WO1998023538A1 - Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow impurity removal - Google Patents
Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow impurity removal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998023538A1 WO1998023538A1 PCT/US1997/021375 US9721375W WO9823538A1 WO 1998023538 A1 WO1998023538 A1 WO 1998023538A1 US 9721375 W US9721375 W US 9721375W WO 9823538 A1 WO9823538 A1 WO 9823538A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- process according
- coagulant
- range
- silica
- membrane
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 78
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 73
- 238000004065 wastewater treatment Methods 0.000 title description 5
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 title description 4
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 139
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 112
- 239000000701 coagulant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 78
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 73
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 59
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 238000001471 micro-filtration Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Fluoride anion Chemical compound [F-] KRHYYFGTRYWZRS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- ROSDSFDQCJNGOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dimethylamine Chemical compound CNC ROSDSFDQCJNGOL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 24
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 22
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 22
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- GQOKIYDTHHZSCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M dimethyl-bis(prop-2-enyl)azanium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].C=CC[N+](C)(C)CC=C GQOKIYDTHHZSCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 14
- BRLQWZUYTZBJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Epichlorohydrin Chemical group ClCC1CO1 BRLQWZUYTZBJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- ANBBXQWFNXMHLD-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminum;sodium;oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[Na+].[Al+3] ANBBXQWFNXMHLD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910001388 sodium aluminate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical group [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical group [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- VSCWAEJMTAWNJL-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminium trichloride Chemical group Cl[Al](Cl)Cl VSCWAEJMTAWNJL-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 claims description 8
- 229920000371 poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 7
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical compound NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 6
- LVYZJEPLMYTTGH-UHFFFAOYSA-H dialuminum chloride pentahydroxide dihydrate Chemical compound [Cl-].[Al+3].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].O.O LVYZJEPLMYTTGH-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 claims description 6
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000008119 colloidal silica Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- RUTXIHLAWFEWGM-UHFFFAOYSA-H iron(3+) sulfate Chemical compound [Fe+3].[Fe+3].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O RUTXIHLAWFEWGM-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910000360 iron(III) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052793 cadmium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- XVIWVTWNQQUGQI-UHFFFAOYSA-L disodium;sulfanylidenemethanediolate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=S XVIWVTWNQQUGQI-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 244000007835 Cyamopsis tetragonoloba Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052745 lead Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 2
- 150000002222 fluorine compounds Chemical group 0.000 claims 1
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 claims 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 abstract description 47
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 abstract description 16
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 abstract description 15
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 7
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 6
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910052755 nonmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000004809 Teflon Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920006362 Teflon® Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011020 pilot scale process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012798 spherical particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- DIZPMCHEQGEION-UHFFFAOYSA-H aluminium sulfate (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Al+3].[Al+3].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O DIZPMCHEQGEION-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 3
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000498 cooling water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 3
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 2
- 229920000544 Gore-Tex Polymers 0.000 description 2
- TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium chloride Chemical compound [Mg+2].[Cl-].[Cl-] TWRXJAOTZQYOKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011021 bench scale process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002149 energy-dispersive X-ray emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004255 ion exchange chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000153 supplemental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229920006322 acrylamide copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3] WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052788 barium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N barium atom Chemical compound [Ba] DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium atom Chemical compound [Cd] BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002738 chelating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002270 dispersing agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011790 ferrous sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000003891 ferrous sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical class [H]* 0.000 description 1
- 239000010842 industrial wastewater Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003112 inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- BAUYGSIQEAFULO-UHFFFAOYSA-L iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) Chemical compound [Fe+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O BAUYGSIQEAFULO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910000359 iron(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001629 magnesium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000395 magnesium oxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N magnesium oxide Inorganic materials [Mg]=O CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- AXZKOIWUVFPNLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N magnesium;oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[Mg+2] AXZKOIWUVFPNLO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002791 soaking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N tellanylidenegermanium Chemical compound [Te]=[Ge] JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013022 venting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D65/00—Accessories or auxiliary operations, in general, for separation processes or apparatus using semi-permeable membranes
- B01D65/02—Membrane cleaning or sterilisation ; Membrane regeneration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/147—Microfiltration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/16—Feed pretreatment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/44—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis
- C02F1/444—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis by ultrafiltration or microfiltration
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/52—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
- C02F1/5236—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using inorganic agents
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/52—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities
- C02F1/54—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by flocculation or precipitation of suspended impurities using organic material
- C02F1/56—Macromolecular compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/58—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by removing specified dissolved compounds
- C02F1/583—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by removing specified dissolved compounds by removing fluoride or fluorine compounds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2311/00—Details relating to membrane separation process operations and control
- B01D2311/04—Specific process operations in the feed stream; Feed pretreatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/04—Backflushing
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/16—Use of chemical agents
- B01D2321/162—Use of acids
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/16—Use of chemical agents
- B01D2321/164—Use of bases
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/16—Use of chemical agents
- B01D2321/168—Use of other chemical agents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2321/00—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
- B01D2321/28—Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling by soaking or impregnating
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
- C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
- C02F2101/20—Heavy metals or heavy metal compounds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/34—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from industrial activities not provided for in groups C02F2103/12 - C02F2103/32
- C02F2103/346—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from industrial activities not provided for in groups C02F2103/12 - C02F2103/32 from semiconductor processing, e.g. waste water from polishing of wafers
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the treatment and purification of wastewater at high flow rates. More particularly, the present invention relates to process and apparatus for removing heavy metal and certain non-metal contaminants, such as silica and fluoride, from large quantities of wastewater.
- CMP chemical mechanical polishing
- silica Dissolved silica in industrial cooling water is also a major problem.
- Silica is a scale forming material commonly found in cooling water which can foul heat exchangers, pipes, valves, pumps, and boilers.
- silica concentration in a cooling water system exceeds its solubility limit of roughly about 150 to about 200 milligrams per liter, silica polymerizes to form scale. It may also react with multivalent cations, such as magnesium and calcium, to form scale.
- Microfiltration systems have also been considered to remove silica contaminants from wastewater.
- traditional microfiltration membranes having a pore size of about 0.5 microns rapidly clog with silica precipitated using conventional inorganic coagulants.
- Such particulates are consistently less than 1 micron in size.
- the inorganic coagulants cannot aid in the precipitation of microfine colloidal silica.
- the partially formed floe will also deform and block the membrane pores, preventing flow.
- the present invention is directed to a process for removing metal and certain non-metal contaminants from large volumes of wastewater.
- a wastewater stream containing a contaminant is treated with a chemical coagulant.
- Typical metal contaminants found in mining and other industrial wastewater streams include silver (Ag) , arsenic (As) , gold (Au) , barium (Ba) , cadmium (Cd) , chromium (Cr) , copper (Cu) , mercury (Hg) , nickel (Ni) , lead (Pb) , zinc (Zn) , fluoride (F) , and silica (Si0 2 ) .
- the present invention can readily be adapted for removing other metals and contaminants found in wastewater by using suitable coagulant chemistry.
- the coagulant reacts with the contaminant to form a particulate having a size greater than about 5 ⁇ .
- a wastewater stream includes raw water as well as process water streams containing the identified contaminant.
- Known and novel chemical coagulants are available to achieve the desired particulate formation. For instance, ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate, aluminum sulfate, sodium aluminate, and aluminum and iron polymers are well known inorganic coagulants.
- Organic and polymeric coagulants can also be used, such as polyacrylamides (cationic, nonionic, and anionic) , epi- dma's (epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymers) , DADMAC's (polydiallydimethylammonium chlorides) , copolymers of acrylamide and DADMAC, natural guar, etc.
- Some coagulants, such as boro- hydrides, are selective for certain metals.
- the stoichiometric ratio of coagulant to metal or non-metal contaminant is preferably optimized to result in acceptable contaminant removal at minimum coagulant cost.
- the required coagulant concentration will depend on several factors, including contaminant influent concentration, wastewater flow rate, contaminant effluent compliance requirement, coagulant/contaminant reaction kinetics, etc.
- the ratio of coagulant to metal contaminant is typically in the range from 3:1 to 16:1.
- Arsenic for example, requires a 6:1 to 10:1 (ferric coagulant: arsenic) ratio
- lead requires a 3:1 to 8:1 coagulant:metal ratio
- zinc uses about 4:1 coagulant:metal ratio
- copper typically requires a coagulant:metal ratio in the range from 3:1 to 8:1.
- Fluoride typically has a ratio of coagulant to contaminant in the range from 2:1 to 30:1, depending on the system.
- the ratio of silicon to coagulant is typically in the range from 20:1 to 50:1, depending on the system, an preferably about 40:1. If small amounts of silica can remain in the effluent stream, then the ratio of silicon to coagulant can be 120:1 or even higher.
- the optimum mole ratio will also vary depending on the coagulant used. For instance, low molecular weight epi-dma (25,000 to 100,000) and very high molecular weight epi-dma (1,000,000 to 1.5 million) require from 3 to 5 times the dose to flocculate silica. It has been found that organic coagulants cause the silica to form well defined spherical particles having a typical particle size in the range from 0.05 ⁇ to 0.15 ⁇ . The particles tend to agglomerate to form larger clusters having a typical size in the range from 10 ⁇ to 300 ⁇ . The silica particles are easily separated from microfiltration membranes enabling efficient silica removal without membrane degradation.
- a supplemental coagulant can optionally be used in combination with the organic and polymeric coagulant to optimize the silica removal.
- typical supplemental coagulants include, aluminum chlorohydrate ("ACH,” Al n OH 2n-m Cl m , e.g., Al 4 OH 6 Cl with a typical A1:C1 ratio of 2:1), sodium aluminate (NaA10 2 ) , aluminum chloride (A1C1 3 ) , and polyaluminum chloride ("PAC,” A1 6 0C1 5 ) .
- the typical mole ratio of silica to inorganic coagulant is about 25:1.
- Treated wastewater is passed through a microfiltration membrane which physically separates the metal, silica or fluoride contaminant from the wastewater.
- Suitable microfiltration membranes are commercially available from manufacturers such as W.L. Gore, Koch, and National Filter Media (Salt Lake City, Utah) .
- one GOR-TEX® membrane used in the present invention is made of polypropylene felt with a sprayed coating of teflon. The teflon coating is intended to promote water passage through the membrane.
- Such microfiltration membrane material has been found to be useful for many wastewater treatment systems.
- the microfiltration membranes are used in a tubular "sock" configuration to maximize surface area.
- the membrane sock is placed over a slotted tube to prevent the sock from collapsing during use.
- a net material is placed between the membrane sock and the slotted tube to facilitate flow between the membrane and the slots in the tube.
- a large number of membrane modules, each containing a number of individual filter socks are used.
- the microfiltration membranes preferably have a pore size in the range from 0.5 micron to 5 micron, and preferably from 0.5 micron to 1.0 micron.
- the treated wastewater flow rate through 0.5 to 1 micron microfiltration membranes can be in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD for metal contaminants and in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day (“GFD”) to 600 GFD for silica contaminants.
- Solids are preferably removed from the membrane surface by periodically backflushing the microfiltration membranes and draining the filtration vessel within which the membranes are located. The periodic, short duration back flush removes any buildup of contaminants from the walls of the microfiltration membrane socks. The dislodged solid material within the filtration vessel is flushed into a holding tank for further processing of the solids.
- the wastewater treatment system disclosed herein is designed to provide compliance with the contaminant discharge effluent limits. Wastewater pretreatment chemistry creates insoluble metal and non-metal contaminant particulates which are efficiently removed by the microfiltration membranes.
- Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one wastewater pretreatment system.
- Figure 2 is a schematic representation of one wastewater microfiltration apparatus for high flow impurity removal.
- the present invention is directed to a process for removing metal and certain non-metal contaminants, such as silica and fluoride, from large volumes of wastewater.
- the wastewater is collected and pretreated with one or more chemical coagulants such that the contaminant reacts with the coagulant (s) to form particulates having a size greater than about 5 ⁇ .
- the chemical coagulants are preferably mixed with the wastewater using reaction vessels or static in-line mixers, although other mixing methods can be used.
- the treated wastewater is then passed through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 ⁇ to 5 ⁇ to remove the contaminant particulates.
- a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 ⁇ to 5 ⁇ to remove the contaminant particulates.
- wastewater flow rates in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD for metal contaminants and in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day (“GFD”) to 600 GFD for silica contaminants. are possible.
- the microfiltration membrane is periodically backflushed to remove solids from the membrane surface. The rejected solids are gravity collected in the filter vessel bottom and time cycle discharged to a settling tank for further sludge processing.
- the microfiltration membranes are preferably provided in a cassette arranged module.
- the microfiltration membranes provide a positive particle separation in a high recovery dead head filtration array.
- the dead head filtration operates effectively at low pressures (4 psi to 15 psi, preferably 5 psi to 10 psi) and high flow rates, allowing 100% discharge of the supplied water with no transfer pumps needed. Solids which settle on the wall of the membrane during filtration are periodically backflushed away (and gravity settled) from the membrane surface to ensure a continuously clean filtration area.
- the individual cassette module design allows for easy replacement of the membrane modules.
- filter socks useful with the present invention contain a teflon coating on a polypropylene or polyethylene felt backing material. Such socks are available from W.L. Gore.
- Another presently preferred filter sock manufactured by National Filter Media, Salt Lake City, Utah consists of a polypropylene membrane bonded to a polypropylene or polyethylene felt backing. Membrane "failure" is due primarily to flux rate loss, not mechanical failure. Many operations deem it more cost-effective to replace the membrane socks instead of cleaning contaminants from the membrane.
- the membrane life is important to the continuous operation and operational cost of the filtration system.
- the membranes manufactured by W.L. Gore and National Filter Media have been found to be robust and free of catastrophic failures at a temperature of 160°F and a pH greater than 13.
- Anticipated operating conditions for the present invention are ambient temperature and pH between 5 and 11.
- a currently preferred operating pH range is between about 7.3 and 9.3, although good results are obtained ⁇ 1.0 pH unit from the optimum pH. It is presently preferred to adjust the pH before adding the organic coagulant.
- membranes used according to the present invention will have a life equal to or greater than 18 months.
- the filtration system operates at a low pressure, preferably between 4 and 15 psi.
- the operating pressure is preferably below 25 psi. Although the currently preferred operating pressure is below about 25 psi, excellent silica removal results have been obtained using the organic coagulants identified above with commercially available high pressure microfiltration systems which operate at pressures between 30 and 80 psi. Existing microfiltration systems using conventional inorganic coagulants can be retrofitted for use with the organic coagulants to obtain dramatically improved performance.
- Example 3 A 15 gpm pilot scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica.
- the silica was present in dissolved and colloidal silica form in the waste stream.
- SDI Silt Density Indices
- the filtration membrane was a 0.5 micron polypropylene felt with a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating obtained from W.L. Gore.
- the membrane flux rate ranged from 175 GFD to 400 GFD at a vessel operating pressure less than 15 psi. The results are reported below in parts per million.
- a 15 gallon per minute (gpm) pilot scale system was used to process wastewater containing copper and lead in a combined waste flow.
- the copper and lead removal system employed the use of a blend of sodium thiocarbonate and sodium aluminate which was fed at a ratio of 3.2:1 (thiocarbonate to combined metal concentration of copper and lead as measured by atomic absorption) .
- the precipitate was flocculated with a medium charge, medium molecular weight polyacrylamide polymer for ease of filtering or settling. This yielded a very low to non- detectable effluent values of copper and lead in the effluent.
- the membrane was a 1.0 micron polypropylene needled monoelement obtained from National Filter Media. The membrane flux rate was estimated to be 1000 GFD at vessel pressures from 4.5 to 6.0 psi. The results are reported below in parts per million: Time Lead Copper
- a 3-5 gpm bench scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica.
- the silica-containing waste stream was obtained from a commercially available CMP slurry sold by Rodel, known as ILD 1300.
- the ILD 1300 slurry was diluted according to manufacturer's instructions, and it was found to contain about 1380 ppm Si, measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption, and about 70 ppm ammonium (NH 4 ) , measured by ion chromatography.
- One liter of the waste stream weighted about 993.7 grams.
- the silicon was present in the waste stream as dissolved and colloidal silica.
- the waste stream was adjusted to a pH of about 8.58 by adding small amounts of sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid.
- the waste stream was mixed for about 3 minutes while the pH was adjusted. 2.09 g of a 20% by weight solution of epi-DMA, an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having an average molecular weight of 250,000150,000 (EnChem Lot I- 1396/423/MIC) and 0.19 g of dry aluminum chlorohydrate were added to one liter of the waste stream and mixed for about 20 minutes.
- the reaction mixture was pumped at a pressure of about 6 psi through a two foot long filter sock having a diameter of about 3.5 inches.
- the membrane flux was estimated at 189 GFD.
- the filter sock contained a GOR-TEX® membrane (Lot. No. 66538-3- 786) obtained from W.L. Gore.
- the membrane had a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating on polypropylene felt having a 0.5 ⁇ pore size (1.5 ⁇ absolute).
- the filter membrane effluent was collected, and it was found to contain about 15.5 ppm Si, measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption, and about 70 ppm ammonium (NH 4 ) , measured by ion chromatography.
- Example 6 A 3-5 gpm bench scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica.
- the silica-containing waste stream was obtained from a commercially available CMP slurry sold by
- reaction mixture was pumped through the filter sock of
- the solids were collected from the filter surface and air dried for 24 hours.
- the solids formed were well defined spherical particles which were easily removed from the filter membrane surface.
- the dried and ground solids were analyzed, and the results are reported below in weight percent.
- Each filtration vessel preferably provides a mounting platform for from 9 to 49 filter cassette modules.
- One currently preferred filter cassette module contains 16 individual sock filters configured with 0.5 micron filtration membranes. The rated flow rate is 0.9 gpm per square foot of membrane area. Each full cassette module has 64 square feet of membrane area and is rated at 58 gpm with a differential pressure less than 15 psi.
- a lifting mechanism is preferably included to allow removal and replacement of the membrane cassette modules.
- the filtration membranes are periodically backflushed with filtrate to remove solids from the membrane surface. During the backflush procedure, the filtration vessel is taken off line and wastewater is drained from the filtration vessel via a backflush exit stream 42 to a backflush tank 44.
- the membranes will require soaking to remove trace amounts of organics. Cleaning preferably occurs as needed or as part of a regular maintenance program.
- the vessel drain opens to remove all contaminant via the sludge discharge stream 50.
- the cleaning solution is introduced into each filtration vessel through cleaning supply stream 54. Typical cleaning solutions include acids, bases, and surfactants.
- the filtration vessel can be returned to operation without draining and rinsing the filtration membranes. If membrane rinsing is necessary, the contents of the filtration vessel 32, 34, 36 are removed via cleaning discharge stream 56 for further processing.
- the chemical pretreatment achieves particle formation based on size, not weight. As a result, chemical pretreatment costs are lower than those typically required for a clarifier/sand filter.
Abstract
A process and system for removing heavy metals, fluoride, silica and other contaminants from large volumes of wastewater is disclosed. In the process, a wastewater stream containing the contaminant is treated with a chemical coagulant to create a particle having a diameter greater than 5 microns. Treated wastewater is passed through a microfiltration membrane which physically separates the metal contaminant particle from the wastewater. Commercially available microfiltration membranes having a pore size from 0.5 micron to 5 microns may be used. The treated wastewater flow rate through the microfiltration membranes can range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ('GFD') to 1500 GFD for metal contaminants and from 140 GFD to 600 GFD for silica contaminants. Solids are removed from the membrane surface by periodically backflushing the microfiltration membranes and draining the filtration vessel within which the membranes are located. The dislodged solid material within the filtration vessel is flushed into a holding tank for further processing of the solids.
Description
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH PLOW IMPURITY REMOVAL
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the treatment and purification of wastewater at high flow rates. More particularly, the present invention relates to process and apparatus for removing heavy metal and certain non-metal contaminants, such as silica and fluoride, from large quantities of wastewater.
Background of Invention Many manufacturing operations generate extremely large quantities of water containing heavy metals or other contami- nants. For instance, mining drawdown wells which are used to dewater deep mining operations are known to generate up to 75,000 gallons per minute (gpm) of water. Often this water contains heavy metals or other impurities which must be removed from the water before it can be safely discharged into the environment.
Current techniques for treating drawdown wastewater include large settling ponds, clarifiers, and sand filter systems utilizing iron or aluminum chemistry with large quantities of polymer additives. Such systems are able to demonstrate 90% compliance to discharge regulations. For example, arsenic cannot be safely discharged into the environment unless its concentration is less than 50 ppb ("parts per billion") . If influent arsenic levels are greater than 300 ppb, clarifier and sand filter systems are not able to consistently provide discharge levels less than 50 ppb. To achieve this level of arsenic reduction, chemical coagulants are required to form heavy and large particles, typically greater than 200 microns in size. However, such systems are subject to biological fouling, sand settling, and upsets. Upsets result in out of compliance water. In addition, system maintenance is extensive, with very large land areas required for the system installation.
Filters have been considered to remove metal contaminants from wastewater. But traditional microfiltration membranes have
flux rates that are too low to justify their use in large scale water processing systems.
Many industrial operations generate large quantities of water containing silica. For instance, chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processes, widely used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, produce waste water streams containing high quantities of silica. CMP processes are used to polish the silicon-based wafer surface during various stages of semiconductor manufacture. Waste streams containing the polishing slurry and silica are produced during CMP. The silica must be removed before the water can be safely discharged to the environment or recycled within the facility.
Dissolved silica in industrial cooling water is also a major problem. Silica is a scale forming material commonly found in cooling water which can foul heat exchangers, pipes, valves, pumps, and boilers. No known inhibitor, chelating agent or dispersant exists which will significantly control silica's tendency to form scale. When the silica concentration in a cooling water system exceeds its solubility limit of roughly about 150 to about 200 milligrams per liter, silica polymerizes to form scale. It may also react with multivalent cations, such as magnesium and calcium, to form scale.
Researchers have examined many different methods of removing soluble silica, including the use of ferric sulfate, calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, magnesium sulfate, magnesium oxide, aluminum hydroxide, sodium aluminate and activated alumina. Activated alumina has received much attention in processes for removing silica. See, U.S. Patent No. 4,276,180 to Matson and U.S. Patent No. 5,512,181 to Matchett. Other aluminum containing compounds such as sodium aluminate, aluminum sulfate, and aluminum chloride in an alkaline environment (pH greater than 8) have been used to remove soluble and colloidal silica. See, U.S. Patent No. 5,453,206 to Browne. However, these processes are not capable of processing large volumes of wastewater through high flow mechanical systems because of degradation of particles and particulates below 5 micron in size.
Microfiltration systems have also been considered to remove silica contaminants from wastewater. However, traditional
microfiltration membranes having a pore size of about 0.5 microns rapidly clog with silica precipitated using conventional inorganic coagulants. Such particulates are consistently less than 1 micron in size. Moreover, the inorganic coagulants cannot aid in the precipitation of microfine colloidal silica. The partially formed floe will also deform and block the membrane pores, preventing flow.
It would be a significant advancement in the art to provide a process and system for removing metals and other contaminants such as silica and fluoride from large quantities of wastewater. Such processes and systems are disclosed and claimed herein.
Summary of the Invention The present invention is directed to a process for removing metal and certain non-metal contaminants from large volumes of wastewater. In the process, a wastewater stream containing a contaminant is treated with a chemical coagulant. Typical metal contaminants found in mining and other industrial wastewater streams include silver (Ag) , arsenic (As) , gold (Au) , barium (Ba) , cadmium (Cd) , chromium (Cr) , copper (Cu) , mercury (Hg) , nickel (Ni) , lead (Pb) , zinc (Zn) , fluoride (F) , and silica (Si02) . The present invention can readily be adapted for removing other metals and contaminants found in wastewater by using suitable coagulant chemistry. The coagulant reacts with the contaminant to form a particulate having a size greater than about 5 μ. As used herein, a wastewater stream includes raw water as well as process water streams containing the identified contaminant. Known and novel chemical coagulants are available to achieve the desired particulate formation. For instance, ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate, aluminum sulfate, sodium aluminate, and aluminum and iron polymers are well known inorganic coagulants. Organic and polymeric coagulants can also be used, such as polyacrylamides (cationic, nonionic, and anionic) , epi- dma's (epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymers) , DADMAC's (polydiallydimethylammonium chlorides) , copolymers of acrylamide and DADMAC, natural guar, etc. Some coagulants, such as boro- hydrides, are selective for certain metals. The stoichiometric
ratio of coagulant to metal or non-metal contaminant is preferably optimized to result in acceptable contaminant removal at minimum coagulant cost.
The required coagulant concentration will depend on several factors, including contaminant influent concentration, wastewater flow rate, contaminant effluent compliance requirement, coagulant/contaminant reaction kinetics, etc. For metal contaminants, the ratio of coagulant to metal contaminant is typically in the range from 3:1 to 16:1. Arsenic, for example, requires a 6:1 to 10:1 (ferric coagulant: arsenic) ratio, lead requires a 3:1 to 8:1 coagulant:metal ratio, zinc uses about 4:1 coagulant:metal ratio, while copper typically requires a coagulant:metal ratio in the range from 3:1 to 8:1. Fluoride typically has a ratio of coagulant to contaminant in the range from 2:1 to 30:1, depending on the system. For silica contaminants, the ratio of silicon to coagulant is typically in the range from 20:1 to 50:1, depending on the system, an preferably about 40:1. If small amounts of silica can remain in the effluent stream, then the ratio of silicon to coagulant can be 120:1 or even higher. The optimum mole ratio will also vary depending on the coagulant used. For instance, low molecular weight epi-dma (25,000 to 100,000) and very high molecular weight epi-dma (1,000,000 to 1.5 million) require from 3 to 5 times the dose to flocculate silica. It has been found that organic coagulants cause the silica to form well defined spherical particles having a typical particle size in the range from 0.05 μ to 0.15 μ. The particles tend to agglomerate to form larger clusters having a typical size in the range from 10 μ to 300 μ. The silica particles are easily separated from microfiltration membranes enabling efficient silica removal without membrane degradation.
Small amounts of a supplemental coagulant can optionally be used in combination with the organic and polymeric coagulant to optimize the silica removal. Examples of typical supplemental coagulants include, aluminum chlorohydrate ("ACH," AlnOH2n-mClm, e.g., Al4OH6Cl with a typical A1:C1 ratio of 2:1), sodium aluminate (NaA102) , aluminum chloride (A1C13) , and polyaluminum chloride ("PAC," A160C15) . The typical mole ratio of silica to inorganic coagulant is about 25:1.
Treated wastewater is passed through a microfiltration membrane which physically separates the metal, silica or fluoride contaminant from the wastewater. Suitable microfiltration membranes are commercially available from manufacturers such as W.L. Gore, Koch, and National Filter Media (Salt Lake City, Utah) . For instance, one GOR-TEX® membrane used in the present invention is made of polypropylene felt with a sprayed coating of teflon. The teflon coating is intended to promote water passage through the membrane. Such microfiltration membrane material has been found to be useful for many wastewater treatment systems.
The microfiltration membranes are used in a tubular "sock" configuration to maximize surface area. The membrane sock is placed over a slotted tube to prevent the sock from collapsing during use. A net material is placed between the membrane sock and the slotted tube to facilitate flow between the membrane and the slots in the tube. In order to achieve the extremely high volume flow rates, a large number of membrane modules, each containing a number of individual filter socks, are used. The microfiltration membranes preferably have a pore size in the range from 0.5 micron to 5 micron, and preferably from 0.5 micron to 1.0 micron. By controlling the ratio of coagulant to contaminant, 99.99% of the precipitated contaminant particles can be greater than 5 microns. This allows the use of larger pore size microfiltration membranes. It has been found that the treated wastewater flow rate through 0.5 to 1 micron microfiltration membranes can be in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD for metal contaminants and in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 600 GFD for silica contaminants. Solids are preferably removed from the membrane surface by periodically backflushing the microfiltration membranes and draining the filtration vessel within which the membranes are located. The periodic, short duration back flush removes any buildup of contaminants from the walls of the microfiltration membrane socks. The dislodged solid material within the filtration vessel is flushed into a holding tank for further processing of the solids.
The wastewater treatment system disclosed herein is designed to provide compliance with the contaminant discharge effluent limits. Wastewater pretreatment chemistry creates insoluble metal and non-metal contaminant particulates which are efficiently removed by the microfiltration membranes.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic representation of one wastewater pretreatment system. Figure 2 is a schematic representation of one wastewater microfiltration apparatus for high flow impurity removal.
Detailed Description of the Invention The present invention is directed to a process for removing metal and certain non-metal contaminants, such as silica and fluoride, from large volumes of wastewater. In operation, the wastewater is collected and pretreated with one or more chemical coagulants such that the contaminant reacts with the coagulant (s) to form particulates having a size greater than about 5 μ. The chemical coagulants are preferably mixed with the wastewater using reaction vessels or static in-line mixers, although other mixing methods can be used.
The treated wastewater is then passed through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 μ to 5 μ to remove the contaminant particulates. In such a system, wastewater flow rates in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD for metal contaminants and in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 600 GFD for silica contaminants. are possible. The microfiltration membrane is periodically backflushed to remove solids from the membrane surface. The rejected solids are gravity collected in the filter vessel bottom and time cycle discharged to a settling tank for further sludge processing. The microfiltration membranes are preferably provided in a cassette arranged module. The microfiltration membranes provide a positive particle separation in a high recovery dead head filtration array. The dead head filtration operates effectively at low pressures (4 psi to 15 psi, preferably 5 psi to 10 psi)
and high flow rates, allowing 100% discharge of the supplied water with no transfer pumps needed. Solids which settle on the wall of the membrane during filtration are periodically backflushed away (and gravity settled) from the membrane surface to ensure a continuously clean filtration area. The individual cassette module design allows for easy replacement of the membrane modules.
Currently preferred filter socks useful with the present invention contain a teflon coating on a polypropylene or polyethylene felt backing material. Such socks are available from W.L. Gore. Another presently preferred filter sock manufactured by National Filter Media, Salt Lake City, Utah, consists of a polypropylene membrane bonded to a polypropylene or polyethylene felt backing. Membrane "failure" is due primarily to flux rate loss, not mechanical failure. Many operations deem it more cost-effective to replace the membrane socks instead of cleaning contaminants from the membrane.
The membrane life is important to the continuous operation and operational cost of the filtration system. The membranes manufactured by W.L. Gore and National Filter Media have been found to be robust and free of catastrophic failures at a temperature of 160°F and a pH greater than 13. Anticipated operating conditions for the present invention are ambient temperature and pH between 5 and 11. For silica removal, a currently preferred operating pH range is between about 7.3 and 9.3, although good results are obtained ± 1.0 pH unit from the optimum pH. It is presently preferred to adjust the pH before adding the organic coagulant. It is expected that membranes used according to the present invention will have a life equal to or greater than 18 months. The filtration system operates at a low pressure, preferably between 4 and 15 psi. Greater pressures are possible; however, the higher the pressure, the quicker the membrane loss of flux rate. The operating pressure is preferably below 25 psi. Although the currently preferred operating pressure is below about 25 psi, excellent silica removal results have been obtained using the organic coagulants identified above with commercially available high pressure microfiltration systems which operate at pressures between 30 and 80 psi. Existing
microfiltration systems using conventional inorganic coagulants can be retrofitted for use with the organic coagulants to obtain dramatically improved performance.
The following examples are offered to further illustrate the present invention. These examples are intended to be purely exemplary and should not be viewed as a limitation on any claimed embodiment.
Example 1 Using a 50 gallon per minute (gpm) pilot scale system, actual mine draw-down wastewater containing arsenic contaminant was processed according to the present invention. Ferric sulfate (at a ratio of 8:1 Fe:As) was used as the coagulant. DADMAC ( (poly)diallyldimethylammonium chloride) and a copolymer of acrylamide and DADMAC were used at a concentration of 1 ppm (parts per million) . The DADMAC was used as a 20% liquid and the DADMAC acrylamide copolymer was used as a 10% liquid. The membrane was obtained from W.L. Gore having a teflon coating and a nominal pore size range of 0.5 μ. The flux rate ranged from 430 to 600 GFD at an operating pressure less than 10 psi. The results are reported below in Table 1.
Table 1
All Values are in Parts Per Billion (ppb) Time Arsenic Influent Arsenic Effluent
Period Mean High Low Mean High Low
A 331 429 247 13.3 82 0
B 270 375 165 5.3 15 0
C 279 369 231 7.0 24 0
D 278 278 278 2.7 7 0
E 244 268 197 4.9 14 0
Example 2 A 15 gpm pilot scale system was used to process wastewater containing fluoride and a combined flow of fluoride and silica. A 38% sodium aluminate solution at a ratio of 0.23:1 A1:F and 50% aluminum chlorohydrate at a dose of 35 ppm to aid in the removal of the fluoride, total dissolved solids (TDS) , total suspended solids (TSS) , and some of the other present salt forms. The precipitate was flocculated with a medium charge
(25±5 mole percent) , medium molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide polymer for ease of filtering or settling. This yielded very low to non-detectable effluent values of fluoride and Silt Density Indices (SDI) below 3.0. The filtration membrane was a 0.5 μ polypropylene bonded membrane obtained from National Filter Media. The membrane flux rate was measured at 650 to 800 GFD at a vessel operating pressure less than 9 psi. The results are reported below in parts per million.
Period Influent F Effluent F
A 130.0 1.86
B 191.5 21.7
C 142.2 2.13
D 120.0 0.72
E 156.5 1.41
F 125.7 0.79
G 60.93 0.97
H 206.25 0.95
I 133.3 0.39
J 112.9 0.85
K 78.2 3.96
L 133.5 3.96
Average 132.6 3.8
Min 60.93 0.39
Max 206.25 21.7
Time
Period Influent F + SiO? Effluent F + SiQ2
A 264.0 0.24
B 172.0 0.26
C 140.0 0.31
D 153.0 0.39
E 98.0 0.36
F 89.0 0.29
Average 152.7 0.31
Min 89.0 0.24
Max 264.0 0.39
Example 3 A 15 gpm pilot scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica. The silica was present in dissolved and colloidal silica form in the waste stream. A 38% sodium aluminate solution at a ratio of 0.45:1 Al:Si, 46% aluminum sulfate at constant dose of 45 ppm, 50% aluminum chlorohydrate at a dose of 25 ppm, and a 20% epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine (a
high charged, low molecular weight cationic epi-DMA product) at a dosage of 0.25 - 1.0 ppm to aid in the removal of the silica, TDS and TSS. This formed a well defined particle for filtering or settling. This yielded very low to non-detectable effluent values of the silica and Silt Density Indices (SDI) below 3.0.
The filtration membrane was a 0.5 micron polypropylene felt with a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating obtained from W.L. Gore. The membrane flux rate ranged from 175 GFD to 400 GFD at a vessel operating pressure less than 15 psi. The results are reported below in parts per million.
Time
Period Influent Si07 Effluent Si07
A 140 0.443 B B 1 16600 0.33
C 125 0.37
D 153 0.39
E 177 0.36
F 165 0.29
Average 153 0.364
Min 125 0.29
Max 177 0.443
Example 4
A 15 gallon per minute (gpm) pilot scale system was used to process wastewater containing copper and lead in a combined waste flow. The copper and lead removal system employed the use of a blend of sodium thiocarbonate and sodium aluminate which was fed at a ratio of 3.2:1 (thiocarbonate to combined metal concentration of copper and lead as measured by atomic absorption) . The precipitate was flocculated with a medium charge, medium molecular weight polyacrylamide polymer for ease of filtering or settling. This yielded a very low to non- detectable effluent values of copper and lead in the effluent. The membrane was a 1.0 micron polypropylene needled monoelement obtained from National Filter Media. The membrane flux rate was estimated to be 1000 GFD at vessel pressures from 4.5 to 6.0 psi. The results are reported below in parts per million:
Time Lead Copper
Period Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
A 3.2 0.11 28.0 N.D.
B 2.85 0.14 32.98 0.032
C 3.66 0.109 21.31 0.045
D 2.45 0.15 23.0 0.023
E 3.0 0.10 28.0 N.D.
F 2.4 0.09 35.0 N.D.
G 3.8 N.D. 35.11 0.07
H 2.76 0.10 33.0 0.055
I 4.12 N.D. 27.27 0.11
J 2.65 0.12 24.6 N.D.
Average 3.09 0.09 28.82 0.0335
Min 2.4 N.D. 21.31 N.D.
Max 4.12 0.15 35.11 0.11
Exampl e 5
A 3-5 gpm bench scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica. The silica-containing waste stream was obtained from a commercially available CMP slurry sold by Rodel, known as ILD 1300. The ILD 1300 slurry was diluted according to manufacturer's instructions, and it was found to contain about 1380 ppm Si, measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption, and about 70 ppm ammonium (NH4) , measured by ion chromatography. One liter of the waste stream weighted about 993.7 grams. The silicon was present in the waste stream as dissolved and colloidal silica. The waste stream was adjusted to a pH of about 8.58 by adding small amounts of sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid. The waste stream was mixed for about 3 minutes while the pH was adjusted. 2.09 g of a 20% by weight solution of epi-DMA, an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having an average molecular weight of 250,000150,000 (EnChem Lot I- 1396/423/MIC) and 0.19 g of dry aluminum chlorohydrate were added to one liter of the waste stream and mixed for about 20 minutes.
The reaction mixture was pumped at a pressure of about 6 psi through a two foot long filter sock having a diameter of about 3.5 inches. The membrane flux was estimated at 189 GFD. The filter sock contained a GOR-TEX® membrane (Lot. No. 66538-3- 786) obtained from W.L. Gore. The membrane had a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating on polypropylene felt having a 0.5 μ pore size (1.5 μ absolute).
The filter membrane effluent was collected, and it was found to contain about 15.5 ppm Si, measured by graphite furnace atomic absorption, and about 70 ppm ammonium (NH4) , measured by ion chromatography. The solids were collected from the filter surface and air dried for 24 hours. The recovered solids formed well defined spherical particles which were easily removed from the filter membrane surface. The dried and ground solids were analyzed, and the results are reported below in weight percent. ILD 1300 Results
Loss on Drying 45.53 %
Carbon 3.84 %
Hydrogen 1.04 %
Nitrogen 1.41 % Silicon 36.74 %
Aluminum 2.30 %
Other ingredients in the recovered solid, such as sodium, potassium, and unknown proprietary ingredients of ILD 1300, were not analyzed. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the resulting spherical silica particles show the particles to be spherical, having a typical particle size in the range from 0.05 μ to 0.15 μ. Although the spherical particles are smaller than the membrane pore size, it has been found that the particles agglomerate to form large clusters that do not pass through the membrane. The clusters have an average size in the range from 10 μ to 300 μ. EDX analysis of the sample indicated the presence of silicon and aluminum in the sample, wherein the concentration of silicon was much greater than the concentration of aluminum.
Example 6 A 3-5 gpm bench scale system was used to process wastewater containing silica. The silica-containing waste stream was obtained from a commercially available CMP slurry sold by
Hoescht, known as KLEBOSOL. The KLEBOSOL slurry was diluted according to manufacturer's instructions, and it was found to contain about 4474 ppm Si and about 3.2 ppm aluminum by graphite furnace atomic absorption. One liter of the waste stream weighed about 998.4 grams. The silicon was present in the waste stream as dissolved and colloidal silica. The waste stream was
adjusted to pH 9.84 by addition of small amounts of NaOH and
H2S04. The waste stream was mixed for about 3 minutes while the pH was adjusted. 2.09 g of a 20% by weight solution of epi-dma, an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having an average molecular weight of 250,000150,000 (EnChem Lot I-1396/423/MlC) was added to one liter of the waste stream and mixed for about
20 minutes.
The reaction mixture was pumped through the filter sock of
Example 3 at a pressure of about 6 psi. The filter membrane effluent was collected, and it was found to contain about 8.32 ppm Si and < 0.1 ppm aluminum by graphite furnace atomic absorption.
The solids were collected from the filter surface and air dried for 24 hours. The solids formed were well defined spherical particles which were easily removed from the filter membrane surface. The solids appeared dry as they were removed from the membrane. The dried and ground solids were analyzed, and the results are reported below in weight percent.
KLEBOSOL Results Loss on Drying 1. 91 %
Carbon 1. 41 % Nitrogen 0. 43 % Silicon 40 . 49 % Aluminum 0. 98 % Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the resulting silica particles show the particles to be spherical, having a typical particle size in the range from 0.05 μ to 0.15 μ. The spherical silica particles were remarkably similar to the silica particles of Example 5. EDX analysis of the sample indicated the presence of silicon and aluminum in the sample, wherein the concentration of silicon was much greater than the concentration of aluminum.
Reference is made to Figure 1 which illustrates one possible wastewater pretreatment system 10 within the scope of the present invention. The illustrated wastewater pretreatment system 10 includes a plurality of pretreatment reactor vessels 12, 14, and 16 which enable the wastewater feed stream 18 to chemically react with one or more chemical coagulants. Chemical coagulants which react with contaminants in the wastewater feed stream 18 are introduced into the pretreatment reactor vessels
via chemical coagulant feed streams 20, 22, and 24. The pH within the pretreatment reactor vessels is preferably monitored with a pH sensor 26. Acid or base can be added to the pretreatment reactor vessels, if necessary, to adjust the pH via acid/base feed stream 28.
The number of pretreatment reactor vessels can vary depending on the number of chemical coagulants being used and the reaction chemistry used to form the waste particulates. The size of the reactor vessels can be varied to provide different reaction times.
After flowing through the necessary pretreatment reactor vessels, the wastewater feed stream flows into a feed tank 30 for holding the pretreated wastewater. Additional chemical coagulants can be added directly to the feed tank 30, if necessary, via a chemical coagulant feed stream 31. As shown in Figure 2, the pretreated wastewater is directed to one or more filtration vessels 32, 34, and 36 via filtration vessel feed stream 38. The size of feed stream 38 will depend on the designed flow rate of the filtration vessel. For example, in a system having 5 filtration vessels, each handling 2500 gpm, a 24 inch feed line to the system is suitable. Each filtration vessel 32, 34, and 36 is a stand alone filtration device. The number and size of each filtration vessel can vary depending on the system capacity requirements. The filtrate is removed from each filtration vessel via a filtrate stream 40.
Each filtration vessel preferably provides a mounting platform for from 9 to 49 filter cassette modules. One currently preferred filter cassette module contains 16 individual sock filters configured with 0.5 micron filtration membranes. The rated flow rate is 0.9 gpm per square foot of membrane area. Each full cassette module has 64 square feet of membrane area and is rated at 58 gpm with a differential pressure less than 15 psi. A lifting mechanism is preferably included to allow removal and replacement of the membrane cassette modules. The filtration membranes are periodically backflushed with filtrate to remove solids from the membrane surface. During the backflush procedure, the filtration vessel is taken off line and wastewater is drained from the filtration vessel via a backflush exit stream 42 to a backflush tank 44. The backflush tank 44
provides temporary storage before the backflushed wastewater is conveyed to the feed tank 30 via backflush return stream 46. It is estimated that 400-500 gallons of water will be used during a typical back flush cycle for a 2500 gpm filtration vessel. A vacuum breaker 48 is preferably provided to allow equalization of pressure within the respective filtration vessel 32, 34, or 36 during the backflush procedure. A vent/relief stream 49 is provided to allow venting or release of excess or over- pressurized wastewater. The filtrate side of the filtration vessel 32, 34, 36 is open to the atmospheric pressure. The filtrate is collected in the top of the filtration vessel and allowed to drain into the filtrate stream 40. This volume of water provides the positive head which, when coupled with the negative head of draining the pressure side of the vessel via backflush exit stream 42, produces enough positive pressure gradient to backflush the filtration membrane.
After sufficient sludge settles within the bottom of the filtration vessel 32, 34, 36, the sludge is removed via a sludge discharge stream 50. While the sludge is removed, the filtration membranes are preferably rinsed with water from a water rinse stream 52. The collected sludge is removed from the system for further processing or storage.
Periodically, the membranes will require soaking to remove trace amounts of organics. Cleaning preferably occurs as needed or as part of a regular maintenance program. The vessel drain opens to remove all contaminant via the sludge discharge stream 50. The cleaning solution is introduced into each filtration vessel through cleaning supply stream 54. Typical cleaning solutions include acids, bases, and surfactants. In some cases the filtration vessel can be returned to operation without draining and rinsing the filtration membranes. If membrane rinsing is necessary, the contents of the filtration vessel 32, 34, 36 are removed via cleaning discharge stream 56 for further processing.
As shown in Figure 2 , multiple filtration vessels are preferably used, in parallel, to provide for the required flow rate. However, the filtration vessels can be operated in series to provide primary filtration and secondary filtration. Because
filtration vessels are taken off line during the backflushing, additional filtration vessels and capacity are preferably used to ensure that the require discharge flow is maintained. An additional filtration vessel may be supplied to provide for off- line maintenance while the remainder of the system meets the flow rate requirements.
The wastewater treatment system preferably includes access to the various process streams to allow for sampling and analysis. The valves, pumps, and sensors customarily used in the art to safely control the described fluid flow to and from the filtration vessels are preferably provided. Such valves, pumps, and sensors also allow for automation of the process.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the present invention provides a process for removing contaminants from wastewater utilizing a positive physical barrier to precipitated particles. The positive separation barrier permits discharge having lower concentration limits than conventional clarifier/sand filter systems.
The apparatus for removing contaminants from wastewater occupies less space than conventional clarifier/sand filter systems. The apparatus is easily expandable.
The chemical pretreatment achieves particle formation based on size, not weight. As a result, chemical pretreatment costs are lower than those typically required for a clarifier/sand filter.
Claims
1. A process for removing metal contaminants from large volumes of wastewater comprising the steps of:
(a) treating a wastewater stream containing a metal contaminant with an organic or inorganic coagulant, wherein the coagulant reacts with the metal contaminant to form a particulate having a size greater than about 5 μ;
(b) passing the treated wastewater through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 μ to 5 μ, wherein the treated wastewater flow rate is in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD, such that the metal contaminant is removed from water passing through the microfiltration membrane; and (c) periodically backflushing the microfiltration membrane to remove solids from the membrane surface.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the metal contaminant is selected from the group consisting of Ag, As, Au, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn.
3. A process according to claim 1, wherein the metal contaminant is selected from the group consisting of Ag, As, Au, Ba, Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb.
4. A process according to claim 1, wherein the mole ratio of coagulant to metal contaminant is in the range from 3 : 1 to 16:1.
5. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treated wastewater flow rate is greater than 5,000 gallons per minute ("gpm") .
6. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treated wastewater flow rate is greater than 10,000 gallons per minute
("gpm") .
7. A process according to claim 1, wherein the metal contaminant is arsenic and the coagulant includes ferric sulfate at a Fe:As mole ratio of from 6:1 to 10:1, DADMAC ((poly)di- allyldimethylammonium chloride) and a copolymer of acrylamide and DADMAC.
8. A process according to claim 1, wherein the metal contaminant is copper and the coagulant is a blend of sodium thiocarbonate and sodium aluminate which was fed at a ratio of from 3:1 to 8:1 thiocarbonate to total metal contaminant concentration.
9. A process according to claim 8, further comprising the step of adding from 20 to 30 mole percent, relative to the metal contaminant content, medium molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide polymer.
10. A process according to claim 1, wherein the metal contaminant is lead and the coagulant is a blend of sodium thiocarbonate and sodium aluminate which was fed at a ratio of from 3:1 to 8:1 thiocarbonate to total metal contaminant concentration.
11. A process according to claim 10, further comprising the step of adding from 20 to 30 mole percent, relative to the metal contaminant content, medium molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide polymer.
12. A process according to claim 1, wherein the microfiltration membrane comprises polypropylene felt with a coating of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) .
13. A process according to claim 1, wherein the microfiltration membrane comprises polypropylene woven membrane bonded to a polypropylene or polyethylene felt backing.
14. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure less than 25 psi.
15. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure in the range from about 4 psi to 15 psi.
16. A process according to claim 1, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure in the range from about 5 psi to 10 psi.
17. A process according to claim 1, wherein the coagulant is a polyacrylamide.
18. A process according to claim 1, wherein the coagulant is a epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine (epi-dma) polymer.
19. A process according to claim 1, wherein the coagulant is a DADMAC (polydiallydimethylammonium chloride) polymer.
20. A process according to claim 1, wherein the coagulant is a copolymers of an acrylamide and DADMAC (polydi- allydimethylammonium chloride) .
21. A process according to claim 1, wherein the coagulant is a natural guar.
22. A process for removing fluoride from large volumes of wastewater comprising the steps of:
(a) treating a wastewater stream containing fluoride with a coagulant, wherein the coagulant reacts with the fluoride to form a particulate having a size greater than about 5 μ;
(b) passing the treated wastewater through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 μ to 5 μ, wherein the treated wastewater flow rate is in the range from 700 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 1500 GFD, such that the fluoride is removed from water passing through the microfiltration membrane; and
(c) periodically backflushing the microfiltration membrane to remove solids from the membrane surface.
23. A process according to claim 22, wherein the mole ratio of coagulant to fluoride is in the range from 2:1 to 30:1.
24. A process according to claim 22, wherein the coagulant is aluminum chloride, aluminum chlorohydrate, and sodium aluminate.
25. A process according to claim 22, wherein the coagulant is a sodium aluminate solution at a ratio of from 0.2:1 to 5:1 A1:F and aluminum chlorohydrate at a dose of from 30 to 40 ppm.
26. A process according to claim 25, further comprising the step of adding from 20 to 30 mole percent, relative to the fluoride content, medium molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide polymer.
27. A process for removing silica from large volumes of wastewater comprising the steps of:
(a) treating a wastewater stream containing silica with an organic polymer coagulant, wherein the coagulant reacts with the silica to form a spherical, silica-based particulate which agglomerated to form a cluster having a size greater than about 5 μ;
(b) passing the treated wastewater through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 μ to 5 μ, such that the silica is removed from water passing through the microfiltration membrane; and
(c) periodically backflushing the microfiltration membrane to remove solids from the membrane surface.
28. A process according to claim 27, wherein the mole ratio of silica to coagulant is in the range from 20:1 to 50:1.
29. A process according to claim 27, wherein the mole ratio of silica to coagulant is in the range from 35:1 to 45:1.
30. A process according to claim 27, further comprising the step of adjusting the pH of the wastewater stream to a pH in the range from about 5 to 11.
31. A process according to claim 27, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer.
32. A process according to claim 27, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having a molecular weight in the range from 25,000 to 1.5 million.
33. A process according to claim 27, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having a molecular weight in the range from 200,000 to 300,000.
34. A process according to claim 27, wherein the coagulant is a DADMAC (polydiallydimethylammonium chloride) polymer.
35. A process according to claim 27, wherein the coagulant is a copolymers of an acrylamide and DADMAC (polydiallydimethylammonium chloride) .
36. A process according to claim 27, wherein the membrane has a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating on polypropylene felt.
37. A process according to claim 27, wherein the membrane has a PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) coating on polyethylene felt.
38. A process according to claim 27, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure less than 80 psi.
39. A process according to claim 27, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure less than 25 psi.
40. A process according to claim 27, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure in the range from about 4 psi to 15 psi.
41. A process according to claim 27, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a pressure in the range from about 5 psi to 10 psi.
42. A process according to claim 27, wherein the treated wastewater is passed through the microfiltration membrane at a flow rate is in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 600 GFD.
43. A process for removing silica from large volumes of wastewater comprising the steps of:
(a) treating a wastewater stream containing silica with an organic coagulant, wherein the coagulant reacts with the silica to form a spherical particulate which agglomerates to form a cluster having a size greater than about 5 μ;
(b) passing the treated wastewater through a microfiltration membrane having a pore size in the range from 0.5 μ to 5 μ, wherein the treated wastewater flow rate is in the range from 150 gallons per square foot of membrane per day ("GFD") to 600 GFD, such that the silica is removed from water passing through the microfiltration membrane; and
(c) periodically backflushing the microfiltration membrane to remove solids from the membrane surface.
44. A process according to claim 43, wherein the mole ratio of silica to coagulant is in the range from 20:1 to 50:1.
45. A process according to claim 43, wherein the mole ratio of silica to coagulant is in the range from 35:1 to 45:1.
46. A process according to claim 43, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer.
47. A process according to claim 43, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having a molecular weight in the range from 25,000 to 1.5 million.
48. A process according to claim 43, wherein the coagulant is an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having a molecular weight in the range from 200,000 to 300,000.
49. A process according to claim 43, wherein the coagulant is a DADMAC (polydiallydimethylammonium chloride) polymer.
50. A process according to claim 43, wherein the coagulant is a copolymers of an acrylamide and DADMAC (polydiallydimethylammonium chloride) .
51. A spherical silica precipitate prepared by reacting a waste stream containing dissolved or colloidal silica with an epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine polymer having a molecular weight greater than 25,000, wherein the molar ratio of silicon to polymer is in the range from 20:1 to about 60:1.
52. A silica precipitate according to claim 51, wherein the spherical silica precipitate agglomerates to form clusters having an average size in the range from 10 μ to 300 μ.
53. A silica precipitate according to claim 51, wherein the silica precipitate has a silica content greater than 30% by weight.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU53603/98A AU5360398A (en) | 1996-11-26 | 1997-11-26 | Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow impurity removal |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/756,681 | 1996-11-26 | ||
US08/756,681 US5871648A (en) | 1996-11-26 | 1996-11-26 | Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow impurity removal |
US08/965,574 | 1997-11-06 | ||
US08/965,574 US5965027A (en) | 1996-11-26 | 1997-11-06 | Process for removing silica from wastewater |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998023538A1 true WO1998023538A1 (en) | 1998-06-04 |
Family
ID=27116275
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1997/021375 WO1998023538A1 (en) | 1996-11-26 | 1997-11-26 | Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow impurity removal |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5965027A (en) |
AU (1) | AU5360398A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998023538A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6258277B1 (en) | 1999-01-15 | 2001-07-10 | Nalco Chemical Company | Composition and method for simultaneously precipitating metal ions from semiconductor wastewater and enhancing microfilter operation |
EP2746230A1 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-25 | Total SA | Process for removing mercury from production water and condensates. |
CN105417826A (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2016-03-23 | 北京清大国华环境股份有限公司 | Catalyst waste water zero discharge method and device |
US10023487B2 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2018-07-17 | Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support | Method of recovering oil or gas and treating the resulting produced water |
Families Citing this family (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6428705B1 (en) | 1996-11-26 | 2002-08-06 | Microbar Incorporated | Process and apparatus for high flow and low pressure impurity removal |
US6260709B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2001-07-17 | Parker-Hannifin Corporation | Membrane filter element for chemical-mechanical polishing slurries |
US6355214B1 (en) * | 1999-06-16 | 2002-03-12 | Hercules Incorporated | Methods of preventing scaling involving inorganic compositions, and inorganic compositions therefor |
US6398964B1 (en) * | 1999-08-19 | 2002-06-04 | Koch Microelectronic Service Company, Inc. | Process for treating aqueous waste containing copper and copper CMP particles |
US6338803B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-01-15 | Koch Microelectronic Service Co., Inc. | Process for treating waste water containing hydrofluoric acid and mixed acid etchant waste |
US6203705B1 (en) | 1999-10-22 | 2001-03-20 | Koch Microelectronic Service Company, Inc. | Process for treating waste water containing copper |
TW504400B (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2002-10-01 | Toshiba Corp | Filtering apparatus, back wash method therefor, filtering device and power plant |
US6755973B2 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2004-06-29 | Water Solutions Inc. | Waste water treatment process for animal processing contaminant removal |
JP3557197B2 (en) * | 2002-05-17 | 2004-08-25 | 三洋電機株式会社 | Filtration method of colloid solution |
US20040065613A1 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2004-04-08 | Jason Cadera | Use of polymer as flocculation aid in membrane filtration |
US7335303B2 (en) * | 2003-01-22 | 2008-02-26 | Development Center For Biotechnology | Zero-discharge of water glass effluents by alkaline biotreatment techniques |
US20040262209A1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2004-12-30 | Hiroyuki Umezawa | Filtration apparatus |
TWI309579B (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2009-05-11 | Sanyo Electric Co | Method for preparing coagulant, and method for coagulation treatment of fluid |
US20090050565A1 (en) * | 2005-04-05 | 2009-02-26 | Muralidhara Harapanahalli S | System and Method for Removing Contaminants From Wastewater |
US7988866B2 (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2011-08-02 | Tokuyama Corporation | Method of treating fumed silica-containing drainage water |
WO2007023872A1 (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2007-03-01 | Tokuyama Corporation | Method for processing waste water containing silicon powder |
US7582212B2 (en) * | 2005-09-08 | 2009-09-01 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Method of removing silicon dioxide from waste liquid, method of cleaning membrane tube and method of processing waste water |
US8206592B2 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2012-06-26 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Treating acidic water |
US7722841B2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2010-05-25 | General Electric Company | Polymeric chelant and coagulant to treat metal-containing wastewater |
US7153434B1 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2006-12-26 | Severn Trent Water Purification, Inc. | Methods for removing contaminants from water and silica from filter media beds |
US7448259B2 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2008-11-11 | Dresser-Rand Company | Position feedback device for rotatable member |
MX2009005543A (en) * | 2006-11-28 | 2009-06-05 | Du Pont | Methods for purifying an aqueous hydrochloric acid solution. |
CN101801513A (en) * | 2007-07-03 | 2010-08-11 | 水技术国际公司 | Method for treatment of high pH silica brines |
US8491794B2 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2013-07-23 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Process for enhanced total organic carbon removal while maintaining optimum membrane filter performance |
US8491788B2 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2013-07-23 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Process for enhanced total organic carbon removal while maintaining optimum membrane filter performance |
WO2009073366A2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2009-06-11 | M-I Llc | Dewatering of silicate wellbore fluids |
JP2010167551A (en) * | 2008-12-26 | 2010-08-05 | Nomura Micro Sci Co Ltd | Method for regenerating used slurry |
US20110203928A1 (en) * | 2010-02-25 | 2011-08-25 | General Electric Company | Silica remediation in water |
JP6126790B2 (en) * | 2011-03-31 | 2017-05-10 | Hoya株式会社 | Manufacturing method of glass substrate for magnetic disk and manufacturing method of magnetic disk |
RU2497758C2 (en) * | 2012-02-08 | 2013-11-10 | Открытое акционерное общество "Сибирский химический комбинат" | Method of preparing siliceous solutions for recycling |
US9738553B2 (en) | 2012-03-16 | 2017-08-22 | Aquatech International, Llc | Process for purification of produced water |
NZ700313A (en) * | 2012-03-28 | 2017-03-31 | Dober Chemical Corp | Water treatment compositions and methods of use |
US20140144846A1 (en) * | 2012-11-26 | 2014-05-29 | Memc Singapore, Pte. Ltd (Uen200614797D) | Methods For The Recycling of Wire-Saw Cutting Fluid |
US20140326674A1 (en) * | 2013-01-14 | 2014-11-06 | Chemtreat, Inc. | Zero Liquid Discharge Method for High Silica Solutions |
US20190202720A1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2019-07-04 | Fife Water Services, Inc. | Method for purifying food and meat processing facility liquids and process or waste waters by using a combination of metal salts and a flocculant to coagulate and then flocculate contaminants from a contaminated liquid |
CN114477545B (en) * | 2022-02-15 | 2023-06-09 | 爱环吴世(苏州)环保股份有限公司 | Method and device for treating silicon-containing grinding wastewater |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5605633A (en) * | 1993-11-29 | 1997-02-25 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Process for treating photographic waste water |
Family Cites Families (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1324118A (en) * | 1919-12-09 | hottinglr and | ||
US3075645A (en) * | 1958-01-06 | 1963-01-29 | Thomas M Riddick | Water treatment in municipal and industrial water systems |
US3097163A (en) * | 1958-08-25 | 1963-07-09 | Riddick Thomas Moore | Treatment of water in municipal and industrial water systems |
US3101317A (en) * | 1959-07-01 | 1963-08-20 | Nalco Chemical Co | Coagulation process |
US3544476A (en) * | 1967-05-09 | 1970-12-01 | Taki Fertilizer Mfg Co Ltd | Coagulant and method for treating aqueous medium comprising a basic metal salt and a multivalent anion |
US3521752A (en) * | 1968-11-12 | 1970-07-28 | Western Mechanical Inc | Water purification apparatus |
US4016075A (en) * | 1975-03-17 | 1977-04-05 | Southern Pacific Land Co. | Process for removal of silica from geothermal brine |
SE429128B (en) * | 1976-11-29 | 1983-08-15 | Nordstjernan Rederi Ab | PROCEDURE FOR SEPARATING POLLUTANTS IN WATER SUSPENSIONS OR EMULSIONS |
US4188291A (en) * | 1978-04-06 | 1980-02-12 | Anderson Donald R | Treatment of industrial waste water |
US4207183A (en) * | 1978-05-11 | 1980-06-10 | Resources Conservation Company | Prevention of solute deposition fouling in membrane processes |
US4260493A (en) * | 1979-05-21 | 1981-04-07 | Shipley Company, Inc. | Solution waste treatment |
US4420401A (en) * | 1979-05-21 | 1983-12-13 | Shipley Company Inc. | Solution waste treatment |
US4276180A (en) * | 1979-11-30 | 1981-06-30 | Matson Jack V | Industrial waste-water reuse by selective silica removal over activated alumina |
DE3208200A1 (en) * | 1982-03-06 | 1983-09-08 | Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt | METHOD FOR THE CONTINUOUS REMOVAL OF SILICA FROM CELL FLUE |
US4450057A (en) * | 1983-11-18 | 1984-05-22 | Olin Corporation | Process for removing aluminum and silica from alkali metal halide brine solutions |
ATE77806T1 (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1992-07-15 | Miyoshi Yushi Kk | PROCESSES FOR THE DEPOSITION OF METALS. |
US4765913A (en) * | 1986-02-11 | 1988-08-23 | Union Oil Co. Of Calif. | Process for removing silica from silica-rich geothermal brine |
US5171453A (en) * | 1986-09-19 | 1992-12-15 | Rhone-Poulenc Chimie | Water clarification/purification |
US4780211A (en) * | 1986-11-07 | 1988-10-25 | Desalination Systems, Inc. | Method of dewatering using PTFE membrane |
US5246686A (en) * | 1988-01-29 | 1993-09-21 | Atochem | Basic aluminum chlorosulfate flocculating agents |
US4938876A (en) * | 1989-03-02 | 1990-07-03 | Ohsol Ernest O | Method for separating oil and water emulsions |
US5078900A (en) * | 1989-08-04 | 1992-01-07 | Tiegel Manufacturing Co. | Process for removing dissolved contaminants from aqueous solutions using getters and reversibly dispersible carriers |
US4957634A (en) * | 1989-10-06 | 1990-09-18 | Bowers Jr Joseph S | Heavy metal recovery process |
US5071587A (en) | 1990-05-31 | 1991-12-10 | Aquatechnica, Inc. | Composition and method for purifying water |
US5108620A (en) * | 1990-07-03 | 1992-04-28 | Spectrulite Consortium, Inc. | Process for recovery of spent etchant |
AU617290B3 (en) * | 1991-05-27 | 1991-10-04 | Hoefer, Dawn Annette | Process for removing silica from aqueous liquors |
US5164095A (en) * | 1991-10-02 | 1992-11-17 | Nalco Chemical Company | Dithiocarbamate polymers |
US5182023A (en) * | 1991-10-17 | 1993-01-26 | Texas Romec, Inc. | Process for removing arsenic from water |
US5205939A (en) * | 1992-07-06 | 1993-04-27 | Nalco Chemical Company | Removal of silver from aqueous systems |
CA2090989C (en) * | 1993-03-04 | 1995-08-15 | Konstantin Volchek | Removal of arsenic from aqueous liquids with selected alumina |
US5512181A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1996-04-30 | Nalco Chemical Company | Removing silica from cooling waters with colloidal alumina and dialysis |
US5415782A (en) | 1993-11-22 | 1995-05-16 | Nalco Chemical Company | Method for the alteration of siliceous materials from bayer process liquors |
US5609765A (en) * | 1994-05-19 | 1997-03-11 | Bowman; Ronald W. | Steam stripping method for the softening of water |
JPH07331350A (en) * | 1994-06-10 | 1995-12-19 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Silver removing method |
US5510040A (en) * | 1994-11-21 | 1996-04-23 | Nalco Chemical Company | Removal of selenium from water by complexation with polymeric dithiocarbamates |
US5620629A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1997-04-15 | Nalco Chemical Company | Colloidal silica/polyelectrolyte blends for natural water clarification |
-
1997
- 1997-11-06 US US08/965,574 patent/US5965027A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1997-11-26 AU AU53603/98A patent/AU5360398A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-11-26 WO PCT/US1997/021375 patent/WO1998023538A1/en active Application Filing
-
2000
- 2000-08-30 US US09/651,807 patent/US6312601B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5605633A (en) * | 1993-11-29 | 1997-02-25 | Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. | Process for treating photographic waste water |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6258277B1 (en) | 1999-01-15 | 2001-07-10 | Nalco Chemical Company | Composition and method for simultaneously precipitating metal ions from semiconductor wastewater and enhancing microfilter operation |
US6403726B1 (en) | 1999-01-15 | 2002-06-11 | Nalco Chemical Company | Water soluble polymer containing dithiocarbamate functionalities |
US10023487B2 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2018-07-17 | Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support | Method of recovering oil or gas and treating the resulting produced water |
EP2746230A1 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-25 | Total SA | Process for removing mercury from production water and condensates. |
WO2014095992A1 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2014-06-26 | Total Sa | Process for removing mercury from production water and condensates |
CN105417826A (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2016-03-23 | 北京清大国华环境股份有限公司 | Catalyst waste water zero discharge method and device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU5360398A (en) | 1998-06-22 |
US5965027A (en) | 1999-10-12 |
US6312601B1 (en) | 2001-11-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6312601B1 (en) | Silica precipitate | |
US5904853A (en) | Wastewater treatment process and apparatus for high flow silica removal | |
US6428705B1 (en) | Process and apparatus for high flow and low pressure impurity removal | |
US6582605B2 (en) | Method of treating industrial waste waters | |
US6613230B2 (en) | Method for simultaneous removal of arsenic and fluoride from aqueous solutions | |
Ayres et al. | Removing heavy metals from wastewater | |
US20020003112A1 (en) | Process and apparatus for removal of heavy metals from wastewater | |
US20020003116A1 (en) | System and method for removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions | |
US6203705B1 (en) | Process for treating waste water containing copper | |
AU2003226270B2 (en) | Waste water treatment process for animal processing contaminant removal | |
WO2003008336A2 (en) | Reverse osmosis pretreatment using low pressure filtration | |
KR20010087434A (en) | Treatement process for fluorine-containing waters | |
WO2002004360A9 (en) | Method of treating semiconductor waste waters | |
KR20040002594A (en) | Liquid treatment method and apparatus | |
KR100385706B1 (en) | Process for Removing Silica from Wastewater | |
US20040129639A1 (en) | Extraction methodology for suspended and dissolved material from fruit and vegetable wastewater | |
EP1078887A1 (en) | A process for treating aqueous waste containing copper and copper CMP particles | |
US20040055962A1 (en) | Process and apparatus for removal of heavy metals from wastewater | |
TWI230691B (en) | Process and apparatus for removal of heavy metals from wastewater | |
TWI268911B (en) | Method of treating semiconductor waste waters |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |