|Número de publicación||WO2000029855 A1|
|Tipo de publicación||Solicitud|
|Número de solicitud||PCT/US1999/023460|
|Fecha de publicación||25 May 2000|
|Fecha de presentación||6 Oct 1999|
|Fecha de prioridad||14 Oct 1998|
|Número de publicación||PCT/1999/23460, PCT/US/1999/023460, PCT/US/1999/23460, PCT/US/99/023460, PCT/US/99/23460, PCT/US1999/023460, PCT/US1999/23460, PCT/US1999023460, PCT/US199923460, PCT/US99/023460, PCT/US99/23460, PCT/US99023460, PCT/US9923460, WO 0029855 A1, WO 0029855A1, WO 2000/029855 A1, WO 2000029855 A1, WO 2000029855A1, WO-A1-0029855, WO-A1-2000029855, WO0029855 A1, WO0029855A1, WO2000/029855A1, WO2000029855 A1, WO2000029855A1|
|Inventores||Ying W. Hsu, John W. Reeds, Iii, Christ H. Saunders|
|Solicitante||Irvine Sensors Corporation|
|Exportar cita||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citas de patentes (5), Citada por (15), Clasificaciones (3), Eventos legales (4)|
|Enlaces externos: Patentscope, Espacenet|
Multi-Element Micro Gyro
Background of the Invention This invention relates to sensing devices which utilize the gyroscopic principle, i.e., measuring the Coriolis force created by the conservation of momentum of a moving body. Specifically, the invention concerns devices called micro-gyros, which are small and inexpensive. They rely on conservation of momentum of a structure having limited oscillation motion, rather than full rotation. They are able to withstand rough environments for long periods of time. In this field, the terms used to describe the directions of motions and of forces can be confusing. Applicant in describing and claiming the present invention will refer to the three separate directions (which are orthogonally related to one another) as follows: (a) the driven element, which is cause to oscillate at a predetermined, arbitrary rate inside the gyro, moves around the drive axis; (b) the velocity of the gyro environment, which is to be determined by the gyro, is around the rate axis; and (c) the Coriolis force, which is a function of the velocity of the gyro environment, is measured by motion of a sensing element around the output axis. A number of patents have been issued to the Charles Draper Laboratory for such micro-gyro sensors, including Patents 5,016,072; 5,203,208;5,349,855; 5,408,877; 5,535,902; and 5,555,765. The earliest of the listed Draper patents refers to U.S. Pat. No. 4,598,585 to Boxenhom, which discloses a planar micro-mechanical vibratory gyroscope adapted for small geometry configurations which may be constructed using semiconductor fabrication mass production techniques. In Draper Pat. 5,016,072, a single element mass is supported by a system of flexible linkages, made of semiconductor material, to allow for movement in two axes. A system of electrodes drives the mass to vibrate in one axis, and senses the motion of the mass due to Coriolis force in another axis. In another patent issued to Draper, patent 5,203,208, the same concept is extended to a symmetrical support linkage system. Draper Patent 5,349,855 is another micro gyro design wherein an element mass is supported by a system of flexures. The element is driven laterally, and reacts rotationally due to Coriolis force. Patent 5,408,877 issued to Draper relies on moving a single proof mass along one linear axis, and senses the motion of the same element along an orthogonal axis due to Coriolis force. Draper Patent 5,555,765 shows a micro gyro using a single mass element formed into the shape of a wheel. By oscillating the wheel mass, a rotation about an axis normal to the plane of the wheel will create Coriolis force that will tilt the wheel. Patent 5,359,893 issued to Motorola uses a pair of elements supported in an H-shape linkage frame so that angular velocity can be measured in two perpendicular axes. Patent 5,488,862 of Neukermans et al involves a design with an outer torsional frame that is excited to tilt about an axis in the plane of the frame; an inner frame responds to the Coriolis force by oscillating (and carrying with it the outer frame) in an axis orthogonal to the outer frame axis. Both the drive and the sensing mechanisms rely on piezo-voltage actuators and sensors mounted on the hinges. In addition to the listed patents, substantial micro-gyro work has been done by the Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center. There are several significant defects in the prior art micro-gyros. With the exception of patent #5,488,862, reliance is on a single mass element for both driving and sensing functions. This coupling of the driving and output motion severely limits the sensitivity of the gyro. For example, as the single element is driven to vibrate, a key parameter that affects the driving mechanism is the alignment between the element and the drive electrodes. In the presence of an angular rate, the Coriolis force will create a secondary motion on the same element, thereby disturbing the alignment between the mass and the driving electrodes. Complex control schemes are necessary to compensate for such undesirable motions. Furthermore, with only a single mass element, it is difficult to match the two resonant frequencies. Corrections are limited to support linkages only; any correction made to the mass element will alter both driving and output resonance simultaneously. Another complication is that the proximity of a single element to multiple electrodes leads to stray capacitance and coupled electric fields that are significant sources of electrical noise. In patent 5,488,862, although two elements are used, the design does not allow for independent movement of each element. The outer frame is rigidly connected to the inner frame, so that the two frames essentially behave as a single mass element. When the inner frame rotates, the outer frame rotates with it. Another shortcoming in that design is that the outer frame has severely limited movement, due to typically very small thickness spaces (usually micro meters) in micromachining. The limited rotation of the frame results in low angular momentum, and hence low gyro sensitivity. In all prior art designs there is also a lack of ability to electronically correct for imbalances of the system due to manufacturing tolerances. The problem is worsened by the use of a single element for drive and output motions. Since the same physical element is driven and sensed, due to mechanical coupling any forces used to balance the mass will often generate undesirable signals that corrupt the intended signal. For the same reason, self-testing of the micro gyro in prior art designs is very difficult.
Summary of the Invention The present invention essentially separates the mass (momentum of inertia) of the constant motion element driven to oscillate around the drive axis from the mass (momentum of inertia) of the variable motion sensing element which creates the measured force. This may be accomplished using: (a) an outer ring-shaped element which oscillates around the drive axis, and (b) an inner disk-shaped element which oscillates, or rocks, around the output axis as a result of the Coriolis effect. The torque around the output axis may be measured by any suitable means, such as capacitance, magnetic force, piezoelectric or piezorestive effect, or optical signals. The dual-element configuration permits matching of the resonant frequency of the ring in its oscillation with the resonant frequency of the disk in its rocking. The dual-element structure also permits the ring and the disk to be excited independently, so that each can be dynamically compensated for manufacturing tolerances by counterbalancing. The sensing element, e.g., the disk, may be supported by a pair of hinges, or flexures, that permit tilting about an axis formed by these hinges. The hinges are connected to posts, or anchors which support the entire device on a substrate. The hinges provide mechanical isolation of the gyro from the stresses in the substrate. The design of the anchor hinges can be modified to accommodate either single or dual-axis sensing. The essential separation of the driven element from the sensing element may also be accomplished using outer and inner rectangular-shaped elements, which are caused to move, respectively, in linear directions along two orthogonal directions.
Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 is an isometric view of the two internally movable parts of a micro-gyro; Figure 2 is an isometric view of the substrate which supports the structure shown in Figure 1 ; Figure 3 is a plan view of the micro-gyro of Figures 1 and 2, showing a block diagram of the electrical circuitry which connects to the micro-gyro parts and electrodes; Figure 4 is a plan view enlargement of a portion of the micro-gyro; Figure 5 is a section on the line 5-5 of Figure 4; Figure 6 is a plan view of a micro-gyro so mounted that it can sense rates in either of two axes; Figure 7 is an isometric exploded view of an alternative micro-gyro design; Figure 8 is an isometric exploded view of a micro-gyro design similar to Figure 7, in which rate can be sensed in either of two axes; and Figure 9 is a plan view of another alternative micro-gyro design.
Detailed Description of Specific Embodiments Figures 1 and 2 are isometric views showing a micro-gyro device. Figure 1 shows first and second elements in the micro-gyro, which are movable within the gyro around different axes, the first moving in a vibrating, or oscillating, mode around the drive axis to create a constant driving momentum. The second moves around an output axis normal to the drive axis, in response to the Coriolis force. Figure 2 shows the substrate, or platform, which supports the first and second elements, and which moves as part of the entire micro-gyro under the influence of external motion which is the value being measured. This external motion is around the rate axis. Figure 3 is a plan view of the two elements shown in Figure 1 , with an electrical diagram added. The elements of the micro-gyro and the substrate may be formed of silicon chip material (or other easily shaped, inexpensive material). An outer ring-shaped element 20 is used as the driving element, and an inner disk-shaped element 22 is used as the sensing element. The elements 20 and 22 have essentially independent motion around different axes. The outer element 20 is caused to oscillate at a predetermined rate around a drive axis 21 , which is perpendicular to the plane of the micro-gyro. The inner element 22 is caused by Coriolis force to oscillate, or rock, around an output axis 24, which is in the plane of the gyro elements. The two element gyro is supported on a substrate 26, on which two anchor posts 28 and 30 are mounted. The inner disk element 22 is pivotally mounted on anchors posts 28 and 30 by means of aligned hinges 32 and 34, and is caused by Coriolis force to oscillate, or attempt to oscillate, around the output axis 24. The two anchors 28 and 30 support the disk and ring structures 20 and 22, and also space the movable elements 20 and 22 from the substrate 26. The inner element 22 is connected to the outer element 20 by means of a plurality of spokes, or flexures, 36. The preferred number of spokes is four, as shown. Each spoke 36 is 45 from the output axis 24, and also 45 from the rate axis 40, which is the axis of motion of the external velocity being measured. The spokes 36 are very narrow (e.g., three microns), and are quite long, so they do not restrict the movement of the sensing element 22, and permit essentially free relative movement of the sensing element 22 and the driving element 20. The spokes 36 transfer the Coriolis force from the outer element 20 to the inner element 22. The disk has four notches 37 to accommodate the desired length of spokes 36. A plurality of thin links, or flexures, are used to connect each anchor 28 and 30 to the inner element 22. in the drawing, three such links are shown at 32 connecting anchor 28 to inner element 22, and three such links are shown at 34 connecting anchor 30 to inner element 22. The slender links provide maximum mechanical isolation of the gyro elements 22 and 20 from the substrate 26. The triangular arrangement of the three link structures at each anchor provides the best combination of (a) high resistance to motion of disk element 22 around the drive axis 21 , with (b) low, or soft, resistance to motion of disk element 22 around the output axis 24. The ring element 20 can be caused to oscillate by different means, e.g., electrostatic, magnetic, piezoelectric. As shown, its oscillation is caused by electrostatic forces acting on a plurality of short arms, or protrusions, 44 extending outwardly from the ring element 20. Four such arms are shown, each located in line with one of the spokes 36. Each of the arms 44 interacts with, and is caused to oscillate by, a pair of electrode pads 46 and 48 mounted on the substrate 26 in proximity to the respective arm. Figure 4 is a plan view enlargement of the electrode driving arrangement; and Figure 5 is a cross-section taken on line 5-5 of Figure 4. To maximize the available oscillating force a plurality of laterally extending fingers 50 extend from each side of each arm, and are interleaved with a plurality of fingers 52 extending from the adjacent electrode pad 46 or 48. The two interleaved sets of fingers 50 and 52 do not engage one another, but are located as close as feasible, in order to maximize effectiveness of the electrostatic forces. As shown the fingers 52 extending from electrodes 46 and 48 are located in the same plane as the fingers 50 extending from each arm 44, because each electrode pad is mounted on a spacer 54 between the respective electrode pad 46 or 48 and the substrate 26. The ring element 20 is excited to oscillate about its center (drive) axis 21. The radial spokes 36 accommodate this motion by bending slightly; the same spokes also provide the mechanical spring force that returns the ring element 20 to its initial position. When the substrate 26 is stationary with no external rotation, the ring element will oscillate, and the disk element 22 will remain stationary. When the substrate is rotated by a rate (Ω) about the rate axis 40, the Coriolis force generated
by the ring 20 and the rotational rate (Ω) will cause the disk 22 to vibrate about the
sense (output) axis 24, formed by the anchor hinges 32 and 34. The anchor hinges are preferably a triangular three-flexure structure to enhance the resistance to torsional loads from the oscillating ring element 20. By operating near the resonant frequencies, and matching the frequencies of the ring 20 (around axis 21) and of the disk 22 (around axis 24), the energy is efficiently transferred from the ring to the disk, and the small Coriolis forces are effectively measured. By detecting the motion of the disk 22, the Coriolis, hence rate Ω, can be determined. When the disk 22 rocks,
the supporting anchor hinges bend slightly to permit a small rotation of the disk about the output axis 24. The oscillation of ring element 20 may be established by applying a differential voltage between the fingers 50 connected to the ring element and the fingers 52 connected to the electrical pads mounted on the substrate. By alternating the potential on the electrode pads 46 and 48, ring element 20 can be driven into oscillation around its axis 21 , i.e., motion of each arm 44 back and forth between electrode pads 46 and 48. The output, or sensed, value is detected by measuring the rocking motion of disk-element 22 around its axis 24. There are several ways for sensing such movement. Available methods include measuring changes in capacitance, piezo-electric, magnetic, and optical. In the preferred embodiment, capacitance is used as the sensing medium. In Figure 2, electrodes 60 and 62 on substrate 26 are used to detect the change in capacitance when the disk 22 oscillates. The disk 22 and the electrodes 60 and 62 form pairs of parallel capacitors; when the distance between the disk and the electrode changes, the value of capacitance also changes. This capacitance change can be measured by using electrical circuits known to those skilled in the art. The two sensing electrodes 60 and 62 operate in the opposite sense, i.e., when one capacitor increases, the other decreases. The opposite sensing capacitors provide a way to accomplish differential sensing, which results in improved sensitivity. In the differential mode, as opposed to the absolute mode, the effects of environment and electrical noise are drastically reduced, because these effects are canceled out. All effects that affect both capacitors are eliminated from the sensing circuit.
The micro-gyro can be operated in two different modes: open- loop, or closed-loop. In the open-loop mode, the disk 22 is free to rotate whenever a Coriolis force is generated. The amplitude of the disk movement is the measure of the rate. In the closed-loop mode, the disk 22 is actively maintained in a known position (null), through the use of feedback and a mechanism for forcing the disk 22 into the null position. In closed-loop mode, the electrical voltage (or current) necessary to counteract the Coriolis force becomes the measure of rate. In closed- loop, the sensitivity of the micro gyro is not changed, but the maximum rate detectable is greatly increased, and time needed for detection is significantly reduced. In Figure 2, electrodes 64 and 66 are the rebalancing electrodes. In operation, an electrical potential is applied to the rebalancing electrodes and the disk 22. The voltage necessary to maintain the disk in the null position is controlled, based on the feedback from the main sensing electrodes 60 and 62.
The combination of the sensing electrodes 60 and 62 and rebalancing electrodes 64 and 66 also provides a means for self-testing the micro gyro. To do so, the rebalancing electrodes 64 and 66 are intentionally injected with a voltage that tilts the disk 22. The resulting movement can be verified with the sensing electrodes 60 and 62. The measured change, for example in capacitance value, can be compared to the values stored in memory for acceptable values obtained during calibration. In this manner, the sensor can be tested at the start of every application. The self-testing capability is particularly crucial for applications where high reliability and safety are involved.
The micro-gyro also incorporates a feature for correcting the imbalances due to manufacturing tolerances. For example, due to tolerances, the disk 22 may not be exactly situated on the center defined by the anchor hinges 28 and 30. This imbalance can generate an offset in the output signal that reduces the gyro detection range. Correction electrodes 68 and 70 function in the same manner as the rebalancing electrodes 64 and 66, except that the correction electrodes are used to correct for imperfections in the structure due to manufacturing tolerances. Another application of the correction electrodes 68 and 70 is for frequency matching. By providing a small force opposing the disk movement, the resonant frequency of the disk can be adjusted. Mechanical and electrical adjustments in the design can be used for frequency matching. Mechanical adjustments may be made by changing slightly the geometry of flexures 32, 34 and 36. Electrical adjustments for disk 22 may be made by pulling it down electrostatically to pre-load the flexures 32 and 34. Electrical adjustments for ring 20 may be made by using a bias in the voltage used to drive the comb, i.e., the fingers 50. Figure 2 also shows terminal pads which connect to separate electrodes on the substrate 26, and which are available for wire bond connecting to circuitry external to the micro-gyro. Current microelectronic manufacturing techniques also permit integration of the gyro sensing elements and electronic circuitry onto a monolithic substrate. Figure 3 is a plan view of the micro-gyro, together with a block diagram of the electrical system which interacts with the micro-gyro. The electrodes 46 and 48 shown in Figure 2 are arranged in pairs adjacent to each of the four arms, or protrusions, 44, and are connected to eight terminal pads 72 on substrate 26. The sensing electrodes 60 and 62 on substrate 26 are connected, respectively, to two terminals pads 74. The rebalancing electrodes 64 and 66 are connected, respectively, to two terminal pads 76. The correction electrodes 68 and 70 are connected, respectively, to two terminal pads 78. The ring 20 and the disk 22 are connected to a constant voltage through the anchors 28 and 30. A reference voltage, e.g., 5 volts is maintained in the disk 22 and ring 20. The voltages on the electrodes 46 and 48, which are used to drive the ring into oscillation, are alternated at each electrode between values above and below the 5 volt reference value. For example, an 8 volt range may be used, from 1 volt to 9 volts. When the four electrodes 46 are at 1 volt, the four electrodes 48 are at 9 volts. These values are reversed at a frequency which causes the ring 20 to oscillate at or near its resonant frequency. The ratio of the mass of ring 20 to the mass of disk 22, or more correctly the ratio of the momentum of inertia of ring 20 (around axis 21) to the momentum of inertia of disk 22 (around axis 24), are designed to have both the ring and disk vibrating at or near their resonant frequencies, whenever the micro-gyro is creating a Coriolis force which is to be measured. The force acting on the disk 22, tending to cause its rocking, or vibratory, motion is detected by the electrodes 60 and 62. And their capacitance values are countered by electrodes 64 and 66, in order to maintain the disk 22 essentially in null position, while sensing the value of the Coriolis force. In Figure 3, the electrodes 60 and 62, 64 and 66, and 68 and 70 are shown in dashed lines below the disk 22. In the block diagram at the right of the figure, drive control circuitry to oscillate the ring 20 is indicated at 80. It receives input signals on line 81 , and sends control signals to the electrode pads 46 and 48. The sensing amplifier circuitry is indicated at 82; it is shown receiving signals from electrodes 60 and 62 and outputting signals through A to D circuitry at 84 to line 85. The force rebalancing circuitry is indicated at 86, with control signals entering on line 87, and with its output signals feeding to the balancing electrodes 64 and 66. The dynamic compensation circuitry is indicated at 88, with its entering signals from memory circuitry indicated at 89, and its output signals feeding to the correction electrodes 68 and 70. In Figure 2, a ground-connected rectangular pad (electrode) 90 at the center of the substrate serves as a ground shield to minimize noise and maximize sensitivity at the sensing electrodes. Because the substrate 26 is formed of silicon material, it is necessary to provide a thin insulating layer, e.g., silicon nitride material, between the substrate and the electrically conducting portions of the micro-gyro (anchors, disk, ring, sensing electrodes). It is important to minimize the mechanical interconnection between the gyroscopic ring element and the output sensing disk element. However, the Coriolis effect has to be transmitted from the ring to the disk, and the ring relies for its support above the substrate on the anchors of the disk. The vibratory oscillating motion of the ring 20 around drive axis 21 does not move the disk 22 around that axis; and the vibratory rocking motion of the disk 22 around the output (sensing) axis 24 does not move the ring 20 around that axis. Any energy tending to create such undesired motions is absorbed in the structure with substantially no effect. The important effect transmitted between the ring and disk is the Coriolis force which causes the disk 22 to vibrate around output axis 24. That force is caused by coexistence of (a) motion of the entire micro-gyro around the rate axis 40, and (b) the momentum of inertia of the ring 20 around drive axis 21. The vibration of ring 20 around drive axis 21 should be at its resonant frequency; and the vibration of disk 22 around output axis 24 should be at the same resonant frequency. In the experimental tests of the micro-gyro shown in Figures 1- 5, that resonant frequency (both elements) is approximately 2800 hertz. The resonant frequency of ring 20 is obtained by means of the electrical alternation of voltages. The resonant frequency of disk 22 is obtained by adjustment of the mechanical design of the micro-gyro components. The most effective way of fine- tuning the mechanical design to cause matching resonant frequencies of the elements 20 and 22 is working with the flexures (or hinges) 32 and 34 which connect element 22 to its anchors, and with the flexures (or spokes) 36 which connect element 20 to element 22. Adjusting the sizes of the flexures 32, 34, and 36 provides a simple and effective way of matching the resonant frequencies of elements 20 and 22. Various other micro-gyro designs can provide the desired mechanical isolation of the part moving around the drive axis from the part moving around the output axis, except for the transmission of Coriolis force. Figure 6 illustrates a micro-gyro in which a disk 22a is mounted so it can sense rates in two axes. This is accomplished by using two sets of anchors. Anchors 100 and 102 provide an axis 104, around which the disk 22a may rock. Anchors 106 and 108 provide an axis 110, at right angles to axis 104, around which disk 22a may rock. Each of the four anchors is mechanically connected to the disk by an axially-extending pivot link, or flexure, 112. Note that the single flexure 112 is wider than each of the three triangulated flexures 32 or 34 in Figure 1. Figure 7 shows an alternative design, in which the outer elements, which vibrates around the drive axis, is positioned above or below, but preferably above, the inner element, which rocks around the output axis. As in the previous designs, the outer element 120 is in the form of a ring. But the inner element 122 is a rectangular plate. When ring 120 is driven into oscillation about the center hub, four radial spokes, or flexures, 124 bend slightly to accommodate the motion. The radial spokes 124 are connected to a center post 126 that is secured to the rectangular plate 122. The plate 122 will oscillate due to Coriolis force when the device is rotated. Electrodes 128 and 130 are used to provide an electrostatic force to move the ring 120. Sensing electrodes 132 and 134 are placed on the substrate underneath the plate 122 to sense the output motion. Electrodes 133 and 135 are used for rebalancing. The plate 122 connects to the substrate 136 through anchors 138 and 140. The main advantage of the two-tier design in Figure 7 is that, by placing the elements over each other, the finished design uses the area more efficiently and results in a more compact device. Another benefit of the two-tier approach is further decoupling of the drive element 120 and output element 122. The radial spokes, or flexures, 124 have less restraining effect on the movement of the output element 122. Figure 8 shows an alternative design for the two-tier micro-gyro that permits rate sensing in two-axes. This is accomplished by changing the design of the output plate 122a. It is provided with four support hinges 142, which permit plate 122a to rock about either of the two orthogonal axes 144 or 146. Four sensing electrodes 148 are placed underneath the plate 122a to detect the output motion. Figure 9 shows yet another design that uses separate elements for drive and sense motions. In this arrangement, a ring element 150 is supported on WO 00/29855 χ η PCTAJS99/23460
four radial spokes, or flexures, 152, and is driven into oscillation by electrostatic forces. The four output (sensing) elements 154 are positioned on the perimeter of the ring element 150; these elements are supported by flexures so designed that they move up and down. Underneath the output elements 154 are sensing electrodes 156 and rebalancing electrodes 158. The key advantage of this arrangement is that the size of the sensing electrodes can be made very large to increase the sensitivity of the device. From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that the apparatus disclosed in this application will provide the significant functional benefits summarized in the introductory portion of the specification. The following claims are intended not only to cover the specific embodiments disclosed, but also to cover the inventive concepts explained herein with the maximum breadth and comprehensiveness permitted by the prior art.
|Patente citada||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|US5377544 *||19 Dic 1991||3 Ene 1995||Motorola, Inc.||Rotational vibration gyroscope|
|US5408877 *||16 Mar 1992||25 Abr 1995||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Micromechanical gyroscopic transducer with improved drive and sense capabilities|
|US5635640 *||6 Jun 1995||3 Jun 1997||Analog Devices, Inc.||Micromachined device with rotationally vibrated masses|
|US5650568 *||12 May 1995||22 Jul 1997||The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Gimballed vibrating wheel gyroscope having strain relief features|
|US5955668 *||5 Oct 1998||21 Sep 1999||Irvine Sensors Corporation||Multi-element micro gyro|
|Patente citante||Fecha de presentación||Fecha de publicación||Solicitante||Título|
|WO2002016871A1 *||14 Ago 2001||28 Feb 2002||Hahn-Schickard Gesellschaft Für Angewandte Forschung E.V.||Rotation speed sensor and rotation speed sensor system|
|DE10162947B4 *||20 Dic 2001||14 Ene 2010||DENSO CORPORATION, Kariya-shi||Eine Halbleitervorrichtung mit Abschirmung|
|DE102007035806A1 *||31 Jul 2007||12 Feb 2009||Sd Sensordynamics Ag||Mikromechanischer Drehratensensor|
|DE102007035806B4 *||31 Jul 2007||17 Mar 2011||Sensordynamics Ag||Mikromechanischer Drehratensensor|
|DE102008002748A1 *||27 Jun 2008||31 Dic 2009||Sensordynamics Ag||Mikro-Gyroskop|
|EP1407279A1 *||26 Jun 2002||14 Abr 2004||Microsensors Inc.||A method of designing a flexure system for tuning the modal response of a decoupled micromachined gyroscope and a gyroscope disigned according to the method|
|EP1407279A4 *||26 Jun 2002||11 Nov 2009||Aprolase Dev Co Llc||A method of designing a flexure system for tuning the modal response of a decoupled micromachined gyroscope and a gyroscope disigned according to the method|
|EP1832841A1 *||10 Mar 2006||12 Sep 2007||SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS S.r.l.||Microelectromechanical integrated sensor structure with rotary driving motion|
|US6766689||23 Abr 2002||27 Jul 2004||Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.||Integrated gyroscope of semiconductor material|
|US6928872||21 May 2003||16 Ago 2005||Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.||Integrated gyroscope of semiconductor material with at least one sensitive axis in the sensor plane|
|US7694563||9 Mar 2007||13 Abr 2010||Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.||Microelectromechanical integrated sensor structure with rotary driving motion|
|US8353212||31 Jul 2008||15 Ene 2013||Maxim Integrated Products Gmbh||Micromechanical rate-of-rotation sensor|
|US8429970||25 Jun 2009||30 Abr 2013||Maxim Integrated Products Gmbh||Microgyroscope|
|USRE45792||24 Oct 2013||3 Nov 2015||Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.||High sensitivity microelectromechanical sensor with driving motion|
|USRE45855||24 Oct 2013||19 Ene 2016||Stmicroelectronics S.R.L.||Microelectromechanical sensor with improved mechanical decoupling of sensing and driving modes|
|25 May 2000||AK||Designated states|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): JP
|25 May 2000||AL||Designated countries for regional patents|
Kind code of ref document: A1
Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE
|19 Jul 2000||121||Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application|
|5 Sep 2001||122||Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase|