WO2010144191A2 - Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process - Google Patents

Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010144191A2
WO2010144191A2 PCT/US2010/033545 US2010033545W WO2010144191A2 WO 2010144191 A2 WO2010144191 A2 WO 2010144191A2 US 2010033545 W US2010033545 W US 2010033545W WO 2010144191 A2 WO2010144191 A2 WO 2010144191A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
regenerator
catalytic cracking
fluid catalytic
recited
catalyst
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2010/033545
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2010144191A3 (en
Inventor
Frank J Elvin
Iraj Isaac Rahmim
Original Assignee
Co2 Solutions Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Co2 Solutions Llc filed Critical Co2 Solutions Llc
Publication of WO2010144191A2 publication Critical patent/WO2010144191A2/en
Publication of WO2010144191A3 publication Critical patent/WO2010144191A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/14Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts
    • C10G11/18Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils with preheated moving solid catalysts according to the "fluidised-bed" technique
    • C10G11/182Regeneration
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2/00Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon
    • C10G2/30Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures of undefined composition from oxides of carbon from carbon monoxide with hydrogen
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P30/00Technologies relating to oil refining and petrochemical industry
    • Y02P30/40Ethylene production

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a fluid catalytic cracking process which takes advantage of a flue gas conversion plant including a Fischer-Tropsch process to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and increase the production of useful hydrocarbon products, such as diesel oil, jet fuel, and other products.
  • a fluid catalytic cracking unit typically includes a reactor, a catalyst regenerator, which burns off carbon from the catalyst used in the reactor, a flue gas treatment plant which treats the flue gas from the catalyst regenerator, and a fractionator, which separates the products from the reactor.
  • the present invention discloses modifications to a fluid catalytic cracking unit in order to improve its hydrocarbon yield and to substantially reduce its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. As explained in more detail below, this is accomplished by combining one or more of the following modifications to the process: - Send the flue gases from the fluid catalyst cracking unit to a flue gas conversion plant which includes a Fischer-Tropsch process to convert H 2 and CO into hydrocarbon products such as diesel fuel.
  • any low value refinery fuel or other hydrocarbon or carbon source product in addition to the coke present in the catalyst to be regenerated in order to increase the amount of carbon available for the production of CO (which is then utilized in the Fischer- Tropsch process to increase the hydrocarbon yield.
  • Particularly useful for this purpose is the injection into the regenerator of the low value slurry oil from the bottoms of the main fractionator(s) of the fluid catalytic cracking unit. This also helps re-establish heat-balance in the reactor.
  • the heat balance is negatively affected with the combustion of carbon to CO (only 4,000 BTU/lb of carbon) instead of its combustion to CO 2 (14,000 BTU/lb of carbon) when operating in partial burn.
  • the incorporation of these process modifications to the fluid catalytic cracking unit may include the physical modification of the facility beyond the addition of the flue gas conversion plant with Fischer-Tropsch process. These modifications may include the addition of nozzles and distribution grids to the catalyst regenerator, the addition or modification of nozzles to the main fractionator(s), as well as resizing of components such as the regenerator and the gas plant, especially if the flue gas conversion plant does not include its own fractionators and instead makes use of the main fractionator(s) of the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch products may then be routed to the main fractionator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit or to a separate fractionator.
  • the hydrogen can also be extracted from the off-gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • slurry oil is injected into the regenerator, and the control system may be programmed to control the slurry oil injection at between 1 % and 10% of fluid catalytic cracking unit feed (preferably 5%).
  • CO 2 can be recycled with the air being injected into the catalyst regenerator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit to recycle the CO 2 to extinction and produce more CO.
  • the controller maintains equilibrium while effectively recycling the CO 2 to extinction.
  • heat can be supplied from extra coke on the catalyst, derived from cracking heavier, higher carbon feeds, or by rerouting the fluid catalytic cracking unit fractionator bottoms (slurry oil) into the regenerator instead of routing it to heavy fuel oil storage.
  • the slurry oil is about 90% carbon, making it an ideal source of carbon to produce CO in the regenerator and provide heat to heat-balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the CO is converted into hydrocarbon in the Fischer-Tropsch unit.
  • the use of heavier feeds in the reactor and/or the recycle of slurry oil to the regenerator provide good ways to heat-balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the reduction in available heat caused by not burning the CO to CO 2 in the regenerator also can be compensated by burning any other low value refinery fuel or product in the catalyst regenerator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit - such as absorber off-gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant, and even gasoline from the fluid catalytic cracking unit if the price of gasoline is below diesel price, most of which will provide CO for diesel production in the Fischer-Tropsch process.
  • any hydrocarbon or carbon source for example charcoal or coal or wood or biomass, can be burned to produce the heat balance, and the CO from combustion can go to the Fischer-Tropsch process to produce hydrocarbons such as diesel fuel.
  • Another source of heat for the reactor of the fluid catalytic cracking unit can be the excess heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process.
  • the heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process can be converted into electricity, which can be used to heat up the regenerator using microwaves or radiant heating coils.
  • electricity from any source could be used to balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit heat requirements.
  • the heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process can be used to drive the compressor for the flue gas treatment for the fluid catalytic cracking unit, either by generating steam to directly drive the compressor or by generating steam to produce electricity to drive the compressor.
  • one embodiment of the present invention injects slurry oil (or any other solid, liquid or gaseous source of carbon or hydrocarbon such as charcoal, coal, biomass, etc.) into the catalyst regenerator, converts it to CO in the regenerator, and converts this CO to hydrocarbon in the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant.
  • Residue cracking (catalytic cracking of heavy, high carbon feedstocks, vacuum bottoms, and atmospheric bottoms, as well as gas oil cracking) may be included in the process that is carried out in the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the fluid cracking catalyst preferably is a zeolite or non zeolite silica alumina catalyst. It preferably contains less than one part per million Pt or other oxidation promoters, oxidation catalysts or oxidation chemicals. It preferably has pore volumes of 0.3 to 0.8 cc/gram and a surface area of at least 50 m 2 /g. It preferably has at least 1 ppm Ni or similar reducing promoter and less than 5000 ppm of Ti.
  • the carbon on regenerated catalyst (CRC), regenerator temperature and the flue gas composition are preferably continuously monitored and the relative flows of combustion gas, slurry oil, and CO2 recycle streams adjusted to achieve maximum CO production at the lowest CO 2 recycle rate.
  • the diesel oil and other hydrocarbon products from the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant may be processed in the fluid catalytic cracking unit main fractionator.
  • FIG 1 is a schematic of a standard prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU);
  • Figure 2 is a schematic of a fluid catalytic cracking unit including one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG 3 is a schematic showing the inputs and outputs for the Flue gas conversion unit, which is Section 6 in Figure 2;
  • Figure 4 is a schematic showing an alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit of Figure 3
  • Figure 5 is a schematic showing a second alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit of Figure 3;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic showing another alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic showing some of the modifications which may be made to the catalyst regenerator
  • Figure 8A is an enlarged view of the slurry oil injection nozzle of Figure 7;
  • Figure 8B is an end view of the nozzle of Figure 8A;
  • Figure 9 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for the base case of a prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit
  • Figure 10 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with two different embodiments of the present invention wherein the regenerator is operated in partial CO burn. In case 2a the CO2 is not recycled, while in case 2B the CO 2 is recycled to extinction (in both cases there is no slurry oil injected into the regenerator);
  • Figure 11 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except slurry oil is injected into the regenerator in both of these cases;
  • Figure 12 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except that a shift reactor is used to produce H 2, in one instance there is no CO 2 recycle while in the second case there is CO 2 recycle to extinction;
  • Figure 13 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except with a different fresh feedstock.
  • a typical prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' has five major sections as shown in Figure 1 :
  • - section 4 is the catalyst regenerator 18'; and - section 5 is the flue gas treatment plant 20'.
  • Fluid cracking catalyst (FCC) in the fluid bed reactor 12' facilitates a reaction which converts the heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 (long- chain hydrocarbon molecules) into high value transportation fuels 24, 26 and liquid petroleum gases (LPG) 28, 30.
  • the feed 22 is atomized with steam 34 on its way into the reactor.
  • the atomized heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 is mixed with very hot, powdered catalyst, causing the heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 to vaporize and crack into smaller molecules.
  • the cracked product vapors are then separated from the spent catalyst.
  • the spent catalyst is stripped with steam 36 in the reactor stripper 48' to remove entrained hydrocarbons and is sent to the regenerator 18', and the cracked hydrocarbon vapors are sent to the main fractionator(s) 14'.
  • feed 22 is not converted or is only partially converted, resulting in low value slurry oil 32, which comes out of the bottoms of the fractionator(s) 14'). Some of the feed 22 is converted to low value coke, which is deposited on the spent catalyst.
  • the reactor 12' operates between 85O 0 F and 1100 0 F, at pressures of between 2 psig and 60 psig and with catalyst to oil ratios of between 2:1 and 30:1.
  • the main fractionator 14' (Section 2) separates the diesel 26 and slurry oil 32 from the gas 38, LPG 28, 20 and gasoline 24 by distillation.
  • the feed atomizing steam 34 and catalyst stripping steam 36 are removed from the fractionator 14' overhead receiver as condensed water 40.
  • the gas plant 16' (Section 3) further separates the off-gas 38, LPG 28, 30 and gasoline 24 by distillation and absorption.
  • the coke is burned off the spent catalyst with a gas containing oxygen, usually air 42.
  • the flue gases 44 from the catalyst regenerator 18' are a mixture of CO, CO2, SO2, N 2 , NO x and catalyst fines.
  • the catalyst regenerator 18' operates at temperatures between 1100 0 F and 1600 0 F and similar pressures to the reactor 12'.
  • CO in the flue gas 44 if present, is converted to CO 2 in a waste heat boiler, and the SO2 and catalyst fines are removed in a wet gas scrubber.
  • the CO2 and N 2 exit the fuel gas treatment section 20' (Section 5) at the outlet 46.
  • Fluid cracking catalyst circulates continuously from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4), flowing from the regenerator 18' to the reactor 12' along the path (X), and from the reactor 12' to the regenerator 18' along the path (Y).
  • the catalyst provides four important functions: cracking; coke removal; removal of heat from the regenerator 18' (Section 4); and supply of heat to the reactor 12' (Section 1 ).
  • the fluid catalytic cracking unit Reactor (Section 1): Hot catalyst from the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4), at the regenerator temperature (approximately 1400 0 F) flows into the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) along the path labeled (X).
  • the hot catalyst provides the endothermic heat of reaction, heat of vaporization, and the heat to heat the oil to its cracking temperature.
  • the catalyst circulation rate depends on the feed preheat temperature, regenerator temperature, and reactor temperature, and is usually a ratio of about 6:1 catalyst to oil. However, some designs operate as high as a 30:1 catalyst to oil ratio.
  • the reactor temperature is controlled at approximately 1000 0 F.
  • the feed 22 to the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) is atomized with steam 34.
  • the reactor 12' converts a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock 22, with an API gravity of between 10° and 35° and a Conradson Carbon content of between 0% and 10%, into C 5 + gasoline 24, diesel 26, slurry oil 32, absorber off-gas 38 (which may include H 2 , H 2 S, Ci s, C 2 S,), C 3 S LPG 28, C 4 S LPG 30, and coke. Most of the coke is produced in the cracking reaction where it is deposited onto the surface of the catalyst.
  • the coke contains traces of sulfur, and some coke results from a small quantity of hydrocarbons that are entrained and absorbed onto the catalyst as it leaves the reactor-stripper 48' and enters the regenerator 18'.
  • the vapor products may be separated from the spent catalyst in the reactor 12' by many known separation devices such as cyclones. This ensures the correct oil/catalyst residence time and ensures that no catalyst goes over into the main fractionators 14' (Section 2).
  • the catalyst is stripped with steam 36 in the reactor stripper 48' as it flows from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the regenerator 18' (Section 4), and the stripped hydrocarbons and steam are returned to the reactor 12'.
  • the atomizing steam 34, stripping steam 36, and reactor products leave the reactor 12' as a vapor and flow into the fractionators 14' (Section 2) for separation.
  • the catalyst flows from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the regenerator 18' (Section 4) where the coke is burned off and the catalyst is reheated.
  • a fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' that is processing a gas oil with low Conradson carbon ( ⁇ .05%) may only produce 5% coke.
  • a fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' processing a residue feedstock with up to 10% Conradson carbon may produce up to 12% coke.
  • the coke includes about 6% hydrogen, 94% carbon, and trace amounts of sulfur. It is burned off the catalyst with an oxygen bearing gas 42, such as air.
  • the regenerator temperature is approximately 1400 0 F, and in some residue feedstock processing units the temperature is controlled with steam coils and heat exchangers to remove any excess heat.
  • the flue gases 44 (which may include H 2 O, SO 2 , N 2 , CO and CO 2 .) flow from the regenerator 18' (Section 4) to the flue gas treatment plant 20' (section 5) where any CO is burned to CO 2, and the SO 2 and catalyst fines are removed.
  • the flue gases 44 before treating can have a varied composition. They may contain 0% to 50% CO; 25% to 100% CO 2 , 0% to 6% O2; and 0%-80% N 2 depending on how the fluid catalytic cracking unit is operated, and whether air, or oxygen, or oxygen in air, or O 2 with other gases are used for combustion in the regenerator 18'.
  • the flue gas treatment plant 20' may include a waste heat boiler which converts CO to CO2 and may have a NO x treatment reactor.
  • the fluid catalyst is the fluid catalyst
  • the fluid catalyst provides the surface area, catalytic acidity and activity in the reactor 12'. As it leaves the reactor 12', it removes the unwanted coke (a compound with about 6% hydrogen and 94% carbon) produced during the cracking reactions.
  • the catalyst regenerator 18' the catalyst absorbs most of the heat released when the coke is burned off the catalyst with an oxygen rich gas 42 (usually air).
  • the catalyst is usually made from alumina-silica micro-spheres with diameters of 2-200 microns and impregnated with zeolites (including HY, REY, USY, ZSM-5), additives, including bottom cracking additive (BCA) max diesel additive, metal traps, and oxidation additives and co-catalysts such as Pt.
  • BCA bottom cracking additive
  • Figure 2 shows the fluid catalyst cracking unit 10 that has been modified to incorporate a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) within the facility.
  • the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) has within it a number of individual process units, including a Fischer-Tropsch process Plant (also referred to as an F-T plant), which produces useful hydrocarbons from the CO in the flue gas of the regenerator 18.
  • a Fischer-Tropsch process Plant also referred to as an F-T plant
  • the Fischer-Tropsch reactor itself can be slurry-type or tubular fixed-bed or fluidized bed.
  • the Fischer-Tropsch catalyst might be cobalt-based or iron- based or some other, newer, alternative.
  • the flue gas conversion plant 50 may include the following elements (See Figure 6):
  • the schematic of Figure 2 involves several modifications to the standard, prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' of Figure 1 , which may include the modification of the fluid catalytic cracking unit main fractionator 14', regenerator 18', and gas plant 16', as explained in more detail below. It also includes the addition of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6).
  • the flue gas conversion plant 50 may have a CO shift reactor (See Figure 5), or there may not be a CO shift reactor (See Figure 3). It may include a hydrogen plant (See Figure 4), or it may use imported hydrogen.
  • the fluid catalyst cracking unit 10 includes the full integration of the Flue gas conversion plant 50 (and associated equipment such as mild hydrocracker and additional hydrotreating facilities, shift reactor and hydrogen plant) with the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18, fractionator 14 and gas plant 16.
  • the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18, fractionator 14 and gas plant 16 16.
  • modifications to the main fractionator 14' and the gas plant 16' may not be necessary.
  • modifications to the main fractionator 14' and the gas plant 16' may not be made.
  • a new fluid catalytic cracking unit flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) is added to the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the main process unit in the flue gas conversion section 50 is a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) plant.
  • FIG 3 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2), without shift reactor, wherein H 2 is imported from outside the fluid catalytic cracking unit complex. In that case, only the Fischer-Tropsch process is needed to convert the CO to hydrocarbons such as diesel oil in the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6).
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2), wherein H 2 is generated in a hydrogen plant that is incorporated into the fluid catalytic cracking unit complex, using either natural gas or absorber off-gas 38 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant.
  • Figure 5 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2), wherein H 2 is generated in a hydrogen plant that is incorporated into the fluid catalytic cracking unit complex, using either natural gas or absorber off-gas 38 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant.
  • Figure 5 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2)
  • a new nozzle may be added either in the reactor vapor overhead line 52 or into the main fractionation tower itself 54. This allows the product from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) to be introduced and processed in the fractionators 14 (Section 2).
  • the catalyst regenerator 18 also may be modified to improve the conversion of CO 2 to CO as shown in Figures 2 and 7, adding a spray nozzle and/or an additional combustion air grid.
  • the slurry oil 32 from the main fractionators is injected into the lower section of the regenerator 18 (Section 4) preferably about three feet above the combustion air grid 56, at a point in the regenerator where the carbon on the catalyst is lowest and the O 2 concentration is the highest.
  • a secondary oxygen source 42* is injected along with the slurry oil 32 to provide atomization and controlled stoichiometric combustion of the slurry oil 32 to CO and H 2 O.
  • the CO 2 recycle also can be injected through the combustion air grid 56 along with the oxygen rich combustion gas 42.
  • a nozzle 58 See Figures 7, 8A, and 8B
  • Nozzles 58 may be added to allow the injection of any hydrocarbon, crude oil, oil sand, tar sand, synthetic oil from coal, tar sands or oil sands, or bio-mass, natural gas, absorber fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant off-gas 38 or fluid catalytic cracking unit fractionator bottoms (also referred to as slurry oil 32), without contacting water or water vapor, for the purpose of heat balancing the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 when recycling CO 2 .
  • the slurry oil 32 can be injected into both catalyst beds but preferentially is injected into the low CRC area in the full CO burn vessel.
  • the CO 2 can be injected into both vessels, but preferentially into the high CRC area in the partial burn vessel.
  • the CO 2 recycle can be injected into the regenerator 18 through the combustion air grid 56 with the air or oxygen rich combustion gas, with the slurry oil 32 via the nozzle 58, with the secondary oxygen source 42* at the nozzle 58, and/or through its own CO 2 recycle grid 60.
  • the nozzle 58 includes a slurry oil delivery pipe 62 inside a slightly larger "sleeve" pipe 64 in an arrangement similar to that of a single tube, shell and tube heat exchanger.
  • the slurry oil travels in the "tube side” 62, while air or recycled CO242 * (or a mixture of these) travels along the "shell side” 64.
  • This sleeve arrangement provides an insulating effect on the pipe 62 to keep it relatively cool against the heat of the regenerator 18, to prevent unwanted coking of the slurry oil in the pipe 62.
  • the pipe 62 terminates inside the sleeve 64 at a perforated plate 66 which allows the air/recycled CO 2 42 * to flow around and along the pipe 62 to continually cool it, and then diffuse into the slurry oil 32 in an atomizing chamber 68. Finally, the mixture of the slurry oil 32 and the air/recycled CO 2 42 * are sprayed out into the regenerator 18 through a horizontally oriented slotted opening 70 to ensure that the slurry oil is sprayed substantially horizontally, away from the refractory-lined walls of the regenerator 18 and not directed toward the distributor grids 60, 56.
  • the nozzle 58 includes a flange 72 for mounting to the regenerator wall.
  • the nozzle 58 projects into the regenerator at least far enough to ensure that it clears the refractory material lining the wall of the regenerator 18.
  • the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 operates in partial CO burn. This means that the CRC is controlled between 0.1 % and 1.2 % in the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18 (Several methods are known in the industry for determining and controlling the CRC in the regenerator. For instance, the catalyst may be sampled hourly and the level of CRC can then be visually established, or the temperature in the regenerator can be monitored to empirically determine and control the CRC level).
  • the treated flue gases 46 from the flue gas treatment 20 (Section 5) are routed to the new flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) where the CO is converted to diesel fuel.
  • the process is enhanced if the excess CO 2 from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (section 6) is recycled to the catalyst bed of the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18 to boost CO production, and ultimately convert all coke to CO instead of CO 2 .
  • the CO and CO2 are in equilibrium at a ratio of about 1 :1. This ratio stays constant as the CO 2 is recycled, as it is defined by thermodynamic conditions. Therefore, as the CO 2 is recycled, more Carbon is converted to CO. Ultimately, there is no net CO2, only CO2 recycle. All the carbon on the catalyst is converted to CO.
  • the heat released in the regenerator 18 in this operation is less than that typically required to balance the requirements of the fluid catalytic cracking unit reactor 12 (an exception may occur when processing high residue feedstocks, particularly if oxygen is injected into the regenerator to burn off the coke, as explained in more detail later). Therefore, additional fuel is injected into the catalyst regenerator 18. This can come from any carbon or hydrocarbon source (in addition to the coke present in the catalyst to be regenerated), and will also be converted to CO (and eventually into diesel fuel in the flue gas conversion plant 50).
  • a readily available source of additional fuel is the slurry oil 32 from the bottoms of the main fractionators, as it has a low value and a high carbon content, although absorber off-gas 38 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant could be used instead or in addition to the slurry oil to add heat or an entirely different source of carbon could be used. Heat balances are shown in Figure 12.
  • the flue gas conversion plant 50 converts the CO from the flue gas of the catalyst regenerator 18, water, and external H 2 if needed by the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) plant to hydrocarbons.
  • the hydrocarbon product from the Fischer-Tropsch process is middle distillate or diesel fuel, which is then processed in the main fractionator 14 of the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
  • the CO for the Fischer- Tropsch process comes from the flue gas of the catalyst regenerator 18.
  • the hydrogen may come from a variety of sources. For example, it can be imported as shown in Figure 3. Alternatively, H 2 may be produced by an electrolytic process. Hydrogen also can be extracted from the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38 by membrane separation or pressure swing absorption.
  • the H 2 can be generated from an onsite H 2 plant using natural gas or preferably fluid catalytic cracking unit off- gas 38 as a feed. (The H 2 also could be supplemented from an external source and/or from H 2 in the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38.)
  • H 2 also could be supplemented from an external source and/or from H 2 in the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38).
  • the CO 2 from either the hydrogen plant ( Figure 4) or the shift reactor ( Figure 5) is vented to atmosphere or, alternatively, can be recycled to the catalyst regenerator 18.
  • the shift reactor consumes 67% of the CO from the treated flue gases 46 but still results in significant diesel fuel production in the Fischer-Tropsch plant.
  • Heat See dotted line in Figure 2) from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) is recycled from the flue gas conversion plant 50 in the form of hot CO 2 that is recycled to the catalyst regenerator 18 to heat-balance the catalyst regenerator 18 (Section 4).
  • FIGs 10 and 11 The calculated yields from the modified fluid catalytic cracking unit with the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) are shown in Figures 10 and 11.
  • the improved process results in increased diesel fuel yields, reduced slurry oil yields, and lower CO 2 emissions.
  • Figure 9 shows the base gas oil yields from the base fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' without the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion. In this case, it can be seen that a feed of 36,930 barrels per day yields 6,377 barrels per day of diesel fuel. This partial CO burn operation is in heat balance.
  • Figure 10 shows the yields in two different cases in which the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 is coupled with the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50 without shift in accordance with Figures 2 and 4, with the flue gases 46 being fed to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) but without the slurry oil 32 being injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4).
  • Column 2a is for the case in which the CO2is not recycled
  • column 2b is for the case in which the CO2 is recycled to extinction.
  • FIG 11 shows yields for the same process as shown in Figure 10, except with the slurry oil 32 being injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4).
  • the CO comes from the flue gases 46, from the carbon deposited on the catalyst in the fluid catalytic cracking unit reactor 12 (Section 1 ), and from the carbon in the slurry oil 32 injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4).
  • the heat from burning the slurry oil 32 in the regenerator 18 once again heat-balances the operation.
  • the same feed produces 8,637 barrels per day of diesel fuel without CO 2 recycle and 9,332 barrels per day of diesel fuel with CO 2 recycle, as compared with 6,377 barrels per day in the base case.
  • Figure 12 shows the case in which the shift reaction is used as shown in Figure 5, and the flue gases 46 go to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6), but the slurry oil 32 does not go to the regenerator 18 (Section 4).
  • part of the CO is converted to H 2 in the shift reactor.
  • Carbon on the catalyst from the residue feedstock supplies the heat to once again heat- balance the operation.
  • the same feed produces 6,638 barrels per day of diesel fuel without CO 2 recycle and 6,898 barrels per day of diesel fuel with CO 2 recycle.
  • Figure 13 shows a different fresh feed, using the arrangement of Figures 2 and 4, with the slurry oil 32 not being fed to the regenerator 18 (Section 4) and with the flue gases 46 being fed to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6), both with and without CO 2 recycle.
  • the application of the processes disclosed in this specification also allows for the operation of fluid catalytic cracking units under some unique and particularly interesting conditions. Already discussed above are the capabilities to operate: - under partial burn in the regenerator 18 to increase the production of
  • air can be injected into the regenerator 18 to help burn the coke.
  • a better choice is to inject oxygen into the regenerator 18, but if the coke is being burned to CO2, the amount of heat generated in the regenerator 18, when injecting oxygen, may be too great. This is especially true when operating with high residue feedstocks (such as feedstock with up to 10% Conradson carbon which may produce up to 12% coke).
  • the amount of heat generated can be so high that it risks melting the regenerator 18, even when using steam coils to remove the excess heat. Even when high residue feedstocks are not involved, it may be necessary to dilute the air or oxygen with nitrogen to prevent this high heat load in the regenerator 18.
  • thermodynamic equilibrium is normally a 1 :1 ratio of CO:CO2. If the CO2 is recycled, then the coke in the catalyst in the regenerator 18 will burn to CO in order to maintain that thermodynamic equilibrium). This substantially reduces the heat load as the heat released when burning the carbon to CO is one third of the heat released when burning the carbon to CO 2 .
  • the fluid catalytic cracking unit can then operate using these high residue feedstocks with oxygen injection diluted with the CO 2 recycle, eliminating the need to dilute the oxygen with nitrogen. The reason is two- fold:
  • the CO2 recycle dilutes the oxygen without the need for nitrogen. This provides a distinct advantage in that there is no longer a need to contend with nitrogen coming off as part of the flue gases of the regenerator 18. The separation is much simpler if there are only CO and CO2 coming off of the regenerator 18 (because the recycled CO2 is acting as the diluent for the oxygen) instead of CO, CO2, and nitrogen (with the nitrogen acting as the diluent). If the nitrogen is not separated out of the flue gas stream before it is sent to the flue gas conversion plant 50, then this large volume of nitrogen must be pressurized from the operating pressure in the regenerator (up to 60 PSIG) to that of the Fischer-Tropsch process (about 300 PSIG), and this could be very expensive.

Abstract

A method is provided to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and increase the output of more valuable hydrocarbon products in a fluid catalytic cracking unit.

Description

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process Including Flue Gas Conversion
Process
Background
The present invention relates to a fluid catalytic cracking process which takes advantage of a flue gas conversion plant including a Fischer-Tropsch process to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and increase the production of useful hydrocarbon products, such as diesel oil, jet fuel, and other products.
A fluid catalytic cracking unit typically includes a reactor, a catalyst regenerator, which burns off carbon from the catalyst used in the reactor, a flue gas treatment plant which treats the flue gas from the catalyst regenerator, and a fractionator, which separates the products from the reactor.
Summary The present invention discloses modifications to a fluid catalytic cracking unit in order to improve its hydrocarbon yield and to substantially reduce its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. As explained in more detail below, this is accomplished by combining one or more of the following modifications to the process: - Send the flue gases from the fluid catalyst cracking unit to a flue gas conversion plant which includes a Fischer-Tropsch process to convert H 2 and CO into hydrocarbon products such as diesel fuel.
- Operate the catalyst regenerator for the catalyst cracking unit in partial burn to increase the production of CO and reduce the production of CO2. The increased CO production is advantageously used in the Fischer- Tropsch process to improve the hydrocarbon yield.
- Recycle the CO2 from the flue gas of the catalyst regenerator back into the catalyst bed of the regenerator to drive the net production of CO2 to extinction so that no new CO2 is produced, in order to substantially reduce the level of CO2 emissions from the fluid catalytic cracking unit and result in more CO production, which improves the yield of hydrocarbons in the Fischer- Tropsch process.
- Inject into the catalyst regenerator any low value refinery fuel or other hydrocarbon or carbon source product (in addition to the coke present in the catalyst to be regenerated) in order to increase the amount of carbon available for the production of CO (which is then utilized in the Fischer- Tropsch process to increase the hydrocarbon yield. Particularly useful for this purpose is the injection into the regenerator of the low value slurry oil from the bottoms of the main fractionator(s) of the fluid catalytic cracking unit. This also helps re-establish heat-balance in the reactor.
The heat balance is negatively affected with the combustion of carbon to CO (only 4,000 BTU/lb of carbon) instead of its combustion to CO2 (14,000 BTU/lb of carbon) when operating in partial burn. - The incorporation of these process modifications to the fluid catalytic cracking unit may include the physical modification of the facility beyond the addition of the flue gas conversion plant with Fischer-Tropsch process. These modifications may include the addition of nozzles and distribution grids to the catalyst regenerator, the addition or modification of nozzles to the main fractionator(s), as well as resizing of components such as the regenerator and the gas plant, especially if the flue gas conversion plant does not include its own fractionators and instead makes use of the main fractionator(s) of the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
In one embodiment, the regenerator flue gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit (which is primarily a mixture of CO, CO2, and N2) is sent to a flue gas conversion plant (which preferably is adjacent to the fluid catalytic cracking unit) that uses the Fischer-Tropsch process to react any CO in the flue gas with H2 to make hydrocarbons such as diesel oil, jet fuel, gasoline, etc. (e.g., 33H2 + 16CO = Ci6H34 + 16H2O). The Fischer-Tropsch products may then be routed to the main fractionator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit or to a separate fractionator.
The hydrogen required for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction can be purchased (imported to the facility) or produced from natural gas or produced from the hydrocarbons in the off-gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit in a hydrogen plant in the refinery (CH4 + 2H2O = 4H2 + CO2). The hydrogen can also be extracted from the off-gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit. Alternatively, the required amount of hydrogen for the Fischer-Tropsch process could be produced if 67% of the total CO in the flue gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit is routed to a CO shift reactor (or a Fischer-Tropsch reactor with shift catalyst). In this case no external H2 is required. (H2O + CO = CO2 + H2).
In some embodiments, slurry oil is injected into the regenerator, and the control system may be programmed to control the slurry oil injection at between 1 % and 10% of fluid catalytic cracking unit feed (preferably 5%).
CO2 can be recycled with the air being injected into the catalyst regenerator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit to recycle the CO2 to extinction and produce more CO. The control system may be programmed to measure and maintain the CO2 recycle at the desired level between 10% and 300% of the air or oxygen rate (preferably 200%) to ensure the stoichiometric reaction 2C + O2+ 2CO2 = 2CO + 2CO2 inside the catalyst regenerator. The controller maintains equilibrium while effectively recycling the CO 2 to extinction. The effective overall equation becomes 2C + O2 = 2CO. This further reduces CO 2 emissions by eliminating the CO2 produced from the regenerator. The overall reaction in the catalyst regenerator becomes 2C + O2 = 2CO instead of C + O2 = CO2 or 4C + 3O2 = 2CO + 2CO2.
To heat-balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit when no CO is burned to CO2, heat can be supplied from extra coke on the catalyst, derived from cracking heavier, higher carbon feeds, or by rerouting the fluid catalytic cracking unit fractionator bottoms (slurry oil) into the regenerator instead of routing it to heavy fuel oil storage. The slurry oil is about 90% carbon, making it an ideal source of carbon to produce CO in the regenerator and provide heat to heat-balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit. The CO is converted into hydrocarbon in the Fischer-Tropsch unit. The use of heavier feeds in the reactor and/or the recycle of slurry oil to the regenerator provide good ways to heat-balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
The reduction in available heat caused by not burning the CO to CO2 in the regenerator also can be compensated by burning any other low value refinery fuel or product in the catalyst regenerator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit - such as absorber off-gas from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant, and even gasoline from the fluid catalytic cracking unit if the price of gasoline is below diesel price, most of which will provide CO for diesel production in the Fischer-Tropsch process. In addition, any hydrocarbon or carbon source, for example charcoal or coal or wood or biomass, can be burned to produce the heat balance, and the CO from combustion can go to the Fischer-Tropsch process to produce hydrocarbons such as diesel fuel. Another source of heat for the reactor of the fluid catalytic cracking unit can be the excess heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process. For example, the heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process can be converted into electricity, which can be used to heat up the regenerator using microwaves or radiant heating coils. Also, electricity from any source could be used to balance the fluid catalytic cracking unit heat requirements.
Also, the heat from the Fischer-Tropsch process can be used to drive the compressor for the flue gas treatment for the fluid catalytic cracking unit, either by generating steam to directly drive the compressor or by generating steam to produce electricity to drive the compressor. As indicated above, one embodiment of the present invention injects slurry oil (or any other solid, liquid or gaseous source of carbon or hydrocarbon such as charcoal, coal, biomass, etc.) into the catalyst regenerator, converts it to CO in the regenerator, and converts this CO to hydrocarbon in the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant. Residue cracking (catalytic cracking of heavy, high carbon feedstocks, vacuum bottoms, and atmospheric bottoms, as well as gas oil cracking) may be included in the process that is carried out in the fluid catalytic cracking unit. The fluid cracking catalyst preferably is a zeolite or non zeolite silica alumina catalyst. It preferably contains less than one part per million Pt or other oxidation promoters, oxidation catalysts or oxidation chemicals. It preferably has pore volumes of 0.3 to 0.8 cc/gram and a surface area of at least 50 m2/g. It preferably has at least 1 ppm Ni or similar reducing promoter and less than 5000 ppm of Ti.
The carbon on regenerated catalyst (CRC), regenerator temperature and the flue gas composition are preferably continuously monitored and the relative flows of combustion gas, slurry oil, and CO2 recycle streams adjusted to achieve maximum CO production at the lowest CO2 recycle rate. The diesel oil and other hydrocarbon products from the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant may be processed in the fluid catalytic cracking unit main fractionator.
Brief Description of the Drawings:
Figure 1 is a schematic of a standard prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU);
Figure 2 is a schematic of a fluid catalytic cracking unit including one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a schematic showing the inputs and outputs for the Flue gas conversion unit, which is Section 6 in Figure 2;
Figure 4 is a schematic showing an alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit of Figure 3; Figure 5 is a schematic showing a second alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit of Figure 3;
Figure 6 is a schematic showing another alternative embodiment of the Flue gas conversion unit;
Figure 7 is a schematic showing some of the modifications which may be made to the catalyst regenerator;
Figure 8A is an enlarged view of the slurry oil injection nozzle of Figure 7;
Figure 8B is an end view of the nozzle of Figure 8A;
Figure 9 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for the base case of a prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit;
Figure 10 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with two different embodiments of the present invention wherein the regenerator is operated in partial CO burn. In case 2a the CO2 is not recycled, while in case 2B the CO2 is recycled to extinction (in both cases there is no slurry oil injected into the regenerator);
Figure 11 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except slurry oil is injected into the regenerator in both of these cases; Figure 12 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except that a shift reactor is used to produce H2, in one instance there is no CO2 recycle while in the second case there is CO2 recycle to extinction; and Figure 13 is a table showing the fuel oil yield for a fluid catalytic cracking unit with the same two embodiments of the present invention as in Figure 10, except with a different fresh feedstock.
Detailed Description:
Description of the Prior Art Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process shown in
Figure 1
A typical prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' has five major sections as shown in Figure 1 :
- section 1 is the fluid bed reactor 12'
- section 2 is the main fractionator(s) 14'
- section 3 is the gas plant 16'
- section 4 is the catalyst regenerator 18'; and - section 5 is the flue gas treatment plant 20'.
The yields from this fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' are shown in Figure 9. These are actual yields. (The yields in the other tables are calculated, not actual.)
Fluid cracking catalyst (FCC) in the fluid bed reactor 12' (Section 1 ) facilitates a reaction which converts the heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 (long- chain hydrocarbon molecules) into high value transportation fuels 24, 26 and liquid petroleum gases (LPG) 28, 30. The feed 22 is atomized with steam 34 on its way into the reactor. In the reactor 12', the atomized heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 is mixed with very hot, powdered catalyst, causing the heavy hydrocarbon feed 22 to vaporize and crack into smaller molecules. The cracked product vapors are then separated from the spent catalyst. The spent catalyst is stripped with steam 36 in the reactor stripper 48' to remove entrained hydrocarbons and is sent to the regenerator 18', and the cracked hydrocarbon vapors are sent to the main fractionator(s) 14'. Some of the feed 22 either is not converted or is only partially converted, resulting in low value slurry oil 32, which comes out of the bottoms of the fractionator(s) 14'). Some of the feed 22 is converted to low value coke, which is deposited on the spent catalyst.
The reactor 12' operates between 85O0F and 11000F, at pressures of between 2 psig and 60 psig and with catalyst to oil ratios of between 2:1 and 30:1. The main fractionator 14' (Section 2) separates the diesel 26 and slurry oil 32 from the gas 38, LPG 28, 20 and gasoline 24 by distillation.
The feed atomizing steam 34 and catalyst stripping steam 36 are removed from the fractionator 14' overhead receiver as condensed water 40. The gas plant 16' (Section 3) further separates the off-gas 38, LPG 28, 30 and gasoline 24 by distillation and absorption.
In the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4), the coke is burned off the spent catalyst with a gas containing oxygen, usually air 42. The flue gases 44 from the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4) are a mixture of CO, CO2, SO2, N2, NOx and catalyst fines. The catalyst regenerator 18' operates at temperatures between 11000F and 16000F and similar pressures to the reactor 12'. In the flue gas treatment section 20' (Section 5), CO in the flue gas 44, if present, is converted to CO2 in a waste heat boiler, and the SO2 and catalyst fines are removed in a wet gas scrubber. The CO2 and N2 exit the fuel gas treatment section 20' (Section 5) at the outlet 46.
Fluid cracking catalyst (FCC) circulates continuously from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4), flowing from the regenerator 18' to the reactor 12' along the path (X), and from the reactor 12' to the regenerator 18' along the path (Y). The catalyst provides four important functions: cracking; coke removal; removal of heat from the regenerator 18' (Section 4); and supply of heat to the reactor 12' (Section 1 ).
The fluid catalytic cracking unit Reactor (Section 1): Hot catalyst from the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4), at the regenerator temperature (approximately 14000F) flows into the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) along the path labeled (X). The hot catalyst provides the endothermic heat of reaction, heat of vaporization, and the heat to heat the oil to its cracking temperature. The catalyst circulation rate depends on the feed preheat temperature, regenerator temperature, and reactor temperature, and is usually a ratio of about 6:1 catalyst to oil. However, some designs operate as high as a 30:1 catalyst to oil ratio. The reactor temperature is controlled at approximately 10000F.
The feed 22 to the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) is atomized with steam 34. The reactor 12' converts a heavy hydrocarbon feedstock 22, with an API gravity of between 10° and 35° and a Conradson Carbon content of between 0% and 10%, into C5+ gasoline 24, diesel 26, slurry oil 32, absorber off-gas 38 (which may include H2, H2S, Ci s, C2S,), C3S LPG 28, C4 S LPG 30, and coke. Most of the coke is produced in the cracking reaction where it is deposited onto the surface of the catalyst. The coke contains traces of sulfur, and some coke results from a small quantity of hydrocarbons that are entrained and absorbed onto the catalyst as it leaves the reactor-stripper 48' and enters the regenerator 18'. The vapor products may be separated from the spent catalyst in the reactor 12' by many known separation devices such as cyclones. This ensures the correct oil/catalyst residence time and ensures that no catalyst goes over into the main fractionators 14' (Section 2).
The catalyst is stripped with steam 36 in the reactor stripper 48' as it flows from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the regenerator 18' (Section 4), and the stripped hydrocarbons and steam are returned to the reactor 12'.
The atomizing steam 34, stripping steam 36, and reactor products leave the reactor 12' as a vapor and flow into the fractionators 14' (Section 2) for separation.
The fluid catalytic cracking unit Regenerator (section 4):
The catalyst flows from the reactor 12' (Section 1 ) to the regenerator 18' (Section 4) where the coke is burned off and the catalyst is reheated. A fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' that is processing a gas oil with low Conradson carbon (<.05%) may only produce 5% coke. However, a fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' processing a residue feedstock with up to 10% Conradson carbon may produce up to 12% coke. The coke includes about 6% hydrogen, 94% carbon, and trace amounts of sulfur. It is burned off the catalyst with an oxygen bearing gas 42, such as air. The regenerator temperature is approximately 14000F, and in some residue feedstock processing units the temperature is controlled with steam coils and heat exchangers to remove any excess heat.
Flue Gas Treatment (Section 5) The flue gases 44 (which may include H2O, SO2, N2, CO and CO2.) flow from the regenerator 18' (Section 4) to the flue gas treatment plant 20' (section 5) where any CO is burned to CO2, and the SO 2 and catalyst fines are removed. The flue gases 44 before treating can have a varied composition. They may contain 0% to 50% CO; 25% to 100% CO2, 0% to 6% O2; and 0%-80% N2 depending on how the fluid catalytic cracking unit is operated, and whether air, or oxygen, or oxygen in air, or O2 with other gases are used for combustion in the regenerator 18'. The flue gas treatment plant 20' may include a waste heat boiler which converts CO to CO2 and may have a NOx treatment reactor.
The fluid catalyst
The fluid catalyst provides the surface area, catalytic acidity and activity in the reactor 12'. As it leaves the reactor 12', it removes the unwanted coke (a compound with about 6% hydrogen and 94% carbon) produced during the cracking reactions. In the catalyst regenerator 18' (Section 4) the catalyst absorbs most of the heat released when the coke is burned off the catalyst with an oxygen rich gas 42 (usually air). The catalyst is usually made from alumina-silica micro-spheres with diameters of 2-200 microns and impregnated with zeolites (including HY, REY, USY, ZSM-5), additives, including bottom cracking additive (BCA) max diesel additive, metal traps, and oxidation additives and co-catalysts such as Pt.
Modified Plant Including Flue Gas Conversion Using Fisher-Tropsch Process
Figure 2 shows the fluid catalyst cracking unit 10 that has been modified to incorporate a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) within the facility.
The flue gas conversion Plant (Section 6):
The flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) has within it a number of individual process units, including a Fischer-Tropsch process Plant (also referred to as an F-T plant), which produces useful hydrocarbons from the CO in the flue gas of the regenerator 18. There are, depending on the specifics of the usage, a number of arrangements that may be used. For example, the Fischer-Tropsch reactor itself can be slurry-type or tubular fixed-bed or fluidized bed. The Fischer-Tropsch catalyst might be cobalt-based or iron- based or some other, newer, alternative. In general, the flue gas conversion plant 50 may include the following elements (See Figure 6):
• Shift reactor in order to fix the ratio of H2/CO to slightly above 2.
• The Fischer-Tropsch reactor(s). Depending on the size and design of the facility, this might be one or more reactors. Significant amounts of medium pressure steam (approx. up to 200° C) are generated in these reactors. This steam can be used in heating other process streams and units, as necessary, and can be used to generate electricity for internal use or export. • Separation equipment for the removal of CO2 as well as any remaining
H2/CO, and separation of light hydrocarbon gases from naphtha, diesel/jet, and lubes/waxes.
• Reactors and associated facilities for hydrotreating naphtha and diesel/jet fuel and hydrocracking lubes and waxes to lighter hydrocarbons.
• Separation equipment for the separation of the various hydrocarbons from one another. (In this case, this might be replaced with the fluid catalytic cracking unit main fractionators 14.)
The schematic of Figure 2 involves several modifications to the standard, prior art fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' of Figure 1 , which may include the modification of the fluid catalytic cracking unit main fractionator 14', regenerator 18', and gas plant 16', as explained in more detail below. It also includes the addition of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6). The flue gas conversion plant 50 may have a CO shift reactor (See Figure 5), or there may not be a CO shift reactor (See Figure 3). It may include a hydrogen plant (See Figure 4), or it may use imported hydrogen.
The fluid catalyst cracking unit 10 includes the full integration of the Flue gas conversion plant 50 (and associated equipment such as mild hydrocracker and additional hydrotreating facilities, shift reactor and hydrogen plant) with the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18, fractionator 14 and gas plant 16. Depending on the output from the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50, modifications to the main fractionator 14' and the gas plant 16' may not be necessary. For instance, if the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50 includes its own fractionator(s), then modifications to the main fractionator 14' and the gas plant 16' may not be made.
New Equipment
In order to modify the fluid catalyst cracking unit 10' shown in Figure 1 to make the fluid catalyst cracking unit 10 shown in Figure 2, a new fluid catalytic cracking unit flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) is added to the fluid catalytic cracking unit. The main process unit in the flue gas conversion section 50 is a Fischer-Tropsch (FT) plant.
Figure 3 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2), without shift reactor, wherein H2 is imported from outside the fluid catalytic cracking unit complex. In that case, only the Fischer-Tropsch process is needed to convert the CO to hydrocarbons such as diesel oil in the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6).
Figure 4 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6 of Figure 2), wherein H2 is generated in a hydrogen plant that is incorporated into the fluid catalytic cracking unit complex, using either natural gas or absorber off-gas 38 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant. Figure 5 shows an example of a flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section
6 of Figure 2), in which sufficient H2 for the Fischer-Tropsch plant can be made on site in a shift reactor or modified Fischer-Tropsch Water is added to the shift reactor to facilitate the shift reaction. This amount of water will react exactly with the remaining flue gas CO in the Fischer-Tropsch plant to make hydrocarbons, including diesel fuel.
In converting a prior art plant 10' to the plant 10 shown in Figure 2 (assuming the flue gas conversion plant 50 does not have its own fractionator), a new nozzle may be added either in the reactor vapor overhead line 52 or into the main fractionation tower itself 54. This allows the product from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) to be introduced and processed in the fractionators 14 (Section 2).
The catalyst regenerator 18 also may be modified to improve the conversion of CO2 to CO as shown in Figures 2 and 7, adding a spray nozzle and/or an additional combustion air grid. The slurry oil 32 from the main fractionators is injected into the lower section of the regenerator 18 (Section 4) preferably about three feet above the combustion air grid 56, at a point in the regenerator where the carbon on the catalyst is lowest and the O2 concentration is the highest. A secondary oxygen source 42* is injected along with the slurry oil 32 to provide atomization and controlled stoichiometric combustion of the slurry oil 32 to CO and H2O. Part of the recycled CO2 also can be injected along with the slurry oil 32 to facilitate a direct C + CO2 = 2CO reaction. The CO2 recycle also can be injected through the combustion air grid 56 along with the oxygen rich combustion gas 42. The addition of a nozzle 58 (See Figures 7, 8A, and 8B) or nozzles 58 and a distribution grid 60 inside the regenerator, preferably between 2 feet and 20 feet, and more preferably approximately 6 feet, above the primary combustion air grid 56, allows the recycle of CO2 into the high carbon zone of the regenerator 18 away from the oxygen rich combustion air inlet 42 to maximize the reaction C + CO2 = 2CO.
Nozzles 58, described in more detail below, may be added to allow the injection of any hydrocarbon, crude oil, oil sand, tar sand, synthetic oil from coal, tar sands or oil sands, or bio-mass, natural gas, absorber fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant off-gas 38 or fluid catalytic cracking unit fractionator bottoms (also referred to as slurry oil 32), without contacting water or water vapor, for the purpose of heat balancing the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 when recycling CO2.
In a two stage regenerator or a regenerator with two separate vessels, the slurry oil 32 can be injected into both catalyst beds but preferentially is injected into the low CRC area in the full CO burn vessel. Similarly the CO2 can be injected into both vessels, but preferentially into the high CRC area in the partial burn vessel.
As can be appreciated from Figure 7, the CO2 recycle can be injected into the regenerator 18 through the combustion air grid 56 with the air or oxygen rich combustion gas, with the slurry oil 32 via the nozzle 58, with the secondary oxygen source 42* at the nozzle 58, and/or through its own CO2 recycle grid 60. Referring briefly to Figures 7, 8A, and 8B, the nozzle 58 includes a slurry oil delivery pipe 62 inside a slightly larger "sleeve" pipe 64 in an arrangement similar to that of a single tube, shell and tube heat exchanger. The slurry oil travels in the "tube side" 62, while air or recycled CO242* (or a mixture of these) travels along the "shell side" 64. This sleeve arrangement provides an insulating effect on the pipe 62 to keep it relatively cool against the heat of the regenerator 18, to prevent unwanted coking of the slurry oil in the pipe 62.
The pipe 62 terminates inside the sleeve 64 at a perforated plate 66 which allows the air/recycled CO2 42* to flow around and along the pipe 62 to continually cool it, and then diffuse into the slurry oil 32 in an atomizing chamber 68. Finally, the mixture of the slurry oil 32 and the air/recycled CO2 42* are sprayed out into the regenerator 18 through a horizontally oriented slotted opening 70 to ensure that the slurry oil is sprayed substantially horizontally, away from the refractory-lined walls of the regenerator 18 and not directed toward the distributor grids 60, 56.
The nozzle 58 includes a flange 72 for mounting to the regenerator wall. The nozzle 58 projects into the regenerator at least far enough to ensure that it clears the refractory material lining the wall of the regenerator 18.
New fluid catalytic cracking unit Operation The fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 operates in partial CO burn. This means that the CRC is controlled between 0.1 % and 1.2 % in the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18 (Several methods are known in the industry for determining and controlling the CRC in the regenerator. For instance, the catalyst may be sampled hourly and the level of CRC can then be visually established, or the temperature in the regenerator can be monitored to empirically determine and control the CRC level). The treated flue gases 46 from the flue gas treatment 20 (Section 5) are routed to the new flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) where the CO is converted to diesel fuel. The process is enhanced if the excess CO2 from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (section 6) is recycled to the catalyst bed of the fluid catalytic cracking unit regenerator 18 to boost CO production, and ultimately convert all coke to CO instead of CO2. The CO2 recycle, CRC, and combustion air flow are carefully controlled to establish the following reaction 2C + O2+ 2CO2 = 2CO + 2CO2. By carefully controlling operating variables, the net reaction is 2C + O2 = 2CO, and results in all of the carbon being converted into CO with no net production of CO2. The CO and CO2 are in equilibrium at a ratio of about 1 :1. This ratio stays constant as the CO2 is recycled, as it is defined by thermodynamic conditions. Therefore, as the CO 2 is recycled, more Carbon is converted to CO. Ultimately, there is no net CO2, only CO2 recycle. All the carbon on the catalyst is converted to CO.
The heat released in the regenerator 18 in this operation is less than that typically required to balance the requirements of the fluid catalytic cracking unit reactor 12 (an exception may occur when processing high residue feedstocks, particularly if oxygen is injected into the regenerator to burn off the coke, as explained in more detail later). Therefore, additional fuel is injected into the catalyst regenerator 18. This can come from any carbon or hydrocarbon source (in addition to the coke present in the catalyst to be regenerated), and will also be converted to CO (and eventually into diesel fuel in the flue gas conversion plant 50). A readily available source of additional fuel is the slurry oil 32 from the bottoms of the main fractionators, as it has a low value and a high carbon content, although absorber off-gas 38 from the fluid catalytic cracking unit gas plant could be used instead or in addition to the slurry oil to add heat or an entirely different source of carbon could be used. Heat balances are shown in Figure 12.
The flue gas conversion plant 50, Figure 2 Section 6, Figure 3, and Figure 4
The flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) converts the CO from the flue gas of the catalyst regenerator 18, water, and external H2 if needed by the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) plant to hydrocarbons. In the example of yields shown in Figure 12, the hydrocarbon product from the Fischer-Tropsch process is middle distillate or diesel fuel, which is then processed in the main fractionator 14 of the fluid catalytic cracking unit. The CO for the Fischer- Tropsch process comes from the flue gas of the catalyst regenerator 18. The hydrogen may come from a variety of sources. For example, it can be imported as shown in Figure 3. Alternatively, H2 may be produced by an electrolytic process. Hydrogen also can be extracted from the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38 by membrane separation or pressure swing absorption. This configuration also is shown in Figure 3. Alternatively, as shown in Figure 4, the H2 can be generated from an onsite H2 plant using natural gas or preferably fluid catalytic cracking unit off- gas 38 as a feed. (The H2 also could be supplemented from an external source and/or from H2 in the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38.) Alternatively, as shown in Figure 5, the H2 can also be produced in a shift reaction within the Fischer-Tropsch plant or in a separate shift unit ahead of the Fischer-Tropsch plant. In that case, the H2 plant reaction is CH4 + 2H2O = 4H2 + CO2. (The H2 also could be supplemented from an external source and/or from H2 in the fluid catalytic cracking unit absorber off-gas 38). Other methods for the manufacture of H2 include, but are not limited to, partial oxidation of hydrocarbons (e.g., 2CH4 + O2 = 2CO + 4H2).
The CO2 from either the hydrogen plant (Figure 4) or the shift reactor (Figure 5) is vented to atmosphere or, alternatively, can be recycled to the catalyst regenerator 18. The shift reaction is H2O + CO = CO2 + H2. The shift reactor consumes 67% of the CO from the treated flue gases 46 but still results in significant diesel fuel production in the Fischer-Tropsch plant. Heat (See dotted line in Figure 2) from the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) is recycled from the flue gas conversion plant 50 in the form of hot CO2 that is recycled to the catalyst regenerator 18 to heat-balance the catalyst regenerator 18 (Section 4).
The calculated yields from the modified fluid catalytic cracking unit with the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) are shown in Figures 10 and 11. The improved process results in increased diesel fuel yields, reduced slurry oil yields, and lower CO 2 emissions. Figure 9 shows the base gas oil yields from the base fluid catalytic cracking unit 10' without the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion. In this case, it can be seen that a feed of 36,930 barrels per day yields 6,377 barrels per day of diesel fuel. This partial CO burn operation is in heat balance. Figure 10 shows the yields in two different cases in which the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10 is coupled with the Fischer-Tropsch flue gas conversion plant 50 without shift in accordance with Figures 2 and 4, with the flue gases 46 being fed to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) but without the slurry oil 32 being injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4). Column 2a is for the case in which the CO2is not recycled, and column 2b is for the case in which the CO2 is recycled to extinction.
There is a substantial improvement in yield over the base case of Figure 9, especially when the CO2 is recycled to extinction and 100% of the regenerator CO2 emissions are eliminated. Without recycling the CO2 to extinction, the same feed yields 7,078 barrels per day of diesel fuel, and with recycling the CO2 to extinction, it yields 7,773 barrels per day of diesel fuel as compared with 6,377 barrels per day in the base unit. No external heat is required to heat balance the coupled partial burn case 2a. However, the recycled CO2 case requires 98 million BTU/hr to heat balance. This heat (see dotted line in Figure 2) can be provided by the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6) or, alternatively, from other sources.
Figure 11 shows yields for the same process as shown in Figure 10, except with the slurry oil 32 being injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4). In this case, the CO comes from the flue gases 46, from the carbon deposited on the catalyst in the fluid catalytic cracking unit reactor 12 (Section 1 ), and from the carbon in the slurry oil 32 injected into the regenerator 18 (Section 4). The heat from burning the slurry oil 32 in the regenerator 18 once again heat-balances the operation. In this case, the same feed produces 8,637 barrels per day of diesel fuel without CO2 recycle and 9,332 barrels per day of diesel fuel with CO2 recycle, as compared with 6,377 barrels per day in the base case.
Figure 12 shows the case in which the shift reaction is used as shown in Figure 5, and the flue gases 46 go to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6), but the slurry oil 32 does not go to the regenerator 18 (Section 4). In this case, part of the CO is converted to H2 in the shift reactor. Carbon on the catalyst from the residue feedstock supplies the heat to once again heat- balance the operation. In this case, the same feed produces 6,638 barrels per day of diesel fuel without CO2 recycle and 6,898 barrels per day of diesel fuel with CO2 recycle.
Figure 13 shows a different fresh feed, using the arrangement of Figures 2 and 4, with the slurry oil 32 not being fed to the regenerator 18 (Section 4) and with the flue gases 46 being fed to the flue gas conversion plant 50 (Section 6), both with and without CO2 recycle. It is interesting to note that the application of the processes disclosed in this specification also allows for the operation of fluid catalytic cracking units under some unique and particularly interesting conditions. Already discussed above are the capabilities to operate: - under partial burn in the regenerator 18 to increase the production of
CO, which is advantageously used in the Fischer-Tropsch process to improve the yield of fuel oils from the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10.
- under CO2 recycle to drive net production of CO2 to extinction. This results in a substantial reduction, if not a complete elimination, of CO2 emissions from the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10.
- under CO2 recycle to increase production of CO in the regenerator 18, which is advantageously used in the Fischer-Tropsch process to improve the yield of fuel oils from the fluid catalytic cracking unit 10.
- with injection of low value refinery fuel or other hydrocarbon or carbon source product in addition to the coke present in the catalyst to be regenerated (preferably low value slurry oil from the bottoms of the main fractionator) in order to increase the amount of carbon available for the production of CO (which is then utilized in the Fischer-Tropsch process to increase the yield of fuel oils in the fluid catalytic cracking unit). - with utilization of absorber Off-Gas from the gas plant 16 to obtain hydrogen for use in the Fischer-Tropsch process.
Also, air can be injected into the regenerator 18 to help burn the coke. A better choice is to inject oxygen into the regenerator 18, but if the coke is being burned to CO2, the amount of heat generated in the regenerator 18, when injecting oxygen, may be too great. This is especially true when operating with high residue feedstocks (such as feedstock with up to 10% Conradson carbon which may produce up to 12% coke). The amount of heat generated can be so high that it risks melting the regenerator 18, even when using steam coils to remove the excess heat. Even when high residue feedstocks are not involved, it may be necessary to dilute the air or oxygen with nitrogen to prevent this high heat load in the regenerator 18.
However, if the CO2 is recycled so that there is no net production of CO2, then all the coke is burned to CO which has a considerably lower heat output (the thermodynamic equilibrium is normally a 1 :1 ratio of CO:CO2. If the CO2 is recycled, then the coke in the catalyst in the regenerator 18 will burn to CO in order to maintain that thermodynamic equilibrium). This substantially reduces the heat load as the heat released when burning the carbon to CO is one third of the heat released when burning the carbon to CO2.
The fluid catalytic cracking unit can then operate using these high residue feedstocks with oxygen injection diluted with the CO2 recycle, eliminating the need to dilute the oxygen with nitrogen. The reason is two- fold:
1 - The heat load is considerably lower when burning the carbon to CO instead of when burning it CO2.
2- The CO2 recycle dilutes the oxygen without the need for nitrogen. This provides a distinct advantage in that there is no longer a need to contend with nitrogen coming off as part of the flue gases of the regenerator 18. The separation is much simpler if there are only CO and CO2 coming off of the regenerator 18 (because the recycled CO2 is acting as the diluent for the oxygen) instead of CO, CO2, and nitrogen (with the nitrogen acting as the diluent). If the nitrogen is not separated out of the flue gas stream before it is sent to the flue gas conversion plant 50, then this large volume of nitrogen must be pressurized from the operating pressure in the regenerator (up to 60 PSIG) to that of the Fischer-Tropsch process (about 300 PSIG), and this could be very expensive.
It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the present invention.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A fluid catalytic cracking process, comprising the steps of: feeding a high molecular weight hydrocarbon feedstock into a reactor; mixing the feedstock with catalyst and cracking and vaporizing the feedstock within the reactor; recycling spent catalyst from the reactor to a regenerator; burning off coke from the spent catalyst within the regenerator to regenerate the spent catalyst, producing flue gases including CO and CO2, which leave the regenerator through a flue; returning the regenerated catalyst back to the reactor; feeding at least some of the flue gases from the regenerator to a flue gas conversion plant; reacting CO in the flue gases with hydrogen and producing hydrocarbon products using a Fischer-Tropsch process in said flue gas conversion plant; and recycling CO2 from the flue gases back to the regenerator.
2. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , wherein coke on the spent catalyst is a first carbon source product fed into the regenerator and further comprising the step of injecting an additional carbon source product into the regenerator.
3. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 2, and further comprising the steps of : sending the product from the reactor to a main fractionator; separating the product in the fractionator by means of distillation; and sending some of the fraction produced by the fractionator to the regenerator to serve as at least some of said additional carbon source injected into the regenerator.
4. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 3, and further comprising the steps of: sending at least a portion of the off-gas from said main fractionator to the flue gas conversion plant and using that portion of the off-gas as a source of hydrogen for the Fischer-Tropsch process.
5. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 4, and further comprising the step of sending said hydrocarbon products produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process to the main fractionator of the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
6. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , including the step of recycling said CO2 to drive the net production of CO2 in the regenerator to extinction.
7. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , wherein said hydrogen is imported into the fluid catalytic cracking unit.
8. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , wherein said hydrogen is generated electrolytically.
9. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 3, and further comprising the step of using natural gas to generate hydrogen for the Fischer- Tropsch process.
10. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 4, wherein some of said additional carbon source injected into the regenerator is the bottoms from the fractionator.
11. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , including the step of recycling enough CO2 from the flue gases back to the regenerator to drive the net production of CO2 in the regenerator to extinction.
12. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 11 , wherein said feedstock is a high residue feedstock containing up to 10 % Conradson carbon, and further comprising the steps of: injecting oxygen into the regenerator; and diluting said oxygen with the recycled CO2 from the flue gases.
13. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 1 , wherein said Fischer-Tropsch process produces waste heat; and further comprising the step of using at least some of the waste heat produced by the Fischer- Tropsch process to drive a compressor in the flue gas conversion plant.
14. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 13, including the step of using said waste heat to produce steam and using the steam to drive the compressor.
15. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 13, including the step of using said waste heat to generate electricity and using electricity generated from the waste heat to drive the compressor.
16. A fluid catalytic cracking process, comprising the steps of: feeding a high molecular weight hydrocarbon feedstock into a reactor; mixing the feedstock with catalyst and cracking and vaporizing the feedstock within the reactor; recycling spent catalyst from the reactor to a regenerator; burning off coke from the spent catalyst within the regenerator to regenerate the spent catalyst, producing flue gases including CO and CO2, which leave the regenerator through a flue; returning the regenerated catalyst back to the reactor; feeding at least some of the flue gases from the regenerator to a flue gas conversion plant; reacting CO in the flue gases with hydrogen and producing hydrocarbon products using a Fischer-Tropsch process in said flue gas conversion plant, wherein said Fischer-Tropsch process produces waste heat; and using at least some of the waste heat produced by the Fischer-Tropsch process to drive a compressor in the flue gas conversion plant.
17. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 16, including the step of using said waste heat to produce steam and using the steam to drive the compressor.
18. A fluid catalytic cracking process as recited in claim 17, including the step of using said waste heat to generate electricity and using electricity generated from the waste heat to drive the compressor.
PCT/US2010/033545 2009-06-10 2010-05-04 Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process WO2010144191A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18568209P 2009-06-10 2009-06-10
US61/185,682 2009-06-10
US12/615,453 2009-11-10
US12/615,453 US20100314290A1 (en) 2009-06-10 2009-11-10 Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010144191A2 true WO2010144191A2 (en) 2010-12-16
WO2010144191A3 WO2010144191A3 (en) 2014-03-20

Family

ID=43305497

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/033545 WO2010144191A2 (en) 2009-06-10 2010-05-04 Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20100314290A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2010144191A2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20230272290A1 (en) * 2021-10-10 2023-08-31 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and systems for enhancing processing of hydrocarbons in a fluid catalytic cracking unit using a renewable additive
US11802257B2 (en) 2022-01-31 2023-10-31 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems and methods for reducing rendered fats pour point
US11835450B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2023-12-05 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and assemblies for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US11891581B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2024-02-06 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Tower bottoms coke catching device
US11898109B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-02-13 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Assemblies and methods for enhancing control of hydrotreating and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) processes using spectroscopic analyzers
US11905468B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-02-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Assemblies and methods for enhancing control of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) processes using spectroscopic analyzers
US11905479B2 (en) 2020-02-19 2024-02-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Low sulfur fuel oil blends for stability enhancement and associated methods

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2518775A (en) * 1947-08-29 1950-08-15 Phillips Petroleum Co Combined hydrocarbon conversionhydrocarbon synthesis process
US3671420A (en) * 1970-12-24 1972-06-20 Texaco Inc Conversion of heavy petroleum oils
US4207167A (en) * 1978-03-21 1980-06-10 Phillips Petroleum Company Combination hydrocarbon cracking, hydrogen production and hydrocracking
US4542114A (en) * 1982-08-03 1985-09-17 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Process for the recovery and recycle of effluent gas from the regeneration of particulate matter with oxygen and carbon dioxide
US4744883A (en) * 1982-07-29 1988-05-17 Ashland Oil, Inc. Production of synthesis gas and related products via the cracking of heavy oil feeds
US5560817A (en) * 1994-09-30 1996-10-01 The Boc Group, Inc. Hydrocarbon catalytic cracking process
US20040059009A1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2004-03-25 Conocophillips Fischer-tropsch catalyst regeneration
US20060211777A1 (en) * 2005-03-16 2006-09-21 Severinsky Alexander J Systems, methods, and compositions for production of synthetic hydrocarbon compounds
US20090159949A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Hiroshi Maejima Semiconductor memory device which includes memory cell having charge accumulation layer and control gate

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2251554A (en) * 1938-05-07 1941-08-05 Standard Catalytic Co Conversion of carbon monoxide with hydrogen into hydrocarbons
US2493454A (en) * 1944-12-15 1950-01-03 Stanolind Oil & Gas Co Gas processing for the synthesis of hydrocarbons
US2461064A (en) * 1945-10-20 1949-02-08 Texas Co Method of manufacturing motor fuel
US3164542A (en) * 1962-10-08 1965-01-05 Phillips Petroleum Co Catalytic process for the cracking of hydrocarbon oils containing metallic contaminants
US3248317A (en) * 1965-03-31 1966-04-26 Universal Oil Prod Co Combination of hydrogen producing and hydrogen consuming units
US4298453A (en) * 1977-12-27 1981-11-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Coal conversion
US4412914A (en) * 1981-08-10 1983-11-01 Ashland Oil, Inc. Endothermic removal of coke deposited on sorbent materials during carbo-metallic oil conversion
US4606811A (en) * 1982-07-29 1986-08-19 Ashland Oil, Inc. Combination process for upgrading reduced crude
US4915820A (en) * 1985-02-08 1990-04-10 Ashland Oil, Inc. Removal of coke and metals from carbo-metallic oils
US5037530A (en) * 1989-08-22 1991-08-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic cracking with layered silicates
MY118075A (en) * 1996-07-09 2004-08-30 Syntroleum Corp Process for converting gas to liquids
US7699975B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2010-04-20 Uop Llc Method and system of heating a fluid catalytic cracking unit for overall CO2 reduction

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2518775A (en) * 1947-08-29 1950-08-15 Phillips Petroleum Co Combined hydrocarbon conversionhydrocarbon synthesis process
US3671420A (en) * 1970-12-24 1972-06-20 Texaco Inc Conversion of heavy petroleum oils
US4207167A (en) * 1978-03-21 1980-06-10 Phillips Petroleum Company Combination hydrocarbon cracking, hydrogen production and hydrocracking
US4744883A (en) * 1982-07-29 1988-05-17 Ashland Oil, Inc. Production of synthesis gas and related products via the cracking of heavy oil feeds
US4542114A (en) * 1982-08-03 1985-09-17 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Process for the recovery and recycle of effluent gas from the regeneration of particulate matter with oxygen and carbon dioxide
US5560817A (en) * 1994-09-30 1996-10-01 The Boc Group, Inc. Hydrocarbon catalytic cracking process
US20040059009A1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2004-03-25 Conocophillips Fischer-tropsch catalyst regeneration
US20060211777A1 (en) * 2005-03-16 2006-09-21 Severinsky Alexander J Systems, methods, and compositions for production of synthetic hydrocarbon compounds
US20090159949A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Hiroshi Maejima Semiconductor memory device which includes memory cell having charge accumulation layer and control gate

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11891581B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2024-02-06 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Tower bottoms coke catching device
US11905479B2 (en) 2020-02-19 2024-02-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Low sulfur fuel oil blends for stability enhancement and associated methods
US11920096B2 (en) 2020-02-19 2024-03-05 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Low sulfur fuel oil blends for paraffinic resid stability and associated methods
US11835450B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2023-12-05 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and assemblies for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US11860069B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-01-02 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and assemblies for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US11885739B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-01-30 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and assemblies for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US11898109B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-02-13 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Assemblies and methods for enhancing control of hydrotreating and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) processes using spectroscopic analyzers
US11905468B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-02-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Assemblies and methods for enhancing control of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) processes using spectroscopic analyzers
US11906423B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-02-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods, assemblies, and controllers for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US11921035B2 (en) 2021-02-25 2024-03-05 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and assemblies for determining and using standardized spectral responses for calibration of spectroscopic analyzers
US20230272290A1 (en) * 2021-10-10 2023-08-31 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and systems for enhancing processing of hydrocarbons in a fluid catalytic cracking unit using a renewable additive
US11802257B2 (en) 2022-01-31 2023-10-31 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems and methods for reducing rendered fats pour point

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20100314290A1 (en) 2010-12-16
WO2010144191A3 (en) 2014-03-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1156591A (en) Method for two stage catalyst regeneration
US20100314290A1 (en) Fluid catalytic cracking process including flue gas conversion process
KR101954472B1 (en) Fluidized catalytic cracking of paraffinic naphtha in a downflow reactor
US5009769A (en) Process for catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
US9132415B2 (en) Method to upgrade heavy oil in a temperature gradient reactor (TGR)
US9719026B2 (en) Catalytic cracking process for the treatment of a fraction having a low conradson carbon residue
US4601814A (en) Method and apparatus for cracking residual oils
CN102234534B (en) Method for processing inferior heavy oil
US8618011B2 (en) Systems and methods for regenerating a spent catalyst
EP2254968A1 (en) System and method for introducing an additive to a coking process for improving the yields and properties of desired products
KR930011920B1 (en) Process for catalystic cracking of hydrocarbons
JP2018534395A (en) Method and system for fluid catalytic cracking
US20160362613A1 (en) Fluid catalytic cracking with supplemental heat
CA2801035A1 (en) Method and apparatus for upgrading heavy oil
CN102031135A (en) Comprehensive processing and utilizing method for heavy oil
JP6068437B2 (en) FCC method to maximize diesel using two separate converters
EP3165588A1 (en) Process for production of syngas through regeneration of coked cracking agent
CN101503633A (en) Process and equipment for fluid catalytic cracking for the production of middle distillates of low aromaticity
US10487279B2 (en) Production of high yield of syngas through regeneration of coked upgrading agent
CN102311767B (en) Gasoline olefin reducing catalytic cracking method and device
JPH11263984A (en) Selective evaporation of hydrocarbon feed in catalytic cracking and apparatus therefor
CN111286359B (en) Method for processing heavy hydrocarbon oil raw material
JPH07116457B2 (en) Method for producing hydrocarbon and fuel gas
CN109929593A (en) A kind of consumption hydrogen production device discharge dry gas Optimum utilization method and system
JP2743006B2 (en) Cracking method of hydrocarbon feed under fluidized condition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10786537

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 10786537

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2