WO2007047739A1 - Retangular-passband multiplexer - Google Patents

Retangular-passband multiplexer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007047739A1
WO2007047739A1 PCT/US2006/040675 US2006040675W WO2007047739A1 WO 2007047739 A1 WO2007047739 A1 WO 2007047739A1 US 2006040675 W US2006040675 W US 2006040675W WO 2007047739 A1 WO2007047739 A1 WO 2007047739A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
coupler
arm
interferometer
passband
arm interferometer
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2006/040675
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Christopher Richard Doerr
Original Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Lucent Technologies Inc. filed Critical Lucent Technologies Inc.
Priority to EP06836366A priority Critical patent/EP1938129B1/en
Priority to JP2008536760A priority patent/JP5106405B2/en
Priority to AT06836366T priority patent/ATE513237T1/en
Publication of WO2007047739A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007047739A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/12007Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind forming wavelength selective elements, e.g. multiplexer, demultiplexer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B6/00Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings
    • G02B6/10Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type
    • G02B6/12Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind
    • G02B6/12007Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind forming wavelength selective elements, e.g. multiplexer, demultiplexer
    • G02B6/12009Light guides; Structural details of arrangements comprising light guides and other optical elements, e.g. couplings of the optical waveguide type of the integrated circuit kind forming wavelength selective elements, e.g. multiplexer, demultiplexer comprising arrayed waveguide grating [AWG] devices, i.e. with a phased array of waveguides

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the field optical communications and in particular to a lossless rectangular-passband multiplexer having improved characteristics.
  • WDM wavelength-division multiplexing
  • de/multiplexer(s) hereinafter we use the general term "multiplexer” to exhibit rectangular passbands and zero chromatic dispersion as such characteristics enhance the "cascadability" of the multiplexer.
  • WGR waveguide grating router
  • a first way involves the use of image mismatching, such as using a y-branch, multimode interference (MMI) coupler or short horn on the input waveguide or modifying the grating arm lengths and losses.
  • MMI multimode interference
  • a second way to achieve rectangular passbands with WGRs is to employ synchronized gratings which have two coherently connected interferometers having the same spatial dispersion but very different free-spectral ranges.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of a low-loss, rectangular-passband multiplexer according to the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic of a three-arm interferometer and associated couplers as preferably used in the multiplexer of FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measured transmissivities from 16 outputs of a packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention;
  • FIG. 4(a) is a graph showing the measured transmissivity and FIG 4(b) is a graph showing the group delay for channel 9 of the packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention
  • FIG. 5(a) is a graph showing the measured transmissivity
  • FIG 4(b) is a graph showing the group delay for both the packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention (solid line) and for a simulation of an improved design (dashed line); and
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing the calculated demultiplexing spectra emitted by the interferometer of FIG 2(a) when the 3x3 coupler is single section FIG. 6(a) and two-section FIG 6(b).
  • the multiplexer includes a three-arm interferometer 110, having a free-spectral range (FSR) substantially equal to the channel spacing, connected to an M-arm interferometer 120 with a much larger FSR.
  • the M-arm interferometer 120 has M waveguides 120[I]...120[M], each with a linearly increasing path length, connected to two star couplers 130, 140.
  • the star coupler(s) 130, 140 each include a plurality of input ports connected to a plurality of output ports via a free space region.
  • the plurality (M) of output ports (for coupler 130) are connected to the M waveguides, which provide a pre-determined amount of path length difference to a corresponding plurality (M) of input ports of star coupler 140.
  • these devices are formed from waveguides.
  • the three-arm interferometer 110 comprises three waveguides HO[I], 110[2], 110[3], each exhibiting a linearly increasing path length.
  • the three waveguides HO[I], 110[2], 110[3] are connected to two couplers 117, 119, one at each end of the waveguides.
  • these two couplers 117, 119 are not star couplers such as those (130, 140) connected to the M-arm interferometer 120. This is due in part, to the fact that star couplers exhibit a high excess loss when the number of ports is small and when the entire Brillouin zone must be used by the particular application.
  • a 3 x 3 star coupler typically exhibits ⁇ 1.8dB excess loss as one goes from an outer-input port to an outer-output port.
  • the second coupler coupled to the three-arm interferometer HO was a star coupler, it would emit unwanted light to its higher diffraction orders into the WGR, causing crosstalk.
  • a preferred embodiment of my inventive structure employs a pattern of Y-branch couplers 116 comprising the first coupler 117 and a 3x3 directional coupler [or equivalently a 3x3 multimode interference (MMI) coupler] comprising the second coupler 119.
  • FIG. 2(a) there is shown a schematic of the three arm interferometer
  • couplers 217, 219 which comprise the three-arm interferometer 210, exhibit a linearly increasing length. That is to say, arm 210[2] is longer than arm 210[l] by an amount ⁇ Z and arm 210[3] is longer than arm 210[2] by an amount 2 ⁇ £.
  • couplers 217 and 219 which are shown individually in greater detail in FIG 2(b) and FIG 2(c)/(d), respectively. With initial reference to FIG 2(b), there is shown coupler 217 comprising a pattern of Y-branch couplers 216.
  • coupler 217 may be thought of as a series of 1x2 splitters - in this example - 4 (four), 1x2 splitters. Additionally, if the 1x2 splitters comprising coupler 217 are selectively segmented, a desirable split ratio in addition to very low loss may be realized. As can be greatly appreciated, a significant advantage of this 1x3 coupler design is that the splitting ratio is robust to wavelength, polarization, and fabrication changes.
  • the net splitting ratio directed into the three arms would be 25/50/25.
  • Such a splitting ratio would be quite desirable for the rectangular passband described herein. If, on the other hand, two - 1x2 splitters having a 66.7/33.3 splitting ratio were used in the two outer-most splitters, and two, 1x2 splitters having a 50/50 splitting ratio were used in the other two, the resulting net split would be 33.3/33.3/33.3, distributed evenly into the three arms 210[l], 210[2], and 210[3].
  • this coupler 219 has been shown as a simple, 3x3 directional coupler.
  • this coupler 219 has been shown as a simple, 3x3 directional coupler.
  • this coupler 219 has been shown as a simple, 3x3 directional coupler.
  • a simple, 3x3 directional coupler such as that shown in FIG. 2(c)
  • a 2-stage 3x3 directional coupler such as that shown in FIG. 2(d)
  • interferometer arm(s) 210[l] and 210[3] exhibit a series of consecutive "bends", resulting in a series of phase shifts between local eigenmodes.
  • each directional coupler could be replaced by an equivalent MMI coupler without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows the calculated demultiplexing spectra from port 220[l] (solid line), 220[2] (dotted line), and 220[3] (dashed line) of the interferometer shown in FIG. 2(a) when the 3x3 coupler is single-section [FIG. 6(a)] and two-section [FIG. 6(b)]. Because the relative phases between the outputs 220 [1] ... 220 [3] in the single-section coupler case are +/-90 degrees, all three passbands in FIG. 6(a) are not equally distributed in the free-spectral range.
  • the two-stage coupler is designed to have +/-120 degrees relative phase between the outputs 220.
  • all three passbands in FIG. 6(b) are equally distributed in the free-spectral range, as they would be if the 3x3 coupler was replaced by a true star coupler. This widens the passband in the device of FIG. 1.
  • the input/output matrix of a simple 3 x 3 directional coupler is:
  • is proportional to the length of the coupler.
  • is proportional to the length of the coupler.
  • ⁇ /2. This insures that an input into one of the outer ports of the coupler creates a symmetrical output on the other side of the coupler, thereby causing all wavelengths in the passband to have the same average path length through the device.
  • the pattern of the four Y-branch couplers used at the input of the three-arm interferometer described previously produces the same power distribution, and - at the same time - is insensitive to wavelength, polarization, and fabrication (WPF) changes. This power distribution works well also in the two-section 3x3 coupler case.
  • bounded coupler(s) Yet another consequence of bounded coupler(s) is that a demultiplexed image - emerging from the interferometer 117 of FIG. 1, say - spatially bounces back and forth with wavelength, instead of in a saw-tooth pattern as would be the case if a star coupler were used.
  • a 16-ch version of the multiplexer was designed and subsequently constructed. It was fabricated using silica-on-silicon waveguides with 0.80% core-cladding index contrast and a core height of 6.0 ⁇ m.
  • the device exhibited the following characteristics: a channel spacing of 100 GHz; 82 arms comprising the waveguide grating router (WGR); an operating grating order in the WGR of S3; a bend radius of 4.1 mm; output waveguide port widths of 11.5 ⁇ m, and grating-arm capture angle(s) of 0.13 rad in both star couplers.
  • WGR waveguide grating router
  • the 3 x 3 directional coupler (this design used the single-section design) employed included three waveguides, the outer two bending in with a radius of 10 mm to a center-to- center spacing of 8.2 ⁇ m. Additionally, the waveguides are initially 4.3 ⁇ m wide and widen to 4.8 ⁇ m once all three are parallel. A straight part of the waveguides is 820 ⁇ m long.
  • thermooptic phase shifters In order to wavelength-align the 3-arm interferometer to the WGR, it was necessary to drive the thermooptic phase shifters in the arms such that the longest arm was driven by 490 mW and the middle arm driven by 470 mW.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measured transmissivities for the 16 channels (same phase-shifter settings for all channels).
  • the worst-case insertion loss, including one connector, is 5.8 dB, and the worst-case peak-to-peak ripple in the passband is 1.0 dB.
  • the worst-case crosstalk ( ⁇ 30 GHz from channel centers) is 23.4 dB.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing the measured transmissivity and group delay for channel 9.
  • the loss is fiber-to-fiber, including one connector and single, arbitrary polarization.
  • the passband figure of merit increases even more.
  • the increased figure of merit which is characteristic of devices constructed according to the present invention should prove to be extremely useful for high spectral efficiency systems and highly cascaded devices such as wavelength add-drops.

Abstract

A low-loss rectangular-passband multiplexer including a three-arm interferometer coherently connected to a waveguide grating router (WGR), resulting in a passband substantially of type N=3, without intrinsic loss. The three-arm interferometer has a free-spectral range (FSR) substantially equal to the channel spacing and is connected to an M-arm interferometer having a much larger FSR. The three-arm interferometer includes three waveguides each exhibiting a linearly increasing path length optically connected to a 1x3 coupler and a 3x3 coupler. The 1x3 coupler may be constructed from a series of Y-branch couplers.

Description

RECTANGULAR-PASSBAND MULTIPLEXER
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field optical communications and in particular to a lossless rectangular-passband multiplexer having improved characteristics.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In communications networks employing wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM), it is advantageous for de/multiplexer(s) (hereinafter we use the general term "multiplexer") to exhibit rectangular passbands and zero chromatic dispersion as such characteristics enhance the "cascadability" of the multiplexer. One device which has shown its value as a multiplexer, is the well-known waveguide grating router (WGR). (See, for example, M.K.Smit, "New Focusing and Dispersive Planar Component Based On An Optical Phased Array," Electron. Lett, VoI 24, pp.385-386 (1988); H.Takahashi, et al, "Arrayed-Waveguide Grating For Wavelength Division Multi/Deplexer With Nanometer ikesolvXion " Electron.Lett. Vol. 26, pp. 87-88, (1990); and C.Dragone, "An N x N Optical Multiplexer Using A Planar Arrangement Of Two Star Couρlers,"ZEE£ Photon.Technol.Lett. Vol. 3, pp. 812-815, (1991)).
As known in the art, there are a number of ways to achieve rectangular passbands with WGRs. A first way involves the use of image mismatching, such as using a y-branch, multimode interference (MMI) coupler or short horn on the input waveguide or modifying the grating arm lengths and losses. (See, e.g., C.Dragone, "Frequency Routing Device Having A Wide And Substantially Flat Passband," United States Patent No. 5,412,744, (1995); M.R.Amersfoort, et al., "Passband Broadenting Of Integrated Arrayed Waveguide Filters Using Multimode Interference Couplers," Electron. Lett, VoI 32, pp.449-451, (1996); K.Okamato and A.Sugita, "Flat Spectral Response Arrayed-Waveguide Grating Multiplexer With Parabolic Waveguide Horns," Electron Lett. , Vol.32, pp.1661-1662, (1996); C.Dragone, "Efficient Techniques For Widening The Passband Of A Wavelength Router," J.Lightwave.Technol.I, Vol.16, pp.1895-1906, (Oct 1998); and A.Rigny, et al., "Multigrating Method For Flattened Spectral Response Wavelength Multi/Demultiplexer," Electron. Lett, Vol.33, pp.1701-1702, (1997)). Unfortunately however, image mismatching exhibits an intrinsic loss and the sharper the passband corners, the higher the loss. As can be appreciated, a rectangular passband may be viewed as N side-by-side first-order Gaussian passbands. Consequently, the transmissivity of a rectangular passband created by image mismatching must be <= I/ N.
A second way to achieve rectangular passbands with WGRs is to employ synchronized gratings which have two coherently connected interferometers having the same spatial dispersion but very different free-spectral ranges. (See, e.g., C.Dragone, "Frequency Routing Device Having a Wide And Substantially Flat Passband," United States Patent No. 5,488,680, (1996); G.H.B.Thompson, et al., "An Original Low-Loss And Pass-Band Flattened SiO2 on Si Planar Wavelength Demultiplexer," Optical Fiber Conference Digest, pp.77, (1998); and C.R.Doerr, et al., "Compact And Low-Loss Integrated box-Like Passband Multiplexer," IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett, Vol.15, pp.918-920, (July 2003)).
More recently, it has been shown that a multiplexer may be constructed from a two- arm interferometer coherently connected to a WGR, resulting in a passband of type 7V=2, with little or no intrinsic loss.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
I have developed a low-loss rectangular-passband multiplexer including a three-arm interferometer coherently connected to a Waveguide Grating Router (WGR), resulting in a passband substantially of type JV=3, without intrinsic loss. This innovative construction results in a demultiplexer that is particularly compact and easily constructed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be realized by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic of a low-loss, rectangular-passband multiplexer according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic of a three-arm interferometer and associated couplers as preferably used in the multiplexer of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measured transmissivities from 16 outputs of a packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention;
FIG. 4(a) is a graph showing the measured transmissivity and FIG 4(b) is a graph showing the group delay for channel 9 of the packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention; FIG. 5(a) is a graph showing the measured transmissivity and FIG 4(b) is a graph showing the group delay for both the packaged multiplexer constructed according to the present invention (solid line) and for a simulation of an improved design (dashed line); and
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the calculated demultiplexing spectra emitted by the interferometer of FIG 2(a) when the 3x3 coupler is single section FIG. 6(a) and two-section FIG 6(b).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
With initial reference to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic of my inventive low-loss rectangular multiplexer 100. More specifically, the multiplexer includes a three-arm interferometer 110, having a free-spectral range (FSR) substantially equal to the channel spacing, connected to an M-arm interferometer 120 with a much larger FSR. In a preferred embodiment, the M-arm interferometer 120 has M waveguides 120[I]...120[M], each with a linearly increasing path length, connected to two star couplers 130, 140. Those skilled in the art will quickly recognize the well-known M-arm interferometer
120 as a "frequency routing device" which operates as a multiplexer and demultiplexer of optical frequencies. Such frequency routing devices, are well known in the art and are described in more detail in United States Patent No. 5,488,680 which issued to Dragone on Jan. 30, 1996, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. As is known, the star coupler(s) 130, 140 each include a plurality of input ports connected to a plurality of output ports via a free space region. The plurality (M) of output ports (for coupler 130) are connected to the M waveguides, which provide a pre-determined amount of path length difference to a corresponding plurality (M) of input ports of star coupler 140. Preferably, these devices are formed from waveguides. The three-arm interferometer 110 comprises three waveguides HO[I], 110[2], 110[3], each exhibiting a linearly increasing path length. The three waveguides HO[I], 110[2], 110[3] are connected to two couplers 117, 119, one at each end of the waveguides.
Preferably, for the purposes of my invention, these two couplers 117, 119 are not star couplers such as those (130, 140) connected to the M-arm interferometer 120. This is due in part, to the fact that star couplers exhibit a high excess loss when the number of ports is small and when the entire Brillouin zone must be used by the particular application.
For example, a 3 x 3 star coupler typically exhibits ~1.8dB excess loss as one goes from an outer-input port to an outer-output port. Additionally, if the second coupler coupled to the three-arm interferometer HO was a star coupler, it would emit unwanted light to its higher diffraction orders into the WGR, causing crosstalk. As a result, a preferred embodiment of my inventive structure employs a pattern of Y-branch couplers 116 comprising the first coupler 117 and a 3x3 directional coupler [or equivalently a 3x3 multimode interference (MMI) coupler] comprising the second coupler 119. Turning now to FIG. 2(a), there is shown a schematic of the three arm interferometer
210 and couplers 217, 219, previously described. In particular the three arms 210[l], 210[2], and 210[3], which comprise the three-arm interferometer 210, exhibit a linearly increasing length. That is to say, arm 210[2] is longer than arm 210[l] by an amount ΔZ and arm 210[3] is longer than arm 210[2] by an amount 2Δ£. At opposite ends of the interferometer 210, are couplers 217 and 219 which are shown individually in greater detail in FIG 2(b) and FIG 2(c)/(d), respectively. With initial reference to FIG 2(b), there is shown coupler 217 comprising a pattern of Y-branch couplers 216. And while this is the preferred embodiment for coupler 217, it is noted that any low- loss 1x3 coupler will work. Viewed from another aspect, coupler 217 may be thought of as a series of 1x2 splitters - in this example - 4 (four), 1x2 splitters. Additionally, if the 1x2 splitters comprising coupler 217 are selectively segmented, a desirable split ratio in addition to very low loss may be realized. As can be greatly appreciated, a significant advantage of this 1x3 coupler design is that the splitting ratio is robust to wavelength, polarization, and fabrication changes.
More specifically, if the 1x2 splitters comprising coupler 217 are each 50/50 splitters, then the net splitting ratio directed into the three arms (210[I], 210[2], and 210[3]) would be 25/50/25. Such a splitting ratio would be quite desirable for the rectangular passband described herein. If, on the other hand, two - 1x2 splitters having a 66.7/33.3 splitting ratio were used in the two outer-most splitters, and two, 1x2 splitters having a 50/50 splitting ratio were used in the other two, the resulting net split would be 33.3/33.3/33.3, distributed evenly into the three arms 210[l], 210[2], and 210[3].
Turning our attention now to the other end of this three arm interferometer 210, and in particular coupler 219, we again note that this coupler 219 has been shown as a simple, 3x3 directional coupler. As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, if such a simple, 3x3 directional coupler is used such as that shown in FIG. 2(c), there would be a relatively small output from the center port 220 [2], thereby negatively impacting the total device loss and passband shape. However, by using a 2-stage 3x3 directional coupler such as that shown in FIG. 2(d), we may effectively emulate a 3x3 star coupler. More particularly, and with reference to that FIG. 2(d), one can observe that interferometer arm(s) 210[l] and 210[3] exhibit a series of consecutive "bends", resulting in a series of phase shifts between local eigenmodes. In particular, a first phase shift of ~35 degrees, followed by one of substantially -270 (i.e., -90) degrees, followed by another of substantially -90 degrees, wherein such phases may be modulo 360 degrees, m this manner, the output of the 2-stage 3x3 coupler so constructed would be substantially equal in transmissivity across the three outputs 220 [1], 220 [2], and 220[3]. Note that each directional coupler could be replaced by an equivalent MMI coupler without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Another way to understand the operation of the single- and two-stage 3x3 couplers is with reference to FIG. 6. FIG 6 shows the calculated demultiplexing spectra from port 220[l] (solid line), 220[2] (dotted line), and 220[3] (dashed line) of the interferometer shown in FIG. 2(a) when the 3x3 coupler is single-section [FIG. 6(a)] and two-section [FIG. 6(b)]. Because the relative phases between the outputs 220 [1] ... 220 [3] in the single-section coupler case are +/-90 degrees, all three passbands in FIG. 6(a) are not equally distributed in the free-spectral range. This results in a narrower passband when used in the device of FIG. 1. The two-stage coupler is designed to have +/-120 degrees relative phase between the outputs 220. Thus all three passbands in FIG. 6(b) are equally distributed in the free-spectral range, as they would be if the 3x3 coupler was replaced by a true star coupler. This widens the passband in the device of FIG. 1.
At this point, it is useful to analyze the operation of the 3 x 3 directional coupler. As is known, the input/output matrix of a simple 3 x 3 directional coupler is:
Figure imgf000006_0001
where Θ is proportional to the length of the coupler. In order to have zero chromatic dispersion in the passband, Θ= π/2. This insures that an input into one of the outer ports of the coupler creates a symmetrical output on the other side of the coupler, thereby causing all wavelengths in the passband to have the same average path length through the device. The power distribution at the output of a 3 x 3 coupler with Θ= π/2 when launching into an outer waveguide is 1A, Vz, 1A, respectively. The pattern of the four Y-branch couplers used at the input of the three-arm interferometer described previously produces the same power distribution, and - at the same time - is insensitive to wavelength, polarization, and fabrication (WPF) changes. This power distribution works well also in the two-section 3x3 coupler case.
Advantageously such mode matching insures ~100% transmissivity for the passband edges. If, on the other hand, we made the 1 x 3 coupler using three coupled waveguides
(directional or MMI coupler) instead of the more-desirable Y-branch couplers, deviation from the desired power distribution in the interferometer arms due to small WPF changes in the coupler would have resulted in a high passband ripple.
As can be appreciated - and in sharp contrast to star couplers - directional (and MMI) couplers are "bounded", consequently the phase difference between the outputs of such couplers is not necessarily monotonic. One can show however, that for a P x P directional (or MMI) coupler, the phase changes monotonically from output to output when launching into a single input only when P < 4. Consequently the maximum number of arms we can have in the interferometer connected to the WGR - if we want its path-length difference to monotonically increase - is three (3).
One can quickly appreciate the effect of this number-of-arms limitation if, for example, we tried to expand the present design to include a 4-arm interferometer using a 4 x
4 directional coupler. To construct such a device, the distribution of the arm lengths in the 4- arm interferometer would have to be in the ratio 0:2:1:3, which — as can be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art - cannot be realized compactly.
Yet another consequence of bounded coupler(s) is that a demultiplexed image - emerging from the interferometer 117 of FIG. 1, say - spatially bounces back and forth with wavelength, instead of in a saw-tooth pattern as would be the case if a star coupler were used.
This results in a passband that does not have as high a figure of merit (1-dB passband width divided by 20-dB passband width) as an N=P passband. Notwithstanding these limitations of bounded couplers, the multi-stage 3 χ 3 directional coupler that is employed here can achieve the desired sawtooth pattern.
A 16-ch version of the multiplexer was designed and subsequently constructed. It was fabricated using silica-on-silicon waveguides with 0.80% core-cladding index contrast and a core height of 6.0 μm. The device exhibited the following characteristics: a channel spacing of 100 GHz; 82 arms comprising the waveguide grating router (WGR); an operating grating order in the WGR of S3; a bend radius of 4.1 mm; output waveguide port widths of 11.5 μm, and grating-arm capture angle(s) of 0.13 rad in both star couplers.
The 3 x 3 directional coupler (this design used the single-section design) employed included three waveguides, the outer two bending in with a radius of 10 mm to a center-to- center spacing of 8.2 μm. Additionally, the waveguides are initially 4.3 μm wide and widen to 4.8 μm once all three are parallel. A straight part of the waveguides is 820 μm long.
A chip was subsequently diced out from a fabricated wafer, a fiber ribbon assembly was secured to the left-hand facet of the chip, and the assembly subsequently placed in a protective package. In operation, the polarization-dependent wavelength shift exhibited is 26 pm. In order to wavelength-align the 3-arm interferometer to the WGR, it was necessary to drive the thermooptic phase shifters in the arms such that the longest arm was driven by 490 mW and the middle arm driven by 470 mW.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the measured transmissivities for the 16 channels (same phase-shifter settings for all channels). The worst-case insertion loss, including one connector, is 5.8 dB, and the worst-case peak-to-peak ripple in the passband is 1.0 dB. The worst-case crosstalk (±30 GHz from channel centers) is 23.4 dB. The passband figure of merit is 0.56 nm / 0.96 run = 0.58. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the measured transmissivity and group delay for channel 9. The loss is fiber-to-fiber, including one connector and single, arbitrary polarization.
To help understand these performance characteristics, we simulated the device using eigenmode analysis and the sine beam propagation method. Using the design parameters of the demonstrated device and making the coupling in the 3 χ 3 coupler significantly weaker than expected (-50% of optimum), the solid curve of FIG. 5 was obtained. As can be readily appreciated, the close match between simulation and experiment means that the coupling in the 3 x 3 directional coupler is likely too weak with these preliminary devices. This is probably due to pattern-dependent etching causing the central waveguide to be narrower than the outer ones, resulting in propagation constant mismatch among the three waveguides.
When we reran the simulation with the correct coupler strength, and we tweaked the design by changing the grating arm number to 88, the grating inlet fill angle to 0.155 rad in both star couplers, and the output waveguide widths to 14.5 μm, the dashed curve of FIG. 5 was obtained. As one can see, the loss decreased by ~2 dB, the ripple and chromatic dispersion disappeared, and the crosstalk improved by > 7 dB. This improved passband has a figure of merit of 0.59. This can be favorably compared to alternative multiplexers consisting of a two-arm interferometer synchronized to a WGR, which had a figure of merit of 0.45. If we change the 3x3 coupler to the two-section design of Fig. 2(d), the passband figure of merit increases even more. As can be appreciated, the increased figure of merit which is characteristic of devices constructed according to the present invention should prove to be extremely useful for high spectral efficiency systems and highly cascaded devices such as wavelength add-drops.
At this point, while we have discussed and described our invention using some specific examples, those skilled in the art will recognize that our teachings are not so limited. Accordingly, our invention should be only limited by the scope of the claims attached hereto.

Claims

Claims:
1. An optical apparatus comprising: a 1x3 optical coupler; a 3-arm interferometer, optically connected to the 1x3 coupler, wherein the 3-arms exhibit a linearly increasing path length; and a 3x3 coupler, optically connected to the interferometer, said 3x3 coupler being one selected from the group consisting of: directional coupler; or multimode interference (MMI) coupler.
2. The optical apparatus of claim 1 wherein said 1x3 optical coupler comprises an arrangement of Y-branch couplers.
3. The optical apparatus of claim 1 wherein said 3x3 coupler is a single-stage coupler, and exhibits a substantially 90 degree phase shift between local eigenmodes.
4. The optical apparatus of claim 1 wherein said 3x3 coupler is a two-stage coupler, and exhibits phase shifts of substantially, -35 degrees, ~270 degrees, and ~90 degrees, or a modulo 360 degrees thereof.
5. The optical apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: an M-arm interferometer, optically connected to the 3x3 coupler, wherein the 3-arm interferometer exhibits a free spectral range substantially equal to a channel spacing and the M-arm interferometer exhibits a free spectral range that is substantially greater (») then the free spectral range of the 3-arm interferometer.
6. The optical apparatus of claim 5 wherein the M-arm(s) of the M-arm interferometer exhibits a linearly increasing path length.
7. The optical apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first arm of the 3-arm interferometer exhibits a path length L, the second arm of the 3-arm interferometer exhibits a path length greater than the first arm by an amount substantially equal to AL and the third arm of the 3-arm interferometer exhibits a path length greater than the second arm by an amount substantially equal to 2AL.
PCT/US2006/040675 2005-10-18 2006-10-18 Retangular-passband multiplexer WO2007047739A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06836366A EP1938129B1 (en) 2005-10-18 2006-10-18 Rectangular-passband multiplexer
JP2008536760A JP5106405B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2006-10-18 Rectangular passband multiplexer
AT06836366T ATE513237T1 (en) 2005-10-18 2006-10-18 MULTIPLEXER WITH RECTANGULAR PASSBAND

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/163,422 2005-10-18
US11/163,422 US7433560B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2005-10-18 Rectangular-passband multiplexer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007047739A1 true WO2007047739A1 (en) 2007-04-26

Family

ID=37693107

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/040675 WO2007047739A1 (en) 2005-10-18 2006-10-18 Retangular-passband multiplexer

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7433560B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1938129B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5106405B2 (en)
CN (1) CN101292184A (en)
AT (1) ATE513237T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2007047739A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7715671B2 (en) * 2006-05-19 2010-05-11 Jds Uniphase Corporation Asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer having a reduced drive voltage coupled to a compact low-loss arrayed waveguide grating
JP5275634B2 (en) * 2008-01-17 2013-08-28 古河電気工業株式会社 Optical integrated device and optical integrated device manufacturing method
US8737779B2 (en) * 2009-09-18 2014-05-27 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Optical wavelength multi/demultiplexer
JP5713378B2 (en) * 2009-11-20 2015-05-07 国立大学法人九州大学 Waveguide type optical filter and semiconductor laser
US9819435B2 (en) * 2010-08-26 2017-11-14 Cornell University Optical apparatus, method, and applications
JP6112601B2 (en) * 2013-01-10 2017-04-12 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 Gaschromic light control member.
CN105227233B (en) * 2014-05-30 2017-11-03 北京邮电大学 The interior optical signal-to-noise ratio monitoring method of band based on asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer in parallel
JP7206528B2 (en) 2019-08-01 2023-01-18 日本電信電話株式会社 Optical wavelength multiplexing/demultiplexing circuit

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0702253A2 (en) * 1994-08-24 1996-03-20 AT&T Corp. Frequency routing device having a wide and substantially flat passband
US20040179769A1 (en) * 2001-01-05 2004-09-16 Dragone Corrado P. Broadband optical switching arrangements with very low crosstalk
WO2006084480A1 (en) * 2005-02-10 2006-08-17 Pirelli & C. S.P.A. Optical band splitter/combiner device comprising a three-arms interferometer

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0434854B1 (en) * 1989-12-23 1993-08-04 Dr. Johannes Heidenhain GmbH Device with at least one optical fibre coupler
DE69523104T2 (en) * 1994-02-11 2002-06-06 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv PHASE COUPLED OPTICAL DEVICE
US6421478B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2002-07-16 Jds Fitel Inc. Tapered MMI coupler
US6587615B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2003-07-01 Jds Fitel Inc. Wavelength multiplexer-demultiplexer having a wide flat response within the spectral passband
US6289147B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2001-09-11 Bbv Design Bv Passband flattening of a phasar

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0702253A2 (en) * 1994-08-24 1996-03-20 AT&T Corp. Frequency routing device having a wide and substantially flat passband
US20040179769A1 (en) * 2001-01-05 2004-09-16 Dragone Corrado P. Broadband optical switching arrangements with very low crosstalk
WO2006084480A1 (en) * 2005-02-10 2006-08-17 Pirelli & C. S.P.A. Optical band splitter/combiner device comprising a three-arms interferometer

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CAPPUZZO M A ET AL: "Low-Loss Rectangular-Passband Multiplexer Consisting of a Waveguide Grating Router Synchronized to a Three-Arm Interferometer", IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, PISCATAWAY, NJ, US, vol. 17, no. 11, November 2005 (2005-11-01), pages 2334 - 2336, XP011141397, ISSN: 1041-1135 *
DOERR C R ET AL: "Compact and low-loss integrated flat-top passband demux", OPTICAL COMMUNICATION, 2001. ECOC '01. 27TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SEPT. 30 - OCT. 4, 2001, PISCATAWAY, NJ, USA,IEEE, vol. 6, 30 September 2001 (2001-09-30), pages 24 - 25, XP010582858, ISBN: 0-7803-6705-7 *
DOERR C R ET AL: "Wideband arrayed waveguide grating with three low-loss maxima per passband", IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS IEEE USA, vol. 18, no. 21, 1 November 2006 (2006-11-01), pages 2308 - 2310, XP002418971, ISSN: 1041-1135 *
MADSEN C K: "A Multiport Frequency Band Selector with Inherently Low Loss, Flat Passbands, and Low Crosstalk", IEEE PHOTONICS TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, PISCATAWAY, NJ, US, vol. 10, no. 12, December 1998 (1998-12-01), XP011046371, ISSN: 1041-1135 *
QI JIE WANG ET AL: "Design of 100/300 GHz optical interleaver with IIR architectures", OPTICS EXPRESS OPT. SOC. AMERICA USA, vol. 13, no. 7, 4 April 2005 (2005-04-04), XP002418969, ISSN: 1094-4087 *
YAO SHOUQUAN ET AL: "Theoretical analysis and experiments of 3 arm interferometric DWDM", ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA SCIENCE PRESS CHINA, vol. 29, no. 4, April 2000 (2000-04-01), pages 339 - 343, XP009078497, ISSN: 1004-4213 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101292184A (en) 2008-10-22
JP2009511997A (en) 2009-03-19
EP1938129B1 (en) 2011-06-15
US7433560B2 (en) 2008-10-07
JP5106405B2 (en) 2012-12-26
ATE513237T1 (en) 2011-07-15
EP1938129A1 (en) 2008-07-02
US20070086699A1 (en) 2007-04-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1938129B1 (en) Rectangular-passband multiplexer
EP0901024B1 (en) Wavelength-division-multiplexing cross-connect using angular dispersive elements and phase shifters
US6263127B1 (en) Free-space/arrayed-waveguide router
US6266464B1 (en) Optical arrayed waveguide grating devices
JP5117104B2 (en) Asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer with reduced drive voltage coupled to a small low-loss arrayed-waveguide grating
US6141467A (en) Wavelength-division-multiplexing programmable add/drop using interleave-chirped waveguide grating router
EP0881512A2 (en) Signal router with coupling of multiple waveguide modes for providing a shaped multi-channel radiation pattern
WO2001033270A1 (en) Phasar with flattened pass-band
CN1829132B (en) Wavelength-selective switch, optical network node and method for manufacturing the wavelength-selective switch
Shi et al. Silicon CWDM demultiplexers using contra-directional couplers
Doerr Proposed WDM cross connect using a planar arrangement of waveguide grating routers and phase shifters
EP3078997B1 (en) Photonic integrated device
CN111025468B (en) Mode multiplexing demultiplexer, mode demultiplexing method and mode multiplexing method
EP1020740B1 (en) Optical device having equal length waveguide paths
Doerr et al. Compact and low-loss manner of waveguide grating router passband flattening and demonstration in a 64-channel blocker/multiplexer
US7697801B2 (en) Wavelength selective switch
US6690852B2 (en) Optical multiplexer/demultiplexer
JP4934625B2 (en) PLC type variable dispersion compensator
Doerr et al. Low-loss rectangular-passband multiplexer consisting of a waveguide grating router synchronized to a three-arm interferometer
Bidnyk et al. Configurable coarse wavelength division demultiplexers based on planar reflective gratings
Cowin et al. Polymeric wavelength division multiplexer
Li Planar waveguide WDM technology: From components to systems
Tsao et al. 64x64 silicon-on-insulator arrayed waveguide grating mux/demux for optical interconnections
Doerr et al. Planar lightwave circuit eight-channel CWDM multiplexer
Bhatnagar et al. Variable-width arrayed waveguide demultiplexer on X-cut lithium niobate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200680038498.4

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006836366

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1777/CHENP/2008

Country of ref document: IN

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2008536760

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE