WO2002100060A1 - Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor - Google Patents

Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002100060A1
WO2002100060A1 PCT/US2002/012248 US0212248W WO02100060A1 WO 2002100060 A1 WO2002100060 A1 WO 2002100060A1 US 0212248 W US0212248 W US 0212248W WO 02100060 A1 WO02100060 A1 WO 02100060A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ratio
lag
zero
square root
estimated
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/012248
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Alexandre Mallette
John Paul Oliver
Original Assignee
Motorola, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Motorola, Inc. filed Critical Motorola, Inc.
Priority to BR0210021-5A priority Critical patent/BR0210021A/en
Priority to CN02810944.9A priority patent/CN1529970B/en
Priority to DE60208026T priority patent/DE60208026T2/en
Priority to EP02776552A priority patent/EP1397897B1/en
Priority to AT02776552T priority patent/ATE313198T1/en
Publication of WO2002100060A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002100060A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00—Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/0202—Channel estimation

Definitions

  • the present inventions relate generally to mobile wireless communication devices, and more particularly to estimating Doppler spread/ velocity in mobile wireless communication devices.
  • the performance of many cellular communication systems is dependent on the accuracy of the estimation of unknown parameters, for example, fading channel coefficients in third-generation cellular communication systems, by a mobile wireless communication station or device.
  • Channel estimation in some cellular communication systems requires filtering pilot signals received at the mobile station.
  • the optimum bandwidth of the filter is dependent on the Doppler spread.
  • Velocity is proportional to frequency and thus to Doppler spread. Knowledge of accurate Doppler spread in mobile wireless communication devices is useful for assigning slower mobile stations to micro-cells and for assigning faster mobile stations to macro-cells, and for making relatively precise power control measurements.
  • FIG. 1 is a communication system including a mobile wireless communication device for which Doppler spread is estimated according embodiments of the present inventions.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic process flow diagram for determining Doppler spread.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of the relative bias versus signal to noise ratio (SNR) performance of several embodiments of the present inventions and the prior art.
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of the square root of the relative mean squared error (RMSE) versus SNR performance of several embodiments of the present inventions and the prior art.
  • RMSE relative mean squared error
  • Doppler spread is estimated in mobile wireless communication devices, for example cellular telephone handsets, personal digital assistants, wireless enabled computers, etc.
  • the Doppler spread estimation is based on the real part of an estimated autocorrelation function of the impulse response of a channel over which a signal is communicated. Further references herein for the estimated autocorrelation function refers to the real part thereof. And in another embodiment, the Doppler spread estimation is based on an estimated autocovariance function of the magnitude squared of the impulse response of a channel over which a signal is communicated.
  • the Doppler spread estimates of the present inventions have, among other advantages over the prior art, improved noise immunity.
  • the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function is estimated.
  • the estimation of autocorrelation or autocovariance functions is known generally. In narrow-band communication systems, for example, the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function may be based on a signal received at the mobile wireless communication device.
  • the estimated autocovariance or autocorrelation function may be based on an output of an adaptive equalizer or at some other circuit portion of the wireless mobile communication device.
  • an estimated autocorrelation function is based on I and/ or Q signal components of one or more of several rake fingers A - N associated with a particular path of a rake receiver 110.
  • an estimated autocovariance function is based on I and Q signal components of one or more of the rake fingers of the rake receiver 110.
  • the estimated autocovariance function may be also based on an output, Rout, of a rake receiver 110.
  • the exemplary device 100 of FIG. 1 includes generally an amplifier 120 and other components, including a baseband processor, a digital signal processor, a display and inputs, some of which are not illustrated but are well known in the art, under the control of a local processor 150, for example a programmable DSP or dedicated hardware circuitry like an ASIC or other processor or combinations as is known by those having ordinary skill in the art.
  • a baseband processor for example a programmable DSP or dedicated hardware circuitry like an ASIC or other processor or combinations as is known by those having ordinary skill in the art.
  • the autocorrelation function is estimated from either the in-phase or the quadrature components of a signal, and in another embodiment the autocorrelation function is estimated from both the in-phase and the quadrature components of the signal. In yet another embodiment, the autocovariance function is estimated from the squared magnitude of a signal.
  • a first value of the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function is estimated for a first lag, n.
  • the first lag is any positive or negative non-zero value
  • the estimated function is an autocorrelation function the first lag, n, may be any value including zero.
  • a second value of the estimated autocorrelation or autocovariance function is estimated at a second lag, m, having a magnitude that is greater than a magnitude of the first lag, n.
  • a first ratio is calculated between a first difference and a second difference.
  • the first difference is a difference between the estimated value at the first lag, n, and the estimated value at the second lag, m.
  • the first difference is shown calculated schematically at difference block 230.
  • the second difference is a difference between a first product and a second product.
  • the first product is a product of the second lag squared, m 2 , and the estimated value at the first lag, n.
  • the second product is a product of the first lag squared, n 2 , and the estimated value at the second lag, m.
  • the second difference is shown calculated schematically at difference block 240.
  • the first ratio of the first and second differences is calculated schematically at divider block 250, and is expressed quantitatively as
  • ⁇ (n) is an estimated value of either estimated autocorrelation or autocovariance having the first lag, n, and ⁇ (m) is an estimated value of the same estimated function having the second lag, m.
  • a magnitude of the first ratio is calculated if the first ratio, x, is less than zero.
  • the output of block 255 is the magnitude of the first ratio.
  • the first ratio is less than zero the output of block 255 is set to zero. If the first ratio is greater than zero, then the first ratio is the output of block 255.
  • the square root of the output of block 255 is calculated. If the first ratio is greater than zero, the Doppler spread is proportional to the square root of the first ratio. If the first ratio is less than zero, then the Doppler spread is proportional to the square root of the magnitude of the first ratio. Alternatively, if the first ratio is less than zero, the Doppler spread is zero.
  • the square root of the first ratio is scaled by a second ratio, wherein the estimated Doppler spread or velocity is proportional to a product of the second ratio and the square root of the first ratio.
  • the second ratio is a reciprocal of a product of ⁇ and T, where T is the inverse of a processing rate.
  • the processing rate may be for example a symbol rate or a chip rate or some other rate known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
  • the second ratio is generally expressed qualitatively as
  • the Doppler spread is proportional to the product of the first and second ratios.
  • the Doppler spread is proportional to the product of the first and second ratios scaled by a multiplicative factor of the square root of 2 divided by 2.
  • FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of the relative bias versus signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) performance of several embodiments of the present inventions in comparison to the prior art.
  • the graph illustrates generally a relatively constant estimated Doppler spread bias where the estimated autocorrelation function of the present inventions is based on both in-phase and/ or quadrature components of the signal, or where the autocovariance function is based on the magnitude squared of the signal.
  • the prior art Doppler spread estimation bias is remarkably poorer at lower signal strengths.
  • FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of the square root of the relative mean-square-error (RMSE) versus SNR performance of several embodiments of the present inventions in comparison to the prior art.
  • RMSE relative mean-square-error
  • the graph illustrates generally a relatively constant RMSE for the estimated Doppler spread for embodiments where the estimated autocorrelation function of the present inventions is based on in-phase and/ or quadrature components of the signal, or where the estimated autocovariance function is based on the magnitude squared of the signal.
  • the prior art Doppler spread estimation has a remarkably large RMSE at lower signal strengths.
  • the RMSE based on the estimated autocovariance function estimated from the magnitude of the signal squared or the autocorrelation function based on both the in-phase and quadrature components of the signal is comparatively less than the prior art, particularly at lower signal strengths.

Abstract

A method for estimating Doppler spread in mobile wireless communication devices, for example in CDMA or W-CDMA cellular communication systems, with improved noise immunity. The Doppler spread estimation is based on an estimated value of an autocorrelation or autocovariance at a first lag (210) and at a second lag (220), the magnitude of which is greater than the first lag. A first ratio is determined (250) between a first difference (230) and a second difference (240). The estimated Doppler spread is generally proportional to a square root (260) of the first ratio, and is scaled (270) by a multiplicative factor that depends on whether the estimated function is an autocorrelation or autocovariance function.

Description

DOPPLER SPREAD/ VELOCITY ESTIMATION IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND METHODS
THEREFOR
FIELD OF THE INVENTIONS
The present inventions relate generally to mobile wireless communication devices, and more particularly to estimating Doppler spread/ velocity in mobile wireless communication devices.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONS
The performance of many cellular communication systems is dependent on the accuracy of the estimation of unknown parameters, for example, fading channel coefficients in third-generation cellular communication systems, by a mobile wireless communication station or device.
One significant source of parameter estimate inaccuracy is the
Doppler phenomenon experienced when a mobile station is in motion.
Channel estimation in some cellular communication systems, for example, requires filtering pilot signals received at the mobile station. The optimum bandwidth of the filter is dependent on the Doppler spread.
Velocity is proportional to frequency and thus to Doppler spread. Knowledge of accurate Doppler spread in mobile wireless communication devices is useful for assigning slower mobile stations to micro-cells and for assigning faster mobile stations to macro-cells, and for making relatively precise power control measurements.
It is known how to estimate Doppler spread based on the autocovariance of the square of the magnitude of a signal received at the mobile station. A problem with this approach however is estimator degradation, which results from poor noise immunity associated with estimating the autocovariance of a squared magnitude at lag 0. Another problem with this prior art approach is that it is based upon estimates of 1st and 2nd order moments of the squared magnitude of the received signal, which are basically 2nd and 4th order moments of the signal. Higher order moments of the received signal are generally more difficult to estimate than lower order moments thereof, and thus prior art Doppler spread estimates based on estimates of 1st and 2nd order moments of the squared magnitude of the received signal are susceptible to inaccuracies, which may result in poor system performance.
The various aspects, features and advantages of the present inventions will become more fully apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the following Detailed Description of the Inventions and the accompanying drawings described below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a communication system including a mobile wireless communication device for which Doppler spread is estimated according embodiments of the present inventions. FIG. 2 is a schematic process flow diagram for determining Doppler spread.
FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of the relative bias versus signal to noise ratio (SNR) performance of several embodiments of the present inventions and the prior art.
FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of the square root of the relative mean squared error (RMSE) versus SNR performance of several embodiments of the present inventions and the prior art.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTIONS
In the present invention, Doppler spread is estimated in mobile wireless communication devices, for example cellular telephone handsets, personal digital assistants, wireless enabled computers, etc.
In one embodiment, the Doppler spread estimation is based on the real part of an estimated autocorrelation function of the impulse response of a channel over which a signal is communicated. Further references herein for the estimated autocorrelation function refers to the real part thereof. And in another embodiment, the Doppler spread estimation is based on an estimated autocovariance function of the magnitude squared of the impulse response of a channel over which a signal is communicated. The Doppler spread estimates of the present inventions have, among other advantages over the prior art, improved noise immunity. In FIG. 2, at block 200, the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function is estimated. The estimation of autocorrelation or autocovariance functions is known generally. In narrow-band communication systems, for example, the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function may be based on a signal received at the mobile wireless communication device.
In TDMA systems, the estimated autocovariance or autocorrelation function may be based on an output of an adaptive equalizer or at some other circuit portion of the wireless mobile communication device.
In one embodiment, as illustrated in the exemplary CDMA or WCDMA receiver 100 of FIG. 1, an estimated autocorrelation function is based on I and/ or Q signal components of one or more of several rake fingers A - N associated with a particular path of a rake receiver 110. In another embodiment, an estimated autocovariance function is based on I and Q signal components of one or more of the rake fingers of the rake receiver 110. Alternatively, the estimated autocovariance function may be also based on an output, Rout, of a rake receiver 110.
The exemplary device 100 of FIG. 1 includes generally an amplifier 120 and other components, including a baseband processor, a digital signal processor, a display and inputs, some of which are not illustrated but are well known in the art, under the control of a local processor 150, for example a programmable DSP or dedicated hardware circuitry like an ASIC or other processor or combinations as is known by those having ordinary skill in the art.
In one embodiment of the invention, the autocorrelation function is estimated from either the in-phase or the quadrature components of a signal, and in another embodiment the autocorrelation function is estimated from both the in-phase and the quadrature components of the signal. In yet another embodiment, the autocovariance function is estimated from the squared magnitude of a signal. In FIG. 2, at block 210, a first value of the autocovariance or the autocorrelation function is estimated for a first lag, n. In embodiments of the inventions where the estimated function is an autocovariance function, the first lag is any positive or negative non-zero value, and in embodiments where the estimated function is an autocorrelation function the first lag, n, may be any value including zero.
At block 220, a second value of the estimated autocorrelation or autocovariance function is estimated at a second lag, m, having a magnitude that is greater than a magnitude of the first lag, n. In FIG. 2, a first ratio is calculated between a first difference and a second difference. The first difference is a difference between the estimated value at the first lag, n, and the estimated value at the second lag, m. The first difference is shown calculated schematically at difference block 230. The second difference is a difference between a first product and a second product. The first product is a product of the second lag squared, m2, and the estimated value at the first lag, n. The second product is a product of the first lag squared, n2, and the estimated value at the second lag, m. The second difference is shown calculated schematically at difference block 240.
The first ratio of the first and second differences is calculated schematically at divider block 250, and is expressed quantitatively as
Eq. (1) x = [φ(n) - φ(m)] / [nAp(n) - n2φ(m)]
where φ(n) is an estimated value of either estimated autocorrelation or autocovariance having the first lag, n, and φ(m) is an estimated value of the same estimated function having the second lag, m. In FIG. 2, at block 255, a magnitude of the first ratio is calculated if the first ratio, x, is less than zero. Thus the output of block 255 is the magnitude of the first ratio. Alternatively, at block 255, if the first ratio is less than zero the output of block 255 is set to zero. If the first ratio is greater than zero, then the first ratio is the output of block 255.
At block 260, the square root of the output of block 255 is calculated. If the first ratio is greater than zero, the Doppler spread is proportional to the square root of the first ratio. If the first ratio is less than zero, then the Doppler spread is proportional to the square root of the magnitude of the first ratio. Alternatively, if the first ratio is less than zero, the Doppler spread is zero.
In FIG. 2, at block 270, the square root of the first ratio is scaled by a second ratio, wherein the estimated Doppler spread or velocity is proportional to a product of the second ratio and the square root of the first ratio. The second ratio is a reciprocal of a product of π and T, where T is the inverse of a processing rate. The processing rate may be for example a symbol rate or a chip rate or some other rate known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
The second ratio is generally expressed qualitatively as
Eq. (2) 1 / (πT)
In applications where the estimated function is an autocorrelation function, the Doppler spread is proportional to the product of the first and second ratios. In applications where the estimated function is an autocovariance function, the Doppler spread is proportional to the product of the first and second ratios scaled by a multiplicative factor of the square root of 2 divided by 2. Thus for the autocovariance function, Eq. (2) is scaled as follows:
Figure imgf000008_0001
FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of the relative bias versus signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) performance of several embodiments of the present inventions in comparison to the prior art. The graph illustrates generally a relatively constant estimated Doppler spread bias where the estimated autocorrelation function of the present inventions is based on both in-phase and/ or quadrature components of the signal, or where the autocovariance function is based on the magnitude squared of the signal. By contrast, the prior art Doppler spread estimation bias is remarkably poorer at lower signal strengths. In FIG. 3, the Doppler spread estimate based on the estimated autocovariance function estimated from the magnitude of the signal squared or the Doppler spread estimate based on the estimated autocorrelation from both the in-phase and quadrature components thereof have comparatively less bias than the estimated Doppler spread based only on one of the in-phase or the quadrature component of the signal. FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of the square root of the relative mean-square-error (RMSE) versus SNR performance of several embodiments of the present inventions in comparison to the prior art. The graph illustrates generally a relatively constant RMSE for the estimated Doppler spread for embodiments where the estimated autocorrelation function of the present inventions is based on in-phase and/ or quadrature components of the signal, or where the estimated autocovariance function is based on the magnitude squared of the signal. In contrast, the prior art Doppler spread estimation has a remarkably large RMSE at lower signal strengths. In FIG. 4, the RMSE based on the estimated autocovariance function estimated from the magnitude of the signal squared or the autocorrelation function based on both the in-phase and quadrature components of the signal is comparatively less than the prior art, particularly at lower signal strengths.
While the present inventions and what is considered presently to be the best modes thereof have been described in a manner that establishes possession thereof by the inventors and that enables those of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the inventions, it will be understood and appreciated that there are many equivalents to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and that myriad modifications and variations may be made thereto without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventions, which are to be limited not by the exemplary embodiments but by the appended claims. What is claimed is:

Claims

1. A method for estimating Doppler spread in a mobile wireless communication device, comprising: estimating a value of an estimated autocorrelation of an impulse response of a channel for first and second lags, the second lag having a magnitude greater than a magnitude of the first lag; determining a first ratio between a first difference and a second difference, the first difference is a difference between the estimated value at the first lag and the estimated value at the second lag, the second difference is a difference between a first product and a second product, the first product is a product of the second lag squared and the estimated value at the first lag, the second product is a product of the first lag squared and the estimated value at the second lag; determining a square root of the first ratio if the first ratio is greater than zero; determining Doppler spread proportional to the square root of the first ratio.
2. The method of Claim 1, determining a square root of an absolute value of the first ratio if the first ratio is less than zero.
3. The method of Claim 1, setting the value of the first ratio to zero if the first ratio is less than zero.
4. The method of Claim 1, determining the Doppler spread by multiplying the square root of the first ratio by a second ratio, the second ratio is a reciprocal of a product of π and T, where T is an inverse processing rate.
5. The method of Claim 1, estimating the autocorrelation from both in-phase and quadrature components of a signal.
6. The method of Claim 1, estimating the autocorrelation from one of an in-phase and quadrature component of a signal.
7. A method for estimating Doppler spread in a mobile wireless communication device, comprising: estimating a value of an estimated autocovariance of a magnitude squared of an impulse response of a channel for a first non-zero lag and for a second lag, the second lag having a magnitude greater than a magnitude of the first lag; determining a first ratio between a first difference and a second difference, the first difference is a difference between the estimated value at the first lag and the estimated value at the second lag, the second difference is a difference between a first product and a second product, the first product is a product of the second lag squared and the estimated value at the first lag, the second product is a product of the first lag squared and the estimated value at the second lag; determining a square root of the first ratio if the first ratio is greater than zero; determining Doppler spread proportional to the square root of the first ratio.
8. The method of Claim 7, determining a square root of an absolute value of the first ratio if the first ratio is less than zero.
9. The method of Claim 7, setting the value of the first ratio to zero if the first ratio is less than zero.
10. The method of Claim 7, determining the Doppler spread by multiplying the square root of the first ratio by a second ratio, the second ratio is a ratio of the square root of 2 divided by a product of 2τc and T, where T is an inverse processing rate.
11. A mobile wireless communication device, comprising: means for determining a square root of a first ratio greater than zero, the first ratio defined by [φ(n) - φ(m)] / [m2φ (n) - n2φ(m)], where φ(n) is an estimated value of an estimated autocorrelation of an impulse response of a channel at a first lag, n, φ(m) is an estimated value of the estimated autocorrelation at a second lag, m, a magnitude of the second lag m greater than a magnitude of first lag n; means for determining Doppler spread proportional to a square root of the first ratio if the first ratio is greater than zero.
12. The device of Claim 11, means for determining a square root of an absolute value of the first ratio if the first ratio is less than zero.
13. The device of Claim 11, means for setting the value of the first ratio to zero if the first ratio is less than zero.
14. The device of Claim 11, means for scaling the square root of the first ratio by a multiplicative factor of the reciprocal of a product of π and T, where T is the inverse of a processing rate.
15. The device of Claim 11, a rake receiver having a plurality of rake fingers, means for estimating the autocorrelation from an output of one or more of the plurality of rake fingers.
16. The device of Claim 11, means for estimating the autocorrelation from both in-phase and quadrature components of a received signal.
17. The device of Claim 11, means for estimating the autocorrelation from one of an in-phase or a quadrature component of a received signal.
18. A mobile wireless communication device, comprising: means for determining a square root of a first ratio greater than zero, the first ratio defined by [φ(n) - φ(m)] / [m2φ (n) - n2φ(m)], where φ(n) is an estimated value of an estimated autocovariance from a magnitude squared of an impulse response of a channel at a first nonzero lag, n, φ(m) is an estimated value of the estimated autocovariance at a second lag, m, a magnitude of the second lag m greater than a magnitude of first lag, n; means for determining Doppler spread proportional to a square root of the first ratio if the first ratio is greater than zero.
19. The device of Claim 18, means for scaling the square root of the first ratio by a multiplicative factor of the square root of 2 divided by a product of 2πT, where T is the inverse of a processing rate.
20. The device of Claim 18, a rake receiver, means for estimating the autocovariance from an output of the rake receiver.
21. The device of Claim 18, a rake receiver having a plurality of rake fingers, means for estimating the autocovariance from an output of one or more of the plurality of rake fingers.
22. The device of Claim 18, means for estimating the autocovariance from both in-phase and quadrature components of a received signal.
23. The device of Claim 18, means for determining a square root of an absolute value of the first ratio if the first ratio is less than zero.
24. The device of Claim 18, means for setting the value of the first ratio to zero if the first ratio is less than zero.
PCT/US2002/012248 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor WO2002100060A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BR0210021-5A BR0210021A (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 Method for estimating doppler scattering in a mobile wireless communication device and its device
CN02810944.9A CN1529970B (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 Poppler spread/velcocity estimation in mobile wireless communication device and methods thereof
DE60208026T DE60208026T2 (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 DOPPLER SPREIZING / SPEED ESTIMATION IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND METHOD THEREFOR
EP02776552A EP1397897B1 (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor
AT02776552T ATE313198T1 (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 DOPPLER SPREAD/VELOCITY ESTIMATION IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES AND METHOD THEREOF

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/871,116 US6636574B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2001-05-31 Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor
US09/871,116 2001-05-31

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002100060A1 true WO2002100060A1 (en) 2002-12-12

Family

ID=25356765

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/012248 WO2002100060A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2002-04-18 Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US6636574B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1397897B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1529970B (en)
AT (1) ATE313198T1 (en)
BR (1) BR0210021A (en)
DE (1) DE60208026T2 (en)
RU (1) RU2269206C2 (en)
TW (1) TW586325B (en)
WO (1) WO2002100060A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101808070A (en) * 2010-04-13 2010-08-18 北京大学 Receiver of OFDM system and moving speed estimation method thereof

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7218934B2 (en) * 2002-02-14 2007-05-15 Nokia Corporation Mobile station speed estimation
US20030153274A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2003-08-14 Carsten Juncker Doppler spread estimation
DE102004026072B4 (en) * 2004-05-25 2007-02-15 Micronas Gmbh Method and apparatus for motion compensated noise estimation in mobile wireless transmission systems
KR100608109B1 (en) * 2004-06-28 2006-08-02 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for estimating doppler frequency and moving velocity of a wireless terminal
ATE470276T1 (en) * 2004-12-15 2010-06-15 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M DOPPLER ESTIMATE
US7573964B2 (en) * 2004-12-16 2009-08-11 Motorola, Inc. Channel estimator with extended channel bandwidth
US8094605B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2012-01-10 Livetv, Llc Aircraft communications system with network selection controller and associated methods
KR101488787B1 (en) * 2008-07-08 2015-02-03 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for estimating doppler frequency in mobile communication terminal
US8897385B2 (en) * 2009-10-20 2014-11-25 Maxlinear, Inc. Doppler estimator for OFDM systems
CN101917363B (en) * 2010-08-10 2013-04-24 上海华为技术有限公司 Method and device for estimating Doppler frequency shift
CN103181094B (en) * 2010-11-04 2016-05-04 瑞典爱立信有限公司 Radio base station and the method for wherein expanding for estimating Doppler
RU2565237C1 (en) * 2014-08-07 2015-10-20 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Тихоокеанский океанологический институт им. В.И. Ильичева Дальневосточного отделения Российской академии наук (ТОИ ДВО РАН) Evaluation of complex signal carrier frequency doppler shift
RU2614192C1 (en) * 2015-12-02 2017-03-23 Акционерное общество "Раменское приборостроительное конструкторское бюро" Method of inertial data estimation and its correction according to measurement of doppler velocity sensor
US10845477B2 (en) 2017-05-10 2020-11-24 Google Llc Power management using a low-power radar
US10795009B2 (en) 2017-05-31 2020-10-06 Google Llc Digital beamforming for radar sensing using wireless communication chipset
US10782390B2 (en) 2017-05-31 2020-09-22 Google Llc Full-duplex operation for radar sensing using wireless communication chipset
US10754005B2 (en) * 2017-05-31 2020-08-25 Google Llc Radar modulation for radar sensing using a wireless communication chipset
JP7407200B2 (en) 2019-05-20 2023-12-28 グーグル エルエルシー Mobile device-based radar system for providing multimode interface, and method thereof
KR20210132132A (en) 2019-06-17 2021-11-03 구글 엘엘씨 Mobile device-based radar system for applying different power modes to multi-mode interface

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5809064A (en) * 1990-11-28 1998-09-15 Novatel, Inc. Pseudorandom noise ranging receiver which compensates for multipath distortion by dynamically adjusting the time delay spacing between early and late correlators
US6219561B1 (en) * 1996-10-18 2001-04-17 Cisco Systems, Inc. Wireless communication network using time-varying vector channel equalization for adaptive spatial equalization

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2311184A (en) * 1996-03-13 1997-09-17 Innovision Plc Motion vector field error estimation
US6047017A (en) * 1996-04-25 2000-04-04 Cahn; Charles R. Spread spectrum receiver with multi-path cancellation
US6373862B1 (en) * 1997-12-12 2002-04-16 Texas Instruments Incorporated Channel-aided, decision-directed delay-locked loop
US6424642B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-07-23 Texas Instruments Incorporated Estimation of doppler frequency through autocorrelation of pilot symbols
US6470044B1 (en) * 1999-01-15 2002-10-22 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Computationally parsimonious forward link receiver for DS-CDMA systems and method for same
JP3329383B2 (en) * 1999-06-23 2002-09-30 日本電気株式会社 Despreader, timing detection device, channel estimation device, frequency error measurement method, and AFC control method
MY125793A (en) * 1999-08-12 2006-08-30 Ericsson Inc Methods for estimating doppler spreads including autocorrelation function hypotheses and related systems and receivers

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5809064A (en) * 1990-11-28 1998-09-15 Novatel, Inc. Pseudorandom noise ranging receiver which compensates for multipath distortion by dynamically adjusting the time delay spacing between early and late correlators
US6219561B1 (en) * 1996-10-18 2001-04-17 Cisco Systems, Inc. Wireless communication network using time-varying vector channel equalization for adaptive spatial equalization

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101808070A (en) * 2010-04-13 2010-08-18 北京大学 Receiver of OFDM system and moving speed estimation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1397897A4 (en) 2005-02-02
DE60208026T2 (en) 2006-07-13
EP1397897B1 (en) 2005-12-14
CN1529970A (en) 2004-09-15
CN1529970B (en) 2012-11-28
US20020181553A1 (en) 2002-12-05
RU2269206C2 (en) 2006-01-27
DE60208026D1 (en) 2006-01-19
RU2003134627A (en) 2005-05-27
TW586325B (en) 2004-05-01
US6636574B2 (en) 2003-10-21
EP1397897A1 (en) 2004-03-17
ATE313198T1 (en) 2005-12-15
BR0210021A (en) 2004-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6636574B2 (en) Doppler spread/velocity estimation in mobile wireless communication devices and methods therefor
US20120288040A1 (en) Method and Device for Implementing Automatic Frequency Control
US6529850B2 (en) Apparatus and method of velocity estimation
US8041325B2 (en) Speed-based, hybrid parametric/non-parametric equalization
WO2004102824A1 (en) Determination of a channel estimate of a transmission channel
JP2002111542A (en) Communication terminal device and demodulation method
JPH04229734A (en) Receiver composed of apparatus evaluating frequency transition
JP5089403B2 (en) Method and apparatus for estimating gain offset of amplitude modulated communication signal
US7263349B2 (en) Velocity responsive time tracking
KR101414760B1 (en) Method and apparatus for estimating a signal-to-interference ratio
CN100372256C (en) Method and device for estimating signal interference ratio
WO2007003715A1 (en) Speed detection method in communication system, receiver, network element and processor
US20070047630A1 (en) Synchronous control apparatus for initial synchronization when receiving a wireless signal
JP3322248B2 (en) Receive level measurement method
WO2003009558A1 (en) Frequency discriminator
CN100365951C (en) Information channel estimating method and system in radio communication
US7688920B2 (en) AFC wrap-around detection
Karastergios et al. Simple SNR estimator for mobile fading channels
IL147792A (en) Estimating interference in a communication system
JP2003502901A (en) Method and apparatus for performing interference estimation
JPH05292139A (en) Receiver estimating maximum likelihood series
Ogundile et al. Cubic interpolation based channel estimator for rectangular M-QAM
Li et al. A speed estimation based two-stage symbol aided channel estimator for frequency nonselective variant fading channel
WO2006102792A1 (en) A method of channel estimate in tdd-cdma system
JPH05292138A (en) Receiver estimating maximum likelihood series

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1957/DELNP/2003

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002776552

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 028109449

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2002776552

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2002776552

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: JP