WO1997019635A1 - Respiratory test apparatus - Google Patents

Respiratory test apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997019635A1
WO1997019635A1 PCT/GB1996/002932 GB9602932W WO9719635A1 WO 1997019635 A1 WO1997019635 A1 WO 1997019635A1 GB 9602932 W GB9602932 W GB 9602932W WO 9719635 A1 WO9719635 A1 WO 9719635A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
subject
target
profile
pressure
test
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1996/002932
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kenneth Chatham
Original Assignee
Medrus Technology Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Medrus Technology Limited filed Critical Medrus Technology Limited
Priority to NZ322972A priority Critical patent/NZ322972A/en
Priority to AU77015/96A priority patent/AU7701596A/en
Priority to EP96940006A priority patent/EP0871398A1/en
Publication of WO1997019635A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997019635A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B23/00Exercising apparatus specially adapted for particular parts of the body
    • A63B23/18Exercising apparatus specially adapted for particular parts of the body for improving respiratory function
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/08Detecting, measuring or recording devices for evaluating the respiratory organs
    • A61B5/087Measuring breath flow

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for testing the respiratory ability of subjects.
  • an apparatus which comprises a unit through which a subject can inspire, this unit including a pressure sensing device, and a data processing unit to which the pressure sensing device is connected, and arranged to compare the time- varying pressure, or a parameter thereof, with a prestored target.
  • the apparatus is arranged to store a target for each individual subject.
  • this target comprises a time-varying pressure profile taken from the subject during a pre-test trial inspiration, but then reduced by a predetermined fraction in pressure amplitude.
  • the target may comprise an integral of the trial inspiration pressure profile, reduced by a predetermined fraction.
  • the target is selected as the best result from a number, say three, trial inspirations.
  • the apparatus is preferably arranged for the subject to carry our successive test inspirations, the measured results of each of these being compared against the target, with the time intervals between successive tests progressively reducing.
  • the apparatus prompts the subject to commence each successive inspiration (e.g. by means of a display and/or audible signal) .
  • a set of successive tests e.g. six tests
  • the same interval e.g. 60 seconds
  • a second set of tests are carried out with a smaller internal (e.g. 45 seconds) between them, and so on.
  • the apparatus is arranged to determine if the subject has "passed” that test, in which case the apparatus prompts the subject to carry out the next test, and so on.
  • the subject will fail an individual test, and this completes the exercise: the point in the overall program at which the failure occurs is recorded.
  • the prestored target profile is continuously displayed on a visual display, and the measured profile is built up on the display as the subject breathes in: the subject is thus able to compare his performance with the target, and can adjust his effort in an attempt to exceed the target. This "feedback" to the subject is particularly valuable.
  • the apparatus requires the measured time- varying profile to exceed the target profile by a predetermined margin, in terms of the integral of that curve (e.g. the area under the curve, which is therefore a measure of the work done) .
  • the apparatus requires the duration of the measured time-varying profile to exceed a predetermined fraction (e.g. 90%) of the duration of the target profile.
  • the apparatus is arranged to display one or more of the following: the peak pressure of the target profile, the average peak pressure from the successive test, the integral of the target profile, the accumulating integral of each test profile, and the accumulated integral of the successive tests (corresponding to the total work done by the subject during the test program) .
  • the subject Preferably at each session of use, the subject creates a fresh target, in the manner described above, against which he compares his performance during the tests which he carried out in that session.
  • the peak pressure measured typically over the first second of each inspiration, gives an indication of measured respiratory muscle strength.
  • the integral of each test profile is a measure of the work done.
  • the accumulated integral, over all tests completed successfully in the session, is a measure of respiratory endurance.
  • FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus in accordance with the invention for testing the respiratory ability of a patient
  • FIGURE 2 is a typical time-varying measure of pressure sensed in a trial use of the apparatus of Figure 1;
  • FIGURE 3 is a typical display of a target profile and a measured profile;
  • FIGURE 4 is a typical results grid following a test session.
  • FIG. 1 of the drawings there is shown an apparatus for carrying out respiratory tests, the apparatus comprising a hand-held unit 10 having a mouthpiece 11, and through which the patient or subject inspires, and a personal computer 20 to which a manometer of the unit 10 is connected.
  • the computer 20 includes a visual display unit (VDU) 22 and keyboard 24 is connected to a printer 26.
  • VDU visual display unit
  • the computer is loaded with a respiratory test program in accordance with the invention, arranged for the apparatus to function as follows.
  • the computer creates and stores a record for each subject: thus for each subject, data is entered on the computer keyboard 24 to identify the subject, and various other items of data concerning the subject are also entered.
  • a target pressure profile for the subject is created and stored: thus, the VDU prompts the subject to break in through the hand-held unit 10; the negative pressure created within the air passage of the unit 10 is monitored by the manometer, and a corresponding time-varying profile P as shown in Figure 2 is displayed on the VDU and also stored. This procedure is carried out three times, with an interval of time (e.g. of two minutes) between each inspiration.
  • the computer selects the "best " pressure profile of the three (as a combination of the largest peak and longest duration) : the computer then calculates a target profile T which is predetermined fraction (e.g. 80%) in amplitude of the selected "best" pressure profile; this target profile is then displayed continuously on the VDU.
  • a target profile T which is predetermined fraction (e.g. 80%) in amplitude of the selected "best" pressure profile; this target profile is then displayed continuously on the VDU.
  • the subject is prompted by the computer to commence the testing phase.
  • the subject breathes in again through the hand-held unit 10, and a trace of the measured pressure M is built up on the VDU, as shown in Figure 3: thus, as the subject breathes in, he can visually compare his performance against the target profile being displayed.
  • the computer continuously calculates an integral of the trace which is being created (i.e. the area under the curve, therefore a measure of the work done) , and displays this accumulating figure on the VDU.
  • the VDU also continuously displays the corresponding final integral of the target profile.
  • the computer finds that the integral of the subject's measured trace exceeds the integral of the target profile by a predetermined margin (e.g. by 10%), then the computer regards the subject as having "passed” the test.
  • the computer prompts the subject (via the VDU and/or by an audible signal) , to repeat the exercise, after an interval of 60 seconds.
  • the test proceeds in this manner, until the subject has "passed " the test six times in succession (with 60 seconds between each test) . Then the test proceeds six more times, with a reduced interval (45 seconds) between successive tests, followed by six tests with 30 seconds intervals, six test with 15 second intervals, six tests with 10 seconds intervals, and finally six tests with 5 seconds intervals.
  • the subject will fail to exceed his target.
  • Figure 4 shows the results for a subject who passed all six tests for each of the 60, 45, 30 and 15 seconds intervals tests (A to D) , then passed four of the tests at 10 seconds intervals but then failed the next test. It will be appreciated that the results for this subject can be categorised as "E4".
  • the results table shown in Figure 3 is displayed on the VDU, together with the accumulated total of the intervals under the test curves (being a measure of the total work done) . This information can be printed out, and is also stored by the computer in the data record for that subject.
  • each subject improves his or her performance, firstly by progressing further through the full program of 36 tests, secondly by improving the accumulated "work done" figure, and also by improving the average peak pressure figure.

Abstract

An apparatus for testing the respiratory ability of a subject, comprises a unit (10) through which the subject can inspire, the unit (10) including a pressure sensing device connected to a data processing unit (20). The data processing unit is arranged to compare the time-varying pressure, or a parameter thereof, with a prestored target.

Description

Respiratory Test Apparatus
The present invention relates to an apparatus for testing the respiratory ability of subjects.
There are a number of situations where it is necessary or desirable to test the respiratory ability of a subject, and indeed to improve that ability. For example, it is often necessary to test and improve the respiratory ability of a patient prior to a surgical operation and/or during the rehabilitation of such a patient. As another example, it is often desirable to improve the respiratory ability of athletes or other sportsmen.
I have now devised an apparatus for testing and improving the respiratory ability of subjects.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an apparatus which comprises a unit through which a subject can inspire, this unit including a pressure sensing device, and a data processing unit to which the pressure sensing device is connected, and arranged to compare the time- varying pressure, or a parameter thereof, with a prestored target. Preferably the apparatus is arranged to store a target for each individual subject. Preferably this target comprises a time-varying pressure profile taken from the subject during a pre-test trial inspiration, but then reduced by a predetermined fraction in pressure amplitude. Additionally or instead, the target may comprise an integral of the trial inspiration pressure profile, reduced by a predetermined fraction. Preferably the target is selected as the best result from a number, say three, trial inspirations.
The apparatus is preferably arranged for the subject to carry our successive test inspirations, the measured results of each of these being compared against the target, with the time intervals between successive tests progressively reducing. Preferably, the apparatus prompts the subject to commence each successive inspiration (e.g. by means of a display and/or audible signal) . Preferably a set of successive tests (e.g. six tests) are carried out with the same interval (e.g. 60 seconds) between them, then a second set of tests are carried out with a smaller internal (e.g. 45 seconds) between them, and so on.
At each test, the apparatus is arranged to determine if the subject has "passed" that test, in which case the apparatus prompts the subject to carry out the next test, and so on. At some stage, the subject will fail an individual test, and this completes the exercise: the point in the overall program at which the failure occurs is recorded. During each test, preferably the prestored target profile is continuously displayed on a visual display, and the measured profile is built up on the display as the subject breathes in: the subject is thus able to compare his performance with the target, and can adjust his effort in an attempt to exceed the target. This "feedback" to the subject is particularly valuable.
Preferably the apparatus requires the measured time- varying profile to exceed the target profile by a predetermined margin, in terms of the integral of that curve (e.g. the area under the curve, which is therefore a measure of the work done) . Preferably also the apparatus requires the duration of the measured time-varying profile to exceed a predetermined fraction (e.g. 90%) of the duration of the target profile.
Preferably the apparatus is arranged to display one or more of the following: the peak pressure of the target profile, the average peak pressure from the successive test, the integral of the target profile, the accumulating integral of each test profile, and the accumulated integral of the successive tests (corresponding to the total work done by the subject during the test program) .
Preferably at each session of use, the subject creates a fresh target, in the manner described above, against which he compares his performance during the tests which he carried out in that session. The peak pressure, measured typically over the first second of each inspiration, gives an indication of measured respiratory muscle strength. The integral of each test profile is a measure of the work done. The accumulated integral, over all tests completed successfully in the session, is a measure of respiratory endurance. These results therefore provide an effective assessment of the subject's respiratory muscles.
Through use of the above-described apparatus in successive sessions, I have found that the subject's respiratory ability improves significantly (particularly muscle strength and endurance) .
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only and with reference to the accompany drawings, in which: FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram of an apparatus in accordance with the invention for testing the respiratory ability of a patient;
FIGURE 2 is a typical time-varying measure of pressure sensed in a trial use of the apparatus of Figure 1; FIGURE 3 is a typical display of a target profile and a measured profile; and
FIGURE 4 is a typical results grid following a test session.
Referring to Figure 1 of the drawings, there is shown an apparatus for carrying out respiratory tests, the apparatus comprising a hand-held unit 10 having a mouthpiece 11, and through which the patient or subject inspires, and a personal computer 20 to which a manometer of the unit 10 is connected. The computer 20 includes a visual display unit (VDU) 22 and keyboard 24 is connected to a printer 26. The computer is loaded with a respiratory test program in accordance with the invention, arranged for the apparatus to function as follows.
The computer creates and stores a record for each subject: thus for each subject, data is entered on the computer keyboard 24 to identify the subject, and various other items of data concerning the subject are also entered. In an initial phase, a target pressure profile for the subject is created and stored: thus, the VDU prompts the subject to break in through the hand-held unit 10; the negative pressure created within the air passage of the unit 10 is monitored by the manometer, and a corresponding time-varying profile P as shown in Figure 2 is displayed on the VDU and also stored. This procedure is carried out three times, with an interval of time (e.g. of two minutes) between each inspiration. The computer then selects the "best " pressure profile of the three (as a combination of the largest peak and longest duration) : the computer then calculates a target profile T which is predetermined fraction (e.g. 80%) in amplitude of the selected "best" pressure profile; this target profile is then displayed continuously on the VDU.
After a rest, the subject is prompted by the computer to commence the testing phase. Thus, the subject breathes in again through the hand-held unit 10, and a trace of the measured pressure M is built up on the VDU, as shown in Figure 3: thus, as the subject breathes in, he can visually compare his performance against the target profile being displayed. Also the computer continuously calculates an integral of the trace which is being created (i.e. the area under the curve, therefore a measure of the work done) , and displays this accumulating figure on the VDU. The VDU also continuously displays the corresponding final integral of the target profile.
If at the end of this test the computer finds that the integral of the subject's measured trace exceeds the integral of the target profile by a predetermined margin (e.g. by 10%), then the computer regards the subject as having "passed" the test. The computer then prompts the subject (via the VDU and/or by an audible signal) , to repeat the exercise, after an interval of 60 seconds. The test proceeds in this manner, until the subject has "passed " the test six times in succession (with 60 seconds between each test) . Then the test proceeds six more times, with a reduced interval (45 seconds) between successive tests, followed by six tests with 30 seconds intervals, six test with 15 second intervals, six tests with 10 seconds intervals, and finally six tests with 5 seconds intervals. However, at some stage during this test program, the subject will fail to exceed his target.
Thus, Figure 4 shows the results for a subject who passed all six tests for each of the 60, 45, 30 and 15 seconds intervals tests (A to D) , then passed four of the tests at 10 seconds intervals but then failed the next test. It will be appreciated that the results for this subject can be categorised as "E4". The results table shown in Figure 3 is displayed on the VDU, together with the accumulated total of the intervals under the test curves (being a measure of the total work done) . This information can be printed out, and is also stored by the computer in the data record for that subject.
At the next session of use by the same subject, the subject undergoes an initial phase as described above, and a new target profile is created in the same manner. The test then proceeds as deεcribed above. It will be appreciated that as a result of successive sessions of use of the apparatus, each subject improves his or her performance, firstly by progressing further through the full program of 36 tests, secondly by improving the accumulated "work done" figure, and also by improving the average peak pressure figure.

Claims

Claims
1) An apparatus for testing the respiratory ability of one or more subjects, the apparatus comprising a unit through which a subject can inspire, said unit including a pressure sensing device, and a data processing unit to which the pressure sensing device is connected, said data processing unit being arranged to compare the time-varying pressure, or a parameter thereof, with a prestored target.
2) An apparatus as claimed in claim 1, arranged to store a said target for each individual subject.
3) An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, in which each said target comprises a time-varying pressure profile taken from the subject during a pre-test trial inspiration reduced by a predetermined fraction in pressure amplitude.
4) An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, in which each said target comprises an integral of a trial inspiration pressure profile, reduced by a predetermined fraction.
5) An apparatus as claimed m any preceding claim, arranged for the subject to carry out successive test inspiration, the measured results of each of these being compared against the target, with the time intervals between successive tests being progressively reduced.
6) An apparatus as claimed m claim 5, arranged to prompt the subject to commence each successive inspiration.
7) An apparatus as claimed in claim 5 or 6, arranged to record the point in an overall program of tests at which the subject fails a test.
8) An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, arranged to display the prestored target and to build up a display of the measured profile as the subject breathes in. 9) An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, arranged to require the measured time-varying profile to exceed the target profile by a predetermined margin, in terms of the integral of the corresponding curve.
10) An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, arranged to require the duration of the measured time-varying profile to exceed a predetermined fraction of the duration of the target profile.
11) An apparatus as claimed in any preceding claim, arranged to display one or more of: the peak pressure of the target profile, the average peak pressure from the successive tests, the integral of the target profile, and the accumulated integral of the successive tests.
12) An apparatus for testing the respiratory ability of one or more subjects, the apparatus being substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
PCT/GB1996/002932 1995-11-28 1996-11-28 Respiratory test apparatus WO1997019635A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ322972A NZ322972A (en) 1995-11-28 1996-11-28 Respiratory test apparatus
AU77015/96A AU7701596A (en) 1995-11-28 1996-11-28 Respiratory test apparatus
EP96940006A EP0871398A1 (en) 1995-11-28 1996-11-28 Respiratory test apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9524258.2 1995-11-28
GB9524258A GB2307641A (en) 1995-11-28 1995-11-28 Apparatus for testing respiratory ability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997019635A1 true WO1997019635A1 (en) 1997-06-05

Family

ID=10784531

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1996/002932 WO1997019635A1 (en) 1995-11-28 1996-11-28 Respiratory test apparatus

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0871398A1 (en)
CN (1) CN1208335A (en)
AU (1) AU7701596A (en)
CA (1) CA2242847A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2307641A (en)
NZ (1) NZ322972A (en)
WO (1) WO1997019635A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101310678B (en) * 2008-05-07 2010-06-02 上海力申科学仪器有限公司 Measuring method of anesthesia apparatus tidal volume

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO301210B1 (en) * 1994-12-14 1997-09-29 Camtech As Use of sensors to measure an individual's respiration time volume
DE19713636A1 (en) * 1997-04-02 1998-10-08 Pari Gmbh Breath simulator
KR20050049987A (en) * 2003-11-24 2005-05-27 삼공물산 주식회사 Circuit for displaying remainder of air respirator
EP1978460B1 (en) 2007-04-05 2014-01-22 ResMed R&D Germany GmbH Monitoring device and method
US9833583B2 (en) 2009-03-20 2017-12-05 Koninklijke Philips N.V. System and method for adjusting tidal volume of a self-ventilation subject
CN105381570B (en) * 2015-12-29 2018-11-13 中国人民解放军成都军区总医院 A kind of portable intelligent respiratory training device and method

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3991304A (en) * 1975-05-19 1976-11-09 Hillsman Dean Respiratory biofeedback and performance evaluation system
US4495944A (en) * 1983-02-07 1985-01-29 Trutek Research, Inc. Inhalation therapy apparatus
EP0328415A1 (en) * 1988-02-10 1989-08-16 Sherwood Medical Company Pulmonary function tester
US4984158A (en) * 1988-10-14 1991-01-08 Hillsman Dean Metered dose inhaler biofeedback training and evaluation system
EP0667168A1 (en) * 1994-02-14 1995-08-16 Circadian, Inc. An inhalation training device

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2133157B (en) * 1982-10-09 1986-02-19 Richard Bernhard Richardson Electronic lung function analyser
GB8923982D0 (en) * 1989-10-25 1989-12-13 Clement Clarke Int Measurement apparatus
GB9108370D0 (en) * 1991-04-18 1991-06-05 Clement Clarke Int Measurement apparatus
GB2267758A (en) * 1992-05-28 1993-12-15 Nagano Limited Airflow measuring device
US5373851A (en) * 1993-04-19 1994-12-20 Brunswick Biomedical Corporation Specialized peak flow meter

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3991304A (en) * 1975-05-19 1976-11-09 Hillsman Dean Respiratory biofeedback and performance evaluation system
US4495944A (en) * 1983-02-07 1985-01-29 Trutek Research, Inc. Inhalation therapy apparatus
EP0328415A1 (en) * 1988-02-10 1989-08-16 Sherwood Medical Company Pulmonary function tester
US4984158A (en) * 1988-10-14 1991-01-08 Hillsman Dean Metered dose inhaler biofeedback training and evaluation system
EP0667168A1 (en) * 1994-02-14 1995-08-16 Circadian, Inc. An inhalation training device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101310678B (en) * 2008-05-07 2010-06-02 上海力申科学仪器有限公司 Measuring method of anesthesia apparatus tidal volume

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2242847A1 (en) 1997-06-05
EP0871398A1 (en) 1998-10-21
GB9524258D0 (en) 1996-01-31
CN1208335A (en) 1999-02-17
GB2307641A (en) 1997-06-04
NZ322972A (en) 1998-12-23
AU7701596A (en) 1997-06-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bechbache et al. The entrainment of breathing frequency by exercise rhythm.
US6673026B2 (en) Force measuring device and method
FI115290B (en) Procedure and arrangement for determining the identity of a person who has made a sporting achievement
McGuigan et al. The relationship between isometric and dynamic strength in college football players
McGuigan et al. The importance of isometric maximum strength in college wrestlers
US5800337A (en) Systems and methods for modification of biorythmic activity
US20070219059A1 (en) Method and system for continuous monitoring and training of exercise
Borel et al. An original field evaluation test for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population: the six-minute stepper test
US20040082877A1 (en) Muscle measuring device
McConnell et al. Acute cardiorespiratory responses to inspiratory pressure threshold loading
EP0211880A1 (en) Apparatus for monitoring physiological parameters
US6416473B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for providing an indicator of autonomic nervous system function
Belman et al. Ventilatory load characteristics during ventilatory muscle training.
Jung et al. The elevation training mask induces modest hypoxaemia but does not affect heart rate variability during cycling in healthy adults
Kellerman et al. Inspiratory strengthening effect on resistive load detection and magnitude estimation
Silva et al. Effect of aerobic training on ventilatory muscle endurance of spinal cord injured men
Dunn et al. A damaging punch: Assessment and application of a method to quantify punch performance
WO1997019635A1 (en) Respiratory test apparatus
Treff et al. Computer-aided stroke-by-stroke visualization of actual and target power allows for continuously increasing ramp tests on wind-braked rowing ergometers
Stubbing et al. Psychophysics of inspiratory muscle force
Puranik et al. Wearable device for yogic breathing
Pitetti et al. Field testing: Assessing the physical fitness of mildly mentally retarded individuals
Mohr et al. Heart rate variability as stress indicator
US6606907B1 (en) Measurement apparatus and method
Lai et al. Blood flow restriction therapy: The essential value of accurate surgical-grade tourniquet autoregulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 96199798.2

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1996940006

Country of ref document: EP

Ref document number: 322972

Country of ref document: NZ

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2242847

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2242847

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 97520279

Country of ref document: JP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1996940006

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1996940006

Country of ref document: EP