WO2009038851A2 - Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants - Google Patents
Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2009038851A2 WO2009038851A2 PCT/US2008/068396 US2008068396W WO2009038851A2 WO 2009038851 A2 WO2009038851 A2 WO 2009038851A2 US 2008068396 W US2008068396 W US 2008068396W WO 2009038851 A2 WO2009038851 A2 WO 2009038851A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- mine drainage
- acid mine
- generation source
- preventing
- acid
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09B—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE
- B09B3/00—Destroying solid waste or transforming solid waste into something useful or harmless
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09B—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE
- B09B1/00—Dumping solid waste
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/34—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used
- C02F3/341—Consortia of bacteria
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F1/66—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by neutralisation; pH adjustment
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
- C02F2103/10—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from quarries or from mining activities
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2305/00—Use of specific compounds during water treatment
- C02F2305/06—Nutrients for stimulating the growth of microorganisms
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
Definitions
- the present invention may relate to treatment of mine wastes (e.g., acidic wastewater, water with high metal concentrations, mining rock heaps, mining sludge, or the like), halogenated contaminates, metals in oxidized form, and the like.
- mine wastes e.g., acidic wastewater, water with high metal concentrations, mining rock heaps, mining sludge, or the like
- halogenated contaminates metals in oxidized form
- the present invention may relate to methods and apparatus regarding biological source treatments of acid mine wastes, halogenated contaminants, metals in oxidized form, and the like perhaps even using packaged products.
- Other embodiments may include prevention of the production of acid in wastewater perhaps by treatment of potential acid mine source materials and the like.
- Acid mine drainage is a prevalent environmental issue throughout the world stemming from historic and active coal and hard rock mining activities.
- Much of this waste material may be composed of sulfidic ore as pyrite (FeS 2 ) or other metal-sulfides that can oxidize and dissociate into sulfate and protons (acidity) when exposed to dissolved oxygen in water, thus, lowering the pH of the surrounding environment.
- Acid mine wastewater may contaminate watersheds with elevated concentrations of heavy metals and acidic waters, posing significant threats to the environment and human health.
- Acid mine wastewater may include, but is not limited to, acid mine drainage, mineral mine drainage, heavy metal containing effluent, and the like. Acid mine wastewater may be formed through an oxidation of metal sulfides, which may result in a release of protons (acidity) and hazardous metals.
- Past methods used to treat exposed mine waste may include removal of the material and storing it in a secure location or perhaps even capping the material in place with impermeable or even semi-permeable barriers designed to eliminate airborne dust and reduce water infiltration into the pile and subsequent acid mine drainage generation.
- These caps may be composed of a variety of materials that range from cementitious capping materials to living blankets of acid/metal-tolerant grass, shrub, and tree species growing on thin layers of clay and top soil on top of the waste material.
- Other treatments for acid mine wastewater may include using minerals such as limestone to neutralize acidic water; utilizing natural processes (sulfate reducing activity) in ponds and wetlands; and perhaps treating acid mine wastewater using various bioreactors that dominantly utilize the activity of sulfate reducing bacteria.
- other past treatments may include use of microorganisms to reduce sulfate into sulfide resulting in metal-sulfide precipitates and proton consumption.
- Reductive degradation such as reductive dechlorination is a biological process that is used to describe certain types of biodegradation of oxidized metals, solvents, perhaps even chlorinated solvents, and the like in groundwater.
- Various chlorinated compounds such as but not limited to tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, other chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and the like in groundwater can be biodegraded by naturally occurring bacteria. This may occur when other bacteria, perhaps even anaerobic bacteria, present in a contaminated site take electrons from organic compounds (the "electron donors") and produce H 2 .
- Dechlorinating bacteria may use the electrons in the H 2 to replace a chlorine atom in the compounds.
- TCE may be dechlorinated via dichloroethene and vinyl chloride to ethylene gas, a harmless end-product.
- Other solvents such as 1,1,1 -TC A and carbon tetrachloride, can also be degraded by reductive dechlorination.
- Embodiments of the present invention may include methods and treatments for the prevention of acid mine drainage perhaps including forming a protective biof ⁇ lm over acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- Other embodiments of the present invention may include treatments of contaminated water perhaps including injection of specific substrates to enhance reductive degradation of the contaminants in the contaminated water.
- Figures IA, IB, and 1C are examples of an electromagnetic induction survey showing resistivity changes of a treatment location site.
- Figure 2 is an example of a protective biofilm in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- Figure 3 is an example of a pie chart showing species frequency in a protective biofilm.
- Figure 4A and 4B are examples of acid mine drainage generation source treatments and contaminated water environment treatments, respectively, in accordance with embodiments of the present invention.
- Figure 5 shows water quality parameters monitored in microcosms containing waste material as discussed in the Study #1 feasibility test.
- Figure 6 shows changes in pH in microcosms containing waste material as discussed in the Study #1 feasibility test.
- Figure 7 shows changes in pH in microcosms containing waste material treated as discussed in the Study #1 feasibility test.
- Figure 8 shows changes in water pH during a test using various amendments with crushed waste rock.
- Figure 9 shows TCE degradation in anaerobic microcosms containing TCE- contaminated groundwater.
- the present invention includes a variety of aspects, which may be combined in different ways.
- the following descriptions are provided to list elements and describe some of the embodiments of the present invention. These elements are listed with initial embodiments, however it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments.
- the variously described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed to limit the present invention to only the explicitly described systems, techniques, and applications. Further, this description should be understood to support and encompass descriptions and claims of all the various embodiments, systems, techniques, methods, devices, and applications with any number of the disclosed elements, with each element alone, and also with any and all various permutations and combinations of all elements in this or any subsequent application.
- a biological source treatment technique may treat acid mine drainage, acid mine wastewater, or even other types of contaminated water perhaps at a source through injections of substrate and perhaps even microbial inoculum injections.
- biological source treatment techniques may be used to treat acid mine drainage at a source by establishing a biofilm or perhaps even a biofilm-mineral mixture on source materials that may neutralize existing acidity and may prevent fresh oxidation of acid generating minerals.
- a treatment location site may include but is not limited to hard rock mines, backfilled coal mining waste, backfilled mining waste, waste rock piles, copper mines, gold mines, lead mines, silver mines, coal mines, and the like.
- a treatment location site may include at least one acid mine drainage generation source.
- An acid mine drainage generation source may be identified at a treatment location site with an acid mine drainage generation source identifier. Identification may include human evaluation, site survey methods, electromagnetic induction surveys, ground electromagnetic induction surveys, air electromagnetic surveys, and the like.
- Utilization of electromagnetic induction surveys may determine areas of low resistance in a treatment location site and may even measure changes in subsurface resistivity throughout a site. Low resistance may be an indication of acid mine drainage generation source material. Accordingly, EM mapping may provide valuable information in potential hotspots and perhaps even acid mine drainage plume movement within a site. From an identification of an acid mine drainage generation source, at least one treatment area may be determined as optimal for administering a treatment injection. As such, at least one injection well may be installed in the treatment areas.
- FIG. 1 shows an example of an electromagnetic induction survey (9) at a treatment location site (7). These figures show a relative change in resistivity over 6 months after encompassing a first and second round of biological source treatment injections based on 400 Hz vertical planar electromagnetic surveys at a depth of 40m. Locations on numbered monitoring wells (indicated by a white "x") and injection wells (8) (indicated with a white or black circle) are shown.
- Figure IA is an initial ground electromagnetic (“EM") survey 6 months after a first round of biological source treatment injections
- Figure IB is a second EM survey 6 months after the initial ground survey and approximately 2-3 months after a second round of biological source treatment injections
- Figure 1C is the difference in resistance between the first and second surveys.
- the darkest area of Figure IA indicates low resistance and may represent an acid mine drainage generation source (10).
- Embodiments of the present invention may provide injection of at least one substrate into at least one treatment area of an acid mine drainage generation source. Injections and injection samples may be administered by an up-gradient, down-hole injection, a gravimetric injection, and the like injection methods.
- a substrate and perhaps even a biofilm inducing substrate injection sample may include but is not limited to a carbon source, a dairy product, returned milk, milk, lactate, whey, ice cream, acetate, chitin, crustacean exoskeleton, corn syrup, vegetable oil, grease, kitchen grease, brewery wastes, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, industrial waste, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a substrate and perhaps even a biofilm inducing substrate injection sample may be a liquid, a concentrated liquid, a solid, a dried solid, a freeze-dried solid, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Returned milk may include lactose, triglycerides, proteins, and the like which may provide necessary elements to at least one kind of microbial population to create a protective biofilm.
- Returned milk may include spoiled milk, ice cream, milk, and the like and may even be old milk that has past its expiration date and has been returned to a dairy. Use with returned milk as a substrate may provide an inexpensive and recyclable option since it may provide new uses of waste products.
- Returned milk may be high in organic carbon and it may be easy to concentrate.
- Returned milk may provide the nutrients and vitamins that may be beneficial to microbial growth or perhaps even any kind of biological growth. There may even be some beneficial microorganisms in the milk itself that may make up a good portion of a microbial community of a protective biofilm, as further discussed below.
- one injection of substrate may be sufficient to treatment of acid mine drainage. However, in other embodiments, it may take multiple substrate doses or perhaps even multiple biofilm inducing substrate injection samples to treat an acid mine drainage generation source.
- an amount of carbon source which may be injected into a treatment area of an acid mine drainage generation source may include but is not limited to a 2 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 3 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 4 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 5 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 6 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material, and the like ratios.
- a water extractable sulfate may be an amount of sulfate that can be extracted from a given amount of source material using a mild extraction method such as but not limited to mixing in deionized water for about 12 to about 24 hours. Of course, any ratio may be used and all options are meant to be included in this disclosure.
- an amount of carbon may include but is not limited to a 2:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 3:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 4:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 5:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 6:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced, and the like ratios.
- bacteria perhaps even sulfate-reducing bacteria, consume carbon they may use 1 mole of sulfate (SO 4 2" ) as a terminal electron acceptor (perhaps the same way aerobic bacteria use oxygen) for every 2 moles of carbon they consume.
- Reduce in this case, may include chemically reducing by gaining an electron. Since there may be other kinds of bacteria species in a biofilm which may not be using sulfate as an electron acceptor but may be using carbon as a food source, the dosage here may vary. Of course, any ratio may be used and all options are meant to be included in this disclosure.
- a substrate may be injected into an acid mine drainage generation source (12), at least some of the substrate may be biologically consumed by at least one kind of microbial population and a protective biofilm (13) may be biologically constructed over a plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials (14) as can be understood from Figures 2 and 4A.
- a microbial population may consume a substrate perhaps by breaking down the substrates into smaller molecules.
- a microbial population may be an indigenous microbial population located in an acid mine drainage generation source, or in other embodiments, microbial populations may be newly injected, perhaps even only a single injection of a newly injected microbial population, into a treatment area of an acid mine drainage generation source.
- microbial populations may include but are not limited to metal-reducing bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogenic bacteria, facultative anaerobes, site specific species, bacteria found in a substrate, aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, obligate anaerobic bacteria, cow teat bacteria, metal-tolerant denitrifier bacteria, sulfur-loving fermenter bacteria, Desulfosporosinus sp, sulfate reducing bacteria clone 159, acidovorax avenae, nickel tolerant denitrif ⁇ er bacteria, facultative denitrifiers, uncultured bacterium clone B-42, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Other components may include but are not limited to at least one nutrient perhaps in a nutrient injection sample, a pH adjuster perhaps in a pH adjuster injection sample, reductant perhaps in a reductant injection sample, inoculum, and the like.
- nutrients may include but are not limited to nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, Na 2 HPO 4 , NaH 2 PO 4 , NH 4 Cl, KCl, NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), MgSO 4 , MnSO 4 H 2 O, NaCl, FeSO 4 TH 2 O, CaCl 2 2H 2 O, CoCl 2 OH 2 O, ZnCl 2 , CuSO 4 SH 2 O, AIK(SO 4 ) 2 - 12H 2 O, H 3 BO 3 , Na 2 MoO 4 , NiCl 2 6H 2 O, Na 2 WO 4 -2H 2 O, potassium compounds, magnesium compounds, calcium compounds, sodium compounds, trace amounts of metals, compounds of other cationic substitution for sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and the like, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Examples of a pH adjuster may include but is not limited to lime, trona, carbonate, bicarbonate, enzymes, proteins, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Examples of a reductant may include but is not limited to NaS, cystein, organic substrates, combinations thereof, and the like. Organic substrates may indirectly serve as a reductant when they may oxidize and reduce an environment.
- Examples of an inoculum includes but is not limited to bacteria populations, ES inoculum, municipal sewage sludge, enriched ES inoculum, non-toxic media with microbial consortia, and the like.
- an biof ⁇ lm inducing substrate injection sample (11) which may include individual or perhaps even combined packaged injections of substrates, inoculum, nutrients, pH adjuster, reductant, additives, other components, and the like may be injected into an acid mine drainage generation source (12) having a plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials (14) and a surrounding environment (15) as shown in Figure 4 A.
- an acid mine drainage generation source (12) having a plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials (14) and a surrounding environment (15) as shown in Figure 4 A.
- a protective biofilm may be created as shown in Figure 2 and discussed in more detail below.
- a packaged product may include, individually or perhaps even in various combinations, a substrate or any other components as described herein.
- a packaged product may be specifically designed for a particular site and may have all of the needed ingredients combined in a single product.
- a packaged product may also include liquid, concentrated liquid, dried, freeze-dried, or the like substrates, inoculum injections, nutrients, pH adjusters, reductants, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a protective biofilm which may be biologically constructed over acid mine drainage generation source materials may be a complex protective biofilm with a diverse microbial community.
- This complex protective biofilm may include microbial cells and perhaps even extracellular polymers.
- a diverse microbial community may have numerous different microbial species including but not limited to greater than about 50 different species, greater than about 70 different species, about 75 different species, greater than about 75 different species, and the like.
- a complex protective biofilm may include a multilayered community as shown in Figure 2.
- a biofilm may have at least two layers, at least three layers, at least four layers, and the like, hi embodiments, at least some facultative anaerobic bacteria may be found in an outermost layer (20) and perhaps even at least some obligate anaerobic bacteria may be found in an inner layer (19) of a multilayered community.
- bacteria which may be found in a complex biofilm may include but are not limited to aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, obligate anaerobic bacteria, cow teat bacteria, metal- tolerant denitrifier bacteria, sulfur-loving fermenter bacteria, Desulfosporosinus sp, sulfate reducing bacteria clone 159, acidovorax avenae, nickel tolerant denitrifier bacteria, facultative denitrifiers, uncultured bacterium clone B-42, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a protective biofilm (13) may include, in embodiments, a multilayered community with perhaps an outer layer (20) and an inner layer (19) coating an acid mine drainage generation source material (14).
- oxygen (O 2 ) may surround a biofilm.
- various reactions may occur in the layers of a biofilm as shown in Figure 2.
- Figure 3 shows a chart of the different kinds of species analyzed in a biofilm.
- facultative anaerobic bacteria such as perhaps anaerobic bacteria from cow teat, may be a dominant species found in a biofilm.
- Other more dominant species may include metal-tolerant, denitrifying bacteria, and sulfur-loving, fermenter bacteria.
- this figure represents only one example of the kinds of bacteria which may be found in an acid mine drainage biofilm.
- a protective biofilm may prevent oxidation of acid mine drainage generation source materials by providing an oxidation prevention source and sulfuric acid generation prevention source. For example, interactions among the species in a diverse microbial community may result in physically preventing oxidation in an acid mine drainage generation source materials and perhaps even chemically preventing oxidation in an acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- a complex biofilm may have an oxygen- reducing capacity by providing an oxygen-reducing microbial barrier which may chemically consume oxygen before it can reach any acid mine drainage generation source materials and cause acid generation.
- a biofilm may form a hydrophobic physical barrier, perhaps due to exopolymer secretions in a biofilm, which could physically shield the acid mine drainage generation source materials from exposure to oxygen by eliminating contact between acid mine drainage generation source materials and oxygenated water.
- a biofilm may provide an anaerobic system around acid mine drainage generation source materials which creates an oxygen-free micro-environment surrounding an acid source even though the overlying water remains aerobic.
- the prevention of oxidation in acid mine drainage generation source materials may result in the prevention of sulfuric acid generation.
- a protective biofilm may effectively scavenge all oxygen near the source materials and prevent oxidation and acid generation.
- a protective biofilm that may be established on the acid mine drainage generation source materials may provide an effective system to raise the pH of the surrounding environment and perhaps even prevent fresh acid generation.
- a surrounding environment may include water, wastewater, and the like.
- the present invention may provide attaining at least a circumneutral pH in a surrounding environment. This may include increasing a pH level from an acidic pH level to a circumneutral pH level or perhaps even maintaining a circumneutral pH level or perhaps even neutralizing sulfuric acid in an acid mine drainage generation source.
- An acidic pH level may include but is not limited to less than about 6 pH, less than about 5 pH, about 4.5 pH, about 2.5 pH, and the like.
- a circumneutral pH may include but is not limited to greater than about 6 pH, about 7 pH, greater than about 7 pH, about 7.2 pH, between about 6 pH and about 8.5 pH, and the like.
- Acid mine drainage generation source materials may be any kind of material which can assist in or even produce sulfuric acid and contamination of environments including but not limited to iron sulfides, iron disulfide (FeS 2 ), FeS, metal sulfides, sulfidic ore, crushed ore, tailings pile, waste rock, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a protective biofilm may include a permanent protective biofilm which perhaps can be maintained to prevent acid mine generation for a long period of time.
- Preventing sulfuric acid generation for a period of time may include but is not limited to at least about 3 months, more than about 1.8 years, more than about 2 years, about 6 months, about 9 months, about 12 months, about 18 months, more than about 19 months, about 24 months, about 3 years, about 5 years, about 10 years, and the like. Of course, any amount of time may be included perhaps even up to about 50 or up to about 100 years, and all are meant to be included in this disclosure.
- inventions of the present invention may include precipitating metals and perhaps even reducing iron concentrations in an acid mine drainage generation source.
- halogenated compounds such as perchloroethene, trichloroethylene, and perchlorate, which may remain recalcitrant in the environment.
- Most halogenated contaminants may be carcinogens and therefore may warrant immediate and effective clean-up remedies.
- Reductive dehalogenation may be applied in the biodegradation of halogenated compounds.
- dehalogenating microbes When substrates are added to a halogen-contaminated water environment, dehalogenating microbes may catalyze a transfer of electrons from organic substrates to halogenated compounds, reducing them to less harmful intermediates and perhaps may eventually produce harmless end products.
- a number of microbial populations that may adapt to low redox environments have been identified as capable of catalyzing reductive dehalogenation. These bacteria may include but are not limited to: sulfate-reducing, methanogenic, dehalogenating species, and the like.
- oxidized form such as hexavalent chromium (Cr (Vl)), uranium (V), arsenate (As (V)), and the like, which may become extremely toxic to human and environmental health.
- Cr (Vl) hexavalent chromium
- V uranium
- As (V) arsenate
- Reductive immobilization or perhaps even reductive degradation may be applied in the biodegradation of oxidized metal compounds.
- microbes may catalyze a transfer of electrons from organic substrates to the oxidized metals, reducing them to immobilized precipitates.
- a number of microbial populations that may adapt to low redox environments have been identified as capable of catalyzing reductive immobilization.
- These bacteria may include but are not limited to: metal-reducing, sulfate-reducing, methanogenic bacteria, or the like.
- reductive immobilization may be similar to reductive dehalogenation. It may be desirable to provide cost-effective "natural" substrates that can facilitate reductive degradation of various kinds of contaminants. For example, a number of agricultural and dairy waste products can serve as ideal substrates for reductive dehalogenation. These substrates may include, but are not limited to: spoiled milk, whey, corn syrup, brewery waste, and the like. A biological source treatment technique can also be applied in reductive dehalogenation.
- the present invention may provide a method and treatment of contaminated water.
- an injection (16) of a substrate may be added to a contaminated water environment (17) having contaminants (18) as shown in Figure 4B.
- Contaminants of a contaminated water environment may include but are not limited tohalogenated compounds, oxidized metals, chlorinated alkenes, chlorinated alkanes, chlorinated aromatics, fluorinated alkenes, fluorinated alkanes, brominated alkenes, brominated alkanes, brominated aromatics, perchloroethene, trichloroethene, perchlorate, dichloroethylene, vinyl chloride, carbon tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, uranium, chromium, arsenate, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Treatment of a contaminated water environment may include the injection of substrates.
- the injection of returned milk may provide enhanced reductive degradation of the contaminated water environment.
- returned milk may be a liquid, concentrated liquid, solid, dried, freeze-dried, or the like.
- the substrate may provide an electron source to at least one population of bacteria, perhaps even an anaerobic bacteria population. This may cause degradation of the contaminant providing a harmless end-product.
- End-products may include immobilized precipitates such as when dealing with oxidized metal contaminants or the like.
- Embodiments may provide an ex-situ or perhaps even an in-situ contaminated water environment. Further additives may be injected into a contaminated water environment perhaps with or in addition to a substrate injection.
- Additives may include but are not limited to organic substrates, nutrients, micro-metals, bacterial inoculum, pH adjuster, reductant, sulfate, ferrous iron, ferrous sulfate, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Organic substrates may include but are not limited to whey, ice cream, lactate, acetate, chitin, crustacean exoskeleton, corn syrup, vegetable oil, grease, kitchen grease, brewery wastes, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, industrial waste, combinations thereof, and the like.
- nutrients may include but are not limited to nitrogen, phosphorous, ammonium phosphate, iron, combinations thereof, and the like.
- Bacterial inoculum may include but are not limited to metal-reducing bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogenic bacteria, facultative bacteria, site specified species, fermentative bacteria, dehalogenating bacteria, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a pH adjuster may include but is not limited to lime, trona, carbonate, bicarbonate, enzymes, proteins, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a reductant may include but is not limited to NaS, cystein, organic substrates, combinations thereof, and the like.
- embodiments of the present invention may include injecting a packaged product into a contaminated water environment.
- a biological source treatment application in the field may need to be feasible for industrial and governmental reclamation teams. For instance, many areas that may require treatment may have restrictions on injection of municipal waste into or even near groundwater systems. Additionally, in order to inject sufficient amounts of substrate, thousands of gallons may need to be injected into each treatment well.
- a biological source treatment application for both acid mine drainage and reductive degradation may include but is not limited to mixing key nutrients and proper bacterial consortium, to perhaps significantly enhance degradation efficiencies.
- the present invention may include development of a packaged product that has core and perhaps even extended recipes of constituents including but not limited to organic substrates, key nutrients, micro metals, capable bacterial consortium, combinations thereof, and the like.
- constituents may be adjusted and specifically designed for different cases of acid mine drainage, acid mine wastewater, reductive degradation, and the like uses.
- One example of a packaged product or even a kit may include a liquid, solid, concentrated, dried or even freeze-dried mixture of organic substrates, nutrients and microbial inoculum.
- substrates are meant to be included in the scope of this patent application and may include but is not limited to: dairy products, dairy wastes, dairy byproducts, spoiled milk, whey, ice cream, lactate, acetate, chitin, crustacean exoskeleton, corn syrup, vegetable oil, used kitchen grease, brewery wastes, organic rich industrial waste, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, combinations thereof, and the like.
- a broad spectrum of nutrients are meant to be included in the scope of this application and may include but is not limited to nitrogen, phosphorous, iron, and the like.
- a broad spectrum of microbial inoculum are meant to be included in the scope of this application and may include but is not limited to sulfate reducing bacteria, facultative microbes, site specified species, and the like.
- a packaged product may be packaged in an easily transportable and storable form which may include but is not limited to 40-lb bags, 250-lb super bags, or any size.
- some packaging may include storage of a liquid mixture, perhaps a liquid concentrate, or the like.
- some packaging may include storage of dry mixtures and the like.
- Some examples of other applications of packaged products may include but are not limited to: products which may be hydrated and mixed on site and even injected into contaminated areas; products used for remediation and prevention of acid mine drainage and other mining wastes; products for remediation of halogenated contaminants through reductive dehalogenation; and perhaps even products for direct or even facilitated immobilization of oxidized metals, and the like.
- a packaged product may be conveniently produced, transported and applied for acid mine drainage, acid mine wastewater, reductive dehalogenation of halogenated compounds, immobilization of oxidized metal species in the environment, and the like.
- This technology may be innovative, practical, cost-effective, and perhaps even beneficial to both the environment and industries. The commercial market for this technology may be significant.
- acid mine treatments, contaminated water treatments, and the like treatments may further include the following non-limiting examples: a pH adjuster (e.g., lime, trona, or the like) for perhaps environments with low pH; addition of nitrogen, phosphorous, combinations thereof, and the like; exclusion of bacterial inoculum for perhaps environments with existing populations; addition of bacterial inoculum for perhaps environments without the necessary populations; reductants perhaps for oxidized sites; addition of sulfate for perhaps co-metabolism of DNAPLs if sulfate-reduction may be a chosen pathway and a site may be deficient of sulfate; and perhaps even addition of ferrous iron perhaps to precipitate high sulfide concentrations; combinations thereof, and the like.
- a pH adjuster e.g., lime, trona, or the like
- Embodiments may include the following non-limiting example recipes (based on site specifics):
- Example 1 Biological source treatment recipe for treating acid mine drainage at an abandoned mine in southeast US:
- Acid mine drainage from this site requires 200 mM of substrate carbon for remediation. Nitrogen or phosphorous may not be necessary; however microbial populations may be low in the abandoned mine. There may not be a need for pH adjustment.
- a biological source treatment recipe may include:
- Dried Spoiled Milk 10 g dried spoiled milk / L acid mine drainage
- Bacterial Inoculum (either a dry or wet product): calculating a weight or volume of bacterial inoculum that yields 108 bacterial cells / g dried milk
- the original groundwater contained TCE contamination and a large population of sulfate-reducing bacteria present. Sulfate reduction was chosen as pathway to remove TCE.
- Groundwater was initially low in sulfate, nitrogen, and phosphorous.
- the recipe may include: Dried Spoiled Milk: 4 g Dried Milk / L groundwater
- Ammonium Phosphate 0.04 g ammonium phosphate / g dried milk
- Ferrous Sulfate 0.2 g ferrous sulfate / g dried milk
- Study #1 Results of our laboratory feasibility testing of the biological source treatment system using waste material from the Sheldon Mine site near Prescott, Arizona, USA.
- the Sheldon Mine Complex is a historic site located in the Prescott National Forest, Yavapai County, Arizona, approximately 13 km southeast of Prescott, Arizona. This was an active copper, gold, lead, and silver mine from 1863 to 1959.
- Reclamation work in the form of landform modification was attempted on the waste rock and tailings piles from 1975 to 1976 by the US Forest Service and the University of Arizona.
- these reclamation efforts decreased surface erosion at the sites, established vegetation, and improved the over all aesthetic value of the area, the landform designs illuminated fast surface runoff, which helps to prevent erosion but thereby causes increased infiltration into the piles.
- Soil samples were collected aseptically from approximately 0.30 to 0.45 m below the ground surface and stored in large plastic Ziploc ® baggies from 10 locations on SRP and 9 locations on STP at the site. Additionally, 7.5 L of water was collected for microcosm setup from Rich Gulch Creek upstream from where the creek runs adjacent to 4.5-acre waste rock pile and 0.5 L of water was collected for chemical analysis at the point where the creek first intersects 4.5-acre waste rock pile and near the middle of SRP where iron discoloration is very apparent in the creek. The creek water was stored in a cooler on ice and all samples were transported to Western Research Institute in Laramie, Wyoming, USA
- Waste material samples were extracted using a 1:1 ratio of material: reverse osmosis water using mild agitation for 3 h. These extracts were analyzed for pH, electrical conductivity, and major anions (chloride (Cl “ ), nitrate (NO 3 " ), phosphate (PO 4 3” ), and sulfate (SO 4 2" )).
- Composite samples were created using all 10 samples collected from the rock pile for a rock pile composite and all 9 samples collected from the tailings pile for a tailings pile composite. Additionally, large rocks collected at the base of the rock pile were crushed to 1 to 5 mm to create three distinct mine materials for further testing.
- Extractions from these three materials and the three water samples from Rich Gulch Creek were analyzed for pH, EC, major anions as described for the individual soil samples, major cations (calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), sodium (Na)), metals (iron (Fe), and lead (Pb)), and dissolved organic carbon.
- Anions were analyzed by ion chromatography on a DIONEX DX-100 ion chromatograph (Sunnyvale, CA). Cations and metals were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
- Dissolved organic carbon was analyzed on a Shimadzu total organic carbon analyzer (Columbia, MD).
- Microcosms were established in 250-ml glass jars using 20 g of mine waste material (composite material from the rock pile, the tailings pile, or crushed rock and 100 ml of Rich Gulch Creek water.
- Various amendments were added to these microcosms including (1) a control microcosm with no amendments, (2) a microcosm with 3 wt% inoculum only (municipal effluent solids (ES) with 88% moisture content or a microbial enrichment originally inoculated with ES), (3) a microcosm with either wet or dry substrate only (returned milk, using a 4:1 molar ratio of carbon rwater-extractable sulfate), and (4) a microcosm with both inoculum and substrate.
- ES municipal effluent solids
- each microcosm was loosely covered with aluminum foil with a small hole in the middle to allow interaction of the overlying water with ambient air.
- the pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen (DO) in each microcosm was monitored at least weekly.
- the liquid in each microcosm dried up after approximately 28 d, was allowed to remain dry for 18 d, after which time they were re-saturated with RO water, monitored for 16 d until dry again from which time they remained dry for 26 d, were re-saturated with RO water, and were monitored for 3 more days.
- Table 2 contains all site sample characterization data. Of particular interest to this project are the elevated sulfate concentrations (which are key to acid mine drainage generation), the low dissolved organic carbon concentrations, and extremely low or nonexistent NO 3 " and PO 4 3" concentrations (which are all insufficient for robust microbial growth).
- the pH in the wet/dry microcosms that received substrate and inoculum was between 5.1 and 5.2 while the pH in the control microcosms was between 3.6 and 3.8.
- the pH in the amended treatments was 6.3 to 6.4 and the pH in the controls was 5.4 to 6.0, which reflected the pH of the RO water added (5.6).
- the pH in both treatments returned to pre-dry levels within 16 d at which time the microcosms were allowed to dry out and remained dry for 26 d.
- the microcosms were rewetted for a second time and the pH remained at pre-dry levels (see Fig. 7).
- the pH of the microcosms treated with substrate only and substrate and inoculum was significantly (P ⁇ 0.001) higher than control microcosms and microcosms treated with inoculum only for the tailings pile, the rock pile, and the crushed rock materials at the end of the 90-day experiments.
- the pH was not significantly different at the end of the experiment between the substrate only and substrate and inoculum treatments for the tailings pile materials but the pH was significantly (P ⁇ 0.001) higher in the substrate and inoculum treatment, when compared to the substrate only treatment for the rock pile materials. This suggests that the indigenous microbial communities in the waste material and substrate may be sufficient for acid mine drainage prevention and additional microbial inoculation may not be necessary.
- Study #2 Figure 8 shows results from changes in water pH during testing of various amendments with crushed waste rock.
- This graph shows changes in water pH in aerobic microcosms containing crushed waste rock from a historic gold mine in AZ and surface water (pH -6.5) from the same site.
- Microcosms that received dry or wet amendments prevented acid rock drainage from occurring and eventually caused the pH to stabilize in the circum-neutral range.
- the amendments used in this trial was a carbon source substrate.
- the initial low pH value in dry and wet treatments was due to the low pH of the amendments ( ⁇ 4.5).
- the dry and wet treatments were dosed at a 4:1 molar ratio of organic carbon to the water-extractable sulfate concentration of the waste material.
- the decrease in pH in the no amendment control demonstrates the effects of waste rock oxidation, which generates acid rock drainage when no preventative treatment is applied.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage comprising the steps of: identifying an acid mine drainage generation source at a treatment location site; locating at least one treatment area in said acid mine drainage generation source; injecting at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source; biologically consuming at least some of said at least one substrate by at least one kind of microbial population; biologically constructing a protective biofilm over a plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials; preventing oxidation of said acid mine drainage generation source materials with said biofilm; preventing sulfuric acid generation in said acid mine drainage generation source; and attaining at least a circumneutral pH in a surrounding environment of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of up- gradient, down-hole injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of gravimetrically injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting at least one carbon source into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- said step of injecting said at least one carbon source into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting an amount of said carbon source, said amount selected from a group consisting of: - a 2 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 3 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 4 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 5 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; and a 6 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 4 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one carbon source into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting an amount of said carbon source, said amount selected from a group consisting of: - a 2: 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 3: 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 4:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 5 : 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; and a 6: 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced. 10.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting a liquid substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting a solid substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting a packaged product into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said at least one substrate into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of injecting multiple substrate doses in said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- said microbial inoculum comprises at least one new kind of microbial population.
- 26. A method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein and further comprising the step of injecting a pH adjuster into said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- 27. A method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 26 or any claim herein wherein said pH adjuster is selected from a group consisting of lime, trona, carbonate, bicarbonate, enzymes, proteins, and combinations thereof.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said treatment location site is selected from a group consisting of hard rock mine, backfilled coal mining waste, backfilled mining waste, waste rock pile, copper mine, gold mine, lead mine, silver mine, and coal mine.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said acid mine drainage generation source materials are selected from a group consisting of iron sulfides, iron disulfide (FeS 2 ), FeS, metal sulfides, sulfidic ore, crushed ore, tailings pile, waste rock, and combinations thereof.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of biologically constructing said protective biofilm over said plurality of said acid mine drainage generation source materials comprises the step of biologically constructing a complex protective biofilm over said plurality of said acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 32 or any claim herein wherein said complex protective biofilm comprises a diverse microbial community.
- said diverse microbial community comprises a number of different microbial species selected from a group consisting of greater than about 50 different species, greater than about 70 different species, about 75 different species, and greater than about 75 different species.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 35 or any claim herein wherein said multilayered community comprises layers selected from a group consisting of at least two layers, at least three layers, and at least four layers.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 33 or any claim herein wherein said diverse microbial community comprises bacteria selected from a group consisting of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, obligate anaerobic bacteria, cow teat bacteria, metal-tolerant denitrifier bacteria, sulfur-loving fermenter bacteria, Desulfosporosinus sp, sulfate reducing bacteria clone 159, acidovorax avenae, nickel tolerant denitrifier bacteria, facultative denitrifiers, uncultured bacterium clone B-42, and combinations thereof.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 33 or any claim herein wherein said diverse microbial community comprises facultative anaerobic bacteria as a dominant species.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of biologically constructing a protective biofilm over said plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials comprise the step of biologically constructing a permanent protective biofilm over said plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- said step of identifying said acid mine drainage generation source at said treatment location site comprises the step of utilizing an electromagnetic induction survey.
- said electromagnetic induction survey is selected from a group consisting of a ground electromagnetic induction survey and an air electromagnetic induction survey.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of locating said at least one treatment area in said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of installing at least one injection well in said at least one treatment area of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of attaining at least said circumneutral pH in said surrounding environment of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of increasing a pH level in said surrounding environment of said acid mine drainage generation source.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 46 or any claim herein wherein said step of increasing said pH level in said surrounding environment of said acid mine drainage generation source comprises the step of increasing said pH level from an acidic pH to a circumneutral pH.
- said circumneutral pH is selected from a group consisting of greater than about 6 pH, about 7 pH, greater than about 7 pH, about 7.2 pH, and between about 6 pH and about 8.5 pH.
- said step of preventing sulfuric acid generation in said acid mine drainage generation source comprises preventing sulfuric acid generation for a period of time, said period of time is selected from a group consisting of at least about 3 months, more than about 1.8 years, more than about 2 years, about 6 months, about 9 months, about 12 months, about 18 months, more than about 19 months, about 24 months, about 3 years, about 5 years, and about 10 years.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials comprises the step of physically preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 51 or any claim herein wherein said step of physically preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials comprises the step of providing a hydrophobic physical barrier in said biof ⁇ lm.
- a method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein wherein said step of preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials comprises the step of chemically preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials.
- said step of chemically preventing oxidation in said acid mine drainage generation source materials comprises the step of providing an oxygen- reducing microbial barrier in said biofilm.
- 57. A method of preventing acid mine drainage according to claim 1 or any claim herein and further comprising the step of reducing iron concentrations in said acid mine drainage generation source.
- An acid mine drainage treatment comprising: an acid mine drainage generation source identifier; a treatment location site having at least one acid mine drainage generation source; a plurality of acid mine drainage generation source materials in said at least one acid mine drainage generation source at said treatment location site; and at least one biofilm inducing substrate injection sample.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 59 or any claim herein wherein said at least one biofilm inducing substrate injection sample comprises an up- gradient, down-hole injection sample.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 68 or any claim herein wherein said carbon source comprises an amount of carbon selected from a group consisting of: - a 2 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 3 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 4 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 5 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; and a 6 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material.
- said carbon source comprises an amount of carbon selected from a group consisting of: - a 2 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 3 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 4 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extractable sulfate concentration of waste material; a 5 to 1 ratio of organic carbon to water extract
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 68 or any claim herein wherein said carbon source comprises an amount of carbon selected from a group consisting of: a 2:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 3 : 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; - a 4: 1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; a 5:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced; and a 6:1 ratio of moles of carbon consumed to moles of sulfate reduced.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 59 or any claim herein wherein said at least one biofilm inducing substrate injection sample comprises a substrate selected from a group consisting of acetate, chitin, crustacean exoskeleton, corn syrup, vegetable oil, grease, kitchen grease, brewery wastes, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, industrial waste, and combinations thereof.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 82 or any claim herein wherein said at least one kind of newly injected microbial population comprises a single injection of said at least one newly injected microbial population.
- said at least one nutrient injection sample comprises a nutrient selected from a group consisting of nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and combinations thereof.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 85 or any claim herein wherein said at least one nutrient injection sample comprises a nutrient selected from a group consisting Of Na 2 HPO 4 , NaH 2 PO 4 , NH 4 Cl, KCl, NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), MgSO 4 ,
- pH adjuster injection sample comprises a pH adjuster selected from a group consisting of lime, trona, carbonate, bicarbonate, enzymes, proteins, and combinations thereof.
- said reductant injection sample comprises a reductant selected from a group consisting of NaS, cystein, organic substrates, and combinations thereof.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 59 or any claim herein wherein said treatment location site is selected from a group consisting of hard rock mine, backfilled coal mining waste, backfilled mining waste, waste rock pile, copper mine, gold mine, lead mine, silver mine, and coal mine.
- said protective biofilm comprises a complex protective biofilm.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 96 or any claim herein wherein said diverse microbial community comprises a number of different microbial species selected from a group consisting of greater than about 50 different species, greater than about 70 different species, about 75 different species, and greater than about 75 different species.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 98 or any claim herein wherein said multilayered community comprises layers selected from a group consisting of at least two layers, at least three layers, and at least four layers.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 96 or any claim herein wherein said diverse microbial community comprises bacteria selected from a group consisting of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, obligate anaerobic bacteria, cow teat bacteria, metal- tolerant denitrifier bacteria, sulfur-loving fermenter bacteria, Desulfosporosinus sp, sulfate reducing bacteria clone 159, acidovorax avenae, nickel tolerant denitrifier bacteria, facultative denitrifiers, uncultured bacterium clone B-42, and combinations thereof.
- said diverse microbial community comprises bacteria selected from a group consisting of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, facultative anaerobic bacteria, sulfate reducing bacteria, obligate anaerobic bacteria, cow teat bacteria, metal- tolerant denitrifier bacteria, sulfur-loving fermenter bacteria, Desulfosporosinus s
- said complex protective biofilm comprises microbial cells and extracellular polymers.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 59 or any claim herein wherein said acid mine drainage generation source identifier comprises an electromagnetic induction survey.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 105 or any claim herein wherein said electromagnetic induction is selected from a group consisting of a ground electromagnetic induction survey and an air electromagnetic induction survey. 107.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 63 or any claim herein wherein said circumneutral pH is selected from a group consisting of greater than about 6 pH, about 7 pH, greater than about 7 pH, about 7.2 pH, and between about 6 pH and about 8.5 pH.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 109 or any claim herein said acidic pH is selected from a group consisting of less than about 6 pH, less than about 5 pH, about 4.5 pH, and about 2.5 pH.
- An acid mine drainage treatment according to claim 63 or any claim herein wherein said surrounding environment comprises water.
- a method of treating contaminated water comprising the steps of: providing a contaminated water environment having contaminants; injecting returned milk into said contaminated water environment; enhancing reductive degradation of said contaminated water environment with said returned milk; supplying an electron source from said returned milk to at least one population of anaerobic bacteria in said contaminated water environment; degrading said contaminants; and providing a harmless end-product from said reductive degradation of said contaminants.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 117 or any claim herein wherein said contaminated water environment comprises an in-situ contaminated water environment.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 117 or any claim herein wherein said contaminated water environment comprises an ex-situ contaminated water environment.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 117 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said returned milk into said contaminated water environment comprises the step of injecting liquid returned milk into said contaminated water environment.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 1 17 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said returned milk into said contaminated water environment comprises the step of injecting concentrated liquid returned milk into said contaminated water environment.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 117 or any claim herein wherein said returned milk comprises solid returned milk.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 123 or any claim herein wherein said solid returned milk comprises a dried product.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 123 or any claim herein wherein said solid returned milk comprises a freeze-dried product.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 117 or any claim herein wherein said step of injecting said returned milk into said contaminated water environment comprises the step of injecting a packaged product into said contaminated water environment.
- said at least one additive is selected from a group consisting of organic substrates, nutrients, micro-metals, bacterial inoculum, pH adjuster, reductant, sulfate, ferrous iron, ferrous sulfate, and combinations thereof.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 128 or any claim herein wherein said organic substrates are selected from a group consisting of whey, ice cream, lactate, acetate, chitin, crustacean exoskeleton, corn syrup, vegetable oil, grease, kitchen grease, brewery wastes, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, industrial waste, and combinations thereof.
- a method of treating contaminated water according to claim 128 or any claim herein wherein said bacterial inoculum is selected from a group consisting of metal- reducing bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogenic bacteria, facultative bacteria, site specified species, fermentative bacteria, dehalogenating bacteria, and combinations thereof.
- the basic concepts of the present invention may be embodied in a variety of ways. It involves both contamination treatment techniques as well as devices to accomplish the appropriate treatment.
- the contamination treatment techniques are disclosed as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various devices described and as steps which are inherent to utilization. They are simply the natural result of utilizing the devices as intended and described.
- the devices are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only accomplish certain methods but also can be varied in a number of ways. Importantly, as to all of the foregoing, all of these facets should be understood to be encompassed by this disclosure.
- each of the treatment devices as herein disclosed and described ii) the related methods disclosed and described, iii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these devices and methods, iv) those alternative designs which accomplish each of the functions shown as are disclosed and described, v) those alternative designs and methods which accomplish each of the functions shown as are implicit to accomplish that which is disclosed and described, vi) each feature, component, and step shown as separate and independent inventions, vii) the applications enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed, viii) the resulting products produced by such systems or components, ix) each system, method, and element shown or described as now applied to any specific field or devices mentioned, x) methods and apparatuses substantially as described hereinbefore and with reference to any of the accompanying examples, xi) the various combinations and permutations of each of the elements disclosed, xii) each potentially dependent claim or concept as a dependency on each and every one of the
- any claims set forth at any time are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this description of the invention, and the applicant expressly reserves the right to use all of or a portion of such incorporated content of such claims as additional description to support any of or all of the claims or any element or component thereof, and the applicant further expressly reserves the right to move any portion of or all of the incorporated content of such claims or any element or component thereof from the description into the claims or vice-versa as necessary to define the matter for which protection is sought by this application or by any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof, or to obtain any benefit of, reduction in fees pursuant to, or to comply with the patent laws, rules, or regulations of any country or treaty, and such content incorporated by reference shall survive during the entire pendency of this application including any subsequent continuation, division, or continuation-in-part application thereof or any reissue or extension thereon.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2008302676A AU2008302676B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
US12/666,625 US8105489B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
CA2693176A CA2693176C (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US93745507P | 2007-06-26 | 2007-06-26 | |
US60/937,455 | 2007-06-26 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2009038851A2 true WO2009038851A2 (en) | 2009-03-26 |
WO2009038851A3 WO2009038851A3 (en) | 2009-05-14 |
Family
ID=40468711
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/068396 WO2009038851A2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8105489B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2008302676B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2693176C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009038851A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8105489B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2012-01-31 | The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
CN111072157A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-04-28 | 华南理工大学 | Kaolinite-loaded biosynthetic nano ferro-sulphur material and preparation method and application thereof |
CN112678961A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-04-20 | 江南大学 | Method for combined denitrification of kitchen waste fermentation liquid and solid slow-release combined carbon source |
EP4029617A1 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2022-07-20 | Darina Styriakova | Environmental stabilization and backfilling of mines and/or excavated underground spaces |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10335757B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2019-07-02 | Specialty Earth Sciences | Process for making environmental reactant(s) |
CA2784061A1 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2011-06-23 | Ciris Energy, Inc. | Biogasification of coal to methane and other useful products |
US8815184B2 (en) | 2010-08-16 | 2014-08-26 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Process for separating and recovering metals |
US8834725B2 (en) | 2011-01-31 | 2014-09-16 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Method for treating acid mine drainage |
WO2012158689A1 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2012-11-22 | Swearingen Jason A | Treatment apparatus and methods |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4906575A (en) * | 1987-03-06 | 1990-03-06 | Chevron Research Company | Phosphate compound that is used in a microbial profile modification process |
US5833855A (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1998-11-10 | Auburn University | Situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater |
US6196765B1 (en) * | 1998-11-06 | 2001-03-06 | Joseph G. Harrington | Inhibiting acid mine drainage by displacing oxygen in rock heap |
US6632364B1 (en) * | 1995-04-11 | 2003-10-14 | Arcadis G & M | Engineered in situ anaerobic reactive zones |
US6967099B1 (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2005-11-22 | Geovation Technologies, Inc. | Plant-fiber containing composition for anaerobic bioremediation |
US7030617B2 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2006-04-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System, apparatus, and method for conducting electromagnetic induction surveys |
US7147779B1 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2006-12-12 | Westinghouse Savannah River Company | Passive treatment of wastewater and contaminated groundwater |
US7153541B2 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2006-12-26 | Univ New York State Res Found | Method for inhibiting oxidation of metal sulfide-containing material |
US7189329B2 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2007-03-13 | A.Y. Laboratories Ltd. | Control of development of biofilms in industrial process water |
Family Cites Families (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3388058A (en) | 1966-08-03 | 1968-06-11 | Nalco Chemical Co | Treatment of acid mine water waste |
US3516931A (en) | 1968-10-18 | 1970-06-23 | Barnes & Tucker Co | Process of treating acid mine water |
US3823081A (en) | 1972-12-18 | 1974-07-09 | Kettering Scient Res Inc | Acid mine water treatment process |
US4695378A (en) | 1984-11-07 | 1987-09-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior | Acid mine water aeration and treatment system |
US4869905A (en) | 1987-05-12 | 1989-09-26 | The B. F. Goodrich Company | Method of making and a slow release composition for abating acid water formation |
US4886432A (en) | 1988-06-23 | 1989-12-12 | Engineering Enterprises, Inc. | Bladder pump assembly |
US5171454A (en) | 1991-08-19 | 1992-12-15 | Betz Laboratories, Inc. | Methods for inhibiting the production of acid in acid mine waters |
US5200033A (en) | 1991-09-09 | 1993-04-06 | Lwv Associates, Inc. | Method for removing organic contaminants from soils |
US5439594A (en) | 1993-06-23 | 1995-08-08 | Geraghty & Miller, Inc. | Method for subsurface vapor extraction |
US5575589A (en) | 1995-04-11 | 1996-11-19 | Geraghty & Miller, Inc. | Apparatus and method for removing volatile contaminants from phreatic water |
US5554290A (en) | 1995-04-11 | 1996-09-10 | Geraghty & Miller, Inc. | Insitu anaerobic reactive zone for insitu metals precipitation and to achieve microbial de-nitrification |
US5588490A (en) | 1995-05-31 | 1996-12-31 | Geraghty & Miller, Inc. | Method and system to achieve two dimensional air sparging |
AUPN396595A0 (en) | 1995-07-05 | 1995-07-27 | La Trobe University | Methods for ameliorating/neutralizing acidity in soils or other such porous bodies |
US5550141A (en) | 1995-08-31 | 1996-08-27 | Natural Resources - Canada | Method for inhibiting the formation of acid mine drainage |
US5616251A (en) | 1995-11-20 | 1997-04-01 | Kareem Batarseh | Methods to prevent and treat acid mine drainage and to remove metals and non-metals from aqueous sources |
US5698107A (en) | 1996-03-11 | 1997-12-16 | Wurzburger; Stephen Ray | Treatment for acid mine drainage |
US6110379A (en) | 1996-03-11 | 2000-08-29 | Overton; James Michael | Method for treating water containing sulfate |
US6007274A (en) | 1997-05-19 | 1999-12-28 | Arcadis Geraghty & Miller | In-well air stripping, oxidation, and adsorption |
DE29713111U1 (en) * | 1997-07-23 | 1998-01-22 | Trw Repa Gmbh | Airbag restraint system for vehicle occupants |
US6481929B1 (en) | 1998-04-27 | 2002-11-19 | Arcadis Geraghty & Miller | Aerobic bioreduction of municipal solid waste landfill mass |
US6165251A (en) | 1998-05-05 | 2000-12-26 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency | On-line gas chromatograph with sample preparation, concentration, and calibration apparatus for measuring trace organic species from combustor flue gas |
US6116816A (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2000-09-12 | Arcadis Geraghty & Miller, Inc. | In situ reactive gate for groundwater remediation |
US6555001B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-04-29 | Areadis G&M | Accelerated remediation using tree crops |
US6783678B2 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2004-08-31 | Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc | Halogenated solvent remediation |
US6962662B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2005-11-08 | Stephen Ray Wurzburger | Process for treating lightly contaminated acid mine water |
US20020094564A1 (en) | 2000-07-17 | 2002-07-18 | Banfield Jillian F. | Method for extracting and separating metals |
CN1291994C (en) | 2000-07-21 | 2006-12-27 | 吉里德科学公司 | Prodrugs of phosphonate nucleotide analogues and methods for selecting and making same |
AUPR105400A0 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2000-11-23 | Nauveau Technology Investments Ltd | Processes and compositions for water treatment |
US6398960B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2002-06-04 | Solutions Industrial & Environmental Services, Inc. | Method for remediation of aquifers |
US6777449B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2004-08-17 | Case Logic, Inc. | Method of making and using nanoscale metal |
US6797171B2 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2004-09-28 | Robert W. Bartlett | In situ anaerobic bioremediation of earth and sold waste contaminants using organic/water emulsions |
US6616845B2 (en) | 2001-05-29 | 2003-09-09 | Aqwise Wise Water Technologies, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for biological wastewater treatment |
US7140495B2 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2006-11-28 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Layered sheet construction for wastewater treatment |
US6932909B2 (en) | 2002-01-15 | 2005-08-23 | Kroff Chemical Company, Inc. | Method of treating mine drainage |
US7033507B2 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2006-04-25 | Noram Engineering And Constructors Ltd. | Method for removing metals from acid mine drainage |
WO2005066081A1 (en) | 2004-01-06 | 2005-07-21 | Hans Bioshaft Limited | Waste water treatment plant and method |
US7141170B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2006-11-28 | North Wind, Inc. | Halogenated solvent remediation |
US7338597B1 (en) | 2004-06-25 | 2008-03-04 | Northwestern University | Apparatus for water treatment |
US7501629B2 (en) | 2005-03-22 | 2009-03-10 | Arcadis G & M Inc. | Fenceline monitoring of air contaminants |
US20070045189A1 (en) | 2005-08-31 | 2007-03-01 | General Electric Company | Acid mine water demineralization methods |
EP1987176A2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2008-11-05 | Marianna Cooley | Water treatment device and method |
WO2009038851A2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2009-03-26 | University Of Wyoming Research Corporation D/B/A Western Research Institute | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
-
2008
- 2008-06-26 WO PCT/US2008/068396 patent/WO2009038851A2/en active Application Filing
- 2008-06-26 US US12/666,625 patent/US8105489B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-06-26 AU AU2008302676A patent/AU2008302676B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2008-06-26 CA CA2693176A patent/CA2693176C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4906575A (en) * | 1987-03-06 | 1990-03-06 | Chevron Research Company | Phosphate compound that is used in a microbial profile modification process |
US6632364B1 (en) * | 1995-04-11 | 2003-10-14 | Arcadis G & M | Engineered in situ anaerobic reactive zones |
US5833855A (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1998-11-10 | Auburn University | Situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater |
US7030617B2 (en) * | 1998-04-13 | 2006-04-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System, apparatus, and method for conducting electromagnetic induction surveys |
US6196765B1 (en) * | 1998-11-06 | 2001-03-06 | Joseph G. Harrington | Inhibiting acid mine drainage by displacing oxygen in rock heap |
US6967099B1 (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2005-11-22 | Geovation Technologies, Inc. | Plant-fiber containing composition for anaerobic bioremediation |
US7189329B2 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2007-03-13 | A.Y. Laboratories Ltd. | Control of development of biofilms in industrial process water |
US7153541B2 (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2006-12-26 | Univ New York State Res Found | Method for inhibiting oxidation of metal sulfide-containing material |
US7147779B1 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2006-12-12 | Westinghouse Savannah River Company | Passive treatment of wastewater and contaminated groundwater |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8105489B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2012-01-31 | The University Of Wyoming Research Corporation | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants |
CN111072157A (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2020-04-28 | 华南理工大学 | Kaolinite-loaded biosynthetic nano ferro-sulphur material and preparation method and application thereof |
CN112678961A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-04-20 | 江南大学 | Method for combined denitrification of kitchen waste fermentation liquid and solid slow-release combined carbon source |
EP4029617A1 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2022-07-20 | Darina Styriakova | Environmental stabilization and backfilling of mines and/or excavated underground spaces |
EP4029616A1 (en) * | 2021-01-14 | 2022-07-20 | Darina Styriakova | Environmental stabilization and backfilling of mines |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2009038851A3 (en) | 2009-05-14 |
CA2693176C (en) | 2015-02-03 |
US8105489B2 (en) | 2012-01-31 |
CA2693176A1 (en) | 2009-03-26 |
AU2008302676A1 (en) | 2009-03-26 |
US20100329790A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
AU2008302676B2 (en) | 2013-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2008302676B2 (en) | Treatment and prevention systems for acid mine drainage and halogenated contaminants | |
Moodley et al. | Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: Research developments with a focus on waste/by-products | |
Akhtar et al. | Bioremediation of arsenic and lead by plants and microbes from contaminated soil | |
Ashok et al. | Remediation of nitrate-contaminated water by solid-phase denitrification process—a review | |
Kosolapov et al. | Microbial processes of heavy metal removal from carbon‐deficient effluents in constructed wetlands | |
Cohen | Use of microbes for cost reduction of metal removal from metals and mining industry waste streams | |
Kulshreshtha et al. | A review on bioremediation of heavy metals in contaminated water | |
Rivett et al. | Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: a review of biogeochemical controlling processes | |
Abioye | Biological remediation of hydrocarbon and heavy metals contaminated soil | |
Bert et al. | Phytoremediation as a management option for contaminated sediments in tidal marshes, flood control areas and dredged sediment landfill sites | |
Choudhary et al. | Bioremediation of heavy metals by microbes | |
Williams et al. | Field evidence of selenium bioreduction in a uranium‐contaminated aquifer | |
Roane et al. | Microbial remediation of metals | |
Hazen et al. | Developments in bioremediation of soils and sediments polluted with metals and radionuclides: 2. Field research on bioremediation of metals and radionuclides | |
Kao et al. | Laboratory column studies for evaluating a barrier system for providing oxygen and substrate for TCE biodegradation | |
US6432693B1 (en) | Advanced inorganic solid-chemical composition and methods for anaerobic bioremediation | |
Anekwe et al. | Bioremediation of acid mine drainage–Review | |
Khan et al. | Constructed wetlands: a clean-green technology for degradation and detoxification of industrial wastewaters | |
Anekwe et al. | Wastewater and bioventing treatment systems for acid mine drainage–contaminated soil | |
Mahmoud et al. | Phytoremediation application: Plants as biosorbent for metal removal in soil and water | |
Kerkar et al. | Bioremediation of heavy metals from saline water using hypersaline dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria | |
Pal et al. | Use of bio-resources for remediation of soil pollution | |
Jin et al. | Biological source treatment of acid mine drainage using microbial and substrate amendments: microcosm studies | |
Weiersbye | Global review and cost comparison of conventional and phytotechnologies for mine closure | |
Hunter et al. | Removing selenite from groundwater with an in situ biobarrier: laboratory studies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 08832072 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
DPE1 | Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2693176 Country of ref document: CA |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 12666625 Country of ref document: US |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2008302676 Country of ref document: AU |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2008302676 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20080626 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
DPE1 | Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101) | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 08832072 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |