WO2000045477A9 - Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers - Google Patents

Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers

Info

Publication number
WO2000045477A9
WO2000045477A9 PCT/US2000/001721 US0001721W WO0045477A9 WO 2000045477 A9 WO2000045477 A9 WO 2000045477A9 US 0001721 W US0001721 W US 0001721W WO 0045477 A9 WO0045477 A9 WO 0045477A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
laser
waveguide
glass
waveguides
lasers
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/001721
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000045477A1 (en
Inventor
Joseph S Hayden
David L Veasey
Original Assignee
Schott Glass Tech Inc
Us Commerce
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schott Glass Tech Inc, Us Commerce filed Critical Schott Glass Tech Inc
Priority to AT00919256T priority Critical patent/ATE464682T1/en
Priority to DE60044182T priority patent/DE60044182D1/de
Priority to EP00919256A priority patent/EP1153461B1/en
Priority to JP2000596633A priority patent/JP4832644B2/en
Publication of WO2000045477A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000045477A1/en
Publication of WO2000045477A9 publication Critical patent/WO2000045477A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C4/00Compositions for glass with special properties
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/12004Combinations of two or more optical elements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/12007Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind forming wavelength selective elements, e.g. multiplexer, demultiplexer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/122Basic optical elements, e.g. light-guiding paths
    • G02B6/124Geodesic lenses or integrated gratings
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/122Basic optical elements, e.g. light-guiding paths
    • G02B6/125Bends, branchings or intersections
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/13Integrated optical circuits characterised by the manufacturing method
    • G02B6/134Integrated optical circuits characterised by the manufacturing method by substitution by dopant atoms
    • G02B6/1345Integrated optical circuits characterised by the manufacturing method by substitution by dopant atoms using ion exchange
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/255Splicing of light guides, e.g. by fusion or bonding
    • G02B6/2551Splicing of light guides, e.g. by fusion or bonding using thermal methods, e.g. fusion welding by arc discharge, laser beam, plasma torch
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/06Construction or shape of active medium
    • H01S3/063Waveguide lasers, i.e. whereby the dimensions of the waveguide are of the order of the light wavelength
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/06Construction or shape of active medium
    • H01S3/063Waveguide lasers, i.e. whereby the dimensions of the waveguide are of the order of the light wavelength
    • H01S3/0632Thin film lasers in which light propagates in the plane of the thin film
    • H01S3/0635Thin film lasers in which light propagates in the plane of the thin film provided with a periodic structure, e.g. using distributed feed-back, grating couplers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/06Construction or shape of active medium
    • H01S3/063Waveguide lasers, i.e. whereby the dimensions of the waveguide are of the order of the light wavelength
    • H01S3/0632Thin film lasers in which light propagates in the plane of the thin film
    • H01S3/0637Integrated lateral waveguide, e.g. the active waveguide is integrated on a substrate made by Si on insulator technology (Si/SiO2)
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/09Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping
    • H01S3/091Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping
    • H01S3/094Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light
    • H01S3/0941Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light of a laser diode
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/10Controlling the intensity, frequency, phase, polarisation or direction of the emitted radiation, e.g. switching, gating, modulating or demodulating
    • H01S3/105Controlling the intensity, frequency, phase, polarisation or direction of the emitted radiation, e.g. switching, gating, modulating or demodulating by controlling the mutual position or the reflecting properties of the reflectors of the cavity, e.g. by controlling the cavity length
    • H01S3/1055Controlling the intensity, frequency, phase, polarisation or direction of the emitted radiation, e.g. switching, gating, modulating or demodulating by controlling the mutual position or the reflecting properties of the reflectors of the cavity, e.g. by controlling the cavity length one of the reflectors being constituted by a diffraction grating
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/23Arrangements of two or more lasers not provided for in groups H01S3/02 - H01S3/22, e.g. tandem arrangements of separate active media
    • H01S3/2383Parallel arrangements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B2006/12083Constructional arrangements
    • G02B2006/12107Grating
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B2006/12083Constructional arrangements
    • G02B2006/12121Laser
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B2006/12133Functions
    • G02B2006/1215Splitter
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B2006/12166Manufacturing methods
    • G02B2006/12183Ion-exchange
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/30Optical coupling means for use between fibre and thin-film device
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/26Optical coupling means
    • G02B6/35Optical coupling means having switching means
    • G02B6/3502Optical coupling means having switching means involving direct waveguide displacement, e.g. cantilever type waveguide displacement involving waveguide bending, or displacing an interposed waveguide between stationary waveguides
    • G02B6/3508Lateral or transverse displacement of the whole waveguides, e.g. by varying the distance between opposed waveguide ends, or by mutual lateral displacement of opposed waveguide ends
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/24Coupling light guides
    • G02B6/42Coupling light guides with opto-electronic elements
    • G02B6/4201Packages, e.g. shape, construction, internal or external details
    • G02B6/4249Packages, e.g. shape, construction, internal or external details comprising arrays of active devices and fibres
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S2302/00Amplification / lasing wavelength
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/06Construction or shape of active medium
    • H01S3/0619Coatings, e.g. AR, HR, passivation layer
    • H01S3/0621Coatings on the end-faces, e.g. input/output surfaces of the laser light
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/06Construction or shape of active medium
    • H01S3/063Waveguide lasers, i.e. whereby the dimensions of the waveguide are of the order of the light wavelength
    • H01S3/0632Thin film lasers in which light propagates in the plane of the thin film
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/05Construction or shape of optical resonators; Accommodation of active medium therein; Shape of active medium
    • H01S3/08Construction or shape of optical resonators or components thereof
    • H01S3/08086Multiple-wavelength emission
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/09Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping
    • H01S3/091Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping
    • H01S3/094Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light
    • H01S3/094049Guiding of the pump light
    • H01S3/094053Fibre coupled pump, e.g. delivering pump light using a fibre or a fibre bundle
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/09Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping
    • H01S3/091Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping
    • H01S3/094Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light
    • H01S3/094084Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light with pump light recycling, i.e. with reinjection of the unused pump light, e.g. by reflectors or circulators
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/09Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping
    • H01S3/091Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping
    • H01S3/094Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light
    • H01S3/0941Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light of a laser diode
    • H01S3/09415Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping using optical pumping by coherent light of a laser diode the pumping beam being parallel to the lasing mode of the pumped medium, e.g. end-pumping
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/1601Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion
    • H01S3/1603Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth
    • H01S3/1608Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth erbium
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/1601Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion
    • H01S3/1603Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth
    • H01S3/1611Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth neodymium
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/1601Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion
    • H01S3/1603Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth
    • H01S3/1618Solid materials characterised by an active (lasing) ion rare earth ytterbium
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/17Solid materials amorphous, e.g. glass
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/17Solid materials amorphous, e.g. glass
    • H01S3/175Solid materials amorphous, e.g. glass phosphate glass
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/14Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range characterised by the material used as the active medium
    • H01S3/16Solid materials
    • H01S3/17Solid materials amorphous, e.g. glass
    • H01S3/176Solid materials amorphous, e.g. glass silica or silicate glass
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S3/00Lasers, i.e. devices using stimulated emission of electromagnetic radiation in the infrared, visible or ultraviolet wave range
    • H01S3/23Arrangements of two or more lasers not provided for in groups H01S3/02 - H01S3/22, e.g. tandem arrangements of separate active media
    • H01S3/2383Parallel arrangements
    • H01S3/2391Parallel arrangements emitting at different wavelengths
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/06Arrangements for controlling the laser output parameters, e.g. by operating on the active medium
    • H01S5/065Mode locking; Mode suppression; Mode selection ; Self pulsating
    • H01S5/0651Mode control
    • H01S5/0653Mode suppression, e.g. specific multimode
    • H01S5/0654Single longitudinal mode emission

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of optics and lasers, and more specifically to a method and apparatus of integrating one or more optical waveguides on a glass substrate and of forming lasers therein.
  • optical fibers The telecommunications industry commonly uses optical fibers to transmit large amounts of data in a short time.
  • One common light source for optical-fiber communications systems is a laser formed using erbium-doped glass.
  • One such system uses erbium-doped glass fibers to form a laser that emits at a wavelength of about 1.536 micrometer and is pumped by an infra-red source operating at a wavelength of about 0.98 micrometer.
  • One method usable for forming waveguides in a glass substrate is described in U.S. Patent 5,080,503 issued Jan. 14, 1992 to Najafi et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • a phosphate glass useful for lasers is described in
  • the invention provides, among its embodiments, a system and method for forming an optical system including a high-powered laser on a glass substrate, and a resulting glass-substrate-based optical system and method for operating the optical system.
  • the invention is further directed to methods for forming optical waveguides on glass substrates, including: forming substrates with multiple waveguides and including wherein at least two of the multiple waveguides have differing wavelengths.
  • Further embodiments of the invention provide a laser component that includes a glass substrate doped with a laser species and having one or more, preferably multiple, waveguides defined by channels within the substrate.
  • a “channel within the substrate” is meant to broadly include any channel formed on or in the substrate, whether or not covered by another structure or layer of substrate.
  • Each substrate waveguide (or “channel") is defined within the substrate as a region of increased index of refraction relative to the substrate.
  • the glass substrate is doped with a laser species which can be optically pumped (preferably a rare-earth element such as Er, Yb, Nd, Ho, Tm, Sm, Tb, Dy or Pr or a combination of such elements such as Er and Yb) to form a laser medium which is capable of lasing at a plurality of frequencies.
  • Mirrors or distributed Bragg reflection gratings may be located along the length of a waveguide for providing feedback to create a laser-resonator cavity. One or more of the mirrors or reflection gratings is made partially reflective for providing laser output.
  • the laser component may constitute a monolithic array of individual waveguides in which the waveguides of the array form laser resonator cavities with differing resonance characteristics (e.g., resonating at differing wavelengths).
  • the component may thus be used as part of a laser system that outputs laser light at a plurality of selected wavelengths.
  • the resonance characteristics of a waveguide cavity are varied by adjusting the width of the channel formed in the substrate which thereby changes the effective refractive index of the waveguide.
  • the effective refractive index can be changed by modifying the diffusion conditions under which the waveguides are formed as described below. Changing the effective refractive index thus changes the effective length of the waveguide cavity which determines the wavelengths of the longitudinal modes supported by the cavity.
  • the resonance characteristics of the waveguide cavities are individually selected by varying the pitch of the reflection gratings used to define the cavities which, along with the effective refractive index for the propagated optical mode, determines the wavelengths of light reflected by the gratings.
  • the location of the gratings on the waveguides is varied in order to select a laser-resonator cavity length that supports the desired wavelength of light.
  • the waveguide or multiple waveguides, optionally as part of a laser element are constructed from a glass substrate which is a phosphate alkali glass doped with a rare-earth element such as Er or Yb/Er.
  • the Yb/Er ratio is from approximately 1:1 to 8:1, particularly 3:1 to 8:1. This has been discovered as a result of investigation as to the optimal erbium and ytterbium rare earth ion concentrations in rare earth doped laser glasses, in particular as erbium and ytterbium 1.54 ⁇ m laser sources and amplifiers employed in the fields of telecommunication and data transmission.
  • erbium/ytterbium doped glasses for such applications were typically characterized by low erbium concentration (generally much less than 1 wt% Er 2 O 3 content) with a corresponding high ytterbium content (typically at a ion ratio of greater than 10 ytterbium ions for each erbium ion input to the glass); such glasses are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559 and U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708.
  • Such high levels of Yb were initially expected to yield high output powers and high slope efficiency based on prior experience with silicate and phosphate glass formulations, see for example U.S. Patent No. 4,962,067.
  • glasses with a Yb/Er rare earth content of from about 1:1 to 8:1 demonstrated a higher output power (up to 180 mW compared to a prior high of only 16 mW) and higher slope efficiency (of at least 28% compared to a prior high of only 27%).
  • Yb 2 O 3 with different hydroxyl content were prepared.
  • the residual hydroxyl content in these glasses is proportional to the measured infrared absorption at 3.0um and is detailed in Table 1.
  • melt NIST-IH and NIST-1L were characterized by an absorption at 3. Oum below 2.0cm 1 , a level expected to be low enough not to significantly influence laser performance.
  • the absorption level in melt NIST-1L was less than 1.0cm "1 , a threshold value below which the prior art has shown is not an issue in evaluating laser performance of a given laser glass, see Cook, L.M. et al, Proc SPIE Vol. 505, pp 102-111 (1984).
  • The cross relaxation efficiency, ⁇ , of ytterbium to erbium ion in the glass was estimated by the inventors to be given by, where ⁇ Yb - Er is the measured lifetime of the Yb 3+ 2 F 5/2 level in a codoped sample with Er (measured at 1.79xl0 "3 seconds) and ⁇ Yb is the measured lifetime of Yb 34" 2 F 5/2 level in a sample with no erbium (measured at 1.37xl0 "3 seconds). The value of ⁇ was thus calculated to be 0.87. Additional description of this modeling method, but applied to silicate glasses having greatly inferior laser properties, is provided in the SPIE article provided as Paper E in the attached Appendix which is incorporated by reference.
  • the doping selection modeling method provided the following conclusions: as more Yb is incorporated into a glass with a constant Er concentration, the average distance between Er ions and Yb ions decreases, thus causing a rise in the cross relaxation efficiency of Yb-Er energy transfer.
  • the disadvantage of this is that more of the pump power is absorbed in a shorter distance. The result is that less Er ions will be inverted in a certain length, thus there will be less gain available as well as additional reabsorption loss in the 3-level Er ion laser system. Laser performance will suffer. The penalty will be higher thresholds and lower slope efficiencies. To obtain the best possible performance, both the Yb-Er cross relaxation and the total number of inverted ions as a function of pump power must be optimized simultaneously.
  • the modeling pointed to a glass doped with 1.15 wt% Er 2 O 3 and 4.73 wt% Yb 2 O 3 with an Er concentration of lxlO 20 ions/cm 3 .
  • Er concentrations up to 6 x 10 20 ions/cm 3 can be used, the total doping concentration is constrained only by the solubility for rare earths within the glass host, the levels as high as 10 x 10 20 rare earth ions per cm 3 are known, see U.S. Pat.
  • the lasers of this invention have output power that is limited only by the available pump power, up to values that can exceed 20 mW, e.g. , 25-180 mW. Such power levels allow the use of glass waveguide lasers in metropolitan area networks without the need for expensive optical amplifiers in the network. The advantages are shown particularly for lasers having a length of 15 mm or less.
  • the doping level, i.e., concentration, of Er ions is from > 0 up to 5 or 6 x 10 20 ions/cm 3 and the Er/Yb ratio is about 4:1.
  • ratio's of aboutl, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 or 8 to 1 can be useful.
  • improved ion exchange methods are used to create channels defining the waveguides in the glass substrate.
  • a surface of the glass substrate is exposed to an ion-exchange solvent through a mask layer having one or more line apertures corresponding to the channel or channels (for multiple waveguide embodiments).
  • Processing steps include the generation of waveguides within the glass substrate using K+-Na+ ion exchange through channel apertures fabricated by standard microlithographic techniques.
  • KNO 3 solvent can be used applied through an aluminum mask layer to perform the K+-Na+ ion exchange.
  • the exchange of K+ for Na+ ions in the substrate produces a channel in the exposed portion of higher refractive index than the remainder of the substrate, thus, defining a waveguide.
  • nitrate melts of of any mixture of the following nitrate salts lithium nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, rubidium nitrate, cesium nitrate, copper nitrate, silver nitrate and thallium nitrate, for example, can be used for the ion- exchange to provide the waveguide.
  • the inventors have discovered that the glass is etched significantly when exchange is done in an aluminum crucible in the open atmosphere of box oven. Therefore, according to the invention, it was discovered that performing the ion- exchange in a borosilicate, e.g., pyrex, crucible, as opposed to an aluminum crucible, greatly reduced the amount of surface attack and etching of the phosphate glasses caused by the KNO 3 ion-exchange melt. Further, improved control of the water content of the melt by baking the KNO 3 at a temperature of 120°C or more, preferably about 120 °C, for a period of 24-48 hours in an inert argon atmosphere was achieved.
  • a borosilicate e.g., pyrex
  • the ion-exchange process results in a slightly buried waveguide with the highest index in the waveguide occurring slightly below the surface. This provides the additional advantage of reducing scattering loss. This advantage can be even further enhanced to provide a channel with a shape and size optimized for laser operation by conducting a field assisted ion-exchange process using an electric field, particularly an electric field varied as a function of time wgere the electric field is applied using a liquid sodium nitrate electrode or a solid silver electrode.
  • the temperature can also be varied as a function of time for further tailoring of the index profile within the waveguide.
  • lasers prepared from ion-exchanged waveguides can achieve a high power of over 20 mW, particularly 25 to 180 mW and a high slope efficiency of 28% or higher (previous state-of-the-art in phosphate glass was 16 mW power and 27% slope efficiency by D. Barbier, et al., at Conference on Optical amplifiers and applications, 1995). Further, a high coupling efficiency of pump light from the optical fiber is enabled by the low index change caused by potassium-sodium ion exchange. High coupling efficiency of signal light to the optical fiber is also achieved due to the low index change caused by potassium-sodium ion exchange.
  • Glasses used as substrates for the above ion-exchange methods include sodium- aluminum-phosphate formulations such as the composition described above, additional glasses are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559 and U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708. Particular applicability is found with glass formulations identified above in the category of rare earth doped sodium-aluminum-phosphate compositions, in particular having the Er/Yb ratio described above.
  • Rare earth ions of choice include erbium and ytterbium, resulting in compatibility with currently commercially available, inexpensive, semiconductor pump lasers and emission within the telecommunications wavelength region about 1.5 ⁇ m, particularly 1.54 ⁇ m, ytterbium alone to result in laser sources at 1.0 ⁇ m, for use in standardized clock apparatus, and neodymium to result in preparing laser sources for small, localized optical networks at 1.06 ⁇ m and optical sensors and for gas detection.
  • further examples of useful devices for the described ion-exchange process include glasses doped with other rare earth ions, for example, Pr lasers, Ho lasers, Tm lasers, as well as Dy, Sm, Eu and Tb lasers. Representative wavelengths are listed below in Table 4, see, also, Emmett, et al., Physics of Laser Fusion, Vol. IN, "The future development of high-power solid state laser systems", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-53344, November
  • processing conditions that allow successful fabrication of waveguide structures in phosphate glass substrates by ion exchange technology without the substrate exhibiting signs of chemical attack that influence waveguide integrity or quality are described.
  • This embodiment of the invention relates to waveguide lasers that are capable of high power operation and that exhibit low pumping threshold levels and high slope efficiency.
  • These waveguides are prepared in rare earth doped phosphate laser glasses using ion exchange technology.
  • Two basic technologies are commonly employed. In the first, ions of one type are exchanged for ions of another type within selected regions of a glass surface. The ions are selected such that the refractive index within the desired waveguide is higher than in the surrounding substrate glass.
  • the ion source is from a molten bath, often described as a salt batch, into which the glass is submerged.
  • Common salt baths contain alkali salts such as potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, and/or other salts such as silver nitrate.
  • a second criteria in salt bath identity selection is to select ions that are highly mobile within the glass structure and offer melting points consistent with acceptable diffusion rates and melting points of the employed salts.
  • the ions to be placed into the glass are first applied as a solid to one or more glass surfaces. Electrodes are then placed onto the glass surfaces (in some cases the ion source can also act as an electrode, for example in the case of silver ion exchange) and an electric field through the glass then assists in driving the ion exchange process. Additionally, both types of ion-exchange techniques can be conducted to provide the desired waveguides.
  • Glasses used as substrates for the lasers of this invention are of a sodium- aluminum-phosphate formulation such as the compositions listed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559.
  • a simple example of waveguide fabrication to produce a waveguide laser in phosphate glass is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708.
  • Phosphate glasses are typically characterized by inferior chemical durability, and are particularly susceptible to attack by acidic solutions and by direct water attack. This can be demonstrated by a review of chemical resistance tests on common commercial phosphate glasses, see for example the Schott Optical Glass Catalog. Water, although not strongly acidic in nature, attacks the phosphorous sites within the glass structure leading to the formation of a phosphoric acid film on glass surfaces which are then responsible for acid attack of the remaining glass.
  • Phosphate glasses also have inferior resistance to alkali. Examples of this phenomena are demonstrated in the Laser Glass Brochure from Schott. All of the phosphate laser glasses in the brochure have inferior alkali resistance when compared to the silicate laser glasses listed in the same brochure. Any OH existing in a salt bath can combine with the alkali ions present, such as K + and/or Na + , and form an alkaline solution that will attack the surface of a phosphate glass submerged in the salt bath for ion exchange.
  • SGT Schott Glass Technologies
  • phosphate glasses developed for this work are designed to exhibit good chemical durability and have been characterized to offer superior chemical durability than conventional state-of-the-art phosphate optical glasses, the need for further improvement was identified. Particularly, it had been observed that resultant waveguides were of poor optical quality. In particular, glass surfaces were observed to be stained with a white appearance to the eye. In addition, sections of the waveguides were found to exhibit at various times the following defects: a) narrowing of the waveguide width at unpredictable locations, b) widening of the waveguide at unpredictable locations (independent of other defects), and c) depressed regions relative to the surrounding, unexchanged, glass substrate.
  • a second source of water is the ambient air within the ion exchange furnace.
  • effective corrective actions discussed were: purging the oven environment (preferably prior to, but also during salt bath insertion) while at elevated temperatures with a dry gas and isolation of the salt bath from the environment (since the refractory within most furnaces acts as a sponge for atmospheric water during periods of inactivity that is later released upon application of high temperature to the furnace).
  • a third source of OH groups can be actual adsorbed water on the surface of the glass part to be treated.
  • Phosphate glasses are known to adsorb water onto their surfaces from the atmosphere. Diffusion coefficients for water into phosphate glasses have been evaluated at several orders of magnitude higher than silicate glasses for the same measurement temperature. Such surface absorbed water can provide hydroxyl that can further re-react with glass surfaces during later processing, for example during field assisted ion exchange.
  • the ion exchange oven would be equipped with gas purge lines to pressurize the oven for purposes of moisture removal. Care would be taken to purge the oven before insertion of the salt bath since the oven refractory were considered as a major moisture source when heated.
  • a fixture would be designed to allow placement and or removal of a preheated glass plate into a preheated and presumably dry salt bath without opening the oven to the surrounding ambient air within the ion exchange laboratory. This step would provide an opportunity to keep the glass/salt bath system isolated from room air during the entire course of the ion exchange process.
  • a substrate containing multiple waveguides can be provided by photolithographic techniques and ion-exchange methods discussed above. Both involve applying a mask over the substrate to define the channels which will constitute the waveguide. By applying a mask with multiple channels over the substrate, a substrate with multiple waveguides therein can be formed. Additionally, multiple waveguides having differing refractive indices, and thus capable of providing lasing at differing wavelengths when incorporated in a laser device, can be formed by applying a mask which defines channels of differing width.
  • the resulting waveguides formed by photolithography or ion-exchange techniques will have differing widths and thus differing refractive indices and can, thus, be used in a laser device to provide a laser capable of operation at differing wavelengths depending upon which waveguide is pumped.
  • the waveguides form laser-resonator cavities with distinct resonance characteristics to provide a distinct lasing action at a selected wavelength when pumped.
  • These waveguides can also be modified in any of the manners discussed above and below to vary their properties.
  • the substrates used to provide the multiple waveguide devices are preferably based on the glasses discussed above.
  • Another embodiment of the invention is directed to modifying or tuning the wavelengths of a waveguide or waveguides in a substrate.
  • heating can be done by heating of the substrate which will alter the wavelengths of the waveguides therein.
  • the substrate containing waveguide(s) is part of a laser device, it was expected that the heating thereof would increase the wavelength of the laser due to expansion of the diffraction grating periodicity. What the inventors have discovered, however, is that for substrates containing solid state waveguides provided as channels in the substrate, as discussed above, heating has a fine tuning effect on altering the wavelength of the waveguide.
  • the increase of wavelength upon heating of laser devices with waveguides according to this invention is significantly lower as a function of the temperature, e.g., the increase of wavelength as a function of temperature is roughly 15 times lower than that for semiconductor DFB lasers.
  • the inventors have discovered that while heating expands the glass increasing the wavelength, the extent of increase is offset by the temperature effecting a decrease of the refractive index with temperature of the glass forming the waveguide(s).
  • JNCS Journal of Non-Crystalline solids
  • active waveguide devices either having one or multiple waveguides, that employ regions of active (for example, rare earth doped) and passive (for example lanthanum doped) glass sections. This is preferably done by preparing the active and passive sections separately and bonding them together. Examples of the sections to be bonded together include the single or multiple waveguide devices discussed above. There are a number of techniques possible to complete the bonding operation, including the use of UN or thermally curable epoxy adhesives available on the open market. There are other techniques that do not require adhesive materials, including a process wherein the parts to be bound are joined by a high temperature fusion process.
  • such bonded parts can be formed in the following manner.
  • Glass blocks to be joined are first cut to a size suitable to yield one or more finished devices.
  • the surfaces to be joined are then ground and polished.
  • a high quality polish is not a requirement but is an advantage. However, simple grinding with 600 grit emery paper is adequate.
  • the samples are thoroughly cleaned using techniques well known in the optical industry.
  • the surfaces to be joined are then placed in direct contact, forming a multiple laminate structure.
  • a fusion of the glass pieces is then conducted by heating the entire assembly to a temperature above, generally about 100°C above, the glass transformation point, Tg, for a period of time to effect fusion thereof, preferably between 0.5 and 2 hours.
  • the fused parts are then cooled, for example, to about 30°C above Tg, held there to allow thermal uniformity, for example for 2-4 hours, followed by a slow cooling ramp drop, e.g., of 30°C to 50°C, to room temperature.
  • the joined fused parts can then be cut, ground, and polished as needed.
  • the waveguide can be provided in the fused blocks before the fusion takes place, in which case they must be aligned to be in communication, or the waveguide can be provided in the fused block after fusion thereof.
  • the glass transformation point, Tg, as measured by dilatometry is 474 °C. Consequently, a good fusion temperature is 575 °C to 590 °C, with controlled cooling onset point of about 500 °C.
  • the softening point of the NIST-IT glass is in the range of 560°C to 565 °C. It is thus equivalent to say that the fusion is performed at a temperature above the softening point of the glass.
  • One disadvantage of the fusion process is that the joined parts need to be closely matched in thermal expansion and in Tg, e.g., in the range of ⁇ 30°C for Tg and in the range of ⁇ 1 to ⁇ 10 xl0-7/K in thermal expansion. Higher mismatches in thermal expansion lead to high levels of residual stress at the glass/glass boundary points due to unequal thermal contraction during the cooling of the joined assembly to room temperature. This criteria is readily satisfied by substituting lanthanum for the active rare earth ions in the NIST-IT glass to prepare the passive material. In this way, the changes in these properties are minimized without altering the sodium-aluminum-phosphate base glass composition.
  • the base composition can also be modified to bring the Tg and thermal expansion values closer, but this can be done without seriously altering the ion exchange properties so that waveguide fabrication in both the passive and active portions of the prepared assembly can be conducted with minimal adjustment to accommodate different diffusion properties that could alter ion exchange behavior.
  • Waveguides prepared in accordance with any of the above descriptions, having multiple or single waveguides of the same or differing wavelengths, are useful in preparing lasers by providing the waveguide with a grating pattern. Examples of methods for producing lasers from waveguides of the type discussed above are provided in the Papers A, B and C provided in the attached Appendix, which are incorporated herein by reference. These references also discuss methods generally applicable to production of waveguides and those teachings are additionally incorporated by reference herein.
  • lasers are fabricated from the waveguides by providing a reflecting element at both ends of the waveguide.
  • the reflecting elements can be those known in the art. Included as embodiments are waveguides having optically polished ends provided with mirrors on both ends.
  • An additional preferred embodiment is providing the waveguide with a diffraction grating on one end of the waveguide.
  • the grating is provided by etching onto the glass substrate containing the waveguide(s).
  • One preferred type of grating is a DBR grating as known in the art. Such gratings are advantageous because they provide a narrow reflection line and thus provide a laser with a narrower wavelength.
  • One embodiment provides making the photoresist grating by evaporation of a chromium coating with the specimen inclined 60 degrees to the normal of the evaporation source beam.
  • One embodiment provides a DBR grating exposure in standard photoresist using an optical phase mask. Additionally, providing a SiO 2 buffer layer coating by sputtering or CND deposition will reduce surface scattering losses. While it is difficult to get standard photoresist to propertly adhere to phosphate glasses, application of sputter deposited SiO 2 on the surface of the phosphate glass, e.g., 1-2 nm, will greatly improve adhesion of the photoresist during processing.
  • One embodiment provides for actively monitoring the diffraction efficiency of the photoresist grating mask during photoresist developing. This optimizes the contrast of the photoresist grating and thereby provides for enhanced etch selectivity.
  • One embodiment provides etching of the grating by Ar-ion sputtering in a standard Reactive-Ion-Etching system. No CFC (chlorinated fluoro-carbon) emissions, as with reactive-ion-etching of silica glass, are observed.
  • One embodiment provides many gratings that are exposed in photoresist fabricated on each single glass chip on a wafer in a single exposure using a silica plate that has multiple pitch phase masks printed on it.
  • One embodiment provides a nearly sinusoidal grating without excess loss due to improved isotropic plasma etching using only Argon gas at low pressure.
  • One embodiment provides an isotropic etching in an argon ion plasma leaving a smooth surface resulting in lower grating scattering losses.
  • One embodiment provides each grating with accurate line width control due to phase mask exposure of photoresist and control of differential linewidth using phase masks with more than one period on a single substrate.
  • One embodiment provides a laser wavelength that is selected by printing a single pitch grating over an array of optical waveguides with each waveguide in the array having a different refractive index.
  • One embodiment provides a laser wavelength that is selected by fabricating a single pitch grating on an array of identical optical waveguides where each waveguide crosses the grating at varying angles.
  • One embodiment provides a mode field shape and size that is optimized for laser operation using a filed assisted ion-exchange process where the electric field is varied as a function of time.
  • the invention can provide a monolithic single-frequency waveguide laser in a spectroscopically superior phosphate glass, for example, with an initial laser linewidth was 500 kHz.
  • the present invention provides predictable emission wavelength if effective index of the waveguide is known.
  • the present invention provides high power, e.g., up to 80 mW (previous state- of-the art for an Er-doped DBR laser was ⁇ 2 mw by Technical University of Denmark Microelectronic Centrct. Technology was sputter deposited silica doped with Er).
  • the present invention demonstrates a Yb/Er-doped phosphate glass laser using a DBR surface relief grating.
  • the previous best device like this utilized an external fiber grating and produced power of 2.2 mW at 70 mW coupled pump power by A. Yeniay, et al., Lehigh University & Lucent, April 29, 1997 in IEEE Photonics Technology Letters. This Yeniay demonstration did not operate as a single frequency laser.
  • the present invention provides high slope efficiency of 26 percent (previous state-of-the-art for similar devices was about 11 percent by Yeniay, et al., Lehigh University & Lucent).
  • the present invention provides a process for fo ⁇ rting waveguides onto (or into) the surface of a glass substrate.
  • photo-lithographic techniques define waveguides by changing the index of refraction of waveguide channels formed into the surface of the substrate.
  • a glass wafer approximately 10 cm by 10 cm by 1 mm is cut from a slab of IOG-1 laser glass available from Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. , of Duryea, PA, USA.
  • the surfaces of interest including a "top" major surface (where "top” refers to an orientation and not necessarily to the placing of the device as used in operation) are polished to optical smoothness.
  • the glass wafer will have a plurality of segments according to one embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, the top surface of the wafer will be processed to form a large number (e.g., in one embodiment, one hundred devices) of individual segments
  • each segment is a portion of the wafer diced to about 1.5 cm by 0.5 cm.
  • Another embodiment is directed to segment having forty laser waveguides organized in eight sets.
  • the segments may be processed, for example, according to one of the methods described in Paper A, Paper B, and/or Paper C of the Appendix, to form a plurality of sets (e.g., in one embodiment, each set has five waveguides; and in another embodiment, each set is used such that one waveguide is used, and the other four provide redundancy in case one or more do not function properly).
  • each set is overlaid with a diffraction Bragg reflector (DBR) which forms one mirror of a laser, and each DBR is fabricated to a different spacing designed to resonate at a different output wavelength.
  • DBR diffraction Bragg reflector
  • only eight of the forty waveguides are used for eight respective lasers; the others are provided for redundancy.
  • the DBR for one set is designed such that all five waveguides of that set will lase at the same wavelength, and any one of these waveguides can be used as the laser for the desired wavelength of that set.
  • each of the DBRs are designed for a different output wavelength.
  • the segment is designed to provide eight lasing waveguides each outputting light at one of eight predetermined wavelengths that are tuned by the eight DBRs.
  • an input mirror e.g., a multi-layer dielectric mirror
  • an external mirror is placed against that face to provide the feedback function desired for lasing and the pump-light-launching function.
  • the input mirror is designed to transmit as much light as possible at the pump wavelength (in one embodiment, 0.98 micrometers), while reflecting as much light as possible at the output wavelength (in one embodiment, a selected wavelength near 1.54 micrometers as tuned by the corresponding to the DBR).
  • the segment is used in a communications system that uses dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM), wherein, for example, forty different wavelengths are each modulated to carry a different channel of information, and then all forty channels are passed on a single optic fiber.
  • DWDM dense wavelength-division multiplexing
  • each channel's wavelength differs from the next channel's wavelength by 0.8 nanometers.
  • a segment could be designed to output laser light at wavelengths of 1.5360, 1.5368, 1.5376, 1.5384, 1.5400, 1.5408 and 1.5416 micrometers.
  • Other segments of a system could be designed to lase at eight other channel wavelengths.
  • a forty-channel system only needs five such different part numbers (i.e., unique part designs), rather than forty different part numbers in conventional approaches.
  • a segment is used as part of a multi-wavelength laser source.
  • a pump light source for example, a semiconductor laser diode lasing at about 0.98 micrometers; this source can even be very "noisy," emitting a range of frequencies from perhaps as low as 0.96 and as high as 1.00 micrometers, and still provide a suitable source for laser emitting at e.g., 1.5360 micrometers
  • a suitable source for laser emitting at e.g., 1.5360 micrometers
  • eight pump laser diodes are used.
  • each respective fiber is optically coupled to the emitting end of the top or first waveguide of the eight respective sets. If any one of the first waveguides is non-functional, the alignment block can be moved down to couple to the next waveguide of the eight sets.
  • a segment is used as part of another multi-wavelength laser source with the output fibers connected to the middle waveguide of each set of waveguides.
  • a different pumping mechanism can be used wherein each pump is coupled through a lens (which can be a conventional convex-type lens or a diffraction or holographic lens) that helps concentrate the light from the pumps into the waveguides.
  • a segment is used as part of a single-wavelength laser source.
  • This embodiment provides a single output wavelength selected from the eight available.
  • This embodiment also provides an optical fiber for coupling light from a pump laser diode into the desired waveguide. It is to be understood that any of the above pump-coupling methods and apparatus could be used in the other discussed embodiments.
  • a segment having a laser comprising a waveguide, DBR mirror and optional input mirror is provided.
  • the single laser has an external launch mirror.
  • Other embodiments include redundant waveguides all operating at a single wavelength, other waveguides each having a DBR tuned to a unique wavelength, or both, all integrated on a single segment.
  • a packaged device that includes a segment according to one of the other embodiments of the present invention.
  • the device includes a hermetic package, and is pumped, in this embodiment, by a fiber, and coupled to an output fiber. While this embodiment includes a laser as described above, it is otherwise a passive device. Such a device takes a pump light input, which can be noisy as described above, and outputs a "clean" laser output light at a different frequency, wherein the output is stable and has a very narrow wavelength spectrum. .
  • an integrated device that includes a segment according to one of the other embodiments of the present invention is provided.
  • the device includes active components such as a pump laser diode, a photodetector (e.g., a light- sensing diode), a thermistor and electrical connections between and to these components.
  • active components such as a pump laser diode, a photodetector (e.g., a light- sensing diode), a thermistor and electrical connections between and to these components.
  • Some embodiments also include a temperature maintaining device (such as a resistor or thermo-electric device to heat and/or cool device) in order to maintain a constant temperature.
  • Some embodiments also include an output modulator to encode information on the output light.
  • Some such embodiments also include an output combiner to combine the modulated light into a single fiber.
  • a top laser using lensed coupling of a pump laser diode to a segment according to one of the embodiments of the present invention is provided.
  • Lasers incorporating waveguides according to the invention have potentially narrower line widths than current state-of-the-art semiconductor lasers primarily because of the long upper state lifetime of the Er laser manifold in phosphate glass.
  • the Schallow-Townes relationship gives an ultimate limit for solid state lasers of less than 1 Hz compared to approximately 10-100 kHz for diode lasers.
  • the lasers of this invention have been demonstrated to have line widths of less than or equal to 500 kHz, much better than the typical 1 MHZ laser line widths for standard WDM lasers sources used today.
  • the relative intensity noise (RIN) of solid state waveguide lasers is a distinct advantage over semiconductor lasers for analog fiber telecommunications. This is especially true as analog modulation frequencies increase to multi-GHz transmission rates as is expected to become common place in the near future.
  • the only excess contribution above the shot noise photon statistics is the relaxation oscillation peak which occurs around 500 kHz. Beyond 500 kHz, the RIN drops rapidly in waveguide lasers. This, combined with high glass saturation power, means very low noise lasers can be achieved.
  • semiconductor lasers typically have relaxation oscillations between 3 and 10 GHz, which is a potentially important frequency range for optical analog communications.
  • Another embodiment of this invention is the fabrication of a single-frequency 1.32-1.4 um laser in Nd-doped phosphate glass fused to La-doped glass, as shown in Figure 2.
  • a waveguide is fabricated in the Nd-La fused substrate using the ion exchange process described above.
  • a DBR grating is written in the La section of the substrate. It is necessary to write the DBR grating in the passive section of the substrate since Nd acts as a three level laser system near 1.3 um.
  • the period of the grating is fabricated to be such that it reflects a single wavelength in the range of 1.32—1.4 um thus produces a single frequency laser in this range. Many water absorption peaks occur in this region of the optical spectrum, therefore such a laser could be used as a high power laser source for the detection of low level water concentration in high purity gases.
  • the glass waveguide lasers discussed here will not suffer at all from wavelength drift as in semiconductor lasers.
  • the high optical intensity in the laser cavity causes a change in the index of refraction of the semiconductor material, and consequently a change in the optical characteristics of the laser cavity that results in the wavelength of the laser drifting over time.
  • the change in the material is so severe that a longitudinal mode hop occurs that causes a large wavelength shift since longitudinal modes in semiconductor lasers have large frequency spacing.
  • the effect is usually catastrophic and may bring down the whole network for a short time while the problem source is isolated. This effect is not well studied in phosphate glasses but our intuition is that the effect will not be large. Since the longitudinal modes are also very close (within WDM channel tolerances) mode hopping will not be as severe an effect if aging does in the phosphate glass.
  • the devices described here are capable of replacing current semiconductor based laser sources for application in telecommunications and data transmission applications within the 1.5 um telecommunications band. Output powers exceed that required (20 mW) when pumped with inexpensive 980 nm class pump lasers available on the market today.
  • the devices described can also provide small, compact laser sources for localized optical networks operating at either 1.5 um or near 1.0 um through the use of erbium and neodymium rare earths respectively.
  • the inventors forsee the need for inexpensive, compact, efficient sources at 1.0 um for use in localized networks within individual aircraft, automobiles, seacraft, etc.
  • the short distance for optical transmission allows the use of conventional optical fiber (that is optimized at 1.3 um and 1.5 um but suffers from dispersion issues at 1.0 um) without accumulated distortion from dispersion effects, in combination with the additional advantage of employing less costly, and easier to operate and maintain than detectors at 1.3 um or 1.5 um, detectors that are sensitive at 1.0 um.
  • a wide variety of rare earth species and combinations of species can be supported in the glass formulations of this invention. Combined with the laser structures of this invention, a number of laser wavelengths can be made available as coherent light sources for diagnostic and spectroscopic analysis completed with optical techniques.
  • Waveguide lasers were fabricated in the NIST-IT phosphate glasses. Waveguides were formed by K + -Na + exchange through channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 ⁇ m. The apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer. Standard metal deposition and microlithography techniques were employed to form the waveguide mask. The exchange was performed in a shallow aluminum crucible containing molten KNO 3 at 375 °C for 4 hours in a box furnace.
  • the ion exchanged specimens were blocked with a similar glass using glycothalate wax and were diced using an automatic wafer dicing saw that employed a resonoid blade.
  • the specimens were cut to a dimension of approximately 2.2 cm x 1 cm.
  • the waveguides were parallel to the 2.2 cm long dimension.
  • the waveguide end facets were polished roughly using Al 2 O 3 powder grits of 25 ⁇ m size and 9 ⁇ m size on flat glass lapping blocks. After the rough polish, the final polish was done using a mixmre of cerium oxide and water which was dispensed onto soft lapping material on an automatic polishing machine. After polishing was completed, the samples were deblocked in acetone by the process of ultrasound.
  • the refractive index as a function of position within the sample was analyzed using the method of refractive near-field scanning.
  • the dimensions of transverse modes of the waveguides were measured by coupling light into one end of the waveguide and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror.
  • the pump laser light was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective. The laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters. The mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of > 99.9 % and 15 % at 1540 and 960 nm, respectively.
  • the output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1540 nm and 15 % at 960 nm. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized. Additional information for this example can be found in the JNCS article provided as Paper D in the attached Appendix.
  • Waveguide lasers were fabricated in Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 (equivalent to NIST-IT and NIST-1X) phosphate glasses, discussed in Example 1.
  • the Yb/Er glass was doped with 1.15 wt % Er 2 O 3 (l.Ox lO 20 ions/cm 3 ) and 4.73 wt % Yb 2 O 3 (4.0 X 10 20 ions/cm 3 ).
  • the Yb-doped laser the glass was doped with 4.73 wt % Yb 2 O 3 (4.0 x lO 20 ions/cm 3 ).
  • Waveguides were formed by K + -Na + exchange through channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 ⁇ m.
  • the apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer.
  • Standard metal deposition and microlithography techniques were employed to form the waveguide mask.
  • the exchange was performed in a shallow aluminum crucible containing molten KNO 3 at 375 °C for 4 h in a box furnace.
  • the initial ion exchanges took no steps to avoid the interaction of water vapor or oxygen with the ion exchange solvent. Subsequent experiments revealed that this process was not reliable in terms of repeatability and waveguide laser yield.
  • the ion exchanged specimens were blocked with a similar glass using glycothalate wax and were diced using an automatic wafer dicing saw that employed a resonoid blade.
  • the specimen was cut to a dimension of approximately 2.2 cm x 1cm.
  • the waveguides were parallel to the 2.2 cm long dimension.
  • the waveguide end facets were polished, roughly using Al 2 O 3 powder grits of 25 ⁇ m size and 9 ⁇ m size on flat glass lapping blocks. After the rough polish, the final polish was done using a mixmre of cerium oxide and water which was dispensed onto soft lapping material on an automatic polishing machine. After polishing was completed, the samples were deblocked in acetone by the process of ultrasound.
  • the refractive index as a function of position within the sample was analyzed using the method of refractive near-field scanning.
  • the dimensions of transverse modes of the waveguides were measured by coupling light into one end of the waveguide and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror. The pump laser light was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective. The laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters.
  • the mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of > 99.9 % and 15 % at 1540 and 960 nm, respectively.
  • the output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1540 nm and 15 % at 960 nm. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized.
  • a Yb-doped waveguide laser was tested using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig 1.
  • the Yb 3+ device was 10 mm in length.
  • the pump-input mirror had a reflectance of 50 % at 950 nm and 98 % at 1030 nm.
  • Two output couplers with transmittances of 7 % and 21 % at 1020 nm were investigated. These output couplers had reflectances of 32 % and 34 % at 950 nm, respectively.
  • Example 3 Crucible ion-exchange Protected from Ambient Environment
  • DBR distributed-Bragg-reflector
  • WDM wavelength division multiplexing
  • Integrated, single-frequency, solid-state lasers using the Er 3"1" ion offer a very promising and competitive alternative to DFB lasers for use in future WDM communications systems and for CATN.
  • DFB lasers for use in future WDM communications systems and for CATN.
  • Several demonstrations of the waveguide and fiber laser technology have been discussed in the literature.
  • One primary advantage of solid-state waveguide lasers is that they offer the possibility for arrays of lasers operating on many wavelengths on a single glass chip.
  • Rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers can also provide kilohertz linewidths with high radiance, low noise, and easy coupling to optical fibers.
  • Single-transverse-mode waveguides at 1535 nm wavelength were fabricated in a commercially available phosphate alkali glass that was co-doped with 0.99 x 10 20 ions/cm 3 and 3.97 x 10 20 Yb 3+ ions/cm 3 .
  • 7,8 Phosphate glass is a very good host material for ytterbium and erbium ions since the sensitization efficiency is nearly unity and large doping concentrations are possible before the onset of concentration quenching.
  • the guides were formed by ion exchange of K + for ⁇ a + using line apertures 3 to 8 ⁇ m wide etched in a 200 nm thick aluminum mask layer.
  • the exchange time was 4 hours in an aluminum crucible containing molten KNO 3 at 375 °C. Inspection of the samples using refractive near-field scanning after the ion exchange revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by approximately 1 ⁇ m during the exchange process. The mechanism behind the etching of the glass during the exchange is currently under investigation, and it is thought that it is caused by residual water in the hygroscopic nitrate melt. The surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions, as observed using a lOOOx Nomarski contrast microscope, appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses.
  • the waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels.
  • the length of the waveguides prior to the grating fabrication step was 2.2 cm.
  • Measurements of the waveguide mode-field dimensions showed that a single transverse mode was supported in each of the waveguides.
  • the 1/e full- widths of the mode-field intensity were 16 ⁇ m wide by 11 ⁇ m deep at 1.54 ⁇ m wavelength. It supported multiple transverse modes at the 977 nm pump wavelength.
  • the pump energy was confined primarily within the lowest-order transverse mode, which had 1/e dimensions of 13 ⁇ m wide by 9.5 ⁇ m deep. All measurements of the intensity profile are within an estimated experimental error of + 10% .
  • a DBR surface relief grating was fabricated holographically in a 0.5 ⁇ m thick layer of Shipley 1805 photoresist using a 90° corner that split a collimated laser beam into two beams.
  • the corner was mounted on a rotation stage so that the angle of the two beams could be varied
  • One surface of the corner was a mirror, and the other surface was a vacuum chuck for holding the sample.
  • Light from a 457.8 nm Ar-ion layer was spatially filtered by focusing through a 15 ⁇ m pinhole using a 20x objective lens.
  • the beam was collimated using a 76 mm diameter lens with a 350 mm focal length.
  • the exposure time for the photoresist was 18s with 3.85 nW incident in each arm of the 0.44 cm 2 exposed region (0.8 cm long x 0.55 cm wide).
  • the grating was developed in undiluted Shipley CD-30 8 developer. During the development, the diffraction of light from a 632.8 nm HeNe laser as monitored. When the first-order diffracted power reached a peak, the grating was removed, rinsed, and dried.
  • the mirror was held in place by a spring clip, and index-matching fluid was used between the mirror and the waveguide facet.
  • the DBR grating was used as the laser output coupler.
  • We tested the laser by coupling light from a Ti-AljO 2 laser turned to a wavelength of 977 nm using a 4x objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.1. The launching efficiency was estimated to be between 65 and 71 percent.
  • Fig. 10 of Paper D in the Appendix shows the laser output power as a function of launched pump power and the spectrum of the laser.
  • the waveguide diffusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 ⁇ m.
  • the slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power is calculated to by 26 percent when we take the coupling factor to be 71 percent.
  • Fig. 11 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when coupled pump power exceeded 300 mW.
  • the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, single-frequency operation, and dual-frequency operations.
  • the frequency spacing between the longitudinal modes we determined that the physical length of the laser cavity was 1.4 cm.
  • the path length difference between the two arms was 10 km corresponding to linewidth resolution limit of 30 kHz for a gaussian line shape.
  • Optical isolations were used in both arms to prevent optical linewidth narrowing due to feedback; however, the output end of the laser was not beveled.
  • Fig. 12 of Paper D in the Appendix shows the self-heterodyne spectrum. The laser linewidth we obtained from this measurement was 500 kHz.
  • This example has demonstrated an array of high power, robustly single- frequency, integrated, DBR waveguide lasers operating near 1536 nm wavelength.
  • the slope efficiencies of the lasers are 26 percent based on launched pump power, and the threshold is less than 50 mW when pumped at a wavelength of 977 nm.
  • the linewidths of the lasers were measured to be 500 kHz, and the outputs were linearly polarized in a TE mode.
  • Er 3+ /Yb3+ glass waveguide laser in particular, has several advantages over lasers in Er 3+ -doped or Er 3+ /Yb 3+ -co-doped glass fiber and bulk crystalline or glass hosts.
  • Ion-exchanged waveguides can be fabricated in glasses with large ytterbium concentrations (-5-15%) which allows the devices to be substantially shorter than fiber lasers. This results in lower polarization and output power noise, caused by thermal and mechanical stress-induced birefringence, and a smaller device volume. Short (- 1-2 cm) laser cavities are also of interest because of the potential for realizing high-pulse-repetition rate (GHz), passively mode-locked lasers.
  • waveguide lasers can be designed to operate in a single transverse mode independent of the operating power or pump laser transverse mode profile, and to not require the alignment of bulk mirrors.
  • the mode field sizes in waveguides can be designed to closely match those of optical fiber for efficient coupling with fiber optic systems.
  • the glass was co-doped with 1.15 wt % Er 2 O 3 (0.99 x 10 20 ions/cm 3 ) and 4.73 wt% Yb ⁇ (3.97 x 10 20 ions/cm 3 ).
  • Waveguides were formed by K + -Na + exchange through a 200 nm thick Al mask layer with channel apertures ranging from 3 to 8 ⁇ m in width. The exchange occurred in a KNO 2 melt at 375 °C for 4 hours in an Al crucible. The laser results reported here are for a 6.5 ⁇ m wide mask aperture. Inspection of the samples after the ion exchange process revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by one or two microns during the exchange process. The widths of the etched channels were close to the widths of the mask apertures and uniform in width and depth.
  • the refractive index as a function of position within the exchanged sample was analyzed using a refractive near-field scanning method.
  • Fig. Bl in Paper B of the Appendix shows the index depth profile at the center of the waveguide formed with the 6.5 ⁇ m mask aperture for a wavelength of 633 nm. This method allows the relative position and absolute index values to be determined with an accuracy of 0.7 ⁇ m and 0.001, respectively.
  • the transverse modes of the waveguides were characterized by coupling light at the wavelength of interest into one end of the waveguides and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
  • the uncertainty of the mode dimensions determined using this method are -10% .
  • the device supported a single transverse mode at 1.54 ⁇ m having dimensions of 14.5 ⁇ m wide by 7.5 ⁇ m deep (measured at the 1/e points).
  • the waveguide supported multiple transverse modes at 980 nm.
  • the pump energy was confined primarily within the lower order transverse mode which had dimensions of 6.4 ⁇ m wide by 3.6 ⁇ m deep.
  • the device was pumped with a Ti 3"1" sapphire laser.
  • the waveguide laser cavities were formed by placing thin dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips, and index matching oil was used between the mirror and waveguide end faces to reduce losses.
  • the pump laser was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective.
  • the laser output and unabsorbed pump were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters.
  • the laser cavity was 20 mm in length.
  • the mirror through which the pump was launched had reflectivities of > 99.9% and 15% at 1536 and 980 nm, respectively.
  • the output coupler had a reflectivity of 80% at 1536 nm and transmitted 85% of the incident pump power.
  • the launching efficiency was estimated to be ⁇ 71 %, including losses due to the transmission of the input mirror and launching objective.
  • the laser output power characteristics for two different pump wavelengths are illustrated in Fig. B2 of Paper B in the Appendix. When pumped at 979 nm, the launched pump power threshold was 51 mW. A maximum output power of 168 mW was obtained for 611 mW of launched
  • the E ⁇ 3+ IYb 3+ laser usually operated at several wavelengths simultaneously.
  • a typical laser spectrum showing simultaneous operation at 1536.0, 1540.7 and 1544.8 nm is depicted in Fig. B3 of Paper B in the Appendix.
  • the wavelength(s) of operation could be shifted by passing some of the collimated 1.5 ⁇ m laser output through a prism and reflecting it back through the prism and into the waveguide using a dielectric mirror. This formed a weakly-coupled, external cavity. By rotating the prism, it was possible to produce wavelengths ranging from 1536 to 1595 nm.
  • a common feature of many three-level rare-earth lasers is sustained relaxation oscillations which can be caused by small fluctuations in the pump laser power. Fluctuations in output power at frequencies ranging from -0.5 to 1.5 MHZ were observed in this laser. The amplitude of the fluctuations decreased with pump power.
  • Figure in B4 Paper B of the Appendix shows the output power as a function of time for pump power levels just above threshold and 9.4 times threshold.
  • the output power fluctuations of -30% (peak to peak) of the average power were observed.
  • the fluctuations decreased to -5% (peak to peak) of the average power.
  • the Tf + : sapphire pump laser exhibited output power fluctuations of -2-3 % . Using a diode laser as the pump source should result in much quieter operation of the Er 3 * laser.
  • Output powers exceeding 160 mW at 1.5 ⁇ m are now available from glass waveguide lasers fabricated using a simple thermal ion exchange process. Improvements in the waveguide fabrication process to optimize the waveguide geometry (such as incorporating a field assisted ion exchange and fabricated buried waveguides), as well as adjustments in the cavity length and coupling, should improve the performance of these devices.
  • Example 6 Waveguide lasers and amplifiers in glasses codoped with Er 3"1" and Yb 3" are promising candidates for compact multifunctional devices operating near 1.5 ⁇ m.
  • the large gain bandwidth resulting from the inhomogeneously broadened glass host makes these devices ideal for narrow-line sources useful in wavelength division multiplexing applications.
  • these waveguide lasers offer the possibility of high repetition rate (GHz) mode-locked lasers using semiconductor saturable absorbers. Such lasers would be ideal as sources for soliton communications systems.
  • Other applications requiring an eye-safe wavelength, such as remote sensing and range finding could benefit from compact, high power cw or Q-switched waveguide laser sources based on these materials.
  • optical amplifiers offering gain in the range 1530 to 1550 nm may be realized.
  • the devices were fabricated in a commercially available laser glass.
  • the glass is a phosphorus-free, mixed-alkali, zinc-silicate glass.
  • Nominally, all three glasses were doped with 1 wt% Er 2 O 3 (0.85 x 10 20 cm "3 ) and the glasses designated NIST10A,
  • NIST10C, and NIST10E contain Er 3+ :Yb 3+ ratios of 3:1 (2.47 x 10 20 Yb 3" ions cm “3 ), 5:1 (4.16 x 10 20 cm “3 ), and 8:1 (6.83 x 10 20 cm “3 ), respectively.
  • the results reported were obtained by ion exchange through 3 ⁇ m apertures in 150 nm thick Al mask layers. The ion exchange was carried out in a melt of 100% KNO, for 14 hours at 400 °C.
  • the optical modes of the waveguides at the signal wavelength were evaluated by coupling at 1.5 ⁇ m LED into a waveguide while the output was imaged onto an infrared camera.
  • the waveguides supported a single transverse mode of dimensions 20.5 + 2.1 ⁇ m wide by 11.5 ⁇ 1.2 ⁇ m deep (measured at the 1/e points) at the signal wavelength. Since the host glass is a mixed alkali glass which contains potassium, the introduction of additional potassium by the ion exchange process leads to a very small index change. As a result, the optical mode is not tightly confined. Although the waveguides supported multiple transverse modes at the pump wavelength, an examination of the pump mode while the device was lasing showed that only the lowest-order mode was excited. The result is excellent overlap between the pump and signal modes. The pump mode measured 15.2 + 1.5 ⁇ m wide by 7.0 + 0.7 ⁇ m deep.
  • Waveguide losses were estimated at 860 nm, away from the broad Yb 3+ absorption peak. Cutback measurements performed on samples prepared identically to the laser sample indicated an average waveguide loss of 0.25 + 0.11 dB/cm for
  • the coupling efficiency for the pump light was determined by measuring the pump throughput at 860 nm and correcting for losses from the input and output optics, as well as waveguide loss using the above reported loss Figures. Coupling efficiencies typically fell between 50% and 70% . The coupling efficiency was assumed to be identical at 860 nm and 975 nm.
  • dielectric mirrors were attached to the polished end facets of the waveguide laser sample with index matching fluid and held in place by a small clip.
  • the input mirror had a reflectance at 1536 nm of 99.9% and a transmittance at the pump wavelength of > 90%
  • Various output couplers with reflectances ranging from 60 to 98% were used. All output couplers were also transmissive at the pump wavelength.
  • the waveguide devices were pumped by a Ti: sapphire laser operating at 974.5 nm, which is the peak of the Yb 3"1" absorption spectrum in this glass host. Pump light was coupled into the waveguide with a 4X (0.10 NA) microscope objective, and the output signal light was collected by a 20X objective. For signal power measurements, the output from the waveguide was focused onto an InGaAs power meter. The laser performance was investigated as a function of device length as well as output coupler reflectance.
  • Figure Cl in Paper C of the Appendix shows a plot of laser signal power vs. launched pump power for two different output couplers, for a 1.68 cm long device fabricated in the glass with 5 Yb 3"1" per Er 3"1" ion.
  • the slope efficiencies and laser thresholds were determined by fitting a line to the laser data. The lowest threshold was achieved when using a 98% reflector as output coupler. This device lased with a launched pump power threshold of approximately 59 mW. The slope efficiency of this device was 2.0% with respect to launched pump power. The highest slope efficiency was realized with a 70% reflector used as an output coupler. In this case, a slope efficiency of 6.5% was achieved with a launched pump power threshold of 86 mW. For a launched pump power of 398 mW, this laser produced 19.6 mW of output power.
  • Table 1 Performance data for highest slope efficiency devices fabricated in IOG10 silicate glass with different Yb 3+ :Er 3+ dopant ratios.
  • DBR distributed-Bragg-reflector
  • Integrated, single-frequency, solid-state lasers using the Er 3* ion offer a very promising and competitive alternative to DFB lasers for use in future WDM communications systems and for CATV.
  • Several demonstrations of the waveguide and fiber laser technology have been discussed in the literature. 1*5
  • One primary advantage of coltd-state waveguide lasers is that they offer the possibility for arrays of lasers operating on many wavelengths; on a single glass chip.
  • Rare-earth-doped waveguide laser* can also provide kifokertz lincwidihs with high radiance, low noise, and easy coupling to optical fibers. ⁇
  • the guides were formed by ton exchange of + for Na* using line apertures 3 to B ⁇ m wide etched in a 200 nm thick aluminum mask layer.
  • the exchange time was 4 hours in an aluminum orucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 "C. Inspection of the samples using refractive near-field scanning after the ion exchange revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by approximately 1 ⁇ during the exchange process, ,0
  • the meeha ⁇ l ⁇ n behind the etching of the glass during the exchange is currently under investigation, and we think it is caused by residual water in the hygroscopic nitrate melt. 9
  • the surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses.
  • the waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels.
  • the length of the waveguides prior to the grating fabrication step was 2-2 em. Measurements of the waveguide mode-field dimensions showed that a single transverse mode was supported in each of the waveguides.
  • the 1/e full-widths of ihc mode-field intensity were 16 ⁇ m wide by 11 ⁇ m deep at 1.54 ⁇ m wavelength.
  • One surface of the comer was a mirror, and the other surface was a vacuum chuck for holding the sample
  • Ar-ion laser was spatially filtered by focusing through a 15 ⁇ m p ⁇ nhole using a 20x objective lens.
  • the beam was collimated using a 76 mm diameter lens with a 350 mm focel length.
  • the exposure angle was pet to write a grating with a pitch of ⁇ " 507.8 nm. For a waveguide with estimated effeotive index of 1.515 ⁇ 0.003, this pitch should provide laser operation at ⁇ *1538.6 nm ⁇ 3 nm..
  • the exposure time for the photoresist was 19 s with 3.85 mW incident in each arm on the 0.44 cm 2 exposed region (0.8 cm long x 0.55 cm wide),
  • the grating was developed in undiluted Shipley CD-30* developer. During the development, the diffraction of light from a 632.8 nm HeNe laser was monitored- 11 When the first-order diffracted power reached a peak, the grating was removed, rinsed, and dried.
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of the completed DBR. laser arra y .
  • An atomie force microscope micro-graph of a typical grating etched in this type of phosphate glass can be found in reference [11].
  • the tr ⁇ rror was held in place by a spring clip, and mdex-matching fluid was used between the mirror and the waveguide facet.
  • the DBR grating was used as the laser output coupler,
  • We tested the laser by coupling Ught from a Ti'-AljOj laser tuned to a wavelength of 977 nm using a 4- objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.1. The launching efficiency was estimated to be between 65 and 71 percent.
  • Figure 2 shows the laser output power *s a function of launched pump power and the spectrum of the laser.
  • the waveguide diflusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 ⁇ m.
  • the slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power ia calculated to be 26 percent when we take the coupling factor to be 71 percent.
  • FIG. 3 shows that the laser operated on a single longitudinal mode When the coupled pump power did not exceed 300 mW. The laser was robustly single frequency with TE polarisation, and no mode hopping was observed. The inset in Figure 3 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when the coupled pump power exceeded 300 m W, In this pump egime * the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, s ⁇ ngle- frequency operation, and dual-frequency operation.
  • the wavelength Increases as the diflusion aperture width increases, which is consistent with u-creasing effective index as the aperture width Increases.
  • Waveguides weiv fabricated in a cornrnen.ialIy available phosphate glass were co- doped with l .15 wt % Er,Q, (0.99*10* tons/cm') and 4.73 wt % Yb j Q, (3.07 10* lans/em 1 ).
  • the transverse modes of the waveguides ert d ⁇ ar «erlz ⁇ d by coupling light at the wiYeleaah 0 f inierwt into one end of the waveguide and Inwglns the light emerging ficm the other end onto a calibrated i nfrared camera.
  • the unceniunty of the mode dimensions detwm-ned using this method are -10 W
  • the dev i ce supported a ringle transverse mode at 1.54 pm having dimensions of 14.5 ⁇ m wide by 7J l im deeo ( measured a t the l/e polws).
  • Waveguide laser? and amplifiers in glasses oodoped with Ex** and Yb 9* are promising candidates for compact multifunctional devices operating near 1.5 ⁇ m .
  • the large gain bandwidth resulting from the homoganeously broadened jdass host makes these devices ideal for narrow-line sources useful in wavelength division multiplexing applications.
  • these waveguide lasers offer the possibility of high repetition rate (GHz) mode-locked lasers using semiconductor sat r ⁇ ble absorbers. Such lasers would be ideal as sources for sollton communications systems.
  • Other applications requiring an eye ⁇ 9ftfe wavelength, such as remote sensing and range finding, could benefit from compact, high power cw or Q- ⁇ wltched waveguide laser sources based on these materials.
  • the devices were fabricated in a commercially available laser glass. 4
  • the glass is a phosphorus-free, mixed-alkali, zinc silicate glass.
  • all three glasses were doped with 1 wt% EnOj (0.S5 x 10* cn ⁇ ») and the glasses designated NIST10A, NISTlOC, and NIST10E contain Er ⁇ .Yb 3 * ratios of 3;1 (2.47 x 10»* Yb 5 * Jons C ⁇ T*) , 51 (4.16 x 10* em- 5 ) , and ⁇ :l (6.83 x lO ⁇ cm*), respectively.
  • the results reported were obtained by ion exchange through 3 ⁇ m apertures In 150 nm thick Al sk layers. The ion exchange was carried out in a melt of 100% KNOs for 14 hours at 400 * C.
  • Wc present experimental and theoretical results of our recent work on the development of waveguide lasers using rare-earth-dopcd phosphate glasses. ⁇ n improvement has been achieved over previously reported waveguide laser results using the process of ion exchange in a commercially available Yb/Er-co-dopcd phosphate glass composition. Wc have demonstrated slope efl ⁇ cicncies near 30 percent with output powers approaching 200 mW for 1540 nm Fabry- Perot waveguide lasers. These lasers are continuously tunable over approximately 70 nm. In addition, Yb-dopcd Fabry-Perot waveguide lasers have been fabricated and tested. These lasers
  • Waveguides in rare-earth-doped materials for lasers and amplifiers have been fabricated using a number of different methods. These include thermal and ficld-assisled ion exchange in bulk-doped silicate and phosphate glasses ⁇ ' "8J and film deposition of several rarc-earth-doped dielectric films that are formed into optical channel waveguides. Film deposition or formation methods include rf sputtering, t9", ⁇ ] plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition,' n J flame hydrolysis 12J ion implantation, l ' 31 laser ablation, Il4] and sol-gel deposition 1153 .
  • the laser properties that must be engineered in the glass include the absorption and emission cross sections of the laser transition and the absorption and emission cross sections of the optical pump energy level.
  • the spontaneous emission lifetimes must also be optimized for the laser and pump transition with the laser transition lifetime relatively long and the lifetime of the pump level as short as possible.
  • Laser operation is also improved by reducing or eliminating the effects of cooperative upconversion.
  • codoped glasses such as Yb/Er-eodopcd glass, the energy transfer efficiency from the sensitizing ion must be maximized.
  • Yb codoping with Er in phosphate glasses can provide near unity sensitizing efficiencies.
  • the glass In addition to optimizing the rare-earth ion spectroscopic properties, the glass must have properties that allow the fabrication of channel waveguides.
  • the most common way lo form waveguides in bulk glasses is the process of ion exchange, where alkali ions in the glass arc exchanged for ions with larger polarizability, thus causing an increase in the refractive index near the glass surface.
  • Such a process requires that the starting glass contain alkali-oxide components such as Na 2 O or K 2 O.
  • the chemical treatments employed in conventional waveguide fabrication by lithographic technology demand that the host glasses offer chemical durability so that substrate surfaces are not degraded during the processing of devices.
  • the rare-earth doping concentration be as large as possible to reduce cavity lengths and mode-volumes. It is important that the doping concentration of the active rare earth ions be variable in a manner such that it can be altered without significantly altering the base glass matrix, Without this feature, each doping level can possibly represent a unique processing challenge as processing conditions may need to be adjusted to accommodate changes in base glass properties.
  • the resulting glass composition (with the commercial designation IOG-1 I,7] ), is given in mole percent oxide in Table 1.
  • AI2O3 is added chiefly to increase durability since phosphate containing glasses with 2 Os content higher than 50 mole percent are normally react with molten salt baths and the other processing chemicals used in waveguide preparation (i.e. to remove ion diffusion barriers).
  • the incorporation of a high total lanthanido content (denoted as 2 O in Table 1) also contributes to enhanced chemical durability and allows for variation in active ion concentration with minimal impact on glass properties.
  • the alkali oxide of choice is Na 2 O since the sodium ion is known to be very mobile in glass and because sodium ion also exchanges well with potassium or silver for waveguide preparation.
  • Transition metal content in the glasses was estimated at 20 ppm Fe and less than I ppm for all other common transition metals.
  • Lanthanum, erbium, and ytterbium rare earth compounds were selected to minimize the introduction of other lanthanide elements (less than 1000 ppm total).
  • Melting and refining temperatures were typically 1250 to 1350 °C, with refining periods of 2 to 3 hours.
  • Produced glass was east into molds and annealed at 530 °C for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature at 30 °C/hr. Cast blocks were then used to prepare characterization samples for refractive index, density and residual hydroxyl content at 3.0
  • Yb Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 glass samples with were prepared for measurement of spectral absorption. Both glasses were doped with Yb concentration of 4 x 10 20 cm" 3 and the eodoped sample contained 1 x 10 20 cm" 3 Er ions. The dimensions of the characterization samples were 9-mm thick, 21 -mm tall and 10 mm wide. The absorption spectra were measured using an automatic spectrophotometer. The emission cross section spectrum for the erbium ions was calculated using the theory of McCumber f 191 as applied by Miniscalco and Qui by I2 ° 3 using the measured spectral absorption.
  • the Yb emission cross section was obtained from measured spontaneous emission spectra and scaled to give the measured radiative decay rate. To measure the emission spectra, the samples were pumped at a wavelength of 974 nm and the spectra were recorded using a 0.3-m triple grating spectrometer.
  • the lifetime of the 4 I ⁇ 3 2 Er laser manifold in the eodoped glass was measured in the limit of vanishing excitation power by chopping a 974 nm pump laser beam at 50 Hz using an acoustooptic modulator. The florescence decay near 1550 n wavelength was observed to determine the 1/e lifetime. The lifetime of the 2 F ' s/2 Yb level was measured similarly by observing florescence decay near 974 nm.
  • Waveguide lasers were fabricated in Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 phosphate glasses.
  • the Yb/Er glass was doped with 1.15 wt % Er 2 O 3 (l.OxlO 20 ions/cm 3 ) and 4.73
  • the glass was doped with 4.73
  • Waveguides were formed by K 4 -Na + exchange through
  • channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 ⁇ m.
  • the apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer.
  • the exchange was performed in a crucible containing molten KNO 3 at 375 °C for 4 h.
  • the Yb/Er laser results reported below are for a waveguide
  • a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) surface relief grating was fabricated on a comb of eleven waveguides using a separate eodoped specimen in a 0.5 ⁇ m thick layer of photoresist. A 90° comer split a collimated laser beam into two beams for a holographic exposure. [2):1 The exposure angle was set to write a grating with a period of ⁇ - 507.8 nm.
  • DBR distributed Bragg reflector
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror.
  • the laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters.
  • the mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of >99.9 % and 15 % at 1 ,54 and 0.96 ⁇ m, respectively.
  • the output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1.54 ⁇ m and 15 % at 0.96 ⁇ m. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized.
  • the Yb-dopcd waveguide laser was tested using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig 2.
  • the Yb 34 device was 10 mm in length.
  • the pump-input mirror had a reflectance of 50 % at 950 nm and 98 % at 1030 nm.
  • Two output couplers with transmittances of 7 % and 21 % at 1020 nm were investigated. These output couplers had reflectances of 32 % and 34 % at 950 nm, respectively.
  • the configuration shown in Fig 2 was also used to evaluate the slope efficiency and threshold of a Yb/Er-codopcd DBR laser.
  • the DBR grating was used as the output coupler instead of the end mounted mirror.
  • Figure 3a shows the spectral dependence of absorption and emission cross sections of the erbium ions in Yb/Er-codoped IOG-1.
  • the peak emission cross section of the Er 3+ using this method was found to be 6.6 x 10 "21 cm 2 at 1542 nm.
  • the measured upper state lifetime of the 4 li3 2 Er manifold was measured to be 8.1 ms in the limit of vanishing excitation power.
  • Figure 3b shows the spectral dependence of the absorption and emission cross sections for IOG-1 glass doped with a Yb concentration of 4 x 10 20 cm" 3 ,
  • the peak emission cross section of the 2 Fs/ 2 laser manifold is 1.27 x 10 '20 cm 2 and occurs at a wavelength of 974 nm.
  • the radiative lifetime of the 2 F 5 2 level was measured to be 1.4 s,
  • the peak absorption cross section was at 974 nm and was 1.28 x 10 "20 cm 2 . Uncertainties in these reported cross sections arc ⁇ 20 %.
  • a discussion of the Yb-Er cross relaxation efficiency will follow in the discussion section.
  • the widths of the recessed channels were close to the widths of the mask apertures and uniform in width and depth.
  • the surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses.
  • the waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels. The final sample length was 22 mm.
  • Figure 4 shows the refractive index depth profile obtained from the refracted ray
  • the index profile indicates a maximum index change of 0.008 that is typical of potassium-sodium ion exchange.
  • the waveguide supported a single transverse mode having dimensions of 16 ⁇
  • the coupling efficiency of the incident pump power was between 65 and 71 %, including losses due to the transmitlanee of the input mirror and launching objective.
  • the coupled pump power shown on the x- axis in Figure 5 was calculated based on a 71 % coupling efficiency. The uncertainty of the power measurements are estimated to be 5 %.
  • the threshold pump power was 23 mW, and the slope efficiency was 28 %.
  • One end of the waveguide was accidentally chipped during our experiments and necessitated the repolishing of the end face.
  • the output powers as a function of coupled pump powers of the resulting 20-mm long waveguide laser, when pumped at 979 nm, arc also shown in Fig. 5.
  • the launched pump power threshold was 51 mW, and a maximum output power of 170 mW was obtained for 610 W of launched pump power. At these power levels, there was no change in the slope efficiency as a function of pump power, suggesting that the Yb ions are not saturating as they do in Yb/Er-codoped silica fiber lasers. l26 '
  • the Yb Er-laser usually operated at several wavelengths simultaneously.
  • Tuning of the laser was also accomplished using the extended cavity configuration shown in Figure 7b.
  • the laser output power as a function of wavelength is illustrated in Fig. 8a.
  • 3.4 Yb-doped waveguide laser measurement results The laser output power as a function of launched pump power is shown in Figure 9.
  • the launching efficiency of the pump for these measurements was 45 %, For the 7 % output coupler, the threshold when pumped at 949 n was 18 mW of coupled pump power. For the 21 % output coupler, the threshold pump power was 25 W, and up to 120 mW of output power was obtained. The slope efficiency was 67 % when based on coupled pump power.
  • the Yb laser Like the Yb/Er laser, the Yb laser typically operated at several wavelengths simultaneously. At lower pump powers, the longer wavelength transitions dominate due to ground slate re-absorption losses, which arc larger at shorter wavelengths. As the pumping intensity in the waveguide increases, the Yb-ion ground state population and hence the ground state re-absorption loss is reduced, and the shorter wavelength transitions, which lie closer to the peak of the Yb 3+ emission cross section, are favored.
  • the Yb-dopcd waveguide laser was tuned by reflecting some of the collimated laser output power back into the waveguide using the first-order reflection from a diffraction grating having 1200 grooves/mm. The cavity was similar to Fig. 7b. Rotating the grating tuned the laser continuously from 986 nm to 1 50 nm, 3.4 Single-frequency Yb/Er-codoped DBR lasers
  • Figure 10 shows the DBR laser output power as a function of launched pump power and the specti ⁇ im of the laser.
  • the waveguide diffusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 ⁇ m.
  • the slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power is calculated lo be 26 % when wc take the pump coupling factor to be 71 %.
  • Figure 11 shows that the laser operated on a single longitudinal mode when the coupled pump power did not exceed 300 mW.
  • the laser was robustly single frequency with TE polarization, and no mode hopping was observed.
  • the inset in Figure 11 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when the coupled pump power exceeded 300 mW.
  • the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, single- frequency operation, and dual-frequency operation.
  • Figure 12 shows the self-heterodyne spectrum.
  • the laser linewidth wc obtained from this measurement was 500 kHz. Seven of the eleven waveguides on the chip exhibited laser oscillation. The waveguides formed through the smaller apertures did not achieve threshold because the smaller mode volumes caused a reduction of the gain such that the 35 % transmittancc loss of the grating could not be overcome.
  • Table 3 shows the laser operating wavelengths as we scanned the comb of waveguides that had diffusion aperture widths ranging from 5 to 8 ⁇ m. In general, the wavelength increases as the diffusion aperture width increases, which is consistent with increasing effective index as the aperture width increases. A visible defect was apparent on waveguide No. 4 that caused a deviation from the trend.
  • Figure 13a shows that the RIN dropped to less than - 150 dB/Hz for frequencies above ⁇ 0.5 GH?., The data have not been smoothed.
  • the uncertainty in the RTN was 2 dB/Hz.
  • wc found that the relaxation oscillation peak was located near 350 kHz as shown in Fig. 13b.
  • the wavelength as a function of temperature is shown in Fig. 14.
  • the test laser varied linearly from 1536 nm to 1536.8 nm for a change in wavelength ⁇ , of 0.8 nm.
  • This tuning range matches well with the predicted tunability of the laser of 0.6 nm over 50 °C.
  • the prediction is based on the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass and the change in refractive index as a function of the change in temperature, and is approximated by the following equations:
  • the lengths of 22 mm and 20 mm are not optimum lengths for these Yb/Er-codoped waveguide lasers.
  • Using a waveguide laser simulation tool wo predicted the laser output characteristics as a function of length and waveguide mode-field size. The simulation is based on a phcnomenological model which incorporates the Yb/Er laser rate equations on a three dimensional grid, the forward and backward propagating laser signals, and the forward propagating pump signal. I2 ] The propagating intensity profiles were approximated by elliptical functions that approximated the measured transverse laser mode dimensions and the fundamental pump mode dimension.
  • the glass and laser parameters wc used in the model are listed in Table 2.
  • ⁇ 32 . is approximately 2.8 ⁇ s. Simulations using different waveguide laser lengths ranging from 1 to 2 cm were performed.
  • Figure 15 shows how the output power varies as a function of cavity length for several output coupling reflectances ranging from 80 to 95 %. and constant laser pump power of 500 mW.
  • Figure 16 shows Ihe output power as a function of mode width, mode depth and output miiror reflectivity for optimized waveguide lasers. The best solutions arc color-coded in red; these ranged from 175 to 185 mW continuous wave output, assuming a nominal cavity length of 1 cm and launched 974-nm pump power of 500 W. The optimum solution has an output mirror reflectance of 82,9%, a laser mode field with
  • Low-noise DBR lasers that operate on a single longitudinal mode at 1536 nm have been fabricated and tested.
  • the fabrication process can be applied to the manufacture of monolithic laser arrays with wavelengths conforming to the ITU grid for wavelength-division-multiplexed telecommunications.
  • wc have demonstrated Yb-doped waveguide lasers in phosphate glass operating over a wavelength range of 986 to 1050 nm.
  • Table 2 Vcasey Table: 3. -List of waveguides, mask aperture widths, and corresponding DBR laser output wavelengths
  • Fig. 1 Distributed-Bragg-rcflector waveguide laser array realized using a single pitch grating and diffused waveguides with varying effective index.
  • FIG. 2 Schematic of Fabry-Perot waveguide laser test bed
  • Fig. 4 Refractive index depth profile, measured al 635 nm, of an Er ⁇ /Yb 3 ' phosphate glass waveguide obtained using a refracted near-field scanning method.
  • Fig. 5 1540 nm output power as a function of pump power for a 20 mm and a 22 mm long Er'VYb 1 ' waveguide lasers. 20 nun long device was pumped al 979 nm and the 22 mm device was pumped at 960 nm. Also shown is a theoretical fit to the data using a waveguide laser model.
  • Fig. 6 Typical multi-wavelength output spectrum for Fabry-Perot waveguide lasers.
  • Fig. 7 Bxtendcd cavity designs used for tuning of waveguide lasers, a) prism-tuned weakly coupled cavity, b) grating-tuned extended cavity.
  • Fig. 8. a) tuning curve obtained for grating-tuned Fabry-Perol waveguide laser. Solid lines connect the points as a guide lo the eye, b) typical mulli avelength output spectrum of F-P waveguide laser,
  • Fig. 9 Output power as a function of coupled pump power for a Yb-doped waveguide laser operating al a wavelength of 1.02 ⁇ m, The solid line represents the best linear fit to the data from which the slope efficiency was derived.
  • Fig. 10 Single frequency laser output power at 1536.3 nm as a function of launched 977 um pump power.
  • the dotted line represents the best linear fit to the data from which the slope efficiency was derived,
  • the inset shows (he spectrum of the DBR laser on a linear scale.
  • Fig. 1 Fabry Perot (FP) interferometer scan of the DBR laser output showing single frequency operation. Inset shows dual frequency operation for pump powers (P p ) exceeding 300 mW. Longitudinal mode spacing is 7.2 GHz, corresponding to an optical cavity length of 1.4 cm.
  • FP Fabry Perot
  • Fig. 1 Self heterodyne beat spectrum at 75 MHz.
  • the full- width, half-maximum linewidth is approximately 500 kHz.
  • Fig. 13 a) Relative intensity noise (RIN) in the frequency band from 0.1 to 1.1 GHz using a shot noise calibrated RTN system, b) uncalibraled amplitude noise spectrum showing relaxation oscillation noise peak near 300 kllz. The lower curve represents the noise floor of the measurement system.
  • RIN Relative intensity noise
  • Fig. 14 Wavelength of DBR waveguide laser as a function of temperalurc. Dotted line is for the aid of the eye in following the wavelength trend.
  • Fig. 15 Simulated laser output power as a function of laser length for several values of output coupler reflectance, b) simulated laser output power as a function of mode-field diameter for a 1-cm long laser caviiy.
  • a rigorous scalar model for predicting the characteristics of rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers has been developed.
  • the model consists of two nonhomogeneous wave equations: one for the forward-propagating laser signal power, the other for the backward- propagating laser signal. These equations are coupled with one forward-propagating, nonhomogeneous wave equation representing the pump signal.
  • the three wave equations are coupled with the space dependent laser rate equations to form a system of time dependent differential equations. This large system of equations is solved, using appropriate initial and boundary conditions, by the method of lines using collocation for the spatial approximation.
  • Keywords waveguide, laser, Q-switch, erbium, ytterbium, modeling, ion-exchange, sources
  • planar waveguide devices These also exhibit high energy storage capacity which is necessary for high-power pulsed operation.
  • One of the primary limitations of planar waveguide devices is that they require short cavity lengths. This means that optically pumped thresholds are somewhat higher than for fiber lasers where the lengths can be arbitrarily extended.
  • One is to increase the doping concentration of the active ion. This increases the gain per unit length of material, thus lowering thresholds.
  • doping concentration is increased, there is a risk in most host materials of concentration quenching.
  • Figure 1 Schematic of laser cavity to be simulated
  • the model is grouped into two specific types of equations. These are time dependent scalar wave equations and time/space dependent laser rate equations.
  • the computer code can accommodate other frequencies simply by adding additional wave equations for each wavelength and direction of propagation.
  • transverse dependence of the propagating mode fields is accounted for by sampling a transverse field solution or measured transverse field for a waveguide as a function of two transverse dimensions. At each sample point a set of laser rate equations is introduced into the model to account for the interaction of the transverse field with the stationary ions in the host material.
  • P + and P " are the forward and backward-propagating laser powers as a function of longitudinal position in the laser cavity.
  • P p is the forward-propagating pump power in the laser cavity.
  • the pump power in this case, is assumed to be launched from the end opposite the output coupler which has reflectance, R 2 .
  • the optical intensity (in W/cm 2 ) of the laser signal is P ⁇ (z, t )
  • 2 is the normalized intensity distribution and has units of cm "2 .
  • the pump signal P p is treated in a similar fashion.
  • the N,'s are the population densities of the various energy levels in the Er/Yb co-doped material.
  • N is the 4 I ]5/2 ground state of Er
  • N 2 is the 4 I 13/2 laser level of Er
  • N 3 is the 4 I 11/2 980 nm pump level for Er
  • N 4 is the 4 I 9/2 800 nm pump level and upeonversion level of Er
  • N 5 is the 2 F 72 ground state of Yb
  • N 6 is the 2 F 52 pump level of Yb.
  • Figure 2 shows an energy level diagram for the Er/Yb- co-doped system. The Yb pump level is shown as split to illustrate that it has very wide energy range.
  • 2 up is the cooperative upeonversion coefficient from the Er 4 I, 3 2 laser level
  • C up3 is the cooperative upeonversion coefficient ram the Er I U/ , 980 nm pump level
  • C- r is the cross relaxation coefficient or net forward coupling from the Yb 2 F 52 level to the Er 4 I I 1 2 level
  • C I4 is the cooperative down-conversion coefficient or the opposite of cooperative upeonversion.
  • the A's are the nonradiative spontaneous emission rates from the first subscript energy level to the second subscript energy level
  • c is the speed of light in vacuum
  • n g is the effective index of the laser mode
  • ri p is the effective index of the pump mode
  • ⁇ s is the gain coefficient as a function of longitudinal position and time inside the laser cavity.
  • nj X m represents the number of nodes in the transverse dimensions and the two-dimensional grid on which intensities are sampled and on which the N j 's are calculated.
  • the gain or loss coefficient ⁇ s is computed after Bjarklev 14 by calculating the overlap integral of the normalized propagating power distribution and the population density and then multiplying by the emission or absorption cross sections:
  • ⁇ 21 and ⁇ 12 are the emission and absorption cross sections of the host material at the laser wavelength.
  • the normalized intensity propagating in the waveguide is assumed to be independent of z, and is normalized by requiring that:
  • cc is the waveguide loss coefficient, which is subtracted to account for excess waveguide losses from scattering and absorption not due to the rare earth ions. It is also possible to add other position dependent losses in this term which are functions of fabrication parameters or cavity configuration. For example, a position and time dependent term can be added to account for mirror losses or localized losses from waveguide loading or for an intracavity coupler.
  • the pump absorption coefficient ⁇ p is calculated similarly by computing the overlap integral of the ground state populations for the Er ions and the Yb ions with the normalized pump intensity
  • ip is the excess absorption and scattering loss at the 980 nm pump wavelength.
  • 2 is normalized in the same way as the signal field, and is written as
  • ⁇ 21 is the spontaneous emission lifetime of the laser level.
  • B ⁇ is given by
  • B sp ⁇ c ⁇ , (10) where ⁇ is the efficiency of spontaneous emission in the laser line width and is approximated by the ratio of the waveguide numerical aperture solid angle to the solid angle of a sphere times the integral over frequency of the equivalent spontaneous emission spectrum. h ⁇ s is the energy of a single laser photon. This approximation of spontaneous emission is similar to the equivalent bandwidth approximation described by Bjarklev. 14
  • W 2 ⁇ , W 12 , W] 3 , W 55 , and W 65 are the stimulated emission and absorption rates as a function of longitudinal and transverse dimensions and are given by
  • Equations (l)-(4) must be solved simultaneously with appropriate initial conditions and boundary conditions. These conditions determine the laser or amplifier state in which the system will operate. For the laser model, the initial conditions are assumed to be
  • R is the reflectance of a highly reflecting mirror at the pump input end of the laser
  • R 2 is the reflectancd of the output coupler for the laser
  • ⁇ sal is the time-varying absorption coefficient for an arbitrarily thin absorbing switch placed in the laser cavity just inside of the output coupling mirror.
  • L sat is an effective length of the thin absorber providing the switch with an extinction of exp(- ⁇ sat L sat ).
  • P p0 is the pump power launched at the input end of the sample and held constant from time 0.
  • L is the length of the cavity.
  • the w.'s are the weights generated by the quadrature routine.
  • the trapezoidal rale is used to approximate the integrals over ⁇ .
  • the problem is discretized over the transverse (s, ⁇ ) planes resulting in a hyperbolic initial value problem dU f(l7,U z ,t). (18) . dt
  • Figure 3 shows the predicted steady state output power for a waveguide laser as a function of coupled pump power and as the Yb concentration is increased from 3: 1 to 10:1 while leaving the Er concentration constant.
  • AU of these simulations were done using 16 transverse nodes in s. Similar results are obtained by using only 7 nodes in the s dimension. Since the solutions for elliptical fields were typically within several percent of those using circular fields, we only used 1 node in ⁇ in order
  • Table 1 shows the values of the parameters used for these simulations. These parameters are close to those of a phosphorous free alkali-silicate glass which we refer to as NIST- 10. Parameters we were not certain of, like the stimulated emission cross sections for the Er/Yb-co-doped material, we obtained by consulting the literature on Yb/Er and Er-doped glasses which are similar in composition to NIST-10. w- 13 - 0 Other parameters such as waveguide near field profiles, absorption cross sections , and lifetimes have been measured and inserted into the model.
  • the performance of the lasers is actually degraded slightly due to decreased pumping efficiency for samples of equal length.
  • the laser thresholds increase for higher Yb concentrations. This is due to the fact that, as the Yb concentration is increased, more of the pump is absorbed at the front end of the laser, thus the pumping of the output end of the device is reduced. This has the effect of increasing absorption losses in the laser cavity toward the output end, and thus the thresholds increase. It is clear from the simulation that doping concentration and sample length must be concurrently optimized. The curvature of the power curves is attributed to the gradual saturation of the upper Yb level as the pump power is increased, as reported by Fermann, et al. 22
  • the waveguide excess loss at the 1542 nm laser signal wavelength was set at 0.15 dB/cm, which was slightly lower than the measured value of 0.2 dB/cm at 1300 nm.
  • the excess loss at the pump wavelength was set at 0.3 dB/cm.
  • Fit 2 shows the effect of increasing the cross relaxation coefficient slightly from 0.75xl0 "17 cmVs to l.OxlO "17 cm 3 /s while the upeonversion rate is held constant. This small change has the effect of increasing the output power of the laser due to increased pumping efficiency, however, the threshold is not changed significantly. This is most likely due to the low propagation losses in the waveguides.
  • Fit 3 shows the effect of eliminating uniform upeonversion from the simulation while maintaining the cross relaxation coefficient at its original value of 0.75x10 "17 cm 3 /s. The effect of this is to increase the laser output power by a small amount, thus showing that the low upeonversion rate used in the model does not significantly deteriorate performance.
  • Figure 5 is as plot which shows how the slope efficiency and the threshold of this laser will vary as a function of the output coupler reflectivity.
  • the experimental laser characteristics shown in Figure 4 are for an output coupler reflectivity of 98 percent. This operating point is marked on Figure 5 by the circled diamond. This operating point is good for low threshold operation, but is a poor for high output power. Note that this is a poor operation point if high output power is desired, but is a point of lower laser threshold. A good compromise between output power and threshold would be to adjust the output coupler from 98 percent reflectance to 75 percent. This would increase the slope efficiency nearly four times while only doubling the threshold.
  • This is an excellent illustration of the necessity for an accurate laser model, in that it allows for rapid design convergence for optimized rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers.
  • Figure 5 Plot showing the dependence of the laser slope efficiency (left axis) and the laser threshold (right axis) as a function of the cavity output reflectance R 2 The slope efficiency of the laboratory demonstration of the device is marked by the circled diamond.
  • the time-dependent laser simulation to model a Q-switched waveguide laser.
  • the Q-switch is an active switch which is mounted onto the end of a waveguide facet.
  • An integrated mirror is deposited on the back side of the switch material.
  • Such a switch is possible using a semiconductor multi- quantum-well structure.
  • the simulation is run with the laser system starting at rest but with the Q-switch closed or in the high absorption state. This allows the pump to rapidly create a population inversion which is well above threshold for the laser when the Q-switch is opened.
  • We have programmed the active Q-switch to open in 5 ns using a cosine s-bend function.
  • the coupled pump power was set to 200 mW and the system was pumped for 2 ms before the switch was opened.
  • What makes our model unique from other Q-switch models is that we have not assumed that we have a high-Q cavity or a uniform intensity in the cavity. We have not assumed a plane wave electric field, we include several levels and transitions instead of the typical two or three, and we track the saturation of the pumping intensity. In addition, we do not assume that the distribution of energy level population densities assumes the same shape as the pump or the signal field. The populations are allowed to vary freely as functions of position and intensities.
  • Figure 6 is a family of Q-switch pulse simulations using the same parameters that were used in Fit 1 of Figure 4. These simulations varied only the output coupler reflectance. As the reflectance is decreased, a more nearly optimal point for the extraction of power is reached and the pulses narrow slightly and have higher peak powers. The optimum for this cavity length is approximately 80 percent reflectance, resulting in a peak power prediction of 346 W. If the reflectivity is decreased beyond this point, the round trip gain of the cavity coupled with the average lifetime of a photon in the laser cavity causes the pulses to widen and have less peak power. We have not yet determined the primary factor that determines pulse width. We have found that many parameters are involved in pulse width determination.
  • the peak pulse power can be optimized further by decreasing the cavity length from 2 cm to 1.4 cm. At this point, the optimum pulse is slightly narrower in width and the simulated peak power is over 400 W. Other important parameters which affect the pulses, such as near field size, signal-pump overlap, Yb-doping concentration, and Er-doping concentration, are being investigated.
  • FIG. 6 Prediction of Q-switch pulses from the demonstrated Er/Yb-co-doped waveguide laser.
  • the reflectance of the output coupler is varied from 98 percent to 65 percent.
  • the graph shows that the optimum pulse (highest peak power and small width) is extracted when the reflectance is optimized to 80%.

Abstract

The invention is directed to optical devices (Fig. 2) comprising a solid-state structured glass substrate (Fig. 2) having at least one waveguide incorporated therein, particularly waveguides and lasers incorporating such structure. The invention is also directed to methods for modifying such devices and their properties. The waveguides and lasers of the invention provide advantageous high power and increased slope efficiency and find use, for example, in telecommunications applications.

Description

METHOD TO OPTIMIZE RARE EARTH CONTENT F&L*ff*&Ε8ϋJXfE
LASERS AND AMPLIFffiRS
Statements as to Rights to Inventions Made Under Federally Sponsored Research and Development Certain aspects of these inventions were developed with support from NIST
(National Institute for Standards and Technology). The U.S. Government may have rights in certain of these inventions.
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of optics and lasers, and more specifically to a method and apparatus of integrating one or more optical waveguides on a glass substrate and of forming lasers therein.
Background of the Invention
The telecommunications industry commonly uses optical fibers to transmit large amounts of data in a short time. One common light source for optical-fiber communications systems is a laser formed using erbium-doped glass. One such system uses erbium-doped glass fibers to form a laser that emits at a wavelength of about 1.536 micrometer and is pumped by an infra-red source operating at a wavelength of about 0.98 micrometer. One method usable for forming waveguides in a glass substrate is described in U.S. Patent 5,080,503 issued Jan. 14, 1992 to Najafi et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference. A phosphate glass useful for lasers is described in
U.S. Patent 5,334,559 issued Aug. 2, 1994 to Hayden, which is hereby incorporated by reference. An integrated optic laser is described in U.S. Patent 5,491,708 issued Feb. 13, 1996 to Malone et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference.
There is a need in the art for an integrated optical system, including one or more high-powered lasers along with routing and other components, that can be inexpensively mass-produced. The system should be highly reproducible, accurate, and stable.
Summary of the Invention
The invention provides, among its embodiments, a system and method for forming an optical system including a high-powered laser on a glass substrate, and a resulting glass-substrate-based optical system and method for operating the optical system. The invention is further directed to methods for forming optical waveguides on glass substrates, including: forming substrates with multiple waveguides and including wherein at least two of the multiple waveguides have differing wavelengths. Further embodiments of the invention provide a laser component that includes a glass substrate doped with a laser species and having one or more, preferably multiple, waveguides defined by channels within the substrate. (As used herein, a "channel within the substrate" is meant to broadly include any channel formed on or in the substrate, whether or not covered by another structure or layer of substrate.) Each substrate waveguide (or "channel") is defined within the substrate as a region of increased index of refraction relative to the substrate. The glass substrate is doped with a laser species which can be optically pumped (preferably a rare-earth element such as Er, Yb, Nd, Ho, Tm, Sm, Tb, Dy or Pr or a combination of such elements such as Er and Yb) to form a laser medium which is capable of lasing at a plurality of frequencies. Mirrors or distributed Bragg reflection gratings may be located along the length of a waveguide for providing feedback to create a laser-resonator cavity. One or more of the mirrors or reflection gratings is made partially reflective for providing laser output.
The laser component may constitute a monolithic array of individual waveguides in which the waveguides of the array form laser resonator cavities with differing resonance characteristics (e.g., resonating at differing wavelengths). The component may thus be used as part of a laser system that outputs laser light at a plurality of selected wavelengths. In certain embodiments of the invention, the resonance characteristics of a waveguide cavity are varied by adjusting the width of the channel formed in the substrate which thereby changes the effective refractive index of the waveguide. The effective refractive index can be changed by modifying the diffusion conditions under which the waveguides are formed as described below. Changing the effective refractive index thus changes the effective length of the waveguide cavity which determines the wavelengths of the longitudinal modes supported by the cavity. In another embodiment, the resonance characteristics of the waveguide cavities are individually selected by varying the pitch of the reflection gratings used to define the cavities which, along with the effective refractive index for the propagated optical mode, determines the wavelengths of light reflected by the gratings. In still other embodiments, the location of the gratings on the waveguides is varied in order to select a laser-resonator cavity length that supports the desired wavelength of light. In a preferred embodiment, the waveguide or multiple waveguides, optionally as part of a laser element, are constructed from a glass substrate which is a phosphate alkali glass doped with a rare-earth element such as Er or Yb/Er. In the case of Yb/Er doped glass, it is preferred for maximal lasing efficiency that the Yb/Er ratio is from approximately 1:1 to 8:1, particularly 3:1 to 8:1. This has been discovered as a result of investigation as to the optimal erbium and ytterbium rare earth ion concentrations in rare earth doped laser glasses, in particular as erbium and ytterbium 1.54 μm laser sources and amplifiers employed in the fields of telecommunication and data transmission. Prior to this investigation, erbium/ytterbium doped glasses for such applications were typically characterized by low erbium concentration (generally much less than 1 wt% Er2O3 content) with a corresponding high ytterbium content (typically at a ion ratio of greater than 10 ytterbium ions for each erbium ion input to the glass); such glasses are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559 and U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708. Such high levels of Yb were initially expected to yield high output powers and high slope efficiency based on prior experience with silicate and phosphate glass formulations, see for example U.S. Patent No. 4,962,067. The prior art taught that low erbium doping levels (at most 0.15 mole% Er2O3) were required to avoid self quenching effects, and that the ytterbium content be set as high as possible (basically input Yb2O3 to near the solubility limit in the glass, at least 6 mole% Yb>O3) in order to optimize the amount of pumping light absorbed within the laser glass. However, according to this invention, it has been discovered that glasses with a Yb/Er rare earth content of from about 1:1 to 8:1 (particularly the glass called NIST- IT or IOG-1, a sodium-aluminum-phosphate glass having a content in melt of 1.15 wt% Er2O3 and 4.73 wt% Yb,O3) demonstrated a higher output power (up to 180 mW compared to a prior high of only 16 mW) and higher slope efficiency (of at least 28% compared to a prior high of only 27%). The inventors first expected that the poor performance of the prior art glasses was attributed to, at least in part, residual hydroxyl groups left in the glass. Rare earth ions excited in the glass are known to exchange energy with hydroxyl vibrational overtones in the glass, effectively robbing the excited state ions of the stored energy otherwise used to produce amplified laser emission. To investigate this possibility a series of sodium-aluminum-phosphate glasses containing 0.5wt% Er2O3 and 8.94wt%
Yb2O3 with different hydroxyl content were prepared. The residual hydroxyl content in these glasses is proportional to the measured infrared absorption at 3.0um and is detailed in Table 1.
Table 1 - Hydroxyl Content Investigation in Sodium-Aluminum-Phosphate Glass Melt ID Absorption at 3. Oum [cm"1]
NIST-1L 0.72
NIST-IH 1.77
NIST-1J 6.02
The results of this work indicated that although residual hydroxyl content certainly was detrimental to laser performance, it could not alone account for the poor performance of devices fabricated in these three glasses. In fact, melt NIST-IH and NIST-1L were characterized by an absorption at 3. Oum below 2.0cm1, a level expected to be low enough not to significantly influence laser performance. In particular, the absorption level in melt NIST-1L was less than 1.0cm"1, a threshold value below which the prior art has shown is not an issue in evaluating laser performance of a given laser glass, see Cook, L.M. et al, Proc SPIE Vol. 505, pp 102-111 (1984).
As a result, it was determined that the selected doping levels of Er and Yb themselves must be far from optimal. In particular, it was realized that there are performance tradeoffs related to the Yb-doping concentration, the Er-doping concentration, and the Yb/Er-doping ratio within the glass. For example, as indicated earlier, it had been generally thought that the more Yb doping will always result in better laser performance. The inventors instead selected an alternate approach to optimizing the amount of Er and the Yb/Er ratio. The approach involves evaluating the relative performance tradeoffs between Yb-Er cross-relaxation efficiency and the total number of inverted Er ions in the laser cavity.
Spectroscopic evaluations of the NIST-1 glass were performed to determine the cross relaxation coefficient of the Yb-Er energy transfer mechanism. The cross relaxation efficiency, η, of ytterbium to erbium ion in the glass was estimated by the inventors to be given by,
Figure imgf000007_0001
where τYb-Er is the measured lifetime of the Yb3+ 2F5/2 level in a codoped sample with Er (measured at 1.79xl0"3 seconds) and τYb is the measured lifetime of Yb34" 2F5/2 level in a sample with no erbium (measured at 1.37xl0"3seconds). The value of η was thus calculated to be 0.87. Additional description of this modeling method, but applied to silicate glasses having greatly inferior laser properties, is provided in the SPIE article provided as Paper E in the attached Appendix which is incorporated by reference.
The doping selection modeling method provided the following conclusions: as more Yb is incorporated into a glass with a constant Er concentration, the average distance between Er ions and Yb ions decreases, thus causing a rise in the cross relaxation efficiency of Yb-Er energy transfer. The disadvantage of this is that more of the pump power is absorbed in a shorter distance. The result is that less Er ions will be inverted in a certain length, thus there will be less gain available as well as additional reabsorption loss in the 3-level Er ion laser system. Laser performance will suffer. The penalty will be higher thresholds and lower slope efficiencies. To obtain the best possible performance, both the Yb-Er cross relaxation and the total number of inverted ions as a function of pump power must be optimized simultaneously. For a particular device, based on the absorption characteristics of ytterbium at the excitation (pump) wavelength (the absorption cross section at the optimal pump wavelength of 980nm is 14.5 x 10"21 cm2) and the intended device length (2.2cm) the modeling pointed to a glass doped with 1.15 wt% Er2O3 and 4.73 wt% Yb2O3 with an Er concentration of lxlO20 ions/cm3. Although Er concentrations up to 6 x 1020 ions/cm3 can be used, the total doping concentration is constrained only by the solubility for rare earths within the glass host, the levels as high as 10 x 1020 rare earth ions per cm3 are known, see U.S. Pat. 5,077,240 and 5,039,631. These unusual doping levels were selected despite the conventional wisdom that taught that such an erbium doping content was twice the maximum and that the selected ytterbium content was l/4th to l/5th the prior art levels for a high performance laser device. Based on the results achieved with the discovered optimal doping levels, lasers based thereon can provide more power than currently available from high end diode lasers for telecommunication and data transmission applications. Conventional diode lasers typically have output powers of 2 to 20 mW.
The lasers of this invention have output power that is limited only by the available pump power, up to values that can exceed 20 mW, e.g. , 25-180 mW. Such power levels allow the use of glass waveguide lasers in metropolitan area networks without the need for expensive optical amplifiers in the network. The advantages are shown particularly for lasers having a length of 15 mm or less.
In preferred embodiments, the doping level, i.e., concentration, of Er ions is from > 0 up to 5 or 6 x 1020 ions/cm3 and the Er/Yb ratio is about 4:1. Although ratio's of aboutl, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 or 8 to 1 can be useful.
In another preferred embodiment, improved ion exchange methods are used to create channels defining the waveguides in the glass substrate. Generally, a surface of the glass substrate is exposed to an ion-exchange solvent through a mask layer having one or more line apertures corresponding to the channel or channels (for multiple waveguide embodiments).
Processing steps include the generation of waveguides within the glass substrate using K+-Na+ ion exchange through channel apertures fabricated by standard microlithographic techniques. For example, a KNO3 solvent can be used applied through an aluminum mask layer to perform the K+-Na+ ion exchange. The exchange of K+ for Na+ ions in the substrate produces a channel in the exposed portion of higher refractive index than the remainder of the substrate, thus, defining a waveguide. Additionally, nitrate melts of of any mixture of the following nitrate salts: lithium nitrate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, rubidium nitrate, cesium nitrate, copper nitrate, silver nitrate and thallium nitrate, for example, can be used for the ion- exchange to provide the waveguide.
However, the inventors have discovered that the glass is etched significantly when exchange is done in an aluminum crucible in the open atmosphere of box oven. Therefore, according to the invention, it was discovered that performing the ion- exchange in a borosilicate, e.g., pyrex, crucible, as opposed to an aluminum crucible, greatly reduced the amount of surface attack and etching of the phosphate glasses caused by the KNO3 ion-exchange melt. Further, improved control of the water content of the melt by baking the KNO3 at a temperature of 120°C or more, preferably about 120 °C, for a period of 24-48 hours in an inert argon atmosphere was achieved.
Additionally, providing a SiO2 buffer layer coating by sputtering or CND deposition will reduce surface scattering losses.
The ion-exchange process results in a slightly buried waveguide with the highest index in the waveguide occurring slightly below the surface. This provides the additional advantage of reducing scattering loss. This advantage can be even further enhanced to provide a channel with a shape and size optimized for laser operation by conducting a field assisted ion-exchange process using an electric field, particularly an electric field varied as a function of time wgere the electric field is applied using a liquid sodium nitrate electrode or a solid silver electrode. The temperature can also be varied as a function of time for further tailoring of the index profile within the waveguide.
According to this embodiment, lasers prepared from ion-exchanged waveguides can achieve a high power of over 20 mW, particularly 25 to 180 mW and a high slope efficiency of 28% or higher (previous state-of-the-art in phosphate glass was 16 mW power and 27% slope efficiency by D. Barbier, et al., at Conference on Optical amplifiers and applications, 1995). Further, a high coupling efficiency of pump light from the optical fiber is enabled by the low index change caused by potassium-sodium ion exchange. High coupling efficiency of signal light to the optical fiber is also achieved due to the low index change caused by potassium-sodium ion exchange. Glasses used as substrates for the above ion-exchange methods include sodium- aluminum-phosphate formulations such as the composition described above, additional glasses are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559 and U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708. Particular applicability is found with glass formulations identified above in the category of rare earth doped sodium-aluminum-phosphate compositions, in particular having the Er/Yb ratio described above. Rare earth ions of choice include erbium and ytterbium, resulting in compatibility with currently commercially available, inexpensive, semiconductor pump lasers and emission within the telecommunications wavelength region about 1.5 μm, particularly 1.54 μm, ytterbium alone to result in laser sources at 1.0 μm, for use in standardized clock apparatus, and neodymium to result in preparing laser sources for small, localized optical networks at 1.06 μm and optical sensors and for gas detection. However, further examples of useful devices for the described ion-exchange process include glasses doped with other rare earth ions, for example, Pr lasers, Ho lasers, Tm lasers, as well as Dy, Sm, Eu and Tb lasers. Representative wavelengths are listed below in Table 4, see, also, Emmett, et al., Physics of Laser Fusion, Vol. IN, "The future development of high-power solid state laser systems", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-53344, November
1982.
Table 4 - Approximate wavelength ranges of several lanthanide dopants
Er 1520 -1610 nm
Yb 985 - 1250 nm Pr 1300 -1400 nm
Ho 2000 - 2200 nm
Tm 1600 - 2100 nm
Nd 860-900 nm, 1020-1100 nm,
1320-1390 nm
According to this embodiment of the invention preparation of small waveguide laser sources that produce high output power and that exhibit low pumping threshold levels and high slope efficiency for generation of laser emission compared to the prior art can be achieved, for example.
A further preferred embodiment of carrying out ion exchange, in the manner described above or otherwise, the inventors have discovered that carrying out the process in the absence of ambient atmosphere is advantageous due to the lessening of surface etching due to reactions of the glass surface with water vapor in the ambient air. According to this embodiment of the invention, processing conditions that allow successful fabrication of waveguide structures in phosphate glass substrates by ion exchange technology without the substrate exhibiting signs of chemical attack that influence waveguide integrity or quality are described.
This embodiment of the invention relates to waveguide lasers that are capable of high power operation and that exhibit low pumping threshold levels and high slope efficiency. These waveguides are prepared in rare earth doped phosphate laser glasses using ion exchange technology. Two basic technologies are commonly employed. In the first, ions of one type are exchanged for ions of another type within selected regions of a glass surface. The ions are selected such that the refractive index within the desired waveguide is higher than in the surrounding substrate glass. Here, the ion source is from a molten bath, often described as a salt batch, into which the glass is submerged. Common salt baths contain alkali salts such as potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, and/or other salts such as silver nitrate. In addition to a requirement of higher index within the waveguide, a second criteria in salt bath identity selection is to select ions that are highly mobile within the glass structure and offer melting points consistent with acceptable diffusion rates and melting points of the employed salts. In a second technique, the ions to be placed into the glass are first applied as a solid to one or more glass surfaces. Electrodes are then placed onto the glass surfaces (in some cases the ion source can also act as an electrode, for example in the case of silver ion exchange) and an electric field through the glass then assists in driving the ion exchange process. Additionally, both types of ion-exchange techniques can be conducted to provide the desired waveguides.
Glasses used as substrates for the lasers of this invention are of a sodium- aluminum-phosphate formulation such as the compositions listed in, for example, U.S. Patent No. 5,334,559. A simple example of waveguide fabrication to produce a waveguide laser in phosphate glass is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,491,708. Phosphate glasses are typically characterized by inferior chemical durability, and are particularly susceptible to attack by acidic solutions and by direct water attack. This can be demonstrated by a review of chemical resistance tests on common commercial phosphate glasses, see for example the Schott Optical Glass Catalog. Water, although not strongly acidic in nature, attacks the phosphorous sites within the glass structure leading to the formation of a phosphoric acid film on glass surfaces which are then responsible for acid attack of the remaining glass.
Phosphate glasses also have inferior resistance to alkali. Examples of this phenomena are demonstrated in the Laser Glass Brochure from Schott. All of the phosphate laser glasses in the brochure have inferior alkali resistance when compared to the silicate laser glasses listed in the same brochure. Any OH existing in a salt bath can combine with the alkali ions present, such as K+ and/or Na+, and form an alkaline solution that will attack the surface of a phosphate glass submerged in the salt bath for ion exchange. Schott Glass Technologies (SGT) and the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) have engaged in a collaborative research effort to develop advanced guided wave laser sources through the fabrication of small compact laser waveguides in rare earth doped phosphate laser glasses. These waveguides were prepared within the glasses by ion exchange technologies, including replacement of sodium ions within the substrate glass by either potassium ions or silver ions from the surrounding environment. The ion exchange locations were first defined by preparation of a mask that defined the waveguide regions, typically narrow stripes on the glass surface of width less than 50 μm.
Although the phosphate glasses developed for this work are designed to exhibit good chemical durability and have been characterized to offer superior chemical durability than conventional state-of-the-art phosphate optical glasses, the need for further improvement was identified. Particularly, it had been observed that resultant waveguides were of poor optical quality. In particular, glass surfaces were observed to be stained with a white appearance to the eye. In addition, sections of the waveguides were found to exhibit at various times the following defects: a) narrowing of the waveguide width at unpredictable locations, b) widening of the waveguide at unpredictable locations (independent of other defects), and c) depressed regions relative to the surrounding, unexchanged, glass substrate.
Although not intending to be bound by this theory, it was believed that a dominant mechanism for chemical attack of the phosphate glasses during ion exchange was by residual hydroxyl ions within the salt bath or trapped within the glass/electrode interface during field assisted ion exchange. The mechanism was as follows: OH groups from the surrounding environment enter the glass, breaking the basic phosphorous/oxygen back bone responsible for the glass structure, i.e.:
P-O-P-O-P-O-P + OH — > P-O-P-OH HO-P-O-P.
In moderate cases of attack, glass durability is further degraded by the loss of backbone structure. In severe cases of attack, phosphorous could even be expected to leave the glass and migrate to the surface, presenting the white appearance observed in many of the defects within prepared waveguides. The dominant source of water in molten salt bath ion exchange processes was thought to be residual hydroxyl within the starting salts since these chemicals are inherently hydroscopic. Ways to deal with control of this water were considered: addition of agents to the salt bath to "tie up", including powdered aluminum, silicic acid, anhydrous aluminum oxide, diatomaceous earth, free P2O5, halogen containing chemicals that would react with OH to form volatile halide gases, etc.; and, bubbling of a dry gas through the salt bath to achieve direct water removal (dehydration).
A second source of water is the ambient air within the ion exchange furnace. Here, effective corrective actions discussed were: purging the oven environment (preferably prior to, but also during salt bath insertion) while at elevated temperatures with a dry gas and isolation of the salt bath from the environment (since the refractory within most furnaces acts as a sponge for atmospheric water during periods of inactivity that is later released upon application of high temperature to the furnace).
A third source of OH groups can be actual adsorbed water on the surface of the glass part to be treated. Phosphate glasses are known to adsorb water onto their surfaces from the atmosphere. Diffusion coefficients for water into phosphate glasses have been evaluated at several orders of magnitude higher than silicate glasses for the same measurement temperature. Such surface absorbed water can provide hydroxyl that can further re-react with glass surfaces during later processing, for example during field assisted ion exchange.
A number of measures were studied to understand, and control or eliminate the waveguide defects:
1) The current aluminum ion exchange crucible would be modified to allow possible bubbling of dry, and possible reactive, gases through the melt prior to insertion of glass substrates. The role of reactive gases was stressed during the meeting. Normal "dry" gases might quickly reach chemical equilibrium with the moisture in the salt bath, preventing the gas bubble to further dry the melt. A reactive gas within the melt (in particular, the use of chlorine) would react with water diffusing from the melt into the bubble, effectively maintaining the chemical gradient between the melt and bubble and allowing additional drying action to take place.
2) The ion exchange oven would be equipped with gas purge lines to pressurize the oven for purposes of moisture removal. Care would be taken to purge the oven before insertion of the salt bath since the oven refractory were considered as a major moisture source when heated.
3) Alternative crucible materials would be considered. In particular, Schott had reason to believe from trials to ion exchange phosphate glasses for purposes of chemical tempering that fused silica crucibles might offer improved performance in terms of chemical attack of treated glasses. 4) The addition of drying or other agents that could "tie up" hydroxyl groups in the melt was also discussed but no clear implementation plan was apparent at the close of the review meeting.
5) A fixture would be designed to allow placement and or removal of a preheated glass plate into a preheated and presumably dry salt bath without opening the oven to the surrounding ambient air within the ion exchange laboratory. This step would provide an opportunity to keep the glass/salt bath system isolated from room air during the entire course of the ion exchange process.
6) Since molten salt baths are expected to accumulate hydroxyl, or other contamination with time from the surrounding environment and treated glass plates, salt baths would be changed more frequently, in particular upon first visual evidence of a defect problem.
The corrective steps described above make possible the preparation of waveguide laser sources without the occurrence of waveguide defects linked to chemical attack of the phosphate glass substrate. This should enable the easier commercialization of these waveguide sources. Without this invention, reproducible performance levels in devices fabricated in a large scale manufacturing environment would be expected to exhibit erratic performance and/or low yield with associated high manufacturing costs due to unpredictable chemical attack from residual hydroxyl groups with associated defect creation that impacted device performance. Additional embodiments of this invention are directed to optical devices having multiple waveguides on a substrate. The processes described above, while also applicable to preparing singular waveguides and lasers based thereon, are additionally applicable in preparing substrates having multiple waveguides and lasers based thereon.
A substrate containing multiple waveguides can be provided by photolithographic techniques and ion-exchange methods discussed above. Both involve applying a mask over the substrate to define the channels which will constitute the waveguide. By applying a mask with multiple channels over the substrate, a substrate with multiple waveguides therein can be formed. Additionally, multiple waveguides having differing refractive indices, and thus capable of providing lasing at differing wavelengths when incorporated in a laser device, can be formed by applying a mask which defines channels of differing width. The resulting waveguides formed by photolithography or ion-exchange techniques will have differing widths and thus differing refractive indices and can, thus, be used in a laser device to provide a laser capable of operation at differing wavelengths depending upon which waveguide is pumped. In other words, the waveguides form laser-resonator cavities with distinct resonance characteristics to provide a distinct lasing action at a selected wavelength when pumped. These waveguides can also be modified in any of the manners discussed above and below to vary their properties. The substrates used to provide the multiple waveguide devices are preferably based on the glasses discussed above. Another embodiment of the invention is directed to modifying or tuning the wavelengths of a waveguide or waveguides in a substrate. This can be done by heating of the substrate which will alter the wavelengths of the waveguides therein. Where the substrate containing waveguide(s) is part of a laser device, it was expected that the heating thereof would increase the wavelength of the laser due to expansion of the diffraction grating periodicity. What the inventors have discovered, however, is that for substrates containing solid state waveguides provided as channels in the substrate, as discussed above, heating has a fine tuning effect on altering the wavelength of the waveguide. Thus, for example, while semiconductor DFB lasers are increased in wavelength upon heating, the increase of wavelength upon heating of laser devices with waveguides according to this invention is significantly lower as a function of the temperature, e.g., the increase of wavelength as a function of temperature is roughly 15 times lower than that for semiconductor DFB lasers. The inventors have discovered that while heating expands the glass increasing the wavelength, the extent of increase is offset by the temperature effecting a decrease of the refractive index with temperature of the glass forming the waveguide(s). The theory behind this and experiments supporting it are described in the Journal of Non-Crystalline solids (JNCS) article attached as Paper E in the Appendix, particularly at page 14 and in Figure 14. According to the invention, therefore, the temperature control requirements for maintaining a stable wavelength are relaxed with the waveguides according to the invention, i.e., a variance in the temperature will not have as significant effect on the tuning, allowing finer tuning thereof.
In another aspect of the invention it may be of advantage to fabricate active waveguide devices, either having one or multiple waveguides, that employ regions of active (for example, rare earth doped) and passive (for example lanthanum doped) glass sections. This is preferably done by preparing the active and passive sections separately and bonding them together. Examples of the sections to be bonded together include the single or multiple waveguide devices discussed above. There are a number of techniques possible to complete the bonding operation, including the use of UN or thermally curable epoxy adhesives available on the open market. There are other techniques that do not require adhesive materials, including a process wherein the parts to be bound are joined by a high temperature fusion process.
According to the invention, such bonded parts can be formed in the following manner. Glass blocks to be joined are first cut to a size suitable to yield one or more finished devices. The surfaces to be joined are then ground and polished. A high quality polish is not a requirement but is an advantage. However, simple grinding with 600 grit emery paper is adequate. Next, the samples are thoroughly cleaned using techniques well known in the optical industry. The surfaces to be joined are then placed in direct contact, forming a multiple laminate structure. A fusion of the glass pieces is then conducted by heating the entire assembly to a temperature above, generally about 100°C above, the glass transformation point, Tg, for a period of time to effect fusion thereof, preferably between 0.5 and 2 hours. The fused parts are then cooled, for example, to about 30°C above Tg, held there to allow thermal uniformity, for example for 2-4 hours, followed by a slow cooling ramp drop, e.g., of 30°C to 50°C, to room temperature. The joined fused parts can then be cut, ground, and polished as needed. The waveguide can be provided in the fused blocks before the fusion takes place, in which case they must be aligned to be in communication, or the waveguide can be provided in the fused block after fusion thereof.
For a glass such as NIST- IT discussed above, the glass transformation point, Tg, as measured by dilatometry is 474 °C. Consequently, a good fusion temperature is 575 °C to 590 °C, with controlled cooling onset point of about 500 °C. Note that the softening point of the NIST-IT glass is in the range of 560°C to 565 °C. It is thus equivalent to say that the fusion is performed at a temperature above the softening point of the glass.
One disadvantage of the fusion process is that the joined parts need to be closely matched in thermal expansion and in Tg, e.g., in the range of ±30°C for Tg and in the range of ±1 to ±10 xl0-7/K in thermal expansion. Higher mismatches in thermal expansion lead to high levels of residual stress at the glass/glass boundary points due to unequal thermal contraction during the cooling of the joined assembly to room temperature. This criteria is readily satisfied by substituting lanthanum for the active rare earth ions in the NIST-IT glass to prepare the passive material. In this way, the changes in these properties are minimized without altering the sodium-aluminum-phosphate base glass composition. If necessary, the base composition can also be modified to bring the Tg and thermal expansion values closer, but this can be done without seriously altering the ion exchange properties so that waveguide fabrication in both the passive and active portions of the prepared assembly can be conducted with minimal adjustment to accommodate different diffusion properties that could alter ion exchange behavior.
Waveguides prepared in accordance with any of the above descriptions, having multiple or single waveguides of the same or differing wavelengths, are useful in preparing lasers by providing the waveguide with a grating pattern. Examples of methods for producing lasers from waveguides of the type discussed above are provided in the Papers A, B and C provided in the attached Appendix, which are incorporated herein by reference. These references also discuss methods generally applicable to production of waveguides and those teachings are additionally incorporated by reference herein. In general, lasers are fabricated from the waveguides by providing a reflecting element at both ends of the waveguide. The reflecting elements can be those known in the art. Included as embodiments are waveguides having optically polished ends provided with mirrors on both ends. An additional preferred embodiment, is providing the waveguide with a diffraction grating on one end of the waveguide. In a preferred embodiment, the grating is provided by etching onto the glass substrate containing the waveguide(s). One preferred type of grating is a DBR grating as known in the art. Such gratings are advantageous because they provide a narrow reflection line and thus provide a laser with a narrower wavelength. One embodiment provides making the photoresist grating by evaporation of a chromium coating with the specimen inclined 60 degrees to the normal of the evaporation source beam. This results in a hard metal coating on the tops of the photoresist bars that constitute the grating and thus allows a more selective sputter etch of the grating and the use of higher DC bias voltages for the etching process. One embodiment provides a DBR grating exposure in standard photoresist using an optical phase mask. Additionally, providing a SiO2 buffer layer coating by sputtering or CND deposition will reduce surface scattering losses. While it is difficult to get standard photoresist to propertly adhere to phosphate glasses, application of sputter deposited SiO2 on the surface of the phosphate glass, e.g., 1-2 nm, will greatly improve adhesion of the photoresist during processing. One embodiment provides for actively monitoring the diffraction efficiency of the photoresist grating mask during photoresist developing. This optimizes the contrast of the photoresist grating and thereby provides for enhanced etch selectivity.
One embodiment provides etching of the grating by Ar-ion sputtering in a standard Reactive-Ion-Etching system. No CFC (chlorinated fluoro-carbon) emissions, as with reactive-ion-etching of silica glass, are observed.
One embodiment provides many gratings that are exposed in photoresist fabricated on each single glass chip on a wafer in a single exposure using a silica plate that has multiple pitch phase masks printed on it.
One embodiment provides a nearly sinusoidal grating without excess loss due to improved isotropic plasma etching using only Argon gas at low pressure.
One embodiment provides an isotropic etching in an argon ion plasma leaving a smooth surface resulting in lower grating scattering losses.
One embodiment provides each grating with accurate line width control due to phase mask exposure of photoresist and control of differential linewidth using phase masks with more than one period on a single substrate.
One embodiment provides a laser wavelength that is selected by printing a single pitch grating over an array of optical waveguides with each waveguide in the array having a different refractive index.
One embodiment provides a laser wavelength that is selected by fabricating a single pitch grating on an array of identical optical waveguides where each waveguide crosses the grating at varying angles.
One embodiment provides a mode field shape and size that is optimized for laser operation using a filed assisted ion-exchange process where the electric field is varied as a function of time. In one embodiment, the invention can provide a monolithic single-frequency waveguide laser in a spectroscopically superior phosphate glass, for example, with an initial laser linewidth was 500 kHz.
The present invention provides predictable emission wavelength if effective index of the waveguide is known.
The present invention provides high power, e.g., up to 80 mW (previous state- of-the art for an Er-doped DBR laser was ~ 2 mw by Technical University of Denmark Microelectronic Centrct. Technology was sputter deposited silica doped with Er).
The present invention demonstrates a Yb/Er-doped phosphate glass laser using a DBR surface relief grating. The previous best device like this utilized an external fiber grating and produced power of 2.2 mW at 70 mW coupled pump power by A. Yeniay, et al., Lehigh University & Lucent, April 29, 1997 in IEEE Photonics Technology Letters. This Yeniay demonstration did not operate as a single frequency laser. The present invention provides high slope efficiency of 26 percent (previous state-of-the-art for similar devices was about 11 percent by Yeniay, et al., Lehigh University & Lucent).
The following provides some specific embodiments of features discussed above, however, the invention is in no way limited thereto. The present invention provides a process for foπrting waveguides onto (or into) the surface of a glass substrate. In one embodiment, photo-lithographic techniques define waveguides by changing the index of refraction of waveguide channels formed into the surface of the substrate. In one such embodiment, a glass wafer, approximately 10 cm by 10 cm by 1 mm is cut from a slab of IOG-1 laser glass available from Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. , of Duryea, PA, USA. The surfaces of interest, including a "top" major surface (where "top" refers to an orientation and not necessarily to the placing of the device as used in operation) are polished to optical smoothness. The glass wafer will have a plurality of segments according to one embodiment of the present invention. In one embodiment, the top surface of the wafer will be processed to form a large number (e.g., in one embodiment, one hundred devices) of individual segments
(each forming an optical system) which will be diced apart and individually packaged.
For example, in one embodiment, each segment is a portion of the wafer diced to about 1.5 cm by 0.5 cm.
Another embodiment is directed to segment having forty laser waveguides organized in eight sets. The segments may be processed, for example, according to one of the methods described in Paper A, Paper B, and/or Paper C of the Appendix, to form a plurality of sets (e.g., in one embodiment, each set has five waveguides; and in another embodiment, each set is used such that one waveguide is used, and the other four provide redundancy in case one or more do not function properly). In this embodiment, each set is overlaid with a diffraction Bragg reflector (DBR) which forms one mirror of a laser, and each DBR is fabricated to a different spacing designed to resonate at a different output wavelength. In one embodiment, only eight of the forty waveguides are used for eight respective lasers; the others are provided for redundancy.
Thus, the DBR for one set is designed such that all five waveguides of that set will lase at the same wavelength, and any one of these waveguides can be used as the laser for the desired wavelength of that set. However, each of the DBRs are designed for a different output wavelength. Thus the segment is designed to provide eight lasing waveguides each outputting light at one of eight predetermined wavelengths that are tuned by the eight DBRs. In one embodiment, an input mirror (e.g., a multi-layer dielectric mirror) is deposited on an end face of segment opposite the DBRs. In other embodiments, an external mirror is placed against that face to provide the feedback function desired for lasing and the pump-light-launching function. The input mirror is designed to transmit as much light as possible at the pump wavelength (in one embodiment, 0.98 micrometers), while reflecting as much light as possible at the output wavelength (in one embodiment, a selected wavelength near 1.54 micrometers as tuned by the corresponding to the DBR). In one embodiment, the segment is used in a communications system that uses dense wavelength-division multiplexing (DWDM), wherein, for example, forty different wavelengths are each modulated to carry a different channel of information, and then all forty channels are passed on a single optic fiber. In one such embodiment, each channel's wavelength differs from the next channel's wavelength by 0.8 nanometers. Thus, for example, a segment could be designed to output laser light at wavelengths of 1.5360, 1.5368, 1.5376, 1.5384, 1.5400, 1.5408 and 1.5416 micrometers. Other segments of a system could be designed to lase at eight other channel wavelengths. Thus, a forty-channel system only needs five such different part numbers (i.e., unique part designs), rather than forty different part numbers in conventional approaches.
In another embodiment a segment is used as part of a multi-wavelength laser source. In this embodiment, a pump light source (for example, a semiconductor laser diode lasing at about 0.98 micrometers; this source can even be very "noisy," emitting a range of frequencies from perhaps as low as 0.96 and as high as 1.00 micrometers, and still provide a suitable source for laser emitting at e.g., 1.5360 micrometers) is coupled through a suitable launch-end mirror by butting against the end of a selected waveguide of a set of waveguides. In one such embodiment, eight pump laser diodes are used. At the other end of the segment, eight optic fibers are held by an alignment block, such that each respective fiber is optically coupled to the emitting end of the top or first waveguide of the eight respective sets. If any one of the first waveguides is non-functional, the alignment block can be moved down to couple to the next waveguide of the eight sets. In another embodiment, a segment is used as part of another multi-wavelength laser source with the output fibers connected to the middle waveguide of each set of waveguides. A different pumping mechanism can be used wherein each pump is coupled through a lens (which can be a conventional convex-type lens or a diffraction or holographic lens) that helps concentrate the light from the pumps into the waveguides.
In another embodiment, a segment is used as part of a single-wavelength laser source. This embodiment provides a single output wavelength selected from the eight available. This embodiment also provides an optical fiber for coupling light from a pump laser diode into the desired waveguide. It is to be understood that any of the above pump-coupling methods and apparatus could be used in the other discussed embodiments. In another embodiment, a segment having a laser comprising a waveguide, DBR mirror and optional input mirror is provided. The single laser has an external launch mirror. Other embodiments include redundant waveguides all operating at a single wavelength, other waveguides each having a DBR tuned to a unique wavelength, or both, all integrated on a single segment.
In another embodiment, a packaged device that includes a segment according to one of the other embodiments of the present invention is provided. The device includes a hermetic package, and is pumped, in this embodiment, by a fiber, and coupled to an output fiber. While this embodiment includes a laser as described above, it is otherwise a passive device. Such a device takes a pump light input, which can be noisy as described above, and outputs a "clean" laser output light at a different frequency, wherein the output is stable and has a very narrow wavelength spectrum. . In another embodiment an integrated device that includes a segment according to one of the other embodiments of the present invention is provided. The device includes active components such as a pump laser diode, a photodetector (e.g., a light- sensing diode), a thermistor and electrical connections between and to these components. Some embodiments also include a temperature maintaining device (such as a resistor or thermo-electric device to heat and/or cool device) in order to maintain a constant temperature. Some embodiments also include an output modulator to encode information on the output light. Some such embodiments also include an output combiner to combine the modulated light into a single fiber.
In another embodiment, a laser using direct (butt) coupling of pump laser diode to a segment as described in other embodiments is described.
In another embodiment, a top laser using lensed coupling of a pump laser diode to a segment according to one of the embodiments of the present invention is provided.
Lasers incorporating waveguides according to the invention have potentially narrower line widths than current state-of-the-art semiconductor lasers primarily because of the long upper state lifetime of the Er laser manifold in phosphate glass.
The Schallow-Townes relationship gives an ultimate limit for solid state lasers of less than 1 Hz compared to approximately 10-100 kHz for diode lasers. The lasers of this invention have been demonstrated to have line widths of less than or equal to 500 kHz, much better than the typical 1 MHZ laser line widths for standard WDM lasers sources used today.
The relative intensity noise (RIN) of solid state waveguide lasers is a distinct advantage over semiconductor lasers for analog fiber telecommunications. This is especially true as analog modulation frequencies increase to multi-GHz transmission rates as is expected to become common place in the near future. The only excess contribution above the shot noise photon statistics is the relaxation oscillation peak which occurs around 500 kHz. Beyond 500 kHz, the RIN drops rapidly in waveguide lasers. This, combined with high glass saturation power, means very low noise lasers can be achieved. In contrast, semiconductor lasers typically have relaxation oscillations between 3 and 10 GHz, which is a potentially important frequency range for optical analog communications.
There are advantages of putting the DBR grating within a passive section of glass attached to the active glass containing the laser waveguide. This is because when the pumplight reaches the DBR grating, it is not reflected but is instead coupled out of the waveguide at an acute angle, thus the pump light intensity gets depleted very rapidly as it traverses in the DBR grating. If the DBR grating were prepared in erbium doped glass, the resultant population of excited erbium ions within the active glass inside the DBR grating leads to an increase in the spontaneous emission noise. And also introduces a loss within the laser cavity which reduces the efficiency.
Another embodiment of this invention is the fabrication of a single-frequency 1.32-1.4 um laser in Nd-doped phosphate glass fused to La-doped glass, as shown in Figure 2. In this invention, a waveguide is fabricated in the Nd-La fused substrate using the ion exchange process described above. A DBR grating is written in the La section of the substrate. It is necessary to write the DBR grating in the passive section of the substrate since Nd acts as a three level laser system near 1.3 um. Such a design minimizes loss and noise as described above and thus increases the efficiency of the laser. The period of the grating is fabricated to be such that it reflects a single wavelength in the range of 1.32—1.4 um thus produces a single frequency laser in this range. Many water absorption peaks occur in this region of the optical spectrum, therefore such a laser could be used as a high power laser source for the detection of low level water concentration in high purity gases.
Finally, the glass waveguide lasers discussed here will not suffer at all from wavelength drift as in semiconductor lasers. As a semiconductor laser ages, the high optical intensity in the laser cavity causes a change in the index of refraction of the semiconductor material, and consequently a change in the optical characteristics of the laser cavity that results in the wavelength of the laser drifting over time. At some point, the change in the material is so severe that a longitudinal mode hop occurs that causes a large wavelength shift since longitudinal modes in semiconductor lasers have large frequency spacing. When such a event occurs in a WDM network, the effect is usually catastrophic and may bring down the whole network for a short time while the problem source is isolated. This effect is not well studied in phosphate glasses but our intuition is that the effect will not be large. Since the longitudinal modes are also very close (within WDM channel tolerances) mode hopping will not be as severe an effect if aging does in the phosphate glass.
Thus, the devices described here are capable of replacing current semiconductor based laser sources for application in telecommunications and data transmission applications within the 1.5 um telecommunications band. Output powers exceed that required (20 mW) when pumped with inexpensive 980 nm class pump lasers available on the market today.
The devices described can also provide small, compact laser sources for localized optical networks operating at either 1.5 um or near 1.0 um through the use of erbium and neodymium rare earths respectively. In particular, the inventors forsee the need for inexpensive, compact, efficient sources at 1.0 um for use in localized networks within individual aircraft, automobiles, seacraft, etc. Here, the short distance for optical transmission allows the use of conventional optical fiber (that is optimized at 1.3 um and 1.5 um but suffers from dispersion issues at 1.0 um) without accumulated distortion from dispersion effects, in combination with the additional advantage of employing less costly, and easier to operate and maintain than detectors at 1.3 um or 1.5 um, detectors that are sensitive at 1.0 um. A wide variety of rare earth species and combinations of species can be supported in the glass formulations of this invention. Combined with the laser structures of this invention, a number of laser wavelengths can be made available as coherent light sources for diagnostic and spectroscopic analysis completed with optical techniques.
The entire disclosure of all applications, patents and publications, cited above and below, as well as of U.S. provisional application no. 60/117,477 filed January
27, 1999, and U.S. provisional application no. 60/162,458 filed October 29, 1999, from which this application claims priority are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Examples
In the foregoing and in the following examples, all temperatures are set forth uncorrected in degrees Celsius; and, unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are by weight.
Example 1: Er/Yb ratio
An Er:Yb-codoped glass having 1.15 wt% Er2O3 and 4.73 wt% Yb2O3 and a high phosphorous content named NIST-IT, shown in Table 2, was prepared as follows. Chemical compounds were weighed in the proper amounts to produced the desired composition and melted within a fused silica crucible at temperatures in excess of 1200°C to produce vitrified material of limited optical quality, referred to as cullet. To obtain glass of high optical quality for use in laser fabrication, this cullet was then remelted within a platinum crucible at temperatures of 1200°C to 1300°C. Once this melting was complete, the glass melt was stirred and refined at temperatures up to 1400°C for three hours prior to casting the molten glass into a steel mold. The cast glass was annealed at 530°C for two hours before being cooled to room temperature at a cooling rate of 30°C/hr. Table 2 - NIST-IT Example Composition
Oxide Mole%
P2O5 60
Al2O3 13
Na2O 24
La2O3 1.1
Er2O3 0.4
Yb2O3 1.5
The glass casting produced was first cut to yield characterization samples with the following property results:
Table 3 - NIST-IT Property Characterization Results
Property Expected Result Measured Result
Nd 1.523 ±0.003 1.52100
Nd 67.53 +0.05 67.50 density, p [gm/cm3] 2.74+0.03 2.74
-orption at 3. Oum [cm"1] <2.0 1.20
Based on these measured properties, in comparison to the expected results known from prior melts of this glass composition, the proper chemical identity of the prepared glass was assured. It is common practice in the glass industry to have high confidence that the composition is that intended when the index, nd, Abbe number, vd, and density, p, agree with expected values within the tolerance ranges indicated in Table 3. The measured optical properties and the measured density value combined with the recorded input weights of rare earth species into the glass allowed the calculation of the following additional properties:
Table 4 - ΝIST-1T Calculated Property Results
Property Desired Result Calculated Result
Yb3+ content [1020 ions/cm3] 4.0+5% 3.97
Er3+ content [1020 ions/cm3] 1.0+5% 0.99
Refractive Index at 1.54um no particular value 1.511 The rare earth contents values were verified in this manner. Thirty-eight glass plates were then prepared from the remaining glass from the produced casting. Each plate measured 50mm x 50mm x 2mm in thickness and was polished on the 50mm x
50mm faces with a high quality polish normally applied to Schott's commercial filter glass product line.
Waveguide lasers were fabricated in the NIST-IT phosphate glasses. Waveguides were formed by K+-Na+ exchange through channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 μm. The apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer. Standard metal deposition and microlithography techniques were employed to form the waveguide mask. The exchange was performed in a shallow aluminum crucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 °C for 4 hours in a box furnace.
The ion exchanged specimens were blocked with a similar glass using glycothalate wax and were diced using an automatic wafer dicing saw that employed a resonoid blade. The specimens were cut to a dimension of approximately 2.2 cm x 1 cm. The waveguides were parallel to the 2.2 cm long dimension. The waveguide end facets were polished roughly using Al2O3 powder grits of 25 μm size and 9 μm size on flat glass lapping blocks. After the rough polish, the final polish was done using a mixmre of cerium oxide and water which was dispensed onto soft lapping material on an automatic polishing machine. After polishing was completed, the samples were deblocked in acetone by the process of ultrasound.
Several measurements were performed to determine the properties of the ion exchanged waveguides. The refractive index as a function of position within the sample was analyzed using the method of refractive near-field scanning. The dimensions of transverse modes of the waveguides were measured by coupling light into one end of the waveguide and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
To test the Yb/Er-codoped lasers, we typically pumped the waveguides using a tunable Ti:Al2O3 laser. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror. The pump laser light was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective. The laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters. The mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of > 99.9 % and 15 % at 1540 and 960 nm, respectively. The output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1540 nm and 15 % at 960 nm. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized. Additional information for this example can be found in the JNCS article provided as Paper D in the attached Appendix.
The unique set of rare earth content in melt NIST-IT was employed to demonstrate higher output power (up to 180mW compared to a prior high of only 16 mW) and higher slope efficiency (of at least 28% compared to a prior high of 27%) than observed in the prior art, see Barbier, D., et al, Integrated Optics and Optical Fibre Communications, 11th International Conference on, and 23rd European Conference on Optical Communications (Conf. Publ. No. : 448) on Pages: 41 - 44, Vol. 4.
Example 2: Ion-Exchange
Waveguide lasers were fabricated in Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 (equivalent to NIST-IT and NIST-1X) phosphate glasses, discussed in Example 1. The Yb/Er glass was doped with 1.15 wt % Er2O3 (l.Ox lO20 ions/cm3) and 4.73 wt % Yb2O3 (4.0 X 1020 ions/cm3). For the Yb-doped laser, the glass was doped with 4.73 wt % Yb2O3 (4.0 x lO20 ions/cm3). Waveguides were formed by K+-Na+ exchange through channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 μm. The apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer. Standard metal deposition and microlithography techniques were employed to form the waveguide mask. The exchange was performed in a shallow aluminum crucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 °C for 4 h in a box furnace. The initial ion exchanges took no steps to avoid the interaction of water vapor or oxygen with the ion exchange solvent. Subsequent experiments revealed that this process was not reliable in terms of repeatability and waveguide laser yield. The ion exchanged specimens were blocked with a similar glass using glycothalate wax and were diced using an automatic wafer dicing saw that employed a resonoid blade. The specimen was cut to a dimension of approximately 2.2 cm x 1cm. The waveguides were parallel to the 2.2 cm long dimension. The waveguide end facets were polished, roughly using Al2O3 powder grits of 25 μm size and 9 μm size on flat glass lapping blocks. After the rough polish, the final polish was done using a mixmre of cerium oxide and water which was dispensed onto soft lapping material on an automatic polishing machine. After polishing was completed, the samples were deblocked in acetone by the process of ultrasound.
Several measurements were performed to determine the properties of the ion exchanged waveguides. The refractive index as a function of position within the sample was analyzed using the method of refractive near-field scanning. The dimensions of transverse modes of the waveguides were measured by coupling light into one end of the waveguide and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
To test the Yb/Er-codoped Fabry-Perot lasers (lasers with no etched gratings), we typically pumped the waveguides using a tunable Ti:Al2O3 laser. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror. The pump laser light was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective. The laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters. The mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of > 99.9 % and 15 % at 1540 and 960 nm, respectively. The output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1540 nm and 15 % at 960 nm. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized. A Yb-doped waveguide laser was tested using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig 1. The Yb3+ device was 10 mm in length. The pump-input mirror had a reflectance of 50 % at 950 nm and 98 % at 1030 nm. Two output couplers with transmittances of 7 % and 21 % at 1020 nm were investigated. These output couplers had reflectances of 32 % and 34 % at 950 nm, respectively. Example 3: Crucible ion-exchange Protected from Ambient Environment
Using a sealed Al crucible that was designed by David Funk for the purpose of electric-field assisted ion exchange using liquid nitrate contacts on both sides of the wafer, indications of defect-free glass after ion exchange were observed. The was corroded around the edges where the polished Al to glass seal leaked, but was defect and corrosion free in the interior where little air was leaked into the chamber. Subsequent experiments led to sealing a crucible with a graphite gasket material that was air tight. This led to a repeatable demonstration of defect free/corrosion free ion exchange in NIST-1 (IOG-1) phosphate glasses. While the process has not completely eliminated corrosion of the glass in the region of the waveguides, the remaining corrosion is mitigated and uniform and also rinses away in the etching material used to etch the Al mask from the samples.
Example 4:
An array of monolithic, single-frequency distributed-Bragg-reflector (DBR) waveguide lasers has been successfully demonstrated operating near 1536 nm wavelengths. The lasers were fabricated by forming waveguides in Yb/Er co-doped phosphate glass by ion exchange. The slope efficiency for each laser as a function of launched pump power is 26 % and the thresholds occur at 50 mW of launched pump power. An output power of 80 mW was achieved with 350 mW of coupled pump power. Each laser exhibits stable operation on a single longitudinal mode and all have linewidths less than 500 kHz. A comb of waveguides with varying effective indices allows the selection of wave length using a single-period grating.
The description is the first reported monolithic, single-frequency DBR, waveguides lasers in Yb3+/Er2+-co-doped phosphate glass. Over the past several years, the growth in the demand for telecommunications bandwidth generated by new telecommunications services, cable television (CATV), and data communication has drive the rapid development of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) where information is simultaneously transmitted on several different wavelengths in the same optical fiber channel. The development of WDM systems has placed demands on laser sources that are difficult to meet using existing technologies such as semiconductor distributed feedback (DFB) lasers. Issues of concern for such systems include wavelength selectivity, wavelength stability over laser lifetime, tunability, process yield, power limitations, and costs.
Integrated, single-frequency, solid-state lasers using the Er3"1" ion offer a very promising and competitive alternative to DFB lasers for use in future WDM communications systems and for CATN. Several demonstrations of the waveguide and fiber laser technology have been discussed in the literature. One primary advantage of solid-state waveguide lasers is that they offer the possibility for arrays of lasers operating on many wavelengths on a single glass chip. Rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers can also provide kilohertz linewidths with high radiance, low noise, and easy coupling to optical fibers.
Single-transverse-mode waveguides at 1535 nm wavelength were fabricated in a commercially available phosphate alkali glass that was co-doped with 0.99 x 1020 ions/cm3 and 3.97 x 1020 Yb3+ ions/cm3. 7,8Phosphate glass is a very good host material for ytterbium and erbium ions since the sensitization efficiency is nearly unity and large doping concentrations are possible before the onset of concentration quenching. The guides were formed by ion exchange of K+ for Νa+ using line apertures 3 to 8 μm wide etched in a 200 nm thick aluminum mask layer. The exchange time was 4 hours in an aluminum crucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 °C. Inspection of the samples using refractive near-field scanning after the ion exchange revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by approximately 1 μm during the exchange process. The mechanism behind the etching of the glass during the exchange is currently under investigation, and it is thought that it is caused by residual water in the hygroscopic nitrate melt. The surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions, as observed using a lOOOx Nomarski contrast microscope, appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses.
The waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels. The length of the waveguides prior to the grating fabrication step was 2.2 cm. Measurements of the waveguide mode-field dimensions showed that a single transverse mode was supported in each of the waveguides. For the guide formed with the 6.5 μm mask aperture, the 1/e full- widths of the mode-field intensity were 16 μm wide by 11 μm deep at 1.54 μm wavelength. It supported multiple transverse modes at the 977 nm pump wavelength. However, when the device was lasing, the pump energy was confined primarily within the lowest-order transverse mode, which had 1/e dimensions of 13 μm wide by 9.5 μm deep. All measurements of the intensity profile are within an estimated experimental error of + 10% .
A DBR surface relief grating was fabricated holographically in a 0.5 μm thick layer of Shipley 1805 photoresist using a 90° corner that split a collimated laser beam into two beams. The corner was mounted on a rotation stage so that the angle of the two beams could be varied One surface of the corner was a mirror, and the other surface was a vacuum chuck for holding the sample. Light from a 457.8 nm Ar-ion layer was spatially filtered by focusing through a 15 μm pinhole using a 20x objective lens. The beam was collimated using a 76 mm diameter lens with a 350 mm focal length. The exposure angle was set to write a grating with a pitch of A = 507.8 nm. For a waveguide with estimated effective index of 1.515 + 0.003, this pitch should provide laser operation at λ = 1538.6 nm + 3 nm. The exposure time for the photoresist was 18s with 3.85 nW incident in each arm of the 0.44 cm2 exposed region (0.8 cm long x 0.55 cm wide). The grating was developed in undiluted Shipley CD-308 developer. During the development, the diffraction of light from a 632.8 nm HeNe laser as monitored. When the first-order diffracted power reached a peak, the grating was removed, rinsed, and dried.
Before the DBR grating was formed by transferring the photoresist pattern into the glass by Ar-ion sputtering, 40 nm of Cr was deposited on the surface with the specimen inclined 60° to the electron-beam evaporation source. Mounting the specimen in this way causes Cr to accumulate only on the tops of the grating lines and not in the grooves, thus providing a durable etch mask. The grating was etched in the glass for 20 minutes using a reactive ion etching system with a 6.67 Pa (50 mTorr) Ar- ion plasma. The low-pressure plasma created a large self-bias voltage of 1700 V when running at 365 W of coupled power with frequency 13.5 MHZ. The electrode spacing was 3.2 cm. After etching, the sample was cleaned ultrasonically in photoresist stripper at 85 °C. Fig. 1 of Paper D in the Appendix is an illustration of the completed DBR laser array.
The waveguide laser cavities were formed by placing a thin, highly reflecting (R=99.9% at 1540 nm, R=15% at 997 nm) dielectric mirror on the pump input facet. The mirror was held in place by a spring clip, and index-matching fluid was used between the mirror and the waveguide facet. The DBR grating was used as the laser output coupler. We tested the laser by coupling light from a Ti-AljO2 laser turned to a wavelength of 977 nm using a 4x objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.1. The launching efficiency was estimated to be between 65 and 71 percent. To deteπnine the launching efficiency we measured the Fresnel reflectance of the input mirror, the loss of the launching objective, and the excess coupling loss. Fig. 10 of Paper D in the Appendix shows the laser output power as a function of launched pump power and the spectrum of the laser. The waveguide diffusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 μm. The slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power is calculated to by 26 percent when we take the coupling factor to be 71 percent.
We estimated the reflectance of the grating using the simplified laser formula derived from the theory of Rigrod:
Figure imgf000034_0001
where P7 is the output power at the grating end and P2 is the output power at the end opposite the grating. R2 is the grating reflectance and R2 is the reflectance of the attached mirror. We used two mirrors with reflectances of 80 and 90 percent for R2. For both cases, we calculated the grating reflectances, R to be 65 percent. To investigate the longitudinal mode structure of the laser we coupled the laser output into an optical fiber scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer with a free spectral range of 124 GHz. Fig. 11 of Paper D in the Appendix shows that the laser operated on a single longitudinal mode when the coupled pump power did not exceed 300 mW. The laser was robustly single frequency with TE polarization, and no mode hopping was observed. The inset in Fig. 11 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when coupled pump power exceeded 300 mW. In this pump regime, the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, single-frequency operation, and dual-frequency operations. By measuring the frequency spacing between the longitudinal modes we determined that the physical length of the laser cavity was 1.4 cm. We measured the linewidth of the laser using a conventional self-heterodyne configuration with a 75 MHZ frequency shift. The path length difference between the two arms was 10 km corresponding to linewidth resolution limit of 30 kHz for a gaussian line shape. Optical isolations were used in both arms to prevent optical linewidth narrowing due to feedback; however, the output end of the laser was not beveled. Fig. 12 of Paper D in the Appendix shows the self-heterodyne spectrum. The laser linewidth we obtained from this measurement was 500 kHz.
Finally, we measured the laser wavelengths of other waveguides on the chip using an automatic spectrum analyzer with a resolution of 0.1 nm. Seven of the eleven waveguides on the chip exhibited laser oscillation. The waveguides formed through the smaller apertures did not achieve threshold because the smaller mode volumes caused a reduction of the gain such that the 45 percent transmittance loss of grating could not be overcome. Fig. A5 in Paper A of the Appendix shows the change in wavelength trend as we scanned the waveguides. The wavelength increases as the diffusion aperture width increases, which is consistent with increasing effective index as the aperture width increases.
This example has demonstrated an array of high power, robustly single- frequency, integrated, DBR waveguide lasers operating near 1536 nm wavelength. The slope efficiencies of the lasers are 26 percent based on launched pump power, and the threshold is less than 50 mW when pumped at a wavelength of 977 nm. The linewidths of the lasers were measured to be 500 kHz, and the outputs were linearly polarized in a TE mode. We are currently investigating the temperature stability of the lasers and the relative intensity noise (RIN). We expect that with diode laser pumping, the RIN will be similar to other results presented for single-fluency fiber lasers and will fall below - 150 db/Hz above 10 MHZ. We anticipate that the output power and efficiency will increase and the threshold power will decrease when the grating reflectance is increased. This is possible with only minor adjustments to the grating fabrication process. Further improvements will also be realized by directly coating the high reflector onto the waveguide end facets. We have shown that lasers with several output wavelengths can be integrated on a single glass substrate. This example shows that stable, multi- wavelength, WDM sources with wavelengths falling on the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) grid can be realized by writing several gratings of varying period in Yb/Er-co-doped glass waveguides formed by ion exchange.
Example 5:
Compact solid-state lasers based on the 1.5 μm Er 4" transition hold promise as sources for optical fiber communication systems. Yb2+ is commonly used as a sensitizer in Er3+ lasers because it has a much larger absorption cross section near 980 nm than Er3"1", and it efficiently transfers its excited state energy to the upper level of the Er3+ laser. The Er3+/Yb3+ glass waveguide laser, in particular, has several advantages over lasers in Er3+-doped or Er3+/Yb3+-co-doped glass fiber and bulk crystalline or glass hosts. Ion-exchanged waveguides can be fabricated in glasses with large ytterbium concentrations (-5-15%) which allows the devices to be substantially shorter than fiber lasers. This results in lower polarization and output power noise, caused by thermal and mechanical stress-induced birefringence, and a smaller device volume. Short (- 1-2 cm) laser cavities are also of interest because of the potential for realizing high-pulse-repetition rate (GHz), passively mode-locked lasers. Unlike bulk devices, waveguide lasers can be designed to operate in a single transverse mode independent of the operating power or pump laser transverse mode profile, and to not require the alignment of bulk mirrors. In addition, the mode field sizes in waveguides can be designed to closely match those of optical fiber for efficient coupling with fiber optic systems. One disadvantage of Er3+/Yb3+ glass wavelength lasers, up to this point, has been the relatively low output powers (up to a few milliwatts) available from these devices. Increased output power will greatly expand the utility of these devices. This paper describes a cw Er3+/Yb3+-co-doped phosphate glass waveguide laser which has produced 168 mW of output power at around 1540 nm for 611 mW of launched pump power at 979 nm. Waveguides were fabricated in a commercially available phosphate glass. The glass was co-doped with 1.15 wt % Er2O3 (0.99 x 1020 ions/cm3) and 4.73 wt% Yb^ (3.97 x 1020 ions/cm3). Waveguides were formed by K+-Na+ exchange through a 200 nm thick Al mask layer with channel apertures ranging from 3 to 8 μm in width. The exchange occurred in a KNO2 melt at 375 °C for 4 hours in an Al crucible. The laser results reported here are for a 6.5 μm wide mask aperture. Inspection of the samples after the ion exchange process revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by one or two microns during the exchange process. The widths of the etched channels were close to the widths of the mask apertures and uniform in width and depth.
In another embodiment, the refractive index as a function of position within the exchanged sample was analyzed using a refractive near-field scanning method. Fig. Bl in Paper B of the Appendix shows the index depth profile at the center of the waveguide formed with the 6.5 μm mask aperture for a wavelength of 633 nm. This method allows the relative position and absolute index values to be determined with an accuracy of 0.7 μm and 0.001, respectively.
In another embodiment, the transverse modes of the waveguides were characterized by coupling light at the wavelength of interest into one end of the waveguides and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera. The uncertainty of the mode dimensions determined using this method are -10% . The device supported a single transverse mode at 1.54 μm having dimensions of 14.5 μm wide by 7.5 μm deep (measured at the 1/e points). The waveguide supported multiple transverse modes at 980 nm. However, when the device was lasing, the pump energy was confined primarily within the lower order transverse mode which had dimensions of 6.4 μm wide by 3.6 μm deep.
In another embodiment, the device was pumped with a Ti3"1" sapphire laser. The waveguide laser cavities were formed by placing thin dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips, and index matching oil was used between the mirror and waveguide end faces to reduce losses. The pump laser was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective. The laser output and unabsorbed pump were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters. The laser cavity was 20 mm in length. The mirror through which the pump was launched had reflectivities of > 99.9% and 15% at 1536 and 980 nm, respectively. The output coupler had a reflectivity of 80% at 1536 nm and transmitted 85% of the incident pump power. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output coupling has been optimized. The launching efficiency was estimated to be <71 %, including losses due to the transmission of the input mirror and launching objective. The laser output power characteristics for two different pump wavelengths are illustrated in Fig. B2 of Paper B in the Appendix. When pumped at 979 nm, the launched pump power threshold was 51 mW. A maximum output power of 168 mW was obtained for 611 mW of launched
979 nm pump power. A lower threshold could be obtained by turning the pump laser off of the Yb3" absorption peak. For a pump wavelength of 960 nm, the threshold was 23 mW. The slope efficiency for both pump wavelengths was -28%.
Using the broad-band cavity described above, the Eτ3+IYb3+ laser usually operated at several wavelengths simultaneously. A typical laser spectrum showing simultaneous operation at 1536.0, 1540.7 and 1544.8 nm is depicted in Fig. B3 of Paper B in the Appendix. The wavelength(s) of operation could be shifted by passing some of the collimated 1.5 μm laser output through a prism and reflecting it back through the prism and into the waveguide using a dielectric mirror. This formed a weakly-coupled, external cavity. By rotating the prism, it was possible to produce wavelengths ranging from 1536 to 1595 nm.
A common feature of many three-level rare-earth lasers is sustained relaxation oscillations which can be caused by small fluctuations in the pump laser power. Fluctuations in output power at frequencies ranging from -0.5 to 1.5 MHZ were observed in this laser. The amplitude of the fluctuations decreased with pump power.
Figure in B4 Paper B of the Appendix shows the output power as a function of time for pump power levels just above threshold and 9.4 times threshold. At the low pump power, the output power fluctuations of -30% (peak to peak) of the average power were observed. At the high pump power, the fluctuations decreased to -5% (peak to peak) of the average power. The Tf+: sapphire pump laser exhibited output power fluctuations of -2-3 % . Using a diode laser as the pump source should result in much quieter operation of the Er3* laser.
Output powers exceeding 160 mW at 1.5 μm are now available from glass waveguide lasers fabricated using a simple thermal ion exchange process. Improvements in the waveguide fabrication process to optimize the waveguide geometry (such as incorporating a field assisted ion exchange and fabricated buried waveguides), as well as adjustments in the cavity length and coupling, should improve the performance of these devices.
Example 6: Waveguide lasers and amplifiers in glasses codoped with Er3"1" and Yb3" are promising candidates for compact multifunctional devices operating near 1.5 μm. The large gain bandwidth resulting from the inhomogeneously broadened glass host makes these devices ideal for narrow-line sources useful in wavelength division multiplexing applications. In addition, due to the short cavity lengths, these waveguide lasers offer the possibility of high repetition rate (GHz) mode-locked lasers using semiconductor saturable absorbers. Such lasers would be ideal as sources for soliton communications systems. Other applications requiring an eye-safe wavelength, such as remote sensing and range finding could benefit from compact, high power cw or Q-switched waveguide laser sources based on these materials. Additionally, optical amplifiers offering gain in the range 1530 to 1550 nm may be realized.
It is known that the Er3"1" concentration must be kept relatively low (-1 wt %) in these devices in order to reduce the deleterious effects of cooperative upconversion. However, the concentration of sensitizing Yb3+ is not limited due to any ion-ion interaction, and is expected to have a significant effect on device performance. Various authors have investigated this problem theoretically. This example reports experimental results for waveguide lasers fabricated by K+-Na+ ion exchange in silicate glasses with Yb3+:Er3+ ratios of 3:1, 5:1, and 8:1. In addition, we show how it is possible to increase the signal mode volume and optimize the pump-signal overlap through judicious choice of host material and ion exchange processing parameters. The result is an Er^/Yb3"1" waveguide laser producing as much as 19.6 mW at 1.54 μm with 398 mW of launched pump power at 974.5 nm.
The devices were fabricated in a commercially available laser glass. The glass is a phosphorus-free, mixed-alkali, zinc-silicate glass. Nominally, all three glasses were doped with 1 wt% Er2O3 (0.85 x 1020 cm"3) and the glasses designated NIST10A,
NIST10C, and NIST10E contain Er3+:Yb3+ ratios of 3:1 (2.47 x 1020 Yb3" ions cm"3), 5:1 (4.16 x 1020 cm"3), and 8:1 (6.83 x 1020 cm"3), respectively. The results reported were obtained by ion exchange through 3 μm apertures in 150 nm thick Al mask layers. The ion exchange was carried out in a melt of 100% KNO, for 14 hours at 400 °C. The optical modes of the waveguides at the signal wavelength were evaluated by coupling at 1.5 μm LED into a waveguide while the output was imaged onto an infrared camera. The waveguides supported a single transverse mode of dimensions 20.5 + 2.1 μm wide by 11.5 ± 1.2 μm deep (measured at the 1/e points) at the signal wavelength. Since the host glass is a mixed alkali glass which contains potassium, the introduction of additional potassium by the ion exchange process leads to a very small index change. As a result, the optical mode is not tightly confined. Although the waveguides supported multiple transverse modes at the pump wavelength, an examination of the pump mode while the device was lasing showed that only the lowest-order mode was excited. The result is excellent overlap between the pump and signal modes. The pump mode measured 15.2 + 1.5 μm wide by 7.0 + 0.7 μm deep.
Waveguide losses were estimated at 860 nm, away from the broad Yb3+ absorption peak. Cutback measurements performed on samples prepared identically to the laser sample indicated an average waveguide loss of 0.25 + 0.11 dB/cm for
NIST10A, 0.32 + 0.08 dB/cm for NIST10C, and 0.66 + 0.12 dB/cm for NIST10E. The coupling efficiency for the pump light was determined by measuring the pump throughput at 860 nm and correcting for losses from the input and output optics, as well as waveguide loss using the above reported loss Figures. Coupling efficiencies typically fell between 50% and 70% . The coupling efficiency was assumed to be identical at 860 nm and 975 nm. For laser characterization, dielectric mirrors were attached to the polished end facets of the waveguide laser sample with index matching fluid and held in place by a small clip. The input mirror had a reflectance at 1536 nm of 99.9% and a transmittance at the pump wavelength of > 90% Various output couplers with reflectances ranging from 60 to 98% were used. All output couplers were also transmissive at the pump wavelength. The waveguide devices were pumped by a Ti: sapphire laser operating at 974.5 nm, which is the peak of the Yb3"1" absorption spectrum in this glass host. Pump light was coupled into the waveguide with a 4X (0.10 NA) microscope objective, and the output signal light was collected by a 20X objective. For signal power measurements, the output from the waveguide was focused onto an InGaAs power meter. The laser performance was investigated as a function of device length as well as output coupler reflectance. Figure Cl in Paper C of the Appendix shows a plot of laser signal power vs. launched pump power for two different output couplers, for a 1.68 cm long device fabricated in the glass with 5 Yb3"1" per Er3"1" ion. The slope efficiencies and laser thresholds were determined by fitting a line to the laser data. The lowest threshold was achieved when using a 98% reflector as output coupler. This device lased with a launched pump power threshold of approximately 59 mW. The slope efficiency of this device was 2.0% with respect to launched pump power. The highest slope efficiency was realized with a 70% reflector used as an output coupler. In this case, a slope efficiency of 6.5% was achieved with a launched pump power threshold of 86 mW. For a launched pump power of 398 mW, this laser produced 19.6 mW of output power.
A plot of slope efficiency vs. output coupler reflectance for each host glass appears in Figure C2 of Paper C of the attached Appendix. Data for device lengths in each glass which were experimentally determined to give the highest slope efficiency are plotted. Highest slope efficiency performance in each host is also compared in
Table 1.
Table 1: Performance data for highest slope efficiency devices fabricated in IOG10 silicate glass with different Yb3+:Er3+ dopant ratios.
Yb3+:Er3+ Device Output coupler Slope Launched pump Output with length reflectance (%) efficiency threshold 400 MW (cm) (%) (m/W) pump (mW)
3:1 1.80 80 5.2 52 17.9
5:1 1.68 70 6.5 86 20.4
8:1 1.42 70 5.0 238 8:1
The experiment results indicate that the optical dopant ratio is close to 5 Yb34" for each Er34". Increasing the dopant ratio from 3:1 to 5:1 leads to an improvement in slop efficiency. Further increasing the dopant ratio to 8:1 does not improve the efficiency of the device, but does lead to a substantial . penalty in pump power requirements. Recent efforts have been directed toward expanding the above results using a rigorous scalar model. In addition, alteration of the potassium content of the host glass is being investigated as a way to adjust the model value and decrease pump threshold requirements.
APPENDIX - PAPERS A-E
Figure imgf000044_0001
Arrays of DIstrftut&J-Bragg-Refle tor Waveguide Lasers al 1536 nm lu Yb/Er-co-dopβd Phosphate Glass*
David L, Veaβe , David S, Funk, Norman A. Sanford
Optoelectronics ∑Hvision, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
325 roadway, MC 815.04
Boulder CO 80303-3328, USA
Phone; (303) 497-5952
E-mail yeasevGDhoulder. st. fov. fm JhwMπ.ltiS gpv. xanfardfφho φr.n .eov
Joseph S. Hayden
Sehott Glass Technologies, Inc.
400 YarkAv ., Dmyea, PA 28642, USA
Phone: (71 ) 457-1485 «τ 351
E-mail: ihavden<a>Sf23QL.dttmalLcom
We have succtttiBfully demonstrated an array of monolithic, single-frequency distributed-Bragg-reflector (DBR) waveguide lasers operating near 1536 nm wavelengths. The lasers were fabricated by forming waveguides in YbΛEr-co-doped phosphate glass by ion exchange. The slope efficiency for each laser as a function of launched pump power is 26 % and the thresholds occur at 50 W oflaunched pump power. An ouψut power of 80 W was achieved with 350 W of coupled pump power. Each laser exhibits stable operation on a single longitudinal mode and all have linσwidths lew than 500 kHz. A comb of waveguides with varying effective indices allows the selection of Wavelength using a single-period grating.
' CoπErl udou of tte U.S. Qσveπuncnτ- Not rubjcct to cepyrlgt-i
Figure imgf000044_0002
We describe in thi$ letter the first reported monolithjc, βlnglc-frequency distributed- Brftgg-fefiector (DBR), waveguide lasers in Yb^ Er^-co-doped phosphate glass. Over the past several years, tb© growth in the demand for bandwidth generated by new telecommunication βei vices, cable television (CAIN), and data communication has driven the wpid development of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) where information is simultaneously transmitted on several different wavelengths in. the same optical fiber channel. The development of WDM, systems h« placed de ands on loser sources that are difficult to meet using existing technologies such as semiconductor distributed feedback (DFB) lasers. Issues of concern for such systems include waveleugth selectivity, wavelength stability over laser lifetime, tunability, process yield, power limitations, and costs.
Integrated, single-frequency, solid-state lasers using the Er3* ion offer a very promising and competitive alternative to DFB lasers for use in future WDM communications systems and for CATV. Several demonstrations of the waveguide and fiber laser technology have been discussed in the literature.1*5 One primary advantage of coltd-state waveguide lasers is that they offer the possibility for arrays of lasers operating on many wavelengths; on a single glass chip. Rare-earth-doped waveguide laser* can also provide kifokertz lincwidihs with high radiance, low noise, and easy coupling to optical fibers. ^
Single-transverse-mode waveguides at 153S nm wavelength were fabricated in a cormπercially available phosphate alkali glass that was co-doped with 0,99 xl0J1> Er ** iαns/cm3 and 3.97 xlO20 Yb'"1 ions cma.7,t Phosphate glass is a vety good host material for ytterbium and erbiutn ions since the sensitizstion efficiency is nearly unity and large
Figure imgf000045_0001
doping concentrations are possible before the onset of concentration quenching. The guides were formed by ton exchange of + for Na* using line apertures 3 to B μm wide etched in a 200 nm thick aluminum mask layer. The exchange time was 4 hours in an aluminum orucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 "C. Inspection of the samples using refractive near-field scanning after the ion exchange revealed that the regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had become recessed by approximately 1 μ during the exchange process, ,0 The meehaαlπn behind the etching of the glass during the exchange is currently under investigation, and we think it is caused by residual water in the hygroscopic nitrate melt.9 The surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions, as observed using a 1 OOOx nomaxski contrast microscope, appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses.
The waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels. The length of the waveguides prior to the grating fabrication step was 2-2 em. Measurements of the waveguide mode-field dimensions showed that a single transverse mode was supported in each of the waveguides. For tho guide formed with the 6.5 μm mask aperture, the 1/e full-widths of ihc mode-field intensity were 16 μm wide by 11 μm deep at 1.54 μm wavelength. It supported muldple transverse modes at the 977 nro pump waveleπgth- However, when the device was lasing, the pump energy was confined primarily within the loww-t order transverse mode, which had 1/e dimensions of 13 μm wide by 9,5 μtti deep. All measurements of the intensity profije are within an estimated experimental error of ± 10%. A DBR surface relief grating was fabricated hσlographlcally in a 0.5 μm thick layer of Shipley 1805" photoresist using a 90" eomor that split a collimatod laser beam into two beams.1 ' The co er was mounted on a rotation stage so that the angle of the two bea s could be varied. One surface of the comer was a mirror, and the other surface was a vacuum chuck for holding the sample Light from a 457.8 nm Ar-ion laser was spatially filtered by focusing through a 15 μm pϊnhole using a 20x objective lens. The beam was collimated using a 76 mm diameter lens with a 350 mm focel length. The exposure angle was pet to write a grating with a pitch of Λ " 507.8 nm. For a waveguide with estimated effeotive index of 1.515 ± 0.003, this pitch should provide laser operation at λ *1538.6 nm ± 3 nm.. The exposure time for the photoresist was 19 s with 3.85 mW incident in each arm on the 0.44 cm2 exposed region (0.8 cm long x 0.55 cm wide), The grating was developed in undiluted Shipley CD-30* developer. During the development, the diffraction of light from a 632.8 nm HeNe laser was monitored-11 When the first-order diffracted power reached a peak, the grating was removed, rinsed, and dried.
Before transferring the photoresist pattern into the glass by Ar-ion sputtering, we deposited 40 nm of Cr on the surface with the specimen inclined 60β to the eleøtron-beam evaporation source. Mounting the specimen in this way causes Cr to accumulate only on
Figure imgf000047_0001
the tops of the grating lines and not In the grooves, thus providing a durable etch mask. We etched the grating in the glass for 20 minutes using a reactive ion etching system with a 6.67 Pa (βO mTorr) Ar-ion plasma- The low-pressuro plasma created a large self-bias voltage of 1700 V when running at 365 W of coupled power with frequency 13,5 MHz, The eloctxt»de spacing was 3-2 cm. After etching, the sample was cleaned ultrasonicaUy in photoresist stripper at 85 °C. Figure 1 is an illustration of the completed DBR. laser array. An atomie force microscope micro-graph of a typical grating etched in this type of phosphate glass can be found in reference [11].
The waveguide laser cavities wore formed by placing a thin, highly reflecting (R~99.9% at 1540 u . R*=15% at 977 nm) dielectric mirror on the pump input fteet. The trύrror was held in place by a spring clip, and mdex-matching fluid was used between the mirror and the waveguide facet. The DBR grating was used as the laser output coupler, We tested the laser by coupling Ught from a Ti'-AljOj laser tuned to a wavelength of 977 nm using a 4- objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.1. The launching efficiency was estimated to be between 65 and 71 percent. To determine the launching efficiency we measured the Fresnel reflectance of the input rnirror, the loss of the launching objective, and the excess coupling loss. Figure 2 shows the laser output power *s a function of launched pump power and the spectrum of the laser. The waveguide diflusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 μm. The slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power ia calculated to be 26 percent when we take the coupling factor to be 71 percent.
We estimated the reflectance of the grating using (he simplified laser formula derived from the theory of Rigrod:13
Figure imgf000048_0001
where /*, le the output power at the grating end and Pi h the output power at the end opposite the grating. 2tx i* the grating reflectance and Λ* is the reflectance of the attached mirror. We used two mirrors with reflectances of 80 and 90 percent for &z. For both cases we calculated the grating reflectance, Rι, to be 65 percent.
Figure imgf000048_0002
To investigate the longitudinal mode structure of the laser WB coupled the laser output into an optical fibor scanning Fabry Perot interferometer with a free spectral range of 124 GH-5. Figure 3 shows that the laser operated on a single longitudinal mode When the coupled pump power did not exceed 300 mW. The laser was robustly single frequency with TE polarisation, and no mode hopping was observed. The inset in Figure 3 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when the coupled pump power exceeded 300 m W, In this pump egime* the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, sϊngle- frequency operation, and dual-frequency operation. By measuring the 'frequency spacing between the longitucunal modes we determined that the physical length of the laser cavity was 1.4 cm,
We measured the linewidth of the laser using a conventional -.elf-heterodyne configuration wit a 75 MHz frequency shift.14 The path length difference between the two arms was 1 km ooπcsponding to a linewidth resolution limit of 30 kHz for a gaussian line shape.15 Optical isolators were used in both arms to prevent optical linewidth narrowing due to feedback; however, the output end of the laser was not beveled. Figure 4 shows the self-heterodyne spectrum. The laser linewidth we obtained from this measurement was 500 kH?.
Finally, we measured the laser wavelengths of other waveguides on the chip using an automatic spectrum analyzer with a resolution of 0.1 nm. Seven of the eleven waveguides on the chip exhibited laser oscillation. The waveguides formed through the smaller apertures did not achieve threshold because the smaller mode volumes caused a reduction of the gain such that the 45 percent transmlttance loss of grating could not be overcome. Figure S she s the change in wavelength trend as we scanned the
Figure imgf000049_0001
waveguides. The wavelength Increases as the diflusion aperture width increases, which is consistent with u-creasing effective index as the aperture width Increases.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated an array of high power, robustly single- frequency, integrated, DBR waveguide lasers operating near 1536 nm wavelength. The slope efficiencies of the lasers are 26 percent based on launched pump power, and the threshold is less than 50 mW when pumped at a wavelength of 977 nm, The Iinewidths of the lasers were measured to be 500 kHz, and the outputs were linearly polarised in a TB mode. We arc currently Investigating thetemperature stability of the lasers and the relative intensity noise (RIN). We expect that with diode laser pumping, the RIN will be similar to other results presented for single-frequency fiber lasers and will fall below - 150 dB/Hz above 10. MHz.M We anticipate that the output power and efficiency will increase and me threshold power will decrease when the grating reflectance "is increased. This is possible with only minor adjustments to the grating fabrication process. Further improvements will also be realized by directly coating the high reflector onto the waveguide end facets. We have shown that lasers with several output wavelengths can be integrated on a single glass substrate. This demonstration shows that stable, multi- wavelength, WDM sources with wavelengths falling on the Inteπuitioπal Telocommunications Union (ITU) grid can be realized by writing Several gratings of varying period in Yb Er-co-doped glass waveguides formed by ion exchange.
Figure imgf000050_0001
References
'T. Kitagawa, F. Bilodeau, B. Malo, S. Theriault, J. Albert, D.C, Jihnson, K.O. Hill, K. Hattori, and Y, Hibino. Electron. Lett. 30. 1311 (1994). aA. Yeniay, J.-M.P. Delavaux, J- Toulouse, D- Barbler, T. A Strasser, and J.R- Podrazanπi, IBEB Photonics Techaol. Lett 9, 1099 (1997).
5J,T. Kringlebotn, J.-L. Archambault, L. Reekie. J.E. Townsend, G.G. Vienne, and D.N. Payne, Electron- Lett. 30, 972 (1994). W.H- Loh, B.N, Samson, L. Dong, G . Cowle, and K. Rm, Lightwave Technol. 16, 114 (1998).
SGJ. Vossler, C J. Brooks, and .A. Winlck, Blectroo. Lett.31, 1162 (1995).
*T.Y. Fan, R.L. yer. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 24, 89S (1988), IOG-1 laser glass, Schott Glass Technologies, Inc., 400 York Avenue, Duryea, PA.
"Specific materials and process chemicals are reported only to make the process reproducible and are not endorsed by the U.S. Government. Other materials and chemicals may work as ell or better,
SP. Fournier, P. e»h-dnfain, M.A. Fardad, M.P. Andrews, and S.I. Nftjafi, Electron. Lett. 33, 293 (1997).
10 B. Groebli, B. Gisiπ, N. Giβin and H. Zbinden, Opt. Engineerinln& 34, 2309 (1995), N. H. Fontaine and M. Young, "Refracted near-field scanning of fibers and waveguides," submitted to J. Lightwave Technol. n.D.L. Vcasey, K.J. Malone, J.A. Aust, NA. Sanford, and A. Roβhko, Proo, 7th Eur. Conf. on Int Opt p. 579, Delft, (1995). J.B. Roman and K.A. Wmiok, Appl. Phys. Lett 61, 2744 (1992).
,2L. Li, M Xu. G.I. Stegeman, C-T. Seaton. SPIE Proc 835, 72 (1987).
11 W.W. Rigxod, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2487 (1955). D.H. McMahoπ, W-A. Dyes, J. Lightwave Technol. 6, 1102 (1988). 15 J.W. Goodman, Statistical Oρticsy Wxley&Sorts, 1985, p. 168.
Figure imgf000051_0001
Figure imgf000052_0001
5 6 7 8
Diffusion Aperture Width (μm)
Figure imgf000052_0002
170 mW cw at 1540 nm from an erblm Gerblu-H co-doped glass wa.veguid-5 twer
D-.S, Funk, D. L. Veasey, P, . Peters end N. A Sanford
Figure imgf000053_0001
National Institute of Standard? end Technology,
Optøelec rύa-Cf Division, 814.04,
325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 10303
Bbone: (303M«-a289 ftae (SQJ><« MW dflmk@boulderJilstgnv
Figure imgf000053_0002
Compact tolid txtae lasers brand on the 1.5 μm Er*4 transhiαo. hold promise
Figure imgf000053_0003
Waveguides weiv fabricated in a cornrnen.ialIy available phosphate glass.' Tha (l ss was co- doped with l .15 wt % Er,Q, (0.99*10* tons/cm') and 4.73 wt % YbjQ, (3.07 10* lans/em1). Waveguide ware formed by K'-Na* exdjange througb a 200 nm thick Al cask layt wjtfa channel aperture* ran ing from 3 to 8 μ in width. The exchange occurred la tKNO*fnehaτ375 *C far4 hours In an Al σurible- The laser results reported here are for a 6.5 μm wide mask aperture. Inspection of the samples lter die ion exchange process revealed that the regions of the glatt mr&ee corresponding to flw location of the m*sk openings had become recessed by one (o two microns during the axchange process. The widths of the etched channels were close to the wfcfths of the mask apertu es an& uniform In width and depth, The mechanism behind the apparent etching of the glass during the exe-hange process Is currently under Investigation. '
The retractive hce as • function of position within the exchanged stunple was anar zad usint a refraerive near.nrld scanning method.* Figure 1 shows the Index depth profile at tho center of the wevegu.de roπncd wfe the 6.$ μm mask aperture for a wtvel ngth of 633 nm. This method allow* the relative position and absolute fadex values to be determined with an accuracy of 0.7 ura and 0 not respectively. ** w ''
The transverse modes of the waveguides ert dιar «erlzβd by coupling light at the wiYeleaah 0f inierwt into one end of the waveguide and Inwglns the light emerging ficm the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera. The unceniunty of the mode dimensions detwm-ned using this method are -10 W The device supported a ringle transverse mode at 1.54 pm having dimensions of 14.5 μm wide by 7J lim deeo (measured at the l/e polws). The iv- ilde unvaried multiple transverse modes at 980 nm. HovwvcT hen the device was sing, me pump energy was confined primarily within t» lowest
Figure imgf000054_0001
1 J. E. Roman. M. HempireAd. W. S. Brocklβby, S. Nouh, 1. S, Wlfl nson. P. Gamy, C. Ltππin u* and A.
Begutn. "lon-cx changed ErtY waveguide User at 1 ,5 um pumped by laser diode," Electron. (t., vol.
31. p. 1345. 1995.
'G. . Vossler. C. J. Brooks and K_ A. Winick, "Planar Er:Yb glass Ion exchange waveguide laser,"
Electron. Leli.. vol, 31, p. 1162, 1995,
*D. Barbler, J. M, Delavaux. R. . Hyde. /. : Jouanno, A. Kt vorkiaπ and P. Gastaldo, Tuw-bllity of
Yb/Er integrated optical scn in phosphjita glass," λwplifiert and their ApplciΛioπs, 1995 Tech. Dig.
Sen;, Davos: Switzerland, vol. 18, paper PD3. J. Amln. . L. Vβasey, N. A. Sarifurd and J. S. Haydeo, "Waveguide lasers by ion-exchange in Er-dopcd ttlass," In ttare-Eorth-Doff€d Devices, Proc. SPiB, vol.2996, p. 135, 1997,
' lOG-l laser *lass, Schott Glass Technologies, Inc., 400 York Avenue. Duryea, PA. The IOQ.I trβdβπamc is used to allow the reader to reproduce the experiment and does not Imply endorsement by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology.
* B. Groebll. B. Olsln, GUIn and H. Zblπdeπ, "Measuring retractive index profiles of integrated LtNbQi wa veguldei,-' Opt, Eπgtneerlitlήg, vol. _M, p. 2J09, 19S»5. O 2000/045477
Figure imgf000055_0001
oaW-βt *) 1 -TΓ y-aap fewer (nV)
Fig Dl . fce- tivc fa-tø profit ιβ ϋ3 BEI of an ErΛYb pkαpbc-e glass wavefu.de, obtti/ied Wbg a redacted near-field tcatB-taa -oβtfatd-
Figure imgf000055_0002
wavrfeaftfax.
Figure imgf000055_0003
lo gjβss waveguide lasers in silicate glavβea
Figure imgf000056_0001
P. M Peters, D. L. Veasey, D. S. Funk and N. A. Sanford Optoelectronics Division, 815.04, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325
Broadway, Bowlder, CO 80303
S. N. Houde-Walter The Institute of Optics. University of Rochester, Rochester, NY .14627
J. S. Hayden RocD-Materials Group, Schott Glass Technologies, Inc., 400 York Avenue, Duryea,PA
16642
Waveguide laser? and amplifiers in glasses oodoped with Ex** and Yb9* are promising candidates for compact multifunctional devices operating near 1.5 μm, The large gain bandwidth resulting from the homoganeously broadened jdass host makes these devices ideal for narrow-line sources useful in wavelength division multiplexing applications. In addition, due to the short cavity lengths, these waveguide lasers offer the possibility of high repetition rate (GHz) mode-locked lasers using semiconductor sat rαble absorbers. Such lasers would be ideal as sources for sollton communications systems. Other applications requiring an eye→9ftfe wavelength, such as remote sensing and range finding, could benefit from compact, high power cw or Q-βwltched waveguide laser sources based on these materials. Additionally, o tical amplifiers offering gain in the range X530 to 1550 nm may be realized,1 ft is known that the Er5* concentration must be kept relatively low (- 1 wt %) in these devices in order to reduce the deleterious effects of cooperative upconverslon. However, the concentration of sensitizing b** is not limited due to any ion-ion Interaction, and is expected to have a significant effect on device performance. Various authors have investigated this problem theoretically.*9 In this paper we report experimental results for waveguide lasers fabricated by *-Na* Ion exchange in silicate glasses with Yb^.Er** ratios of 3:1, 5:1, and 6:1. ∑n addition, we show how it is possible to increase the signal mode volume and optimize the pump'signal overlap through ju icious choice of laser host material and ion exchange processing parameters. The result is an Er^ b3* waveguide laser producing as much as 19.6 mW at 1.54 μm with 39B rn W of launched pump power at 974.5 nm.
The devices were fabricated in a commercially available laser glass.4 The glass is a phosphorus-free, mixed-alkali, zinc silicate glass. Nominally, all three glasses were doped with 1 wt% EnOj (0.S5 x 10* cnτ») and the glasses designated NIST10A, NISTlOC, and NIST10E contain Er^.Yb3* ratios of 3;1 (2.47 x 10»* Yb5* Jons CΠT*) , 51 (4.16 x 10* em-5) , and β:l (6.83 x lO∞ cm*), respectively. The results reported were obtained by ion exchange through 3 μm apertures In 150 nm thick Al sk layers. The ion exchange was carried out in a melt of 100% KNOs for 14 hours at 400 *C.
' Contribution of the U.S, Oovenimeftl. not wbject to
Figure imgf000056_0002
The optical modes of the waveguides at the signal wavelength were evaluated by
Figure imgf000057_0001
determined to give the highest slope efficiency are plotted. Highest slope efficiency performance in each host is also compared i
Figure imgf000058_0004
Figure imgf000058_0001
Table 1; Performance data for highest slope efficiency devices fabricated in IOG 0 silicate glass with different Yb**.Br** dopant ratios,
Figure imgf000058_0002
The experimental results indicate that the optimal dopant ratio is close to 5 Yb9* or each Er5*. Increasing the dopant ratio from 3:1 to 5:1 leads to an improvement in slope efficiency. Further increasing the dopant ratio to 8:1 does not improve the efficiency of the device, but does lead to a substantial penalty in pump power requirements, Recent efforts have been directed towa d β7 anding the above results using a rigorous scalar model developed at NIST.5 In addition, alteration of the potassium content of the host glass is being investigated as a way to adjust the modal volume and decrease pump threshold requirements,
Figure imgf000058_0003
Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped Waveguide Lasers in Phosphate Glass*
David I,. Veasey, David S. Funk, Philip M. Peters, Norman A. Sanford,
Gregory E. Obarski, Norman Fontaine, Matt Young, Adclc P. Peskin", Wei-chih
I.lub, S.N. Houde-Walterc, Joseph S. Harden"
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Optoelectronics Division, 325 Broadway, MC 815.04
Boulder, CO 80303-3328
E- ail. vea.seγ(ώJbυuhler. nisl.gov
"National Institute of Standards & Technology High Performance Systems and Services Division, 325 Broadway, MC 890.02
Boulder, CO 80303-3328 E-mail.^ peskin&»,bυulder. i.st.gov bRochester Theory Center University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
E-mail: wclin@pas.rochester.edu cThe Institute, of Optics University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627
E-mail: shwtøoptics.roclu's ir.eou
dSchott Glass Technologies, Inc. 400 YorkAve., Duryea, PA 18642, USA
E-mail: ihavdcn(ώ,'>s230L. attmail. com
Abstract
Wc present experimental and theoretical results of our recent work on the development of waveguide lasers using rare-earth-dopcd phosphate glasses. Λn improvement has been achieved over previously reported waveguide laser results using the process of ion exchange in a commercially available Yb/Er-co-dopcd phosphate glass composition. Wc have demonstrated slope eflϊcicncies near 30 percent with output powers approaching 200 mW for 1540 nm Fabry- Perot waveguide lasers. These lasers are continuously tunable over approximately 70 nm. In addition, Yb-dopcd Fabry-Perot waveguide lasers have been fabricated and tested. These lasers
" Contribution of Ihc U.S. Government. Not subject to copyright ' operate near 1020 nm wavelength with slope efficiency of 67 %. We have also realized arrays of single-frequency distributed-Bragg-reflcclor waveguide lasers operating near 1.5 μm by etching a grating in ion-cxchangcd waveguides. Each laser in the array operates at a different wavelength. The slope efficiencies as a function of launched pump power arc 26 % and the thresholds occur at approximately 50 mW of launched pump power. Temperature tuning of the wavelengths is also demonstrated. 1. Introduction
Waveguides in rare-earth-doped materials for lasers and amplifiers have been fabricated using a number of different methods. These include thermal and ficld-assisled ion exchange in bulk-doped silicate and phosphate glasses ^'"8J and film deposition of several rarc-earth-doped dielectric films that are formed into optical channel waveguides. Film deposition or formation methods include rf sputtering, t9",ϋ] plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition,' n J flame hydrolysis 12J ion implantation, l'31 laser ablation, Il4] and sol-gel deposition1153. In this paper we restrict our discussion lo waveguide lasers that are formed by ion-exchange in Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-dopcd phosphate glasses. We report on the development of the glass used to fabricate waveguide lasers and present recent measurement results for waveguide lasers. These measurements include slope efficiency and threshold, wavelength tuning, relative intensity noise and linewidth for single frequency distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) waveguide lasers. We conclude this paper with a brief discussion of a method to optimize the performance of waveguide lasers using a combination of experimental results and theoretical predictions. 2. Experimental Procedures
2.1 Development of Phosphate Glass
Perhaps the most critical step in the development of a robust waveguide laser technology is the design and realization of a suitable laser glass that supports ion exchange. The laser properties that must be engineered in the glass include the absorption and emission cross sections of the laser transition and the absorption and emission cross sections of the optical pump energy level. The spontaneous emission lifetimes must also be optimized for the laser and pump transition with the laser transition lifetime relatively long and the lifetime of the pump level as short as possible. Laser operation is also improved by reducing or eliminating the effects of cooperative upconversion. In codoped glasses, such as Yb/Er-eodopcd glass, the energy transfer efficiency from the sensitizing ion must be maximized. Yb codoping with Er in phosphate glasses can provide near unity sensitizing efficiencies. Il6
In addition to optimizing the rare-earth ion spectroscopic properties, the glass must have properties that allow the fabrication of channel waveguides. The most common way lo form waveguides in bulk glasses is the process of ion exchange, where alkali ions in the glass arc exchanged for ions with larger polarizability, thus causing an increase in the refractive index near the glass surface. Such a process requires that the starting glass contain alkali-oxide components such as Na2O or K2O. At the same time, the chemical treatments employed in conventional waveguide fabrication by lithographic technology demand that the host glasses offer chemical durability so that substrate surfaces are not degraded during the processing of devices.
A final requirement for waveguide laser glasses is that the rare-earth doping concentration be as large as possible to reduce cavity lengths and mode-volumes. It is important that the doping concentration of the active rare earth ions be variable in a manner such that it can be altered without significantly altering the base glass matrix, Without this feature, each doping level can possibly represent a unique processing challenge as processing conditions may need to be adjusted to accommodate changes in base glass properties.
Based on the requirements set out above, we developed a glass that had both good laser and spectroscopic properties and good properties for ion exchange. The resulting glass composition, (with the commercial designation IOG-1 I,7]), is given in mole percent oxide in Table 1. AI2O3 is added chiefly to increase durability since phosphate containing glasses with 2Os content higher than 50 mole percent are normally react with molten salt baths and the other processing chemicals used in waveguide preparation (i.e. to remove ion diffusion barriers). The incorporation of a high total lanthanido content (denoted as 2O in Table 1) also contributes to enhanced chemical durability and allows for variation in active ion concentration with minimal impact on glass properties. The alkali oxide of choice is Na2O since the sodium ion is known to be very mobile in glass and because sodium ion also exchanges well with potassium or silver for waveguide preparation.
All glasses were melted using high purity raw materials. Transition metal content in the glasses was estimated at 20 ppm Fe and less than I ppm for all other common transition metals. Lanthanum, erbium, and ytterbium rare earth compounds were selected to minimize the introduction of other lanthanide elements (less than 1000 ppm total). Melting and refining temperatures were typically 1250 to 1350 °C, with refining periods of 2 to 3 hours. Produced glass was east into molds and annealed at 530 °C for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature at 30 °C/hr. Cast blocks were then used to prepare characterization samples for refractive index, density and residual hydroxyl content at 3.0
μm and 3.333 μm. The measurements of index and density allowed calculation of
estimated index values at lasing wavelengths and number density allowed calculation of estimated index values at lasing wavelengths and number density of rare earth input content using standard techniques. fl8) Absorption at these wavelengths was monitored and held to levels of less than 1.0 cm"1 and 1.8 cm"1, respectively. 2.2 Spectroscopic Measurements
Yb Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 glass samples with were prepared for measurement of spectral absorption. Both glasses were doped with Yb concentration of 4 x 1020 cm"3 and the eodoped sample contained 1 x 1020 cm"3Er ions. The dimensions of the characterization samples were 9-mm thick, 21 -mm tall and 10 mm wide. The absorption spectra were measured using an automatic spectrophotometer. The emission cross section spectrum for the erbium ions was calculated using the theory of McCumber f 191 as applied by Miniscalco and Qui by I2°3 using the measured spectral absorption. The Yb emission cross section was obtained from measured spontaneous emission spectra and scaled to give the measured radiative decay rate. To measure the emission spectra, the samples were pumped at a wavelength of 974 nm and the spectra were recorded using a 0.3-m triple grating spectrometer.
The lifetime of the 43 2 Er laser manifold in the eodoped glass was measured in the limit of vanishing excitation power by chopping a 974 nm pump laser beam at 50 Hz using an acoustooptic modulator. The florescence decay near 1550 n wavelength was observed to determine the 1/e lifetime. The lifetime of the 2F's/2 Yb level was measured similarly by observing florescence decay near 974 nm. 2.3 Waveguide Laser Fabrication Process
Waveguide lasers were fabricated in Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped IOG-1 phosphate glasses. The Yb/Er glass was doped with 1.15 wt % Er2O3 (l.OxlO20 ions/cm3) and 4.73
wt % Yb2O3 (4.0 102n ions/cm3). For the Yb-doped laser, the glass was doped with 4.73
wt % Yb2O3 (4.0x1020 ions/cm3). Waveguides were formed by K4-Na+ exchange through
channel apertures ranging in width from 3 to 8 μm. The apertures were etched in a 200 nm thick Al mask layer. The exchange was performed in a crucible containing molten KNO3 at 375 °C for 4 h. The Yb/Er laser results reported below are for a waveguide
formed using a 6.5 μm mask aperture and the Yb laser results are for a 3 μm mask
aperture.
A distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) surface relief grating was fabricated on a comb of eleven waveguides using a separate eodoped specimen in a 0.5 μm thick layer of photoresist. A 90° comer split a collimated laser beam into two beams for a holographic exposure. [2):1 The exposure angle was set to write a grating with a period of Λ - 507.8 nm.
For a waveguide with estimated effective index of 1.515 ± 0.003, this period was
calculated to provide laser operation at λ =1538.6 nm ± 3 nm. During the development of the photoresist, the diffraction of light from a 632.8 nm HeNc laser was monitored, [22j When the first-order-diffracted power reached a maximum, the grating was removed, rinsed, and dried.
Before transferring the photoresist pattern into the glass by Ar-ion sputtering, we deposited 40 nm of Cr on the surface with the specimen inclined 60° to the electron-beam evaporation source. Mounting the specimen in this way causes Cr to accumulate only on the tops of the grating lines and not in the grooves, thus providing a durable etch mask. We etched the grating in the glass for 20 minutes using a reactive ion etching system with 6.67 Pa (50-mTorr) Ar-ion plasma. The low-pressure plasma created a large self-bias voltage of 1700 V when running at 365 W of coupled power with frequency 13.5 MHz. The electrode spacing was 3.2 cm. After being etched, the sample was cleaned ultrasonically in photoresist stripper at 85 °C. Figure 1 shows a schematic of a completed DBR laser array. 2.4 Waveguide and Laser Measurements
Several measurements were performed to determine the properties of the ion exchanged waveguides. The refractive index as a function of position within the sample was analyzed using the method of refractive near-field scanning. l23iTh dimensions of transverse modes of the waveguides were measured by coupling light into one end of the waveguide and imaging the light emerging from the other end onto a calibrated infrared camera.
To test the Yb/Er-codoped Fabry-Perot lasers (lasers with no etched gratings), we typically pumped the waveguides using a tunable Ti: A12O3 laser. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the laser measurement setup. Placing broadband dielectric mirrors on the polished waveguide end faces formed the laser cavities. The mirrors were held in place by small spring clips with index matching oil between the end facet and the mirror. The
pump laser light was launched through one of the mirrors with a 4X microscope objective.
The laser output and unabsorbed pump light were collimated with a 16X microscope objective and separated using filters. The mirror through which the pump light was launched had a reflectance of >99.9 % and 15 % at 1 ,54 and 0.96 μm, respectively. The output coupler had a reflectance of 80 % at 1.54 μm and 15 % at 0.96 μm. Neither the waveguide length nor the cavity output couplings were optimized.
The Yb-dopcd waveguide laser was tested using a setup similar to the one shown in Fig 2. The Yb34 device was 10 mm in length. The pump-input mirror had a reflectance of 50 % at 950 nm and 98 % at 1030 nm. Two output couplers with transmittances of 7 % and 21 % at 1020 nm were investigated. These output couplers had reflectances of 32 % and 34 % at 950 nm, respectively.
The configuration shown in Fig 2 was also used to evaluate the slope efficiency and threshold of a Yb/Er-codopcd DBR laser. The DBR grating was used as the output coupler instead of the end mounted mirror. To investigate the longitudinal mode structure of the laser wc coupled the laser output into an optical fiber scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer with a free spectral range of 124 GHz.
We measured the linewidth of the DBR laser using a conventional sclf-hetcrodync configuration with a 75 MHz frequency shift. p4J The path length difference between the two amis in the self-heterodyne system was 10 km, corresponding to a linewidth resolution limit of 30 kHz for a Gaussian line shape.1253 Optical isolators were used in both arms to prevent optical linewidth narrowing due to feedback; however, the output end of the laser was not beveled.
Several other laser parameters were measured for the DBR laser. We measured the laser wavelengths of other waveguides on the chip using an automatic spectrum analyzer with a resolution of 0.1 nm to determine the variation in wavelength as a function of diffusion aperture width. The excess relative intensity noise (RIN) of the DBR laser formed with an 8 μm diffusion aperture between 0.1 and 1.1 GHz was measured using a shot noise calibrated RIN measurement system that employs a rf spectrum analyzer. A grating-stabilized, 974-nm pigtailed laser diode served as the pump source. Light from the pump was coupled to a waveguide laser using aspheric lenses. The output power of the DBR laser was set to 2 mW for the measurement. The wavelength of the DBR laser was temperature tuned by varying the temperature of the laser chip from 30 °C to 80 °C using a resistive heater in contact with the waveguide mount. 3. Experimental Results
3.1 Spectroscopic Results and Lifetimes
Figure 3a shows the spectral dependence of absorption and emission cross sections of the erbium ions in Yb/Er-codoped IOG-1. The peak emission cross section of the Er3+ using this method was found to be 6.6 x 10"21 cm2 at 1542 nm. The measured upper state lifetime of the 4li32 Er manifold was measured to be 8.1 ms in the limit of vanishing excitation power. Figure 3b shows the spectral dependence of the absorption and emission cross sections for IOG-1 glass doped with a Yb concentration of 4 x 1020cm"3, The peak emission cross section of the 2Fs/2 laser manifold is 1.27 x 10'20 cm2 and occurs at a wavelength of 974 nm. The radiative lifetime of the 2F5 2 level was measured to be 1.4 s, The peak absorption cross section was at 974 nm and was 1.28 x 10"20 cm2. Uncertainties in these reported cross sections arc ≤ 20 %. A discussion of the Yb-Er cross relaxation efficiency will follow in the discussion section.
3.2 Waveguide Measurement Results
Visual inspection of the waveguide samples after the ion exchange revealed that regions of the glass surface corresponding to the location of the mask openings had
become recessed by approximately 1 μm during the exchange process. The widths of the recessed channels were close to the widths of the mask apertures and uniform in width and depth. The surface quality of the glass in the recessed regions, observed using a lOOOx Nomarski contrast microscope, appears identical to the original surface of the glass and apparently does not cause significant scattering losses. The waveguide end faces were polished perpendicular to the channels. The final sample length was 22 mm.
Figure 4 shows the refractive index depth profile obtained from the refracted ray
measurement method at the center of the waveguide formed with the 6.5 μm mask aperture. The data was taken using a wavelength of 635 nm. The spatial resolution is -1 μ , and the uncertainty of the absolute index value is ~0.001. The index profile indicates a maximum index change of 0.008 that is typical of potassium-sodium ion exchange.
The waveguide supported a single transverse mode having dimensions of 16 μ
wide by 11 μm deep (measured at the 1/e points of intensity profile) at 1540 nm. It
supported multiple transverse modes at 980 nm. However, when the devices were lasing, the pump energy was confined primarily within the lowest order transverse mode, which had dimensions of 13 μm wide by 9.5 μm deep. The uncertainty of the mode dimensions determined using this method are ~10 %. 3.3 Yb/Er Fabry-Perot Waveguide Laser Measurement Results
The laser output power as a function of coupled pump power for the 22 mm device pumped at 960 nm, is shown in Figure 5. We estimated the coupling efficiency of the incident pump power to be between 65 and 71 %, including losses due to the transmitlanee of the input mirror and launching objective. The coupled pump power shown on the x- axis in Figure 5 was calculated based on a 71 % coupling efficiency. The uncertainty of the power measurements are estimated to be 5 %. The threshold pump power was 23 mW, and the slope efficiency was 28 %. One end of the waveguide was accidentally chipped during our experiments and necessitated the repolishing of the end face. The output powers as a function of coupled pump powers of the resulting 20-mm long waveguide laser, when pumped at 979 nm, arc also shown in Fig. 5. The launched pump power threshold was 51 mW, and a maximum output power of 170 mW was obtained for 610 W of launched pump power. At these power levels, there was no change in the slope efficiency as a function of pump power, suggesting that the Yb ions are not saturating as they do in Yb/Er-codoped silica fiber lasers. l26'
The Yb Er-laser usually operated at several wavelengths simultaneously. A typical
laser spectrum showing simultaneous operation at 1.536, 1.541- and 1.545 μm is depicted
in Figure 6. The laser spectrum could be shifted in wavelength by passing some of the
collimated 1.5 μm laser output through a prism and reflecting it back through the prism and into the waveguide using a dielectric mirror. This operation formed a weakly coupled, external cavity. The cavity is shown in Fig. 7a. Rotating the output coupler mirror produced wavelengths ranging from 1536 lo 1595 nm.
Tuning of the laser was also accomplished using the extended cavity configuration shown in Figure 7b. We used a first order grating with a reflectance of 0.6 for the laser output coupler. We rotated the grating and could tune the laser from 1525 nm to 1 64 nm when the coupled pump power was 280 mW at a wavelength of 980 nm. The laser output power as a function of wavelength is illustrated in Fig. 8a. Three representative spectra of the laser arc shown in Fig, 8b. 3.4 Yb-doped waveguide laser measurement results The laser output power as a function of launched pump power is shown in Figure 9. The launching efficiency of the pump for these measurements was 45 %, For the 7 % output coupler, the threshold when pumped at 949 n was 18 mW of coupled pump power. For the 21 % output coupler, the threshold pump power was 25 W, and up to 120 mW of output power was obtained. The slope efficiency was 67 % when based on coupled pump power.
Like the Yb/Er laser, the Yb laser typically operated at several wavelengths simultaneously. At lower pump powers, the longer wavelength transitions dominate due to ground slate re-absorption losses, which arc larger at shorter wavelengths. As the pumping intensity in the waveguide increases, the Yb-ion ground state population and hence the ground state re-absorption loss is reduced, and the shorter wavelength transitions, which lie closer to the peak of the Yb3+ emission cross section, are favored. The Yb-dopcd waveguide laser was tuned by reflecting some of the collimated laser output power back into the waveguide using the first-order reflection from a diffraction grating having 1200 grooves/mm. The cavity was similar to Fig. 7b. Rotating the grating tuned the laser continuously from 986 nm to 1 50 nm, 3.4 Single-frequency Yb/Er-codoped DBR lasers
Figure 10 shows the DBR laser output power as a function of launched pump power and the spectiαim of the laser. The waveguide diffusion aperture for this waveguide was 8 μm. The slope efficiency as a function of launched pump power is calculated lo be 26 % when wc take the pump coupling factor to be 71 %.
We estimated the reflectance of the grating using the simplified laser formula derived from the theory of Rigrod.'l27]
Figure imgf000071_0001
where Pi is the output power al the grating end and P is the output power at the end opposite the grating. Ri is the grating reflectance and R2 is the refleclanee of the attached minor. We used two mirrors with reflectances of 80 and 90 percent for R2- For both cases wc calculated the giating reflectance Rι to be 65 percent.
Figure 11 shows that the laser operated on a single longitudinal mode when the coupled pump power did not exceed 300 mW. The laser was robustly single frequency with TE polarization, and no mode hopping was observed. The inset in Figure 11 shows that a second longitudinal mode appeared when the coupled pump power exceeded 300 mW. In Ihis pump regime, the laser was unstable and exhibited mode hopping, single- frequency operation, and dual-frequency operation. By measuring the frequency spacing between the longitudinal modes we determined that the effective physical length of the laser cavity was 1.4 cm.
Figure 12 shows the self-heterodyne spectrum. The laser linewidth wc obtained from this measurement was 500 kHz. Seven of the eleven waveguides on the chip exhibited laser oscillation. The waveguides formed through the smaller apertures did not achieve threshold because the smaller mode volumes caused a reduction of the gain such that the 35 % transmittancc loss of the grating could not be overcome. Table 3 shows the laser operating wavelengths as we scanned the comb of waveguides that had diffusion aperture widths ranging from 5 to 8 μm. In general, the wavelength increases as the diffusion aperture width increases, which is consistent with increasing effective index as the aperture width increases. A visible defect was apparent on waveguide No. 4 that caused a deviation from the trend.
The results of the RIN measurements are shown in Figure 13. Figure 13a shows that the RIN dropped to less than - 150 dB/Hz for frequencies above ~0.5 GH?., The data have not been smoothed. We estimate the uncertainty in the RTN to be 2 dB/Hz. By measuring the relative amplitude noise (with respect to the noise floor) between 100 kHz and 10 MHz, wc found that the relaxation oscillation peak was located near 350 kHz as shown in Fig. 13b. These noise measurements are consistent with those of Er-doped fiber lasers, and we expect lower RIN when the laser is operated further above threshold.1261
The wavelength as a function of temperature is shown in Fig. 14. The tuning range for
the test laser varied linearly from 1536 nm to 1536.8 nm for a change in wavelength Δλ, of 0.8 nm. This tuning range matches well with the predicted tunability of the laser of 0.6 nm over 50 °C. The prediction is based on the thermal expansion coefficient of the glass and the change in refractive index as a function of the change in temperature, and is approximated by the following equations:
Δλ
Figure imgf000072_0001
where Λ is the grating period and n is the refractive index of the glass. The wavelength stability as a function of temperature is roughly 15 times smaller than that of typical semiconductor DFB lasers.r2SJ Thus the temperature control requirements for maintaining a stable wavelength arc relaxed. 4. Discussion
It is important to note that the lengths of 22 mm and 20 mm are not optimum lengths for these Yb/Er-codoped waveguide lasers. Using a waveguide laser simulation tool, wo predicted the laser output characteristics as a function of length and waveguide mode-field size. The simulation is based on a phcnomenological model which incorporates the Yb/Er laser rate equations on a three dimensional grid, the forward and backward propagating laser signals, and the forward propagating pump signal. I2 ] The propagating intensity profiles were approximated by elliptical functions that approximated the measured transverse laser mode dimensions and the fundamental pump mode dimension. The glass and laser parameters wc used in the model are listed in Table 2. The Yb-Er cross relaxation coefficient ( Cα) and the cooperative upeonversion coefficient (Cup) were the fitting parameters. Reasonable approximations of other laser and waveguide parameters based on actual measurements and analyses were used for other quantities. Figure 5 shows the actual laser data compared to results of the laser simulation. We used Cc - 3.5xl0"16 cm3/s and Cup = 2.5 xl0"18cm3/s lo obtain the best fit. Using Ccr and the approximate equation for cross relaxation quantum efficiency,
Figure imgf000073_0001
from reference 6, we calculated the cross relaxation quantum efficiency to be 97 %, a typical efficiency for phosphate glasses,17 In this equation, we assumed that the lifetime,
τ32. is approximately 2.8 μs. Simulations using different waveguide laser lengths ranging from 1 to 2 cm were performed. Figure 15 shows how the output power varies as a function of cavity length for several output coupling reflectances ranging from 80 to 95 %. and constant laser pump power of 500 mW. Figure 16 shows Ihe output power as a function of mode width, mode depth and output miiror reflectivity for optimized waveguide lasers. The best solutions arc color-coded in red; these ranged from 175 to 185 mW continuous wave output, assuming a nominal cavity length of 1 cm and launched 974-nm pump power of 500 W. The optimum solution has an output mirror reflectance of 82,9%, a laser mode field with
dimensions 6 μ by 12 μm, and a continuous-wave output power of l84 W at 1.54 μm. The optimization used an adaptive simulated annealing algorithm^303 , driven by a waveguide solver E31' and the laser rale equation modelf29]. Details of the optimization method will be presented in a later paper.
5. Conclusions
In summary, we have presented an introduction to the development ofphosphale- bascd laser glass for the fabrication of waveguide lasers. Recent results obtained for Yb/Er-codoped waveguide lasers formed by ion exchange in IOG-1 base glass show a dramatic improvement over previously demonstrated waveguide lasers. The lasers presented in this paper have produced output powers in the 1500 nm telecommunication window approaching 200 W without saturation. Slope efficiencies of 28 % have been achieved. Wavelength tuning has been performed over 70 nm using external cavities. Simulations of Yb/Er-doped waveguide lasers indicated that further improvement of laser performance is possible by optimizing output coupling, cavily length, and doping concentrations. Low-noise DBR lasers that operate on a single longitudinal mode at 1536 nm have been fabricated and tested. The fabrication process can be applied to the manufacture of monolithic laser arrays with wavelengths conforming to the ITU grid for wavelength-division-multiplexed telecommunications. In addition to these results, wc have demonstrated Yb-doped waveguide lasers in phosphate glass operating over a wavelength range of 986 to 1050 nm. These demonstrations of efficient integrated optical lasers clearly show that waveguide lasers are a promising new leclinology that can be used in many applications that have previously been the domain of semiconductor laser sources.
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge the National Science Foundation
(PHY-94-15583) and the U.S. Army Research Office (DAAH04-95-1-0300) for support of the University of Rochester effort.
Table 1: IOG-1 Base Glass Composition (mole %)
P2O5 60
Na2O 24
Figure imgf000076_0001
R = Σ Rare Earths
Table 1. Vcasey
Table 2. Parameteis used to model ihe Yb/Er eodoped waveguide laser
Length of Waveguide Laser Cavity L = 2cm
Signal Field diameters (elliptical 1/e full width) W5X=" 16 μm, Wsy = 11 μm
Pump Field diameters (elliptical, 1/e full width) Wpx=13μm, Wϊy-9.5μm
Signal Effective Index ns=L515
Pump Effective Index np = 1.515
Spontaneous Emission Lifetime of I] 32 τ2ι = 8.1 ms= I/A21
Stimulated Emis
Figure imgf000077_0001
Absorption Cross Section @1540 nm ( 4lιs/2-4Ii3/2) σi2-4.13xl0'21cm2
Er Pump Absorption Cross Section @ 977 nm σi = 1.9x10'21 cm2
Yb Absorpti
Figure imgf000077_0002
Yb Emission Cross Section @ 977 nm ( 2F52-F7/2) σ65=1.19xl0"20cm2
Yb-Er Cross Coupling Coefficient Ccr Fitting parameter, see text
Upeonversion Coefficient Cup Fitting parameter, see text
Signal Wavelength λB- 1540 nm
Pump Wavelength λp=977nm
Er Ion Density Ner=lxl020 cm"3
Yb Ion Density Nyb-4xl020 cm"3
High Reflector Reflectance Ri = 0.9995
Output Coupler Reflectance R2 - 0.80
Nonradiative Lifetime of Level dlι 1/2 τ32=2.8μs = I/A32
Excess Waveguide Scattering Loss αi5 =0.1 dB/cm o-ip = 0.2 dB/cm
Table 2. Vcasey Table: 3. -List of waveguides, mask aperture widths, and corresponding DBR laser output wavelengths
Waveguide Aperture width (μm) Wavelength (nm) i 6.0 1536.02 ~
2 7.5 1536.09
3 7.0 1536.05
4* 6.5 1535.15
5 6.0 1536.26
6 5.5 1536.24
7 5.0 1536.32 observed defect in sample
Table 3. Veasey
Figure 1. Veas y
Figure imgf000079_0001
R=99.9 % 1540 nm
Figure imgf000080_0001
Er/Yb:phosphate glass waveguide
Figure 2. Veasey
Figure imgf000081_0001
Figure 3b. Veasey
Figure imgf000082_0001
Figure 4. Veasey
Figure imgf000083_0001
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 70
Launched Pump Power (mW)
Figure 5. Vcasey
Figure imgf000084_0001
Figure 6. Veasey
Figure imgf000085_0001
Er/Yb:phosphate glass waveguide
Figure 7a. Vcasey
1540 nm output first order
Figure imgf000086_0001
Er/Yb-phosphate glass waveguide
Figure 7b.
Figure imgf000087_0001
1520 1530 1540 1550 1560 157
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 8a, Vcasey
Figure imgf000088_0001
1540 1545 1550 1555 1560 156
Wavelength (nm)
Figure 8b. Veasey
Figure imgf000089_0001
Figure 9. Veasey
Figure imgf000090_0002
Figure imgf000090_0001
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Launched Pump Power at 977 nm (mW
Figure 10. Vcasey
Figure imgf000091_0001
Cavity Sweep
Figure 11. Veasey
Figure imgf000092_0001
<
Beat signal (linear scale)
Figure imgf000092_0002
Figure imgf000093_0001
Φ
S CO
Figure imgf000094_0001
Figure 13b. Veasey
Figure imgf000095_0001
Temperature (°C)
Figure 14. Vcasey
Figure imgf000096_0001
, , -. ,„„
WO 2000/045477
References
[I] . Sa atari and T. Izawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 24, 603 (1974).
[2] .J. Malone, N.A. Sanford, and J.S. Hayden, Electron. Leu. 29, 691 (1993).
[3] T. Feυchtcr, E.K. Mwarania, J, Wang, L. Reekie, J.S. Wilkinson, IEEE Photon. Technol, Lett, 4, 542, (1992).
[4] D. Barbicr, J. Hubner, J.M. Jouanno, A. Kevorkian, A. upascu, Post deadline Conf. Digest,
European Conf. On Integrated Optics (1993).
[5] G.L. Vossler, C.J. Brooks, and K.A. Winik, Electron. Lett. 31, 1162 (1995).
[6J J.E. Roman, M. Hcmpsteud, W.S. Brocklesby, S. Nouh, and J.S. Wilkinson, P. Ca y, C.
Lerminituix, and Λ. Deguin, Post deadline Conf. Digest, European Conf. On Integrated Optics, (1995).
[7] P. Fournicr, P. Meshkinfam, MA. Fardad, M.P. Andrews, and S.I. Najafi, Jilectron. Lett. 33, 293
(1997).
[8] F.D. Patcl, E.C. Ilonea, D. Kiol, S.A. Payne, J.S. Hayden, Conf. Digest, OSA Advanced Solid State Laser Conference, p. 338, (1999).
[9] J. Shmulovich. A. Wong, Y.H. Wong, P.C. Becker, A. J. Bruce, and R. Adar, Electron. Lett 28,
1181 (1992).
[10] Y.C. Yan, A.J. Faber, II. dc Waal, P.G. Kik, and A. Polman, Appl. Phys. Lett 71, 2922 (1997).
[I I] S. Guldberg-Kjacr, J. Hubner, M. Kristensen, C. Laurent-Lund, M. Rysholt Poulsen, and M.W. Sckerl, Electron. Lett, 35, 302, (1999).
[12] T. Kitagawa, K. Ilallori, . Shi- u, Y. Ohmori, . Kobayashi, Electron. Lett. 27, 334 (1991).
[13] G.N. van den Hovcn, R.J.I, M, Kopcr, A. Polman, C. van Dam, J.W. . van Uffelen, and M.K. Sn.il, Appl. P ys. Lett. 68, 1886 (1 96).
[14] R. Serna, J. . Ballesteros, M. Jimenrø de Castro, J. Solis, and C.N. Afonso, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 2352 (1998).
[15J M. Bcnatsou, B. Capoeil, M. Bouazaoui, W. Tchana, and J.P. Vilcot, Appl, Phys, Lett. 71, 428 (1997),
[16] Λ.K Obalon, J. Bernard, C. Parent, G, LeFlem, J.M. Fernandez-Navarro, J.L. Adam, M.J Myers, G. Boulσn, Conf. Digest, OSA Advanced Solid State Laser Conference, p. 335, (1999)
[17] IOG-1 laser glass, Schott Glass Technologies, Inc., 400 York Avenue, Duryea, PA. The IOG-1 trade name is used lo allow the reader lo reproduce the experiment and docs not imply endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[ 18] Laser Glass: Nd-Dooed Glass Spcctroscopic and Physical Properties. Lawrence Li vcrmore National Laboratory, M-095, Rev, 2, November 1981.
[19] D.E. McCumber, Phys. Rev. 134, A299, (1964). t-tO] W J. iniscalo and R.S. Quimby, Optics. Lett. 16, 258 (1991). , . -. .-,-,
WO 2000/045477
[21] D.L. Veasey, K.J. Malone, J.A. Ausi, N.A. Sanford, and A. Roshko, Conf. Digest, Proc. 7"' Eur. Conf. on Integrated. Optics, p. 579, Delft, (1995), J,E. Roman and K.A. Winick, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 2744 (1992) .
[22] L. Li, M, Xu, G. Stegeman, C.T. Seaton, Sl'IP, Proc. 835, 72 (1987)
[23] N. H. Fontaine and M. Young, "Refracted near-field scanning of fibers and waveguides," submitted to Appl. Optics.
[24] D.II. McMahon, W.A. Dyes, J. Lightwave Technol. 6, 1162 (1988).
[25] J.W. Goodman, Statistical Optics, Wiley&Sons, 1985, p. 168.
[26] W.H, Loh, B.N. Samson, L. Dong, G.J. Cowle, and K. Hsu, J. Lightwave Technol, 16, 114 (1998).
[27] W.W. Rigrod, J. Appl. Phys, 36, 2487 (1965).
[28] E, Miskovic, Photonics Spectra 33, 105 February (1 99).
[29] D.L. Vcasey, J.M. Gaiy, and J. Amin, SHE Proc.2996, 109 (1997)
[30] L. lngbcr, "Adaptive Simulated Annealing (ASA)," Global optimization C-codc, Lester lngbcr Research, Chicago, IL (1993). URL htti-:/Av w.inκbcr.coιn/#ASA-CODE
[31]: R.E. Smith, S.N. Houde-Waltcr and G.W. Forbes, J, Quan.Eleciron. QE-28, 1520 (1992).
, .„ ,„--
WO 2000/045477
Figure Captions
Fig. 1. Distributed-Bragg-rcflector waveguide laser array realized using a single pitch grating and diffused waveguides with varying effective index.
Fig. 2. Schematic of Fabry-Perot waveguide laser test bed
Fig. 3. a) Emission and absorption cross sections as a function of wavelength for Er3'1 ions in IOG-1 phosphate glass. Spectral emission was calculated using the method of MeCumber. b) Emission ond absorption cross sections as a function of wavelength for Yb3i ions in IOG-1. Δλj,,, indicates the spectrum width as defined by Λλe„ =Jσ(λ)dλ/σ(λ-αl().
Fig. 4. Refractive index depth profile, measured al 635 nm, of an Er^/Yb3' phosphate glass waveguide obtained using a refracted near-field scanning method.
Fig. 5. 1540 nm output power as a function of pump power for a 20 mm and a 22 mm long Er'VYb1' waveguide lasers. 20 nun long device was pumped al 979 nm and the 22 mm device was pumped at 960 nm. Also shown is a theoretical fit to the data using a waveguide laser model.
Fig. 6. Typical multi-wavelength output spectrum for Fabry-Perot waveguide lasers.
Fig. 7. Bxtendcd cavity designs used for tuning of waveguide lasers, a) prism-tuned weakly coupled cavity, b) grating-tuned extended cavity.
Fig. 8. a) tuning curve obtained for grating-tuned Fabry-Perol waveguide laser. Solid lines connect the points as a guide lo the eye, b) typical mulli avelength output spectrum of F-P waveguide laser,
Fig. 9. Output power as a function of coupled pump power for a Yb-doped waveguide laser operating al a wavelength of 1.02 μm, The solid line represents the best linear fit to the data from which the slope efficiency was derived.
Fig. 10. Single frequency laser output power at 1536.3 nm as a function of launched 977 um pump power. The dotted line represents the best linear fit to the data from which the slope efficiency was derived, The inset shows (he spectrum of the DBR laser on a linear scale.
Fig. 1 1. Fabry Perot (FP) interferometer scan of the DBR laser output showing single frequency operation. Inset shows dual frequency operation for pump powers (Pp) exceeding 300 mW. Longitudinal mode spacing is 7.2 GHz, corresponding to an optical cavity length of 1.4 cm.
Fig. 1 . Self heterodyne beat spectrum at 75 MHz. The full- width, half-maximum linewidth is approximately 500 kHz.
Fig. 13. a) Relative intensity noise (RIN) in the frequency band from 0.1 to 1.1 GHz using a shot noise calibrated RTN system, b) uncalibraled amplitude noise spectrum showing relaxation oscillation noise peak near 300 kllz. The lower curve represents the noise floor of the measurement system.
Fig, 14. Wavelength of DBR waveguide laser as a function of temperalurc. Dotted line is for the aid of the eye in following the wavelength trend.
Fig. 15, Simulated laser output power as a function of laser length for several values of output coupler reflectance, b) simulated laser output power as a function of mode-field diameter for a 1-cm long laser caviiy.
Fig, 16. Output power as a function of waveguide mode width and height at 1.54 μm and output mirror reflectance for optimized waveguide lasers. Range of output powers in mW is indicated by color bar, Rigorous scalar modeling of Er and Er/Yb-doped waveguide lasers*
David L. Neasey® , John M. Gary, and Jaymin Amin
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80303-3328
ABSTRACT
A rigorous scalar model for predicting the characteristics of rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers has been developed. The model consists of two nonhomogeneous wave equations: one for the forward-propagating laser signal power, the other for the backward- propagating laser signal. These equations are coupled with one forward-propagating, nonhomogeneous wave equation representing the pump signal. The three wave equations are coupled with the space dependent laser rate equations to form a system of time dependent differential equations. This large system of equations is solved, using appropriate initial and boundary conditions, by the method of lines using collocation for the spatial approximation. The solutions to this system yield data which predict the time and position-dependent laser signal power, pump power, and population densities in a waveguide laser cavity supporting an arbitrary guided mode. The assumptions made in this new model are that the transverse field maintains the same shape as a function of longitudinal position in the laser cavity and that the effects of spatial hole burning and standing waves are neglected. We have used this model to predict continuous wave and Q-switched laser performance for Er and Er/Yb-doped lasers. We have achieved favorable comparisons with actual laboratory operation of cw Yb/Er-co-doped waveguide lasers. Results from simulations of Er-doped and Yb/Er-doped Q-switched lasers are presented which show that high peak powers on the order of 500 W and 1 ns pulse widths can be achieved.
Keywords: waveguide, laser, Q-switch, erbium, ytterbium, modeling, ion-exchange, sources
2. INTRODUCTION
Over the past several years, there has been considerable interest in the development of solid state waveguide laser sources in dielectric materials such as bulk glasses,1"6 dielectric films,7 and electro-optic hosts such as LiNb03 and LiTa03 .8"10 The interest in such sources has been motivated primarily by the successful deployment of erbium-doped fiber amplifiers in optical communication systems operating in the 1.55 φm band. Rare-earth-doped glass waveguide lasers offer several advantages over their semiconductor laser counterparts. These advantages include lower manufacturing costs due to relaxed fabrication tolerances over semiconductor lasers, broad wavelength tunability, inherently low relative intensity noise (RTN), and narrower laser linewidths. In addition, the beam profiles and numerical apertures can be nearly exactly matched to optical fibers. They also exhibit high energy storage capacity which is necessary for high-power pulsed operation. One of the primary limitations of planar waveguide devices is that they require short cavity lengths. This means that optically pumped thresholds are somewhat higher than for fiber lasers where the lengths can be arbitrarily extended. In order to overcome this problem, several different approaches can be pursued. One is to increase the doping concentration of the active ion. This increases the gain per unit length of material, thus lowering thresholds. However, when doping concentration is increased, there is a risk in most host materials of concentration quenching. This causes severe performance degradation because of increased cooperative up-conversion." Other solutions for the optimization of waveguide laser sources include optimizing host materials, cavity design (by judiciously choosing cavity lengths and output coupler reflectivities), pump coupling, and the pumping rate (through the introduction of co-dopants such as ytterbium (Yb) with erbium (Er)). It is also very important to carefully design the waveguide index profiles so that they yield ideal mode fields and overlap for the signal and pump waves. In order to achieve ideal performance, one must be careful to do all of the above simultaneously. This exercise is clearly not trivial since one is dealing with a many-parameter, highly nonlinear
* Contribution of the U.S. Government, not subject to copyright. ® email: veasey@boulder.nist.gov system. For these reasons, we have developed a laser model to accurately predict waveguide laser performance for continuous wave and pulsed operation modes. This predictive design tool allows us to deteπnine optimum waveguide laser design which will lead to useful, and reliable manufacturable products.
3. THE MODEL FORMULATION
In our model, we have attempted to realistically model a waveguide laser by making as few assumptions as possible while maintaining practical computer run times for the simulation. A picture of a typical waveguide laser and cavity is shown in Figure 1. p+
| Es(r,θ) f
P - « -
Figure imgf000101_0001
Figure 1. Schematic of laser cavity to be simulated
We have started from basic differential calculus using a semi-classical approach to derive the wave equations which accurately describe propagation in a waveguide laser cavity. A similar derivation of the wave equations was presented by Millonni and Eberly.12 We also use the semi-classical laser rate equations which are coupled with propagating signals in a laser cavity. The model we have developed for multiple frequencies and a multi-energy level system is described in this section.
The model is grouped into two specific types of equations. These are time dependent scalar wave equations and time/space dependent laser rate equations. The wave equations describe mathematically the forward and backward propagation of the optical frequencies in the laser cavity. For simplicity, we have included only two optical frequencies in the model presented in this paper. These are the laser signal frequency at 1=1542 nm and the pump signal at 1=980 nm. This simplification produces three first order wave equations: one for the forward-propagating laser signal, one for the backward- traveling laser signal, and one for the forward-propagating pump signal. The computer code can accommodate other frequencies simply by adding additional wave equations for each wavelength and direction of propagation.
These wave equations, dP+(z, t ) c dP+(z, t) c BΛ N2 dA
+ — s(z, t)p+(z, t) + (1) dt dz X21
dP~(z, t) _ c dP (z, i) c B. sp { N2 dA
• + • α.(z, t )P (z, t) + (2) dt dz 121
8P (z, t) _ c dpP(z, t) c
+ • - p(z, t)pP{z, i) (3) dt dz are coupled with sets of time-dependent laser rate equations, in which the energy level population densities, Nj = Ni(t,z,r,θ) are functions of time and position. The rate equations are
Figure imgf000102_0001
These equations describe the rates at which rare-earth ion energy levels in the material are populated and depleted by absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous emission as functions of longitudinal and transverse dimensions. This set of equations was presented by Pasquale. I3 The number of rate equations in a set is determined by the number of energy levels one wishes to track in a simulation. For the Er/Yb-co-doped system in this paper there are six time-dependent equations in a set which means we are tracking six energy levels. There are two time-dependent conservation equations in this system. It is straightforward to alter the rate equation set to account for other interesting energy level transitions. This provides great flexibility for modeling many rare-earth-doped lasers and amplifiers. The transverse dependence of the propagating mode fields is accounted for by sampling a transverse field solution or measured transverse field for a waveguide as a function of two transverse dimensions. At each sample point a set of laser rate equations is introduced into the model to account for the interaction of the transverse field with the stationary ions in the host material.
P+ and P" are the forward and backward-propagating laser powers as a function of longitudinal position in the laser cavity. Pp is the forward-propagating pump power in the laser cavity. The pump power, in this case, is assumed to be launched from the end opposite the output coupler which has reflectance, R2. The optical intensity (in W/cm2) of the laser signal is P~(z, t ) | Es(r, θ) |2 , where | Es |2 is the normalized intensity distribution and has units of cm"2. The pump signal Pp is treated in a similar fashion. The N,'s are the population densities of the various energy levels in the Er/Yb co-doped material. N, is the 4I]5/2 ground state of Er, N2 is the 4I13/2 laser level of Er, N3 is the 4I11/2 980 nm pump level for Er, N4 is the 4I 9/2 800 nm pump level and upeonversion level of Er, N5 is the 2F72 ground state of Yb, and N6 is the 2F52 pump level of Yb. Figure 2 shows an energy level diagram for the Er/Yb- co-doped system. The Yb pump level is shown as split to illustrate that it has very wide energy range.
Figure imgf000102_0002
Figure imgf000102_0003
Yb" Er
Figure 2. Energy level diagram for Er/Yb-co-doped laser host.
2up is the cooperative upeonversion coefficient from the Er 4I,3 2 laser level, Cup3 is the cooperative upeonversion coefficient ram the Er IU/, 980 nm pump level, C-ris the cross relaxation coefficient or net forward coupling from the Yb 2F52 level to the Er 4II 1 2 level, and CI4 is the cooperative down-conversion coefficient or the opposite of cooperative upeonversion. The A's are the nonradiative spontaneous emission rates from the first subscript energy level to the second subscript energy level, c is the speed of light in vacuum, ng is the effective index of the laser mode, rip is the effective index of the pump mode, and αs is the gain coefficient as a function of longitudinal position and time inside the laser cavity.
The second term on the right side of equations (1-3) represents the contribution or loss of power in the laser line width due to stimulated emission or absorption and excess waveguide loss at each point z and time t. nj X m, represents the number of nodes in the transverse dimensions and the two-dimensional grid on which intensities are sampled and on which the Nj's are calculated.
The gain or loss coefficient αs is computed after Bjarklev14 by calculating the overlap integral of the normalized propagating power distribution and the population density and then multiplying by the emission or absorption cross sections:
Figure imgf000103_0001
σ21 and σ12 are the emission and absorption cross sections of the host material at the laser wavelength. The normalized intensity propagating in the waveguide is assumed to be independent of z, and is normalized by requiring that:
J! EΛ dA = I. (6)
The gain coefficient as a function of z and t is then given by
α. :(z, t) = y21(z, t ) - y]2(z, t) - cc* (7) ccis is the waveguide loss coefficient, which is subtracted to account for excess waveguide losses from scattering and absorption not due to the rare earth ions. It is also possible to add other position dependent losses in this term which are functions of fabrication parameters or cavity configuration. For example, a position and time dependent term can be added to account for mirror losses or localized losses from waveguide loading or for an intracavity coupler.
The pump absorption coefficient αp is calculated similarly by computing the overlap integral of the ground state populations for the Er ions and the Yb ions with the normalized pump intensity |Ep|2 and multiplying by the pump absorption cross sections- giving:
Figure imgf000103_0002
ip is the excess absorption and scattering loss at the 980 nm pump wavelength. The pump intensity | Ep |2 is normalized in the same way as the signal field, and is written as
IL LL I P 2 dA = 1. (9)
The third term on the right side of equations (1) and (2) represents the contribution of spontaneous emission to the propagating optical power. τ21 is the spontaneous emission lifetime of the laser level. The coefficient Bφ is given by
Bsp = ηcλυ,, (10) where η is the efficiency of spontaneous emission in the laser line width and is approximated by the ratio of the waveguide numerical aperture solid angle to the solid angle of a sphere times the integral over frequency of the equivalent spontaneous emission spectrum. hυs is the energy of a single laser photon. This approximation of spontaneous emission is similar to the equivalent bandwidth approximation described by Bjarklev.14
W2ι, W12, W]3 , W55, and W65 are the stimulated emission and absorption rates as a function of longitudinal and transverse dimensions and are given by
Figure imgf000104_0001
0"65 w65 = X) Err
We have not included other energy levels in the model as of yet but have plans to add other levels as (outlined by Desurvire 15 ) to the Εr model. This will allow consideration of excited state absorption (ΕSA) and its effect on device performance. Each additional energy level adds an extra equation to the rate equation set for each transverse field sample point.
Equations (l)-(4) must be solved simultaneously with appropriate initial conditions and boundary conditions. These conditions determine the laser or amplifier state in which the system will operate. For the laser model, the initial conditions are assumed to be
P+(z, 0) = P~(z, 0) = 0,
Pp (z, O) = P g e-(σ'^,(z, 0)+σS6N5{z,0))z, (12)
N,{t = θ) = NET , N2A4(* = 0) = 0, N5(t = 0) = Nn, N6{t = θ) = 0.
These conditions assume that the laser system is initially at rest and that the pump wave has propagated a single cavity length without significantly affecting the population densities in the sample. This is done to avoid sharp discontinuities in the initial condition for the pump.
Boundary conditions are imposed on the values of P+, P", and Pp as follows:
Figure imgf000104_0002
P~{L, t) - R2(e2a^'Lsat )p-(L, t) = 0, (13)
Figure imgf000104_0003
R, is the reflectance of a highly reflecting mirror at the pump input end of the laser, R2 is the reflectancd of the output coupler for the laser, and αsal is the time-varying absorption coefficient for an arbitrarily thin absorbing switch placed in the laser cavity just inside of the output coupling mirror. Lsat is an effective length of the thin absorber providing the switch with an extinction of exp(- αsatLsat). Pp0 is the pump power launched at the input end of the sample and held constant from time 0. L is the length of the cavity. For cw operation αsat is set to 0, and for Q-switched operation αsat is set to a function representing the dependence of the absorption coefficient on time. This is an approximate representation of active Q- switching. We could easily make the absorption coefficient of the switch a function of intensity, thus modeling passive Q- switching with a saturable absorber without introducing any more complexity into the model.
4. METHOD OF SOLUTION At this point our model consists of a large set of coupled integral-differential equations in the form of an initial value problem. The first step in the solution procedure is to transform the integrals so that they can be computed by a generalized Gauss- aguerre quadrature formula.16 Using cylindrical coordinates to represent elliptical electrical fields given by
E, = e -2βs(θ)r2 \ E. i2 = e-2β„(θy2 (14)
the integrals in equation (5) and (8) have the form
2π ∞ j" J K 2β(θ -: rdrdθ. (15) o o This integral under the transformation s=2βDΘDr2, and φ = θ, becomes
2
P(s,ψ)e'
11 -dsdφ. (16) o o 4β(φ)
This is the form required for the use of Gauss-Laguerre quadrature in integration variable s.
Once the number n0 of points, , used to approximate the integrals in s is selected, then the location of the points and the corresponding weights for the quadrature are determined by a library routine. 16 Then the integral over 5 is approximated by
Figure imgf000105_0001
The w.'s are the weights generated by the quadrature routine. The trapezoidal rale is used to approximate the integrals over φ. Thus the problem is discretized over the transverse (s, φ) planes resulting in a hyperbolic initial value problem dU f(l7,Uz,t). (18) . dt
The vector U(z,t) contains the values of the solution at the discrete points (z„s},q>^; that is, U(t) =(P,+, P,", P,p, Nlljιk, ...,N4,.ιk) for l < I < I0, 1 < j < n0, 1 < k < m0.
Next, an approximation by cubic Hermite collocation17 is used to discretize these equations in the z-direction. First a set of nodal points z, with z, < z1+1 covering the length of the device is selected. The solution is represented by the value of the solution vector U and its spatial derivatives Uz at each nodal point. These values determine a cubic polynomial in each subinterval (z„z,+1). These polynomials are used to approximate the solution. The spatial derivatives, within each interval, are detennined by differentiating these polynomials. Instead of representing U(z) by the values of U and its derivative at each node, it is convenient to determine the cubic polynomials by the values of U(z) at two Gaussian quadrature points in each subinterval. In addition the values U(0) and U(L) at the endpoints are needed. The Gaussian quadrature points and the endpoints are the collocation points at which the right side of the partial differential equation is evaluated. This results in a system of ordinary differential equations (ODE); that is, a method-of-lines approximation.18 Finally, the vector of unknowns in the system of ODE's is W(t) = ((Pv +, Pv ", Pv p, Nlvj k, ...,N4vj k) where the P's approximate the value at the vth collocation point zv. Here 1 < n < 2I0, therefore the total number of unknown functions is (3+^.^)210. Typical computaions we use have I0=10, n0=16, and mo=l, although we have used nio up to 12. This ODE system is solved using a public domain software package by Petzold. 19 5. CONTINUOUS WAVE LASER RESULTS
We have used this time dependent model to predict the performance of an Er Yb-co-doped waveguide laser operating in cw mode and Q-switched mode. In both cases the laser is initially assumed to be in a rest state where all of the ions are assumed to be in the ground state and the laser signal powers in the cavity are 0. The pump is turned on at t~0 and is assumed to instantaneously propagate to the other end of the laser cavity without affecting die population inversion. This process in a 2 cm waveguide laser takes approximately 0.1 ns. The solver is started at this point, and the laser cavity powers and energy level populations are tracked as functions of position and time.
For steady state solutions, the code is run until the output power from the laser cavity reaches a steady state. Clearly, this is not the most computationally efficient way to solve for steady state laser performance if that is all we want. Since our primary purpose is to predict time response, we have not yet implemented a more efficient steady state computer code. During the period of below-threshold and above-threshold operation we resolve the time dependent powers in the laser cavity and the variations in population inversions.
Figure 3 shows the predicted steady state output power for a waveguide laser as a function of coupled pump power and as the Yb concentration is increased from 3: 1 to 10:1 while leaving the Er concentration constant. AU of these simulations were done using 16 transverse nodes in s. Similar results are obtained by using only 7 nodes in the s dimension. Since the solutions for elliptical fields were typically within several percent of those using circular fields, we only used 1 node in φ in order
Figure imgf000106_0001
to conserve computer time. Table 1 shows the values of the parameters used for these simulations. These parameters are close to those of a phosphorous free alkali-silicate glass which we refer to as NIST- 10. Parameters we were not certain of, like the stimulated emission cross sections for the Er/Yb-co-doped material, we obtained by consulting the literature on Yb/Er and Er-doped glasses which are similar in composition to NIST-10. w-13- 0 Other parameters such as waveguide near field profiles, absorption cross sections , and lifetimes have been measured and inserted into the model.
It is not instructive to generate a curve like that of Figure 3 for variation in Yb concentration if the cross relaxation coefficient is left constant. This coefficient CCT is a strong function of Yb concentration and increases as the Yb concentration is increased. The primary reason for this increase is that the Yb ions, on average, move closer to the Er ions and thus the transfer efficiency is increased. Discussions of the energy transfer in Er/Yb-co-doped glass are presented by Roman et al.2,21 They present a formula which can be used to determine the cross relaxation coefficients. Upon using this somewhat approximate formula, one finds that for device in Roman, the CCT coefficient is approximately 0.5xl0"I7cm3/s. This calculation assumes a lifetime of the 2F7/2 Yb level to be 2.0 ms and the lifetime of the 4II 1 2 Er level to be 10 μs. Romdn also indicates that the efficiency increases as a function of Yb concentration. For the data generated in Figure 3, we have assumed that, as the Yb concentration varies from 2.47x1020 ions/cm3 up to 8.5xl020 ions/cm3, the cross relaxation coefficient increases linearly from 0.75xl0 cmVs to 5xl0"17 cm3/s. These numbers are close to those deduced from references 2 and 21 for a similar glass composition. We intend to measure these parameters for various concentrations of Yb in the NIST- 10 glass in the very near future. If the transfer efficiency is left constant as the Yb concentration is increased, the performance of the lasers is actually degraded slightly due to decreased pumping efficiency for samples of equal length. The laser thresholds increase for higher Yb concentrations. This is due to the fact that, as the Yb concentration is increased, more of the pump is absorbed at the front end of the laser, thus the pumping of the output end of the device is reduced. This has the effect of increasing absorption losses in the laser cavity toward the output end, and thus the thresholds increase. It is clear from the simulation that doping concentration and sample length must be concurrently optimized. The curvature of the power curves is attributed to the gradual saturation of the upper Yb level as the pump power is increased, as reported by Fermann, et al.22
We have demonstrated laser operation in several NIST- 10 waveguide samples doped with Er and with Er/Yb. The waveguides were prepared by molten salt ion-exchange. Details of the process will follow in subsequent publications. Figure 4 shows a comparison of laboratory data with the predictions obtained from the simulation. To generate these theoretical curves, we used the Yb-Er cross relaxation coefficient Ccr and the uniform upeonversion coefficient Cup as fitting parameters since these spectroscopic parameters have not yet been determined in a systematic way for our glass. The values we used for the fits are indicated on Figure 4 and typify values quoted in the literature for dopant concentrations used in the NIST-10 silicate glass.2'3'"'13,20 For all of the fits, the waveguide excess loss at the 1542 nm laser signal wavelength was set at 0.15 dB/cm, which was slightly lower than the measured value of 0.2 dB/cm at 1300 nm. The excess loss at the pump wavelength was set at 0.3 dB/cm. These values represent what we think are realistic loss values for the pump and signal fields, given the values measured by the cut-back method at 1300 nm. Fit 1, represented by the solid line, is the closest of the three fits to slope efficiency and threshold, and we think that it falls within our experimental error. However, the error in our power measurements has not yet been fully characterized. Fit 2 shows the effect of increasing the cross relaxation coefficient slightly from 0.75xl0"17 cmVs to l.OxlO"17 cm3/s while the upeonversion rate is held constant. This small change has the effect of increasing the output power of the laser due to increased pumping efficiency, however, the threshold is not changed significantly. This is most likely due to the low propagation losses in the waveguides. Fit 3 shows the effect of eliminating uniform upeonversion from the simulation while maintaining the cross relaxation coefficient at its original value of 0.75x10"17 cm3/s. The effect of this is to increase the laser output power by a small amount, thus showing that the low upeonversion rate used in the model does not significantly deteriorate performance.
Figure 5 is as plot which shows how the slope efficiency and the threshold of this laser will vary as a function of the output coupler reflectivity. The experimental laser characteristics shown in Figure 4 are for an output coupler reflectivity of 98 percent. This operating point is marked on Figure 5 by the circled diamond. This operating point is good for low threshold operation, but is a poor for high output power. Note that this is a poor operation point if high output power is desired, but is a point of lower laser threshold. A good compromise between output power and threshold would be to adjust the output coupler from 98 percent reflectance to 75 percent. This would increase the slope efficiency nearly four times while only doubling the threshold. This is an excellent illustration of the necessity for an accurate laser model, in that it allows for rapid design convergence for optimized rare-earth-doped waveguide lasers.
Figure imgf000108_0001
Output Coupler Reflectance
Figure 5. Plot showing the dependence of the laser slope efficiency (left axis) and the laser threshold (right axis) as a function of the cavity output reflectance R2 The slope efficiency of the laboratory demonstration of the device is marked by the circled diamond.
6. Q-SWITCHED LASER SIMULATIONS
Finally, we have used the time-dependent laser simulation to model a Q-switched waveguide laser. We have used the cavity configuration of Figure 1, in which the Q-switch is an active switch which is mounted onto the end of a waveguide facet. An integrated mirror is deposited on the back side of the switch material. Such a switch is possible using a semiconductor multi- quantum-well structure. Again, the simulation is run with the laser system starting at rest but with the Q-switch closed or in the high absorption state. This allows the pump to rapidly create a population inversion which is well above threshold for the laser when the Q-switch is opened. We have programmed the active Q-switch to open in 5 ns using a cosine s-bend function. The initial extinction was set at s = -50, which holds the laser well below threshold with Lsat=0.5 mm. The coupled pump power was set to 200 mW and the system was pumped for 2 ms before the switch was opened. What makes our model unique from other Q-switch models is that we have not assumed that we have a high-Q cavity or a uniform intensity in the cavity. We have not assumed a plane wave electric field, we include several levels and transitions instead of the typical two or three, and we track the saturation of the pumping intensity. In addition, we do not assume that the distribution of energy level population densities assumes the same shape as the pump or the signal field. The populations are allowed to vary freely as functions of position and intensities.
Figure 6 is a family of Q-switch pulse simulations using the same parameters that were used in Fit 1 of Figure 4. These simulations varied only the output coupler reflectance. As the reflectance is decreased, a more nearly optimal point for the extraction of power is reached and the pulses narrow slightly and have higher peak powers. The optimum for this cavity length is approximately 80 percent reflectance, resulting in a peak power prediction of 346 W. If the reflectivity is decreased beyond this point, the round trip gain of the cavity coupled with the average lifetime of a photon in the laser cavity causes the pulses to widen and have less peak power. We have not yet determined the primary factor that determines pulse width. We have found that many parameters are involved in pulse width determination. We have shown that the peak pulse power can be optimized further by decreasing the cavity length from 2 cm to 1.4 cm. At this point, the optimum pulse is slightly narrower in width and the simulated peak power is over 400 W. Other important parameters which affect the pulses, such as near field size, signal-pump overlap, Yb-doping concentration, and Er-doping concentration, are being investigated.
7. SUMMARY
In summary, we have presented a detailed time dependent model for use in the simulation of integrated photonic waveguide lasers. The model treats the waveguide laser with very few approximations. Approximations which we do make are those concerned with the tracking of signal and pump phase. We do not track the phases of waves propagating in the laser cavity. This prohibits us from predicting effects such as cavity standing waves and spatial hole burning, and the dependence of the population densities and intensities related to these effects.
Figure imgf000109_0001
Time (ns)
Figure 6. Prediction of Q-switch pulses from the demonstrated Er/Yb-co-doped waveguide laser. The reflectance of the output coupler is varied from 98 percent to 65 percent. The graph shows that the optimum pulse (highest peak power and small width) is extracted when the reflectance is optimized to 80%. The FWHM pulse width for the R2 = 98% pulse is 1,58 ns, the R2 = 90% pulse width is 1.5 ns, the R2= 80% pulse width is 1.68 ns, and the R2= 65% pulse width is 2.32 ns.
Other approximations we make are that die intensity distributions in the waveguide do not vary as functions of z or time and spontaneous emission is not discretized into many frequencies. The model in its present form, gives us the capability to accurately model waveguide lasers and amplifiers. We have successfully used the model in a predictive fashion to simulate laboratory results for continuous wave Yb/Er co-doped waveguide lasers. The fits from the simulation to the slope efficiency data are excellent using realistic values for all of the pertinent input parameters.
In addition, we have reported the predicted Q-switched performance of Er/Yb-co-doped glass waveguide lasers and have shown that values of peak power can reach hundreds of watts for sample lengths of the order of 1-2 cm. These simulations have used parameters for fabricated waveguide lasers. We have not sufficiently investigated the design space and we strongly believe that more optimum designs can be achieved. An exhaustive investigation of the design space and the interplay among laser parameters is currently underway. Simulations not discussed here suggest that powers on the order of 1 kW can be achieved through the optimization of cavity design and the careful engineering of waveguide index profiles to maximize overlap of the pump and signal guided waves.
We anticipate that this model will be used extensively to model several different rare earth systems for laser and amplifier performance. This work will be done in order to optimize the designs of waveguide and fiber lasers and also to determine the most critical host parameters. In this way, the model acts as a metrology tool by indicating which parameters have the greatest effect on laser performance. These parameters can then be measured more accurately to facilitate the development of more suitable host materials. These simulations have proven to be an invaluable tool for our current work in rare-earth-doped materials and devices.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Bradley Alpert of NIST for helpful discussions and for the provision of several computer codes which greatly benefited the development of the equation solver. REFERENCES
1. T. Feuchter, E.K. Mwarania, J. Wang, L. Reekie, and J.S. Wilkinson, "Erbium-doped ion-exchanged waveguide lasers in BK-7 glass," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 4, pp. 542-544 (1992).
2. J.E. Romήn, M. Hempstead, W.S. Brockleby, S. Nouh, J.S. Wilkinson, P. Camy, C. Lerminiaux, and A. Beguin, " Ion-exchanged Er/Yb waveguide laser at 1.5 μm pumped by a laser diode," Electronics Letters, 31, pp. 1345-1346 (1995).
3. G.L. Vossler, C.J. Brooks, and K.A. Winick, "Planar Er:Yb glass ion exchanged waveguide laser," Electronics Letters, 31, pp. 1162-1163 (1995).
4. D. Barbier, J.M. Delavaux, R.L. Hyde, J.M. Jouanno, A. Kervorkian, and P. Gastaldo, "Tunability of Yb/Er integrated optical lasers in phosphate glass, " Proceeding of Optical Amplifiers and their Applications, postdeadline paper PD3 (Davos, 1995).
5. D.L. Veasey, K.J. Malone, J.A. Aust, N.A. Sanford, and A. Roshko, " Distributed feedback lasers in rare-earth-doped phosphate glass," Proceedings of the 7,h European Conference on Integrated Optics (Delft, 1995).
6. J.A. Aust, K.J. Malone, D.L. Veasey, and N.A. Sanford, "Passively Q-switched Nd-doped waveguide laser," Optics Letters, 19, pp. 1849-1851 (1994).
7. T. Kitagawa, K. Hattori, M. Shirnizu, Y. Ohmori, and M. Kobayashi, "Guide-wave laser based on erbium-doped silica planar lightwave circuit," Electronics Letters, 27, pp. 334-335 (1991).
8. J.Amin, J.A. Aust, and N.A. Sanford, " Z-propagating waveguide lasers in rare-earth-doped Ti:LiNb03," Applied Physics Letters, 69, pp. 3785-3787 (1996).
9. I. Baumann, R. Brinkmann, M. Dinand, W. Sohler, and S. Westhδfer, "Ti:Er:LiNb03 waveguide laser of optimized efficiency," IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 32, pp. 1695-1706 (1996).
10. N.A. Sanford, J.A. Aust, K.J. Malone, and D.R. Larson, "Nd:LiTa03 waveguide laser," Optics Letters, 17, pp. 1578-1580 (1992).
11. M. Federighi and F. Di Pasquale, " The effect of pair-induced energy transfer on the performance of silica waveguide amplifiers with high Er3+/Yb + concentrations," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 7, pp. 303-305 (1995).
12. P.W. Milonni and J.H. Eberly, Laser, New York, Wiley, 1988, ch. 10.
13. F. Di Pasquale and M. Federighi, "Improved Gain Characteristics in High-Concentration Er3+/Yb3+ Co-doped Glass Waveguide Amplifiers," IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 30, pp. 2127-2131 (1994).
14. A. Bjarklev, Optical Fiber Amplifiers: Design and System Applications, Artech House, Boston-London, ch 5, (1993).
15. E. Desurvire, Erbium-doped Fiber Amplifiers, Wiley, New York, p. 278 (1994).
16. G. Golub and J. Welsch, "Calculation of Gauss Quadrature Rules," Math Comp, 23 , pp. 221-230 (1969).
17. M. Schultz, Spline Analysis , Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1973).
18. M. Davis, Numerical Methods and Modeling for Chemical Engineers, Wiley, New York (1984).
19. Petzold, "A description of DASSL; A DifferentialAlgebraic System Solver," Proc. IMACS World Congress, Montreal, Canada (1982).
20. J.E. Roman, M. Hempstead, C. Ye, S. Nouh, P. Camy, P. Laborde, and C. Leπr niaux, "1.7 μm excited state absorption measurement in erbium-doped glasses," Applied Physics Letters, 64, pp. 470-472 (1995).
21. J.E. Roman, M. Hempstead, W.S. Biocklesby, S. Nouh, J.S. Wilkinson, P. Camy, C. Leπrriniaux, and A. Beguin, "Diode pumped, ion-exchanged Er/Yb waveguide laser at 1.5 μm in phosphorous-free silicate glass," Proc. 7* European Conf. on Integrated Optics, postdeadline paper, pp. 13-16 (Delft 1995).
22. M.E. Fermarm, D.C. Hanna, D.P. Shepherd, P.J. Suni, and J.E. Townsend, "Efficient operation of an Yb-sensitized Er fibre laser at 1.56 μm," Electronics Letters " 24, pp. 1135-1136 (1988).
Table 1. Parameters used to model the Er/Yb co-doped waveguide laser
Figure imgf000111_0001

Claims

We Claim:
1. An optical device comprising a glass substrate doped with a laser species and having one or more waveguides defined by channels in the substrate having a distinct refractive index from the substrate wherein the substrate is an alkali phosphate glass doped with Yb and Er, wherein the weight ratio of Yb:Er dopant is from about 1 :1 to about 8:1.
2. An optical device of claim 1, wherein the device has two or more waveguides.
3. An optical device of claim 2, wherein the waveguides are comprised of an alkali phosphate glass doped with Er and Yb, which has been treated so that the refractive index is higher than that of the substrate.
4. An optical device of claim 3, wherein the optical device is prepared by applying a mask to the substrate glass having apertures of a width and length corresponding to the waveguides to be formed in the substrate and conducting ion- exchange by contact with an ion-exchange solvent to form the waveguides through the apertures.
5. An optical device of claim 3, wherein the optical device is prepared by applying a mask to the substrate glass having apertures of a width and length corresponding to the waveguides to be formed in the substrate and conducting photolithography to form the waveguides through the apertures.
6. An optical device of claim 1, which further comprises a reflecting element in association with the waveguide to provide a laser effect when pumped.
7. The optical device of claim 6, wherein the reflecting element is a diffraction grating provided on the substrate.
8. The optical device of claim 5, which is in the form of a laser providing a power of over 20 mW and a slope efficiency of 28% or higher.
9. The optical device of claim 8, which is in the form of a laser providing a power of 25-180 mW.
10. The optical device of claim 1, which contains two or more waveguides.
11. A method for making a waveguide comprising: forming a mask layer upon a surface of a glass substrate doped with Er and Yb, the mask layer having one or more apertures therein, exposing the substrate surface through the mask to an ion-exchange solvent, thereby forming one or more waveguides in the substrate as channels corresponding to said apertures, wherein: (a) the ion-exchange solvent is subjected to dehydration before and/or during the ion-exchange, and/or (b) the ion-exchange is conducted under an environment excluding some or all of the atmospheric air or oxygen.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the mask contains two or more apertures and the substrate is provided with two or more corresponding waveguides.
13. The method of claim 11, further comprising providing a reflecting element on the waveguide to provide a laser device.
14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the substrate is comprised of an alkali phosphate glass doped with Er and Yb.
15. The method of claim 11 , further comprising conducting field-assisted ion exchange on the substrate.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the ion-exchange solvent is subjected to dehydration by baking the solvent at a temperature of 120° C or more in an inert atmosphere.
ill
PCT/US2000/001721 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers WO2000045477A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT00919256T ATE464682T1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING THE RARE EARTH CONTENT FOR WAVEGUIDE LASER AND AMPLIFIER
DE60044182T DE60044182D1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27
EP00919256A EP1153461B1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers
JP2000596633A JP4832644B2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Rare earth content optimization for waveguide lasers and amplifiers

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11747799P 1999-01-27 1999-01-27
US60/117,477 1999-01-27
US16245899P 1999-10-29 1999-10-29
US60/162,458 1999-10-29

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000045477A1 WO2000045477A1 (en) 2000-08-03
WO2000045477A9 true WO2000045477A9 (en) 2004-05-21

Family

ID=26815336

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/002065 WO2000045478A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass lasers
PCT/US2000/001974 WO2000051212A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Waveguide lasers
PCT/US2000/002083 WO2000052791A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass lasers
PCT/US2000/001720 WO2000045481A1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 High-power waveguide lasers
PCT/US2000/001721 WO2000045477A1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers
PCT/US2000/001718 WO2000045197A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Improved ion exchange technology for fabrication of waveguide source lasers

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/002065 WO2000045478A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass lasers
PCT/US2000/001974 WO2000051212A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Waveguide lasers
PCT/US2000/002083 WO2000052791A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-26 Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass lasers
PCT/US2000/001720 WO2000045481A1 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 High-power waveguide lasers

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/001718 WO2000045197A2 (en) 1999-01-27 2000-01-27 Improved ion exchange technology for fabrication of waveguide source lasers

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (8) US6330388B1 (en)
EP (5) EP1181751A2 (en)
JP (3) JP2002536824A (en)
AT (2) ATE503289T1 (en)
AU (3) AU3583800A (en)
CA (2) CA2362131A1 (en)
DE (2) DE60044182D1 (en)
WO (6) WO2000045478A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (195)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6330388B1 (en) 1999-01-27 2001-12-11 Northstar Photonics, Inc. Method and apparatus for waveguide optics and devices
EP1214763B1 (en) * 1999-09-23 2004-06-02 The Provost, Fellows And Scholars Of The College Of The Holy And Undivided Trinity Of Queen Elizabeth Near Dublin Optical waveguide and a method of making an optical waveguide
FR2804251B1 (en) * 2000-01-26 2002-03-08 France Telecom METHOD AND DEVICE FOR WAVELENGTH SWITCHING OF A LASER SOURCE
US6810052B2 (en) * 2000-05-02 2004-10-26 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration, Inc. Eyesafe Q-switched laser
US7190705B2 (en) 2000-05-23 2007-03-13 Imra America. Inc. Pulsed laser sources
US7088756B2 (en) * 2003-07-25 2006-08-08 Imra America, Inc. Polarization maintaining dispersion controlled fiber laser source of ultrashort pulses
US6611372B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2003-08-26 The Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona Erbium and ytterbium co-doped phosphate glass optical fiber amplifiers using short active fiber length
DE10029381A1 (en) * 2000-06-21 2002-01-03 Bosch Gmbh Robert Optical waveguide used as a component of an optical amplifier or laser, has a core doped with laser-active ions and additionally with Cerium
FR2811148B1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2006-07-21 Thomson Csf PUMP LASER AND OPTIMIZED LASER MEDIA
US6594420B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2003-07-15 Harris Corporation Multi-fiber ribbon form factor-compliant, integrated multi-channel optical amplifier
WO2002013906A1 (en) 2000-08-16 2002-02-21 Vanderbilt University Methods and devices for optical stimulation of neural tissues
TW503188B (en) * 2000-08-29 2002-09-21 Sumitomo Heavy Industries Marking method, device the optical member marked
US6909854B1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2005-06-21 Motorola, Inc. Methods and apparatus for beam shaping in optical wireless communications system
US6954564B2 (en) * 2000-11-27 2005-10-11 Teem Photonics Apparatus and method for integrated photonic devices having high-performance waveguides and multicompositional substrates
AU2002239600A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-24 Sri International Dense wavelength division multiplexing (dwdm) fiberoptic source
US6697548B2 (en) * 2000-12-18 2004-02-24 Evident Technologies Fabry-perot opitcal switch having a saturable absorber
US6782027B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2004-08-24 Finisar Corporation Resonant reflector for use with optoelectronic devices
US6928224B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2005-08-09 Corning Incorporated Laser-induced crystallization of transparent glass-ceramics
US7126976B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2006-10-24 Waveguide Solutions, Inc. Solid state lasers and a method for their production
US6944192B2 (en) * 2001-03-14 2005-09-13 Corning Incorporated Planar laser
US6640040B2 (en) 2001-03-15 2003-10-28 The Regents Of The University Of California Compact cladding-pumped planar waveguide amplifier and fabrication method
US20020181914A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-12-05 Jansen David B. Method and apparatus for decreasing signal propagation delay in a waveguide
US20020176458A1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2002-11-28 O'connor Gary Method of monitoring an optical signal from a laser
AU2002345605A1 (en) 2001-06-06 2002-12-16 Bae Systems Information Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Calcium gallium sulphide (caga2s4) as a high gain erbium host
AU2002316195A1 (en) * 2001-06-06 2003-01-08 Bae Systems Information Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Optical composite ion/host crystal gain elements
US6847673B2 (en) * 2001-06-22 2005-01-25 The Regents Of The University Of California Solid state laser disk amplifer architecture: the normal-incidence stack
US7989376B2 (en) 2001-06-26 2011-08-02 Afo Research, Inc. Fluorophosphate glass and method for making thereof
US6829082B2 (en) 2001-06-28 2004-12-07 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Erbium doped crystal amplifier
US6751391B2 (en) 2001-07-24 2004-06-15 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Optical systems incorporating waveguides and methods of manufacture
JP2003075665A (en) * 2001-09-07 2003-03-12 Furukawa Electric Co Ltd:The Flat plate optical waveguide circuit and method for compensating central wavelength of light transmission
CA2783176C (en) * 2001-09-20 2014-05-20 The Uab Research Foundation Mid-ir microchip laser: zns:cr2+ laser with saturable absorber material
WO2003028177A1 (en) * 2001-09-24 2003-04-03 Giga Tera Ag Pulse-generating laser
US6567589B2 (en) * 2001-10-03 2003-05-20 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Integrated-optic out-coupler device and method for making and using the same
US20030067945A1 (en) * 2001-10-09 2003-04-10 Photon-X, Inc. Tunable optical waveguide laser using rare-earth dopants
US6788870B1 (en) 2001-11-08 2004-09-07 Tyco Telecommunications (Us) Inc. Isothermal fiber optic tray
US20050103441A1 (en) * 2001-11-14 2005-05-19 Masanobu Honda Etching method and plasma etching apparatus
CA2363149A1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2003-05-16 Photonami Inc. Surface emitting dfb laser structures for broadband communication systems and array of same
EP1321791A2 (en) * 2001-12-04 2003-06-25 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Optical package substrate, optical device, optical module, and method for molding optical package substrate
US6859587B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2005-02-22 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for wafer level testing of integrated optical waveguide circuits
US6816514B2 (en) * 2002-01-24 2004-11-09 Np Photonics, Inc. Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass single-mode fiber lasers
US20030168154A1 (en) * 2002-02-15 2003-09-11 Myers John D. Phosphate glass fiber for fusion-splicing to silica glass fiber
US7125632B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-10-24 Pd-Ld, Inc. Fiber optic devices having volume Bragg grating elements
EP1345054A1 (en) * 2002-03-15 2003-09-17 Aston Photonic Technologies Ltd. Tuneable optical fiber grating transmission filter
US7528385B2 (en) 2002-03-15 2009-05-05 Pd-Ld, Inc. Fiber optic devices having volume Bragg grating elements
US6911160B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-06-28 Kigre, Inc. Phosphate glass for use in the manufacture of ultra-short length lasers and amplifiers
US20030185514A1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2003-10-02 Bendett Mark P. Method and apparatus for tapping a waveguide on a substrate
US6813405B1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2004-11-02 Teem Photonics Compact apparatus and method for integrated photonic devices having folded directional couplers
US20030196455A1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2003-10-23 Mccov Michael A. Apparatus and method for photonic waveguide fabrication
US6690689B2 (en) * 2002-05-29 2004-02-10 Triquint Technology Holding, Co. Apparatus and method for compensating for age induced wavelength drift in tunable semiconductor lasers
WO2004023171A2 (en) * 2002-09-06 2004-03-18 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. Intrinsic fabry-perot optical fiber sensors and their multiplexing
US8705904B2 (en) * 2002-10-08 2014-04-22 Infinera Corporation Photonic integrated circuits having chirped elements
US6912079B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2005-06-28 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for phase shifting an optical beam in an optical device
DE10311820A1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2004-09-30 Schott Glas Semiconductor light source used in lighting comprises a semiconductor emitter, especially an LED, and a luminescent glass body
JP4022498B2 (en) * 2003-04-18 2007-12-19 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション OPTICAL LINK MODULE, OPTICAL CONNECTION METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE INCLUDING THE OPTICAL LINK MODULE, SIGNAL TRANSFER METHOD, PRISM, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
EP1649564A4 (en) * 2003-07-03 2007-09-05 Pd Ld Inc Use of volume bragg gratings for the conditioning of laser emission characteristics
CA2540089A1 (en) 2003-09-26 2005-04-07 Pd-Ld, Inc. Methods for manufacturing volume bragg grating elements
US8606060B2 (en) * 2003-10-15 2013-12-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamic manipulation and dispersion in photonic crystal devices
US20050271325A1 (en) * 2004-01-22 2005-12-08 Anderson Michael H Liquid crystal waveguide having refractive shapes for dynamically controlling light
US8860897B1 (en) 2004-01-22 2014-10-14 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Liquid crystal waveguide having electric field orientated for controlling light
US7720116B2 (en) * 2004-01-22 2010-05-18 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Tunable laser having liquid crystal waveguide
US8989523B2 (en) 2004-01-22 2015-03-24 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Liquid crystal waveguide for dynamically controlling polarized light
US8463080B1 (en) 2004-01-22 2013-06-11 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Liquid crystal waveguide having two or more control voltages for controlling polarized light
US7522803B2 (en) * 2004-02-20 2009-04-21 Isuzu Glass Co., Ltd. Process for producing optical device
WO2005080283A1 (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-09-01 Isuzu Glass Co., Ltd. Method for manufacturing optical element of refractive index distribution type
EP1729381A4 (en) * 2004-03-23 2009-08-05 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Dbr-type variable-wavelength light source
US7804864B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2010-09-28 Imra America, Inc. High power short pulse fiber laser
US7180656B2 (en) * 2004-04-07 2007-02-20 Avago Technologies Fiber Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Compact optical amplifier
US7340124B2 (en) 2004-04-07 2008-03-04 Avago Technologies Fiber Ip Pte Ltd Optical switch using rare earth doped glass
US7209283B2 (en) * 2004-04-07 2007-04-24 Avago Technologies Fiber Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Compact optical amplifier with a flattened gain profile
US7492463B2 (en) 2004-04-15 2009-02-17 Davidson Instruments Inc. Method and apparatus for continuous readout of Fabry-Perot fiber optic sensor
US7062137B2 (en) * 2004-08-05 2006-06-13 Nufern Fiber optic article including fluorine
US7315683B2 (en) * 2004-09-09 2008-01-01 Corning Incorporated Optical waveguides formed in glass-ceramic materials and method for making same
KR100620391B1 (en) * 2004-12-14 2006-09-12 한국전자통신연구원 Integrated semiconductor Light Source
EP1681540A1 (en) * 2004-12-21 2006-07-19 Davidson Instruments, Inc. Multi-channel array processor
EP1674833A3 (en) * 2004-12-21 2007-05-30 Davidson Instruments, Inc. Fiber optic sensor system
WO2006072182A1 (en) * 2005-01-10 2006-07-13 Kresimir Franjic Laser amplifiers with high gain and small thermal aberrations
WO2006083998A2 (en) 2005-02-03 2006-08-10 Pd-Ld, Inc. High-power, phased-locked, laser arrays
JP4359252B2 (en) * 2005-03-14 2009-11-04 株式会社日立製作所 Tunable semiconductor laser device
EP1869737B1 (en) * 2005-03-16 2021-05-12 Davidson Instruments, Inc. High intensity fabry-perot sensor
WO2006103767A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Mode control waveguide laser
CA2521731A1 (en) * 2005-05-09 2006-11-09 Jian-Jun He Wavelength switchable semiconductor laser
US7526167B1 (en) 2005-06-24 2009-04-28 Lockheed Martin Corporation Apparatus and method for a high-gain double-clad amplifier
JP2007011106A (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-18 Yokogawa Electric Corp Light waveform shaping element
US7608551B2 (en) * 2005-07-05 2009-10-27 Margaryan Alfred A Bismuth containing fluorophosphate glass and method for making thereof
US7570320B1 (en) 2005-09-01 2009-08-04 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Thermo-optic liquid crystal waveguides
US7736382B2 (en) * 2005-09-09 2010-06-15 Lockheed Martin Corporation Apparatus for optical stimulation of nerves and other animal tissue
WO2007033069A2 (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-03-22 Davidson Instruments Inc. Tracking algorithm for linear array signal processor for fabry-perot cross-correlation pattern and method of using same
EP1942364A1 (en) 2005-09-14 2008-07-09 Mirage Innovations Ltd. Diffractive optical relay and method for manufacturing the same
US8945197B1 (en) 2005-10-24 2015-02-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Sight-restoring visual prosthetic and method using infrared nerve-stimulation light
US7876803B1 (en) 2007-03-21 2011-01-25 Lockheed Martin Corporation High-power, pulsed ring fiber oscillator and method
US8744570B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2014-06-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Optical stimulation of the brainstem and/or midbrain, including auditory areas
US8475506B1 (en) 2007-08-13 2013-07-02 Lockheed Martin Corporation VCSEL array stimulator apparatus and method for light stimulation of bodily tissues
US8012189B1 (en) 2007-01-11 2011-09-06 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and vestibular implant using optical stimulation of nerves
US8929973B1 (en) 2005-10-24 2015-01-06 Lockheed Martin Corporation Apparatus and method for characterizing optical sources used with human and animal tissues
US8792978B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2014-07-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation Laser-based nerve stimulators for, E.G., hearing restoration in cochlear prostheses and method
US8956396B1 (en) 2005-10-24 2015-02-17 Lockheed Martin Corporation Eye-tracking visual prosthetic and method
US7988688B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2011-08-02 Lockheed Martin Corporation Miniature apparatus and method for optical stimulation of nerves and other animal tissue
US8709078B1 (en) 2011-08-03 2014-04-29 Lockheed Martin Corporation Ocular implant with substantially constant retinal spacing for transmission of nerve-stimulation light
US7280729B2 (en) 2006-01-17 2007-10-09 Micron Technology, Inc. Semiconductor constructions and light-directing conduits
CN100359348C (en) * 2006-01-18 2008-01-02 中国科学院上海光学精密机械研究所 Substrate surface protection method for ion exchange process
US7608827B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2009-10-27 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Near-field terahertz imaging
US20070252998A1 (en) * 2006-03-22 2007-11-01 Berthold John W Apparatus for continuous readout of fabry-perot fiber optic sensor
US7995631B2 (en) * 2006-04-14 2011-08-09 Raytheon Company Solid-state laser with spatially-tailored active ion concentration using valence conversion with surface masking and method
US7684051B2 (en) 2006-04-18 2010-03-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fiber optic seismic sensor based on MEMS cantilever
US7743661B2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2010-06-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fiber optic MEMS seismic sensor with mass supported by hinged beams
US8805136B2 (en) * 2006-05-08 2014-08-12 Photonics On-Fiber Devices, Inc. On-fiber tunable Bragg gratings for DWDM applications
US8115937B2 (en) * 2006-08-16 2012-02-14 Davidson Instruments Methods and apparatus for measuring multiple Fabry-Perot gaps
JP4441918B2 (en) * 2006-08-31 2010-03-31 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Light source device and image display device
US8207509B2 (en) 2006-09-01 2012-06-26 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Substrates, systems and methods for analyzing materials
AU2007289057C1 (en) * 2006-09-01 2014-01-16 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Substrates, systems and methods for analyzing materials
US8498699B2 (en) 2008-10-03 2013-07-30 Lockheed Martin Company Method and nerve stimulator using simultaneous electrical and optical signals
US8996131B1 (en) 2006-09-28 2015-03-31 Lockheed Martin Corporation Apparatus and method for managing chronic pain with infrared light sources and heat
WO2008050257A2 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-05-02 Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh Intracavity frequency-converted solid-state laser for the visible wavelength region
US7883536B1 (en) 2007-01-19 2011-02-08 Lockheed Martin Corporation Hybrid optical-electrical probes
US7787128B2 (en) * 2007-01-24 2010-08-31 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Transducer for measuring environmental parameters
KR100827175B1 (en) * 2007-02-23 2008-05-02 삼성전자주식회사 Optical waveguide sheet and manufacturing methode of thereof
WO2008117249A1 (en) * 2007-03-26 2008-10-02 Scuola Superiore Di Studi Universitari E Di Perfezionamento Sant'anna Integrated optical waveguide amplifier or laser with rare earth ions and sensitizer elements co-doped core and related optical pumping method
US8455157B1 (en) 2007-04-26 2013-06-04 Pd-Ld, Inc. Methods for improving performance of holographic glasses
JP4888261B2 (en) * 2007-07-12 2012-02-29 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Light source device, image display device, and monitor device
US8023548B2 (en) * 2007-08-15 2011-09-20 Iulian Basarab Petrescu-Prahova Diode lasers type of devices with good coupling between field distribution and gain
JP4591489B2 (en) * 2007-08-30 2010-12-01 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Light source device, image display device, and monitor device
US8834545B2 (en) 2011-07-22 2014-09-16 Lockheed Martin Corporation Optical-stimulation cochlear implant with electrode(s) at the apical end for electrical stimulation of apical spiral ganglion cells of the cochlea
JP2009272614A (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-19 Sharp Corp Erbium-doped silicon nanocrystalline-embedded silicon oxide waveguide and method of manufacturing the same, and integrated circuit including the same
US7616851B1 (en) * 2008-06-26 2009-11-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Tunable wavelength filter device
EP4325209A2 (en) 2008-09-16 2024-02-21 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Integrated optical device
WO2010040142A1 (en) 2008-10-03 2010-04-08 Lockheed Martin Corporation Nerve stimulator and method using simultaneous electrical and optical signals
US8361914B2 (en) * 2008-10-31 2013-01-29 Margaryan Alfred A Optical components for use in high energy environment with improved optical characteristics
WO2010053911A2 (en) 2008-11-04 2010-05-14 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology External-cavity one-dimensional multi-wavelength beam combining of two-dimensional laser elements
US8101471B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2012-01-24 Intel Corporation Method of forming programmable anti-fuse element
US8526110B1 (en) 2009-02-17 2013-09-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Spectral-beam combining for high-power fiber-ring-laser systems
US9366938B1 (en) 2009-02-17 2016-06-14 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Electro-optic beam deflector device
US8133384B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2012-03-13 Harris Corporation Carbon strand radio frequency heating susceptor
DE102009001468A1 (en) * 2009-03-11 2010-09-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh light source
US11181688B2 (en) 2009-10-13 2021-11-23 Skorpios Technologies, Inc. Integration of an unprocessed, direct-bandgap chip into a silicon photonic device
US8934509B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2015-01-13 Lockheed Martin Corporation Q-switched oscillator seed-source for MOPA laser illuminator method and apparatus
EP2537019B1 (en) 2010-02-19 2016-09-07 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Device for measuring analytical reactions
US8994946B2 (en) 2010-02-19 2015-03-31 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Integrated analytical system and method
US8614853B2 (en) 2010-03-09 2013-12-24 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Two-dimensional wavelength-beam-combining of lasers using first-order grating stack
CN102884462A (en) * 2010-03-22 2013-01-16 科勒奇普(以色列)有限公司 Opto-electronic transceiver having housing with small form factor
US8531761B2 (en) * 2010-05-27 2013-09-10 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology High peak power optical amplifier
US8995038B1 (en) 2010-07-06 2015-03-31 Vescent Photonics, Inc. Optical time delay control device
US9620928B2 (en) 2010-07-16 2017-04-11 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Continuous wave or ultrafast lasers
KR101150860B1 (en) * 2010-08-06 2012-07-19 한국광기술원 Pulse analyzer using optical sensor
US8488920B2 (en) * 2010-09-01 2013-07-16 Xyratex Technology Limited Optical PCB and a method of making an optical PCB
US9900124B2 (en) * 2011-04-01 2018-02-20 Infinera Corporation Periodic superchannel carrier arrangement for optical communication systems
WO2012154958A1 (en) 2011-05-10 2012-11-15 Invensys Systems, Inc. Multi-drop optical communication
JP2012256663A (en) * 2011-06-08 2012-12-27 Nec Corp Optical amplifier and optical amplification method
US9599613B2 (en) 2011-07-20 2017-03-21 University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization Photonic blood typing
US20130044778A1 (en) * 2011-08-18 2013-02-21 Jacques Gollier Optical sources having a cavity-matched external cavity
US20130044773A1 (en) * 2011-08-18 2013-02-21 Venkata Adiseshaiah Bhagavatula Optical sources having proximity coupled laser source and waveguide
US10305243B2 (en) 2011-10-14 2019-05-28 Mellanox Technologies Silicon Photonics Inc. Reduction of mode hopping in a laser cavity
WO2013063586A1 (en) * 2011-10-28 2013-05-02 Ofs Fitel, Llc Distributed feedback (dfb) brillouin fiber lasers
CA2855913C (en) * 2011-11-16 2016-11-29 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Semiconductor laser excitation solid-state laser
EP2805391B1 (en) 2012-01-18 2018-06-20 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP High density laser optics
US10031138B2 (en) 2012-01-20 2018-07-24 University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization Hierarchical films having ultra low fouling and high recognition element loading properties
GB201202128D0 (en) * 2012-02-08 2012-03-21 Univ Leeds Novel material
US9372308B1 (en) 2012-06-17 2016-06-21 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Arrays of integrated analytical devices and methods for production
EP3524964B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2020-07-15 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. An optical analytical device
US8805133B1 (en) * 2013-01-18 2014-08-12 Np Photonics, Inc. Low-loss UV to mid IR optical tellurium oxide glass and fiber for linear, non-linear and active devices
US8818160B2 (en) 2013-01-18 2014-08-26 Np Photonics, Inc. IR supercontinuum source using low-loss heavy metal oxide glasses
US9624540B2 (en) 2013-02-22 2017-04-18 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Integrated illumination of optical analytical devices
WO2014189599A2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2014-11-27 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Photonic devices and methods of using and making photonic devices
US9726553B2 (en) * 2013-06-11 2017-08-08 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Optical temperature sensor and use of same
US9790128B2 (en) 2013-08-07 2017-10-17 Corning Incorporated Laser controlled ion exchange process and glass articles formed therefrom
US8843217B1 (en) 2013-09-13 2014-09-23 Lockheed Martin Corporation Combined vestibular and cochlear implant and method
FR3015135B1 (en) * 2013-12-13 2017-05-19 Thales Sa LASER SOURCE WITH REDUCED RAISE WIDTH
US10003173B2 (en) 2014-04-23 2018-06-19 Skorpios Technologies, Inc. Widely tunable laser control
US10495820B1 (en) 2014-06-17 2019-12-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and apparatus for low-profile fiber-coupling to photonic chips
US9606068B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2017-03-28 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Arrays of integrated analytical devices
US9568640B2 (en) 2014-09-15 2017-02-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Displacement measurements using simulated multi-wavelength light sources
US9671673B2 (en) * 2014-11-17 2017-06-06 Singapore University Of Technology And Design Optical device for dispersion compensation
KR102356454B1 (en) * 2015-02-17 2022-01-27 삼성전자주식회사 Dual coupler device, spectroscope including the dual coupler device, and non-invasive biometric sensor including the spectroscope
EP4220256A1 (en) 2015-03-16 2023-08-02 Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. Analytical system comprising integrated devices and systems for free-space optical coupling
US10187626B2 (en) * 2015-04-10 2019-01-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Apparatuses and methods for three-dimensional imaging of an object
US9696498B2 (en) * 2015-05-04 2017-07-04 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Three-dimensional (3D) photonic chip-to-fiber interposer
AU2016276980B2 (en) 2015-06-12 2021-09-23 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Integrated target waveguide devices and systems for optical coupling
US10393887B2 (en) 2015-07-19 2019-08-27 Afo Research, Inc. Fluorine resistant, radiation resistant, and radiation detection glass systems
CN105866903B (en) * 2016-05-18 2019-01-22 武汉光迅科技股份有限公司 A kind of laser and planar optical waveguide hybrid integrated structure and its manufacturing method
DE102016123343A1 (en) * 2016-12-02 2018-06-07 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Optical fiber system with mode field matching
TWI636617B (en) 2016-12-23 2018-09-21 財團法人工業技術研究院 Electromagnetic wave transmitting board differential electromagnetic wave transmitting board
DE102017101004A1 (en) * 2017-01-19 2018-07-19 Schott Ag Laser medium for solid-state lasers
WO2018137562A1 (en) * 2017-01-26 2018-08-02 Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute Company Limited Methods and apparatus for on-chip derivative spectroscopy
US20180341139A1 (en) 2017-05-23 2018-11-29 Government Of The United States, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Projection using liquid crystal polarization gratings to modulate light
DE102017111938B4 (en) * 2017-05-31 2022-09-08 OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Optically pumped semiconductor laser diode
KR20200105514A (en) * 2018-01-18 2020-09-07 코닝 인코포레이티드 Low-loss waveguide formed in high-transmission glass using Ag-Na ion exchange
US10585242B1 (en) 2018-09-28 2020-03-10 Corning Research & Development Corporation Channel waveguides with bend compensation for low-loss optical transmission
WO2020096950A1 (en) * 2018-11-06 2020-05-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Heterogeneously integrated indium gallium nitride on silicon photonic integrated circuits
US10862031B2 (en) * 2019-03-01 2020-12-08 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Method to effectively suppress heat dissipation in PCRAM devices
US10871614B1 (en) 2019-07-03 2020-12-22 Globalfoundries Inc. Transverse-electric (TE) pass polarizer
US11088503B2 (en) 2019-07-30 2021-08-10 Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. Laser with a gain medium layer doped with a rare earth metal with upper and lower light-confining features
US11381053B2 (en) * 2019-12-18 2022-07-05 Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. Waveguide-confining layer with gain medium to emit subwavelength lasers, and method to form same
US10983273B1 (en) * 2020-06-22 2021-04-20 Voyant Photonics, Inc. Integrated optical waveguide emitter
KR20230156084A (en) * 2021-03-05 2023-11-13 아이피지 포토닉스 코포레이션 Intracavity holographic laser mode converter
CN113675716A (en) * 2021-08-16 2021-11-19 厦门大学 LED (light-emitting diode) pumping multi-wavelength waveguide laser and multi-wavelength waveguide laser
US11733468B2 (en) * 2021-12-08 2023-08-22 Viavi Solutions Inc. Photonic structure using optical heater

Family Cites Families (82)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1848A (en) 1840-11-07 Edward gossefcln
US2110237A (en) 1936-03-06 1938-03-08 Swift & Co Sediment tester
US2182564A (en) 1937-07-10 1939-12-05 Samuel L Leiboff Extraction process
NL252802A (en) 1959-11-20
US3733179A (en) 1968-08-29 1973-05-15 Minnesota Mining & Mfg Method and apparatus for the quantitative determination of blood chemicals in blood derivatives
JPS5038342B2 (en) 1971-12-01 1975-12-09
US3888648A (en) 1972-12-07 1975-06-10 Us Navy Method for forming an optical wave guide coupler
US4039249A (en) * 1973-03-28 1977-08-02 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Integrated optical devices including tunable fixed grating
US3912363A (en) 1974-01-29 1975-10-14 Rca Corp Optical fiber to planar waveguide coupler
US4318058A (en) * 1979-04-24 1982-03-02 Nippon Electric Co., Ltd. Semiconductor diode laser array
US4335079A (en) 1980-10-20 1982-06-15 Vander Mey John E Apparatus for the sulfonation or sulfation of organic liquids
JPS60145840A (en) 1984-01-06 1985-08-01 松下電工株式会社 Single-side metallic foil lined laminated board
JPS60158407A (en) 1984-01-28 1985-08-19 Shimadzu Corp Production of optical waveguide
US4659175A (en) 1984-09-06 1987-04-21 American Telephone And Telegrraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Fiber waveguide coupling device
US4986624A (en) 1985-07-15 1991-01-22 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Optical fiber evanescent grating reflector
JPS6329986A (en) * 1986-07-23 1988-02-08 Hoya Corp Light-waveguide type laser
JPS6442510A (en) 1987-08-10 1989-02-14 Sumitomo Metal Ind Method for melting and refining scrap
US5164343A (en) * 1987-12-04 1992-11-17 Kigre, Inc. Ion-exchangeable phosphate glass compositions and strengthened optical quality glass articles
JPH0242510A (en) 1988-08-03 1990-02-13 Fanuc Ltd Display system for working information
DE3826942A1 (en) 1988-08-09 1990-02-22 Bodenseewerk Geraetetech METHOD FOR PRODUCING WAVE GUIDES ON A GLASS SUBSTRATE BY ION EXCHANGE
JP2656972B2 (en) 1989-02-22 1997-09-24 日立電線株式会社 Multi-wavelength glass waveguide laser array
US4962067A (en) 1989-07-14 1990-10-09 Kigre, Inc. Erbium laser glass compositions
JPH087647Y2 (en) * 1989-09-26 1996-03-04 ホーヤ株式会社 Optical waveguide type laser device
US5080503A (en) 1989-12-12 1992-01-14 Ecole Polytechnique Optical waveguide device and method for making such device
DE4022090A1 (en) * 1989-12-18 1991-06-20 Forschungszentrum Juelich Gmbh ELECTRO-OPTICAL COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
WO1991010149A1 (en) * 1989-12-26 1991-07-11 Allied-Signal Inc. Method for forming optically active waveguides
JPH0644645B2 (en) * 1990-03-30 1994-06-08 ホーヤ株式会社 Optical waveguide type laser medium and optical waveguide type laser device
US5039190A (en) 1990-09-07 1991-08-13 At&T Bell Laboratories Apparatus comprising an optical gain device, and method of producing the device
FR2666699A1 (en) 1990-09-11 1992-03-13 Thomson Csf LASER WITH COUPLED OPTICAL GUIDES.
US5243609A (en) 1990-11-20 1993-09-07 General Instrument Corporation Laser with longitudinal mode selection
US5134620A (en) 1990-11-20 1992-07-28 General Instrument Corporation Laser with longitudinal mode selection
US5151908A (en) 1990-11-20 1992-09-29 General Instrument Corporation Laser with longitudinal mode selection
US5081314A (en) 1990-12-07 1992-01-14 Kissel Charles L Process for producing acrolein
CA2101541C (en) 1991-02-01 2002-07-30 Wolfgang Sohler Rare-earth-doped lithium niobate waveguide structures
DE4106589C2 (en) 1991-03-01 1997-04-24 Wacker Siltronic Halbleitermat Continuous recharge with liquid silicon during crucible pulling according to Czochralski
US5142660A (en) 1991-03-07 1992-08-25 Litton Systems, Inc. Broadband light source using rare earth doped glass waveguide
US5295209A (en) 1991-03-12 1994-03-15 General Instrument Corporation Spontaneous emission source having high spectral density at a desired wavelength
JP3157548B2 (en) 1991-06-24 2001-04-16 日本電信電話株式会社 Waveguide type optical tap circuit
CA2091711C (en) 1992-03-17 2001-12-18 Shinji Ishikawa Method for producing glass thin film
JPH05270586A (en) * 1992-03-25 1993-10-19 Shibuya Kogyo Co Ltd Cap transfer device
JPH05270856A (en) * 1992-03-27 1993-10-19 Hoya Corp Laser glass
JPH05270857A (en) * 1992-03-27 1993-10-19 Hoya Corp Laser glass
JP3214910B2 (en) 1992-08-18 2001-10-02 富士通株式会社 Manufacturing method of planar waveguide optical amplifier
US5384797A (en) 1992-09-21 1995-01-24 Sdl, Inc. Monolithic multi-wavelength laser diode array
US5526369A (en) 1992-10-07 1996-06-11 Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. Phosphate glass useful in high energy lasers
US5365538A (en) 1992-10-29 1994-11-15 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Inc. Slab waveguide pumped channel waveguide laser
JPH0770791B2 (en) * 1992-12-22 1995-07-31 日本電気株式会社 Semiconductor laser and manufacturing method thereof
JPH06216439A (en) * 1993-01-13 1994-08-05 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Light amplifier
US5334559A (en) 1993-02-01 1994-08-02 Schott Glass Technologies, Inc. Phosphate glass useful in lasers
US5491708A (en) 1993-02-01 1996-02-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Integrated optic laser
US5448586A (en) 1993-09-20 1995-09-05 At&T Corp. Pumping arrangements for arrays of planar optical devices
JPH07140336A (en) 1993-09-22 1995-06-02 Shin Etsu Chem Co Ltd Optical waveguide
US5436919A (en) * 1994-01-25 1995-07-25 Eastman Kodak Company Multiwavelength upconversion waveguide laser
JPH07261040A (en) * 1994-03-23 1995-10-13 Hitachi Cable Ltd Glass waveguide and its manufacture
US5580471A (en) * 1994-03-30 1996-12-03 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for material treatment and inspection using fiber-coupled laser diode
US5530709A (en) * 1994-09-06 1996-06-25 Sdl, Inc. Double-clad upconversion fiber laser
US5544268A (en) * 1994-09-09 1996-08-06 Deacon Research Display panel with electrically-controlled waveguide-routing
DE59406688D1 (en) 1994-10-13 1998-09-17 Ant Nachrichtentech Optical fiber amplifier
US5513196A (en) * 1995-02-14 1996-04-30 Deacon Research Optical source with mode reshaping
US5663972A (en) 1995-04-03 1997-09-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Ultrafast pulsed laser utilizing broad bandwidth laser glass
US5858051A (en) 1995-05-08 1999-01-12 Toshiba Machine Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing optical waveguide
US5677769A (en) 1995-05-30 1997-10-14 Imra America Optical sensor utilizing rare-earth-doped integrated-optic lasers
DE69626950D1 (en) 1996-01-12 2003-04-30 Corning Oti Spa Rare earth doped lithium niobate DBR laser
IL118209A0 (en) 1996-05-09 1998-02-08 Yeda Res & Dev Active electro-optical wavelength-selective mirrors and active electro-optic wavelength-selective filters
US5805755A (en) 1996-06-17 1998-09-08 Tellium, Inc. Self-aligned transition from ridge to buried heterostructure waveguide, especially for multi-wavelength laser array integration
GB9615013D0 (en) * 1996-07-17 1996-09-04 Univ Southampton Optical glass optical waveguide amplifier and optical waveguide laser
US5703980A (en) 1996-09-20 1997-12-30 Northern Telecom Method for low-loss insertion of an optical signal from an optical fibre to a waveguide integrated on to a semiconductor wafer
JPH10117040A (en) * 1996-10-08 1998-05-06 Nec Corp Semiconductor laser element and manufacture of the same
US5915051A (en) 1997-01-21 1999-06-22 Massascusetts Institute Of Technology Wavelength-selective optical add/drop switch
DE69704074T2 (en) 1997-03-27 2001-06-21 Tno Erbium-doped planar waveguide
KR100261230B1 (en) 1997-07-14 2000-07-01 윤종용 Integrated optic intensity
US5887097A (en) 1997-07-21 1999-03-23 Lucent Technologies Inc. Apparatus for pumping an optical fiber laser
USH1848H (en) * 1997-08-18 2000-05-02 Amin; Jaymin Z-propagating waveguide laser and amplifier device in rare-earth-doped LiNbO3
US20020028390A1 (en) 1997-09-22 2002-03-07 Mohammad A. Mazed Techniques for fabricating and packaging multi-wavelength semiconductor laser array devices (chips) and their applications in system architectures
JP3909946B2 (en) 1998-01-30 2007-04-25 富士通株式会社 Bidirectional wavelength switch and optical multiplexer / demultiplexer
GB2325334B (en) 1998-07-10 1999-04-14 Bookham Technology Ltd External cavity laser
US6270604B1 (en) * 1998-07-23 2001-08-07 Molecular Optoelectronics Corporation Method for fabricating an optical waveguide
US6434294B1 (en) 1998-09-02 2002-08-13 Bae Systems Aerospace Electronics Inc. Photonic local oscillator signal generator and method for generating a local oscillator signal
US6330388B1 (en) 1999-01-27 2001-12-11 Northstar Photonics, Inc. Method and apparatus for waveguide optics and devices
JP2001209018A (en) 2000-01-26 2001-08-03 Nec Corp Optical modulator with monitor
US6882782B2 (en) 2000-11-01 2005-04-19 Schott Glas Photonic devices for optical and optoelectronic information processing
US20030002771A1 (en) 2001-06-01 2003-01-02 Jds Uniphase Corporation Integrated optical amplifier

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4511051B2 (en) 2010-07-28
CA2362131A1 (en) 2000-08-31
WO2000051212A3 (en) 2001-09-07
US6690873B2 (en) 2004-02-10
WO2000045197A3 (en) 2003-05-22
US6430349B1 (en) 2002-08-06
WO2000052791A9 (en) 2001-11-15
EP1153461A1 (en) 2001-11-14
EP1153461A4 (en) 2005-12-14
US6636678B1 (en) 2003-10-21
AU5585500A (en) 2000-09-14
EP1163710B1 (en) 2011-03-23
EP1163710A4 (en) 2005-12-14
WO2000051212A2 (en) 2000-08-31
US6970494B1 (en) 2005-11-29
WO2000045197A2 (en) 2000-08-03
EP1330667A2 (en) 2003-07-30
US20020146047A1 (en) 2002-10-10
WO2000052791A2 (en) 2000-09-08
JP2002536821A (en) 2002-10-29
WO2000045477A1 (en) 2000-08-03
JP2003524879A (en) 2003-08-19
DE60045762D1 (en) 2011-05-05
EP1330667A4 (en) 2005-12-14
AU3583800A (en) 2000-08-18
EP1181751A2 (en) 2002-02-27
ATE503289T1 (en) 2011-04-15
WO2000045481A1 (en) 2000-08-03
JP2002536824A (en) 2002-10-29
US6529675B1 (en) 2003-03-04
EP1153461B1 (en) 2010-04-14
WO2000052791A3 (en) 2001-05-03
AU5721300A (en) 2000-09-21
WO2000045478A2 (en) 2000-08-03
CA2361485A1 (en) 2000-09-08
WO2000045478A3 (en) 2000-11-30
ATE464682T1 (en) 2010-04-15
DE60044182D1 (en) 2010-05-27
US7050470B1 (en) 2006-05-23
JP4832644B2 (en) 2011-12-07
EP1161781A2 (en) 2001-12-12
US6330388B1 (en) 2001-12-11
US6381392B1 (en) 2002-04-30
EP1163710A1 (en) 2001-12-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2000045477A9 (en) Method to optimize rare earth content for waveguide lasers and amplifiers
Veasey et al. Yb/Er-codoped and Yb-doped waveguide lasers in phosphate glass
WO2000045478A9 (en) Rare-earth doped phosphate-glass lasers
Mwarania et al. Low-threshold monomode ion-exchanged waveguide lasers in neodymium-doped BK-7 glass
US5491708A (en) Integrated optic laser
Subramanian et al. Erbium-doped waveguide laser in tantalum pentoxide
Mwarania et al. Neodymium-doped ion-exchanged waveguide lasers in BK-7 glass
Bonar et al. Co-doping effects in rare-earth-doped planar waveguides
Aydın Development of high-power 3 µm fiber laser sources and components
Casale et al. 1.55 µm hybrid waveguide laser made by ion-exchange and wafer bonding
Amin et al. Waveguide lasers by ion-exchange in Er-doped glass
Madasamy Fabrication and characterization of erbium doped waveguide amplifiers and lasers
Malone et al. Glasses for waveguide lasers
Aydin Degree Thèse (Ph. D.)--Université Laval, 2019.
Hwang Short erbium doped phosphate fiber amplifiers
Vossler Waveguide lasers and amplifiers in rare-earth-doped lithium niobate and silicate glasses
Mairaj et al. Toward compact optical waveguide devices for active infrared applications
Wang Single-frequency and mode-locked glass waveguide lasers and fiber-optic waveguide resonators for optical communications
Digonnet et al. Nonlinear optics in doped fibers. Final report, May 1, 1992--April 30, 1996

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000919256

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2000 596633

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000919256

Country of ref document: EP

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGE 111, CLAIMS, ADDED