WO1996011048A1 - Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process - Google Patents

Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996011048A1
WO1996011048A1 PCT/US1995/012364 US9512364W WO9611048A1 WO 1996011048 A1 WO1996011048 A1 WO 1996011048A1 US 9512364 W US9512364 W US 9512364W WO 9611048 A1 WO9611048 A1 WO 9611048A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
membrane
stage
gas
vol
permeate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1995/012364
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Richard A. Callahan
Original Assignee
Enerfex, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23245656&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO1996011048(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Enerfex, Inc. filed Critical Enerfex, Inc.
Priority to EP95935653A priority Critical patent/EP0785818B9/en
Priority to JP51260796A priority patent/JP3850030B2/en
Priority to CA002202142A priority patent/CA2202142C/en
Priority to DE69529759T priority patent/DE69529759T3/en
Priority to AT95935653T priority patent/ATE233123T1/en
Publication of WO1996011048A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996011048A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
    • B01D53/225Multiple stage diffusion
    • B01D53/226Multiple stage diffusion in serial connexion
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/22Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process and apparatus for the production of a high purity gas which in general is more permeable in polymeric membranes relative to other gases with which it is mixed.
  • the more permeable gas e.g., carbon dioxide
  • the more permeable gas e.g., carbon dioxide
  • U.S. Patent 4,990,168 to Sauer et al describes a two or more stage membrane and distillation process to separate and concentrate carbon dioxide from a destination tail gas mixture containing it in a high concentration of about 75% C0 2 .
  • the nature and composition of the membrane material is described in detail, and polyimide, polyarimid, polyester, polya ide and cellulose acetate are noted as examples.
  • U.S. Patent 5,102,432 to Prasad describes a two or more stage membrane process to separate and concentrate high purity nitrogen from ambient air. This process relates to concentrating the less permeable component of a gas mixture to high purity by refining it by passing it through successive stages as a high pressure non-permeate phase.
  • the Prasad '432 patent describes that a permeate stream of a downstream membrane is recycled to the initial feed and/or to the non-permeate phase of an upstream membrane. Also, the Prasad '432 patent specifies a range of membrane selectivities.
  • a membrane process for the production of very high purity permeate gas a desired product from a feed gas mixture containing less than 40 mol% of the desired permeate gas comprises providing in a primary stage the process feed gas mixture to a primary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability to provide an intermediate permeate gas and a retentate gas, and providing the intermediate permeate gas in a secondary stage to a secondary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high selectivity, to produce therefrom a very high purity permeate gas product.
  • the membrane of the primary membrane separator unit has an intrinsic permeability of more than 250 Barrer/cm x 10 4 .
  • the membrane of the secondary membrane separator unit has an intrinsic permeability of 250 Barrer/cm x 10 4 or less.
  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for carrying out the process of the invention, i.e., an apparatus comprising a means for providing a process feed gas mixture to a primary stage membrane separator unit, which unit comprises a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability, and a means for providing an intermediate permeate gas produced from said primary stage membrane separator unit to a secondary stage membrane separator unit, which unit comprises a membrane having a relatively low intrinsic permeability.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a conventional one stage membrane separation process wherein a highly purified retentate N 2 product is obtained by subjecting air to a separator unit comprising a conventional polymer membrane.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a two stage process
  • N 2 gas is produced as a highly purified retentate gas in a two stage membrane process, with recycling of the N 2 -enriched permeate from the second stage to the initial air feed.
  • Figure 3 illustrates processes wherein a permeate product is purified in two stages, with recycling of the retentate from the second stage to the process feed, including embodiments of the present invention as described below.
  • a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability needs a smaller area for a given gas flow, however, it also generally shows less selectivity between gases.
  • a membrane having relatively high selectivity generally has lower intrinsic permeability for constituent gases of a mixture.
  • the low intrinsic permeability in the second or succeeding membrane separator stages is not a limitation, because of the reduced flow in the concentrated product permeate feed from the previous membrane separator stage or stages. In the second membrane separator stage, the higher selectivity ensures the highest final permeate product purity.
  • the initial primary stage utilizes a high intrinsic permeability membrane whereby intermediate concentration levels (40 to 80 vol%) of the desired very high purity permeate gas product in the intermediate permeate gas are achieved with minimal membrane area.
  • the secondary or succeeding stages utilized low intrinsic permeability membranes, whereby high levels of about 96.0+% of permeate concentration are achieved with minimal membrane area. Concentrated and reduced permeate flow from the initial stages accommodates the successive or second membrane's lower intrinsic permeability.
  • the selectivity of a more permeable gas over a less permeable gas is defined as the ratio of their permeabilities.
  • Barrers/cm x 10 of typical membrane materials are given below for four common gases, as well as the C0 2 /N 2 and 0 2 /N 2 selectivities.
  • a desirable component of a gas mixture may be either more permeable or less permeable than the other components of the mixture. If the desired component is the less permeable species, then the membrane is said to be retentate selective and the feed stream is refined to a high purity in the retained or less permeable (retentate) component.
  • the feed-retentate phase is present on the high pressure upstream side of the membrane and is referred to hereinafter as the retentate phase.
  • On the downstream side of the membrane there is provided a permeate phase at a much lower pressure, usually slightly above one atmosphere. Almost all commercial membrane processes currently operate to refine a retentate to high purity, usually with a single stage membrane.
  • An example is the separation of oxygen from air, or more aptly the production of nitrogen enriched air.
  • a feed stream of ambient air containing about 79 vol% nitrogen and 21 vol% oxygen is pressurized and passed over the upstream side of a polycarbonate membrane.
  • the more permeable oxygen permeates the membrane much more rapidly than nitrogen, leaving behind about a 99% pure nitrogen retentate product phase and generating about a 31.5 vol% oxygen (68.5 vol% nitrogen) permeate waste phase, which is typically dumped back to the atmosphere.
  • Another commercial example is the separation of carbon dioxide from wellhead natural gas, or more aptly, the production of methane enriched or pipeline quality gas.
  • a feed stream of wellhead gas at 93 vol% methane and 7 vol% carbon dioxide at pressure is passed over the upstream side of a cellulose acetate membrane.
  • the more permeable carbon dioxide permeates more quickly, yielding a 98% pure methane retentate product phase, and generating about a 37% pure carbon dioxide permeate waste phase, which is typically flared to the atmosphere at the production site.
  • Normally a single stage membrane like those mentioned above is best suited to bring the retentate phase to its asymptotic purity concentration, 99.0+%, in a single pressurized retentate phase.
  • Optimum performance of a single stage retentate membrane is achieved by matching feed flux (flow volume per unit area per unit time) and membrane surface area.
  • FIG. 1 A flow diagram for a typical single stage membrane of polycarbonate to produce a nitrogen enriched retentate is shown in Figure 1.
  • the feed gas is pressurized ambient air.
  • the asymptotic retentate product phase concentration can be increased to 99.5 vol%, and even 99.95 vol%, by feeding the pressurized retentate stream to subsequent membrane stages to further refine the nitrogen enriched stream.
  • the ultimate purity of the retentate product phase is a function of the feed flow rate and total membrane area.
  • all stages utilize the same low intrinsic permeability membrane because of its relatively high oxygen over nitrogen selectivity and the relatively high initial nitrogen feed purity of 79%.
  • Figure 2 is an example of a two stage process to produce nitrogen of up to 99.5 vol% purity.
  • a multiple stage membrane process according to the present invention would not benefit such an air separation where a high purity nitrogen retentate product phase is desired, because the relatively high intrinsic permeability of the primary membrane separator stage plus the relatively high initial feed concentration of nitrogen in air would allow excessive amounts of nitrogen to permeate through the membrane, thereby reducing the recovery of nitrogen in the retentate.
  • the multiple stage membrane process in accordance with the present invention is optimally utilized when the object is to concentrate by a membrane process a desired gas as a permeate from a relatively low initial level of 40% or lower to a level of about 96.0 vol% or higher purity.
  • Figure 3 shows a two stage membrane process according to this invention, capable of separating carbon dioxide to a level of about 96.0+ vol% purity with process flows as noted in Table 3 below.
  • Table 1 below shows an example of flow rates, material balances, and membrane areas for a process as shown in Figure 3 in a comparative case wherein both membranes are of a single composition, viz., polycarbonate.
  • the process feed gas mixture, Fl is 11.7% carbon dioxide and 88.3% nitrogen, which is the composition of a natural gas combustion exhaust after the water of combustion is removed.
  • Table 1 shows that the first stage requires about 70,713 square feet of membrane and the second stage requires about 4,600 square feet of membrane, or a total area of 75,313 square feet of membrane, to achieve 96.0 vol% carbon dioxide purity in P2 with about 76.5 vol% of the carbon dioxide initially present in the process feed gas mixture being recovered. That is, 23.5 vol% of the carbon dioxide in the feed Fl is dumped as waste in the first stage retentate stream, Rl.
  • Table 2 shows a similar process and similar flows as in Table 1, except, in accordance with the present invention, the first stage utilizes a cellulose acetate membrane instead of polycarbonate.
  • the first stage requires only about 20,055 square feet of membrane, and the combined stages require only a total area of only about 24,648 square feet, to achieve the same results.
  • Table 3 shows a similar process and flows as in Table 1 and Table 2, except that in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the first stage utilizes a silicone polycarbonate copolymer membrane instead of either pure cellulose acetate or polycarbonate.
  • the first stage requires even less area, about 2,261 square feet of membrane, and the combined stages a total area of only about 6,859 square feet of membrane, to achieve the same results, i.e., > 96.0 vol% C0 2 .
  • the process in Table 3 represents a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • a major benefit is a substantial reduction in the total membrane area required to accomplish a particular desired gas separation.
  • this invention provides substantially higher productivity.
  • Tables 1 and 3 there is shown an 90.0% reduction in membrane area for a feed stream of about 37,973 to 39,621 standard cubic feet per hour (scfh) .
  • the present invention as described in Table 3 can process 11.3 (feed flux ratio) times the feed flow compared with the homogeneous membrane process shown in Table 1.
  • the present invention is further discussed particularly in terms of a preferred embodiment of the present invention wherein the membrane feed stream is the product of the combustion of any hydrocarbon fuel, such as fossil fuel, in air.
  • a process stream which comprises 40 vol% or less C0 2 , the balance typically air or nitrogen or any other less permeable gas or gases, the same can be processed in accordance with the present invention.
  • the process of the present invention is even more preferred in the case of using a process gas stream containing 25 vol% or less C0 2 , and is especially preferred in the case of using a process gas stream containing 11.7 vol% or less C0 2 .
  • a typical exhaust of a natural gas or methane combustion device has a composition of about 11.7% carbon dioxide and 88.3% N 2 based on stoichiometric composition after cleaning and dehydrating steps.
  • the pre-treated feed stream is then compressed to about 90 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) (465 cm Hg) and cooled to the recommended membrane operating temperature range of about 25_C (77_F) to 50_C (122_F) .
  • the compressed feed gas mixture then enters the first stage membrane of a two stage membrane process according to this invention.
  • the first stage membrane is composed of a silicone/polycarbonate copolymer with a perma-selective layer of about 0.0001cm (1 mm or 10,000 Angstrom).
  • the permeate gas recovered contains about 85% of the incoming carbon dioxide at about 40 vol% purity.
  • the calculated permeate flux gives a membrane area factor of about 256 square feet per 100 pounds of carbon dioxide in the first stage permeate.
  • the fresh feed, Fl as shown in Table 3 is about 39,621 scfh.
  • the fresh feed Fl combined with the retentate recycle R2 from the second stage is about 50,748 scfh, and the area factor calculated above determines a required net membrane area of about 2,261 square feet in the first stage.
  • the resultant first stage permeate flow PI of about 14,666 scfh is compressed to about 100 psia (517 cm Hg) and cooled to the required membrane temperature as above to become F2, the second stage feed gas.
  • the second stage feed gas F2 then enters the secondary and final stage membrane which is composed of a polycarbonate polymer with a perma-selective layer of about 0.00001cm (0.1 mm or 1,000 Angstrom).
  • the second stage permeate has a purity of about 96.0 vol%.
  • the calculated permeate flux gives a membrane area factor of about 1,103 square feet per 100 pounds of carbon dioxide in the secondary stage permeate.
  • the secondary stage feed gas F2, from Table 3, is about 14,666 scfh, and the area factor above determines a required membrane area of about 4,598 square feet in the secondary stage.
  • the total membrane area of both stages in the preferred embodiment is about 6,859 square feet, in which the first relatively high intrinsic permeability membrane separator, or silicone polycarbonate copolymer stage, comprises about 33.0% of the total membrane area and the second relatively low intrinsic permeability membrane separator, or polycarbonate stage, comprises stage the balance.
  • the total membrane area required for the same separation and process flow is about 75,313 square feet, with about 93.9% of the total, or 70,713 square feet, comprising the first stage.
  • a major benefit of the present invention is a very large reduction in membrane area.
  • the present invention provides very large increases (e.g., 1130%) in process capacity.
  • This preferred embodiment of the present invention also provides as a by-product a first stage retentate stream with relatively high nitrogen purity of about 97%, the balance carbon dioxide. Though this nitrogen purity may be considered medium in a scale of low to high purity, the stream can be used as a general purpose inert gas because carbon dioxide is also inert.
  • the by-product retentate of this composition may be used or further purified to yield high purity nitrogen as desired.
  • the very high purity permeate product stream P2 in the preferred embodiment described above is subsequently desirably compressed to about 260 psia and sub-cooled to about -14_F, which is the dew point of a 99.95 vol% carbon dioxide gas mixture.
  • the liquid carbon dioxide so produced may either be stored or used for any useful purpose.
  • means for pre-treating, cooling, transporting, and compressing the various process streams in the present invention includes but is not limited to those described in U.S. Patent 5,233,837 to Callahan, hereby incorporated by reference.

Abstract

A membrane process and apparatus are described for the production of a desired very high purity permeate gas by use of a multiple stage membrane process wherein in a primary stage a process feed gas mixture is provided to a primary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability to provide an intermediate permeate gas and a retentate gas, and providing the intermediate permeate gas in a secondary stage to a secondary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively low intrinsic permeability, to produce therefrom a very high purity permeate gas product.

Description

MULTIPLE STAGE SEMI-PERMEABLE MEMBRANE GAS SEPARATION PROCESS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process and apparatus for the production of a high purity gas which in general is more permeable in polymeric membranes relative to other gases with which it is mixed. The more permeable gas, e.g., carbon dioxide, is separated and concentrated by permeating through specific membrane stages to a high purity. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION U.S. Patent 4,990,168 to Sauer et al describes a two or more stage membrane and distillation process to separate and concentrate carbon dioxide from a destination tail gas mixture containing it in a high concentration of about 75% C02. The nature and composition of the membrane material is described in detail, and polyimide, polyarimid, polyester, polya ide and cellulose acetate are noted as examples. The use of different membrane materials with different properties for application in different stages is not described. Furthermore, although a process such as that described in the Sauer '168 patent may be useful in limited localities where gas mixtures containing carbon dioxide in a high concentration are available, such as the tail gas of a typical C02 liquefier, such a process is of little value in the more numerous localities where gas containing carbon dioxide in a high concentration is not readily available, such as a fossil fuel combustion exhaust or limekiln vent gas. Therefore, the Sauer '168 patent does not address adequately the problem of providing high purity carbon dioxide in localities in which a source containing carbon dioxide in a relatively high concentration is not readily available.
U.S. Patent 5,102,432 to Prasad describes a two or more stage membrane process to separate and concentrate high purity nitrogen from ambient air. This process relates to concentrating the less permeable component of a gas mixture to high purity by refining it by passing it through successive stages as a high pressure non-permeate phase. The Prasad '432 patent describes that a permeate stream of a downstream membrane is recycled to the initial feed and/or to the non-permeate phase of an upstream membrane. Also, the Prasad '432 patent specifies a range of membrane selectivities. A need has continued to exist for improved processes and apparatus for providing high purity gases in an economical and efficient manner; in particular, an improved process and apparatus for providing local production of high purity carbon dioxide starting from abundantly available low concentration sources as mentioned above has been strongly desired. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a membrane process for the production of very high purity permeate gas a desired product from a feed gas mixture containing less than 40 mol% of the desired permeate gas, which process comprises providing in a primary stage the process feed gas mixture to a primary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability to provide an intermediate permeate gas and a retentate gas, and providing the intermediate permeate gas in a secondary stage to a secondary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high selectivity, to produce therefrom a very high purity permeate gas product. Preferably, the membrane of the primary membrane separator unit has an intrinsic permeability of more than 250 Barrer/cm x 104. Also preferably, the membrane of the secondary membrane separator unit has an intrinsic permeability of 250 Barrer/cm x 104 or less.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to an apparatus for carrying out the process of the invention, i.e., an apparatus comprising a means for providing a process feed gas mixture to a primary stage membrane separator unit, which unit comprises a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability, and a means for providing an intermediate permeate gas produced from said primary stage membrane separator unit to a secondary stage membrane separator unit, which unit comprises a membrane having a relatively low intrinsic permeability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 illustrates a conventional one stage membrane separation process wherein a highly purified retentate N2 product is obtained by subjecting air to a separator unit comprising a conventional polymer membrane.
Figure 2 illustrates a two stage process wherein
N2 gas is produced as a highly purified retentate gas in a two stage membrane process, with recycling of the N2-enriched permeate from the second stage to the initial air feed.
Figure 3 illustrates processes wherein a permeate product is purified in two stages, with recycling of the retentate from the second stage to the process feed, including embodiments of the present invention as described below.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that for some gas separations it is generally beneficial to use more than one membrane stage, comprising using membranes in succeeding stages having lower intrinsic permeability. Specifically, for gas mixture separations where it is desirable to separate and concentrate the more permeable component to a purity of about 96.0+% (by volume), it has been found that lesser total membrane area is required when a two or more stage membrane system is employed wherein a primary stage utilizes a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability in a primary membrane separator unit, and a secondary stage or succeeding stages utilize a membrane having a relatively low intrinsic permeability. Examples of common gases that exhibit relatively high intrinsic permeability when so treated are carbon dioxide and hydrogen.
A membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability needs a smaller area for a given gas flow, however, it also generally shows less selectivity between gases. By comparison, a membrane having relatively high selectivity generally has lower intrinsic permeability for constituent gases of a mixture. However the low intrinsic permeability in the second or succeeding membrane separator stages is not a limitation, because of the reduced flow in the concentrated product permeate feed from the previous membrane separator stage or stages. In the second membrane separator stage, the higher selectivity ensures the highest final permeate product purity. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, it has now been found that by combining successively higher selectivity membrane separator stages into a multiple stage membrane process, it is possible to achieve both high permeability and high selectivity in a unitary membrane process, and thus use smaller membranes with higher efficiency. More specifically, in an ideal multiple stage membrane process in accordance with the present invention, the initial primary stage utilizes a high intrinsic permeability membrane whereby intermediate concentration levels (40 to 80 vol%) of the desired very high purity permeate gas product in the intermediate permeate gas are achieved with minimal membrane area. In accordance with the present invention, the secondary or succeeding stages utilized low intrinsic permeability membranes, whereby high levels of about 96.0+% of permeate concentration are achieved with minimal membrane area. Concentrated and reduced permeate flow from the initial stages accommodates the successive or second membrane's lower intrinsic permeability.
The generally accepted unit of permeability is known as the Barrer, and is usually expressed in the following units: P=(cm *cm)_(cm *sec*cm Hg)*lθ"10. The intrinsic permeability is permeability divided by the membrane perma-selective barrier thickness, and is usually expressed in the following units: P/L = (cm ) _(cm x sec x cm Hg) x 10* , wherein L is the barrier thickness (in cm) .
The selectivity of a more permeable gas over a less permeable gas is defined as the ratio of their permeabilities. Intrinsic permeabilities in
Barrers/cm x 10 of typical membrane materials are given below for four common gases, as well as the C02/N2 and 02/N2 selectivities.
silicone/ cellulose poly¬
Gas polycarbonate acetate carbonate L=0. 0001cm L=0. 00001cm L=0. 00001cm
C02 970. 0 110 35
H2 210. 0 84 140
°2 160. 0 33 . 0 5 . 25 2 70. 0 5. 5 0. 875
Selectivity Ratios
C02/N2 13 . 86 20. 0 40 . 0
02/N2 2 . 29 6. 0 6. 0
From Fick's Law of diffusion combined with Henry's Law of sorption, it is seen that the gas permeation flux (V) (flow volume per unit area per unit time) across a membrane for any component is equal to its intrinsic permeability (P/L) times its partial pressure difference (pi - p2) across the membrane barrier where p is the partial pressure in the higher pressure retentate side and P2 is the partial pressure in the lower pressure permeate side: V = P/L (pi - p2) .
A desirable component of a gas mixture may be either more permeable or less permeable than the other components of the mixture. If the desired component is the less permeable species, then the membrane is said to be retentate selective and the feed stream is refined to a high purity in the retained or less permeable (retentate) component. The feed-retentate phase is present on the high pressure upstream side of the membrane and is referred to hereinafter as the retentate phase. On the downstream side of the membrane there is provided a permeate phase at a much lower pressure, usually slightly above one atmosphere. Almost all commercial membrane processes currently operate to refine a retentate to high purity, usually with a single stage membrane. An example is the separation of oxygen from air, or more aptly the production of nitrogen enriched air. For instance, a feed stream of ambient air containing about 79 vol% nitrogen and 21 vol% oxygen is pressurized and passed over the upstream side of a polycarbonate membrane. As this happens, the more permeable oxygen permeates the membrane much more rapidly than nitrogen, leaving behind about a 99% pure nitrogen retentate product phase and generating about a 31.5 vol% oxygen (68.5 vol% nitrogen) permeate waste phase, which is typically dumped back to the atmosphere.
Another commercial example is the separation of carbon dioxide from wellhead natural gas, or more aptly, the production of methane enriched or pipeline quality gas. A feed stream of wellhead gas at 93 vol% methane and 7 vol% carbon dioxide at pressure is passed over the upstream side of a cellulose acetate membrane. The more permeable carbon dioxide permeates more quickly, yielding a 98% pure methane retentate product phase, and generating about a 37% pure carbon dioxide permeate waste phase, which is typically flared to the atmosphere at the production site. Normally a single stage membrane like those mentioned above is best suited to bring the retentate phase to its asymptotic purity concentration, 99.0+%, in a single pressurized retentate phase. Optimum performance of a single stage retentate membrane is achieved by matching feed flux (flow volume per unit area per unit time) and membrane surface area.
A flow diagram for a typical single stage membrane of polycarbonate to produce a nitrogen enriched retentate is shown in Figure 1. In all cases the feed gas is pressurized ambient air. The asymptotic retentate product phase concentration can be increased to 99.5 vol%, and even 99.95 vol%, by feeding the pressurized retentate stream to subsequent membrane stages to further refine the nitrogen enriched stream. The ultimate purity of the retentate product phase is a function of the feed flow rate and total membrane area. In the case of multiple stages, all stages utilize the same low intrinsic permeability membrane because of its relatively high oxygen over nitrogen selectivity and the relatively high initial nitrogen feed purity of 79%. Figure 2 is an example of a two stage process to produce nitrogen of up to 99.5 vol% purity. A multiple stage membrane process according to the present invention would not benefit such an air separation where a high purity nitrogen retentate product phase is desired, because the relatively high intrinsic permeability of the primary membrane separator stage plus the relatively high initial feed concentration of nitrogen in air would allow excessive amounts of nitrogen to permeate through the membrane, thereby reducing the recovery of nitrogen in the retentate.
The multiple stage membrane process in accordance with the present invention is optimally utilized when the object is to concentrate by a membrane process a desired gas as a permeate from a relatively low initial level of 40% or lower to a level of about 96.0 vol% or higher purity.
Figure 3 shows a two stage membrane process according to this invention, capable of separating carbon dioxide to a level of about 96.0+ vol% purity with process flows as noted in Table 3 below. Table 1 below shows an example of flow rates, material balances, and membrane areas for a process as shown in Figure 3 in a comparative case wherein both membranes are of a single composition, viz., polycarbonate. The process feed gas mixture, Fl, is 11.7% carbon dioxide and 88.3% nitrogen, which is the composition of a natural gas combustion exhaust after the water of combustion is removed.
Table 1 shows that the first stage requires about 70,713 square feet of membrane and the second stage requires about 4,600 square feet of membrane, or a total area of 75,313 square feet of membrane, to achieve 96.0 vol% carbon dioxide purity in P2 with about 76.5 vol% of the carbon dioxide initially present in the process feed gas mixture being recovered. That is, 23.5 vol% of the carbon dioxide in the feed Fl is dumped as waste in the first stage retentate stream, Rl.
TABLE 1
AREA, FT2 STREAM FLOW, SCFH CONC, V0L96 PRESS., PSIA
STAGE 1
POLYCARBONATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FRESH FEED, F1 37,973 1 1.7 90
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 70,713 RETENTATE, R1 34,443 3.1 80
C02: 35 N2: 0.875 PERMEATE, PI 7,336 58.9 1 5
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 40
STAGE 2
POLYCARBONATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FEED, F2 7,336 58.9 100
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 4,600 RETENTATE, R2 3,793 24.3 90
C02: 35 N2: 0.875 PERMEATE, P2 3,542 96.0 1 5
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 40
Referring to Figure 3 again, Table 2 shows a similar process and similar flows as in Table 1, except, in accordance with the present invention, the first stage utilizes a cellulose acetate membrane instead of polycarbonate.
TABLE 2
AREA, FT2 STREAM FLOW, SCFH CONC, V0L% PRESS., PSIA
STAGE 1
CELLULOSE TRIACETATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FRESH FEED, Fl 37,540 1 1.7 90
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 20,255 RETENTATE, R1 33,999 3.0 80
C02. 1 10 N2: 5.5 PERMEATE, PI 1 1 ,013 52.1 1 5
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 20
STAGE 2
POLYCARBONATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FEED, F2 1 1 ,013 52.1 100
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 4,593 RETENTATE, R2 7,473 31.3 90
C02: 35 N2: 0.875 PERMEATE, P2 3,542 96.0 1 5
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 40
Quite significantly, in this case it has been found that the first stage requires only about 20,055 square feet of membrane, and the combined stages require only a total area of only about 24,648 square feet, to achieve the same results.
Referring to Figure 3 again. Table 3 shows a similar process and flows as in Table 1 and Table 2, except that in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the first stage utilizes a silicone polycarbonate copolymer membrane instead of either pure cellulose acetate or polycarbonate. TABLE 3
AREA, FT2 STREAM FLOW, SCFH CONC, VOL% PRESS., PSIA
STAGE 1
SILICONE POLYCARBONATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FRESH FEED, Fl 39,621 1 1.7 90
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 2,261 RETENTATE, R1 36,095 3.4 80
C02: 970 N2: 70 PERMEATE, PI 14,665 49.1 15
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 14
STAGE 2
POLYCARBONATE
INTRINSIC PERMEABILITIES FEED, F2 14,664 49.1 100
(BARRER/CM X 10000) 4,598 RETENTATE, R2 1 1 ,121 34.2 90
C02: 35 N2: 0.875 PERMEATE, P2 3,543 96.0 15
SELECTIVITY C02/N2: 40
Note that in this case the first stage requires even less area, about 2,261 square feet of membrane, and the combined stages a total area of only about 6,859 square feet of membrane, to achieve the same results, i.e., > 96.0 vol% C02. The process in Table 3 represents a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
For any user of the process and apparatus of the present invention, a major benefit is a substantial reduction in the total membrane area required to accomplish a particular desired gas separation. For any given total membrane area, this invention provides substantially higher productivity. For example, comparing Tables 1 and 3, there is shown an 90.0% reduction in membrane area for a feed stream of about 37,973 to 39,621 standard cubic feet per hour (scfh) . For any given area the present invention as described in Table 3 can process 11.3 (feed flux ratio) times the feed flow compared with the homogeneous membrane process shown in Table 1.
The general process steps of the present invention are further described below, together with further explanation with respect to Figure 3 and the data given in Table 3 as a specific preferred example of the present invention. Herein, all parts and percentages (%) are by volume, also equivalent to mole fraction, unless otherwise indicated.
The present invention is further discussed particularly in terms of a preferred embodiment of the present invention wherein the membrane feed stream is the product of the combustion of any hydrocarbon fuel, such as fossil fuel, in air. However, if a process stream is available which comprises 40 vol% or less C02, the balance typically air or nitrogen or any other less permeable gas or gases, the same can be processed in accordance with the present invention. The process of the present invention is even more preferred in the case of using a process gas stream containing 25 vol% or less C02, and is especially preferred in the case of using a process gas stream containing 11.7 vol% or less C02. A typical exhaust of a natural gas or methane combustion device has a composition of about 11.7% carbon dioxide and 88.3% N2 based on stoichiometric composition after cleaning and dehydrating steps. The pre-treated feed stream is then compressed to about 90 pounds per square inch absolute (psia) (465 cm Hg) and cooled to the recommended membrane operating temperature range of about 25_C (77_F) to 50_C (122_F) . The compressed feed gas mixture then enters the first stage membrane of a two stage membrane process according to this invention. The first stage membrane is composed of a silicone/polycarbonate copolymer with a perma-selective layer of about 0.0001cm (1 mm or 10,000 Angstrom). Under these conditions of feed gas composition, pressure, and flux, the permeate gas recovered contains about 85% of the incoming carbon dioxide at about 40 vol% purity. The calculated permeate flux gives a membrane area factor of about 256 square feet per 100 pounds of carbon dioxide in the first stage permeate. The fresh feed, Fl, as shown in Table 3 is about 39,621 scfh. The fresh feed Fl combined with the retentate recycle R2 from the second stage is about 50,748 scfh, and the area factor calculated above determines a required net membrane area of about 2,261 square feet in the first stage. The resultant first stage permeate flow PI of about 14,666 scfh is compressed to about 100 psia (517 cm Hg) and cooled to the required membrane temperature as above to become F2, the second stage feed gas.
The second stage feed gas F2 then enters the secondary and final stage membrane which is composed of a polycarbonate polymer with a perma-selective layer of about 0.00001cm (0.1 mm or 1,000 Angstrom).
Under these conditions of feed composition, pressure and flux, the second stage permeate has a purity of about 96.0 vol%. The calculated permeate flux gives a membrane area factor of about 1,103 square feet per 100 pounds of carbon dioxide in the secondary stage permeate. The secondary stage feed gas F2, from Table 3, is about 14,666 scfh, and the area factor above determines a required membrane area of about 4,598 square feet in the secondary stage.
The total membrane area of both stages in the preferred embodiment is about 6,859 square feet, in which the first relatively high intrinsic permeability membrane separator, or silicone polycarbonate copolymer stage, comprises about 33.0% of the total membrane area and the second relatively low intrinsic permeability membrane separator, or polycarbonate stage, comprises stage the balance. By comparison, if both membrane stages are composed of the relatively low intrinsic permeability polycarbonate membrane as shown in Table 1, the total membrane area required for the same separation and process flow is about 75,313 square feet, with about 93.9% of the total, or 70,713 square feet, comprising the first stage. Thus a major benefit of the present invention is a very large reduction in membrane area. Conversely, for a specified size membrane system, the present invention provides very large increases (e.g., 1130%) in process capacity.
This preferred embodiment of the present invention also provides as a by-product a first stage retentate stream with relatively high nitrogen purity of about 97%, the balance carbon dioxide. Though this nitrogen purity may be considered medium in a scale of low to high purity, the stream can be used as a general purpose inert gas because carbon dioxide is also inert. The by-product retentate of this composition may be used or further purified to yield high purity nitrogen as desired.
The very high purity permeate product stream P2 in the preferred embodiment described above is subsequently desirably compressed to about 260 psia and sub-cooled to about -14_F, which is the dew point of a 99.95 vol% carbon dioxide gas mixture. The liquid carbon dioxide so produced may either be stored or used for any useful purpose. Also with respect to the preferred embodiment described above, means for pre-treating, cooling, transporting, and compressing the various process streams in the present invention includes but is not limited to those described in U.S. Patent 5,233,837 to Callahan, hereby incorporated by reference.
While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A membrane process for the production of a desired very high purity permeate gas product from a feed gas mixture containing less than 40 vol% of the desired permeate gas, which process comprises providing in a primary stage a process feed gas mixture to a primary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high intrinsic permeability, to provide an intermediate permeate gas and a retentate gas, and providing the intermediate permeate gas in a secondary stage to a secondary membrane separator unit comprising a membrane having a relatively high selectivity, to produce therefrom the very high purity permeate gas product.
2. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the primary membrane separator unit comprises a membrane with an intrinsic permeability of more than 250 Barrer/cm x 104.
3. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the secondary membrane separator unit comprises a membrane with an intrinsic permeability of 250 Barrer/cm x 10 or less.
4. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the primary membrane separator unit comprises a membrane with an intrinsic permeability of more than 250 Barrer/cm x 10 and the secondary membrane separator unit comprises a membrane with an intrinsic permeability of less than 250 Barrer/cm x 10 4.
5. A membrane process as in claim 1 wherein the intermediate permeate gas comprises from 40 vol% to 80 vol% of the gas to be provided as the very high purity permeate gas product.
6. A membrane process as in claim 1 which further comprises using products of fossil fuel combustion as the process feed gas mixture.
7. A membrane process as in claim 1 which further comprises using products of hydrocarbon combustion in air as the process feed gas mixture.
8. A membrane process as in claim 1 which further comprises using products of fossil fuel combustion in a limekilm as the process feed gas mixture.
9. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the process feed gas mixture is a process gas stream containing 25 vol% or less of carbon dioxide.
10. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the process feed gas mixture is a process gas stream containing 11.7 vol% or less of carbon dioxide.
11. A membrane process as in claim 1, wherein the process feed gas mixture contains carbon dioxide and carbon dioxide is recovered as the very high purity permeate gas product at a purity of more than 96.0 vol%.
PCT/US1995/012364 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process WO1996011048A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP95935653A EP0785818B9 (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process
JP51260796A JP3850030B2 (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 Gas separation process using semi-permeable membrane in multiple stages
CA002202142A CA2202142C (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process
DE69529759T DE69529759T3 (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 MULTI-STAGE SEPARATION PROCESS WITH SEMIPERMEABLEN MEMBRANES
AT95935653T ATE233123T1 (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 MULTI-STEP SEPARATION PROCESS WITH SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANES

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/320,273 US5482539A (en) 1993-09-22 1994-10-11 Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane process and apparatus for gas separation
US08/320,273 1994-10-11

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996011048A1 true WO1996011048A1 (en) 1996-04-18

Family

ID=23245656

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1995/012364 WO1996011048A1 (en) 1994-10-11 1995-10-10 Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US5482539A (en)
EP (1) EP0785818B9 (en)
JP (1) JP3850030B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100395829B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE233123T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69529759T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2192208T5 (en)
WO (1) WO1996011048A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999051325A2 (en) * 1998-04-08 1999-10-14 Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. Membrane process for producing carbon dioxide
US6128919A (en) * 1998-04-08 2000-10-10 Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. Process for separating natural gas and carbon dioxide
GB2457929A (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-02 David James Benton Process to extract carbon dioxide from air
US11471823B2 (en) 2019-02-12 2022-10-18 Haffmans B.V. System and method for separating a gas mixture

Families Citing this family (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5482539A (en) * 1993-09-22 1996-01-09 Enerfex, Inc. Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane process and apparatus for gas separation
US5693121A (en) * 1994-11-17 1997-12-02 Enerfex, Inc. Semi-permeable membrane separation process for the production of very high purity nitrogen
US5641337A (en) * 1995-12-08 1997-06-24 Permea, Inc. Process for the dehydration of a gas
US5709732A (en) * 1996-04-02 1998-01-20 Praxair Technology, Inc. Advanced membrane system for separating gaseous mixtures
US5730779A (en) * 1996-10-31 1998-03-24 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Fluorochemical recovery and recycle using membranes
US5976220A (en) * 1996-12-09 1999-11-02 3M Innovative Properties Company Diffusional gas transfer system and method using same
AU5677098A (en) * 1997-01-23 1998-08-18 Carbon Membranes Ltd. Recovery of perfluorinated compounds and hydrofluorocarbon gases using molecularsieve membranes
US5827351A (en) * 1997-02-14 1998-10-27 Praxair Technology, Inc. Air separation system and method
JP2001526655A (en) * 1997-05-02 2001-12-18 イー・アイ・デュポン・ドウ・ヌムール・アンド・カンパニー Removal of CO2 from fluorocarbon by semipermeable membrane
WO1998050332A1 (en) * 1997-05-02 1998-11-12 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Separation of co2 from unsaturated fluorinated compounds by semipermeable membrane
US5855647A (en) * 1997-05-15 1999-01-05 American Air Liquide, Inc. Process for recovering SF6 from a gas
GB9713989D0 (en) * 1997-07-02 1997-09-10 Boc Group Plc Controlling atmospheres in containers
US5843208A (en) * 1997-07-24 1998-12-01 Alliedsignal Inc. Process for recovering sulfur hexafluoride
EP0908219B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 1999-12-08 Gkss-Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Gmbh Multi-stage process for the separation/recovery of gases
US6179900B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2001-01-30 Gkss Forschungszentrum Geesthacht Gmbh Process for the separation/recovery of gases
US6032484A (en) * 1998-03-23 2000-03-07 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Recovery of perfluorinated compounds from the exhaust of semiconductor fabs with recycle of vacuum pump diluent
US5976222A (en) * 1998-03-23 1999-11-02 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Recovery of perfluorinated compounds from the exhaust of semiconductor fabs using membrane and adsorption in series
JP2966836B1 (en) * 1998-07-22 1999-10-25 日本エア・リキード株式会社 Gas purification method and gas purification device
US6168649B1 (en) * 1998-12-09 2001-01-02 Mg Generon, Inc. Membrane for separation of xenon from oxygen and nitrogen and method of using same
DE19923155A1 (en) * 1999-05-20 2000-11-23 Solvay Fluor & Derivate Process for removing sulfur hexafluoride/nitrogen mixtures from gas-isolated lines comprises contacting the gas mixture with a membrane
JP2001062240A (en) * 1999-08-27 2001-03-13 Air Liquide Japan Ltd Method and device for adjusting concentration of mixed gas
JP4357046B2 (en) * 1999-10-01 2009-11-04 株式会社東芝 Gas recovery device
FR2802114B1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2002-06-28 Air Liquide INSTALLATION AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING GAS BY SELECTIVE PERMEATION
US6953492B2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2005-10-11 Enerfex, Inc. Membrane technology to reduce nitrogen in natural gas
US6921428B2 (en) * 2001-01-25 2005-07-26 Ube Industries, Ltd. Device and method for separating and collecting halide gas
US6428606B1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-08-06 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Membrane gas separation process with compressor interstage recycle
US7395425B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2008-07-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Data protection system that protects data by encrypting the data
US20040000513A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Colling Craig W. Apparatus using solid perm-selective membranes in multiple groups for simultaneous recovery of specified products from a fluid mixture
US6630011B1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2003-10-07 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Nitrogen removal from natural gas using two types of membranes
US6986802B2 (en) * 2003-08-28 2006-01-17 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Selective separation of fluid compounds utilizing a membrane separation process
US7429287B2 (en) * 2004-08-31 2008-09-30 Bp Corporation North America Inc. High efficiency gas sweetening system and method
US20070150337A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-06-28 Pegasus Transtech Corporation Trucking document delivery system and method
US20070148070A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Shrikar Chakravarti Production of moderate purity carbon dioxide streams
US20070148069A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Shrikar Chakravarti Carbon dioxide recovery from flue gas and the like
US20070148068A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2007-06-28 Burgers Kenneth L Reclaiming amines in carbon dioxide recovery
FR2918978B1 (en) * 2007-07-20 2010-02-12 Inst Francais Du Petrole NOVEL HYDROGEN PURIFICATION PROCESS USING A COMBINATION OF MEMBRANE SEPARATION UNITS
US8192524B2 (en) * 2009-01-29 2012-06-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for upgrading natural gas with improved management of CO2
WO2010108233A1 (en) * 2009-03-26 2010-09-30 Eco Bio Technologies Pty Ltd Method for the separation of gases
US20100275777A1 (en) * 2009-04-30 2010-11-04 Hasse David J Membrane-Based Process for CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Generated by Oxy-Combustion of Coal
US8231785B2 (en) * 2009-05-12 2012-07-31 Uop Llc Staged membrane system for gas, vapor, and liquid separations
US8454724B2 (en) 2010-06-30 2013-06-04 Uop Llc Flexible system to remove carbon dioxide from a feed natural gas
FR2962994A1 (en) * 2010-07-20 2012-01-27 Air Liquide Making flow comprising nitrogen comprises combusting hydrocarbon fuel, capturing carbon dioxide in smoke flow having nitrogen and carbon dioxide and separating the first residual flow into flow comprising nitrogen and second residual flow
US9545599B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2017-01-17 Generon Igs, Inc. Hybrid membrane system for gas streams with condensable hydrocarbons
ES2583903T3 (en) 2013-07-30 2016-09-22 Haldor Topso¿E A/S Procedure to produce high purity CO by purification with CO membrane produced by SOEC
US10143961B2 (en) 2015-12-03 2018-12-04 Air Liquide Advanced Technologies U.S. Llc Method and system for purification of natural gas using membranes
CN108339377B (en) * 2017-01-23 2021-02-26 神华集团有限责任公司 From containing CO2Separation of CO from gas streams2Method and membrane separation system
RU170496U1 (en) * 2017-02-06 2017-04-26 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) DEVICE FOR CONTINUOUS SEPARATION OF A MIXTURE OF HYDROCARBON GASES
WO2020203994A1 (en) 2019-03-29 2020-10-08 宇部興産株式会社 Gas separation system

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2966235A (en) * 1958-09-24 1960-12-27 Selas Corp Of America Separation of gases by diffusion through silicone rubber
US4130403A (en) * 1977-08-03 1978-12-19 Cooley T E Removal of H2 S and/or CO2 from a light hydrocarbon stream by use of gas permeable membrane
US4264338A (en) * 1977-11-02 1981-04-28 Monsanto Company Method for separating gases
US4435191A (en) * 1983-06-30 1984-03-06 Monsanto Company Process for separating aggressive gases from gas mixtures
JPS59207827A (en) * 1983-05-10 1984-11-26 Ube Ind Ltd Method for separating gas from gas mixture
US4597777A (en) * 1983-02-15 1986-07-01 Monsanto Company Membrane gas separation processes
US4602477A (en) * 1985-06-05 1986-07-29 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Membrane-aided distillation for carbon dioxide and hydrocarbon separation
US4690695A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-09-01 Union Carbide Corporation Enhanced gas separation process
US4701187A (en) * 1986-11-03 1987-10-20 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Process for separating components of a gas stream
JPS63151332A (en) * 1986-12-13 1988-06-23 Ube Ind Ltd Separation and recovery of carbon dioxide
JPS6443329A (en) * 1987-08-11 1989-02-15 Nippon Kokan Kk Gas separation method employing two kinds of membranes
US4990168A (en) * 1989-07-17 1991-02-05 Sauer Richard A Recovery of carbon dioxide from a carbon dioxide plant vent gas using membranes
US5205842A (en) * 1992-02-13 1993-04-27 Praxair Technology, Inc. Two stage membrane dryer
US5282969A (en) * 1993-04-29 1994-02-01 Permea, Inc. High pressure feed membrane separation process

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3246449A (en) 1959-06-09 1966-04-19 Union Carbide Corp Recovery of helium
US3307330A (en) * 1965-04-30 1967-03-07 Du Pont Diffusion process and apparatus
JPS5263178A (en) * 1975-11-17 1977-05-25 Toshiba Corp Gas separation unit
US4208902A (en) * 1978-12-20 1980-06-24 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Gas concentration analysis method and system
SU1119718A1 (en) * 1983-01-14 1984-10-23 Московский Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Инженерно-Физический Институт Method of separating gas mixtures
US4639257A (en) * 1983-12-16 1987-01-27 Costain Petrocarbon Limited Recovery of carbon dioxide from gas mixture
JPS60161703A (en) * 1984-01-30 1985-08-23 Teijin Ltd Gas permselective composite membrane
JPS62167390A (en) * 1986-01-17 1987-07-23 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Method for treating by-product gas
JPS62286517A (en) * 1986-06-04 1987-12-12 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Gas separation system
ES2052605T3 (en) 1986-08-15 1994-07-16 Permea Inc ASYMMETRIC GAS SEPARATION MEMBRANES THAT HAVE FILMS OF GRADUATED DENSITY.
JPH04180812A (en) * 1990-11-16 1992-06-29 Nkk Corp Removal of vapor and carbon dioxide gas
US5102432A (en) * 1990-12-10 1992-04-07 Union Carbide Industrial Gases Technology Corporation Three-stage membrane gas separation process and system
WO1992019358A1 (en) * 1991-05-07 1992-11-12 Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. Membrane fractionation process
FR2683737B1 (en) * 1991-11-18 1994-08-05 Air Liquide PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE PRODUCTION BY PERMEATION OF A LIGHT IMPURE GAS FROM A GAS MIXTURE CONTAINING THIS LIGHT GAS.
US5282968A (en) * 1992-08-03 1994-02-01 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for separating and recovering halocarbons from mixtures thereof
US5233837A (en) * 1992-09-03 1993-08-10 Enerfex, Inc. Process and apparatus for producing liquid carbon dioxide
US5482539A (en) * 1993-09-22 1996-01-09 Enerfex, Inc. Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane process and apparatus for gas separation
FR2724327B1 (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-10-25 Air Liquide METHOD FOR CASCADE MEMBRANE SEPARATION OF MEMBRANES OF DIFFERENT SELECTIVITY

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2966235A (en) * 1958-09-24 1960-12-27 Selas Corp Of America Separation of gases by diffusion through silicone rubber
US4130403A (en) * 1977-08-03 1978-12-19 Cooley T E Removal of H2 S and/or CO2 from a light hydrocarbon stream by use of gas permeable membrane
US4264338A (en) * 1977-11-02 1981-04-28 Monsanto Company Method for separating gases
US4597777A (en) * 1983-02-15 1986-07-01 Monsanto Company Membrane gas separation processes
JPS59207827A (en) * 1983-05-10 1984-11-26 Ube Ind Ltd Method for separating gas from gas mixture
US4435191A (en) * 1983-06-30 1984-03-06 Monsanto Company Process for separating aggressive gases from gas mixtures
US4602477A (en) * 1985-06-05 1986-07-29 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Membrane-aided distillation for carbon dioxide and hydrocarbon separation
US4690695A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-09-01 Union Carbide Corporation Enhanced gas separation process
US4701187A (en) * 1986-11-03 1987-10-20 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Process for separating components of a gas stream
JPS63151332A (en) * 1986-12-13 1988-06-23 Ube Ind Ltd Separation and recovery of carbon dioxide
JPS6443329A (en) * 1987-08-11 1989-02-15 Nippon Kokan Kk Gas separation method employing two kinds of membranes
US4990168A (en) * 1989-07-17 1991-02-05 Sauer Richard A Recovery of carbon dioxide from a carbon dioxide plant vent gas using membranes
US5205842A (en) * 1992-02-13 1993-04-27 Praxair Technology, Inc. Two stage membrane dryer
US5282969A (en) * 1993-04-29 1994-02-01 Permea, Inc. High pressure feed membrane separation process

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999051325A2 (en) * 1998-04-08 1999-10-14 Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. Membrane process for producing carbon dioxide
WO1999051325A3 (en) * 1998-04-08 1999-12-02 Messer Griesheim Ind Inc Membrane process for producing carbon dioxide
US6128919A (en) * 1998-04-08 2000-10-10 Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. Process for separating natural gas and carbon dioxide
GB2457929A (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-02 David James Benton Process to extract carbon dioxide from air
US11471823B2 (en) 2019-02-12 2022-10-18 Haffmans B.V. System and method for separating a gas mixture
US11964231B2 (en) 2019-02-12 2024-04-23 Haffmans B.V. System and method for separating a gas mixture

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0785818B2 (en) 2006-10-04
EP0785818B9 (en) 2007-08-29
ES2192208T3 (en) 2003-10-01
DE69529759T2 (en) 2004-02-19
US5482539A (en) 1996-01-09
JP3850030B2 (en) 2006-11-29
ES2192208T5 (en) 2007-05-16
ATE233123T1 (en) 2003-03-15
KR970706051A (en) 1997-11-03
EP0785818B1 (en) 2003-02-26
DE69529759D1 (en) 2003-04-03
US5873928A (en) 1999-02-23
KR100395829B1 (en) 2003-11-20
EP0785818A4 (en) 1998-01-07
DE69529759T3 (en) 2007-05-16
EP0785818A1 (en) 1997-07-30
JPH10506843A (en) 1998-07-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5482539A (en) Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane process and apparatus for gas separation
JP2664169B2 (en) Method for separating components of gaseous fluid
US4717407A (en) Process for recovering helium from a multi-component gas stream
Baker et al. The design of membrane vapor–gas separation systems
US5224350A (en) Process for recovering helium from a gas stream
KR101985551B1 (en) Process for separation of gases
EP0410845B1 (en) Recovery of carbon dioxide plant vent gas using membranes
JP2660464B2 (en) Three-stage membrane gas separation method and system
EP0547355B1 (en) Membrane oxygen process and system
KR950016823A (en) Recovery method of hydrogen by adsorptive membrane
EP0603798A1 (en) Membrane process for the production of high purity nitrogen
Stern et al. Recycle and multimembrane permeators for gas separations
JPH05269333A (en) Multistage cascade-sweep process for membrane gas separation
US5306427A (en) Low pressure feed membrane separation process
EP0110858A1 (en) Membrane gas separation process
US5693121A (en) Semi-permeable membrane separation process for the production of very high purity nitrogen
US5688307A (en) Separation of low-boiling gases using super-glassy membranes
KR102557207B1 (en) Membrane process and system for high recovery of a nonpermeating gas
CA2202142C (en) Multiple stage semi-permeable membrane gas separation process
Li et al. Use of an internally staged permeator in the enrichment of methane from biogas
Yan et al. Comparative study of two-membrane permeators for gas separations
Ettouney et al. Effect of cell configuration on separation characteristics of gas mixtures by polymeric membranes
JP2022176139A (en) gas separation process
JP2001520212A (en) Treatment of ethylene by gas permeation method
KR20200076093A (en) Carbon dioxide separation method by using separation membranes in gtl synthesis process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2202142

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2202142

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1019970702381

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1995935653

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1995935653

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1019970702381

Country of ref document: KR

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1995935653

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1019970702381

Country of ref document: KR