WO2010071967A1 - Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process - Google Patents
Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010071967A1 WO2010071967A1 PCT/CA2008/002306 CA2008002306W WO2010071967A1 WO 2010071967 A1 WO2010071967 A1 WO 2010071967A1 CA 2008002306 W CA2008002306 W CA 2008002306W WO 2010071967 A1 WO2010071967 A1 WO 2010071967A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- fischer
- tropsch
- cobalt
- weight
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 84
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 82
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 146
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 86
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 85
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ruthenium Chemical compound [Ru] KJTLSVCANCCWHF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 229910052707 ruthenium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 85
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 31
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 31
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 28
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 229910052702 rhenium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 19
- WUAPFZMCVAUBPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N rhenium atom Chemical compound [Re] WUAPFZMCVAUBPE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 19
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Zr]=O MCMNRKCIXSYSNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000007701 flash-distillation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- -1 zircoπia Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- QCWXUUIWCKQGHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zirconium Chemical compound [Zr] QCWXUUIWCKQGHC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052726 zirconium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims 7
- 239000002808 molecular sieve Substances 0.000 claims 4
- URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium aluminosilicate Chemical compound [Na+].[Al+3].[O-][Si]([O-])=O.[O-][Si]([O-])=O URGAHOPLAPQHLN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 4
- 239000001993 wax Substances 0.000 abstract description 46
- CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N Ascorbic acid Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H]1OC(=O)C(O)=C1O CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N 0.000 abstract description 12
- 239000002283 diesel fuel Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 43
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 39
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 28
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 28
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 26
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 24
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 22
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 22
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 22
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 22
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 20
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 19
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 15
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 15
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 14
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 10
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 9
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 9
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000004517 catalytic hydrocracking Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 5
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003208 petroleum Substances 0.000 description 3
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002453 autothermal reforming Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006555 catalytic reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001805 chlorine compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- VLWBWEUXNYUQKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt ruthenium Chemical compound [Co].[Ru] VLWBWEUXNYUQKJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003546 flue gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012263 liquid product Substances 0.000 description 2
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010454 slate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 2
- QSHYGLAZPRJAEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-(chloromethyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)-1,3-thiazole Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1C1=NC(CCl)=CS1 QSHYGLAZPRJAEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000003198 Cynara Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000208947 Cynara Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052688 Gadolinium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 101001012040 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain ATCC 15692 / DSM 22644 / CIP 104116 / JCM 14847 / LMG 12228 / 1C / PRS 101 / PAO1) Immunomodulating metalloprotease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000001335 aliphatic alkanes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000001336 alkenes Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 125000004429 atom Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000035 biogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006315 carbonylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005810 carbonylation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009903 catalytic hydrogenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 1
- UFMZWBIQTDUYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt dinitrate Chemical compound [Co+2].[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O UFMZWBIQTDUYBN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MZZUATUOLXMCEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt manganese Chemical compound [Mn].[Co] MZZUATUOLXMCEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910001981 cobalt nitrate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- UBEWDCMIDFGDOO-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt(II,III) oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Co+2].[Co+3].[Co+3] UBEWDCMIDFGDOO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- CRHLEZORXKQUEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N dialuminum;cobalt(2+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3].[Co+2].[Co+2] CRHLEZORXKQUEI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010410 dusting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000011194 food seasoning agent Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- ZZUFCTLCJUWOSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N furosemide Chemical compound C1=C(Cl)C(S(=O)(=O)N)=CC(C(O)=O)=C1NCC1=CC=CO1 ZZUFCTLCJUWOSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UIWYJDYFSGRHKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N gadolinium atom Chemical compound [Gd] UIWYJDYFSGRHKR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005431 greenhouse gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000037 hydrogen sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005984 hydrogenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003701 inert diluent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003350 kerosene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012188 paraffin wax Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002574 poison Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000614 poison Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000572 poisoning Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000000607 poisoning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011112 process operation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011027 product recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002407 reforming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000013341 scale-up Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004071 soot Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011029 spinel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052596 spinel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000629 steam reforming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZCUFMDLYAMJYST-UHFFFAOYSA-N thorium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Th]=O ZCUFMDLYAMJYST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013022 venting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002918 waste heat Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/89—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with noble metals
- B01J23/8913—Cobalt and noble metals
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/76—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
- B01J23/84—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
- B01J23/889—Manganese, technetium or rhenium
- B01J23/8896—Rhenium
-
- B01J35/393—
-
- B01J35/394—
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/16—Reducing
- B01J37/18—Reducing with gases containing free hydrogen
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B3/00—Hydrogen; Gaseous mixtures containing hydrogen; Separation of hydrogen from mixtures containing it; Purification of hydrogen
- C01B3/02—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen
- C01B3/32—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air
- C01B3/34—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air by reaction of hydrocarbons with gasifying agents
- C01B3/38—Production of hydrogen or of gaseous mixtures containing a substantial proportion of hydrogen by reaction of gaseous or liquid organic compounds with gasifying agents, e.g. water, carbon dioxide, air by reaction of hydrocarbons with gasifying agents using catalysts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J21/00—Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
- B01J21/02—Boron or aluminium; Oxides or hydroxides thereof
- B01J21/04—Alumina
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J21/00—Catalysts comprising the elements, oxides, or hydroxides of magnesium, boron, aluminium, carbon, silicon, titanium, zirconium, or hafnium
- B01J21/06—Silicon, titanium, zirconium or hafnium; Oxides or hydroxides thereof
- B01J21/08—Silica
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/74—Iron group metals
- B01J23/75—Cobalt
-
- B01J35/40—
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J37/00—Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
- B01J37/02—Impregnation, coating or precipitation
- B01J37/0201—Impregnation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/02—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0205—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step
- C01B2203/0227—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step
- C01B2203/0233—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step the reforming step being a steam reforming step
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/02—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0205—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step
- C01B2203/0227—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step
- C01B2203/0244—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a reforming step containing a catalytic reforming step the reforming step being an autothermal reforming step, e.g. secondary reforming processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/02—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/025—Processes for making hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a partial oxidation step
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/04—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/04—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0405—Purification by membrane separation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/04—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas containing a purification step for the hydrogen or the synthesis gas
- C01B2203/0465—Composition of the impurity
- C01B2203/0495—Composition of the impurity the impurity being water
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/06—Integration with other chemical processes
- C01B2203/062—Hydrocarbon production, e.g. Fischer-Tropsch process
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/08—Methods of heating or cooling
- C01B2203/0872—Methods of cooling
- C01B2203/0888—Methods of cooling by evaporation of a fluid
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/08—Methods of heating or cooling
- C01B2203/0872—Methods of cooling
- C01B2203/0888—Methods of cooling by evaporation of a fluid
- C01B2203/0894—Generation of steam
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1258—Pre-treatment of the feed
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B2203/00—Integrated processes for the production of hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/12—Feeding the process for making hydrogen or synthesis gas
- C01B2203/1288—Evaporation of one or more of the different feed components
- C01B2203/1294—Evaporation by heat exchange with hot process stream
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G2400/00—Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
- C10G2400/04—Diesel oil
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/50—Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals
- Y02P20/52—Improvements relating to the production of bulk chemicals using catalysts, e.g. selective catalysts
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies, e.g. for aircraft
- Y02T50/678—Aviation using fuels of non-fossil origin
Abstract
A Fischer-Tropsch process for producing diesel fuel or diesel blending stock with a high cetane number, in a concentration of 65-90wt% at pressures below 200 psia, using a cobalt catalyst with a rehenium and/or ruthenium promoter, The catalyst is a cobalt catalyst with crystallites having an average diameter greater than 16 nanometers, and the resulting hydrocarbon product after a rough flash, contains less than 10wt% waxes (>C23).
Description
LOW-PRESSURE FΪSCHER-TROPSCH PROCESS
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a Fischer-Tropsch process for converting carbon monoxide and hydrogen to diesel fuel or diesel blending stock with a high cetane number in a concentration of 65-90+wt %, at pressures below 200 psia, using a particular defined cobalt catalyst with crystallites of a size greater than 16 nanometers.
Background of the Invention
i) Overview
The Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process for converting carbon monoxide and hydrogen to liquid motor fuels and/or wax has been known since the 1920' s.
During the Second World War synthetic diesel was manufactured in Germany using coal gasification to supply a 1:1 ratio of hydrogen and carbon monoxide for conversion to fuel hydrocarbons. Because of trade sanctions and the paucity of natural gas, South Africa further developed the coal via gasification route to synthesis gas and employed a fixed-bed iron Fischer-Tropsch catalyst. Iron catalysts are very active for the water-gas shift reaction which moves the gas composition from a deficiency of hydrogen and closer to the optimum Hfe/CO ratio of around 2.0. When large natural gas supplies were developed, steam and autotheπnal reformers were employed to produce the synthesis gas feedstock to slurry-bed FT reactors using cobalt or iron catalysts.
In Gas-To-Liquids (GTL) plants, compromises must be made between liquid product yield and plant operating and capital costs, For example, if there is a market for electricity, a steam reformer design may be chosen because this technology
produces a large amount of waste heat: flue gas heat can be converted to electricity using an 'economiser1 and steam turbine. If conservation of natural gas feedstock and low capital cost are paramount, autotheπnal or partial oxidation reformers using air are favored.
Another factor in selecting the best reformer type is the nature of the reformer hydrocarbon feed gas. If the gas is rich in CO2, this can be advantageous because the desired H2/CO ratio can then be achieved directly in the reformer gas without the need to remove excess hydrogen, and some of the CO∑ is converted to CO, increasing the potential volume of liquid hydrocarbon product that can be produced. Additionally, the volume of steam that is required is reduced, which reduces the process energy requirements,
The market for Fischer-Tropsch (FT) processes is concentrated on large "World-Scale" plants with natural gas feed rates of greater than 200 million scfd because of the considerable economies if scale. These plants operate at high-pressure, about 450 psia, and use extensive recycling of tail gas in the FT reactor. For, example, the Norsk Hydro plant design has a recycle ratio of about 3.0, The emphasis is on achieving the maximum wax yield. In terms of product slate, these large plants strive for the maximum yield of FT waxes in order to minimize the formation of Ci-Cs products. The waxes are then hydrocracked to primarily diesel and naphtha fractions. Unfortunately, light hydrocarbons are also formed in this process. The reformers use some form of autothermal reforming with oxygen produced cryogenically from air, an expensive process in terms of operating cost and capital cost. The ecomonies of scale justify the use of high operating pressure, the use of oxygen natural gas reforming, extensive tail gas recycling to the FT reactor for increasing synthesis gas conversion and controlling heat removal and product wax hydrocracking. To date, an ecomomical FT plant design has not been developed for small plants with capacities of less than 100 million scfd.
The present invention strives for optimized economics in a completely different market: small FT plants using less than 100 million scfd. The emphasis is on simplicity and minimized capital cost, somewhat at the expense of efficiency.
u) Existing FT Technologies Technology of this invention
Large plants, > 25MMscfd Small plants, < I OOMMscfd
High pressure, > 200 psia Low pressure, < 200 psia
Oxygen to reformer Air to reformer
Extensive recycling to FT reactor or reformer No recycling ("once-through" process)
Low single-pass FT CO conversion (< 50%) High single-pass conversion (>
65%)
Deliberate and extensive wax formation Less than 10% wax formation
Hydrocracking waxes No hydrocracking operations Multiple-pass FT reactors Single- pass-FT reactor
Low FT diesel yield (<50 %) High diesel yield (55-90 % of hydrocarbon liquid)
iϋ) Prior art
The catalytic hydrogenation of carbon monoxide to produce a variety of products ranging from methane to heavy hydrocarbons (up to do and higher) as well as oxygenated hydrocarbons is usually referred to as Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The high molecular weight hydrocarbon product primarily comprises normal paraffins which can not be used directly as motor fuels because their cold properties are not compatible. After further hydroprocessing, Fischer-Tropsch hydrocarbon products can be transformed into products with a higher added value such as diesel, jet fuel or kerosene. Consequently, it is desirable to maximize the production of high value liquid hydrocarbons directly to that component separation or hydrocracking are not necessary.
CatalytJcally active group VIII, in particular, iron, cobalt and nickel are used a"? Fisehpr-TrrmKeii mtalysts; cobalt/ruthenium is one of the most common catalyzing
systems. Further, the catalyst usually contains a support or carrier metal as well as a promoter, e.g., rhenium.
Metal oxides, e.g., silica, alumina, titania, zirconia or mixture thereof, have been utilized as catalyst supports in Fischer-Tropsch hydrocarbons synthesis. U.S. Pat. No. 4,542,122 disclosed a cobalt or cobalt thoria on titania as a hydrocarbon synthesis catalyst U.S. Pat, No. 4,088,671 disclosed a cobalt-ruthenium catalyst where alumina was used as a support. European Pat No. 142,887 described a silica supported cobalt catalyst together with zirconium, titanium, ruthenium and/or chromium.
U.S. Pat, No. 4,801,573 described a promoted cobalt and rhenium catalyst supported on alumina. The amount of cobalt is most preferably about 10-40wt% of the catalyst. However, rhenium is preferably about 2-20wt of cobalt content. U.S. Pat. No, 5,248,701 disclosed a copper promoted cobalt-manganese spinel that was said to be useful as a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst with selectivity for olefins and higher paraffins.
U.S. Pat, No. 4,738,948, issued in Apr. 19, J 988, describes a catalyst comprising cobalt ruthenium at an atomic ratio of 10-400, on a refractory carrier, such as titania or silica, The catalyst is used for conversion of synthesis gas with an H2:C0 ratio of 0.5-10, preferably 0.5-4, to Cs-Cw hydrocarbons at a pressure of 80-6O0psig and at a temperature of 160-3000C, at a gas hourly space velocity of 100-5000 v/hr/v.
U.S. Pat. No. 2003/0134912 Al published July 17, 2003 describes a Fischer- Tropsch process that uses an activated carbon support to limit formation of heavier components by size exclusion. The product is segregated into three (3) boiling fractions, which are then re-combined to make diesel. The diesel is not made as a direct product exiting the Fischer-Tropsch reactor.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,801,573, issued January 31, 1989 (expired), described a catalyst of cobalt and rhenium deposited on alumina. The reaction products are a complicated mixture that follow the Shulz-Flory distribution.
After a period of time in operation, a catalyst becomes deactivated, losing its effectiveness for synthesis gas conversion. Among the main deactivation mechanisms for cobalt based catalysts are sulfur poisoning [e.g. R. L. Espinoza, et al, Applied Catalysis A:General 186 (1999)13], metal oxidation [e.g. D. Schanke et al, Catal. Lett. 34 (1995) 269] and surface condensation of heavy hydrocarbons [e,g. E. Iglesia et al, J. Catal, 143 (1993)345],
U.S. Pat, No. 5,728,918, issued on Mar. 17, 1998, described a catalyst comprising cobalt on a support, used for conversion of synthesis gas with an H2:C0 ratio of 1 -3, preferably 1.8-2.2, to C5 + hydrocarbons at a pressure of 1-lOObar and at a temperature of 150-3000C, at atypical gas hourly space velocity of 1000-6000 v/hr/v.
Generation Activation of this catalyst was achieved by using a gas containing carbon monoxide and less than 30% hydrogen at a temperature more than 1O°C above Fischer-Tropsch conditions in the range 100-500"C at a pressure of 0.5-1 Obar, for air, at least lOmin preferably 1-12 hours.
US Patent 2,471,288 refers to the use of a alumina as a catalyst for cracking gas oil, while a Polish paper published in Przemysl Chemiczny (2004), 83 (3) pp. 137- 140 describes the use of Co AI2O3 for the purpose of cracking propane. Clearly, cobalt and alumina have paraffin cracking activity,
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis performed at low pressure, 17-21 atmospheres, and relatively high temperature, usually produces short chain hydrocarbons of 0.6-0.7 chain growth probability factor. U.S. Pat App. No 20050209348 published on Sep. 22, 2005, described a Fischer-Tropsch process performed at an elevated temperature between 230-2800C, for example 24O0C and at elevated pressure typically between 1.7MPa and 2.IMPa, for example 1.8MPa, using a compact reactor. The preferred catalyst comprised a coating of gamma alumina support with 10-40% cobalt (by weight compared to the alumina) and with a promoter such as ruthenium, platinum or gadolinium which is less than 10% of the cobalt weight. The gas hourly space h, for example 20000hr"' and the produced hydrocarbon liquid
consisted of saturated linear alkanes of chain lengths range between about 6-17. Consequently, it is rich in aircraft fuel. However, the selectivity to the production of Cs+ hydrocarbon was less than 65% and the conversion of carbon monoxide was no greater than 75%. Hence, there is still a great need to identify other Fischer-Tropsch processes which can be used to directly produce different types of fuel such as, diesel fuel,
Summary of the Invention In the Fischer-Tropsch process, it has been found various parameters such as the size and shape of cobalt crystallites affect the activity of cobalt supported catalysts. The size of metal crystallites controls the number of active sites available for reduction (dispersion) and degree of reduction. It has been shown that the catatyst support type (γAl2θ3, Siθ2 and TIO2, etc) and structure greatly affect the shape, size, dispersion and reducibility of cobalt metal clusters, and hence C5+ selectivity. Furthermore, the support pore size distribution, pore shape, average pore diameter, pore volume and surface area influence the cobalt supported catalyst's activity. In fact, different batches of the same support but with various pore size distributions can result in cobalt supported catalysts of different C5+ selectivity.
Under certain pretreatment and activation conditions, a strong interaction between cobalt metal and oxide supports forms undesirable cobalt-support structures, for example, cobalt aluminate, which may require high reduction temperature. High reduction temperature can result in sintering cobalt crystallites and forming large cobalt metal clusters. Not only temperature treatments, but also cobalt metal precursors and metal loading, as well as metal promoters affect the size of cobalt crystallites. Low cobalt metal loading could result in high metal dispersion and small crystallites but enhances the metal-support interaction leading to poor reducibility and low catalyst activity.
Hydrogenation of carbon monoxide using cobalt supported catalyst is directly proportional to the amount of exposed cobalt atoms. Therefore, increasing cobalt ffl*l HicTiprcirm ΛTI tv>* oxide support surface, logically, enhances the catalyst activity
and C5+ selectivity. However, small cobalt crystallites strongly interact with the oxide support forming unreducible cobalt-support systems. The strong correlation between cobalt metal crystallites and reducibility influences the catalyst activity and may produce undesirable products. Under typical Fischer-Tropsch reaction conditions cobalt crystallite size range (9-200 nm) and dispersion range (11-0,5 %) have minor influence on C5+ selectivity. Nevertheless, smaller cobalt crystallites suffer from serious deactivation. In fact, Barbie et. al 2000 studied the correlation between the deactivation rate and cobalt crystallite size and observed a peak at 5.5 ran.
The invention in one broad aspect comprises a low-pressure Fischer-Tropsch process and a catalyst that produces a high diesel-fraction yield. Process pressure is below 200 psig. The catalyst is cobalt deposited at greater than 5 weight percent on gamma alumina, optionally along with rhenium or ruthenium at 0.01 -2 wt. %. It has been discovered that this catalyst is very effective at low pressures in converting synthesis gas into diesel in high yield. The present invention is particularly well suited to conversion of low pressure gases containing low molecular weight hydrocarbons into FT liquids. Examples of applications are landfill gas, oil field solution gas and low pressure gas from de-pressured gas fields. In all these cases, multiple-stage gas and air compression would be required in traditional FT plants. The high efficiency of the present FT catalyst enables high CO conversion and produces a product stream containing up to 90+ wt. % diesel in a single pass. The use of air in the natural gas reformer provides a synthesis gas containing approximately 50% nitrogen, which facilitates heat removal in the FT reactor as sensible heat and increases gas velocity and heat transfer efficiency, so that tail gas recycling is not needed. Naphtha can be partially sepaiated from the hydrocarbon product by flash distillation at low cost to generate a more pure diesel product. This also serves to provide some product cooling. The liquid hydrocarbon product is excellent for blending with petroleum diesel to increase cetane number and reduce sulfur content.
Advantageously, it has been experimentally been determined that the Fischer-
Tropsch process (hereinaftert "FT process") of the present invention is particularly <.«■«.,*;„» ,,«.;r,/y * ™Kalt catalyst comprised of crystallites, wherein said crystallites
have an average diameter greater than 16 nanometers. Diesel fuel or diesel blending stock with high cetane number is prosuced as a Fischer-Tropsch product in a concentration of 65-90+ weight percent at pressures below 200 psia using a cobalt catalyst having such crystallites, in combination with rhenium and /or ruthenium promoter. After a rough flash, a substantially pure diesel can be produced,
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a process flow diagram for a particular embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 is a flow diagram for flash separation of naphtha and diesel hydrocarbon fractions as a subsequent step to the Fischer-Tropsch process of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a graph showing C5+ carbon number distribution for the catalyst of Example 3 (trilobes) at 1900C;
Figure 4 is a graph showing the effect of pressure on the performance of the catalyst of Example 4
Figure S is a graph showing the effect of carbon number on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes, at 190"C, 70 psia, using a CSS-350 alumina support (ie Example 7);
Figure 6 is a graph showing the effect of carbon number distribution on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes, at 2009C and 70 psia, using an LD-5 alumina support (ie. Example 8a);
Figure7 is a graph showing the effect of carbon number distribution on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes, at 19O0C at 70 spia using an n ΛΛΛ _» — :_a supp0]rt (je Example 9);
Figure 8 is a graph showing the effect of carbon number distribution on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes, for the catalyst of Example 10 using ruthenium promoter;
Figure 9 is a graph showing the effect of carbon number distribution on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes for the catalyst of Example 11 , using an Aerolyst 3038 silica catalyst support instead of alumina;
Figure 10 is a graph showing the relationship of cobalt catalyst crystallite size to wax content of C5+ F-T product; and
Figure 11 is a graph showing a comparison of catalyst used in Example 9 carbon distribution with a traditional Anderson-Shultz-Flory distribution.
* In all Figures showing graphs of carbon numbers, naphtha is indicated by large squares, diesel by diamonds and light waxes by small squares.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
In order to operate the FT process at high conversions with oxygen- blown reformer synthesis gas, the approach has been to recycle tail gas in a high proportion- at a ratio of 3.0 or greater based on fresh gas feed. A secondary benefit is that the fresh gas is diluted in carbon monoxide, which reduces the required rate of heat removal from the FT reactor, reduces hot-spoting and improves the product slate. However, tailgas recycling is a very energy and capital intensive activity. The separation of oxygen from air is also an energy and capital intensive activity.
The approach taken in the present process is to use air in the reformer, which gives a synthesis gas containing approximately 50 % nitrogen as inert diluent, eliminating the need for tail gas recycling to moderate FT reactor heat removal
requirements. Others employing air- blown synthesis gas in FT processes have achieved the desired high CO conversions by using multiple FT reactors in series, which entails high capital costs and complex operation. The present process achieves high CO conversion in a simple single pass and a high diesel cut by using a special catalyst as more particularly described below.
The catalyst of the present invention in a preferred embodiment employs an alumina support with high cobalt concentration, along with a low level of rhenium to facilitate catalyst reduction. The high cobalt concentrations increase catalyst activity, enabling high single-pass synthesis gas conversion.
The Anderson-Shultz-Florey theory predicts the FT hydrocarbons to cover a very wide range of carbon numbers, from 1-60, whereas the most desirable product is diesel fuel (C9-C13, Chevron definition). In order to reduce the 'losses' of CO to making C1-C5 hydrocarbons, a common approach is to strive to make mostly wax in the FT reactor and then, in a separate operation, to hydrocrack the wax to mostly diesel and naphtha. Surprisingly, the process and catalyst of the present invention makes diesel in high yield (to 90 wt%) directly in the FT reactor, obviating the need for expensive and complex hydrocracking facilities.
Because of the elimination of oxygen purification, high-pressure compression, tail gas recycling and hydrocracking, the present process can be applied economically in much smaller plants than hitherto considered possible for FT technology.
Figure 1 shows the process flow diagram for the present invention, wherein the letters A-k signify the following:
A Raw hydrocarbon-containing gas
B Gas conditioning equipment
C Reformer
D Water
E Air or oxygen
F Cooler
G Water removal
H hydrogen removal (optional)
I Fischer Tropsch reactor
J Back-pressure regulator K Product cooling and recovery (2-options)
Letter A represents the raw hydrocarbon-containing process feed gas. This could be from a wide variety of sources: for example, from a natural gas field, a landfill facility (biogenic gas), a petroleum oil processing facility (solution gas), among others. The pressure of the gas for the present process can vary widely, from atmospheric pressure to 200 psia or higher. Single-stage or two-stage compression may be required, depending on the source pressure and the desired process operating pressure. For example, for landfill gas, the pressure is typically close to atmospheric pressure and blowers are used to transmit the gas into combustion equipment. Solution gas, which is normally flared, must also be compressed to the process operating pressure. There are also many old exploited and late-life natural gas fields with pressure too low for acceptance into pipelines that could make possible feedstock for the present process, Other natural gas sources, which may or may not be stranded (no access to a pipeline) may already be at or above the desired process operation pressure and these are also candidates. Another candidate is natural gas that is too high in inerts such as nitrogen to meet pipeline specifications.
Letter B represents hydrocarbon gas conditioning equipment. The gas may require clean-up to remove components that would damage reformer or FT catalyst. Examples of these are mercury, hydrogen sulfide, silicones and organic chlorides. Organic chlorides, such as found in land-fill gas, produce hydrochloric acid in the reformer) which can cause severe corrosion. Silicones form a continuous silicon dioxide coating on the catalyst, blocking pores. Hydrogen sulphide is a powerful FT catalyst poison and is usually removed to 1.0 ppm or lower, Some gas, from sweet- gas fields, may not require any conditioning (clean-up).
The hydrocarbon concentration in the raw gas affects the economics of the process because less hydrocarbon product is formed from the same volume of feed gas. Nevertheless, the process can operate with 50% or lower methane concentration, for example, using land-fill gas. There may even be reasons to operate the process even at a financial loss: for example to meet greenhouse gas government or corporate emission standards. The process can operate with feed gases containing only methane hydrocarbon or containing natural gas liquids by the application of known reformer technologies. The presence of carbon dioxide in the feed gas is beneficial,
Letter C represents the reformer, which may be of several types depending on the composition of the feed gas. A significant benefit of low pressure reformer operation is the lower rate of the Brouard reaction and diminution of metal dusting.
Partial oxidation reformers normally operate at very high pressure ie. 450 psia or greater, and so are not optimum for a low-pressure FT process. It is energetically inefficient, and can easily make soot, however, it does not require water, and makes a syngas with a H2ZCO ratio near 2,0, optimum for FT catalysts. Partial oxidation reformers may be employed in the present process,
Steam reformers are capital expensive and require flue gas heat recovery to maximize efficiency in large plants. Because the synthesis gas contains relatively low levels of inerts such as nitrogen, temperature control in the FT reactor can be difficult without tail gas recycling to the FT reactor. However, the low level of inerts enables recycling of some tail gas to the reformer tube-side, supplementing natural gas feed, or to the shell side to provide heat. Keeping in mind that FT tail gas must be combusted before venting in any event, this energy can be used for electrical generation or, better yet, to provide the reformer heat which would be otherwise be provided from burning natural gas. For small FT plants, steam reformers are a viable choice. Steam reformers may be employed in the present process.
Autothermal reforming is an efficient process of relatively low capital cost +uα+ .,^o ™~A-.rr,t- t-πiperatures and modest steam concentrations to produce a soot-
free synthesis gas with H2/CO around 2.5 using IOW-CO2 natural gas feed, which is closer to the desired ratio than for steam reforming. However some hydrogen removal is still requited for most natural gas feeds. If the feed gas contains greater than about 33 % CO2, as is the case with land-fill gas feed, then an H2/CO ratio of 2.0 can be achieved without any recycle streams, and the water use can also be diminished. This is the most desired type of reformer for the present low-pressure FT processes.
Letter D represents the optional water that is injected as steam into the reformer. All reformer technologies except partial oxidation require the injection of steam.
Letter E represents an oxidizing gas, which could be air, oxygen or oxygen- enriched air.
Letter F represents a cooler for reducing the reformer outlet temperature from greater than 800 0C. to close to ambient. The cooling may be done in several stages, but preferably in a single stage. The cooling may be achieved with shell- and- tube or plate- and- frame heat exchangers and the recovered energy may be utilized to preheat the reformer feed gases, as is well known in the industry. Another way of cooling the reformer tail gas is by direct injection of water into the stream or by passing the stream through water in a vessel.
Letter G represents a separator for separating the reformer synthesis gas from condensed water, so as to minize the amount of water entering downstream equipment.
Letter H represents optional hydrogen removal equipment such as Prism™ hydrogen-selective membranes which are sold by Air Products, or Cynara membranes from Natco,
Certain reformer processes produce a synthesis gas too rich in hydrogen, some of which must be removed to achieve optimum FT reactor performance. An ideal u ir'n. .„♦:„ ;„ i m ^ whereas the raw synthesis gas may have a ratio of 3.0 or
higher. High hydrogen concentrations give rise to larger CO loss to producing methane instead of the desired motor fuels or motor fuel precursor such as naphtha.
Letter I represents typical FT reactors, which are of the fixed- bed or slurry 5 bubble type and either may be used. However, the fixed-bed is preferred because if its simplicity of operation and ease of scale-up.
Letter J represents a back-pressure controller which sets the process pressure. It may be placed in other locations depending on the product recovery and possible i o partial separation process employed.
Letter K represents product cooling and recovery. Product cooling is typically accomplished by heat exchange with cold water and serves to pre-heat the water for use elsewhere in the FT plant. Separation is accomplished in a separator vessel 15 designed for oil/water separation. However a second alternative is to flash- cool the FT reactor product before the aforementioned cooler-separator as shown in Figure 2. This serves two purposes- firstly to reduce the product temperature and secondly to enable partial separation of the naphtha component in the produced hydrocarbon product, enriching the remaining liquid in the diesel component. 0
Figure 2 shows a process diagram, for flash separation of naphtha and diesel hydrocarbons, in which:
1 is a fixed-bed Fischer Tropsch reactor. 5 2 is a mixture of gases, water, naphtha, diesel and light waxes at ca.190-2400C and pressure greater than atmospheric.
3 is a pressure let-down valve.
4 is stream 2 at reduced temperature due to gas expansion and at 14.7 psia. 0 5 is a flash drum vessel.
6 is a vapour phase consisting of stream 2 minus diesel and light waxes.
7 is a cooler,
8 is stream 6 with naphtha and water in the liquid phase.
9 is a vessel to retain naphtha and water.
10 is a waste tailgas stream consisting mainly of inert gases and light hydrocarbons.
The FT products 2 flow through a pressure let-down valve 3 and into a flash drum 5. The inert gases and lower-boiling hydrocarbons, water and naphtha go overhead as vapour out of the flash drum and through cooler 7. The diesel and light waxes collect in vessel 5. The water and naphtha condense in cooler 7 and are collected in vessel 9. The remaining gases exit overhead in stream 10 and are typically combusted, sometimes with energy recovery, or are used to generate electricity.
EXAMPLES
Table 1. Physical characteristics of alumina catalyst supports
EXAMPLE 1.
Catalyst synthesis was conducted by ordinary means as practiced by those knowledgable in the art. The catalyst support was alumina trilobe exmidate obtained 5 from Sasol Germany GmbH (hereafter referred to as 'trilobe'). The extrudate dimensions were 1.67 mm diameter and 4.1 mm length. The support was calcined in air at 5000C. for 24 hours. A solution mixture of cobalt nitrate and perrhenic acid was added to the support by the method of incipient wetness to achieve 5 wt% cobalt metal and 0.5 wt.% rhenium metal in the finished catalyst. The catalyst was dried i o slowly and then heated in a convection oven at the rate of 1.00C per minute to 3500C. and held at that temperature for 12 hours. A volume of 29 cc of oxidized catalyst was placed in a Vi inch OD tube that had an outer annular space through which temperature-control water was flowed under pressure in order to remove the heat of reaction. In effect, the FT reactor was a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with catalyst
15 placed in the tube side. The inlet gas and water were both at the targeted reaction temperature. Catalyst reduction was accomplished by the following procedure:
Reduction- gas flow rate (cc/min)/H2 in nitrogen (%)/teπiperatLire (°C.)/time (hours): 0 1. 386/70/200/4, pre-heat stage
2. 386/80/to 325/4, slow heating stage
3. 386/80/325/30, fixed- temperature stage
During Fischer-Tropsch catalysis, total gas flow to the FT reactor was at a GHSV 5 of 1000 hr"1. Gas composition was representative of an air-autothermal reformer gas:
50% nitrogen, 33.3% H2 and 16.7 % CO. A seasoning of the catalyst was used to reduce methane production. This was accomplished by holding the reactor temperature at 170 0C. for the first 24 hours. Presumably, this process causes carbonylation of the cobalt surface and increased FT activity. CO conversion and 0 liquid production were measured at a variety of temperatures between 190 0C. and
220 0C.
EXAMPLE 2
The catalyst used was the same as Example 1, except that the cobalt metal loading was 10 wt%.
EXAMPLE 3
The catalyst used was the same as Example 1 , except that the cobalt metal loading was 15 wt%.
EXAMPLE 4 The catalyst used was the same as Example 1. except that the cobalt metal loading was 20 wt%.
EXAMPLE 5
The catalyst used was the same as Example 1 , except that the cobalt metal loading was 26 wt%.
EXAMPLE 6
The catalyst used was the same as Example 1, except that the cobalt metal loading was 35 wt%.
EXAMPLE 7
The catalyst used was the same as used in Example 1 , except that the alumina support was CSS-350, obtained from Alcoa, and the cobalt loading was 20 weight percent. This support is spherical with a diameter of 1/16 inch.
EXAMPLE 8a.8b. 8c & 8d
The catalyst used was the same as used in Example 1, except as follows:
Catalyst 8a was identical to Catalyst I, except that the alumina support was LD-S, obtained from Alcoa, and the cobalt loading was 20 weight percent. This support is spherical with an average particle distribution of 1963 microns. Example 8a used the particle size mixture as received. Some of the original particles were ground to
"atalysts 8b, 8c and 8d were made with particles of diameter 214,
359 and 718 microns respectively, The cobalt loading in Examples 8b, 8c and 8d was identical to Example 8a.
EXAMPLE 9. The catalyst used was the same as used in Example 1, except that the alumina support was F-220, obtained from Alcoa, and the cobalt loading was 20 weight percent. F-220 is a spherical support with a mesh size distribution of 7/14.
EXAMPLE 10 The catalyst used was the same as used in Example 4, except that the promoter was ruthenium rather than rhenium.
EXAMPLE 11
The catalyst used was the same as used in Example 3, except that Aerolyst 3038 silica catalyst support from Degussa was used instead of alumina.
Catalyst characterization
The above catalysts were each analyzed for average crystallite size (d(CoO), Dispersion (D%) and Degree of Reduction (DOR) using a Chembet 3000 (Quantachrome Instruments) TPR/TPD analyzer. The catalyst was reduced at 3250C in H2 flow and cobalt dispersion was calculated assuming that one hydrogen molecule covers two cobalt surface atoms. Oxygen chemisorption was measured with a series of (027He) pulses passed through the catalyst at 38O0C temperature after reducing the catalyst at 3250C. The up-take oxygen moles were determined and degree of reduction was calculated assuming that all cobalt metal was re-oxidized to Co3O4, Cobalt crystallite size was calculated from: d(CoO)= (96/D%) DOR D% : Dispersion DOR : Degree of reduction
F-T Catalyst Evaluation
(i) Influence of cobalt loading-Examples 1-6
The effect of Co loading on catalyst performance was tested with Examples 1- 6 with the results shown in Table 2 (below).
Table 2. Effect of catalyst loading on performance on Examples 1-6 (trilobes) at 70 psia.
Weight % Cobalt
(Example number) 5 (1) 10 (2) 15 (3) 20 (4) 26 (S) 35 (6)
OptimumTemperature, "C 220 210 205 200 200 200
Hydrocarbon Liquid Rate, ml/h 0,09 0.54 0.74 1.03 0.77 0.86
Naphtha, wt% 6.4 8.8 13.9 17.9 16.4 15.8
Diesel, wt% 92,5 82.8 78.3 75.3 76.8 76.8
Light wax, wt% 1.1 8.4 7.8 6.9 6 8 7.4
Diesel production, ml/h 0.08 0.45 0.58 0.78 0.59 0.66
CO Conversion, mol % 19.4 42.0 61 2 85.1 82.8 83.1
C5+ Selectivity, % 28.6 80.6 71.3 68.0 65.1 64.3
Cetane number 81 79 77 76 74 75
Examples 1-6 were conducted at various temperatures, and the temperature that gave the largest amount of hydrocarbon product is listed, It is clear that 5% cobalt was not enough to provide a useful amount of liquid hydrocarbons: the best concentration was 20 wt% Co, which gave 1.03 ml/h. The concentration of diesel range hydrocarbons in the hydrocarbon product was 75.3-92.5 % at cobalt loadings of
10 wt% cobalt or higher. The highest diesel production rate (0.78 ml/h) was achieved with the trilobe support with 20% cobalt at 70 psia.
The performance data for the catalyst of Example 4 at 202.5 is shown in Table
8. The level of wax (O23) on the C5+ liquid was only 6.8 % and the diesel fraction was 73.5% (C9-C23). It was found that for all catalysts of Examples 1-11 where the crystallite average diameter was greater than 16 nm, the C5+ wax was less than 10 weight %, enabling the product to be used directly as diesel blend.
Figure 3 shows the carbon number distribution for the catalyst of Example 3
(trilobe) at 190 0C. A very narrow distribution was obtained having no heavy wax. Diesel was 90.8%, naphtha 6.1% and light waxes 3.1%. Cetane number was very high at 88. In all graphs of carbon numbers, naphtha is indicated by large squares, id light waxes by small squares.
Influence of pressure
The catalyst of Example 4 was run in the standard testing rig as described above at a temperature of 202.5 0C. at a variety of pressures. Results in Table 3 (below) and Figure 4 indicate that productivity of the catalyst for production of liquid hydrocarbons was significant at low pressures down to 70 psia, with the optimum results obtained at pressures between 70 psia and 175 psia. Preferred pressures are 70-350 psia and most preferably from 70 to 175 psia. The diesel fraction over that pressure range was fairly constant at 70.8-73.5 weight percent. As shown in Table 8, the catalyst of Example 4, with 20 % cobalt had an average crystallite size of 22.26 nm and a C5+ wax fraction of 6.8 wt % enabling the product to be used as a diesel blend.
Table 3. Effect of pressure on catalyst performance (Example 4 catalyst, 202.S 0C).
Pressure, psia 40 70 100 125 140 175 200
Hydrocarbon Liquid Rate, mi/ti 0.405 1.047 1.082 1.034 1.046 1.079 0.605
Naphtha, wt% 8.5 19.7 24.7 23.5 23.9 26.6 23.9
Diesel, wt% 77.8 73.5 71.9 73.1 73.4 70.8 74.1
Light wax, wt% 13.7 6.Θ 3.4 3.4 2.7 2.6 2.0
Diesel production, ml/h 0.32 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.76 0.60
CO Conversion, mol % 59.4 90.2 84.1 83.8 74.8 73.4 65.8
C5+ Selectivity, % 76.6 58.1 54.4 52.5 61 3 57.7 52.0
Example 7
As seen in Table 4 (below), the maximum diesel production rate was achieved at 215 0C. and 70 psia. Compared with the catalyst of Example 4, the catalyst of Example 7 gave a lower diesel production rate at its optimum temperature (215 0C), but a higher diesel fraction. Figure 5 is a graph showing the effect of carbon number on the % weight production of liquid fuels and/or waxes, at 1900C, 70 psia, using a CSS-350 alumina support (ie Example 7). Figure 5 shows the narrow carbon number range in the liquid product at 190 ° C, with 89.6% in the diesel range. Cetane number
was 81. However, as shown in Table 8, the crystallite size was 18.26 nm, and the wax fraction was 7.2% enabling the product to be used as a diesel blend.
Table 4. Performance of Example 7 at various temperatures (CSS-350).
Temperature, 0C 190 200 210 215 220
Hydrocarbon Liquid Rate, ml/h 0.55 0.58 0.64 0.70 0.68
Naphtha, wt% 5.4 15.2 13.4 15.4 14.3
Diesel, wt% 89.6 76.8 82.0 77.4 81.3
Light wax, wt% 5.0 8.0 4.6 7.2 4.4
Diesel production, ml/h 20.1 47.2 45.2 53.8 49.5
Average Molecular Weight 194.9 170.2 171.2 164.8 168.3
CO Conversion, mol % 47.8 53.4 81.6 93.8 100.0
EXAMPLE 8a.8b.8c. 8d
The testing results are shown in Table 5 (following page).
As may be seem from Table 5, catalysts 8b, 8c and 8d showed Co metal dispersion higher than for Catalyst 8a. Catalysts that contain CoO average crystallite sizes below 16 nanometers gave a high wax cut in the FT product of 17.6-19.3% wt, whereas catalyst 8a, which contained CoO crystallites larger than 16 nm (actually, 23.06 nm) gave a lower wax cut of 7.4 weight percent in the C5+ liqiud, enabling the product to be used as a diesel blend.
Table 5. Performance of Catalyst 8a-8d at 70 psia.
Catalyst 8a 8b* Bc* 8d*
Average Particle size, microns 1Θ63 274 359 718
Average crystallite size, nm 23.06 9.19 14.76 15.72
Dispersion, % 4.16 10.45 6.5 6.11
Fischer-Tropsch test Temperature, *C 200 200 200 200
C5+ composition wt, %:
Naphtha (carbon number C6-C8) 9 3 10.1 10.4 11.4
Diesel (carbon number C9-C23) 84.1 70.9 72.0 69.3
Wax (carbon number > C23) 6.6 19.0 17.6 19.3
Average molecular weight, AMU 182 195 190 193
CO conversion, % 52,7 68 8 111 69.3
*Not part of the present Application
Figure 6 shows C5+ carbon number distribution for Example 8a (LD-5) at 2000C, 70 psia.
EXAMPLE 9
Example 9 catalyst was tested at 70 psia.
As shown in Table 6 (below) and Figure 7, the 190 0C hydrocarbon product contained 99.1% "naphtha plus diesel". Diesel itself was at 93.6%. There was very little light wax. Cetane number was 81. As shown in Table 8, the crystallite size was 22.22 run and the wax fraction was 2.3 %, enabling the product to be directly as a diesel fuel.
Table 6. Performance of Catalyst 9 (F-220) at various temperatures (pressure 70 psia).
Temperature, 0C 190 200 210 215
Hydrocarbon Liquid Rate, ml/h 0.465 0.757 0.Θ 0.733
Naphtha, wt% 5.5 9.2 20.1 21.5
Diesel, wt% 93.6 88.5 77.0 74.7
Light wax, wt% 0.9 2.3 2.9 3.8
Diesel production, ml/h 0.41 0.Θ2 0.53 0.47
Average Molecular Weight 1882 1B1.4 157.7 154.1
CO Conversion, mol % 50.0 72.2 94.7 92.2
Cetane number 61.0 76.0 67.0 65.0
Figure 7 shows C5+ carbon number distribution for Example 9 (F-220) at 190 0C, 70 psia
EXAMPLE 10;
Data in Table 7 (below) and Figure 8 show that the use of ruthenium catalyst promoter instead of rhenium also provides a narrow distribution of hydrocarbons with 74.42% in the diesel range having an overall cetane number of 78. As shown in Table
8, the crystallite size was 20.89 ran and the wax fraction was 3,73 %, enabling the product to be used as a diesel blend.
Table 7. Performance of Catalyst 10 (Ruthenium promoter, LD-5 alumina suDDOrt).
Temperature, °C/Pressure, psia 215
Conversion, % 94.64
C5+ liquid rate, ml/h 0.73
Diesel production rate, ml/h 0.54
C5+ weight fractions, %:
Naphtha (C6-C8) 21.85
Diesel (C9-C23) 74.42
Wax (>C23) 3.73
Cetane number 78
Average molecular weight 164
Figure 8 shows C5+ carbon number distribution for the catalyst of Example 10 using a ruthenium promoter.
EXAMPLE 11 For the catalyst of Example 11 , the hydrocarbon liquid production rate was
0.55 ml/h at 2100C. The carbon distribution curve shown in Figure 9 demonstrates a narrow distribution with a high diesel cut.
As shown in Table 8 (below), the crystallite size was 33.1 run and the wax fraction was 5.2 %, enabling the product to be used as a diesel blend, perhaps after flashing off the naphtha fraction.
Table 8. Summary of the effect of cobalt crystallite size on C5+ wax concentration.
Catalyst Number 4 7 9 10 11
Name Trilobes CSS-350 F-220 LD-5/Ru Aerolyst 3038
Average crystallite size, nm 22.26 18.26 22.22 20.89 33.1
Dispersion, % 4.31 5.26 4.32 4.6 2.9
Fischer-Tropsch test Temperature, 0C 202.5 215 200 215 200
C5+ composition wt. %:
Naphtha (carbon number C6-C8) 19.7 15.4 9.2 21.85 20.7
Diesel (carbon number C9-C23) 73 5 77.4 88.5 74.4 74.1
Wax (carbon number > C23) 6.8 7.2 2.3 3.7 5.2
Average molecular weight, AMU 165 165 181 164 147
CO conversion, % 90.2 93.8 72.2 92.6 57,0
Figure 9 shows a graph of the C5+ carbon number distribution for the catalyst of Example 11 (Aerolyst 3038 silica) .
Summary The catalysts of Examples 1 -11 (except catalysts 8 b, c and d), as may be seen from the above discussion, show that a narrow distribution of hydrocarbons, mainly in the diesel range, having low wax content (<10 wt.%) is obtained when the FT catalyst has cobalt crystallites larger than 16 nm, as shown in Figure 10 showing the relationship of cobalt catalyst cτystallite size to wax weight content (%) of C5+ FT product [ naphtha is indicated by large squares, diesel by diamonds and light waxes by small squares].
Figure 11 compares this result with expectations from the Anderson-Shultz- Flory (A-S-F) carbon number distribution based on chain growth. The A-S-F distribution provides only 50 wt. % diesel fraction, whereas the present invention provides > 65 wt, %.
The liquid hydrocarbon product of the present catalysts is more valuable than the broad A-S-F type of product because it can be used directly as a diesel-blending stock without hydrocracking to increase cetane number and decrease sulphur content of petroleum diesels. Because the present process is a simple once-through process, it entails low capital cost.
Although the disclosure describes and illustrates preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to these particular embodiments. Many variations and modifications will now occur to those skilled in the art. For a complete definition of the invention and its intended scope, reference is to be made to the summary of the invention and the appended claims read together with and considered with the disclosure and drawings herein.
Claims
1. A Fischer-Tropsch process producing a liquid hydrocarbon product containing less than 10 weight percent wax (>C23) and greater than 65% diesel (C9-C23), having a cobalt catalyst with crystallites, said crystallites having an average diameter greater that 16 nanometers.
2. The process of claim 1 having a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support for the cobalt catalyst, wherein said catalyst support is selected from the group of catalyst supports comprising alumina, zirconia, titania or silica materials.
3. The processes of any one of claims 1 or 2, wherein the cobalt catalyst has a catalyst loading, and wherein said catalyst loading is greater than 10 weight %.
4. The process of any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the operating pressure for said Fischer-Tropsch process is less than 100 psia.
5. The process of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein promoters are utilized in such process, and said promotors are selected from the group of promotors comprised of ruthenium, rhenium, nickel, zirconium and titanium, and mixtures thereof.
6. The process of any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein a flash distillation is conducted .
7. The process of claim 6, wherein said flash distillation is conducted on the Fischer-Tropsch product to reduce the naphtha cut.
8. A Fischer-Tropsch process operating at less than 200 psia, using an air autothermal reformer, and having a CO conversion of at least 65 % and providing a diesel yield greater than 60% by weight in a single- pass Fischer- Tropsch reactor using a cobalt catalyst, said catalyst having a metallic cobalt loading greater than 5% by weight and rhenium loading of less than 2% by weight on a catalyst support material selected from the group of catalyst support materials comprising alumina, zircoπia, and silica, wherein said cobalt catalyst is in the form of crystallites, said crystallites having an average diameter greater that 16 nanometers.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support material is comprised of alumina.
10. The process if claim 8 having a feed gas, wherein selective membranes or molecular sieves are employed to remove hydrogen from the feed gas.
1 1. The process of claim 8 wherein the cobalt catalyst loading is greater than 6 weight %.
12. The process of claim 8 wherein the operating pressure is less than 100 psia.
13. A Fischer-Tropsch process as claimed in claim 8, said reactor further having a promoter, wherein said promoter comprises a promoter selected from the group of promoters consisting of ruthenium and rhenium or mixtures thereof.
14. A Fischer-Tropsch process operating at less than 200 psia, using an oxygen autothermal reformer, and having a CO conversion of at least 65 % and providing a diesel yield greater than 60% by weight in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor using a cobalt catalyst, said catalyst having a metallic cobalt loading greater than 5% by weight and a rhenium loading of less than 2% by weight on a catalyst support selected from the group of catalyst supports comprised of alumina, zirconia and silica materials, wherein said cobalt catalyst is in the form of crystallites, said crystallites having an average diameter greater that 16 nanometers.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support is comprised of alumina.
16. The process of claim 14 having a tailgas from the reformer, wherein the tailgas is partially recycled to the reformer.
17. The process of claim 14 ftirther having a feed gas wherein selective membranes or molecular sieves are employed to remove hydrogen from the gas.
18. The process of claim 14 wherein the cobalt catalyst loading is greater than 6 weight %.
19. The process of claim 14 wherein the operating pressure is less than 100 psia.
20. A Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 14, said reactor further having a promoter, wherein said promoter comprises a promoter selected from the group of promoters consisting of ruthenium or rhenium, or mixtures thereof
21. A Fischer-Tropsch process operating at less than 200 psia, using an oxygen steam reformer, and having a CO conversion of at least 65 % and providing a diesel yield greater than 60% in by weight in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor using a cobalt catalyst with a metallic cobalt loading greater than 5% by weight and rhenium loading of less than 2% by weight on a catalyst support selected from the group of catalyst supports comprised of alumina, zirconia, or silica materials, or mixtures thereof, wherein said cobalt catalyst is in the form of crystallites, said crystallites having an average diameter greater that 16 nanometers.
22. The process of claim 21 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support is comprised of alumina.
23. The process of claim 21 further having a feed gas, wherein selective membranes or molecular sieves are employed to remove hydrogen from the feed gas.
24. The process of claim 21 having a tailgas from the reformer, wherein some or all of the tailgas is burned to provide heat to the reformer .
25. The process of claim 21 wherein the cobalt catalyst loading is greater than 6 weight %.
26. The process of claim 21 wherein the operating pressure is less than 100 psia.
27. A Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 21, said reactor further having a promoter, wherein said promoter comprises a promoter selected from the group of promoters comprising ruthenium, rhenium ,or mixtures thereof
28. A Fischer-Tropsch process operating at less than 200 psia, using an air or oxygen partial oxidation reformer, and having a CO conversion of greater than 65 % and providing a diesel yield greater than 60% by weight in a Fischer-Tropsch reactor using a cobalt catalyst with a metallic cobalt loading greater than 5% by weight and rhenium loading of less than 2% by weight on a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support selected from the group of catalyst supports comprising alumina, zirconia, and silica materials, wherein said cobalt catalyst is in the form of crystallites, said crystallites having an average diameter greater that 16 nanometers.
29. The process of claim 28 wherein the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst support is comprised of alumina.
30. The process of claim 28 having a feed gas, wherein selective membranes or molecular sieves are employed to remove hydrogen from the feed gas.
31. The process of claim 28 wherein the cobalt catalyst loading is greater than 6 weight %.
32. The process of claim 28 wherein the operating pressure is less than 100 psia.
33. A Fischer-Tropsch process of claim 28, said reactor further having a promoter, wherein said promoter comprises a promoter selected from the group of promoters comprising ruthenium, rhenium, or mixtures thereof.
Priority Applications (10)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2008/002306 WO2010071967A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2008-12-22 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
CA2748216A CA2748216C (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
MYPI2011002900A MY160250A (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
RU2011130432/04A RU2487159C2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Method of conducting fischer-tropsch process at low pressure |
CN200980157057.XA CN102325858B (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
MX2011006743A MX2011006743A (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process. |
AU2009329785A AU2009329785B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure Fischer-Tropsch process |
ARP090105016A AR074831A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | FISCHER -TROPSCH LOW PRESSURE PROCESS |
PCT/CA2009/001862 WO2010071989A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
EP09833974A EP2379676A4 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2009-12-21 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2008/002306 WO2010071967A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2008-12-22 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010071967A1 true WO2010071967A1 (en) | 2010-07-01 |
Family
ID=42286818
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2008/002306 WO2010071967A1 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2008-12-22 | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2010071967A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140374660A1 (en) * | 2013-06-25 | 2014-12-25 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Engine Chemical Reactor With Catalyst |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050119116A1 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2005-06-02 | Conocophillips Company | Silica-alumina catalyst support, catalysts made therefrom and methods of making and using same |
CA2567425A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-05-08 | Canada Chemical Corporation | Simple low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
US7452844B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2008-11-18 | Süd-Chemie Inc | High surface area, small crystallite size catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
-
2008
- 2008-12-22 WO PCT/CA2008/002306 patent/WO2010071967A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7452844B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2008-11-18 | Süd-Chemie Inc | High surface area, small crystallite size catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis |
US20050119116A1 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2005-06-02 | Conocophillips Company | Silica-alumina catalyst support, catalysts made therefrom and methods of making and using same |
CA2567425A1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2008-05-08 | Canada Chemical Corporation | Simple low-pressure fischer-tropsch process |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
WEICK ET AL., HANDBOOK OF PETROLEUM REFINING PROCESSES, THIRD EDITION, MCGRAW-HILL, CHAPTERS 15.2 AND 15.3, 2004 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140374660A1 (en) * | 2013-06-25 | 2014-12-25 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Engine Chemical Reactor With Catalyst |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8053481B2 (en) | Low-pressure Fischer-Tropsch process | |
US20080108716A1 (en) | Simple low-pressure fischer-tropsch process | |
US10774271B2 (en) | Catalyst and process for the production of diesel fuel from natural gas, natural gas liquids, or other gaseous feedstocks | |
US8529865B2 (en) | Conversion of produced oxygenates to hydrogen or synthesis gas in a carbon-to-liquids process | |
CN1295544A (en) | Gas conversion using synthesis gas produced hydrogen for catalyst rejuvenation and hydrocarbon conversion | |
NO171409B (en) | PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF A HYDROGENRIQUE GAS VEDA AUTOTHERMIC REFORM OF A HYDROCARBON-CONTAINED OUTPUT MATERIAL | |
WO2020061070A1 (en) | Processes and catalysts for reforming of impure methane-containing feeds | |
GB2475492A (en) | Fischer-Tropsch catalyst with an alkaline earth metal content of less than 2000 ppm | |
EP1848532A2 (en) | Silyl-modified catalyst and use of this catalyst for the conversion of synthesis gas to hydrocarbons | |
EP1887072A1 (en) | a process for the treatment of fischer-tropsch tail gas | |
US9074148B2 (en) | Hydrogen and carbon utilization in synthetic fuels production plants | |
US20230340334A1 (en) | Processes for the production of liquid fuels from carbon containing feedstocks, related systems and catalysts | |
US20040244377A1 (en) | System for power generation in a process producing hydrocarbons | |
AU2002362693A1 (en) | System for power generation in a process producing hydrocarbons | |
CA2748216C (en) | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process | |
EP1419127B1 (en) | Process for the preparation of hydrocarbons | |
CA2567425A1 (en) | Simple low-pressure fischer-tropsch process | |
US9909071B2 (en) | Process for small scale gas to liquid hydrocarbon production through recycling | |
WO2010071967A1 (en) | Low-pressure fischer-tropsch process | |
US8455556B2 (en) | Fischer-Tropsch catalyst | |
WO2008055353A1 (en) | Low pressure fixed bed fischer-tropsch process and apparatus | |
WO2018088986A1 (en) | Processes for the production of liquid fuels from carbon containing feedstocks, related systems and catalysts |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 08879053 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 08879053 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |