WO2008139141A1 - Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment - Google Patents

Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008139141A1
WO2008139141A1 PCT/GB2008/001527 GB2008001527W WO2008139141A1 WO 2008139141 A1 WO2008139141 A1 WO 2008139141A1 GB 2008001527 W GB2008001527 W GB 2008001527W WO 2008139141 A1 WO2008139141 A1 WO 2008139141A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tool
jetting
fluid
holder
sleeve
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2008/001527
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jim B. Surjaatmadja
Original Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Curtis, Philip, Anthony
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., Curtis, Philip, Anthony filed Critical Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Priority to CN200880016243.7A priority Critical patent/CN101680290B/en
Priority to AT08750500T priority patent/ATE546613T1/en
Priority to BRPI0809410-1A priority patent/BRPI0809410A2/en
Priority to AU2008249846A priority patent/AU2008249846B2/en
Priority to PL08750500T priority patent/PL2147190T3/en
Priority to CA2681607A priority patent/CA2681607C/en
Priority to MX2009011686A priority patent/MX2009011686A/en
Priority to EP08750500A priority patent/EP2147190B1/en
Publication of WO2008139141A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008139141A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/11Perforators; Permeators
    • E21B43/114Perforators using direct fluid action on the wall to be perforated, e.g. abrasive jets
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures

Definitions

  • the present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formations. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
  • Jetting tools are used in a number of different industries and have a variety of different applications. For instance, jetting tools are used in subterranean operations such as perforating and hydraulic fracturing.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is often utilized to stimulate the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations penetrated by well bores.
  • the well casing where present, such as in vertical sections of wells adjacent the formation to be treated, is perforated. This perforating operation can be performed using explosive means or hydrajetting. Where only one portion of a formation is to be fractured as a separate stage, it is then isolated from the other perforated portions of the formation using conventional packers or the like, and a fracturing fluid is pumped into the well bore through the perforations in the well casing and into the isolated portion of the formation to be stimulated at a rate and pressure such that fractures are formed and extended in the formation.
  • a propping agent may be suspended in the fracturing fluid which is deposited in the fractures.
  • the propping agent functions to prevent the fractures from closing, thereby providing conductive channels in the formation through which produced fluids can readily flow to the well bore. In certain formations, this process is repeated in order to thoroughly populate multiple formation zones or the entire formation with fractures.
  • the jetting tool cannot be made of a very hard material to avoid erosion because such materials are brittle and will shatter during jetting operations or when the jetting tool is moved in and out of the jetting location. Consequently, the current jetting tools comprise a cylindrical structure which cannot withstand the abrasive forces. In some applications a fluid jet that is made of a hard material is installed on the cylindrical structure.
  • one disadvantage of the current hydrajetting methods is that the jetting tool is eroded during operation. In order to deal with this erosion the jetting tool must be extracted from the hole to be repaired or replaced. The extraction of the jetting tool can be expensive and could also lead to a job failure. In such situations it would be desirable to have a method and tool for delivering fluids to the formation to be fractured which could withstand the impact of the erosive forces.
  • the present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
  • the present invention is directed to an abrasive resistance jetting tool which includes a sleeve.
  • the sleeve is composed of a material with a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A and has at least one hole in its wall. A fluid flowing through the sleeve can exit through the hole.
  • the present invention is directed to a fluid jetting device with a cylindrical body having a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A. A fluid flowing through the cylindrical body is emitted through an orifice in the cylindrical body.
  • the present invention may include a holder enclosing the jetting device.
  • the holder includes holes that align with the holes in the sleeve in order to allow the emission of a fluid from the sleeve.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
  • FIGURE 2 illustrates the impact of damage causing factors on a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
  • FIGURE 3 illustrates the result of straight jetting and angled jetting using a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates a cutaway view of an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention depicting the solid sleeve, holders and associated parts.
  • FIGURE 5 illustrates the impact of damage causing factors on an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
  • the high pressure exerted on the formation at the tip of the cavity causes a fracture to be formed and extend some distance into the formation.
  • a propping agent is suspended in the fracturing fluid which is deposited in the fracture.
  • the propping agent may be a granular substance such as, for example, sand grains, ceramic or bauxite or other man-made grains, walnut shells, or other material carried in suspension by the fracturing fluid.
  • the propping agent functions to prevent the fractures from closing and thereby provides conductive channels in the formation through which produced fluids can readily flow to the well bore.
  • the presence of the propping agent also increases the erosive effect of the jetting fluid.
  • a fracturing fluid is pumped through the fracturing tool and into the well bore to raise the ambient fluid pressure exerted on the formation.
  • the fluid is pumped into the fracture at a rate and high pressure sufficient to extend the fracture an additional distance from the well bore into the formation.
  • Nozzle 130 may extend beyond the surface of the outer wall as depicted in Figure 1, or nozzle 130 may extend only to the surface of the outer wall of the hydrajetting tool 100.
  • the orientation of nozzle 130 may be modified depending upon the formation to be fractured.
  • the nozzle 130 has an exterior opening which acts as a nozzle opening 150 that allows the passage of fluids from the inner side of hydrajetting tool 100 through the nozzle 130.
  • the nozzle 130 may be composed of any material that is capable of withstanding the stresses associated with fluid fracture, the abrasive nature of the fracturing or other treatment fluids and any proppants or other fracturing agents used.
  • the materials that can be used for construction of the nozzle 13.0 may include, but are not limited to tungsten carbide, diamond composites, and certain ceramics.
  • the nozzle 130 is often composed of abrasion resistive materials such as tungsten carbide, or other certain ceramics, such materials are expensive and brittle. As a result, a tool wholly made of such substances will likely shatter as it cannot withstand the forces encountered as it moves down to the site to be fractured. Consequently, the body of the hydrajetting tool 100 is typically made of steel or similar materials that although not brittle, are not strong enough to withstand the abrasive forces encountered during the hydrajetting process.
  • FIG. 2 Shown in Figure 2, is the impact of damage causing factors on a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art. Arrows are used to show the direction of the fluid flow as the fluid approaches and exits the nozzle 130 through the nozzle opening 150. Typically, there are three distinct phenomena that damage the hydrajetting tool 100 as the fluid exits the nozzle 130.
  • a slight movement of the hydrajetting tool 100 can initiate a Coriolis swirling effect.
  • the hydrajetting tool 100 is not completely stationary during the jetting process. For example, the tool may move due to vibrations resulting from the jetting process. If the hydrajetting tool 100 turns during the jetting process it will cause the fluid to start swirling, thereby creating a tornado effect 240. As the fluid swirls 240 it further erodes the inner walls 245 of the hydrajetting tool 100 along its circumference.
  • the third major source of damage to the hydrajetting tool 100 results from the reflection of the emitted fluid 250 from the perforations 255. As the fluid reflects 230 from the perforation it erodes 235 the hydrajetting tool 100. As discussed above, in some hydrajetting tools the direction of the nozzle opening 150 may be altered depending on the formation to be fractured. The damage resulting from the reflection of the fluid is shown in more detail in Figure 3. Depicted in Figure 3 is a diagram showing the damage to the hydrajetting tool 100 due to reflected fluids from the perforations 255 with the nozzle 300, 315 at different angles.
  • the reflection of the fluid onto the hydrajetting tool 100 is the least when the nozzle 300 shoots the fluid 305 straight into the perforation 255.
  • the splashback fluid 310 which is moving in a direction opposite to that of the jet 305 reduces the effectiveness of the jet 305 leading to an ineffective cutting of the perforation 255.
  • Jet 300 also reduces the effectiveness of the splashback fluid 310 in damaging the tool near the fluid exit of the jet. Massive erosion on the tool 235 still occur around the perimeter of the nozzle.
  • applying the jet 320 at an angle makes the cutting process highly effective.
  • due to angling the nozzle 315 the effect of fluid 325 reflected onto the hydrajetting tool 100 increases as the splashback fluid 325 is undeterred. Because the fluid 325 is shooting back at the hydrajetting tool 100 at full velocity, it will cut 330 the hydrajetting tool in a short amount of time.
  • FIGURE 4 Shown in FIGURE 4 is a cutaway view of an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention shown generally with reference numeral 400.
  • the improved jetting tool 400 includes a solid sleeve 440 comprising a plurality of hard material parts 415, 420 and 425.
  • the hard material parts are made from a material having a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A.
  • the materials that may be used to make the hard material parts 415, 420, 425 include, but are not limited to, carbide or other ceramics with a high resistance to abrasive forces.
  • the carbide used to make the hard material parts 415, 420 and 425 may be of all grades and may be a carbide with different types of binders or without binders.
  • the binder may be made of a variety of suitable materials including, but not limited to, Molybdenum and Cobalt.
  • Molybdenum and Cobalt the exemplary solid sleeve comprises three hard material parts 415, 420, 425, it would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure that a different number of hard material parts can be used depending on the desired length of the jetting tool 400 and other factors such as the nature of the formation being fractured.
  • the suitable hard materials such as carbide or other ceramics are brittle and easily shatter.
  • This problem is resolved by enclosing the solid, sleeve 440 between a first holder 405 on one side and a second holder 410 on the other side.
  • the holders 405, 410 act as a carrier and sacrificial body on the outside of the solid sleeve 440.
  • the primary purpose of the holders 405, 410 is to protect the solid sleeve 440 against shattering during the jetting process and as the tool is moved to and returned from a desired location.
  • the holders may be made of a variety of materials including but not limited to steel, fiberglass, or other suitable materials.
  • one of the hard material parts 420 includes a hole 430.
  • holes 435 created on the body of the holders 405, 410 which are aligned to match the holes of the solid sleeve 440.
  • the number of the holes and the angles at which the holes are located can be varied depending on the nature of the formation and other relevant factors in order to achieve a desirable performance. Because holes are created directly in the body of the jetting tool 400, a nozzle need not be used and the fluid can flow out of the jetting tool 400 through the holes in the walls.
  • FIGURE 5 Shown in FIGURE 5 is the impact of damage causing factors on an improved jetting tool 400 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the fluid 500 flows through the improved jetting tool 400 and exits through the hole 435 in the wall of the jetting tool 400.
  • the causes of damage are the same as that discussed with regard to the Prior Art, namely, the fluid rapidly turning the corner 520, the fluid overshot 510, the Coriolis swirling of the fluid 540 and the reflection of the fluid 530 from the perforations
  • the solid sleeve 440 is composed of hard materials, it will not be eroded by the fluid turning the corner 520, the Coriolis swirling 540, or the overshot fluid 510. Moreover, although the reflection of the fluid 530 from the perforations 255 impacts the holder 405 and erodes 535 it, this erosion will not impact the performance of the jetting tool 400. Specifically, although the reflected fluid 530 may completely erode the holder 405, it cannot erode the hard material below it, and hence, cannot impact the operation of the jetting mechanism which is composed of the hard material forming the solid sleeve 440.
  • the main purpose of the holder 405 is to prevent the shattering of the solid sleeve 440 and the holder 405 can perform that function despite having parts of its surface eroded 535 by the reflected fluid 530.
  • the improved jetting tool 400 can withstand a long duration of jetting and need not be removed from the hole for part replacement until the job is completed.
  • any damage to holders 405, 410 can easily be repaired by simply replacing them as they are made from cheap material and are easily separable from the solid sleeve 440.

Abstract

The present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom. The invention involves a fluid jetting device with a sleeve composed of a hard material. The sleeve includes at least one hole and a fluid flowing through the jetting device is emitted through the hole in the sleeve.

Description

HYDRAJET TOOL FOR ULTRA HIGH EROSIVE ENVIRONMENT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formations. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
[0002] Jetting tools are used in a number of different industries and have a variety of different applications. For instance, jetting tools are used in subterranean operations such as perforating and hydraulic fracturing.
[0003] Hydraulic fracturing is often utilized to stimulate the production of hydrocarbons from subterranean formations penetrated by well bores. Typically, in performing hydraulic fracturing treatments, the well casing, where present, such as in vertical sections of wells adjacent the formation to be treated, is perforated. This perforating operation can be performed using explosive means or hydrajetting. Where only one portion of a formation is to be fractured as a separate stage, it is then isolated from the other perforated portions of the formation using conventional packers or the like, and a fracturing fluid is pumped into the well bore through the perforations in the well casing and into the isolated portion of the formation to be stimulated at a rate and pressure such that fractures are formed and extended in the formation. A propping agent may be suspended in the fracturing fluid which is deposited in the fractures. The propping agent functions to prevent the fractures from closing, thereby providing conductive channels in the formation through which produced fluids can readily flow to the well bore. In certain formations, this process is repeated in order to thoroughly populate multiple formation zones or the entire formation with fractures.
[0004] One method for fracturing formations may be found in United States Patent No. 5,765,642, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, whereby a hydrajetting tool is utilized to jet fluid through a nozzle against a subterranean formation at a pressure sufficient to form a cavity and fracture the formation using stagnation pressure in the cavity. [0005] Hydrajetting in oil field applications often involves long duration jetting for cutting a multitude of casing strings and perforations. This problem is greatly magnified when a hydrajetting tool is utilized to form a cavity and fracture the formation using the stagnation pressure in the cavity as discussed in U.S. Patent No. 5,765,642. This is because millions of pounds of proppants may be flowing through the hydrajetting tool at very high velocities in order to form a cavity and fracture the formation. One solution for withstanding the abrasive forces encountered during the jetting process is to make the jetting tool from an ultra-hard material. However, the jetting tool cannot be made of a very hard material to avoid erosion because such materials are brittle and will shatter during jetting operations or when the jetting tool is moved in and out of the jetting location. Consequently, the current jetting tools comprise a cylindrical structure which cannot withstand the abrasive forces. In some applications a fluid jet that is made of a hard material is installed on the cylindrical structure. Hence, one disadvantage of the current hydrajetting methods is that the jetting tool is eroded during operation. In order to deal with this erosion the jetting tool must be extracted from the hole to be repaired or replaced. The extraction of the jetting tool can be expensive and could also lead to a job failure. In such situations it would be desirable to have a method and tool for delivering fluids to the formation to be fractured which could withstand the impact of the erosive forces.
SUMMARY
[0006] The present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
[0007] In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an abrasive resistance jetting tool which includes a sleeve. The sleeve is composed of a material with a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A and has at least one hole in its wall. A fluid flowing through the sleeve can exit through the hole. [0008] In another embodiment the present invention is directed to a fluid jetting device with a cylindrical body having a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A. A fluid flowing through the cylindrical body is emitted through an orifice in the cylindrical body.
[0009] In certain embodiments the present invention may include a holder enclosing the jetting device. The holder includes holes that align with the holes in the sleeve in order to allow the emission of a fluid from the sleeve.
[0010] The features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the description of the preferred embodiments which follows when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are within the spirit of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] These drawings illustrate certain aspects of some of the embodiments of the present invention, and should not be used to limit or define the invention.
[0012] FIGURE 1 illustrates a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
[0013] FIGURE 2 illustrates the impact of damage causing factors on a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
[0014] FIGURE 3 illustrates the result of straight jetting and angled jetting using a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art.
[0015] FIGURE 4 illustrates a cutaway view of an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention depicting the solid sleeve, holders and associated parts.
[0016] FIGURE 5 illustrates the impact of damage causing factors on an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The present invention primarily relates to mining and subterranean well formation. More particularly, the present invention relates to an improved method and system for perforating, slotting, and cutting steel and subterranean rock; and also for fracturing a subterranean formation to stimulate the production of desired fluids therefrom.
[0018] In wells penetrating certain formations, and particularly deviated wells, it is often desirable to create a number of structures, including perforations, small fractures, large fractures, or a combination thereof. Oftentimes, these structures are created by operations that are performed using a hydrajet tool.
[0019] One of the most severe jetting applications is encountered when using the hydrajet tool as a fracturing tool as discussed in United States Patent No. 5,765,642. During the fracturing process the fracturing tool is positioned within a formation, to be fractured and fluid is then jetted through the fluid jet against the formation at a pressure sufficient to cut through the casing and cement sheath and form a cavity therein. The pressure must be high enough to also be able to fracture the formation by stagnation pressure in the cavity. A high stagnation pressure is produced at the tip of a cavity in a formation being fractured because of the jetted fluids being trapped in the cavity as a result of having to flow out of the cavity in a direction generally opposite to the direction of the incoming jetted fluid. The high pressure exerted on the formation at the tip of the cavity causes a fracture to be formed and extend some distance into the formation. In certain situations, a propping agent is suspended in the fracturing fluid which is deposited in the fracture. The propping agent may be a granular substance such as, for example, sand grains, ceramic or bauxite or other man-made grains, walnut shells, or other material carried in suspension by the fracturing fluid. The propping agent functions to prevent the fractures from closing and thereby provides conductive channels in the formation through which produced fluids can readily flow to the well bore. The presence of the propping agent also increases the erosive effect of the jetting fluid.
[0020] In order to extend the fracture formed as described above further into the formation in accordance with this invention, a fracturing fluid is pumped through the fracturing tool and into the well bore to raise the ambient fluid pressure exerted on the formation. The fluid is pumped into the fracture at a rate and high pressure sufficient to extend the fracture an additional distance from the well bore into the formation.
[0021] The details of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the figures. Turning to Figure 1, a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art is shown generally by reference numeral 100. Nozzle 130 may extend beyond the surface of the outer wall as depicted in Figure 1, or nozzle 130 may extend only to the surface of the outer wall of the hydrajetting tool 100. The orientation of nozzle 130 may be modified depending upon the formation to be fractured. The nozzle 130 has an exterior opening which acts as a nozzle opening 150 that allows the passage of fluids from the inner side of hydrajetting tool 100 through the nozzle 130. Typically, the nozzle 130 may be composed of any material that is capable of withstanding the stresses associated with fluid fracture, the abrasive nature of the fracturing or other treatment fluids and any proppants or other fracturing agents used. The materials that can be used for construction of the nozzle 13.0 may include, but are not limited to tungsten carbide, diamond composites, and certain ceramics.
[0022] Although the nozzle 130 is often composed of abrasion resistive materials such as tungsten carbide, or other certain ceramics, such materials are expensive and brittle. As a result, a tool wholly made of such substances will likely shatter as it cannot withstand the forces encountered as it moves down to the site to be fractured. Consequently, the body of the hydrajetting tool 100 is typically made of steel or similar materials that although not brittle, are not strong enough to withstand the abrasive forces encountered during the hydrajetting process.
[0023] Shown in Figure 2, is the impact of damage causing factors on a hydrajetting tool in accordance with the prior art. Arrows are used to show the direction of the fluid flow as the fluid approaches and exits the nozzle 130 through the nozzle opening 150. Typically, there are three distinct phenomena that damage the hydrajetting tool 100 as the fluid exits the nozzle 130.
[0024] First, as the fluid approaches the nozzle opening 150 it tends to rapidly turn the corner in order to exit the nozzle 130 through the nozzle opening 150. As the fluid 220 turns to exit the nozzle opening 150, some of the fluid overshoots as depicted by arrows 210. This fluid overshot also causes erosion 215 on the inner wall of the hydrajetting tool 100.
[0025] Secondly, a slight movement of the hydrajetting tool 100 can initiate a Coriolis swirling effect. The hydrajetting tool 100 is not completely stationary during the jetting process. For example, the tool may move due to vibrations resulting from the jetting process. If the hydrajetting tool 100 turns during the jetting process it will cause the fluid to start swirling, thereby creating a tornado effect 240. As the fluid swirls 240 it further erodes the inner walls 245 of the hydrajetting tool 100 along its circumference.
[0026] The third major source of damage to the hydrajetting tool 100 results from the reflection of the emitted fluid 250 from the perforations 255. As the fluid reflects 230 from the perforation it erodes 235 the hydrajetting tool 100. As discussed above, in some hydrajetting tools the direction of the nozzle opening 150 may be altered depending on the formation to be fractured. The damage resulting from the reflection of the fluid is shown in more detail in Figure 3. Depicted in Figure 3 is a diagram showing the damage to the hydrajetting tool 100 due to reflected fluids from the perforations 255 with the nozzle 300, 315 at different angles. The reflection of the fluid onto the hydrajetting tool 100 is the least when the nozzle 300 shoots the fluid 305 straight into the perforation 255. However, at this angle the splashback fluid 310 which is moving in a direction opposite to that of the jet 305 reduces the effectiveness of the jet 305 leading to an ineffective cutting of the perforation 255. Jet 300 also reduces the effectiveness of the splashback fluid 310 in damaging the tool near the fluid exit of the jet. Massive erosion on the tool 235 still occur around the perimeter of the nozzle. On the other hand, applying the jet 320 at an angle makes the cutting process highly effective. However, due to angling the nozzle 315 the effect of fluid 325 reflected onto the hydrajetting tool 100 increases as the splashback fluid 325 is undeterred. Because the fluid 325 is shooting back at the hydrajetting tool 100 at full velocity, it will cut 330 the hydrajetting tool in a short amount of time.
[0027] Shown in FIGURE 4 is a cutaway view of an improved jetting tool in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention shown generally with reference numeral 400. The improved jetting tool 400 includes a solid sleeve 440 comprising a plurality of hard material parts 415, 420 and 425. The hard material parts are made from a material having a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A. The materials that may be used to make the hard material parts 415, 420, 425 include, but are not limited to, carbide or other ceramics with a high resistance to abrasive forces. The carbide used to make the hard material parts 415, 420 and 425 may be of all grades and may be a carbide with different types of binders or without binders. In an embodiment where a carbide with binders is used to make the hard material parts 415, 420 and 425, the binder may be made of a variety of suitable materials including, but not limited to, Molybdenum and Cobalt. Although the exemplary solid sleeve comprises three hard material parts 415, 420, 425, it would be readily apparent to one skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure that a different number of hard material parts can be used depending on the desired length of the jetting tool 400 and other factors such as the nature of the formation being fractured.
[0028] As discussed above, the suitable hard materials such as carbide or other ceramics are brittle and easily shatter. This problem is resolved by enclosing the solid, sleeve 440 between a first holder 405 on one side and a second holder 410 on the other side. The holders 405, 410 act as a carrier and sacrificial body on the outside of the solid sleeve 440. The primary purpose of the holders 405, 410 is to protect the solid sleeve 440 against shattering during the jetting process and as the tool is moved to and returned from a desired location. The holders may be made of a variety of materials including but not limited to steel, fiberglass, or other suitable materials.
[0029] In the exemplary embodiment, one of the hard material parts 420 includes a hole 430. There are also holes 435 created on the body of the holders 405, 410 which are aligned to match the holes of the solid sleeve 440. The number of the holes and the angles at which the holes are located can be varied depending on the nature of the formation and other relevant factors in order to achieve a desirable performance. Because holes are created directly in the body of the jetting tool 400, a nozzle need not be used and the fluid can flow out of the jetting tool 400 through the holes in the walls.
[0030] Shown in FIGURE 5 is the impact of damage causing factors on an improved jetting tool 400 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The fluid 500 flows through the improved jetting tool 400 and exits through the hole 435 in the wall of the jetting tool 400. The causes of damage are the same as that discussed with regard to the Prior Art, namely, the fluid rapidly turning the corner 520, the fluid overshot 510, the Coriolis swirling of the fluid 540 and the reflection of the fluid 530 from the perforations
255.
[0031] However, because the solid sleeve 440 is composed of hard materials, it will not be eroded by the fluid turning the corner 520, the Coriolis swirling 540, or the overshot fluid 510. Moreover, although the reflection of the fluid 530 from the perforations 255 impacts the holder 405 and erodes 535 it, this erosion will not impact the performance of the jetting tool 400. Specifically, although the reflected fluid 530 may completely erode the holder 405, it cannot erode the hard material below it, and hence, cannot impact the operation of the jetting mechanism which is composed of the hard material forming the solid sleeve 440. The main purpose of the holder 405 is to prevent the shattering of the solid sleeve 440 and the holder 405 can perform that function despite having parts of its surface eroded 535 by the reflected fluid 530. As a result, the improved jetting tool 400 can withstand a long duration of jetting and need not be removed from the hole for part replacement until the job is completed. Moreover, any damage to holders 405, 410 can easily be repaired by simply replacing them as they are made from cheap material and are easily separable from the solid sleeve 440.
[0032] Although the present invention is described above in the context of hydrajetting and fracturing in a subterranean formation, as would be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art with the benefit of this disclosure, the improved jetting tool may be used in many other applications and industries.
[0033] Therefore, the present invention is well-adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those which are inherent therein. While the invention has been depicted and described by reference to exemplary embodiments of the invention, such a reference does not imply a limitation on the invention, and no such limitation is to be inferred. The invention is capable of considerable modification, alternation, and equivalents in form and function, as will occur to those ordinarily skilled in the pertinent arts and having the benefit of this disclosure. The depicted and described embodiments of the invention are exemplary only, and are not exhaustive of the scope of the invention. Consequently, the invention is intended to be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims, giving full cognizance to equivalents in all respects. The terms in the claims have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and clearly defined by the patentee.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A jetting tool comprising: a sleeve having at least one hole in a wall of the sleeve; wherein the sleeve comprises a material with a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A; and wherein a fluid flowing in the sleeve exits through the hole.
2. The jetting tool of claim 1, wherein the sleeve is cylindrical.
3. The jetting tool of claim 1 , wherein the material comprises a ceramic.
4. The jetting tool of claim 3, wherein the ceramic comprises a carbide.
5. The jetting tool of claim 4, wherein the carbide comprises a carbide without a binder.
6. The jetting tool of claim 4, wherein the carbide comprises a carbide with a binder.
7. The jetting tool of claim 6, wherein the binder is one of cobalt or molybdenum.
8. The jetting tool of claim 1 , wherein the jetting tool is a hydrajetting tool.
9. The jetting tool of claim 1, wherein the sleeve is enclosed in a holder.
10. The jetting tool of claim 9, wherein the holder comprises a first part and a second part.
11. The jetting tool of claim 9, wherein a hole in the holder is aligned with a hole in the body.
12. The jetting tool of claim 9, wherein the holder is separable from the body.
13. The jetting tool of claim 1, wherein the material has a hardness greater than 80 Rockwell A.
14. The jetting tool of claim 1 , wherein the jetting tool is a fracturing tool.
15. A fluid j etting device comprising: a cylindrical body; wherein the cylindrical body has a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A; an orifice in the cylindrical body; wherein a fluid flowing through the cylindrical body exits through the orifice.
16. A jetting device comprising: a holder having at least one hole formed therein; at least one insert enclosed in the holder; wherein the insert has a hardness greater than 75 Rockwell A; the insert having at least one hole formed therein; wherein the hole in the insert aligns with the hole in the holder.
17. The jetting device of claim 16, wherein the insert comprises a ceramic.
18. The jetting device of claim 17, wherein the ceramic comprises a carbide.
19. The jetting device of claim 16, wherein the holder is separable from the insert.
20. The jetting device of claim 16, wherein the holder comprises a first part and a second part, wherein the first part and the second part cooperate to enclose the insert.
PCT/GB2008/001527 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment WO2008139141A1 (en)

Priority Applications (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN200880016243.7A CN101680290B (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment
AT08750500T ATE546613T1 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 WATERJET TOOL FOR HIGH OSIVE ENVIRONMENTS
BRPI0809410-1A BRPI0809410A2 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 BLASTING TOOL, AND BLASTING DEVICE
AU2008249846A AU2008249846B2 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment
PL08750500T PL2147190T3 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment
CA2681607A CA2681607C (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment
MX2009011686A MX2009011686A (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment.
EP08750500A EP2147190B1 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/748,087 2007-05-14
US11/748,087 US7841396B2 (en) 2007-05-14 2007-05-14 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008139141A1 true WO2008139141A1 (en) 2008-11-20

Family

ID=39701141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2008/001527 WO2008139141A1 (en) 2007-05-14 2008-05-01 Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US7841396B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2147190B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101680290B (en)
AR (1) AR066548A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE546613T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2008249846B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0809410A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2681607C (en)
MX (1) MX2009011686A (en)
PL (1) PL2147190T3 (en)
RU (1) RU2422626C1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008139141A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104727794A (en) * 2015-02-03 2015-06-24 北京众博达石油科技有限公司 Scouring-resistant ejector

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8066059B2 (en) 2005-03-12 2011-11-29 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Methods and devices for one trip plugging and perforating of oil and gas wells
US8371369B2 (en) * 2007-12-04 2013-02-12 Baker Hughes Incorporated Crossover sub with erosion resistant inserts
US8439116B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2013-05-14 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for inducing fracture complexity in hydraulically fractured horizontal well completions
US8960292B2 (en) 2008-08-22 2015-02-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. High rate stimulation method for deep, large bore completions
US9796918B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2017-10-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Wellbore servicing fluids and methods of making and using same
US9016376B2 (en) 2012-08-06 2015-04-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and wellbore servicing apparatus for production completion of an oil and gas well
US8887803B2 (en) 2012-04-09 2014-11-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Multi-interval wellbore treatment method
US8631872B2 (en) 2009-09-24 2014-01-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Complex fracturing using a straddle packer in a horizontal wellbore
US8720566B2 (en) * 2010-05-10 2014-05-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Slot perforating tool
US8448700B2 (en) * 2010-08-03 2013-05-28 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Abrasive perforator with fluid bypass
US9227204B2 (en) 2011-06-01 2016-01-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydrajetting nozzle and method
US20130048282A1 (en) 2011-08-23 2013-02-28 David M. Adams Fracturing Process to Enhance Propping Agent Distribution to Maximize Connectivity Between the Formation and the Wellbore
US9097104B2 (en) 2011-11-09 2015-08-04 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc Erosion resistant flow nozzle for downhole tool
US9228422B2 (en) 2012-01-30 2016-01-05 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Limited depth abrasive jet cutter
US9371693B2 (en) 2012-08-23 2016-06-21 Ramax, Llc Drill with remotely controlled operating modes and system and method for providing the same
US10094172B2 (en) 2012-08-23 2018-10-09 Ramax, Llc Drill with remotely controlled operating modes and system and method for providing the same
US9677383B2 (en) 2013-02-28 2017-06-13 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc Erosion ports for shunt tubes
CN106761597A (en) * 2016-12-27 2017-05-31 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 A kind of single-blade hydraulic ejector
US10677024B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2020-06-09 Thru Tubing Solutions, Inc. Abrasive perforator with fluid bypass

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3145776A (en) * 1962-07-30 1964-08-25 Halliburton Co Hydra-jet tool
US4050529A (en) * 1976-03-25 1977-09-27 Kurban Magomedovich Tagirov Apparatus for treating rock surrounding a wellbore
WO1997014868A1 (en) * 1995-10-16 1997-04-24 Magne Hovden Purging means for purging upwards in ring spacing between drill pipe and bore hole wall

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4103748A (en) * 1976-12-10 1978-08-01 Arnold James F Method for inhibiting the wear in a well casing
US4243727A (en) * 1977-04-25 1981-01-06 Hughes Tool Company Surface smoothed tool joint hardfacing
US5181569A (en) * 1992-03-23 1993-01-26 Otis Engineering Corporation Pressure operated valve
US5636691A (en) * 1995-09-18 1997-06-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Abrasive slurry delivery apparatus and methods of using same
US5765642A (en) * 1996-12-23 1998-06-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Subterranean formation fracturing methods
US6286599B1 (en) * 2000-03-10 2001-09-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for lateral casing window cutting using hydrajetting
US8181703B2 (en) * 2003-05-16 2012-05-22 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method useful for controlling fluid loss in subterranean formations
US7017665B2 (en) * 2003-08-26 2006-03-28 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Strengthening near well bore subterranean formations
US7059406B2 (en) * 2003-08-26 2006-06-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Production-enhancing completion methods
US7104320B2 (en) * 2003-12-04 2006-09-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of optimizing production of gas from subterranean formations
US7445045B2 (en) * 2003-12-04 2008-11-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of optimizing production of gas from vertical wells in coal seams
US7225869B2 (en) * 2004-03-24 2007-06-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of isolating hydrajet stimulated zones
US7159660B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2007-01-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydrajet perforation and fracturing tool
US7373989B2 (en) * 2004-06-23 2008-05-20 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Flow nozzle assembly
US7090153B2 (en) * 2004-07-29 2006-08-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Flow conditioning system and method for fluid jetting tools
CN2742133Y (en) * 2004-11-19 2005-11-23 刘淑清 Hydraulic cutting seam deep penetration high pressure jet gun nozzle for petroleum production well
US7571766B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2009-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of fracturing a subterranean formation using a jetting tool and a viscoelastic surfactant fluid to minimize formation damage
US7617871B2 (en) * 2007-01-29 2009-11-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Hydrajet bottomhole completion tool and process
US20090120633A1 (en) 2007-11-13 2009-05-14 Earl Webb Method for Stimulating a Well Using Fluid Pressure Waves
US8096358B2 (en) * 2008-03-27 2012-01-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of perforating for effective sand plug placement in horizontal wells

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3145776A (en) * 1962-07-30 1964-08-25 Halliburton Co Hydra-jet tool
US4050529A (en) * 1976-03-25 1977-09-27 Kurban Magomedovich Tagirov Apparatus for treating rock surrounding a wellbore
WO1997014868A1 (en) * 1995-10-16 1997-04-24 Magne Hovden Purging means for purging upwards in ring spacing between drill pipe and bore hole wall

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104727794A (en) * 2015-02-03 2015-06-24 北京众博达石油科技有限公司 Scouring-resistant ejector

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2681607C (en) 2012-03-13
CN101680290A (en) 2010-03-24
CN101680290B (en) 2014-11-26
AU2008249846A1 (en) 2008-11-20
BRPI0809410A2 (en) 2014-09-16
US20080283299A1 (en) 2008-11-20
MX2009011686A (en) 2009-11-10
RU2422626C1 (en) 2011-06-27
CA2681607A1 (en) 2008-11-20
PL2147190T3 (en) 2012-07-31
AU2008249846B2 (en) 2013-01-31
EP2147190B1 (en) 2012-02-22
EP2147190A1 (en) 2010-01-27
AR066548A1 (en) 2009-08-26
ATE546613T1 (en) 2012-03-15
US7841396B2 (en) 2010-11-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2681607C (en) Hydrajet tool for ultra high erosive environment
US9644460B2 (en) Method for the enhancement of injection activities and stimulation of oil and gas production
US7159660B2 (en) Hydrajet perforation and fracturing tool
US7287592B2 (en) Limited entry multiple fracture and frac-pack placement in liner completions using liner fracturing tool
US7431090B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for multiple fracturing of subterranean formations
US8757262B2 (en) Apparatus and method for abrasive jet perforating and cutting of tubular members
US7963332B2 (en) Apparatus and method for abrasive jet perforating
CA2135565A1 (en) Method of cutting high strength materials with water soluble abrasives
AU2013376965B2 (en) Downhole tool with erosion resistant layer and method of use
US9416610B2 (en) Apparatus and method for abrasive jet perforating
US20120305679A1 (en) Hydrajetting nozzle and method
WO2016043699A1 (en) Jetting tool for boosting pressures at target wellbore locations
US20150144341A1 (en) System and Method for Forming Cavities
US9822616B2 (en) Pressure actuated flow control in an abrasive jet perforating tool
Van Gijtenbeek et al. Unique Hydrajet Tool Provides Cost Savings and Improved Performance in Placing Many Perforations and Proppant Fractures in Horizontal Wellbores
Gholinezhad Evaluation of latest techniques for remedial treatment of scale depositions in petroleum wells
Houser et al. Pinpoint fracturing using a multiple-cutting process
Denney Perforating System Enhances Testing and Treatment of Fracture-Stimulated Wells

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200880016243.7

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08750500

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008249846

Country of ref document: AU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2681607

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2008249846

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20080501

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2009/011686

Country of ref document: MX

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008750500

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009146059

Country of ref document: RU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: PI0809410

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20090928