WO1999051059A1 - Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid - Google Patents

Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999051059A1
WO1999051059A1 PCT/US1999/006642 US9906642W WO9951059A1 WO 1999051059 A1 WO1999051059 A1 WO 1999051059A1 US 9906642 W US9906642 W US 9906642W WO 9951059 A1 WO9951059 A1 WO 9951059A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
compression
hearing aid
feedback cancellation
feedback
signal
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/006642
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
James M. Kates
John L. Melanson
Original Assignee
Audiologic Hearing Systems Lp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26763435&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO1999051059(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Audiologic Hearing Systems Lp filed Critical Audiologic Hearing Systems Lp
Priority to DK99914175.7T priority Critical patent/DK1068773T4/en
Priority to AT99914175T priority patent/ATE286344T1/en
Priority to AU32075/99A priority patent/AU3207599A/en
Priority to DE69922940.5T priority patent/DE69922940T3/en
Priority to EP99914175.7A priority patent/EP1068773B2/en
Publication of WO1999051059A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999051059A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H04R25/356—Amplitude, e.g. amplitude shift or compression
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
    • H04R25/453—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/41—Detection or adaptation of hearing aid parameters or programs to listening situation, e.g. pub, forest
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H04R25/353—Frequency, e.g. frequency shift or compression
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in audio systems such as hearing aids.
  • ITE shell establishes an acoustic feedback path that limits the maximum possible gain to less than 40 dB for a small vent and even less for large vents.
  • the acoustic feedback path includes the effects of the hearing aid amplifier, receiver, and microphone as well as the vent acoustics.
  • the traditional procedure for increasing the stability of a hearing aid is to reduce the gain at high frequencies. Controlling feedback by modifying the system frequency response, however, means that the desired high-frequency response of the instrument must be sacrificed in order to maintain stability.
  • Phase shifters and notch filters have also been tried, but have not proven to be very effective.
  • a more effective technique is feedback cancellation, in which the feedback signal is estimated and subtracted from the microphone signal.
  • multiband dynamic range compression allows compression to be controlled separately in different frequency bands.
  • high frequency sounds such as speech consonants, can be made louder while loud environmental noises - rumbles, traffic noise, cocktail party babble - can be attenuated.
  • the primary objective of the combined audio compression and feedback cancellation processing of the present invention is to eliminate "whistling" due to feedback in an unstable hearing aid amplification system, while make soft sounds louder without making loud sounds louder, in a selectable manner according to frequency.
  • the feedback cancellation element of the present invention uses one or more filters to model the feedback path of the system and thereby subtract the expected feedback from the audio signal before hearing aid processing occurs.
  • the hearing aid processing includes audio compression, for example multiband compression.
  • the operation of the audio compression element may be responsive to information gleaned from the feedback cancellation element, the feedback cancellation may be responsive to information gleaned from the compression element, or both.
  • a hearing aid comprises a microphone for converting sound into an audio signal, feedback cancellation means including means for estimating a physical feedback signal of the hearing aid, and means for modelling a signal processing feedback signal to compensate for the estimated physical feedback signal, subtracting means, connected to the output of the microphone and the output of the feedback cancellation means, for subtracting the signal processing feedback signal from the audio signal to form a compensated audio signal, a hearing aid processor including audio compression means, connected to the output of the subtracting means, for processing the compensated audio signal, and a speaker, connected to the output of the hearing aid processor, for converting the processed compensated audio signal into a sound signal.
  • the feedback cancellation means provides information to the compression means , and the compression means adjusts its operation in accordance with this information. For example, an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector can indicate the presence of an incoming sinusoid, which is likely due to feedback oscillations in the hearing aid. The maximum gain of the audio compression at low levels can be reduced if the feedback cancellation means detects an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector.
  • the compression means provides information, for example input signal power levels at various frequencies, to the feedback cancellation means, and the feedback cancellation element adjusts its operation in accordance with this information.
  • the feedback cancellation adaptation constant can be adjusted based upon the power level of one or more of the frequency bands of the audio compressor.
  • the adaptation time constant of the feedback cancellation element could be adjusted based on the output of one of the compression bands or a weighted combination of two or more bands.
  • the compression means provides information to the feedback cancellation means, and the feedback cancellation means provides information to the compression means, and each element adjusts its operation in accordance with the information obtained from the other.
  • Figure 1 is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid incorporating multiband audio compression.
  • Figure 2 (prior art) is a block diagram showing a hearing aid incorporating feedback cancellation.
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation.
  • Figure 4 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the compression element modifies its operation according to information from the feedback cancellation.
  • Figure 5 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the feedback cancellation element modifies its operation according to information from the compression element.
  • Figure 6 is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the compression element modifies its operation according to information from the feedback cancellation, and the feedback cancellation element modifies its operation according to information from the compression element.
  • FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing an example of a hearing aid 10 incorporating multiband audio compression 40.
  • This invention is described in detail in Patent Application Serial Number 08/870,426, entitled “Spectral Sampling Multiband Audio Compressor.”
  • An audio input signal 52 enters microphone 12, which generates input signal 54.
  • Signal 54 is converted to a digital signal by analog to digital converter 15, which outputs digital signal 56.
  • Digital signal 56 is received by filter bank 16, which is implemented as a Short Time Fourier Transform system, where the narrow bins of the Fourier Transform are grouped into overlapping sets to form the channels of the filter bank.
  • filter bank 16 is implemented as a Short Time Fourier Transform system, where the narrow bins of the Fourier Transform are grouped into overlapping sets to form the channels of the filter bank.
  • Wavelets, FIR filter banks, and IIR filter banks could be used as the foundation for filter bank design.
  • Filter bank 16 filters signal 56 into a large number of heavily overlapping bands 58.
  • Each band 58 is fed into a power estimation block 18, which integrates the power of the band and generates a power signal 60.
  • Each power signal 60 is passed to a dynamic range compression gain calculation block, which calculates a gain 62 based upon the power signal 60 according to a predetermined function.
  • Multipliers 22 multiply each band 58 by its respective gain 62 in order to generate scaled bands 64. Scaled bands 64 are summed in adder 24 to generate output signal 68. Output signal 68 may be provided to a receiver (not shown) in hea ⁇ ng aid 10 or may be further processed.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram showing a hea ⁇ ng aid incorporating feedback cancellation.
  • This invention is desc ⁇ bed m detail in Patent Application Se ⁇ al Number 08/972,265, entitled "Feedback Cancellation Apparatus and Methods.
  • Feedback path modelling 250 includes the running adaptation of the zero filter coefficients.
  • the se ⁇ es combination of the frozen pole filter 206 and the zero filter 212 gives a model transfer function G(z) determined du ⁇ ng start-up.
  • the coefficients of the pole model filter 206 are kept at values established du ⁇ ng start-up and no further adaptation of these values takes place du ⁇ ng normal hea ⁇ ng aid operation.
  • Once the hea ⁇ ng aid processing is turned, on zero model filter 212 is allowed to continuously adapt in response to changes in the feedback path as will occur, for example, when a telephone handset is brought up to the ear.
  • the LMS adaptation algo ⁇ thm is used by block 210
  • the adaptation is d ⁇ ven by e ⁇ or signal e(n) which is the output of the summation 208.
  • the inputs to the summation 208 are the signal from the microphone 202, and the feedback cancellation signal produced by the cascade of the delay 214 with the all-pole model filter 206 in se ⁇ es with the zero model filter 212.
  • the zero filter coefficients are updated using LMS adaptation m block 210.
  • Figure 3 is a block diagram showing a hea ⁇ ng aid 300 according to the present invention, incorporating compression 340 and feedback cancellation 350.
  • Other types of hea ⁇ ng aid processing for example direction sensitivity or noise suppression, could also be incorporated into block 340.
  • An example of a compression scheme which could be used is shown in block 40 of Figure 1, but the invention is by no means limited to this particular compression scheme. Many kinds of compression could be used.
  • an example of feedback cancellation is shown in block 250 of Figure 2, but many other types of feedback cancellation could be used instead, including algo ⁇ thms operating in the frequency domain as well as in the time domain.
  • Microphone 202 converts input sound 100 into an audio signal. Though this is not shown, the audio signal would generally be converted into a digital signal prior to processing.
  • Feedback cancellation means 350 estimates a physical feedback signal of hearing aid 300, and models a signal processing feedback signal to compensate for the estimated physical feedback signal.
  • Subtracting means 208 connected to the output of microphone 202 and the output of feedback cancellation means 350, subtracts the signal processing feedback signal from the audio signal to form a compensated audio signal.
  • Compression processor 340 is connected to the output of subtracting means 208, for processing the compensated audio signal.
  • Speaker 220 connected to amplifier 218 at the output of hearing aid processor 340, converts the processed compensated audio signal into a sound signal. If the processed compensated audio signal is a digital signal, it is converted back to analog (not shown).
  • FIG 4 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid 400 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that compression element 440 modifies its operation according to information from feedback cancellation 450.
  • the types of information available and useful to compression block 440 will vary.
  • a feedback cancellation block 450 identical to 250 of Figure 2 the coefficients of zero model 212 will change with time as feedback cancellation 350 attempts to compensation for feedback. Testing one or more of these coefficients to determine whether they are outside expected ranges in magnitude, or are changing faster than expected, gives a clue as to whether feedback cancellation 350 is having difficulty compensating for the feedback. For example, an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector might indicate the presence of an incoming sinusoid.
  • signal 406 would indicate to compression block 440 to lower gain at low levels, either for all frequencies or for selected frequencies.
  • compression block 440 is identical to compression block 100 of Figure 1, signal 406 would be used to generate a control signal for one or more gain calculation blocks 20.
  • the gain for frequencies between 1.5 KHz and 3 KHz might be lowered temporarily, as these are often the frequencies at which hearing aids are unstable.
  • the kneepoint between the linear amplification function of compression 440 and the compression function at higher signal levels could be moved to a higher signal level. Once the zero model coefficients begin behaving normally, the gain applied by compression 440 can be partially or completely restored to normal.
  • the attack and/or release times of the compression 440 could be modified in response to changes in the zero model coefficients.
  • the compressor release time for example, can be increased when the magnitude of the zero filter coefficient vector increases and returned to its normal value when the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector decreases, thus ensuring that the compression stays at lower gains for a longer period of time when the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector is larger than normal.
  • FIG 5 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid 500 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that feedback cancellation element 550 modifies its operation according to information from compression element 540.
  • the adaptation time constant of feedback cancellation 550 could be adjusted based on the output of one of the compression bands.
  • the adaptive filter (zero model 212 in Figure 2) used for feedback cancellation 550 adapts more rapidly and converges to a more accurate solution when the hearing aid input signal is broadband (e.g. White noise) than when it is na ⁇ owband (e.g. A tone). Better feedback cancellation system performance can be obtained by reducing the rate of adaptation when a na ⁇ owband input signal is detected.
  • the rate of adaptation is directly proportional to the parameter ( in the LMS update equation below.
  • the spectral analysis performed by the multiband compression can be used to determine the approximate bandwidth of the incoming signal.
  • the rate of adaptation for the adaptive feedback cancellation filter weight updates is then decreased (( made smaller) as the estimated input signal bandwidth decreases.
  • the magnitude of the step size used in the LMS adaptation 210 can be made inversely proportional to the power in one or more compression bands, for example as determined by power estimation blocks 18 (see Figure 1).
  • the adaptive update of the zero filter weights becomes:
  • b k ( n+ 1 ) b k ( n) + - ⁇ — e ⁇ n) d( n-k) , where ⁇ 2 ( n)
  • ( ⁇ .+ 1) is the kth zero filter coefficient at time n+ 1
  • e(n) is the error signal provided by subtraction means 208
  • d(n-k) is the input to the adaptive filter at time n delayed by k samples
  • s x 2 (n) is the estimated power at time n from compression 540
  • the filtered hearing aid input power can be obtained from one of the frequency bands of compression 540 (from one of power estimation blocks 18 shown in Figure 1, for example).
  • This adaptation approach offers the advantage of reduced computational requirements, since the power estimate is already available from compression 540, while giving much faster adaptation at lower signal levels than is possible with a system which does not use power normalization 506.
  • Feedback compensation 550 will also adjust faster when normalized based on compression 540 input power rather than feedback compensation 550 input power, because the latter signal has been compressed, raising the level of less intense signals and thus reducing the adaptation step size after power normalization.
  • LMS adapt block 210 can overflow the accumulator if the input signal to hea ⁇ ng aid 500 is too high. By testing the power level of the input signal to compression 540, it is possible to determine whether the input signal is high enough to make such an overflow likely, and freeze the filter coefficients until the high input signal level drops to normal.
  • s ⁇ 2 (n) is the estimated power at time n of the hea ⁇ ng aid mput signal
  • g is the gain in the filter band used to estimate power
  • q is the gam in pole fdter 206
  • q is the maximum safe power level to avoid overflow
  • the adaptive filter update is not performed for that data block. Rather, the filter coefficients are frozen at their cu ⁇ ent level until the high input signal level drops to normal.
  • the magnitude of the step size used in the LMS adaptation is the magnitude of the step size used in the LMS adaptation
  • the 210 can be made dependent on the envelope fluctuations detected in one or more compression bands.
  • a sinusoid will have very little fluctuation in its signal envelope, while noise will typically have large fluctuations.
  • the envelope fluctuations can be estimated by detecting the peaks and valleys of the signal and taking the running difference between these two values. The adaptation step size can then be made smaller as the detected envelope fluctuations decrease.
  • Figure 6 is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid 600 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that feedback cancellation element 650 modifies its operation according to information from compression element 640, and compression element 640 modifies its operation according to information from feedback cancellation 650.

Abstract

The present invention combines audio compression (340, 440, 540, 640) and feedback cancellation (350, 450, 550, 650) in an audio system such as a hearing aid. The feedback cancellation element of the present invention uses one or more filters (206, 212) to model the feedback path (222) of the system and thereby subtract the expected feedback from the audio input signal (100) before hearing aid processing occurs (240). The hearing aid processing includes audio compression, for example multiband compression. The operation of the audio compression element may be responsive to information (406) gleaned from the feedback cancellation element, the feedback cancellation may be responsive to information (506) gleaned from the compression element, or both (606).

Description

APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR COMBINING AUDIO COMPRESSION AND FEEDBACK CANCELLATION IN A HEARING AID
Pending Patent Application Serial Number 08/870,426, filed June 6, 1997 and entitled "Spectral Sampling Multiband Audio Compressor," pending Patent Application Serial Number 08/972,265, filed November 18, 1997 and entitled "Feedback
Cancellation Apparatus and Methods," and pending Patent Application Serial Number 08/540,534, filed October 10, 1995 and entitled "Digital Signal Processing Hearing Aid" are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
HELD OF THE INVENTION:
The present invention relates to apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in audio systems such as hearing aids.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART:
Mechanical and acoustic feedback limits the maximum gain that can be achieved in most hearing aids. System instability caused by feedback is sometimes audible as a continuous high-frequency tone or whistle emanating from the hearing aid. Mechanical vibrations from the receiver in a high-power hearing aid can be reduced by combining the outputs of two receivers mounted back-to-back so as to cancel the net mechanical moment; as much as 10 dB additional gain can be achieved before the onset of oscillation when this is done. But in most instruments, venting the BTE earmold or
ITE shell establishes an acoustic feedback path that limits the maximum possible gain to less than 40 dB for a small vent and even less for large vents. The acoustic feedback path includes the effects of the hearing aid amplifier, receiver, and microphone as well as the vent acoustics. The traditional procedure for increasing the stability of a hearing aid is to reduce the gain at high frequencies. Controlling feedback by modifying the system frequency response, however, means that the desired high-frequency response of the instrument must be sacrificed in order to maintain stability. Phase shifters and notch filters have also been tried, but have not proven to be very effective. A more effective technique is feedback cancellation, in which the feedback signal is estimated and subtracted from the microphone signal. One particularly effective feedback cancellation scheme is disclosed in Patent Application Serial Number 08/972,265, entitled "Feedback Cancellation Apparatus and Methods," incorporated herein by reference. Another technique often used in hearings aids is audio compression of the input signal. Both single band and multiband dynamic range compression is well known in the art of audio processing. Roughly speaking, the purpose of dynamic range compression is to make soft sounds louder without making loud sounds louder (or equivalently, to make loud sounds softer without making soft sounds softer). Therefore, one well known use of dynamic range compression is in hearing aids, where it is desirable to boost low level sounds without making loud sounds even louder.
The purpose of multiband dynamic range compression is to allow compression to be controlled separately in different frequency bands. Thus, high frequency sounds, such as speech consonants, can be made louder while loud environmental noises - rumbles, traffic noise, cocktail party babble - can be attenuated.
Patent Application Serial Number 08/540,534, entitled "Digital Signal Processing Hearing Aid," incorporated herein by reference, gives an extended summary of multiband dynamic range compression techniques with many references to the prior art.
Patent Application Serial Number 08/870,426, entitled "Continuous Frequency Dynamic Range Audio Compressor," incorporated herein by reference, teaches another effective multiband compression scheme.
A need remains in the art for apparatus and methods to combine audio compression and feedback cancellation in audio systems such as hearing aids.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The primary objective of the combined audio compression and feedback cancellation processing of the present invention is to eliminate "whistling" due to feedback in an unstable hearing aid amplification system, while make soft sounds louder without making loud sounds louder, in a selectable manner according to frequency.
The feedback cancellation element of the present invention uses one or more filters to model the feedback path of the system and thereby subtract the expected feedback from the audio signal before hearing aid processing occurs. The hearing aid processing includes audio compression, for example multiband compression.
As features of the present invention, the operation of the audio compression element may be responsive to information gleaned from the feedback cancellation element, the feedback cancellation may be responsive to information gleaned from the compression element, or both.
A hearing aid according to a first embodiment of the present invention comprises a microphone for converting sound into an audio signal, feedback cancellation means including means for estimating a physical feedback signal of the hearing aid, and means for modelling a signal processing feedback signal to compensate for the estimated physical feedback signal, subtracting means, connected to the output of the microphone and the output of the feedback cancellation means, for subtracting the signal processing feedback signal from the audio signal to form a compensated audio signal, a hearing aid processor including audio compression means, connected to the output of the subtracting means, for processing the compensated audio signal, and a speaker, connected to the output of the hearing aid processor, for converting the processed compensated audio signal into a sound signal. In a second embodiment, the feedback cancellation means provides information to the compression means , and the compression means adjusts its operation in accordance with this information. For example, an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector can indicate the presence of an incoming sinusoid, which is likely due to feedback oscillations in the hearing aid. The maximum gain of the audio compression at low levels can be reduced if the feedback cancellation means detects an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector.
In a third embodiment, the compression means provides information, for example input signal power levels at various frequencies, to the feedback cancellation means, and the feedback cancellation element adjusts its operation in accordance with this information. For example, the feedback cancellation adaptation constant can be adjusted based upon the power level of one or more of the frequency bands of the audio compressor. For example, the adaptation time constant of the feedback cancellation element could be adjusted based on the output of one of the compression bands or a weighted combination of two or more bands. In a fourth embodiment, the compression means provides information to the feedback cancellation means, and the feedback cancellation means provides information to the compression means, and each element adjusts its operation in accordance with the information obtained from the other.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 (prior art) is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid incorporating multiband audio compression.
Figure 2 (prior art) is a block diagram showing a hearing aid incorporating feedback cancellation.
Figure 3 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation.
Figure 4 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the compression element modifies its operation according to information from the feedback cancellation. Figure 5 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the feedback cancellation element modifies its operation according to information from the compression element.
Figure 6 is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid according to the present invention, incorporating compression and feedback cancellation, wherein the compression element modifies its operation according to information from the feedback cancellation, and the feedback cancellation element modifies its operation according to information from the compression element.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Figure 1 (prior art) is a flow diagram showing an example of a hearing aid 10 incorporating multiband audio compression 40. This invention is described in detail in Patent Application Serial Number 08/870,426, entitled "Spectral Sampling Multiband Audio Compressor." An audio input signal 52 enters microphone 12, which generates input signal 54. Signal 54 is converted to a digital signal by analog to digital converter 15, which outputs digital signal 56. This invention could be implemented with analog elements as an alternative. Digital signal 56 is received by filter bank 16, which is implemented as a Short Time Fourier Transform system, where the narrow bins of the Fourier Transform are grouped into overlapping sets to form the channels of the filter bank. However, a number of techniques for constructing filter banks in the frequency domain or in the time domain, including Wavelets, FIR filter banks, and IIR filter banks, could be used as the foundation for filter bank design.
Filter bank 16 filters signal 56 into a large number of heavily overlapping bands 58. Each band 58 is fed into a power estimation block 18, which integrates the power of the band and generates a power signal 60. Each power signal 60 is passed to a dynamic range compression gain calculation block, which calculates a gain 62 based upon the power signal 60 according to a predetermined function.
Multipliers 22 multiply each band 58 by its respective gain 62 in order to generate scaled bands 64. Scaled bands 64 are summed in adder 24 to generate output signal 68. Output signal 68 may be provided to a receiver (not shown) in heaπng aid 10 or may be further processed.
Figure 2 (prior art) is a block diagram showing a heaπng aid incorporating feedback cancellation. This invention is descπbed m detail in Patent Application Seπal Number 08/972,265, entitled "Feedback Cancellation Apparatus and Methods. Feedback path modelling 250 includes the running adaptation of the zero filter coefficients. The seπes combination of the frozen pole filter 206 and the zero filter 212 gives a model transfer function G(z) determined duπng start-up. The coefficients of the pole model filter 206 are kept at values established duπng start-up and no further adaptation of these values takes place duπng normal heaπng aid operation. Once the heaπng aid processing is turned, on zero model filter 212 is allowed to continuously adapt in response to changes in the feedback path as will occur, for example, when a telephone handset is brought up to the ear.
Duπng the running processing shown in Figure 2, no separate probe signal is used, since it would be audible to the heaπng aid wearer. The coefficients of zero filter 212 are updated adaptively while the heaπng aid is in use. The output of heaπng aid processing 240 is used as the probe. In order to minimize the computational requirements, the LMS adaptation algoπthm is used by block 210 The adaptation is dπven by eπor signal e(n) which is the output of the summation 208. The inputs to the summation 208 are the signal from the microphone 202, and the feedback cancellation signal produced by the cascade of the delay 214 with the all-pole model filter 206 in seπes with the zero model filter 212. The zero filter coefficients are updated using LMS adaptation m block 210.
Figure 3 is a block diagram showing a heaπng aid 300 according to the present invention, incorporating compression 340 and feedback cancellation 350. Other types of heaπng aid processing, for example direction sensitivity or noise suppression, could also be incorporated into block 340. An example of a compression scheme which could be used is shown in block 40 of Figure 1, but the invention is by no means limited to this particular compression scheme. Many kinds of compression could be used. Similarly, an example of feedback cancellation is shown in block 250 of Figure 2, but many other types of feedback cancellation could be used instead, including algoπthms operating in the frequency domain as well as in the time domain. Microphone 202 converts input sound 100 into an audio signal. Though this is not shown, the audio signal would generally be converted into a digital signal prior to processing. Feedback cancellation means 350 estimates a physical feedback signal of hearing aid 300, and models a signal processing feedback signal to compensate for the estimated physical feedback signal. Subtracting means 208, connected to the output of microphone 202 and the output of feedback cancellation means 350, subtracts the signal processing feedback signal from the audio signal to form a compensated audio signal. Compression processor 340 is connected to the output of subtracting means 208, for processing the compensated audio signal. Speaker 220, connected to amplifier 218 at the output of hearing aid processor 340, converts the processed compensated audio signal into a sound signal. If the processed compensated audio signal is a digital signal, it is converted back to analog (not shown).
Figure 4 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid 400 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that compression element 440 modifies its operation according to information from feedback cancellation 450. Depending upon the type of feedback cancellation, the types of information available and useful to compression block 440 will vary. Taking as an example a feedback cancellation block 450 identical to 250 of Figure 2, the coefficients of zero model 212 will change with time as feedback cancellation 350 attempts to compensation for feedback. Testing one or more of these coefficients to determine whether they are outside expected ranges in magnitude, or are changing faster than expected, gives a clue as to whether feedback cancellation 350 is having difficulty compensating for the feedback. For example, an increase in the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector might indicate the presence of an incoming sinusoid. If it appears that feedback compensation 450 is having trouble compensating for feedback, signal 406 would indicate to compression block 440 to lower gain at low levels, either for all frequencies or for selected frequencies. Thus, if compression block 440 is identical to compression block 100 of Figure 1, signal 406 would be used to generate a control signal for one or more gain calculation blocks 20. For example, the gain for frequencies between 1.5 KHz and 3 KHz might be lowered temporarily, as these are often the frequencies at which hearing aids are unstable. As another example, the kneepoint between the linear amplification function of compression 440 and the compression function at higher signal levels could be moved to a higher signal level. Once the zero model coefficients begin behaving normally, the gain applied by compression 440 can be partially or completely restored to normal. As a third example, the attack and/or release times of the compression 440 could be modified in response to changes in the zero model coefficients. The compressor release time, for example, can be increased when the magnitude of the zero filter coefficient vector increases and returned to its normal value when the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector decreases, thus ensuring that the compression stays at lower gains for a longer period of time when the magnitude of the zero coefficient vector is larger than normal.
Figure 5 is a block diagram showing a hearing aid 500 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that feedback cancellation element 550 modifies its operation according to information from compression element 540. For example, the adaptation time constant of feedback cancellation 550 could be adjusted based on the output of one of the compression bands.
The adaptive filter (zero model 212 in Figure 2) used for feedback cancellation 550 adapts more rapidly and converges to a more accurate solution when the hearing aid input signal is broadband (e.g. White noise) than when it is naπowband (e.g. A tone). Better feedback cancellation system performance can be obtained by reducing the rate of adaptation when a naπowband input signal is detected. The rate of adaptation is directly proportional to the parameter ( in the LMS update equation below. The spectral analysis performed by the multiband compression can be used to determine the approximate bandwidth of the incoming signal. The rate of adaptation for the adaptive feedback cancellation filter weight updates is then decreased (( made smaller) as the estimated input signal bandwidth decreases.
As another example, the magnitude of the step size used in the LMS adaptation 210 (see Figure 2) can be made inversely proportional to the power in one or more compression bands, for example as determined by power estimation blocks 18 (see Figure 1). In this particular example,, the adaptive update of the zero filter weights becomes:
bk( n+ 1 ) = bk( n) + -^—e{ n) d( n-k) , where σ2( n)
(β.+ 1) is the kth zero filter coefficient at time n+ 1 , e(n) is the error signal provided by subtraction means 208, d(n-k) is the input to the adaptive filter at time n delayed by k samples, and sx 2 (n) is the estimated power at time n from compression 540
In particular, the filtered hearing aid input power can be obtained from one of the frequency bands of compression 540 (from one of power estimation blocks 18 shown in Figure 1, for example). This adaptation approach offers the advantage of reduced computational requirements, since the power estimate is already available from compression 540, while giving much faster adaptation at lower signal levels than is possible with a system which does not use power normalization 506. Feedback compensation 550 will also adjust faster when normalized based on compression 540 input power rather than feedback compensation 550 input power, because the latter signal has been compressed, raising the level of less intense signals and thus reducing the adaptation step size after power normalization.
Another example of adjusting feedback compensation 550 operation based upon information from compression 540 is the following. The cross coπelation calculation used in LMS adapt block 210 (see Figure 2) can overflow the accumulator if the input signal to heaπng aid 500 is too high. By testing the power level of the input signal to compression 540, it is possible to determine whether the input signal is high enough to make such an overflow likely, and freeze the filter coefficients until the high input signal level drops to normal.
The test used is whether:
gpσ^( n) < θ, where
sχ 2 (n) is the estimated power at time n of the heaπng aid mput signal, g is the gain in the filter band used to estimate power, q is the gam in pole fdter 206, and q is the maximum safe power level to avoid overflow
If this test is not satisfied, the adaptive filter update is not performed for that data block. Rather, the filter coefficients are frozen at their cuπent level until the high input signal level drops to normal.
As another example, the magnitude of the step size used in the LMS adaptation
210 (see Figure 2) can be made dependent on the envelope fluctuations detected in one or more compression bands. A sinusoid will have very little fluctuation in its signal envelope, while noise will typically have large fluctuations. The envelope fluctuations can be estimated by detecting the peaks and valleys of the signal and taking the running difference between these two values. The adaptation step size can then be made smaller as the detected envelope fluctuations decrease.
8 Figure 6 is a flow diagram showing a hearing aid 600 which is very similar to hearing aid 300 of Figure 3, except that feedback cancellation element 650 modifies its operation according to information from compression element 640, and compression element 640 modifies its operation according to information from feedback cancellation 650.
An example of this is a combination of the processing described in conjunction with Figure 4 with that described in conjunction with Figure 5. The power estimated by the compressor or the detected envelope fluctuations in one or more bands is used to adjust the adaptive weight update, and the magnitude of the zero filter coefficient vector is used to adjust the compression gain or the compression attack and/or release times.
While the exemplary preferred embodiments of the present invention are described herein with particularity, those skilled in the art will appreciate various changes, additions, and applications other than those specifically mentioned, which are within the spirit of this invention. In particular, the present invention has been described with reference to a hearing aid, but the invention would equally applicable to public address systems, telephones, speaker phones, or any other electroacoustical amplification system where feedback is a problem.
What is claimed is:

Claims

1. A hearing aid comprising: a microphone for converting sound into an audio signal; feedback cancellation means including means for estimating a physical feedback signal of the hearing aid, and means for modelling a signal processing feedback signal to compensate for the estimated physical feedback signal; subtraction means, connected to the output of the microphone and the output of the feedback cancellation means, for subtracting the signal processing feedback signal from the audio signal to form a compensated audio signal; hearing aid processing means, connected to the output of the subtractor, for processing the compensated audio signal; and speaker means, connected to the output of the hearing aid processing means, for converting the processed compensated audio signal into a sound signal; wherein said feedback cancellation means forms a feedback path from the output of the hearing aid processing means to the input of the subtracting means; and wherein said hearing aid processing means includes compression means for performing audio compression.
2. The hearing aid of claim 1 , wherein the compression means and the feedback cancellation means operate in the time domain.
3. The hearing aid of claim 1 , wherein the compression means and the feedback cancellation means operate in the frequency domain.
4. The hearing aid of claim 1, wherein the compression means operates in the time domain and the feedback cancellation means operates in the frequency domain.
5. The hearing aid of claim 1 , wherein the compression means operates in the frequency domain and the feedback cancellation means operates in the time domain.
6. The hearing aid of claim 1 , further including means for providing information from the feedback cancellation means to the compression means, and wherein said compression means adjust its operation based upon information provided by the feedback cancellation means.
1 0
7. The hearing aid of claim 6, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the hearing aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the hearing aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies a gain value based on the norm.
8. The hearing aid of claim 6, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the hearing aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the hearing aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies an attack time constant based on the norm.
9. The hearing aid of claim 6, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the hearing aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the hearing aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies a release time constant based on the norm.
10. The hearing aid of claim 1 , further including means for providing information from the compression means to the feedback cancellation means , and wherein said feedback cancellation means adjusts its operation based upon information provided by the compression means.
11. The hearing aid of claim 10, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio signal into frequency bands and means for computing at least one power level for the frequency bands; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed power level provided by the compression means.
12. The hearing aid of claim 10, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio signal into frequency bands and means for computing at least one signal envelope peak to valley ratio for the frequency bands; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed signal envelope peak to valley ratio provided by the compression means.
1 1
13. The heaπng aid of claim 10, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio signal into frequency bands, means for computing a power level for at least one frequency band, and means for computing a signal envelope peak to valley ratio for at least one frequency band; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed power level and at least one computed signal envelope peak to valley ratio provided by the compression means.
14. The heaπng aid of claim 1 , further including means for providing information from the compression means to the feedback cancellation means and from the feedback cancellation means to the compression means, and wherein said feedback cancellation means adjusts its operation based upon information provided by the compression means, and said compression means adjusts its operation based upon information provided by the feedback cancellation means.
15. The heaπng aid of claim 14, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the heaπng aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the heaπng aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies a gain value based on the norm.
16. The heaπng aid of claim 14, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the heaπng aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the heaπng aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies an attack time constant based on the norm.
17. The heaπng aid of claim 14, wherein: the feedback cancellation means includes a zero filter; the heaπng aid includes means for calculating a norm of a vector of coefficients of the heaπng aid cancellation means zero filter; and the compression means modifies a release time constant based on the norm.
18. The heaπng aid of claim 14, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio
1 2 signal into frequency bands and means for computing at least one power level for the frequency bands; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed power level provided by the compression means.
19. The hearing aid of claim 14, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio signal into frequency bands and means for computing at least one signal envelope peak to valley ratio for the frequency bands; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed signal envelope peak to valley ratio provided by the compression means.
20. The hearing aid of claim 14, wherein: the compression means includes means for separating the compensated audio signal into frequency bands, means for computing a power level for at least one frequency band, and means for computing a signal envelope peak to valley ratio for at least one frequency band; and the feedback cancellation means modifies an adaptation step size according to at least one computed power level and at least one computed signal envelope peak to valley ratio provided by the compression means.
1 3
PCT/US1999/006642 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid WO1999051059A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK99914175.7T DK1068773T4 (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and method for combining audio compression and feedback suppression in a hearing aid
AT99914175T ATE286344T1 (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COMBINING AUDIO COMPRESSION AND FEEDBACK CANCELLATION IN A HEARING AID
AU32075/99A AU3207599A (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid
DE69922940.5T DE69922940T3 (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and method for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid
EP99914175.7A EP1068773B2 (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8037698P 1998-04-01 1998-04-01
US60/080,376 1998-04-01
US09/165,825 1998-10-02
US09/165,825 US6434246B1 (en) 1995-10-10 1998-10-02 Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999051059A1 true WO1999051059A1 (en) 1999-10-07

Family

ID=26763435

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/006642 WO1999051059A1 (en) 1998-04-01 1999-03-26 Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US6434246B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1068773B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE286344T1 (en)
AU (1) AU3207599A (en)
DE (1) DE69922940T3 (en)
WO (1) WO1999051059A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2001095578A2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2001-12-13 Phonak Ag Method for verifying the availability of a signal component and device for carrying out said method
US6434247B1 (en) 1999-07-30 2002-08-13 Gn Resound A/S Feedback cancellation apparatus and methods utilizing adaptive reference filter mechanisms
US6650124B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-11-18 Phonak Ag Method for checking an occurrence of a signal component and device to perform the method
EP1453355A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2004-09-01 Bernafon AG Signal processing in a hearing aid
EP1748677A2 (en) 2005-07-25 2007-01-31 Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH Hearing device and method for the adjustment of an amplifying characteristic
EP2506602A3 (en) * 2011-03-31 2015-06-10 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Hearing aid and method for operating the same
EP1191814B2 (en) † 2000-09-25 2015-07-29 Widex A/S A multiband hearing aid with multiband adaptive filters for acoustic feedback suppression.
US9712908B2 (en) 2013-11-05 2017-07-18 Gn Hearing A/S Adaptive residual feedback suppression
US10602282B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2020-03-24 Gn Resound A/S Adaptive feedback gain correction

Families Citing this family (146)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5796842A (en) * 1996-06-07 1998-08-18 That Corporation BTSC encoder
US8908872B2 (en) * 1996-06-07 2014-12-09 That Corporation BTSC encoder
JP4312389B2 (en) * 1998-11-09 2009-08-12 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ Method for measuring, correcting or adjusting the output signal of a hearing aid having a model processor in the field, and a hearing aid for implementing the method
US7117149B1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2006-10-03 Harman Becker Automotive Systems-Wavemakers, Inc. Sound source classification
ATE289152T1 (en) 1999-09-10 2005-02-15 Starkey Lab Inc AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING
US6480610B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2002-11-12 Sonic Innovations, Inc. Subband acoustic feedback cancellation in hearing aids
WO2001050459A1 (en) * 1999-12-31 2001-07-12 Octiv, Inc. Techniques for improving audio clarity and intelligibility at reduced bit rates over a digital network
BR0107191A (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-07-16 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv Methods to estimate a compression gain obtainable in the compression of a given audio signal, to record an audio signal in a recording medium, and to transmit an audio signal, a device for estimating a compression gain obtainable in the compression of a given data audio signal, recording device to record an audio signal on a recording medium, and transmitter to transmit an audio signal
US20020075965A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-06-20 Octiv, Inc. Digital signal processing techniques for improving audio clarity and intelligibility
US6754356B1 (en) * 2000-10-06 2004-06-22 Gn Resound As Two-stage adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing instruments
US20030023429A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2003-01-30 Octiv, Inc. Digital signal processing techniques for improving audio clarity and intelligibility
US7236929B2 (en) * 2001-05-09 2007-06-26 Plantronics, Inc. Echo suppression and speech detection techniques for telephony applications
US7433462B2 (en) * 2002-10-31 2008-10-07 Plantronics, Inc Techniques for improving telephone audio quality
US7725315B2 (en) * 2003-02-21 2010-05-25 Qnx Software Systems (Wavemakers), Inc. Minimization of transient noises in a voice signal
US8073689B2 (en) * 2003-02-21 2011-12-06 Qnx Software Systems Co. Repetitive transient noise removal
US7895036B2 (en) * 2003-02-21 2011-02-22 Qnx Software Systems Co. System for suppressing wind noise
US8326621B2 (en) 2003-02-21 2012-12-04 Qnx Software Systems Limited Repetitive transient noise removal
US7885420B2 (en) * 2003-02-21 2011-02-08 Qnx Software Systems Co. Wind noise suppression system
US7949522B2 (en) 2003-02-21 2011-05-24 Qnx Software Systems Co. System for suppressing rain noise
US8271279B2 (en) 2003-02-21 2012-09-18 Qnx Software Systems Limited Signature noise removal
US7092532B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2006-08-15 Unitron Hearing Ltd. Adaptive feedback canceller
WO2004105430A1 (en) * 2003-05-26 2004-12-02 Dynamic Hearing Pty Ltd Oscillation suppression
US20040240690A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2004-12-02 Blamey Peter J. Oscillation detection
WO2004105429A1 (en) * 2003-05-26 2004-12-02 Dynamic Hearing Pty Ltd Oscillation detection
US7809150B2 (en) * 2003-05-27 2010-10-05 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus to reduce entrainment-related artifacts for hearing assistance systems
AU2003236382B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2011-02-24 Phonak Ag Feedback suppression in sound signal processing using frequency transposition
AU2004201374B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2010-12-23 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
US7756276B2 (en) * 2003-08-20 2010-07-13 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
US7519193B2 (en) * 2003-09-03 2009-04-14 Resistance Technology, Inc. Hearing aid circuit reducing feedback
CN1939092B (en) * 2004-02-20 2015-09-16 Gn瑞声达A/S Eliminate method and the hearing aids of feedback
EP1730992B1 (en) * 2004-03-23 2017-05-10 Oticon A/S Hearing aid with anti feedback system
US7691960B2 (en) * 2004-05-19 2010-04-06 Akzo Nobel N.V. Citric acid based emulsifiers for oilfield applications exhibiting low fluorescence
US20070106530A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2007-05-10 Blamey Peter J Oscillation suppression
US20050285935A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2005-12-29 Octiv, Inc. Personal conferencing node
US20050286443A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2005-12-29 Octiv, Inc. Conferencing system
US7610196B2 (en) * 2004-10-26 2009-10-27 Qnx Software Systems (Wavemakers), Inc. Periodic signal enhancement system
US8543390B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2013-09-24 Qnx Software Systems Limited Multi-channel periodic signal enhancement system
US8170879B2 (en) * 2004-10-26 2012-05-01 Qnx Software Systems Limited Periodic signal enhancement system
US7716046B2 (en) * 2004-10-26 2010-05-11 Qnx Software Systems (Wavemakers), Inc. Advanced periodic signal enhancement
US7949520B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2011-05-24 QNX Software Sytems Co. Adaptive filter pitch extraction
US8306821B2 (en) * 2004-10-26 2012-11-06 Qnx Software Systems Limited Sub-band periodic signal enhancement system
US7680652B2 (en) 2004-10-26 2010-03-16 Qnx Software Systems (Wavemakers), Inc. Periodic signal enhancement system
DE102004053776B4 (en) * 2004-11-08 2007-10-31 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Method for amplifying an acoustic signal and corresponding acoustic system
US8284947B2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2012-10-09 Qnx Software Systems Limited Reverberation estimation and suppression system
US8027833B2 (en) 2005-05-09 2011-09-27 Qnx Software Systems Co. System for suppressing passing tire hiss
US8311819B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2012-11-13 Qnx Software Systems Limited System for detecting speech with background voice estimates and noise estimates
US8170875B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2012-05-01 Qnx Software Systems Limited Speech end-pointer
US8553899B2 (en) * 2006-03-13 2013-10-08 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Output phase modulation entrainment containment for digital filters
US8116473B2 (en) 2006-03-13 2012-02-14 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Output phase modulation entrainment containment for digital filters
US7844453B2 (en) 2006-05-12 2010-11-30 Qnx Software Systems Co. Robust noise estimation
WO2008051570A1 (en) 2006-10-23 2008-05-02 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Entrainment avoidance with an auto regressive filter
EP2077061A2 (en) 2006-10-23 2009-07-08 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Entrainment avoidance with pole stabilization
DK2095681T5 (en) * 2006-10-23 2016-07-25 Starkey Labs Inc AVOIDING FILTER DRIVING WITH A FREQUENCY DOMAIN TRANSFORMATION ALgorithm
US8326620B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2012-12-04 Qnx Software Systems Limited Robust downlink speech and noise detector
US8335685B2 (en) * 2006-12-22 2012-12-18 Qnx Software Systems Limited Ambient noise compensation system robust to high excitation noise
US20080231557A1 (en) * 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Leadis Technology, Inc. Emission control in aged active matrix oled display using voltage ratio or current ratio
US8904400B2 (en) * 2007-09-11 2014-12-02 2236008 Ontario Inc. Processing system having a partitioning component for resource partitioning
US8850154B2 (en) 2007-09-11 2014-09-30 2236008 Ontario Inc. Processing system having memory partitioning
US8694310B2 (en) 2007-09-17 2014-04-08 Qnx Software Systems Limited Remote control server protocol system
WO2009049320A1 (en) 2007-10-12 2009-04-16 Earlens Corporation Multifunction system and method for integrated hearing and communiction with noise cancellation and feedback management
US9082397B2 (en) * 2007-11-06 2015-07-14 Nokia Technologies Oy Encoder
WO2009059631A1 (en) * 2007-11-06 2009-05-14 Nokia Corporation Audio coding apparatus and method thereof
US8209514B2 (en) * 2008-02-04 2012-06-26 Qnx Software Systems Limited Media processing system having resource partitioning
BRPI0915203A2 (en) 2008-06-17 2016-02-16 Earlens Corp device, system and method for transmitting an audio signal, and device and method for stimulating a target tissue
KR20110086804A (en) 2008-09-22 2011-08-01 사운드빔, 엘엘씨 Balanced armature devices and methods for hearing
DE102009014540A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2010-10-07 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Method for operating a hearing device with increased feedback compensation and hearing device
DE102009018812B4 (en) 2009-04-24 2015-05-28 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Method for operating a hearing device and hearing device with a crossover network
DE102009021310B4 (en) 2009-05-14 2011-02-24 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Binaural hearing apparatus and method for operating a binaural hearing apparatus with frequency distortion
US8355517B1 (en) 2009-09-30 2013-01-15 Intricon Corporation Hearing aid circuit with feedback transition adjustment
US8659170B2 (en) * 2010-01-20 2014-02-25 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Semiconductor device having conductive pads and a method of manufacturing the same
DE102010006154B4 (en) * 2010-01-29 2012-01-19 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Hearing aid with frequency shift and associated method
US9654885B2 (en) 2010-04-13 2017-05-16 Starkey Laboratories, Inc. Methods and apparatus for allocating feedback cancellation resources for hearing assistance devices
US8903109B2 (en) * 2010-06-23 2014-12-02 Stmicroelectronics, Inc. Frequency domain multiband dynamics compressor with automatically adjusting frequency band boundary locations
US8634578B2 (en) 2010-06-23 2014-01-21 Stmicroelectronics, Inc. Multiband dynamics compressor with spectral balance compensation
US9142207B2 (en) 2010-12-03 2015-09-22 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Oversight control of an adaptive noise canceler in a personal audio device
US8908877B2 (en) 2010-12-03 2014-12-09 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Ear-coupling detection and adjustment of adaptive response in noise-canceling in personal audio devices
EP2656639B1 (en) 2010-12-20 2020-05-13 Earlens Corporation Anatomically customized ear canal hearing apparatus
US9214150B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2015-12-15 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Continuous adaptation of secondary path adaptive response in noise-canceling personal audio devices
US9076431B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2015-07-07 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Filter architecture for an adaptive noise canceler in a personal audio device
US9824677B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2017-11-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US8848936B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2014-09-30 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Speaker damage prevention in adaptive noise-canceling personal audio devices
US8958571B2 (en) * 2011-06-03 2015-02-17 Cirrus Logic, Inc. MIC covering detection in personal audio devices
US8948407B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2015-02-03 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US9318094B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2016-04-19 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Adaptive noise canceling architecture for a personal audio device
US9325821B1 (en) * 2011-09-30 2016-04-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Sidetone management in an adaptive noise canceling (ANC) system including secondary path modeling
EP2590436B1 (en) * 2011-11-01 2014-05-14 Phonak AG Binaural hearing device and method to operate the hearing device
WO2013067145A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2013-05-10 Northeastern University Systems and methods for enhancing place-of-articulation features in frequency-lowered speech
US9014387B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2015-04-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Coordinated control of adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) among earspeaker channels
US9142205B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2015-09-22 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Leakage-modeling adaptive noise canceling for earspeakers
US9076427B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2015-07-07 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Error-signal content controlled adaptation of secondary and leakage path models in noise-canceling personal audio devices
US9319781B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2016-04-19 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Frequency and direction-dependent ambient sound handling in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US9123321B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2015-09-01 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Sequenced adaptation of anti-noise generator response and secondary path response in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9082387B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2015-07-14 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Noise burst adaptation of secondary path adaptive response in noise-canceling personal audio devices
US9318090B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2016-04-19 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Downlink tone detection and adaptation of a secondary path response model in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9532139B1 (en) 2012-09-14 2016-12-27 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Dual-microphone frequency amplitude response self-calibration
US9107010B2 (en) 2013-02-08 2015-08-11 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Ambient noise root mean square (RMS) detector
US9369798B1 (en) 2013-03-12 2016-06-14 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Internal dynamic range control in an adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) system
US9106989B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-08-11 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Adaptive-noise canceling (ANC) effectiveness estimation and correction in a personal audio device
US9414150B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-08-09 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Low-latency multi-driver adaptive noise canceling (ANC) system for a personal audio device
US9215749B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-12-15 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Reducing an acoustic intensity vector with adaptive noise cancellation with two error microphones
US9208771B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-12-08 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Ambient noise-based adaptation of secondary path adaptive response in noise-canceling personal audio devices
US9635480B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-04-25 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Speaker impedance monitoring
US9502020B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-11-22 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Robust adaptive noise canceling (ANC) in a personal audio device
US9467776B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-10-11 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Monitoring of speaker impedance to detect pressure applied between mobile device and ear
US20140270291A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Mark C. Flynn Fitting a Bilateral Hearing Prosthesis System
US10206032B2 (en) 2013-04-10 2019-02-12 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for multi-mode adaptive noise cancellation for audio headsets
US9066176B2 (en) 2013-04-15 2015-06-23 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive noise cancellation including dynamic bias of coefficients of an adaptive noise cancellation system
US9462376B2 (en) 2013-04-16 2016-10-04 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for hybrid adaptive noise cancellation
US9478210B2 (en) 2013-04-17 2016-10-25 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for hybrid adaptive noise cancellation
US9460701B2 (en) 2013-04-17 2016-10-04 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive noise cancellation by biasing anti-noise level
US9578432B1 (en) 2013-04-24 2017-02-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Metric and tool to evaluate secondary path design in adaptive noise cancellation systems
US9264808B2 (en) 2013-06-14 2016-02-16 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for detection and cancellation of narrow-band noise
US9392364B1 (en) 2013-08-15 2016-07-12 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Virtual microphone for adaptive noise cancellation in personal audio devices
US9666176B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2017-05-30 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive noise cancellation by adaptively shaping internal white noise to train a secondary path
US9620101B1 (en) 2013-10-08 2017-04-11 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for maintaining playback fidelity in an audio system with adaptive noise cancellation
US10219071B2 (en) 2013-12-10 2019-02-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation
US9704472B2 (en) 2013-12-10 2017-07-11 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for sharing secondary path information between audio channels in an adaptive noise cancellation system
US10382864B2 (en) 2013-12-10 2019-08-13 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for providing adaptive playback equalization in an audio device
US9369557B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2016-06-14 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Frequency-dependent sidetone calibration
US9479860B2 (en) 2014-03-07 2016-10-25 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for enhancing performance of audio transducer based on detection of transducer status
US9648410B1 (en) 2014-03-12 2017-05-09 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Control of audio output of headphone earbuds based on the environment around the headphone earbuds
US10034103B2 (en) 2014-03-18 2018-07-24 Earlens Corporation High fidelity and reduced feedback contact hearing apparatus and methods
US9319784B2 (en) 2014-04-14 2016-04-19 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Frequency-shaped noise-based adaptation of secondary path adaptive response in noise-canceling personal audio devices
US9997171B2 (en) * 2014-05-01 2018-06-12 Gn Hearing A/S Multi-band signal processor for digital audio signals
JP6351538B2 (en) * 2014-05-01 2018-07-04 ジーエヌ ヒアリング エー／エスＧＮ Ｈｅａｒｉｎｇ Ａ／Ｓ Multiband signal processor for digital acoustic signals.
US9609416B2 (en) 2014-06-09 2017-03-28 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Headphone responsive to optical signaling
US10181315B2 (en) 2014-06-13 2019-01-15 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for selectively enabling and disabling adaptation of an adaptive noise cancellation system
EP3169396B1 (en) 2014-07-14 2021-04-21 Earlens Corporation Sliding bias and peak limiting for optical hearing devices
US9478212B1 (en) 2014-09-03 2016-10-25 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for use of adaptive secondary path estimate to control equalization in an audio device
US9924276B2 (en) 2014-11-26 2018-03-20 Earlens Corporation Adjustable venting for hearing instruments
US9552805B2 (en) 2014-12-19 2017-01-24 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for performance and stability control for feedback adaptive noise cancellation
US10026388B2 (en) 2015-08-20 2018-07-17 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Feedback adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) controller and method having a feedback response partially provided by a fixed-response filter
US9578415B1 (en) 2015-08-21 2017-02-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Hybrid adaptive noise cancellation system with filtered error microphone signal
DK3139636T3 (en) * 2015-09-07 2019-12-09 Bernafon Ag HEARING DEVICE, INCLUDING A BACKUP REPRESSION SYSTEM BASED ON SIGNAL ENERGY LOCATION
DK3355801T3 (en) 2015-10-02 2021-06-21 Earlens Corp Adapted ear canal device for drug delivery
US10178483B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2019-01-08 Earlens Corporation Light based hearing systems, apparatus, and methods
US11350226B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2022-05-31 Earlens Corporation Charging protocol for rechargeable hearing systems
US10492010B2 (en) 2015-12-30 2019-11-26 Earlens Corporations Damping in contact hearing systems
US10013966B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2018-07-03 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive active noise cancellation for multiple-driver personal audio device
CN109952771A (en) 2016-09-09 2019-06-28 伊尔兰斯公司 Contact hearing system, device and method
WO2018093733A1 (en) 2016-11-15 2018-05-24 Earlens Corporation Improved impression procedure
US10751524B2 (en) * 2017-06-15 2020-08-25 Cochlear Limited Interference suppression in tissue-stimulating prostheses
WO2019173470A1 (en) 2018-03-07 2019-09-12 Earlens Corporation Contact hearing device and retention structure materials
WO2019199680A1 (en) 2018-04-09 2019-10-17 Earlens Corporation Dynamic filter
WO2020078521A1 (en) * 2018-10-14 2020-04-23 Al Shalash Taha Kais Taha Enhance the contrast between the peaks and valleys in speech spectrum
DK3955594T3 (en) * 2020-08-10 2023-07-03 Oticon As FEEDBACK CONTROL USING A CORRELATION MEASURE

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4852175A (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-07-25 Siemens Hearing Instr Inc Hearing aid signal-processing system
US4879749A (en) * 1986-06-26 1989-11-07 Audimax, Inc. Host controller for programmable digital hearing aid system
EP0415677A2 (en) * 1989-08-30 1991-03-06 Gn Danavox A/S Hearing aid having compensation for acoustic feedback
US5027410A (en) * 1988-11-10 1991-06-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Adaptive, programmable signal processing and filtering for hearing aids

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3894195A (en) * 1974-06-12 1975-07-08 Karl D Kryter Method of and apparatus for aiding hearing and the like
US3947636A (en) * 1974-08-12 1976-03-30 Edgar Albert D Transient noise filter employing crosscorrelation to detect noise and autocorrelation to replace the noisey segment
US4689818A (en) 1983-04-28 1987-08-25 Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc. Resonant peak control
US4718099A (en) * 1986-01-29 1988-01-05 Telex Communications, Inc. Automatic gain control for hearing aid
US4731850A (en) 1986-06-26 1988-03-15 Audimax, Inc. Programmable digital hearing aid system
US5016280A (en) 1988-03-23 1991-05-14 Central Institute For The Deaf Electronic filters, hearing aids and methods
US5091952A (en) † 1988-11-10 1992-02-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Feedback suppression in digital signal processing hearing aids
US5019952A (en) 1989-11-20 1991-05-28 General Electric Company AC to DC power conversion circuit with low harmonic distortion
DK170600B1 (en) † 1992-03-31 1995-11-06 Gn Danavox As Hearing aid with compensation for acoustic feedback
DK169958B1 (en) † 1992-10-20 1995-04-10 Gn Danavox As Hearing aid with compensation for acoustic feedback
US5500902A (en) 1994-07-08 1996-03-19 Stockham, Jr.; Thomas G. Hearing aid device incorporating signal processing techniques
EP0855129A1 (en) * 1995-10-10 1998-07-29 AudioLogic, Incorporated Digital signal processing hearing aid with processing strategy selection
US6097824A (en) * 1997-06-06 2000-08-01 Audiologic, Incorporated Continuous frequency dynamic range audio compressor
US6072884A (en) * 1997-11-18 2000-06-06 Audiologic Hearing Systems Lp Feedback cancellation apparatus and methods

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4879749A (en) * 1986-06-26 1989-11-07 Audimax, Inc. Host controller for programmable digital hearing aid system
US4852175A (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-07-25 Siemens Hearing Instr Inc Hearing aid signal-processing system
US5027410A (en) * 1988-11-10 1991-06-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Adaptive, programmable signal processing and filtering for hearing aids
EP0415677A2 (en) * 1989-08-30 1991-03-06 Gn Danavox A/S Hearing aid having compensation for acoustic feedback

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
KATES J M: "FEEDBACK CANCELLATION IN HEARING AIDS: RESULTS FROM A COMPUTER SIMULATION", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, vol. 39, no. 3, 1 March 1991 (1991-03-01), pages 553 - 562, XP000224129, ISSN: 1053-587X *
KATES J M: "OPTIMAL ESTIMATION OF HEARING-AID COMPRESSION PARAMETERS", JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, vol. 94, no. 1, 1 July 1993 (1993-07-01), pages 1 - 12, XP000383978, ISSN: 0001-4966 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6434247B1 (en) 1999-07-30 2002-08-13 Gn Resound A/S Feedback cancellation apparatus and methods utilizing adaptive reference filter mechanisms
EP1191814B2 (en) † 2000-09-25 2015-07-29 Widex A/S A multiband hearing aid with multiband adaptive filters for acoustic feedback suppression.
WO2001095578A2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2001-12-13 Phonak Ag Method for verifying the availability of a signal component and device for carrying out said method
WO2001095578A3 (en) * 2001-10-05 2002-12-19 Phonak Ag Method for verifying the availability of a signal component and device for carrying out said method
US6650124B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-11-18 Phonak Ag Method for checking an occurrence of a signal component and device to perform the method
EP1453355A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2004-09-01 Bernafon AG Signal processing in a hearing aid
AU2004200726B2 (en) * 2003-02-26 2008-12-11 Bernafon Ag Signal processing in a hearing aid
EP1748677A2 (en) 2005-07-25 2007-01-31 Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH Hearing device and method for the adjustment of an amplifying characteristic
EP1748677A3 (en) * 2005-07-25 2009-10-21 Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH Hearing device and method for the adjustment of an amplifying characteristic
US10602282B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2020-03-24 Gn Resound A/S Adaptive feedback gain correction
EP2506602A3 (en) * 2011-03-31 2015-06-10 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Hearing aid and method for operating the same
US9712908B2 (en) 2013-11-05 2017-07-18 Gn Hearing A/S Adaptive residual feedback suppression

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1068773A1 (en) 2001-01-17
EP1068773B1 (en) 2004-12-29
DE69922940T3 (en) 2018-01-11
EP1068773B2 (en) 2017-07-12
US20020094100A1 (en) 2002-07-18
AU3207599A (en) 1999-10-18
ATE286344T1 (en) 2005-01-15
DE69922940D1 (en) 2005-02-03
DE69922940T2 (en) 2005-12-29
US6434246B1 (en) 2002-08-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1068773B1 (en) Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid
US6072884A (en) Feedback cancellation apparatus and methods
EP1228665B1 (en) Feedback cancellation apparatus and methods utilizing an adaptive reference filter
US6219427B1 (en) Feedback cancellation improvements
US6498858B2 (en) Feedback cancellation improvements
US6831986B2 (en) Feedback cancellation in a hearing aid with reduced sensitivity to low-frequency tonal inputs
US7933424B2 (en) Hearing aid comprising adaptive feedback suppression system
US7974428B2 (en) Hearing aid with acoustic feedback suppression
US9628923B2 (en) Feedback suppression
US10117029B2 (en) Method of operating a hearing aid system and a hearing aid system
US9712908B2 (en) Adaptive residual feedback suppression
DK1068773T4 (en) Apparatus and method for combining audio compression and feedback suppression in a hearing aid
KR100363252B1 (en) Adaptive feedback cancellation apparatus and method for multi-band compression hearing aids
JP3084883B2 (en) Noise reduction device
US20240129659A1 (en) Noise canceling audio headset
CN117177120A (en) Noise-reducing audio earphone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999914175

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999914175

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1999914175

Country of ref document: EP