WO2008141039A1 - Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials - Google Patents

Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008141039A1
WO2008141039A1 PCT/US2008/062890 US2008062890W WO2008141039A1 WO 2008141039 A1 WO2008141039 A1 WO 2008141039A1 US 2008062890 W US2008062890 W US 2008062890W WO 2008141039 A1 WO2008141039 A1 WO 2008141039A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
proppant
particulate
substrate
composite
proppants
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2008/062890
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Richard Rediger
Jesse Petrella
Michael Joseph Aron
Bedford W. Fennell
Original Assignee
Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc filed Critical Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc
Priority to RU2009145962/03A priority Critical patent/RU2478779C2/en
Priority to CA2685839A priority patent/CA2685839C/en
Publication of WO2008141039A1 publication Critical patent/WO2008141039A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • E21B43/267Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures reinforcing fractures by propping
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/80Compositions for reinforcing fractures, e.g. compositions of proppants used to keep the fractures open
    • C09K8/805Coated proppants
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S507/00Earth boring, well treating, and oil field chemistry
    • Y10S507/922Fracture fluid
    • Y10S507/924Fracture fluid with specified propping feature

Definitions

  • This inv ention relates to particulate compositions suitable for hydraulic fracturing treatments (i.e., as a composite proppant), suitable for gravel packing in sand control, or suitable for other w ell formation treatments.
  • the invention is directed to the use of a material having a lower density than the substrate attached through a binder as a coating on the substrate to enhance the buoyancy of a particulate composition (i.e. , a proppant).
  • Proppants are used to keep open fractures created by hydraulic fracturing of a subterranean formation, e.g., in an oil or gas bearing strata.
  • the fracturing is performed in a subterranean formation to increase oil or gas production.
  • Fracturing is caused by injecting a viscous fracturing fluid at a high pressure into the well.
  • a particulate material referred to as a "propping agent” or "proppant” is placed in the formation to maintain the fracture in a propped open condition when the injection pressure is released.
  • the proppants are carried into the well by suspending them in a fluid filling the fracture with a slurry of proppant.
  • proppants Upon release of the pressure, the proppants lodge in the fractures so that the fractures do not close once fracturing pressure is reduced.
  • Using proppants increases production of oil and/or gas from a subterranean formation by providing highly conductive channels through the formation.
  • Propp ⁇ tH materials that hav e been w idely used include: ( 1 ) particulate sintered ceramics, Upically aluminum oxide, silica, or bauxite, often w ith clay-like binders or other additiv e ⁇ to increase the particulate ' s compressive strength, especially sintered bauxite; (2 ) natural, relativeh coarse, sand, the particles of which are roughly spherical, generally called “frac sand” and (3) resin-coated particulates of (1 ) and (2), i.e. , resin-coated proppant.
  • each of these materials (as well as others) has a relatively high density (high specific gravity) that causes the proppants to settle rapidly once suspended in a transporting fluid, e.g., fracture fluid or frac fluid.
  • a transporting fluid e.g., fracture fluid or frac fluid.
  • such proppants generally have a density above 1.60 g/cc. and often above 3.50 g/cc.
  • Specific gravity is defined as the ratio of the density of the material or substance whose specific gravity is being determined to the density of a reference material, usually water, reported at a reference temperature (usually under a condition where the density of water ⁇ s 1 gin jc ). Speci fic gra ⁇ it> is a dinicnsionless quantity.
  • the density of a material or substance is the ratio of the mass of the material to the volume that the mass of material occupies (mass ⁇ olume) and is often reported in grams/cubic centimeters (gm/cc or g/cc) or grams/millililer (gm/ml or g/ml).
  • Another method of reducing the rate of proppant settlement is to use proppants having a low er specific gra ⁇ ⁇ i.e., a higher buoyancy) such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and sealed porous ceramics. These types of proppants exhibit a lower apparent specific gravity.
  • the apparent specific gravity is the measurement of the specific gravity of a porous solid or substance w hen the volume used in the density calculation is considered to include the porosity, i.e., the porous permeable interior, of the porous solid or substance.
  • the apparent density is less than the intrinsic density of just the solid mass of material.
  • proppants appear or perform as if they are less dense than silica sand or ceramic proppants, they tend to settle more slowly in a fluid.
  • these types of proppants are generally less crush resistant and realistically are only satisfactorily used in shallower wells at 3,000 to 4,000 psi closure pressures. Many formations may experience closure stresses of 6,000 to 10,000 psi and higher.
  • particulate compositions (proppants) having a higher buoyancy (i.e., a lower density and a lower specific gravity) and a broad closure pressure tolerance may be produced using traditional proppant materials such as (1) particulate sintered ceramics, typically aluminum oxide, silica, or bauxite, possibly with clay-like binders or other additives to increase the particulate's compressive strength, especially sintered bauxite and (2) natural, relatively coarse, sand, the particles of which are roughly spherical, generally called "frac sand,” and well as newer high crush resistant proppant materials (3).
  • frac sand natural, relatively coarse, sand, the particles of which are roughly spherical, generally called "frac sand”
  • newer high crush resistant proppant materials (3) as a substrate and applying or attaching, as a coating, a second, more buoyant (i.e., less dense) material to the substrate.
  • less dense particles such as cork particles, lower density woody material, including saw dust, plastics, (e.g.. phenolics, urethanes, polyesters, epoxies and ureas especially foamed plastics) and the like are attached to the surface of a high crush resistant (such as a conventional) proppant substrate.
  • the less dense particles may be attached to the proppant substrate using a variety of methods such as an adhesive coating.
  • the amount of less dense particles affixed to the proppant substrate may range anywhere from about 0.1 to about 20% based on the type of the less dense particles and the proppant substrate.
  • Cork particles for example, may comprise 2% to 10% of the total weight of the coated composite proppant.
  • similar coatings of less dense materials may also be applied to low density proppant substrates such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and sealed porous ceramics to achieve similar effects).
  • the material(s) or substance(s) to be attached to the proppant substrate should have an actual, inherent, or intrinsic specific gravity (i.e., not an apparent specific gravity) less than the specific gravity of the proppant substrate.
  • U.S. Patent 4,493,875 describes a proppant construction in which a coating of glass microspheres embedded in an adhesive coats a conventional silica sand proppant.
  • the material of the glass microspheres, i.e., the glass has substantially the same specific gravity (density) as the silica sand substrate (i.e., the same inherent, intrinsic or actual specific gravity or density).
  • microspheres because of the hollow nature of the microspheres, they have a lower "apparent" specific gravity. Unfortunately, when such microspheres are damaged during use (as they unavoidably are given the rigors encountered during use as a proppant), and thus expose the interior of the spheres to the surrounding environment, the material no longer acts to reduce the density of the associated proppant. As a result, the proppant losses its buoyancy and fails to be carried adequately by the carrier fluid (frac fluid).
  • carrier fluid frac fluid
  • Composite proppants having a core of a high crush-resistant proppant substrate with an intrinsically less dense coating material (as noted above) adhered to its surface may be prepared using a variety of processes.
  • a crush resistant proppant substrate e.g., a ceramic or silica sand particle
  • an adhesive resin e.g., a silicone or silica sand particle
  • particulate lower density coating material means a particulate substance having an actual, intrinsic, or inherent specific gravity (or density) lower than either the actual (e.g., intrinsic), or the apparent specific gravity (or density) of the proppant substrate.
  • the resin is added to the mixture as an adhesive for attaching the particulate lower density coating material to the surface of the proppant substrate. After mixing the proppant substrate, the adhesive resin and the lower density particulate coating material for a predefined period of time, the mixture then is discharged screened and cooled.
  • the coating of the lower density material particles may comprise a single particulate material or may include combinations of particulate materials depending on intended use.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a scanning electron microscopic image of a composite proppant of the present invention.
  • the present invention relates to a low density (low specific gravity) composite proppant (i.e., a composite proppant of increased buoyancy) to be used in petroleum and gas production to "support prop" hydraulic fractures in a subterranean formation.
  • the proppant keeps the hydraulic fractures open for the inflow of petroleum and/or natural gas, and can substantially improve the yield per well.
  • the invention relates to a coated proppant substrate as a composite proppant of increased buoyancy.
  • the invention also relates to methods for making and using these composite proppants.
  • fractures in subterranean formations may be created by injecting a treating fluid (e.g., a fracture fluid, or frac fluid) into the subterranean formation.
  • a treating fluid e.g., a fracture fluid, or frac fluid
  • Procedures for hydraulically fracturing a formation are known to those skilled in the art and do not form part of the present invention (see for example U.S. Patents 6,059,034 and 6,330,916).
  • the treating fluid hydraulic fracturing fluid
  • subterraneous fractures may increase the size and number of channels through which oil and/or other hydrocarbons may be extracted.
  • Creating fractures in a subterranean formation generally enhances the flow of the hydrocarbon material (e.g., oil) being extracted during recovery operations.
  • proppants are injected and lodged in the fractures. Without a supporting structure (provided by the proppant) to hold the fractures open, the fractures likely would close to some extent impeding the subsequent flow of the hydrocarbon fluid through the fractured formation.
  • Proppants are typically transferred in the initial injection of fracture fluid or may be included in a subsequent injection of fluid into the formation for retaining the fractured formation in a open position. In many instances, fractures may be created in areas far from the fluid injection point. Thus, proppants need to remain suspended in the treating or fracture fluid long enough for the proppants to be carried to the farthest fractures.
  • a particulate lower density material in accordance with the present invention, as a coating on the proppant substrate produces a composite proppant having a lower specific gravity (i.e., a higher buoyancy) and allows the proppants to settle at a lower rate from a particular fluid.
  • the composite proppant of the present invention travels farther through the subterraneous formation before settling in the fracture, than would otherwise be the case.
  • the proppants lodge within the fracture and may agglomerate to form a stable framework within the fracture to provide a fluid permeable region.
  • a crush resistant proppant substrate which typically comprises a particulate material, such as sand, a naturally occurring mineral, such as fused zirconia, a ceramic, such as sintered bauxite, or a sintered alumina, or another non-ceramic refractory such as milled or glass beads, as w ell as their resin-coated counterparts, is coated with a less dense particulate material, such as cork particles.
  • the proppant substrate of the composite proppant of the present invention should be sufficiently strong to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 3,000 psi, preferably the crush resistance of the proppant should be sufficient to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 5,000 psi, and more preferably the crush resistance of the proppant should be sufficient to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 7,500 psi and higher.
  • the proppant substrate such as sand or a ceramic (optionally pre-coated with a resin), generally has a distribution of particles having sizes in the range of from about 4 mesh to about 100 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve numbers)(/.e. the particles pass through a screen opening of about 4760 microns (4 mesh) and are retained on a screen opening of about 150 microns (100 mesh)).
  • Preferred proppant substrates have a distribution of particle sizes in the range of 8 mesh to 60 mesh, and more usually in the range of 16 mesh to 50 mesh (preferably at least 90% by weight of the particles satisfy such mesh size range).
  • Particularly preferred proppant substrates have a distribution of particle sizes with at least 90 % by weight of the particles having a size within the range of 20 mesh to 40 mesh.
  • the proppant substrate then is coated with a particulate lower density material such as a particulate cork.
  • the particulate lower density material typically has an actual, intrinsic, or inherent density of less than about 1.6 g/cc, preferably less than about 0.5 g/cc.
  • Suitable materials for use as the particulate lower density material include particulate cork, particulate low density woods, such as balsa, bamboo, pine and red cedar, and particulate, preferably foamed plastics, such as phenolics, urethanes. polyesters, epoxies and ureas.
  • the particulate lower density material is supplied as particulates (particles) having a particle size smaller than the proppant substrate for attaching to the surface of the proppant substrate.
  • the lower density material particulates have a distribution of particles sized in the range of 30 mesh to 635 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve numbers), i.e., particle sizes betw een 600 and 20 microns.
  • a mesh size range is recited, it means that the distribution of particles pass through the screen with the more open mesh size recited in the range and are retained on the screen having the less open (more closed) mesh size recited in the range.
  • the lower density material particulates have a distribution of particles sizes in the range of 100 mesh to 200 mesh, i.e., particle sizes between 150 and 75 microns.
  • the lower density material particulates are adhered to the surface of the proppant substrate.
  • ⁇ n adhesive typically is applied in an amount of 1 to 10 weight percent of the proppant substrate, and more usually in an amount of 2 to 5 percent.
  • a wide variety of adhesives can be used, including phenolic resins, urea resins, isocyanate resins, epoxy resins and the like. The nature of the adhesive resin is not narrowly critical.
  • Phenol- formaldehyde novolac resins can be produced by reacting a molar excess of phenol with formaldehyde in the presence of an acid catalyst, such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid or. oxalic acid (us ⁇ all ⁇ in an amount of 0.2 to 2% by weight based on the phenol). Maintaining the mole ratio of phenol to formaldehyde at. for example, 1 :0.7-0.9, is common when preparing such resins.
  • the present invention is not to be limited to any particular type of novolac resin.
  • Novolac resins are thermoplastic, i.e., they are not self-crosslinkable. Novolac resins are converted to cured resins by, for example, reacting them under heat with a crosslinking agent, such as hexa (also called hexamine or hexamethylenetetramine), or for example, by mixing them with a solid acid catalyst and paraformaldehyde and reacting them under heat. Novolac resins also may be cured with other cross linkers such as resoles and epoxies.
  • a crosslinking agent such as hexa (also called hexamine or hexamethylenetetramine)
  • hexa also called hexamine or hexamethylenetetramine
  • Novolac resins also may be cured with other cross linkers such as resoles and epoxies.
  • a solid novolac resin generally in flake form, is added to preheated proppant (200 0 F to 400 °F)(about 93 0 C to about 204 0 C) in a suitable production coater, the temperature being above the melt point of the novolac (typically 170 0 F to 200 °F)(about 77 0 C to about 93 0 C).
  • the heat causes the novolac resin to melt and the mixing action uniformly coats the surface of the proppant.
  • an aqueous solution of hexa typically is added.
  • the added water cools the coated proppant through evaporation as the hexa is distributed throughout the resin. This cooling rapidly drops the temperature of the coaled proppant and initially prevents the curing of novolac resin by the hexamine.
  • the so-coated proppant can be discharged at this point, further cooled and screened.
  • the presence of the hexamine in the novolac coating allows the coating to cure under the elevated temperature conditions encountered in the subterranean formation (cured-in-place).
  • the novolac-hexamine coating may be allowed to achieve full cure in the mixer prior to discharge of the coated proppant (pre- cured coating).
  • the conventional procedure for making a coated proppant with a novolac resin is modified by including the lower density coating material particles along with the molten novolac resin and proppant in the mixing operation.
  • the lower density coating material particles become adhered to the surface of the proppant substrate though the adhesive action of the novolac resin.
  • the lower density coating material particles can be added to the solid no ⁇ olac resin in an operation separate from, i.e., prior to, the coating operation. Then the resin with the embedded lower density coating material particles is used to coat the proppant substrate.
  • the adhesive used to adhere the lower density coating material particles to the proppant substrate may be a thermoplastic resin of the type disclosed in co-pending U.S. Application Serial No. 1 1/456,897, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • thermoplastic adhesive material Particularly preferred for use as the thermoplastic adhesive material are those substances commonly referred to as hot melt adhesi ⁇ es.
  • hot melt adheshes such as Opt-E-BondTM HLOO33 manufactured b ⁇ the UB Fuller Co.. and Cool-LokTM 34-250A manufactured by National ⁇ dhesives ma ⁇ be used as an adhesh e for attaching the particulate lower density materials to the crush resistant proppant substrate.
  • Other adhesive options include pine rosins and modified rosins marketed by Georgia-Pacific Corporation as NOVARESS 1 100 and NOVARES® 1 182.
  • thermoplastic resin as the adhesive is that after the thermoplastic coated proppants is lodged in a fracture, thermal energy in the subterraneous formation causes the thermoplastic to become tacky (sticky) and fuse with other similarly thermoplastic-coated proppants to form a supporting framework for keeping the fracture open. Furthermore, the tacky (sticky) nature of the thermoplastic coated proppants is expected to help keep the particulate lower density coating material from eroding from the proppant substrate and/or helps to capture any eroded particulates and may also capture other loose solid particulates in (low-backs. As such, the amount of solid material that is extracted with the desired hydrocarbon, e.g., petroleum, may be controlled or reduced.
  • desired hydrocarbon e.g., petroleum
  • a particulate cork material is mixed with a molten thermoplastic resin and is coated on a proppant substrate to lower the density (increase the buoyancy) of the composite proppant.
  • the composite proppant not only is the composite proppant provided with an inherent tackiness, the composite proppant also has an enhanced buoyancy due to the adherence of the lower density coating material particles on the proppant.
  • the amount of lower density coating material particulates used in coating the proppant substrate may range from about 0.1 weight % to about 20 weight % based on the weight of the proppant substrate and is usually expected to be applied in an amount between about 1 and 10% by weight.
  • a cork particulate material may comprise 2 w eight % to 3 weight % of a proppant ⁇ s weight. Higher amounts also can be used and the present im ention should not be limited to these amounts.
  • the proppant substrates coated with the lower density particulate material may include commonl) used proppanl substrates such as silica sand, ceramics, bauxite and the like, as well as their resin pre-coated alternatives, as w ell as newer crush resistant proppant substrates.
  • commonl used proppanl substrates such as silica sand, ceramics, bauxite and the like, as well as their resin pre-coated alternatives, as w ell as newer crush resistant proppant substrates.
  • more viscous fluids were required to carry these types of proppants greater distances into a fractured subterranean formation due to their relatively higher densities (higher specific gravities).
  • these proppant substrates may be carried using less viscous fluids (than traditionally used) to transfer the proppants a similar or greater distance into the fractured formation.
  • composite proppants of the present invention typically have a particle size distribution in the range of about 14 mesh to 100 mesh (mesh size according to the U.S. Standard Sieve Series).
  • the particulates e.g.. composite proppants
  • the particulates have a size falling within this range.
  • at least 90% by weight of the particulates have a size distribution of 8 to 60 mesh, and more preferably 16 to 50 mesh.
  • at least 90% by weight of the particulates have a particulate distribution size in the range of 20 mesh to 40 mesh.
  • proppant substrates of lower apparent specific grav it may also be used.
  • 1 hose types of proppants may include natural or synthetically pioduced materials and structures such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and porous ceramics. These proppants generally have a lower crush resistant threshold than conventional proppants.
  • Using proppants having a relatively lower apparent specific gravity further reduces the viscosity and pressure required to pump the fluid carrying the proppanl through the subterraneous formation. Attaching less dense particulate materials to these types of proppants may further increase the distance the proppants are able to trax el prior to settling.
  • attaching less dense particulate materials to proppants having lower apparent specific gravities may allow well drilling operations to further low er the viscosity of the fracture or treating fluid. Lowering the viscosity of the treating fluid may also further reduce the amount of power or pressure required to pump the fluid the necessary distance. Again, the tradeoff with these materials, however, is their lower crush resistant threshold
  • high buoyancy composite proppants may be used in a variety of other applications and operations.
  • high buoyancy composite proppants may be used in gravel packing procedures in which a screening device is placed in a wellbore.
  • Other hydrocarbon recovery-related operations may also benefit from the use of higher buoyancy proppants as will be apparent to a worker skilled in such related procedures.
  • a particulate cork-coated silica sand may be prepared by initially heating the uncoated sand, adding a hot melt adhesive and mixing the sand with the adhesive for a predefined amount of time. Subsequently, particulate cork material may be added to the heated mixture, coating the silica sand with the cork particles.
  • the formation of the composite proppant may include multiple steps of adding adhesive to insure that the cork material coats the silica sand sufficiently. Once the sand has been sufficiently coated with the cork material particles, the composite proppant is cooled and discharged, and then screened to the desired particle size distribution.
  • a proppant substrate material e.g., about 3000 g of 20/40 frac sand or a porous ceramic (such as the 20/40 porous ceramic available commercially from Carbo Ceramics)
  • a preheated mixer such as a mill and allowed to equilibrate at a temperature of about 400" F (about 204 0 C).
  • a frac sand novolac resin e.g., Georgia-Pacific GP-2202 frac resin
  • % hexamine and 2 wt. % wax powder is added to the proppant/molten resin mixture and mixed for about fifteen additional seconds. Subsequently, an additional amount of the resin (about 120 g) is added and mixed for another fifteen seconds. Then, more hexamine/wax powder mixture (about 18.4 g) is added and mixing is continued for two minutes. The coated proppant is then discharged after the two minutes and subsequently can be screened to a desired particle size.
  • Example 1 The procedure of Example 1 w as repeated w ith two differences. First after the first portion of the hexa wax powder has been mixed, 50 g of powdered (particulate) cork is added and mixed for about 20 seconds. Then, after the addition of 120 g of additional ( ⁇ P-2202. mixing is continued for 30 seconds, not just 15 seconds. The coated proppant is then discharged after the tw o minutes and subsequently can be screened to a desired particle size.
  • Figure 1 is a scanning electron microscopic image of the composite proppant of this example having particulate cork attached by the resin adhesive to the surface of the proppant substrate.

Abstract

A composite proppant having an increased buoyancy comprising a proppant substrate such as a porous ceramic or a silica sand coated with a material of a lesser actual density than the apparent density of the proppanl substrate to increase the buoyancy of the composite proppant.

Description

INCREASING BUOYANCY OF WELL TREATING MATERIALS
TECHNICAL FIELD
(01 ] This inv ention relates to particulate compositions suitable for hydraulic fracturing treatments (i.e., as a composite proppant), suitable for gravel packing in sand control, or suitable for other w ell formation treatments. Specifically, the invention is directed to the use of a material having a lower density than the substrate attached through a binder as a coating on the substrate to enhance the buoyancy of a particulate composition (i.e. , a proppant).
BACKGROUND
[021 Proppants are used to keep open fractures created by hydraulic fracturing of a subterranean formation, e.g., in an oil or gas bearing strata. Typically, the fracturing is performed in a subterranean formation to increase oil or gas production. Fracturing is caused by injecting a viscous fracturing fluid at a high pressure into the well. As fractures are formed, a particulate material, referred to as a "propping agent" or "proppant" is placed in the formation to maintain the fracture in a propped open condition when the injection pressure is released. As a fracture forms, the proppants are carried into the well by suspending them in a fluid filling the fracture with a slurry of proppant. Upon release of the pressure, the proppants lodge in the fractures so that the fractures do not close once fracturing pressure is reduced. Using proppants increases production of oil and/or gas from a subterranean formation by providing highly conductive channels through the formation.
[03] 1 he maintenance of these channels provides increased flow of various fluids, e.g., lmlrocarbons such as natural "as and oil. [04] ProppαtH materials that hav e been w idely used include: ( 1 ) particulate sintered ceramics, Upically aluminum oxide, silica, or bauxite, often w ith clay-like binders or other additiv e^ to increase the particulate's compressive strength, especially sintered bauxite; (2 ) natural, relativeh coarse, sand, the particles of which are roughly spherical, generally called "frac sand" and (3) resin-coated particulates of (1 ) and (2), i.e. , resin-coated proppant.
|05] I n fortunately, each of these materials (as well as others) has a relatively high density (high specific gravity) that causes the proppants to settle rapidly once suspended in a transporting fluid, e.g., fracture fluid or frac fluid. In particular, such proppants generally have a density above 1.60 g/cc. and often above 3.50 g/cc.
[06] Specific gravity is defined as the ratio of the density of the material or substance whose specific gravity is being determined to the density of a reference material, usually water, reported at a reference temperature (usually under a condition where the density of water ■s 1 gin jc ). Speci fic gra\ it> is a dinicnsionless quantity. The density of a material or substance is the ratio of the mass of the material to the volume that the mass of material occupies (mass \ olume) and is often reported in grams/cubic centimeters (gm/cc or g/cc) or grams/millililer (gm/ml or g/ml).
[07] When the proppant settles too rapidly from the frac fluid, the settlement interferes with positioning of the proppant throughout the fractured formation. To counteract this result, the fracturing fluid is often thickened to increase its viscosity and thus slow the rate of a specific proppant's settlement. One issue with using a higher viscosity fracturing fluid, however, is the increased amount of energy required to pump the fluid into the subterranean formations when the fractures are created and when proppant is delivered throughout the formation. In other words, more energy is required to pump thicker fluid* [08) Another method of reducing the rate of proppant settlement is to use proppants having a low er specific gra\
Figure imgf000004_0001
{i.e., a higher buoyancy) such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and sealed porous ceramics. These types of proppants exhibit a lower apparent specific gravity. The apparent specific gravity is the measurement of the specific gravity of a porous solid or substance w hen the volume used in the density calculation is considered to include the porosity, i.e., the porous permeable interior, of the porous solid or substance. Thus, in the case of porous materials the apparent density is less than the intrinsic density of just the solid mass of material.
[09] Since these proppants appear or perform as if they are less dense than silica sand or ceramic proppants, they tend to settle more slowly in a fluid. However, these types of proppants are generally less crush resistant and realistically are only satisfactorily used in shallower wells at 3,000 to 4,000 psi closure pressures. Many formations may experience closure stresses of 6,000 to 10,000 psi and higher.
[ 10] In view of the foregoing, interest in developing new solutions to proppant design and transport in well recovery operations remains strong. In particular, particulate compositions (proppants) that have slower settlement times yet are able to function at higher closure stresses continue to be in demand.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[11] In accordance with the present invention, particulate compositions (proppants) having a higher buoyancy (i.e., a lower density and a lower specific gravity) and a broad closure pressure tolerance may be produced using traditional proppant materials such as (1) particulate sintered ceramics, typically aluminum oxide, silica, or bauxite, possibly with clay-like binders or other additives to increase the particulate's compressive strength, especially sintered bauxite and (2) natural, relatively coarse, sand, the particles of which are roughly spherical, generally called "frac sand," and well as newer high crush resistant proppant materials (3). as a substrate and applying or attaching, as a coating, a second, more buoyant (i.e., less dense) material to the substrate.
[12] In one embodiment, less dense particles such as cork particles, lower density woody material, including saw dust, plastics, (e.g.. phenolics, urethanes, polyesters, epoxies and ureas especially foamed plastics) and the like are attached to the surface of a high crush resistant (such as a conventional) proppant substrate. The less dense particles may be attached to the proppant substrate using a variety of methods such as an adhesive coating. The amount of less dense particles affixed to the proppant substrate may range anywhere from about 0.1 to about 20% based on the type of the less dense particles and the proppant substrate. Cork particles, for example, may comprise 2% to 10% of the total weight of the coated composite proppant. (In the broader aspects of the invention, similar coatings of less dense materials may also be applied to low density proppant substrates such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and sealed porous ceramics to achieve similar effects).
[13| In practicing the present invention, the material(s) or substance(s) to be attached to the proppant substrate should have an actual, inherent, or intrinsic specific gravity (i.e., not an apparent specific gravity) less than the specific gravity of the proppant substrate. For example, U.S. Patent 4,493,875 describes a proppant construction in which a coating of glass microspheres embedded in an adhesive coats a conventional silica sand proppant. The material of the glass microspheres, i.e., the glass, has substantially the same specific gravity (density) as the silica sand substrate (i.e., the same inherent, intrinsic or actual specific gravity or density). However, because of the hollow nature of the microspheres, they have a lower "apparent" specific gravity. Unfortunately, when such microspheres are damaged during use (as they unavoidably are given the rigors encountered during use as a proppant), and thus expose the interior of the spheres to the surrounding environment, the material no longer acts to reduce the density of the associated proppant. As a result, the proppant losses its buoyancy and fails to be carried adequately by the carrier fluid (frac fluid).
[ 14) The present im ention a\oids this inherent problem with the prior art since the present invention instead is directed to the use of materials whose actual, intrinsic, or inherent specific gravity (actual, intrinsic, or inherent density) is lower than the specific gravity (actual or apparent) of the proppant substrate. Applicant submits that the nature of the material used in the present invention exhibits an improved integrity relative to the hollow microspheres used in the prior art.
115] Composite proppants having a core of a high crush-resistant proppant substrate with an intrinsically less dense coating material (as noted above) adhered to its surface may be prepared using a variety of processes. In one example, a crush resistant proppant substrate, e.g., a ceramic or silica sand particle, may be heated and mixed with an adhesive resin and a particulate lower density coating material to form the composite proppant. As used throughout the specification and claims the phrase "particulate lower density coating material" means a particulate substance having an actual, intrinsic, or inherent specific gravity (or density) lower than either the actual (e.g., intrinsic), or the apparent specific gravity (or density) of the proppant substrate. The resin is added to the mixture as an adhesive for attaching the particulate lower density coating material to the surface of the proppant substrate. After mixing the proppant substrate, the adhesive resin and the lower density particulate coating material for a predefined period of time, the mixture then is discharged screened and cooled. The coating of the lower density material particles may comprise a single particulate material or may include combinations of particulate materials depending on intended use.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
116] Figure 1 illustrates a scanning electron microscopic image of a composite proppant of the present invention. DEl AILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[ 17] The present invention relates to a low density (low specific gravity) composite proppant (i.e., a composite proppant of increased buoyancy) to be used in petroleum and gas production to "support prop" hydraulic fractures in a subterranean formation. The proppant keeps the hydraulic fractures open for the inflow of petroleum and/or natural gas, and can substantially improve the yield per well. More particularly, the invention relates to a coated proppant substrate as a composite proppant of increased buoyancy. The invention also relates to methods for making and using these composite proppants.
[18] By making and using composite proppants of lower density (i.e., of increased buoyancy), power consumption associated with pumping a fracturing fluid and proppants into subterraneous formations during well drilling operations may be reduced. That is, the viscosity of the fracturing fluid does not need to be increased as much as currently employed in order to reduce the settlement rate of the proppant. Since higher viscosity fluids require more power to pump them at a predefined pressure than do lower viscosity fluids, using a lower viscosity fluid consumes less power and results in lower energy costs. The present invention allows lower viscosity fluids to be used since the lower density proppants of the present invention settle at a lower rate due to their increased buoyancy. Furthermore, the slower settlement rate of the lower density proppants of the present invention allows the proppants to be distributed over a larger subterraneous area.
[19] According to one or more arrangements of the present invention, fractures in subterranean formations may be created by injecting a treating fluid (e.g., a fracture fluid, or frac fluid) into the subterranean formation. Procedures for hydraulically fracturing a formation are known to those skilled in the art and do not form part of the present invention (see for example U.S. Patents 6,059,034 and 6,330,916). The treating fluid (hydraulic fracturing fluid) is injected at a high pressure to force the creation of subterraneous fractures. In oil drilling operations, subterraneous fractures may increase the size and number of channels through which oil and/or other hydrocarbons may be extracted. Creating fractures in a subterranean formation generally enhances the flow of the hydrocarbon material (e.g., oil) being extracted during recovery operations.
[2OJ To maintain these fractures open, as is well known, proppants are injected and lodged in the fractures. Without a supporting structure (provided by the proppant) to hold the fractures open, the fractures likely would close to some extent impeding the subsequent flow of the hydrocarbon fluid through the fractured formation. Proppants are typically transferred in the initial injection of fracture fluid or may be included in a subsequent injection of fluid into the formation for retaining the fractured formation in a open position. In many instances, fractures may be created in areas far from the fluid injection point. Thus, proppants need to remain suspended in the treating or fracture fluid long enough for the proppants to be carried to the farthest fractures.
[21 ] The use of a particulate lower density material, in accordance with the present invention, as a coating on the proppant substrate produces a composite proppant having a lower specific gravity (i.e., a higher buoyancy) and allows the proppants to settle at a lower rate from a particular fluid. Thus, the composite proppant of the present invention travels farther through the subterraneous formation before settling in the fracture, than would otherwise be the case. Once a coated composite proppant of the present invention reaches a fracture, the proppants lodge within the fracture and may agglomerate to form a stable framework within the fracture to provide a fluid permeable region.
[221 O'ie advantage of using a composite proppant having a lower specific gravity (i.e., a higher buoyancy) in accordance with the present invention is that the fluid viscosity needed to carry the proppant the desired distance into the fractured formation can accordingly be reduced, relative to the viscosity of the fluid that otherwise would be needed for the unmodified proppant. This viscosity reduction reduces energy costs associated with the hydrocarbon recovery operation. [23] In order to prepare the composite proppant of the present invention, a crush resistant proppant substrate, which typically comprises a particulate material, such as sand, a naturally occurring mineral, such as fused zirconia, a ceramic, such as sintered bauxite, or a sintered alumina, or another non-ceramic refractory such as milled or glass beads, as w ell as their resin-coated counterparts, is coated with a less dense particulate material, such as cork particles. The proppant substrate of the composite proppant of the present invention should be sufficiently strong to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 3,000 psi, preferably the crush resistance of the proppant should be sufficient to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 5,000 psi, and more preferably the crush resistance of the proppant should be sufficient to withstand a closure pressure of at least about 7,500 psi and higher.
(24] The proppant substrate, such as sand or a ceramic (optionally pre-coated with a resin), generally has a distribution of particles having sizes in the range of from about 4 mesh to about 100 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve numbers)(/.e. the particles pass through a screen opening of about 4760 microns (4 mesh) and are retained on a screen opening of about 150 microns (100 mesh)). Preferred proppant substrates have a distribution of particle sizes in the range of 8 mesh to 60 mesh, and more usually in the range of 16 mesh to 50 mesh (preferably at least 90% by weight of the particles satisfy such mesh size range). Particularly preferred proppant substrates have a distribution of particle sizes with at least 90 % by weight of the particles having a size within the range of 20 mesh to 40 mesh.
[25 j In accordance with the present invention, the proppant substrate then is coated with a particulate lower density material such as a particulate cork. In the broadest aspects of the present invention the particulate lower density material typically has an actual, intrinsic, or inherent density of less than about 1.6 g/cc, preferably less than about 0.5 g/cc. Suitable materials for use as the particulate lower density material include particulate cork, particulate low density woods, such as balsa, bamboo, pine and red cedar, and particulate, preferably foamed plastics, such as phenolics, urethanes. polyesters, epoxies and ureas.
|26] Preferably, the particulate lower density material is supplied as particulates (particles) having a particle size smaller than the proppant substrate for attaching to the surface of the proppant substrate. Preferably, the lower density material particulates have a distribution of particles sized in the range of 30 mesh to 635 mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve numbers), i.e., particle sizes betw een 600 and 20 microns. As is conventional, when a mesh size range is recited, it means that the distribution of particles pass through the screen with the more open mesh size recited in the range and are retained on the screen having the less open (more closed) mesh size recited in the range. For the most part, at least 90% by weight of the particles in a given sample are intended to have the recited distribution. Usually, the lower density material particulates have a distribution of particles sizes in the range of 100 mesh to 200 mesh, i.e., particle sizes between 150 and 75 microns.
|27] To prepare the composite proppant of the present invention, the lower density material particulates are adhered to the surface of the proppant substrate. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention this is accomplished by affixing the lower density material particulates to the surface of the proppant substrate using an adhesive binder resin. Λn adhesive typically is applied in an amount of 1 to 10 weight percent of the proppant substrate, and more usually in an amount of 2 to 5 percent. In the broadest aspect of the invention a wide variety of adhesives can be used, including phenolic resins, urea resins, isocyanate resins, epoxy resins and the like. The nature of the adhesive resin is not narrowly critical.
[28| One particularly common adhesive for use in the present invention is the class of phenol- formaldehyde novolac resins commonly used to coat conventional proppants. Phenol- formaldehyde novolac resins can be produced by reacting a molar excess of phenol with formaldehyde in the presence of an acid catalyst, such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid or. oxalic acid (usιιall\ in an amount of 0.2 to 2% by weight based on the phenol). Maintaining the mole ratio of phenol to formaldehyde at. for example, 1 :0.7-0.9, is common when preparing such resins. However, the present invention is not to be limited to any particular type of novolac resin.
[291 Novolac resins are thermoplastic, i.e., they are not self-crosslinkable. Novolac resins are converted to cured resins by, for example, reacting them under heat with a crosslinking agent, such as hexa (also called hexamine or hexamethylenetetramine), or for example, by mixing them with a solid acid catalyst and paraformaldehyde and reacting them under heat. Novolac resins also may be cured with other cross linkers such as resoles and epoxies.
[3OJ Novolac resins have long been used for coating of proppants. A solid novolac resin, generally in flake form, is added to preheated proppant (200 0F to 400 °F)(about 93 0C to about 204 0C) in a suitable production coater, the temperature being above the melt point of the novolac (typically 170 0F to 200 °F)(about 77 0C to about 93 0C). The heat causes the novolac resin to melt and the mixing action uniformly coats the surface of the proppant. Subsequent to achieving uniform coating, an aqueous solution of hexa typically is added. The added water cools the coated proppant through evaporation as the hexa is distributed throughout the resin. This cooling rapidly drops the temperature of the coaled proppant and initially prevents the curing of novolac resin by the hexamine. The so-coated proppant can be discharged at this point, further cooled and screened. When used, the presence of the hexamine in the novolac coating allows the coating to cure under the elevated temperature conditions encountered in the subterranean formation (cured-in-place). In an alternative process, the novolac-hexamine coating may be allowed to achieve full cure in the mixer prior to discharge of the coated proppant (pre- cured coating). These coating and curing techniques are well known and understood in the prior art and can be adapted with only routine experimentation for use in affixing the particulate lower density material to the proppant substrate in connection with the present invention.
[31 ] In accordance w ith the present invention, the conventional procedure for making a coated proppant with a novolac resin is modified by including the lower density coating material particles along with the molten novolac resin and proppant in the mixing operation. Thus, when the coating is cooled, the lower density coating material particles become adhered to the surface of the proppant substrate though the adhesive action of the novolac resin. Alternatively, the lower density coating material particles can be added to the solid no\ olac resin in an operation separate from, i.e., prior to, the coating operation. Then the resin with the embedded lower density coating material particles is used to coat the proppant substrate.
[32 J In another embodiment of the invention, the adhesive used to adhere the lower density coating material particles to the proppant substrate may be a thermoplastic resin of the type disclosed in co-pending U.S. Application Serial No. 1 1/456,897, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
[33] In particular, various types of thermoplastic materials that may be used as an adhesive for adhering the lower density coating material particles to the proppant substrate in this embodiment of the invention broadly include polyethylene; polypropylene; SIS (styrene- isoprene-styrene) copolymers; ABS copolymers (i.e., acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene); SBS (styrene-butadiene-styrene) copolymers; polyurethanes; EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) copolymers; polystyrene; acrylic polymers; polyvinyl chloride and other similar fluoroplastics; pine rosins and modified rosins, such as rosin esters including glycerol rosin esters and pentaerythritol rosin esters; polysulfide; EEA (ethylene ethyl acrylate) copolymers; styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers; nylons, phenol-formaldehyde novolac resins, waxes and other similar materials and their mixtures. Particularly preferred for use as the thermoplastic adhesive material are those substances commonly referred to as hot melt adhesi\es. for example, hot melt adheshes such as Opt-E-Bond™ HLOO33 manufactured b\ the UB Fuller Co.. and Cool-Lok™ 34-250A manufactured by National Λdhesives ma\ be used as an adhesh e for attaching the particulate lower density materials to the crush resistant proppant substrate. Other adhesive options include pine rosins and modified rosins marketed by Georgia-Pacific Corporation as NOVARESS 1 100 and NOVARES® 1 182.
[34] One of the benefits of using such a thermoplastic resin as the adhesive is that after the thermoplastic coated proppants is lodged in a fracture, thermal energy in the subterraneous formation causes the thermoplastic to become tacky (sticky) and fuse with other similarly thermoplastic-coated proppants to form a supporting framework for keeping the fracture open. Furthermore, the tacky (sticky) nature of the thermoplastic coated proppants is expected to help keep the particulate lower density coating material from eroding from the proppant substrate and/or helps to capture any eroded particulates and may also capture other loose solid particulates in (low-backs. As such, the amount of solid material that is extracted with the desired hydrocarbon, e.g., petroleum, may be controlled or reduced.
[35 J In one specific example of the present invention, a particulate cork material is mixed with a molten thermoplastic resin and is coated on a proppant substrate to lower the density (increase the buoyancy) of the composite proppant. Thus, not only is the composite proppant provided with an inherent tackiness, the composite proppant also has an enhanced buoyancy due to the adherence of the lower density coating material particles on the proppant.
[36] The amount of lower density coating material particulates used in coating the proppant substrate may range from about 0.1 weight % to about 20 weight % based on the weight of the proppant substrate and is usually expected to be applied in an amount between about 1 and 10% by weight. In one particular arrangement, a cork particulate material may comprise 2 w eight % to 3 weight % of a proppant \s weight. Higher amounts also can be used and the present im ention should not be limited to these amounts.
[37] Λs noted abo\ e. the proppant substrates coated with the lower density particulate material may include commonl) used proppanl substrates such as silica sand, ceramics, bauxite and the like, as well as their resin pre-coated alternatives, as w ell as newer crush resistant proppant substrates. Traditionally, more viscous fluids were required to carry these types of proppants greater distances into a fractured subterranean formation due to their relatively higher densities (higher specific gravities). However, by attaching the lower density particulate materials, such as particulate cork, on the surface of the proppant these proppant substrates may be carried using less viscous fluids (than traditionally used) to transfer the proppants a similar or greater distance into the fractured formation.
[38] With respect to size, composite proppants of the present invention typically have a particle size distribution in the range of about 14 mesh to 100 mesh (mesh size according to the U.S. Standard Sieve Series). Generally, at least 90% by weight of the particulates (e.g.. composite proppants) added to the treating or fracturing fluid have a size falling within this range. Preferably, at least 90% by weight of the particulates have a size distribution of 8 to 60 mesh, and more preferably 16 to 50 mesh. In some particularly preferred arrangements, at least 90% by weight of the particulates have a particulate distribution size in the range of 20 mesh to 40 mesh.
[39] According to one or more embodiments, proppant substrates of lower apparent specific grav it) may also be used. 1 hose types of proppants may include natural or synthetically pioduced materials and structures such as hollow glass balls, walnut hulls and porous ceramics. These proppants generally have a lower crush resistant threshold than conventional proppants. Using proppants having a relatively lower apparent specific gravity further reduces the viscosity and pressure required to pump the fluid carrying the proppanl through the subterraneous formation. Attaching less dense particulate materials to these types of proppants may further increase the distance the proppants are able to trax el prior to settling. Additionally or alternatively, attaching less dense particulate materials to proppants having lower apparent specific gravities may allow well drilling operations to further low er the viscosity of the fracture or treating fluid. Lowering the viscosity of the treating fluid may also further reduce the amount of power or pressure required to pump the fluid the necessary distance. Again, the tradeoff with these materials, however, is their lower crush resistant threshold
While the discussion herein refers to well drilling operations in particular, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the use of high buoyancy composite proppants according to the present invention may be used in a variety of other applications and operations. For example, in addition to the oil drilling operations discussed above, high buoyancy composite proppants may be used in gravel packing procedures in which a screening device is placed in a wellbore. Other hydrocarbon recovery-related operations may also benefit from the use of higher buoyancy proppants as will be apparent to a worker skilled in such related procedures.
As noted above, the composite proppants described herein may be prepared using a variety of processes. In one example, a particulate cork-coated silica sand may be prepared by initially heating the uncoated sand, adding a hot melt adhesive and mixing the sand with the adhesive for a predefined amount of time. Subsequently, particulate cork material may be added to the heated mixture, coating the silica sand with the cork particles. The formation of the composite proppant may include multiple steps of adding adhesive to insure that the cork material coats the silica sand sufficiently. Once the sand has been sufficiently coated with the cork material particles, the composite proppant is cooled and discharged, and then screened to the desired particle size distribution. [42] One of ordman skill in the art will appreciate that the amount of substrate, resin and paniculate coating material ma\ \ary based on the desired degree of coating, weight of the substrate, t>pe of substrate, type of coating material, type of resin and other factors.
[43) While the im ention has been described with respect to specific examples including presently preferred modes of carrying out the invention, those skilled in the art will appreciate that there are numerous variations and permutations of the above described systems and techniques that fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
|44| A proppant substrate material (e.g., about 3000 g of 20/40 frac sand or a porous ceramic (such as the 20/40 porous ceramic available commercially from Carbo Ceramics)) is preheated in an oven and the preheated substrate then is added to a preheated mixer such as a mill and allowed to equilibrate at a temperature of about 400" F (about 204 0C). When the proppant substrate temperature reaches 400° F (about 204 0C), a frac sand novolac resin (e.g., Georgia-Pacific GP-2202 frac resin) is added to the heated proppant and then mixed for about fifteen seconds. Then, about 9 g of a powder mixture of 98 wt. % hexamine and 2 wt. % wax powder is added to the proppant/molten resin mixture and mixed for about fifteen additional seconds. Subsequently, an additional amount of the resin (about 120 g) is added and mixed for another fifteen seconds. Then, more hexamine/wax powder mixture (about 18.4 g) is added and mixing is continued for two minutes. The coated proppant is then discharged after the two minutes and subsequently can be screened to a desired particle size.
EKAMPLL2
[45) The procedure of Example 1 w as repeated w ith two differences. First after the first portion of the hexa wax powder has been mixed, 50 g of powdered (particulate) cork is added and mixed for about 20 seconds. Then, after the addition of 120 g of additional ( ϊP-2202. mixing is continued for 30 seconds, not just 15 seconds. The coated proppant is then discharged after the tw o minutes and subsequently can be screened to a desired particle size.
[46] The following Table shows the apparent specific gravities of representative proppants made using the procedures of Examples 1 and 2.
20/40 Frac Sand 20/40 Porous Ceramic
Example 1 2.37 1.96
Example 2 2.18 1.94
[47] Figure 1 is a scanning electron microscopic image of the composite proppant of this example having particulate cork attached by the resin adhesive to the surface of the proppant substrate.
|48| In one simulation, fifty grams of each of the coated frac sand proppant of Example 1 and the composite frac sand proppant of Example 2 were mixed together and suspended in three hundred milliliters of thickened fracture fluid to model the transport of the proppanls through a fracture fluid. The proppant of Example 1 was colored red using 2 g of a red pigment, while the proppant of Example 2 was colored blue using 2 g of a blue pigment. In the simulation, the cork coated sand proppants took longer to settle out and a greater fraction ended up on the top of the settled packet, as demonstrated by the separation of the colored layers.
|49| The present invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. 1 lowever, this application is intended to cover those changes and substitutions that may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Unless otherwise specifically indicated, all percentages are by weight. Throughout the specification and in the claims the term "about" is intended to encompass - or - 5%.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1 . Λ method for treating a subterranean formation comprising introducing into fractures in the formation particles comprising a composite proppant, said composite proppant comprising a core of a proppant substrate having an adhered coating of a particulate material, the particulate material having an actual density less than an apparent density of the proppant substrate.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proppant substrate is selected from the group consisting of bauxite, silica sand and porous ceramic, optionally coated with a resin.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adhered coating of particulate material comprises a particulate cork.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the particulate cork comprises 2% to 3% by weight of the composite proppant.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the material is adhered to the proppant substrate using a hot melt adhesive.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the material is adhered to the proppant substrate using a novolac resin crosslinked with hexamine.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the hot melt adhesive includes a thermoplastic resin.
8. 1 he method of claim 1 , wherein the adhered coating of particulate material comprises 0.1 % to 20% by weight of the composite proppant.
9. A particulate composite proppant comprising a proppant substrate capable of u ithstanding a closure pressure of at least about 5,000 psi and having an adhered coating of a particulate material with an actual density less than an apparent density of the proppant substrate.
K). The particulate composite proppant of claim 9 further comprising an adhesive adhering the particulate material to the proppant substrate.
1 1 . The particulate composite proppant of claim 10, wherein the adhesive includes a thermoplastic resin.
12. The particulate composite proppant of claim 10, wherein the adhesive includes a wax powder.
13. The particulate composite proppant of claim 10, wherein the adhesive includes a thermosetting resin.
14. The particulate composite proppant of claim 9, wherein the adhered coating of particulate material comprises a particulate cork.
15. The particulate composite proppant of claim 14, wherein the particulate cork comprises 2% to 3% by weight of the particulate composite proppant.
16. The particulate composite proppant of claim 9, wherein the proppant substrate comprises at least one of a porous ceramic, silica sand, bauxite and hollow glass, optionally having a resin coating.
17. The particulate composite proppant of claim 15, wherein the proppant substrate comprises a particulate silica sand. I h. The paniculate composite proppant of claim 10, wherein the material comprises 0.1% to U°o of the composite proppant by weight.
PCT/US2008/062890 2007-05-11 2008-05-07 Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials WO2008141039A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU2009145962/03A RU2478779C2 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-05-07 Improvement of floatation abilities of materials for well treatment
CA2685839A CA2685839C (en) 2007-05-11 2008-05-07 Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/747,359 2007-05-11
US11/747,359 US8058213B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2007-05-11 Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008141039A1 true WO2008141039A1 (en) 2008-11-20

Family

ID=39683521

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2008/062890 WO2008141039A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-05-07 Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8058213B2 (en)
AR (1) AR066529A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2685839C (en)
CL (1) CL2008001375A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2478779C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008141039A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105051151A (en) * 2013-02-01 2015-11-11 巴斯夫欧洲公司 A proppant
US10538696B2 (en) 2015-01-12 2020-01-21 Southwestern Energy Company Proppant and methods of using the same

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8133587B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2012-03-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Proppant materials comprising a coating of thermoplastic material, and methods of making and using
US8003214B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2011-08-23 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Well treating materials comprising coated proppants, and methods
US7754659B2 (en) * 2007-05-15 2010-07-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
CA2777748C (en) 2009-10-20 2017-09-19 Soane Energy Llc Proppants for hydraulic fracturing technologies
US8448706B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2013-05-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Delivery of particulate material below ground
US8459353B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2013-06-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Delivery of particulate material below ground
US9234415B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2016-01-12 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Delivery of particulate material below ground
US8714248B2 (en) 2010-08-25 2014-05-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of gravel packing
EP2665892B1 (en) 2011-01-17 2019-06-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method for fracturing a formation using a fracturing fluid mixture
EP2751387B1 (en) 2011-08-31 2019-06-19 Self-Suspending Proppant LLC Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing
US9297244B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2016-03-29 Self-Suspending Proppant Llc Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing comprising a coating of hydrogel-forming polymer
US20140000891A1 (en) 2012-06-21 2014-01-02 Self-Suspending Proppant Llc Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing
US9868896B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2018-01-16 Self-Suspending Proppant Llc Self-suspending proppants for hydraulic fracturing
WO2013120009A1 (en) 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Preparation of polymeric resins and carbon materials
WO2013120011A1 (en) 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Energ2 Technologies, Inc. Preparation of polymeric resins and carbon materials
US9133337B2 (en) 2012-02-09 2015-09-15 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Methods for making polymer particulates in gel form
AU2012388203B2 (en) 2012-08-23 2017-04-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Reduced emissions method for recovering product from a hydraulic fracturing operation
US9169433B2 (en) * 2012-09-27 2015-10-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for enhancing well productivity and minimizing water production using swellable polymers
US9321956B2 (en) 2012-11-28 2016-04-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for hindering the settling of particulates in a subterranean formation
WO2014085603A1 (en) 2012-11-29 2014-06-05 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Preparation of phenol-formaldehyde resin beads using suspension or emulsion polymerization
US11352505B1 (en) * 2013-07-25 2022-06-07 Oceanit Laboratories, Inc. Method of making buoyancy adjusted materials and their application thereof
GB201316610D0 (en) * 2013-09-18 2013-10-30 Montanuniversitat Leoben Ground supporting energy recovery medium with carbohydrate-based thickener salt and proppant in base liquid
US9932521B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2018-04-03 Self-Suspending Proppant, Llc Calcium ion tolerant self-suspending proppants
BR112017020593A2 (en) * 2015-03-27 2018-07-03 Carbo Ceramics Inc methods and compositions for using scoring surface chemistry and internal porosity to consolidate scoring particles
KR102637617B1 (en) 2015-08-28 2024-02-19 그룹14 테크놀로지스, 인코포레이티드 Novel materials with extremely durable intercalation of lithium and manufacturing methods thereof
WO2017109048A1 (en) * 2015-12-23 2017-06-29 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Proppant composite
CN111088028B (en) * 2018-10-23 2022-07-08 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Ultralow-density proppant and preparation method and application thereof
WO2020106655A1 (en) 2018-11-21 2020-05-28 Self-Suspending Proppant Llc Salt-tolerant self-suspending proppants made without extrusion
US10619090B1 (en) 2019-04-15 2020-04-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Fracturing fluid compositions having Portland cement clinker and methods of use

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4493875A (en) * 1983-12-09 1985-01-15 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Proppant for well fractures and method of making same
WO2004092254A2 (en) * 2003-04-15 2004-10-28 Borden Chemical, Inc. Particulate material containing thermoplastic elastomer and methods for making and using same
WO2005095202A1 (en) * 2004-03-22 2005-10-13 Meissner Joerg Swimming aid
WO2006034298A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-30 Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. Particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same
GB2426023A (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-15 Bj Services Co Structured composite compositions for well treatment

Family Cites Families (98)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3815680A (en) 1971-04-09 1974-06-11 Continental Oil Co Method for fracturing and propping unconsolidated and dilatant subterranean formations
US3929191A (en) 1974-08-15 1975-12-30 Exxon Production Research Co Method for treating subterranean formations
US4073343A (en) 1976-12-23 1978-02-14 Texaco Inc. Sand consolidation method
US4126181A (en) 1977-06-20 1978-11-21 Palmer Engineering Company Ltd. Method and apparatus for formation fracturing with foam having greater proppant concentration
US4160483A (en) 1978-07-21 1979-07-10 The Dow Chemical Company Method of treating a well using fluoboric acid to clean a propped fracture
US4183813A (en) 1978-11-15 1980-01-15 Palmer Engineering Company Ltd. Mixture concentrator
US4222444A (en) 1978-12-06 1980-09-16 Hamilton Harold L Method of well fluid leak prevention
GB2050467B (en) 1979-06-07 1983-08-03 Perlman W Fracturing subterranean formation
US4336842A (en) 1981-01-05 1982-06-29 Graham John W Method of treating wells using resin-coated particles
US4547468A (en) 1981-08-10 1985-10-15 Terra Tek, Inc. Hollow proppants and a process for their manufacture
US4439489A (en) 1982-02-16 1984-03-27 Acme Resin Corporation Particles covered with a cured infusible thermoset film and process for their production
CA1202882A (en) 1982-03-01 1986-04-08 Owen Richmond Method of removing gas from an underground seam
CA1185778A (en) 1982-07-12 1985-04-23 Brian R. Ainley Stable foams and methods of use
US4518040A (en) 1983-06-29 1985-05-21 Halliburton Company Method of fracturing a subterranean formation
US4527627A (en) 1983-07-28 1985-07-09 Santrol Products, Inc. Method of acidizing propped fractures
US4569394A (en) 1984-02-29 1986-02-11 Hughes Tool Company Method and apparatus for increasing the concentration of proppant in well stimulation techniques
US4888240A (en) 1984-07-02 1989-12-19 Graham John W High strength particulates
US4585064A (en) 1984-07-02 1986-04-29 Graham John W High strength particulates
CA1228226A (en) 1984-07-05 1987-10-20 Arup K. Khaund Sintered low density gas and oil well proppants from a low cost unblended clay material of selected compositions
US4665990A (en) 1984-07-17 1987-05-19 William Perlman Multiple-stage coal seam fracing method
US4923714A (en) 1987-09-17 1990-05-08 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Novolac coated ceramic particulate
US4869960A (en) 1987-09-17 1989-09-26 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Epoxy novolac coated ceramic particulate
US4852650A (en) 1987-12-28 1989-08-01 Mobil Oil Corporation Hydraulic fracturing with a refractory proppant combined with salinity control
US5188175A (en) 1989-08-14 1993-02-23 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Method of fracturing a subterranean formation with a lightweight propping agent
US5005641A (en) 1990-07-02 1991-04-09 Mohaupt Henry H Gas generator with improved ignition assembly
US5133624A (en) 1990-10-25 1992-07-28 Cahill Calvin D Method and apparatus for hydraulic embedment of waste in subterranean formations
US5128390A (en) 1991-01-22 1992-07-07 Halliburton Company Methods of forming consolidatable resin coated particulate materials in aqueous gels
US5217074A (en) 1991-10-29 1993-06-08 Exxon Chemical Patents Inc. Method of fracturing formations
US5728302A (en) 1992-04-09 1998-03-17 Groundwater Services, Inc. Methods for the removal of contaminants from subterranean fluids
US5425994A (en) 1992-08-04 1995-06-20 Technisand, Inc. Resin coated particulates comprissing a formaldehyde source-metal compound (FS-MC) complex
US5330005A (en) 1993-04-05 1994-07-19 Dowell Schlumberger Incorporated Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
CA2497728C (en) 1993-04-05 2008-02-19 Roger J. Card Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5422183A (en) 1993-06-01 1995-06-06 Santrol, Inc. Composite and reinforced coatings on proppants and particles
US5381864A (en) 1993-11-12 1995-01-17 Halliburton Company Well treating methods using particulate blends
US5411093A (en) 1993-12-10 1995-05-02 Mobil Oil Corporation Method of enhancing stimulation load fluid recovery
US5837656A (en) 1994-07-21 1998-11-17 Santrol, Inc. Well treatment fluid compatible self-consolidating particles
US5500174A (en) 1994-09-23 1996-03-19 Scott; Gregory D. Method of manufacture of a prepacked resin bonded well liner
GB9503949D0 (en) 1995-02-28 1995-04-19 Atomic Energy Authority Uk Oil well treatment
US5639806A (en) 1995-03-28 1997-06-17 Borden Chemical, Inc. Bisphenol-containing resin coating articles and methods of using same
US6047772A (en) 1995-03-29 2000-04-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5582249A (en) 1995-08-02 1996-12-10 Halliburton Company Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5839510A (en) 1995-03-29 1998-11-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6209643B1 (en) 1995-03-29 2001-04-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of controlling particulate flowback in subterranean wells and introducing treatment chemicals
US5787986A (en) 1995-03-29 1998-08-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5775425A (en) 1995-03-29 1998-07-07 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of fine particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5833000A (en) 1995-03-29 1998-11-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5501274A (en) 1995-03-29 1996-03-26 Halliburton Company Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5929437A (en) 1995-08-18 1999-07-27 Protechnics International, Inc. Encapsulated radioactive tracer
US5578371A (en) 1995-08-25 1996-11-26 Schuller International, Inc. Phenol/formaldehyde fiberglass binder compositions exhibiting reduced emissions
US6528157B1 (en) 1995-11-01 2003-03-04 Borden Chemical, Inc. Proppants with fiber reinforced resin coatings
US5697440A (en) 1996-01-04 1997-12-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6364018B1 (en) 1996-11-27 2002-04-02 Bj Services Company Lightweight methods and compositions for well treating
US6059034A (en) 1996-11-27 2000-05-09 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US20050028979A1 (en) 1996-11-27 2005-02-10 Brannon Harold Dean Methods and compositions of a storable relatively lightweight proppant slurry for hydraulic fracturing and gravel packing applications
US6330916B1 (en) 1996-11-27 2001-12-18 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US7426961B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2008-09-23 Bj Services Company Method of treating subterranean formations with porous particulate materials
US6749025B1 (en) 1996-11-27 2004-06-15 Bj Services Company Lightweight methods and compositions for sand control
US6017854A (en) 1997-05-28 2000-01-25 Union Oil Company Of California Simplified mud systems
WO1999027229A1 (en) 1997-11-21 1999-06-03 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US6114410A (en) 1998-07-17 2000-09-05 Technisand, Inc. Proppant containing bondable particles and removable particles
DK1023382T3 (en) 1998-07-22 2006-06-26 Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc Composite propellant, composite filtration agents and processes for their preparation and use
US6406789B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2002-06-18 Borden Chemical, Inc. Composite proppant, composite filtration media and methods for making and using same
US6582819B2 (en) 1998-07-22 2003-06-24 Borden Chemical, Inc. Low density composite proppant, filtration media, gravel packing media, and sports field media, and methods for making and using same
US6116342A (en) 1998-10-20 2000-09-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6439789B1 (en) 2000-09-27 2002-08-27 Closure Medical Corporation Polymerizable 1, 1-disubstituted ethylene monomer formulation applicators, applicator tips, applicator kits and methods
US6439309B1 (en) 2000-12-13 2002-08-27 Bj Services Company Compositions and methods for controlling particulate movement in wellbores and subterranean formations
US6491097B1 (en) 2000-12-14 2002-12-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Abrasive slurry delivery apparatus and methods of using same
US6790317B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2004-09-14 University Of Hawaii Process for flash carbonization of biomass
DE60120794T2 (en) 2001-07-03 2007-05-03 Scapa Tapes North America, Inc., Windsor HEAT-ACTIVATED TAPE WITH AN ACRYLIC FOAM-SPECIFIC CARRIER
EA005718B1 (en) 2001-09-11 2005-04-28 Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. Methods for controlling screenouts of propping material in a hydraulic formation fracturing
US6626241B2 (en) 2001-12-06 2003-09-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of frac packing through existing gravel packed screens
US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-11-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment
US7153575B2 (en) 2002-06-03 2006-12-26 Borden Chemical, Inc. Particulate material having multiple curable coatings and methods for making and using same
US6732800B2 (en) 2002-06-12 2004-05-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of completing a well in an unconsolidated formation
US7066260B2 (en) 2002-08-26 2006-06-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Dissolving filter cake
US6832650B2 (en) 2002-09-11 2004-12-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of reducing or preventing particulate flow-back in wells
US7100688B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2006-09-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture monitoring using pressure-frequency analysis
US6817414B2 (en) 2002-09-20 2004-11-16 M-I Llc Acid coated sand for gravel pack and filter cake clean-up
CN1304729C (en) 2002-12-18 2007-03-14 宜兴东方石油支撑剂有限公司 Solid propping agent for oil-gas well fractrue
US6892813B2 (en) 2003-01-30 2005-05-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for preventing fracture proppant flowback
WO2004083600A1 (en) 2003-03-18 2004-09-30 Bj Services Company Method of treating subterranean formations using mixed density proppants or sequential proppant stages
US7581872B2 (en) 2003-04-30 2009-09-01 Serva Corporation Gel mixing system
US7044220B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2006-05-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US7178596B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2007-02-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well
US20050059588A1 (en) * 2003-09-15 2005-03-17 Regents Of The University Of California Peptides which generate antibodies resulting in lysis of pathologically adherent erythrocytes
CA2540429C (en) 2003-11-04 2007-01-30 Global Synfrac Inc. Proppants and their manufacture
US7244492B2 (en) 2004-03-04 2007-07-17 Fairmount Minerals, Ltd. Soluble fibers for use in resin coated proppant
US7073581B2 (en) 2004-06-15 2006-07-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Electroconductive proppant compositions and related methods
WO2006023172A2 (en) 2004-08-16 2006-03-02 Fairmount Minerals, Ltd. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean formations using elastomeric resin coated proppants
US7210526B2 (en) 2004-08-17 2007-05-01 Charles Saron Knobloch Solid state pump
US7491444B2 (en) 2005-02-04 2009-02-17 Oxane Materials, Inc. Composition and method for making a proppant
UA92339C2 (en) * 2005-02-25 2010-10-25 Сьюпириор Графайт Ко. graphite-impregnated coating of particulate materials
CN1325423C (en) 2005-07-13 2007-07-11 攀枝花环业冶金渣开发有限责任公司 High titanium type petroleum oil pressing crack propping agent and production method thereof
US8003214B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2011-08-23 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Well treating materials comprising coated proppants, and methods
US8133587B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2012-03-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Proppant materials comprising a coating of thermoplastic material, and methods of making and using
WO2008033225A2 (en) 2006-09-13 2008-03-20 Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. Logging device with down-hole transceiver for operation in extreme temperatures
US7624802B2 (en) 2007-03-22 2009-12-01 Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Low temperature coated particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same
US7754659B2 (en) 2007-05-15 2010-07-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4493875A (en) * 1983-12-09 1985-01-15 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Proppant for well fractures and method of making same
WO2004092254A2 (en) * 2003-04-15 2004-10-28 Borden Chemical, Inc. Particulate material containing thermoplastic elastomer and methods for making and using same
WO2005095202A1 (en) * 2004-03-22 2005-10-13 Meissner Joerg Swimming aid
WO2006034298A2 (en) * 2004-09-20 2006-03-30 Hexion Specialty Chemicals Inc. Particles for use as proppants or in gravel packs, methods for making and using the same
GB2426023A (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-15 Bj Services Co Structured composite compositions for well treatment

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105051151A (en) * 2013-02-01 2015-11-11 巴斯夫欧洲公司 A proppant
US10538696B2 (en) 2015-01-12 2020-01-21 Southwestern Energy Company Proppant and methods of using the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8058213B2 (en) 2011-11-15
CL2008001375A1 (en) 2008-11-14
RU2478779C2 (en) 2013-04-10
CA2685839C (en) 2015-07-14
CA2685839A1 (en) 2008-11-20
US20080277115A1 (en) 2008-11-13
RU2009145962A (en) 2011-06-20
AR066529A1 (en) 2009-08-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8058213B2 (en) Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials
US7754659B2 (en) Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
US7244492B2 (en) Soluble fibers for use in resin coated proppant
US8003214B2 (en) Well treating materials comprising coated proppants, and methods
EP1859001B1 (en) Methods of creating high porosity propped fractures
US20100282468A1 (en) Fracturing fluid compositions comprising solid epoxy particles and methods of use
CA2546765C (en) Structured composite compositions for treatment of subterranean wells
AU2005313226B2 (en) Low-quality particulates and methods of making and using improved low-quality particulates
US20120183687A1 (en) Methods for Reducing Particulate Density
US20140076558A1 (en) Methods and Compositions for Treating Proppant to Prevent Flow-Back
DK181044B1 (en) Flowback resistant proppants
CN109943315B (en) Scale inhibition proppant and preparation method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 08755114

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2685839

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009145962

Country of ref document: RU

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08755114

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1