WO2001026569A1 - Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001026569A1
WO2001026569A1 PCT/US2000/027836 US0027836W WO0126569A1 WO 2001026569 A1 WO2001026569 A1 WO 2001026569A1 US 0027836 W US0027836 W US 0027836W WO 0126569 A1 WO0126569 A1 WO 0126569A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
heart
nozzle
monitor
delivered
gating device
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/027836
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001026569A9 (en
Inventor
Keith L. March
Susan B. Klein
Original Assignee
Advanced Research & Technology Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Advanced Research & Technology Institute filed Critical Advanced Research & Technology Institute
Priority to AU80025/00A priority Critical patent/AU8002500A/en
Publication of WO2001026569A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001026569A1/en
Publication of WO2001026569A9 publication Critical patent/WO2001026569A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/1048Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/00234Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for minimally invasive surgery
    • A61B2017/00238Type of minimally invasive operation
    • A61B2017/00243Type of minimally invasive operation cardiac
    • A61B2017/00247Making holes in the wall of the heart, e.g. laser Myocardial revascularization
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B18/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body
    • A61B2018/00315Surgical instruments, devices or methods for transferring non-mechanical forms of energy to or from the body for treatment of particular body parts
    • A61B2018/00345Vascular system
    • A61B2018/00351Heart
    • A61B2018/00392Transmyocardial revascularisation
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N2005/1085X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy characterised by the type of particles applied to the patient
    • A61N2005/1087Ions; Protons
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61NELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
    • A61N5/00Radiation therapy
    • A61N5/10X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
    • A61N5/1048Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
    • A61N5/1064Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for adjusting radiation treatment in response to monitoring

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for non- invasive myocardial revascularization, and more particularly to an apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization using highly energetic particles.
  • Coronary vessel occlusion leading to myocardial ischemia is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the Western hemisphere. Ischemia is caused by the depletion of oxygen supply to the myocardium resulting from blockage of the myocardial arteries or deterioration of the vascular structure.
  • LTMR invasive laser transmyocardial revascularization
  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for use with a particle accelerator for effecting non-invasive myocardial revascularization through application of energetic heavy ions.
  • a heavy ion refers to any particle with one or more units of electric charge and a mass exceeding one atomic mass unit.
  • the accelerator generates a beam of heavy ions traveling at relativistic speeds.
  • the apparatus of the present invention comprises an electronic gating device for timing the delivery of the beam; a beam nozzle for directing the beam; a beam monitoring device for measuring the energy, intensity, and position of the beam in the beam nozzle; and, a heart monitor for synchronizing the gating device to the heart beat.
  • the apparatus may also include a range modulator to increase the width of the Bragg peak and a delivered-dose monitor for directly measuring the dose delivered to the target area of the heart.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the differences between photons, electrons, and protons for the dose deposited in tissue.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of the apparatus of the present invention for use with a particle accelerator.
  • Figure 3 illustrates a schematic of a nozzle configuration.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the relative dose versus depth of a proton Bragg peak.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a heart monitor device and associated timing signals.
  • Irradiation of the myocardium with high energy heavy ions is useful to effect myocardial revascularization.
  • Heavy ion radiation is fundamentally different from other ionizing radiations, such as x-rays or ⁇ rays, in that heavy ions traveling at relativistic speeds interact weakly with the outer shell electrons of the material through which they pass. The strong interactions at the end of the heavy ion's range result in the deposition of all of the remaining energy deep within the target. As the heavy ions traverse the material, successive weak interactions slow the heavy ions. The slower, less energetic heavy ions interact more strongly with the material through which they pass. In contrast, electron and photon beams deposit most of their energy near the surface.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the differences between photons, electrons, and protons for the dose deposited in tissue.
  • a proton beam exhibits a sharper, better defined penumbra and distal cut off than is possible with maximally collimated photon beams.
  • protons or other heavy ions for non-invasive myocardial revascularization.
  • the proton is chosen as an exemplary heavy ion.
  • the apparatus of the present invention comprises an electronic gating device (20) for use with a particle accelerator (10), such as a cyclotron or synchrotron as shown in Fig. 2.
  • the gating device (20) includes a laminated, fast switching magnet located in the beam line, a variable delay circuit, a strain gauge, and associated electronics and software controls.
  • the gating device (20) diverts the proton beam from a shunt line of the accelerator (10) to a patient treatment line at a prescribed time. The diversion of the proton beam into the patient treatment line defines the exposure time of the proton dose delivered to the patient.
  • Electronic gating avoids the problem of the dose rate ramping up and down as the dose is initialized and terminated, which occurs in mechanical gates as the lead gates move into and out of the proton beam. Additional electronic gates can be added, so that the ECG trigger is only allowed during exhalation, as discussed below. This minimizes the tissue thickness effects and dispersion of the beam within the patient's tissue.
  • the apparatus of the invention further comprises a beam nozzle (30) for receiving and modifying the beam of protons in the patient treatment line.
  • the nozzle (30) includes focusing magnets which are adjusted so the focal point of the beam coincides with the target location of the myocardial wall at a selected phase of the cardiac cycle.
  • This nozzle configuration produces a very small, 2 - 8 mm diameter, 100% isodose area, with a fairly small penumbra of 2 - 8 mm.
  • the penumbra is defined as the distance between 80% point and 20% point of the energy peak across the beam diameter.
  • the advantage of this nozzle configuration is that no beam intensity is lost, which can occur when other beam modification devices are present in the nozzle.
  • the nozzle (32) comprises a scattering foil (33) to receive the beam from the gating device (20) and flatten the beam profile by expanding the central portion of the beam.
  • the scattering foil (33) may be formed of metal, such as aluminum, lead, or copper, or plastic, or a combination of plastic and metal.
  • the second nozzle (32) includes a collimator array having one or more collimators (34) arranged in series to substantially decrease the number of scattered protons and produce a substantially collimated beam.
  • the collimators (34) are arranged in series so that the output from one collimator provides the input to the subsequent collimator.
  • the first collimator (34) in the collimator array intercepts the beam emitted by the scattering foil (33).
  • the collimated beam profile produces a larger 100% isodose area (5 - 9 mm) and a smaller penumbra (2 - 5 mm) than the focused beam of the first nozzle configuration.
  • the maximum diameter of the irradiation spot may be equivalent in both first and second nozzle configurations, but the second nozzle configuration (32) substantially reduces the available beam current, and therefore requires higher initial beam intensity.
  • the beam emitted by the nozzle (30) or (32) is delivered to the myocardial wall of the heart (90) at a selected phase of the cardiac cycle.
  • a range modulator (60) may also be incorporated in the apparatus to accept the beam in the patient line and emit a beam that has a spread-out Bragg peak width.
  • the width of the Bragg peak is generally measured at the point halfway between the maximum dose and the proximal plateau, called the "full width half max" (FWHM).
  • the range modulator (60) may comprise a plastic propeller. As the propeller spins, varying thicknesses of plastic pass through the beam, rapidly shifting the Bragg peak back and forth. Alternately, spreading of the Bragg peak may be accomplished by sliding wedges through the beam or expanding volumes of liquid within the beam. Spreading out the Bragg peak may be desirable to compensate for heart motion or, if necessary, to increase the Bragg peak width so that it encompasses the entire thickness of the heart wall as best seen in Fig. 4.
  • a heart monitor (50) is provided to monitor the motion of the heart and/or cardiac phase as shown in Fig. 5.
  • Suitable methods for monitoring heart position and/or cardiac phase include ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, ECG and similar techniques.
  • an ECG communicates with the gating device (20) to coordinate the proton delivery with the heart motion, so that protons may be delivered to the target area of the heart despite target area movement.
  • the apparatus of the current invention may also include one or more beam monitoring devices (40) for measuring the energy, intensity, and position of the proton beam in the nozzle (30) and (32), before delivery to the patient.
  • Standard radiotherapy devices such as split ion chambers and secondary electron emission monitors (SEM) may be used.
  • the beam monitoring device samples the charged current passing through the nozzle (30) and (32) and estimates the dosage that will be delivered to the target area of the heart.
  • the beam monitoring device (40) is calibrated to account for the expected decrease in dosage due to the presence of intervening tissue between the beam and the target area of the heart. From the calibration, the beam current at the beam monitoring device is converted to the expected dose delivered at the target.
  • the apparatus of the current invention may also include a delivered-dose monitor (70) for directly measuring the dose actually delivered to the target area of the heart.
  • the delivered-dose monitor (70) measures radioactive emissions, such as positron emissions, caused by the nuclear absorption of proton energy within the tissue. Proton energy absorbed by blood within the lumen of the heart may also create radioactive emissions, but proton-exposed blood, as it is pumped from the heart, does not reveal persistent radioactive emissions within the treatment region. Thus, radioactive emissions detected by the monitor (70) are indicative of the delivery of protons within tissue.
  • the delivered-dose monitor (70) may be a positron emission tomography (PET) system.
  • PET positron emission tomography
  • protons interact not with the electrons of the target atoms, but with the nuclei.
  • a positively charged electron a positron
  • the emitted positron is extremely short lived and combines almost instantly with a negatively charged electron.
  • the collision produces two gamma rays, 180 degrees opposed, of a specific energy (115 keV).
  • the PET system includes two gamma ray detectors disposed on opposing sides of the sample object, i.e. the heart in this application.
  • the PET system identifies the location of the positron emission by calculating the difference in arrival time of the two gamma rays at the gamma ray detectors.
  • the method of use of the apparatus encompasses the delivery of both the proximal plateau or the Bragg peak to the target area of the heart.
  • the dose delivered to the myocardial wall is determined by the energy, intensity, and temporal characteristics of the proton beam.
  • Two different delivery schemes for proton delivery are possible using the method and apparatus of the invention. The first scheme delivers the proximal plateau, and the second scheme delivers the Bragg peak. The differences between these two delivery schemes is understood in terms of the mechanics of interaction of the protons with the matter through which they travel.
  • LET linear energy transfer
  • the operator selects the nozzle configuration depending on the type of proton delivery desired for a particular treatment.
  • the method and apparatus using the first nozzle configuration (30) delivers the proximal plateau of the depth/dose curve to the myocardial target. This method minimizes the beam diameter at the target location while maximizing the beam current and reducing the positioning uncertainty.
  • the method using the second nozzle configuration (32) delivers the Bragg peak to the myocardial wall. The distal edge of the Bragg peak can be located at the inner myocardial wall, within the blood chamber of the heart, or within the myocardial wall, Fig. 4.
  • the operator positions the patient relative to the nozzle (30) so that the trajectory of protons emitted from the nozzle (30) is directed towards the target treatment area of the heart.
  • the heart monitor (50) and delivered-dose monitor (70) are also positioned relative to the patient.
  • the operator selects the dose delivery time to avoid smearing of the delivered dose. It may be preferable that the total dose be delivered in a single pulse of short enough duration to be unaffected by the heart motion. For example, if the dose is delivered when the heart is resting between diastole and systole, heart motion is suspended for approximately 0.4 seconds. This position correlates with the plateau region of the ECG following the "T" wave, preceding the "P" wave, as shown in Fig. 5. It is possible to deliver a 0.2 second proton pulse of highly accurate dose by triggering the proton delivery off of the electronic ECG signal. The large "R" signal is used to trigger the delivery.
  • a variable delay is programmed into the system.
  • the delay is set for the duration of the "Q" wave, the plateau, and the "T” wave in the ECG of the individual patient.
  • the trigger signal is then sent to a switch that alters the field of the laminated magnet within the electronic gating device (20), which switches the proton beam from the shunt line to the patient treatment line for 0.2 seconds.
  • the switching process takes less than 0.000002 seconds.
  • Electronic switching is many orders of magnitude faster than mechanical gating.
  • a single pulse of 50 Gy delivered in 0.2 seconds requires approximately 100 nA of beam current at the target site.
  • the operator Prior to delivery of the pulse, the operator further adjusts the characteristics of the Bragg peak to provide the desired type of proton delivery.
  • the characteristics of the Bragg peak are determined by the initial energy of the protons at the extraction site from the accelerator. The higher the energy, the further the protons will penetrate the patient. For example, assuming an average distance through tissue to the myocardium to be about 16 cm, a 110 MeV proton deposits maximum energy in the myocardial wall.
  • the operator may adjust the energy to a desired amount by degrading the initial output energy from the accelerator or, if the accelerator is a synchrotron, by adjusting the selected output of the synchrotron.
  • the operator may adjust the width of the Bragg peak through use of the range modulator (60).
  • the slope of the distal edge of the Bragg peak is approximately 2 mm for an initial energy of 210 MeV (degraded or not). Lower initial energy will produce a steeper distal slope; lower energy also affects the width of the Bragg peak.
  • the width of the Bragg peak is also affected by the diagnostic and dosimetry devices which intersect the beam. If the placement of the Bragg peak can be very precisely controlled, it is not necessary to alter the width of the Bragg peak. Prior to dose delivery, the operator may also adjust the width of the
  • Bragg peak to be delivered through use of the range modulator (60).
  • Manipulation of the beam energy which results in the translocation of the Bragg peak, will scatter the beam to some degree, depending upon the change in energy. Significant degradation of beam energy will scatter the protons and may require a collimated method of delivery.
  • the operator uses the PET system to locate the tissue through which the protons pass.
  • the PET system does not image the tissue per se. Specifically, the PET system locates the position in three-dimensional space where the proximal plateau and/or Bragg peak are delivered.
  • the position located by the PET system is superimposed on an image of the patient created via a traditional imaging device, such as an MRI, CT, fluoroscopy, or x-ray device, to create an image of the heart showing the region of the delivered protons.
  • a traditional imaging device such as an MRI, CT, fluoroscopy, or x-ray device
  • the region of the delivered protons may be superimposed on a digitized fluoroscopy image grabbed at the exact 0.2 seconds of irradiation, which also can be triggered by the gating device.
  • the operator may collect the PET signal anywhere from seconds to hours after irradiation. It is also possible, by knowing the cross section and concentration of the nucleus with which the proton interacted to calculate the dose delivered based on

Abstract

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for use with a particle accelerator (10) for effecting non-invasive myocardial revascularization through application of energetic heavy ions. The apparatus accepts a beam of energetic heavy ions from the accelerator and controls the timing and location of delivery of the beam to a treatment region of the myocardium. An electronic gating device (20) is provided for timing the delivery of the beam. A beam nozzle (30) is provided for directing the beam. A beam monitoring device (40) measures the energy, intensity, and position of the beam in the beam nozzle. A heart monitor (50) is provided for synchronizing the gating device to the heart beat. A range modulator (60) may be used to increase the width of the Bragg peak and a delivered-dose monitor (70) may be used for measuring the dose delivered to the target area of the heart.

Description

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR NON-INVASIVE MYOCARDIAL
REVASCULARIZATION
Susan B. Klein Keith L. March
Field Of The Invention
The present invention relates generally to an apparatus and method for non- invasive myocardial revascularization, and more particularly to an apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization using highly energetic particles.
Background Of The Invention Coronary vessel occlusion leading to myocardial ischemia is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the Western hemisphere. Ischemia is caused by the depletion of oxygen supply to the myocardium resulting from blockage of the myocardial arteries or deterioration of the vascular structure.
Several methods have been developed to achieve reversal of ischemic regions of the myocardium. These methods include mechanical approaches, such as surgical bypass and angioplasty, to circumvent or open occluded vessels; non- mechanical approaches, such as gene therapy; and, invasive laser transmyocardial revascularization (LTMR). However, many areas of the myocardium cannot be fully revascularized by the current approaches due to small or diseased vascular targets, patient health status contrary to surgery, detrimental effects of loosened plaque, repeated restinosis following angioplasty, and inherent hazards of handling radioactive isotopes. The results from early investigations into the effectiveness of LTMR demonstrate significant improvement in the quality of life for patients receiving
LTMR. This investigation is based on patient satisfaction, number of incidents of reported angina, number visits to the hospital for angina related discomfort, and procedure survivability following LTMR. However, the procedure is complicated, high risk and available only to a small percentage of patients. A non-invasive technique capable of producing an improvement in quality of life has the potential of helping millions of people per year. Consequently a need exists for minimally invasive techniques for transmyocardial revascularization.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for use with a particle accelerator for effecting non-invasive myocardial revascularization through application of energetic heavy ions. A heavy ion, as used herein, refers to any particle with one or more units of electric charge and a mass exceeding one atomic mass unit. The accelerator generates a beam of heavy ions traveling at relativistic speeds.
The apparatus of the present invention comprises an electronic gating device for timing the delivery of the beam; a beam nozzle for directing the beam; a beam monitoring device for measuring the energy, intensity, and position of the beam in the beam nozzle; and, a heart monitor for synchronizing the gating device to the heart beat. The apparatus may also include a range modulator to increase the width of the Bragg peak and a delivered-dose monitor for directly measuring the dose delivered to the target area of the heart. Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 illustrates the differences between photons, electrons, and protons for the dose deposited in tissue.
Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of the apparatus of the present invention for use with a particle accelerator.
Figure 3 illustrates a schematic of a nozzle configuration.
Figure 4 illustrates the relative dose versus depth of a proton Bragg peak.
Figure 5 illustrates a heart monitor device and associated timing signals.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments Irradiation of the myocardium with high energy heavy ions is useful to effect myocardial revascularization. Heavy ion radiation is fundamentally different from other ionizing radiations, such as x-rays or γrays, in that heavy ions traveling at relativistic speeds interact weakly with the outer shell electrons of the material through which they pass. The strong interactions at the end of the heavy ion's range result in the deposition of all of the remaining energy deep within the target. As the heavy ions traverse the material, successive weak interactions slow the heavy ions. The slower, less energetic heavy ions interact more strongly with the material through which they pass. In contrast, electron and photon beams deposit most of their energy near the surface. Figure 1 illustrates the differences between photons, electrons, and protons for the dose deposited in tissue. In addition, a proton beam exhibits a sharper, better defined penumbra and distal cut off than is possible with maximally collimated photon beams. For these reasons, it is desirable to use protons or other heavy ions for non-invasive myocardial revascularization. For describing the apparatus of the invention, the proton is chosen as an exemplary heavy ion.
The apparatus of the present invention comprises an electronic gating device (20) for use with a particle accelerator (10), such as a cyclotron or synchrotron as shown in Fig. 2. The gating device (20) includes a laminated, fast switching magnet located in the beam line, a variable delay circuit, a strain gauge, and associated electronics and software controls. The gating device (20) diverts the proton beam from a shunt line of the accelerator (10) to a patient treatment line at a prescribed time. The diversion of the proton beam into the patient treatment line defines the exposure time of the proton dose delivered to the patient. Electronic gating avoids the problem of the dose rate ramping up and down as the dose is initialized and terminated, which occurs in mechanical gates as the lead gates move into and out of the proton beam. Additional electronic gates can be added, so that the ECG trigger is only allowed during exhalation, as discussed below. This minimizes the tissue thickness effects and dispersion of the beam within the patient's tissue.
The apparatus of the invention further comprises a beam nozzle (30) for receiving and modifying the beam of protons in the patient treatment line. In a first configuration, the nozzle (30) includes focusing magnets which are adjusted so the focal point of the beam coincides with the target location of the myocardial wall at a selected phase of the cardiac cycle. This nozzle configuration produces a very small, 2 - 8 mm diameter, 100% isodose area, with a fairly small penumbra of 2 - 8 mm. The penumbra is defined as the distance between 80% point and 20% point of the energy peak across the beam diameter. The advantage of this nozzle configuration is that no beam intensity is lost, which can occur when other beam modification devices are present in the nozzle.
In a second nozzle configuration, as shown in Fig. 3, the nozzle (32) comprises a scattering foil (33) to receive the beam from the gating device (20) and flatten the beam profile by expanding the central portion of the beam. The scattering foil (33) may be formed of metal, such as aluminum, lead, or copper, or plastic, or a combination of plastic and metal. The second nozzle (32) includes a collimator array having one or more collimators (34) arranged in series to substantially decrease the number of scattered protons and produce a substantially collimated beam. The collimators (34) are arranged in series so that the output from one collimator provides the input to the subsequent collimator. The first collimator (34) in the collimator array intercepts the beam emitted by the scattering foil (33). The collimated beam profile produces a larger 100% isodose area (5 - 9 mm) and a smaller penumbra (2 - 5 mm) than the focused beam of the first nozzle configuration. The maximum diameter of the irradiation spot may be equivalent in both first and second nozzle configurations, but the second nozzle configuration (32) substantially reduces the available beam current, and therefore requires higher initial beam intensity. The beam emitted by the nozzle (30) or (32) is delivered to the myocardial wall of the heart (90) at a selected phase of the cardiac cycle. A range modulator (60) may also be incorporated in the apparatus to accept the beam in the patient line and emit a beam that has a spread-out Bragg peak width. The width of the Bragg peak is generally measured at the point halfway between the maximum dose and the proximal plateau, called the "full width half max" (FWHM). The range modulator (60) may comprise a plastic propeller. As the propeller spins, varying thicknesses of plastic pass through the beam, rapidly shifting the Bragg peak back and forth. Alternately, spreading of the Bragg peak may be accomplished by sliding wedges through the beam or expanding volumes of liquid within the beam. Spreading out the Bragg peak may be desirable to compensate for heart motion or, if necessary, to increase the Bragg peak width so that it encompasses the entire thickness of the heart wall as best seen in Fig. 4.
A heart monitor (50) is provided to monitor the motion of the heart and/or cardiac phase as shown in Fig. 5. Suitable methods for monitoring heart position and/or cardiac phase include ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, ECG and similar techniques. For example, in one configuration of the apparatus an ECG communicates with the gating device (20) to coordinate the proton delivery with the heart motion, so that protons may be delivered to the target area of the heart despite target area movement.
The apparatus of the current invention may also include one or more beam monitoring devices (40) for measuring the energy, intensity, and position of the proton beam in the nozzle (30) and (32), before delivery to the patient. Standard radiotherapy devices, such as split ion chambers and secondary electron emission monitors (SEM) may be used. The beam monitoring device samples the charged current passing through the nozzle (30) and (32) and estimates the dosage that will be delivered to the target area of the heart. The beam monitoring device (40) is calibrated to account for the expected decrease in dosage due to the presence of intervening tissue between the beam and the target area of the heart. From the calibration, the beam current at the beam monitoring device is converted to the expected dose delivered at the target. The apparatus of the current invention may also include a delivered-dose monitor (70) for directly measuring the dose actually delivered to the target area of the heart. The delivered-dose monitor (70) measures radioactive emissions, such as positron emissions, caused by the nuclear absorption of proton energy within the tissue. Proton energy absorbed by blood within the lumen of the heart may also create radioactive emissions, but proton-exposed blood, as it is pumped from the heart, does not reveal persistent radioactive emissions within the treatment region. Thus, radioactive emissions detected by the monitor (70) are indicative of the delivery of protons within tissue.
The delivered-dose monitor (70) may be a positron emission tomography (PET) system. Occasionally, protons interact not with the electrons of the target atoms, but with the nuclei. When this happens, a positively charged electron, a positron, is emitted as a result of the reaction. The emitted positron is extremely short lived and combines almost instantly with a negatively charged electron. The collision produces two gamma rays, 180 degrees opposed, of a specific energy (115 keV). The PET system includes two gamma ray detectors disposed on opposing sides of the sample object, i.e. the heart in this application. The PET system identifies the location of the positron emission by calculating the difference in arrival time of the two gamma rays at the gamma ray detectors.
The method of use of the apparatus encompasses the delivery of both the proximal plateau or the Bragg peak to the target area of the heart. The dose delivered to the myocardial wall is determined by the energy, intensity, and temporal characteristics of the proton beam. Two different delivery schemes for proton delivery are possible using the method and apparatus of the invention. The first scheme delivers the proximal plateau, and the second scheme delivers the Bragg peak. The differences between these two delivery schemes is understood in terms of the mechanics of interaction of the protons with the matter through which they travel.
Protons traveling at relativistic speeds lose energy via small interactions with outer shell electrons of the target material. Because each interaction is small, small amounts of energy are transferred to secondary electrons. These secondary electrons do not travel far and do not cause significant damage. As the protons slow, the ionization potential rises rapidly. The increased interactions between target electrons and the beam of protons cause a further energy loss (slowing) and an increased ionization potential. This characteristic produces a sudden loss of energy at the end of the proton's range. When the dose delivered versus distance is plotted, loss of energy at the end of the proton's range is depicted by the Bragg peak phenomenon as shown Fig. 1. No dose is delivered beyond the distal edge of the Bragg peak. Although protons are not considered high linear energy transfer (LET) particles, the microscopic LET increases from approximately 0.4 keV/μm, approaching the Bragg peak, to 100 keV/μm, at the Bragg peak.
The operator selects the nozzle configuration depending on the type of proton delivery desired for a particular treatment. The method and apparatus using the first nozzle configuration (30) delivers the proximal plateau of the depth/dose curve to the myocardial target. This method minimizes the beam diameter at the target location while maximizing the beam current and reducing the positioning uncertainty. The method using the second nozzle configuration (32) delivers the Bragg peak to the myocardial wall. The distal edge of the Bragg peak can be located at the inner myocardial wall, within the blood chamber of the heart, or within the myocardial wall, Fig. 4. The operator positions the patient relative to the nozzle (30) so that the trajectory of protons emitted from the nozzle (30) is directed towards the target treatment area of the heart. The heart monitor (50) and delivered-dose monitor (70) are also positioned relative to the patient. The operator selects the dose delivery time to avoid smearing of the delivered dose. It may be preferable that the total dose be delivered in a single pulse of short enough duration to be unaffected by the heart motion. For example, if the dose is delivered when the heart is resting between diastole and systole, heart motion is suspended for approximately 0.4 seconds. This position correlates with the plateau region of the ECG following the "T" wave, preceding the "P" wave, as shown in Fig. 5. It is possible to deliver a 0.2 second proton pulse of highly accurate dose by triggering the proton delivery off of the electronic ECG signal. The large "R" signal is used to trigger the delivery. A variable delay is programmed into the system. The delay is set for the duration of the "Q" wave, the plateau, and the "T" wave in the ECG of the individual patient. The trigger signal is then sent to a switch that alters the field of the laminated magnet within the electronic gating device (20), which switches the proton beam from the shunt line to the patient treatment line for 0.2 seconds. The switching process takes less than 0.000002 seconds. Electronic switching is many orders of magnitude faster than mechanical gating. A single pulse of 50 Gy delivered in 0.2 seconds requires approximately 100 nA of beam current at the target site.
Prior to delivery of the pulse, the operator further adjusts the characteristics of the Bragg peak to provide the desired type of proton delivery. The characteristics of the Bragg peak are determined by the initial energy of the protons at the extraction site from the accelerator. The higher the energy, the further the protons will penetrate the patient. For example, assuming an average distance through tissue to the myocardium to be about 16 cm, a 110 MeV proton deposits maximum energy in the myocardial wall. The operator may adjust the energy to a desired amount by degrading the initial output energy from the accelerator or, if the accelerator is a synchrotron, by adjusting the selected output of the synchrotron. The operator may adjust the width of the Bragg peak through use of the range modulator (60). The slope of the distal edge of the Bragg peak is approximately 2 mm for an initial energy of 210 MeV (degraded or not). Lower initial energy will produce a steeper distal slope; lower energy also affects the width of the Bragg peak. The width of the Bragg peak is also affected by the diagnostic and dosimetry devices which intersect the beam. If the placement of the Bragg peak can be very precisely controlled, it is not necessary to alter the width of the Bragg peak. Prior to dose delivery, the operator may also adjust the width of the
Bragg peak to be delivered through use of the range modulator (60). Manipulation of the beam energy, which results in the translocation of the Bragg peak, will scatter the beam to some degree, depending upon the change in energy. Significant degradation of beam energy will scatter the protons and may require a collimated method of delivery.
The operator uses the PET system to locate the tissue through which the protons pass. The PET system does not image the tissue per se. Specifically, the PET system locates the position in three-dimensional space where the proximal plateau and/or Bragg peak are delivered. The position located by the PET system is superimposed on an image of the patient created via a traditional imaging device, such as an MRI, CT, fluoroscopy, or x-ray device, to create an image of the heart showing the region of the delivered protons. For example, the region of the delivered protons may be superimposed on a digitized fluoroscopy image grabbed at the exact 0.2 seconds of irradiation, which also can be triggered by the gating device. The operator may collect the PET signal anywhere from seconds to hours after irradiation. It is also possible, by knowing the cross section and concentration of the nucleus with which the proton interacted to calculate the dose delivered based on the positron emission.
These and other advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing specification. Accordingly, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. For example, while the above illustrations have been made with respect to treatment of the heart, the apparatus and method of this invention may also be applied to treatment of the lungs. It should therefore be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is intended to include all changes and modifications that are within the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims

We claim:
1. A non-invasive myocardial revascularization apparatus for use with a beam of energetic heavy ions produced by an accelerator comprising: a electronic gating device for controlling the exposure time of a myocardium to the beam; a beam nozzle for directing the beam to a target area of the myocardium; a beam monitor for measuring a selected property of the heavy ion beam in the beam nozzle to control beam dosage to the myocardium; and a heart monitor for detecting the heart beat and for synchronizing the gating device to the heart beat.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the electronic gating device comprises a laminated, fast switching magnet.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the electronic gating device comprises a variable delay circuit.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the electronic gating device comprises a strain gauge.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the nozzle comprises a focusing magnet for focusing the beam of heavy ions.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the nozzle comprises a scattering foil for flattening the beam profile.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the nozzle comprises a collimator for collimating the flattened the beam profile produced by the scattering foil.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the heart monitor comprises one of an ultrasound device, fluoroscope, CT, MRI, or ECG.
9. The apparatus of claim 1 comprising a range modulator for increasing the Bragg peak width of the heavy ions.
10. The apparatus of claim 1 comprising a delivered-dose monitor for measuring the dosage delivered to the target area of the heart.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the delivered-dose monitor comprises PET system.
12. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the beam monitor comprises a beam energy detector.
13. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the beam monitor comprises a beam intensity detector.
14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the beam monitor comprises a beam position detector.
15. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the heart monitor comprises a heart position detector.
16. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the heart monitor comprises a heart beat detector.
17. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the heart monitor comprises a cardiac phase detector.
18. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the beam nozzle is disposed downstream from the gating device.
19. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the selected property is the beam energy.
20. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the selected property is the beam intensity.
21. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the selected property is the beam location relative to the beam nozzle.
22. A method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization using a beam of energetic heavy ions produced by an accelerator comprising: detecting the cardiac phase with a heart monitor; opening an electronic gating device in response to the detected cardiac phase to pass a beam of heavy ions from the accelerator to a beam nozzle; measuring a selected property of the heavy ion beam with a beam monitor to control beam dosage; directing the beam with the beam nozzle to a target area of a myocardium; and closing the electronic gating device in response to the detected cardiac phase.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein the selected property is the beam energy.
24. The method of claim 22 wherein the selected property is the beam intensity.
25. The method of claim 22 wherein the selected property is the beam location relative to the beam nozzle.
26. The method of claim 22 comprising the step of increasing the Bragg peak width of the heavy ions with a range modulator.
27. The method of claim 22 comprising the step of measuring the dosage delivered to the target area of the heart with a delivered-dose monitor.
28. The method of claim 27 wherein the step of measuring the delivered dosage comprises the step of measuring positron emissions.
29. The method of claim 22 wherein the step of detecting a heart beat includes detecting the heart location.
PCT/US2000/027836 1999-10-08 2000-10-06 Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization WO2001026569A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU80025/00A AU8002500A (en) 1999-10-08 2000-10-06 Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15847699P 1999-10-08 1999-10-08
US60/158,476 1999-10-08

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001026569A1 true WO2001026569A1 (en) 2001-04-19
WO2001026569A9 WO2001026569A9 (en) 2002-09-26

Family

ID=22568307

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/027836 WO2001026569A1 (en) 1999-10-08 2000-10-06 Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU8002500A (en)
WO (1) WO2001026569A1 (en)

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006012452A1 (en) * 2004-07-21 2006-02-02 Still River Systems, Inc. A programmable particle scatterer for radiation therapy beam formation
US7283307B2 (en) 2004-07-07 2007-10-16 Oasys Technology, Llc Common aperture vision system
WO2009155337A2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2009-12-23 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
US20120186973A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-07-26 Xyleco, Inc. Processing material with ion beams
AU2013202840B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2015-01-22 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
AU2015200235B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2016-03-24 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
US9409140B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2016-08-09 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US9622335B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-04-11 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Magnetic field regenerator
US9661736B2 (en) 2014-02-20 2017-05-23 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Scanning system for a particle therapy system
US9681531B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-06-13 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Control system for a particle accelerator
US9706636B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-07-11 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adjusting energy of a particle beam
US9723705B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-08-01 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Controlling intensity of a particle beam
US9730308B2 (en) 2013-06-12 2017-08-08 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Particle accelerator that produces charged particles having variable energies
US9925395B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2018-03-27 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Inner gantry
US9950194B2 (en) 2014-09-09 2018-04-24 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Patient positioning system
US10155124B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2018-12-18 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Controlling particle therapy
US10254739B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2019-04-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Coil positioning system
US10258810B2 (en) 2013-09-27 2019-04-16 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Particle beam scanning
US10646728B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2020-05-12 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adaptive aperture
US10653892B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2020-05-19 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Configurable collimator controlled using linear motors
US10675487B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2020-06-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Energy degrader enabling high-speed energy switching
USRE48047E1 (en) 2004-07-21 2020-06-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Programmable radio frequency waveform generator for a synchrocyclotron
USRE48317E1 (en) 2007-11-30 2020-11-17 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Interrupted particle source
US10925147B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2021-02-16 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Treatment planning
US11103730B2 (en) 2017-02-23 2021-08-31 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Automated treatment in particle therapy
US11291861B2 (en) 2019-03-08 2022-04-05 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Delivery of radiation by column and generating a treatment plan therefor
US11298565B2 (en) 2017-11-16 2022-04-12 Ebamed Sa Heart arrhythmia non-invasive treatment device and method
US11951327B2 (en) 2017-11-16 2024-04-09 Ebamed Sa Heart arrhythmia non-invasive treatment device and method

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8003964B2 (en) 2007-10-11 2011-08-23 Still River Systems Incorporated Applying a particle beam to a patient
US8933650B2 (en) 2007-11-30 2015-01-13 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Matching a resonant frequency of a resonant cavity to a frequency of an input voltage
WO2014052708A2 (en) 2012-09-28 2014-04-03 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Magnetic shims to alter magnetic fields
WO2014052718A2 (en) 2012-09-28 2014-04-03 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Focusing a particle beam
TWI604868B (en) 2012-09-28 2017-11-11 美威高能離子醫療系統公司 Particle accelerator and proton therapy system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5807384A (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-09-15 Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) enhanced treatment for coronary artery disease
US5931834A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-08-03 Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. Method for non-synchronous laser-assisted myocardial revascularization
US5951543A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-09-14 Clinicon Corporation Delivery system and method for surgical laser
US5957916A (en) * 1994-05-25 1999-09-28 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Myocardial revascularization through the endocardial surface using a laser

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5957916A (en) * 1994-05-25 1999-09-28 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Myocardial revascularization through the endocardial surface using a laser
US5931834A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-08-03 Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. Method for non-synchronous laser-assisted myocardial revascularization
US5807384A (en) * 1996-12-20 1998-09-15 Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) enhanced treatment for coronary artery disease
US5951543A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-09-14 Clinicon Corporation Delivery system and method for surgical laser

Cited By (53)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7283307B2 (en) 2004-07-07 2007-10-16 Oasys Technology, Llc Common aperture vision system
EP2305349A1 (en) * 2004-07-21 2011-04-06 Still River Systems, Inc. A programmable particle scatterer for radiation therapy beam formation
WO2006012452A1 (en) * 2004-07-21 2006-02-02 Still River Systems, Inc. A programmable particle scatterer for radiation therapy beam formation
USRE48047E1 (en) 2004-07-21 2020-06-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Programmable radio frequency waveform generator for a synchrocyclotron
US7718982B2 (en) 2004-07-21 2010-05-18 Still River Systems, Inc. Programmable particle scatterer for radiation therapy beam formation
US10722735B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2020-07-28 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Inner gantry
US10279199B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2019-05-07 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Inner gantry
US9925395B2 (en) 2005-11-18 2018-03-27 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Inner gantry
USRE48317E1 (en) 2007-11-30 2020-11-17 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Interrupted particle source
US9517444B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2016-12-13 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US10500560B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2019-12-10 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US10092890B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2018-10-09 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US9919282B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2018-03-20 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US9700868B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2017-07-11 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US9409140B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2016-08-09 Xyleco, Inc. Processing biomass and petroleum containing materials
US9937478B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2018-04-10 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
WO2009155337A3 (en) * 2008-06-18 2010-03-11 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
WO2009155337A2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2009-12-23 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
CN102065991A (en) * 2008-06-18 2011-05-18 希乐克公司 Treatment of materials with ion beams
US9687810B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2017-06-27 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
US8147655B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2012-04-03 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
US9387454B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2016-07-12 Xyleco, Inc. Processing material with ion beams
US10399059B2 (en) 2008-06-18 2019-09-03 Xyleco, Inc. Processing material with ion beams
US20120186973A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-07-26 Xyleco, Inc. Processing material with ion beams
AU2015200235B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2016-03-24 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
EA022000B1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2015-10-30 Ксилеко, Инк. Method of changing a molecular structure of cellulosic or lignocellulosic material
AU2013202840B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2015-01-22 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
AU2009260197B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2014-03-27 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
EP3375515A1 (en) * 2008-06-18 2018-09-19 Xyleco, Inc. Processing materials with ion beams
US9681531B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-06-13 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Control system for a particle accelerator
US10155124B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2018-12-18 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Controlling particle therapy
US10254739B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2019-04-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Coil positioning system
US10368429B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2019-07-30 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Magnetic field regenerator
US9723705B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-08-01 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Controlling intensity of a particle beam
US9622335B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-04-11 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Magnetic field regenerator
US9706636B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-07-11 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adjusting energy of a particle beam
US9730308B2 (en) 2013-06-12 2017-08-08 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Particle accelerator that produces charged particles having variable energies
US10258810B2 (en) 2013-09-27 2019-04-16 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Particle beam scanning
US10456591B2 (en) 2013-09-27 2019-10-29 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Particle beam scanning
US10675487B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2020-06-09 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Energy degrader enabling high-speed energy switching
US10434331B2 (en) 2014-02-20 2019-10-08 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Scanning system
US9661736B2 (en) 2014-02-20 2017-05-23 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Scanning system for a particle therapy system
US9950194B2 (en) 2014-09-09 2018-04-24 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Patient positioning system
US11213697B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2022-01-04 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adaptive aperture
US10646728B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2020-05-12 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adaptive aperture
US10786689B2 (en) 2015-11-10 2020-09-29 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Adaptive aperture
US10925147B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2021-02-16 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Treatment planning
US11103730B2 (en) 2017-02-23 2021-08-31 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Automated treatment in particle therapy
US10653892B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2020-05-19 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Configurable collimator controlled using linear motors
US11298565B2 (en) 2017-11-16 2022-04-12 Ebamed Sa Heart arrhythmia non-invasive treatment device and method
US11951327B2 (en) 2017-11-16 2024-04-09 Ebamed Sa Heart arrhythmia non-invasive treatment device and method
US11291861B2 (en) 2019-03-08 2022-04-05 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Delivery of radiation by column and generating a treatment plan therefor
US11311746B2 (en) 2019-03-08 2022-04-26 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc. Collimator and energy degrader for a particle therapy system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2001026569A9 (en) 2002-09-26
AU8002500A (en) 2001-04-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2001026569A1 (en) Apparatus and method for non-invasive myocardial revascularization
US6320935B1 (en) Dosimeter for a miniature energy transducer for emitting X-ray radiation
RU2552383C2 (en) Method and system for electron beam applications
US7453076B2 (en) Bi-polar treatment facility for treating target cells with both positive and negative ions
EP3043863B1 (en) Arrays of accelerating structures and rapid imaging for facilitating rapid radiation therapies
Karzmark et al. A technique for large-field, superficial electron therapy
US20040162457A1 (en) Antiproton production and delivery for imaging and termination of undersirable cells
JP7408743B2 (en) Radiotherapy systems, methods and software
Ramsey et al. A comparison of beam characteristics for gated and nongated clinical x‐ray beams
US6630675B2 (en) X-ray scintillator compositions for X-ray imaging applications
JP2018202146A (en) Kilovoltage radiation therapy
US20220161060A1 (en) System and method for optimizing radiotheraphy treatments
Podgorsak et al. X-ray depth doses from linear accelerators in the energy range from 10 to 32 MeV
Kim et al. The physics of stereotactic radiosurgery
WO2012011083A1 (en) Photon radiation therapy monitoring apparatus
Kraft et al. Heavy ion therapy at GSI
US20240085580A1 (en) Proton ct system with improved proton energy detector
KR101412611B1 (en) Apparatus and method for enhance spatial resoution in ion chamber array
Chen et al. Proton radiography and proton computed tomography
US20240100365A1 (en) Method and system for monitoring a hadron beam during hadron-therapy treatment of a subject
Denissova A gated breath-hold radiotherapy technique using a linear position transducer
Biggs The physics of intraoperative radiotherapy using high energy electron beams
Boyd Advantages of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) over other radiotherapy techniques
Flinton et al. MEGAVOLTAGE EQUIPMENT
JPH1090499A (en) Radiation generator

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1/5-5/5, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/5-5/5; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP