WO1997019809A1 - Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle - Google Patents
Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1997019809A1 WO1997019809A1 PCT/US1996/018919 US9618919W WO9719809A1 WO 1997019809 A1 WO1997019809 A1 WO 1997019809A1 US 9618919 W US9618919 W US 9618919W WO 9719809 A1 WO9719809 A1 WO 9719809A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- passageway
- coatings
- inches
- inner diameter
- ratio
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B05—SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05B—SPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES
- B05B7/00—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas
- B05B7/16—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas incorporating means for heating or cooling the material to be sprayed
- B05B7/22—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas incorporating means for heating or cooling the material to be sprayed electrically, magnetically or electromagnetically, e.g. by arc
- B05B7/222—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas incorporating means for heating or cooling the material to be sprayed electrically, magnetically or electromagnetically, e.g. by arc using an arc
- B05B7/226—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas incorporating means for heating or cooling the material to be sprayed electrically, magnetically or electromagnetically, e.g. by arc using an arc the material being originally a particulate material
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
- C23C4/12—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge characterised by the method of spraying
- C23C4/134—Plasma spraying
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to the thermal spraying of powdered materials, as well as their application to surfaces as protective coatings.
- a variety of thermal spray coatings have long been used to protect various components.
- a principal variety of thermal spray coatings to which the subject matter of the present invention pertains includes plasma sprayed coatings, although the improvements of the present invention will also pertain to other coatings and processes such as high velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) , having similar uses and properties.
- Plasma spray processes have been used to apply many different types of coatings to a variety of substrates, and find utility in numerous industries. One such application is responsive to conditions where a high degree of stress and wear is prevalent. In such a case, protective coatings containing carbides are often used.
- the mid-span stiffeners used in the fan blades of aircraft gas turbine engines are commonly coated with a highly wear resistant tungsten carbide-cobalt (WC-Co) coating.
- Popular techniques for the application of such coatings would include plasma spraying and high velocity oxy-fuel spraying.
- hardness is often a factor of primary concern.
- plasma sprayed coatings and high velocity oxy-fuel coatings have proven to be limited in their ability to meet the minimum mechanical property requirements for certain applications, particularly the requirements for minimum hardness.
- 5,330,798 discloses flame sprayed coatings applied with a high velocity oxy-fuel spray process.
- the disclosed process uses the kinetic energy of impacting particles to obtain dense coatings.
- the resulting coatings are not of a hardness commensurate with many present applications.
- thermal spray coatings of improved hardness that employ traditional wear resistant materials. It is also an object of the present invention to provide thermal spray coatings of improved hardness which can be implemented with existing thermal spray apparatus, and at a reasonable cost.
- U.S. Patents No. 4,256,779 (Sokol et al.) and 4,235,943 (McComas et al.) disclose a plasma spray method and apparatus which is known in the industry as the "Gator-Gard ® " System, offered by Sermatech International, Inc. of Limerick, Pennsylvania.
- the disclosed system includes a plasma-producing torch coupled with a nozzle for directing the resulting plasma stream to develop a plasma jet of improved characteristics.
- the disclosed system is useful in applying thermally sprayed coatings to desired substrates.
- the plasma stream Upon entering the nozzle of the apparatus, the plasma stream is passed through a plasma cooling zone defined by a plasma cooling passageway, to a plasma accelerating zone defined by a narrowed passageway that expands into a plasma/particle confining zone for the discharge of material from the nozzle, and the thermal spray apparatus.
- the narrowed passageway of the apparatus is cooled, and the powder material to be applied to the substrate by the apparatus is introduced into the plasma stream along the cooled, narrowed passageway. This results in appropriate heating (melting) and acceleration of the powder particles, for application to the substrate which is to receive the thermal spray coating.
- Such apparatus has worked well for applying coatings of various types to appropriate substrates.
- a variety of wear resistant coatings such as C-Co and Cr 3 C 2 -NiCr have been effectively applied with such an apparatus.
- plasma spray coatings of increased hardness can be applied to desired substrates by extending the distance at which the apparatus can spray the plasma/particle stream, preferably by a factor of two to three times the distance normally used.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a plasma spray apparatus for implementing the improvements of the present invention.
- Figure 2 is a graph showing variations in microhardness responsive to variations in gas flow rate for two different nozzles including a conventional nozzle and a nozzle incorporating the improvements of the present invention.
- Figure 3 is a graph showing variations in microhardness at different spray distances for different nozzles including a conventional nozzle and nozzles incorporating the improvements of the present invention.
- Figure 4 is a graph similar to that of Figure 3, showing results for different operating parameters.
- Figure 5 is a graph similar to that of Figure 2, showing results at an increased spray distance.
- Figures 6A and 6B are photomicrographs comparing conventional coatings (Figure 6A) with coatings produced in accordance with the present invention ( Figure 6B) .
- Figures 7A and 7B show X-ray diffractions comparing conventional coatings (Figure 7A) with coatings produced in accordance with the present invention ( Figure 7B) .
- Figures 7A and 7B show X-ray diffractions comparing conventional coatings ( Figure 7A) with coatings produced in accordance with the present invention ( Figure 7B) .
- Figures 7A and 7B show X-ray diffractions comparing conventional coatings ( Figure 7A) with coatings produced in accordance with the present invention ( Figure 7B) .
- FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a thermal spray apparatus 1 corresponding to the thermal spray apparatus disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,256,779 and incorporating the improvements of the present invention.
- the thermal spray apparatus 1 is generally comprised of a nozzle assembly 2 (i.e., an insert) which is mated to a plasma gun 3.
- the plasma gun 3 employs a cooperating cathode 4 (preferably formed of tungsten) and anode 5 (preferably formed of copper) .
- the cathode 4 and anode 5 are electrically excited to produce an arc at 6, for igniting a plasma-forming gas (e.g., an inert gas such as helium) which is introduced at 7 , between the cathode 4 and the anode 5.
- a plasma-forming gas e.g., an inert gas such as helium
- the plasma gun 3 is mated with the nozzle assembly 2 so that the resulting plasma stream is introduced into an inlet passageway 10 of the nozzle assembly 2.
- the inlet passageway 10 communicates with a narrowed passageway 11, which thereafter expands outwardly into a ceramic nozzle 12.
- the plasma stream produced by the plasma gun 3 enters the inlet passageway 10.
- the inlet passageway 10 is surrounded by a cooling medium, such as water, to define a plasma cooling zone 13.
- the plasma stream In passing from the inlet passageway 10 to the narrowed passageway 11, the plasma stream is constricted along a zone 14. Thereafter, the plasma stream passes through a particle introduction zone 15 which incorporates one or more conduits 16 for receiving a powder to be introduced into the plasma stream through one or more ports 17.
- the particle introduction zone 15 Upon entering the particle introduction zone 15, powder introduced through the port 17 enters the narrowed passageway 11, where it is heated to a plasticized state and accelerated in the ceramic nozzle 12. The plasticized and accelerated powder particles are then discharged from this plasma/particle confining zone 18, exiting the nozzle assembly 2 as a spray 19 for application to an appropriate substrate 20.
- the result is a thermal spray coating 21 applied to the surface 22 of the substrate 20. It has been found that the characteristics of the thermal spray coating 21 can be affected by varying the dimension of the passageway 12. As an example, the passageway 12 of a convention nozzle assembly 2 typically has a length of about 1.25 inches. In accordance with the present invention, it has been found that the applied coating 21 can be improved, particularly in terms of its hardness, by extending this length.
- L/D ratio is a ratio of the length of the passageway 12 relative to the inner diameter of the passageway 12.
- this ratio is preferably increased from a conventional value of about 5:1 to values in a range of from 7:1 to 16.5:1. Particularly useful results are obtained with ratios of from 10:1 to 13:1.
- the L/D ratio which is employed will vary depending upon the particular application involved (i.e., the substrate to receive the coating, the coating materials used, etc.) .
- L/D ratios of between 5:1 and 7:1 can be effectively employed in developing hardened plasma spray coatings, it has been found that better results are achieved for coatings produced with L/D ratios of from 7:1 to 16.5:1, and particularly for ratios of from 10:1 to 13:1.
- the passageway 12 of a conventional nozzle assembly 2 has a typical inner diameter of 0.25 inches (a typical outer diameter for the nozzle 12 would be 0.370 inches) and a typical length of 1.25 inches, yielding an L/D ratio of 5:1.
- Increasing the length of the passageway 12 to 3.125 inches will increase the L/D ratio to 12.5:1.
- L/D ratios in the preferred range of 7:1 to 16.5:1 will correspond to lengths ranging from 1.75 inches to 4.125 inches.
- L/D ratios in the optimum range of 10:1 to 13:1 will correspond to lengths ranging from 2.50 inches to 3.25 inches.
- the improvements of the present invention are useful with coatings formed of a variety of different materials, for application to various substrates, as desired.
- the improvements of the present invention will be further discussed with reference to a particular class of coatings, specified as "GG-WC-102" coatings by Sermatech International, Inc.
- Such coatings are similarly specified as "PWA 256-4” Coatings by Pratt & Whitney Aircraft (United Technologies Corp.).
- the specified system uses a tungsten carbide-cobalt coating, which is widely applied in the aircraft industry and which has been found to be particularly responsive to improvement in accordance with the present invention.
- microhardness of the resulting coating is on the order of 950 units (DPH J00 ) . This value is a function of many process parameters, some of the more important variables being the gas flow rate, the current applied to the electrodes and the spray distance relative to the substrate.
- the extended passageway 12 of the present invention forms part of the nozzle assembly 2, which can be separated from the plasma gun 3, this independently affixed component can be varied in configuration (in particular, its length) in straightforward fashion.
- These nozzle assemblies which are commonly referred to in the industry as “blocks”, are conventionally formed of copper (so-called “Cu-blocks”) .
- FIG. 2 is a graph showing variations in mircohardness responsive to variations in gas flow rate for two different blocks including a standard block and a P-block operating at two different current levels (800 and 840 amperes, respectively) , at a spray distance of 2 inches. From this graph it is seen that the P-block yields coatings of increased hardness relative to coatings applied with the standard block, particularly at the higher gas flow rates.
- Figure 3 is a graph showing variations in microhardness as a function of block type, at various spray distances including 2, 3 and 4 inches, respectively.
- the spray apparatus was operated at 840 amperes, with a gas flow rate of 300 units. From this graph it is seen that in all cases, the hardness of the resulting coating tends to maximize for the P-block, rolling off for both longer and shorter passageways.
- Figure 4 is a graph similar to the graph of Figure 3, except that the spray apparatus was in this case operated at 800 amperes, with a gas flow rate of 300 units. Again, it is seen that in all cases, the hardness of the resulting coating tends to maximize for the P-block, rolling off for both longer and shorter passageways.
- Figure 5 is a graph similar to the graph of Figure 2, except that the spray distance was in this case increased to 4 inches.
- the spray apparatus was operated at both 800 and 840 amperes, respectively. From this graph it is seen that at a spray distance of 4 inches, only the P-block meets an acceptable minimum microhardness level of 950 units.
- Spray distances of from 3 to 6 inches multiples of from 1.5 to 3 times the conventional spray distance of 2 inches
- coatings produced according to the above discussed specifications were developed. Previously, it had been found that such coatings could not be consistently applied at working distances in excess of 2 inches.
- such coatings were applied using a P-block nozzle, at spray distances of up to 4 inches from the substrate. Mechanical properties and microstructures of the resulting coatings were then compared (standard block vs. P-block) . More specifically, standard nozzles operating at a spray distance of 2 inches were compared with P-block nozzles operated at a spray distance of 3.5 inches, using process parameters appropriate to each design.
- Photomicrographs of typical structures were obtained at a magnification of 200 (200X) for coatings achieved with both a standard block nozzle ( Figure 6A) and a P-block nozzle ( Figure 6B) . No significant differences are observable from these photomicrographs, except that the coatings produced with the P-block nozzle appear slightly more dense. However, both coatings are within specified limits. Such coatings were further examined for cracks, oxides, carbide content and cobalt islands. In each case, the coatings produced with the P-block nozzle were found to be acceptable.
- Almen strips were coated using both the standard block nozzle and the P-block nozzle, and the height of curvature was measured for such coatings. After subtracting the effects of grit blasting on curvature, intensities achieved for the standard block and P-block coatings were measured at -UN and -22N, respectively. These numbers provide an indication of the relative compressive stress imposed by the coating on the substrate. It is known that compressive stresses are helpful in offsetting fatigue debit due to the application of hardface coatings. The P-block coating would be expected, if anything, to enhance performance under fretting wear conditions.
- X-ray diffraction is typically used to measure the relative content of various phases present in a coating.
- Many such phases may be present in a tungsten carbide-cobalt coating including, for example, WC, W-,C, Co 3 W 3 C, Co 2 W 4 C, and other combinations of such elements.
- WC, W 2 C and CO j W j C Previous studies relative to such coatings have shown that the primary phases present are WC, W 2 C and CO j W j C.
- the phase constituted of W-C is generally not present in the powder, in the form received, but rather forms as a result of the decarburization that occurs as a result of the thermal spray process.
- the W 2 C phase is harder than the WC phase, the former phase is not particularly desirable because it is a more brittle phase than the WC phase.
- the diffractograms of Figures 7A and 7B show the WC and W 2 C peaks between 20 angles normally used for such coatings. For the purpose of comparison, only the primary WC and W 2 C peaks are labeled in the diffractograms of Figures 7A and 7B.
- the resulting measurements indicate ratios of 1.6 and 1.8 for coatings produced with the standard block nozzle and the P-block nozzle, respectively. This would suggest that coatings produced with the P-block nozzle cause less decarburization of the powder. In other words, coatings produced with the P-block nozzle had more of the desired phase, namely WC, than coatings produced with the standard block nozzle. This should also lead to enhancement of the coatings produced with the P-block nozzle in terms of their impact wear properties.
- coatings produced with the P-block nozzle of the present invention will exhibit no detrimental properties relative to coatings produced with a standard block nozzle.
- the resulting coatings, when produced with a P-block nozzle will benefit from the enhanced microstructural properties which are observed during the coating process including higher compressive stress on the substrate, lower W 2 C phase formation, and lower substrate temperature.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002238054A CA2238054A1 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1996-11-27 | Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle |
EP96946255A EP0874730A4 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1996-11-27 | Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/564,915 US5858469A (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1995-11-30 | Method and apparatus for applying coatings using a nozzle assembly having passageways of differing diameter |
US08/564,915 | 1995-11-30 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1997019809A1 true WO1997019809A1 (en) | 1997-06-05 |
WO1997019809A9 WO1997019809A9 (en) | 1997-09-04 |
Family
ID=24256425
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1996/018919 WO1997019809A1 (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1996-11-27 | Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5858469A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0874730A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997019809A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6059533A (en) * | 1997-07-17 | 2000-05-09 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Damped blade having a single coating of vibration-damping material |
SE0302201D0 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2003-08-13 | Airson Ab | Air Supply Arrangement |
SE529056C2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-04-17 | Plasma Surgical Invest Ltd | Plasma generating device, plasma surgical device and use of a plasma surgical device |
SE529053C2 (en) | 2005-07-08 | 2007-04-17 | Plasma Surgical Invest Ltd | Plasma generating device, plasma surgical device and use of a plasma surgical device |
SE529058C2 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2007-04-17 | Plasma Surgical Invest Ltd | Plasma generating device, plasma surgical device, use of a plasma surgical device and method for forming a plasma |
US7717358B2 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2010-05-18 | Technical Engineering, Llc | Nozzle for use with thermal spray apparatus |
US7928338B2 (en) * | 2007-02-02 | 2011-04-19 | Plasma Surgical Investments Ltd. | Plasma spraying device and method |
US8735766B2 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2014-05-27 | Plasma Surgical Investments Limited | Cathode assembly and method for pulsed plasma generation |
US7589473B2 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2009-09-15 | Plasma Surgical Investments, Ltd. | Pulsed plasma device and method for generating pulsed plasma |
US8613742B2 (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2013-12-24 | Plasma Surgical Investments Limited | Methods of sealing vessels using plasma |
US9089319B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2015-07-28 | Plasma Surgical Investments Limited | Volumetrically oscillating plasma flows |
CA3191050A1 (en) | 2020-08-28 | 2022-03-03 | Nikolay Suslov | Systems, methods, and devices for generating predominantly radially expanded plasma flow |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4256779A (en) * | 1978-11-03 | 1981-03-17 | United Technologies Corporation | Plasma spray method and apparatus |
US4416421A (en) * | 1980-10-09 | 1983-11-22 | Browning Engineering Corporation | Highly concentrated supersonic liquified material flame spray method and apparatus |
US4869936A (en) * | 1987-12-28 | 1989-09-26 | Amoco Corporation | Apparatus and process for producing high density thermal spray coatings |
Family Cites Families (64)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA837030A (en) * | 1970-03-17 | Stand Mille | Method of depositing heat fusible material and apparatus therefor | |
BE419531A (en) * | 1936-02-01 | |||
US2770708A (en) * | 1954-09-21 | 1956-11-13 | Amalgamated Growth Ind Inc | Electric arc torch |
US2960594A (en) * | 1958-06-30 | 1960-11-15 | Plasma Flame Corp | Plasma flame generator |
US3010009A (en) * | 1958-09-29 | 1961-11-21 | Plasmadyne Corp | Method and apparatus for uniting materials in a controlled medium |
GB943793A (en) * | 1959-06-03 | 1963-12-04 | British Oxygen Co Ltd | Electric arc apparatus and processes |
NL254841A (en) * | 1959-08-14 | 1900-01-01 | ||
GB876455A (en) * | 1959-08-21 | 1961-08-30 | Metco Inc | A new or improved plasma flame powder spray gun |
GB958375A (en) * | 1959-08-24 | 1964-05-21 | Nat Res Dev | Improvements in or relating to constricted arc or plasma jet torches |
GB972183A (en) * | 1959-11-11 | 1964-10-07 | British Oxygen Co Ltd | Electric arc process for depositing metallic coatings |
GB967445A (en) * | 1960-03-25 | 1964-08-19 | British Oxygen Co Ltd | Electric arc torch |
US3075065A (en) * | 1960-10-04 | 1963-01-22 | Adriano C Ducati | Hyperthermal tunnel apparatus and electrical plasma-jet torch incorporated therein |
NL279638A (en) * | 1961-06-13 | |||
US3145287A (en) * | 1961-07-14 | 1964-08-18 | Metco Inc | Plasma flame generator and spray gun |
US3140421A (en) * | 1962-04-17 | 1964-07-07 | Richard M Spongberg | Multiphase thermal arc jet |
GB1012689A (en) * | 1962-06-07 | 1965-12-08 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Improvements in plasma-jet spray guns |
US3179783A (en) * | 1962-06-20 | 1965-04-20 | Giannini Scient Corp | Method and apparatus for treating electrically-conductive surfaces to make them hardor corrosion resistant |
NL295695A (en) * | 1962-07-27 | 1900-01-01 | ||
DE1571153A1 (en) * | 1962-08-25 | 1970-08-13 | Siemens Ag | Plasma spray gun |
BE638614A (en) * | 1962-11-07 | 1900-01-01 | ||
US3179784A (en) * | 1962-12-20 | 1965-04-20 | Giannini Scient Corp | Method and apparatus for spraying plastics |
US3304402A (en) * | 1963-11-18 | 1967-02-14 | Metco Inc | Plasma flame powder spray gun |
US3301995A (en) * | 1963-12-02 | 1967-01-31 | Union Carbide Corp | Electric arc heating and acceleration of gases |
BE693139A (en) * | 1966-01-27 | 1967-07-03 | ||
US3533756A (en) * | 1966-11-15 | 1970-10-13 | Hercules Inc | Solids arc reactor method |
US3668108A (en) * | 1966-11-15 | 1972-06-06 | Hercules Inc | Solids arc reactor apparatus and method |
FR2117731B2 (en) * | 1967-10-11 | 1974-08-23 | Anvar | |
US4146654A (en) * | 1967-10-11 | 1979-03-27 | Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique | Process for making linings for friction operated apparatus |
US3470347A (en) * | 1968-01-16 | 1969-09-30 | Union Carbide Corp | Method for shielding a gas effluent |
DE1639325A1 (en) * | 1968-02-08 | 1971-02-04 | Montedison Spa | Versatile plasma jet generator and process for its manufacture |
US3573090A (en) * | 1968-12-09 | 1971-03-30 | Avco Corp | Method of applying a plasma spray coating |
US3591759A (en) * | 1969-06-04 | 1971-07-06 | Sealectro Corp | Method of depositing heat fusible material and apparatus therefor |
GB1279208A (en) * | 1970-03-24 | 1972-06-28 | Standard Telephones Cables Ltd | Method of and apparatus for producing fine powder |
US3684911A (en) * | 1970-08-25 | 1972-08-15 | Giancarlo Perugini | Plasma-jet generator for versatile applications |
US3676638A (en) * | 1971-01-25 | 1972-07-11 | Sealectro Corp | Plasma spray device and method |
US3740522A (en) * | 1971-04-12 | 1973-06-19 | Geotel Inc | Plasma torch, and electrode means therefor |
US3914573A (en) * | 1971-05-17 | 1975-10-21 | Geotel Inc | Coating heat softened particles by projection in a plasma stream of Mach 1 to Mach 3 velocity |
US3814620A (en) * | 1971-10-18 | 1974-06-04 | Gen Electric | Method of applying fused silica coating to a substrate |
GB1359540A (en) * | 1971-10-29 | 1974-07-10 | British Titan Ltd | Heating a gas |
US3707615A (en) * | 1971-11-12 | 1972-12-26 | Metco Inc | Nozzle for a plasma generator |
US3896244A (en) * | 1971-11-17 | 1975-07-22 | Chromalloy American Corp | Method of producing plasma sprayed titanium carbide tool steel coatings |
US3823302A (en) * | 1972-01-03 | 1974-07-09 | Geotel Inc | Apparatus and method for plasma spraying |
US3839618A (en) * | 1972-01-03 | 1974-10-01 | Geotel Inc | Method and apparatus for effecting high-energy dynamic coating of substrates |
CH578622A5 (en) * | 1972-03-16 | 1976-08-13 | Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie | |
US3851140A (en) * | 1973-03-01 | 1974-11-26 | Kearns Tribune Corp | Plasma spray gun and method for applying coatings on a substrate |
US3892882A (en) * | 1973-05-25 | 1975-07-01 | Union Carbide Corp | Process for plasma flame spray coating in a sub-atmospheric pressure environment |
US4004735A (en) * | 1974-06-12 | 1977-12-25 | Zverev Anatoly | Apparatus for detonating application of coatings |
FR2287276A1 (en) * | 1974-10-07 | 1976-05-07 | United Technologies Corp | THERMAL SPRAYER AND METHOD OF SPRAYING USING THIS APPARATUS |
US4127760A (en) * | 1975-06-09 | 1978-11-28 | Geotel, Inc. | Electrical plasma jet torch and electrode therefor |
US4121082A (en) * | 1977-04-27 | 1978-10-17 | Metco, Inc. | Method and apparatus for shielding the effluent from plasma spray gun assemblies |
US4236059A (en) * | 1978-11-03 | 1980-11-25 | United Technologies Corporation | Thermal spray apparatus |
US4235943A (en) * | 1979-02-22 | 1980-11-25 | United Technologies Corporation | Thermal spray apparatus and method |
US4540121A (en) * | 1981-07-28 | 1985-09-10 | Browning James A | Highly concentrated supersonic material flame spray method and apparatus |
US4568019A (en) * | 1984-02-24 | 1986-02-04 | Browning James A | Internal burner type flame spray method and apparatus having material introduction into an overexpanded gas stream |
JPS61259777A (en) * | 1985-05-13 | 1986-11-18 | Onoda Cement Co Ltd | Single-torch type plasma spraying method and apparatus |
US4634611A (en) * | 1985-05-31 | 1987-01-06 | Cabot Corporation | Flame spray method and apparatus |
US4836447A (en) * | 1988-01-15 | 1989-06-06 | Browning James A | Duct-stabilized flame-spray method and apparatus |
CH675431A5 (en) * | 1988-04-28 | 1990-09-28 | Castolin Sa | |
US5082179A (en) * | 1988-04-28 | 1992-01-21 | Castolin S.A. | Method of flame-spraying of powdered materials and flame-spraying apparatus for carrying out that method |
DE3903887C2 (en) * | 1989-02-10 | 1998-07-16 | Castolin Sa | Device for flame spraying powdery materials by means of an autogenous flame |
WO1990012123A1 (en) * | 1989-03-31 | 1990-10-18 | Leningradsky Politekhnichesky Institut Imeni M.I.Kalinina | Method of treatment with plasma and plasmatron |
US5120582A (en) * | 1991-01-16 | 1992-06-09 | Browning James A | Maximum combustion energy conversion air fuel internal burner |
US5330798A (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 1994-07-19 | Browning Thermal Systems, Inc. | Thermal spray method and apparatus for optimizing flame jet temperature |
US5518178A (en) * | 1994-03-02 | 1996-05-21 | Sermatech International Inc. | Thermal spray nozzle method for producing rough thermal spray coatings and coatings produced |
-
1995
- 1995-11-30 US US08/564,915 patent/US5858469A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1996
- 1996-11-27 EP EP96946255A patent/EP0874730A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1996-11-27 WO PCT/US1996/018919 patent/WO1997019809A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4256779A (en) * | 1978-11-03 | 1981-03-17 | United Technologies Corporation | Plasma spray method and apparatus |
US4416421A (en) * | 1980-10-09 | 1983-11-22 | Browning Engineering Corporation | Highly concentrated supersonic liquified material flame spray method and apparatus |
US4869936A (en) * | 1987-12-28 | 1989-09-26 | Amoco Corporation | Apparatus and process for producing high density thermal spray coatings |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP0874730A4 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0874730A1 (en) | 1998-11-04 |
US5858469A (en) | 1999-01-12 |
EP0874730A4 (en) | 2000-12-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1161314A (en) | Plasma spray method and apparatus | |
KR950008379B1 (en) | Process for producing chromium carbidenickel base age hardenable alloy coatings and coated articles so produced | |
US5858469A (en) | Method and apparatus for applying coatings using a nozzle assembly having passageways of differing diameter | |
US3958097A (en) | Plasma flame-spraying process employing supersonic gaseous streams | |
WO1997019809A9 (en) | Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle | |
CA2479811A1 (en) | Nozzle for thermal spray of low oxide content coatings | |
EP0748393B1 (en) | Thermal spray nozzle for producing rough thermal spray coatings, method for producing rough thermal spray coatings | |
Talib et al. | Thermal spray coating technology: A review | |
KR950007665B1 (en) | Tungsten chromium carbide-nickel coatings for various articles and process for producing in its | |
Refke et al. | Characterization of LPPS processes under various spray conditions for potential applications | |
US6666646B1 (en) | Drag reduction for gas turbine engine components | |
Nicoll et al. | Thermal spray coatings for high temperature protection | |
CA1065203A (en) | Thermal spraying using cool plasma stream | |
CA2238054A1 (en) | Thermal spray using adjusted nozzle | |
Berndt et al. | Thermal Spray 2001: New Surfaces for a New Millenium; Proceedings of the 2nd International Thermal Spray Conference, 28-30 May, 2001, Singapore | |
Sakaki | Cold Spray Process~ Overview and Application Trends~ | |
Rodriguez et al. | Effect of heat treatment on properties of nickel hard surface alloy deposited by HVOF | |
US5453303A (en) | Low substrate temperature deposition of diamond coatings derived from glassy carbon | |
US20050026001A1 (en) | Shielded ceramic thermal spray coating | |
US7070835B2 (en) | Method for applying a coating to a substrate | |
Guest | Plasma and detonation gun coatings | |
Sturgeon | High velocity oxy-fuel spraying | |
Leylavergne et al. | Comparison of plasma-sprayed coatings produced in argon or nitrogen atmosphere | |
Renault et al. | A reliable and reproducible plasma spray process using on-line control | |
Tucker Jr | Plasma spray, detonation gun, and HVOF deposition techniques |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CA JP |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE |
|
COP | Corrected version of pamphlet |
Free format text: PAGES 1-17,DESCRIPTION,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1-14;PAGES 18-25,CLAIMS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 15-20;PAGES 1/5-5/5,DRAWINGS,REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/8-8/8;DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1996946255 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2238054 Country of ref document: CA Ref country code: CA Ref document number: 2238054 Kind code of ref document: A Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 97520614 Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1996946255 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Ref document number: 1996946255 Country of ref document: EP |