WO2001040882A1 - Process control system with automatic fault-avoidance - Google Patents

Process control system with automatic fault-avoidance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001040882A1
WO2001040882A1 PCT/US2000/032814 US0032814W WO0140882A1 WO 2001040882 A1 WO2001040882 A1 WO 2001040882A1 US 0032814 W US0032814 W US 0032814W WO 0140882 A1 WO0140882 A1 WO 0140882A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
source signal
process control
control system
signal
standard
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2000/032814
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Richard L. Thibault
Original Assignee
The Foxboro Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Foxboro Company filed Critical The Foxboro Company
Priority to AU24271/01A priority Critical patent/AU2427101A/en
Publication of WO2001040882A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001040882A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B9/00Safety arrangements
    • G05B9/02Safety arrangements electric
    • G05B9/03Safety arrangements electric with multiple-channel loop, i.e. redundant control systems

Definitions

  • the invention pertains to control and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for avoidance of faults in process and other control systems.
  • control and “control systems” refer to the control of a device or system by monitoring one or more of its characteristics. This is used to insure that output, processing, quality and/or efficiency remain within desired parameters over the course of time.
  • digital data processing or other automated apparatus monitor the device or system in question and automatically adjust its operational parameters.
  • such apparatus monitor the device or system and display alarms or other indicia of its characteristics, leaving responsibility for adjustment to the operator.
  • Control is used in a number of fields.
  • Process control for example, is typically employed in the manufacturing sector for process, repetitive and discrete manufactures, though, it also has wide application in electric and other service industries.
  • Environmental control finds application in residential, commercial, institutional and industrial settings, where temperature and other environmental factors must be properly maintained.
  • Control is also used in articles of manufacture, from toasters to aircraft, to monitor and control device operation.
  • a sensor can generate a validated measurement signal (VMV) representing a best estimate of a control variable being monitored, a validated uncertainty signal (VU) identifying the uncertainty in VMV, a status signal (MV) indicating the status of VMV (e.g., "clear,” “blurred,” “dazzled,” “blind,”), and a device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
  • VMV validated measurement signal
  • VU validated uncertainty signal
  • MV status signal
  • device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
  • An object of this invention is to provide improved methods and apparatus for control and, more particularly, improved such methods and apparatus that provide for avoidance of detected faults.
  • a further object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as facilitate maintaining continuous operation of a process, environmental, industrial or other control system in the face of actual or potential degradation of a sensor or other control element.
  • a still further object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus for use with self-vahdating control elements and particularly, for example, with self-vahdating sensors.
  • control system with components that respond to actual or potential faults, e.g., in sensors or other field devices, by automatically switching to other sources of desired control or process variables.
  • the invention provides a control system with first and second control components that generate first and second "source" signals, respectively, representing substantially identical or related process control variables.
  • a third control component which normally processes the first source signal, responds to actual or potential degradation of that signal (or the control component that generated it) for processing the second source signal in lieu of the first.
  • a process control system can have a first sensor that generates a temperature reading of a reactor vessel and a second sensor that generates a pressure reading of that same vessel.
  • a control processor can be arranged to process the reading generated by the first sensor, e.g., as part of a temperature control loop.
  • the control processor can process readings from the second sensor, e.g., in lieu of those from the first.
  • the first control component e.g., the first sensor in the above example
  • the first component generates a confidence signal indicative of actual or potential degradation of the first sensor.
  • that confidence can be a measurement value (MV) status signal and/or a device status signal, both as described above.
  • the third control component e.g., the control processor in the example
  • Still further aspects of the invention provide a control system as described above in which the second control component (e.g., the second sensor in the example) generates a signal identifying the control variable (e.g., temperature or pressure) output by it.
  • the second component can transmit that signal, e.g., to a distributed registry, for storage.
  • the third control component can retrieve the identifier signal from the registry in the event of actual or potential degradation of the first source signal, thus, permitting identification of the second source signal as a potential substitute for the first.
  • control components and/or registry are coupled via bus, a network and other communications media, by way of non-limiting example, compatible with any of Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNetTM, InterBusTM and Modbus ® standards, among others.
  • Figure 1 depicts a digital data processing system of the type with which apparatus and methods according to the invention may be practiced
  • Figure 2 illustrates controlled processes, along with a fault-avoidance process control system according to the invention for controlling them;
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart depicting operation of a fault-avoidance process control system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a digital data processing system of the type with which apparatus and methods according to the invention may be practiced.
  • the system includes one or more controllers 10 A, 10B or other digital data processors that monitor and/or control one or more manufacturing, industrial or other processes 12A, 12B.
  • the illustrated controllers 10A, 10B represent hardware or software processes executing on workstations, microprocessors, embedded processors,"smart" field devices, or other digital data processing apparatus of the types commercially available in the marketplace, constructed and operated in accord with the teachings herein to achieve fault-avoidance in process control.
  • Workstation 11 represents a personal computer, mainframe computer or other digital data processing device that can be used, e.g., by an operator, to monitor and/or administer controllers 10A, 10B. While workstation 11 can be independent of the other devices shown in the drawing, it can alternatively incorporate functionality of controllers 10A, 10B. Conversely, monitoring and/or administrative functionality of workstation 11 can be contained in microprocessors, embedded processors, controllers, "smart" field devices that serve other functions in the control system.
  • Network 14 provides a communications medium for the transfer of data and control information among components of the control system, including, controllers 10A, 10B, workstation 11, blocks 32 - 42, and field devices. Though illustrated to represent a LAN, WAN, or global network (Internet), those skilled in the art will appreciate that element 14 may comprise a bus or other communications medium through which information may be transferred. In prefe ⁇ ed embodiments, at least portions of the network 14 comprise buses compatible with industry standards such as, by non-limiting example, Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNetTM, InterBusTM and/or Modbus ® .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates in greater detail processes 12 A, 12B and a control system according to the invention for controlling them.
  • exemplary process 12A is a manufacturing process including conventional processing equipment, such as by way of non-limiting example conveyors, aeration tanks, and so forth.
  • Control of the process 12A is effected through flow sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, level sensors, valves, recorders, positioners, or other sensors or actuators operating with outputs and inputs in the range of 4 - 20 mA or 1 - 5 V dc, or otherwise, per proprietary or industry protocol (collectively, "field devices").
  • these include valve 24 that governs the rate of fluid flow to a reactor vessel 25, whose temperature and pressure are monitored by sensors 16, 18.
  • sensors 20 that monitors the outflow of vessel 25 to tank 21.
  • the sensors are "smart" field devices, i.e., sensors or actuators that include embedded processors, microprocessors or other digital data processing capacity, operating in accord with the teachings herein.
  • one or more of the sensors 16, 18, 20 can be of the self-vahdating variety that output estimates of measured process variables (e.g., pressure, temperature, flow, respectively), along with information about the uncertainty and rehabihty of those estimates.
  • Preferred self-vahdating sensors include, by way of non-limiting example, those taught in incorporated-by-reference U.S. Patents 5,570,300 and 5,774,378.
  • Such sensors generate a validated measurement signal (VMV) representing a best estimate of a process variable being monitored, a validated uncertainty signal (VU) identifying the uncertainty in VMV, a status signal (MV) indicating the status of VMV (e.g., "clear,” “blurred,” “dazzled,” “blind,”), and a device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
  • VMV validated measurement signal
  • VU validated uncertainty signal
  • MV status signal
  • device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
  • controllers 10A, 10B that are coupled to field devices 16 - 30, as well as to one another, via network 14.
  • the controllers execute control strategies in the conventional manner known in the art as modified in accord with the teachings herein.
  • controllers 10A, 10B comprise blocks and/or other executable software components (collectively, “blocks") 32 - 42 that model field devices, processing apparatus and other aspects of the controlled process 12A and that monitor and/or control the states and interactions therebetween, e.g., via execution of control algorithms (or portions thereof) or otherwise.
  • blocks 32 - 42 comprise blocks of the type utilized in the I/A Series ® systems marketed by the assignee hereof and/or objects of the type disclosed in co-pending commonly assigned patent apphcations 60/139,071, filed June 11, 1999, entitled “Omnibus and Web Control," 60/144,693, filed July 20, 1999, entitled “Omnibus and Web Control,” 60/146,406, filed July 29, 1999, entitled “Bi-Directional Entities for Maintaining Block Parameters and Status in a Process Control System," and 60/149,276, filed August 17, 1999, entitled “Methods and Apparatus for Process Control (AutoArchitecture),” the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • the blocks 32 - 42 may represent other software and/or hardware components capable of executing on or in connection with controllers 10A, 10B.
  • the blocks may be various types of function blocks, or the like, as defined and executed within the aforementioned Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNetTM, InterBusTM and Modbus ® or other industry standards.
  • Blocks 32 - 42 operate in the conventional manner known in the art, as modified in accord with the teachings herein for fault avoidance.
  • controller 10A includes supervisor 32, temperature controller 34 and flow controller 36, each of which may include further blocks (not shown).
  • Supervisor component 32 initiates process control functions, including activation and execution of blocks 34, 36.
  • Block 32 also generates a temperature supervisory set point, e.g., based on operator input.
  • Block 34 is a temperature controller that utilizes a proportional-integral-derivative (PJD) or other control algorithm to generate a flow set point based on the temperature set point from the supervisor object 32 and on temperature readings from sensor 18.
  • Block 36 serves as a flow controller that, too, utilizes a PID or other control algorithm to set a flow level, e.g., for valve 24, based on the flow set point from block 34 and on flow readings from sensor 20.
  • PID proportional-integral-derivative
  • supervisor 32 is referred to as a "source” for temperature controller 34 and, more accurately, for the temperature set point parameter used by controller 34.
  • Temperature sensor 18 is also a source for controller 34.
  • the flow controller 36 conversely, is referred to as a "sink” for temperature controller 34 and, more accurately, for the flow set point parameter generated by it.
  • sources i.e., suppliers
  • sinks i.e., consumers
  • the illustrated apparatus includes one or more registries 42 - 48 to maintain information about the field devices 16 - 32. These can be contained in memory or other data stores within workstation 11, within the processors 10A, 10B, within smart field devices 16 - 32, within standalone storage devices (as illustrated), or otherwise. Where more than one registry is provided, they can be distributed among domains and, indeed, among the field devices themselves.
  • the registries can be implemented as pointers, symbols, objects, variables, vectors, tables, records, databases, files, or other data structures or stores. They can be implemented as stand-alone entities or, for example, within other system components such as function blocks, or the like, as defined and executed within the aforementioned Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNetTM, InterBusTM and Modbus ® or other industry standards.
  • the registries maintain information about the control or process variables monitored by sensor-type field devices.
  • entries in registry 42 can indicate that sensor 16 monitors the pressure of vessel 25 and that sensor 18 monitors the temperature of that vessel.
  • Registry 44 can indicate that sensor 20 monitors flow in the conduit between vessel 25 and tank 21.
  • the registries can also maintain information about process variables governed by actuator- type sensors. Other information can be maintained in the registries, as well, for example identifiers of sources and/or sinks of each of the elements in the process control system.
  • each process control component 32 - 42 maintains, e.g., in its own dedicated store or in a registry, identities of the process variables supplied to it by the "sources.” Identities and other information regarding the sources can be maintained as well.
  • temperature controller 34 maintains an internal store indicating that one of its sources, sensor 18, supplies the temperature of vessel 25.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart depicting how the process control system of Figure 2 provides for fault-avoidance. In steps 50 - 52, each field device "registers" with the system upon "hot” insertion, installation or commencement of operation.
  • registration is performed by sensor-type field devices, e.g., pressure, temperature and flow sensors 16 - 20, and entails generating an identifier indicating which process variable is monitored by each sensor.
  • sensor 16 generates an identifier signal indicating that it monitors the pressure of vessel 25, while sensor 18 generates a signal indicating that it monitors the temperature of that vessel.
  • identifier signals are stored in registry 42, or elsewhere, as discussed above.
  • the identifier signal generated by the field device can be based, for example, on information stored in the sensor, or otherwise supplied to the system, e.g., by a field technician prior to (or concurrent with) insertion. Alternatively, by way of further non-limiting example, it can be based on keys, tags or other physical indicia installed on or in the field device.
  • controllers 10A, 10B commence operation, monitoring and/or controlling operation of processes 12A, 12B.
  • each component 32 - 42 monitors its sources to identify actual or potential degradation of the information supplied by them.
  • the sources are self-vahdating field devices, as described above, the recipient component (or sink) utilizes the above-described status signals as means of determining actual or potential fault.
  • temperature controller 34 can identify as faulty a source (e.g., sensor 18) generating an MV signal of "blurred,” “dazzled,” “blind.”
  • the recipient process control components i.e., blocks 32 - 42
  • the recipient process control components can monitor process variables, statistically or otherwise, to identify actual or potential degradation.
  • Still other elements resident in the controllers and/or in the control system e.g., other field devices
  • the detection of fault by recipient components or other elements can be based on principles paralleling those discussed in incorporated-by- reference U.S. Patents 5,570,300 and 5,774,378, or otherwise.
  • step 58 processing continues in the normal course unless an actual or potential fault is detected in a source (e.g., temperature sensor 18).
  • a source e.g., temperature sensor 18
  • the recipient component e.g., temperature controller 34
  • Step 60 Alternatively, another component or element in the system (e.g., supervisor component 32) seeks a replacement on behalf of the recipient.
  • the replacement is identified via a search of registries 42 - 48 for a source that provides an identical or related process variable to that identified as actually or potentially faulty.
  • a source that provides an identical or related process variable to that identified as actually or potentially faulty.
  • pressure sensor 16 is deemed to provide a "related" process variable, since the temperature of the contents vessel 25 can be determined with acceptable accuracy from its pressure.
  • replacement readings are taken from sensors or other process control components that measure (or otherwise generate) an identical or related process variable but that normally output another process variable.
  • multimeasurement sensors e.g., a flow sensor 20 implemented as a CFT10 Series I/A Series ® mass flow transmitter of the type commercially available from the assignee hereof. Though such a sensor typically outputs a flow reading, it measures temperature (along with other flow-related variables) in order to normalize the flow reading.
  • temperature controller 34 can utilize the temperature readings generated by mass flow sensor 20 as replacements.
  • Step 62 If no replacement source is found (step 62), the operator is notified. Step 64. System operation may nonetheless continue, depending on the nature of the fault.
  • a replacement source If a replacement source is found (step 66), its outputs are coupled to the inputs of the recipient component The manner in which this is accomplished varies in accord with the specific nature of source/sink coupling in controller 10A. For example, if each component (e.g., temperature controller 34) maintains pointers to its sources (e.g., temperature sensor 18), replacement is effected by substituting a pointer to the replacement element (e.g., pressure sensor 16) for that of the actually or potentially faulty element (e.g., temperature sensor 18). Alternatively, if source information is coded into component via a configurator (not shown), such a configurator may be employed to impart sufficient information to effect replacement.
  • a configurator may be employed to impart sufficient information to effect replacement.
  • the recipient executes appropriate conversions (e.g., pressure-to-temperature conversions) and/or compensates for differences in uncertainty or accuracy, e.g., using alternate control algorithms in order to insure proper operation.
  • appropriate conversions e.g., pressure-to-temperature conversions
  • compensates for differences in uncertainty or accuracy e.g., using alternate control algorithms in order to insure proper operation.
  • a source Once a source, previously detected as actually or potentially faulty, resumes normal operation (e.g., as a result of physical repair or replacement by a technician or as a result of termination of a transient fault condition), it can be coupled back into the system - thus, in effect, replacing its replacement.
  • a repaired source can register with the system upon being brought on-line and, in the process, send a local or system-wide notification, e.g., over medium 14 or portions thereof. Recipients or sinks of information generated by the repaired source can recouple with it, as described above.
  • Such recoupling can be predicated, for example, on a comparison of tolerances, accuracy or other operational parameters of the repaired source and the replacement that had been substituted for it on detection of the original fault condition. Described above are methods and apparatus achieving the desired objects. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments described herein and shown in the drawings are examples of the invention and that other embodiments incorporating one or more of the mechanisms and techniques herein, or equivalents thereof, fall within the scope of the invention.
  • further embodiments of the invention provide environmental control systems utilizing apparatus and methods like those herein to monitor and/or control heating, ventilation, cooling, and other environmental factors.
  • Yet still further embodiments of the invention provide industrial control systems, manufacturing control systems, or the like, that also utilize apparatus and methods like those herein to monitor and/or control respective industrial, manufacturing or other processes.

Abstract

A control system incorporates components that automatically switch information sources in response to actual or potential degradation of information generated by them. Thus, a control system has first (10A) and second (10B) control components that generate first and second 'source' signals, respectively, representing substantially identical or related process control variables. A third control component, which normally processes the first source signal, responds to actual or potential degradation of that signal for processing the second source signal in lieu of the first.

Description

PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC FAULT-AVOIDANCE
Background of the Invention
The invention pertains to control and, more particularly, to methods and apparatus for avoidance of faults in process and other control systems.
The terms "control" and "control systems" refer to the control of a device or system by monitoring one or more of its characteristics. This is used to insure that output, processing, quality and/or efficiency remain within desired parameters over the course of time. In many control systems, digital data processing or other automated apparatus monitor the device or system in question and automatically adjust its operational parameters. In other control systems, such apparatus monitor the device or system and display alarms or other indicia of its characteristics, leaving responsibility for adjustment to the operator.
Control is used in a number of fields. Process control, for example, is typically employed in the manufacturing sector for process, repetitive and discrete manufactures, though, it also has wide application in electric and other service industries. Environmental control finds application in residential, commercial, institutional and industrial settings, where temperature and other environmental factors must be properly maintained. Control is also used in articles of manufacture, from toasters to aircraft, to monitor and control device operation.
Reliability is among the key requirements of any control system. A controlled manufacturing process, for example, that occasionally produces a bad batch is wholly unacceptable for many purposes. Given die expense of manufacturing individual process control components that achieve satisfactory levels of reliability, designers have turned to redundancy. This typically involves using two or more control elements in place of one. The duplicated units can be sensors, actuators, controllers or other components in the control hierarchy. Thus, for example, U.S. Patent 4,347,563 discloses an industrial control system in which redundant processing units serve as bus masters "of the moment," monitoring status information generated by primary processing units. If a redundant unit detects that a primary has gone faulty while executing an apphcations program, the redundant unit loads that program and takes over the primary's function. A shortcoming of these and many other prior art redundancy schemes is their imposition of undue computational or hardware overhead. U.S. Patent 4,058,975, for example, has the disadvantage of requiring a computer to continually compare the outputs of multiple temperature sensors monitoring a gas turbine.
Implementing such solutions can be difficult in some situations and impossible in others. The latter may prove true if the control elements or configuration do not support communications or processing necessary to implement the necessary redundancy protocols.
The self-validating sensors described in U.S. Patents 5,570,300 and 5,774,378 (assigned to the assignee hereof and the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference) represent a significant advance in the art. Such sensors provide not only estimates of control variables (e.g., pressure or temperature) being monitored, but also information about the uncertainty and reliability of those estimates. Thus, for example, a sensor can generate a validated measurement signal (VMV) representing a best estimate of a control variable being monitored, a validated uncertainty signal (VU) identifying the uncertainty in VMV, a status signal (MV) indicating the status of VMV (e.g., "clear," "blurred," "dazzled," "blind,"), and a device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
Notwithstanding the advent of self-validating sensors, still more flexible mechanisms for avoiding fault are desired. This is increasingly so as the art shifts to control architectures that permit the "hot" insertion or replacement of control elements.
An object of this invention is to provide improved methods and apparatus for control and, more particularly, improved such methods and apparatus that provide for avoidance of detected faults. A further object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus as facilitate maintaining continuous operation of a process, environmental, industrial or other control system in the face of actual or potential degradation of a sensor or other control element.
A still further object of the invention is to provide such methods and apparatus for use with self-vahdating control elements and particularly, for example, with self-vahdating sensors.
Summary of the Invention
The foregoing are among the objects attained by the invention which provides, in one aspect, a control system with components that respond to actual or potential faults, e.g., in sensors or other field devices, by automatically switching to other sources of desired control or process variables.
Thus, in one aspect, the invention provides a control system with first and second control components that generate first and second "source" signals, respectively, representing substantially identical or related process control variables. A third control component, which normally processes the first source signal, responds to actual or potential degradation of that signal (or the control component that generated it) for processing the second source signal in lieu of the first.
By way of example, a process control system according to this aspect of the invention can have a first sensor that generates a temperature reading of a reactor vessel and a second sensor that generates a pressure reading of that same vessel. A control processor can be arranged to process the reading generated by the first sensor, e.g., as part of a temperature control loop. In response to indications of actual or potential degradation of the first sensor, the control processor can process readings from the second sensor, e.g., in lieu of those from the first.
Further aspects of the invention provide a control system as described above in which the first control component (e.g., the first sensor in the above example) generates a confidence signal indicative of actual or potential degradation of the first sensor. Where the first component is a self-validating sensor, that confidence can be a measurement value (MV) status signal and/or a device status signal, both as described above. The third control component (e.g., the control processor in the example) can identify actual or potential degradation of the first control component from that confidence signal.
Still further aspects of the invention provide a control system as described above in which the second control component (e.g., the second sensor in the example) generates a signal identifying the control variable (e.g., temperature or pressure) output by it. The second component can transmit that signal, e.g., to a distributed registry, for storage. The third control component can retrieve the identifier signal from the registry in the event of actual or potential degradation of the first source signal, thus, permitting identification of the second source signal as a potential substitute for the first.
Yet still further aspects of the invention provide a control system as described above in which the control components and/or registry are coupled via bus, a network and other communications media, by way of non-limiting example, compatible with any of Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNet™, InterBus™ and Modbus® standards, among others.
Other aspects of the invention provide process, environment, industrial control systems and methods in accord with the foregoing.
These and still other aspects of the invention are evident in the drawings and in the description that follows.
Brief Description of the Drawings
A more complete understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which:
Figure 1 depicts a digital data processing system of the type with which apparatus and methods according to the invention may be practiced;
Figure 2 illustrates controlled processes, along with a fault-avoidance process control system according to the invention for controlling them; and
Figure 3 is a flowchart depicting operation of a fault-avoidance process control system according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Illustrated Embodiment
Figure 1 depicts a digital data processing system of the type with which apparatus and methods according to the invention may be practiced. The system includes one or more controllers 10 A, 10B or other digital data processors that monitor and/or control one or more manufacturing, industrial or other processes 12A, 12B. The illustrated controllers 10A, 10B represent hardware or software processes executing on workstations, microprocessors, embedded processors,"smart" field devices, or other digital data processing apparatus of the types commercially available in the marketplace, constructed and operated in accord with the teachings herein to achieve fault-avoidance in process control.
Workstation 11 represents a personal computer, mainframe computer or other digital data processing device that can be used, e.g., by an operator, to monitor and/or administer controllers 10A, 10B. While workstation 11 can be independent of the other devices shown in the drawing, it can alternatively incorporate functionality of controllers 10A, 10B. Conversely, monitoring and/or administrative functionality of workstation 11 can be contained in microprocessors, embedded processors, controllers, "smart" field devices that serve other functions in the control system.
Network 14 provides a communications medium for the transfer of data and control information among components of the control system, including, controllers 10A, 10B, workstation 11, blocks 32 - 42, and field devices. Though illustrated to represent a LAN, WAN, or global network (Internet), those skilled in the art will appreciate that element 14 may comprise a bus or other communications medium through which information may be transferred. In prefeπed embodiments, at least portions of the network 14 comprise buses compatible with industry standards such as, by non-limiting example, Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNet™, InterBus™ and/or Modbus®.
Figure 2 illustrates in greater detail processes 12 A, 12B and a control system according to the invention for controlling them. In the illustration, exemplary process 12A is a manufacturing process including conventional processing equipment, such as by way of non-limiting example conveyors, aeration tanks, and so forth. Control of the process 12A is effected through flow sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, level sensors, valves, recorders, positioners, or other sensors or actuators operating with outputs and inputs in the range of 4 - 20 mA or 1 - 5 V dc, or otherwise, per proprietary or industry protocol (collectively, "field devices"). In the illustrated embodiment, these include valve 24 that governs the rate of fluid flow to a reactor vessel 25, whose temperature and pressure are monitored by sensors 16, 18. These also include flow sensor 20 that monitors the outflow of vessel 25 to tank 21. In a preferred embodiment, one or more of the sensors are "smart" field devices, i.e., sensors or actuators that include embedded processors, microprocessors or other digital data processing capacity, operating in accord with the teachings herein.
Whether of the "smart" variety or otherwise, one or more of the sensors 16, 18, 20 can be of the self-vahdating variety that output estimates of measured process variables (e.g., pressure, temperature, flow, respectively), along with information about the uncertainty and rehabihty of those estimates. Preferred self-vahdating sensors include, by way of non-limiting example, those taught in incorporated-by-reference U.S. Patents 5,570,300 and 5,774,378. Such sensors generate a validated measurement signal (VMV) representing a best estimate of a process variable being monitored, a validated uncertainty signal (VU) identifying the uncertainty in VMV, a status signal (MV) indicating the status of VMV (e.g., "clear," "blurred," "dazzled," "blind,"), and a device status signal indicating a status of the sensor itself.
Monitoring and control of processes 12A, 12B is further effected through controllers 10A, 10B that are coupled to field devices 16 - 30, as well as to one another, via network 14. The controllers execute control strategies in the conventional manner known in the art as modified in accord with the teachings herein.
To this end, the controllers 10A, 10B comprise blocks and/or other executable software components (collectively, "blocks") 32 - 42 that model field devices, processing apparatus and other aspects of the controlled process 12A and that monitor and/or control the states and interactions therebetween, e.g., via execution of control algorithms (or portions thereof) or otherwise. In the illustrated embodiment, blocks 32 - 42 comprise blocks of the type utilized in the I/A Series® systems marketed by the assignee hereof and/or objects of the type disclosed in co-pending commonly assigned patent apphcations 60/139,071, filed June 11, 1999, entitled "Omnibus and Web Control," 60/144,693, filed July 20, 1999, entitled "Omnibus and Web Control," 60/146,406, filed July 29, 1999, entitled "Bi-Directional Entities for Maintaining Block Parameters and Status in a Process Control System," and 60/149,276, filed August 17, 1999, entitled "Methods and Apparatus for Process Control (AutoArchitecture)," the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The blocks 32 - 42 may represent other software and/or hardware components capable of executing on or in connection with controllers 10A, 10B. For example, the blocks may be various types of function blocks, or the like, as defined and executed within the aforementioned Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNet™, InterBus™ and Modbus® or other industry standards.
Blocks 32 - 42 operate in the conventional manner known in the art, as modified in accord with the teachings herein for fault avoidance. Thus, for example, controller 10A includes supervisor 32, temperature controller 34 and flow controller 36, each of which may include further blocks (not shown). Supervisor component 32 initiates process control functions, including activation and execution of blocks 34, 36. Block 32 also generates a temperature supervisory set point, e.g., based on operator input. Block 34 is a temperature controller that utilizes a proportional-integral-derivative (PJD) or other control algorithm to generate a flow set point based on the temperature set point from the supervisor object 32 and on temperature readings from sensor 18. Block 36 serves as a flow controller that, too, utilizes a PID or other control algorithm to set a flow level, e.g., for valve 24, based on the flow set point from block 34 and on flow readings from sensor 20.
In process control terminology, supervisor 32 is referred to as a "source" for temperature controller 34 and, more accurately, for the temperature set point parameter used by controller 34. Temperature sensor 18 is also a source for controller 34. The flow controller 36, conversely, is referred to as a "sink" for temperature controller 34 and, more accurately, for the flow set point parameter generated by it. Like terminology can be applied to the other elements and parameters that are sources (i.e., suppliers) or sinks (i.e., consumers) of information produced within the system.
The illustrated apparatus includes one or more registries 42 - 48 to maintain information about the field devices 16 - 32. These can be contained in memory or other data stores within workstation 11, within the processors 10A, 10B, within smart field devices 16 - 32, within standalone storage devices (as illustrated), or otherwise. Where more than one registry is provided, they can be distributed among domains and, indeed, among the field devices themselves. The registries can be implemented as pointers, symbols, objects, variables, vectors, tables, records, databases, files, or other data structures or stores. They can be implemented as stand-alone entities or, for example, within other system components such as function blocks, or the like, as defined and executed within the aforementioned Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNet™, InterBus™ and Modbus® or other industry standards.
The registries maintain information about the control or process variables monitored by sensor-type field devices. Thus, for example, entries in registry 42 can indicate that sensor 16 monitors the pressure of vessel 25 and that sensor 18 monitors the temperature of that vessel. Registry 44, by way of further example, can indicate that sensor 20 monitors flow in the conduit between vessel 25 and tank 21. The registries can also maintain information about process variables governed by actuator- type sensors. Other information can be maintained in the registries, as well, for example identifiers of sources and/or sinks of each of the elements in the process control system.
In the illustrated embodiment, each process control component 32 - 42 maintains, e.g., in its own dedicated store or in a registry, identities of the process variables supplied to it by the "sources." Identities and other information regarding the sources can be maintained as well. Thus, for example, temperature controller 34 maintains an internal store indicating that one of its sources, sensor 18, supplies the temperature of vessel 25. Figure 3 is a flowchart depicting how the process control system of Figure 2 provides for fault-avoidance. In steps 50 - 52, each field device "registers" with the system upon "hot" insertion, installation or commencement of operation. In the illustrated embodiment, registration is performed by sensor-type field devices, e.g., pressure, temperature and flow sensors 16 - 20, and entails generating an identifier indicating which process variable is monitored by each sensor. Thus, for example, sensor 16 generates an identifier signal indicating that it monitors the pressure of vessel 25, while sensor 18 generates a signal indicating that it monitors the temperature of that vessel. These identifier signals are stored in registry 42, or elsewhere, as discussed above.
The identifier signal generated by the field device can be based, for example, on information stored in the sensor, or otherwise supplied to the system, e.g., by a field technician prior to (or concurrent with) insertion. Alternatively, by way of further non-limiting example, it can be based on keys, tags or other physical indicia installed on or in the field device.
In step 54, controllers 10A, 10B commence operation, monitoring and/or controlling operation of processes 12A, 12B.
In step 56, each component 32 - 42 (Fig. 2) monitors its sources to identify actual or potential degradation of the information supplied by them. Where the sources are self-vahdating field devices, as described above, the recipient component (or sink) utilizes the above-described status signals as means of determining actual or potential fault. In this regard, for example, temperature controller 34 can identify as faulty a source (e.g., sensor 18) generating an MV signal of "blurred," "dazzled," "blind."
For sources that are not self-vahdating, the recipient process control components, i.e., blocks 32 - 42, can monitor process variables, statistically or otherwise, to identify actual or potential degradation. Still other elements resident in the controllers and/or in the control system (e.g., other field devices) can monitor sources and notify recipients of actual or potential degradation. The detection of fault by recipient components or other elements can be based on principles paralleling those discussed in incorporated-by- reference U.S. Patents 5,570,300 and 5,774,378, or otherwise.
In step 58, processing continues in the normal course unless an actual or potential fault is detected in a source (e.g., temperature sensor 18). Upon detection of such a fault, the recipient component (e.g., temperature controller 34) seeks a replacement source. Step 60. Alternatively, another component or element in the system (e.g., supervisor component 32) seeks a replacement on behalf of the recipient.
In either event, the replacement is identified via a search of registries 42 - 48 for a source that provides an identical or related process variable to that identified as actually or potentially faulty. Thus, for example, in the event readings from temperature sensor 18 are detected as actually or potentially faulty, readings from another temperature sensor (not shown) on the same vessel 25 could be identified for use as replacements.
In the illustrated embodiment, pressure sensor 16 is deemed to provide a "related" process variable, since the temperature of the contents vessel 25 can be determined with acceptable accuracy from its pressure.
In still further embodiments, replacement readings are taken from sensors or other process control components that measure (or otherwise generate) an identical or related process variable but that normally output another process variable. Examples of this include multimeasurement sensors, e.g., a flow sensor 20 implemented as a CFT10 Series I/A Series® mass flow transmitter of the type commercially available from the assignee hereof. Though such a sensor typically outputs a flow reading, it measures temperature (along with other flow-related variables) in order to normalize the flow reading. Upon determining that temperature readings from sensor 18 are actually or potentially faulty, temperature controller 34 can utilize the temperature readings generated by mass flow sensor 20 as replacements. This is likewise true of (i) multimeasurement sensors that measure or otherwise generate "related" process variables, such as pressure in the above example, and (ii) blocks and other process components that generate identical or related process variables by way of calculations performed during execution of a control algorithm or otherwise.
If no replacement source is found (step 62), the operator is notified. Step 64. System operation may nonetheless continue, depending on the nature of the fault.
If a replacement source is found (step 66), its outputs are coupled to the inputs of the recipient component The manner in which this is accomplished varies in accord with the specific nature of source/sink coupling in controller 10A. For example, if each component (e.g., temperature controller 34) maintains pointers to its sources (e.g., temperature sensor 18), replacement is effected by substituting a pointer to the replacement element (e.g., pressure sensor 16) for that of the actually or potentially faulty element (e.g., temperature sensor 18). Alternatively, if source information is coded into component via a configurator (not shown), such a configurator may be employed to impart sufficient information to effect replacement. In the event that the replacement source does not provide identical information to that provided by the actually or potentially fault source, the recipient executes appropriate conversions (e.g., pressure-to-temperature conversions) and/or compensates for differences in uncertainty or accuracy, e.g., using alternate control algorithms in order to insure proper operation.
Once a source, previously detected as actually or potentially faulty, resumes normal operation (e.g., as a result of physical repair or replacement by a technician or as a result of termination of a transient fault condition), it can be coupled back into the system - thus, in effect, replacing its replacement. For example, a repaired source can register with the system upon being brought on-line and, in the process, send a local or system-wide notification, e.g., over medium 14 or portions thereof. Recipients or sinks of information generated by the repaired source can recouple with it, as described above. Such recoupling can be predicated, for example, on a comparison of tolerances, accuracy or other operational parameters of the repaired source and the replacement that had been substituted for it on detection of the original fault condition. Described above are methods and apparatus achieving the desired objects. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments described herein and shown in the drawings are examples of the invention and that other embodiments incorporating one or more of the mechanisms and techniques herein, or equivalents thereof, fall within the scope of the invention.
Thus, for example, further embodiments of the invention provide environmental control systems utilizing apparatus and methods like those herein to monitor and/or control heating, ventilation, cooling, and other environmental factors. Yet still further embodiments of the invention provide industrial control systems, manufacturing control systems, or the like, that also utilize apparatus and methods like those herein to monitor and/or control respective industrial, manufacturing or other processes.
In view of the foregoing, what is claimed is:

Claims

1. A control system comprising
a first set comprising plural control components, each control component generating a source signal representative of control variable, an identifier signal identifying that control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
a second set comprising at least one control component that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more control components in common.
2. A control system according to claim 1 , wherein at least the control component that generates the selected source signal is self-vahdating.
3. A control system according to claim 2, wherein the self-vahdating control component generates the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of the control component
4. A control system according to claim 1 , comprising one or more registries that are coupled to the control components in the first and second sets for storing the identifier signals.
5. A control system according to claim 4, comprising a plurality of distributed registries.
6. A control system according to claim 1 , wherein the control components of the first and second sets are coupled by any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
7. A control system according to claim 6, wherein the control components of the first and second sets are coupled by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
8. A control system comprising
a first set comprising plural control components, each control component generating a source signal representative of control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
one or more registries that store identifier signals, each identifying a control variable and any of a control signal or control component corresponding thereto,
a second set comprising at least one control component that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more control components in common,
wherein the registries, the control components of the first set and the control components of the second set are coupled by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
9. A process control system comprising a first set comprising plural process control components, each process control component generating a source signal representative of process variable, an identifier signal identifying that process variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
a second set comprising at least one process control component that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more process control components in common.
10. A process control system according to claim 9, wherein at least the process control component that generates the selected source signal is a self-vahdating process control component.
11. A process control system according to claim 10, wherein the self-vahdating process control component generates the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of the process control component.
12. A process control system according to claim 9, comprising one or more registries that are coupled to the process control components in the first and second sets for storing the identifier signals.
13. A process control system according to claim 12, wherein the registries are distributed.
14. A process control system according to claim 9, wherein the process control components of the first and second sets are coupled by any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
15. A process control system according to claim 14, wherein the process control components of the first and second sets are coupled by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
16. A process control system comprising
a first set comprising plural process control components, each process control component generating a source signal representative of process variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
one or more registries that store identifier signals, each identifying a process variable and any of a control signal or process control component corresponding thereto,
a second set comprising at least one process control component that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more process control components in common,
wherein the registries, the process control components of the first set and the process control components of the second set are coupled by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
17. A method of operating a control system, comprising
generating, with each control component in a first set of plural control components, a source signal representative of a control variable and confidence signals indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
storing, in one or more registries, one or more identifier signals that identify control variables and any of control signals and control component corresponding thereto,
with a control component of a second set that comprises at least one control component, processing a selected source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that selected source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals in the registries an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more control components in common,
transferring information among any of the registries and the control components via a communications medium operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
18. A method of operating a process control system, comprising
generating, with each process control component in a first set of plural process control components, a source signal representative of process variable, an identifier signal identifying that process variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal, with a process control component in a second set comprising at least one process control component, processing a selected source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (h) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more process control components in common.
19. A method according to claim 18, wherein at least the process control component that generates the selected source signal is a self-vahdating process control component.
20. A method according to claim 19, comprising generating, with the self-vahdating process control component, the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of the self-vahdating process control component.
21. A method according to claim 18, comprising storing the identifier signals in one or more registries.
22. A method according to claim 21, wherein the registries are distributed about the process control system.
23. A method according to claim 18, comprising transferring information among any of the process control components via any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
24. A method according to claim 23, comprising transferring information among any of the process control components via communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
25. A method of operating a process control system comprising
generating, with each process control component in a first set of plural process control components, a source signal representative of process variable and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
storing identifier signals in one or more registries, each identifying a process variable and any of a control signal or process control component coπesponding thereto,
with a process control component in second set comprising at least one process control component, processing a selected source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
transferring information among any of the registries and the control components via a communications medium operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard,
wherein the first and second sets have any of zero, one or more process control components in common.
26. A control system comprising
a first control component generating a first source signal,
a second control component generating a second source signal, the first and second source signals representing any of substantially identical control variables and related control variables,
a third control component that is in at least selective communication with the first control component and the second control component,
the third control component processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation of that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
27. A control system according to claim 26, wherein the first control component generates a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first source signal.
28. A control system according to claim 27, wherein the first control component is self-vahdating.
29. A control system according to claim 27, wherein the first source signal is a measurement.
30. A control system according to claim 29, wherein the first control component is self-validating sensor.
31. A control system according to claim 27, wherein the second control component generates an identifier signal identifying a control variable represented by the second source signal.
32. A control system according to claim 31 , wherein the third control component processes the second source signal in heu of the first source signal in response to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first control signal and in response to an identifier signal identifying the second source signal as representative of a control variable that is any of substantially identical to and related to a control variable represented by the first source signal.
33. A control system according to claim 31 , comprising a registry that stores the identifier signal.
34. A control system according to claim 33, wherein the third control component obtains the identifier signal from the registry.
35. A process control system comprising
a first process control component generating a first source signal,
a second process control component generating a second source signal,
the first and second source signals being representative of any of substantially identical and related process variables,
a third process control component that is in at least selective communication with the first process control component and the second process control component,
the third process control component processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation of that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
36. A process control system according to claim 35, wherein the first process control component generates a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first source signal.
37. A process control system according to claim 36, wherein the first process control component is self-vahdating.
38. A process control system according to claim 36, wherein the first source signal is a measurement.
39. A process control system according to claim 38, wherein the first process control component is self-vahdating sensor.
40. A process control system according to claim 36, wherein the second process control component generates an identifier signal identifying the process variable represented by the second source signal.
41. A process control system according to claim 40, wherein the third process control component processes the second source signal in heu of the first source signal in response to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first control signal and in response to an identifier signal identifying the second source signal as representing a process variable that is any of substantially identical or related to the process variable represented by the first control signal.
42. A process control system according to claim 40, comprising a registry that stores the identifier signal.
43. A process control system according to claim 42, wherein the third process control component obtains the identifier signal from the registry.
44. A process control system comprising
a first field device generating a first source signal,
a second field device generating a second source signal, the first and second source signals being representative of any of substantially identical and related process variables,
a process control component in communication with the first field device and the second field device,
the process control component processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation of that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
45. A process control system according to claim 44, wherein the process control component is a controller.
46. A process control system according to claim 44, wherein the process control component is coupled with any of the first field device and the second field device by any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
47. A process control system according to claim 46, wherein process control component is coupled with any of the first field device and the second field device by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
48. A process control system according to claim 44, wherein the first source signal and the second source signal represent a characteristic of a same process element and a same process control component.
49. A process control system according to claim 48, wherein the first source signal and the second source signal represent related characteristics of any of a same process element and a same process control component.
50. A process control system according to claim 49, wherein the first field device generates a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first source signal.
51. A process control system according to claim 50, wherein the first field device is self-vahdating.
52. A process control system according to claim 50, wherein the first source signal is a measurement.
53. A process control system according to claim 52, wherein the first field device is self-validating sensor.
54. A process control system according to claim 50, wherein the second field device generates an identifier signal identifying the process variable represented by the second source signal.
55. A process control system according to claim 54, wherein the process control component processes the second source signal in heu of the first source signal in response to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first control signal and in response to an identifier signal identifying the second source signal as representing a process variable that is any of substantially identical or related to the process variable represented by the first control signal.
56. A process control system according to claim 54, comprising a registry that stores the identifier signal.
57. A process control system according to claim 56, wherein the process control component obtains the identifier signal from the registry.
58. A method of operating a control system, comprising the steps of generating, with a first control component, a first source signal,
generating, with a second control component, a second source signal,
the first and second source signals being representative of any of substantiaUy identical and related process variables,
with a third control component processing, processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation of that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
59. A method of operating a control system according to claim 58, comprising the step of generating, with the first control component, a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first source signal.
60. A method of operating a control system according to claim 59, wherein the first control component is self-vahdating.
61. A method of operating a control system according to claim 59, comprising the step of generating the first source signal as a measurement.
62. A method of operating a control system according to claim 61, wherein the first control component is self-validating sensor.
63. A method of operating a control system according to claim 59, comprising the step of generating, with the second control component, an identifier signal identifying the control variable represented by the second source signal.
64. A method of operating a control system according to claim 63, comprising the step of responding to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of the first control signal and to an identifier signal identifying the control variable represented by the second source signal as any of substantially identical and related to the control variable represented by the first source signal,
by processing, with the third control component, the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
65. A method of operating a control system according to claim 63, comprising the step of storing the identifier signal in a registry.
66. A method of operating a control system according to claim 65, comprising the step of using the third control component to obtain the identifier signal from the registry.
67. A method of operating a process control system, comprising the steps of
generating, with a first process control component, a first source signal,
generating, with a second process control component, a second source signal,
the first and second source signals being representative of any of substantially identical and related process variables,
with a third process control component, processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
68. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 67, comprising the step of generating, with the first process control component, a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation the first source signal.
69. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 68, wherein the first process control component is self-vahdating.
70. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 68, comprising the step of generating the first source signal as a measurement
71. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 70, wherein the first process control component is self-validating sensor.
72. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 68, comprising the step of generating, with the second process control component, an identifier signal identifying the process variable represented by the second source signal.
73. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 72, wherein the third process control component processes the second source signal in heu of the first source signal in response to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation the first control signal and to an identifier signal identifying the second source signal as representing a process variable that is any of substantially identical and related to the process variable represented by the first source signal.
74. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 72, comprising the step of storing the identifier signal in a registry.
75. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 74, wherein the third process control component obtains the identifier signal from the registry.
76. A method of operating a process control system comprising
generating, with a first field device, a first source signal, generating, with a second field device, a second source signal,
the first and second source signals being representative of any of substantially identical and related process variables,
with a process control component, processing the first source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that signal by processing the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
77. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 76, wherein the process control component is a controller.
78. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 76, comprising communicating between the process control component and any of the first field device and the second field device by way of any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
79. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 78, comprising communicating between the process control component and any of the first field device and the second field device by communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
80. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 76, wherein the first and second source signals represent like characteristics of any of a same process element and a same process control component.
81. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 80, wherein the first and second control signals represent related characteristic of any of a same process element and a same process control component.
82. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 81 , comprising generating with the first field device a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation the first source signal.
83. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 82, wherein the first field device is self-vahdating.
84. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 82, comprising the step of generating the first source signal as a measurement.
85. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 84, wherein the first field device is self-vahdating sensor.
86. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 82, comprising generating with the second field device an identifier signal identifying the process variable represented by the second source signal.
87. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 86, comprising
responding to a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation the first control signal and to an identifier signal identifying the second source signal as representing a control variable that is any of substantially identical to and related to the control variable represented by the first source signal,
by processing, with the process control component, the second source signal in heu of the first source signal.
88. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 86, comprising the step of storing the identifier signal in a registry.
89. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 88, comprising the step of using the process control component to obtain the identifier signal from the registry.
90. A control system comprising
a plurality of field devices, each generating a source signal representative of a control variable, an identifier signal identifying that control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
at least one block that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the field devices and blocks are coupled by any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
91. A control system according to claim 90, wherein the block executes within a field device.
92. A control system according to claim 90, wherein the field devices comprise any of a flow sensor, pressure sensor, temperature sensor, level sensor, valve, recorder, positioner, other sensor, and other actuator.
93. A control system according to claim 90, wherein at least one field device is self-vahdating.
94. A control system according to claim 93, wherein the self-vahdating field device generates the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of that self-vahdating field device.
95. A control system according to claim 90, comprising one or more registries that store the identifier signals.
96. A control system according to claim 95, comprising a plurality of distributed registries.
97. A control system according to claim 90, wherein the communications media is operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
98. A process control system comprising
a plurality of field devices, each generating a source signal representative of a control variable, an identifier signal identifying that control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
wherein the field devices comprise any of flow sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, level sensors, valves, recorders, positioners, other sensors and other actuators,
one or more registries that store the identifier signals,
at least one process control block that processes a selected source signal and that responds to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the field devices, registries and control blocks are coupled by a network comprising one or more buses operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
99. A process control system according to claim 98, wherein any of a process control block and a registry are resident within a field device.
100. A process control system according to claim 98, wherein at least one field device is self-vahdating.
101. A process control system according to claim 98, wherein the self-vahdating field device generates the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of that self-validating field device.
102. A process control system according to claim 101, comprising plural registries that are distributed within the process control system.
103. A method of operating a control system comprising
generating, with each field device in a set of plural field devices, a source signal representative of a control variable, an identifier signal identifying that control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal,
with at least one block, processing a selected source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
wherein the field devices and blocks are coupled by any of a bus, a network and other communications media.
104. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, comprising executing the block within a field device.
105. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, wherein the field devices comprise any of a flow sensor, pressure sensor, temperature sensor, level sensor, valve, recorder, positioner, other sensor and other actuator.
106. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, wherein at least one field device is self-vahdating.
107. A method of operating a control system according to claim 106, comprising generating, with the self-vahdating field device, the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the corresponding source signal and a status of that self-vahdating field device.
108. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, comprising storing the identifier signals in one or more registries.
109. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, comprising storing the identifier signal in plural registries that are distributed about the control system.
110. A method of operating a control system according to claim 103, comprising transferring information among the field devices and blocks with a communications media operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
111. A method of operating a process control system comprising
generating, with each field device in a set of plural field devices, a source signal representative of a control variable, an identifier signal identifying that control variable, and a confidence signal indicative of any of actual and potential degradation of that source signal, wherein the field devices comprise any of flow sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, level sensors, valves, recorders, positioners, other sensors and other actuators,
one or more registries that store the identifier signals,
with at least one block, processing a selected source signal and responding to any of actual and potential degradation that source signal by (i) identifying from the identifier signals an alternate source signal, and (ii) processing that alternate source signal in heu of the selected source signal,
transferring information among the field devices, registries and control blocks via a communications medium comprising one or more buses operable in accord with any of a Foundation Fieldbus standard, a Profibus standard, a DeviceNet™ standard, an InterBus™ standard and a Modbus® standard.
112. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 111, comprising the step of executing a process control block within a field device.
113. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 111, wherein at least one field device is self-vahdating.
114. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 111, comprising generating, with the self-vahdating field device, the confidence signal to be representative of any of a status of a value represented by the coπesponding source signal and a status of that self-vahdating field device.
115. A method of operating a process control system according to claim 114, comprising plural registries that are distributed within the process control system.
PCT/US2000/032814 1999-12-03 2000-12-01 Process control system with automatic fault-avoidance WO2001040882A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU24271/01A AU2427101A (en) 1999-12-03 2000-12-01 Process control system with automatic fault-avoidance

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/454,053 1999-12-03
US09/454,053 US6473660B1 (en) 1999-12-03 1999-12-03 Process control system and method with automatic fault avoidance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001040882A1 true WO2001040882A1 (en) 2001-06-07

Family

ID=23803098

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2000/032814 WO2001040882A1 (en) 1999-12-03 2000-12-01 Process control system with automatic fault-avoidance

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6473660B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2427101A (en)
WO (1) WO2001040882A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003077050A2 (en) * 2002-03-11 2003-09-18 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system
US8856345B2 (en) 2002-03-11 2014-10-07 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6675193B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2004-01-06 Invensys Software Systems Method and system for remote control of a local system
US6721900B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-04-13 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Safety network for industrial controller having reduced bandwidth requirements
US7010991B2 (en) 2000-09-13 2006-03-14 Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc. Surface particle detector
US6847917B2 (en) * 2001-05-24 2005-01-25 Simmonds Precision Products, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting condition indicators in determining the health of a component
JP3748077B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2006-02-22 オムロン株式会社 SAFETY NETWORK SYSTEM, SAFETY SLAVE, SAFETY CONTROLLER, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND INFORMATION COLLECTION METHOD AND MONITOR METHOD IN SAFETY NETWORK SYSTEM
US7370239B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2008-05-06 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Input/output device with configuration, fault isolation and redundant fault assist functionality
US6888453B2 (en) * 2001-06-22 2005-05-03 Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc. Environmental monitoring system
US7188200B2 (en) * 2001-07-25 2007-03-06 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Method for data exchange between an operating and monitoring program and a field device
WO2003089995A2 (en) 2002-04-15 2003-10-30 Invensys Systems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for process, factory-floor, environmental, computer aided manufacturing-based or other control system with real-time data distribution
US6741951B2 (en) * 2002-08-02 2004-05-25 General Electric Company Method for performing a hazard review and safety analysis of a product or system
US7103424B2 (en) * 2003-09-02 2006-09-05 National Instruments Corporation Re-configurable motion controller drive
US7287184B2 (en) * 2003-09-16 2007-10-23 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. High speed synchronization in dual-processor safety controller
US7234084B2 (en) * 2004-02-18 2007-06-19 Emerson Process Management System and method for associating a DLPDU received by an interface chip with a data measurement made by an external circuit
US7058089B2 (en) * 2004-02-18 2006-06-06 Rosemount, Inc. System and method for maintaining a common sense of time on a network segment
US7761923B2 (en) 2004-03-01 2010-07-20 Invensys Systems, Inc. Process control methods and apparatus for intrusion detection, protection and network hardening
US7451003B2 (en) * 2004-03-04 2008-11-11 Falconeer Technologies Llc Method and system of monitoring, sensor validation and predictive fault analysis
US9285801B2 (en) * 2004-09-14 2016-03-15 National Instruments Corporation Automatic generation of a motion controller
US7860857B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2010-12-28 Invensys Systems, Inc. Digital data processing apparatus and methods for improving plant performance
US7480536B2 (en) * 2006-09-21 2009-01-20 General Electric Company Method for assessing reliability requirements of a safety instrumented control function
US20090076628A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-19 David Mark Smith Methods and apparatus to upgrade and provide control redundancy in process plants
US8589814B2 (en) * 2010-04-16 2013-11-19 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for visual presentation of information in a process control system
US9240164B2 (en) 2013-02-27 2016-01-19 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus and method for providing a pan and zoom display for a representation of a process system
US9977413B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2018-05-22 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus and method for managing open windows in a graphical display for a representation of a process system

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5428769A (en) * 1992-03-31 1995-06-27 The Dow Chemical Company Process control interface system having triply redundant remote field units
US5491625A (en) * 1993-12-23 1996-02-13 The Dow Chemical Company Information display system for actively redundant computerized process control
US5570300A (en) * 1992-04-22 1996-10-29 The Foxboro Company Self-validating sensors
US5586156A (en) * 1995-07-14 1996-12-17 General Electric Company Reactor protection system with automatic self-testing and diagnostic
US5715178A (en) * 1989-11-02 1998-02-03 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Method of validating measurement data of a process parameter from a plurality of individual sensor inputs
US5774378A (en) * 1993-04-21 1998-06-30 The Foxboro Company Self-validating sensors
US5864773A (en) * 1995-11-03 1999-01-26 Texas Instruments Incorporated Virtual sensor based monitoring and fault detection/classification system and method for semiconductor processing equipment
US6049578A (en) * 1997-06-06 2000-04-11 Abb Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power, Inc. Digital plant protection system
US6070250A (en) * 1996-12-13 2000-05-30 Westinghouse Process Control, Inc. Workstation-based distributed process control system

Family Cites Families (228)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3810119A (en) 1971-05-04 1974-05-07 Us Navy Processor synchronization scheme
US3825905A (en) 1972-09-13 1974-07-23 Action Communication Syst Inc Binary synchronous communications processor system and method
FR2296221A1 (en) 1974-12-27 1976-07-23 Ibm France SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEM
US4648064A (en) 1976-01-02 1987-03-03 Morley Richard E Parallel process controller
US4312068A (en) 1976-08-12 1982-01-19 Honeywell Information Systems Inc. Parallel generation of serial cyclic redundancy check
US4276593A (en) 1979-03-30 1981-06-30 Beckman Instruments, Inc. Transfer system for multi-variable control units
US4302820A (en) 1979-08-20 1981-11-24 Allen-Bradley Company Dual language programmable controller
US4428044A (en) 1979-09-20 1984-01-24 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Peripheral unit controller
US4347563A (en) 1980-06-16 1982-08-31 Forney Engineering Company Industrial control system
US4323966A (en) 1980-02-05 1982-04-06 The Bendix Corporation Operations controller for a fault-tolerant multiple computer system
US4471457A (en) 1980-08-21 1984-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Supervisory control of peripheral subsystems
DE3040080C1 (en) 1980-10-24 1987-11-12 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart Device for signal-safe data transmission between a route and vehicles guided on it
US4410942A (en) 1981-03-06 1983-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Synchronizing buffered peripheral subsystems to host operations
US4435762A (en) 1981-03-06 1984-03-06 International Business Machines Corporation Buffered peripheral subsystems
US4423486A (en) 1981-04-30 1983-12-27 Hobart Corporation Commodity display for weighing scale
US4493027A (en) 1981-05-22 1985-01-08 Data General Corporation Method of performing a call operation in a digital data processing system having microcode call and return operations
US4466098A (en) 1982-06-11 1984-08-14 Siemens Corporation Cross channel circuit for an electronic system having two or more redundant computers
JPS58225442A (en) 1982-06-25 1983-12-27 Toshiba Corp Priority control circuit
DE3236812A1 (en) 1982-10-05 1984-04-05 Standard Elektrik Lorenz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEM
US4488226A (en) 1982-11-23 1984-12-11 Challenge Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for high speed asynchronous serial data transfer
US4675812A (en) 1983-02-14 1987-06-23 International Business Machines Corp. Priority circuit for channel subsystem having components with diverse and changing requirement for system resources
US4872106A (en) 1983-04-06 1989-10-03 New Forney Corp. Industrial process control system with back-up data processors to take over from failed primary data processors
US4733366A (en) 1983-05-16 1988-03-22 Data General Corporation Apparatus for providing an interrupt signal in response to a permanent or transient power failure
US4692859A (en) 1983-05-16 1987-09-08 Rca Corporation Multiple byte serial data transfer protocol
US4682304A (en) 1983-08-04 1987-07-21 Tektronix, Inc. Asynchronous multiple buffered communications interface having an independent microprocessor for controlling host/peripheral exchanges
JPS6054052A (en) 1983-09-02 1985-03-28 Nec Corp Processing continuing system
JPH0638600B2 (en) 1983-12-28 1994-05-18 株式会社東芝 Local area network system
US4615001A (en) 1984-03-29 1986-09-30 At&T Bell Laboratories Queuing arrangement for initiating execution of multistage transactions
US4683530A (en) 1984-04-10 1987-07-28 Telemecanique Electrique Serial information transfer protocol
US4959774A (en) 1984-07-06 1990-09-25 Ampex Corporation Shadow memory system for storing variable backup blocks in consecutive time periods
US4719593A (en) 1984-07-09 1988-01-12 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Apparatus for generating digital timing waveforms
US4641276A (en) 1984-10-22 1987-02-03 General Electric Company Serial-parallel data transfer system for VLSI data paths
US4663704A (en) 1984-12-03 1987-05-05 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Universal process control device and method for developing a process control loop program
US4692918A (en) 1984-12-17 1987-09-08 At&T Bell Laboratories Reliable local data network arrangement
US4672530A (en) 1984-12-17 1987-06-09 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Distributed control with universal program
US4649479A (en) 1985-02-28 1987-03-10 International Business Machines Corp. Device driver and adapter binding technique
US4727477A (en) 1985-03-22 1988-02-23 International Business Machines Corp. Logically transportable microprocessor interface control unit permitting bus transfers with different but compatible other microprocessors
US5307372A (en) 1985-07-19 1994-04-26 Clinicom Incorporated Radio transceiver for transmitting and receiving data packets
US4790762A (en) 1985-07-23 1988-12-13 Honeywell Inc. Backplane for a modularly expandable programmable controller
US4910658A (en) 1985-09-04 1990-03-20 Eaton Leonard Technologies, Inc. Real time process controller with serial I/O bus
US4703421A (en) 1986-01-03 1987-10-27 Gte Communication Systems Corporation Ready line synchronization circuit for use in a duplicated computer system
US5481741A (en) 1986-04-14 1996-01-02 National Instruments Corporation Method and apparatus for providing attribute nodes in a graphical data flow environment
US4742349A (en) 1986-05-22 1988-05-03 Chrysler Motors Corporation Method for buffered serial peripheral interface (SPI) in a serial data bus
US4817094A (en) 1986-12-31 1989-03-28 International Business Machines Corporation Fault tolerant switch with selectable operating modes
US4914657A (en) 1987-04-15 1990-04-03 Allied-Signal Inc. Operations controller for a fault tolerant multiple node processing system
US4965880A (en) 1987-07-15 1990-10-23 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Productio installation for the manufacture of a product
US4816996A (en) 1987-07-24 1989-03-28 Motorola, Inc. Queued serial peripheral interface for use in a data processing system
US4958277A (en) 1987-07-24 1990-09-18 Motorola, Inc. Queued serial peripheral interface for use in a data processing system
EP0306211A3 (en) 1987-09-04 1990-09-26 Digital Equipment Corporation Synchronized twin computer system
US4965742A (en) 1987-09-30 1990-10-23 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process control system with on-line reconfigurable modules
US4910691A (en) 1987-09-30 1990-03-20 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Process control system with multiple module sequence options
CA2003338A1 (en) 1987-11-09 1990-06-09 Richard W. Cutts, Jr. Synchronization of fault-tolerant computer system having multiple processors
US4918690A (en) 1987-11-10 1990-04-17 Echelon Systems Corp. Network and intelligent cell for providing sensing, bidirectional communications and control
US5129087A (en) 1988-02-03 1992-07-07 International Business Machines, Corp. Computer system and a method of monitoring transient data structures in a computer system
US4897777A (en) 1988-04-11 1990-01-30 Square D Company Peer-to-peer register exchange controller for PLCS
US5596331A (en) 1988-05-13 1997-01-21 Lockheed Martin Corporation Real-time control sequencer with state matrix logic
DE68927946T2 (en) 1988-08-02 1997-10-16 Philips Electronics Nv Method and device for synchronizing parallel processors using an unsharp lock
US5175829A (en) 1988-10-25 1992-12-29 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and apparatus for bus lock during atomic computer operations
US5068778A (en) 1988-11-28 1991-11-26 Reliance Electric Industrial Company Industrial control system device
US4965717A (en) 1988-12-09 1990-10-23 Tandem Computers Incorporated Multiple processor system having shared memory with private-write capability
US5050165A (en) 1989-06-01 1991-09-17 Seiko Instruments Inc. Bridge circuit for interconnecting networks
US5136704A (en) 1989-06-28 1992-08-04 Motorola, Inc. Redundant microprocessor control system using locks and keys
US4991170A (en) 1989-07-17 1991-02-05 Ag Communication Systems Corporation Circuit for interfacing a digital signal processor to a serial interface controller
US5138708A (en) 1989-08-03 1992-08-11 Unisys Corporation Digital processor using current state comparison for providing fault tolerance
US5008805A (en) 1989-08-03 1991-04-16 International Business Machines Corporation Real time, fail safe process control system and method
US5513095A (en) 1989-08-16 1996-04-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Flexible automation system for variable industrial processes
DE69033120T2 (en) 1989-09-01 1999-10-21 Amdahl Corp Operating system and database with an access structure made up of several tables
US5131092A (en) 1989-09-01 1992-07-14 Square D Company Communication system enabling programmable logic controllers access to host computer tasks and host computer access to programmable logic controllers without polling
US5115235A (en) 1989-09-25 1992-05-19 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Flexible module interconnect system
EP0422310A1 (en) 1989-10-10 1991-04-17 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed mechanism for the fast scheduling of shared objects
JPH03156559A (en) 1989-11-14 1991-07-04 Nec Corp Interruption processing system for multiprocessor system
US5295258A (en) 1989-12-22 1994-03-15 Tandem Computers Incorporated Fault-tolerant computer system with online recovery and reintegration of redundant components
WO1991011766A2 (en) 1990-01-30 1991-08-08 Johnson Service Company Networked facilities management system
US5134574A (en) 1990-02-27 1992-07-28 The Foxboro Company Performance control apparatus and method in a processing plant
CA2034878C (en) 1990-03-08 2002-04-02 Craig S. Hyatt Programmable controller communication module
US5159673A (en) 1990-03-22 1992-10-27 Square D Company Apparatus for networking programmable logic controllers to host computers
US5151978A (en) 1990-03-22 1992-09-29 Square D Company Lan interface which permits a host computer to obtain data without interrupting a ladder program executing in the interface
US5245704A (en) 1990-03-22 1993-09-14 Square D Company System for sharing data between microprocessor based devices
US5271013A (en) 1990-05-09 1993-12-14 Unisys Corporation Fault tolerant computer system
US5163055A (en) 1990-06-27 1992-11-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Communications system using a fault tolerant protocol
US5122948A (en) 1990-06-28 1992-06-16 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Remote terminal industrial control communication system
US5151981A (en) 1990-07-13 1992-09-29 International Business Machines Corporation Instruction sampling instrumentation
GB2247318B (en) 1990-08-20 1994-08-10 Rosemount Ltd A transmitter
US5166685A (en) 1990-09-04 1992-11-24 Motorola, Inc. Automatic selection of external multiplexer channels by an A/D converter integrated circuit
US5168276A (en) 1990-09-04 1992-12-01 Motorola, Inc. Automatic A/D converter operation using a programmable control table
US5162986A (en) 1990-10-19 1992-11-10 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Remote downloading and uploading of motion control program information to and from a motion control I/O module in a programmable controller
US5212784A (en) 1990-10-22 1993-05-18 Delphi Data, A Division Of Sparks Industries, Inc. Automated concurrent data backup system
US5297143A (en) 1990-12-03 1994-03-22 Echelon Systems, Corp. Network communication protocol including a reliable multicasting technique
AU1647392A (en) 1991-03-18 1992-10-21 Echelon Corporation Programming language structures for use in a network for communicating, sensing and controlling information
WO1992016895A1 (en) 1991-03-18 1992-10-01 Echelon Corporation Networked variables
US5410717A (en) 1991-03-22 1995-04-25 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Removable function card for a programmable controller processor
US5517655A (en) 1991-04-26 1996-05-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for monitoring transactions in an object-oriented environment
US5303375A (en) 1991-04-26 1994-04-12 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method for facilitating selection of running functional process in object-oriented environments
US5335338A (en) 1991-05-31 1994-08-02 Micro Solutions, Inc. General purpose parallel port interface
US5233615A (en) 1991-06-06 1993-08-03 Honeywell Inc. Interrupt driven, separately clocked, fault tolerant processor synchronization
GB2258725B (en) 1991-07-30 1995-06-21 Rosemount Ltd A method of decoding a spectrally modulated light signal
CA2062620C (en) 1991-07-31 1998-10-06 Robert Paff Surveillance apparatus with enhanced control of camera and lens assembly
US5272702A (en) 1991-08-05 1993-12-21 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Integrity mapping in data communication system
US5283729A (en) 1991-08-30 1994-02-01 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Tuning arrangement for turning the control parameters of a controller
JPH0573697A (en) 1991-08-30 1993-03-26 Nec Corp Microcomputer
US5459839A (en) 1991-09-05 1995-10-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for managing queue read and write pointers
US5258999A (en) 1991-10-03 1993-11-02 Motorola, Inc. Circuit and method for receiving and transmitting control and status information
CA2073516A1 (en) 1991-11-27 1993-05-28 Peter Michael Kogge Dynamic multi-mode parallel processor array architecture computer system
US5359721A (en) 1991-12-18 1994-10-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Non-supervisor mode cross address space dynamic linking
US5289365A (en) 1991-12-23 1994-02-22 Donnelly Corporation Modular network control system
US5267240A (en) 1992-02-20 1993-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Frame-group transmission and reception for parallel/serial buses
US5303392A (en) 1992-02-27 1994-04-12 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Accessing current symbol definitions in a dynamically configurable operating system
US5352033A (en) 1992-03-27 1994-10-04 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Operator work station having a monitor support assembly
CA2064541C (en) 1992-03-31 1998-09-15 Thomas A. Gray Cycling error count for link maintenance
JP3489123B2 (en) 1992-04-15 2004-01-19 株式会社日立製作所 Application binding method
US5347181A (en) 1992-04-29 1994-09-13 Motorola, Inc. Interface control logic for embedding a microprocessor in a gate array
US5630152A (en) 1992-05-18 1997-05-13 Motorola, Inc. Communication protocol between master and slave device with register information sharing
US5581760A (en) 1992-07-06 1996-12-03 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for referring to and binding to objects using identifier objects
US5398331A (en) 1992-07-08 1995-03-14 International Business Machines Corporation Shared storage controller for dual copy shared data
US5303227A (en) 1992-08-03 1994-04-12 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for enhanced modes in SPI communication
US5302952A (en) 1992-08-28 1994-04-12 Motorola, Inc. Automatic A/D converter operation with pause capability
US5513192A (en) 1992-08-28 1996-04-30 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Fault tolerant disk drive system with error detection and correction
US5434997A (en) 1992-10-02 1995-07-18 Compaq Computer Corp. Method and apparatus for testing and debugging a tightly coupled mirrored processing system
US5579487A (en) 1992-10-02 1996-11-26 Teletransaction, Inc. Portable work slate computer with multiple docking positions for interchangeably receiving removable modules
US5513354A (en) 1992-12-18 1996-04-30 International Business Machines Corporation Fault tolerant load management system and method
US5719761A (en) 1993-01-15 1998-02-17 Alaris Medical Systems, Inc. Configuration control system for configuring multiple biomedical devices
US5551047A (en) 1993-01-28 1996-08-27 The Regents Of The Univeristy Of California Method for distributed redundant execution of program modules
GB2275113B (en) 1993-02-09 1996-04-03 Rosemount Ltd Displacement sensor
US5450403A (en) 1993-03-02 1995-09-12 The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for multiplex transmission
US5676141A (en) 1993-03-31 1997-10-14 Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated Electronic processor for pulse oximeters
JP3365576B2 (en) 1993-06-14 2003-01-14 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Object execution method and apparatus
US5513329A (en) 1993-07-15 1996-04-30 Dell Usa, L.P. Modular host local expansion upgrade
EP0636956B1 (en) 1993-07-28 1999-06-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method of data loading
EP0746816B1 (en) 1993-08-03 2001-10-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Flexible multi-platform partitioning for computer applications
US5880775A (en) 1993-08-16 1999-03-09 Videofaxx, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting changes in a video display
US5530643A (en) 1993-08-24 1996-06-25 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Method of programming industrial controllers with highly distributed processing
US5629949A (en) 1993-09-21 1997-05-13 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Error correction verification method and apparatus using CRC check remainders
US5576946A (en) 1993-09-30 1996-11-19 Fluid Air, Inc. Icon based process design and control system
US5450425A (en) 1993-11-19 1995-09-12 Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Protocol for communication of a data packet
FI94680C (en) 1993-11-26 1995-10-10 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Expanded PCMCIA interface and procedure for its identification
US5664168A (en) 1993-11-29 1997-09-02 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus in a data processing system for selectively inserting bus cycle idle time
US5483660A (en) 1993-11-29 1996-01-09 Motorola Inc. Method and apparatus for performing multiplexed and non-multiplexed bus cycles in a data processing system
US5572673A (en) 1993-12-01 1996-11-05 Sybase, Inc. Secure multi-level system for executing stored procedures
US5504902A (en) 1993-12-01 1996-04-02 Patriot Sensors And Controls Corporation Multi-language generation of control program for an industrial controller
JP2867860B2 (en) 1993-12-16 1999-03-10 日本電気株式会社 Cross connect device
US5664101A (en) 1993-12-22 1997-09-02 Heidelberg Druckmaschinen Ag Intelligent industrial local area network module for use in a distributed control system
US5555437A (en) 1993-12-22 1996-09-10 Adaptec, Inc. Read-write state machine in a host interface for controlling read and write operations in a disk drive
US5509811A (en) 1994-01-12 1996-04-23 Dell Usa, L.P. Computer enclosure with embedded PCMCIA modem card
US5485620A (en) 1994-02-25 1996-01-16 Automation System And Products, Inc. Integrated control system for industrial automation applications
US5664231A (en) 1994-04-29 1997-09-02 Tps Electronics PCMCIA interface card for coupling input devices such as barcode scanning engines to personal digital assistants and palmtop computers
US5805922A (en) 1994-05-02 1998-09-08 Motorola, Inc. Queued serial peripheral interface having multiple queues for use in a data processing system
US5841963A (en) 1994-06-08 1998-11-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Dual information processing system having a plurality of data transfer channels
US5587899A (en) 1994-06-10 1996-12-24 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining the ultimate gain and ultimate period of a controlled process
US5544008A (en) 1994-06-30 1996-08-06 International Business Machines Corporation Computer expansion module apparatus
US5627979A (en) 1994-07-18 1997-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing a graphical user interface for mapping and accessing objects in data stores
US5600845A (en) 1994-07-27 1997-02-04 Metalithic Systems Incorporated Integrated circuit computing device comprising a dynamically configurable gate array having a microprocessor and reconfigurable instruction execution means and method therefor
US5687316A (en) 1994-07-29 1997-11-11 International Business Machines Corporation Communication apparatus and methods having P-MAC, I-MAC engines and buffer bypass for simultaneously transmitting multimedia and packet data
US5555510A (en) 1994-08-02 1996-09-10 Intel Corporation Automatic computer card insertion and removal algorithm
US5598536A (en) 1994-08-09 1997-01-28 Shiva Corporation Apparatus and method for providing remote users with the same unique IP address upon each network access
US5630056A (en) 1994-09-20 1997-05-13 Stratus Computer, Inc. Digital data processing methods and apparatus for fault detection and fault tolerance
US5611057A (en) 1994-10-06 1997-03-11 Dell Usa, L.P. Computer system modular add-in daughter card for an adapter card which also functions as an independent add-in card
US5793963A (en) 1994-10-24 1998-08-11 Fisher Rosemount Systems, Inc. Apparatus for providing non-redundant secondary access to field devices in a distributed control system
US5568378A (en) 1994-10-24 1996-10-22 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Variable horizon predictor for controlling dead time dominant processes, multivariable interactive processes, and processes with time variant dynamics
BR9509503A (en) 1994-10-24 1997-12-30 Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc Networked field device distributed control system bridge field module designed to transmit information from a distribution network to a bridge / converter control network
MY114883A (en) 1994-11-14 2003-02-28 Ibm Method and apparatus for providing a remotely located outrigger card electrically coupled to a control card
US5642511A (en) 1994-12-16 1997-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing a visual application builder framework
US5748467A (en) 1995-02-21 1998-05-05 Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc. Method of adapting and applying control parameters in non-linear process controllers
US5867704A (en) 1995-02-24 1999-02-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Multiprocessor system shaving processor based idle state detection and method of executing tasks in such a multiprocessor system
US5519701A (en) 1995-03-29 1996-05-21 International Business Machines Corporation Architecture for high performance management of multiple circular FIFO storage means
US5790791A (en) 1995-05-12 1998-08-04 The Boeing Company Apparatus for synchronizing flight management computers where only the computer chosen to be the master received pilot inputs and transfers the inputs to the spare
US5742762A (en) 1995-05-19 1998-04-21 Telogy Networks, Inc. Network management gateway
US5752246A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-05-12 International Business Machines Corporation Service agent for fulfilling requests of a web browser
US5701414A (en) 1995-06-19 1997-12-23 Motorola, Inc. Controller for selective call receiver having memory for storing control information, plurality of addresses, status information, receive address information, and message
US5555213A (en) 1995-06-29 1996-09-10 Rockwell International Corporation Interface circuit, system and method for interfacing an electronic device and a synchronous state machine having different clock speeds
US5659680A (en) 1995-06-30 1997-08-19 Micro Processor Systems, Inc. PC compatible modular based diagnostic system
US5617540A (en) 1995-07-31 1997-04-01 At&T System for binding host name of servers and address of available server in cache within client and for clearing cache prior to client establishes connection
US5781449A (en) 1995-08-10 1998-07-14 Advanced System Technologies, Inc. Response time measurement apparatus and method
US5680409A (en) 1995-08-11 1997-10-21 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting and identifying faulty sensors in a process
US5872992A (en) 1995-08-24 1999-02-16 Motorola, Inc. System and method for avoiding bus contention on a multiplexed bus by providing a time period subsequent to a read operation
DE69525531T2 (en) 1995-09-04 2002-07-04 Hewlett Packard Co Data processing system with a ring-shaped queue in a page memory
DE19533961A1 (en) 1995-09-13 1997-03-20 Siemens Ag Method for loading software in communication systems with non-redundant, decentralized devices
US5774670A (en) 1995-10-06 1998-06-30 Netscape Communications Corporation Persistent client state in a hypertext transfer protocol based client-server system
US5764906A (en) 1995-11-07 1998-06-09 Netword Llc Universal electronic resource denotation, request and delivery system
US6094600A (en) 1996-02-06 2000-07-25 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. System and method for managing a transaction database of records of changes to field device configurations
US5930768A (en) 1996-02-06 1999-07-27 Supersonic Boom, Inc. Method and system for remote user controlled manufacturing
US5777874A (en) 1996-02-12 1998-07-07 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Programmable controller backup system
US5761518A (en) 1996-02-29 1998-06-02 The Foxboro Company System for replacing control processor by operating processor in partially disabled mode for tracking control outputs and in write enabled mode for transferring control loops
US5752007A (en) 1996-03-11 1998-05-12 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. System and method using separators for developing training records for use in creating an empirical model of a process
US5844601A (en) 1996-03-25 1998-12-01 Hartness Technologies, Llc Video response system and method
US5754772A (en) 1996-03-26 1998-05-19 Unisys Corporation Transaction service independent HTTP server-to-transaction gateway
JP3146150B2 (en) 1996-04-01 2001-03-12 スター精密株式会社 Surveillance camera system
US5768119A (en) 1996-04-12 1998-06-16 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system including alarm priority adjustment
US5838563A (en) 1996-04-12 1998-11-17 Fisher-Rosemont Systems, Inc. System for configuring a process control environment
US5828851A (en) 1996-04-12 1998-10-27 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system using standard protocol control of standard devices and nonstandard devices
US5801942A (en) 1996-04-12 1998-09-01 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system user interface including selection of multiple control languages
US5862052A (en) 1996-04-12 1999-01-19 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system using a control strategy implemented in a layered hierarchy of control modules
US5727128A (en) 1996-05-08 1998-03-10 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. System and method for automatically determining a set of variables for use in creating a process model
US5854944A (en) 1996-05-09 1998-12-29 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining wait states on a per cycle basis in a data processing system
US5752008A (en) 1996-05-28 1998-05-12 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Real-time process control simulation method and apparatus
US5805442A (en) 1996-05-30 1998-09-08 Control Technology Corporation Distributed interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems
US5982362A (en) 1996-05-30 1999-11-09 Control Technology Corporation Video interface architecture for programmable industrial control systems
US5768510A (en) 1996-07-01 1998-06-16 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Object-oriented system, method and article of manufacture for a client-server application enabler system
US5831669A (en) 1996-07-09 1998-11-03 Ericsson Inc Facility monitoring system with image memory and correlation
JP3115237B2 (en) 1996-09-03 2000-12-04 株式会社東芝 Control program creation device and control program creation method
US5822220A (en) 1996-09-03 1998-10-13 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process for controlling the efficiency of the causticizing process
US5726912A (en) 1996-09-06 1998-03-10 Honeywell Iac Control system monitor
US5797038A (en) 1996-09-09 1998-08-18 Ford Motor Company Method and system for serially based host/peripheral communication
US5970430A (en) 1996-10-04 1999-10-19 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Local device and process diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions
US6047222A (en) * 1996-10-04 2000-04-04 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Process control network with redundant field devices and buses
IL119454A (en) 1996-10-21 2002-07-25 Serconet Ltd Distributed serial control system
US5956487A (en) 1996-10-25 1999-09-21 Hewlett-Packard Company Embedding web access mechanism in an appliance for user interface functions including a web server and web browser
US5909586A (en) 1996-11-06 1999-06-01 The Foxboro Company Methods and systems for interfacing with an interface powered I/O device
US6035264A (en) 1996-11-26 2000-03-07 Global Maintech, Inc. Electronic control system and method for externally controlling process in a computer system with a script language
US5758073A (en) 1996-12-02 1998-05-26 Tritech Microelectronics International, Ltd. Serial interface between DSP and analog front-end device
US6139177A (en) 1996-12-03 2000-10-31 Hewlett Packard Company Device access and control using embedded web access functionality
US5732218A (en) 1997-01-02 1998-03-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Management-data-gathering system for gathering on clients and servers data regarding interactions between the servers, the clients, and users of the clients during real use of a network of clients and servers
US5980078A (en) 1997-02-14 1999-11-09 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system including automatic sensing and automatic configuration of devices
US5938775A (en) 1997-05-23 1999-08-17 At & T Corp. Distributed recovery with κ-optimistic logging
US5994998A (en) 1997-05-29 1999-11-30 3Com Corporation Power transfer apparatus for concurrently transmitting data and power over data wires
US5847957A (en) 1997-06-16 1998-12-08 Base Ten Systems, Inc. Web access for a manufacturing execution system
US5832418A (en) 1997-06-23 1998-11-03 Micron Electronics Apparatus for testing a controller with random contraints
US6151625A (en) 1997-09-10 2000-11-21 Schneider Automation Inc. Internet web interface including programmable logic controller for controlling output devices based on status of input devices
US6282454B1 (en) 1997-09-10 2001-08-28 Schneider Automation Inc. Web interface to a programmable controller
US6014612A (en) 1997-10-02 2000-01-11 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Remote diagnostics in a process control network having distributed control functions
US6055633A (en) 1997-10-28 2000-04-25 Honeywell Inc. Method of reprogramming memories in field devices over a multidrop network
US6049775A (en) 1998-01-30 2000-04-11 Bell & Howell Mail And Messaging Technologies Company Systems, methods and computer program products for monitoring and controlling mail processing devices
US5980090A (en) 1998-02-10 1999-11-09 Gilbarco., Inc. Internet asset management system for a fuel dispensing environment
US6115468A (en) 1998-03-26 2000-09-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Power feed for Ethernet telephones via Ethernet link
US6201996B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-03-13 Control Technology Corporationa Object-oriented programmable industrial controller with distributed interface architecture
ATE236418T1 (en) * 1998-08-17 2003-04-15 Aspen Technology Inc METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SENSOR CONFIRMATION
US6176421B1 (en) 1999-02-04 2001-01-23 Marconi Commerce Systems Inc. Fuel dispenser architecture having server
US6298454B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2001-10-02 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Diagnostics in a process control system
US6218930B1 (en) 1999-03-10 2001-04-17 Merlot Communications Apparatus and method for remotely powering access equipment over a 10/100 switched ethernet network

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5715178A (en) * 1989-11-02 1998-02-03 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Method of validating measurement data of a process parameter from a plurality of individual sensor inputs
US5428769A (en) * 1992-03-31 1995-06-27 The Dow Chemical Company Process control interface system having triply redundant remote field units
US5570300A (en) * 1992-04-22 1996-10-29 The Foxboro Company Self-validating sensors
US5774378A (en) * 1993-04-21 1998-06-30 The Foxboro Company Self-validating sensors
US5491625A (en) * 1993-12-23 1996-02-13 The Dow Chemical Company Information display system for actively redundant computerized process control
US5586156A (en) * 1995-07-14 1996-12-17 General Electric Company Reactor protection system with automatic self-testing and diagnostic
US5864773A (en) * 1995-11-03 1999-01-26 Texas Instruments Incorporated Virtual sensor based monitoring and fault detection/classification system and method for semiconductor processing equipment
US6070250A (en) * 1996-12-13 2000-05-30 Westinghouse Process Control, Inc. Workstation-based distributed process control system
US6049578A (en) * 1997-06-06 2000-04-11 Abb Combustion Engineering Nuclear Power, Inc. Digital plant protection system

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003077050A2 (en) * 2002-03-11 2003-09-18 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system
WO2003077050A3 (en) * 2002-03-11 2004-04-08 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system
US8856345B2 (en) 2002-03-11 2014-10-07 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2427101A (en) 2001-06-12
US6473660B1 (en) 2002-10-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6473660B1 (en) Process control system and method with automatic fault avoidance
JP6567444B2 (en) Method and replacement device for providing control redundancy to a process plant control system
US6742136B2 (en) Redundant devices in a process control system
US8229578B2 (en) Methods and apparatus to manage module run sequences in a process control environment
EP2345015B1 (en) System and method for improved coordination between control and safety systems
US7761698B2 (en) Method for replacing a field device of automation technology
US8463964B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for control configuration with enhanced change-tracking
EP0929855B1 (en) Maintenance interface device for use in a process control network
US6760687B2 (en) Sequence of events detection in a process control system
GB2410353A (en) Notification of faults in redundant devices in a process control system
JP2003280707A (en) Abnormality diagnosis device, abnormality diagnosis method and abnormality diagnosis program of machine tool
GB2364783A (en) Process monitoring and control using self-validating sensors
US10386832B2 (en) Redundant control system for an actuator and method for redundant control thereof
US7551074B2 (en) Method and arrangement for monitoring a transmission medium
US10324120B2 (en) Arrangement with a plurality of peripheral units and a sensor
WO2000043846A2 (en) Integration of diagnostics and control in a component-based production line
US6701462B1 (en) Situational aware output configuration and execution
Llanos et al. Transmission delays in residual computation
US20060176823A1 (en) Smart actuator topology
US20170205790A1 (en) Field device with self-recovery
Amir et al. Digital Field Device Application on a Floating Production Unit (FPU) Hull Project
KR100483432B1 (en) Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment Management System using Hot Backup
CN116324633A (en) Method and system for controlling or regulating a technical device
CN110703716A (en) Multi-device communication method applied to automatic control system
Llanos Rodríguez et al. Transmission delays in residual computation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP