NETWORK SECURITY SYSTEM
RELATED APPLICATIONS AND CLAIM OF PRIORITY [0001] This application claims priority to and incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/563,437, entitled "Network Security System" and filed April 19, 2004 and U.S. Application Serial No. 10/918,171 filed August 13, 2004 entitled "Network Security System".
TECHNICAL FIELD [0002] The present application is directed to intrusion detection for computer-based systems. More particularly, the present application is directed to methods and systems for inhibiting intrusion attempts originating from a networked client host from reaching a networked server host.
BACKGROUND [0003] Computer networks provide connectivity between computing devices on local networks and/or remote networks. A connection between two remote networks typically occurs through a communications network such as the Internet. Communications over the Internet pass through a series of communication links and routers/switches, many of which are located within third-party networks that are also interconnected with the Internet. Thus, communications between two remote networks across the . Internet are typically "open" because neither the sender nor the receiver controls the path that the communications traffic travels from source to destination. Rather, the path is controlled by the various providers and devices located on the Internet itself.
[0004] The connectivity between remote networks can be used to allow a client host
to utilize a network-accessible service provided by a remote server host. Common network-
accessible services include but are not limited to Finger, Echo, SMTP, Telnet, SSH, FTP,
DNS, HTTP and HTTPS as well as those services utilizing IP Protocol 50, ICMP, TCP/IP
and UDP.
[0005] Because private networks are connected to an open system such as the
h temet, security is of great concern when communicating with other private networks via
network-accessible services. Often, network administrators install firewall devices, intrusion
detection devices, intrusion prevention devices and/or other buffers on a local area network
("LAN") in order to screen and/or filter incoming and/or outgoing content from the local
network. Alternatively, system administrators can install firewall, intrusion detection, or
intrusion prevention software on a local host within a LAN in order to screen and or filter
incoming and/or outgoing content from the local host. This can require the network
administrator and/or the system administrator to install complex and costly equipment and/or
software in order to ensure that the local network and/or local host is protected.
[0006] Exemplary network security systems are described in U.S. Patent No.
6,687,831 to Albaugh et al; U.S. Patent No. 6,654,882 to Froutan et al; U.S. Patent No.
6,321,336 to Applegate et al; U.S. Patent No. 5,892,903 to Klaus; and U.S. Patent No.
5,557,752 to Smaha et al. However, each of these network security systems requires the installation of costly and/or complex equipment and/or software.
[0007] What are needed are improved methods and systems for inhibiting intrusion
attempts directed at network-accessible services.
SUMMARY [0008] Before the present methods, systems and materials are described, it is to be
understood that this invention is not limited to the particular methodologies, systems and materials described, as these may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments
only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention which will be limited only by the appended claims. [0009] It must also be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a "communication request" is a reference to one or more communications requests and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Although any methods, materials, and devices similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of embodiments of the invention, the preferred methods, materials, and devices are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated by reference. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the invention is not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention.
[0010] In an embodiment, a system provides protection against intrusion attempts directed at network-accessible services and methods covering the initiation of the use of the system and the perfection of the intrusion protection provided by the system through a demonstrative base-lining process.
[0011] In an embodiment, the system includes one or more networks, network devices and computing devices that provide firewall, intrusion detection and/or intrusion
prevention protection for a server host on a private network that provides network-accessible service(s) through a connection to an open communications network such as the Internet from intrusion attempts initiated by a client host on a private network connected to an open
communications network such as the Internet. [0012] In an embodiment, the system includes one or more networks, network
devices and computing devices that provide firewall, intrusion detection and/or intrusion
prevention protection for a client host on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the Internet from intrusion attempts initiated by a server host on a private network that provides network-accessible service(s) through a connection to an open communications network such as the Internet.
[0013] In an embodiment, the system provides intrusion protection for a plurality of client hosts and multiple server hosts providing network-accessible service(s) limited only by the number of public IP addresses available to the service provider hosting the system.
[0014] The system, in conjunction with the methods, may permit the protection of a client host on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the
Internet or a server host providing network-accessible service(s) on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the Internet with no hardware or software installation required on the client host, client private network, server host or server private network.
[0015] Through execution of the invented method of initiating protection of a server host providing network-accessible service(s) on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the Internet, the system may intercept the traffic between the client host and server host by having a domain name server, which provides authoritative responses for the server host, advertise the public IP address of the system as the actual public
IP address of the server host.
[0016] In an embodiment, the system does not store the intercepted traffic other than to process the traffic. The system may examine the traffic in real time such that communications between the client host and the server host providing the network-accessible service(s) are not perceptibly delayed. In this embodiment, the system is used for many or all network-accessible services, such as interactive network-accessible services.
[0017] The system is capable of providing intrusion protection for any common interactive network-accessible service(s) including but not limited to Finger, Echo, SMTP, Telnet, SSH, FTP, DNS, HTTP, and HTTPS as well as those services utilizing IP Protocol 50, ICMP, TCP/TP, and UDP.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0018] Aspects, features, benefits and advantages of the embodiments will be apparent with regard to the following description and accompanying drawings where:
[0019] FIG. 1 is a network diagram depicting an overview of an exemplary physical
flow of communication requests from a client host to a server host and communication
responses from a server host to a client host through an embodiment of a security system; [0020] FIG. 2 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary logic flow of communication requests from a client host to a server host through a security system;
[0021] FIG. 3 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary logic flow of communication responses from a server host through a security system;
[0022] FIG. 4 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary method for initiating protection of a server host; [0023] FIG. 5 is a network diagram depicting an exemplary physical flow of
communication requests from a client host to a server host and communication responses from a server host to a client;
[0024] FIG. 6 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary method for configuring a security system to provide protection of a server host; [0025] FIG. 7 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary logic flow of
communication requests from a client host to a server host through a security system;
[0026] FIG. 8 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary logic flow of
communication responses from a server host to a client host through the security system; and [0027] FIG. 9 is a process diagram depicting an exemplary method for refining the configuration of a security system through a demonstrative base-lining process.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0028] Embodiments of the present invention include methods and systems for inhibiting or preventing intrusion attempts from occurring between a client host on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the Internet and a server host providing network-accessible service(s) on a private network connected to the open
communications network, hi an embodiment, the present invention may prevent intrusion attempts without the need for substantial additional computer software or hardware devices on the private networks, the client host or the server host.
[0029] FIGs. 1-3 illustrate an exemplary communication process between a client
host 140 on a private network connected to an open communications network such as the
Internet 160 and a server host 155 providing network-accessible service(s) on a private network connected to the open communications network 160. The client host 140 may be part of a first private network such as an Internet service provider (ISP) network 135. The
server host 155 may be a web server that is part of a second private network such as a
corporate network 145.
[0030] In order to communicate with a network-accessible service on the server host 155, the client host 140 may transmit a request 105 (step 205 in FIG. 2) to an authoritative domain name server 150 for the server host 155 to resolve its public IP address. The
authoritative domain name server 150 may respond 110 (step 210 in FIG. 2) with a public IP
address (e.g., 66.207.129.215 in FIG. 1) for a separate security system or network 165 assigned to protect the server host 155 providing the network-accessible service instead of, as
is typically done, the true public IP address of the server host 155 (e.g., 151.52.26.63 in FIG.
1). [0031] The client host 140 may then transmit its communication request 115 (step
215 in FIG. 2). The communication request 115 (step 215 in FIG. 2) is transmitted to the security system 165 because of the IP address provided by the DNS server. The security system 165 may perform a series of processing steps (220 in FIG. 2) to determine whether the
communication request 115 is an intrusion attempt. If the communication request 115 is
determined to be non-intrusive, the security system 165 may forward the communication
request 120 (step 225 in FIG. 2) to the network-accessible service on the server host 155. The
client firewall 170 permits the communication request (step 230 in FIG. 2) to enter the corporate network 145 because it comes from a public IP address of the security system 165.
The server host 155 then receives the communication request 120 (step 235 in FIG. 2).
[0032] The server host 155 may perform any necessary processing and generate a response 125 to the forwarded communication request 120, if required. If generated, the
response 125 may first be sent to the security system 165 (step 305 in FIG. 3) since the forwarded communication request 120 originated from the security system 165. The security
system 165 may receive the response 125 (step 310 in FIG. 3) and perform a series of
processing steps (315 in FIG. 3) designed to determine whether the response 125 is an
intrusion attempt. If the response 125 is determined to be non-intrusive, the security system 165 may then forward the response 130 (step 320 in FIG. 3) to the client host 140, which
processes the response 130, 325. In an embodiment, the server host 155 transmits the
response 125 directly to the client host 140. [0033] hi an embodiment, some or all of the processing steps performed by the security system 165 between the original communication request 115 and the forwarded
communication request 120 and/or between the response 125 and the forwarded response 130
occur in real time without storing the communications requests 115 and 120 or the responses
125 and 130 other than as required for real time processing. Thus, the security system 165 may permit interactivity between the client host 140 and server host 155 without any perceptible delay in communication between the two systems. This allows the security
system 165 to be used for providing intrusion protection to interactive and/or batch network- accessible services, including but not limited to Finger, Echo, SMTP, Telnet, SSH, FTP, DNS, HTTP and HTTPS, as well as those services utilizing IP Protocol 50, ICMP, TCP/IP and UDP.
[0034] In an alternate embodiment, the devices of the security system 165 may be
located on the corporate network 145. In such an embodiment, the devices of the security
system 165 perform the series of processing steps (220 in FIG. 2) to determine whether the communication request 115 is an intrusion attempt and forward the communication request 120 (steps 225 and 230 in FIG. 2) to the network-accessible service on the server host 155 if
the communication request 115 is non-intrusive. Likewise, the devices of the security system 165 may perform the series of processing steps (315 in FIG. 3) to determine whether the
response 125 is an intrusion attempt and forward the response 130 (step 320 in FIG. 3) to the client host 140 via the communications network 160 if the response 130 is non-intrusive.
[0035] In an alternate embodiment, the devices of the security system 165 are located on the client network 135. In such an embodiment, the devices of the security system
165 perform the series of processing steps 220 to determine whether the communication
request 115 is an intrusion attempt and forward the communication request 120 (steps 225
and 230 in FIG. 2) via the communications network 160 to the network-accessible service on the server host 155 if the communication request 115 is non-intrusive. Likewise, the devices
of the security system 165 may perform the series of processing steps (315 in FIG. 3) to
determine whether the response 125 is an intrusion attempt and forward the response 130,
(step 320 in FIG. 3) to the client host 140 if the response 130 is non-intrusive. [0036] h an embodiment, the security system 165 may maintain an event log of the
requests 115 and responses 125 that pass through the security system 165. In an embodiment,
the event log may maintain only a partial copy of a request 115 or a response 125.
[0037] FIGs. 1 and 4 illustrate a method of configuring the security system 165 to
initiate network intrusion protection of a server host 155 providing network-accessible service(s), and the resultant configuration within the server host 155. Initially, an owner of a
server host 155 providing a network-accessible service(s) may contact 405 a service provider
hosting the security system 165 to provide network intrusion protection. The owner may
communicate (step 410) the public IP address, IP protocol(s) and IP port(s) of the server host
155 to the service provider. The service provider may assign (step 415) a public IP address within the public network segment of the security system 165 (e.g., 66.207.129.215 in FIG. 1) to accept communication requests for and/or responses from the specified server host 155.
The service provider may execute (step 420) the "Internal Host Setup Process" upon the security system, as shown in FIG. 6 and described in more detail below, to configure the
security system 165 to perform intrusion protection for the specified server host 155 and its network-accessible services. [0038] The service provider may then communicate (step 425) the assigned public
IP address (66.207.129.215) to the owner of the server host 155. The owner of the server host
155 may update (step 430) the configuration of its domain name server 150 such that the "A"
record for the server host 155 indicates the service provider provisioned public IP address
(66.207.129.215) rather than the public IP address of the server host 155 (e.g., 151.52.26.63 in FIG. 1). The nature of the domain name server infrastructure dictates that this change will propagate (step 435) through the entire communications network 160 within a specified time
period, such as 72 hours. [0039] hi an embodiment, the owner of the server host 155 may configure a
perimeter firewall 170 to restrict inbound network traffic with a destination address corresponding to the public IP address of the server host 155 (e.g., 151.52.26.63) to traffic having a source address corresponding to the public IP address assigned by the security
system 165 (step 440). Such an embodiment may provide a heightened level of network intrusion protection.
[0040] By providing network intrusion protection between the client host 140 and
the server host 155, the security system 165 inhibits or prevents viruses, worms, directed intrusion attempts and other malicious traffic from reaching and or being delivered from the
server host 155. In addition, by being loosely coupled with both the private network 135 of
the client host 140 and the private network 145 of the server host 155 through an open communications network 160, the security system 165 may provide network intrusion protection for multiple client hosts 140 belonging to multiple private networks 135 and multiple server hosts 155 belonging to multiple private networks 145 simultaneously. As
such, economies of scale may be achieved since no additional devices or computing software
are required on the client host 140, the client host's private network 135, the server host 155
or the server host's private network 145. [0041] FIG. 5 illustrates a detailed network diagram of an embodiment of a security
system 165 and the packet translations that occur when the security system 165 is used to provide intrusion protection between a client host on a first private network connected to an
open communications network such as the Internet and a server host providing network- accessible service(s) on a second private network connected to the open communications network. The client host 505 is part of a first private network such as an ISP network 510
connected to an open communications network 515. The first private network may include
network devices, such as routers, firewalls, proxies, etc., that connect the client host 505 to
the ISP network 510. These network devices may perfonn address translations, routing and/or other communication techniques and functions. Regardless of the intermediary network devices and intermediary network processing, the client host 505 may be reachable via a public IP address (e.g., 48.2.56.67 in FIG. 5). The public IP address may allow the
client host 505 to communicate over the open communications network 515.
[0042] The server host 525 may be part of a second private network, such as a
corporate network 520 connected to the open communications network 515. The second private network may include network devices, such as routers, firewalls, proxies, etc., that
connect the server host 525 to the corporate network 520. These network devices may perform address translations, routing and/or other communication techniques and functions. Regardless of the intermediary network devices and intermediary network processing, the server host 525 may be reachable via a public IP address (e.g., 151.52.26.63 in FIG. 5). The public IP address may allow the server host 525 to communicate over the open
communications network 515.
[0043] FIGs. 5 and 6 illustrate a method of configuring the security system 165 to
initiate network intrusion protection of a server host 525 providing network-accessible
service(s) and the resultant configuration within the security system 165. The security system
165 may be part of a private network connected to an open communications network such as
the Internet 515. Referring to FIG. 5, the security system may have a private network that
includes a public network segment 535 having a plurality of public IP addresses and an
internal network segment 545 having a plurality of private IP addresses. In an embodiment,
the public IP addresses may include a public IP address associated with the public IP address
of a server host 525. One public IP address (e.g., 66.207.129.215 in FIG. 5) may provide
network intrusion protection for the server host 525. Accordingly, a one-to-one relationship
may exist between a public IP address of the server host 525 (e.g., 151.52.26.63 in FIG. 5)
and the assigned public IP address (66.207.129.215).
[0044] The private IP addresses for use on the private network segment 545 within
the security system may be assigned a private IP address 605 (e.g., 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2 and
10.0.2.3 550 may each be assigned to a security sub-system 555 within the security system
165). As such, a one-to-many relationship may exist between the public IP address
(66.207.129.215) and the private IP addresses 550 (10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2 and 10.0.2.3).
[0045] Within the security system 165, the assigned public IP address
(66.207.129.215) may exist as a virtual IP address assigned to and shared between IP network
load balancers 540. The load balancers 540 may provide address translation and routing
between the public network segment 535 within the security system 165 and the private
network segment 545 within the security system. More specifically, the network load
balancers 540 may perform 610 network address translation and routing between the virtual
public IP address (66.207.129.215) and the private IP addresses 550 (10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2 and
10.0.2.3). [0046] The security system 165 may include the above described network
communications framework and a security sub-system 555. The security sub-system 555 may include computing devices that perform load-balancing and failover protection. The computing devices may be configured with multiple computer software programs, referred to herein as "modules," which provide network firewall functionality, network intrusion prevention (IPS) functionality and/or network intrusion detection (IDS) functionality.
[0047] Each computing device may operate in one of two modes: passive and active. When the computing devices are passive, no network intrusion prevention functionality is performed. However, network intrusion protection may still be realized through the network firewall module and the intrusion detection module. When the computing devices are active, full network intrusion protection may be provided including network intrusion prevention.
Each assigned private IP address 550 (10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2 and 10.0.2.3) maybe assigned 615 to a particular security sub-system 555 computing device.
[0048] The network firewall modules of the security sub-system 555 may perform TCP/IP layer 3 network traffic filtering based on, for example, source and/or destination IP addresses, source and/or destination TCP/IP ports, and IP protocols. The network firewall
modules may further perform 620 network address translation between private IP addresses. In addition, a firewall module may be implemented as an Ethernet router device. In other words, the firewall module may perform "inbound" and "outbound" processing using, for example, two Ethernet network interface controllers that route traffic between "inbound" and "outbound" interfaces. As such, the firewall module may perform "inbound" processing, including filtering and network address translation; "outbound" processing, including filtering
and network address translation; and additional "in between" processing, including forwarding IP packets to an intrusion prevention module for examination. [0049] Each firewall module of each computing device within the security sub¬
system may be configured 620 to allow communication requests using the specified IP protocol(s), and/or TCP/IP port(s) for the protected network-accessible service(s) provided by
the protected server host 525. In addition, each firewall module of each computing device may be configured 620 to perform network address translation between an assigned private IP
address (e.g., 10.0.2.2) 550 and the public IP address (151.52.26.63) of the protected server
host 525. [0050] In an embodiment, if the firewall module receives an IP packet that does not meet its filtering criteria for allowed network traffic, the IP packet is discarded. In an embodiment, the discard event is logged, hi an alternate embodiment, at least a portion of the IP packet is saved. In an embodiment, an alert is sent to a system administrator or a network
administrator, hi an embodiment, a message is transmitted to the sender of the IP packet. [0051] The network intrusion prevention module of the security sub-system 555 may perform, for example, TCP/IP layer 3 through TCP/TP layer 7 packet examinations. The network intrusion prevention module may reassemble IP packets that have been fragmented, whether intentionally to mask the contents of the IP packet or because of IP packet size limitations within any of the network devices through which the IP packet traversed. The network intrusion prevention module may then examine characteristics of the IP packet including, for example, various packet header values and/or the contents of the packet data payload. These characteristics and packet data payload may then be compared with a database of known network intrusion attempt signatures. If a match exists, the mode (passive v. active) of the computing device on which the network intrusion prevention module resides may determine how the IP packet is handled 625. If the computing device is passive, the
matched IP packet may not be discarded. However, the fact that the IP packet would have
been discarded had the computing device been active and data including, for example, at least
a partial copy of the IP packet header and IP packet data payload may be logged. If the
computing device is active, the matched IP packet may be discarded. Moreover, the fact that
the IP packet was discarded and data including, for example, at least a partial copy of the IP
packet header and IP packet data payload may be logged. If a match does not exist, the IP
packet may be forwarded to its destination.
[0052] The network intrusion detection module of the security sub-system 555 may
similarly be capable of performing, for example, TCP/IP layer 3 through TCP/IP layer 7
packet examinations. The network intrusion detection module may first reassemble IP
packets that have been fragmented, whether intentionally to mask the contents of the IP
packet or because of IP packet size limitations within any of the network devices through
which the IP packet traversed. The network intrusion detection module may then examine
characteristics of the IP packet including, for example, various packet header values and/or
the contents of the packet data payload. This examination may occur because the intrusion
detection module "listens" to all IP traffic traversing the routed Ethernet interface of the
computing device. These characteristics and packet data payload may be compared with a
database of known network intrusion attempt signatures. If a match exists, the fact that the IP
packet was matched and data including, for example, at least a partial copy of the IP packet
header and/or the IP packet data payload may be logged. If a match does not exist, the IP
packet may be permitted to continue toward its destination.
[0053] Referring to FIG. 5, a communication request 560 may be transmitted from a
client host 505 with a public IP address (e.g., 48.2.56.67 as in FIG. 5). The commumcation
request 560 may be directed, by the end-user of the client host 505, to a protected network-
accessible service provided by a server host 525 with a public IP address (e.g., 151.52.26.63
as in FIG. 5). The security system may intercept the request because of the special configuration of the domain name server that provides authoritative responses for the server
host 525. As such, this communication request 560 has a source IP address equal to the public IP address of the client host (48.2.56.67) and a destination IP address equal to the public IP address assigned for the protection of the server host 525 to the security system
(e.g., 66.207.129.215 as in FIG. 5). [0054] Referring to FIG. 7, the network load balancers 540 of the security system
may receive 705 the communication request 560. The network load balancers 540 may
translate the destination IP address to one of the private IP addresses 710 assigned for the
protection of the server host 525 to a specific computing device within the security system's
security sub-system 555 (e.g., 10.0.2.2 as in FIG. 5). The communication request 565 may
then be routed 715 to the specific computing device within the security sub-system.
[0055] The computing device may perform intrusion protection processing including, for example, the firewall module 720 making a determination 725 of whether the communication request 565 is permitted based on the firewall module's filtering criteria. If
the communication request 565 is not permitted, the fact that it is not permitted may be
logged 770, and the communication request may be discarded 775. In an alternate
embodiment, the computing device generates an alert if the request 565 is not permitted. In an alternate embodiment, the computing device generates a message to the sender if the
request 565 is not permitted, hi an alternate embodiment, the computing device saves at least
a portion of the communication request 565 if the request is not permitted. [0056] If the communication request 565 is permitted, it may be presented to the intrusion prevention module 730 for examination. The intrusion prevention module may determine 735 whether the communication request 565 is permitted based on whether or not
it matches one of a plurality of intrusion prevention signatures. If the communication request
565 matches an intrusion prevention signature, the fact that it matched and data including, for
example, at least a partial copy of the communication request's IP packet header and/or the IP
packet data payload may be logged 780. A determination 785 of the operating mode of the
current security sub-system computing device may be made. If the current computing device
is active, the communication request 565 may be discarded 790. Alternately, at least a
portion of the communication request 565 may be saved. Alternately or additionally, an alert
and/or a message may be generated. If the current computing device is passive, the
communication request 565 may be allowed to pass to the "outside" interface of the routed
Ethernet connection maintained by the firewall module of the security sub-system 555.
[0057] During the traversal of the routed Ethernet interface, the intrusion detection
module 740 may examine the communication request 565 to determine 745 whether the communication request matches one of a plurality of intrusion detection signatures. If the
communication request 565 matches an intrusion detection signature, the fact that it matched
and data including, for example, at least a partial copy of the communication request's IP
packet header and IP packet data payload may be logged 795. If the communication request
565 was not discarded during the prior processing, upon reaching the "outside" interface of
the routed Ethernet connection, the firewall module may translate 750 the source IP address
of the communication request to the private IP addresses assigned for the protection of the
server host 525 to the current computing device within the security system's security sub¬
system 555 (10.0.2.2).
[0058] The firewall module may then translate 755 the destination P address of the
communication request to the public IP address of the protected server host 525
(151.52.26.63). The computing device may then route the communication request to the
network load balancers 540, which may translate 765 the source IP address of the
communication request 570 to the public IP addresses assigned for the protection of the .
server host 525 to the security system (66.207.129.215). The communication request 575
may then be routed normally through the open network 515 to the protected server host 525.
[0059] Referring to FIG. 5, a response 595 to a previous communication request 575
may be transmitted from a protected server host 525 having an IP address (e.g.,
151.52.26.63). The response 595 may be directed towards the security system with a
destination IP address of, for example, 66.207.129.215. This may occur because the
communication request 575 originated from the security system 165. As such, the response
595 may have a source IP address equal to the IP address of the server host 525
(151.52.26.63) and a destination IP address equal to the public IP address assigned for the
protection of the server host 525 to the security system 165 (66.207.129.215).
[0060] Referring to FIG. 8, the network load balancers 540 of the security system
may receive 805 the response 595 and may translate 810 its destination IP address to one of
the private IP addresses assigned for the protection of the server host 525 to a specific
computing device within the security system's security sub-system 555 (e.g., 10.0.2.2). The
response 590 maybe routed 815 to the specific computing device.
[0061] The computing device may perform intrusion protection processing
including, for example, the firewall module 820 making a determination 825 of whether the
response 590 is permitted based on the firewall module's filtering criteria. If the response
590 is not permitted, the fact that it is not permitted may be logged 870, and the response may
be discarded 875. hi an alternate embodiment, the computing device generates an alert if the
response 590 is not permitted. In an alternate embodiment, the computing device generates a
message to the sender if the response 590 is not permitted. In an alternate embodiment, the
computing device saves at least a portion of the response 590 if it is not permitted.
[0062] If the response 590 is permitted, it may be presented to the intrusion
prevention module 830 for examination. The intrusion prevention module may determine
835 whether the response 590 is permitted based on whether or not it matches one of a
plurality of intrusion prevention signatures. If the response 590 matches an intrusion
prevention signature, the fact that it matched and data including, for example, at least a partial
copy of the response's IP packet header and/or the IP packet data payload may be logged 880.
A determination 885 of the operating mode of the current security sub-system computing
device may be made. If the current computing device is active, the response 590 may be
discarded 890. Alternately, at least a portion of the response 590 may be saved. Alternately
or additionally, an alert and/or a message may be generated. If the current computing device
is passive, the response 590 may be allowed to pass to the "outside" interface of the routed
Ethernet connection maintained by the firewall module of the security sub-system 555.
[0063] During the traversal of the routed Ethernet interface, the intrusion detection
module 840 may examine the response 590 to determine 845 whether the response matches
one of a plurality of intrusion detection signatures. If the response 590 matches an intrusion
detection signature, the fact that it matched and data including, for example, at least a partial
copy of the response's IP packet header and IP packet data payload may be logged 895. If the
response 590 was not discarded during the prior processing, upon reaching the "outside"
interface of the routed Ethernet connection, the firewall module may translate 850 the source
IP address of the response to the private IP addresses assigned for the protection of the server
host 525 to the current computing device within the security system's security sub-system 555 (10.0.2.2).
[0064] The firewall module may then translate 855 the destination IP address of the
response to the public IP address of the client host 505 (48.2.56.67). The computing device
may then route the response 585 to the network load balancers 540, which may translate 865 the source IP address of the response to the public IP addresses assigned for the protection of
the server host 525 to the security system (66.207.129.215). The response 580 may then be routed normally through the open network 515 to the client host 505.
[0065] FIGs. 1 and 9 illustrate a method of utilizing the security system 165 to refine
and/or perfect the network intrusion protection of a server host 155 providing network- accessible service(s) and the resultant configuration within embodiments of the security
system 165. The service provider may perform 905 the Initial Host Setup method, as shown in FIG. 6, to provide network intrusion protection to a server host 155 providing a network-
accessible service(s). After this initial setup, the computing device within the security sub¬
system of the security system 165 may operate in passive mode. Communication requests and responses to communication requests may then be allowed to flow 910 through the security system 165. The security system may log 915 all potential network intrusion attempts directed at the protected network-accessible service(s) that would have been blocked had the security system been configured in active mode. In addition, the owner of the
protected server host 155 may review the logs 920 to determine potential false positives (i.e., communication requests and responses that the security system 165 determines to be intrusion attempts that are not actually intrusion attempts). The service provider may adjust 925 the
intrusion prevention signatures and/or intrusion detection signatures (combined, the network intrusion attempt signatures) to eliminate or reduce the occurrence of such false positives. This learning process may iterate until the owner of the protected server host 155 is comfortable with the actions that would be performed by the security system when operating
in active mode. Upon reaching this comfort level, the service provider may configure 930 the computing device within the security sub-system to operate in active mode in order to provide
a heightened level of network intrusion protection to the server host 155. [0066] It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the anangements of the components set forth in this description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Hence, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be
regarded as limiting. [0067] As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the description be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.