WO1996001123A1 - Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent - Google Patents
Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1996001123A1 WO1996001123A1 PCT/US1995/008309 US9508309W WO9601123A1 WO 1996001123 A1 WO1996001123 A1 WO 1996001123A1 US 9508309 W US9508309 W US 9508309W WO 9601123 A1 WO9601123 A1 WO 9601123A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- somatotropin
- bovine
- bst
- period
- cattle
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K38/00—Medicinal preparations containing peptides
- A61K38/16—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- A61K38/17—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- A61K38/22—Hormones
- A61K38/27—Growth hormone [GH] (Somatotropin)
Definitions
- the invention relates to the treatment of beef cattle during the finishing stage of growth.
- the invention xelates to treating beef cattle during the finishing stage of growth in a feed lot to increase weight gain and to increase the proportion of weight gain which appears in carcass components, significantly increasing both dressing percentage and carcass weight.
- Bovine somatotropin (bST) , usually in the form of recombinant bST (rbST) , is a broad-acting polypeptide hormone which influences a wide range of complex functions in cattle, including growth rate, maturation, milk production and the like.
- bST recombinant bST
- rbST recombinant bST
- bST treatment typically decreases the dressing percentage of the cattle.
- the body weight When cattle are slaughtered, the body weight consists of carcass weight, non-carcass body components, and digestive fill.
- the carcass weight is the weight of the carcass, including the kidneys, but not including the head, hide, hooves, viscera including digestive fill, and other internal organs.
- the ratio of the carcass weight of the animal to the total body weight in percent is referred to as the dressing percentage.
- bST administration to beef cattle during the finishing stage of growth has also been found, when continued substantially until slaughter, to increase the proportion of weight gain which appears in non-carcass components. This calculation can frequently be made from data presented in the prior art references. Thus, bST-induced increase in body weight has typically been disproportionately allocated to commercially less- valuable non-carcass components of the animals.
- the invention comprises a method of preparing beef cattle for slaughter.
- a source of bST is implanted in the intraperitoneal space of beef cattle in the finishing stage of growth being prepared for slaughter.
- bST is released in the intraperitoneal space at a rate and a dose effective for increasing the body weight (BW) or feed conversion efficiency (FE) or carcass weight (CW) or average daily gain (ADG) of beef cattle in the finishing stage of growth over an extended period of time ending substantially at slaughter of the animals.
- the animals are treated subcutaneously or intraperitoneally with an estrogenic agent at a dose effective for increasing the body or carcass weight (BW or CW) of beef cattle in the finishing stage of growth.
- the dressing percentage and carcass weight of the bST- and estrogenic agent-treated animals are significantly increased.
- the invention relates to a method of preparing beef cattle in the finishing stage of growth for slaughter.
- the finishing stage of growth is the final stage of growth before slaughter, and follows the stocker stage of growth when the bovine receives nutrients primarily from pasturage or hay, optionally with feed supplementation, which in turn follows the calf or suckling stage when the calf receives nutrients primarily from its mother.
- Cattle in the finishing stage of growth are generally nonlactating bovines (steers or heifers) of 12 months (or even as low as 3 months) to 2 years of age who are undergoing rapid growth.
- the finishing stage of growth can be regarded as beginning when the typical beef stocker is about 700 pounds (about 320 kg) of weight.
- Such animals will usually be slaughtered when a weight of about 1000 or 1300 pounds (about 450 kg or 600 kg) or more is reached.
- the finishing stage of growth is a period of time during growth when the bovine is of sufficient size and age when supplied with a suitable feed to undergo a rapid average daily weight gain, for example, an average daily gain of at least 1 kg/d, that is, when the rate of weight gain is l or more than 1 kg/d.
- cattle during this phase of growth can gain in the range of about 1 to about 2 kilograms or even more per day.
- the cattle treated in accordance with the invention are high-performance cattle capable of growth at a rate of greater than about 1.5 kg/d, most preferably at a rate greater than about 1.7 kg/d.
- the current limit of average daily gain (ADG) during finishing is about 3 kg/d; however, as higher performance cattle are developed, this limit may be exceeded.
- the range above 1 or 1.5 etc. kg/d is finite and definite and will be known to those skilled in the art.
- the bovine feed may be supplemented with concentrated feed, richer than pasturage or hay in digestible proteins, carbohydrates, and fats.
- feed grain may constitute from 12 to 80% or more of the animal's feed.
- the feed may contain from 12 to 16 percent or more protein or protein- equivalent nitrogen.
- National Research Council. (NRC) guidelines permit finishing at as low as 9% protein - equivalent nitrogen.
- bST bovine somatotropin
- the bovine somatotropin can be pituitary-derived or recombinantly produced bovine somatotropin.
- the bST can be a naturally-occurring sequence or a sequence altered by addition or deletion or substitution of one or more amino acids. All of these forms of bovine somatotropin are now well-known to those skilled in the art.
- bovine somatotropin variants include, but are not limited to, polypeptides having the following amino acid sequences with unspecified amino acid residues being the same as or similar to the naturally occurring somatotropin:
- N-terminal methionyl residue on the variants described above could also be- removed, either during or after expression.
- one or more amino acids of the following sequence -glu-arg-ala-tyr-ile-pro-glu- (which are numbers 32-38 of the bovine somatotropin sequence set forth above) may be deleted. This type of deletion is described in European Patent Application, Publication Numbers 282,318, and 282,319, both of which were published September 14, 1988. Other deletion variants with somatotropin activity can also be used, such as deletion of amino acids 32-45.
- the somatotropins found most effective for administration via the composition of the invention are those which have an N-terminal group of methionine and are associated with zinc metal. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Bl 4,985,404, incorporated herein by reference.
- the formulation of bovine somatotropin for use in an osmotic implant may generally include a stabilizing polyol.
- stabilizing polyol means polyol, for example, with three hydroxyl groups, which maintains the somatotropin in a physically stable composition, i.e. the somatotropin does not precipitate to an undesirable degree over reasonable storage or administration period.
- Glycerol is the preferred polyol, however, other polyols may be used, such as tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane.
- the formulation may further include a physiologically compatible buffer, incorporated for maintaining the pH exhibited by the composition within a range in which the somatotropin is bioactive.
- the pH exhibited by the solution should be between a minimum of about 4.5 or, preferably about 5, or more preferably 5.7 and a maximum of the greater of about 7 and about the isoelectric point of the somatotropin.
- the isoelectric point for A-BST is 8.6. These isoelectric points are for the standard monomeric forms obtained in bulk preparation of these somatotropins. Isoelectric points for other variants, other derivatives and other forms can be determined using standard techniques. For A-BST, the optimum pH is about between about 6.1 and about 7.5.
- the buffer be an alkali metal phosphate.
- the buffer be comprised substantially of monobasic:dibasic phosphates such as, for example, mono-or-di-sodium or potassium phosphates at 1M or 0.45 M or the like.
- Another effective buffer for controlling the pH in the desired range is a histidine hydrohalide such as histidine hydrochloride.
- Additional buffers that maintain this pH range are citrate buffers and acid addition salts of tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, such as the hydrochloride salt. These tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane salts also contain hydroxyl groups and can act as a stabilizing polyol in some circumstances. Any other buffer that can maintain a pH in the desired range can be used.
- a wetting agent such as a nonionic surfactant is preferably incorporated as well. Such surfactant also inhibits foaming.
- the surfactant can be present in the excipient at amounts between about 0.005% and about 2.5% more preferably about 0.25%.
- a particularly preferred nonionic surfactant is a polyethoxylated sorbitan ester, such as a tri(polyoxyethylene) ester of sorbitan mono-oleate, such as that sold under the trade designation Tween 80 by ICI Americas Inc.
- An advantage of the use of a buffered polyol excipient for the somatotropin is the high loading achievable due to the high solubility of the somatotropin in the excipient liquid.
- the pH maintained by the buffer inhibits the formation of dimers and other aggregates.
- it has not been determined whether the somatotropin is true solution or colloidal solution it is desirable that the somatotropin does not precipitate or otherwise separate from the excipient, either on standing or under the influence of shear encountered in passage of the composition through the discharge opening of an infusion pump.
- the concentration of somatotropin in the composition is at least.about 10% by weight, preferably at least about 15% by weight, more preferably at least about 20% by weight and even more preferably at least about 25% or even about 30% by weight.
- the somatotropin concentration may range as high as about 45% by weight.
- the polyol concentration may be at least about 20% by weight or 25% by weight and may range as high as 80% by weight or 70% by weight or 60% by weight or 50% by weight or 40% by weight.
- a relatively high glycerol content additionally provides a bacteriostatic effect. It is generally considered that an excipient containing about 50% glycerol provides bacteriostatic effect.
- the osmotic implant may further contain an estrogenic agent, for example, 17- ⁇ -estradiol, at a concentration of about .05 to about 1%, more preferably about 0.18 to about 0.72%.
- the formulation further comprises a wetting agent, such as nonionic surfactant with optimum concentrations between about 0.005% or about 2.5% by weight.
- a wetting agent such as nonionic surfactant with optimum concentrations between about 0.005% or about 2.5% by weight.
- the buffer salt which in the case of a phosphate buffer may typically comprise 4% to 7% by weight
- the sodium or potassium chloride which may be added to stabilize the formulation, described below
- the balance of the formulation typically is water.
- a preferred formulation contains at least about 7% water, more preferably at least about 15% water, and even more preferably between about 25% and about 35% by weight water.
- an alkaline halide such as sodium chloride or potassium chloride is added to the excipient prior to formulation with somatotropin. It has been found that this facilitates maintaining homogeneity of the formulation during filling of the implants, for example, when using Zn-bST.
- the filled implant can be subjected to heat treatments from about 6 to 24 hours, preferably 16 hours, at. a temperature between about 35°C and 50°C, preferably 39-46°C, most preferably about 40°C.
- the alkaline chloride comprises about 1 to about 4% by weight of the final formulation.
- the formulation is normally a clear, homogeneous single phase.
- the formulation appears as a solid or semisolid at typical storage temperatures of about 4°C.
- the formulation decreases in viscosity to produce a viscous liquid at the body temperature of an animal. In this way, the formulation can be dispensable without being readily fluid at all temperatures.
- the ratios of water and buffer to somatotropin preferably decline with increasing somatotropin concentration so as to maintain a polyol concentration as high as practicable.
- polyol content is limited by viscosity considerations, and the maximum polyol concentration is about 40-45% for formulations having a hormone content about 25%. Higher polyol concentrations provide a benefit in physical stability, but can result in viscosity that makes handling difficult.
- the bST is an aqueous suspension of bST formulated for release in an osmotic pump as hereinafter described.
- Such formulations can include glycerol, monobasic and dibasic sodium phosphate buffer, Tween-80, an alkaline halide salt such as sodium chloride and/or potassium chloride, but are not limited to these ingredients, in addition to the active ingredients such as bST and the estrogenic agent.
- the currently preferred formulation comprises 36.5% ⁇ 1.5% for Zn-bST in a phosphate buffer, glycerols, wetting agent, salt excipient blend where the w/w/w/w proportions of phosphate buffer, glycerol, Tween-80, and KC1 are 48.38/48.38/0.24/3.0 respectively.
- the phosphate buffer is 60:40 monobasic:dibasic sodium phosphate, and the molarity is 0.45.
- the preferred composition containing an estrogenic agent comprises about 0.06% to about 3.0% 17-beta- estradiol.
- bST is intraperitoneally released in beef cattle in the finishing stages of growth at an effective dose and rate for significantly increasing a parameter selected from the group consisting of body weight (BW) , carcass weight (CW) , average daily gain (ADG) or feed efficiency (FE) of the animal.
- BW body weight
- CW carcass weight
- ADG average daily gain
- FE feed efficiency
- The-peritoneum is the serous membrane lining of the abdominal walls (parietal peritoneum) and investing the viscera (visceral peritoneum) .
- the parietal peritoneum is the membrane which lines the abdominal and pelvic walls and the undersurface of the diaphragm.
- the visceral peritoneum is the membrane reflected at various places over the viscera, forming a complete covering for the stomach, spleen, liver, ascending portion of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, transverse colon, sigmoid flexure, upper end of the rectum, uterus, and ovaries; it also partially covers the descending and transverse portions of the duodenum, the cecum, ascending and descending colon, the middle part of the rectum, the posterior wall of the bladder, and the upper portion of the vagina.
- the peritoneum serves to hold the viscera in position by folds, some of which form the mesenteries, which connect portions of the intestine with the posterior abdominal wall; others, the omenta, folds attached to the stomach, and still others, the ligaments of the liver, spleen, stomach, kidneys, bladder, and uterus.
- the space between the parietal and visceral peritoneums is the Peritoneal Cavity, which consists of the Pelvic Peritoneal Cavity below and
- the General Peritoneal Cavity communicates by the Foramen of Winslow with the Cavity of the Great Omentum, which is also known as the Lesser Peritoneal Cavity.
- intraperitoneal cavity includes any of the Pelvic
- the implant is inserted into the Lesser Peritoneal Cavity. It has been established that access to the peritoneal cavity is best gained by inserting a trocar through the left paralumbar fossa. Initially, it was thought that insertion through the right paralumbar fossa would be the preferred side, as the rumen is positioned adjacent to the left paralumbar fossa. However, it was determined that the position of the kidneys and associated kidney are asymmetrically distributed toward the right side of the body and interfere with trocar access to the peritoneal cavity.
- the implantation is preferably accomplished using a two step procedure.
- a vertical incision is made substantially through the hide alone of the left paralumbar fossa.
- the incision is vertical relative to the ground and preferably less than 25mm or 20mm in length.
- a sterile non-toxic plastic tube having, for example, a 30° bevel at the tip, optionally double-beveled, and providing a substantially-non-incising puncturing tip, is inserted through the incision and into the peritoneum. Sterile implants are inserted therethrough and the tube is removed and the wound permitted to close. Further description is provided in Appendix B hereto which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the bST is intraperitoneally released since it has been observed that subcutaneous daily injections or prolonged non-intraperitoneal release can result in a decrease or in a nonsignificant change in dressing percentage and have not resulted in significant increases in dressing percentage and carcass weight.
- a practical minimum rate of release for observing significant changes in body weight or carcass weight or average daily gain or feed efficiency is about 3 mg/d bST and that above about 14 mg/d bST, there is little additional improvement.
- the intraperitoneal daily release is maintained preferably in the range of about 3 mg/d to about 14 mg/d.
- higher dosages can also be employed.
- the intraperitoneal daily release is maintained in the range of about 6 or 9 to about 12 mg/d.
- the release is preferably continuous since daily injections or biweekly injections can cause a reduction in dressing percentage. See, e.g., Mosley et al., op. cit., and Wright et al., op. cit.
- a pulsatile intraperitoneal release enhancing dressing percent is within the scope of the invention, for example, a pulsatile release 6, 12 or more times per day so that noncarcass growth is not unduly stimulated.
- the preferably continuous release can be zero-order or non-zero order provided that the release threshold is preferably maintained in the range of above about 3 mg/d to about 14 mg/d, more preferably in the range of about 9 to about 12 mg/day that is, provided that the rate of release does not fall below a value in these ranges during substantially the entire period of treatment.
- the rate of release does not exceed values of these ranges since higher dosages of bST which are not maintained over the long term may favor increase in weight of non-carcass organs and such higher dosages may result if a prolonged continuous intraperitoneal release above the minimum is to be achieved using a non ⁇ zero release implant.
- bST is released at a substantially zero-order rate of release when the rate of release is substantially independent of the amount of bST remaining in the implant. It is preferred that the release be substantially zero-order. Thus, for example, a constant rate of release is zero-order. Such a rate of release can be accomplished by an osmotic implant such as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
- the bST administration is effected by such an implantable device capable of delivering the desired- dose of bST intraperitoneally for a prolonged period of time.
- the osmotic implant is such as is described in the patent application attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference.
- Other methods of achieving a substantially zero-order rate of release can also be used, for example, a pellet of bST having an approximately constant-area release surface, or using- other techniques known to those skilled in the art.
- bST daily injection produced serum bST levels that were 400 to 700% higher than baseline for the first four hours post-injection and returned to baseline about 12 hours after injection (Enright et al., 1990 and Early et al., 1990a); whereas continuous bST delivery from a pellet has been found to produce about a 100% increase in serum bST in Holstein heifers and no detectable increase in serum bST in cross-bred steers.
- Example 4 intraperitoneal bST osmotic implants in feedlot cattle increased dressing percent from 61.8% for the controls up to 62.4 to 62.8% for bST treated animals. Possible explanations for this effect included l) presence of performance enhancers (e.g., an estrogenic agent) and 2) the mode of delivery (zero- order intraperitoneal delivery) .
- performance enhancers e.g., an estrogenic agent
- Example 3 the synergistic effect of an estrogenic agent and intraperitoneal zero-order delivery of bST is demonstrated. Neither product alone caused a significant increase in dressing percent, but in combination-treated cattle there was a significant increase in dressing percent.
- the enhancement of dressing percent with an estrogenic agent and intraperitoneal bST zero-order delivery can be considered due to factors including, 1) the synergistic effects of bST and the estrogenic agent, 2) the effect of substantially zero-order osmotic bST delivery and 3) the effect of intraperitoneal delivery compared to subcutaneous delivery of bST.
- the implant is such as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
- Such implants may contain about 800 mg bST and release bST at a nominal rate of about 6 to 7 mg/d. Two or more implants can be used concurrently to achieve a desired rate of release, for example, about 10 mg/d to 12 mg/d.
- the implant preferably providing a substantially constant release
- the implant is implanted in the intraperitoneal cavity of the bovine being treated.
- Implanting in the intraperitoneal cavity facilitates recovery of the implant with the non-carcass components of the bovine following slaughter.
- the combination of intraperitoneal implant and substantially constant release has been found advantageous in facilitating a significant increase in dressing percent and carcass weight in bST-treated cattle.
- Implantation is preferably accomplished via the left paralumbar fossa since this has been found, as indicated above, to facilitate implantation.
- the left paralumbar fossa is a generally triangular area on the bovine between the hip bone and the last rib and below the loin area on the left side. Tissue and hide depth here is about 0.5 to 2.0", but trocars used for implantation are generally on the order of 1 to 5 inches. The insertion depth of the trocar needs to be greater than the actual thickness of the paralumbar region due to stretching of the peritoneal lining.
- the only internal organs presenting a risk of injury is the rumen. Damage to the rumen can be eliminated or reduced by administering the implant to fasting or feed restricted animals.
- bST is released intraperitoneally concurrently with administration of an effective dose of an estrogenic agent.
- the estrogenic agent can .be administered either subcutaneously or intraperitoneally.
- Any estrogenic substance may be used as the estrogenic agent in the present invention.
- An estrogenic substance is one which when administered to a normal female animal will cause growth of the uterus and teats. However, only estrogenic substances which are suitable for administration to food animals can be put into actual use.
- the acceptable estrogens for food- producing animals are estrone and estradiol steroids such as 17-beta estradiol, estradiol benzoate, ethinylestradiol, etc. or non-steroidal compounds with estrogenic activity, such as diethylstilbesterol, hexestrol, dianestrol, zeranol, etc., and derivatives of these substances.
- estrone and estradiol steroids such as 17-beta estradiol, estradiol benzoate, ethinylestradiol, etc. or non-steroidal compounds with estrogenic activity, such as diethylstilbesterol, hexestrol, dianestrol, zeranol, etc., and derivatives of these substances.
- the simple esters, such as the C1-C6 alkanoates, and the benzoates, formed on one or two of the available hydroxy groups of estradiol and zeranol, or on the one hydroxy group of estrone
- estradiol benzoate estradiol dipropionate, estrone acetate, zeranol hexanoate, zeranol dibutyrate, 17-beta-estradiol, 17- beta-ethinyl-estradiol, can be used.
- the estrogen can be released in the range of about 5ug/d to 500ug/d or even higher. Preferably the estrogen is released in the range of about 15 to about 60 ug/d.
- the dose of estrogenic agent can advantageously be the same as that used when the estrogenic agent is administered as an anabolic agent to cattle in the finishing stage of growth to significantly increase body weight (BW) or carcass weight (CW) .
- BW body weight
- CW carcass weight
- the effective dose may be even lower, for example, in the range of 15 to 30 ug/d.
- the estrogenic agent is delivered concurrently with the intraperitoneal release of bST.
- the administration of the estrogenic agent can be by pellets or other means such as are well-known in the art.
- the estrogenic agent is delivered intraperitoneally in the bovine using an osmotic pump, for example, the osmotic pump employed for the bST or another separate osmotic pump containing the estrogenic agent in a suitable excipient.
- the estrogenic agent is released in the bovine for a period of time generally concurrent with the period of bST delivery.
- treatment with an estrogenic agent prior to and concurrent with initial bST treatment has also been found effective.
- the bST and/or estrogenic agent implant is implanted into the animals at the beginning of the finishing stage of growth.
- either the estrogenic source or the bST implant or both may also be implanted earlier and either provide a delayed initiation of bST release or a longer period of release.
- the intraperitoneal bST release is provided preferably during the entire period of the finishing stage of growth and is continued substantially until the time for slaughter of the animals. It has been previously found that the benefits of bST treatment may be adversely affected by discontinuation of bST. Hence, it is preferred that bST treatments continue at least until a time when the beneficial effects of concurrent bST and estrogen treatment will persist at slaughter, for example, until about two weeks before slaughter and most preferably that bST release be ongoing at slaughter.
- the period of time during which an effective rate of intraperitoneal release must be maintained can be any period effective for significantly increasing dressing percentage and carcass weight in finishing cattle receiving an estrogenic agent. Currently, it is believed that a minimum of about 6 or even about 9-12 weeks are required.
- the period of bST release is preferably at least for about 12 weeks prior to slaughter and more preferably about 18 or more weeks prior to slaughter. Overall, the period of bST treatment can be from about 6 to about 24 or 30 weeks or longer preceding slaughter of the beef cattle.
- the bovines be on a supplemented diet, that is, on a diet that contains more protein or carbohydrate or fat or combinations of these than is found in hay or pasturage.
- Example 1 Weekly Subcutaneously Administered Pellets A study was undertaken to determine the effect of 40 or 80 mg A-bST pellets administered subcutaneously weekly during a 84-day beef cattle study on 1) growth, 2) feed efficiency and 3) carcass composition.
- Non-Carcass Gain Response (%) — No Gain 61% a, b - different superscripts indicate that numbers in a row are significantly different (p ⁇ .05) .
- Example 2 Weekly Subcutaneous or Intraperitoneal Pellets
- Non-Carcass Gain Response (%) — 100% 39% a, b - different superscripts indicate that numbers in ⁇ . row are significantly different (p ⁇ .05).
- the estrogen release is estimated at about 200 ug/d.
- the results are shown in the following table.
- Examples 3 and 4 indicate that concurrent intraperitoneal treatment of finishing beef cattle with intraperitoneal bST and estradiol significantly increase dressing percentage and carcass weight and furthermore allocate-most of the increased weight to the carcass components.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU29563/95A AU703299B2 (en) | 1994-07-01 | 1995-06-30 | Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent |
MX9700227A MX9700227A (en) | 1994-07-01 | 1995-06-30 | Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent. |
EP95925429A EP0773792A1 (en) | 1994-07-01 | 1995-06-30 | Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US269,986 | 1994-07-01 | ||
US08/269,986 US5595752A (en) | 1994-07-01 | 1994-07-01 | Increasing dressing percentage and carcass weight in finishing beef cattle |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1996001123A1 true WO1996001123A1 (en) | 1996-01-18 |
Family
ID=23029417
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1995/008309 WO1996001123A1 (en) | 1994-07-01 | 1995-06-30 | Combination treatment as animal growth promoter containing bovine somatotropin and an estrogenic agent |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5595752A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0773792A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU703299B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2193988A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL114409A (en) |
MX (1) | MX9700227A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996001123A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA955456B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6605594B2 (en) | 1996-12-31 | 2003-08-12 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Aqueous glycerol formulations of somatotropin |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999000140A2 (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 1999-01-07 | Monsanto Company | Accelerating animal hoof growth with somatotropin |
KR19990071255A (en) | 1998-02-28 | 1999-09-15 | 성재갑 | Combination composition of somatotropin and vitamin |
Family Cites Families (81)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1555711A (en) * | 1921-10-26 | 1925-09-29 | Harry B Hershinger | Grease gun |
US1642950A (en) * | 1927-02-24 | 1927-09-20 | Earle C Haas | Medical-powder applicator |
US1929154A (en) * | 1931-07-29 | 1933-10-03 | Sundock Rose | Powder spray and injector |
US2059966A (en) * | 1932-09-27 | 1936-11-03 | Gynex Corp | Dispensing device |
US2086580A (en) * | 1935-06-24 | 1937-07-13 | Myron C Shirley | Applicator |
US2519555A (en) * | 1945-08-31 | 1950-08-22 | Abbott Lab | Sterile medicament insufflator cartridge and insufflator |
US2587364A (en) * | 1948-05-20 | 1952-02-26 | Edith Mitchell | Balling gun |
US2572155A (en) * | 1949-10-01 | 1951-10-23 | Robert H Hoyt | Vial for use in artificial insemination |
US3016895A (en) * | 1958-08-01 | 1962-01-16 | Pan American Lab Inc | Injector for subcutaneous implantation of solids |
US3140078A (en) * | 1961-06-15 | 1964-07-07 | Adhesive Eng Co | Mixing and dispensing device |
US3144178A (en) * | 1962-03-12 | 1964-08-11 | Stanley J Sarnoff | Cartridge holder |
US3141583A (en) * | 1962-03-23 | 1964-07-21 | William L Brickson | Injection gun |
US3256884A (en) * | 1963-04-15 | 1966-06-21 | Hill | Injection device for artificial insemination having a disposable dispensing capsule with detachable actuator |
US3348545A (en) * | 1964-10-22 | 1967-10-24 | Sarnoff | Latched cartridge |
US3506008A (en) * | 1968-03-25 | 1970-04-14 | Ortho Pharma Corp | Medical applicator |
US3620216A (en) * | 1969-06-25 | 1971-11-16 | Abbott Lab | Implant trocar |
US3760804A (en) * | 1971-01-13 | 1973-09-25 | Alza Corp | Improved osmotic dispenser employing magnesium sulphate and magnesium chloride |
GB1525841A (en) * | 1976-05-18 | 1978-09-20 | Hundon Forge Ltd | Drug implanters |
US4403610A (en) * | 1980-06-19 | 1983-09-13 | N.J. Phillips Pty. Limited | Gun to implant pellets in animals |
US4557724A (en) * | 1981-02-17 | 1985-12-10 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Apparatus and methods for minimizing cellular adhesion on peritoneal injection catheters |
US4492576A (en) * | 1982-06-15 | 1985-01-08 | Dragan William B | Dental syringe and method of packaging and dispensing a dental material |
US4452775A (en) * | 1982-12-03 | 1984-06-05 | Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc. | Cholesterol matrix delivery system for sustained release of macromolecules |
US4576604A (en) * | 1983-03-04 | 1986-03-18 | Alza Corporation | Osmotic system with instant drug availability |
GB8403138D0 (en) * | 1984-02-07 | 1984-03-14 | Graham N B | Sustained release of active ingredient |
US4857534A (en) * | 1984-04-05 | 1989-08-15 | North Carolina State University | Method of maintaining ruminants on high energy low fiber diet |
US4891208A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1990-01-02 | The Liposome Company, Inc. | Steroidal liposomes |
US4721612A (en) * | 1984-04-12 | 1988-01-26 | The Liposome Company, Inc. | Steroidal liposomes |
US4725439A (en) * | 1984-06-29 | 1988-02-16 | Alza Corporation | Transdermal drug delivery device |
US4820267A (en) * | 1985-02-19 | 1989-04-11 | Endocon, Inc. | Cartridge injector for pellet medicaments |
US4769011A (en) * | 1985-03-28 | 1988-09-06 | Interpore International, Inc. | Syringe apparatus and method for the surgical implantation of granular substances |
US4670249A (en) * | 1985-04-12 | 1987-06-02 | International Minerals & Chemical Corp. | Growth-promoting compositions |
US4624847A (en) * | 1985-04-22 | 1986-11-25 | Alza Corporation | Drug delivery device for programmed delivery of beneficial drug |
US4786501A (en) * | 1985-07-15 | 1988-11-22 | International Minerals & Chemical Corp. | Cylindrical implants for the controlled release of growth hormones |
US4863901A (en) * | 1986-01-09 | 1989-09-05 | Brigham & Women's Hospital | Use of growth hormone for nitrogen retention under hypocaloric conditions |
US4917685A (en) * | 1986-05-16 | 1990-04-17 | International Minerals & Chem. Corp. | Delivery device for the administration of stabilized growth promoting hormones |
US4723958A (en) * | 1986-05-23 | 1988-02-09 | Merck & Co., Inc. | Pulsatile drug delivery system |
US4787384A (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1988-11-29 | Bio Medic Data System, Inc. | Animal marker implanting system |
US4997825A (en) * | 1986-12-22 | 1991-03-05 | Eli Lilly And Company | Synergistic treatment method |
ES2019410B3 (en) * | 1987-02-13 | 1991-06-16 | Wilhelm A Keller | EVACUATION CARTRIDGE WITH DRIVE PISTON |
US4863736A (en) * | 1987-03-16 | 1989-09-05 | Monsanto Company | Somatotropin prolonged release |
US4846793A (en) * | 1987-03-18 | 1989-07-11 | Endocon, Inc. | Injector for implanting multiple pellet medicaments |
US4816439A (en) * | 1987-03-27 | 1989-03-28 | Nordiske Gentofte A/S | The use of human growth hormone for the treatment of intoxicated individuals |
DE3802158A1 (en) * | 1987-08-11 | 1989-02-23 | Hoechst Ag | DEVICE FOR APPLICATION OF IMPLANTS |
ZA891588B (en) * | 1988-03-07 | 1990-11-28 | Lilly Co Eli | Phenethanolamine and growth hormone combinations |
US4959218A (en) * | 1988-03-25 | 1990-09-25 | Alza Corporation | Method for delivering somatotropin to an animal |
US5057318A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1991-10-15 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system for beneficial agent over a broad range of rates |
US5110596A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1992-05-05 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system comprising means for delivering agent to livestock |
US5059423A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1991-10-22 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system comprising biocompatible beneficial agent formulation |
US5037420A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1991-08-06 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system comprising two sections for delivering somatotropin |
EP0374120A3 (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1991-07-31 | Monsanto Company | Comosition for controlled release of polypeptides |
US5034229A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1991-07-23 | Alza Corporation | Dispenser for increasing feed conversion of hog |
US5135523A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1992-08-04 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system for administering agent to ruminants and swine |
US5174999A (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1992-12-29 | Alza Corporation | Delivery system comprising fluid ingress and drug egress |
GB8829089D0 (en) * | 1988-12-13 | 1989-01-25 | Coopers Animal Health | Intra ruminal device |
US4923096A (en) * | 1989-01-09 | 1990-05-08 | Mark L. Anderson | Dripless automatic syringe for dispensing fluids |
US5219572A (en) * | 1989-03-17 | 1993-06-15 | Pitman-Moore, Inc. | Controlled release delivery device for macromolecular proteins |
NL8901281A (en) * | 1989-05-23 | 1990-12-17 | Nedap Nv | Implant needle for animal application - has axial groove and slanted sharp front |
US5035897A (en) * | 1989-09-05 | 1991-07-30 | Alza Corporation | Dosage form for delivering soluble or insoluble drugs |
US5112614A (en) * | 1989-09-14 | 1992-05-12 | Alza Corporation | Implantable delivery dispenser |
US5100392A (en) * | 1989-12-08 | 1992-03-31 | Biosynthesis, Inc. | Implantable device for administration of drugs or other liquid solutions |
US5045082A (en) * | 1990-01-10 | 1991-09-03 | Alza Corporation | Long-term delivery device including loading dose |
US5223266A (en) * | 1990-01-24 | 1993-06-29 | Alza Corporation | Long-term delivery device with early startup |
US5156851A (en) * | 1990-06-20 | 1992-10-20 | Monsanto Company | Coated veterinary implants |
US5232708A (en) * | 1990-06-20 | 1993-08-03 | Monsanto Company | Coated veterinary implants |
US5091185A (en) * | 1990-06-20 | 1992-02-25 | Monsanto Company | Coated veterinary implants |
US5234694A (en) * | 1990-07-11 | 1993-08-10 | Alza Corporation | Method for increasing feed efficiency in animals |
US5234692A (en) * | 1990-07-11 | 1993-08-10 | Alza Corporation | Delivery device with a protective sleeve |
US5234693A (en) * | 1990-07-11 | 1993-08-10 | Alza Corporation | Delivery device with a protective sleeve |
US5238687A (en) * | 1990-07-11 | 1993-08-24 | Alza Corporation | Delivery device with a protective sleeve |
US5180591A (en) * | 1990-07-11 | 1993-01-19 | Alza Corporation | Delivery device with a protective sleeve |
US6020894A (en) * | 1990-08-16 | 2000-02-01 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Full-color desktop publishing system |
MX9201040A (en) * | 1991-03-12 | 1992-09-01 | Alza Corp | ADMINISTRATION DEVICE IN RELATION TO SPACE AND STABILITY. |
US5227167A (en) * | 1991-06-11 | 1993-07-13 | Alza Corporation | Long-term delivery device including hydrophobic loading dose |
US5137727A (en) * | 1991-06-12 | 1992-08-11 | Alza Corporation | Delivery device providing beneficial agent stability |
US5209746A (en) * | 1992-02-18 | 1993-05-11 | Alza Corporation | Osmotically driven delivery devices with pulsatile effect |
US5312333A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-05-17 | United States Surgical Corporation | Endoscopic material delivery device |
US5281197A (en) * | 1992-07-27 | 1994-01-25 | Symbiosis Corporation | Endoscopic hemostatic agent delivery system |
AU4986393A (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1994-03-15 | Massey University | Methods for effecting a prolonged reduction in measurable fat content and medicaments for use therein |
FR2694885B1 (en) * | 1992-08-20 | 1994-10-07 | Rhone Merieux | Method for improving the growth and quality of carcasses of meat-producing domestic animals, vaccination package and vaccines. |
US5292307A (en) * | 1992-09-16 | 1994-03-08 | Dolzine Theodore W | Dispensing package for unit dosage |
US5304119A (en) * | 1993-06-24 | 1994-04-19 | Monsanto Company | Instrument for injecting implants through animal hide |
-
1994
- 1994-07-01 US US08/269,986 patent/US5595752A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1995
- 1995-06-30 CA CA002193988A patent/CA2193988A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1995-06-30 IL IL11440995A patent/IL114409A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-06-30 ZA ZA955456A patent/ZA955456B/en unknown
- 1995-06-30 WO PCT/US1995/008309 patent/WO1996001123A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1995-06-30 AU AU29563/95A patent/AU703299B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1995-06-30 EP EP95925429A patent/EP0773792A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1995-06-30 MX MX9700227A patent/MX9700227A/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6605594B2 (en) | 1996-12-31 | 2003-08-12 | Monsanto Technology, Llc | Aqueous glycerol formulations of somatotropin |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2956395A (en) | 1996-01-25 |
IL114409A (en) | 1998-12-27 |
IL114409A0 (en) | 1995-10-31 |
US5595752A (en) | 1997-01-21 |
MX9700227A (en) | 1997-05-31 |
ZA955456B (en) | 1996-05-14 |
CA2193988A1 (en) | 1996-01-18 |
EP0773792A1 (en) | 1997-05-21 |
AU703299B2 (en) | 1999-03-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Barbul et al. | Wound healing and thymotropic effects of arginine: a pituitary mechanism of action | |
US6719992B2 (en) | Non-aqueous surfactant-containing formulations for extended release of somatotropin | |
JP2664398B2 (en) | Sustained-release somatotropin and method of administration | |
Putnam et al. | Metabolic and production responses to dietary protein and exogenous somatotropin in late gestation dairy cows | |
CZ815687A3 (en) | Non-aqueous preparation based on somatotropin | |
Gibson et al. | Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors in critical illness | |
US5292721A (en) | Use of growth hormone to enhance porcine fetal energy and sow lactation performance | |
Azain et al. | Comparison of daily versus continuous administration of somatotropin on growth rate, feed intake, and body composition in intact female rats | |
JP2620417B2 (en) | Compositions for sustained release of biologically active polypeptides | |
JPH0561252B2 (en) | ||
JPH05503702A (en) | How to inhibit follicle maturation | |
US5595752A (en) | Increasing dressing percentage and carcass weight in finishing beef cattle | |
US5686413A (en) | Ractopamine and growth hormone combinations | |
US7030091B2 (en) | Non-aqueous injectable formulation preparation with pH adjusted for extended release of somatotropin | |
Gomez et al. | Hypophysectomy and replacement therapy in relation to the growth and secretory activity of the mammary gland | |
Buttle | The luteotrophic complex in hysterectomized and pregnant goats. | |
CHIANG et al. | Administration of growth hormone to pregnant rats on a reduced diet inhibits growth of their fetuses | |
AU643073B2 (en) | Treatment of human lactation failure | |
US7048938B2 (en) | Non-aqueous injectable formulations for extended release of somatotropin | |
US4997825A (en) | Synergistic treatment method | |
Dubreuil et al. | Influence of growth hormone-releasing factor and (or) thyrotropin-releasing factor on sow blood components, milk composition and piglet performance | |
KR100355517B1 (en) | Aqueous Sustained Release Agent | |
KR0152082B1 (en) | A composition comprising somatotropin | |
EP0272890B1 (en) | Synergistic treatment method | |
CA2101357A1 (en) | Veterinary method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AM AU BB BG BR BY CA CN CZ EE FI GE HU IS JP KG KR KZ LK LR LT LV MD MG MN MX NO NZ PL RO RU SG SI SK TJ TM TT UA UZ VN |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): KE MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2193988 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1995925429 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1995925429 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWR | Wipo information: refused in national office |
Ref document number: 1995925429 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1995925429 Country of ref document: EP |