown in Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,629,563, and Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,774,039. These membranes are formed by spinodal decomposition induced by solvent extraction from a cast metastable dispersion of two liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, in a liquid quench bath.
  • Some physical properties including tensile strength and elongation at break, are often lower than desirable, and lower than required for the integrity of some otherwise desirable uses of these membranes.
  • the present invention is intended as, and has as its primary object, an improvement on the process and product of Wrasidlo, cited above.
  • the disclosure of the Wrasidlo patents is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the present invention provides an improved method for making the ultraporous and microporous membranes, wherein interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath is limited to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, and where the casting temperature of the dispersion is materially reduced.
  • ultraporous and microporous membranes are produced which are substantially free of polymer spheres entrained in the support, have increased tensile strength and elongation at break, a materially reduced standard deviation in controlling pore diameter, and an increased population of skin pores, resulting in and demonstrated by exceptionally high flow rates in relation to the controlling pore diameter.
  • FIG. 1 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic asymmetric spinodal structure of the support region of membranes of the present invention, in a cross section of a fracture face at an enlargement of 650X.
  • FIG. 2 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic skin pores of a membrane of the present invention at an enlargement of 3,000X.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship of bubble point and flow for membranes of the present invention compared to comparable, historical values for membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship of increase in flow rate of the membranes of the invention over the corresponding historical values of production of Wrasidlo membranes of comparable bubble point.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of bubble point covariance for membranes of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph of flow rate covariance for membranes of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
  • FIG. 7 is reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with Example II of Wrasidlo, showing the high population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,80OX. A spinodal structure is apparent.
  • FIG. 8 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with the present invention, showing the very low population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,80OX. The spinodal structure of the membrane is shown in detail.
  • the present invention is directed to improved membranes, and to the improved method for making such membranes.
  • a characterization of the method for making membranes is described and characterized initially.
  • the major elements which differ from Wrasidlo are found in the limitation of the interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, and the employment of a casting temperature of the dispersion materially less than those commonly employed in the usual techniques, generally on the order of about 6 to 14°C or more.
  • Other process parameters may be subject to adjustment in relation to these parameters to assure the maintenance of the requisite properties in the membrane produced, but these are generally minor in degree and are reactive to and compensatory for the primary changes in the operating conditions and steps.
  • the necessary casting temperature will be on the order of 6 to 14 or more, often on the order of about 10 to 12, °C below the casting temperature appropriate to 1 second environmental dwell time.
  • the lower casting temperature is an important benefit to the process. It has been learned that lower temperatures make the system less variable and less vulnerable to variation in substantially all parameters.
  • the method of the present invention involves the essential steps of mixing a polymer, a solvent, and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid- liquid dispersion consisting of a polymer-rich phase and a solvent-rich (polymer-poor) phase within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, casting the dispersion into a thin film at the casting temperature, passing the cast layer within a time of less than 0.5 seconds at the casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which the solvent is freely miscible and in which the polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of the polymer by spinodal decomposition, and recovering the membrane from the quench bath.
  • the polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500. All proportions are in weight percent.
  • O.D. optical density of the dispersion. Casting temperature is given in * C.
  • Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
  • the polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500.
  • O.D. is optical density of the dispersion.
  • Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
  • the residence time between the casting operation and the quench bath is reduced by one order of magnitude.
  • a reduction in casting temperature on the order of about 10"C is also imposed.
  • the dwell time should be kept below 0.5 seconds, and preferably below 0.25 seconds, and is desirably the minimum that can be achieved with the constraints of the casting equipment employed.
  • the casting dispersion should, as noted in the Tables, have an optical density of from about 0.5 to 1, depending on the pore diameter sought; generally, higher optical densities produce higher pore diameters .
  • the casting dispersion is ordinarily cast onto a moving support by means of a doctor blade with a knife gap of typically about 250 to 450 micrometers, often about 300 micrometers; after the quench, the membrane produced is typically about 85 to 105 micrometers in thickness for ultraporous membranes, and about 105 to about 145 for microporous membranes.
  • the values may be increased or decreased as desired, as is well known in the art. While as described, the procedure produces flat sheet membrane, the present invention is equally applicable to casting -14-
  • the casting dispersion is spin cast through a hollow die rather than being cast onto a support in a flat film form.
  • the lumen of the hollow fiber is sometimes formed by air or inert gas and the outside quenched in non-solvent liquid, but usually the quench liquid flows through the center and skins the Lumen. If the lumen is formed by a gas, it should be introduced as close to the quench bath as possible.
  • the die may be immersed in the quench bath in some cases, reducing the atmospheric dwell time of the outer surface of the cast membrane to zero. It is possible, of course, to provide a hollow fiber with both inner and outer skins by employing the quench liquid in both the lumen and the quench bath.
  • the cast dispersion is passed into a quench bath, most commonly of water, frequently at or near the casting temperature.
  • the quench operation precipitates the polymer to produce a skin having the requisite pore sizes, and a support region having the characteristic spinodal structure with a high degree of asymmetry, increasing from the region immediately adjacent to the skin to the opposite face.
  • the resulting membrane is ordinarily washed to free it of entrained solvent, and may be dried to expel additional increments of solvent, diluent, and quench liquid, and thus recover the membrane.
  • the casting operation is amenable to a wide variety of known variations, familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art, as discussed by Wrasidlo and others in the prior art. So long as the criteria defined for the present invention are met, none of these are excluded.
  • the resulting membrane produced by the process cf the present invention shares a number of characteristics in common with those taught by Wrasidlo and used in commerce in the practice of his technology. There are substantial differences which are attained, however.
  • the membrane is produced substantially substantially free of the artifacts of discontinuous dispersion in the casting medium.
  • negligible numbers of polymer spheres have been observed in membranes cast by the method of the present invention. Compare the membrane of the present invention shown in FIG 8 with FIG. 7, showing the prior art problem, which is now largely resolved. The requirement for the removal of such materials as a part of the membrane wash operations is now eliminated or greatly reduced, reducing the time of the wash, the amount of water or other wash constituents is reduced substantially, and production of finished product are simplified.
  • pore diameter of the skin pores is far more consistent, as shown by bubble point testing.
  • Testing of membranes of the present invention shows that the bubble points desired are achieved far more readily and consistently at all points in the casting operation, from start-up to conclusion, with markedly reduced standard deviation in pore diameter for all pore sizes.
  • Pore diameter is the primary quality control parameter in such membranes, and bubble point is the convenient parameter for defining microporous membrane integrity, the ultimate criteria being bacterial or microsphere challenge tests.
  • Another feature of the membranes of the present invention is the material increase in flow rates for a given controlling pore size. While the relationships and physical features of the membrane of the present invention which determine flow rates have not been fully explored as yet, the data show a substantial increase in flow rate as a function of pore diameter (or pore radius, as discussed in Wrasidlo) . The data suggest an increase in the total number of pores produced in the membrane skin, and possibly a narrower distribution of pore diameter, with few pores having a diameter materially less than the controlling pore diameter as determined by bubble point measurements. See FIG. 2. What the data do show with certainty is represented in the data plotted in FIG. 3, which demonstrates flow rate plotted against pore diameter, for the membranes of the examples provided in the present application, including the comparative examples. It is apparent that at a given pore diameter, the flow rate is materially increased in the present invention, when compared to the historical values achieved by the Wrasidlo teachings.
  • the flow rates are less susceptible to variation during manufacture of the membrane, as reflected by a standard deviation in flow rate of normally about 120 or less, more often about 100 or less, and less than 75 except for the largest pore diameters.
  • This improved consistency at the higher flow rates is indicative of a material change in the utility of these membranes for the user, and enables the present invention to assure higher levels of quality assurance to users, particularly those with critical applications for such membranes.
  • covariance of flow rates of the membranes made by the new procedures of the present invention are less than 6, and for most pore diameters, less than 5.
  • FIG. 6 also demonstrates that flow rate covariance of membranes made by the Wrasidlo procedure has historically been greater than 12.5. Standard deviations are materially reduced as well,
  • the consistency achieved in the present invention is a per se benefit in the production and use of the membranes of the present invention, and represents a very substantial gain in productivity and the reduction of scrap or out-of specification materials.
  • the occurrence of scrap has been reduced to a level consistently less than 5% of production, and long production runs with no losses to scrap are now frequently attained.
  • the improved consistency is also of compelling import to the integrity of the membrane offered to users.
  • the improved consistency in pore diameter and in flow rate are accompanied by a material increase in the flow rate for each pore diameter, ranging from an increase in flow rate of from 110 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 65, up to about 500 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 30, representing a gain in flow rate of 10 to 20 percent at a given pore diameter.
  • FIG. 1 A photomicrograph showing the characteristic spinodal structure of the membranes of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1.
  • the structure is that produced by spinodal decomposition of the metastable dispersion in the membrane casting operation, and the figure illustrates the significant asymmetry which makes such membranes highly effective as depth filters, affording the gradual change in the apertures through the support region such that the changing effective pore diameter is progressive.
  • the skin of the membrane is quite thin, and difficult to delineate precisely by photomicroscopy in cross section. Where skin pores are directly observable, as shown in FIG. 2, the number of pores and their general regularity is directly observable.
  • a number of membranes have been made and tested in accordance with the present invention, and compared with the commercially available embodiments of the Wrasidlo technology. These efforts and comparisons are set out in the following examples.
  • each Example represents a roll of membrane, made as described above, bubble point (BP) is reported as the arithmetic mean of all quality control samples taken for each roil.
  • the bubble point represents the pressure, in p ⁇ i, of breakthrough of air applied to a 90 mm disc sample wetted with distilled water, common to the membrane art.
  • Flow is reported as the arithmetic mean of all samples for each roll and represents the flow of distilled water, in ml per minute, passing through a 90 mm disc at an applied pressure of 10 psi.
  • BRK represents tensile strength at break in grams, while ELG is elongation at break, in percent.

Abstract

Ultraporous and microporous polymer membranes cast from metastable dispersions are signifcantly improved by limiting the time of environmental exposure to less than about 0.5, preferably less than 0.25 seconds, between casting and quenching, and reducing the casting temperatures about 10 to about 20 °C lower than the usual prior art values. The resulting membranes have far less debris entrained in the membrane, far more consistent and uniform pore sizes, a substantially greater number of skin pores, and greatly increased flow rates for any given pore diameter.

Description

ULTRAPOROUS AND MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES AND METHOD OF MAKING MEMBRANES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field of the Invention The present invention relates to ultraporous and microporous membranes which are useful in materials separations, by filtration, dialysis, and the like, and as supports and containment media for materials, and related uses. In particular, it relates to highly asymmetric, integral membranes with a skin and a porous sub-structure or support region.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A wide diversity of polymer membranes are known, and have attained wide applicability in diverse uses. Such membranes are characterized by a variety of properties and characteristics, and the selection of a membranes for a particular use is generally a function of the properties required or desired.
The most characteristic property of concern for most applications is the effective controlling pore diameter, which defines what materials may pass through the membrane, and which are retained. Ultraporous membranes are generally those with an effective controlling pore diameter of less than about 0.050 micrometers (or sometimes considered to be less than about 0.025 micrometers), down to as 0.005 micrometers, which is the realm of the size of a molecule of, for example, simple sugars and the like. Microporous membranes are those with effective limiting pore diameters of greater than ultraporous, normally greater than about 0.050 micrometers, up to about 1 micrometer, or occasionally more .
As used in the present application, the tern "pore diameter" is employed to represent the span across skin pores or controlling pores of a membrane. It is not intended to suggest that all pores are circular and, indeed, most are not, as those of ordinary skill in the art will understand and as FIG. 2 illustrates. Smaller pore membranes extend into the reverse osmosis region and below that into the gas separation region. Reverse osmosis membranes are used for ionic separations, under high applied pressure differentials, sufficient to overcome osmotic pressure, and are sometimes said to be dependent on a mechanism which is often characterized as intermolecular dissolution. Such membranes have a dense, non-porous surface skin, and do not function by effects dependent on seive-like characteristics. As a distinguishing characteristic, reverse osmosis is, in material part, dependent on the os olarity of a solution as a determinant of the separatory characteristics of the reverse osmosis operation, while ultraporous and microporous membranes pass or retain materials predominantly on the basis of their size, at applied pressure differential which are commonly far less, often an order of magnitude less, than reverse osmosis operations, and are ordinarily considered to be substantially different in kind. Gas separation membranes operate on a molecular scale and fractionate gas mixtures based on size and absorption/desorption characteristics.
An important property of porous membranes is their permeability to flow. In the majority of applications, it is commonly desirable to process effectively the greatest volume of a feed material in the least amount of time. All other things being equal, the higher the flow rate of filtrate or related materials through the membrane, the higher the efficiency and economy of the procedure. It has long been known that flow rates are proportional to pore diameters, and pore population. Taken together, these define an effective area through which fluids may pass. In practice, the relationship is ordinarily very approximate and highly variable. Membranes may have a skin or may be skinless, i.e., with an isotropic structure from one face to the other. If a cast liquid film of adequate polymer concentration is quenched in a strong non-solvent, as with polysulfone solutions (or dispersions) quenched in water, the result is a "skinned" membrane, i.e., one with considerably smaller pores on the "skin" side than on the opposite side. If the quench liquid is a weak non-solvent, e.g., by adding solvent to the water, a more open skin and ultimately a skinless membrane can be produced.
When a skin is present, as generally in the case with gas separation, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes and sometimes with microporous membranes, it is most often a dense film of polymer material with very small pores that extend into a support region of larger pores. If the pores are large enough, they can be observed by electron scanning microscopy, and this is true in the microporous range. However, because of the limitations of SEM techniques pores may not always be directly observable at diameters of less than about 0.050 micrometers, but their presence can be confirmed by the retentivity characteristics of the membrane.
Membranes can have different structures, generally determined by the technique by which it is synthesized. Examples include fibrous, granular, cellular, and spinodal, and they may be symmetrical, or asymmetric, isotropic or anisotropic (i.e., graded pore density) .
Fibrous microstructure is most commonly associated with biaxial stretching of films of polymers. This is commonly employed, for example, in the production of porous membranes of polytetrafluoroethylene (TEFLON) , in the microporous membranes commercially available as GORETEX, among others. It is inherent in the nature of the process that the result is a skinless, symmetrical membrane .
Granular microstructure can be characteristic of membranes formed by the precipitation of polymer from certain formulations by a nucleation and growth mechanism. Globules or granules of precipitated polymer form and grow, and fuse with other such globules at their points of contact, leaving voids in the interstices which contribute the porosity of the granular mass. Such structures frequently contain "macrovoids" or "finger voids" in regions adjacent to skin imperfections which allow the quench liquid to penetrate the interior. The voids consequently are also skinned and lead to reduced membrane 5 permeability. This occurs most commonly in ultraporous and reverse osmosis membranes. The techniques for the formation of such membranes are illustrated by Michaels, U.S. 3,615,024. The granular microstructure and characteristic "macrovoids" are illustrated by the 0 photomicrographs shown in Wang, U.S. 3,988,245.
Cellular pore structures which are honeycombed or sponge-like in appearance, are dependent presumably on a precipitation rate that is slower than with granular structures containing macrovoids. They can be skinned cr 5 unskinned. The latter structure generally is formed when the precipitation agent is moisture in the air (nc liquid quenching during the curing process) . A network cf thin struts creates the system of contiguous polyhedral shaped cells. Liquid quenched membranes of this type are often C associated with a dense or ultraporous skin.
Spinodal microstructure, as mentioned earlier, occurs when the polymer is precipitated by a spinodal decomposition mechanism, characterized by the formation of two separate liquid phases, one polymer rich and the ether 5 polymer poor, under conditions wherein each phase is continuous and dispersed in * a characteristic pattern at the point at which the polymer precipitation occurs. Depending on the specific characteristics of the technique for attaining the spinodal decomposition mechanism, the C resulting membrane may be, on the one hand, skinless, symmetrical, and uniform throughout, cr skinned, asymmetric, and non-isotropic.
In the present application, the term spinodal structure is intended to mean the characteristic structure attained when a membrane is precipitated by spinodal decomposition, and to reflect the features illustrated ir. FIG. 1 and, in different scale, FIG. 8 which illustrate, by SΞM photo icroscopy the remaining structure when the two, intertangled and intermixed continuous phases of spinodal decomposition are achieved. As those of ordinary skill in the art will understand, the spinodal structure represents one of the two continuous phases formed by the precipitated polymer, the other being the void volume within the structure.
The skinless symmetrical variety may be formed by thermal quench techniques or by solvent evaporation techniques. Thermal quenching techniques are illustrated by Castro, U.S. 4,247,498.
Skinned membranes with a highly asymmetric support structure are shown in Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,629,563, and Wrasidlo, U.S. 4,774,039. These membranes are formed by spinodal decomposition induced by solvent extraction from a cast metastable dispersion of two liquid phases, one polymer rich and the other polymer poor, in a liquid quench bath.
All the various techniques involved, and the membranes produced, have achieved a measure of commercial success. The spinodal microstructure, however, has often been preferred in a number of applications. As a general rule, the structure, affords good mechanical properties, including tensile strength, elongation at break, and the like, the lowest hydraulic resistance to flow of any of the known microstructures, and offers opportunities to take advantage of the internal structure of the support as a depth filter, as a containment medium for materials, and other like advantages. As is well known to the art, the skinless, symmetric varieties have rather different uses that the skinned, highly asymmetric membranes of Wrasidlo. In the dispersion casting technique of Wrasidlo, a number of disadvantages have been encountered. These include the following:
When the polymer is precipitated from the dispersion, there are frequent occurrences of small discontinuities. The reason for this is not fully understood, but the result is the formation, within the microstructure of the membrane support, substantial number, and at time vast numbers of tiny polymer spheres. These discrete spheres are difficult to remove by washing, and substantial numbers may remain in the membrane. This is highly undesirable, in most uses of the membranes, since there are few applications where the introduction of these spheres into a filtrate is acceptable. See the spheres illustrated in FIG. 7, which represent a severe case, after normal washing of the membrane.
The procedure for the formation of the membranes taught by Wrasidlo has over time proved to be excessively variable in the controlling pore diameter, flow rate for a given pore diameter, and in the occurrence of macro flaws in the integrity of the skin, leading to the loss of an unacceptable proportion" of the membranes to a failure to satisfy necessary quality control standards. Quality control rejection of such membranes often has been substantial.
Some physical properties, including tensile strength and elongation at break, are often lower than desirable, and lower than required for the integrity of some otherwise desirable uses of these membranes.
These membranes are often employed in critical applications in the electronics industry, food processing, processing of biological materials, as sterilizing filters, and the like. Deficiencies in meeting the quality control requirements of such sensitive fields of use are quite unacceptable.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to improve the technology by which skinned, asymmetric ultraporous and microporous membranes having a support structure with an asymmetric spinodal structure are produced, and to provide such membranes with improved properties and characteristics, and to satisfy the highest standards of quality control and product integrity.
The present invention is intended as, and has as its primary object, an improvement on the process and product of Wrasidlo, cited above. The disclosure of the Wrasidlo patents is incorporated herein by reference.
In one aspect, the present invention provides an improved method for making the ultraporous and microporous membranes, wherein interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath is limited to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, and where the casting temperature of the dispersion is materially reduced. In another aspect of the present invention, ultraporous and microporous membranes are produced which are substantially free of polymer spheres entrained in the support, have increased tensile strength and elongation at break, a materially reduced standard deviation in controlling pore diameter, and an increased population of skin pores, resulting in and demonstrated by exceptionally high flow rates in relation to the controlling pore diameter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic asymmetric spinodal structure of the support region of membranes of the present invention, in a cross section of a fracture face at an enlargement of 650X. FIG. 2 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing the characteristic skin pores of a membrane of the present invention at an enlargement of 3,000X.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship of bubble point and flow for membranes of the present invention compared to comparable, historical values for membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship of increase in flow rate of the membranes of the invention over the corresponding historical values of production of Wrasidlo membranes of comparable bubble point.
FIG. 5 is a graph of bubble point covariance for membranes of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
FIG. 6 is a graph of flow rate covariance for membranes of the present invention compared to historical, corresponding measurements of membranes of the prior art, represented by the Wrasidlo patents cited above.
FIG. 7 is reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with Example II of Wrasidlo, showing the high population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,80OX. A spinodal structure is apparent.
FIG. 8 is a reproduction of an SEM photomicrograph showing a membrane made in accordance with the present invention, showing the very low population of polymer spheres, in a section of the support region at an enlargement of 1,80OX. The spinodal structure of the membrane is shown in detail.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention is directed to improved membranes, and to the improved method for making such membranes. In the following discussion, a characterization of the method for making membranes is described and characterized initially.
In the method of the present invention, the process of the Wrasidlo patents, discussed and cited hereinabove, is the starting point of the work, and the relevant disclosure of the Wrasidlo method is accordingly incorporated by reference.
In present method, the major elements which differ from Wrasidlo are found in the limitation of the interaction of the cast dispersion with the atmosphere prior to solvent extraction in a quench bath to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, and the employment of a casting temperature of the dispersion materially less than those commonly employed in the usual techniques, generally on the order of about 6 to 14°C or more. Other process parameters may be subject to adjustment in relation to these parameters to assure the maintenance of the requisite properties in the membrane produced, but these are generally minor in degree and are reactive to and compensatory for the primary changes in the operating conditions and steps. It has long been known that the cast film of the metastable dispersion in the Wrasidlo technology interacts with the atmosphere, and that the properties of the membrane, and particularly the skin pores of the membrane, are sensitive to variations in temperature and humidity, velocity and direction of air flow, and perhaps others. Controlling these parameters has received a considerable level of attention and, indeed, some have taken steps intended to take advantage of these interactions. See Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd., G.B. 2, 199,786 A, wherein the exposure and dwell time in the atmosphere and the humidity are increased to attempt to achieve certain benefits. The conventional thinking has been that moisture in the atmosphere initiates the requisite pores at the immediate film/air interface which have diameters proportional to the water vapor concentration and exposure times.
The view in the art for liquid quenched hydrophobic membrane production has at least in part been influenced by the limitations of the commonly employed equipment used to cast and quench such membranes. In large measure, such equipment has been designed and built on the basis that relatively long exposure times in the atmosphere are generally beneficial. It has been common to employ residence times of atmospheric exposure greater than 1 second, and often longer than 5 seconds. Most equipment cannot attain dwell times between the casting operation and the quench bath of less than 1 second without specific modifications. Since such modifications run counter to the conventional wisdom in the art, there has never been any incentive to do so. It has now been found that residence times of materially less than 1 second, employed with a materially reduced casting temperature, are of quite surprising and unexpected benefit. As discussed in detail below, the membrane product is quite substantially improved in a number of properties and parameters.
As Wrasidlo has previously pointed out, all the parameters of the casting procedure and the conditions of operation are mutually interdependent. A change of one parameter will require a correlating change in at least one other parameter. If the environmental residence time is reduced, as required in the present invention, to less than 0.5 seconds, and preferably less than 0.25 seconds, for a casting formulation and conditions which had been developed for a longer exposure time, of, say, 1 to 5 seconds, an unsuitable membrane will be obtained if no other parameters are adjusted to balance the effect on the system of the rapid passage into the quench liquid. It has also been known in the art that for any given dispersion and any given set of casting conditions, there is a relatively narrow casting temperature variance which will be effective. This is generally monitored directly,- and correlated with the optical density of the metastable dispersion, in order to produce the desired membrane. If the temperature of the casting dope is too high or too low, unsuitable membrane or even no membrane at all will be produced. In the context of the present invention, the appropriate temperature will be lower than that for the same dispersion when cast at longer environmental dwell times, but it is not possible to define the precise temperature without working trials of the system and confirmation of the results through analytical techniques common to the art. As a general rule, the necessary casting temperature will be on the order of 6 to 14 or more, often on the order of about 10 to 12, °C below the casting temperature appropriate to 1 second environmental dwell time.
The lower casting temperature is an important benefit to the process. It has been learned that lower temperatures make the system less variable and less vulnerable to variation in substantially all parameters.
As the temperature gets closer to ambient temperatures, as one example, distortions of the casting equipment through thermal expansion and like effects are reduced, and it has proved simpler and more reliable to maintain working tolerances. This in turn provides better control over the casting and quenching operations, so that quality of the product is easier to establish and maintain. Utility costs of the operation are reduced and, in new installations, simpler temperature control equipment may prove effective. It is believed, although there is no wish to be bound thereby, that reduced casting temperature plays a direct role in the reduction of polymer spheres entrained in the membrane as an artifact of small proportions of a separately dispersed phase in the casting dispersion. See FIG. 7, which shows such polymer spheres in a prior art membrane. It appears that the spinodal decomposition mechanism operates more uniformly and exclusively at the lower temperatures employed in the present invention, resulting in substantially no incidence of such polymer spheres. It is possible that this result is partly or wholly attributable to some other factor involved in the system, of course, but it remains the case that the high temperature casting of the prior art consistently produced such polymer spheres, and few and often none are observed in the procedure of the present invention.
In practice, the method of the present invention involves the essential steps of mixing a polymer, a solvent, and a non-solvent to produce a metastable liquid- liquid dispersion consisting of a polymer-rich phase and a solvent-rich (polymer-poor) phase within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, casting the dispersion into a thin film at the casting temperature, passing the cast layer within a time of less than 0.5 seconds at the casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which the solvent is freely miscible and in which the polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of the polymer by spinodal decomposition, and recovering the membrane from the quench bath.
As noted in the Wrasidlo patents, cited above and incorporated herein by reference, a substantial number of polymers, solvents, non-solvents, and quench liquids have been employed, and have been formulated into casting dispersions suitable for casting membranes with a wide spectrum of pore diameters. All of these are contemplated in the present invention. For convenience, the present invention is discussed in the most common of these systems, where the polymer is a polysulfone, the solvent is dimethylformamide, the non-solvent diluent is t-amyl alcohol, and the quench liquid is water.
There are several ' standard pore diameters which have achieved common commercial acceptance for such polyysulfone membranes. These include molecular weight cutoff values of 10,000 and 100,000 Daltons, and pore diameters of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.45 micrometers. The basis for casting the commercially available membranes according to Wrasidlo is shown in Table I:
Figure imgf000014_0001
Notes:
The polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500. All proportions are in weight percent.
O.D. is optical density of the dispersion. Casting temperature is given in *C.
Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
The corresponding parameters for the same membranes cast in accordance with the present invention are shown in Table II:
Figure imgf000015_0001
Notes:
The polysulfone is Amoco Udell P-3500.
All proportions are in weight percent.
O.D. is optical density of the dispersion.
Casting temperature is given in "C
Time to quench is the dwell time in seconds between the doctor blade and the quench bath.
As those of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize, the residence time between the casting operation and the quench bath is reduced by one order of magnitude. A reduction in casting temperature on the order of about 10"C is also imposed. In a more general sense, the dwell time should be kept below 0.5 seconds, and preferably below 0.25 seconds, and is desirably the minimum that can be achieved with the constraints of the casting equipment employed.
The casting dispersion should, as noted in the Tables, have an optical density of from about 0.5 to 1, depending on the pore diameter sought; generally, higher optical densities produce higher pore diameters .
The casting dispersion is ordinarily cast onto a moving support by means of a doctor blade with a knife gap of typically about 250 to 450 micrometers, often about 300 micrometers; after the quench, the membrane produced is typically about 85 to 105 micrometers in thickness for ultraporous membranes, and about 105 to about 145 for microporous membranes. The values may be increased or decreased as desired, as is well known in the art. While as described, the procedure produces flat sheet membrane, the present invention is equally applicable to casting -14-
hollow fiber membrane, and will indeed facilitate the dispersion casting operation by reducing or even eliminating the atmospheric exposure time previously thought to be necessary to such procedures. In application of the present invention to the casting of hollow fiber, the casting dispersion is spin cast through a hollow die rather than being cast onto a support in a flat film form. The lumen of the hollow fiber is sometimes formed by air or inert gas and the outside quenched in non-solvent liquid, but usually the quench liquid flows through the center and skins the Lumen. If the lumen is formed by a gas, it should be introduced as close to the quench bath as possible. As those familiar with hollow fiber casting are aware, the die may be immersed in the quench bath in some cases, reducing the atmospheric dwell time of the outer surface of the cast membrane to zero. It is possible, of course, to provide a hollow fiber with both inner and outer skins by employing the quench liquid in both the lumen and the quench bath.
The cast dispersion is passed into a quench bath, most commonly of water, frequently at or near the casting temperature. In the bath, the quench operation precipitates the polymer to produce a skin having the requisite pore sizes, and a support region having the characteristic spinodal structure with a high degree of asymmetry, increasing from the region immediately adjacent to the skin to the opposite face. The resulting membrane is ordinarily washed to free it of entrained solvent, and may be dried to expel additional increments of solvent, diluent, and quench liquid, and thus recover the membrane.
The casting operation is amenable to a wide variety of known variations, familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art, as discussed by Wrasidlo and others in the prior art. So long as the criteria defined for the present invention are met, none of these are excluded.
The resulting membrane produced by the process cf the present invention shares a number of characteristics in common with those taught by Wrasidlo and used in commerce in the practice of his technology. There are substantial differences which are attained, however.
It is a very great advantage of the improvements provided by the present invention that the membrane is produced substantially substantially free of the artifacts of discontinuous dispersion in the casting medium. To date, only negligible numbers of polymer spheres have been observed in membranes cast by the method of the present invention. Compare the membrane of the present invention shown in FIG 8 with FIG. 7, showing the prior art problem, which is now largely resolved. The requirement for the removal of such materials as a part of the membrane wash operations is now eliminated or greatly reduced, reducing the time of the wash, the amount of water or other wash constituents is reduced substantially, and production of finished product are simplified.
It is another significant achievement of the present invention that the pore diameter of the skin pores is far more consistent, as shown by bubble point testing. Testing of membranes of the present invention shows that the bubble points desired are achieved far more readily and consistently at all points in the casting operation, from start-up to conclusion, with markedly reduced standard deviation in pore diameter for all pore sizes. Pore diameter is the primary quality control parameter in such membranes, and bubble point is the convenient parameter for defining microporous membrane integrity, the ultimate criteria being bacterial or microsphere challenge tests.
Indeed, for most pore diameters, it is now possible to maintain production at bubble point measurements having a standard deviation of less than 3, compared to a historical value of about 5 or more for such membranes, although in smaller pore sizes it may be necessary to accept a slightly higher standard deviation of less than 5, compared to a historical value of 9 or more for comparable membranes. Covariance in bubble point is less than 8, and ordinarily and preferably less than 5, compared to historic values of 9 or higher, and most often above 11 or even higher, as illustrated in FIG. 5. The skin pores are illustrated in FIG. 2, revealing both a high population of pores, a large proportion of which are at or near the effective controlling pore diameter.
Another feature of the membranes of the present invention is the material increase in flow rates for a given controlling pore size. While the relationships and physical features of the membrane of the present invention which determine flow rates have not been fully explored as yet, the data show a substantial increase in flow rate as a function of pore diameter (or pore radius, as discussed in Wrasidlo) . The data suggest an increase in the total number of pores produced in the membrane skin, and possibly a narrower distribution of pore diameter, with few pores having a diameter materially less than the controlling pore diameter as determined by bubble point measurements. See FIG. 2. What the data do show with certainty is represented in the data plotted in FIG. 3, which demonstrates flow rate plotted against pore diameter, for the membranes of the examples provided in the present application, including the comparative examples. It is apparent that at a given pore diameter, the flow rate is materially increased in the present invention, when compared to the historical values achieved by the Wrasidlo teachings.
In addition, the flow rates are less susceptible to variation during manufacture of the membrane, as reflected by a standard deviation in flow rate of normally about 120 or less, more often about 100 or less, and less than 75 except for the largest pore diameters. This improved consistency at the higher flow rates is indicative of a material change in the utility of these membranes for the user, and enables the present invention to assure higher levels of quality assurance to users, particularly those with critical applications for such membranes. As shown in FIG. 6, covariance of flow rates of the membranes made by the new procedures of the present invention are less than 6, and for most pore diameters, less than 5. FIG. 6 also demonstrates that flow rate covariance of membranes made by the Wrasidlo procedure has historically been greater than 12.5. Standard deviations are materially reduced as well,
The consistency achieved in the present invention is a per se benefit in the production and use of the membranes of the present invention, and represents a very substantial gain in productivity and the reduction of scrap or out-of specification materials. The occurrence of scrap has been reduced to a level consistently less than 5% of production, and long production runs with no losses to scrap are now frequently attained. The improved consistency is also of compelling import to the integrity of the membrane offered to users.
As shown in FIG. 4, the improved consistency in pore diameter and in flow rate are accompanied by a material increase in the flow rate for each pore diameter, ranging from an increase in flow rate of from 110 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 65, up to about 500 ml/min. at a bubble point of about 30, representing a gain in flow rate of 10 to 20 percent at a given pore diameter.
A photomicrograph showing the characteristic spinodal structure of the membranes of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. As those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, the structure is that produced by spinodal decomposition of the metastable dispersion in the membrane casting operation, and the figure illustrates the significant asymmetry which makes such membranes highly effective as depth filters, affording the gradual change in the apertures through the support region such that the changing effective pore diameter is progressive.
The skin of the membrane is quite thin, and difficult to delineate precisely by photomicroscopy in cross section. Where skin pores are directly observable, as shown in FIG. 2, the number of pores and their general regularity is directly observable. A number of membranes have been made and tested in accordance with the present invention, and compared with the commercially available embodiments of the Wrasidlo technology. These efforts and comparisons are set out in the following examples.
SPECIFIC EXAMPLES In the following examples, the formulations employed are those set forth in Table I and Table II, above. The conditions of casting are also those set forth in the tables. Both the examples of the present invention and those based on the Wrasidlo teachings were performed on the same equipment, and under the same conditions; the only differences are those set forth in the above Tables. As inspection will show, no adjustments of the formulations to achieve specifically targeted pore diameters were made in most cases, with the results that some of the bubble point values are higher than desired. Further adjustments to achieve the desired bubble point, reflecting a specifically required pore diameter are know to the art, and are specifically taught by Wrasidlo.
A plurality of rolls of membrane were cast. Each roll was sampled at a plurality of predetermined locations, across the web and throughout the length of the cast membrane. The values for each sample were averaged, and the standard deviation determined, for both bubble point and flow rate. The results obtained are shown in the following Table III:
TABLE III
Exam le Flow σ BP σ BRK σ ELG σ
Figure imgf000020_0001
30-4 2311 45 37 1 . 1 518 16 27
Figure imgf000020_0002
TABLE III, cont.
Figure imgf000021_0001
Figure imgf000022_0001
In the foregoing data in Table III, each Example represents a roll of membrane, made as described above, bubble point (BP) is reported as the arithmetic mean of all quality control samples taken for each roil. The bubble point represents the pressure, in pεi, of breakthrough of air applied to a 90 mm disc sample wetted with distilled water, common to the membrane art. Flow is reported as the arithmetic mean of all samples for each roll and represents the flow of distilled water, in ml per minute, passing through a 90 mm disc at an applied pressure of 10 psi. BRK represents tensile strength at break in grams, while ELG is elongation at break, in percent.
Figure imgf000023_0001
In Table IV, the values reported for each comparative example, the values reported are the arithmetic mean of all values for actual commercial production of a substantial number of rolls of membrane, produced as indicated in Table I, under the same conditions as those employed in the present invention, except as noted above. The principles, preferred embodiments, and modes of operation of the present invention have been described in the forgoing specification and examples. The invention is not intended to be constrained thereby, or construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, since these are intended to be illustrative rather than restrictive.
Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method of making a highly asymmetric integrally skinned polymer membrane, said method comprising:
A. mixing a polymer, a solvent and a non- solvent to produce a metastable liquid-liquid dispersion within the binodal or spinodal at a casting temperature, and having an optical density of from about 0.5 to about 1,
B. casting said dispersion into a thin layer at said casting temperature,
C. passing said cast layer within a time of less than 0.5 seconds at said casting temperature into a solvent extraction quench bath of non-solvent quench liquid in which said solvent is freely iscible and in which said polymer is substantially insoluble, and effecting precipitation of a major proportion of said polymer by spinodal decomposition, and
D. recovering from said quench bath a membrane.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said time is less than about 0.25 seconds. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said time is not more than about 0.1 seconds. . An asymmetric integral skinned polymer membrane comprising:
A. a porous skin having skin pores with a controlling diameter within the range of from about 500
MWCO to about 0.5 micrometers, and a standard deviation of pore diameter, as determined by the bubble point method, of less than 3,
B. a support region having a highly asymmetric spinodal structure,
C. said membrane having a standard deviation of flow rate of less than about 100 and a flow rate covariance of less than about 6. 5. The membrane of claim 4 wherein said polymer is a polysulfone.
6. The membrane of claim 5 wherein said membrane has a standard deviation of flow rate of less than 75 and a flow rate covariance of less than about 5.
7. A membrane product which is the product of the process of claim 1.
PCT/US1992/001975 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes WO1992017265A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP92908893A EP0589897B1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Method of making membranes
JP50833292A JP3416131B2 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Superporous and microporous membranes and their preparation
DE69229861T DE69229861T2 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 METHOD FOR PRODUCING MEMBRANES

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US674,907 1991-03-26
US07/674,907 US5171445A (en) 1991-03-26 1991-03-26 Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1992017265A1 true WO1992017265A1 (en) 1992-10-15

Family

ID=24708376

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1992/001975 WO1992017265A1 (en) 1991-03-26 1992-03-13 Ultraporous and microporous membranes and method of making membranes

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5171445A (en)
EP (2) EP0911074B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3416131B2 (en)
DE (2) DE69233584T2 (en)
ES (2) ES2138597T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1992017265A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999002248A1 (en) * 1997-07-08 1999-01-21 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Highly asymmetric polyethersulfone filtration membranes
EP1666129A1 (en) * 2003-08-07 2006-06-07 Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha Composite porous membrane and process for producing the same

Families Citing this family (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE208653T1 (en) * 1994-03-04 2001-11-15 Usf Filtration & Separations LARGE-PORED MEMBRANE MADE OF SYNTHETIC POLYMERS
US6277281B1 (en) * 1994-03-04 2001-08-21 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Large pore synthetic polymer membranes
US5834107A (en) * 1996-01-22 1998-11-10 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
US6391265B1 (en) * 1996-08-26 2002-05-21 Biosite Diagnostics, Inc. Devices incorporating filters for filtering fluid samples
US6045899A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-04-04 Usf Filtration & Separations Group, Inc. Highly assymetric, hydrophilic, microfiltration membranes having large pore diameters
US6146747A (en) * 1997-01-22 2000-11-14 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
US6258272B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2001-07-10 Usf Filtrations And Separations Group, Inc. Internal hydrophilic membranes from blended anionic copolymers
US7108791B2 (en) * 1999-09-14 2006-09-19 Millipore Corporation High-resolution virus removal methodology and filtration capsule useful therefor
US6612447B1 (en) * 2000-07-24 2003-09-02 Baxter International Inc. Blood collection systems and filters using a porous membrane element
US6736971B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2004-05-18 Cuno Incorporated Pre-metered, unsupported multilayer microporous membrane
JP2005506168A (en) * 2000-08-07 2005-03-03 キュノ、インコーポレーテッド Multi-zone unsupported microporous thin film
US6994789B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2006-02-07 Cuno Incorporated Pre-metered, unsupported multilayer microporous membrane
US6605154B1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2003-08-12 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mounting device
US6695920B1 (en) * 2001-06-27 2004-02-24 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Mandrel for supporting a stent and a method of using the mandrel to coat a stent
US6673154B1 (en) * 2001-06-28 2004-01-06 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mounting device to coat a stent
US6818063B1 (en) * 2002-09-24 2004-11-16 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and method for minimizing coating defects
US7335265B1 (en) 2002-10-08 2008-02-26 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Apparatus and method for coating stents
US7074276B1 (en) 2002-12-12 2006-07-11 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Clamp mandrel fixture and a method of using the same to minimize coating defects
US7354480B1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2008-04-08 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and system for reducing coating defects
US7323209B1 (en) 2003-05-15 2008-01-29 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for coating stents
US7517581B2 (en) * 2003-09-26 2009-04-14 Parker-Hannifin Corporation Semipermeable hydrophilic membrane
US7198675B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2007-04-03 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Stent mandrel fixture and method for selectively coating surfaces of a stent
US8042485B1 (en) 2003-12-30 2011-10-25 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent mandrel fixture and method for coating stents
US8349388B1 (en) 2004-03-18 2013-01-08 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Method of coating a stent
US7648727B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2010-01-19 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Methods for manufacturing a coated stent-balloon assembly
US7892592B1 (en) 2004-11-30 2011-02-22 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Coating abluminal surfaces of stents and other implantable medical devices
US7823533B2 (en) 2005-06-30 2010-11-02 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent fixture and method for reducing coating defects
US7735449B1 (en) 2005-07-28 2010-06-15 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Stent fixture having rounded support structures and method for use thereof
US7867547B2 (en) 2005-12-19 2011-01-11 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Selectively coating luminal surfaces of stents
US7985441B1 (en) 2006-05-04 2011-07-26 Yiwen Tang Purification of polymers for coating applications
US8003156B2 (en) 2006-05-04 2011-08-23 Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Rotatable support elements for stents
US8603530B2 (en) 2006-06-14 2013-12-10 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Nanoshell therapy
US8048448B2 (en) 2006-06-15 2011-11-01 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. Nanoshells for drug delivery
US8017237B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2011-09-13 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Nanoshells on polymers
DE102007029444A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2008-12-24 Goedel, Werner A., Dr. Porous diaphragm for separating particles, liquid drop or mixture of both from gas or liquid, has pores with diameter depending on distance of one of two diaphragm surfaces
US8048441B2 (en) 2007-06-25 2011-11-01 Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Nanobead releasing medical devices
SG178507A1 (en) 2009-08-24 2012-03-29 Oasys Water Inc Forward osmosis membranes
US9156006B2 (en) 2009-12-03 2015-10-13 Yale University High flux thin-film composite forward osmosis and pressure-retarded osmosis membranes
WO2012108914A2 (en) 2010-10-04 2012-08-16 Oasys Water, Inc. Thin film composite heat exchangers
FR2992227B1 (en) * 2012-06-20 2022-04-01 Commissariat Energie Atomique FILTRATION ASSEMBLY FOR FILTERING NANOPARTICLES COMPRISING A FILTER AND A FILTER SUPPORT, ASSOCIATED APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING THE ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR COLLECTING AND ANALYZING ASSOCIATED NANOPARTICLES.
US11241657B2 (en) 2019-11-22 2022-02-08 Pall Corporation Filter for removing silica from ultra pure water and method of use

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3158532A (en) * 1960-12-06 1964-11-24 Pall Corp Tapered pore filter elements
US3709774A (en) * 1970-05-13 1973-01-09 Gen Electric Preparation of asymmetric polymer membranes
US3883626A (en) * 1972-11-21 1975-05-13 Asahi Chemical Ind Porous cellulose acetate membrane and a process for the manufacture of same
US3988245A (en) * 1971-09-07 1976-10-26 Aqua-Chem, Inc. Anisotropic polyvinyl formal resin microporous membrane and its preparation
US4177150A (en) * 1976-09-08 1979-12-04 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Dried porous acrylonitrile polymer membrane, process for producing same and separators made therefrom
US4220543A (en) * 1977-09-06 1980-09-02 Kuraray Co., Ltd. Ethylene-vinyl alcohol membranes having improved properties and a method of producing the same
US4247498A (en) * 1976-08-30 1981-01-27 Akzona Incorporated Methods for making microporous products
US4629563A (en) * 1980-03-14 1986-12-16 Brunswick Corporation Asymmetric membranes
US4774039A (en) * 1980-03-14 1988-09-27 Brunswick Corporation Dispersing casting of integral skinned highly asymmetric polymer membranes
US4814082A (en) * 1986-10-20 1989-03-21 Memtec North America Corporation Ultrafiltration thin film membranes

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3158532A (en) * 1960-12-06 1964-11-24 Pall Corp Tapered pore filter elements
US3709774A (en) * 1970-05-13 1973-01-09 Gen Electric Preparation of asymmetric polymer membranes
US3988245A (en) * 1971-09-07 1976-10-26 Aqua-Chem, Inc. Anisotropic polyvinyl formal resin microporous membrane and its preparation
US3883626A (en) * 1972-11-21 1975-05-13 Asahi Chemical Ind Porous cellulose acetate membrane and a process for the manufacture of same
US4247498A (en) * 1976-08-30 1981-01-27 Akzona Incorporated Methods for making microporous products
US4177150A (en) * 1976-09-08 1979-12-04 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Dried porous acrylonitrile polymer membrane, process for producing same and separators made therefrom
US4220543A (en) * 1977-09-06 1980-09-02 Kuraray Co., Ltd. Ethylene-vinyl alcohol membranes having improved properties and a method of producing the same
US4629563A (en) * 1980-03-14 1986-12-16 Brunswick Corporation Asymmetric membranes
US4774039A (en) * 1980-03-14 1988-09-27 Brunswick Corporation Dispersing casting of integral skinned highly asymmetric polymer membranes
US4629563B1 (en) * 1980-03-14 1997-06-03 Memtec North America Asymmetric membranes
US4814082A (en) * 1986-10-20 1989-03-21 Memtec North America Corporation Ultrafiltration thin film membranes

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP0589897A4 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999002248A1 (en) * 1997-07-08 1999-01-21 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Highly asymmetric polyethersulfone filtration membranes
EP1666129A1 (en) * 2003-08-07 2006-06-07 Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha Composite porous membrane and process for producing the same
EP1666129A4 (en) * 2003-08-07 2009-07-15 Asahi Chemical Ind Composite porous membrane and process for producing the same
US8999167B2 (en) 2003-08-07 2015-04-07 Asahi Kasei Medical Co., Ltd. Composite porous membrane and process for producing the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0589897B1 (en) 1999-08-25
EP0911074B1 (en) 2005-12-21
ES2256908T3 (en) 2006-07-16
EP0589897A4 (en) 1994-07-06
DE69233584D1 (en) 2006-01-26
JP3416131B2 (en) 2003-06-16
ES2138597T3 (en) 2000-01-16
US5171445A (en) 1992-12-15
DE69229861D1 (en) 1999-09-30
DE69233584T2 (en) 2006-08-10
EP0589897A1 (en) 1994-04-06
JPH06506146A (en) 1994-07-14
EP0911074A1 (en) 1999-04-28
DE69229861T2 (en) 2000-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0589897B1 (en) Method of making membranes
US5188734A (en) Ultraporous and microporous integral membranes
Soroko et al. Impact of TiO2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of crosslinked polyimide organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes
US6056903A (en) Preparation of polyethersulfone membranes
US5886059A (en) Highly asymmetric polyethersulfone filtration membranes
EP1842581B1 (en) Method for preparing highly asymmetric ultrafiltration membranes
EP0121911B1 (en) Hollow fiber filter medium and process for preparing the same
US6165363A (en) Hollow fiber type filtration membrane
WO1999059707A1 (en) Highly porous polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
JP3467940B2 (en) Composite membrane, method of making and using the same
IE45467B1 (en) Semipermeable membranes and method for producing same
EP0247597B1 (en) Process for producing porous membranes
AU715033B2 (en) Polyacrylonitrile-based filtration membrane in a hollow fiber state
AU735146B2 (en) Ultraporous and microporous membranes
US4968470A (en) Asymmetric permselective polyacetylene membranes and process for the formation thereof
KR100429355B1 (en) Composition including polyethylene glycol for preparing microporous polyethersulfone membrane and method for preparing microporous membrane using the same
Popescu et al. The influence of surfactants on the wetting of hydrophobic microporous surfaces
CA2060258A1 (en) Fixed plate casting system
JPS61118106A (en) Production of anisotropic filtering membrane
JPH11244675A (en) Production of membrane

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LU MC NL SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1992908893

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1992908893

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1992908893

Country of ref document: EP