WO2008103059A1 - Flux control system for active voltage conditioning - Google Patents

Flux control system for active voltage conditioning Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008103059A1
WO2008103059A1 PCT/NZ2008/000027 NZ2008000027W WO2008103059A1 WO 2008103059 A1 WO2008103059 A1 WO 2008103059A1 NZ 2008000027 W NZ2008000027 W NZ 2008000027W WO 2008103059 A1 WO2008103059 A1 WO 2008103059A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
flux
voltage
alpha
beta
term
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/NZ2008/000027
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Simon James Walton
Original Assignee
Abb Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Abb Limited filed Critical Abb Limited
Priority to JP2009550823A priority Critical patent/JP5108031B2/en
Priority to KR1020097017417A priority patent/KR101463636B1/en
Priority to EP08724017.2A priority patent/EP2113140B1/en
Priority to CN2008800055990A priority patent/CN101657945B/en
Publication of WO2008103059A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008103059A1/en
Priority to US12/544,485 priority patent/US8143747B2/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/18Arrangements for adjusting, eliminating or compensating reactive power in networks
    • H02J3/1807Arrangements for adjusting, eliminating or compensating reactive power in networks using series compensators
    • H02J3/1814Arrangements for adjusting, eliminating or compensating reactive power in networks using series compensators wherein al least one reactive element is actively controlled by a bridge converter, e.g. unified power flow controllers [UPFC]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/04Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions for transformers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E40/00Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y02E40/10Flexible AC transmission systems [FACTS]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to active voltage conditioning of a three-phase mains supply.
  • Disturbance in utility and mains supply voltages is a major problem for industrial and commercial users that depend on electronic equipment for factory and office automation.
  • Voltage sags have been identified as being one of the most commonly occurring disturbances. Mains voltage sags of sufficient magnitude can cause electrical or electronic equipment to malfunction or shut down, which can be very cosdy, especially in continuous process applications.
  • One known solution to this problem is to install onsite active voltage conditioning units that are arranged to detect voltage disturbances or sags in the supply and inject a corrective voltage into the supply to compensate and ensure reliability.
  • a typical active voltage conditioner configuration is shown in Figure 1.
  • the active voltage conditioner 1 is connected to die output of a local distribution transformer 3 that distributes a three-phase mains supply 5.
  • the active voltage conditioner 1 comprises a three-phase voltage source inverter 7, bypass circuit 9, and an injection transformer 8 connected in a series between the incoming main supply from the distribution transformer 3 and the load 4.
  • a control system of the active voltage conditioner monitors the incoming supply voltage and when it deviates from the nominal voltage level it inserts an appropriate compensating voltage using the inverter 7 and series injection transformer 8 thereby regulating the load voltage 4 to the nominal value, thus eliminating voltage disturbances from the mains supply affecting the load.
  • Energy for the compensating voltage is sourced from a three-phase rectifier connected to the input supply, direcdy or via a transformer or autotransformer, and which can supply or remove power from the inverter 7 as required.
  • the rectifier controls power flow in and out of the input supply from the distribution transformer 3 in such a way as to hold the inverter 7 input direct current (DC) bus supply at a constant value. In diis way, the system automatically acts to provide energy balance drawing extra power from the input supply when required or supplying it back to the input supply if the voltage correction results in excess regenerated energy.
  • the control system typically utilises a digital signal processor (DSP) microprocessor-based system that is arranged to calculate any vectorial voltage differences from a perfect balanced and regulated three-phase supply, and then uses these differences to calculate and create appropriate pulse width modulated (PWM) waveforms to control the inverter 7 to insert an appropriate compensating voltage in both phase and magnitude on individual phases via the serious injection transformer 8.
  • DSP digital signal processor
  • the DSP is typically arranged to sample die incoming mains supply and calculate the correction or compensation voltage to be applied through the injection transformer 8 to restore the output to a regulated, balanced three phase sinusoidal supply, or as close as possible to this within the correction capabilities of the system.
  • the three phase voltages of the mains supply are measured in real time and then transformed into the stationary reference frame where they are represented as alpha and beta terms. This is an application of standard vector control principals well known in the art.
  • the DSP then calculates the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, necessary to bring the utility supply back to die set nominal level.
  • the DSP then utilises Va and Vb to generate the PWM waveforms for controlling the inverter 7 to generate and apply the appropriate compensation voltage(s) to the primary terminals of the injection transformer 8.
  • the present invention broadly consists in a flux control system for a three- phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, the flux control system being arranged to modify the compensation voltage(s) to be applied to the primary terminals of the injection transformer so as to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: a magnetic flux model module or modules that are arranged to calculate the core flux level(s) of the injection transformer based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; a flux offset module or modules that are arranged to apply a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the core flux level(s) calculated by the flux model module or modules and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and a peak flux module or modules that are arranged to apply a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.
  • the or each magnetic flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the compensation voltage(s) and output core flux level(s), the core flux level(s) being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term.
  • the or each flux offset module is arranged to fed the calculated core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term.
  • the or each peak flux module comprises: a dead zone modifier that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term, the peak flux module being arranged to fed the core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply core flux level(s) by the amplified limiter term.
  • the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented collectively in the stationary reference frame.
  • the compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in Cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms, or alternatively as polar co-ordinates.
  • the voltage compensation and flux level terms may be described in terms of a rotating reference frame (DQ representation).
  • the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) may be represented individually in the time domain using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes.
  • the present invention broadly consists in a method of controlling the core flux level(s) of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, comprising the steps of: receiving the compensation voltage(s); calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the calculated core flux level(s) and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.
  • the step of calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) comprises the steps of: integrating the compensation voltage(s) to generate core flux level(s); amplifying the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
  • the step of applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: amplifying the calculated core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
  • the step of applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero kmiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar; multiplying the calculated core flux level(s) by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
  • the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented collectively in the stationary reference frame.
  • the compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms, or alternatively as polar co-ordinates.
  • the voltage compensation and flux level terms may be described in terms of a rotating reference frame (DQ representation).
  • the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) may be represented individually in the time domain using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes.
  • the present invention broadly consists in a flux control system for a three- phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, the flux control system being arranged to modify the alpha and beta terms to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: alpha and beta flux control subsystems that are arranged to receive the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and output modified compensation terms, each subsystem comprising: a flux model module that is arranged to generate an alpha or beta flux term based on the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; and a flux offset module that is arranged to apply a first modification to the alpha or beta voltage compensation term based on the alpha or beta flux term generated by the flux model module and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; and a peak flux limiter that is arranged to calculate a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the
  • each flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and output an alpha or beta flux term, the alpha or beta flux term being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the intrinsic time constant term.
  • each flux offset module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the extrinsic time constant term.
  • the peak flux limiter comprises: a peak flux level module that is arranged to calculate a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms from the alpha and beta flux control subsystems; a dead zone modifier that receives the calculated peak flux level representation and that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the peak flux level representation lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term.
  • each peak flux module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply the alpha or beta flux term by the amplified limiter term from the peak flux limiter.
  • the present invention broadly consists in a method of controlling the core flux of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, comprising the steps of: receiving the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms; modelling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms based on the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; applying a first modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; calculating a peak flux level representation in the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms and generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to a preset positive flux threshold; and applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and the
  • the step of modelling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms comprises the steps of: integrating the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms to generate respective alpha and beta flux terms; amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into thek respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
  • the step of applying a first modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
  • the step of generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to the preset positive flux threshold comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated peak flux level representation lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a nonzero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar.
  • the step of applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: multiplying the alpha and beta flux terms by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
  • the present invention broadly consists in a computer program or computer software that comprises computer instructions for carrying out the system or method steps described in respect of any one of the first- fourth aspects of the invention.
  • the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply.
  • the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected, directly or indirectly, to the output of a three-phase inverter.
  • the calculated compensation voltage(s) or the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame are utilised to generate corresponding pulse width modulated (PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
  • PWM pulse width modulated
  • the active voltage conditioner is online in that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
  • the flux control system may be a subsystem of the overall control system of the active voltage conditioner or may alternatively be a separate control module. It will be appreciated that the flux control system and associated method may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination thereof. By way of example, the flux control system and associated method may be implemented in computer software for a microprocessor, microcontroller, or any other programmable device.
  • the terms "alpha” and “beta” are intended to represent cartesian co-ordinates of three- phase characteristics, such as voltage and flux levels, in the stationary reference frame.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a known active voltage conditioner configuration for regulating a three-phase mains supply
  • Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a preferred form flux control system of the invention, and more specifically showing alpha and beta flux control subsystems and a peak flux limiter;
  • Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of the alpha flux control subsystem of the flux control system
  • Figure 4 shows a schematic diagram of the peak flux limiter of the flux control system.
  • the preferred form flux control system and associated method is for online three-phase active voltage conditioners that utilise an injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply in a manner previously described.
  • the flux control system is employed to modify the calculated correction or compensation voltages to be applied to the primary terminals of the injection transformer so as to achieve optimal performance in regulating the mains supply but also ensuring that the core flux of the injection transformer is controlled and limited so as to avoid magnetic saturation during operation that may lead to loss of system control and unreliable voltage conditioning.
  • the preferred form flux control system is arranged to continuously predict or estimate the magnitude and angular position of the magnetic flux of the core of the injection transformer based on the calculated compensation voltage to be applied to the primary terminals of the transformer.
  • the flux control system modifies the magnitude and phase of the calculated compensation voltage, based on the predicted magnitude and angular position of the flux, so as to maximise the application of applied voltage without exceeding a maximum preset flux level or magnitude that will cause magnetic saturation of the transformer of the core.
  • control system of an active voltage conditioner typically calculates, in the stationary reference frame, alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, necessary to bring the three-phase mains supply back to the set nominal level.
  • the control system then utilises Va and Vb to generate PWM waveforms for controlling a three-phase inverter to generate and apply appropriate compensation voltage(s) to the primary terminals of the injection transformer to correct or regulate each of the individual phases.
  • the preferred form flux control system operates as a subsystem of the control system of the active voltage conditioner and is arranged to model, predict or calculate the core flux levels of the injection transformer based on Va and Vb, and also an intrinsic such as an intrinsic time constant term, specific to the injection transformer.
  • the flux control system then applies a first modification to Va and Vb to gradually reduce any flux offset in the core of the injection transformer and, if necessary, a second modification to Va and Vb to ensure the peak core flux level remains below a predetermined positive threshold.
  • the modified alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Voa and Vob, are then utilised by the remainder of the control system to generate the PWM signals or waveforms for controlling the inverter to apply the appropriate compensation voltages to the primary terminals of the injection transformer for conditioning and regulating the mains supply without driving the injection transformer into magnetic saturation.
  • the preferred form flux control system 10 receives the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, as inputs and outputs the modified alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Voa and Vob.
  • Va and Vb are independently modified by separate alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems of the flux control system 10.
  • the alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems are identical in configuration and by way of example Figure 3 shows the alpha flux control subsystem 12 that will be described in more detail below.
  • the alpha flux control subsystem 12 receives Va and a limiter term Wt from a peak flux limiter 13 of the flux control system at its input ports 16 and 18 respectively and outputs Voa and an alpha flux term ⁇ a at its output ports 20 and 22 respectively.
  • the alpha flux control subsystem 12 comprises a flux model module 24 that is arranged to generate the alpha flux term ⁇ a based on the alpha voltage compensation term Va and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer characteristics.
  • die flux model module 24 comprises an integrator 26 that is arranged to integrate Va and output ⁇ a.
  • the flux model module 24 is arranged to feed ⁇ a back into the input of the integrator 26 via negative feedback loop 28 that comprises an amplifier 30 that is arranged to amplify ⁇ a by an intrinsic time constant term Ri.
  • the intrinsic time constant term Ri is selected based on the characteristics of the injection transformer and in particular represents the actual transformer resistance R over magnitising inductance L.
  • the integrator 26 may, for example, be a discrete-time integrator modelled in the Z domain or any other integration module could alternatively be utilised if desired.
  • the alpha flux control subsystem 12 also comprises a flux offset module 32 that is arranged to apply a first modification to Va based on ⁇ a generated by the flux model module 24 and an extrinsic characteristic(s), such as an extrinsic time constant term Rx calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer.
  • the flux offset module 32 is arranged to feed ⁇ a back into Va via a negative feedback loop 34 that comprises an amplifier 36 that is arranged to amplify ⁇ a via the extrinsic time constant term Rx.
  • the extrinsic time constant term Rx does not model the actual injection transformer but instead produces a small voltage across die primary of the injection transformer of the correct phase and magnitude to reset any flux offset to substantially zero gradually over time.
  • the intrinsic time constant term Ri of the flux model module 24 is adjusted to match the actual injection transformer characteristics whereas the extrinsic time constant term Rx of the flux offset module 32 is adjusted to reset any flux offset in a reasonable time without creating significant distortion in the compensating voltage output by the active voltage conditioner.
  • the alpha flux control system 12 also comprises a peak flux module 38 that is arranged to apply a second modification to Va based on ⁇ a generated by the flux model module 24 and a limiter term Wt generated by peak flux limiter 13 to prevent the peak flux level in the core of the injection transformer from exceeding a preset positive flux threshold.
  • the peak flux module 38 is arranged to feed ⁇ a back into Va via a negative feedback loop 40 that comprises a multiplier 42 that is arranged to multiply ⁇ a by Wt from the peak flux limiter 13.
  • the peak flux limiter 13 receives ⁇ a and ⁇ b from the alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems as inputs, ⁇ a and ⁇ b represent the core flux levels of the injection transformer in the stationary reference frame, ⁇ a and ⁇ b are passed through a peak flux level module 44 that is arranged to calculate a value ⁇ p that represents or is a function of the peak flux level of the core of the injection transformer.
  • the value ⁇ p calculated by the module 44 is the square of the peak flux level of the core of the injection transformer.
  • the module 44 is arranged to calculate the square of the magnitude or norm of the vector resulting from the ⁇ a and ⁇ b terms through conventional vectorial calculation.
  • the vector magnitude or norm involves taking the square root of the sum of the squares of the orthogonal vector ⁇ a and ⁇ b terms.
  • the module 44 may be arranged to calculate and output a value ⁇ p that represents the vector norm or magnitude of the peak flux level itself.
  • it is less computationally intensive to use the square of the vector norm or magnitude of the peak flux level for ⁇ p as shown in Figure 4. This also has the benefit of emphasizing large excursions in flux magnitude.
  • any other non-negative non-linear function of the vector norm or magnitude could be calculated and output as the value ⁇ p if desired.
  • the output ⁇ p of the peak flux level module 44 is applied to a dead zone modifier 46 that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if ⁇ p lies within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term, the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the ⁇ p lies outside the range, ie the amount by which it exceeds the positive flux threshold.
  • the limiter term increases linearly in accordance with the amount by which ⁇ p lies outside the range.
  • the positive threshold is determined by the characteristics of the injection transformer and the peak flux levels beyond which magnetic saturation will occur.
  • the limiter term is then amplified by a sealer Ks at amplifier 48 to generate the limiter term output Wt.
  • the flux control system operates in such a way that under normal steady-state operating conditions the flux of the injection transformer is modelled in real time and any flux offset is gradually reset to zero or close to it by applying suitable scaled and aligned voltage offsets (the first modification). Further, should a voltage compensation change be demanded that will cause the peak transformer flux to go above a level defined in the dead zone limit, offset voltages will be produced which limit the actual voltages generated by the inverter to prevent significant flux excursions (the second modification). In this way, the online active voltage conditioner will operate to produce the fastest voltage adjustments allowable without resultant problematic injection transformer magnetic saturation.
  • the flux control system may be implemented as a subsystem within the control system of an active voltage conditioner.
  • the flux control system or algorithm(s) may be implemented as computer software or a computer program that runs on a microprocessor, microcontroller or other programmable device that is part of the control system.
  • the flux control system may be in the form of an independent module embedded in hardware or the like and which co-operates with the control system.
  • the preferred form flux control system is performed in the stationary reference frame, using alpha and beta terms. Transformation between three-phase representation in the time domain and representation in the stationary reference frame as alpha and beta terms is well known in the art.
  • the alpha and beta terms are cartesian co-ordinates in the stationary reference frame and it will be appreciated that the flux control system could alternatively be modified to operate in polar co-ordinates or in any other suitable format. Further, it will be appreciated that the flux control system may be implemented or performed in other domains. For example, it will be appreciated that the flux control system need not necessarily be implemented in the stationary reference frame and that it could be modified to operate in a rotating reference frame or using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes.
  • the flux control system may be arranged to: estimate the core flux level in the injection transformer based on the voltage to be applied to the primary terminals for that phase and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the transformer; modify the voltage to be applied based on the estimated flux level and an extrinsic time constant term to gradually reduce any flux offset to substantially zero; and modify the voltage to be applied to prevent peak flux levels from moving outside a preset range.
  • the modelling of the flux levels in the core of the injection transformer and the modifications (flux offset modification and peak flux modification) to the voltages to be applied to the injection transformer for the three phases may be performed in any suitable domain and format, for example on a collective basis (stationary reference frame) or individually phase by phase.

Abstract

A flux control system (10) for a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage to a mains supply. The flux control system (10) being arranged to modify the compensation voltage (Va,Vb) to be applied to the primary terminals of the injection transformer so as to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer. The flux control system (10) comprises magnetic flux model modules (24) that are arranged to calculate the core flux level(s) of the injection transformer, flux offset modules (32) that are arranged to apply a first modification to the compensation voltage to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer, and peak flux modules (38) that are arranged to apply a second modification to the compensation voltage to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.

Description

FLUX CONTROL SYSTEM FOR ACTIVE VOLTAGE CONDITIONING
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to active voltage conditioning of a three-phase mains supply.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
Disturbance in utility and mains supply voltages is a major problem for industrial and commercial users that depend on electronic equipment for factory and office automation.
Voltage sags have been identified as being one of the most commonly occurring disturbances. Mains voltage sags of sufficient magnitude can cause electrical or electronic equipment to malfunction or shut down, which can be very cosdy, especially in continuous process applications. One known solution to this problem is to install onsite active voltage conditioning units that are arranged to detect voltage disturbances or sags in the supply and inject a corrective voltage into the supply to compensate and ensure reliability.
A typical active voltage conditioner configuration is shown in Figure 1. The active voltage conditioner 1 is connected to die output of a local distribution transformer 3 that distributes a three-phase mains supply 5. The active voltage conditioner 1 comprises a three-phase voltage source inverter 7, bypass circuit 9, and an injection transformer 8 connected in a series between the incoming main supply from the distribution transformer 3 and the load 4. A control system of the active voltage conditioner monitors the incoming supply voltage and when it deviates from the nominal voltage level it inserts an appropriate compensating voltage using the inverter 7 and series injection transformer 8 thereby regulating the load voltage 4 to the nominal value, thus eliminating voltage disturbances from the mains supply affecting the load. Energy for the compensating voltage is sourced from a three-phase rectifier connected to the input supply, direcdy or via a transformer or autotransformer, and which can supply or remove power from the inverter 7 as required. The rectifier controls power flow in and out of the input supply from the distribution transformer 3 in such a way as to hold the inverter 7 input direct current (DC) bus supply at a constant value. In diis way, the system automatically acts to provide energy balance drawing extra power from the input supply when required or supplying it back to the input supply if the voltage correction results in excess regenerated energy.
The control system typically utilises a digital signal processor (DSP) microprocessor-based system that is arranged to calculate any vectorial voltage differences from a perfect balanced and regulated three-phase supply, and then uses these differences to calculate and create appropriate pulse width modulated (PWM) waveforms to control the inverter 7 to insert an appropriate compensating voltage in both phase and magnitude on individual phases via the serious injection transformer 8. In particular, the DSP is typically arranged to sample die incoming mains supply and calculate the correction or compensation voltage to be applied through the injection transformer 8 to restore the output to a regulated, balanced three phase sinusoidal supply, or as close as possible to this within the correction capabilities of the system. Typically, the three phase voltages of the mains supply are measured in real time and then transformed into the stationary reference frame where they are represented as alpha and beta terms. This is an application of standard vector control principals well known in the art. The DSP then calculates the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, necessary to bring the utility supply back to die set nominal level. The DSP then utilises Va and Vb to generate the PWM waveforms for controlling the inverter 7 to generate and apply the appropriate compensation voltage(s) to the primary terminals of the injection transformer 8.
Various similar active voltage conditioning configurations are proposed and described in US patents 5,319,534, 5,610,501 and 6,327,162, which are incorporated herein by reference. All these configurations also utilise the inverter fed injection transformer topology for regulating the supply voltage to a load.
During operation of such active voltage conditioners, when step or sudden changes are made to the voltage of the primary of the injection transformer, the transformer core flux adjusts in proportion to the applied voltage and there is also normally a flux offset present. Subsequent changes in voltage will add and subtract from this flux offset and diis can make the peak core flux levels larger or smaller depending on the phase and magnitude of the voltage changes. Therefore, there is a risk of core magnetic saturation which results in very high inverter currents and possible loss of system control. This problem reduces the reliability and effectiveness of the active voltage conditioner.
In this specification where reference has been made to patent specifications, other external documents, or other sources of information, this is generally for the purpose of providing a context for discussing the features of the invention. Unless specifically stated otherwise, reference to such external documents is not to be construed as an admission that such documents, or such sources of information, in any jurisdiction, are prior art, or form part of the common general knowledge in the art.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a flux control system for reducing the risk of core magnetic saturation in the injection transformer of active voltage conditioners, or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In a first aspect, the present invention broadly consists in a flux control system for a three- phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, the flux control system being arranged to modify the compensation voltage(s) to be applied to the primary terminals of the injection transformer so as to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: a magnetic flux model module or modules that are arranged to calculate the core flux level(s) of the injection transformer based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; a flux offset module or modules that are arranged to apply a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the core flux level(s) calculated by the flux model module or modules and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and a peak flux module or modules that are arranged to apply a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range. Preferably, the or each magnetic flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the compensation voltage(s) and output core flux level(s), the core flux level(s) being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term.
Preferably, the or each flux offset module is arranged to fed the calculated core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term.
Preferably, the or each peak flux module comprises: a dead zone modifier that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term, the peak flux module being arranged to fed the core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply core flux level(s) by the amplified limiter term.
In one form, the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented collectively in the stationary reference frame. Preferably, for a three wire three phase system, the compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in Cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms, or alternatively as polar co-ordinates. In an alternative form the voltage compensation and flux level terms may be described in terms of a rotating reference frame (DQ representation). In another alternative form, the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) may be represented individually in the time domain using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes.
In a second aspect, the present invention broadly consists in a method of controlling the core flux level(s) of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, comprising the steps of: receiving the compensation voltage(s); calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the calculated core flux level(s) and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.
Preferably, the step of calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) comprises the steps of: integrating the compensation voltage(s) to generate core flux level(s); amplifying the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
Preferably, the step of applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: amplifying the calculated core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
Preferably, the step of applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero kmiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar; multiplying the calculated core flux level(s) by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
In one form, the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented collectively in the stationary reference frame. Preferably, for a three wire three phase system, the compensation voltages and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms, or alternatively as polar co-ordinates. In an alternative form the voltage compensation and flux level terms may be described in terms of a rotating reference frame (DQ representation). In another alternative form, the three-phase compensation voltages and flux level(s) may be represented individually in the time domain using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes.
In a third aspect, the present invention broadly consists in a flux control system for a three- phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, the flux control system being arranged to modify the alpha and beta terms to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: alpha and beta flux control subsystems that are arranged to receive the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and output modified compensation terms, each subsystem comprising: a flux model module that is arranged to generate an alpha or beta flux term based on the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; and a flux offset module that is arranged to apply a first modification to the alpha or beta voltage compensation term based on the alpha or beta flux term generated by the flux model module and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; and a peak flux limiter that is arranged to calculate a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms from the alpha and beta flux control subsystems and generate a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to a preset positive flux threshold, the alpha and beta flux control subsystems each further comprising: a peak flux module that is arranged to apply a second modification to the alpha or beta voltage compensation term based on the alpha or beta flux term generated by the flux model module and the limiter term generated by the peak flux limiter to prevent the peak flux level representation in the injection transformer from exceeding the preset positive flux threshold. Preferably, each flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and output an alpha or beta flux term, the alpha or beta flux term being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the intrinsic time constant term.
Preferably, each flux offset module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the extrinsic time constant term.
Preferably, the peak flux limiter comprises: a peak flux level module that is arranged to calculate a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms from the alpha and beta flux control subsystems; a dead zone modifier that receives the calculated peak flux level representation and that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the peak flux level representation lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term.
Preferably, each peak flux module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply the alpha or beta flux term by the amplified limiter term from the peak flux limiter.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention broadly consists in a method of controlling the core flux of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, comprising the steps of: receiving the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms; modelling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms based on the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; applying a first modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; calculating a peak flux level representation in the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms and generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to a preset positive flux threshold; and applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and the limiter term generated to prevent the peak flux level representation in the injection transformer from exceeding the preset positive flux threshold.
Preferably, the step of modelling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms comprises the steps of: integrating the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms to generate respective alpha and beta flux terms; amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into thek respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
Preferably, the step of applying a first modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
Preferably, the step of generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to the preset positive flux threshold comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated peak flux level representation lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a nonzero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar.
Preferably, the step of applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: multiplying the alpha and beta flux terms by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
In a fifth aspect, the present invention broadly consists in a computer program or computer software that comprises computer instructions for carrying out the system or method steps described in respect of any one of the first- fourth aspects of the invention.
The following features may apply to any one or more of the first-fifth aspects of the invention described above.
By way of example, the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply. Preferably, the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected, directly or indirectly, to the output of a three-phase inverter. More preferably, the calculated compensation voltage(s) or the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame are utilised to generate corresponding pulse width modulated (PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
Preferably, the active voltage conditioner is online in that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
By way of the example, the flux control system may be a subsystem of the overall control system of the active voltage conditioner or may alternatively be a separate control module. It will be appreciated that the flux control system and associated method may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination thereof. By way of example, the flux control system and associated method may be implemented in computer software for a microprocessor, microcontroller, or any other programmable device. The terms "alpha" and "beta" are intended to represent cartesian co-ordinates of three- phase characteristics, such as voltage and flux levels, in the stationary reference frame.
The term "comprising" as used in this specification and claims means "consisting at least in part of. When interpreting each statement in this specification and claims that includes the term "comprising", features other than that or those prefaced by the term may also be present. Related terms such as "comprise" and "comprises" are to be interpreted in the same manner.
The invention consists in the foregoing and also envisages constructions of which the following gives examples only.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A preferred embodiment of the invention will be described by way of example only and with reference to the drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a known active voltage conditioner configuration for regulating a three-phase mains supply;
Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a preferred form flux control system of the invention, and more specifically showing alpha and beta flux control subsystems and a peak flux limiter;
Figure 3 shows a schematic diagram of the alpha flux control subsystem of the flux control system; and
Figure 4 shows a schematic diagram of the peak flux limiter of the flux control system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The preferred form flux control system and associated method is for online three-phase active voltage conditioners that utilise an injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply in a manner previously described. In particular, the flux control system is employed to modify the calculated correction or compensation voltages to be applied to the primary terminals of the injection transformer so as to achieve optimal performance in regulating the mains supply but also ensuring that the core flux of the injection transformer is controlled and limited so as to avoid magnetic saturation during operation that may lead to loss of system control and unreliable voltage conditioning.
Briefly, the preferred form flux control system is arranged to continuously predict or estimate the magnitude and angular position of the magnetic flux of the core of the injection transformer based on the calculated compensation voltage to be applied to the primary terminals of the transformer. The flux control system then modifies the magnitude and phase of the calculated compensation voltage, based on the predicted magnitude and angular position of the flux, so as to maximise the application of applied voltage without exceeding a maximum preset flux level or magnitude that will cause magnetic saturation of the transformer of the core.
As described, the control system of an active voltage conditioner typically calculates, in the stationary reference frame, alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, necessary to bring the three-phase mains supply back to the set nominal level. The control system then utilises Va and Vb to generate PWM waveforms for controlling a three-phase inverter to generate and apply appropriate compensation voltage(s) to the primary terminals of the injection transformer to correct or regulate each of the individual phases.
Briefly, the preferred form flux control system operates as a subsystem of the control system of the active voltage conditioner and is arranged to model, predict or calculate the core flux levels of the injection transformer based on Va and Vb, and also an intrinsic
Figure imgf000012_0001
such as an intrinsic time constant term, specific to the injection transformer. The flux control system then applies a first modification to Va and Vb to gradually reduce any flux offset in the core of the injection transformer and, if necessary, a second modification to Va and Vb to ensure the peak core flux level remains below a predetermined positive threshold. The modified alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Voa and Vob, are then utilised by the remainder of the control system to generate the PWM signals or waveforms for controlling the inverter to apply the appropriate compensation voltages to the primary terminals of the injection transformer for conditioning and regulating the mains supply without driving the injection transformer into magnetic saturation.
Referring to Figure 2, the preferred form flux control system 10 receives the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Va and Vb, as inputs and outputs the modified alpha and beta voltage compensation terms, Voa and Vob. Va and Vb are independently modified by separate alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems of the flux control system 10. The alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems are identical in configuration and by way of example Figure 3 shows the alpha flux control subsystem 12 that will be described in more detail below.
The alpha flux control subsystem 12 receives Va and a limiter term Wt from a peak flux limiter 13 of the flux control system at its input ports 16 and 18 respectively and outputs Voa and an alpha flux term φa at its output ports 20 and 22 respectively. The alpha flux control subsystem 12 comprises a flux model module 24 that is arranged to generate the alpha flux term φa based on the alpha voltage compensation term Va and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer characteristics. In particular, die flux model module 24 comprises an integrator 26 that is arranged to integrate Va and output φa. Further, the flux model module 24 is arranged to feed φa back into the input of the integrator 26 via negative feedback loop 28 that comprises an amplifier 30 that is arranged to amplify φa by an intrinsic time constant term Ri. In the preferred form, the intrinsic time constant term Ri is selected based on the characteristics of the injection transformer and in particular represents the actual transformer resistance R over magnitising inductance L. The integrator 26 may, for example, be a discrete-time integrator modelled in the Z domain or any other integration module could alternatively be utilised if desired.
The alpha flux control subsystem 12 also comprises a flux offset module 32 that is arranged to apply a first modification to Va based on φa generated by the flux model module 24 and an extrinsic characteristic(s), such as an extrinsic time constant term Rx calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer. In particular, the flux offset module 32 is arranged to feed φa back into Va via a negative feedback loop 34 that comprises an amplifier 36 that is arranged to amplify φa via the extrinsic time constant term Rx. In a preferred form, the extrinsic time constant term Rx does not model the actual injection transformer but instead produces a small voltage across die primary of the injection transformer of the correct phase and magnitude to reset any flux offset to substantially zero gradually over time. The intrinsic time constant term Ri of the flux model module 24 is adjusted to match the actual injection transformer characteristics whereas the extrinsic time constant term Rx of the flux offset module 32 is adjusted to reset any flux offset in a reasonable time without creating significant distortion in the compensating voltage output by the active voltage conditioner.
The alpha flux control system 12 also comprises a peak flux module 38 that is arranged to apply a second modification to Va based on φa generated by the flux model module 24 and a limiter term Wt generated by peak flux limiter 13 to prevent the peak flux level in the core of the injection transformer from exceeding a preset positive flux threshold. In particular, the peak flux module 38 is arranged to feed φa back into Va via a negative feedback loop 40 that comprises a multiplier 42 that is arranged to multiply φa by Wt from the peak flux limiter 13.
Referring to Figure 4, the peak flux limiter 13 of the flux control system will now be described in more detail. The peak flux limiter 13 receives φa and φb from the alpha 12 and beta 14 flux control subsystems as inputs, φa and φb represent the core flux levels of the injection transformer in the stationary reference frame, φa and φb are passed through a peak flux level module 44 that is arranged to calculate a value φp that represents or is a function of the peak flux level of the core of the injection transformer. In the preferred form, the value φp calculated by the module 44 is the square of the peak flux level of the core of the injection transformer. In particular, the module 44 is arranged to calculate the square of the magnitude or norm of the vector resulting from the φa and φb terms through conventional vectorial calculation. It will be appreciated that the vector magnitude or norm involves taking the square root of the sum of the squares of the orthogonal vector φa and φb terms. In alternative forms, the module 44 may be arranged to calculate and output a value φp that represents the vector norm or magnitude of the peak flux level itself. However, in the preferred form, it is less computationally intensive to use the square of the vector norm or magnitude of the peak flux level for φp as shown in Figure 4. This also has the benefit of emphasizing large excursions in flux magnitude. It will also be appreciated that any other non-negative non-linear function of the vector norm or magnitude could be calculated and output as the value φp if desired.
The output φp of the peak flux level module 44 is applied to a dead zone modifier 46 that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if φp lies within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term, the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the φp lies outside the range, ie the amount by which it exceeds the positive flux threshold. In the preferred form, the limiter term increases linearly in accordance with the amount by which φp lies outside the range. The positive threshold is determined by the characteristics of the injection transformer and the peak flux levels beyond which magnetic saturation will occur. The limiter term is then amplified by a sealer Ks at amplifier 48 to generate the limiter term output Wt.
In summary, the flux control system operates in such a way that under normal steady-state operating conditions the flux of the injection transformer is modelled in real time and any flux offset is gradually reset to zero or close to it by applying suitable scaled and aligned voltage offsets (the first modification). Further, should a voltage compensation change be demanded that will cause the peak transformer flux to go above a level defined in the dead zone limit, offset voltages will be produced which limit the actual voltages generated by the inverter to prevent significant flux excursions (the second modification). In this way, the online active voltage conditioner will operate to produce the fastest voltage adjustments allowable without resultant problematic injection transformer magnetic saturation.
It will be appreciated that the flux control system may be implemented as a subsystem within the control system of an active voltage conditioner. In particular, the flux control system or algorithm(s) may be implemented as computer software or a computer program that runs on a microprocessor, microcontroller or other programmable device that is part of the control system. Alternatively, the flux control system may be in the form of an independent module embedded in hardware or the like and which co-operates with the control system. The preferred form flux control system is performed in the stationary reference frame, using alpha and beta terms. Transformation between three-phase representation in the time domain and representation in the stationary reference frame as alpha and beta terms is well known in the art. The alpha and beta terms are cartesian co-ordinates in the stationary reference frame and it will be appreciated that the flux control system could alternatively be modified to operate in polar co-ordinates or in any other suitable format. Further, it will be appreciated that the flux control system may be implemented or performed in other domains. For example, it will be appreciated that the flux control system need not necessarily be implemented in the stationary reference frame and that it could be modified to operate in a rotating reference frame or using phase quantities or other non-orthogonal axes. In particular, it will be appreciated that for each individual phase, the flux control system may be arranged to: estimate the core flux level in the injection transformer based on the voltage to be applied to the primary terminals for that phase and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the transformer; modify the voltage to be applied based on the estimated flux level and an extrinsic time constant term to gradually reduce any flux offset to substantially zero; and modify the voltage to be applied to prevent peak flux levels from moving outside a preset range. In essence, the modelling of the flux levels in the core of the injection transformer and the modifications (flux offset modification and peak flux modification) to the voltages to be applied to the injection transformer for the three phases may be performed in any suitable domain and format, for example on a collective basis (stationary reference frame) or individually phase by phase.
The foregoing description of the invention includes preferred forms thereof. Modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the accompanying claims.

Claims

1. A flux control system for a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, the flux control system being arranged to modify the compensation voltage(s) to be applied to the primary terminals of die injection transformer so as to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: a magnetic flux model module or modules that are arranged to calculate the core flux level(s) of the injection transformer based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; a flux offset module or modules that are arranged to apply a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the core flux level(s) calculated by the flux model module or modules and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and a peak flux module or modules that are arranged to apply a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.
2. A flux control system according to claim 1 wherein the or each magnetic flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the compensation voltage(s) and output core flux level(s), the core flux level(s) being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term.
3. A flux control system according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the intrinsic time constant term represents the actual injection transformer resistance divided by the magnetizing inductance of the injection transformer.
4. A flux control system according to claim 2 or claim 3 wherein the integrator is a discreet-time integrator modeled in the Z domain.
5. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the or each flux offset module is arranged to fed the calculated core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term.
6. A flux control system according to claim 5 wherein the extrinsic time a constant term is calculated to produce a small voltage across the primary terminals of the injection transformer of the correct phase and magnitude to gradually reset any flux offset in the injection transformer to substantially zero over time.
7. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the or each peak flux module comprises: a dead zone modifier that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term, the peak flux module being arranged to fed the core flux level(s) back into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply core flux
Figure imgf000018_0001
by the amplified limiter term.
8. A flux control system according to claim 7 wherein the magnitude of the non-zero limiter term increases linearly in accordance with the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside at the range.
9. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented collectively in the stationary reference frame.
10. A flux control system according to claim 9 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in Cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms.
11. A flux control system according to any one of claims 1-8 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented in terms of a rotating reference frame.
12. A flux control system according to any one of claims 1-8 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented individually in the time domain.
13. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply.
14. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected to the output of a three- phase inverter, the calculated compensation voltage(s) being utilised to generate corresponding Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
15. A flux control system according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the active voltage conditioner is online such that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage(s) via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
16. A method of controlling the core flux level(s) of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply calculated compensation voltage(s), one for each phase, to a mains supply, comprising the steps of: receiving the compensation voltage(s); calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) based on the compensation voltage(s) and an intrinsic time constant term specific to die injection transformer; applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) based on the calculated core flux level(s) and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset(s) in the injection transformer; and applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) to prevent the core flux level(s) from moving outside a preset range.
17. A method according to claim 16 wherein the step of calculating the injection transformer core flux level(s) comprises the steps of: integrating the compensation voltage(s) to generate core flux level(s); amplifying the core flux level(s) by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
18. A method according to claim 16 or claim 17 wherein the intrinsic time constant term represents the actual injection transformer resistance divided by the magnetizing inductance of the injection transformer.
19. A method according to claim 17 or claim 18 wherein the step of integrating the compensation voltage(s) to generate core flux level(s) comprises the step of operating a discrete-time integrator modeled in the Z domain.
20. A method according to any one of claims 16-19 wherein the step of applying a first modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: amplifying the calculated core flux level(s) by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
21. A method according to claim 20 wherein the extrinsic time constant term is calculated to produce a small voltage across the primary terminals of the injection transformer of the correct phase and magnitude to gradually reset any flux offset in the injection transformer to substantially zero over time.
22. A method according to any one of claims 16-21 wherein the step of applying a second modification to the compensation voltage(s) comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated core flux level(s) lie within the range defined between 0 and a preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range; amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar; multiplying the calculated core flux level(s) by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied core flux level(s) into the compensation voltage(s) via a negative feedback loop.
23. A method according to claim 22 wherein the step of generating a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range comprises the step of increasing the limiter term linearly in accordance with the amount by which the calculated core flux level(s) lie outside the range.
24. A method according to any one of claims 16-23 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented collectively in a stationary reference frame.
25. A method according to claim 24 wherein the compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented in the stationary reference frame in Cartesian co-ordinates as alpha and beta terms.
26. A method according to any one of claims 16-23 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented in terms of a rotating reference frame.
27. A method according to any one of claims 16-23 wherein the three-phase compensation voltage(s) and flux level(s) are represented individually in the time domain.
28. A method according to any one of claims 16-27 wherein the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply.
29. A method according to any one of claims 16-28 wherein the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected to the output of a three-phase inverter, the calculated compensation voltage(s) being utilised to generate corresponding Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
30. A method according to any one of claims 16-29 wherein the active voltage conditioner is online such that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage(s) via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
31. A flux control system for a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises an injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, the flux control system being arranged to modify the alpha and beta terms to avoid magnetic saturation of the injection transformer and comprising: alpha and beta flux control subsystems that are arranged to receive the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and output modified compensation terms, each subsystem comprising: a flux model module that is arranged to generate an alpha or beta flux term based on the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; and a flux offset module that is arranged to apply a first modification to die alpha or beta voltage compensation term based on the alpha or beta flux term generated by the flux model module and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; and a peak flux limiter that is arranged to calculate a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms from the alpha and beta flux control subsystems and generate a hmiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to a preset positive flux threshold, the alpha and beta flux control subsystems each further comprising: a peak flux module that is arranged to apply a second modification to the alpha or beta voltage compensation term based on the alpha or beta flux term generated by the flux model module and the limiter term generated by the peak flux limiter to prevent the peak flux level representation in the injection transformer from exceeding the positive flux threshold.
32. A flux control system according to claim 31 wherein each flux model module comprises an integrator that is arranged to integrate the alpha or beta voltage compensation term and output an alpha or beta flux term, the alpha or beta flux term being fed back into the input of the integrator via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the intrinsic time constant term.
33. A flux control system according to claim 31 or claim 32 wherein each flux offset module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the alpha or beta flux term by the extrinsic time constant term.
34. A flux control system according to any one of claims 31-33 wherein the peak flux limiter comprises: a peak flux level module that is arranged to calculate the peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms from the alpha and beta flux control subsystems; a dead zone modifier that receives the calculated peak flux level representation and that is arranged to generate a limiter term of substantially zero if the peak flux level representation lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and an amplifier that is arranged to amplify the limiter term by a preset scalar and output the amplifier limiter term.
35. A flux control system according to any one of claims 31-34 wherein each peak flux module is arranged to fed the alpha or beta flux term back into the alpha or beta voltage compensation term via a negative feedback loop comprising a multiplier that is arranged to multiply the alpha or beta flux term by the amplified limiter term from the peak flux limiter.
36. A flux control system according to any one of claims 31-35 wherein the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply.
37. A flux control system according to any one of claims 31-36 wherein the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected to the output of a three-phase inverter, the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame being utilised to generate corresponding Pulse Width Modulated
(PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
38. A flux control system according to any one of claims 31-37 wherein the active voltage conditioner is online such that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
39. A method of controlling the core flux of an injection transformer to avoid magnetic saturation in a three-phase active voltage conditioner that utilises the injection transformer to apply compensation voltage to a mains supply based on alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame, comprising the steps of: receiving the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms; modeling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms based on the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms respectively and an intrinsic time constant term specific to the injection transformer; applying a first modification to die alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and an extrinsic time constant term calculated to gradually reduce any flux offset in the injection transformer; calculating a peak flux level representation for the injection transformer based on the alpha and beta flux terms and generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to a preset positive flux threshold; and applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms based on the alpha and beta flux terms generated respectively and the limiter term generated to prevent the peak flux level representation in the injection transformer from exceeding the positive flux threshold.
40. A method according to claim 39 wherein the step of modeling the injection transformer flux and generating alpha and beta flux terms comprises the steps of: integrating the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms to generate respective alpha and beta flux terms; amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the intrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
41. A method according to claim 39 or claim 40 wherein the step of applying a first modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: amplifying the alpha and beta flux terms by the extrinsic time constant term; and feeding back the amplified alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
42. A method according to any one of claims 39-41 wherein the step of generating a limiter term based on a comparison of the calculated peak flux level representation to the preset positive flux threshold comprises the steps of: generating a limiter term of substantially zero if the calculated peak flux level lies within the range between 0 and the preset positive flux threshold or alternatively a non-zero limiter term the magnitude of which is dependent on the amount by which the calculated peak flux level representation exceeds the positive flux threshold; and amplifying the limiter term by a preset scalar.
43. A method according to any one of claims 39-42 wherein the step of applying a second modification to the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms comprises the steps of: multiplying the alpha and beta flux terms by the amplified limiter term; and feeding back the multiplied alpha and beta flux terms into their respective alpha and beta voltage compensation terms via a negative feedback loop.
44. A method according to any one of claims 39-43 wherein the active voltage conditioner is for conditioning a three-phase mains supply.
45. A method according to any one of claims 39-44 wherein the primary terminals of the injection transformer are connected to the output of a three-phase inverter, the alpha and beta voltage compensation terms calculated in the stationary reference frame being utilised to generate corresponding Pulse Width Modulated (PWM) signals for driving the inverter to generate the appropriate compensating voltages for applying to the primary terminals of the injection transformer.
46. A method according to any one of claims 39-45 wherein the active voltage conditioner is online such that it continuously monitors the mains supply voltage and continuously applies compensating voltage via the injection transformer to regulate the voltage supply.
PCT/NZ2008/000027 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning WO2008103059A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009550823A JP5108031B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Magnetic flux control system for active voltage regulation
KR1020097017417A KR101463636B1 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning
EP08724017.2A EP2113140B1 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning
CN2008800055990A CN101657945B (en) 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning
US12/544,485 US8143747B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2009-08-20 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US89066907P 2007-02-20 2007-02-20
US60/890,669 2007-02-20

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/544,485 Continuation US8143747B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2009-08-20 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008103059A1 true WO2008103059A1 (en) 2008-08-28

Family

ID=39710268

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/NZ2008/000027 WO2008103059A1 (en) 2007-02-20 2008-02-14 Flux control system for active voltage conditioning

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8143747B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2113140B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5108031B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101463636B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101657945B (en)
WO (1) WO2008103059A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9041246B2 (en) * 2010-09-29 2015-05-26 General Electric Company System and method for phase balancing in a power distribution system
EP2461476B1 (en) * 2010-12-02 2013-02-13 ABB Technology AG Method for operating an inverter
US20130116947A1 (en) * 2011-11-09 2013-05-09 Zafer Sahinoglu Method and System for Detecting Unbalance in Power Grids
US9274580B2 (en) * 2012-06-29 2016-03-01 Intel Corporation Voltage regulator supplying power exclusively to a non-core region of a processor having a supply capability threshold
US10418814B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2019-09-17 Smart Wires Inc. Transformers with multi-turn primary windings for dynamic power flow control
US10903653B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2021-01-26 Smart Wires Inc. Voltage agnostic power reactor
US10008317B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2018-06-26 Smart Wires Inc. Voltage or impedance-injection method using transformers with multiple secondary windings for dynamic power flow control
US10180696B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2019-01-15 Smart Wires Inc. Distributed impedance injection module for mitigation of the Ferranti effect
US10199150B2 (en) 2015-12-10 2019-02-05 Smart Wires Inc. Power transmission tower mounted series injection transformer
US10230948B2 (en) * 2016-02-03 2019-03-12 Mediatek Inc. Video transmitting system with on-the-fly encoding and on-the-fly delivering and associated video receiving system
US10097037B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-10-09 Smart Wires Inc. System and method for distributed grid control with sub-cyclic local response capability
US10218175B2 (en) 2016-02-11 2019-02-26 Smart Wires Inc. Dynamic and integrated control of total power system using distributed impedance injection modules and actuator devices within and at the edge of the power grid
US10651633B2 (en) 2016-04-22 2020-05-12 Smart Wires Inc. Modular, space-efficient structures mounting multiple electrical devices
US10468880B2 (en) 2016-11-15 2019-11-05 Smart Wires Inc. Systems and methods for voltage regulation using split-conductors with loop current reduction
US10666038B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2020-05-26 Smart Wires Inc. Modular FACTS devices with external fault current protection
CN111952984A (en) * 2020-08-24 2020-11-17 西安许继电力电子技术有限公司 Non-access type alternating voltage compensation circuit and system
CN112688549B (en) * 2020-12-21 2022-04-15 国创能源互联网创新中心(广东)有限公司 Transformer magnetic saturation processing method, device and system and electrical equipment

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4896092A (en) * 1988-10-12 1990-01-23 Power Distribution, Inc. Voltage regulator for AC single phase and three phase systems
US5610501A (en) * 1995-02-01 1997-03-11 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Dynamic power and voltage regulator for an ac transmission line
WO1999039420A1 (en) * 1998-02-02 1999-08-05 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Neutral point connected apparatus providing compensation to an ac power line
US6327162B1 (en) * 1995-01-13 2001-12-04 General Electric Company Static series voltage regulator

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1479904A (en) * 1974-10-15 1977-07-13 Ass Elect Ind Alternating current power transmission systems
US4135101A (en) * 1977-07-08 1979-01-16 Power Monitors, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling loads in electric power systems by reduction of peak loads
US4286207A (en) * 1980-04-14 1981-08-25 Westinghouse Electric Corp. High-power AC voltage stabilizer
JPS6420047U (en) * 1987-07-24 1989-01-31
JP2760646B2 (en) * 1990-09-18 1998-06-04 株式会社東芝 Current command value calculation device for power converter
US5319534A (en) * 1993-08-16 1994-06-07 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Series-parallel active power line conditioner utilizing reduced-turns-ratio transformer for enhanced peak voltage regulation capability
DE19524963A1 (en) * 1995-07-08 1997-01-09 Bosch Gmbh Robert Switching power supply with B control
JP3400283B2 (en) * 1997-02-27 2003-04-28 株式会社東芝 Power converter
FR2777399B1 (en) * 1998-04-09 2000-06-09 Centre Nat Rech Scient METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A STATIC CONVERTER SUPPLYING A CURRENT SOURCE
US5949221A (en) * 1998-05-21 1999-09-07 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Line powered, primary side connected apparatus injecting voltage compensation into an electric power line using one transformer
US6559562B1 (en) * 2001-12-14 2003-05-06 Ssi Power, Llc Voltage sag and over-voltage compensation device with pulse width modulated autotransformer
JP4613475B2 (en) * 2003-03-12 2011-01-19 株式会社安川電機 Sensorless vector control method and control apparatus for AC motor
US7117070B2 (en) * 2003-06-30 2006-10-03 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Power flow controller responsive to power circulation demand for optimizing power transfer
US7388766B2 (en) * 2004-08-26 2008-06-17 Curtiss-Wright Electro-Mechanical Corporation Harmonic control and regulation system for harmonic neutralized frequency changer
WO2006064742A1 (en) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 The Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. Self-excited reactive power compensating apparatus
US7920392B2 (en) * 2007-05-11 2011-04-05 Soft Switching Technologies Corporation Dynamic voltage sag correction

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4896092A (en) * 1988-10-12 1990-01-23 Power Distribution, Inc. Voltage regulator for AC single phase and three phase systems
US6327162B1 (en) * 1995-01-13 2001-12-04 General Electric Company Static series voltage regulator
US5610501A (en) * 1995-02-01 1997-03-11 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Dynamic power and voltage regulator for an ac transmission line
WO1999039420A1 (en) * 1998-02-02 1999-08-05 Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation Neutral point connected apparatus providing compensation to an ac power line

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2113140A4 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2113140A1 (en) 2009-11-04
CN101657945A (en) 2010-02-24
EP2113140A4 (en) 2010-04-14
US20100026275A1 (en) 2010-02-04
JP5108031B2 (en) 2012-12-26
EP2113140B1 (en) 2013-07-17
KR101463636B1 (en) 2014-11-19
US8143747B2 (en) 2012-03-27
CN101657945B (en) 2012-11-28
KR20090115158A (en) 2009-11-04
JP2010519643A (en) 2010-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2113140B1 (en) Flux control system for active voltage conditioning
US9812862B2 (en) Paralleling of active filters with independent controls
Saxena et al. An MPC based algorithm for a multipurpose grid integrated solar PV system with enhanced power quality and PCC voltage assist
CN102017376A (en) UPS frequency converter and line conditioner
CN105098789A (en) Difference setting method and system of excitation system and power system stabilization (PSS) coordination method and system
KR101520248B1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Controlling Doubly-fed Induction Generator using Adaptive Backstepping Control Scheme
KR101562848B1 (en) Method for uninterruptible power supply system control by using active damping control scheme and repeat control techniques
US7327134B1 (en) Method and system for transformer control
KR20180044306A (en) Virtual capacitance
He et al. An Ultra-Fast Inrush-Current-Free Startup Method for Grid-tie Inverter without Voltage Sensors
CN104993502B (en) Primary frequency modulation implementation method and device under a kind of power closed loop mode
Williamson et al. A controller for single-phase parallel inverters in a variable-head pico-hydropower off-grid network
CN107370358A (en) The current loop control method and current loop controller of circuit of power factor correction
Wang et al. Feed-forward control of solid state transformer
CN108197788B (en) Microgrid voltage frequency deviation estimation method under peer-to-peer control mode
CN107732918B (en) Three-phase optimal power flow calculation method for power distribution network based on constant hessian matrix
CN114928070A (en) Self-synchronization control method and device of cascade STATCOM system
Das et al. Improved RLS algorithm for voltage regulation of wind-solar rural renewable energy system
CN105406492B (en) A kind of three-phase electric load autobalance algorithm
CN113241753B (en) Improved virtual generator control method for direct-current micro-grid
CN105048459B (en) Meter and the inverse type power supply symmetrical short-circuit of low-voltage control simplify modeling method
Saralaya et al. An improved control strategy without current sensors for DSTATCOM
Wang et al. Model prediction adaptive control for wide-area power system stability enhancement
Ribeiro et al. A robust control strategy for regulating dc-link voltage of active power filter without load current measurements
WO2023242836A1 (en) Fast dc link voltage control of grid-connected converters maintaining low total harmonic distortion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200880005599.0

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08724017

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008724017

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 4849/CHENP/2009

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009550823

Country of ref document: JP

Ref document number: 1020097017417

Country of ref document: KR

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE