WO1997029563A1 - Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997029563A1
WO1997029563A1 PCT/US1997/001262 US9701262W WO9729563A1 WO 1997029563 A1 WO1997029563 A1 WO 1997029563A1 US 9701262 W US9701262 W US 9701262W WO 9729563 A1 WO9729563 A1 WO 9729563A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
protocol
predefined
data link
protocols
enabling
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1997/001262
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Russ Ohanian
Joachim Schubert
Achim LÖBBERT
Bradford Steinka
Original Assignee
Microcom Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microcom Systems, Inc. filed Critical Microcom Systems, Inc.
Priority to EP97903994A priority Critical patent/EP0820667A4/en
Priority to JP52853997A priority patent/JP3684439B2/en
Publication of WO1997029563A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997029563A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/40Network security protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/18Multiprotocol handlers, e.g. single devices capable of handling multiple protocols

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to switched network communications, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote site during the establishment of a connection.
  • PSTN public switched telephone networks
  • ISDN integrated services digital network
  • the PSTN is a system whereby calls (and thus circuits used to make the connection) are dedicated until either party terminates the call. This system is very inefficient because any unused bandwidth of a given call cannot be shared with other parties. Thus the PSTN may have thousands of circuits that are being underutilized and still not be able to have enough circuits to satisfy all the callers at a given time.
  • the ISDN is a switched digital network that enables the local telephone company to provide a range of services in order to meet the needs of their users and enable the telephone company to utilize their resources (circuits and switches) efficiently.
  • a switched network is a network that provides a choice of services for establishing a circuit or network connection between parties. Those services typically include circuit switching services and packet switching services; however, other services such as asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) or frame relay technology are also available in some areas.
  • ATM asynchronous transfer mode
  • the ISDN provides the available services to the user on an as needed basis as well as enables the user to increase or decrease bandwidth on demand. the PSTN.
  • the Telecommunications Standardization Sector of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T) has promulgated the I Series Recommendations.
  • ITU-T I Series Recommendations in combination with other more general networking ITU-T recommendations define many aspects of the ISDN services, including the network interfaces and protocols.
  • ISDN service usually comprises one D-channel and one or more B- channels.
  • the D-channel is used to setup the call with the ISDN service provider central office and to provide all the call control signals for each of the B-channels.
  • the user contacts the telephone company via the D-channel to request different types of services provided by the network.
  • the D-channel data rate can be 16K or 64K bits per second (bps).
  • the Bearer Channel or B-channel is the basic user channel for the transfer of data and can provide a data rate of up to 64K bits per second (bps) per channel. It can be used to carry digital data, digitized voice, or a combination of the two. More than one B-channel can be combined to achieve higher data rates.
  • circuit switched circuit switched
  • packet switched packet switched
  • semipermanent equivalent to a leased line
  • H-channels providing data rates greater than 64Kbps, can be provided.
  • BTI Basic Rate Interface
  • PRI Primary Rate Interface
  • H-channels instead of or in addition to B-channels.
  • the ITU-T recommendations define network interfaces and protocols in terms of the Open Systems Interconnect (OSI) reference model.
  • the OSI reference model is an internationally recognized standard developed to provide a common basis for the coordination of standards development for systems interconnection.
  • the OSI reference model separates the communications functions of a system into a hierarchical set of seven layers. Each layer performs a related subset of the functions required to communicate with another system. Each layer relies on the next lower layer to perform more primitive functions (and conceal the details of those functions) as well as provides services to the next higher layer.
  • the seven layers are the physical layer, the data link layer, the network layer, the transport layer, the session layer, the presentation layer and the application layer.
  • the physical layer, the data link layer and the network layer together provide what may be called network services.
  • the ISDN interfaces and protocols are primarily concerned with these three layers.
  • the physical layer is concerned with the mechanical and electrical connections that couple the transmission medium (usually copper cable or optical fiber) that make up the circuit.
  • the physical layer is also concerned with how an unstructured bit stream is transmitted across over the physical link.
  • ITU-T Recommendations 1.430 and 1.431 define the physical layer for the ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI) and Primary Rate Interface (PRI) respectively. Examples of other physical layer specifications include Electronic Industries Association (EIA) RS-232 C, RS-422 and portions of ITU-T X.21
  • the data link layer provides for reliable transfer of data across the physical link and for the transmission of blocks of data (frames) with the necessary synchronization, error control and flow control.
  • One common data link layer protocol is High-level Data-Link Control (HDLC).
  • Other related data link layer protocols include Link Access Procedure Balanced (LAPB) for packet switched networks, X.75/SLP (Single Link Procedure) is similar to LAPB but provides additional features for interconnection of switched networks, Link Access Procedure for the D-channel (LAPD) used on the D-channel for data link control, ITU-T V.120 (similar to LAPD) used on the B-channel for circuit switched connections, Link Access Procedure for Frame-mode bearer services (LAPF) for networks providing frame relay services and Logical Link Control (LLC) for local area networks.
  • LAPB Link Access Procedure Balanced
  • LAPD Link Access Procedure for the D-channel
  • ITU-T V.120 similar to LAPD
  • LAPF Link Access Procedure for Frame-mode bearer services
  • LLC Logical Link Control
  • the network layer provides for the transfer of information between end systems across a network and relieves the upper layers of the burden of having to accommodate the underlying network protocols and technologies.
  • the network layer is responsible for establishing, maintaining and terminating network connections.
  • One example of a network layer standard is ITU-T X.25.
  • Circuit switched networks provide a dedicated circuit (on demand) between parties when either party places a call.
  • the call is established when the network creates an end-to-end circuit connection between the parties. Once the call is established, the parties are free to select any data link protocol for the transmission of data.
  • ITU-T Recommendation I.465/V.120 (hereinafter referred to as V.120) defines one data link layer control protocol for circuit switched network services.
  • Packet switched networks provide a network of pathways between the parties and the system breaks the data transmitted between the parties into packets that are routed through the network.
  • One of the most widely used protocols for packet switched network services is defined in ITU-T Recommendation X.25.
  • ITU-T Recommendation X.25 defines one well known data link layer control protocol, Link Access Procedure - Balanced (LAPB).
  • LAPB Link Access Procedure - Balanced
  • HDLC high-to-Point Protocol
  • Synchronous PPP transparent HDLC Synchronous Point-to-Point Protocol
  • Asynchronous PPP transparent HDLC Asynchronous Point-to-point Protocol
  • LAPF LAPF and LLC.
  • the circuit or network connection is intended to refer to the physical layer link between the parties equipment that affords the transfer of data.
  • the data link connection includes the procedures and protocols necessary for the parties to transfer data via the circuit or network connection.
  • a data link connection may be initiated by either party, typically by initiating a link setup procedure whereby the parties agree to begin the exchange of data according to a common protocol .
  • the parties In order for a data link connection to be established it is necessary for both parties to utilize the same data link layer protocol. Thus, the parties must agree on the data link layer protocol prior to placing the call.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a method of detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote device, where the local device attempts to setup a data link connection with the remote device.
  • Yet another object of the invention is to provide a system which can detect the data link layer protocol used by a remote device.
  • Still another object of the present invention is to provide a system which can detect the data link layer protocol used by a remote device attempting to setup a data link connection with a local device.
  • the invention is directed to a method of and system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system connected to a network that supports several data link layer protocols.
  • a detection system is disclosed that can detect the protocol utilized by a remote system and permit a local system to establish a connection across the network utilizing the protocol detected.
  • the detection system preferably forms part of a network interfacing device for coupling a unit of data terminal equipment to the network.
  • the network interfacing device preferably is of the type having its own CPU with memory and is modified to include a system for automatically detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system during the establishment of a data link connection across the network.
  • the network interfacing device includes a detection system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system attempting to setup a data link connection, and a detection system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system, where the local system attempts to setup a data link connection with the remote system.
  • the detection system automatically detects the protocol used by the remote system attempting to setup a data link connection with a local system by receiving one or more valid units of information and analyzing the information units to determine whether the information units include commands or responses that are characteristic of a specific data link protocol. For example, this may be accomplished by comparing specific fields in each information unit to the valid expected values for those fields according to the protocols to be detected.
  • a protocol may be detected based upon other characteristics such as the information unit length or structure or a combination of various characteristics.
  • a protocol can be detected when the fields of one or more valid information units match the expected values for that specific protocol.
  • the local system activates the appropriate protocol subsystem to permit the local system to establish a data link connection and communicate with the remote system across the network. If the fields do not match, the same or different fields of the one or more valid information units are automatically compared, preferably in a predefined sequence, with the expected values for different protocols until a match is obtained or no protocol is detected. If no protocol is detected, a default protocol can be assumed or it can be assumed that a data link connection cannot be established and the call may be terminated.
  • the detection system compares the first valid data unit to the link setup commands of the various protocols supported by the local system.
  • the protocol is detected according the link setup command received from the remote system.
  • a subset of protocols that share a common (or similar) command or response can be detected by first detecting that one valid information unit includes the common command or response and then analyzing a second valid information unit received to determine if it is a command or response characteristic of one specific protocol. As stated above, this can be accomplished by detecting various features characteristic of each of the subset of protocols to detected. It is further contemplated that additional frames may be compared to additional characteristic features to further detect the difference between two or more similar protocols. Alternatively, additional frames may be compared to additional characteristic features to further verify the protocol detected.
  • the local system In the case where the local system attempts to setup a data link connection, the local system automatically detects the protocol used by a remote system by transmitting a link setup command for a given protocol to the remote system and waiting for an acknowledgement. If the acknowledgement is received, the protocol is detected and the local system activates the protocol subsystem necessary to establish a data link connection communicate with the remote system. If the acknowledgement is not received within a specific timeout period, the link setup commands for other protocols are transmitted, preferably in a predefined sequence, until an acknowledgement is received or no protocol is detected. If no protocol is detected, a default protocol can be answered, or it can be assumed a data link connection cannot be established and the call can be terminated.
  • the local system can send one or more additional commands to the remote system and utilize the response (such as an acknowledgement or reply) to further verify the protocol being used by the remote system.
  • the response such as an acknowledgement or reply
  • Such a system may be used to detect a subset of protocols that utilize a common or similar link setup commands.
  • Fig. 1 is a diagram showing the ISDN Protocol Architecture and the various ITU-T standards that define the various layer functions;
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a detection system constructed in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the method of automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote caller of an incoming call in accordance with the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the method of automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote caller for an outgoing call in accordance with the present invention.
  • the present invention is directed to an automatic method and system used by a local system for detecting the data link protocol used by a remote system in order to establish a data link connection across a network for the transfer of information such as digital data or digitized voice data.
  • the network is of the type that permits the use of several different protocols that are not necessarily compatible and where users are free to select a protocol that meets their specific needs.
  • the term "network" is intended to include any means that permits the transfer of information between two points, including traditional dedicated or leased lines, circuit switched networks such as provided by PSTNs and ISDNs, and virtual connections such as those provided by networks offering packet switched, frame relay or cell relay services.
  • a detection system is described herein for use with Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDN).
  • ISDN is a switched network that permits the user to specify the type of connection to be established and thus permits the use of any one of many data link protocols.
  • the physical interface (corresponding to the physical layer of the OSI Model) is dictated by the ISDN service provider (typically the telephone company).
  • the most common physical interfaces are the Basic Rate Interface (BRI) and the Primary Rate Interface (PRI) as defined in the ITU-T 1.430 and 1.431 Recommendations.
  • BRI Basic Rate Interface
  • PRI Primary Rate Interface
  • Fig. 1 is a diagram of the ISDN protocol architecture illustrating the relationship between the various ITU-T recommendations and how they are classified according to the OSI model.
  • the ITU-T Specifications are merely recommendations intended to foster public standardization and facilitate worldwide open interconnection, and accordingly compliance with these recommendations is encouraged but not required. Users are free to choose among various public protocols or to implement their own proprietary protocol. In either case, each party participating in a call must utilize the same protocol in order to establish a data link connection and reliably transfer data across the network.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a detection system 10 for connecting a piece of terminal equipment 30 to an ISDN 20, detection system 10 includes a piece of network interfacing equipment 40 in accordance with the present invention.
  • the ISDN service requires a network terminating device 45, which can be provided as a separate entity or integrated into the network interfacing equipment 40 as shown in Fig. 2.
  • the network terminating device 45 performs a physical layer conversion from the ISDN provider format called the U interface to the ITU-T 1.430/1.431 Recommendation format called the S/T interface.
  • the network interfacing equipment 40 may also include the ability to convert, at the physical layer, the S/T interface to a non-ISDN interface such as RS-232C for connection to conventional non-ISDN data terminal equipment.
  • a non-ISDN interface such as RS-232C for connection to conventional non-ISDN data terminal equipment.
  • Such a device is more commonly known as a terminal adapter.
  • the invention forms part of an internal ISDN terminal adapter which can optionally include a network terminating device 45.
  • the device takes the form of an IBM PC compatible adapter card.
  • the invention may also take the form of an external terminal adapter for use with other types of computers and terminal equipment.
  • the network terminating device 45 would provide an output port for each of the protocols supported or means to communicate to the terminal equipment 30 the protocol detected.
  • the invention could be embodied in a piece of terminal equipment, with or without a network terminating device for direct connection to a switched network such as ISDN.
  • the network interfacing equipment 40 includes a microprocessor based system controller 60 including a central processing unit (CPU) 62, associated memory systems 64 for storage, an interconnecting bus system 66 and an input-output system 68 for interfacing with other devices such as terminal equipment 30.
  • the network interfacing equipment 40 also includes a network interface controller 50 for receiving information from the network terminating device 45 and separating the information into frames, and for receiving frames of information from controller 60 and processing that information for transmission through the network termination device 45 over an ISDN to a remote site.
  • the network interface controller 50 when receiving information from an ISDN, the network interface controller 50 sends each frame of information to the system controller 60 to determine the data link layer protocol associated with the received information.
  • the system controller 60 can determine the data link layer protocol by comparing various fields of the first valid frame received from the network 20 with values that are characteristic of each specific protocol supported.
  • the appropriate field values characteristic of each protocol supported by the network interfacing equipment 40 can be stored in memory 64. If a specific protocol is detected, the system controller 60 loads the software modules necessary to implement that protocol and establish a data link connection to communicate with remote system across the network 20.
  • the appropriate fields of the first valid frame can be compared to corresponding values for each supported protocol in a predetermined sequence until a match occurs, although it should be appreciated that other time sequencing and comparing techniques can be used, for example, comparing the received values to the corresponding characteristic values of all the supported protocols at the same time.
  • one protocol to be detected is of the type used by systems connected to an ISDN for communication on a B-channel known as a B-channel protocol.
  • a B-channel protocol a protocol used by systems connected to an ISDN for communication on a B-channel known as a B-channel protocol.
  • users of ISDN B-channels are capable of utilizing any one of several data link layer protocols for the transfer of data and unless the protocol is agreed upon prior to placing the call, a data link connection will not be established. Examples of those protocols include LAPB, X.75/SLP, V.120, LAPF and Synchronous PPP.
  • the network interface controller 50 is an HDLC controller which separates the incoming data into valid HDLC frames which are transferred to the system controller 60. In the case where a remote system attempts to setup a data link connection, the system controller 60 checks the first valid frame for each of the protocols supported.
  • the LAPB protocol is detected if the frame contains a SABM command or if the first frame byte is the LAPB link address B (0x01) and second frame byte is a valid LAPB control field.
  • the V.120 protocol is detected if the frame contains a SABME command or if the first two frame bytes are equal to the V.120 default Logical Link Identifier (LLI) (0x0801) and the third frame byte is a valid V.120 control field.
  • the transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP is detected if the first two frame bytes are equal to the PPP address header (0xFF03). If none of the above protocols are detected, the detection system will assume the a transparent HDLC protocol is being used.
  • a command that is common to two or more protocols can be detected and then a second received information unit can be analyzed to determine if it contains characteristics of a supported protocol.
  • a second received information unit can be analyzed to determine if it contains characteristics of a supported protocol.
  • LAPB and V.120 utilize an XID command and responses to exchange information regarding connection management.
  • an XID command or response can be detected and then the appropriate protocol, either LAPB or V.120, will be detected upon receipt of a SABM or SABME command, respectively.
  • the system controller 60 of the local system will attempt to initialize the data link using by an acknowledged link setup procedure.
  • the system controller 60 sends a link set mode command to the remote system (also including an architecture similar to or the same as that shown in Fig. 2) requesting the setup of a data link using a specific mode of data transfer.
  • the remote system also including an architecture similar to or the same as that shown in Fig. 2
  • HDLC supports several modes including Normal Response Mode (for multi-drop line configurations), Asynchronous Balanced Mode (ABM) for point to point connections and Asynchronous Response Mode (ARM).
  • SABM Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode
  • LAPB detected protocol
  • the detection system may repeat the set mode command for specified number of tries. If the remote system doesn't acknowledge the set mode command, the set mode command of a different protocol is sent.
  • the system controller 60 will repeat this process for each of the supported protocols until a connection is established, or all the supported protocols have been rejected. If no connection can be established a failure is reported to the next higher (network) layer.
  • the system 10 can send one or more commands that are common or generic to a subset of protocols supported and wait for a response. The response can be analyzed to determine if it includes information characteristic of a specific protocol to be detected. In this embodiment, several commands and responses may be exchanged and one or more of the several responses or portions thereof can be evaluated in order to determine the protocol used by the remote system.
  • the system controller 60 sends a SABM command to detect LAPB and Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended (SABME) to detect V.120.
  • SABM Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended
  • Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred process 100 of detecting the B-channel protocol in the case where a remote system is attempting to setup a data link connection in accordance with the present invention.
  • the remote system is configured to utilize a predefined data link protocol and the local system is not configured for a specific data link protocol and will attempt to determine that protocol based the frames received.
  • the process 100 begins at step 110 when the local system receives the first valid frame from the remote system.
  • the protocol defines certain types of frames for specific functions such as information frames, supervisory frames and unnumbered frames.
  • the detection system can receive frames that are valid in the sense that they adhere to the format defined by the protocol specification, but are not valid because they are inappropriate at the time the frames are received or for the procedure defined by the protocol specification. These invalid frames can be ignored.
  • the process can begin by receiving XID commands and the XID frame can be evaluated to determine whether it is from a system using the LAPB or a V.120 protocol. The system will respond to the XID command with the appropriate XID response for the protocol detected and wait to receive the next valid frame. The system would then utilize that second frame at step 120 verify that the appropriate protocol was selected.
  • the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid LAPB frame. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first byte in the frame (the address field) is equal to the LAPB link address B (0x01) and that the second byte in the frame (the control field) is a valid LAPB control field. If the LAPB protocol is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the LAPB protocol, step 125, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the LAPB protocol. Alternatively, an appropriate protocol stack implementing the LAPB protocol could be loaded.
  • the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid V.120 (LAPD) frame in step 130. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first two bytes in the frame (the address field) are equal to the default LLI (0x0801) and the third byte in the frame is a valid V.120 control field. If the V.120 protocol is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the V.120 protocol step 135, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the V.120 protocol or alternatively, loading the appropriate V.120 protocol stack.
  • the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP frame at step 140. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first two bytes in the frame (the PPP address header) are equal to (0xFF03). If the Synchronous PPP is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the Synchronous PPP at step 145, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP protocol or loading the appropriate Synchronous PPP protocol stack. If the Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP protocol is not detected, that detection system assumes that a transparent HDLC protocol is being used. Fig.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the process 200 of detecting the B-channel protocol in the case wherein the local system attempts to initialize a data link connection with a remote system in accordance with the present invention.
  • the remote system is configured to utilize a predefined data link protocol and the local system is not configured for a specific data link protocol and will attempt to determine that protocol using an acknowledged link setup procedure.
  • An acknowledged link setup procedure requires the remote system to respond to a link setup request packet with an acknowledgement packet.
  • the process 200 begins at step 210 when the local system attempts to initialize the data link by sending a set mode command to establish a LAPB connection.
  • the local system then waits for a predefined timeout period for an acknowledge response at step 220. If no acknowledge is received within the timeout period, the detection system can repeat the process a predefined number of times and then abort the attempt to establish a LAPB connection.
  • the local system sends a Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode (SABM) command.
  • SABM Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode
  • the detection system will wait 1 second for an acknowledge before timing out.
  • the detection system will repeat the process 3 times before aborting the attempt at a LAPB connection. If an acknowledge is received, the detection system enables the appropriate subsystem to implement the LAPB protocol at step 225, and begin the transfer of data.
  • SABM Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode
  • this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the LAPB protocol or by loading a LAPB protocol stack. If a LAPB connection cannot be established, the local system attempts to initialize the data link by sending a set mode command to establish a V.120 (LAPD) connection at step 230. The local system then waits for a predefined timeout period for an acknowledge at step 240. If no acknowledge is received within the timeout period, the detection system can repeat the process a predefined number of times and then aborts the attempt to establish a V.120 connection. In the preferred embodiment, the local system sends a Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended (SABME) command. The detection system will wait 1 second for an acknowledge before timing out.
  • SABME Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended
  • the detection system will repeat the process 3 times before aborting the attempt at a V.120 connection. If an acknowledgement is received, the detection system enables the appropriate subsystem to implement the V.120 protocol at step 245, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the V.120 protocol or by loading a V.120 protocol stack. If a V.120 connection cannot be established, the detection system will abort the attempt to establish a link.
  • the order in which the detection system checks for each protocol is not of critical importance to the invention. In addition to the protocols disclosed above, other protocols may be included. The order in which the detection system checks for each protocol may become important in environments where the timeout period for establishing a data link connection is short for a particular protocol, in which case that protocol should be detected first.
  • the detection system checks for each protocol is significant where both systems are utilizing the invention to detect a protocol. In this situation, any of the subset of protocols supported by both systems may be used and thus the first protocol checked that is supported by both systems will be used. Thus, the protocols that are preferred should be detected first.
  • the invention has been described as being inco ⁇ orated as part of an end user system (local system) connected to a network for transmitting information to a remote system.
  • the invention may be inco ⁇ orated in a network system or as part of the network in order to detect the protocol used by the network subscriber in order to establish a data link layer connection or to connect the subscriber to the appropriate network service.
  • the invention may be inco ⁇ orated in a system used to link or bridge two or more networks.

Abstract

In order to transfer data via a switched network (20) that provides a wide range of network services, the users (30) must establish a circuit or network connection (40) and establish a data link connection. The circuit or network connection (40) provides the physical connection between the users (30) and data link connection provides the protocols and procedures for the transfer of data. A data link connection will not be established if the users (30) are not using the same data link protocol. A method (100) is disclosed which permits a local system (30) to detect the data link protocol used by a remote system (20) when the remote system (20) initiates the data link setup (110) and a method (200) for detecting the data link protocol when the local system (30) initiates the data link setup (210).

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING SWITCHED NETWORK
PROTOCOLS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to switched network communications, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote site during the establishment of a connection.
Background of the Invention
The public switched telephone networks (PSTN) are analog networks designed primarily for the transmission of voice information. Through the use of modems these networks are capable of transmitting data, although even using the state of the art technology the data bandwidth is very limited. In order to meet the demand for increased bandwidth, a digital network known as integrated services digital network (ISDN) has been developed.
The PSTN is a system whereby calls (and thus circuits used to make the connection) are dedicated until either party terminates the call. This system is very inefficient because any unused bandwidth of a given call cannot be shared with other parties. Thus the PSTN may have thousands of circuits that are being underutilized and still not be able to have enough circuits to satisfy all the callers at a given time.
The ISDN is a switched digital network that enables the local telephone company to provide a range of services in order to meet the needs of their users and enable the telephone company to utilize their resources (circuits and switches) efficiently. A switched network is a network that provides a choice of services for establishing a circuit or network connection between parties. Those services typically include circuit switching services and packet switching services; however, other services such as asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) or frame relay technology are also available in some areas. The ISDN provides the available services to the user on an as needed basis as well as enables the user to increase or decrease bandwidth on demand. the PSTN. In order to facilitate international standardization of ISDN systems, the Telecommunications Standardization Sector of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU-T) has promulgated the I Series Recommendations. The ITU-T I Series Recommendations in combination with other more general networking ITU-T recommendations define many aspects of the ISDN services, including the network interfaces and protocols.
ISDN service usually comprises one D-channel and one or more B- channels. The D-channel is used to setup the call with the ISDN service provider central office and to provide all the call control signals for each of the B-channels. The user contacts the telephone company via the D-channel to request different types of services provided by the network. Typically, the D-channel data rate can be 16K or 64K bits per second (bps). The Bearer Channel or B-channel is the basic user channel for the transfer of data and can provide a data rate of up to 64K bits per second (bps) per channel. It can be used to carry digital data, digitized voice, or a combination of the two. More than one B-channel can be combined to achieve higher data rates. Essentially, three kinds of circuit or network connections can be setup over a B-channel: circuit switched, packet switched and semipermanent (equivalent to a leased line). In addition to or instead of B-channels, H-channels, providing data rates greater than 64Kbps, can be provided.
Basis ISDN access service, intended for residential and small office subscribers, is provided by what is called a Basic Rate Interface (BRI) which typically consists of two B-channels and one D-channel . A Primary Rate Interface (PRI), intended for commercial subscribers, typically consists of 23 or 30 B- channels and one D-channel. The PRI may also include H-channels instead of or in addition to B-channels.
The ITU-T recommendations define network interfaces and protocols in terms of the Open Systems Interconnect (OSI) reference model. The OSI reference model is an internationally recognized standard developed to provide a common basis for the coordination of standards development for systems interconnection. The OSI reference model separates the communications functions of a system into a hierarchical set of seven layers. Each layer performs a related subset of the functions required to communicate with another system. Each layer relies on the next lower layer to perform more primitive functions (and conceal the details of those functions) as well as provides services to the next higher layer. The seven layers are the physical layer, the data link layer, the network layer, the transport layer, the session layer, the presentation layer and the application layer. The physical layer, the data link layer and the network layer together provide what may be called network services. The ISDN interfaces and protocols are primarily concerned with these three layers.
The physical layer is concerned with the mechanical and electrical connections that couple the transmission medium (usually copper cable or optical fiber) that make up the circuit. The physical layer is also concerned with how an unstructured bit stream is transmitted across over the physical link. ITU-T Recommendations 1.430 and 1.431 define the physical layer for the ISDN Basic Rate Interface (BRI) and Primary Rate Interface (PRI) respectively. Examples of other physical layer specifications include Electronic Industries Association (EIA) RS-232 C, RS-422 and portions of ITU-T X.21
The data link layer provides for reliable transfer of data across the physical link and for the transmission of blocks of data (frames) with the necessary synchronization, error control and flow control. One common data link layer protocol is High-level Data-Link Control (HDLC). Other related data link layer protocols include Link Access Procedure Balanced (LAPB) for packet switched networks, X.75/SLP (Single Link Procedure) is similar to LAPB but provides additional features for interconnection of switched networks, Link Access Procedure for the D-channel (LAPD) used on the D-channel for data link control, ITU-T V.120 (similar to LAPD) used on the B-channel for circuit switched connections, Link Access Procedure for Frame-mode bearer services (LAPF) for networks providing frame relay services and Logical Link Control (LLC) for local area networks. The network layer provides for the transfer of information between end systems across a network and relieves the upper layers of the burden of having to accommodate the underlying network protocols and technologies. The network layer is responsible for establishing, maintaining and terminating network connections. One example of a network layer standard is ITU-T X.25.
Circuit switched networks provide a dedicated circuit (on demand) between parties when either party places a call. The call is established when the network creates an end-to-end circuit connection between the parties. Once the call is established, the parties are free to select any data link protocol for the transmission of data. ITU-T Recommendation I.465/V.120 (hereinafter referred to as V.120) defines one data link layer control protocol for circuit switched network services.
Packet switched networks provide a network of pathways between the parties and the system breaks the data transmitted between the parties into packets that are routed through the network. One of the most widely used protocols for packet switched network services is defined in ITU-T Recommendation X.25. ITU-T Recommendation X.25 defines one well known data link layer control protocol, Link Access Procedure - Balanced (LAPB).
In addition to V.120 and LAPB, other data link layer control protocols that can be used on switched networks include HDLC, transparent HDLC Synchronous Point-to-Point Protocol (Synchronous PPP), transparent HDLC Asynchronous Point-to-point Protocol (Asynchronous PPP), LAPF and LLC.
In order for two parties to transfer data, it is necessary for the parties to establish both a circuit or network connection between them and to establish a data link connection between them. As used herein, the circuit or network connection is intended to refer to the physical layer link between the parties equipment that affords the transfer of data. The data link connection includes the procedures and protocols necessary for the parties to transfer data via the circuit or network connection. A data link connection may be initiated by either party, typically by initiating a link setup procedure whereby the parties agree to begin the exchange of data according to a common protocol . In order for a data link connection to be established it is necessary for both parties to utilize the same data link layer protocol. Thus, the parties must agree on the data link layer protocol prior to placing the call. This creates a problem for users of the types of networks that provide many services because there are many possible data link protocols. If the parties do not specify a data link protocol prior to placing the call and the parties' network interfacing equipment is configured for different data link protocols, a data link connection may not be established.
One solution to this problem is to assign separate telephone numbers for each protocol supported. Another solution is to utilize a sub-address to direct the call to a port configured for a specific protocol. The disadvantage with these solutions is that the caller still has to contact the remote party to determine which telephone number or sub-address is assigned to which protocol. In addition, some networks do not support sub-address functions.
Objects of the Invention
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide method of detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote device.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method of detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote device attempting to setup a data link connection with local device.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method of detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote device, where the local device attempts to setup a data link connection with the remote device.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a system which can detect the data link layer protocol used by a remote device.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a system which can detect the data link layer protocol used by a remote device attempting to setup a data link connection with a local device.
And yet another object of the present invention is to provide a system which can detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote device, where the local device attempts to setup a data link connection with a remote device. And still another object of the present invention is to provide a system which can detect automatically the data link layer protocol used by a remote device in order to configure a local device to the appropriate data link layer protocol in order to establish the connection. Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description wherein a preferred embodiment is shown and described, simply by way of illustration of the best mode of the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention.
Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not restrictive.
Summary of the Invention
The invention is directed to a method of and system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system connected to a network that supports several data link layer protocols. In accordance with the present invention, a detection system is disclosed that can detect the protocol utilized by a remote system and permit a local system to establish a connection across the network utilizing the protocol detected. The detection system preferably forms part of a network interfacing device for coupling a unit of data terminal equipment to the network. The network interfacing device preferably is of the type having its own CPU with memory and is modified to include a system for automatically detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system during the establishment of a data link connection across the network. The network interfacing device includes a detection system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system attempting to setup a data link connection, and a detection system for detecting the data link layer protocol used by a remote system, where the local system attempts to setup a data link connection with the remote system. The detection system automatically detects the protocol used by the remote system attempting to setup a data link connection with a local system by receiving one or more valid units of information and analyzing the information units to determine whether the information units include commands or responses that are characteristic of a specific data link protocol. For example, this may be accomplished by comparing specific fields in each information unit to the valid expected values for those fields according to the protocols to be detected. Alternatively, a protocol may be detected based upon other characteristics such as the information unit length or structure or a combination of various characteristics. Thus, a protocol can be detected when the fields of one or more valid information units match the expected values for that specific protocol. When a protocol is detected, the local system activates the appropriate protocol subsystem to permit the local system to establish a data link connection and communicate with the remote system across the network. If the fields do not match, the same or different fields of the one or more valid information units are automatically compared, preferably in a predefined sequence, with the expected values for different protocols until a match is obtained or no protocol is detected. If no protocol is detected, a default protocol can be assumed or it can be assumed that a data link connection cannot be established and the call may be terminated.
In one embodiment, the detection system compares the first valid data unit to the link setup commands of the various protocols supported by the local system. The protocol is detected according the link setup command received from the remote system. In an alternative embodiment, a subset of protocols that share a common (or similar) command or response can be detected by first detecting that one valid information unit includes the common command or response and then analyzing a second valid information unit received to determine if it is a command or response characteristic of one specific protocol. As stated above, this can be accomplished by detecting various features characteristic of each of the subset of protocols to detected. It is further contemplated that additional frames may be compared to additional characteristic features to further detect the difference between two or more similar protocols. Alternatively, additional frames may be compared to additional characteristic features to further verify the protocol detected. In the case where the local system attempts to setup a data link connection, the local system automatically detects the protocol used by a remote system by transmitting a link setup command for a given protocol to the remote system and waiting for an acknowledgement. If the acknowledgement is received, the protocol is detected and the local system activates the protocol subsystem necessary to establish a data link connection communicate with the remote system. If the acknowledgement is not received within a specific timeout period, the link setup commands for other protocols are transmitted, preferably in a predefined sequence, until an acknowledgement is received or no protocol is detected. If no protocol is detected, a default protocol can be answered, or it can be assumed a data link connection cannot be established and the call can be terminated.
In addition, the local system can send one or more additional commands to the remote system and utilize the response (such as an acknowledgement or reply) to further verify the protocol being used by the remote system. Such a system may be used to detect a subset of protocols that utilize a common or similar link setup commands.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The foregoing and other objects of this invention, the various features thereof, as well as the invention itself, may be more fully understood from the following description, when read together with the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing the ISDN Protocol Architecture and the various ITU-T standards that define the various layer functions;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a detection system constructed in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the method of automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote caller of an incoming call in accordance with the present invention; and
Fig. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the method of automatically detecting the protocol used by a remote caller for an outgoing call in accordance with the present invention. Detailed Description of the Drawings
The present invention is directed to an automatic method and system used by a local system for detecting the data link protocol used by a remote system in order to establish a data link connection across a network for the transfer of information such as digital data or digitized voice data. The network is of the type that permits the use of several different protocols that are not necessarily compatible and where users are free to select a protocol that meets their specific needs. As used herein, the term "network" is intended to include any means that permits the transfer of information between two points, including traditional dedicated or leased lines, circuit switched networks such as provided by PSTNs and ISDNs, and virtual connections such as those provided by networks offering packet switched, frame relay or cell relay services.
By way of example, a detection system is described herein for use with Integrated Services Digital Networks (ISDN). The ISDN is a switched network that permits the user to specify the type of connection to be established and thus permits the use of any one of many data link protocols. The physical interface (corresponding to the physical layer of the OSI Model) is dictated by the ISDN service provider (typically the telephone company). The most common physical interfaces are the Basic Rate Interface (BRI) and the Primary Rate Interface (PRI) as defined in the ITU-T 1.430 and 1.431 Recommendations.
Fig. 1 is a diagram of the ISDN protocol architecture illustrating the relationship between the various ITU-T recommendations and how they are classified according to the OSI model. As one of ordinary skill in the an will appreciate, the ITU-T Specifications are merely recommendations intended to foster public standardization and facilitate worldwide open interconnection, and accordingly compliance with these recommendations is encouraged but not required. Users are free to choose among various public protocols or to implement their own proprietary protocol. In either case, each party participating in a call must utilize the same protocol in order to establish a data link connection and reliably transfer data across the network. Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a detection system 10 for connecting a piece of terminal equipment 30 to an ISDN 20, detection system 10 includes a piece of network interfacing equipment 40 in accordance with the present invention. ISDN service requires a network terminating device 45, which can be provided as a separate entity or integrated into the network interfacing equipment 40 as shown in Fig. 2. The network terminating device 45 performs a physical layer conversion from the ISDN provider format called the U interface to the ITU-T 1.430/1.431 Recommendation format called the S/T interface. The network interfacing equipment 40 may also include the ability to convert, at the physical layer, the S/T interface to a non-ISDN interface such as RS-232C for connection to conventional non-ISDN data terminal equipment. Such a device is more commonly known as a terminal adapter.
In the preferred embodiment, the invention forms part of an internal ISDN terminal adapter which can optionally include a network terminating device 45. The device takes the form of an IBM PC compatible adapter card. The invention may also take the form of an external terminal adapter for use with other types of computers and terminal equipment. In addition, one of ordinary skill in the art will recogmze that the invention can be integrated as part of a network terminating device. As such, the network terminating device 45 would provide an output port for each of the protocols supported or means to communicate to the terminal equipment 30 the protocol detected. Alternatively, the invention could be embodied in a piece of terminal equipment, with or without a network terminating device for direct connection to a switched network such as ISDN.
Preferably, the network interfacing equipment 40 includes a microprocessor based system controller 60 including a central processing unit (CPU) 62, associated memory systems 64 for storage, an interconnecting bus system 66 and an input-output system 68 for interfacing with other devices such as terminal equipment 30. The network interfacing equipment 40 also includes a network interface controller 50 for receiving information from the network terminating device 45 and separating the information into frames, and for receiving frames of information from controller 60 and processing that information for transmission through the network termination device 45 over an ISDN to a remote site. In accordance with the invention when receiving information from an ISDN, the network interface controller 50 sends each frame of information to the system controller 60 to determine the data link layer protocol associated with the received information. The system controller 60 can determine the data link layer protocol by comparing various fields of the first valid frame received from the network 20 with values that are characteristic of each specific protocol supported. The appropriate field values characteristic of each protocol supported by the network interfacing equipment 40 can be stored in memory 64. If a specific protocol is detected, the system controller 60 loads the software modules necessary to implement that protocol and establish a data link connection to communicate with remote system across the network 20. The appropriate fields of the first valid frame can be compared to corresponding values for each supported protocol in a predetermined sequence until a match occurs, although it should be appreciated that other time sequencing and comparing techniques can be used, for example, comparing the received values to the corresponding characteristic values of all the supported protocols at the same time. If no protocol is detected, a default protocol can be assumed, or a connection is not established and the call may be terminated. In a preferred embodiment, one protocol to be detected is of the type used by systems connected to an ISDN for communication on a B-channel known as a B-channel protocol. In many instances, users of ISDN B-channels are capable of utilizing any one of several data link layer protocols for the transfer of data and unless the protocol is agreed upon prior to placing the call, a data link connection will not be established. Examples of those protocols include LAPB, X.75/SLP, V.120, LAPF and Synchronous PPP. As used herein, references to specific protocols such as LAPB or V.120 are intended to include all equivalent implementations of that protocol, including, for example, the similar LAPB implementations defined in ITU-T X.25 and X.75 and the similar LAPD implementations in ITU-T Q.921 and V.120. In the preferred embodiment, the network interface controller 50 is an HDLC controller which separates the incoming data into valid HDLC frames which are transferred to the system controller 60. In the case where a remote system attempts to setup a data link connection, the system controller 60 checks the first valid frame for each of the protocols supported. For example, in the preferred embodiment, the LAPB protocol is detected if the frame contains a SABM command or if the first frame byte is the LAPB link address B (0x01) and second frame byte is a valid LAPB control field. The V.120 protocol is detected if the frame contains a SABME command or if the first two frame bytes are equal to the V.120 default Logical Link Identifier (LLI) (0x0801) and the third frame byte is a valid V.120 control field. The transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP is detected if the first two frame bytes are equal to the PPP address header (0xFF03). If none of the above protocols are detected, the detection system will assume the a transparent HDLC protocol is being used.
Alternatively, a command that is common to two or more protocols can be detected and then a second received information unit can be analyzed to determine if it contains characteristics of a supported protocol. For example, both LAPB and V.120 utilize an XID command and responses to exchange information regarding connection management. In accordance with the invention, an XID command or response can be detected and then the appropriate protocol, either LAPB or V.120, will be detected upon receipt of a SABM or SABME command, respectively.
In the case where the local system (including an architecture similar to or the same as that shown in Fig. 2) attempts to setup a data link connection, the system controller 60 of the local system will attempt to initialize the data link using by an acknowledged link setup procedure. As part of this procedure, the system controller 60 sends a link set mode command to the remote system (also including an architecture similar to or the same as that shown in Fig. 2) requesting the setup of a data link using a specific mode of data transfer. For example,
HDLC supports several modes including Normal Response Mode (for multi-drop line configurations), Asynchronous Balanced Mode (ABM) for point to point connections and Asynchronous Response Mode (ARM). Thus, the system controller 60 of the local system sends a Set mode command such as Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode (SABM) and waits for a remote system acknowledgement. If the acknowledgement is received, the system controller 60 loads the software modules necessary to implement the detected protocol (LAPB) and establish a data link connection to communicate with a remote system across the network 20. If an acknowledgement is not received before a specified timeout period expires, the detection system may repeat the set mode command for specified number of tries. If the remote system doesn't acknowledge the set mode command, the set mode command of a different protocol is sent. The system controller 60 will repeat this process for each of the supported protocols until a connection is established, or all the supported protocols have been rejected. If no connection can be established a failure is reported to the next higher (network) layer. Alternatively, the system 10 can send one or more commands that are common or generic to a subset of protocols supported and wait for a response. The response can be analyzed to determine if it includes information characteristic of a specific protocol to be detected. In this embodiment, several commands and responses may be exchanged and one or more of the several responses or portions thereof can be evaluated in order to determine the protocol used by the remote system.
In the preferred embodiment, the system controller 60, sends a SABM command to detect LAPB and Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended (SABME) to detect V.120. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that once a B-channel circuit or network connection is established between the parties participating in a call, either party may request initialization of the data link connection, thus the calling party need not be the party requesting initialization. Therefore, the called party of the remote location may request initialization. In either event, the invention is not dependent upon whether the system has initiated the call or is receiving a call.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the preferred process 100 of detecting the B-channel protocol in the case where a remote system is attempting to setup a data link connection in accordance with the present invention. In this situation the remote system is configured to utilize a predefined data link protocol and the local system is not configured for a specific data link protocol and will attempt to determine that protocol based the frames received. The process 100 begins at step 110 when the local system receives the first valid frame from the remote system. One of ordinary skill in the an will appreciate that the protocol defines certain types of frames for specific functions such as information frames, supervisory frames and unnumbered frames. Thus, it is possible for the detection system to receive frames that are valid in the sense that they adhere to the format defined by the protocol specification, but are not valid because they are inappropriate at the time the frames are received or for the procedure defined by the protocol specification. These invalid frames can be ignored. Optionally, the process can begin by receiving XID commands and the XID frame can be evaluated to determine whether it is from a system using the LAPB or a V.120 protocol. The system will respond to the XID command with the appropriate XID response for the protocol detected and wait to receive the next valid frame. The system would then utilize that second frame at step 120 verify that the appropriate protocol was selected.
At step 120, the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid LAPB frame. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first byte in the frame (the address field) is equal to the LAPB link address B (0x01) and that the second byte in the frame (the control field) is a valid LAPB control field. If the LAPB protocol is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the LAPB protocol, step 125, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the LAPB protocol. Alternatively, an appropriate protocol stack implementing the LAPB protocol could be loaded.
If the LAPB protocol is not detected, the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid V.120 (LAPD) frame in step 130. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first two bytes in the frame (the address field) are equal to the default LLI (0x0801) and the third byte in the frame is a valid V.120 control field. If the V.120 protocol is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the V.120 protocol step 135, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the V.120 protocol or alternatively, loading the appropriate V.120 protocol stack.
If the V.120 protocol is not detected, the detection system checks the frame to determine whether it is a valid Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP frame at step 140. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by verifying that the first two bytes in the frame (the PPP address header) are equal to (0xFF03). If the Synchronous PPP is detected, the detection system would enable the appropriate subsystem to implement the Synchronous PPP at step 145, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP protocol or loading the appropriate Synchronous PPP protocol stack. If the Transparent HDLC Synchronous PPP protocol is not detected, that detection system assumes that a transparent HDLC protocol is being used. Fig. 4 is a flow chart illustrating the process 200 of detecting the B-channel protocol in the case wherein the local system attempts to initialize a data link connection with a remote system in accordance with the present invention. In this situation the remote system is configured to utilize a predefined data link protocol and the local system is not configured for a specific data link protocol and will attempt to determine that protocol using an acknowledged link setup procedure.
An acknowledged link setup procedure requires the remote system to respond to a link setup request packet with an acknowledgement packet.
The process 200 begins at step 210 when the local system attempts to initialize the data link by sending a set mode command to establish a LAPB connection. The local system then waits for a predefined timeout period for an acknowledge response at step 220. If no acknowledge is received within the timeout period, the detection system can repeat the process a predefined number of times and then abort the attempt to establish a LAPB connection. In the preferred embodiment, the local system sends a Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode (SABM) command. The detection system will wait 1 second for an acknowledge before timing out. The detection system will repeat the process 3 times before aborting the attempt at a LAPB connection. If an acknowledge is received, the detection system enables the appropriate subsystem to implement the LAPB protocol at step 225, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the LAPB protocol or by loading a LAPB protocol stack. If a LAPB connection cannot be established, the local system attempts to initialize the data link by sending a set mode command to establish a V.120 (LAPD) connection at step 230. The local system then waits for a predefined timeout period for an acknowledge at step 240. If no acknowledge is received within the timeout period, the detection system can repeat the process a predefined number of times and then aborts the attempt to establish a V.120 connection. In the preferred embodiment, the local system sends a Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended (SABME) command. The detection system will wait 1 second for an acknowledge before timing out. The detection system will repeat the process 3 times before aborting the attempt at a V.120 connection. If an acknowledgement is received, the detection system enables the appropriate subsystem to implement the V.120 protocol at step 245, and begin the transfer of data. In the preferred embodiment, this is accomplished by executing a finite state machine that implements the V.120 protocol or by loading a V.120 protocol stack. If a V.120 connection cannot be established, the detection system will abort the attempt to establish a link.
In the preferred embodiment, the order in which the detection system checks for each protocol, as indicated in each of Figs. 3 and 4 is not of critical importance to the invention. In addition to the protocols disclosed above, other protocols may be included. The order in which the detection system checks for each protocol may become important in environments where the timeout period for establishing a data link connection is short for a particular protocol, in which case that protocol should be detected first.
The order in which the detection system checks for each protocol is significant where both systems are utilizing the invention to detect a protocol. In this situation, any of the subset of protocols supported by both systems may be used and thus the first protocol checked that is supported by both systems will be used. Thus, the protocols that are preferred should be detected first. In the foregoing description, the invention has been described as being incoφorated as part of an end user system (local system) connected to a network for transmitting information to a remote system. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention may be incoφorated in a network system or as part of the network in order to detect the protocol used by the network subscriber in order to establish a data link layer connection or to connect the subscriber to the appropriate network service. Alternatively, the invention may be incoφorated in a system used to link or bridge two or more networks.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of the equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.

Claims

What is claimed is: 1. A network interfacing apparatus for interfacing at least one unit of terminal equipment to a switched network having at least one channel for receiving information including data from a remote site in accordance with at least one of a plurality of predefined protocols, wherein each of said predefined protocols is defined by at least one unique data value uniquely positioned within a predetermined sequence of values within a unit of information, said apparatus comprising: receiving means for receiving at least one unit of information from said channel; at least two protocol system means, one for each of said predefined protocols, for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote site according to a corresponding one of said predefined protocols; comparing means for comparing one or more characteristic elements of said at least one unit of information with one or more predefined corresponding values for at least one of said predefined protocols; and means for selecting and enabling the appropriate one of said protocol system means in response to a match between the one or more characteristic elements of said at least one data unit and the one or more predefined corresponding values, so as to permit said apparatus to communicate with the remote site according to the selected one of said predefined protocols.
2. A network interfacing apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising at least a third protocol system means for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote site according to a third protocol of said predefined of protocols.
3. A network interfacing apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising: at least a third protocol system means for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote site according to a third protocol of said predefined of protocols; means for selecting and enabling the third protocol system means in response to a match between the one or more characteristic elements of said at least one data unit and the one or more predefined corresponding values, so as to permit said apparatus to communicate with the remote site according to the selected one of said predefined protocols.
4. A network apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein each of said predefined protocols is a data link protocol for the transfer of data across a switched network.
5. A network apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein each of said predefined protocols is a data link protocol for the transfer of data across an ISDN network.
6. A network apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said one or more characteristic elements includes at least one data field in said at least one unit of information and wherein said comparing means includes means for comparing said data field value with a predefined corresponding value appropriate for at least one of said predefined protocols.
7. A network apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising at least a third protocol system means for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote site according to a third protocol of said predefined of protocols; and a default protocol selection and enabling means for selecting and enabling the third protocol system means corresponding to the one of said predefined protocols when said comparing means is unable to match any of the one or more characteristic elements of said at least one unit of information with one or more predefined corresponding values for at least one of said predefined protocols.
8. A method of detecting one of a selected number of predefined communication protocols, each of said protocols being used to communicate over a switched network having at least one channel for transmitting information, said method comprising the steps of: receiving at least one unit of information from said channel; comparing one or more characteristic elements of said at least one unit of information with one or more predefined corresponding values for at least one of said predefined protocols; and selecting and enabling a protocol system means for transmitting information in accordance with a particular protocol in response to a match between the one or more characteristic elements of said at least one unit of information and the one or more predefined corresponding values for at least one of said predefined protocols, so as to permit communication with the remote site according to one of said predefined protocols.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of selecting and enabling includes the step of selecting and enabling a default protocol system means for transmitting information in accordance with the default one of said protocols when the one or more characteristic elements of said at least one unit of information cannot be matched with the one or more predefined corresponding values for at least one of said predefined protocols during the step of comparing.
10. The method according to claim 8, wherein each of said predefined communication protocol is a data link layer protocol.
11. A network interfacing apparatus for interfacing at least one unit of terminal equipment to a switched network having at least one channel for transferring information including data to and from a remote system in accordance with any one of at least two predefined protocols, said apparatus comprising: communication means for transmitting and receiving units of information via said channel; at least two protocol system means, one for each of said predefined protocols, for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote system according to any one of said predefined protocols; controller means for controlling said communication means, said controller means including means for selecting a first protocol system means to attempt to establish a data link connection between said apparatus and said remote system according to said first protocol, means for waiting for a predefined time period for said data link connection to be established and means for selecting and enabling said first protocol system means if said data link connection is established and means for selecting and establishing said second protocol means if said data link connection according to said first protocol cannot be established.
12. A network interfacing apparatus for interfacing at least one unit of terminal equipment to a switched network having at least one channel for transferring information including data to and from a remote system in accordance with one of a plurality of predefined protocols, said apparatus comprising: communication means for transmitting and receiving units of information via said channel, at least a first protocol system means for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote system according to a first protocol of said predefined protocols; at least a second protocol system means for enabling said apparatus to communicate with said remote system according to a second protocol of said predefined protocols; controller means for controlling said communication means, said controller means including means for selecting said first protocol system means to attempt to establish a data link connection between said apparatus and said remote system according to said first protocol, means for waiting for a predefined time period for said data link connection according to said first protocol to be established and means for selecting and enabling said first protocol system means to enable said apparatus to communicate with said remote system if said data link connection is established; and means for selecting said second protocol means if said data link connection according to said first protocol cannot be established to attempt to establish a data link connection between said apparatus and said remote system according to said second protocol, means for waiting for a predefined time period for said data link connection according to said second protocol to be established and means for selecting and enabling said second protocol system means to enable said apparatus to communicate with said remote system if said data link connection is established.
13. A method of detecting a communication protocol of the type used to communicate with a remote system over a switched network having at least one channel for receiving information, said method comprising the steps of: transmitting a data link setup command according to a first communication protocol to said remote system; waiting for a predetermined time for said remote system to acknowledge said data link setup command; and selecting and enabling a first protocol system means for providing communications according to said first communication protocol if said remote system acknowledges said data link semp command within said predefined time and selecting and enabling a second protocol system means for providing communications according to said second communication protocol if said remote system does not acknowledge said data link setup command within said predefined time.
14. A method of detecting a communication protocol of the type used to communicate with a remote system over a switched network having at least one channel for receiving information, said method comprising the steps of: transmitting a data link setup command according to a first communication protocol to said remote system; waiting for a predetermined time for said remote system to acknowledge said data link setup command; selecting and enabling a first protocol system means for providing communications according to said first communication protocol if said remote system acknowledges said data link setup command within said predefined time; and if said remote system does not acknowledge said data link setup command within said predefined time; transmitting a second data link setup command according to a second communication protocol to said remote system; waiting for a second predetermined time for said remote system to acknowledge said second data link setup command; selecting and enabling a second protocol system means for providing communications according to said second communication protocol if said remote system acknowledges said second data link semp command within said second predefined time.
PCT/US1997/001262 1996-02-09 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols WO1997029563A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP97903994A EP0820667A4 (en) 1996-02-09 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols
JP52853997A JP3684439B2 (en) 1996-02-09 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/599,183 1996-02-09
US08/599,183 US6122287A (en) 1996-02-09 1996-02-09 Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997029563A1 true WO1997029563A1 (en) 1997-08-14

Family

ID=24398584

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/001262 WO1997029563A1 (en) 1996-02-09 1997-01-28 Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US6122287A (en)
EP (1) EP0820667A4 (en)
JP (1) JP3684439B2 (en)
WO (1) WO1997029563A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000030320A1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2000-05-25 Digi International Inc. Circuits and methods for detecting the mode of a telecommunications signal
WO2000056012A2 (en) * 1999-03-15 2000-09-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. A multi-service architecture with any port any service (apas) hardware platform
WO2001045354A1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2001-06-21 Nokia Corporation Data call routing on ip connections
EP1124402A2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2001-08-16 Avaya Technology Corp. Automated link variant determination and protocol configuration
EP1150471A2 (en) * 2000-04-27 2001-10-31 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and system for recommending an available network protocol
EP1564936A2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-08-17 Broadcom Corporation Multiple protocol wireless communications in a WLAN
WO2007093098A1 (en) 2006-02-14 2007-08-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. A method for transmitting subscriber line layer 2 encapsulation mode to broadband access server
WO2008118375A2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-10-02 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus of introducing xid frames for lapdm procedure
WO2013060419A1 (en) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-02 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Slave control device and method for programming a slave control device
US20150169481A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 Man Truck & Bus Ag Method and device for data communication in vehicles, particularly in motor vehicles

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI103084B1 (en) * 1997-01-20 1999-04-15 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Packet radio networks and the procedure for updating the routing area
FI105977B (en) * 1998-03-06 2000-10-31 Nokia Multimedia Network Termi A method, system, and receiver for establishing connections over a multi-protocol communication network
US6061551A (en) 1998-10-21 2000-05-09 Parkervision, Inc. Method and system for down-converting electromagnetic signals
RU2133557C1 (en) * 1998-09-09 1999-07-20 Лукин Александр Федорович Structurized-entity telephone network and telephone communication system for remote structurized entity using this network
US9325556B2 (en) 1998-10-21 2016-04-26 Parkervision, Inc. Methods and systems for down-converting a signal
US7966388B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2011-06-21 Qwest Communications International Inc Network management system and graphical user interface
US7058075B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2006-06-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Self-configuring interface for communication protocols
US6665724B2 (en) * 1999-07-20 2003-12-16 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method for automatically delaying initialization of a protocol stack within a network interface
US20060167986A1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2006-07-27 Trzyna Peter K Internet telephone system
US20040193722A1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2004-09-30 Donovan Kevin Remington Joseph Bartholomew Universal instant messaging system for the internet
US6647419B1 (en) * 1999-09-22 2003-11-11 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for allocating server output bandwidth
US6778505B1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2004-08-17 Agere Systems Inc. DSL automatic protocol detection system
US6687232B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2004-02-03 Adtran, Inc. Subscriber loop terminal equipment-resident mechanism for determining bit rate of high-level data link control communication channel
AU2000275015A1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-04-08 Eicon Technology Corporation Auto encapsulation detection
US7392301B1 (en) * 2000-11-14 2008-06-24 Siemens Subscriber Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for automated assistance in configuring customer premises equipment
KR100757466B1 (en) * 2001-04-17 2007-09-11 삼성전자주식회사 System for providing service with device in home network and method thereof and System for receiving service in homenetwork and method thereof
US7006452B2 (en) * 2001-05-22 2006-02-28 Intel Corporation Matching DSL data link layer protocol detection
US20030023731A1 (en) * 2001-07-24 2003-01-30 Adtran, Inc. Mechanism for automatically determining signaling role and associated protocol of frame relay communication device
EP1522178B1 (en) * 2002-06-25 2008-03-12 PR Electronics A/S Method and adapter for protocol detection in a field bus network
US7443845B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2008-10-28 Cisco Technology, Inc. Apparatus and method for a lightweight, reliable, packet-based transport protocol
US7475142B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2009-01-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. CIFS for scalable NAS architecture
US8023520B2 (en) * 2003-03-27 2011-09-20 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Signaling packet
US20040258143A1 (en) * 2003-06-20 2004-12-23 Sbc, Inc. Transceiver with upper level communication status indicator and method of troubleshooting
WO2005025183A1 (en) * 2003-09-10 2005-03-17 Nokia Corporation Method and system for establishing a data link layer protocol on a physical layer port connection
US20090030980A1 (en) * 2007-07-23 2009-01-29 Kevin Remington Joseph Donovan Universal instant messaging system for the internet
US8248947B2 (en) * 2009-07-22 2012-08-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for improving power efficiency and latency of mobile devices using an out of band wireless resource
JP5193990B2 (en) * 2009-12-17 2013-05-08 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Relay device
CN112788018B (en) * 2020-12-30 2022-12-27 深圳市航天泰瑞捷电子有限公司 Multi-protocol data acquisition method, system, device and computer readable storage medium

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5440558A (en) * 1990-03-22 1995-08-08 Nec Corporation Data link setup in connection-oriented local area network with floating administration of data link addresses
US5463628A (en) * 1990-05-12 1995-10-31 Motorola Data network interface
US5509121A (en) * 1991-09-02 1996-04-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Multi-protocol communication control apparatus
US5581558A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-12-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus for bridging non-compatible network architectures

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4755992A (en) * 1986-06-06 1988-07-05 Racal Data Communications Inc. Transparent packet access over d-channel of ISDN
JP2826122B2 (en) * 1988-09-22 1998-11-18 株式会社リコー Data terminal device and transmission control method thereof
JP2802088B2 (en) * 1989-02-06 1998-09-21 株式会社日立製作所 Protocol selection switching method
US5182748A (en) * 1989-10-20 1993-01-26 Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co., Ltd. Protocol conversion system
IT1236730B (en) * 1989-10-31 1993-03-31 Sgs Thomson Microelectronics MONOLITHIC SPEED ADAPTER FOR NUMERIC NETWORK INTEGRATED IN THE SERVICES (RNIS OR ISDN).
JP2930624B2 (en) * 1989-11-17 1999-08-03 松下電送システム株式会社 Terminal equipment for ISDN
US5274700A (en) * 1989-11-27 1993-12-28 Unifi Communications Corporation Methods of automatically rerouting an incoming telephone call placed over a network
JPH0417458A (en) * 1990-05-11 1992-01-22 Ricoh Co Ltd Transmission control method for isdn terminal equipment
DE4107742A1 (en) * 1991-03-11 1992-09-17 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag PROTOCOL ADJUSTMENT
DE69126604T2 (en) * 1991-03-13 1998-01-08 Ibm Adaptation device and method for the effective connection of data processing devices and networks
US5442630A (en) * 1991-05-24 1995-08-15 Gagliardi; Ugo O. ISDN interfacing of local area networks
JPH05327712A (en) * 1991-08-09 1993-12-10 Nec Corp Terminal adaptor
GB2273850A (en) * 1992-12-22 1994-06-29 Ibm ISDN Call processing
JPH07118717B2 (en) * 1993-01-05 1995-12-18 日本電気株式会社 Multi-protocol packet network configuration method
US5621731A (en) * 1994-02-04 1997-04-15 Omnilink Communications Corporation Private exchange for ISDN
US5555244A (en) * 1994-05-19 1996-09-10 Integrated Network Corporation Scalable multimedia network
US5606599A (en) * 1994-06-24 1997-02-25 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for automatically converting from an analog voice mode to a simultaneous voice and data mode for a multi-modal call over a telephone line
US5485460A (en) * 1994-08-19 1996-01-16 Microsoft Corporation System and method for running multiple incompatible network protocol stacks
US5671251A (en) * 1995-02-28 1997-09-23 Motorola, Inc. Apparatus and method for a data communications device to selectively operate as an analog modem, as a digital modem, and as a terminal adapter
US5732283A (en) * 1995-10-24 1998-03-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method of providing universal support for multiple pointing devices
US5751796A (en) * 1996-06-21 1998-05-12 Paradyne Corporation Rapid startup protocol for communication between a plurality of modems

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5440558A (en) * 1990-03-22 1995-08-08 Nec Corporation Data link setup in connection-oriented local area network with floating administration of data link addresses
US5463628A (en) * 1990-05-12 1995-10-31 Motorola Data network interface
US5509121A (en) * 1991-09-02 1996-04-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Multi-protocol communication control apparatus
US5581558A (en) * 1995-03-29 1996-12-03 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus for bridging non-compatible network architectures

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP0820667A4 *

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7602805B2 (en) 1998-11-13 2009-10-13 Gary Parnes Circuits and methods for detecting the mode of a telecommunications signal
WO2000030320A1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2000-05-25 Digi International Inc. Circuits and methods for detecting the mode of a telecommunications signal
US6614801B1 (en) 1998-11-13 2003-09-02 Digi International Inc. Circuits and methods for detecting the mode of a telecommunications signal
US6975632B2 (en) 1999-03-15 2005-12-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Multi-service architecture with any port any service (APAS) hardware platform
WO2000056012A2 (en) * 1999-03-15 2000-09-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. A multi-service architecture with any port any service (apas) hardware platform
WO2000056012A3 (en) * 1999-03-15 2001-02-01 Cisco Tech Ind A multi-service architecture with any port any service (apas) hardware platform
WO2001045354A1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2001-06-21 Nokia Corporation Data call routing on ip connections
US7372847B2 (en) 1999-12-17 2008-05-13 Nokia Corporation Data call routing on IP connections
EP1124402A2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2001-08-16 Avaya Technology Corp. Automated link variant determination and protocol configuration
EP1124402A3 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-03-24 Avaya Technology Corp. Automated link variant determination and protocol configuration
US6975597B1 (en) 2000-02-11 2005-12-13 Avaya Technology Corp. Automated link variant determination and protocol configuration for customer premises equipment and other network devices
EP1150471A3 (en) * 2000-04-27 2002-04-03 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and system for recommending an available network protocol
US6601094B1 (en) * 2000-04-27 2003-07-29 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for recommending an available network protocol
EP1150471A2 (en) * 2000-04-27 2001-10-31 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and system for recommending an available network protocol
US7680059B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2010-03-16 Broadcom Corporation Multiple protocol wireless communications in a WLAN
EP1564936A3 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-03-11 Broadcom Corporation Multiple protocol wireless communications in a WLAN
EP1564936A2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-08-17 Broadcom Corporation Multiple protocol wireless communications in a WLAN
EP1978697A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2008-10-08 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. A method for transmitting subscriber line layer 2 encapsulation mode to broadband access server
EP1978697A4 (en) * 2006-02-14 2009-03-18 Huawei Tech Co Ltd A method for transmitting subscriber line layer 2 encapsulation mode to broadband access server
WO2007093098A1 (en) 2006-02-14 2007-08-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. A method for transmitting subscriber line layer 2 encapsulation mode to broadband access server
WO2008118375A2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-10-02 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus of introducing xid frames for lapdm procedure
WO2008118375A3 (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-12-18 Interdigital Tech Corp Method and apparatus of introducing xid frames for lapdm procedure
WO2013060419A1 (en) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-02 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Slave control device and method for programming a slave control device
US9501440B2 (en) 2011-10-27 2016-11-22 Volkswagen Ag Slave control device and method for programming a slave control device
CN103891210B (en) * 2011-10-27 2017-12-08 大众汽车有限公司 From control device and for the method to being programmed from control device
US20150169481A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 Man Truck & Bus Ag Method and device for data communication in vehicles, particularly in motor vehicles
US9798687B2 (en) * 2013-12-12 2017-10-24 Man Truck & Bus Ag Method and device for LIN master and identical LIN slaves data communication in motor vehicles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0820667A1 (en) 1998-01-28
JP3684439B2 (en) 2005-08-17
EP0820667A4 (en) 2000-12-27
US6122287A (en) 2000-09-19
JPH11512914A (en) 1999-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6122287A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting switched network protocols
US5931928A (en) System for ISDN terminal adapter DCE for automatically negotiating data compression with it's PPP peer when DTE is unable or unwilling to negotiate compression
EP0605349B1 (en) Switched circuit connection management over public data networks for wide area networks
JP2548879B2 (en) Device for managing use of data communication channel, method for managing use of data communication facility and port connection manager
US6005846A (en) Apparatus for an improved ISDN terminal adapter having automatic SPID configuration and methods for use therein
US6031848A (en) Apparatus for an improved ISDN terminal adapter having baud rate unblocking and methods for use therein
US6563839B1 (en) Communication system having a limited number of communication channels
US6175576B1 (en) Signaling capable telecommunication system and method
Cisco Configuring Remote CAPI
AU741494B2 (en) Procedure for the switching of data traffic in a data communication system
AU741495B2 (en) Procedure for the switching of data traffic in a data communication system
KR100219226B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
KR100219225B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
US6301270B1 (en) Right to left matching of device address numbers with provided integrated services digital network destination numbers
KR100219220B1 (en) Method for processing setup request primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
JP2812767B2 (en) Packet terminal device and communication system
KR100219221B1 (en) Method for processing information request primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
KR100219224B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
KR100219227B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
KR100219223B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in layer 3 of isdn uni
KR100295945B1 (en) D-channel packet service method in isdn exchange system
KR100219222B1 (en) Method for processing primitives in gcr layer of isdn uni
KR980013104A (en) How ISDN User-Network Connections Handle Primitives at Layer 3
JPH03259695A (en) Electronic exchange
KR980013116A (en) How to handle primitives in the GCR layer of an ISDN user-network connection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CN JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1997903994

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1997 528539

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1997903994

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1997903994

Country of ref document: EP