WO1999031853A1 - Mobile data routing - Google Patents

Mobile data routing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999031853A1
WO1999031853A1 PCT/GB1998/003711 GB9803711W WO9931853A1 WO 1999031853 A1 WO1999031853 A1 WO 1999031853A1 GB 9803711 W GB9803711 W GB 9803711W WO 9931853 A1 WO9931853 A1 WO 9931853A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
agent
data
mobile node
node
foreign
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1998/003711
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jason Stuart Flynn
Original Assignee
British Telecommunications Public Limited Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GBGB9726643.1A external-priority patent/GB9726643D0/en
Application filed by British Telecommunications Public Limited Company filed Critical British Telecommunications Public Limited Company
Priority to AU14980/99A priority Critical patent/AU745274B2/en
Priority to CA002312972A priority patent/CA2312972A1/en
Priority to JP2000539616A priority patent/JP3983976B2/en
Priority to EP98959049A priority patent/EP1053620B1/en
Priority to US09/555,740 priority patent/US6549522B1/en
Priority to DE69822516T priority patent/DE69822516T2/en
Publication of WO1999031853A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999031853A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1036Load balancing of requests to servers for services different from user content provisioning, e.g. load balancing across domain name servers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/22Alternate routing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/24Multipath
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1004Server selection for load balancing
    • H04L67/1017Server selection for load balancing based on a round robin mechanism
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/08Load balancing or load distribution
    • H04W28/088Load balancing or load distribution among core entities
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00Communication routing or communication path finding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00Communication routing or communication path finding
    • H04W40/02Communication route or path selection, e.g. power-based or shortest path routing
    • H04W40/12Communication route or path selection, e.g. power-based or shortest path routing based on transmission quality or channel quality
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1004Server selection for load balancing
    • H04L67/101Server selection for load balancing based on network conditions
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • H04L67/1001Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
    • H04L67/1004Server selection for load balancing
    • H04L67/1012Server selection for load balancing based on compliance of requirements or conditions with available server resources
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00Communication routing or communication path finding
    • H04W40/24Connectivity information management, e.g. connectivity discovery or connectivity update
    • H04W40/30Connectivity information management, e.g. connectivity discovery or connectivity update for proactive routing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00Communication routing or communication path finding
    • H04W40/34Modification of an existing route
    • H04W40/36Modification of an existing route due to handover
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W80/00Wireless network protocols or protocol adaptations to wireless operation
    • H04W80/04Network layer protocols, e.g. mobile IP [Internet Protocol]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the routing of data within communications networks, including but not confined to networks such as the Internet, and particularly, but not exclusively, to a method of routing data directed to a mobile node.
  • the mobile node may be a mobile host, such as a portable computer, or it may be a router which is responsible for the mobility of one or more entire networks, for example, the mobile data network within an aircraft. In either case, the mobile node may change its point of attachment from one network or subnetwork to another.
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • Data is transferred in the form of data units known as IP datagrams between points in the Internet specified by IP addresses.
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • the use of IP hides the physical nature of the underlying networks from application processes running over the Internet.
  • These networks may, for example, be a combination of wired and wireless local and wide area networks using different physical protocols such as Ethernet and token-ring, including networks linked by telephone through an Internet Service Provider (ISP), or through satellite or ground based radio or infra-red links.
  • ISP Internet Service Provider
  • RFC 791 maintained by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
  • IETF Internet Engineering Task Force
  • RFC documents are widely available on the Internet at, for example, "ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfcxxxx.txt", where "xxxx" represents the RFC number, so that RFC 791 is available as rfc791.txt.
  • IPv4 The current version of IP, known as IPv4, does not itself support mobility, but a protocol entitled “IP Mobility Support”, commonly referred to as Mobile IP, has been designed to enhance IPv4 to support mobility. This protocol is described in document RFC 2002, available as detailed above.
  • IPv6 IP Mobility Support
  • IPv4 assumes that a node's IP address uniquely identifies the node's fixed point of attachment to the Internet. If the node is transferred to a different point, it can only be contacted by allocating it a new IP address. Mobile IP, however, enables a mobile node, such as a laptop or palmtop computer, to send and receive IP datagrams over the Internet regardless of the physical location at which it is connected to the Internet and without changing its IP address.
  • a mobile node such as a laptop or palmtop computer
  • the Internet comprises a large number of networks and sub-networks 1, 2, 3, 4 connected via routers 5.
  • a router may be a general purpose computer programmed to perform routing tasks.
  • routers throughout the Internet are dedicated pieces of hardware, controlled by software or firmware, provided by companies such as Cisco Systems, California, USA. In either case, the functionality of a router intended for use in an IP based network is defined in RFC 1812.
  • a mobile node (MN) 6 is normally connected to the Internet via a home network 1.
  • the unique IP address assigned to the node 6 is known as its home address.
  • Mobility agents known as foreign agents (FA) and home agents (HA), advertise their presence on a network via availability messages known as Agent Advertisements.
  • a mobility agent is typically a router connected to a particular network; for example, a home agent 7 is a router connected to the home network 1 and a foreign agent 8 is a router connected to a foreign network 2.
  • the mobile node 6 may optionally solicit an Agent Advertisement message from any local mobility agents via an Agent Solicitation message. By receiving Agent Advertisements, the mobile node 6 is able to determine whether it is on its home network 1 or on a foreign network 2, 3, 4.
  • the mobile node 6 While the mobile node 6 is on its home network, it has no need for mobility services.
  • a temporary care-of address on the foreign network 2 This can be a foreign agent care-of address, which is the IP address of the foreign agent, obtained by receiving or soliciting Agent Advertisements from any foreign agents based on the foreign network 2.
  • the care-of address may be obtained by using an external assignment mechanism, such as Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) (the reader is referred to RFC 1541 for further information), in which case it is known as a co-located care-of address.
  • DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol
  • the mobile node 6 then registers its new care-of address with its home agent 7 by exchanging Registration Request and Registration Reply messages with it.
  • Registration provides a mechanism by which mobile nodes can communicate their current reachability information to their home agent. The registration process is described in more detail below, assuming that the mobile node 6 on the foreign network 2 is registering a foreign agent care-of address received via an Agent Advertisement from, for example, foreign agent 8.
  • the mobile node 6 sends a Registration Request message to the foreign agent 8, which processes it and forwards it to the mobile node's home agent 7.
  • the Registration Request message includes the IP address of the foreign agent.
  • the home agent 7 sends a Registration Reply message to the foreign agent 8 granting (or denying) the registration request.
  • the foreign agent 8 processes this Reply and forwards it to the mobile node 6. This process establishes a temporary address for the mobile node 6 to which datagrams can be delivered while the node is roaming away from its home network 1. If the mobile node 6 is returning to its home network 1 having been on a foreign network 2, it deregisters with its home agent 7, through exchange of Registration Request and Registration Reply messages.
  • a correspondent node (CN) 9 attached to a network 4 sends a message intended for the mobile node 6, while it is connected to the foreign network 2, the message is intercepted by the home agent 7, as shown by arrow A.
  • the home agent 7 encapsulates the datagrams forming the message with the care-of address for the mobile node 6, in this example being the IP address of the foreign agent 8, and forwards the message to the foreign agent 8.
  • the transmission of the encapsulated datagrams, shown by arrow B, is known as tunnelling.
  • the foreign agent 8 receives the datagrams, decapsulates them and forwards them to the mobile node 6, as shown by arrow C. Messages from the mobile node 6 to other nodes in the Internet need not follow this route, but may be sent directly via an appropriate router, which may be foreign agent 8.
  • IP Encapsulation within IP The model is that a tunnel is the path followed by a datagram while encapsulated. Encapsulation allows an IP datagram to be hidden from intermediate routers which would incorrectly attempt to route it to the mobile node. Instead, the datagram is routed between the encapsulator and a knowledgeable decapsulator, such as a foreign agent, which can correctly route the datagram.
  • the home agent 7 and foreign agent 8 are known as the endpoints of the tunnel. In the case of the co-located care-of address, the mobile node itself acts as an endpoint of the tunnel.
  • the home agent 7 maintains reachability information for the mobile node 6, in a form known as a mobility binding. This is the association of the mobile node's identity with a care-of address and a parameter known as the Lifetime, which is the number of seconds remaining before the registration of the node 6 with the home agent 7 expires.
  • the aim behind a Lifetime value is to maintain the dynamic nature of the system, with a binding expiring within a set time unless positively maintained by the mobile node 6.
  • the default Router Advertisement Lifetime value which may be used where a mobile node is registering with a foreign agent which it has acquired via an Agent Advertisement, is 1800 seconds.
  • the home agent 7 On receipt of a Registration Request message, the home agent 7 creates or modifies the mobility binding, for example, by re-setting the Lifetime value where the Request is a re-registration request and the mobility binding has not yet expired. If the Lifetime value for a given mobility binding expires before a re-registration request has been received, the home agent 7 deletes the mobility binding from its record.
  • the Registration Reply message from the home agent 7 informs the mobile node 6 (via the foreign agent 8) of the status of its Request, including the Lifetime value allocated by the home agent 7.
  • Mobile IP supports multiple simultaneous mobility bindings, so that each mobile node 6 may register with a number of foreign agents and so obtain a number of care-of addresses. This is particularly useful where a mobile node using a wireless interface to a network, for example an RF interface, moves within range of more than one foreign agent. For example, if the mobile node is a router on an aircraft, then while the aircraft is in flight, the router may from time to time register with a series of foreign agents based on the ground below using a radio link.
  • the home agent 7 retains its existing list of mobility bindings when it receives a Registration Request containing the IP address of a new foreign agent. If the Lifetime value of one mobility binding expires, the home agent 7 deletes that mobility binding from its record, but retains in its record the other non-expired bindings.
  • bandwidth bottlenecks occur in the forwarding of data from the home agent, either in the tunnelling routes or in the links between the foreign agents and the mobile node. For example, where the network links between the mobile node and the foreign agents are wireless links, these may have a substantially lower bandwidth than that available between the correspondent node and the home agent.
  • the primary role of the home agent and foreign agents is to provide the appropriate encapsulation and decapsulation to re-route data arriving at the mobile node's home network from a correspondent node, so as to reach the mobile node at its current location.
  • the maximum data rate at which data can be received from the correspondent node without data loss is therefore limited to the data rate corresponding to the highest available bandwidth path between the home agent and mobile node.
  • the present invention provides a method of routing data to a mobile node within a communications network, comprising the steps of determining the location of a plurality of agent nodes from which data can be transmitted to the mobile node; and transmitting successive data units from a stream of data units intended for the mobile node to different respective ones of the agent nodes.
  • Next successive ones of the data units may be transmitted to the agent nodes on a round robin basis.
  • data units may be transmitted to the agent nodes based on an assessment of the availability of each agent node or the quality of the connection between each agent node and the mobile node.
  • the quality of the connection may be assessed in terms of available bandwidth or specifically by considering the level of buffer use at each agent node.
  • a datagram may be re-routed to a different agent node if the quality of the connection does not meet predetermined criteria, such as a minimum available bandwidth.
  • a method according to the present invention is capable of providing a virtual bandwidth channel which is the sum of the bandwidths of the individual channels available between the agent nodes and the mobile node.
  • a communications system for mobile data transfer comprising a mobile node connectable to a foreign network away from its home network, a home agent node associated with the home network for receiving a stream of data units intended for the mobile node, a plurality of foreign agent nodes associated with the foreign network for forwarding data units received from the home agent node to the mobile node, characterised in that the home agent node is configured to transmit successive data units from a received stream of data units to different respective ones of the foreign agent nodes.
  • Figure la is a schematic diagram of the general arrangement of a mobile IP based system
  • Figure lb is the diagram of Figure la showing the flow of data to a mobile node attached to a foreign network
  • Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram showing the data flows within a prior art system
  • Figure 3 a is a schematic block diagram showing the data flows within a system according to the present invention
  • Figure 3b is an example of a practical implementation of the system shown in Figure 3a.
  • FIG. 2 shows the prior art situation in which the mobile node 6 is within range of three foreign agents 10, 11, 12.
  • the correspondent node 9 sends a message comprising a sequence of datagrams P, Q, R ... Z to the mobile node 6, this message is intercepted by the home agent 7.
  • the home agent 7 maintains a record of the current mobility bindings for the mobile node 6, from which it knows the IP addresses of all of the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 with which the mobile node is registered.
  • the home agent 7 produces the requisite number of identical copies of that datagram, in this case three, and encapsulates these with the respective care-of address of the foreign agents.
  • Each of the three identical copies of the received datagram is encapsulated with respective ones of three IP addresses corresponding to each of the foreign agents 10, 11, 12.
  • the home agent 7 then tunnels the encapsulated datagrams to the respective foreign agents.
  • the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 decapsulate the datagrams and forward the three identical copies of the datagrams to the mobile node 6.
  • FIG 3a schematically illustrates the system according to the invention, the figures beside each link indicating an example data transfer capacity for that link.
  • the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 may represent routers connected to ground-based radio stations which maintain a radio link with a mobile computer 6 which is operating in the field disconnected from its home network.
  • the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 may represent routers enabling connections over three different media types, for example, respectively, connection 13 to a wireless LAN over an infra-red link, connection 14 to an ISP via a modem and connection 15 to a wireless LAN base station over a radio link.
  • the lowest capacity links are likely to be those between the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 and the mobile node 6, particularly if these are wireless links.
  • the maximum data rate between the correspondent node 9 and the mobile node 6 is therefore limited by the highest data rate on any one of the foreign agent - mobile node links.
  • the maximum data transfer rate in the prior art system is 28.8 kbps, being the data rate between foreign agent 11 and mobile node 6.
  • the home agent 7 receives a message destined for the mobile node 6 from the correspondent node 9, as before.
  • each datagram P, Q, R ... Z comprised in the message is not copied as it is received; instead it is immediately sent to the next available foreign agent. This may be done on a "round robin" basis, so that the first datagram P is sent to the first foreign agent 10, the second Q is sent to the second foreign agent 11 and the third R is sent to the third foreign agent 12.
  • the fourth datagram S is then sent to the first foreign agent 10 and the process repeats for the remaining datagrams.
  • each encapsulated datagram is received by the respective foreign agent, it is then decapsulated and forwarded to the mobile node 6.
  • the resulting rate of data transfer to the mobile node 6 depends on a number of fa ⁇ ors, one of the most significant being the underlying Internet protocol which manages the data transfer. Data transfer within the Internet may take place on a connectionless or connection-oriented basis, depending on the protocol used, which in turn depends on the nature of the service which is to be provided over the Internet.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • UDP User Datagram Protocol
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • TCP/IP Transmission Control Protocol
  • UDP User Datagram Protocol
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • TCP/IP is implemented in software, and is normally resident in, and an integral part of, the computer operating system. User access to TCP/UDP through the operating system is comparable to similar processes such as user access to the computer's file system.
  • a variety of TCP/IP implementations are commercially available for different platforms such as DOS and UNIX.
  • Microsoft TCP/IP software is provided as an integral part of the Microsoft Windows 95 and Windows NT operating systems.
  • UDP provides a conne ⁇ ionless IP datagram delivery service which does not maintain an end-to-end connertion between transmitting and receiving nodes and therefore does not guarantee data delivery. It merely treats each datagram as a self-contained entity to be transferred on a best-try approach. It is up to the application using the UDP service to perform error checking; if it does not do so, it has no way of knowing if a datagram has arrived at the receiver or if it has been lost in transit. This form of transfer is particularly suitable for some types of data, for example image or voice data, where speed may be more important than occasional errors, which are unlikely to substantially affect the received image or speech quality.
  • TCP is a connection-oriented protocol which maintains an end-to-end conne ⁇ ion between transmitting and receiving nodes, and provides a reliable and secure logical connection for data transfer between the nodes.
  • TCP assumes that it can obtain a simple but potentially unreliable data service from the IP protocol layer. To turn this into a reliable service, it therefore has to provide a range of fun ⁇ ions including (a) basic data transfer, (b) reliability and error corre ⁇ ion, allowing recovery from damaged or missing data or data delivered out of sequence, and (c) flow control, which provides the receiving node with the means to govern the amount of data sent by the transmitting node.
  • the TCP specification setting out the detailed requirements for implementation in each of these areas is available as RFC 793.
  • the system according to the present invention is particularly suited to UDP based tasks such as the transmission of image and voice data and will generate a significantly better data transfer rate as compared with the prior art system. If the maximum transfer rate over the foreign agent - mobile node links is insufficient to cope with the transfer rate between correspondent node 9 and home agent 7, UDP does not perform any form of flow control and simply drops data packets which exceed existing buffer capacities. It is therefore necessary to provide separate error checking facilities.
  • TCP receives information concerning undelivered or delayed datagrams. It acts on this information by decreasing the transfer rate on the correspondent node - home agent link so as to match the transfer rate on that link to the aggregate rate available over the foreign agent - mobile node links.
  • the result of the various factors which interact to produce overall TCP control is that it is difficult to predict the actual overall transfer rate, other than to say that this is likely to be better than the overall rate achievable with the prior art system. So, referring to Figure 3a, the maximum available data rate in a TCP based system is likely to lie somewhere between 28.8 kbps and 57.6 kbps.
  • the bandwidth of the foreign agent - mobile node links is difficult to predict, so to achieve optimal performance, modifications or alternatives to the round-robin algorithm can be used.
  • Mobile IP provides mechanisms for the mobile node to maintain its registrations, periodically checking for new foreign agents or that an already registered agent is no longer reachable. When the mobile node comes within range of further foreign agents, new registrations are initiated and datagrams may then be sent to those agents, so further increasing the potential data transfer rate. Similarly, when a foreign agent is no longer within range of the mobile node, the foreign agent will be de-registered and the incoming datagrams may be divided between the remaining agents.

Abstract

Data is routed through the Internet to a mobile node (6) by using home agents (7) and foreign agents (8, 10, 11, 12) to provide mobility functions. Data transfer rates to the mobile node (6) are improved by providing for transfer of data from the home agent (7) to a plurality of foreign agents (10, 11, 12) on a round-robin basis, which can be enhanced by checking the quality of the connection between the foreign agent (10, 11, 12) and the mobile node (6) and re-routing the data through another foreign agent if certain predetermined quality criteria are not met.

Description

Mobile Data Routing
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the routing of data within communications networks, including but not confined to networks such as the Internet, and particularly, but not exclusively, to a method of routing data directed to a mobile node. The mobile node may be a mobile host, such as a portable computer, or it may be a router which is responsible for the mobility of one or more entire networks, for example, the mobile data network within an aircraft. In either case, the mobile node may change its point of attachment from one network or subnetwork to another.
Background
The routing of data around the diverse networks which make up the Internet is based on a protocol known as the Internet Protocol (IP). Data is transferred in the form of data units known as IP datagrams between points in the Internet specified by IP addresses. The use of IP hides the physical nature of the underlying networks from application processes running over the Internet. These networks may, for example, be a combination of wired and wireless local and wide area networks using different physical protocols such as Ethernet and token-ring, including networks linked by telephone through an Internet Service Provider (ISP), or through satellite or ground based radio or infra-red links.
The detailed specification of IP is available in a "Request for Comments" document, RFC 791, maintained by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). RFC documents are widely available on the Internet at, for example, "ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfcxxxx.txt", where "xxxx" represents the RFC number, so that RFC 791 is available as rfc791.txt.
The current version of IP, known as IPv4, does not itself support mobility, but a protocol entitled "IP Mobility Support", commonly referred to as Mobile IP, has been designed to enhance IPv4 to support mobility. This protocol is described in document RFC 2002, available as detailed above. The next generation of IP (IPv6) is being specifically designed to deal with the mobility requirement.
IPv4 assumes that a node's IP address uniquely identifies the node's fixed point of attachment to the Internet. If the node is transferred to a different point, it can only be contacted by allocating it a new IP address. Mobile IP, however, enables a mobile node, such as a laptop or palmtop computer, to send and receive IP datagrams over the Internet regardless of the physical location at which it is connected to the Internet and without changing its IP address. One example of the mechanism by which it does so is illustrated in Figures la and lb.
Referring to Figure la, the Internet comprises a large number of networks and sub-networks 1, 2, 3, 4 connected via routers 5. A router may be a general purpose computer programmed to perform routing tasks. Increasingly, routers throughout the Internet are dedicated pieces of hardware, controlled by software or firmware, provided by companies such as Cisco Systems, California, USA. In either case, the functionality of a router intended for use in an IP based network is defined in RFC 1812.
A mobile node (MN) 6 is normally connected to the Internet via a home network 1. The unique IP address assigned to the node 6 is known as its home address. Mobility agents, known as foreign agents (FA) and home agents (HA), advertise their presence on a network via availability messages known as Agent Advertisements. A mobility agent is typically a router connected to a particular network; for example, a home agent 7 is a router connected to the home network 1 and a foreign agent 8 is a router connected to a foreign network 2. The mobile node 6 may optionally solicit an Agent Advertisement message from any local mobility agents via an Agent Solicitation message. By receiving Agent Advertisements, the mobile node 6 is able to determine whether it is on its home network 1 or on a foreign network 2, 3, 4. While the mobile node 6 is on its home network, it has no need for mobility services. When the mobile node 6 is temporarily moved to a foreign network 2, as shown by the dotted box in Figure la, it obtains a temporary care-of address on the foreign network 2. This can be a foreign agent care-of address, which is the IP address of the foreign agent, obtained by receiving or soliciting Agent Advertisements from any foreign agents based on the foreign network 2. Alternatively, the care-of address may be obtained by using an external assignment mechanism, such as Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) (the reader is referred to RFC 1541 for further information), in which case it is known as a co-located care-of address.
The mobile node 6 then registers its new care-of address with its home agent 7 by exchanging Registration Request and Registration Reply messages with it. Registration provides a mechanism by which mobile nodes can communicate their current reachability information to their home agent. The registration process is described in more detail below, assuming that the mobile node 6 on the foreign network 2 is registering a foreign agent care-of address received via an Agent Advertisement from, for example, foreign agent 8.
First, the mobile node 6 sends a Registration Request message to the foreign agent 8, which processes it and forwards it to the mobile node's home agent 7. The Registration Request message includes the IP address of the foreign agent. The home agent 7 sends a Registration Reply message to the foreign agent 8 granting (or denying) the registration request. The foreign agent 8 processes this Reply and forwards it to the mobile node 6. This process establishes a temporary address for the mobile node 6 to which datagrams can be delivered while the node is roaming away from its home network 1. If the mobile node 6 is returning to its home network 1 having been on a foreign network 2, it deregisters with its home agent 7, through exchange of Registration Request and Registration Reply messages.
Referring to Figure lb, when a correspondent node (CN) 9 attached to a network 4 sends a message intended for the mobile node 6, while it is connected to the foreign network 2, the message is intercepted by the home agent 7, as shown by arrow A. The home agent 7 encapsulates the datagrams forming the message with the care-of address for the mobile node 6, in this example being the IP address of the foreign agent 8, and forwards the message to the foreign agent 8. The transmission of the encapsulated datagrams, shown by arrow B, is known as tunnelling. The foreign agent 8 receives the datagrams, decapsulates them and forwards them to the mobile node 6, as shown by arrow C. Messages from the mobile node 6 to other nodes in the Internet need not follow this route, but may be sent directly via an appropriate router, which may be foreign agent 8.
The concepts of encapsulation and tunnelling are described in detail in RFC 2003, "IP Encapsulation within IP". The model is that a tunnel is the path followed by a datagram while encapsulated. Encapsulation allows an IP datagram to be hidden from intermediate routers which would incorrectly attempt to route it to the mobile node. Instead, the datagram is routed between the encapsulator and a knowledgeable decapsulator, such as a foreign agent, which can correctly route the datagram. The home agent 7 and foreign agent 8 are known as the endpoints of the tunnel. In the case of the co-located care-of address, the mobile node itself acts as an endpoint of the tunnel.
To enable the tunnelling process described above to funαion correctly, the home agent 7 maintains reachability information for the mobile node 6, in a form known as a mobility binding. This is the association of the mobile node's identity with a care-of address and a parameter known as the Lifetime, which is the number of seconds remaining before the registration of the node 6 with the home agent 7 expires. The aim behind a Lifetime value is to maintain the dynamic nature of the system, with a binding expiring within a set time unless positively maintained by the mobile node 6. As an example, the default Router Advertisement Lifetime value, which may be used where a mobile node is registering with a foreign agent which it has acquired via an Agent Advertisement, is 1800 seconds.
On receipt of a Registration Request message, the home agent 7 creates or modifies the mobility binding, for example, by re-setting the Lifetime value where the Request is a re-registration request and the mobility binding has not yet expired. If the Lifetime value for a given mobility binding expires before a re-registration request has been received, the home agent 7 deletes the mobility binding from its record. The Registration Reply message from the home agent 7 informs the mobile node 6 (via the foreign agent 8) of the status of its Request, including the Lifetime value allocated by the home agent 7.
Mobile IP supports multiple simultaneous mobility bindings, so that each mobile node 6 may register with a number of foreign agents and so obtain a number of care-of addresses. This is particularly useful where a mobile node using a wireless interface to a network, for example an RF interface, moves within range of more than one foreign agent. For example, if the mobile node is a router on an aircraft, then while the aircraft is in flight, the router may from time to time register with a series of foreign agents based on the ground below using a radio link.
In the case of multiple simultaneous mobility bindings, the home agent 7 retains its existing list of mobility bindings when it receives a Registration Request containing the IP address of a new foreign agent. If the Lifetime value of one mobility binding expires, the home agent 7 deletes that mobility binding from its record, but retains in its record the other non-expired bindings. A problem with this method of data transmission arises when bandwidth bottlenecks occur in the forwarding of data from the home agent, either in the tunnelling routes or in the links between the foreign agents and the mobile node. For example, where the network links between the mobile node and the foreign agents are wireless links, these may have a substantially lower bandwidth than that available between the correspondent node and the home agent.
The primary role of the home agent and foreign agents is to provide the appropriate encapsulation and decapsulation to re-route data arriving at the mobile node's home network from a correspondent node, so as to reach the mobile node at its current location. The maximum data rate at which data can be received from the correspondent node without data loss is therefore limited to the data rate corresponding to the highest available bandwidth path between the home agent and mobile node.
Summary of the Invention
To address this limitation on the data rate, the present invention provides a method of routing data to a mobile node within a communications network, comprising the steps of determining the location of a plurality of agent nodes from which data can be transmitted to the mobile node; and transmitting successive data units from a stream of data units intended for the mobile node to different respective ones of the agent nodes.
Next successive ones of the data units may be transmitted to the agent nodes on a round robin basis.
Alternatively or in addition, data units may be transmitted to the agent nodes based on an assessment of the availability of each agent node or the quality of the connection between each agent node and the mobile node. The quality of the connection may be assessed in terms of available bandwidth or specifically by considering the level of buffer use at each agent node. A datagram may be re-routed to a different agent node if the quality of the connection does not meet predetermined criteria, such as a minimum available bandwidth.
A method according to the present invention is capable of providing a virtual bandwidth channel which is the sum of the bandwidths of the individual channels available between the agent nodes and the mobile node.
According to the invention, there is further provided a communications system for mobile data transfer, comprising a mobile node connectable to a foreign network away from its home network, a home agent node associated with the home network for receiving a stream of data units intended for the mobile node, a plurality of foreign agent nodes associated with the foreign network for forwarding data units received from the home agent node to the mobile node, characterised in that the home agent node is configured to transmit successive data units from a received stream of data units to different respective ones of the foreign agent nodes.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure la is a schematic diagram of the general arrangement of a mobile IP based system;
Figure lb is the diagram of Figure la showing the flow of data to a mobile node attached to a foreign network;
Figure 2 is a schematic block diagram showing the data flows within a prior art system; Figure 3 a is a schematic block diagram showing the data flows within a system according to the present invention; and Figure 3b is an example of a practical implementation of the system shown in Figure 3a.
Detailed Description Figure 2 shows the prior art situation in which the mobile node 6 is within range of three foreign agents 10, 11, 12. When the correspondent node 9 sends a message comprising a sequence of datagrams P, Q, R ... Z to the mobile node 6, this message is intercepted by the home agent 7. The home agent 7 maintains a record of the current mobility bindings for the mobile node 6, from which it knows the IP addresses of all of the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 with which the mobile node is registered. As each datagram is received, the home agent 7 produces the requisite number of identical copies of that datagram, in this case three, and encapsulates these with the respective care-of address of the foreign agents.
Each of the three identical copies of the received datagram is encapsulated with respective ones of three IP addresses corresponding to each of the foreign agents 10, 11, 12. The home agent 7 then tunnels the encapsulated datagrams to the respective foreign agents. The foreign agents 10, 11, 12 decapsulate the datagrams and forward the three identical copies of the datagrams to the mobile node 6.
Figure 3a schematically illustrates the system according to the invention, the figures beside each link indicating an example data transfer capacity for that link. The foreign agents 10, 11, 12 may represent routers connected to ground-based radio stations which maintain a radio link with a mobile computer 6 which is operating in the field disconnected from its home network. Alternatively, referring to Figure 3b, the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 may represent routers enabling connections over three different media types, for example, respectively, connection 13 to a wireless LAN over an infra-red link, connection 14 to an ISP via a modem and connection 15 to a wireless LAN base station over a radio link. In a system such as the one illustrated in Figures 2 and 3, the lowest capacity links are likely to be those between the foreign agents 10, 11, 12 and the mobile node 6, particularly if these are wireless links. In the prior art transmission scheme, the maximum data rate between the correspondent node 9 and the mobile node 6 is therefore limited by the highest data rate on any one of the foreign agent - mobile node links. Assuming that the data transfer rates shown in Figure 3a are also applicable to the prior art system of Figure 2, the maximum data transfer rate in the prior art system is 28.8 kbps, being the data rate between foreign agent 11 and mobile node 6.
Referring to Figure 3a, in the system according to the invention, the home agent 7 receives a message destined for the mobile node 6 from the correspondent node 9, as before. However, each datagram P, Q, R ... Z comprised in the message is not copied as it is received; instead it is immediately sent to the next available foreign agent. This may be done on a "round robin" basis, so that the first datagram P is sent to the first foreign agent 10, the second Q is sent to the second foreign agent 11 and the third R is sent to the third foreign agent 12. The fourth datagram S is then sent to the first foreign agent 10 and the process repeats for the remaining datagrams.
As each encapsulated datagram is received by the respective foreign agent, it is then decapsulated and forwarded to the mobile node 6. The correspondent node 9 in Figure 3a may therefore send data at a composite rate which is the sum of the individual data rates for each of the foreign agent - mobile node links, namely 19.2 + 28.8 + 9.6 = 57.6 kbps, ie. double the rate that is possible with the prior art arrangement in Figure 2.
If the data rate between correspondent node 9 and home agent 7 exceeds the maximum possible data rate for the system, the resulting rate of data transfer to the mobile node 6 depends on a number of faαors, one of the most significant being the underlying Internet protocol which manages the data transfer. Data transfer within the Internet may take place on a connectionless or connection-oriented basis, depending on the protocol used, which in turn depends on the nature of the service which is to be provided over the Internet.
Two of the best known data transport protocols are Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), which are part of the TCP/IP Internet suite which also provides the Internet Protocol (IP). In known systems, TCP/IP is implemented in software, and is normally resident in, and an integral part of, the computer operating system. User access to TCP/UDP through the operating system is comparable to similar processes such as user access to the computer's file system. A variety of TCP/IP implementations are commercially available for different platforms such as DOS and UNIX. For example, Microsoft TCP/IP software is provided as an integral part of the Microsoft Windows 95 and Windows NT operating systems.
UDP provides a conneαionless IP datagram delivery service which does not maintain an end-to-end connertion between transmitting and receiving nodes and therefore does not guarantee data delivery. It merely treats each datagram as a self-contained entity to be transferred on a best-try approach. It is up to the application using the UDP service to perform error checking; if it does not do so, it has no way of knowing if a datagram has arrived at the receiver or if it has been lost in transit. This form of transfer is particularly suitable for some types of data, for example image or voice data, where speed may be more important than occasional errors, which are unlikely to substantially affect the received image or speech quality.
However, for many applications, a reliable conneαion-oriented service is required, which guarantees IP datagram delivery. TCP is a connection-oriented protocol which maintains an end-to-end conneαion between transmitting and receiving nodes, and provides a reliable and secure logical connection for data transfer between the nodes.
TCP assumes that it can obtain a simple but potentially unreliable data service from the IP protocol layer. To turn this into a reliable service, it therefore has to provide a range of funαions including (a) basic data transfer, (b) reliability and error correαion, allowing recovery from damaged or missing data or data delivered out of sequence, and (c) flow control, which provides the receiving node with the means to govern the amount of data sent by the transmitting node. The TCP specification setting out the detailed requirements for implementation in each of these areas is available as RFC 793.
The system according to the present invention is particularly suited to UDP based tasks such as the transmission of image and voice data and will generate a significantly better data transfer rate as compared with the prior art system. If the maximum transfer rate over the foreign agent - mobile node links is insufficient to cope with the transfer rate between correspondent node 9 and home agent 7, UDP does not perform any form of flow control and simply drops data packets which exceed existing buffer capacities. It is therefore necessary to provide separate error checking facilities.
If the service being provided requires the use of TCP, a number of factors operate to produce a reliable, conneαion-oriented transfer. Since data is transferred over three separate links operating at different data rates, sequence control seeks to ensure that the datagrams arrives in the corrert order. If the maximum data rate over the foreign agent - mobile node links is insufficient to cope with the transfer rate between correspondent node 9 and home agent 7, TCP receives information concerning undelivered or delayed datagrams. It acts on this information by decreasing the transfer rate on the correspondent node - home agent link so as to match the transfer rate on that link to the aggregate rate available over the foreign agent - mobile node links. However, the result of the various factors which interact to produce overall TCP control is that it is difficult to predict the actual overall transfer rate, other than to say that this is likely to be better than the overall rate achievable with the prior art system. So, referring to Figure 3a, the maximum available data rate in a TCP based system is likely to lie somewhere between 28.8 kbps and 57.6 kbps.
In a praαical system, the bandwidth of the foreign agent - mobile node links is difficult to predict, so to achieve optimal performance, modifications or alternatives to the round-robin algorithm can be used. In particular, before allocating a datagram to a particular foreign agent - mobile node link, it is desirable to determine whether the foreign agent is available, or to check the available bandwidth across the link. This can be done by, for example, checking the level of buffer use at each of the foreign agent routers. Checking the quality of the connection, and re-routing the datagram if the quality does not meet some predetermined criterion, such as a minimum bandwidth, helps to limit the possibility that a very low bandwidth foreign agent - mobile node link will become a new bottleneck in the data transfer process.
Mobile IP provides mechanisms for the mobile node to maintain its registrations, periodically checking for new foreign agents or that an already registered agent is no longer reachable. When the mobile node comes within range of further foreign agents, new registrations are initiated and datagrams may then be sent to those agents, so further increasing the potential data transfer rate. Similarly, when a foreign agent is no longer within range of the mobile node, the foreign agent will be de-registered and the incoming datagrams may be divided between the remaining agents.
Although the above examples have been described with reference to the Internet, the invention is applicable to any network based on the Internet Protocol and the principles may be extended to systems based on other network protocols.

Claims

Claims
1. A method of routing data to a mobile node (6) within a communications network, comprising the steps of: determining the location of a plurality of agent nodes (10, 11, 12) from which data may be transmitted to the mobile node; and transmitting successive data units from a stream of data units intended for the mobile node to different respe╬▒ive ones of the agent nodes.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein next successive ones of the data units are transmitted to the agent nodes on a round-robin basis.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising assessing the quality of the conne╬▒ion between each agent node and the mobile node prior to transmitting a data unit to the agent node.
4. A method according to claim 3, including re-routing the data unit to a different one of the agent nodes if the connection quality does not meet predetermined criteria.
5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the predetermined criteria include a minimum bandwidth for the conne╬▒ion between an agent node and the mobile node.
6. A method according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein the available bandwidth for data transfer across the conne╬▒ion is a measure of the quality of the conne╬▒ion.
7. A method according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the agent nodes include data buffers and the level of buffer use is a measure of the quality of the connertion.
8. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein each data unit is an
IP datagram.
9. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the agent nodes are foreign agents within a Mobile IP based network.
10. A method according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the stream of IP datagrams is received by a home agent (7).
11. A communications system for mobile data transfer, comprising: a mobile node (6) connectable to a foreign network (2) away from its home network (1); a home agent node (7) associated with the home network (1) for receiving a stream of data units intended for the mobile node; a plurality of foreign agent nodes (10, 11, 12) associated with the foreign network for forwarding data units received from the home agent node to the mobile node; characterised in that the home agent node is configured to transmit successive data units from a received stream of data units to different respective ones of the foreign agent nodes.
12. A method of routing data to a mobile node within a communications network, substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
13. A communications system for mobile data transfer substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
PCT/GB1998/003711 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data routing WO1999031853A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU14980/99A AU745274B2 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data routing
CA002312972A CA2312972A1 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data routing
JP2000539616A JP3983976B2 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Route data that can be moved
EP98959049A EP1053620B1 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data routing
US09/555,740 US6549522B1 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data rate enhancement via foreign agent load balancing
DE69822516T DE69822516T2 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 MOBILE DATENLEITWEG

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP97310243 1997-12-17
GB9726643.1 1997-12-17
GBGB9726643.1A GB9726643D0 (en) 1997-12-17 1997-12-17 Mobile data routing
EP97310243.7 1997-12-17

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999031853A1 true WO1999031853A1 (en) 1999-06-24

Family

ID=26147749

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1998/003711 WO1999031853A1 (en) 1997-12-17 1998-12-11 Mobile data routing

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US6549522B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1053620B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3983976B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1282481A (en)
AU (1) AU745274B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2312972A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69822516T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1999031853A1 (en)

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001020931A1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2001-03-22 Ericsson, Inc. Routing multimedia traffic across an ip-based wireless telecommunications network
WO2001028185A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2001-04-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Wide area network mobility for ip based networks
EP1120945A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-08-01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ) Assignment of a serveraddress to a terminal
WO2001076286A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-10-11 Nokia Corporation Architecture and packet routing in a multi-bearer-type network
WO2001093534A2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2001-12-06 Aerocast.Com, Inc. Selective routing
EP1182846A2 (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-02-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. A method of supporting seamless hand-off in a mobile telecommunications network
EP1280313A2 (en) * 2001-07-13 2003-01-29 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Mobil networking system, home agent, communication repeater, communication terminal, bandwidth control method
WO2003055265A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient re-registration of mobile ip nodes in wireless communication system
US6721291B1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2004-04-13 Nokia Ip Anycast binding mobile communication method and system
EP1429514A1 (en) * 2002-12-09 2004-06-16 Alcatel Internet protocol mobility supporting method, a related system and related devices
WO2004032396A3 (en) * 2002-10-03 2004-06-24 Cisco Tech Ind Method, device and system for distributing server requests among a cluster of servers that have registered as mobile nodes
US6836806B1 (en) 2000-06-01 2004-12-28 Aerocast, Inc. System for network addressing
US6904025B1 (en) * 1999-10-12 2005-06-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Wide area network mobility for IP based networks
US6937589B2 (en) 2000-03-31 2005-08-30 Nec Corporation Mobile communication system with packet effectively transmitted and control method for the same
US6973057B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2005-12-06 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Public mobile data communications network
US7158492B2 (en) 2000-03-13 2007-01-02 Nokia Corporation Load balancing in telecommunications system supporting mobile IP
US7460547B2 (en) 2002-10-03 2008-12-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Mobile director
US7747772B2 (en) 2000-06-01 2010-06-29 Aerocast.Com, Inc. Viewer object proxy
US8526353B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2013-09-03 Kyocera Corporation Communication device, radio communication device, communication control method and radio communication method
EP2838287A2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2015-02-18 Orange Intermediate network entity for supporting mobility

Families Citing this family (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3717733B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2005-11-16 シャープ株式会社 Network system
US6907017B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2005-06-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Mobility management in wireless internet protocol networks
US6988146B1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2006-01-17 Alcatel Simple multicast extension for mobile IP SMM
US7218634B1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2007-05-15 Nortel Networks Limited Assisted power-up and hand-off system and method
US7653743B2 (en) * 2000-11-28 2010-01-26 Microsoft Corporation Protocol for throttling high volume messages
US7047273B2 (en) * 2000-11-28 2006-05-16 Navic Systems, Inc. Load balancing in set top cable box environment
US6771623B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2004-08-03 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method for ensuring reliable mobile IP service
US6959341B1 (en) 2000-12-20 2005-10-25 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic network allocation for mobile router
US20020116532A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-08-22 Berg Mitchell T. Method and system for communicating an information packet and identifying a data structure
US7287090B1 (en) 2000-12-21 2007-10-23 Noatak Software, Llc Method and system for identifying a computing device in response to a request packet
US20020116397A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-08-22 Berg Mitchell T. Method and system for communicating an information packet through multiple router devices
US7546369B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2009-06-09 Berg Mitchell T Method and system for communicating a request packet in response to a state
US7418522B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2008-08-26 Noatak Software Llc Method and system for communicating an information packet through multiple networks
US7512686B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2009-03-31 Berg Mitchell T Method and system for establishing a data structure of a connection with a client
US7421505B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2008-09-02 Noatak Software Llc Method and system for executing protocol stack instructions to form a packet for causing a computing device to perform an operation
US20020116605A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-08-22 Berg Mitchell T. Method and system for initiating execution of software in response to a state
US7006509B1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2006-02-28 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for graceful slowlink deletion and subsequent fast link addition in an IMA group
US6952434B1 (en) 2000-12-27 2005-10-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for processing control cells to prevent event missequencing and data loss in IMA groups
US7295551B1 (en) * 2000-12-28 2007-11-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Support mobile device in asymmetric link environment
US7065104B1 (en) 2000-12-28 2006-06-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for managing inverse multiplexing over ATM
KR100551867B1 (en) * 2000-12-28 2006-02-13 엘지전자 주식회사 Method of Reporting and Controling for Mobile Node Foreign Agent Handoff
US6985463B1 (en) * 2001-03-08 2006-01-10 Ipr Licensing, Inc. Resource utilization efficiency during hand-off in mobile communication systems
US20030073439A1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-04-17 Wenzel Peter W. Home agent redundancy in a cellular system
US8290505B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2012-10-16 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Consequential location derived information
US8918073B2 (en) 2002-03-28 2014-12-23 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless telecommunications location based services scheme selection
US7346053B1 (en) 2002-05-07 2008-03-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for supporting IP multicast for a mobile router
US7315526B2 (en) 2002-06-20 2008-01-01 Thomson Licensing Dual home mobility management in a wireless telephony/wireless LAN interworking environment
US20070238455A1 (en) 2006-04-07 2007-10-11 Yinjun Zhu Mobile based area event handling when currently visited network doe not cover area
US8666397B2 (en) 2002-12-13 2014-03-04 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Area event handling when current network does not cover target area
JP3838363B2 (en) * 2003-03-17 2006-10-25 Kddi株式会社 Mobile network and communication method thereof
GB2400274B (en) * 2003-04-05 2006-11-29 Hewlett Packard Development Co Apparatus and related methods for establishing a network connection
JP4185853B2 (en) * 2003-11-28 2008-11-26 株式会社日立コミュニケーションテクノロジー Wireless system, server, and mobile station
US7424293B2 (en) 2003-12-02 2008-09-09 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. User plane location based service using message tunneling to support roaming
US7417961B2 (en) * 2003-12-09 2008-08-26 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and apparatus for implementing a speed sensitive mobile router
US7260186B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2007-08-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Solutions for voice over internet protocol (VoIP) 911 location services
US7652995B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2010-01-26 International Business Machines Corporation Autonomic reassociation of clients in a wireless local area network
US20080126535A1 (en) 2006-11-28 2008-05-29 Yinjun Zhu User plane location services over session initiation protocol (SIP)
FI121255B (en) * 2004-10-08 2010-08-31 Sap Ag A method and apparatus for controlling the availability of mobile telephone service agents in a telephone service environment
PT1865669T (en) 2005-03-31 2018-08-03 Sun Patent Trust Communication control method, communication node, and mobile node
US7353034B2 (en) 2005-04-04 2008-04-01 X One, Inc. Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices
US8660573B2 (en) 2005-07-19 2014-02-25 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Location service requests throttling
US9282451B2 (en) * 2005-09-26 2016-03-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Automatic location identification (ALI) service requests steering, connection sharing and protocol translation
CN1953607B (en) * 2005-10-17 2012-01-25 株式会社日立制作所 A method and device for switch-over in mobile network communication
US7633917B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2009-12-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Mobile network device multi-link optimizations
US8532266B2 (en) * 2006-05-04 2013-09-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Efficient usage of emergency services keys
US8208605B2 (en) 2006-05-04 2012-06-26 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended efficient usage of emergency services keys
US8040860B2 (en) * 2006-10-26 2011-10-18 Nokia Corporation Mobile IP solution for communication networks
ATE505023T1 (en) * 2006-11-06 2011-04-15 Nokia Corp GLOBAL ACCESSIBILITY IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
CN101584192B (en) * 2006-11-27 2013-10-30 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Node registering method
US8050386B2 (en) 2007-02-12 2011-11-01 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile automatic location identification (ALI) for first responders
FR2921221B1 (en) * 2007-09-13 2009-12-11 Airbus France ACARS ROUTER FOR REMOTE AVIONIC APPLICATIONS
WO2009038726A1 (en) 2007-09-17 2009-03-26 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Emergency 911 data messaging
US9130963B2 (en) 2011-04-06 2015-09-08 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Ancillary data support in session initiation protocol (SIP) messaging
US7929530B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2011-04-19 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Ancillary data support in session initiation protocol (SIP) messaging
US7948871B2 (en) * 2008-03-26 2011-05-24 Ericsson Ab Method and apparatus for mobility agent recovery
US8867485B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2014-10-21 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Multiple location retrieval function (LRF) network having location continuity
US8428024B2 (en) 2010-07-21 2013-04-23 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) System and method for mobility with a split home agent architecture using MPTCP
US8699433B2 (en) * 2010-07-21 2014-04-15 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) System and method for providing mobility with a split home agent architecture
WO2012141762A1 (en) 2011-02-25 2012-10-18 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile internet protocol (ip) location
WO2013048551A1 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Unique global identifier for minimizing prank 911 calls
US9307372B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2016-04-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. No responders online
US9544260B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2017-01-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Rapid assignment dynamic ownership queue
US8755385B2 (en) 2012-05-03 2014-06-17 Itron, Inc. Authentication using DHCP services in mesh networks
US9591525B2 (en) * 2012-05-03 2017-03-07 Itron Global Sarl Efficient device handover/migration in mesh networks
US9313638B2 (en) 2012-08-15 2016-04-12 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Device independent caller data access for emergency calls
US9456301B2 (en) 2012-12-11 2016-09-27 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Efficient prisoner tracking
US8983047B2 (en) 2013-03-20 2015-03-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Index of suspicion determination for communications request
US9408034B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2016-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended area event for network based proximity discovery
US9516104B2 (en) 2013-09-11 2016-12-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Intelligent load balancer enhanced routing
US9479897B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-10-25 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. SUPL-WiFi access point controller location based services for WiFi enabled mobile devices
GB201802347D0 (en) 2018-02-13 2018-03-28 Nchain Holdings Ltd Computer-implemented system and method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5325362A (en) * 1993-09-29 1994-06-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Scalable and efficient intra-domain tunneling mobile-IP scheme
WO1996021984A2 (en) * 1995-01-10 1996-07-18 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Packet radio system, and a terminal equipment for a packet radio system
US5680548A (en) * 1994-12-02 1997-10-21 Xcellenet, Inc. Systems and methods for work assignment and distribution from a server to remote/mobile nodes

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2708116B1 (en) 1993-07-21 1995-09-01 Bull Sa Communication system with a network and access protocol to transport providers belonging to this system.
US5825759A (en) * 1994-10-26 1998-10-20 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Distributing network services and resources in a mobile communications network
US5870460A (en) * 1995-05-31 1999-02-09 Mci Communications Corporation System for least cost routing of data transactions in a telecommunications network
JPH0916486A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-01-17 Xerox Corp Method for consistent interpretation of event
US5734829A (en) * 1995-10-20 1998-03-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method and program for processing a volume of data on a parallel computer system
DE19618535A1 (en) 1996-05-08 1997-07-24 Siemens Ag Driver information system for motor vehicles with information and communications devices
JP2842524B2 (en) * 1996-06-06 1999-01-06 日本電気株式会社 Multicast group configuration method and multicast communication network
US6134433A (en) 1996-12-09 2000-10-17 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) System and method of forwarding data calls in a radio telecommunications network
US5928325A (en) * 1997-02-24 1999-07-27 Motorola, Inc. Method of dynamically establishing communication of incoming messages to one or more user devices presently available to an intended recipient
US6144671A (en) * 1997-03-04 2000-11-07 Nortel Networks Corporation Call redirection methods in a packet based communications network

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5325362A (en) * 1993-09-29 1994-06-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Scalable and efficient intra-domain tunneling mobile-IP scheme
US5680548A (en) * 1994-12-02 1997-10-21 Xcellenet, Inc. Systems and methods for work assignment and distribution from a server to remote/mobile nodes
WO1996021984A2 (en) * 1995-01-10 1996-07-18 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Packet radio system, and a terminal equipment for a packet radio system

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GEIGER R L ET AL: "WIRELESS NETWORK EXTENSION USING MOBILE IP", DIGEST OF PAPERS OF COMPCON (COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE) 1996, TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY SANTA CLARA, FEB. 25 - 28, 1996, no. CONF. 41, 25 February 1996 (1996-02-25), INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, pages 9 - 14, XP000628459 *
KOJO M ET AL.: "An Efficient Transport Service for Slow Wireless Telephone Links", IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, vol. 15, no. 7, September 1997 (1997-09-01), pages 1337 - 1348, XP002065094 *

Cited By (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6973057B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2005-12-06 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Public mobile data communications network
US6665291B1 (en) 1999-09-17 2003-12-16 Ericsson Inc. Method and system for carrying data, voice and video across an internet protocol based wireless telecommunications network
WO2001020931A1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2001-03-22 Ericsson, Inc. Routing multimedia traffic across an ip-based wireless telecommunications network
WO2001028185A1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2001-04-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Wide area network mobility for ip based networks
US6904025B1 (en) * 1999-10-12 2005-06-07 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Wide area network mobility for IP based networks
US6721291B1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2004-04-13 Nokia Ip Anycast binding mobile communication method and system
EP1120945A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-08-01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ) Assignment of a serveraddress to a terminal
WO2001056245A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-08-02 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Allocation of a server address to a terminal
US7333459B2 (en) 2000-01-27 2008-02-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Allocation of a server address to a terminal
US7158492B2 (en) 2000-03-13 2007-01-02 Nokia Corporation Load balancing in telecommunications system supporting mobile IP
WO2001076286A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-10-11 Nokia Corporation Architecture and packet routing in a multi-bearer-type network
US6937589B2 (en) 2000-03-31 2005-08-30 Nec Corporation Mobile communication system with packet effectively transmitted and control method for the same
WO2001093534A2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2001-12-06 Aerocast.Com, Inc. Selective routing
US6658000B1 (en) 2000-06-01 2003-12-02 Aerocast.Com, Inc. Selective routing
US7747772B2 (en) 2000-06-01 2010-06-29 Aerocast.Com, Inc. Viewer object proxy
WO2001093534A3 (en) * 2000-06-01 2002-08-29 Aerocast Com Inc Selective routing
US6836806B1 (en) 2000-06-01 2004-12-28 Aerocast, Inc. System for network addressing
EP1182846A3 (en) * 2000-08-21 2003-05-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. A method of supporting seamless hand-off in a mobile telecommunications network
US6987743B2 (en) 2000-08-21 2006-01-17 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of supporting seamless hand-off in a mobile telecommunications network
GB2366483A (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-03-06 Lucent Technologies Inc A method of delivering packets to a roaming mobile
EP1182846A2 (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-02-27 Lucent Technologies Inc. A method of supporting seamless hand-off in a mobile telecommunications network
EP1280313A2 (en) * 2001-07-13 2003-01-29 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Mobil networking system, home agent, communication repeater, communication terminal, bandwidth control method
EP1280313A3 (en) * 2001-07-13 2004-01-28 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Mobile networking system, home agent, communication repeater, communication terminal, bandwidth control method
WO2003055265A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient re-registration of mobile ip nodes in wireless communication system
US7003294B2 (en) 2001-12-20 2006-02-21 Qualcomm Incorporated Efficient re-registration of mobile IP nodes
KR100924617B1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2009-11-02 콸콤 인코포레이티드 Efficient re-registration of mobile ip nodes in wireless communication system
US7251496B2 (en) 2002-10-03 2007-07-31 Cisco Technology, Inc. Mobile director
WO2004032396A3 (en) * 2002-10-03 2004-06-24 Cisco Tech Ind Method, device and system for distributing server requests among a cluster of servers that have registered as mobile nodes
US7460547B2 (en) 2002-10-03 2008-12-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Mobile director
EP1610523A3 (en) * 2002-12-09 2006-03-29 Alcatel Internet protocol mobility supporting system and related devices
EP1429514A1 (en) * 2002-12-09 2004-06-16 Alcatel Internet protocol mobility supporting method, a related system and related devices
EP1610523A2 (en) * 2002-12-09 2005-12-28 Alcatel Internet protocol mobility supporting system and related devices
EP2838287A2 (en) * 2004-02-06 2015-02-18 Orange Intermediate network entity for supporting mobility
EP2838287A3 (en) * 2004-02-06 2015-03-25 Orange Intermediate network entity for supporting mobility
EP1741219B1 (en) * 2004-02-06 2017-04-19 3G Licensing S.A. Mobile home agent in a foreign network
US8526353B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2013-09-03 Kyocera Corporation Communication device, radio communication device, communication control method and radio communication method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69822516D1 (en) 2004-04-22
CN1282481A (en) 2001-01-31
US6549522B1 (en) 2003-04-15
CA2312972A1 (en) 1999-06-24
DE69822516T2 (en) 2005-02-03
EP1053620B1 (en) 2004-03-17
AU745274B2 (en) 2002-03-14
JP3983976B2 (en) 2007-09-26
JP2002509391A (en) 2002-03-26
EP1053620A1 (en) 2000-11-22
AU1498099A (en) 1999-07-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1053620B1 (en) Mobile data routing
AU745231B2 (en) Proxy routing
US7305429B2 (en) Method and apparatus for global server load balancing
EP1927228B1 (en) Multiple interface mobile node with simultaneous home- and foreign network connection
US8095130B2 (en) Controlling hand-off in a mobile node with two mobile IP clients
EP1451950B1 (en) MOBILE ROUTER SUPPORT FOR IPv6
EP1618723B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for securing proxy mobile ip
US20030021275A1 (en) Mobile data routing
US20040029555A1 (en) System and method for supporting mobile internet protocol using multiple separate tunnels
US7421512B2 (en) Communication system and method therefor
Chowdhury et al. SINEMO: An IP-diversity based approach for network mobility in space
US20040019664A1 (en) Method and system for discovering a network element in a network such as an agent in an IP network
JP3659236B2 (en) Mobile communication network system, foreign agent router, address server, and packet delivery method used therefor
JP2003018193A (en) Mobile data communication system designatable of passing router at path optimization
Liske Mobility in IPv6

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 98812208.1

Country of ref document: CN

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA CN IN JP SG US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998959049

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2312972

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2312972

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09555740

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: IN/PCT/2000/118/CHE

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14980/99

Country of ref document: AU

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998959049

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 14980/99

Country of ref document: AU

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1998959049

Country of ref document: EP